0001204459-12-000132.txt : 20120124 0001204459-12-000132.hdr.sgml : 20120124 20120124130343 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001204459-12-000132 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 6-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 134 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20120119 FILED AS OF DATE: 20120124 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20120124 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Grandview Gold, Inc. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001313974 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: METAL MINING [1000] IRS NUMBER: 000000000 STATE OF INCORPORATION: A6 FISCAL YEAR END: 0531 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 6-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-51303 FILM NUMBER: 12541491 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 330 BAY STREET STREET 2: SUITE 820 CITY: TORONTO STATE: A6 ZIP: M5H 2S8 BUSINESS PHONE: 416-486-3444 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 330 BAY STREET STREET 2: SUITE 820 CITY: TORONTO STATE: A6 ZIP: M5H 2S8 6-K 1 form6k.htm FORM 6-K GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. : Form 6-K - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of January, 2012

Commission File Number: 000-51303

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)

Suite 820, 330 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5H 2S8 CANADA
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

[           ] Form 20-F   [ x ] Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [           ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [           ]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes [           ] No [ x ]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _________


SUBMITTED HEREWITH

Exhibits

 99.1News release - English
 
 99.2Material change report - English
 
 99.3News release - English
 
 99.4Interim financial statements - English
 
 99.5MD&A - English
 
 99.6Form 52-109F2 - Certification of Interim Filings - CFO
 
 99.7Form 52-109F2 - Certification of Interim Filings - CEO
 
 99.8Interim financial statements - English
 
 99.9MD&A - English
 
 99.1052-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.1152-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.12News release - English
 
 99.13News release - English
 
 99.14News release - English
 
 99.15News release - English
 
 99.16News release - English
 
 99.17ON Form 13-502F1 (Class 1 Reporting Issuers - Participation Fee)
 
 99.18Audited annual financial statements - English
 
 99.19MD&A - English
 
 99.20Annual information form - English
 
 99.2152-109F1 - Certification of annual filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.2252-109F1 - Certification of annual filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.23News release - English
 
 99.24Interim financial statements - English
 
 99.25MD&A - English
 
 99.2652-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.2752-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.28News release - English
 
 99.29Notice of the meeting and record date - English
 
 99.30Other
 
 99.31Other
 
 99.32Notice of meeting - English
 
 99.33Management information circular - English
 
 99.34Form of proxy - English
 
 99.35Certificate re dissemination to shareholders
 
 99.36News release - English
 
 99.37Early warning report
 
 99.38Interim financial statements - English
 
 99.39MD&A - English
 
 99.4052-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.4152-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.42Interim financial statements - English
 
 99.43MD&A - English
 
 99.4452-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.4552-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.46News release - English
 
 99.47News release - English
 
 99.48ON Form 13-502F1 (Class 1 Reporting Issuers - Participation Fee)
 
 99.49Audited annual financial statements - English
 
 99.50MD&A - English
 
 99.51Annual information form - English
 
 99.5252-109F1 - Certification of annual filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.5352-109F1 - Certification of annual filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.54Notice of the meeting and record date - English
 
 99.55Interim financial statements - English
 
 99.56MD&A - English
 
 99.5752-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.5852-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.59Notice
 
 99.60Letter from successor auditor
 
 99.61Letter from former auditor
 
 99.62Notice of meeting - English
 
 99.63Management information circular - English
 
 99.64Form of proxy - English
 
 99.65Certificate re dissemination to shareholders
 
 99.66News release - English
 
 99.67Early warning report
 
 99.68Early warning report
 
 99.69Interim financial statements/report - English
 
 99.70MD&A - English
 
 99.7152-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.7252-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.73Report of voting results
 
 99.74News release - English
 
 99.75Interim financial statements/report - English
 
 99.76MD&A - English
 
 99.7752-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.7852-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.79News release - English
 
 99.80News release - English
 
 99.81News release - English
 
 99.82Annual information form - English
 
 99.83MD&A - English
 
 99.8452-109F1 - Certification of annual filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.8552-109F1 - Certification of annual filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.86ON Form 13-502F1 (Class 1 Reporting Issuers - Participation Fee)
 
 99.87Audited annual financial statements - English
 
 99.88News release - English
 
 99.89Notice of the meeting and record date - English
 
 99.90Notice of meeting - English
 
 99.91Management information circular - English
 
 99.92Form of proxy - English
 
 99.93Certificate re dissemination to shareholders
 
 99.94Interim financial statements/report - English
 
 99.95MD&A - English
 
 99.9652-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CFO (E)
 
 99.9752-109F2 - Certification of interim filings - CEO (E)
 
 99.98News release - English
 
 99.99Report of voting results
 

 


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
  (Registrant)
     
Date: January 24, 2012 By: /s/ Paul Sarjeant
   
    Paul Sarjeant
  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

 


EX-99.1 2 exhibit99-1.htm EXHIBIT 99.1 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.1

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC ANNOUNCES CLOSING OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT

Toronto, Ontario, December 5, 2008 – Grandview Gold Inc. ("Grandview" or the “Company") (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) is pleased to announce that it has closed a brokered private placement (the “Offering”) with Sandfire Securities Inc. (“Sandfire”). The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares (the “Common Shares”) to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666.65.

In connection with the Offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the Offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months after closing.

The proceeds from the Offering will be used primarily to fund Grandview's drilling program on its Red Lake project in Ontario, as well as working capital and general corporate purposes. All costs associated with the Offering will be paid by Grandview from its general funds.

“The Company will focus exploration funds and geological expertise on high potential properties in the Red Lake Gold District,” says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant. “We encountered considerable visible gold and numerous high-grade intercepts during drilling at our Dixie Lake Property (the “Property”) earlier this year and last season, most particularly in the promising NS Zone and we intend to test extensions of that mineralization and other targets as well. Dixie Lake drill programs delivered assays like 163.75 g/T Au over 0.47m, 61.97 g/T Au over 1m, and 22.9 g/T Au over 2.86m - typical of the kind of narrow-vein, high-grade gold environment found elsewhere in the Red Lake Gold District.”

The securities issued pursuant to Offering will all be subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance. The Offering is subject to Toronto Stock Exchange acceptance of requisite regulatory filings.

About the Property
Grandview has an option agreement with Fronteer Development Group, and has earned a 64% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property located just 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine, one of the richest, lowest cost production gold mines in the world. The Red Lake Mine produces approximately 600,000 ounces worth USD$460 million annually, with over 11 million ounces (USD $8.5 billion) gold to date. Since the mid 1960s’ the Red Lake Gold District has yielded over 30 million ounces of gold worth over USD $23 billion at today’s prices.

About MineralFields, Pathway and First Canadian Securities ®
MineralFields Group (a division of Pathway Asset Management) is a Toronto-based mining fund with significant assets under administration that offers its tax-advantaged super flow-through limited partnerships to investors throughout Canada during most of the calendar year, as well as hard-dollar resource limited partnerships to investors throughout the world. Pathway Asset Management also specializes in the manufacturing and distribution of structured products and mutual funds. Information about MineralFields Group is available at www.mineralfields.com. First Canadian Securities®, a division of Limited Market Dealer Inc., is active in leading resource financings (both flow-through and hard dollar PIPE financings) on competitive, effective and service-friendly terms, with investors both within, and outside of MineralFields Group

For further information, contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.


This is not an offer for sale, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, in the United States or to any US Person (as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") of any equity shares or any other securities of Grandview Gold Inc. Securities ("securities") of Grandview Gold Inc. are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and on the OTC BB. This does not constitute, and should not be construed as, "general solicitation or general advertising" as defined under Regulation D of the Securities Act, or "directed selling efforts" under Regulation S of the Securities Act.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Corporation's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.2 3 exhibit99-2.htm EXHIBIT 99.2 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.2

FORM 51-102F3

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT

Item 1. Name and Address of Company
   
  Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Issuer")
  330 Bay Street, Suite 820
  Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S8
   
Item 2. Date of Material Change
   
  December 4, 2008
   
Item 3. News Release
   

The Issuer issued a press release via a Canadian new wire on December 4, 2008, a copy of which has been filed on SEDAR.

   
Item 4. Summary of Material Change
   

The Issuer announced that it has closed a brokered private placement (the “Offering”) with Sandfire Securities Inc. (“Sandfire”). The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow through common shares (the “Common Shares”) to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666.65.

   
Item 5. Full Description of Material Change
   

In connection with the Offering, the Issuer paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the Offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months from closing.

 

The proceeds from the Offering will be used primarily to fund the Issuer's drilling program on its Red Lake project in Ontario, as well as working capital and general corporate purposes. All costs associated with the Offering will be paid by the Issuer from its general funds.

 

“The Company will focus exploration funds and geological expertise on high potential properties in the Red Lake Gold District,” says the Issuer's President and CEO Paul Sarjeant. “We encountered considerable visible gold and numerous high-grade intercepts during drilling at our Dixie Lake Property (the “Property”) earlier this year and last season, most particularly in the promising NS Zone and we intend to test extensions of that mineralization and other targets as well. Dixie Lake drill programs delivered assays like 163.75 g/T Au over 0.47m, 61.97 g/T Au over 1m, and 22.9 g/T Au over 2.86m - typical of the kind of narrow-vein, high-grade gold environment found elsewhere in the Red Lake Gold District.” The securities issued pursuant to Offering will all be subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance. The Offering is subject to Toronto Stock Exchange acceptance of requisite regulatory filings.



- 2 -

Item 6. Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) or (3) of National Instrument 51-102
   
  Not applicable.
   
Item 7. Omitted Information
   
  No information has been omitted from this material change report.
   
Item 8. Executive Officer
   

The following senior officer of the Issuer is knowledgeable about the material change and the Report and may be contacted by the Commission as follows:

   
  Paul Sarjeant
  Telephone: 416-486-3444
   
Item 9. Date of Report
   
  December 5, 2008.


EX-99.3 4 exhibit99-3.htm EXHIBIT 99.3 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.3 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.3

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Inc. CEO Issues Biannual Update to Shareholders

December 11, 2008 – Toronto, Ontario – Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) (“Grandview” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that Mr. Paul Sarjeant, B.Sc., P.Geo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc. has issued his biannual update to shareholders.

The full text of the update can be found on the Grandview Gold Inc website at http://grandviewgold.com/Media_Centre/Company_News/?nid=99

Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit www.grandviewgold.com

This document may contain forward-looking statements, relating to the Company’s operations or to the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc.’s operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc.’s control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events of otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.4 5 exhibit99-4.htm EXHIBIT 99.4 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.4 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.4

 
 
Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
For the Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
 
 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2008 audited financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    November 30,     May 31,  
(Unaudited)   2008     2008  

Assets

           

Current assets

           

Cash

$  75,535   $  84,856  

Short term investments

  403,536     1,011,410  

GST and sundry receivable

  38,453     40,664  

Prepaid expenses

  31,432     150,166  
    548,956     1,287,096  

Reclamation bond

  16,239     13,090  

Due from a related party (Note 11(iv))

  60,000     90,000  

Mining interests (Note 5)

  10,744,618     10,282,950  
  $  11,369,813   $  11,673,136  

Liabilities

           

Current liabilities

           

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$  35,959   $  118,526  

Asset retirement obligation

  16,239     13,090  
    52,198     131,616  
             

Shareholders' equity

  11,317,615     11,541,520  
  $  11,369,813   $  11,673,136  

Nature of operations and going concern assumption (Note 1)

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2008     2007     2008     2007     26, 2004)  
                               

Expenses

                             

Stock based compensation

$  -   $  1,003,275   $  -   $  1,003,275   $  4,030,125  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  22,523     518,307     39,347     670,965     1,738,442  

Professional fees

  33,528     90,311     64,257     162,807     1,120,229  

Management services

  38,863     68,786     113,077     145,036     1,201,066  

Office and administration

  (769 )   50,716     16,416     125,123     663,975  

Exploration expenses

  4,656     -     4,656     -     4,656  

Flow-through interest expense

  -     -     -     -     186,054  

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

Bad debt

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

 

                             

 

  98,801     1,731,395     237,753     2,107,206     8,970,782  

 

                             

Loss before the under noted

  (98,801 )   (1,731,395 )   (237,753 )   (2,107,206 )   (8,970,782 )

Interest income

  2,485     19,869     3,048     35,895     84,617  

Write-off of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     (528,376 )

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     35,667  

Site restoration costs

  -     -     -     (30,000 )   -  

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     -     (170,000 )

 

                             

Loss before income taxes

  (96,316 )   (1,711,526 )   (234,705 )   (2,101,311 )   (9,548,874 )

Future income tax (recovery)

  -     -     -     -     (1,555,157 )

 

                             

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period

$  (96,316 ) $  (1,711,526 ) $  (234,705 ) $  (2,101,311 ) $  (7,993,717 )

 

                             

Basic loss per share (Note 9)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.05 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.07 )      

 

                             

Diluted loss per share (Note 9)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.05 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.07 )      

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2008     2007     2008     2007     26, 2004)  
                               

Accumulated deficit

                             

Balance at beginning of period

$  (11,331,649 ) $  (8,577,211 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (8,187,426 ) $  (3,434,248 )

Net loss for the period

  (96,316 )   (1,711,526 )   (234,705 )   (2,101,311 )   (7,993,717 )

 

                             

Balance at end of period

$  (11,427,965 ) $  (10,288,737 ) $  (11,427,965 ) $  (10,288,737 ) $  (11,427,965 )

- 4 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

                Contributed     Accumulated        
    Share capital     Warrants     surplus     deficit     Total  
                               

At May 31, 2007

$  11,019,703   $  2,611,614   $  3,356,344   $  (8,187,426 ) $  8,800,235  

 

                             

Private placement

  4,950,150     -     -     -     4,950,150  

Warrant valuation

  (940,212 )   1,167,629     -     -     227,417  

Mineral property acquisition

  45,800     -     -     -     45,800  

Exercise of warrants

  66,544     -     -     -     66,544  

Fair value of warrants exercised

  36,673     (36,673 )   -     -     -  

Stock based compensation

  -     -     1,433,600     -     1,433,600  

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  (488,720 )   -     -     -     (488,720 )

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  (227,417 )   -     -     -     (227,417 )

Flow-through cost of issue

  (260,255 )   -     -     -     (260,255 )

Net loss for the year

  -     -     -     (3,005,834 )   (3,005,834 )

 

                             

At May 31, 2008

$  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  

 

                             

Mineral property acquisition

  10,800     -     -     -     10,800  

Warrants expired

  -     (78,000 )   78,000     -     -  

Net loss for the period

  -     -     -     (234,705 )   (234,705 )

 

                             

At November 30, 2008

$  14,213,066   $  3,664,570   $  4,867,944   $ (11,427,965 ) $  11,317,615  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2008     2007     2008     2007     26, 2004)  
                               

Cash flows from operating activities

                             

Net loss for the period

$  (96,316 ) $  (1,711,526 ) $  (234,705 ) $  (2,101,311 ) $  (7,993,717 )

Items not involving cash:

                             

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     (35,667 )

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

Stock based compensation

  -     1,162,525     -     1,162,525     4,030,125  

Future income tax recovery

  -     -     -     -     (1,555,157 )

Accrued interest income

  -     (18,146 )   -     (18,146 )   (36,410 )

Write-off of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     528,376  

Changes in non-cash working capital items:

                             

GST and sundry receivable

  5,097     (49,295 )   32,211     70,465     (7,963 )

Prepaid expenses

  147,190     33,988     118,734     (50,935 )   (31,432 )

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  (181,456 )   (374,160 )   (82,567 )   (278,959 )   42,129  
                               

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (125,485 )   (956,614 )   (166,327 )   (1,216,361 )   (5,033,481 )
                               

Cash flows from financing activities

                             

Loans from related parties

  -     -     -     -     (28,594 )

Share/warrant issuance

  -     66,544     -     3,552,144     17,635,544  

Cost of issuance

  -     (7,500 )   -     (385,845 )   (1,728,476 )

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     -     175,000  

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     -     (75,000 )
                               

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  -     59,044     -     3,166,299     15,978,474  
                               

Cash flows from investing activities

                             

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     768     -     (13,128 )   (13,090 )

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  73,070     1,563,979     607,874     (975,000 )   (367,126 )

Exploration advances

  -     -     -     312,491     -  

Expenditures on mining interests

  (130,967 )   (940,609 )   (450,868 )   (2,420,242 )   (10,399,242 )

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     (90,000 )
                               

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

$  (57,897 ) $  624,138   $  157,006   $  (3,095,879 ) $  (10,869,458 )

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2008     2007     2008     2007     26, 2004)  
                               

Change in cash during the period

$  (183,382 ) $  (273,432 ) $  (9,321 ) $  (1,145,941 ) $  75,535  

 

                             

Cash, beginning of period

  258,917     426,768     84,856     1,299,277     -  

 

                             

Cash, end of period

$  75,535   $  153,336   $  75,535   $  153,336   $  75,535  

 

                             

Supplement schedule of non-cash transactions

                   

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  10,800   $  35,000   $  563,875  

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  

Stock-option compensation included in mining interest

$  -   $  111,475   $  -   $  111,475   $  111,475  

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     from date of  
    November 30,     November 30,     inception  
(Unaudited)   2008     2007     2008     2007     of projects  

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project,

                             

Nevada, USA

                             

Balance, beginning of period

$  5,846,638   $  4,991,404   $  5,679,340   $  4,386,457   $  -  

Drilling, assays and related field work

  26,233     581,722     96,595     895,385     4,690,650  

Project administration and general

  1,849     7,025     14,090     11,380     72,121  

Property acquisition and holding costs

  9,671     -     94,366     286,929     1,121,620  

Total expenditures during the period

  37,753     588,747     205,051     1,193,694     5,884,391  

Balance, end of period

$ 5,884,391   $  5,580,151   $  5,884,391   $  5,580,151   $  5,884,391  

Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$ 3,375,031   $  2,247,725   $  3,275,971   $  1,531,160   $  -  

Drilling, assays and related field work

  30,813     141,124     118,633     782,689     2,882,374  

Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     11,240     75,000     523,470  

Total expenditures during the period

  30,813     141,124     129,873     857,689     3,405,844  

Balance, end of period

$ 3,405,844   $  2,388,849   $  3,405,844   $  2,388,849   $  3,405,844  

Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$ 1,391,982   $  683,747   $  1,327,639   $  668,597   $  -  

Drilling, assays and related field work

  62,320     320,064     161,737     335,214     1,107,063  

Project administration and general

  81     -     307     -     307  

Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     -     382,313  

Government refund

  -     -     (35,300 )   -     (35,300 )

Total expenditures during the period

  62,401     320,064     126,744     335,214     1,454,383  

Balance, end of period

$ 1,454,383   $  1,003,811   $  1,454,383   $  1,003,811   $  1,454,383  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     from date of  
    November 30,     November 30,     inception  
(Unaudited)   2008     2007     2008     2007     of projects  
                               

Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$   -   $  726,375   $  -   $  548,404   $  -  
                               

Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     2,149     -     179,244     415,904  

Project administration and general

  -     -     -     876     -  

Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     -     112,472  

Write-off

  -     -     -     -     (528,376 )

 

                             

Total expenditures during the period

  -     2,149     -     180,120     -  
                               

Balance, end of period

$  -   $  728,524   $  -   $  728,524   $  -  
                               

Total

$  10,744,618   $  9,701,335   $  10,744,618   $  9,701,335   $  10,744,618  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 9 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.

Nature of operations and going concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onwards.

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, they do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Basis of presentation and accounting policies

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2008, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 10 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.

Basis of presentation and accounting policies (continued)

   

Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments – Disclosures and Presentation

On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: Capital Disclosures (Handbook Section 1535), Financial Instruments – Disclosures (Handbook Section 3862), and Financial Instruments – Presentation (Handbook Section 3863). These new standards became effective for the Company on June 1, 2008.

Capital Disclosures
Handbook Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook section in Note 3 to these interim financial statements.

Financial Instruments
Handbook Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook sections in Note 4 to these interim financial statements.

Section 1400, General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation
This section specifies requirements to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company disclosure reflects such assessment.

Future accounting changes

International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]
In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In November 2007, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new accounting standard on its financial statements.

- 11 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.

Capital management

   

When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to maintain optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary, in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its projects. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management to sustain future development of the business.

   

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage; as such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed. The Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it feels there is sufficient geologic or economic potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

   

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the relative size of the Company, is appropriate.

   

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the three and six months ended November 30, 2008. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

   
4.

Risk factors

   

The Company’s significant mineral properties are outlined below:

   

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA
Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada
Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

   

(collectively called the "Properties").

   

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon the Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

   

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

   

Credit risk

   

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash, short term investments, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

   

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of November 30, 2008. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

- 12 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk factors (continued)

   

Liquidity risk

   

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at November 30, 2008, the Company had a cash and short term investments balance of $479,071 (May 31, 2008 - $1,096,266) to settle current liabilities of $35,959 (May 31, 2008 - $118,526). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

   

Market risk

   

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

   
(a) Interest rate risk
   

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

   
(b) Foreign currency risk
   

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

   
(c) Price risk
   

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as it relates to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

   

Sensitivity analysis

   

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and short term investments as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

   

As of November 30, 2008, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

- 13 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk factors (continued)

   

Sensitivity analysis (continued)

   

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a six month period:

   
(i) Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at November 30, 2008, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the six months ended November 30, 2008 would have been approximately $2,000 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at November 30, 2008, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $2,000 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.
   
(ii) The Company does not hold balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.
   
(iii) Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability
   

and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of November 30, 2008, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

   
5.

Mining interests

   

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

   

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 6 of the audited financial statements as at May 31, 2008. There were no significant changes to mining interests that occurred from June 1, 2008 to November 30, 2008 except as follows:

   

On September 11, 2008, the Company reported that it has incurred the expenditures required to successfully fulfill the terms of its option agreement with EMCO Corporation SA ("EMCO") to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property.

   
6.

Share capital

   
(a) Authorized
   

Unlimited number of common shares

   

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non- participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

- 14 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.

Share capital (continued)

   

(b) Issued


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversion

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (731,430 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  9,543,301  

- 15 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.

Share capital (continued)

   

(b) Issued (continued)


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (563,472 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
 

Private placement

  11,169,000     4,950,150  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (940,212 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  130,000     45,800  
 

Exercise of warrants

  147,875     66,544  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     36,673  
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (488,720 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (227,417 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (260,255 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
 

Mineral property acquisition (1)

  30,000     10,800  
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

  36,318,765   $  14,213,066  

(1) On July 11, 2008, the Company issued 30,000 common shares to EMCO related to an option to acquire a 60 percent interest in 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims for the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property.

- 16 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Warrants


      Number of     Weighted Average  
      Warrants     Exercise Price  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  -   $  -  
 

Issued

  602,500     1.44  
 

Expired/cancelled

  -     -  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  602,500   $  1.44  
 

Issued

  3,435,238     1.63  
 

Expired/cancelled

  (602,500 )   (1.44 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  3,435,238   $  1.63  
 

Issued

  4,189,999     0.91  
 

Expired/cancelled

  (1,043,654 )   1.60  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  6,581,583   $  1.18  
 

Issued

  5,853,480     0.62  
 

Issued

  73,937     0.65  
 

Exercised

  (147,875 )   0.45  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  12,361,125   $  0.92  
 

Expired

  (250,000 )   (1.00 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

  12,111,125   $  0.92  

The following are the warrants outstanding at November 30, 2008:

  Number of     Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
  Warrants     Value     Price     Date  
                       
  1,199,999   $  284,400   $  1.40     December 22, 2008  
  240,000     85,200     0.65     December 22, 2008  
  350,000     74,550     0.70     February 28, 2009  
  1,698,937     366,316     0.65     March 16, 2009  
  177,125     43,927     0.45     March 16, 2009  
  1,992,987     1,335,301     1.75     March 27, 2009  
  398,597     301,738     1.10     March 27, 2009  
  4,357,000     714,548     0.65     July 6, 2009  
  687,120     145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
  656,000     225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
  153,360     55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
  200,000     32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
                       
  12,111,125   $  3,664,570              

- 17 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

8.

Stock options


      Number     Weighted Average  
      of     Exercise  
      Stock Options     Price  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  -   $  -  
 

Granted

  1,225,000     1.01  
 

Cancelled

  (100,000 )   1.00  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  1,125,000   $  1.06  
 

Granted

  1,100,000     1.55  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  2,225,000   $  1.28  
 

Granted

  1,250,000     1.06  
 

Expired

  (375,000 )   1.00  
 

Cancelled

  (250,000 )   1.19  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  2,850,000   $  1.26  
 

Granted

  2,700,000     0.63  
 

Expired

  (850,000 )   1.13  
 

Cancelled

  (125,000 )   1.38  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  4,575,000   $  0.89  
 

Cancelled

  (75,000 )   0.68  
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

  4,500,000   $  0.89  

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2008:

    Options outstanding Options exercisable  
    Weighted  
    average  
    remaining Weighted Weighted  
    Number contractual average Number average  
  Expiry Date of Options life exercise price of options exercise price  
                                 
 

October 1, 2009

  600,000     0.84 years   $  1.00     600,000   $  1.00  
 

December 20, 2009

  75,000     1.05     1.10     75,000     1.10  
 

April 15, 2010

  700,000     1.37     0.50     700,000     0.50  
 

January 6, 2011

  150,000     2.10     1.25     150,000     1.25  
 

April 3, 2011

  550,000     2.34     1.80     550,000     1.80  
 

October 31, 2011

  500,000     2.92     1.00     500,000     1.00  
 

September 27, 2012

  1,925,000     3.83     0.68     1,925,000     0.68  
                                 
      4,500,000     2.68 years   $  0.89     4,500,000   $  0.89  

- 18 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

9.

Basic and diluted loss per share


      Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
      November 30,     November 30,  
      2008     2007     2008     2007  
                           
 

Numerator for basic loss per share

$  (96,316 ) $  (1,711,526 ) $  (234,705 ) $  (2,101,311 )
 

 

                       
 

Numerator for diluted loss per share

$  (96,316 ) $  (1,711,526 ) $  (234,705 ) $  (2,101,311 )
 

 

                       
 

Denominator:

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - basic

  36,318,765     33,769,328     36,312,107     31,976,187  
 

 

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - diluted

  36,318,765     33,769,328     36,312,107     31,976,187  
 

 

                       
 

Basic and diluted loss per share

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.05 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.07 )

Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options was not calculated as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

   
10.

Segmented information

   

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (May 31, 2008 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts in the unaudited interim financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

   

The Company operates in two geographic segments for the six months ended November 30, 2008 and year ended May 31, 2008 as follows:


      November 30,     May 31,  
  Assets   2008     2008  
               
 

Canada

$  5,485,422   $  5,993,796  
 

United States of America

  5,884,391     5,679,340  
 

 

           
 

Total

$  11,369,813   $  11,673,136  

- 19 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

11.

Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere


  i)

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2008, $15,000 and $30,000, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2007 - $16,500 and $36,000, respectively) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

     
  ii)

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2008, $43,500 and $87,000, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2007 - $37,500 and $75,000, respectively) was paid to the president and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $5,000 and $20,000, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2007 - $15,000 and $30,000, respectively) were capitalized to mining interests. Also, $6,000 and $12,000, respectively in car and office allowances (three and six months ended November 30, 2007 - $6,000 and $12,000, respectively) was included in this amount.

     
  iii)

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2008, $15,000 and $32,638, respectively, (three and six months ended November 30, 2007 - $12,333 and $39,333, respectively) in consulting fees were also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

     
  iv)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the president and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $60,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009.


These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

   
12.

Subsequent event

   

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the “Offering”) with Sandfire Securities Inc. The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares (the “Common Shares”) to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,667.

   

In connection with the Offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the Offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months after closing.

   

The securities issued pursuant to Offering will all be subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance.

- 20 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

   

The Company's unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(g) in the fiscal 2008 audited financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

   

Prior to June 1, 2003, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation plan for US GAAP purposes under FASB statement 123, under which no compensation expense was required to be recognized in fiscal 2003.

   

For the six months ended ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the six months ended November 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(c) of the audited annual financial statements for May 31, 2008, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

   

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for- sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

   

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 11 of the audited annual financial statements for May 31, 2008). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing financial statements.

- 21 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Had the Company's balance sheets as at November 30, 2008 and May 31, 2008 been prepared using US GAAP, such balance sheets would be presented as follows:


      November 30, 2008     May 31, 2008  
               
 

Assets

           
 

Current assets

           
 

Cash

$  75,535   $  84,856  
 

Short term investments

  403,536     1,011,410  
 

GST and sundry receivable

  38,453     40,664  
 

Prepaid expenses

  31,432     150,166  
 

 

           
 

 

  548,956     1,287,096  
 

 

           
 

Reclamation bond

  16,239     13,090  
 

Due from a related party

  74,552     102,296  
 

Mineral property rights

  2,027,403     1,921,797  
 

 

           
 

 

$  2,667,150   $  3,324,279  
 

 

           
 

Liabilities

           
 

Current liabilities

           
 

Accounts payable

$  35,959   $  73,526  
 

Accrued liabilities

  -     45,000  
 

 

           
 

 

  35,959     118,526  
 

Assets retirement obligation

  16,239     13,090  
 

 

           
 

 

  52,198     131,616  
 

 

           
 

Shareholders' equity

           
 

Share capital

           
 

Authorized - unlimited common shares

           
 

Issued

           
 

Common shares

  15,768,223     15,757,423  
 

Additional paid in capital

  726,344     648,344  
 

Warrants

  3,664,570     3,742,570  
 

Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities

  (315,539 )   (315,539 )
 

Deferred stock-option compensation

  4,141,600     4,141,600  
 

Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company

  (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
 

Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage

  (18,236,303 )   (17,647,792 )
               
      2,614,952     3,192,663  
               
    $  2,667,150   $  3,324,279  

- 22 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss


                        Cumulative  
                        from date  
      Six Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
      2008     2007     2006     ("March 26, 2004")  
                           
 

Expenses

                       
 

General exploration

$  360,718   $  2,204,788   $  2,159,053   $  9,117,747  
 

Management services

  113,077     145,036     168,655     1,201,066  
 

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  39,347     670,965     195,446     1,738,442  
 

Bad debt

  -     -     -     1,235  
 

Professional fees

  64,257     162,807     195,871     1,120,229  
 

Office and administration

  16,416     125,123     56,418     663,975  
 

Flow-through interest expense

  -     -     -     186,054  
 

Gain on forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )
 

Stock based compensation

  -     1,003,275     1,170,687     4,030,125  
 

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     170,000  
 

Site restoration costs

  -     30,000     -     -  
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     9,766  
 

 

                       
 

Loss before the under noted

  (593,815 )   (4,341,994 )   (3,946,130 )   (18,202,972 )
 

Interest income

  5,304     35,895     21,584     99,169  
 

Write-off mineral property rights

  -     -     -     (132,500 )
 

 

                       
 

Net loss for the period and from date of inception

  (588,511 )   (4,306,099 )   (3,924,546 )   (18,236,303 )
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive (loss) items:

                       
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     (15,234 )
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss for the period

$  (588,511 ) $  (4,306,099 ) $  (3,924,546 ) $ (18,251,537 )
 

 

                       
 

Loss per common share

                       
 

Basic

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 ) $  (0.21 )      
 

Diluted

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 ) $  (0.21 )      
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss per

                       
 

common share

                       
 

Basic

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 ) $  (0.21 )      
 

Diluted

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 ) $  (0.21 )      

- 23 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

   

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
               
 

Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversation

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 24 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued) Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (continued)


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
 

Private placements

  11,169,000     4,950,150  
 

Warrants valuation

  -     (940,212 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  130,000     45,800  
 

Exercise of warrants

  147,875     66,544  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     36,673  
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (488,720 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (227,417 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  30,000     10,800  
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

  36,318,765   $  15,768,223  

Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

  Additional paid in capital      
 

Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005

$  25,000  
 

Expired warrants

  173,388  
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  198,388  
 

Expired warrants

  449,956  
 

Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008

$  648,344  
 

Expired warrants

  78,000  
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

$  726,344  

- 25 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Warrants      
         
 

Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004

$  -  
 

Issued

  173,388  
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

$  173,388  
 

Issued

  2,086,995  
 

Expired

  (173,388 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  2,086,995  
 

Issued

  974,575  
 

Expired

  (449,956 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

$  2,611,614  
 

Issued

  1,167,629  
 

Exercised

  (36,673 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

$  3,742,570  
 

Expired

  (78,000 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

$  3,664,570  

  Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities      
         
 

Balance, June 1, 2001

$  (85,625 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (121,100 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2002

$  (206,725 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (88,580 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2003

$  (295,305 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (5,000 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, March 26, 2004

$  (300,305 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (15,234 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2004, May 31, 2005, May 31, 2006, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2008

$ (315,539 )

- 26 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Deferred stock-option compensation      
 

Balance, May 31, 2004

$  -  
 

Vesting of stock options

  775,613  
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

$  775,613  
 

Vesting of stock options

  573,700  
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  1,349,313  
 

Vesting of stock options

  1,358,687  
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

$  2,708,000  
 

Vesting of stock options

  1,433,600  
 

Balance, May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2008

$  4,141,600  

  Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage      
         
 

Balance, March 26, 2004

$  -  
 

Net loss

  4,678  
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (15,234 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2004

$  (10,556 )
 

Net loss

  (1,743,463 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

$  (1,754,019 )
 

Net loss

  (3,673,388 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  (5,427,407 )
 

Net loss

  (6,062,489 )
 

 

     
 

Balance May 31, 2007

$  (11,489,896 )
 

Net loss

  (6,157,896 )
 

 

     
 

Balance May 31, 2008

$  (17,647,792 )
 

Net loss

  (588,511 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, November 30, 2008

$  (18,236,303 )

- 27 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Cash Flows


                        Cumulative  
                        from date  
      Six Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
      2008     2007     2006     ("March 26, 2004")  
                           
 

Cash flows from operating activities

               
 

Net loss for the period

$  (588,511 ) $  (4,306,099 ) $  (3,924,546 ) $  (18,236,303 )
 

Items not involving cash:

                       
 

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     9,766  
 

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     1,235  
 

Stock-option compensation

  -     1,274,000     1,170,687     4,030,125  
 

Accrued Interest income

  (2,256 )   (18,146 )   -     (50,962 )
 

Write-off of mineral property rights

  -     -     -     132,500  
 

Change in non-cash operating working activities:

               
 

GST and sundry receivable

  32,211     70,465     (31,433 )   (13,633 )
 

Prepaid expenses

  118,734     (50,935 )   (135,368 )   (25,762 )
 

Due from a related party

  -     -     (90,000 )   (90,000 )
 

Accounts payable

  (37,567 )   (278,959 )   (117,341 )   106,978  
 

Accrued liabilities

  (45,000 )   -     -     (64,288 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (522,389 )   (3,309,674 )   (3,128,001 )   (14,236,011 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from financing activities

                       
 

Repayment of loans from related parties

  -     -     -     (28,594 )
 

Share/warrant issuance

  -     3,552,144     -     17,635,544  
 

Cost of issue

  -     (385,845 )   -     (1,728,476 )
 

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     175,000  
 

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     (75,000 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  -     3,166,299     -     15,978,474  
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from investing activities

                       
 

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     (13,128 )   -     (13,090 )
 

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  607,874     (975,000 )   -     (367,126 )
 

Exploration advances

  -     312,491     62,246     -  
 

Purchase of mineral property rights

  (94,806 )   (326,929 )   (186,652 )   (1,286,713 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  513,068     (1,002,566 )   (124,406 )   (1,666,929 )
 

 

                       
 

Change in cash during the period

  (9,321 )   (1,145,941 )   (3,252,407 )   75,534  
 

Cash, beginning of period

  84,856     1,299,277     3,802,800     1  
 

 

                       
 

Cash, end of period

$  75,535   $  153,336   $  550,393   $  75,535  

- 28 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2008
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued) Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


                        Cumulative  
                        from date  
      Six Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
      2008     2007     2006     ("March 26, 2004")  
                           
 

Supplement schedule of non-cash transaction

               
 

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  10,800   $  35,000   $  34,500   $  563,875  
 

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  165,250   $  184,750  
 

Stock-option compensation included in mining interest

$  -   $  111,475   $  -   $  111,475  
 

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements

In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 provides guidance on determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-05 concludes, amongst other matters, that warrants and options issued by an entity with an exercise price that is different from the entity’s functional currency cannot be classified as equity. EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of EITF 07-05 will have on the statements.

