Harral Dunbar, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Ghost International

Litigation Release No. 17477 / April 18, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Harral Dunbar, Jr., Individually and d/b/a Ghost International, Civil Action Number 02-233-B-M1 (M.D. La.)

PERMANENT INJUNCTION ISSUED AGAINST HARRAL DUNBAR, JR. FOR SECURITIES FRAUD CONDUCTED ON INTERNET AND REGISTRATION VIOLATIONS

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced today that on April 12, 2002, Judge Frank J. Polozola of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana issued an order of permanent injunction against Harral Dunbar, Jr., in his individual capacity and d/b/a Ghost International, an Internet Website operation. In an earlier order, the Court found that Dunbar, of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, owned the Ghost International Website and used it to solicit investors in investment contracts by promises of inordinate amounts of guaranteed returns and promises of no-risk investing, and further found that investors have received little or no return despite several months of promises by Dunbar that returns would be paid. Dunbar consented to the permanent injunction without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's complaint.

The Commission's complaint alleged that between mid-2001 and March 2002, Dunbar obtained over $7,500 from eleven investors in Canada, Australia and the United States by touting Ghost International's "private contribution and investment program" which allegedly paid, for example, $100,000 on a $200 investment over a few weeks. Dunbar made various promises of returns, including ones up to 1000 percent. Dunbar made various representations to fraudulently induce investors including that his company dealt in "high yield investments" and that funds were to be placed in offshore bank accounts, which would pay promised returns for five months of a supposed seven-month program. The complaint also alleged that Dunbar lulled investors by making promises that payments would be made shortly. However, when the time elapsed, the promised payments were not forthcoming.

The complaint charged Dunbar with, and the Court permanently enjoined Dunbar from, violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Court's order directed that Dunbar pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties, and held that the amounts to be paid shall be resolved upon motion of the Commission at a later date.

See also: L.R. 17411 (March 14, 2002); L.R. 17400 (March 7, 2002)