- 29 -


EX-99.5 6 exhibit99-5.htm EXHIBIT 99.5 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.5 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.5

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2008

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three-month period ended November 30, 2008 (“second quarter 2009”) and the six-month period ended November 30, 2008 (“six-month period 2009”) and its financial position as at November 30, 2008. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual financial statements and related notes, and MD&A as at May 31, 2008.

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13 to the unaudited financial statements for the first quarter 2009.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

The comparative reporting period is the three months ended November 30, 2007 (“second quarter 2008”) and the six-month period ended November 30, 2007 (“six-month period 2008”).

This MD&A was prepared on January 14, 2009.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing gold properties in North America. Grandview continues to be involved in the acquisition, exploration and, if warranted, the development of properties for the mining of precious metals in Ontario and Manitoba, Canada and Nevada, USA.


Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS). During the next three years, Grandview pursued this investment opportunity, but subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining.

On March 26, 2004, the Company put a new management team in place, identified an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with the National Instrument 43-101, and acquired an option to earn an interest in the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome Properties; the terms of which it subsequently fulfilled (refer below).

Properties and Projects

Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

Grandview has an 80% undivided interest in the Pony Creek and Elliot Dome :Properties, both in Elko County, Nevada.

In accordance with the terms of the option agreement between the Company and Mill City Gold Corp. (“Mill City”), dated April 14, 2005, Mill City has exercised its option to dilute its 40% participating interest in the Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties to a 20% carried interest, up to and including the date on which the bankable feasibility study is completed by the Company. At that time Mill City shall convert its 20% carried interest to a 20% participating interest. The acceptance by Mill City of the terms of the Company’s earn in immediately converted the Company’s 60% interest to a 80% interest in the Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties.

Exploration costs of $37,753 were incurred during the second quarter 2009. Exploration costs incurred during second quarter 2008 were $588,747. Exploration costs of $205,051 were incurred for the six-month period 2009, compared with $1,193,694 for the corresponding period last year. Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2008 were $5,884,391.

During 2008, the Company completed a 13-hole reverse circulation drill program for a total of 12,830 feet (3,910.4 meters) on three separate target areas across the Pony Creek and Elliott Dome Properties. In addition, our geological staff continued mapping, sampling and geophysical interpretation to help further delineate drill targets. A large historic database was examined to identify additional clues with respect to controls of mineralization within the South Resource area. New structural concepts were tested and proved very successful. Five drill holes tested the idea of northerly structures as conduits for fluid flow in the South Resource Area and we were rewarded with several holes intersecting significant gold grades, including 42.7 meters grading 2.59 grams per tonne gold. We are currently modeling this new data in an attempt to better understand controls on mineralizing fluids and determine the overall potential of the project.

A deep, 2000 foot (609.6 meter) hole was drilled at the Red Rock target to test for a hidden “Rain” type which was projected to be intersected at a down-hole depth of approximately 1,500 foot. Unfortunately the target contact was not reached and after reaching rig capacity, the hole was stopped.

Seven drill holes also explored the Pony Creek West area. All holes encountered anomalous gold values in what is mapped as Chainman Formation units, but no significant intercepts were discovered.

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).


Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”). The Company obtained this interest by fulfilling the terms of its original option agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”). Under the terms of the option agreement, dated August 26, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 51% interest in the Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $300,000, which it has, making payments totaling $75,000 to the underlying property vendor and by issuing 160,000 shares of the Company at $1.25 per share (for a total value of $200,000) to a third party as a finder’s fee. The Company recently presented a detailed accounting of its $1,711,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward. Fronteer accepted the Company’s earn-in and has further informed the Company that, as per the terms of the option agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 49% participating interest to a 36% participating interest in the property.

Grandview has also acquired a 60% interest in ten (10) unpatented and two (2) patented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”). Grandview earned this interest, under an agreement, as amended, with EMCO Corporation SA (“EMCO”), by incurring $500,000 in resource exploration and development expenditures and by issuing 215,000 common shares of the Company and also by issuing 200,000 warrants at an exercise price of $1.40 per share (which expire 36 months from the date of issuance). On July 11, 2008, the Company issued the final 30,000 common shares required under the agreement with EMCO to acquire a 60 percent interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property.

Exploration costs of $30,813 were incurred during second quarter 2009 on the Red Lake Properties (second quarter 2008: $141,124). Exploration costs of $129,873 were incurred during six-month period 2009 on the Red Lake Properties (six-month period 2008: $857,689). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2008 were $3,405,844.

At the Dixie Lake Property, the Company completed two drilling campaigns between the summer of 2007 and the end of the winter 2008 on the Dixie Lake Property. The summer program included 18 diamond drill holes (4,563 meters of core) drilled on a number of known zones including the; 88-04 Zone, Main Zone, South Zone, C-Zone, and the MMI-East Zone. The most significant result was the discovery of a previously unknown zone of high-grade quartz veins with abundant visible gold in drill core. We identified this area as the New South Zone (“NS Zone”). This type of mineralization more closely resembles the high-grade mineralization that Goldcorp is mining just northwest of us at the Red Lake mine complex. An intercept of 22.90 gram per tonne gold over 2.86 meters (amongst others) in the summer 2007 program prompted the Company to return to continue testing the NS Zone. In January 2008, the Company completed an additional two drill holes on the NS Zone and was successful in intersecting the quartz vein zone with one of the two holes, returning 18.26 grams per tonne over 2.20 meters.

Ongoing evaluation of this new target area continues and it is hoped that additional drilling will help to enlarge and delineate the NS Zone.

At the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property in Red Lake, the Company completed a five (5) hole diamond drill program totalling 1,087 meters. The drill program targeted geophysical and structural elements beneath the waters of Red Lake and thus drilling was carried out during the winter months in early 2008 when sufficient ice thickness was present.

Three holes targeted what is believed to be the southwest extension of a structural corridor from the Goldcorp/Premier Gold Bonanza property immediately adjacent to the Company's property. Difficulties reaching bedrock and coring resulted in abandoning the holes after several attempts. These targets remain untested and we hope to return to the area to pursue drilling. The drill was then pulled back to a land based setup and two holes were successfully drilled on the margin of the historic Orlac Deposit. Gold bearing mineralization was encountered in holes BS-08-03 and BS-08-04 in proximity to a granite-volcanoclastic contact zone.


Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, Gem, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in five (5) mining claims, located in Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”.

Grandview has an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven (7) claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, Manitoba (the “Gem Property”). Grandview may earn this interest by completing $250,000 in exploration work by December 31, 2007. In January, the company successfully negotiated an extension to the timelines for incurring expenditures under the option agreement in respect of the Gem Property to December 31, 2008. In return for the extension, Grandview forwarded digital information from the airborne geophysical survey completed by Grandview in 2006 to Marum Resources Inc. (“Marum”). Marum will process the data and combine that information with other data in its possession. Marum will then share the information with Grandview once compiled.

Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

Exploration costs of $62,401 were incurred during second quarter 2009 on the Manitoba Properties (second quarter 2008: $320,064). Exploration costs of $126,744 were incurred during six-month period 2009 on the Manitoba Properties (six-month period 2008: $335,214). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2008 were $1,454,383.

In Manitoba ASK Prospecting complete a first pass assessment of our claim groups in southeastern portion of the Rice Lake Belt. The results were mixed, but did identify a number of areas to follow up, including the Angelina Property towards the north end of our land position. A number of samples returned +10 gram per tonne assays (with visible gold noted) on some shear zones that had previously been identified, but not drilled.

The Company completed a limited seven-hole (1,193 meter) drill program on the Angelina Property in the fall to test a gold bearing shear zone at depth. The Company’s efforts were not rewarded and it has no further plans for the Angelina Property at this time.

During the current quarter work focused on finalizing mapping and reports for filing with government agencies to maintain land status of claims in the region.

Rocky Ridge Property in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview had an option to acquire a 70% interest in 7 mining claims, located in the Lac du Bonnet mining district of Manitoba (the “Rocky Ridge Property”). Grandview may have earned this interest by incurring $600,000 in resource exploration and development expenditures, making $85,000 in payments and issuing 225,000 shares of the Company, over a 2-year period. The Company allowed its option to lapse on this property during 2008, due to poor drill results.

Exploration costs of $Nil were incurred during the second quarter 2009 on the Rocky Ridge Property (second quarter 2008: $726,375). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2008 of $528,376 were written off prior to the start of the financial year ended May 31, 2009.


Private Placements

On July 11, 2008, the Company issued 30,000 common shares to EMCO (refer discussion relating to the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property above).

Refer also “Subsequent Events” for a private placement completed subsequent to the end of the second quarter 2009.

Results of Operations

Second quarter 2009

Grandview incurred a net loss of $96,316 for the second quarter 2009, compared with $1,711,526 for the second quarter 2008. The lower net loss for the second quarter 2009 compared to the corresponding period last year is due to efforts to curtail organizational activity during the current economic climate.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the second quarter 2009 of $125,485 compares with $956,614 for the second quarter 2008. The reduction in cash flows used in operating activities is due to a significant reduction in exploration and development activities.

Six-month period 2009

Grandview incurred a net loss of $166,327 for the six-month period 2009, compared with $1,216,361 for the six-month period 2008. The lower net loss for the six-month period 2009 compared to the corresponding period last year is due to efforts to curtail organizational activity during the current economic climate.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the six-month period 2009 of $166,327 compares with $1,216,361 for the six-month period 2008. The reduction in cash flows used in operating activities is due to a significant reduction in exploration and development activities.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

 

 

Second

 

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Third

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

Nov. 31,

 

 

Aug. 31,

 

 

May 31,

 

 

Feb. 28,

 

 

 

2008

 

 

2008

 

 

2008

 

 

2008

 

Revenue

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

Expenses

 

98,801

 

 

138,952

 

 

425,903

 

 

264,491

 

Net loss

 

(96,316

)

 

(138,389

)

 

(870,408

)

 

(34,115

)

Net loss per share

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.03

)

 

(0.00

)

Cash flows from (used in) operating activities

 

(125,485

)

 

(40,843

)

 

(244,135

)

 

(99,957

)

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

479,071

 

 

735,523

 

 

1,096,266

 

 

1,927,043

 

Assets

 

11,369,813

 

 

11,645,288

 

 

11,673,136

 

 

12,383,498

 

 

 

Second

 

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Third

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

Nov. 30,

 

 

Aug. 31,

 

 

May 31,

 

 

Feb. 28,

 

 

 

2007

 

 

2007

 

 

2007

 

 

2007

 

Revenue

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

Expenses

 

1,731,395

 

 

375,811

 

 

370,329

 

 

666,918

 

Net income (loss)

 

(1,711,526

)

 

(389,785

)

 

193,241

 

 

(666,918

)

Net income (loss) per share

 

(0.05

)

 

(0.01

)

 

0.01

 

 

(0.03

)

Cash flows used in operating activities

 

(956,614

)

 

(259,747

)

 

(269,368

)

 

(430,290

)

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

1,146,482

 

 

2,965,747

 

 

1,299,277

 

 

1,083,491

 

Assets

 

11,312,038

 

 

12,064,680

 

 

9,217,009

 

 

8,357,714

 



Liquidity and Capital Resources

Grandview’s working capital on November 30, 2008 was $482,997, compared with $1,168,570 on May 31, 2008. The cash balance on November 30, 2008, was $75,535 and short-terms investments were $403,536, compared with a cash balance of $84,856 and short-term investments of $1,011,410 on May 31, 2008.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and as no additional funding was acquired during the first quarter 2009, the cash balance and liquidity situation of the Company overall was negatively affected.

250,000 warrants expired during the six-month period 2009 and 75,000 stock options were cancelled during the six-month period 2009. The Company issued 30,000 shares to EMCO related to its option to acquire a 60 percent interest in 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims for the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of November 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding 36,318,765 common shares; 12,111,125 warrants; and 4,500,000 stock options.

As of January 14, 2009, the Company had outstanding 36,318,765 common shares; 10,671,126 warrants; and 4,500,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Chairman was paid $15,000 for consulting services during the second quarter 2009 (second quarter 2008: $16,500). He was paid $30,000 for consulting services during the six-month period 2009 (six-month period 2008: $36,000).

Consulting fees of $43,500 were paid to the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company for second quarter 2009 (second quarter 2008: $37,500). Included herein were car and office allowances of $6,000 (second quarter 2008: $6,000). Consulting fees of $87,000 were paid to the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company for six-month period 2009 (six-month period 2008: $75,000). Included herein were car and office allowances of $12,000 (six-month period 2008: $12,000). The CEO was advanced a loan of $90,000 on October 31, 2006, of which $60,000 remained outstanding at November 30, 2008. The loan bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009.

Consulting and accounting services expenses of $15,000 were paid during the second quarter 2009 to a company controlled by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company (second quarter 2008: $12,333).


Consulting and accounting services expenses of $32,638 were paid during the six-month period 2009 (six-month period 2008: $39,333).

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Sandfire Securities Inc. This offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,667.

In connection with this offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 common shares at a price of $0.05 per common share for a period of 24 months after closing.

The securities issued pursuant to this offering will all be subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.


Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at November 30, 2008 of $16,239, compared with $13,090 as at May 31, 2008.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.


Critical Accounting Policies

Income Tax

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method. The determination of future income tax assets and liabilities is based on the differences between the financial statement and the income tax bases of assets and liabilities, using substantively enacted tax rates in effect for the period in which the differences are expected to reverse. Future income tax assets are recorded to recognize tax benefits only to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that they will be realized.

Mineral Property Costs

Direct exploration and development costs are deferred in the accounts, net of amounts recovered from third parties, including receipts from options. At production, these costs will be amortized using the units-of production method based on estimated reserves. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written off when the decision to abandon is made, or earlier if a determination is made that the property does not have economically recoverable reserves.

The recorded book value of the Company's mineral properties in North America is not intended to reflect the present or future value of the gold projects. The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its properties in North America. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. If after the review, it is determined that the carrying amount of a mining interest is impaired, that mining interest is written-down to its estimated net realizable value. A mining interest is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The amounts shown for mining properties do not necessarily represent present or future values. Their recoverability is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of highly liquid investments with maturity of 3 months or less at the date of original issue.

Flow-through Financing

The Company has financed a portion of its exploration activities through the issue of flow through shares, which transfer the tax deductibility of exploration expenditures to the investor. Proceeds received on the issue of such shares have been credited to capital stock and the related \ exploration costs have been charged to mineral properties. Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration and development activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with income tax legislation. When these expenditures are renounced, temporary taxable differences created by the renunciations reduce share capital.

Loss per Share

Basic loss per share is determined by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial period. Diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share as the effect of potential issues of shares under option or from warrant exercises would be anti-dilutive.


Revenue recognition

Gains and losses on sale of marketable securities and properties are recognized when realized. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis.

Share issue costs and reorganization costs

Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital. Reorganization costs are charged to deficit.

Translation of foreign currencies

Foreign currency accounts are translated into Canadian dollars as follows: At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue or expense is translated into Canadian dollars by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the year end date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars by using the exchange rate in effect at that date and the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations in the current period.

Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments – Disclosures and Presentation

On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: Handbook Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, Handbook Section 3862 and Financial Instruments – Disclosures, and Handbook Section 3863, Financial Instruments – Presentation. These standards became effective for the Company on June 1, 2008.

Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance.

The new Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments — Disclosure and Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these new accounting standards on its financial statements.

General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation

Handbook Section 1400 specifies requirements to assess and entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s disclosure currently reflects such assessment.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the AcSB formally adopted the strategy of replacing financial reporting under Canadian GAAP with financial reporting under IFRS, for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008, the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable for-profit enterprises. Financial reporting under IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company will be required to prepare comparative financial statements in accordance with IFRS beginning with the three-month period ended February 28, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its financial statements.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In October 2007, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new accounting standard on its consolidated financial statements.

United States GAAP

Refer also Note 13 to the unaudited financial statements for second quarter 2009 for a discussion of GAAP accounting pronouncements in the United States (“US”) that have or may in subsequent reporting periods affect the differences reported by the Company between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of November 30, 2008, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of November 30, 2008, such financial reporting disclosure controls and procedures and the design of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the first quarter 2009 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

OUTLOOK

During this recent quarter the company focused efforts on finalizing exploration efforts in Manitoba and Ontario and maintaining our land position in good standing. We continue to explore for, and evaluate opportunities in and around our centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake, Northwestern Ontario and our Manitoba holdings. No fieldwork was carried out on our Pony Creek project in Nevada due to the high cost of operating this project with non Flow-Thru dollars.

In light of the current market conditions, the Company has made difficult, but prudent decisions to reduce costs were appropriate to maintain as streamlined a cost structure as possible. We are cognizant of market conditions, but believe opportunities exist that can have a long-term positive effect on the company. We will continue to pursue these ideas moving forward so as to maintain and grow shareholder value.

Exploration programs in the Red Lake are will be deferred until the summer of 2009 in order to take advantage of further ground work prior to drilling the NS Zone at the Dixie Lake property to follow-up on gold bearing intercepts from previous drilling programs.


RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.


EX-99.6 7 exhibit99-6.htm EXHIBIT 99.6 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.6 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.6

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify that:

1.

I, have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the issuer) for the interim period ending November 30, 2008;

 
2.

Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings;

   
3.

Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim filings;

     
4.

The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the issuer, and we have:

     

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide a reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

     

(b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide a reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP; and

     
5.

I have caused the issuer to disclose in the interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 14, 2009

“Ernest Cleave”                       
Signature
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.7 8 exhibit99-7.htm EXHIBIT 99.7 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.8 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.8

FORM 52-109F2

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify that:

1.

I, have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the issuer) for the interim period ending November 30, 2008;

     
2.

Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings;

     
3.

Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the interim filings;

     
4.

The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the issuer, and we have:

     

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide a reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

     

(b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide a reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP; and

     
5.

I have caused the issuer to disclose in the interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 14, 2009

“Paul Sarjeant”                         
Signature
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.8 9 exhibit99-8.htm EXHIBIT 99.8 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.8 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.8

 
Grandview Gold Inc.
 
(An Exploration Stage Company)
 
Interim Financial Statements
 
(Unaudited)
 
For the Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)  
 


 

 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2008 audited financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at February 28, 2009.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at February 28, 2009.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    February 28,     May 31,  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008  

Assets

           

Current assets

           

             Cash

$  289,218   $  84,856  

             Short term investments

  405,740     1,011,410  

             GST and sundry receivable

  6,262     40,664  

             Prepaid expenses

  36,500     150,166  

 

  737,720     1,287,096  

Reclamation bond

  16,682     13,090  

Due from a related party (Note 11(iv))

  10,000     90,000  

Mining interests (Note 5)

  9,329,748     10,282,950  

 

$  10,094,150   $  11,673,136  

Liabilities

           

Current liabilities

           

             Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$  87,062   $  118,526  

Asset retirement obligation

  16,682     13,090  

 

  103,744     131,616  

 

           

Shareholders' equity

  9,990,406     11,541,520  

 

$  10,094,150   $  11,673,136  

Nature of operations and going concern assumption (Note 1)

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 29,     February 28,     February 29,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Expenses

                             

Stock based compensation

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  1,003,275   $  4,030,125  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  35,660     102,002     75,007     772,967     1,774,102  

Professional fees

  47,568     61,083     111,825     223,890     1,167,797  

Management services

  62,769     (15,197 )   175,846     129,839     1,263,835  

Office and administration

  34,333     71,915     50,749     197,038     698,308  

Exploration expenses

  -     -     4,656     -     4,656  

Flow-through interest expense

  2,747     44,688     2,747     44,688     188,801  

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

Debt forgiveness (Note 11(iv))

  60,000     -     60,000     -     61,235  

 

                             

 

  243,077     264,491     480,830     2,371,697     9,213,859  

 

                             

Loss before the under noted

  (243,077 )   (264,491 )   (480,830 )   (2,371,697 )   (9,213,859 )

Interest income

  2,204     14,920     5,252     50,815     86,821  

Write-off of mineral properties

  (1,469,669 )   -     (1,469,669 )   -     (1,998,045 )

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     35,667  

Site restoration costs

  -     -     -     (30,000 )   -  

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     -     (170,000 )

 

                             

Loss before income taxes

  (1,710,542 )   (249,571 )   (1,945,247 )   (2,350,882 )   (11,259,416 )

Future income tax (recovery)

  (120,833 )   (215,456 )   (120,833 )   (215,456 )   (1,675,990 )

 

                             

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period

$  (1,589,709 ) $  (34,115 ) $  (1,824,414 ) $  (2,135,426 ) $  (9,583,426 )

 

                             

Basic loss per share (Note 9)

$  (0.04 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.05 ) $  (0.06 )      

 

                             

Diluted loss per share (Note 9)

$  (0.04 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.05 ) $  (0.06 )      

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 29,     February 28,     February 29,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)
                               
Accumulated deficit                              
Balance at beginning of period $  (11,427,965 ) $  (10,288,737 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (8,187,426 ) $  (3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (1,589,709 )   (34,115 )   (1,824,414 )   (2,135,426 )   (9,583,426 )
                               
Balance at end of period $  (13,017,674 ) $  (10,322,852 ) $  (13,017,674 ) $  (10,322,852 ) $  (13,017,674 )

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 4 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

                Contributed      Accumulated        
    Share capital     Warrants     surplus     deficit     Total  
At May 31, 2007 $  11,019,703   $  2,611,614   $  3,356,344   $  (8,187,426 ) $  8,800,235  
                               
Private placement   4,950,150     -     -     -     4,950,150  
Warrant valuation   (940,212 )   1,167,629     -     -     227,417  
Mineral property acquisition   45,800     -     -     -     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   66,544     -     -     -     66,544  
Fair value of warrants exercised   36,673     (36,673 )   -     -     -  
Stock based compensation   -     -     1,433,600     -     1,433,600  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (488,720 )   -     -     -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (227,417 )   -     -     -     (227,417 )
Flow-through cost of issue   (260,255 )   -     -     -     (260,255 )
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (3,005,834 )   (3,005,834 )
                               
At May 31, 2008 $  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  
                               
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (33,333 )   -     -     -     (33,333 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (522,150 )   522,150     -     -  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (1,824,414 )   (1,824,414 )
                               
At February 28, 2009 $  14,444,900   $  3,251,086   $  5,312,094   $ (13,017,674 ) $  9,990,406  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  

 

  February 28,     February 29,     February 28,     February 29,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Cash flows from operating activities

                             

Net loss for the period

$  (1,589,709 ) $  (34,115 ) $  (1,824,414 ) $  (2,135,426 ) $  (9,583,426 )

Items not involving cash:

                             

       Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

       Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     (35,667 )

       Debt forgiveness (Note 11(iv))

  60,000     -     60,000     -     61,235  

       Accrued bonus (Note 11(iv))

  20,000     -     20,000     -     20,000  

       Stock based compensation

  -     -     -     1,162,525     4,030,125  

       Future income tax recovery

  (120,833 )   (215,456 )   (120,833 )   (215,456 )   (1,675,990 )

       Accrued interest income

  -     (9,889 )   -     (28,035 )   (36,410 )

       Write-off of mineral properties

  1,469,669     -     1,469,669     -     1,998,045  

Changes in non-cash working capital items:

                             

       GST and sundry receivable

  2,191     127,561     34,402     198,026     (5,772 )

       Prepaid expenses

  (5,068 )   73,807     113,666     22,872     (36,500 )

       Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  51,103     (41,865 )   (31,464 )   (320,824 )   93,232  

 

                             

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (112,647 )   (99,957 )   (278,974 )   (1,316,318 )   (5,146,128 )

 

                             

Cash flows from financing activities

                             

Loans from related parties

  -     -     -     -     (28,594 )

Share/warrant issuance

  416,666     1,464,550     416,666     5,016,694     18,052,210  

Cost of issuance

  (33,333 )   (101,654 )   (33,333 )   (487,499 )   (1,761,809 )

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     -     175,000  

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     -     (75,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  383,333     1,362,896     383,333     4,529,195     16,361,807  

 

                             

Cash flows from investing activities

                             

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     205     -     (12,923 )   (13,090 )

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  (2,204 )   -     605,670     (975,000 )   (369,330 )

Exploration advances

  -     -     -     312,491     -  

Expenditures on mining interests

  (54,799 )   (492,472 )   (505,667 )   (2,912,714 )   (10,454,041 )

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     (90,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

$  (57,003 ) $  (492,267 ) $  100,003   $  (3,588,146 ) $  (10,926,461 )

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  

 

  February 28,     February 29,     February 28,     February 29,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Change in cash during the period

$  213,683   $  770,672   $  204,362   $  (375,269 ) $  289,218  

 

                             

Cash, beginning of period

  75,535     153,336     84,856     1,299,277     -  

 

                             

Cash, end of period

$  289,218   $  924,008   $  289,218   $  924,008   $  289,218  

 

                             

Supplement schedule of non-cash transactions

                   

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  10,800   $  35,000   $  563,875  

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  

Stock-option compensation included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475   $  111,475  

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements

- 7 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

                          Cumulative  

 

  Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     from date of  

 

  February 28,     February 29,     February 28,     February 29,     inception  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     of projects  

 

                             

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  5,884,391   $  5,580,151   $  5,679,340   $  4,386,457   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     44,418     96,595     939,803     4,690,650  

       Project administration and general

  -     4,102     14,090     15,482     72,121  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  13     -     94,379     286,929     1,121,633  

 

                             

       Total expenditures during the period

  13     48,520     205,064     1,242,214     5,884,404  

 

                             

Balance, end of period

$  5,884,404   $  5,628,671   $  5,884,404   $  5,628,671   $  5,884,404  

 

                             

Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  3,405,844   $  2,388,849   $  3,275,971   $  1,531,160   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  39,264     375,562     157,897     1,158,251     2,921,638  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  236     -     11,476     75,000     523,706  

 

                             

       Total expenditures during the period

  39,500     375,562     169,373     1,233,251     3,445,344  

 

                             

Balance, end of period

$  3,445,344   $  2,764,411   $  3,445,344   $  2,764,411   $  3,445,344  

 

                             

Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  1,454,383   $  1,003,811   $  1,327,639   $  668,597   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  15,356     70,540     177,093     405,754     1,122,419  

       Project administration and general

  (70 )   -     237     -     237  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     -     382,313  

       Government refund

  -     -     (35,300 )   -     (35,300 )

       Write-off

  (1,469,669 )   -     (1,469,669 )   -     (1,469,669 )

 

                             

       Total expenditures during the period

  (1,454,383 )   70,540     (1,327,639 )   405,754     -  

 

                             

Balance, end of period

$  -   $  1,074,351   $  -   $  1,074,351   $  -  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     from date of  

 

  February 28,     February 29,     February 28,     February 29,     inception  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     of projects  

 

                             

Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  -   $  728,524   $  -   $  548,404   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     (2,150 )   -     177,094     415,904  

       Project administration and general

  -     -     -     876     -  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     -     112,472  

       Write-off

  -     -     -     -     (528,376 )

 

                             

       Total expenditures during the period

  -     (2,150 )   -     177,970     -  

 

                             

Balance, end of period

$  -   $  726,374   $  -   $  726,374   $  -  

 

                             

Total

$  9,329,748   $  10,193,807   $  9,329,748   $  10,193,807   $  9,329,748  

The notes to unaudited interim financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 9 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.

Nature of operations and going concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onwards.

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, they do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Basis of presentation and accounting policies

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2008, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 10 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2. Basis of presentation and accounting policies (continued)
     
  Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments – Disclosures and Presentation

On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: Capital Disclosures (Handbook Section 1535), Financial Instruments – Disclosures (Handbook Section 3862), and Financial Instruments – Presentation (Handbook Section 3863). These new standards became effective for the Company on June 1, 2008.

     
    Capital Disclosures
 

Handbook Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non- compliance. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook section in Note 3 to these interim financial statements.

     
    Financial Instruments

Handbook Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook sections in Note 4 to these interim financial statements.

     
  Section 1400, General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation

This section specifies requirements to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company disclosure reflects such assessment.

     
  Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2009, the Emerging Issues Committee of the CICA issued EIC-173, Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which applies to interim and annual financial statements for periods ending on or after January 20, 2009. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements will have no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

     
  Mining Exploration Costs

On March 27, 2009, the Emerging Issues Committee of the CICA approved an abstract EIC-174, “Mining Exploration Costs”, which provides guidance on capitalization of exploration costs related to mining properties in particular, and on impairment of long-lived assets in general. The Company has applied this new abstract for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 and there was no significant impact on its financial statements as a result of applying this abstract.

- 11 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2. Basis of presentation and accounting policies (continued)
     
  Future accounting changes
     
    International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its financial statements.

     
    Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In November 2007, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new accounting standard on its financial statements.

     
    Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, Consolidated Financial Statements. Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

     
3. Capital management
     

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

     

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so.

- 12 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.

Capital management (continued)

     

Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

     
i)

minimizing discretionary disbursements;

     
ii)

reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

     
iii)

exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

     

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

     

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

     
4.

Risk factors

     

The Company’s significant mineral properties are: (i) Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA; and (ii) Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (collectively called the "Properties").

     

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon the Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

     

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

     

Credit risk

     

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash, short term investments, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

     

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of February 28, 2009. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

     

Liquidity risk

     

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at February 28, 2009, the Company had a cash and short term investments balance of $694,958 (May 31, 2008 - $1,096,266) to settle current liabilities of $87,062 (May 31, 2008 - $118,526). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

- 13 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk factors (continued)

     

Market risk

     

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

     
(a)

Interest rate risk

     

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

     
(b)

Foreign currency risk

     

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

     
(c)

Price risk

     

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as it relates to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

     

Sensitivity analysis

     

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and short term investments as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

     

As of February 28, 2009, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

     

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

     

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a nine month period:

     
(i) Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at February 28, 2009, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the nine months ended February 28, 2009 would have been approximately $3,000 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at February 28, 2009, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $3,000 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.

- 14 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk factors (continued)

     

Sensitivity analysis (continued)

     
(ii) The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.
     
(iii) Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of February 28, 2009, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.
     
5.

Mining interests

     

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

     

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 6 of the audited financial statements as at May 31, 2008. There were no significant changes to mining interests that occurred from June 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009 except as follows:

     
(a)

On September 11, 2008, the Company reported that it has incurred the expenditures required to successfully fulfill the terms of its option agreement with EMCO Corporation SA ("EMCO") to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property.

     
(b)

The Company determined that the carrying value of its Rice Lake Gold Camp in Manitoba, Canada could not be supported, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,469,669.

- 15 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.

Share capital

     
(a)

Authorized

     

Unlimited number of common shares

     

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non- participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

     
(b)

Issued


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversion

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (731,430 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  9,543,301  

- 16 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.

Share capital (continued)

     
(b)

Issued (continued)


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (563,472 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
 

Private placement

  11,169,000     4,950,150  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (940,212 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  130,000     45,800  
 

Exercise of warrants

  147,875     66,544  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     36,673  
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (488,720 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (227,417 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (260,255 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
 

Mineral property acquisition (i)

  30,000     10,800  
 

Private placement (ii)

  8,333,333     416,666  
 

Cost of issue - cash

  -     (33,333 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (30,666 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (120,833 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, February 28, 2009

  44,652,098   $  14,444,900  
               
 

(i) On July 11, 2008, the Company issued 30,000 common shares to EMCO related to an option to acquire a 60 percent interest in 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims for the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property.

     
 

(ii) On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the “Offering”) with Sandfire Securities Inc. The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares (the “Common Shares”) to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666. The securities issued pursuant to Offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance.

- 17 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.

Share capital (continued)

     
(b)

Issued (continued)

     

In connection with the Offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised ($33,333) under the Offering and also issued broker warrants to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months after closing. The fair value of each warrant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 156.7%; risk-free interest rate of 1.52% and an expected average life of 2 years. The value assigned was $30,666.

     

Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through share agreements, the tax attributes of the related expenditures are renounced to subscribers. As a result, the Company is required to recognize a foregone tax benefit of $120,833 at the time of renouncement.

     
7.

Warrants


      Number of     Weighted Average  
      Warrants     Exercise Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Issued   602,500     1.44  
  Expired/cancelled   -     -  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
  Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
  Expired/cancelled   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
  Issued   4,189,999     0.91  
  Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583   $  1.18  
  Issued   5,853,480     0.62  
  Issued   73,937     0.65  
  Exercised   (147,875 )   0.45  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
  Expired   (2,039,999 )   (1.14 )
  Issued   666,666     0.05  
               
  Balance, February 28, 2009   10,987,792   $  0.83  

- 18 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Warrants (continued)

   

The following are the warrants outstanding at February 28, 2009:


  Number of     Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
  Warrants     Value     Price     Date  
                       
  1,698,937   $  366,316   $  0.65     March 16, 2009  
  177,125     43,927     0.45     March 16, 2009  
  1,992,987     1,335,301     1.75     March 27, 2009  
  398,597     301,738     1.10     March 27, 2009  
  4,357,000     714,548     0.65     July 6, 2009  
  687,120     145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
  656,000     225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
  153,360     55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
  200,000     32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
  666,666     30,666     0.05     December 4, 2010  
                       
  10,987,792   $  3,251,086              

8.

Stock options


      Number     Weighted Average  
      of     Exercise  
      Stock Options     Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
  Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
  Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
  Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
  Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
  Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.26  
  Granted   2,700,000     0.63  
  Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
  Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
  Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
               
  Balance, February 28, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  

- 19 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

8.

Stock options (continued)

   

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at February 28, 2009:


      Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
            Weighted                    
            average                    
            remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
      Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
  Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise price  
                                 
  October 1, 2009   600,000     0.59 years   $  1.00     600,000   $  1.00  
  December 20, 2009   75,000     0.81     1.10     75,000     1.10  
  April 15, 2010   700,000     1.13     0.50     700,000     0.50  
  January 6, 2011   150,000     1.85     1.25     150,000     1.25  
  April 3, 2011   550,000     2.09     1.80     550,000     1.80  
  October 31, 2011   500,000     2.67     1.00     500,000     1.00  
  September 27, 2012   1,825,000     3.58     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
                                 
      4,400,000     2.39 years   $  0.90     4,400,000   $  0.90  

9.

Basic and diluted loss per share


      Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
      February 28,     February 29,     February 28,      February 29,  
      2009     2008     2009     2008  
                           
 

Numerator for basic loss per share

$  (1,589,709 ) $  (34,115 ) $  (1,824,414 ) $  (2,135,426 )
 

 

                       
 

Numerator for diluted loss per share

$  (1,589,709 ) $  (34,115 ) $  (1,824,414 ) $  (2,135,426 )
 

 

                       
 

Denominator:

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - basic

  44,172,646     35,645,781     40,253,842     33,191,201  
 

 

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - diluted

  44,172,646     35,645,781     40,253,842     33,191,201  
 

 

                       
 

Basic and diluted loss per share

$  (0.04 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.05 ) $  (0.06 )

Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options was not calculated as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

- 20 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
10. Segmented information

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (May 31, 2008 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts in the unaudited interim financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

The Company operates in two geographic segments for the nine months ended February 28, 2009 and year ended May 31, 2008 as follows:

      February 28,     May 31,  
  Assets   2009     2008  
               
  Canada $  4,209,746   $  5,993,796  
  United States of America   5,884,404     5,679,340  
               
  Total $  10,094,150   $  11,673,136  

11.

Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere

     
i)

For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009, $5,000 and $35,000, respectively (three and nine months ended February 29, 2008 - $15,000 and $51,000, respectively) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

     
ii)

For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009, $39,500 and $126,500, respectively (three and nine months ended February 29, 2008 - $55,500 and $130,500, respectively) was paid to the president and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $12,750 and $32,750, respectively capitalized to mining interests (three and nine months ended February 29, 2008 - $100,500 and $130,500, respectively was capitalized to mining interests). Also, $2,000 and $14,000, respectively in car and office allowances (three and nine months ended February 29, 2008 - $6,000 and $18,000, respectively) was included in this amount.

     
iii)

For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009, $11,000 and $43,638, respectively, (three and nine months ended February 29, 2008 - $21,000 and $60,333 respectively) in consulting fees were also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

     
iv)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the president and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. As at February 28, 2009, $60,000 of the loan was forgiven and $20,000 was treated as a 2008 bonus.

     

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

- 21 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

   

The Company's unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(g) in the fiscal 2008 audited financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

   

Prior to June 1, 2003, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation plan for US GAAP purposes under FASB statement 123, under which no compensation expense was required to be recognized in fiscal 2003.

   

For the nine months ended ended February 28, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the nine months ended February 28, 2009, 2008, and 2007. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(c) of the audited annual financial statements for May 31, 2008, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

   

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for- sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

   

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow- through share investors (see Note 11 of the audited annual financial statements for May 31, 2008). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing financial statements.

- 22 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Had the Company's balance sheets as at February 28, 2009 and May 31, 2008 been prepared using US GAAP, such balance sheets would be presented as follows:


      February 28, 2009     May 31, 2008  
               
 

Assets

           
 

Current assets

           
 

Cash

$  289,218   $  84,856  
 

Short term investments

  405,740     1,011,410  
 

GST and sundry receivable

  6,262     40,664  
 

Prepaid expenses

  36,500     150,166  
 

 

           
 

 

  737,720     1,287,096  
 

 

           
 

Reclamation bond

  16,682     13,090  
 

Due from a related party

  12,677     102,296  
 

Mineral property rights

  1,645,339     1,921,797  
 

 

           
 

 

$  2,412,418   $  3,324,279  
 

 

           
 

Liabilities

           
 

Current liabilities

           
 

Accounts payable

$  41,426   $  73,526  
 

Accrued liabilities

  45,636     45,000  
 

 

           
 

 

  87,062     118,526  
 

Assets retirement obligation

  16,682     13,090  
 

 

           
 

 

  103,744     131,616  
 

 

           
 

Shareholders' equity

           
 

Share capital

           
 

Authorized - unlimited common shares

           
 

Issued

           
 

     Common shares

  16,120,890     15,757,423  
 

     Additional paid in capital

  1,170,494     648,344  
 

     Warrants

  3,251,086     3,742,570  
 

     Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities

  (315,539 )   (315,539 )
 

     Deferred stock-option compensation

  4,141,600     4,141,600  
 

     Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company

  (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
 

     Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage

  (18,925,914 )   (17,647,792 )
 

 

           
 

 

  2,308,674     3,192,663  
 

 

           
 

 

$  2,412,418   $  3,324,279  

- 23 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss


                        Cumulative  
      Nine Months Ended     from date  
      February 28,      February 29,     February 28,     of inception  
      2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
                           
 

Expenses

                       
 

General exploration

$  415,268   $  2,697,260   $  2,789,371   $  9,172,297  
 

Management services

  175,846     129,839     246,364     1,263,835  
 

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  75,007     772,967     358,730     1,774,102  
 

Debt forgiveness

  60,000     -     -     61,235  
 

Professional fees

  111,825     223,890     285,149     1,167,797  
 

Office and administration

  63,045     197,038     110,433     710,604  
 

Flow-through interest expense

  2,747     44,688     141,366     188,801  
 

Loss on forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )
 

Stock based compensation

  -     1,003,275     1,302,187     4,030,125  
 

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     170,000  
 

Site restoration costs

  -     30,000     -     -  
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     9,766  
 

 

                       
 

Loss before the under noted

  (903,738 )   (5,098,957 )   (5,233,600 )   (18,512,895 )
 

Interest income

  7,929     50,815     21,584     101,794  
 

Write-off mineral property rights

  (382,313 )   -     -     (514,813 )
 

 

                       
 

Net loss for the period and from date of inception

  (1,278,122 )   (5,048,142 )   (5,212,016 )   (18,925,914 )
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive (loss) items:

                       
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     (9,766 )   (15,234 )
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss for the period

$  (1,278,122 ) $  (5,048,142 ) $  (5,221,782 ) $ (18,941,148 )
 

 

                       
 

Loss per common share

                       
 

Basic

$  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 ) $  (0.26 )      
 

Diluted

$  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 ) $  (0.26 )      
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss per

                       
 

common share

                       
 

Basic

$  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 ) $  (0.27 )      
 

Diluted

$  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 ) $  (0.27 )      

 

 

- 24 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

   

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
               
  Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and            
  as of March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
  Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
  Private placement   120,000     120,000  
  Private placement   150,000     150,000  
  Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
  Private placement   175,000     175,000  
  Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
  Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
  Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
  Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
  Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
  Debt conversation   80,000     100,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
  Private placement   590,320     737,900  
  Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
  Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
  Private placement   400,000     500,000  
  Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
  Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
  Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
  Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
  Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
  Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
  Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
  Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
  Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 25 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (continued)

            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
  Private placements   11,169,000     4,950,150  
  Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
  Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
  Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
  Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
  Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (33,333 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
               
  Balance, February 28, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,120,890  

Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

  Additional paid in capital      
  Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005 $  25,000  
  Expired warrants   173,388  
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  198,388  
  Expired warrants   449,956  
  Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 $  648,344  
  Expired warrants   522,150  
  Balance, February 28, 2009 $  1,170,494  

- 26 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Warrants      
         
  Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Issued   173,388  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
  Issued   2,086,995  
  Expired   (173,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
  Issued   974,575  
  Expired   (449,956 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
  Issued   1,167,629  
  Exercised   (36,673 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
  Expired   (522,150 )
  Issued   30,666  
         
  Balance, February 28, 2009 $  3,251,086  
         
  Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities      
         
  Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004, May 31, 2005, May 31, 2006, May 31, 2007, May 31, 2008 and February 28, 2009 $  (315,539 )

- 27 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Deferred stock-option compensation      
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Vesting of stock options   775,613  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
  Vesting of stock options   573,700  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
  Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
  Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and February 28, 2009 $  4,141,600  
         
  Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage      
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
  Net loss   4,678  
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
  Net loss   (1,743,463 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
  Net loss   (3,673,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
  Net loss   (6,062,489 )
         
  Balance May 31, 2007 $  (11,489,896 )
  Net loss   (6,157,896 )
         
  Balance May 31, 2008 $  (17,647,792 )
  Net loss   (1,278,122 )
         
  Balance, February 28, 2009 $  (18,925,914 )

- 28 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Cash Flows


                        Cumulative  
      Nine Months Ended     from date  
      February 28,      February 29,     February 28,     of inception  
      2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from operating activities

               
 

Net loss for the period

$  (1,278,122 ) $  (5,048,142 ) $  (5,212,016 ) $  (18,925,914 )
 

Items not involving cash:

                       
 

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     9,766  
 

Debt forgiveness

  60,000     -     -     61,235  
 

Accrued bonus

  20,000     -     -     20,000  
 

Stock-option compensation

  -     1,274,000     1,302,187     4,030,125  
 

Accrued Interest income

  9,619     (28,035 )   -     (39,087 )
 

Write-off of mineral property rights

  382,313     -     -     514,813  
 

Change in non-cash operating working activities:

               
 

GST and sundry receivable

  34,402     198,026     (73,479 )   (11,442 )
 

Prepaid expenses

  113,666     22,872     (182,670 )   (30,830 )
 

Due from a related party

  -     -     (90,000 )   (90,000 )
 

Accounts payable

  (32,100 )   (320,824 )   67,369     112,445  
 

Accrued liabilities

  636     -     -     (18,652 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (689,586 )   (3,902,103 )   (4,188,609 )   (14,403,208 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from financing activities

                       
 

Repayment of loans from related parties

  -     -     -     (28,594 )
 

Share/warrant issuance

  416,666     5,016,694     1,559,999     18,052,210  
 

Cost of issue

  (33,333 )   (487,499 )   (124,800 )   (1,761,809 )
 

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     175,000  
 

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     (75,000 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  383,333     4,529,195     1,435,199     16,361,807  
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from investing activities

                       
 

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     (12,923 )   -     (13,090 )
 

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  605,670     (975,000 )   -     (369,330 )
 

Exploration advances

  -     312,491     251,325     -  
 

Purchase of mineral property rights

  (95,055 )   (326,929 )   (217,224 )   (1,286,962 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  510,615     (1,002,361 )   34,101     (1,669,382 )
 

 

                       
 

Change in cash during the period

  204,362     (375,269 )   (2,719,309 )   289,217  
 

Cash, beginning of period

  84,856     1,299,277     3,802,800     1  
 

 

                       
 

Cash, end of period

$  289,218   $  924,008   $  1,083,491   $  289,218  

- 29 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued) Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


                        Cumulative  
      Nine Months Ended     from date  
      February 28,      February 29,     February 28,     of inception  
      2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
                           
 

Supplement schedule of non-cash transaction

               
 

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  10,800   $  35,000   $  56,500   $  563,875  
 

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  184,750   $  184,750  
 

Stock-option compensation included in mining interest

$  -   $  111,475   $  -   $  111,475  
 

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements

In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 provides guidance on determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-05 concludes, amongst other matters, that warrants and options issued by an entity with an exercise price that is different from the entity’s functional currency cannot be classified as equity. EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of EITF 07-05 will have on the statements.

- 30 -


EX-99.9 10 exhibit99-9.htm EXHIBIT 99.9 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.9 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.9

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2009

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three-month period ended February 28, 2009 (“third quarter 2009”) and the nine-month period ended February 28, 2009 (“nine-month period 2009”) and its financial position as at February 28, 2009. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual financial statements and related notes, and MD&A as at May 31, 2008.

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 12 to the unaudited financial statements for the third quarter 2009.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

The comparative reporting periods are the three months ended February 29, 2008 (“third quarter 2008”) and the nine-month period ended February 29, 2008 (“nine-month period 2008”).

This MD&A was prepared on April 13, 2009.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing gold properties in North America. Grandview continues to be involved in the acquisition, exploration and, if warranted, the development of properties for the mining of precious metals in Ontario and Manitoba, Canada and Nevada, USA.


Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS). During the next three years, Grandview pursued this investment opportunity, but subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining.

On March 26, 2004, the Company put a new management team in place, identified an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with the National Instrument 43-101, and acquired an option to earn an interest in the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome Properties; the terms of which it subsequently fulfilled (refer below).

Economic Situation and Company Response

The Company is taking firm measures in response to the global financial and commodity price crisis. Management is strongly committed to ensuring that the Company survives the current market turmoil and is implementing a strategy to ensure this goal. The Company has recently reduced expenditures to a minimum through significant cost reductions at all its operations and the corporate head office.

However, current market conditions and the difficulty of obtaining financing during the current economic downturn substantially increases concerns regarding the ability of the Company to raise additional capital and to continue as a going concern.

The realization of shareholder value will continue to be our key objective, and continuing advancement of the Company’s projects will be fundamental to this objective. Although the current cash position of the Company is sufficient to cover corporate activities and minor operational activities, including the maintenance of royalty, option and other property commitments, the Company is actively seeking to raise additional funding to achieve its goal of advancing it exploration and development activities at its properties of merit.

The Company had available to it at February 28, 2009 $694,958 in cash and short-term investments and does not earn any revenue from any of its properties. Such circumstances, in addition to uncertainty relating to the Company’s ability to obtain the necessary funding to complete exploration and development work, lend substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to achieve future profitable production and, accordingly, the appropriateness of the use of accounting principles applicable to a going concern. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital, exploration and development requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties.

Properties and Projects

The Company did not engage in any substantial level of exploration activity during the third quarter 2009 and all comparisons to and variances from previous reporting periods are predominantly attributable to this fact.

Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

Grandview has an 80% undivided interest in the Pony Creek and Elliot Dome :Properties, both in Elko County, Nevada.

Exploration costs of $13 were incurred during the third quarter 2009. Exploration costs incurred during the third quarter 2008 were $48,520. Exploration costs of $205,064 were incurred for the nine-month period 2009, compared with $1,242,214 for the corresponding period last year. Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to February 28, 2009 were $5,884,404.


Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

Grandview has also acquired a 60% interest in ten (10) unpatented and two (2) patented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”).

Exploration costs of $39,500 were incurred during third quarter 2009 on the Red Lake Properties (third quarter 2008: $375,562). Exploration costs of $169,373 were incurred during nine-month period 2009 on the Red Lake Properties (nine-month period 2008: $1,233,251). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to February 28, 2009 were $3,445,344.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, Gem, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in five (5) mining claims, located in Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”.

Grandview has an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven (7) claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, Manitoba (the “Gem Property”). Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

Exploration costs of $15,286 were incurred during third quarter 2009 on the Rice Lake Properties (third quarter 2008: $70,540). Exploration costs of $142,030 were incurred during nine-month period 2009 on the Rice Lake Properties (nine-month period 2008: $405,754). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to February 28, 2009 were $1,469,669.

As the exploration results from the Manitoba properties have been largely disappointing and management considers the likelihood of future profitable development or production are low, the Company decided to write off during the third quarter 2009 the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures of $1,469,669 associated with these properties.

Rocky Ridge Property in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview had an option to acquire a 70% interest in 7 mining claims, located in the Lac du Bonnet mining district of Manitoba (the “Rocky Ridge Property”). The Company allowed its option to lapse on this property during 2008, due to poor drill results.

Private Placements

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Sandfire Securities Inc. This offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,667.


In connection with this offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 common shares at a price of $0.05 per common share for a period of 24 months after closing.

The securities issued pursuant to this offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold period commencing from the date of issuance.

Results of Operations

Third quarter 2009

Grandview incurred a net loss of $1,589,709 for the third quarter 2009, compared with $34,115 for the third quarter 2008. The increase in net loss for the third quarter 2009 compared to the corresponding period last year is due to the write-off of the Company’s Manitoba properties recorded during the third quarter 2009 of $1,469,669.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the third quarter 2009 of $112,647 compares with $99,957 for the third quarter 2008.

Nine-month period 2009

Grandview incurred a net loss of $1,824,414 for the nine-month period 2009, compared with $2,135,426 for the nine-month period 2008. The lower net loss for the nine-month period 2009 compared to the corresponding period last year is attributable to $1,003,275 in stock option expense recorded during the nine-month period 2008 (nine-month period 2009: $Nil) and investor relations expenditures of $772,967 incurred during the nine-month period 2008 (nine-month period 2009: $75,007), offset by the write-off of mineral properties of $1,469,669 recorded during the nine-month period 2009 (nine-month period 2008: $Nil).

Cash flows used in operating activities for the nine-month period 2009 of $278,974 compares with $1,316,318 for the nine-month period 2008. The reduction in cash flows used in operating activities is due to a significant reduction in exploration and development activities overall.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

  Third Second First Fourth
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31, May 31,
  2009 2008 2008 2008
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 243,077 98,801 138,952 425,903
Net loss (1,589,709) (96,316) (138,389) (870,408)
Net loss per share (0.04) (0.00) (0.00) (0.03)
Cash flows used in operating activities (112,647) (125,485) (40,843) (244,135)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period 694,958 479,071 735,523 1,096,266
Assets 10,094,150 11,369,813 11,645,288 11,673,136



  Third Second First Fourth
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31, May 31,
  2008 2007 2007 2007
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 264,491 1,731,395 375,811 370,329
Net income (loss) (34,115) (1,711,526) (389,785) 193,241
Net income (loss) per share (0.00) (0.05) (0.01) 0.01
Cash flows used in operating activities (99,957) (956,614) (259,747) (269,368)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period 1,927,043 1,146,482 2,965,747 1,299,277
Assets 12,383,498 11,312,038 12,064,680 9,217,009

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Grandview’s working capital on February 28, 2009 was $650,658, compared with $1,168,570 on May 31, 2008. The cash balance on February 28, 2009, was $289,218 and short-terms investments were $405,740, compared with a cash balance of $84,856 and short-term investments of $1,011,410 on May 31, 2008.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and continues to incur net losses.

During the nine-month period 2009 the Company issued 30,000 shares to EMCO related to its option to acquire a 60 percent interest in 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims for the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property and issued 8,333,333 flow-through common shares as part of the MineralFields private placement.

2,039,999 warrants expired during the nine-month period 2009 and the Company also issued broker warrants to acquire 666,666 common shares as part of the MineralFields private placement.

175,000 stock options were cancelled during the nine-month period 2009.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of February 28, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,652,098 common shares; 10,987,792 warrants; and 4,400,000 stock options.

As of April 13, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,652,098 common shares; 6,720,146 warrants; and 4,400,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Chairman was paid $5,000 for consulting services during the third quarter 2009 (third quarter 2008: $15,000). He was paid $35,000 for consulting services during the nine-month period 2009 (nine-month period 2008: $51,000).


Consulting fees of $39,500 were paid to the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company for third quarter 2009 (third quarter 2008: $55,500). Included herein were car and office allowances of $2,000 (third quarter 2008: $6,000). Consulting fees of $126,500 were paid to the CEO of the Company for nine-month period 2009 (nine-month period 2008: $130,500). Included herein were car and office allowances of $14,000 (nine-month period 2008: $18,000). The CEO was advanced a loan of $90,000 on October 31, 2006, of which $10,000 remained outstanding at February 28, 2009. The loan bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009.

Consulting and accounting services expenses of $11,000 were paid during the third quarter 2009 to a company controlled by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company (third quarter 2008: $21,000). Consulting and accounting services expenses of $43,638 were paid during the nine-month period 2009 (nine-month period 2008: $60,333).

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.


Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at February 28, 2009 of $16,682, compared with $13,090 as at May 31, 2008.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments – Disclosures and Presentation

On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: Handbook Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, Handbook Section 3862 and Financial Instruments – Disclosures, and Handbook Section 3863, Financial Instruments – Presentation. These standards became effective for the Company on June 1, 2008.


Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance.

The new Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments — Disclosure and Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these new accounting standards on its financial statements.

General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation

Handbook Section 1400 specifies requirements to assess and entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s disclosure currently reflects such assessment.

Section 1400, General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation

This section specifies requirements to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company disclosure reflects such assessment.

Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2009, the Emerging Issues Committee of the CICA issued EIC-173, Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which applies to interim and annual financial statements for periods ending on or after January 20, 2009. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements will have no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Mining Exploration Costs

On March 27, 2009, the Emerging Issues Committee of the CICA approved an abstract EIC-174, “Mining Exploration Costs”, which provides guidance on capitalization of exploration costs related to mining properties in particular, and on impairment of long-lived assets in general. The Company has applied this new abstract for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 and there was no significant impact on its financial statements as a result of applying this abstract.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the AcSB formally adopted the strategy of replacing financial reporting under Canadian GAAP with financial reporting under IFRS, for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008, the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable for-profit enterprises. Financial reporting under IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company will be required to prepare comparative financial statements in accordance with IFRS beginning with the three-month period ended February 28, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In October 2007, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new accounting standard on its consolidated financial statements.


Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, Consolidated Financial Statements. Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

United States GAAP

Refer also Note 12 to the unaudited financial statements for third quarter 2009 for a discussion of GAAP accounting pronouncements in the United States (“US”) that have or may in subsequent reporting periods affect the differences reported by the Company between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of February 28, 2009, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of February 28, 2009, such financial reporting disclosure controls and procedures and the design of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the third quarter 2009 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

OUTLOOK

During this recent quarter the company focused efforts on exploration efforts in Ontario and maintaining its land position in good standing. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario.

In light of the current market conditions, the Company has made difficult, but prudent decisions to reduce costs were appropriate to maintain as streamlined a cost structure as possible.


Exploration programs in the Red Lake area will be deferred until the summer of 2009 in order to take advantage of further ground work prior to drilling the NS Zone at the Dixie Lake property to follow-up on gold bearing intercepts from previous drilling programs.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.


EX-99.10 11 exhibit99-10.htm EXHIBIT 99.10 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.10 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.10

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended February 28, 2009.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on December 1, 2008 and ended on February 28, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: April 14, 2009

“Ernest Cleave”                             
[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.11 12 exhibit99-11.htm EXHIBIT 99.11 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.11 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.11

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended February 28, 2009.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on December 1, 2008 and ended on February 28, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: April 14, 2009

“Paul Sarjeant”                            
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.12 13 exhibit99-12.htm EXHIBIT 99.12 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.12 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.12

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold and Mill City Gold Announce Discontinuation of Nevada Project;
Results to Date Indicate Further Exploration Not in Best Interest of Shareholders

May 22, 2009, - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc., (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") as joint venture operator pursuant to its agreement with Mill City Gold Corp (TSX-V Symbol: MC) (“Mill City”) today announced that the Company will not continue exploration of its Pony Creek/Elliott Dome Property (the “Property”) in Nevada. The Company sites compelling new modeling data regarding both the shallow drill inferred resource and the deeper targets identified on the Property, and difficult capital market conditions as primary reasons for their decision.

"Grandview completed significant work across all major target areas on the Property these past two years in particular, but the results simply do not justify further expenditure of shareholder dollars. Given current market conditions, the vast project is far too expensive to explore and even more un-economic to 'maintain' solely from an advanced royalties perspective," says Grandview President & CEO Paul Sarjeant. Grandview completed 3-D modeling of all geologic data last season which greatly evolved its understanding of the Property and confirmed that further exploration and development of the Property is simply not economic. Sarjeant explains that "the deep Rain-type targets identified on the Property are simply too deep and expensive to explore in this current economic environment and based on results to date, there is no guarantee that a further exploration program on the Property would create any incremental value for our shareholders."

What is in the best interest of shareholders is a continued focus on opportunity, internationally and domestically. In Canada, focus remains on the major gold camps of Ontario and Manitoba where the junior gold mining environment is more robust, the Company has several high-potential properties ranging from mid-stage to grass roots development, and where royalty payments more accurately reflect the actual or implied resource potential of Company properties. Grandview is currently preparing to mobilize its Canadian exploration team to Red Lake, and news of that program is forthcoming. Also, Grandview is aggressively pursuing near-term, cash-flowing opportunities in all mining-friendly markets that will lessen the Company’s reliance on capital markets to fund exploration and acquisition.

“Globalization has created tremendous opportunity for juniors in recent years. Many of the world’s top mining companies have made enormous capital investments in politically stable environments abroad, and that outreach is opening doors for development stage companies like Grandview to expand their portfolios. To overlook these opportunities would be negligent, particularly now when so many juniors have opted out of the process entirely. We have impressive international mining experience in our Company and we’re leaning heavily on that experience as we consider new markets.” adds Michael Hitch.

Messrs Sarjeant and Hitch recently returned from South America and are completing due diligence on a producing gold property located on an entirely new gold belt in Northern Peru. “This belt has not seen any modern exploration or production techniques and we see an opportunity for a captive, in-house, cash-flowing facility that will lessen our reliance on capital markets and exposure to dilution. Cash generation is most definitely a focus moving forward and the time is right for the Company to pursue this aggressively,” adds Hitch.


For further information, contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit grandviewgold.com.

About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

Forward Looking Statements

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.13 14 exhibit99-13.htm EXHIBIT 99.13 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.13 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.13

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold’s Geological Team Prepares for Red Lake Program;
Exploration Focuses on Highly-Prospective Dixie Lake and Loisan Properties

June 1, 2009, - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to report that its 2009 Summer-Fall Canadian Exploration Program will focus primarily on two of the Company’s highly prospective Red Lake gold camp properties (the “Properties”), namely the Dixie Lake Project (“Dixie Lake”) and the Loisan Project (“Loisan”), and that the geological team led by Toby Hughes, P.Geo, Vice President Exploration, is prepared to mobilize to Dixie Lake as soon as ground conditions permit.

Exploration Summary – Dixie Lake

The 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake project is located in northwestern Ontario, just 22 km South of Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine, one of the richest, lowest cost production gold mines in the world – producing approximately 600,000 ounces annually with over 12 million ounces to date. The Company began work on the Dixie Lake Project in 2005, with significant results including the extension of two existing gold zones, 88-4 & 88-4 West, and discovery of a new gold zone, the NS Zone, that returned visible-gold rich high-grade assays ranging from 163.75 g/T Au over 0.47m, 22.90 g/T Au over 2.86m and 18.26 g/T Au over 2.2m.

“The story at Dixie consists of two parts, the 88-4 Zone, a sediment hosted quartz vein zone that has been the focus of previous drill programs and the new NS Zone which represents a volcanic hosted high grade vein/shear hosted gold environment more typically found elsewhere in the Red Lake district that is being mined successfully at projects like the Red Lake Mine,” says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant.

At Dixie Lake this season, planned exploration focuses on expanding the historic (non 43-101 compliant), 417,000 ton (0.126 opt) resource established by Teck Exploration Ltd (1989-90). Computer modeling and reinterpretation of historic and current data suggests that additional targets exist within, below and adjacent to 88-4, with the possibility of additional resources between it and the 88-4 West extension. 88-4 West has returned similar intercepts to that within the 88-4 zone. The Company anticipates that assays from target and infill drilling will help develop a new resource estimate for Dixie Lake.

Additional targets include follow-up drilling on the high grade NS-Zone gold intersections obtained from the previous two years of drilling. Work done this field season has the potential to develop another new gold zone, distinct from 88-4.

Geochemical results from MMI (geochemical) sampling east of these zones, over and around the contact of a large diorite body, suggest a significant gold/copper target flanking this intrusion. Several drill holes are planned for this, previously untested target.

Exploration Summary – Loisan

The 60 hectare Loisan project is located in Balmertown, Ontario contiguous to the south with Goldcorp’s/Premier Gold’s Rahill-Bonanza JV property currently being drilled with extraordinary results and within 3 km of the Red Lake Gold Mines complex (combined production +23 million oz Au). Geophysics and air photo lineaments suggest a strong structural intersection underlies the property.

Loisan is considered a highly prospective project, most particularly as indicated by surface geology and its strategic location in the Red Lake gold-bearing sequence. Loisan has received no modern exploration, though historic trenching is visible. Near term plans include first phase mapping and sampling of the property, and re-sampling of trenches. A drill program may follow in the fall of this year.


Exploration Summary – Sanshaw-Bonanza

A third project area, Sanshaw-Bonanza, is located approximately 5 km southwest of Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine, and is contiguous with the western boundary of the Goldcorp/Premier Rahill-Bonanza property, and 4 km southeast of the Bruce Channel discovery (Goldcorp’s recent $1.5 billion takeover from Gold Eagle). The Bonanza exploration program is planned for early winter 2010 with a focus on diamond drilling targets that may be the southwest extension of the Goldcorp/Premier CP-Zones (Follansbee Zones). Goldcorp and Premier have aggressive summer drill programs planned for Rahill-Bonanza over several target zones and the Company will be watching the Goldcorp/Premier results closely. See the map in Premier Gold Mines’ news release of May 26, 2009, and also the Red Lake regional map on our website, for details regarding the Bonanza and Whitehorse Island target areas.

About the Properties

Grandview has an option agreement with Fronteer Development Group and has earned a 64% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property. Grandview has not completed the work required to verify the historical estimate established by Teck and is not treating this historical estimate as being compliant with current standards under 43-101 and as such this historical estimate should not be relied upon. Grandview holds 100% interest in the 60 hectare Loisan property. Last year, Grandview completed exploration on the Bonanza project and has earned a 60% interest in the project.

About the Red Lake Gold District

The Red Lake Gold Mining District in northwestern Ontario is to Canada what the Witwatersrand District is to South Africa - the most prolific gold producing region in the entire country. Since the mid-1960's The Red Lake District has yielded over 30-million ounces of and is home to Goldcorp's Red Lake and Campbell Mines.

Despite Red Lake's long history, the most prolific discovery was made just a dozen years ago. Dickenson Mines Ltd. had been successfully operating the Arthur White Mine in the region since 1948 and was acquired by Goldcorp in 1989. After applying advanced science and contemporary perspective to the former Arthur White Mine site and surrounding area, and implementing an impressive exploration program, Goldcorp made one of the highest grade gold discoveries in the world, averaging 9.08 ounces of gold over 7.5 feet on nine drill holes.

The (now) high profile Red Lake district has attracted nearly 60 juniors over the past five years and district real estate has elevated to blue chip status. Grandview has considerable interests in the Red Lake District and on the Red Lake Gold Trend. These three projects, namely Sanshaw-Bonanza, Dixie Lake and Loisan, plus interests in Manitoba's emerging Rice Lake District fit perfectly into the Company's Canadian exploration strategy of applying advanced geology, geophysics and geochemistry to the Red Lake & Rice Lake greenstone belts.

About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

For further information, contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.14 15 exhibit99-14.htm EXHIBIT 99.14 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.14 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.14

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Inc. Signs Letter of Intent with Private Peruvian Group;
Agreement Subject to Completion of Due Diligence and Regulatory Approval

June 19, 2009, -Toronto, Ontario -Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to report that it has signed a Letter of Intent (the “Letter of Intent”) with a private Peruvian group to acquire an 80% interest in a 400 hectare property (the “Property”). The Letter of Intent contemplates the entering into of a definitive option agreement (the "Agreement") under which Grandview would earn its 80% by: (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Agreement; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of 2 million common shares of Grandview over a three year period. Grandview has a further option to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of Grandview prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Agreement. The Letter of Intent and the transactions contemplated thereby are conditional upon completion of satisfactory due diligence by Grandview and receipt of all required regulatory approval, including the approval of the TSX.

Grandview CEO & President, Mr. Paul Sarjeant, P.Geo, and Chairman, Dr. Michael Hitch, P.Geo, visited the Property recently and are currently reviewing due diligence materials. "The gold-producing Property is located in a relatively new area of production and exploration in Northern Peru. In spite of lack of access to modern mining techniques, small-scale mining of high-grade gold veins is currently taking place on the Property and in the surrounding area, and that production is ongoing" says Mr. Sarjeant.

Numerous high-grade gold-bearing structures have been identified on the Property and Grandview considers the opportunity as one with strong exploration upside and the potential for near-term, small-scale gold production. "We are committed to securing captive, cash-flowing opportunities that will lessen the Company’s reliance on the capital markets and exposure to dilution. This particular Property appears to satisfy our acquisitions model. The project is highly-prospective, yet small enough in scale that, a relatively small capital expenditure should be able to elevate it into low-cost production quickly and cost-effectively" adds Dr. Hitch.

Meanwhile, Grandview Vice-President Exploration, Toby Hughes, P.Geo is on the ground in the Red Lake Gold District of northwestern Ontario, preparing to begin the 2009 Canadian Exploration Program. The 2009 Red Lake program is funded and will proceed as outlined in the Company’s news release (http://www.grandviewgold.com/Media_Centre/Company_News/?nid=101) of June 1, 2009. Drilling is scheduled to commence Monday June 22 at the Dixie Lake property.

About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc. is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.


For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc.'s operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc.'s control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.15 16 exhibit99-15.htm EXHIBIT 99.15 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.15 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.15

 
NEWS RELEASE   TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release  OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Signs Memorandum of Understanding with
Peruvian Group to Acquire 100% of Producing Gold Property

July 15, 2009, - Toronto, Ontario -Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to report the signing of a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary Recuperación Realzada S.A.C., with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a 400 hectare property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Property”). The Option provides Grandview with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Property by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of Grandview over a three year period. The Option also allows Grandview to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of Grandview prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum. The Memorandum and the transactions contemplated therein and thereby are conditional upon receipt of all required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSX.

The Property is located in northwest Peru, near the town of Suyo, in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, in the Department of Piura. Year-round road access to the property is excellent from the nearby Pan-American Highway. Little modern exploration has taken place on the Property or in the surrounding area, though five zones of mineralization have been identified on the Property by the previous owners, three of which are currently being worked by local small-scale miners. During an initial due diligence exploratory trip in April, 2009, Grandview President and CEO Mr. Paul Sarjeant. P.Geo and Chairman Dr. Michael Hitch, P.Geo, noted additional, previously un-mapped vein structures on the Property, and believe that upside exploration potential of the Property is excellent.

“This signing is pivotal for the company in that it tangibly demonstrates to Grandview shareholders what we have been working toward these past many months – that is, our commitment to meaningful change for the company, and to the pursuit and acquisition of high-potential, cash-flowing or nearer-term projects that will lessen our dependence on capital markets, accelerate exploration programs, and increase capitalization,” says Paul Sarjeant.

Numerous NNW trending faults/veins are observed on the Property which control both high grade gold mineralization in veins and well disseminated gold targets. Mineralization is associated with highly altered (argillic and sillicic) vein/fault system hosted within volcanic flows and volcanoclastic units of basaltic to andesitic composition. Zone One can be traced for approximately 400m south-southeast on surface, and has at least three adits/shafts that host small-scale mining. Previous exploration work done in Zone One indicates that, at the primary outcropping the overall width reaches 4.5m, with individual continuous chip samples returning 25.6 g/T Au over 1.10m, 30.6 g/T Au over 1.5m, and 12.3 g/T Au over 1.6m from within the volcanic breccia unit, and 6.19 g/T Au over 2.6m from the hanging wall fractured volcanic unit. The southern extension of Zone One connects with Zone Four were previous work indicates gold mineralization is present at surface. Zones Two and Three lie 500 meters southeast of the previous mentions targets and again demonstrate both high grade gold vein and disseminated gold targets.

Zone Five is located 400 meters southwest of Zone One and hosts high grade gold vein/shear structures similar to other targets. These areas of mineralization provide significant exploration potential on the property. It should be noted that, while the Company did visit the Property to undertake preliminary due diligence, a qualified person has not yet done work to classify the historical samples as a current mineral resource.

In the coming months, the Company plans to capture small-scale gold production on the Peruvian Property and complete more comprehensive exploration. Meanwhile, exploration continues at the Company’s Dixie Lake Project in the Red Lake Gold District in northwestern Ontario, as per the Red Lake exploration program outlined in the news release dated June 1, 2009. News of the Canadian and Peruvian exploration programs will be released as it becomes available.


About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc. is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

For further information, contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.16 17 exhibit99-16.htm EXHIBIT 99.16 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.16 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.16

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release   OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Inc. Appoints Dr. Marcello Veiga and Dr. Bernard Klein to Advisory Board

July 23, 2009, - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to report that, it has appointed Metallurgists and Environmental Engineers Dr. Marcello Veiga, Ph.D., P.E., and Dr. Bern Klein, Ph.D., P.Eng., to the Company’s Board of Advisors.

Both Dr. Veiga and Dr. Klein have extensive experience working with and in developing mining communities abroad, and in early and mid-stage projects in North America. Grandview CEO and President Paul Sarjeant believes the appointments significant in that they add an important layer of metallurgical and environmental expertise to the Company’s exploration and development team, and further that, as the Company prepares to commence work on its newly optioned gold producing property in northern Peru (the “Property”), mineral production and processing experience is of paramount importance.

“These gentlemen are immensely qualified and, I believe, uniquely able to help us move this project forward quickly. Their sustainable development expertise, and their experience working with small-scale miners and mining companies to improve efficiencies to mutual benefit should prove invaluable to the Company," says Sarjeant. Grandview maintains strident Environmental and Social Governance policies at its North American mineral properties, and is committed to evolving these policies and developing the Property to mutual benefit.

Dr. Marcello Veiga, Ph.D., P.E., has worked for the past thirty one years, as a metallurgical engineer and environmental geochemist for mining and consulting companies in Brazil, Canada, US, Venezuela, Chile and Peru. He has worked extensively on environmental and social issues related to mining. As an Associate Professor of the Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering at the University of British Columbia, since 1997, his research and teaching topics include: sustainable development in mining, conflicts with communities, mine closure and reclamation, remedial procedures for metal pollution, in particular mercury pollution, bioaccumulation of metals, impacts of metals to health and the environment, acid rock drainage and mineral processing (process mineralogy). From 2002 to 2008, he worked as an expert and Chief Technical Advisor of the GEF/UNDP/UNIDO Global Mercury Project for UNIDO - United Nations Industrial Development Organization, in Vienna. This includes the implementation of Environmental and Health Assessment of mercury pollution in artisanal gold mining in Asia, Africa and South America. The project also included the implementation of procedures to reduce mercury emissions and local fabrication of pieces of equipment to reduce exposure of artisanal miners to mercury vapors and increase gold recovery. Believing that poverty is the main cause for the environmental problems of the planet, Dr. Veiga works actively in the education of artisanal gold miners worldwide, in partnership with the United Nations. In 2009, he was named one of the Top 25 Canadian Immigrants, by Canadian Immigrant magazine.

Dr. Bern Klein, Ph.D., P.Eng., is a Professional Engineer with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia. He has twenty years of experience in the mining industry. For ten of these years he worked in the area of process development and was involved with process development for over 300 mining projects. About 50% of these projects were aimed at process development for gold prospects which included gravity concentration, flotation, cyanide leaching and oxidative pre-treatment. Dr. Klein has served as a technical expert to United Nations Environmental Program to introduce alternative technologies to reduce the health and environmental impact of mercury use by small scale gold miners He is presently Department Head and an Associate Professor in the area of Mineral Processing Engineering at the Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia, and teaches courses in mineral processing, processing of precious metal ores. His areas of research include comminution, gravity concentration, cyanide leaching, mine-mill integration, acid rock drainage and effluent treatment. He is also Vice President Mineral Processing for BC Mining Research Ltd.


About the Property

Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Recuperación Realzada S.A.C., Grandview has an agreement with a Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option to acquire 100% interest in the 400 hectare producing gold Property. The Property is located in northwest Peru, near the town of Suyo, in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, in the Department of Piura. Year-round road access to the property is excellent from the nearby Pan-American Highway. Little modern exploration has taken place on the Property or in the surrounding area, though five zones of mineralization have been identified on the Property by the previous owners, three of which are currently being worked by local small-scale miners. For more information about the Property and for historic assays, see the Company news release of July 15, 2009.

About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.17 18 exhibit99-17.htm EXHIBIT 99.17 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.17 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.17

FORM 13-502F1

CLASS 1 REPORTING ISSUERS -- PARTICIPATION FEE

Reporting Issuer Name:                 Grandview Gold Inc.

End date of last completed fiscal year:       May 31, 2009

Market value of listed or quoted securities:    
Total number of securities of a class or series outstanding as at the issuer's last completed fiscal year   44,652,098 (i)
     
Simple average of the closing price of that class or series as of the last trading day of each month in the last completed fiscal year (See clauses 2.7(a)(ii)(A) and (B) of the Rule)   $0.12 (ii)
     
 Market value of class or series (i) X (ii) =           $5,358,252(A)
     
(Repeat the above calculation for each other class or series of securities of the reporting issuer that was listed or quoted on a marketplace in Canada or the United States of America at the end of the last completed fiscal year) (B)
     
     
Market value of other securities as at the end of the last completed fiscal year:    
 (See paragraph 2.7(b) of the Rule)    
 (Provide details of how value was determined)   (C)
     
(Repeat for each other class or series of securities to which paragraph 2.7(b) of the Rule applies) (D)
     
Capitalization for the last completed fiscal year    
 (Add market value of all classes and series of securities) (A) + (B) + (C) + (D)=   $5,358,252
     
Participation Fee    
 (From Appendix A of the Rule, select the participation fee    
 beside the capitalization calculated above)   $600 
     
Late Fee, if applicable    
 (As determined under section 2.5 of the Rule)    


EX-99.18 19 exhibit99-18.htm EXHIBIT 99.18 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.18 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.18

Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Financial Statements

May 31, 2009 and 2008

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the year end consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company's circumstances. Management also accepts responsibility for ensuring the use of appropriate accounting policies and estimates in disclosure of information prepared following accounting principle generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company's affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on "Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as at May 31, 2009.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at May 31, 2009.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
   
Toronto, Canada  
August 26, 2009  
   

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders of Grandview Gold Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) as at May 31, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, accumulated deficit, changes in shareholders’ equity, cash flows and mineral properties for each of the three years ended May 31, 2009 and for the period from the date of inception of the exploration stage on March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at May 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years ended May 31, 2009 and for the period from the date of inception of the exploration stage on March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2009 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

  "McCarney Greenwood LLP"
   
Toronto, Canada McCarney Greenwood LLP
August 3, 2009 Chartered Accountants
  Licensed Public Accountants

Comments by Auditors on United States of America-Canada Reporting Difference

In the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the consolidated financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated August 3, 2009 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such conditions and events in the auditor's report when these are adequately disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.

  "McCarney Greenwood LLP"
   
Toronto, Canada McCarney Greenwood LLP
August 3, 2009 Chartered Accountants
  Licensed Public Accountants
   

Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

As at May 31,   2009     2008  
Assets            
Current assets            
           Cash and cash equivalents $  106,593   $  84,856  
           Short term investments (Note 5)   407,493     1,011,410  
           GST and sundry receivable   5,707     40,664  
           Prepaid expenses   12,283     150,166  
           Due from a related party (Note 15(vi))   10,000     90,000  
             
    542,076     1,377,096  
             
Reclamation bond (Note 7)   14,332     13,090  
             
Mining interests (Note 8)   3,442,793     10,282,950  
             
  $  3,999,201   $  11,673,136  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  72,467   $  118,526  
Asset retirement obligation   14,332     13,090  
             
    86,799     131,616  
             
Shareholders' equity   3,912,402     11,541,520  
        $    
  $  3,999,201     11,673,136  

Nature of operations and going concern assumption (Note 1)
Subsequent event (Note 16)

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Approved by the Board of Directors:
"Paul T. Sarjeant", Director
"Richard Brown", Director

2


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration  
                                     stage  
    Year ended May 31,     (March 26  
    2009                2008     2007     2004 )
                         
Expenses                        
Share-based payments $  -   $  1,322,125   $  1,358,687   $  4,030,125  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   88,716     673,712     441,612     1,787,811  
Professional fees   167,672     322,033     317,768     1,223,644  
Management services (Note 15)   255,201     238,539     381,384     1,343,190  
Office and administration   21,579     196,503     173,741     669,138  
Exploration evaluation expenses   19,885     -     -     19,885  
Flow-through interest expense   2,747     44,688     141,366     188,801  
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     9,766     25,000  
Bad debt   -     -     -     1,235  
                         
                         
    555,800     2,797,600     2,824,324     9,288,829  
                         
                         
Loss before the under noted   (555,800 )   (2,797,600 )   (2,824,324 )   (9,288,829 )
Interest income   7,503     59,887     21,682     89,072  
Write-off of mineral properties   (7,460,454 )   (528,376 )   -     (7,988,830 )
Forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     35,667  
Failed merger costs   -     -     -     (170,000 )
                         
                         
Loss before income taxes   (8,008,751 )   (3,266,089 )   (2,802,642 )   (17,322,920 )
Future income tax recovery (Note 13)   (120,833 )   (260,255 )   (563,472 )   (1,675,990 )
                         
                         
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 ) $  (2,239,170 ) $  (15,646,930 )
                         
                         
Basic loss per share (Note 12) $  (0.20 ) $  (0.09 ) $  (0.11 )      
        $                
Diluted loss per share (Note 12) $  (0.20 )   (0.09 ) $  (0.11 )      

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

3


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration stage  
    Year ended May 31,     (March 26,  
                      2004 )
    2009     2008                    2007        
                         
Accumulated deficit                        
Balance at beginning of period $  (11,193,260 ) $  (8,187,426 ) $  (5,948,256 ) $  (3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (7,887,918 )   (3,005,834 )            (2,239,170 )   (15,646,930 )
                         
Balance at end of period $  (19,081,178 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (8,187,426 ) $  (19,081,178 )

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

4


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                Contributed     Accumulated        
    Share capital     Warrants     surplus     deficit     Total  
                               
At May 31, 2006 $  9,543,301   $  2,086,995   $  1,547,701   $  (5,948,256 ) $  7,229,741  
                               
                               
Private placement   3,022,499     -     -     -     3,022,499  
Warrant valuation   (624,025 )   624,025     -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   56,500     -     -     -     56,500  
Share-based payments   -     -     1,358,687     -     1,358,687  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (249,300 )   -     -     -     (249,300 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (165,800 )   165,800     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (563,472 )   -     -     -     (563,472 )
Fair value of warrants issued   -     184,750     -     -     184,750  
Warrants expired   -     (449,956 )   449,956     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (2,239,170 )   (2,239,170 )
                               
At May 31, 2007   11,019,703     2,611,614     3,356,344     (8,187,426 )   8,800,235  
                               
                               
Private placement   4,950,150     -     -     -     4,950,150  
Warrant valuation   (940,212 )   940,212     -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   45,800     -     -     -     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   66,544     -     -     -     66,544  
Fair value of warrants exercised   36,673     (36,673 )   -     -     -  
Share-based payments   -     -     1,433,600     -     1,433,600  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (488,720 )   -     -     -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (227,417 )   227,417     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (260,255 )   -     -     -     (260,255 )
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (3,005,834 )   (3,005,834 )
                               
At May 31, 2008 $  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $  (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  

See notes 9, 10 and 11 for share capital, warrants and contributed surplus from the date of inception of the exploration stage, March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2009.

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

5


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity – Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                Contributed     Accumulated        
    Share capital     Warrants     surplus     deficit                        Total  
                               
At May 31, 2008 $  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $  (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  
                               
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666           -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
                               
At May 31, 2009 $  14,430,400   $  1,203,804   $  7,359,376   $  (19,081,178 ) $  3,912,402  

See notes 9, 10 and 11 for share capital, warrants and contributed surplus from the date of inception of the exploration stage, March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2009.

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

6


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration stage  
    Year ended May 31,     (March 26,  
    2009     2008     2007                        2004 )
                         
Cash flows from operating activities                        
                         
Net loss for the period $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 ) $  (2,239,170 ) $  (15,646,930 )
Items not involving cash:                        
           Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     9,766     25,000  
           Forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
           Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
           Share-based payments   -     1,322,125     1,358,687     4,030,125  
           Future income tax recovery   (120,833 )   (260,255 )   (563,472 )   (1,675,990 )
           Accrued interest income   (7,493 )   (36,410 )   -     (43,903 )
           Write-off of mineral properties   7,460,454     528,376     -     7,988,830  
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                        
           GST and sundry receivable   34,957     181,267     (91,634 )   (5,217 )
           Prepaid expenses   137,883     8,526     (138,055 )   (12,283 )
           Due from a related party   80,000     -     -     80,000  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (46,059 )   (298,248 )   (4,728 )   78,637  
                         
Cash flows used in operating activities   (349,009 )   (1,560,453 )   (1,668,606 )   (5,216,163 )
                         
Cash flows from financing activities                        
Loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   416,666     5,016,694     3,022,499     18,052,210  
Cost of issuance   (47,833 )   (488,720 )   (249,300 )   (1,776,309 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
                         
Cash flows provided by financing activities   368,833     4,527,974     2,773,199     16,347,307  
                         
Cash flows from investing activities                        
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     (13,090 )   -     (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investment   611,410     (975,000 )   -     (363,590 )
Exploration advances   -     312,491     (40,514 )   -  
Expenditures on mining interests   (609,497 )   (3,506,343 )   (3,477,602 )   (10,557,871 )
Due from a related party   -     -     (90,000 )   (90,000 )
                         
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $  1,913   $  (4,181,942 ) $  (3,608,116 ) $  (11,024,551 )

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

7


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      CUMULATIVE  
                      FROM DATE OF  
                      INCEPTION OF  
                      THE  
                      EXPLORATION  
                      SAGE  
    YEAR ENDED MAY 31,     (MARCH 26,  
    2009     2008     2007     2004 )
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period $  21,737   $  (1,214,421 ) $  (2,503,523 ) $  106,593  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   84,856     1,299,277     3,802,800     -  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $  106,593   $  84,856   $  1,299,277   $  106,593  
                         
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions                        
Share issuance included in mining interest $  10,800   $  45,800   $  56,500   $  563,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  184,750   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  111,475   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  23,477   $  21,682   $  45,159  

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

8


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration stage  
   

Year ended May 31, 

    (March 26,  
    2009                            2008     2007     2004 )
                         
Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA (Note 8(a))                        
Balance, beginning of period $  5,679,340   $  4,386,457   $  1,881,582   $  -  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   90,775     989,754     2,304,714     4,684,830  
           Project administration and general   38,848     16,200     32,810     96,879  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   94,379     286,929     167,351     1,121,633  
           Write-off   (5,903,342 )   -     -     (5,903,342 )
           Total activity during the period   (5,679,340 )   1,292,883     2,504,875     -  
Balance, end of period $  -   $  5,679,340   $  4,386,457   $    
                         
Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Note 8(b))                    
                         
Balance, beginning of period $  3,275,971     1,531,160     1,074,803     -  
        $     $     $    
           Drilling, assays and related field work   166,146     1,655,011     375,907     2,929,887  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   676     89,800     80,450     512,906  
           Total activity during the period   166,822     1,744,811     456,357     3,442,793  
Balance, end of period $  3,442,793   $  3,275,971   $  1,531,160   $  3,442,793  
                         
Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada (Note 8(c))                        
Balance, beginning of period $  1,327,639   $  $668,597   $  459,381   $  -  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   218,436     659,042     130,512     1,163,762  
           Project administration and general   227     -     -     227  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   10,810     -     78,704     393,123  
           Write-off   (1,557,112 )   -     -     (1,557,112 )
           Total activity during the period   (1,327,639 )   659,042     209,216     -  
                         
Balance, end of period   -     1,327,639     668,597   $  -  

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

9


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties – Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      CUMULATIVE  
                      FROM DATE OF  
                      INCEPTION OF  
                      THE  
                      EXPLORATION  
                      STAGE  
    YEAR ENDED MAY 31,     (MARCH 26,  
    2009     2008     2007     2004 )
                         
Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada (Note 8(d))                        
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  548,404   $  -   $  -  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   -     -     415,904     415,904  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   -     (20,028 )   132,500     112,472  
           Write-off   -     (528,376 )   -     (528,376 )
                         
           Total activity during the period   -     (548,404 )   548,404     -  
                         
Balance, end of period $  -   $     $  548,404   $    
                -        
Total $  3,442,793   $  10,282,950   $  7,134,618   $  3,442,793  

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

10


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

1. Nature of operations and going concern
   
Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.
   
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.
   
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
   
The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company's requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.
   
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
   
The significant accounting policies for the Company are as follows:


  (a) Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada.

A summary of the differences between Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") which affect the Company is contained in Note 17.

  (b) Basis of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. ("Grandview USA"). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.

11


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)


  (c) Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination of the recoverability of mining interest costs, the asset retirement obligation, the valuation allowance relating to the future tax asset, the calculation of share-based payments expense and warrants. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

  (d) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and balances with banks with original maturities of three months or less and which are readily convertible into cash.

  (e) Mineral property costs

Direct exploration and development costs are deferred in the accounts, net of amounts recovered from third parties, including receipts from options. At production, these costs will be amortized using the units-oproduction method based on estimated reserves. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written-off when the decision to abandon is made, or earlier if a determination is made that the property does not have economically recoverable reserves.

The recorded book value of the Company's mineral properties in North America is not intended to reflect the present or future value of the gold projects.

The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its properties in North America. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. If after the review, it is determined that the carrying amount of a mining interest is impaired, that mining interest is written-down to its estimated net realizable value. A mining interest is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The amounts shown for mining properties do not necessarily represent present or future values. Their recoverability is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof.

  (f) Flow-through financing

The Company has financed a portion of its exploration activities through the issue of flow-through shares in the past, which transfer the tax deductibility of exploration expenditures to the investor. Proceeds received on the issue of such shares have been credited to share capital and the related exploration costs have been charged to mineral properties. Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration and development activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with income tax legislation. When these expenditures are renounced, temporary taxable differences created by the renunciations reduce share capital.

12


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)


  (g) Short term investments

Short term investments comprise investments in guaranteed investment certificate due to mature within one year from the date of purchase. These investments are classified as "held-for-trading" and have been recorded at fair value.

  (h) Asset retirement obligations

Section 3110 of the CICA Handbook requires the recognition of a liability for obligations relating to the retirement of property, plant and equipment and obligations arising from acquisition, construction, development or normal operations of those assets. The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") in the year in which a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

  (i) Income taxes

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method of tax accounting. Under this method, current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable for the current period. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and on unclaimed losses carried forward and are measured using the substantially enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse or losses are expected to be utilized. Future tax assets are recorded to recognize tax benefits only to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not they will be realized.

  (j) Share-based payments

The fair value of the stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management's assumptions as disclosed in Note 11 and is recorded as share-based payments over the vesting period of the stock-options, with the offsetting credit recorded as an increase in contributed surplus. If the stock options are exercised, the proceeds are credited to share capital and the fair value at the date of grant is reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital.

  (k) Revenue recognition

Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis.

  (l) Share issue costs and reorganization costs

Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital. Reorganization costs are charged to deficit.

13


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)


  (m) Translation of foreign currencies

Foreign currency accounts are translated into Canadian dollars as follows:

At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue or expense is translated into Canadian dollars by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the year end date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars by using the exchange rate in effect at that date and the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations in the current period.

  (n) Accounting Changes

CICA Handbook Section 1506, "Accounting Changes". This section prescribes the criteria for changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and correction of errors. The Company has adopted these new standards effective June 1, 2007. The impact that the adoption of Section 1506 will have on the Company's results of operations and financial condition will depend on the nature of future accounting changes.

  (o) Financial instruments - recognition and measurement

All financial instruments are classified into one of the following five categories: held-for-trading, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, available-for-sale financial assets or other financial liabilities. All financial instruments, including derivatives, are measured in the balance sheet at fair value except for loans and receivables, held to maturity investments and other financial liabilities which are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Subsequent measurement and changes in fair value will depend on their initial classification, as follows: held-for-trading financial assets are measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of operations in the period in which they arise; available-for-sale financial instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income until the investment is de-recognized or becomes impaired at which time the amounts would be recorded in the statement of operations. The Company has made the following classifications:

  Cash and cash equivalents Held-for-trading
  Short term investments Held-for-trading
  GST and sundry receivable Loans and receivable
  Due from a related party Loans and receivable
  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Other financial liabilities

Transaction costs are expensed as incurred for financial instruments classified as held for trading and transaction costs, other than impairment losses, are included in other comprehensive income until the asset is removed from the balance sheet for financial instruments classified as available-for-sale. For other financial instruments, transaction costs are expensed on initial recognition. The Company accounts for regular purchases and sales of financial assets using trade date accounting.

14


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)


  (p) Accounting policy choice for transaction costs

On June 1, 2007, the Emerging Issues Committee ("EIC") of the CICA issued Abstract No. 166, "Accounting Policy Choice for Transaction Costs" ("EIC-166"). This EIC addresses the accounting policy choice of expensing or adding transaction costs related to the acquisition of financial assets and financial liabilities that are classified as other than held-for-trading. Specifically, it requires that the same accounting policy choice be applied to all similar financial instruments classified as other than held-for-trading, but permits a different policy choice for financial instruments that are not similar. The Company has adopted EIC-166 effective November 30, 2007 and requires retroactive application to all transaction costs accounted for in accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement. The Company has evaluated the impact of EIC-166 and determined that no adjustments are currently required.

  (q) Capital disclosures and financial instruments – disclosures and presentation

On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: "Capital Disclosures" (Handbook Section 1535), "Financial Instruments – Disclosures" (Handbook Section 3862), and "Financial Instruments – Presentation" (Handbook Section 3863). These new standards became effective for the Company on June 1, 2008.

Capital Disclosures

Handbook Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity's objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook section in Note 3 to these consolidated financial statements.

Financial Instruments

Handbook Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, "Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation", revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook sections in Note 4 to these consolidated financial statements.

  (r) Section 1400, "General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation"

This section specifies requirements to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's disclosure reflects such assessment.

  (s) Credit risk and the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities

In January 2009, the CICA approved EIC-173, "Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which applies to interim and annual financial statements for periods ending on or after January 20, 2009. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements has had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

15


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)


  (t) Mining exploration costs

On March 27, 2009, the CICA approved an abstract EIC-174, "Mining Exploration Costs", which provides guidance on capitalization of exploration costs related to mining properties in particular, and on impairment of long-lived assets in general. The Company has applied this new abstract for the year ended May 31, 2009 and there was no significant impact on its consolidated financial statements as a result of applying this abstract.

  (u) Future accounting changes

International Financial Reporting Standards ["IFRS"]

In January 2006, the CICA's Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" and 3450 "Research and Development Costs". This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new accounting standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS IAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

3. Capital management

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company's objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

16


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

3. Capital Management (Continued)

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so.

Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

  (i) minimizing discretionary disbursements;
     
  (ii) reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and
     
  (iii) exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year ended May 31, 2009. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

4. Risk factors

The Company's significant mineral property is Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (called the "Property").

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon the Property. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Property would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty's inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and cash equivalents and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of May 31, 2009. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

17


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

4. Risk factors (Continued)

Liquidity risk

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at May 31, 2009, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents and short term investments balance of $514,086 (May 31, 2008 - $1,096,266) to settle current liabilities of $72,467 (May 31, 2008 - $118,526). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

Market risk

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

(a) Interest rate risk

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

(b) Foreign currency risk

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

(c) Price risk

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

Sensitivity analysis

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and cash equivalents and short term investments as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

As of May 31, 2009, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

18


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

4. Risk factors (Continued)

Sensitivity analysis (Continued)

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a twelve month period:

  (i)

Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at May 31, 2009, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the twelve months ended May 31, 2009 would have been approximately $4,000 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at May 31, 2009, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $4,000 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.

   

 

  (ii)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

   

 

  (iii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company's future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company's value. As of May 31, 2009, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.


5. Short term investments

As of May 31, 2009, the Company has $400,000 (2008 - $975,000; 2007 - $nil) invested in a cashable guaranteed investment certificate maturing at various dates to April 8, 2010, bearing interest at variable rate. As at May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 the Company had accrued $7,493, $36,410 and $nil respectively as interest receivable on its short term investments.

6. Marketable securities

Marketable securities consist of:

  Navitrak International Corporation  
     
  Common shares (at cost) $ 325,305
  Less cumulative adjustment to marketable securities (Note 17) (325,305)
     
  Carrying value $ -

As at May 31, 2007, the Company owned 488,300 common shares of Navitrak International Corporation ("Navitrak"). Navitrak's common shares are no longer traded on TSX Venture Exchange, therefore, management decided to write-down the carrying value of this investment to $nil.

19


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

7. Reclamation bond

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

8. Mining interests


  (a) Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

On July 27, 2004, the Company entered into an option agreement with Mill City Gold Corp. (formerly Mill City International Corporation) ("Mill City") to earn a 60% interest in the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome Property (the "Pony Creek") in the State of Nevada, USA. In order to earn this option the Company must do the following:

  (i)

after 10 business days of signing the agreement issue 400,000 common shares to Mill City, which were valued at $4,000 (issued);

   

 

  (ii)

spend or cause to be spent $500,000 US on the properties by July 31, 2005 (completed);

   

 

  (iii)

spend or cause to be spent $1,000,000 US on the properties by July 31, 2006 (completed);Mining interests (Continued)

   

 

  (iv)

during this 2 year period the Company and Mill City will look for a joint venture partner who is a major mining and exploration company ("major"). This major would provide assistance with deep hole structural modelling as well as geological database development. In return for the assistance the major will be offered a 1st right of refusal option to earn a 60% interest in the properties by completing a bankable feasibility study;

   

 

  (v)

Mill City will enter into a Professional Geological Services Contract with the Company specifically mandated to ensure all communications with the major are maximized. The Company will pay Mill City $7,250 US per month for the first year and $8,250 US per month for the second year for the various services outlined in the contract;

   

 

  (vi)

if the Company is able to complete sections (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv), Mill City can elect to convert its 40% interest to a 20% carried interest. If Mill City does not convert to a carried interest, it is responsible for 40% of the costs associated with the project. There is a 4% Net Smelter Return ("NSR") payable to an individual who owned the property and it will be reduced to 2% as the Company has the option to purchase another 1% from each property prior to the commencement of commercial production for $1,500,000 US each, for a total of $3,000,000 US;

   

 

  (vii)

if the Company cannot satisfy the conditions of finding a major it can still earn the 60% interest by spending an additional $2,000,000 US by August 31, 2007 and continue the Professional Geological Services Contract for a further year. The NSR will not be reduced from 4% to 2% but the Company may purchase 1% from each property prior to commencement of commercial production for $1,000,000 US each for a total of $2,000,000 US. As of January 21, 2005, the Company and Mill City have amended the option agreement of July 27, 2004. The Company and Mill City have agreed to revise the Agreement by removing the Company's obligation to enter into a Professional Geological Services Contract with Mill City and add that the Company will be responsible for all future underlying advance royalty payments. The terms of the Agreement, as amended, was contained in a standard form Option Agreement dated April 14, 2005 (the "Option Agreement").

20


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

8. Mining interests (Continued)

On June 20, 2007, the Company announced that it had fulfilled the terms of its option agreement with Mill City relating to the Company's right to earn an undivided 60% interest in Pony Creek.

Under the terms of the option agreement with Mill City, dated April 14, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 60% interest in Pony Creek by spending US$3,500,000 over three years. The Company presented a detailed accounting of its US$3,500,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward.

Mill City accepted in writing on June 20, 2007, the Company's earn-in and further, Mill City has informed the Company that, as per the terms of the Option Agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 40% participating interest to a 20% carried interest, up to and including the date on which the Bankable Feasibility Study is completed by the Company. At that time Mill City shall convert its 20% carried interest to a 20% participating interest. The acceptance by Mill City of the terms of the Company's earn-in, immediately converts the Company's 60% interest to an 80% interest in Pony Creek.

The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation on its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project, representing the estimated costs of the Company's obligation to restore the property site to its original condition as required by regulatory authorities. The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation in the amount of $14,332, equal to the amount of reclamation bond posted by the Company with the United States, Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management.

The Company determined that the carrying value of its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project in Nevada, USA could not be supported, resulting in an impairment charge of $5,903,342.

  (b) Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada


  (i)

The Company owns a 100% interest in 8 mining claims located in the Red Lake Area, District of Kenora, in Northwestern Ontario. The mining claims were written off several years ago when the Company decided to change its business. Since the Company has changed back to resource exploration the Company is once again capitalizing the expenditures related to these claims.

   

 

  (ii)

On October 18, 2005, the Company signed a definitive Option Agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. ("Fronteer") for Fronteer's Dixie Lake Property (the "Dixie lake") located in Ontario's Red Lake Gold District on the following terms and conditions:


  (a)

the Company shall earn a 51% interest in the Dixie Lake Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $300,000 (completed), assuming payments totaling $75,000 to the underlying property vendor; and

   

 

  (b)

issuing 160,000 shares of the Company at $1.25 per share for a total value of $200,000, to a third party as a finder's fee (issued).

On October 17, 2007, the Company announced that it has fulfilled the terms of its option agreement with Fronteer relating to the Company's right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie lake.

Under the terms of the option agreement with Fronteer, dated August 26, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie lake by spending US$300,000 over three years, making $75,000 in cash payments and issuing 40,000 shares to the underlying vendor. The Company presented a detailed accounting of its US$1,711,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward.

21


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

8. Mining interests (Continued)


  (b) Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Continued)

Fronteer accepted in writing, the Company's earn-in and further, Fronteer has informed the Company that, as per the terms of the Option Agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 49% participating interest to a 36% participating interest in Dixie lake.

  (iii)

On February 8, 2007, the Company announced it had signed a formal option agreement with EMCO SA, ("EMCO") relating to the acquisition of an option to acquire a 60 percent interest in the 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims in Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property on the following terms and conditions:


  (a)

the Company has an option to earn an undivided 60 percent interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property by incurring $250,000 in resource exploration and development expenditures on or before August 31, 2007; and

   

 

  (b)

issuing 115,000 of the Company's common shares (55,000 common shares were issued in February 2007 and valued at $22,000; 30,000 common shares were issued in April 2008 and valued at $10,800; 30,000 commons shares were issued in July 2008 and valued at $10,800) in tranches over an 18-month period and 200,000 warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $1.40 per share which will expire 36 months from the date of issuance.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 200,000 common share purchase warrants issued for the 60 percent interest in the 10 claim Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property has been estimated to be $32,200 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.96%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 101% and an expected life of 36 months.

   

 

 

Terms of the agreement provide for the dilution of EMCO's interest in the property to 10% on the occurrence of certain events, which would then convert their interest to a 3% NSR. An underlying 1.5% NSR remains with the original property owner.

On June 18, 2007, the Company amended the option agreement with EMCO relating to the Sanshaw-Bonanza property. The Company has agreed to increase the expenditures required to be incurred on or before August 31, 2008 to $500,000 and to issue to EMCO 100,000 common shares in the capital of the Company as consideration for the amended agreement (issued and valued at $35,000).

On September 11, 2008, the Company reported that it has incurred the expenditures required to successfully fulfill the terms of its option agreement with EMCO Corporation SA ("EMCO") to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property.

  (c) Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada


  (i)

The Company currently holds 100% interest in 5 mining claims in close proximity to the Bissett Gold Mine (San Antonio Mine) located on the Rice Lake greenstone belt, in southeastern Manitoba.

   

 

  (ii)

On September 30, 2005, the Company and Marum Resources Inc. ("Marum") entered into an option agreement to jointly explore Marum's 100% owned Gem gold property representing 7 mining claims at the eastern end of Manitoba's Rice Lake Greenstone Belt.

22


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

8. Mining interests (Continued)


  (c) Red Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada (Continued)


  (ii)

(Continued) The Company can earn a 50% undivided interest in the Gem property by performing $250,000 in exploration work on the Property, at a cumulative rate of $125,000 by September 30, 2006 and $250,000 by September 30, 2007, such work to include a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey with a maximum 50-metre line spacing (completed). The Company will be the operator of the property until such time as its option to earn the 50% interest is exercised.

In December 2006, Marum and Grandview agreed to amend their option agreement dated September 30, 2005, whereby Grandview shall earn a 50% interest in the property by spending $250,000 in exploration work before September 30, 2007. Marum and Grandview have agreed to extend the earn-in period to December 31, 2007.

  (iii)

On February 23, 2007, the Company purchased, from McKeena Gold Inc. ("McKeena"), a 100% interest in the Angelina and the Banksian gold properties (Manitoba). The Angelina gold property consists of 4 unpatented mining claims and the Banksian gold property consists of 14 claims. In order to acquire these properties the Company must do the following:


  (a)

Issuance of 100,000 common share warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $0.70, initially expiring February 28, 2008, extended to February 28, 2009.

   

 

  (b)

Issuance of 250,000 common share warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $0.70, initially expiring February 28, 2008, extended to February 28, 2009.

The fair value of the 350,000 common share purchase warrants issued for the Angelina and Banksian gold properties has been estimated to be $74,550 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.02%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 102% and an expected life of 12 months.

  (iv) Grandview has a 100% interest in 16 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba (the "GVG Property"). The Company staked these claims in 2005 and 2006.

The Company determined that the carrying value of its Rice Lake Gold Camp in Manitoba, Canada could not be supported, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,557,112.

  (d) Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada

On November 23, 2006, the Company signed a formal option agreement with Harvest Gold Corp ("Harvest Gold") relating to the acquisition of a 70 percent interest in the Rocky Ridge gold property in Manitoba on the following terms and conditions:

  (i) the Company had an option to earn an undivided 70 percent interest in the Rocky Ridge property by paying an amount of $85,000 and incurring $600,000 in resource exploration; and

23


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

8. Mining interests (Continued)


  (d) Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada (Continued)


  (ii)

issuing 225,000 shares of the Company, over a two-year period. On signing, the Company was required to make a payment of $20,000 (accrued) and issue 50,000 (valued at $34,500) shares (issued) to Harvest Gold (Note 9(b)). At the end of year one, the Company is required to incur $250,000 in exploration expenditures, make a payment of $30,000, and issue 75,000 shares to Harvest Gold. At the end of year two, the Company is required to make a further $350,000 in exploration expenditures, make a final $35,000 payment, and issue the outstanding 100,000 common shares.

   

 

 

Harvest Gold has an option to buy-out up to two percent of a three percent underlying NSR assigned to the original property owner, at a cost of $250,000 per each one percent, for a potential total of $500,000. The one to two percent NSR buy-out would occur on a pro-rata basis, with the Company acquiring 70 percent and Harvest Gold acquiring 30 percent.

   

 

 

A finders fee of 250,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable at $1.00 for a period of two years was issued in connection with the transaction. The value assigned to these warrants was $78,000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 101%; risk-free interest rate - 3.85% and an expected life of 2 years.

   

 

 

During the prior year, the Company decided not to pursue the exploration of this project and to write off all accumulated deferred exploration costs.


9. Share capital


  (a) Authorized

Unlimited number of common shares

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non-participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

24


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9. Share capital (Continue)


  (b) Issued


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
  Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
  Private placement   120,000     120,000  
  Private placement   150,000     150,000  
  Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
  Private placement   175,000     175,000  
  Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
  Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
  Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
  Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
  Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
  Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
  Private placement   590,320     737,900  
  Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
  Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
  Private placement   400,000     500,000  
  Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
  Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
  Private placement (i)   2,399,998     1,559,999  
  Warrant placement (ii)         (284,400 )
  Mineral property acquisition (Note 8(d)(ii))   50,000     34,500  
  Mineral property acquisition (Note 8(b)(iii))   55,000     22,000  
  Private placement (ii)   3,250,000     1,462,500  
  Warrant valuation (ii)   -     (339,625 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out (i)(ii)   -     (249,300 )
  Cost of issue – finder options valuation (i)(ii)   -     (165,800 )
  Flow-through cost of issue (iii)   -     (563,472 )

25


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9. Share capital (Continue)


  (b) Issued (Continued)


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
  Private placement (iv)(v)(vi)   11,169,000     4,950,150  
  Warrant valuation (iv)(v)   -     (940,212 )
  Mineral property acquisition (Note 8(b)(iii))   130,000     45,800  
  Exercise Warrants (Note 10(i))   147,875     66,544  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation (Note 9(b)(iv), (v) and Note 10(i))   -     (227,417 )
  Flow-through cost of issue (vii)   -     (260,255 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
  Mineral property acquisition (Note 8(b)(iii))   30,000     10,800  
  Private Placement (viii)   8,333,333     416,666  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (120,833 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  14,430,400  


  (i)

On December 28, 2006, the Company raised gross proceeds of $1,559,999 by way of a non-brokered private placement. The private placement consisted of 2,399,998 "flow-through" units at a price of $0.65 per unit. Each unit consisted of one flow-through common share of the Company and one-half of one non flow-through common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $1.40 for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 1,199,999 common share purchase warrants granted during the period has been estimated to be $284,400 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.89%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 102% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

 

In connection with the offering the Company was required to pay out of their working capital a cash finder's fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the private placement and they were also required to issue finder's options to acquire non-flow-through units of the Company at a price of $0.65 per unit for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 240,000 common share purchase warrants granted during the period has been estimated to be $85,200 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.89%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 102% and an expected life of 24 months.

26


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9. Share capital (Continued)


  (b) Issued (Continued)


  (ii)

On March 16, 2007, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement for gross proceeds of $1,462,500. The private placement consists up to 3,250,000 units (the "Units") at a price of $0.45 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.65 for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 1,625,000 common share purchase warrants granted during the period has been estimated to be $339,625 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.87%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 103% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

 

In connection with the offering the Company has agreed to pay a cash finder's fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the private placement and also to issue finder's options to acquire Units of the Company at a price of $0.45 per Unit for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 325,000 common share purchase warrants granted during the period has been estimated to be $80,600 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.87%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 103% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

  (iii)

The flow-through renunciation from the private placements listed in Note 9(b)(i) creates a future income tax liability of approximately $563,472 which was allocated as a cost of issuing the flow-through shares after December 31, 2006.

   

 

  (iv)

On July 6, 2007, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Bolder Investment Partners, Ltd. (the "Agent") . The brokered placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,589,000 units in the capital of the Company (the "Units") at a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit for gross proceeds of $3,435,600. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company at a price of $0.65 for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 4,294,500 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $704,298 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.72%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 97% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

 

In connection with the brokered placement, the Company paid a cash fee to the Agent of 8% of the gross proceeds raised for total of $274,848 and also issued broker warrants to acquire 8% of the total number of Units issued at a price of $0.40 per Unit for a period of 24 months from closing. In addition, the Company also paid a cash work fee of $7,500 for certain services of the Agent.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 687,120 broker warrants has been estimated to be $145,670 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.72%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 97% and an expected life of 24 months.

27


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9. Share capital (Continued)


  (b) Issued (Continued)


  (iv)

(Continued) The Company also closed a non-brokered placement on the same terms as the brokered placement for an additional 125,000 Units and further proceeds of $50,000.

   

 

 

Other costs associated to the private placements amounted to $103,497.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 62,500 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $10,250 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.72%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 97% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

  (v)

On December 21, 2007, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the "Brokered Placement") with Bolder Investment Partners, Ltd. (the "Agent"). The Brokered Placement resulted in the issuance of 1,312,000 units in the capital of the Company (the "Units) at a purchase price of $0.55 per Unit for gross proceeds of $721,600 and 605,000 flow-through shares at a purchase price of $0.65 per share for gross proceeds of $393,250. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company at a price of $0.70 for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 656,000 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $225,664 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.85%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 133.41% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

 

In connection with the Brokered Placement, Grandview paid a cash fee to the Agent of 8% of the gross proceeds raised for a total of $89,188 and also issued broker warrants to acquire 8% of the total number of Units issued under the Brokered Placement at a price of $0.60 per Unit for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

 

 

The fair value of the 153,360 broker warrants has been estimated to be $55,056 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.85%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 133.41% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

 

 

Other costs associated to the private placements amounted to $12,466.

   

 

  (vi)

On December 28, 2007, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the "Non-Brokered Placement"). The Non-Brokered Placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 538,000 flow-through shares (the "Flow-Through Shares") at a purchase price of $0.65 per Flow- Through Share for gross proceeds of $349,700 under the Non-Brokered Placement.

   

 

  (vii)

During the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,143,000 flow-through common shares for total proceeds of $742,950. Exploration expenditures of $742,950 were renounced effective December 31, 2007. The renunciation created a future income tax recovery of approximately $260,255, which was allocated as a cost of issuing the flow-through shares.

28


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

9. Share capital (Continued)


  (b) Issued (Continued)


  (viii) On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the "Offering") with Sandfire Securities Inc. The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares (the "Common Shares") to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666. The securities issued pursuant to Offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance.
     
  In connection with the Offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised ($33,333) under the Offering and also issued broker warrants to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months after closing. The fair value of each warrant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 156.7%; risk-free interest rate of 1.52% and an expected average life of 2 years. The value assigned was $30,666.
     
  Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through share agreements, the tax attributes of the related expenditures are renounced to subscribers. As a result, the Company is required to recognize a foregone tax benefit of $120,833 at the time of renouncement.


10. Warrants


      Number of     Weighted Average  
      Warrants     Exercise Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Issued   602,500     1.44  
  Expired/cancelled   -     -  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
  Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
  Expired/cancelled   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
  Issued (Note 8(b)(iii), Note 8(c)(iii), Note 8(d), Note 9(b)(i)(ii))   4,189,999     0.91  
  Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583     1.18  
  Issued (Note 9(b)(iv)(v))   5,853,480     0.62  
  Issued (i)   73,937     0.65  
  Exercised (i)   (147,875 )   0.45  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
  Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
  Issued (Note 9(b)(viii))   666,666     0.05  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  

29


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

10. Warrants (Continued)


  (i)

147,875 warrants at a price of $0.45 expiring March 16, 2009 were exercised. These warrants had a step-up feature resulting in the creation of 73,937 new warrants with an exercise price of $0.65 expiring on March 16, 2009. The fair value of the 73,937 warrants has been estimated to be $26,691 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.16%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 138.81% and an expected life of 1.5 years.

The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2009:

NUMBER OF   FAIR     EXERCISE     EXPIRY  
WARRANTS   VALUE     PRICE     DATE  
                   
4,357,000 $  714,548   $  0.65     July 6, 2009  
687,120   145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
656,000   225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
153,360   55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
200,000   32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
666,666   30,666     0.05     December 4, 2010  
                   
6,720,146 $  1,203,804              

The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2008:

    FAIR     EXERCISE        
NUMBER OF WARRANTS   VALUE     PRICE ($)     EXPIRY  
                   
250,000 $  78,000     1.00     November 29, 2008  
1,199,999   284,400     1.40     December 22, 2008  
240,000   85,200     0.65     December 22, 2008  
350,000   74,550     0.70     February 28, 2009  
1,698,937   366,316     0.65     March 16, 2009  
177,125   43,927     0.45     March 16, 2009  
1,992,987   1,335,301     1.75     March 27, 2009  
398,597   301,738     1.10     March 27, 2009  
4,357,000   714,548     0.65     July 6, 2009  
687,120   145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
656,000   225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
153,360   55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
200,000   32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
12,361,125 $  3,742,570              

30


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

10. Warrants (Continued)

The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2007:

  FAIR EXERCISE  
NUMBER OF WARRANTS VALUE PRICE ($) EXPIRY
       
350,000 $ 74,550 0.70 February 28, 2008
250,000 78,000 1.00 November 29, 2008
1,199,999 284,400 1.40 December 22, 2008
1,992,987 1,335,301 1.75 March 27, 2009
398,597 301,738 1.10 March 27, 2009
1,625,000 339,625 0.65 March 16, 2009
200,000 32,200 1.40 February 8, 2010
240,000 85,200 0.65 December 22, 2008
325,000 80,600 0.45 March 16, 2009
6,581,583 $ 2,611,614    


11. Stock options

The Company maintains an employee stock option plan under which the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed for such purpose, may from time to time grant to employees, officers, directors or consultants of the Company, options to acquire common shares in such numbers, for such terms and at such exercise prices, as may be determined by the Board of Directors or such committee.

The stock option plan provides that the maximum number of common shares in the capital of the Company that may be reserved for issuance for all purposes under the stock option plan shall be equal to 10% of the total issued and outstanding common shares and that the maximum number of common shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one optionee pursuant to share options may not exceed 5% of the common shares outstanding at the time of grant.

The options are valid for a maximum of 5 years from the date of issue and the normal vesting term is 1/4 immediately and 1/4 after 3, 6 and 9 month period from the date of grant.

31


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

11. Stock options (Continued)

The following is continuity of stock options for the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

      Number     Weighted Average  
      of     Exercise  
      Stock Options     price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
  Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
  Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
  Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
  Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
  Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
  Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
  Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
  Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
  Granted (i)(ii)   2,700,000     0.63  
  Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
  Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
  Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
  Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
  Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  


  (i) On September 28, 2007, the Company granted an aggregate of 2,000,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.68 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $1,274,000. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.20%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 161.6% and an expected life of 5 years. The fair value was allocated as follows: directors and management share-based payments - $1,162,525, consulting fees capitalized to mining interests - $111,475.
     
  (ii) On April 15, 2008, the Company granted an aggregate of 700,000 options to a consultant of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 for a period of two years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $159,600, which was expensed during the year. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.65%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 146.3% and an expected life of 2 years.

32


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

11. Stock options (Continued)

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2009:

    Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
          Weighted                    
          average     Weighted              
          remaining     average           Weighted  
    Number     contractual     exercise     Number     average  
           Expiry Date   of Options     life     price     of options     exercise price  
October 1, 2009   600,000     0.34 years   $  1.00     600,000   $  1.00  
December 20, 2009   75,000     0.56     1.10     75,000     1.10  
April 15, 2010   700,000     0.87     0.50     700,000     0.50  
January 6, 2011   150,000     1.60     1.25     150,000     1.25  
April 3, 2011   550,000     1.84     1.80     550,000     1.80  
October 31, 2011   500,000     2.42     1.00     500,000     1.00  
September 27, 2012   1,825,000     3.33     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
                               
    4,400,000     2.13 years   $  0.90     4,400,000   $  0.90  

The stock options have been expensed as follows:

       Number     Cumulative     Expensed     Remainder     Total  
    of     expensed at     at     to be     share-based  
    stock options     May 31, 2008     May 31, 2009     expensed     payment  
(1)   675,000   $  800,100   $  -   $  -   $  800,100  
(1)   75,000     62,850     -     -     62,850  
(1)   150,000     97,050     -     -     97,050  
(1)   200,000     137,100     -     -     137,100  
(1)   150,000     117,150     -     -     117,150  
(1)   600,000     723,000     -     -     723,000  
(2)   500,000     255,500     -     -     255,500  
(2)   150,000     60,750     -     -     60,750  
(2)   500,000     365,000     -     -     365,000  
(2)   100,000     89,500     -     -     89,500  
(3)   2,000,000     1,162,525     -     -     1,162,525  
(3)   700,000     159,600     -     -     159,600  
                               
    5,800,000   $  4,030,125   $  -   $  -   $  4,030,125  

(1) The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 103.23% to 167.25%; risk-free interest rates - 3.44% to 4.15% and an expected average life of 2 to 5 years.

(2) The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 92.11% to 131.00%; risk-free interest rates - 3.95% to 4.26% and an expected average life of 1 to 5 years.

33


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

(3) The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 146.3% to 161.6%; risk-free interest rates - 2.65% to 4.20% and an expected average life of 2 to 5 years.

11. Stock options (Continued)

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2008:

    Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
          Weighted                    
          average     Weighted              
          remaining     average           Weighted  
    Number     contractual     exercise     Number     average  
Expiry Date   of Options     life     price     of options     exercise price  
                               
October 1, 2009   600,000     1.33 years   $  1.10     600,000   $  1.10  
December 20, 2009   75,000     1.55     1.00     75,000     1.00  
April 15, 2010   700,000     1.87     0.50     700,000     0.50  
January 6, 2011   150,000     2.60     1.80     150,000     1.80  
April 3, 2011   550,000     2.84     1.00     550,000     1.00  
October 31, 2011   500,000     3.42     1.00     500,000     1.00  
September 27, 2012   2,000,000     4.33     0.45     2,000,000     0.45  
                               
    4,575,000     3.18 years   $  0.89     4,575,000   $  0.89  

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2007:

    Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
          Weighted                    
          average     Weighted              
          remaining     average           Weighted  
     Number     contractual     exercise     Number     average  
Expiry Date   of Options     life     price     of options     exercise price  
                               
July 11, 2007   150,000     0.11 years   $  1.10     150,000   $  1.10  
January 6, 2008   200,000     0.60     1.25     200,000     1.25  
January 11, 2008   500,000     0.61     1.10     500,000     1.10  
October 1, 2009   675,000     2.33     1.00     675,000     1.00  
December 20, 2009   75,000     2.55     1.10     75,000     1.10  
January 6, 2011   150,000     3.60     1.25     150,000     1.25  
April 3, 2011   600,000     3.84     1.80     600,000     1.80  
October 31, 2011   500,000     4.42     1.00     500,000     1.00  
                               
    2,850,000     2.55 years   $  1.22     2,850,000   $  1.22  

34


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

12. Basic and diluted loss per share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.

      2009     2008     2007  
  Numerator for basic loss per share $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 ) $  (2,239,170 )
  Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 ) $  (2,239,170 )
  Denominator:                  
  Weighted average number of common shares - basic   40,379,322     33,985,825     20,848,165  
  Weighted average number of common shares - diluted   40,379,322     33,985,825     20,848,165  
  Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.20 ) $  (0.09 ) $  (0.11 )

Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

13. Income taxes

Future income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary timing differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts for income tax purposes.

The future tax assets are as follows:

      2009     2008     2007  
  Future tax assets                  
             Exploration expenditures $  1,842,983   $  199,715   $  171,245  
             Marketable securities   47,169     47,169     58,750  
             Capital losses   24,273     48,299     60,158  
             Non-capital losses   1,612,960     1,620,056     1,387,655  
             Cost of issue   175,303     266,499     282,812  
                     
                     
  Total future tax assets   3,702,688     2,181,738     1,960,620  
  Valuation allowance for future tax assets   (3,702,688 )   (2,181,738 )   (1,960,620 )
                     
  Net Future tax assets $ -   $ -   $ -  

35


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

13. Income taxes (Continued)

The Company has provided a valuation allowance equal to the future tax assets because it is not presently more likely than not that they will be realized. The Company's income tax (recovery) for each of the years ended is made up as follows:

      2009     2008     2007  
  Current income tax recovery $  -   $  -   $  -  
  Future income tax recovery   (120,833 )   (260,255 )   (563,472 )
                     
  Total income tax recovery $  (120,833 ) $  (260,255 )   (563,472 )

The Company's actual income tax expense for each of the years ended is made up as follows:

      2009     2008     2007  
  Loss before income taxes $  (8,008,751 ) $  (3,266,089 ) $  (2,802,642 )
                     
  Income tax recovery at combined Federal and                  
  Provincial rates of 33.29%, 35.03% and 36.12%   (2,666,113 )   (1,144,111 )   (1,012,314 )
  Non-deductible write-down of marketable securities   -     -     3,527  
  Non-deductible expenses   146     2,818     1,468  
  Non-deductible write-down of mineral properties   2,483,585     185,090     -  
  Expiry of warrants   330,573     -     -  
  Share-based payments   -     463,140     490,758  
  Cost of issue   (120,610 )   (123,563 )   (92,103 )
  Potential income tax recovery not recognized   -     616,626     608,664  
  Utilization of losses not previously benefitted   (27,581 )   -     -  
  Resource properties – expenditures renounced   (120,833 )   (260,255 )   (563,472 )
                     
  Income tax recovery $  (120,833 ) $  (260,255 ) $  (563,472 )

At May 31, 2009, the Company has non-capital losses of approximately $5,561,500 and capital losses of approximately $167,400. No benefit from these amounts has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The non-capital losses will expire as follows:

  2010 $  3,500  
  2015   747,000  
  2026   1,366,000  
  2027   1,685,000  
  2028   1,760,000  
         
    $  5,561,500  

36


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

14. Segmented information

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2008 - same and 2007 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

The Company operates in two geographic segments for the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

      2009     2008     2007  
  Canada $  3,999,201   $  5,993,786   $  4,830,552  
  United States of America   -   $  5,679,340   $  4,386,457  
  Total assets $  3,999,201   $  11,673,136     9,217,009  


15. Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere


  i)

On June 1, 2004, the Company entered into a management agreement with a company owned by its former President. For the year ended May 31, 2009, payments of $nil (2008 - $nil, 2007 - $5,000) were included in management services expense. Management services expense also includes $nil (2008 - $nil, 2007 - $6,422) in travel expenses paid to the former President and his company.

   

 

  ii)

For year ended May 31, 2009, $35,000 (2008 - $66,000, 2007 - $71,750) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

   

 

  iii)

For year ended May 31, 2009, $150,010 (2008 - $150,000, 2007 - $91,000) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $62,250 (2008 - $150,000, 2007 - $nil) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $14,000 (2008 - $24,000, 2007 - $14,000) in car and office allowances and $607 (2008 - $1,765, 2007 - $13,822) were paid.

   

 

  iv)

For the year ended May 31, 2009, $nil (2008 - $nil, 2007 - $70,000) was paid to a company for consulting services. This company is related to Grandview because a director of Grandview is affiliated with this company.

   

 

  v)

For year ended May 31, 2009, $51,794 (2008 - $76,974, 2007 - $21,000) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

   

 

  vi)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

37


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

16. Subsequent event
   

On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the "Memorandum") was signed with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the "Suyo"). The Option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Suyo by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period. The Option also allows the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum. The Memorandum and the transactions contemplated therein and thereby are conditional upon receipt of all required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSX.

 

 

17.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

 

 

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

 

 

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2009 consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

 

 

For the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the years ended May 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

 

 

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

 

 

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for-sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

38


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 13 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2008 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:

      May 31, 2009     May 31, 2008  
               
  Assets            
  Current assets            
  Cash $  106,593   $  84,856  
  Short term investments   407,493     1,011,410  
  GST and sundry receivable   5,707     40,664  
  Prepaid expenses   12,283     150,166  
  Due from a related party   12,803     102,296  
               
      544,879     1,389,392  
               
  Reclamation bond   14,332     13,090  
  Mineral property rights   512,906     1,921,797  
               
    $  1,072,117   $  $3,324,279  
               
  Liabilities            
  Current liabilities            
  Accounts payable $  9,017   $  $73,526  
  Accrued liabilities   63,450     45,000  
               
      72,467     118,526  
  Assets retirement obligation   14,332     13,090  
      86,799     131,616  
  Shareholders' equity            
  Share capital            
  Authorized - unlimited common shares            
  Issued            
             Common shares   16,106,390     15,757,423  
             Additional paid in capital   3,217,776     648,344  
             Warrants   1,203,804     3,742,570  
             Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
             Deferred share-based payments   4,141,600     4,141,600  
             Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage            
             company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
             Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (20,225,004 )   (17,638,026 )
               
      985,318     3,192,663  
    $ 1,072,117   $ 3,324,279  

39


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

                      Cumulative  
                      from date  
                      of inception  
    Year ended May 31,     ("March 26,  
    2009                          2008                    2007     2004" )
                         
Expenses                        
General exploration $  534,317   $  3,299,979   $  3,259,847   $  9,291,346  
Management services   267,497     1,401,414     1,740,071     5,226,361  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   88,716     832,962     441,612     1,947,061  
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Professional fees   167,672     322,033     317,768     1,223,644  
Office and administration   21,579     196,503     173,741     669,138  
Flow-through interest expense   2,747     44,688     141,366     188,801  
Gain on forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
Failed merger costs   -     -     -     170,000  
                         
Loss before the under noted   (1,082,528 )   (6,097,579 )   (6,074,405 )   (18,681,919 )
Interest income   10,306     72,183     21,682     104,171  
Write-off mineral property rights   (1,514,756 )   (132,500 )   -     (1,647,256 )
                         
Net loss for the period   (2,586,978 )   (6,157,896 )   (6,052,723 )   (20,225,004 )
                         
Comprehensive (loss) items:                        
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     (9,766 )   (25,000 )
                         
Comprehensive loss for the period $  (2,586,978 ) $  (6,157,896 ) $  (6,062,489 ) $  (20,250,004 )
                         
Loss per common share                        
Basic $  (0.06 ) $  (0.18 ) $  (0.29 )      
Diluted $  (0.06 ) $  (0.18 ) $  (0.29 )      
                         
Comprehensive loss per common share                        
Basic $  (0.06 ) $  (0.18 ) $  (0.29 )      
Diluted $  (0.06 ) $  (0.18 ) $  (0.29 )      

40


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became an exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:

            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
  Common shares before change to an exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
  Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
  Private placement   120,000     120,000  
  Private placement   150,000     150,000  
  Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
  Private placement   175,000     175,000  
  Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
  Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
  Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
  Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
  Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
  Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
  Debt conversation   80,000     100,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
  Private placement   590,320     737,900  
  Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
  Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
  Private placement   400,000     500,000  
  Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
  Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )

41


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

  Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
  Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
  Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
  Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
  Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
  Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
  Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
  Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  


17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
  Private placements   1,169,000     4,950,150  
  Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
  Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
  Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
  Mineral property acquisition (Note 8(b)(iii))   30,000     10,800  
               
  Private placement (Note 9(viii))   8,333,333     416,666  
               
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
               
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
               
   Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:            
               
  Additional paid in capital            
               
  Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005       $  25,000  
  Expired warrants         173,388  
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  198,388  
  Expired warrants   449,956  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 $  648,344  
  Expired warrants   2,569,432  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  3,217,776  

42


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


  Warrants      
         
  Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Issued   173,388  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
  Issued   2,086,995  
  Expired   (173,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
  Issued   974,575  
  Expired   (449,956 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
  Issued   1,167,629  
  Exercised   (36,673 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
  Expired   (2,569,432 )
  Issued   30,666  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
         
  Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities      
         
  Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 $  (315,539 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (325,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   -  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 $  (325,305 )

43


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


  Deferred share-based payments      
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Vesting of stock options   775,613  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
  Vesting of stock options   573,700  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
  Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
  Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2009 $  4,141,600  
         
  Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage      
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
  Net loss   4,678  
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
  Net loss   (1,743,463 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
  Net loss   (3,673,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
  Net loss   (6,052,723 )
         
  Balance May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
  Net loss   (6,157,896 )
         
  Balance May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
  Net loss   (2,586,978 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )

44


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

Statement of Cash Flows

                        Cumulative  
                                   from date  
                        of inception  
            Year ended May 31,     ("March 26,  
                       2009     2008     2007                    2004" )
                           
  Cash flows from operating activities                        
  Net loss for the period $  (2,586,978 ) $  (6,157,896 ) $  (6,052,723 ) $  (20,225,004 )
  Items not involving cash:                        
  Forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
  Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
  Share-based payments   -     1,322,125     1,358,687     4,030,125  
  Accrued Interest income   (10,296 )   (48,706 )   -     (59,002 )
  Write-off of mineral property rights   1,514,756     132,500     -     1,647,256  
  Change in non-cash operating working activities:                        
  GST and sundry receivable   34,957     181,267     (91,634 )   (10,887 )
  Prepaid expenses   137,883     8,526     (138,055 )   (6,613 )
  Due from a related party   92,296     -     (90,000 )   2,296  
  Accounts payable   (64,509 )   (222,129 )   (61,560 )   80,036  
  Accrued liabilities   18,450     (76,119 )   56,832     (838 )
                           
  Cash flows used in operating activities   (863,441 )   (4,860,432 )   (5,018,453 )   (14,577,063 )
  Cash flows from financing activities                        
  Repayment of loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
  Share/warrant issuance   416,666     5,016,694     3,022,499     18,052,210  
  Cost of issue   (47,833 )   (488,720 )   (249,300 )   (1,776,309 )
  Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
  Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
                           
  Cash flows provided by financing activities   368,833     4,527,974     2,773,199     16,347,307  
                           
  Cash flows from investing activities                        
  Purchase of reclamation bond   -     (13,090 )   -     (13,090 )
  Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   611,410     (975,000 )   -     (363,590 )
  Exploration advances   -     312,491     (40,514 )   -  
  Purchase of mineral property rights   (95,065 )   (206,364 )   (217,755 )   (1,286,972 )
                           
  Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities   516,345     (881,963 )   (258,269 )   (1,663,652 )
  Change in cash during the period   21,737     (1,214,421 )   (2,503,523 )   106,592  
  Cash, beginning of period   84,856     1,299,277     3,802,800     1  
                           
  Cash, end of period $  106,593   $  84,856   $  1,299,277   $  106,593  

45


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

                      Cumulative  
                      from date  
                      of inception  
    Year ended May 31,     ("March 26,  
    2009     2008     2007     2004" )
                         
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transaction                        
Share issuance included in mining interest $  10,800   $  45,800   $  56,500   $  563,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  184,750   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  111,475   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  23,477   $  21,682   $  45,159  

US GAAP accounting pronouncements adopted in prior years

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that conditional asset retirement obligations meet the definition of liabilities and should be recognized when incurred if their fair values can be reasonably estimated. The Company was required to adopt FIN 47 during the year ended May 31, 2007; the implementation did not have any effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements as the Company does not yet have significant assets which the Company is obligated to retire.

In March 2005, the FASB ratified a consensus reached by the EITF on the issue No. 04-6 entitled "Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry". This Consensus affects the accounting for costs of removing overburden and waste materials during the production phase of a mine. The consensus requires that stripping costs are to be accounted for as variable production costs and charged to operations during the period that the stripping costs are incurred. This consensus is required to be adopted in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2007. This consensus has no effect on the consolidated financial statements since the Company is not yet in the production phase.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections", effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, has been introduced and requires, unless impracticable, retroactive application as the required method for reporting changes in accounting principles in the absence of transitional provisions specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. The adoption of this accounting principle had no effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption, with the cumulative effect adjustment reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The adoption of this standard has not had any material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

46


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Adoption of new US GAAP accounting pronouncements

(i) Fair value measurements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"), which provides a consistent definition of fair value that focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. SFAS No. 157 requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 were applied prospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on April 1, 2008, which did not have any effect on its overall financial condition and results of operations.

SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are described below:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, but do not qualify as Level 1 inputs (i.e., quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities).

Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

As at May 31, 2009, the Company had short term investments totalling $407,493 which are classified as held for trading and measured as level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

(ii) Fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159 "Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". Statement 159 will become effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement for accounting for financial instruments. The adoption of this standard has not had any material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

47


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements

(i) Hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles". This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used when preparing financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles". The Company does not expect any material impact on its financial position and results of operation with the adoption of this statement.

(ii) Determining whether an instrument is indexed to an equity's own stock

In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock" ("EITF 07-05"). EITF 07-05 provides guidance on determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity's own stock. EITF 07-05 concludes, among other matters, that warrants and options issued by an entity with an exercise price that is different from the entity's functional currency cannot be classified as equity. EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of EITF 07-05 will have on the statements.

(iii) Business combinations

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations", which retained the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting. However, SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects.

SFAS No. 141(R) will require that: (1) for all business combinations, the acquirer records all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values; (2) certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at their fair values on the acquisition date; (3) contingent consideration be recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings until settled; (4) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included in the amount recorded for assets acquired; (5) in step acquisitions, previous equity interests in an acquiree held prior to obtained control be re-measured to their acquisition-date fair values, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings; and (6) when making adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies revise any previously issued post-acquisition financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if they had been recorded on the acquisition date.

48


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

17. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Recent US GAAP accounting pronouncements (Continued)

(iii) (Continued) SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of this statement should also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). This standard will be applied to all future business combinations for US GAAP purposes.

(iv) Subsequent events

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, "Subsequent Events" ("SFAS No. 165") which establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. This Statement sets forth (a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (b) the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (c) the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement shall be applied to the accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. This Statement is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively.

18. Comparative figures

Certain prior year figures have been reclassified to conform with the current year's presentation.

49


EX-99.19 20 exhibit99-19.htm EXHIBIT 99.19 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.19 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.19

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2009

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the year ended May 31, 2009 (“2009”) and its financial position as at May 31, 2009. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2009. Selected information is also presented for the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 (“fourth quarter 2009”)

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 17 to the audited annual consolidated financial statements for 2009.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

The comparative reporting periods are the three months ended May 31, 2008 (“fourth quarter 2008”), the year ended May 31, 2008 (“2008”) and the year ended May 31, 2007 (“2007”).

This MD&A was prepared on August 26, 2009.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing gold properties in North America. Grandview continues to be involved in the acquisition, exploration and, if warranted, the development of properties for the mining of precious metals in Ontario and Manitoba, Canada.


Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS). Grandview pursued this investment opportunity, but subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Economic Situation and Company Response

The Company is taking firm measures in response to the global financial and commodity price crisis. Management is strongly committed to ensuring that the Company survives the current market turmoil and is implementing a strategy to ensure this goal. The Company reduced expenditures to a minimum during 2009 through significant cost reductions at all its operations and the corporate head office.

However, current market conditions and the difficulty of obtaining financing during the current economic downturn substantially increases concerns regarding the ability of the Company to raise additional capital and to continue as a going concern.

The realization of shareholder value will continue to be the Company’s key objective, and continuing advancement of the Company’s projects will be fundamental to this objective. Although the current cash position of the Company is sufficient to cover corporate activities and minor operational activities, including the maintenance of royalty, option and other property commitments, the Company is actively seeking to raise additional funding to achieve its goal of advancing its exploration and development activities at its properties of merit.

The Company had available to it at May 31, 2009 $514,086 (May 31, 2008: $1,096,266) in cash and short-term investments and does not earn any revenue from any of its properties. Such circumstances, in addition to uncertainty relating to the Company’s ability to obtain the necessary funding to complete exploration and development work, lend substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to achieve future profitable production and, accordingly, the appropriateness of the use of accounting principles applicable to a going concern. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital, exploration and development requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties.

Properties and Projects

The Company did not engage in any substantial level of exploration activity during the 2009 and during the second half of 2009 wrote off mineral properties considered to have a low likelihood of commercial success, for a total write-off incurred during 2009 of $7,460,454 (2008: $528,376; 2007: $Nil). These facts substantially distort comparisons with previous financial reporting periods.

Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

The cumulative exploration costs and acquisition costs originally capitalized for these properties were written off at year-end, as the Company no longer considered it feasible to continue incurring the property payments required to maintain its interest. The total write-off incurred during 2009 was $5,903,342 (2008: $Nil; 2007: $Nil).

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

2


Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

Grandview has also acquired a 60% interest in ten (10) unpatented and two (2) patented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”).

Exploration costs of $166,822 were incurred 2009 on the Red Lake Properties (2008: $1,744,811: 2007: $456,357). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to May 31, 2009 were $3,442,793.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, Gem, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in five (5) mining claims, located in Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”.

Grandview has an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven (7) claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, Manitoba (the “Gem Property”). Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

As the exploration results from the Manitoba properties have been largely disappointing and as management considers the likelihood of future profitable development or production to be low, the Company decided to write off during the 2009 the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred to date of $1,557,112 (2008: $Nil; 2007: $Nil) associated with these properties.

Rocky Ridge Property in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview had an option to acquire a 70% interest in 7 mining claims, located in the Lac du Bonnet mining district of Manitoba (the “Rocky Ridge Property”). The Company allowed its option to lapse on this property during 2008, due to poor drill results.

Private Placements

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Sandfire Securities Inc. This offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666.

In connection with this offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 common shares at a price of $0.05 per common share for a period of 24 months after closing.

The securities issued pursuant to this offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold period commencing from the date of issuance.

3


Results of Operations

Fourth quarter 2009

Grandview incurred a net loss of $6,063,504 for the fourth quarter 2009, compared with $870,408 for the fourth quarter 2008. The increase in net loss for the fourth quarter 2009 compared with the corresponding period last year is predominantly attributable to the write-off of the Company’s Pony Creek / Elliot Dome property recorded during the fourth quarter 2009 of $5,679,340 (fourth quarter 2008: $Nil).

Cash flows used in operating activities for the fourth quarter 2009 of $70,034 compares with $244,135 for the fourth quarter 2008, reflecting reduced operational and corporate activities during the fourth quarter 2009.

Year ended May 31, 2009

Grandview incurred a net loss of $7,887,918 during 2009, compared with $3,005,834 for 2008 and $2,239,170 for 2007. The increased net loss for the 2009 compared to the previous years is attributable to $7,460,454 in write-off of mineral properties incurred during 2009 (2008: $528,376; 2007: $Nil). The increased loss was partially offset by lower stock-based compensation expense recorded during 2009 of $Nil (2008: $1,322,125; 2007: $1,358,687). Other categories of expenses were consistently lower during 2009 compared with previous reporting periods, attributable to low levels of corporate and operational activity during 2009, as well as efforts by the Company to curtail expenditures.

Cash flows used in operating activities for 2009 of $349,009 compares with $1,560,453 for 2008 and $1,668,606 for 2007. The reduction in cash flows used in operating activities is due to a significant reduction in exploration and development activities overall.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

  Fourth Third Second First
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  May. 31, Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31,
  2009 2009 2008 2008
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 74,970 243,077 98,801 138,952
Net loss (6,063,504) (1,589,709) (96,316) (138,389)
Net loss per share (0.16) (0.04) (0.00) (0.00)
Cash flows used in operating activities (70,034) (112,647) (125,485) (40,843)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 514,086 694,958 479,071 735,523
Assets 3,999,201 10,094,150 11,369,813 11,645,288

  Fourth Third Second First
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  May 31, Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31,
  2008 2008 2007 2007
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 425,903 264,491 1,731,395 375,811
Net income (loss) (870,408) (34,115) (1,711,526) (389,785)
Net income (loss) per share (0.03) (0.00) (0.05) (0.01)

4



Cash flows used in operating activities (244,135) (99,957) (956,614) (259,747)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,096,266 1,927,043 1,146,482 2,965,747
Assets 11,673,136 12,383,498 11,312,038 12,064,680

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Grandview’s working capital on May 31, 2009 was $469,609, compared with $1,258,570 on May 31, 2008. The cash balance on May 31, 2009, was $106,593 and short-terms investments were $407,493, compared with a cash balance of $84,856 and short-term investments of $1,011,410 on May 31, 2008.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and continues to incur net losses. Other than the brokered private placement completed on December 5, 2008 for gross proceeds of $416,666, the Company procured no other sources of funding during 2009.

During the 2009 the Company issued 30,000 shares to EMCO related to its option to acquire a 60 percent interest in 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims for the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property and issued 8,333,333 flow-through common shares as part of the MineralFields private placement.

6,307,645 warrants expired during the 2009 and the Company also issued broker warrants to acquire 666,666 common shares as part of the MineralFields private placement.

175,000 stock options were cancelled during 2009.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of May 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,652,098 common shares, 6,720,146 warrants and 4,400,000 stock options.

As of August 26, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,652,098 common shares, 1,676,026 warrants and 7,750,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On June 1, 2004, the Company entered into a management agreement with a company owned by its former President. For 2009, payments of $Nil (2008: $Nil, 2007: $5,000) were included in management services expense. Management services expense also includes $Nil (2008: $Nil, 2007: $6,422) in travel expenses paid to the former President and his company.

During 2009, $35,000 (2008: $66,000, 2007: $71,750) was paid to the former interim CEO and current Chairman of the Company for consulting services.

During 2009, $150,010 (2008: $150,000, 2007: $91,000) were paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $62,250 (2008: $150,000, 2007: $Nil) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $14,000 (2008: $24,000, 2007: $14,000) in car and office allowances and $607 (2008: $1,765, 2007: $13,822) were paid.

During 2009, $Nil (2008: $Nil, 2007: $70,000) was paid to a company for consulting services. This company is related to the company because a director of the company is affiliated with this company.

5


During 2009, $51,794 (2008: $76,974, 2007: $21,000) in consulting fees were also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On July 15, 2009, the Company, through a subsidiary, reported the signing of a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a 400 hectare property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Property”). The Option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Property by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period. The Option also allows the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum. The Memorandum and the transactions contemplated therein and thereby are conditional upon receipt of all required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSX.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

6


Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at May 31, 2009 of $14,332, compared with $13,090 as at May 31, 2008.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

7


Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada.

A summary of the differences between Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") which affect the Company is contained in Note 17 to the audited consolidated financial statements for 2009.

Basis of consolidation

The audited consolidated financial statements for 2009 include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. ("Grandview USA"). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination of the recoverability of mining interest costs, the asset retirement obligation, the valuation allowance of future tax asset, the calculation of stock-based compensation expense and warrants. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and balances with banks with original maturities of three months or less and which are readily convertible into cash.

Mineral property costs

Direct exploration and development costs are deferred in the accounts, net of amounts recovered from third parties, including receipts from options. At production, these costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method based on estimated reserves. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written-off when the decision to abandon is made, or earlier if a determination is made that the property does not have economically recoverable reserves.

The recorded book value of the Company's mineral properties in North America is not intended to reflect the present or future value of the gold projects.

The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its properties in North America. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. If after the review, it is determined that the carrying amount of a mining interest is impaired, that mining interest is written-down to its estimated net realizable value. A mining interest is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The amounts shown for mining properties do not necessarily represent present or future values. Their recoverability is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof.

8


Flow-through financing

The Company has financed a portion of its exploration activities through the issue of flow-through shares in the past, which transfer the tax deductibility of exploration expenditures to the investor. Proceeds received on the issue of such shares have been credited to share capital and the related exploration costs have been charged to mineral properties. Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration and development activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with income tax legislation. When these expenditures are renounced, temporary taxable differences created by the renunciations reduce share capital.

Short term investments

Short term investments comprise investments in guaranteed investment certificate due to mature within one year from the date of purchase and are classified as "held-for-trading" and have been recorded at fair value.

Asset retirement obligations

Section 3110 of the CICA Handbook requires the recognition of a liability for obligations relating to the retirement of property, plant and equipment and obligations arising from acquisition, construction, development or normal operations of those assets. The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") in the year in which a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

Income taxes

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method of tax accounting. Under this method, current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable for the current period. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and on unclaimed losses carried forward and are measured using the substantially enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse or losses are expected to be utilized. Future tax assets are recorded to recognize tax benefits only to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not they will be realized.

Stock-based compensation

The fair value of the stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management's assumptions as disclosed in Note 11 and recorded as stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the stock-options, with the offsetting credit recorded as an increase in contributed surplus. If the stock options are exercised, the proceeds are credited to share capital and the fair value at the date of grant is reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital.

9


Revenue recognition

Gains and losses on sale of marketable securities and properties are recognized when realized. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis.

Share issue costs and reorganization costs

Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital. Reorganization costs are charged to deficit.

Translation of foreign currencies

Foreign currency accounts are translated into Canadian dollars as follows:

At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue or expense is translated into Canadian dollars by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the year end date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars by using the exchange rate in effect at that date and the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations in the current period.

Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Accounting Changes

Section 1506, of the CICA handbook "Accounting Changes" prescribes the criteria for changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and correction of errors. The Company has adopted these new standards effective June 1, 2007. The impact that the adoption of Section 1506 will have on the Company's results of operations and financial condition will depend on the nature of future accounting changes.

Financial instruments - recognition and measurement

All financial instruments are classified into one of the following five categories: held-for-trading, held-to maturity, loans and receivables, available-for-sale financial assets or other financial liabilities. All financial instruments, including derivatives, are measured in the balance sheet at fair value except for loans and receivables, held to maturity investments and other financial liabilities which are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Subsequent measurement and changes in fair value will depend on their initial classification, as follows: held-for-trading financial assets are measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of operations in the period in which they arise; available-for-sale financial instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income until the investment is de-recognized or impaired at which time the amounts would be recorded in the statement of operations. The Company has made the following classifications:

Cash and cash equivalents: Held-for-trading
Short term investments: Held-for-trading
GST and sundry receivable: Loans and receivable
Due from a related party: Loans and receivable
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: Other financial liabilities

Transaction costs are expensed as incurred for financial instruments classified as held for trading and transaction costs, other than impairment losses, are included in other comprehensive income until the asset is removed from balance sheet for financial instruments classified as available-for-sale. For other financial instruments, transaction costs are expensed on initial recognition. The Company accounts for regular purchases and sales of financial assets using trade date accounting.

10


Accounting policy choice for transaction costs

On June 1, 2007, the Emerging Issues Committee ("EIC") of the CICA issued Abstract No. 166, "Accounting Policy Choice for Transaction Costs" (EIC-166). This EIC addresses the accounting policy choice of expensing or adding transaction costs related to the acquisition of financial assets and financial liabilities that are classified as other than held-for-trading. Specifically, it requires that the same accounting policy choice be applied to all similar financial instruments classified as other than held-for trading, but permits a different policy choice for financial instruments that are not similar. The Company has adopted EIC-166 effective November 30, 2007 and requires retroactive application to all transaction costs accounted for in accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement. The Company has evaluated the impact of EIC-166 and determined that no adjustments are currently required.

Capital disclosures and financial instruments – disclosures and presentation

On December 1, 2006, the CICA issued three new accounting standards: "Capital Disclosures" (Handbook Section 1535), "Financial Instruments – Disclosures" (Handbook Section 3862), and "Financial Instruments – Presentation" (Handbook Section 3863). These new standards became effective for the Company on June 1,2008.

Capital Disclosures

Handbook Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook section in Note 3 to the 2009 annual consolidated financial statements.

Financial Instruments

Handbook Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, "Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation", revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook sections in Note 4 to these consolidated financial statements.

Section 1400, general standard of financial statement presentation

This section specifies requirements to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's disclosure reflects such assessment.

Credit risk and the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities

In January 2009, the CICA approved EIC-173, "Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which applies to interim and annual financial statements for periods ending on or after January 20, 2009. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements has had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Mining exploration costs

On March 27, 2009, the CICA approved an abstract EIC-174, “Mining Exploration Costs”, which provides guidance on capitalization of exploration costs related to mining properties in particular and on impairment of long-lived assets in general. The Company has applied this new abstract for the year

11


ended May 31, 2009 and there was no significant impact on its consolidated financial statements as a result of applying this abstract.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new accounting standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of May 31, 2009, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of May 31, 2009, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

12


Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during 2009 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The Company continues to monitor the deliberations and progress on plans to converge to International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") by accounting standard setting bodies and securities regulators in Canada.

Due to resource constraints the Company has not performed any additional assessment work related to its IFRS conversion project during 2009. The Company must still establish a team that will focus its efforts on this initiative. The Company’s search for additional staff for this project is on-going and more IFRS training will be needed for all levels of management. Despite these limitations in personnel, management has made an initial internal assessment of the accounting standards that will be impacted by the transition to IFRS.

The Company will follow the key events timeline proposed by the AcSB to obtain training and thorough knowledge of IFRS, and continue its assessment of accounting policies with reference to IFRS and plan for convergence to be ready for the 2011 changeover.

OUTLOOK

During this recent quarter the company focused efforts on exploration efforts in Ontario and maintaining its land position in good standing. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario.

In light of the current market conditions, the Company has made difficult, but prudent decisions to reduce costs were appropriate to maintain as streamlined a cost structure as possible.

Exploration programs in the Red Lake area will be deferred until the second half of 2009 in order to take advantage of further ground work prior to drilling the NS Zone at the Dixie Lake property to follow-up on gold bearing intercepts from previous drilling programs.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

13


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

14


EX-99.20 21 exhibit99-20.htm EXHIBIT 99.20 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.20 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.20

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2009

AUGUST 28, 2009


TABLE OF CONTENTS

     

Page 

ITEM 1: CORPORATE STRUCTURE 3
   1.1 Name, Address and Incorporation 3
   1.2 Intercorporate Relationships 3
ITEM 2: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS 3
   2.1 Three Year History 3
ITEM 3: DESCRIBE THE BUSINESS 6
   3.1 General 6
   3.2 Risk Factors 6
   3.3 Companies with Asset-Backed Securities Outstanding 11
   3.4 Companies with Mineral Projects 11
ITEM 4: DIVIDENDS 31
   4.1 Dividend Policy 31
ITEM 5: DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 32
   5.1 General Description of Capital Structure 32
   5.2 Constraint 33
   5.3 Ratings 33
ITEM 6: Market For Securities 33
   6.1 Trading Price and Volume 33
   6.2 Prior Sales 34
ITEM 7: ESCROWED SECURITIES 34
ITEM 8: Directors And Officers 34
   8.1 Names, Addresses, Occupation and Security Holdings 34
   8.2 Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions 36
   8.3 Conflicts of Interest 37
ITEM 9: PROMOTERS 37
   9.1 Promoters 37
ITEM 10: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 37
   10.1 Legal Proceedings 37
ITEM 11: INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS 37


TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)

Page

   11.1 Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions 37
ITEM 12: TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS 38
   12.1 Transfer Agents and Registrars 38
ITEM 13: MATERIAL CONTRACTS 38
   13.1 Material Contracts 38
ITEM 14: INTERESTS OF EXPERTS 39
   14.1 Names of Experts 39
   14.2 Interests of Experts 39
ITEM 15: Audit committee information required in an AIF 39
ITEM 16: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 41

-ii-


PRELIMINARY NOTES

Effective Date of Information

This Annual Information Form ("AIF") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") is dated August 28, 2009. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained herein is current as of May 31, 2009, being the date of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal period.

Information Incorporated by Reference

This AIF is and will be supplemented by, and the following documentation is hereby incorporated by reference as part of this AIF:

  (i)

the Corporation's audited financial statements for the 12 month fiscal period ended May 31, 2008, together with the auditors' report thereon;

     
  (ii)

management's discussion and analysis for the 12 month fiscal period ended May 31, 2008;

     
  (iii)

the "Independent Technical Report on the Dixie Lake Project, Red Lake, Ontario" dated January 13, 2006, prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., which was filed via SEDAR on February 28, 2006 (the "SRK Technical Report");

     
  (iv)

the most recent management information circular of the Corporation dated October 30, 2008 was prepared in respect of the annual and special meeting of shareholders held on Friday, November 28, 2008; and

     
  (v)

all documents, including press releases, material change reports and quarterly and annual financial statements as filed with the the Ontario Securities Commission.

Each of the above-noted documents are available for viewing at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com. Copies are also available upon request from the Corporation's offices.

All financial information in this AIF has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP").

Purpose

This AIF is prepared in accordance with Form 51-102F2 to National Instrument 51-102-Continuous Disclosure Obligations – established by the Canadian Securities Administrators, for the limited purpose of providing material information about the Corporation and its business at a point in time in context of its historical and possible future development.


Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this AIF respecting reserves, resources, plans, objectives and future performance of the Corporation's business are "forward-looking statements". Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "intended", "estimate", "anticipate", "believe" or "continue" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties relating to, among other things, financing, changes in commodity prices, unanticipated reserve and resource grades, geological, processing, transportation, infrastructure and other problems, results of exploration activities, cost overruns, availability of materials and equipment, timeliness of governmental approvals, political risk and related economic risk, actual performance of plant, equipment, and processes relative to specifications and expectations and unanticipated environmental impacts on operations. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those set forth herein under "Risk Factors".

- 2 -


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

TWELVE MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2008

ITEM 1: CORPORATE STRUCTURE

1.1 Name, Address and Incorporation

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") was originally incorporated under the Corporation Act of Ontario on November 23, 1945 as Loisan Red Lake Gold Mines Limited ("Loisan"). Articles of Amendment were filed on November 6, 1979, changing the name from Loisan to Grandview Energy Resources Incorporated ("Energy"). On September 22, 1983, further Articles of Amendment were filed to change the Corporation’s name from Energy to Consolidated Grandview Inc. The Corporation filed further Articles of Amendment on April 9, 1987 to increase the authorized capital of the Corporation to an unlimited number of shares of each class. The Corporation again filed Articles of Amendment on July 6, 2004 changing its corporate name to its current name "Grandview Gold Inc". The registered and corporate head office of the Corporation is located at 330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2S8.

The common shares of the Corporation trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") under the symbol "GVX".

1.2 Intercorporate Relationships

The Corporation has a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nevada on July 16, 2008, under the name Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. was incorporated to hold the Corporation's interest in its Nevada property. As of May 22, 2009 the Corporation announced the termination of it’s Nevada operations and no interest exist within the subsidiary.

As of July 26, 2009 the Corporation created a wholly owned subsidiary pursuant to the laws of Peru under the name Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C. with the intent to hold the Corporation’s Peruvian interests.

ITEM 2: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

2.1 Three Year History

The Corporation is engaged in the exploration and, if warranted, development of gold mineral properties in Canada, South America and United States. The Corporation is an exploration stage company and is not engaged in any mining operations, and there can be no assurance it will ever engage in mining operations.

The Corporation has acquired the following interests: (i) 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the "Dixie Lake Property"); (ii) a 100% interest in three mining claims located in Manitoba, Canada, (the "Bissett Gold Camp Claims"); (iii) an option to acquire a 60% interest in ten unpatented and 2 patented mining claims located on Red Lake, Ontario (the "Bonanza Property"); (iv) a 100% interest in eight mining claims covering approximately 60 hectares located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the "Loisan Property"); (v) an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, in Manitoba (the "Gem Property"); (vi) a 100% interest in 23 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, covering approximately 4,297 hectares (the "GVG Property"); (vii) a 100% interest in 14 unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba covering 2,601 hectares (the "Banksian Property"); and (viii) a 100% interest in 4 unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in south eastern Manitoba (the "Angelina Property").

-3-


As of May 26, 2009 the Corporation announce that it had ceased all operations at the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome project in Nevada and returned the project to Mill City Gold Inc. pursuant to the underlying agreements. The reader is directed to the 2008 AIF for previous disclosure on this project.

On July 15, 2009 the Corporation announced the signing of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding through its wholly-owned subsidiary Recuperación Realzada S.A.C., with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a 400 hectare property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Giulianita Property”).

Private Placement Financings

The Corporation has been trading publicly on an intermittent basis since incorporation on November 23, 1945. Prior to listing on the CNQ in October 2004, the Corporation's common shares traded on the Over-the-Counter Automated Quotation System, a predecessor of the Canadian Dealer Network ("CDN"). From April 16, 1987 to November 2, 2000, and from February 4, 2003 until May 6, 2004, the Corporation was subject to Cease Trade Orders (CTO) issued by the Ontario Securities Commission. The cease trade order was lifted in May, 2004. Over the past three years, the Corporation has completed five exempt financing as follows:

1.

On March 16, 2007, the Corporation completed a private placement offering of 3,250,000 units, with each such unit being comprised of one common share and one half of one purchase warrant where each whole purchase warrant is exercisable into one additional common share upon payment of $0.65, at the subscription price of $0.45 per unit for total gross proceeds of $1,462,500. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian and US properties and for general working capital.

   
2.

On July 6, 2007, the Corporation completed a private placement offering of 8,589,000 units, with each such unit being comprised of one common share and one half of one purchase warrant where each whole purchase warrant is exercisable into one additional common share upon payment of $0.65, at the subscription price of $0.40 per unit for total gross proceeds of $3,435,600. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian and US properties and for general working capital. The private placement was brokered by Bolder Investment Partners, Inc. At the same time, the Corporation closed a non-brokered placement on the same terms for additional proceeds of $50,000 on the sale of a further 125,000 units.

-4-



In connection with this offering, the Corporation secured the consent of its shareholders at a special meeting which occurred on May 17, 2007. A special meeting was required to be called in order to approve this placement under TSX policies as the total number of common shares issuable thereunder exceeded 25% of the then issued and outstanding capital of the Corporation.

   
3.

On December 21, 2007, the Corporation completed a private placement offering of 1,312,000 units, with each such unit being comprised of one common share and one half of one purchase warrant where each whole purchase warrant is exercisable into one additional common share upon payment of $0.70, at the subscription price of $0.55 per unit and 605,000 flow through common shares at $0.65 per flow through common share for total gross proceeds of $1,114,850. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian and US properties and for general working capital. The private placement was brokered by Bolder Investment Partners, Inc.

   
4.

On December 28, 2007, the Corporation completed a non-brokered private placement resulting in the issuance by the Corporation of a total of 538,000 flow- through common shares at a price of $0.65 per flow through common share for gross proceeds of $349,700. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian properties.

   
5.

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Sandfire Securities Inc. This offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow- through common shares to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,667. In connection with this offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 common shares at a price of $0.05 per common share for a period of 24 months after closing. The securities issued pursuant to this offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold period commencing from the date of issuance.

TSX Listing

The common shares of the Corporation were posted and listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "GVX".

-5-


ITEM 3: DESCRIBE THE BUSINESS

3.1 General

The Corporation is a junior mining, exploration and development company. The overall business objective of the Corporation is to acquire, explore for, develop and commence production of mineral resource properties in Canada and South America. More particularly, the Corporation's primary near-term objectives are to complete the current exploration programs and evaluate the ongoing validity of projects in its portfolio. Concurrently with this objective, the Corporation is continuing to seek out and evaluate prospective mineral properties for acquisition and exploration.

3.2 Risk Factors

Due to the nature of the Corporation's business and the present stage of its development, an investment in any of the securities of the Corporation is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the matters set out elsewhere in this AIF, the following are also risks related to the Corporation. The risk factors outlined below are not a definitive list of all risk factors associated with an investment in the Corporation or in connection with the Corporation's operations.

History of Losses

The Corporation is a junior mining, exploration and development corporation with no producing properties. There is no assurance that any of the properties which the Corporation now has or may hereafter acquire or obtain an interest in will generate earnings, operate profitably, or provide a return on investment in the future.

Mining Industry Risks

The operations of the Corporation are speculative due to the high risk nature of its business which involves the acquisition, exploration and development of mining properties and opportunities. Accordingly, the following risks in particular should be considered:

  (a)

The acquisition of, exploration for and development of mineral deposits is an extremely speculative venture involving a high degree of risk. Even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate such risk. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, very few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Unusual or unexpected formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labour disruptions, flooding, cave-ins, landslides, and the inability of the Corporation to obtain suitable machinery, equipment or labour are all risks involved with the conduct of explorations programs and the operation of mines. Substantial expenditures may be required to locate and establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site, and additional financing may be required. It is impossible to ensure that the exploration programs planned by the Corporation will result in a profitable commercial mining operation or venture. The decision as to whether a

-6-



 

particular property contains a commercial mineral deposit and should be brought into production will depend on the results of exploration programs and/or feasibility studies, and the recommendations of duly qualified engineers and geologists. Several significant factors will be considered, including, but not limited to: (i) the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; (ii) metal prices, which are highly cyclical; (iii) government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection; (iv) ongoing costs of production; and (v) availability and cost of additional funding. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Corporation not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

     
  (b)

The activities of the Corporation are to be directed toward the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Corporation will result in discoveries of economic ore bodies or commercial production thereof.

     
  (c)

Depending upon if and when commercial quantities of ore are found, the Corporation may or may not have the financial resources at that time to bring a mine into production. The only sources of funding which might be available to the Corporation at such time may be limited to the sale of equity capital, mineral properties, royalty interests or the entering into of joint ventures, there being no assurances that any of the foregoing forms of funding will be available to the Corporation.

     
  (d)

All phases of the mineral exploration activities of the Corporation are subject to various laws governing prospecting, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. Mining and exploration activities are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Although the Corporation believes that its exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner that would limit or curtail production or development. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing the operations and activities of the Corporation or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Corporation. In the context of environmental permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, the Corporation must comply with known standards, existing laws and regulations which may entail greater or lesser costs and delays depending on the nature of the activity to be permitted and how stringently the regulations are implemented by the permitting authority. The Corporation is not aware of any material environmental constraint affecting any of its development properties that would preclude the economic development or operation of any specific property.

-7-



  (e)

There is a significant degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of mineral deposit estimates and corresponding mineralization grades. Until the mineralized material is actually mined and processed, mineral deposit estimates and mineralization grades must be considered as estimates only. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any mineral deposit estimates or ore-grade information contained herein (including in the documents incorporated herein by reference) will prove accurate. In addition, the value of mineral deposits may vary depending on mineral prices and other factors. Any material change in ore grades or stripping ratios may affect the economic viability of the Corporation's projects. Furthermore, mineral deposit estimate information should not be interpreted as any assurance of mine life or of the potential profitability of existing or future projects.

     
  (f)

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and requirements may result in enforcement actions including orders issued by regulators or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or to be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

     
  (g)

The profitability of the operations of the Corporation are significantly affected by changes in the market price of mineral commodities. Mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Corporation. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of mineral commodities and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of mineral commodities has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production of a particular mineral property to be impracticable.

     
  (h)

The business of mining is generally subject to a number of risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, labour disputes, encountering unusual or unexpected geologic formations, rock bursts, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions, among several others. Such risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or producing facilities, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. While the Corporation may be able to obtain insurance against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate, the nature of these risks are such that liabilities could exceed policy limits or could be excluded from coverage. There are some risks such as certain environmental risks (including potential for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) in respect of which insurance is not generally available to the Corporation or to other companies within the industry or is prohibitively expensive due to excessive premium costs. The potential costs which could be associated with any liabilities not covered by insurance or in excess of insurance coverage or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations may cause substantial delays and require significant capital outlays, adversely affecting the Corporation's earning and competitive position in the future and, potentially, its financial position. Failure to have insurance coverage for any one or more such risks or hazards could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation, its business, financial condition and results of the operations.

-8-



  (i)

The mineral exploration and mining business is extremely competitive in all of its phases. The Corporation encounters competition from other companies in connection with its search for and acquisition of mining properties and interests which are producing or capable of producing minerals. Some of the Corporation's competitors are large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than the Corporation. As a result of this competition, the Corporation may at any point in time be unable to acquire or develop attractive properties on terms it considers acceptable.

     
  (j)

The Corporation's ability to continue exploration of its properties will be dependent upon its ability to raise significant additional funds in the future. Should the Corporation not be able to obtain such financing, a portion of its interest in properties may be needed to be transferred to potential joint venture partners, or its properties may be lost entirely.

Early Stage Properties

The Dixie Lake Property, Bissett Gold Camp Claims, the Loisan Property, the Bonanza Property, the Gem Property, the Banksian Property, the Angelina Property and the GVG Property are in the early or pre-exploration stage only and are each without a known body of commercial ore. There is no certainty that the expenditures made by the Corporation towards the search and evaluation of mineral deposits on either of these or any other properties will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore.

Additional Capital

The ability of the Corporation to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions as well as the business performance of the Corporation. The development and exploration of the Corporation's properties may require substantial additional financing. Failure to obtain such financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of exploration, development or production on any or all of the Corporation's properties or even a loss of property interest. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favourable to the Corporation. If additional financing is raised by the Corporation through the issuance of securities from treasury, control of the Corporation may change and security holders may suffer additional dilution.

-9-


Dilution

In the event the Corporation seeks to procure additional financing through the sale and issuance of its securities, or in the event that current common share option or warrant holders exercise their options or warrants, the then shareholders of the Corporation may suffer immediate and substantive dilution in their percentage ownership of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation. As of the date of this AIF, there were common share purchase warrants outstanding allowing the holders of such warrants to purchase up to 1,676,026 common shares. In addition, 7,750,000 incentive stock options granted to certain directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Corporation, pursuant to the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan, as amended, are also outstanding. As of the date of this AIF, there were 44,652,058 common shares of common stock outstanding, meaning that the exercise of all of the existing common share purchase options and warrants would result in further dilution to the existing shareholders of approximately 18% of the outstanding common shares. Should such common share options and warrants be exercised, the increase in the number of common shares issued and outstanding, and the possibility of sales of such shares may have a depressive effect on the price of the common shares. In addition, the voting power of the Corporation's existing shareholders will be diluted.

Dependence on Key Executives

The Corporation is dependent on the services of key executives and a small number of highly skilled and experienced consultants and personnel. Locating mineral deposits depends on a number of factors, not the least of which is the technical skill of the exploration personnel involved. Due to the relatively small size of the Corporation, the loss of these persons or the Corporation's inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect its business and future operations. The Corporation does not currently carry any key man life insurance on any of its executives. The directors of the Corporation will only devote part of their time to the affairs of the Corporation, while the officers of the Corporation devote their full time to the affairs of the Corporation.

Absence of Dividends

The Corporation has no earnings or dividend record and since it intends to employ available funds for mineral exploration and development it does not intend to pay any dividends in the immediate or foreseeable future. The future dividend policy will be determined by the Board of Directors.

Potential Volatility of Material Price of Common Shares

The TSX has, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Corporation's common shares. In addition, the market price of the common shares is likely to be highly volatile. Factors such as the price of gold, and other minerals, announcements by competitors, changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding the Corporation, and general market conditions and attitudes affecting other exploration and mining companies may have a significant effect on the market price of the common shares. Moreover, it is likely that during the future quarterly periods, the Corporation's results and exploration activities may fluctuate significantly or may fail to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors and, in such event, the market price of the common shares could be materially adversely affected.

-10-


3.3 Companies with Asset-Backed Securities Outstanding

This is not applicable.

3.4 Companies with Mineral Projects

The following section discloses information regarding the Corporation's material mineral properties, namely, the Dixie Lake Property, the Bissett Gold Camp Claims, the Loisan Property, the Gem Property and the Angelina Property.

DIXIE LAKE PROPERTY

The following information is derived from the "Independent Technical Report on the Dixie Lake Project, Red Lake, Ontario for Grandview Gold Inc." prepared by SRK Consulting and dated January 13, 2006 (the "SRK Report"), which was prepared, in accordance with the requirements of NI-43-101. A complete copy of the SRK Report, portions of which are quoted verbatim or paraphrased herein, is available for inspection upon request from the Corporation's head office, as well as on the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com). The SRK Report was authored by Christopher Lee, M.Sc., P. Geo and he is a "qualified person" and "independent" to the Corporation as those terms are defined in NI 43-101. All references to tables and figures in this section are to the tables and figures accompanying the SRK Report, which have been reproduced herein.

Property Description and Location

The Dixie Lake property is located in the Red Lake Mining Camp of northwestern Ontario and is centered at coordinates N50 degrees 51 minutes and W93 degrees 36 minutes. The site appears on NTS map sheet 52K/13. The town of Red Lake, Ontario is located 24 kilometres northwest of the property.

The Dixie Lake property comprises approximately 1,793 hectares in 50 claims. The property has not been legally surveyed.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

Access to the Dixie Lake property is via Tyzyk’s Road and former logging roads, which connect to Highway 105 at coordinates: 457264E, 5638306N (UTM Zone15, Datum: WGS84). The claims are crossed by several logging roads and roads built to Service mineral exploration work. Drill access to the hanging wall of the zone must Cross Dixie Creek –a~15 meter wide stream with year-round flow and limited ice thicknesses in winter. A new bridge was permitted by the Ministry of Fisheries and Oceans and constructed in Spring 2005 to replace an old collapsed bridge over Dixie Creek. This bridge provides access to the 88-04 zone hanging wall, eliminating the need for helicopter support on drill moves.

-11-


Red Lake, Ontario, is an historic gold mining center with a population of about 5,000. The district has produced more than 21 M oz of gold to date, from four principal mines, two of which are still in operation, with more than 6M oz of combined gold reserves (Placer Dome’s Campbell Mine, and Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine). Gold mining and Seasonal tourism activity provide a stable economic base and the town offers all Necessary facilities in support of mineral exploration efforts. Supplies and experienced Field personnel are available. Hydroelectric power lines pass about 1 kilometer north of the property.

The prevailing climate is typically mid-continental: summers are warm, with frequent rain showers and thunderstorms winters are severe, cold and snowy. The Dixie Lake property is partially forested with mature and second growth spruce, poplar, birch and jack pine, and the remainder exhibits the burned remnants of a former wildfire. The regional topography features low rolling hills with a myriad of small lakes, ponds and sloughs. On the property, the terrain is gently sloping and the few streams, including Dixie Creek, have mature, meandering courses. Bedrock occurrences are scarce on the property and, where observed, they are typically glacially polished. In aid of prospecting activities, overburden has been stripped from some areas of the claims (Figure 4-2), apparently by using hand tools and high pressure pump techniques.

History

Fingler and Middleton (2003, pp12–13) provide a very detailed account of historical exploration work conducted on the Dixie Lake property. They documented 116 diamond drill holes, by various operators, with total length in excess of 13,046 meters, as well as geological mapping, airborne- and ground-based geophysical surveys, and geochemical surveys. The large amount of historical activity in the area has defined a commensurate number of targets and target areas. Due to the scarcity of outcrop in the area, most of these targets have been interpreted from geophysics, including airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, ground magnetics, VLF-EM, horizontal loop/Max-Min EM and IP. Anomalies and conductors from these surveys predominantly co-incide with iron formation, graphitic argillites, and sulphide-bearing (pyrite and/or pyrrhotite) argillite, or mafic volcanic rocks.

The 88-04 zone discovery drill hole was targeted on a strong Max-Min (HLEM) conductor, which is also characterized by a northwest trending linear magnetic anomaly, a VLF-EM conductor, and strong chargeability and elevated resistivity in Time Domain Induced Polarization surveys.

The two most significant drilling campaigns on the property were conducted by Teck (1989-90) and Alberta Star/Fronteer Joint Venture (2003-04). Both programs focused on the 88-04 zone as their primary target. The Teck campaign concentrated on delineating the strike extents of the 88-04 zone to about 200 m depth, and identified a relatively enriched portion of the zone in its southeastern part. Canadian Golden Dragon drilled 10 holes in to the 88-04 zone, in 1996-97, further confirming the Presence of relatively high-grade material, locally, in the southeastern part, but effectively closed off the zone to the southeast. Using oriented core measurements, the Alberta Star/Fronteer Joint Venture were able to prove a direct relationship between the plunge of the stretching lineation within the 88-04 zone and enhanced Mineralization within the previously identified southeastern zone. Targeting from this predictive approach, allowed the Alberta Star/Fronteer JV to extended the mineralized ‘shoot’ to a depth of approximately 400 meters. Teck Explorations Ltd. produced the only published resource estimate for the Dixie Lake property (Janzen, 1989). They calculated a polygonal estimate of 417,000 tons grading 0.126 ounces of gold per ton (378,296 metric tones @ 4.3g/tAu) for the 88-04 zone, which was subsequently modified with additional drill information to an "optimistic possible tonnage" of 1.1 million short tons grading 0.10oz/tonAu. The estimate used standard methodologies for the time, but does not meet current standards as defined by the CIMM and NI43-101 (see Section 16 for additional details).

-12-


The target objective of the Alberta Star/Fronteer JV was to upgrade this resource by defining the controls on the distribution of the higher grade intercepts within the zone. Despite their successful determination of the dominant plunge direction of the high-grade material, the abundance of low-grade material within this shoot significantly impeded their attempts to demonstrate continuity of the higher grades. A structural model was proposed, where in the mineralization was interpreted to be folded and transposed into the dominant penetrative foliation, which actually transects the 88-04 zone. Such a model implies that the mineralization occupies a series of stacked lenses within the 88-04 zone, rather than continuous, down-plunge, shoots. Given the abundance of low-grade material surrounding the lenses, and the apparent geometrical complexity of the mineralization, Alberta Star opted out of further work on the property and backed out of their JV with Fronteer.

Geological Setting

Regional Geology

The Dixie Lake Property lies within the Red Lake greenstone belt of the Uchi Sub province of the Archean Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. Publications by Mary Sanborn-Barrie and co-workers (2001; 2004), at the Geological Survey of Canada, provide the most recent and comprehensive geological descriptions of the belt, and are briefly summarized here. The rocks of the Red Lake belt record a protracted (ca. 300Ma) history of episodic magmatism, sedimentation and tectono-thermal activity (Sanborn-Barrie, et al., 2001). Greenstone belt assemblages have been sub-divided into seven distinct units Comprising tholeiitic and calc-alkaline basalts, komatiite, intermediate through felsic tuffs and flows, inter layered or disconformable with quart-magnetite iron formation, fine to coarse grained clastic rocks and polymictic conglomerates.

Local Geology

The Dixie Lake property lies southeast of the main Red Lake gold mining camp in a "...broadly east-west trending belt of mafic to felsic meta-volcanics and associated metasediments, which are in folded between a series of granitic batholiths"(Fingler and Middleton, 2003, p. 16). Fingler and Middleton’s (2003) discussion was largely based on Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 5904. Confederation Assemblage calc-alkaline mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks, including pillowed flows and intermediate of felsic pyroclastic members, have been metamorphosed to amphibolite grade. Meta-sedimentary members include wacke, siltstone, conglomerate and magnetite iron formation. Crystalline rocks in the northern part of the Dixie Lake area include various granites, quartz monzonites and granodiorites; those in the South part of the area consist of tonalite and possibly quartz diorite.

-13-


Property Geology

The following geological description is quoted directly from the 2006 Assessment Report filed by Grandview Gold (Hughes, 2006).

A lack of exposure hampers any comprehensive presentation of the geology of the Dixie Lake property. Most of the information that has been used for interpretation is based on very limited regional scale mapping by government workers, geophysical extrapolation and reviews of the data from drilling.

It is generally agreed that the property is underlain by mainly Confederation Assemblage calc-alkaline mafic to felsic volcanic sequences at the western limit of the Confederation greenstone belt. Marine sediments and pyroclastic deposits appear to be more extensive in the North and eastern portions of the property, though again, hard information is lacking. These deposits include a number of intercalated iron formation units.

Overall, the volcanic suite appears to be lithologically quite variable, this conclusion, based more from drilling than mapping. Gabbros, mafic flows, pillow lavas, and related volcaniclastic rocks are intercalated with felsic volcanic flows, pyroclastic and volcaniclastic rocks and iron formation, wacke, siltstone and argillite. Some gabbros represent high level intrusions or basal flows. Arguably, this holds true for relict pyroxenite and amphibolite units noted in drilling and rarely, in outcrops.

Relatively small felsic-intermediate intrusive rocks are quite common, though again they are poorly documented. Small plugs are known to underlie portions of the Dixie Lake property, including the largest known, one immediately to the East of the known gold occurrences, appearing as an elliptic feature on magnetic maps.

Interpretation of the sequence on and around the main mineralised zones is thus based on magnetic and to a slightly lesser extent on drill data, with a minor component also from IP surveys. The property is essentially dominated by a relatively high magnetic signature sequence of folded mafic to intermediate volcanic units with the aforementioned intercalated lithotypes. This sequence underlies the central portion of the Dixie Lake property, with northern and southern flanking assemblages apparently more intermediate in nature with a higher component of felsic-intermediate felsic volcanic rocks and interbedded volcaniclastic rocks, silts, iron formations (silicate, oxide and sulphide have been recorded from past drilling), and minor argillites.

Despite the high number of drill holes completed on the property and several geophysical surveys, there appears to be lacking a clear differentiation of the relative high magnetic signatures within different lithologies. An examination of more recent drilling, coupled with the findings from the fall programme herein presented, suggest that at least for the mineralised central mafic volcanic sequence, on and around the 88-4 Zone, (see below), there is a clear stratigraphic sequence of:

-14-


Basal mafic volcanic flows and high level sub-volcanic intrusions, including gabbro, sparse amphibolite with rare relict pyroxenitic gabbro noted. These were originally relatively homogeneous and deposited likely in a shallow marine setting. Interflow sediments are common, but thin, silt-argillitic or iron formation in nature.

Slightly higher in the section, (tops were in general consistently down-hole when drilling on the 88-4 zone and to the West, thus, the majority of drilling directed south-west and South has intersected an overturned sequence), increasing volumes of silt-argillite that in some locales have been intruded, with peperitic textures noted within the high level mafic volcanic units. In zones exhibiting lower strain, there is clear evidence that a significant portion of this sequence contains pillow lavas and minor fragmental pillow lavas and sparse pillow breccias.

Mineralised horizons are typically cherty, silicified tuffaceous volcaniclastic rocks or iron formations with variable, multi-phase quartz vein content. Sedimentary sequences are predominantly silt-argillites that may form a significant component of a mineralised intersection. The youngest sequence around the centre of the Dixie Lake claims is a quite homogeneous set of intermediate to mafic volcanic flows (including rare pillows), and minor associated volcanic derived sediments.

"The association of mafic flows, intrusions and intercalated sediments suggests that the Sequence in what is now the centre of the Dixie Lake claims, was formed in a shallow Marine setting relatively close to active venting, with probably several pre-existing Anoxic basins subsequently modified by this activity. Mineralization was at least in part syn-genetic, this including pyrrhotite, pyrite, sphalerite and chalcopyrite. The provenance of arsenopyrite remains unclear.

"The Fall 2005 and recent past drilling, farther West and East established a similar Stratigraphy but with a significantly higher component of felsic (pyroclastic) volcanism deposited in marine conditions also. Basin development is characterized by relatively thin silt-argillite and commonly iron formation development. The volcanic facies suggests quiescent depositional conditions with ‘low key’ modification of sedimentary sequences by volcanic ingress.

"Without the benefit of extensive study of pre-existing drill core, it is suggested that a significant portion of the felsic volcanics previously logged as ‘intrusive’ (dykes mainly), could be thin volcaniclastic and pyroclastic lenses. These would display some textural characteristics similar to thin dykes. Mafic volcanic intrusions are abundant, and range from lamprophyre, to gabbro/diorite (high level apophyses injected into and disrupting the stratigraphy). Lamprophyres appear to be a common feature, though their deformed habit, thin nature and the prevalent biotite alteration in the area suggests some have been misinterpreted. "Comments on alteration a re-restricted to the area drilled this fall. The predominant Alteration is biotite that over prints to varying degrees, an amphibolite grade Metamorphism that had undergone minor erratic diapthoresis prior to biotite alteration. "Sericite post-dates the above and is prevalent within intermediate-felsic volcanic units, with minor ‘lateral’ and ‘vertical’ overlap into highly altered mafic volcanic flows and cherty tuffaceous sediments. "Carbonate alteration is two-fold, an early calcite-quartz+/-Fe-calcite over printed by calcite+/-quartz. Both types are essentially pre-kinematic, with the second phase in part late to occasionally post-kinematic. True ankerite and ferroan dolomite is uncommon, with some intersections in the 88-04 zone hosting a small percentage of these (pre-kinematic veins).

-15-


Silification is in part remobilized quartz veining (on and around 88-04) and possibly also related to silica gel from chert deposition. Quartz flooding is relatively uncommon and past logging of mineralized zones has overstated the intensity of silicification. "Other significant alteration includes epidote in more distal settings (typical for gold camps), and aluminosilicates. The author (Toby Hughes) and T. Pryslak have noted such alteration that has not been previously documented. Thus its extent is unknown, but likely more prevalent than previously considered.

"The structural geology of the property requires re-interpretation. Whilst the overall geometry of the folded sequence is not a subject for debate, the geometries arising from the successive deformational episodes are worthy of additional comment.

"The overall geometry and deformation described by Lee, 2004, clearly describes and illustrates the effects of an interference pattern folding produced by two major events. Resultant fabrics are

a nearly northeast trending S1 overprinted by a northwest S2. In drill core, this is manifest as transposition of S0 into a dominant main fabric, S2. S1 is preserved only as isoclinal features and in meter-scale more open fold sets in low strain zones. The major effect of the D2/S2 event in

terms of mineralization is the formation of what several authors consider to be a property scale, if not regional scale west-northwest trending high strain zone with a significant shear component. This feature is understood to host the 88-04 Zone and possibly, the Main, North and C zones.

"A re-examination over the winter is planned for the structural geology. At this stage, the following points and observations are made as they pertain to the 88-04 Zone and any western extension:

  • The area of highest strain is located either within the 88-04 Zone itself, or in the Hanging wall (younger stratigraphy). The footwall displays much lower strain.

  • Within the mineralized 88-04 Zone, there clearly are sub-sectors with negligible or apparent negligible to low strain that host if not appreciable gold, significant sulphides and/or veining.

  • Despite the efforts of some to undertake detailed structural examination of the drill core, it is clear that the effects of second and third order folding on stratigraphy have not been fully addressed. This phenomenon compounds any complex spatial and genetic relationship between shearing and mineralization.

  • Strain heterogeneity within the 88-04 Zone could be a reflection simply of original basin stratigraphy and in particular, sediment (argillite or iron formation) thickness. Arguably, a case in point is around the original 88-04 drill hole, where appreciable thicknesses of argillite do not necessarily correspond to concomitant increases in either mineralization or alteration.

-16-


  • Any postulated high grade ore shoots within, for example, the 88-04 Zone, may reflect the partial preservation of high concentrations of pre-existing quartz veining, chert sediments or proximity to a vent source.

Previous Drilling by the Corporation

In 2005, the Corporation completed a 16-hole core drilling program on its Dixie Lake Gold Property in Red Lake, Ontario. The Dixie Lake property is located 25 kilometers south of Goldcorp Inc’s Red Lake and Campbell gold mines. Core hole DL0509 intersected 4.0 gpt Au over 7.0m, including an interval of 9.53 gpt Au over 0.90m, and 3.32gpt Au over 1.90m.

Twelve of the sixteen drill holes were designed to test the lateral and vertical extensions to the 88-04 Zone, mostly to the West of the principal "mineralization shoot" of previous drill programs. Two holes (DL0502 and DL0516) tested a parallel magnetic anomaly, co-incident with an elevated Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) Au response ratio. An entirely new area defined by a high MMI Au response ratio in the East of the property was also tested by two holes (DL0503 and DL0504). Holes DL0505 and DL0510 were drilled in the original 88-04 Zone shoot. They returned values of 1.47 gpt Au over 5.95m and 1.66 gpt Au over 8.50m. These holes are drilled on the 88-04 Zone shoot and are shallow intersections into the zone. This zone remains open at depth and down plunge to the west.

Certain areas within the shoot also require additional infill drilling. A new shoot of mineralization, the "GVX shoot" was intersected in four holes from the 2005 campaign brings together continuity with five historical holes. The "GVX shoot" now has 9 holes intersecting the horizon, which grade from 0.70 gpt Au over 1.5 m to 5.85 gpt Au over 4.5 m and 10.1 gpt over 1.1m. Grandview holes DL0506, 08, 09 and 11 intersected this shoot, and encouraging mineralization, as seen in the table above. Historical holes in this zone include DL8920, 22, 29, 39 and DL0309. Hole DL0512 and DL0513 tested the 88-04 Zone horizon between the 88-04 Zone shoot and the GVX shoot. Both holes intersected gold mineralization in the 88-04 Zone horizon and returned results of 1.69 gpt Au over 1.50m in hole DL0512 and 1.56 gpt Au over 1.30m in hole DL0513.

The remaining holes, DL0501, 02, 07, 14, 15 and 16 tested the 88-04 zone west of the "GVX shoot". Hole DL0501 was the western most hole, more then 200m west of the "GVX shoot’. An intersection of 1.22 gpt Au over 1.40 m was returned in the 88-04 zone. Hole DL0515 returned no significant assays, and was drilled approximately 150m west of the "GVX shoot". Holes DL0507 and DL0514 return results of 1.38 gpt Au over 2.30m and 0.56 gpt Au over 1.75m, respectively. These holes tested 100m gaps in drilling and show the continuity of the 88-04 zone. Holes DL0501, 02 and 16 tested the far west extension of the 88-04 zone where it swings to the north. Holes DL0502 and DL0516 are more then 400m away from the 88-04 shoot and returned encouraging results of 1.00 gpt Au over 0.50m and 1.27 gpt Au over 2.00m respectively. Hole DL0502 returned a second zone of mineralization more then 200m down hole from the first zone, which returned 0.53 gpt Au over 1.0m. Hole RL0501 was drilled approximately 50m west of hole DL0515, and 200m west of the "GVX shoot", where it returned 1.22gpt Au over 1.40m

Holes DL0503 and DL0504 tested a high MMI Au response ratio, more then 800m east of the 88-04 Zone.

-17-


These are the first two holes in the vicinity and returned extremely encouraging results for a first phase program on a grass roots target of 3.32 gpt Au over 1.90m in hole DL0503 including a higher grade section running 6.73 gpt Au over 0.50m. In hole DL0504, encouraging values of 0.98 gpt Au over 0.50m were returned. It should be understood that these holes were not ideally situated, and topography and a creek crossing made drill set up less then ideal. Even with these technical challenges, these two holes are considered a great success and additional holes were planned for the next drill program, slated for early 2006

Results from the 2005 drill program point to two high priority targets. The newly identified "GVX shoot" is open to depth and should be followed up down-plunge. The identification of this second shoot to the 88-04 zone also leads to the potential of discovering further high-grade shoots in the 88-04 system. A second high priority target that was developed from the results of the 2005 drilling is the strike extension of the anomalous Au mineralization encountered in hole DL0503 and DL0504. Further, the far west holes DL0501, DL0502 and DL0516 all point to the mineralization of the 88-04 zone continuing to the west, and leave open the potential for additional higher grade shoots west of the "GVX shoot".

While the grades encountered in these zones are moderate, relative to typical operating underground mines in comparable environments, the widths can be quite large, and local high-grade occurrences and proximity to Goldcorp’s Campbell Mine and Red Lake Mine existing infrastructure make this project economically interesting.

The "88-04" zone is a silicified and sulphidized sedimentary rock occurring within a sequence of mafic volcanic rocks. Silica-carbonate alteration occurs as replacement style alteration and in quartz-calcite veins. Pyrrhotite is the most dominant sulphide followed by pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite. Visible gold is not uncommon, and is commonly associated with strong pyrrhotite and weak pyrite-arsenopyrite mineralization, as well as in quartz only veins. Previous work has identified the presence of gold-silver and lead tellurides, locally encapsulated in arsenopyrite. Native gold occurs as free gold crystals up to 50 microns in size.

The Spring 2006 drill programme comprised the completion of 5 NQ drill holes for a total of 1032.7 metres, commencing on 4.4.05 & finished on 18.4.06.

Initial plans called for a larger drill programme, testing extensions to the recently discovered MMI East zone, plus further drilling on the 88-4 Extension & targets proposed in the winter of 2005-2006 (see Fall Drilling Report). Due to the timing of the programme, & associated difficulties with Spring run-off, targets East of the MMI-East could not be drilled. Access across Dixie Creek to the other targets was hampered by ground conditions at & close to the only bridge crossing, & it was concluded that for environmental reasons, the drilling should be suspended until a later date.

Recent Work by the Corporation

During fiscal 2009 the Dixie Lake project saw limited geological work due to work commitments on other projects and limited funding. Work centered primarily on report writing with respect to the 2009 winter drilling program and further geological interpretation and computer modeling. Gemcom was contracted to consolidate all drilling data and model mineralised zones at both the 88-04 Zone and limited information on the NS Zone. That modeling was used as the basis for an exploration program to be carried our in the summer of 2009 on the Property.

-18-


The Corporation completed two drilling campaigns between the summer of 2007 and the end of the winter 2008 on the Dixie Lake property. The summer program included 18 diamond drill holes (4,563 meters of core) drilled on a number of known zones including the; 88-04 Zone, Main Zone, South Zone, C-Zone, and the MMI-East Zone. Drilling also made a significant discovery of a new zone of quartz veining with high grade mineralization and abundant visible gold. Based on these results, the Corporation carried out a brief two hole (575 meter) drill program in early January 2008 to follow up on the first pass results.

Previously unrecognized lode gold style mineralization was encountered in the New South (NS) Zone. Excellent grades from this discovery were. Overall, six diamond drill holes were drilled into the NS zone subsequent to the discovery, with four drill holes intersecting mineralization (DC-10-07, DC-15-07, DC-18-07, and DL-08-01R (see chart below). The Corporation is currently evaluating additional drilling to fully constrain the geometry of the lode gold bearing quartz veins.

Hole Number Azimuth Dip From (m) To (m) Length
(m)
Grade (g/t Au)
DC-10-07 090o -60o 181.83 182.30 0.47 163.75
      200.62 203,48 2.86 22.90
               Incl     202.12 203.12 1.00 61.97
             
DC -15-07 070o -55o 176.60 182.95 6.35 4.28
               Incl     176.60 178.30 1.70 11.30
             
DC-18-07 070o -55o 156.83 158.17 1.34 7.04
             
DC-08-1R 090o -60o 127.60 129.80 2.20 18.26

Drilling of the 88-04 Zone (1.57 g/t Au over 13.13 meters and 2.43 g/t Au over 4.0 meters) indicated the one continues to be open to depth and along strike to the east. Additional results from holes DC-01-07 (9.25 g/t Au and 6.02 g/t over 1 meter widths) and DC-04-07 (3.55 g/t Au over 3.0 meters) are encouraging as they continue to demonstrate the mineralizing potential of the Dixie Lake property.

The Corporation is continuing to evaluate future work plans on the Dixie Lake property.

-19-


BONANZA PROPERTY ("BONANZA’)

Property Description and Location

The Corporation currently holds an option to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Bonanza Property. The property consists of 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims, located on Red Lake, approximately 1.5 km north of the town of Red Lake, Ontario. Much of the property area is overlain by Red Lake, with the exception of two claims on Whitehorse Island. Access to the area during summer months is most easily accomplished via boat and in the winter months via ice roads from the town of Red Lake.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The region is covered with a variable layer of poorly documented till & associated fluvioglacial & lacustrine sediments, in the order of 0 to 15 m in thickness. Outcrop percentage overall is less than 1%. On Whitehorse Island, there is negligible outcrop, though a few scattered exposures of Dome Stock intrusive rock have been cursorily mapped by previous workers.

Topographically, the area is characterised as low rolling relief, with moderate drainage on thin to medium thickness glacial & fluvioglacial deposits. Known maximum thicknesses of these on the property are 45 metres. Elevations range from about 350 to 400 metres above sea-level.

Nearly all of the original vegetation has either been logged off or burnt.

Red Lake is located at the terminus of Highway 105, some 175 km North of Kenora, & reached via the Trans Canada Highway. The Municipality of Red Lake is serviced by regular flights from Winnipeg & Thunder Bay, seven days a week.

History

Exploration was conducted in the mid-late 1930’s & to 1948, when drilling intersected visible gold in a quartz veined, strongly silicic granodiorite/granite contact zone separating the Howey Stock from intermediate volcanic rocks of the Ball assemblage. A shaft was sunk & underground development was carried out on 2 levels with minor bulk sampling providing the above mentioned resource.

During this period, further drilling underground & on Red Lake failed to prove up additional grade & tons & significant exploration was not resumed until the 1970’s, when Bonanza Red Lake Explorations drilled additional holes on the Lake to trace previous known mineralised trends, this part of a feasibility study to include consideration of dewatering the shaft.

In 1987-89, Pure Gold Resources & Noramco resumed exploration with a large drill program, effectively replicating old drilling, outlined a 300 metre wide, 125 m deep, 125 metre long mineralised system with a calculated resource of 300,000 tons grading 0.08 oz per ton Au. Other drilling on a smaller scale, returned generally disappointing results as efforts were made to drill deeper targets along strike.

-20-


Numerous geophysical surveys have been completed by various operators and that data has been compiled with other relevant data for future use.

Regional Geology

The Bonanza property is located within the Uchi Subprovince of the Archæan Province, northwestern Ontario. The region is typically sub-divided into four major subprovinces, specifically the Uchi which contains the Red Lake & Confederation Lake greenstone belts, the South adjacent, predominantly metasedimentary & igneous intrusive English River Subprovince, & the North adjacent Berens River Subprovince. The Bonanza property lies within the Red Lake greenstone belt that hosts the world class gold deposits now held by Goldcorp Inc.

In summary, the Uchi Subprovince contains the most significant gold deposits in the entire north-west of Ontario. Five major assemblages, the Confederation dated around 2730-2800 MY, Woman River, Bruce Channel, dated at around 2800-2900 MY, Ball, dated at 2940-2925 MY,& Balmer, considered the oldest of the assemblages at around 2940-2925 MY, comprise the vast majority of the underlying geology.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out mining operations on the property, but there have been historical operations. The deposit has a historical resource of some 175,000 tons grading 0.2 oz Au above the 375 ft Level (not NI 43-101 compliant). Orlac Red Lake Mines Ltd., (subsequently Sanshaw Mines Ltd.), MacKenzie Red Lake Mines Ltd., & Cable Mines Oils Ltd. conducted drilling & underground work over this period. Caution should be used when evaluating this historical data as it was calculated prior to NI 43-101 coming into force and a qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical data as a current mineral resource within the meaning of NI 43-101.

Exploration and Development

A compilation of historical data and a resource modeling program was carried out. The objective of the compilation was an assessment of the drilling on & around the Orlac deposit, with ultimately, targeting areas for additional drilling. There have been previous efforts to understand the geology & geometry of the deposit using non-digital means. Many sections are simply paper plans & whenever possible, drill information was entered into excel format for processing into MapInfo GIS & Gemcom, the latter to provide more accurate information on the geometry of the gold mineralisation & associated alteration.

In the 2008 fiscal year, the Corporation completed a five (5) hole diamond drill program totalling 1,087 meters. The drill program targeted geophysical and structural targets beneath the waters of

-21-


Red Lake and thus drilling was carried out during the winter months in early 2008 when sufficient ice thickness was present.

Three holes targeted what is believed to be the southwest extension of a structural corridor from the Goldcorp/Premier Gold Bonanza property immediately adjacent to the Corporation's property. The drilling contractor had difficulties reaching bedrock and coring and after several attempts the holes were abandoned. The drill was pulled back to a land based setup and two holes were successfully drilled on the margin of the historic Orlac Deposit. Gold bearing mineralization was encountered in holes BS-08-03 and BS-08-04 in proximity to a granite-volcanoclastic contact zone. The following tables summarizes these results:

Hole Number From (m) To (m) Length (m) Grade (g/tonne Au)
PC-08-03 295.7 298.7 3.0 2.41
               Incl 296.7 297.7 1.0 3.50
         
PC-08-04 298.4 302.9 4.5 2.03

In fiscal 2009, work on the project was limited to report writing, geological evaluation and planning for potential future work programs.

LOISAN PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Corporation currently holds 100% interest in the Loisan Property. The Red Lake area currently hosts two high-grade, world-class gold mines, Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine and Placer Dome’s Campbell Gold Mine.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The Red Lake area is serviced by paved provincial highway 105 from the Trans Canada highway. The property is covered by relatively thin glacial debris. Much of the claims have waterfront access to Red Lake. A paved road, Sandy Point Road, transects many of the claims. Electric power and telephone lines also cross the property. Several year round homes are located on surface rights of some of the claims.

There are no parks or developments other then several year round homes are located on surface rights of some of the claims. The property can be easily accessed by boat, ski-doo, motor vehicle, or float plane.

The property has a small slope from its maximum elevation down to the shoreline, a drop of up to 15m.

The climate is typical mid-latitude continental. Field operations on most of the property are possible year round.

-22-


Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Loisan Property.

Exploration and Development

To date, the Corporation has not carried out any significant exploration or development on the Loisan Property.

BISSETT GOLD CAMP CLAIMS

Property Description and Location

The Bissett Gold Camp Claims are located on the Rice Lake greenstone belt, near the Manitoba/Ontario border and approximately 240 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg, and approximately 90 kilometres west of the Corporation’s Loisan Property.

The following table lists the Bissett Gold Camp Claims:

Bissett Cold Camp mining claims and Due Date

    Area  
 Claim# Name (Ha) Due Date*
W53272 CUPP 2 FR. 14          8/3/2009
W53561 CUPP 3 8          8/4/2009
W46040 MEL 14          2/2/2026
TOTALS 3 CLAIMS 36  

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The area was covered by the most recent continental glaciers, which scoured the property and exposed many rock outcrops throughout the property. The vegetation is predominantly deciduous, with birch, poplar mixed with tamarack, with lesser second or third growth spruce and jack pine.

Access to the Bissett Gold Camp Claims is by car or truck along Provincial Highway 304 and simply parking anywhere along the side of the road. The mining town of Bissett is located less than 10 km from nine of the eleven mining claims.

The weather, climate and seasons should not significantly affect the length of the operating season on this property because the terrain is flat and all-weather-road accessible.

-23-


History

The Bissett Gold Camp Claims contain two patented mining claims, namely the Clappelou and Packsack claims. Gold mineralization on the Packsack claim was first discovered and explored in 1919 and subsequently held by Packsack Mines Limited during the period 1934-1937. Significant gold mineralization was discovered; a mining lease was obtained and a shaft was sunk down to the 525-foot level. Additional mine shafts were sunk and gold mineralization was discovered on Claims # W46039 and W46040.

Geological Setting

The Bissett Gold Camp Claims are located in the Rice Lake greenstone belt, a region in southeastern Manitoba known as the Superior Province. The Superior Province is a terrain of large granitic masses separated by greenstone belts, which consists of rocks and volcanic of sedimentary origin. Rice Lake is an Archean lode gold mining area.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims

Exploration and Development

To date, the Corporation has not carried out any exploration or development on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims.

Environmental Considerations

The Corporation is taking the necessary steps to ensure a minimal impact to the local environment as a result of its exploration activities. Added care is taken to ensure no drill cuttings flow into the local watershed and absorbent fibres are used around all motors and working parts to collect any inadvertent drips of petrochemical. All wastes are transported from the site and deposited into a licensed land fill or recycling facility.

GEM PROPERTY

Pursuant to an Option Agreement dated September 30, 2005 between the Corporation and Marum Resources Inc. ("Marum") the Corporation was granted an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property. To acquire the 50% interest, the Corporation is required to incur a total of $250,000 in exploration expenditures on the Gem Property by September 30, 2007, $125,000 that must be incurred by September 30, 2006. The Corporation negotiated an extension to the agreement with Marum that extends the-earn in period to December 31, 2007 and negates the condition for expenditures in the amount of $125,000 by September 30, 2006. In addition, the exploration work must include a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey with a maximum 50-meter line spacing to be completed by March 31, 2006. The Corporation is also required to file with the Canadian government all assessment work required to keep the Gem Property in good standing. The Corporation negotiated a further extension that moved the December 31, 2007 deadline to December 31, 2008. In consideration for the granting of the extension to December 31, 2008, the Corporation agreed to provide to Marum certain digital information obtained form an airborne geophysical survey completed by the Corporation, which information will be combined with information already held by Marum and the results will be shared with the Corporation. The Gem property is located in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, near the town of Bissett where San Gold Corporation is currently producing gold.

-24-


Upon the Corporation completing the total of $250,000 in exploration work and filing all the required assessment work, the Corporation will be deemed to have earned a 50% interest in the Gem Property. The Corporation will be the operator of all exploration work on the Gem Property until such time as it earns its 50% interest in the property. After earning a 50% interest in the property, the Corporation and Marum intend to enter into an industry standard joint venture agreement.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims.

Exploration and Development

During the summer of 2008, the Corporation carried out geological and structural mapping, rock sampling, compilation of historical data, air photo and satellite interpretation over the project area that included the Gem claims, GVG claims and the Grand claims. The project is collectively referred to as the Rice Lake Reconnaissance Project (“RLRP”). In total, 179 rock samples were collected and analysed for gold and multi-element geochemistry. Approximately 23% of all samples collected contained anomalous gold concentrations (< 0.10 g/t). Many of these anomalous samples came from two newly discovered showings. One new showing was a narrow white quartz vein hosted in a dacitic volcaniclastic cobble conglomerate unit South of Gem Lake that returned two bonanza grade samples of 30.79 g/t and 21.83 g/t gold. The other showing was a zone of sparse light bluish-grey/white quartz veinlets (0.5%) hosted by a sulphide bearing (pyritic clots and stringers) granite intrusion east of Gem Lake that returned assays of 8.30 g/t, 5.74 g/t and 5.01 g/t gold. A total of $125,506.77 dollars was spent on the geological mapping program of Grandview’s RLRP.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, the Corporation contracted Firefly Aviation to conduct a fixed wing airborne magnetic survey covering the Gem Property. Results have only recently been received and are being integrated with the Corporation model and regional data with the intent to have follow up ground work, including prospecting and mapping, commence early in the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

The Corporation carried out limited geological mapping, prospecting and sampling in the summer of 2007 and has plans to continue grass roots exploration efforts to understand the mineral potential of the belt in the 2008 summer field season.

-25-


GVG PROPERTY

In the fall of 2005, the Corporation undertook to stake 20 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, near the town of Bissett where San Gold Corporation is currently producing gold. The property currently consists of 23 claims and is approximately 4,297 hectares in area, and is believed to cover similar geology that hosts the Red Lake Mine, Campbell Mine, and Madsen Mine, in Red Lake, Ontario, located less then 100 kilometres to the east of the GVG Property.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the GVG Property.

Exploration and Development

During the summer of 2008, the Corporation carried out geological and structural mapping, rock sampling, compilation of historical data, air photo and satellite interpretation over the project area that included the Gem claims, GVG claims and the Grand claims. The project is collectively referred to as the Rice Lake Reconnaissance Project (“RLRP”). In total, 179 rock samples were collected and analysed for gold and multi-element geochemistry. Approximately 23% of all samples collected contained anomalous gold concentrations (< 0.10 g/t). Many of these anomalous samples came from two newly discovered showings. One new showing was a narrow white quartz vein hosted in a dacitic volcaniclastic cobble conglomerate unit South of Gem Lake that returned two bonanza grade samples of 30.79 g/t and 21.83 g/t gold. The other showing was a zone of sparse light bluish-grey/white quartz veinlets (0.5%) hosted by a sulphide bearing (pyritic clots and stringers) granite intrusion east of Gem Lake that returned assays of 8.30 g/t, 5.74 g/t and 5.01 g/t gold. A total of $125,506.77 dollars was spent on the geological mapping program of Grandview’s RLRP.

In the fall of 2005, the Corporation contracted Firefly Aviation to conduct a fixed wing airborne magnetic survey covering the GVG Property. Results have been received and are being integrated with the Corporation model and regional data with the intent to have follow up ground work, including prospecting and mapping, in the future.

The Corporation carried out limited geological mapping, prospecting and sampling in the summer of 2007 and has plans to continue grass roots exploration efforts to understand the mineral potential of the belt in the 2008 summer field season.

BANKSIAN PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Banksian Property (Grand claims) is located approximately 30 km southeast of the Rice Lake Gold Mine, Bissett, Manitoba (formerly the San Antonio Mine) operated by San Gold Corporation. The Rice Lake Greenstone Belt accounts for nearly two million ounces of past gold production, most coming from the San Antonio Mine. Access to the property from the north is aided by highway #304 and from the south out of Lac de Bonnett via highway #314. Most of the project area is only accessible by traversing and limited tertiary roads. The property consists of 14 mining claims covering an area of 2,601 hectares.

-26-


History

Most historical work in the project area occurred between the late 1950’s and mid 1970’s. There was a pause activity until the mid 1980’s when exploration activity in the area picked up for approximately 5 years. Recent exploration work commenced around 2003 and has stayed relatively quiet to this point.

In March 2007, the Corporation acquired 100% interest in the claims from McKeena Gold who had staked the ground in the prior year. The Corporation flew an airborne geophysical survey over the project area in conjunction with other projects in the Rice Lake Belt in 2006. At this time the Corporation has begun acquiring historical assessment reports and completed a 7 week prospecting program over the area. As of the writing of this document the results of the program have not been compiled. Future exploration work will hinge on any positive results of the compilation program and prospecting results.

Geological Setting

The Rice Lake Belt covers the western extent of the Uchi geologic terrain. In fact, the Rice Lake greenstone belt, in Manitoba, together with the Red Lake, Bee Lake, and Pickle Lake greenstone belts, in Ontario, form the Uchi subprovince.

The Uchi terrain consists mainly of volcanic rocks that formed in an ancient ocean as well as intrusive and sedimentary rocks. These rocks are home to the important Balmer formation, which is the host to the world class gold deposits discovered at Red Lake 80 km to the east and further east at the Pickle Lake Gold Camp.

Rocks in the Rice Lake Gold Belt are similar in age to those at Red Lake. Gold mineralization is present in both older rocks in the northern part of the Belt and younger rocks in the southern part of the belt. The San Antonio mine, which has contributed over 80% of the gold production from the belt to date, is hosted in the younger southern package of rocks. Limited production has been obtained from deposits in the northern part of the Belt.

Recent Work by the Corporation

During the summer of 2008, the Corporation carried out geological and structural mapping, rock sampling, compilation of historical data, air photo and satellite interpretation over the project area that included the Gem claims, GVG claims and the Grand claims. The project is collectively referred to as the Rice Lake Reconnaissance Project (“RLRP”). In total, 179 rock samples were collected and analysed for gold and multi-element geochemistry. Approximately 23% of all samples collected contained anomalous gold concentrations (< 0.10 g/t). Many of these anomalous samples came from two newly discovered showings. One new showing was a narrow white quartz vein hosted in a dacitic volcaniclastic cobble conglomerate unit South of Gem Lake that returned two bonanza grade samples of 30.79 g/t and 21.83 g/t gold. The other showing was a zone of sparse light bluish-grey/white quartz veinlets (0.5%) hosted by a sulphide bearing (pyritic clots and stringers) granite intrusion east of Gem Lake that returned assays of 8.30 g/t, 5.74 g/t and 5.01 g/t gold. A total of $125,506.77 dollars was spent on the geological mapping program of Grandview’s RLRP.

-27-


In the fall of 2005, the Corporation contracted Firefly Aviation to conduct a fixed wing airborne magnetic survey covering the Banksian Property. Results have been received and are being integrated with the Corporation's model and regional data with the intent to have follow up ground work, including prospecting and mapping, in the future.

The Corporation carried out limited geological mapping, prospecting and sampling in the summer of 2007 and has plans to continue grass roots exploration efforts to understand the mineral potential of the belt in the 2008 summer field season.

ANGELINA PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The property is located approximately 25 km southeast of the town of Bissett in southeastern Manitoba within an area commonly referred to as the Rice Lake Greenstone Belt. The Rice Lake Greenstone belt accounts for nearly two million ounces of past gold production. Most historical production has come from the Rice Lake Gold Mine (formerly the San Antonio Gold Mine) in Bissett, Manitoba. The property consists of 4 mining claims covering an area of 351 hectares.

History

The area was first staked in 1925 and assigned to Moore Lake Mines in 1927. Several shear zones with gold bearing veins were discovered and several trenches and small pits were sunk along a number of veins. There are reports of economic exploitation, but no historical records are available. Moore Lake Mines reportedly suspended operations in 1934. Little work was carried out in the area for a number of years.

The lease was cancelled in 1975. Hans Steinleitner staked over the property in 1976 and converted the claim into Production Lease 29 in January 1980. In June 1983, the lease was transferred to Evan A. Koblanski and then transferred back to Hans G. Steinleitner in April 1985.

In 1987 Rhino Resources Inc. optioned the property from Hans G. Steinleitner and drilled three holes. From July to August 1988, Rhino Resources Inc. conducted geophysical surveys over portions of the Angelina, and Angela claims. Presumably the option reverted to Hans Steinleitner in or before 1993.

In August 1998 the Two Bits claim was acquired by 3469264 Manitoba Limited. Following the recommendations of the Whittles report for Rhino Resources a sample of rock was collected to determine the feasibility of bringing the “two Bits” vein (on the Angelina claim) into production. A bench milling test conducted by Knelson Concentrators in Langley, B.C. determined the project should move ahead to lab scale tests to confirm the current results and /or move straight into pilot or full scale tests. However, due to lack of funds this did not occur.

-28-


W. Kuran staked the Angela and Angelina claims in 2001 and optioned the property to Gossan Resources Limited in 2003. Gossan Resources conducted preliminary geological mapping in 2003 and flew an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in early 2004.

The Corporation acquired 100% interest in the property from McKeena Gold in March 2007.

Geological Setting

Geologically the Angelina Claim Block is comprised of basalts, metasediments, gabbro, pyroclastic tuffs and breccias and feldspathic dykes. This assemblage has been isoclinaly folded and boudinaged, sheared parallel to fold axes, faulted to offset the shear zones and thrust in a south westerly direction. Gold mineralization was found along shear zones striking in a NNW direction and dipping from 50 to 80 degrees to the ENE, containing quartz and carbonate veins and stringers. Historically gold mineralization has been found on six parallel shear zones. Although higher assays have been recorded in the past, up to 261 g/t in a grab sample, the highest assays found by Gossan Resources included 0.53 oz/t over 3.7m and 0.26oz/t over 7.92m in drill core. Historically a seventh mineralized shear zone was identified at depth in diamond drill hole E-88-03, a zone of 0.3oz/t Au over 6’.

Exploration and Development

In 1987 Rhino Resources Inc drills three holes, TB1, TB2 & TB3, under the vein to intersect the interpreted main break. Logs indicate trace to 0.04 oz/ton gold detected over widths ranging from 1’ to 5.7’ in sheared tuffaceous mafic volcanics. In 1988 Rhino Resources Inc. conducted magnetometer, VLF-EM surveying and an IP/Resistivity survey over portions of the Angelina, and Angela claims. From this surveying Rhino identified a number of drill targets and drilled three holes. A zone containing 0.3oz/t Au over 6’ was intersected in hole E88-03.

Hans Steinleitner started his own drill program in July 1993 and reached 30’ before mechanical failure forced the hole to be stopped. Also, samples were taken from a pit at Rhino Grid reference 900E, 350S (shear zone south of the south break) which returned assays up to 1.35 oz in a 2 3/8lb sample.

Following the recommendations of the Whittles report for Rhino Resources 3469264 Manitoba Ltd. collected samples of “ore material” from the “two Bits” vein (on the Angelina claim) to determine mining feasibility. A bench milling test conducted by Knelson Concentrators in Langley, B.C. determined the project should move ahead to lab scale tests to confirm the current results and /or move straight into pilot or full scale tests. However, due to lack of funds this did not occur.

W. Kuran staked the Angela and Angelina claims in 2001 and optioned the property to Gossan Resources Limited in 2003. Gossan Resources Limited conducted preliminary geological mapping in 2003 and flew an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in early 2004 and drilled ten diamond drill hole to test gold bearing zones that had been previously identified.

-29-


Recent Work by the Corporation

In the fall of 2007 a limited 7 diamond drill hole program (1,193 m) was completed on three targeted zones; the Discovery Shear, the Contact Zone and the Beaver Pond Vein.

Four drill holes tested a 350 meter extension of the Discovery Shear zone to the west where surface sampling had encounter grab samples of 15.2 g/t, 16.5 g/t and 10.8 g/t. Visually the shear zone appeared to improve with depth, only two holes returned significant gold values. Best results were from holes AN-07-01 which intersected 2.08 g/t over 0.50 meters at a depth of 77.5 meters, and hole AN-07-04 which intersected 2.13 g/t over 1.50 meters at a drill hole depth of 85.25 meters.

Two diamond drill holes tested a +50 meter thick zone of moderately veined, sericite-ankerite alteration zone north of the Discovery Zone. The best result was in hole AN-07-06 which intersected 1.40 g/t over 1.50 meters at a drill hole depth of 50 meters.

The final hole of the program was designed to test a quartz-ankerite vein at depth previous drilled by Gossan Resources. No significant assays were returned.

GIULIANITA PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Corporation currently holds an option to acquire 100% interest in the Giulianita Property located in northwest Peru, near the town of Suyo, in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, in the Department of Piura.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The project is easily accessed from the Pan-American Highway, approximately 100 kilometers from the city of Puira via paved highway and then approximately 15 km along well developed gravel roads to the central part of the property.

This area of northwestern Peru is temperate to hot, with abundant precipitation in the rainy season (January to March) and extremely arid conditions the remainder of the year. Field operations can be carried out throughout the year. Vegetation includes various species of mid-sized deciduous trees (3 meters in height) and limited undergrowth.

The property covers an area of relatively low elevation with most hills no greater than 350 meters above sea level, and relative relief between hills and valleys of less than 50 meters.

The main water source is the Quiroz River which lies just 2 kilometers to the northeast of the project area. Accommodation, food, power and internet access is available in a number of small towns near the project.

-30-


History

Little historic work or information is available for the project as this area of Peru has seen little in the way of modern exploration work. Records indicate that some alluvial gold extraction was carried out briefly in the mid 1970’s. Local artisanal mining and processing of ores has only occurred within the last three years and remains relatively unorganized by typical Peruvian standards.

Geological Setting

The project area is covered with an extensive layers of basaltic to andesitic volcanic flows and pyroclastics and arcosic sediments of Middle Cretaceous age. Units are fractured and argillically altered in the volcanic outcroppings studied in the area of the prospect. Intrusive units of Upper Cretaceous to Tertiary age have been mapped in the project area and felsic domes are locally present.

Numerous NNW trending faults/veins are observed on the Property which control both high grade gold mineralization and well disseminated gold targets. Mineralization is associated with highly altered (argillic and silicic) vein/fault system hosted within volcanic flows and volcanoclastic units of basaltic to andesitic composition. Several zones of mineralization have been identified on the property, but have not been actively explored in any detail. Zone One can be traced for approximately 400m south-southeast on surface, and has at least three adits/shafts that host small-scale mining. Previous exploration work done in Zone One indicates that, at the primary outcropping the overall width reaches 4.5m, with individual continuous chip samples returning 25.6 g/T Au over 1.10m, 30.6 g/T Au over 1.5m, and 12.3 g/T Au over 1.6m from within the volcanic breccia unit, and 6.19 g/T Au over 2.6m from the hanging wall fractured volcanic unit. The southern extension of Zone One connects with Zone Four were previous work indicates gold mineralization is present at surface. Zones Two and Three are located 500 meters southeast of the previously mentioned targets and again demonstrate both high-grade gold vein and disseminated gold targets.

Zone Five is located 400 meters southwest of Zone One and hosts high-grade gold vein/shear structures similar to other targets. These areas of mineralization provide significant exploration potential on the property.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Giulianta Property.

Exploration and Development

To date, the Corporation has not carried out any significant exploration or development on the Giulianita Property.

ITEM 4: DIVIDENDS

-31-


4.1 Dividend Policy

The Corporation has neither declared nor paid any dividends on its common shares. The Corporation intends to retain its earnings, if any, to finance growth and expand its operations and does not anticipate paying any dividends on its common shares in the foreseeable future. The actual timing, payment and amount of any dividends declared and paid by the Corporation will be determined by and at the sole discretion of the board of directors of the Corporation from time to time based upon, among other factors, the cash flow, results of operations and financial condition of the Corporation, the need for funds to finance ongoing operations and exploration and such other considerations as the board of directors in its discretion may consider or deem relevant. At this time, the Corporation anticipates that payment of dividends would only be possible in the event it successfully brings one of its mining properties into commercial production.

ITEM 5: DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

5.1 General Description of Capital Structure

The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, of which 44,652,058 were issued and outstanding as at the date of this AIF. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of any meeting of shareholders of the Corporation, and to attend and to cast one vote per common share at all such meetings. Holders of common shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and, accordingly, holders of a majority of the common shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors standing for election. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends, if any, on a pro rata basis, such dividends, as and when declared by the Corporation's board of directors in its discretion (please see "Dividend Policy" above). Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, holders of common shares are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis the net assets of the Corporation after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attending to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro rata basis with the holders of common shares with respect to dividends or liquidation. The common shares do not carry any pre-emptive subscription, redemption or conversion rights.

The Corporation is also authorised to issue an unlimited number of special preference voting shares (the "Preference Shares") of which there are none outstanding as of the date of this AIF. The Preference Shares have no par value have been designated as redeemable, voting, and non-participating. No dividends are to be declared, set aside or paid on the Preference Shares. In the event of the liquidation of the Corporation or other distribution of assets or property of the Corporation among shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs the holders of the Preference Shares shall be entitled to receive from the assets and property of the Corporation a sum equivalent to the aggregate paid up capital of the Preference Shares held by them respectively before any amount shall be paid or any property or assets of the Corporation distributed to the holders of any Common Shares or shares of any other class ranking junior to the Preference Shares. After payment to them as above provided the holders of the Preference Shares shall not be entitled to share in the property of the Corporation. The Corporation may not redeem the Preference Shares or any of them prior to the expiration of five years from the respective date of issuance thereof, without prior consent of the holders of the Preference Shares to be redeemed. The Corporation shall redeem the then outstanding Preference Shares five years from the respective dates of issue of the Preference Shares. In the case of a redemption of the Preference Shares, the Corporation shall at least thirty (30) days prior to the date specified for redemption mail to each person who at the date of the mailing is a registered holder of Preference Shares to be redeemed a notice in writing of the intention of the Corporation to redeem such Preference shares. On or after the date so specified for redemption, the Corporation shall pay or cause to be paid to or to the order of the registered holders of the Preference Shares to be redeemed the redemption price thereof on presentation and surrender at the head office of the Corporation or any other place designated in such notice of the certificates representing the Preference Shares called for redemption. From and after the date specified for redemption in any such notice the holders thereof shall not be entitled to exercise any of the rights of Preference Share holders in respect thereof unless payment of the redemption price shall not be made on presentation of certificates in accordance with the foregoing, in which case the rights of the Preference Share holders shall remain unaffected. The Corporation may at any time or times purchase for cancellation all or any part of the Preference Shares outstanding from time to time from the holders thereof, at a price not exceeding the paid up capital thereof, with the consent of the holders thereof. The holders of Preference Shares shall be entitled to receive notice of and attend all meetings of shareholders of the Corporation and shall have one (1) vote for each Preference Share held at all meetings of the shareholders of the Corporation. No holder shall sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of any Preference Share or Preference Shares without prior approval of the board of directors of the Corporation and prior approval of the Ontario Securities Commission. For each five (5) Preference Shares held the holder may at his or her option convert such five (5) Preference Shares into one (1) Share but in no event shall the total number of Shares issued on the conversion of Preference Shares exceed 100,000 Shares in the aggregate.

-32-


5.2 Constraint

This is not applicable.

5.3 Ratings

This is not applicable.

ITEM 6: MARKET FOR SECURITIES

6.1 Trading Price and Volume

The common shares of the Corporation are currently listed for trading on the TSX under the trading symbol "GVX". Prior to April, 2006, the common shares of the Corporation were listed and posted for trading the CNQ. The following chart lists the price ranges and volumes traded for such shares on the TSX for each month during the 12 month period ended May 31, 2009:

Month High Low Close Volume
May, 2009  0.10  0.065 0.07  1,120.386
April, 2009  0.12  0.08 0.08 410,280
March, 2009  0.11  0.075 0.11 583,758
February, 2009  0.145  0.065 0.10 1,374,011
January, 2009 0.08 0.05 0.07 776,800
December, 2008 0.07 0.035 0.05 703,050
November, 2008 0.095 0.04 0.045 1,034,320
October, 2008 0.225 0.06 0.07 1,173,071
September, 2008 0.25 0.10 0.17 734,362
August, 2008 0.25 0.175 0.18 387,377
July, 2008 0.295 0.195 0.22 744,876
June, 2008 0.30 0.24 0.255 794,431

-33-


6.2 Prior Sales

This is not applicable

ITEM 7: ESCROWED SECURITIES

This is not applicable.

ITEM 8: DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

8.1 Names, Addresses, Occupation and Security Holdings

The following table and the notes thereto set out the name, province and country of residence of each director and executive officer of the Corporation, their current position and office with the Corporation, their present principal occupation or employment, the date on which they were first elected or appointed a director or officer of the Corporation, the approximate number of common shares of the Corporation beneficially owned directly or indirectly or over which they exercise control or direction as at the date of this AIF, and the percentage of the total issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation represented by such shares:

Name, Current Position(s)
with the Corporation and
Province and Country
Principal Occupation(s)
During Last Five (5) Years If
Different from Office Held
Director /
Officer
Since
No. and percentage of Shares
beneficially owned, or
controlled or directed, directly
or indirectly as at the date of
this AIF(1)
Paul Sarjeant (2)
Director and Chief Executive
Officer Ontario,
Canada
From 1999 until November, 2006 operated a securities business focused on strategic planning and investment analysis. Since his appointment, Mr. Sarjeant's full time employment has been with the Corporation. November 2006 Nil
D. Richard Brown( 3)(4)(5) 
Director
Ontario, Canada
Partner at Osprey Capital Partners March 2004 5,000/0.011%

-34-



Michael Hitch(5)(8)
Chairman and Director
Vancouver, British Columbia
Professor , Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia November 2005 Nil
Peter Born (4)(8)
Director
Ontario, Canada
Ph.D., professional registered geologist (ON) and President of 1727856 Ontario Ltd. June 2007 Nil
Harold Wolkin(4)(5)(9)
Director
Ontario, Canada
Prior to 2008 served as Managing Director, Investment and Corporate Banking, BMO Capital Markets and currently serves as President and CEO of Princeville Capital Corp. April 2008 40,000/0.09%
Ken Hight (10)
Director
Ontario, Canada
From 2000-2005 served as CEO of ITG Canada, from 2005 – 2008 served as CEO of ETrade Canada, and concurrently EVP, E Trade Financial New York, currently, CEO Liquidnet Canada May 2008 Nil
Ernest Cleave (9)
Chief Financial Officer
Ontario, Canada
Consultant November 2005 Nil
R. Ian Mitchell
Corporate Secretary
Ontario, Canada
Corporate lawyer. Associate at WeirFoulds LLP, a full-service downtown Toronto law firm and corporate and securities counsel to the Corporation. November 2005 Nil

Note(s):

  (1)

The information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, not being within the knowledge of the Corporation, has been furnished by the respective directors and executive officers individually.

     
  (2)

Paul Sarjeant holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,750,000 common shares of the Corporation, 500,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.00 per common share expiring on October 31, 2011, 600,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 650,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Sarjeant under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

     
  (3)

D Richard Brown holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,000,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.00 per common share expiring on October 1, 2009, 200,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.80 per common share expiring on April 3, 2011, 200,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2008, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Brown under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

-35-



  (4)

Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Peter Born.

     
  (5)

Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Michael Hitch.

     
  (6)

Michael Hitch holds options to purchase up to a total of 925,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.25 per common share expiring on January 6, 2011, 100,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.80 per common share expiring on April 3, 2011, 225,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Hitch under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

     
  (7)

Ernest Cleave holds options to purchase up to a total of 475,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Cleave under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

     
  (8)

Dr. Peter Born holds options to purchase up to a total of 800,000 common shares of the Corporation, 225,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014.

     
  (9)

Harold Wolkin holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014.

     
  (10)

Ken Hight holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014.

The directors of the Corporation are elected by the shareholders at each annual general meeting and serve until the next annual general meeting, or until their successors are duly elected or appointed. Officers of the Corporation are appointed by the board of directors.

As of the date of this AIF, approximately 131,000 common shares of the Corporation were beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the current directors and officers of the Corporation as a group representing approximately 0.29% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation on a non-diluted basis.

8.2 Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

Except as disclosed below, to the best knowledge of the Corporation, no director or officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation is, as at the date hereof or has been within the last ten years prior to the date hereof, (a) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued while the director or officer of the Corporation was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; (b) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued after the director or officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in such capacity; (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (d) became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

-36-


To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director or executive officer of the Corporation, (a) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory or (b) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

8.3 Conflicts of Interest

Certain directors and officers of the Corporation are also directors, officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and exploiting natural resource properties. Such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time.

ITEM 9 Promoters

9.1 Not Applicable.

ITEM 10 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

10.1 Legal Proceedings

There are no legal proceedings involving the Corporation or its properties as of the date of this AIF and the Corporation knows of no such proceedings currently contemplated.

ITEM 11 INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

11.1 Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions

Except as disclosed below or elsewhere in this AIF the Corporation is not aware of any material interest direct or indirect in which management, insiders or significant shareholders also have an interest.

-37-


Services Agreement

The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Services Agreement") with Paul Sarjeant and his duly registered sole proprietorship whereby Mr. Sarjeant agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Sarjeant CDN $12,500 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Services Agreement had a three year term ending October 27, 2009.

Consulting Services Agreement

The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Consulting Services Agreement") with Michael Hitch whereby Mr. Hitch agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Consulting services Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Hitch CDN $6,250 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Consulting Services Agreement had a three month term ending September 12, 2006. Although Mr. Hitch is no longer serving as Chief Executive Officer, he continues to provide consulting services to the Corporation and the contract has been extended to December 31, 2007, with a further option for renewal until December 31, 2008. The Consulting Agreement was renewed in December 2007 for a further one year term but the payments under the Consulting Contract were reduced to CDN $5,000 per month. The option was not renewed by the Corporation in 2008 and Mr. Hitch no longer receives any compensation from the Corporation.

Personal Services Agreement

The Corporation entered into a consulting agreement (the "Personal Services Agreement") dated November 15, 2005 with Ernest M. Cleave. Pursuant to the Personal Services Agreement, Mr. Cleave was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. Under the Personal Services Agreement Mr. Cleave receives $60,000 per year. The payments under the Personal Services Agreement were reduced to CDN $3,000 per month.

ITEM 12: Transfer Agents and Registrars

12.1 Transfer Agents and Registrars

Equity Transfer & Trust Company ("Equity") is the Corporation's transfer agent and registrar. Equity is located at Suite 400, 200 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4H1.

-38-


ITEM 13: MATERIAL CONTRACTS

13.1 Material Contracts

The following is a list of material contracts entered into by the Corporation since June, 2004 and still in effect at May 31, 2009. These do not include contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business:

  (a)

Dixie Lake Property - Option agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. and the Corporation, effective dated as of August 26, 2005, relating to the Corporation’s option to acquire an interest in the Dixie Lake Property, Red Lake, Ontario.

     
  (b)

Gem Property - Option Agreement dated September 30, 2005 and subsequently amended on December 15, 2006 between the Corporation and Marum Resources Inc. granting the Corporation an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, in Manitoba.

     
  (c)

Bonanza Property – Option agreement dated effective October 30, 2006 between the Corporation and EMCO CORPORATION SA., and amended on June 22, 2007 relating to the Corporation’s option to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property in the Red Lake Mining District, Red Lake, Ontario.

ITEM 14; INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

14.1 Names of Experts

Christopher Lee, M.Sc., P. Geo and SRK Consulting were both involved in the preparation and compilation of the SRK Report.

14.2 Interests of Experts

None.

ITEM 15 AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN AN AIF

The following information regarding the Audit Committee of the Corporation's Board of Directors is required to be disclosed pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees ("MI 52-110").

Audit Committee Charter

The text of the Audit Committee's charter is set out as Schedule "A" to this AIF.

-39-


Composition of the Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Peter Born. Each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Wolkin and Dr. Born are "independent" and "financially literate", as those terms are defined MI 52-110.

Relevant Education and Experience

The education and experience of each Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as an audit committee member is as follows:

Mr. Brown holds a Masters degree in finance from the Daniels School of Business at the University of Denver and a BA in Economics from the University of Guelph and has over 15 years experience in public company financing, corporate/capital structuring and development. Mr. Brown is on the board of a number of junior resource companies and is also a partner at Osprey Capital, a successful Toronto Investment Banking firm.

Mr. Wolkin is a Chartered Financial Analyst and a former president of the CFA Society of Toronto. He entered the Investment Industry in 1976 as a Financial Analyst and Economist. In 1983, he joined BMO Nesbit Burns as a Senior Research Analyst responsible for Management and Diversified Companies. In 1992, he moved to BMO Nesbit Burns’s Investment and Corporate Banking Group. Over the following 15 years he represented his firm as a lead underwriter for a number of Canada’s largest equity offerings. He received a Bachelor of Arts (Economics) degree from York University and a Master of Arts (Economics and Finance) degree from The University of Toronto. He

Dr. Born holds a PhD in Earth Sciences received from Carleton University in 1996. Dr. Born has been involved in the mining industry since 1978 and has worked for both private and governmental entities. Throughout his career Dr. Born has, in addition to his scientific responsibilities, been responsible for overseeing the financial budgets and reporting requirements for teams of up to 30 people.

Reliance on Certain Exemptions in Sections 2.4, 3.2, 3.4 or 3.5 of MI 52-110

This is not applicable.

Reliance on the Exemptions in Subsection 3.3(2) or Section 3.6 of MI 52-110

This is not applicable.

Reliance on Section 3.8 of MI 52-110

This is not applicable.

Audit Committee Oversight

This is not applicable.

-40-


Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The policy of the Audit Committee regarding the engagement of non-audit services is set out at Section 7 of the Audit Committee's Charter, which is disclosed in its entirety as Schedule "A" hereto.

External Auditor Service Fees (By Category)

Audit Fees

For its financial year ended May 31, 2009, $45,000 was accrued in favour of the Corporation's external auditors, McCarney Greenwood LLP, for audit services.

Audit-Related Fees

For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2009, McCarney Greenwood LLP was paid a total of $NIL in respect of assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Corporation's financial statements which are not included in "Audit Fees", above.

Tax Fees

For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2009, $3,000 was accrued in favour of McCarney Greenwood LLP in respect of tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

All Other Fees

For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2009, McCarney Greenwood LLP was paid a total of $NIL, in respect of products or services other than those reported under "Audit Fees", "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees", above.

ITEM 16 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Corporation may be found on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com.

Information regarding directors' and officers' remuneration, principal holders of the Corporation's securities and securities authorized for issuance pursuant to equity compensation plans is contained in the Corporation's management proxy information circular for the last annual and special meeting of shareholders held on November 28, 2008.

Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the year ended May, 31, 2008.

-41-


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
SCHEDULE "A"
TO ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2005

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Name

There shall be a committee of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") known as the Audit Committee.

General Purpose

The Audit Committee has been established to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the following areas: the Corporation's external audit function; internal control and management information systems; the Corporation's accounting and financial reporting requirements; the Corporation's compliance with law and regulatory requirements; the Corporation's risks and risk management policies and such other functions as are delegated to it by the Board. Specifically, with respect to the Corporation's external audit function, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: the quality and integrity of the Corporation's financial statements; the independent auditors' qualifications; and the performance of the Corporation's independent auditors.

The Audit Committee is intended to facilitate and provide a means of open communication between management, the external auditors and the Board.

Composition and Qualifications

The Audit Committee shall consist of as many members as the Board shall determine, but in any event not fewer than three (3) members who are appointed by the Board. The composition of the Audit Committee shall meet all applicable independence, financial literacy and other legal and regulatory requirements. More specifically, all members of the Audit Committee shall be "unrelated"1 and "financially literate"2 and at least one (1) member shall have "accounting or related financial experience"3.

The Board shall designate the Chairman of the Audit Committee and in so doing shall consider the recommendation of the Governance and Compensation Committee. The Chairman shall have responsibility for overseeing that the Committee fulfills its mandate and duties effectively.

__________________________
1
a director who is independent of management and is free from any interest and any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the director’s ability to act with a view to the best interests of the company, other than interests and relationships arising from shareholding.
2 the ability to read and understand a balance sheet, an income statement, a cash flow statement and the notes attached thereto.
3 the ability to analyse and interpret a full set of financial statements including the notes attached thereto, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

-1-


Each member of the Audit Committee shall continue to be a member until a successor is appointed, unless the member resigns, is removed or ceases to be a director. The Board, following consideration of the recommendation of the Governance and Compensation Committee, may fill a vacancy which occurs in the Audit Committee at any time.

Meetings

The Chairman of the Audit Committee, in consultation with the Audit Committee members, shall determine the schedule and frequency of the Audit Committee meetings provided that the Audit Committee will meet at least four (4) times in each fiscal year and at least once in every fiscal quarter. The Audit Committee shall have the authority to convene additional meetings as circumstances require. A schedule for each of the meetings will be disseminated to Audit Committee members prior to the start of each fiscal year. A detailed agenda for each meeting will be disseminated to Audit Committee members as far in advance of each meeting as is practicable.

The Audit Committee shall meet separately, periodically, with management, counsel and the external auditors. The Audit Committee shall meet separately with the external auditors at every meeting of the Audit Committee at which external auditors are present.

Responsibilities

The Audit Committee is mandated to carry out the following responsibilities:

6.

External Auditors

     
(a)

Subject to applicable law, the Audit Committee shall be responsible for the appointment, compensation, oversight and termination of the external auditor. The external auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee and shall be accountable to the Board and Audit Committee as representatives of the shareholders.

     
(b)

The Audit Committee shall pre-approve all non-audit mandates for services the external auditor shall undertake.

     
(c)

The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself, on behalf of the Board, that the external auditor is independent of management. In assessing such independence, the Audit Committee shall discuss with the external auditors, and may require a letter from the external auditor outlining, any relationships between the external auditors and the Corporation or its affiliates.

     
(d)

The Audit Committee shall review the audit plan of the external auditors, the integration of the external audit with the internal control program, and the results of the audit, which shall include reviewing the external auditor’s letter to management and management’s response thereto and other material written communications between management and the external auditors.

-2-



(e)

The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself, annually or more frequently as the Audit Committee considers appropriate, as to the external auditors' internal quality control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the external auditor, or by any public enquiry, review, or investigation by governmental, professional or other regulatory authorities.

     
(f)

The Audit Committee shall periodically review and discuss with management and the external auditors the quality and acceptability of the Corporation’s accounting policies and practices, the materiality levels which the external auditors propose to employ, any significant changes in the accounting policies and any proposed changes in accounting or financial reporting that may have a significant impact on the Corporation.

     
(g)

The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management by the external auditors, the ramifications of these alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by the external auditors.

     
7.

Financial Information

     
(a)

The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors whether the audited annual financial statements present fairly (in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles) in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of and for the periods presented and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board, the annual audited financial statements of the Corporation.

     
(b)

The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors whether the unaudited quarterly financial statements present fairly (in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of and for the periods presented and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board, the unaudited quarterly financial statements of the Corporation.

     
(c)

The Audit Committee shall review the Annual Report to Shareholders and other financial information (including the annual and quarterly Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Annual Information Form and any prospectus or offering circular) prepared by the Corporation with management and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board and recommend for filing with regulatory bodies.

     
(d)

The Audit Committee shall review any news releases and reports to be issued by the Corporation containing earnings guidance or financial information for research, analysts and rating agencies. The Audit Committee shall also review the Corporation's policies relating to financial disclosure and the release of earningsguidance and the Corporation's compliance with financial disclosure rules and regulations.

-3-


The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors important trends and developments in financial reporting practices and requirements and their effect on the Corporation's financial statements.

8.

Internal Control

     
(a)

The Audit Committee shall oversee the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control systems, through discussions with the Corporation’s external auditors and management and shall report to the Board on an annual basis.

     
(b)

The Audit Committee shall review annually the Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and its effectiveness and enforcement.

     
9.

Risk Management

     
(a)

The Audit Committee shall review with management the principal risks facing the Corporation, and the policies, processes and procedures for management’s monitoring and managing of such risks or exposures. If necessary, the Audit Committee will mandate, monitor and evaluate the steps management has taken to monitor and manage such exposures, including insuring against such risks, where appropriate.

     
10.

Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Requirements

     
(a)

The Audit Committee shall review with management, and any internal or external counsel as the Committee considers appropriate, any legal matters (including the status of pending litigation) that may have a material impact on the Corporation and any material reports or inquiries from regulatory or governmental agencies.

     
(b)

The Audit Committee shall review with counsel the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation's procedures to ensure compliance with the legal and regulatory responsibilities.

     
11.

Other

     
(a)

The Audit Committee shall also perform such other activities related to this Charter as requested by the Board.

     
(b)

The Audit Committee shall review and assess the adequacy of this Charter annually and shall submit any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

-4-



  (c)

The Audit Committee may delegate its authority and duties to subcommittees or individual members of the Committee as it deems appropriate.

Reporting

The Audit Committee shall report its deliberations and discussions regularly to the Board and shall submit to the Board the minutes of its meetings.

Resources

The Audit Committee shall have the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain independent legal, accounting and other consultants to advise the Audit Committee at the expense of the Corporation. The Audit Committee shall be provided with the necessary funding to compensate the external auditors and any other advisors they engage.

The Audit Committee may request any officer or employee of the Corporation or the Corporation’s external counsel or external auditors to attend a meeting of the Audit Committee or to meet with any member of, or consultants to, the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall have full access to all of the Corporation's books, records, facilities and personnel.

Complaints Procedure

Any director, officer or employee who has any concern or complaints regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters or any potential violations of law or regulatory provisions may, in accordance with the Code of Business Conduct, make an anonymous submission to any member of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall establish procedures for the review and resolution of such complaints.

Limitation on the Oversight Role of the Audit Committee

Nothing in this Charter is intended, or may be construed, to impose on any member of the Committee a standard of care or diligence that is in any way more onerous or extensive than the standard to which all members of the Board are subject. Each member of the Committee shall be entitled, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to rely on the integrity of those persons and organizations within and outside the Corporation from whom he or she receives financial and other information, and the accuracy of the information provided to the Corporation by such persons or organizations.

While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Corporation’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada and applicable rules and regulations. These are the responsibility of management and the external auditors.

-5-


EX-99.21 22 exhibit99-21.htm EXHIBIT 99.21 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.21 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.21

FORM 52-109F1
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended May 31, 2009.

   
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

   
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

   
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

   
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end


  (a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that


  (i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

     
  (ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and


  (b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.


5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

   
5.2

N/A

   
5.3

N/A

   
6.

Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have


  (a)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

     
  (b)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A


  (i)

our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

     
  (ii)

N/A




7.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2009 and ended on May 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

   
8.

Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: August 31, 2009

“Ernest Cleave”            
[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.22 23 exhibit99-22.htm EXHIBIT 99.22 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.22 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.22

FORM 52-109F1
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended May 31, 2009.

   
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

   
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

   
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

   
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end


  (a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that


  (i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

     
  (ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and


  (b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.


5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

   
5.2

N/A

   
5.3

N/A

   
6.

Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have


  (a)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

     
  (b)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A


  (i)

our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

     
  (ii)

N/A




7.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2009 and ended on May 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

   
8.

Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: August 31, 2009

“Paul Sarjeant”                
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.23 24 exhibit99-23.htm EXHIBIT 99.23 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.23 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.23

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Red Lake Project Assays Indicate Continuity Between
Gold Zones 88-4 and 88-4 Extension, and New Gold Targets

October 6, 2009, - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to report the receipt of assays for the 2009 diamond drilling programme at its Dixie Lake Property ( the “Property”) in the Red Lake gold district of Ontario, and that findings indicate continuity between gold zones 88-4 and 88-4 Extension, and the existence of additional priority targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone.

The drill programme was designed to test mineralization intersected from previous drilling, specifically, extensions to and infil of, the 88-4 Zone, continuity between the 88-4 Zone and the 88-4 extension, and the more recently discovered NS Zone. The Property, located just 16 miles south of Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine is considered highly prospective for high-grade, narrow vein gold typical of the Red Lake gold district.

“Our objectives this season were to more narrowly define our Dixie Lake targets, target additional gold on the NS Zone, and determine continuity of mineralized zones like 88-4, which previously assayed 3.147 g/T Au over 9.94 metres from 67.9 to 77.85 metres, and 6.89 g/T over 4.68 metres from 124.36 to 129.05," says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant. "And on the so-called 88-4 ‘Extension’ which we now consider contiguous, previous assays include 5.85 g/T au over 4.5 metres from 181.7 to 186.2 metres. The zone correlates with the deeper mineralization intersected in DC-01-07, 1.56 g/T Au over 13.13 metres, and indicates that mineralization within the extension of the 88-4 Zone is continuous vertically.”

Significant Results: Dixie Lake Project; NS Zone, 88-4 Zone & 88-4 extension

Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T Comments
DL-09-01 138.1 138.6 0.5 16.32 NS Zone
           
DL-09-02 135.6 138.0 2.4 1.99 NS Zone quartz vein
           
DL-09-02 148.2 149.6 2.3 2.85 NS Zone quartz vein
           
DL-09-03 26.1 30.5 4.4 2.17 88-4 East end
including 29.5 30.5 1.0 4.79  
           
DL-09-03 178.8 180.2 1.4 5.35 Quartz vein, NS Zone at depth?
           
DL-09-05 91.2 99.3 8.1 2.08 88-4 Zone
including 96.6 97.7 1.1 3.58  
including 97.6 99.3 1.7 2.28  
           
DL-09-06 228.4 233.6 5.2 2.01 Between 88-4 & 88-4 Extension
including 230.3 231.8 1.5 3.52  


In general, gold intersections returned from the drilling reflected successful intersections of the high grade quartz vein set in the NS Zone. Holes DL-09-01, and DL-09-02 intersected auriferous massive quartz veining that is considered to be the same as that intersected from previous drill programmes (2007-2008). The results indicate continuity of the vein set.

Grandview Vice President Exploration Toby Hughes comments, “Arguably, the same quartz vein set was also intersected in DDH DL-09-03, collared some 60 metres north west. Based on a west north-west strike & sub-vertical dip to the vein set, the massive quartz veining intersected therein would be intersected at the depth recorded from drilling (c. 180 metres). If so, the potential for additional gold would increase significantly upon additional drilling.”

The gold mineralization on 88-4 Zone and the NS Zone remain open at depth, both down-dip and down-plunge. Additional targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone are indicated by highly anomalous precious & base metal values (Cu-Zn-Ni), obtained from past geochemical sampling, associated with the emplacement of an intrusion East of the historic drilling. These have not been drill tested & are considered priority targets.

“Overall, we are very pleased by the results of the 2009 programme,” says Sarjeant. “Previous core results coupled with the latest assays suggest the NS Zone has greater continuity and we will need to evaluate our next steps. We believe this target represents the more typical, high-grade, narrow vein gold system associated with producing Red Lake gold district mines. The 88-4 Zone continues to return intercepts consistent with historical results and our drilling has confirmed the zone remains open to further exploration.”

About the Property
Grandview has an option agreement with Fronteer Development Group and has earned a 64% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property located 16 miles south of Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine. The Property has an established gold resource (Teck, 1989), calculating a tonnage for the 88-4 zone of 1.1 million tons grading 0.10 ounces gold per ton. This inferred gold resource included high grade intercepts up to 15.60 g/t gold over 2.83m (from DL89-09) at depths of less than 50m. Grandview has not completed the work required to verify this historical estimate and is not treating this historical estimate as being compliant with current standards under 43-101 and as such this historical estimate should not be relied upon.

About the Red Lake Gold District
The Red Lake Gold Mining District in northwestern Ontario is to Canada what the Witwatersrand District is to South Africa - the most prolific gold producing region in the entire country. Since the mid-1960's The Red Lake District has yielded over 30-million ounces of and is home to Goldcorp's Red Lake and Campbell Mines.

Despite Red Lake's long history, the most prolific discovery was made just a dozen years ago. Dickenson Mines Ltd. had been successfully operating the Arthur White Mine in the region since 1948 and was acquired by Goldcorp in 1989. After applying advanced science and contemporary perspective to the former Arthur White Mine site and surrounding area, and implementing an impressive exploration program, Goldcorp made one of the highest grade gold discoveries in the world, averaging 9.08 ounces of gold over 7.5 feet on nine drill holes.

About Grandview
Grandview Gold Inc. is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at numerous high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.


For further information, contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc.'s operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc.'s control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


EX-99.24 25 exhibit99-24.htm EXHIBIT 99.24 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.24 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.24


Grandview Gold Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

(Unaudited)

 



Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at August 31, 2009.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at August 31, 2009.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
Toronto, Canada  
October 12, 2009  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

             
    August 31,     May 31,  
(Unaudited)   2009     2009  
Assets            
Current assets            
             Cash and cash equivalents $  324,654   $  106,593  
             Short term investments   -     407,493  
             GST and sundry receivable   10,084     5,707  
             Prepaid expenses   8,316     12,283  
             Due from a related party (Note 12(iv))   10,000     10,000  
    353,054     542,076  
             
Reclamation bond (Note 5)   14,375     14,332  
Mining interests (Note 6)   3,566,827     3,442,793  
             
  $  3,934,256   $  3,999,201  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
             Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  102,019   $  72,467  
Asset retirement obligation   14,375     14,332  
    116,394     86,799  
             
Shareholders' equity   3,817,862     3,912,402  
             
  $  3,934,256   $  3,999,201  

Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1)

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollar)

                Cumulative from  
                date of inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     26, 2004)  
Expenses                  
Share-based payments $  368,500   $  -   $  4,398,625  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   17,393     16,824     1,805,204  
Professional fees   42,438     30,729     1,266,082  
Management services (Note 12)   20,000     74,214     1,363,190  
Office and administration   11,934     17,185     681,072  
Exploration evaluation expenses   60     -     19,945  
Flow-through interest expense   -     -     188,801  
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     25,000  
Bad debt   -     -     1,235  
                   
    460,325     138,952     9,749,154  
                   
Loss before the under noted   (460,325 )   (138,952 )   (9,749,154 )
Interest income   (2,715 )   563     86,357  
Write-off of mineral properties   -     -     (7,988,830 )
Forgiveness of debt   -     -     35,667  
Failed merger costs   -     -     (170,000 )
                   
Loss before income taxes   (463,040 )   (138,389 )   (17,785,960 )
Future income tax recovery   -     -     1,675,990  
                   
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period $  (463,040 ) $  (138,389 ) $  (16,109,970 )
                   
Basic loss per share (Note 10) $ (0.01 ) $ (0.00 )      
                   
Diluted loss per share (Note 10) $ (0.01 ) $ (0.00 )      

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                   
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
                exploration  
    Three Months Ended     stage  
    August 31,     (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     26, 2004)  
                   
Accumulated Deficit                  
Balance at beginning of period $ (19,081,178 ) $ (11,193,260 ) $  (3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (463,040 )   (138,389 )   (16,109,970 )
                   
Balance at end of period $ (19,544,218 ) $ (11,331,649 ) $ (19,544,218 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 4 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                               
(Unaudited) Share Capital Warrants Contributed Surplus Accumulated Deficit Total
                               
At May 31, 2008 $ 14,202,266   $ 3,742,570   $ 4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $ 11,541,520  
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
                               
                               
At May 31, 2009   14,430,400     1,203,804     7,359,376     (19,081,178 )   3,912,402  
Share-based payments   -     -     368,500     -     368,500  
Warrants expired   -     (860,218 )   860,218     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (463,040 )   (463,040 )
                               
                               
At August 31, 2009 $ 14,430,400   $ 343,586   $ 8,588,094   $ (19,544,218 ) $ 3,817,862  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                   
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     26, 2004)  
                   
Cash flows from operating activities                  
Net loss for the period $  (463,040 ) $  (138,389 ) $ (16,109,970 )
Items not involving cash:                  
           Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     25,000  
           Forgiveness of debt   -     -     (35,667 )
           Write-off of bad debts   -     -     1,235  
           Share-based payments   368,500     -     4,398,625  
           Future income tax recovery   -     -     (1,675,990 )
           Accrued interest income-   -     -     (43,903 )
           Write-off of mineral properties         -     7,988,830  
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                  
           GST and sundry receivable   (4,377 )   27,114     (9,594 )
           Prepaid expenses   3,967     (28,457 )   (8,316 )
           Due from a related party   -     -     80,000  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   29,552     98,889     108,189  
                   
Cash flows used in operating activities   (65,398 )   (40,843 )   (5,281,561 )
                   
Cash flows from financing activities                  
Loans from related parties   -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   -     -     18,052,210  
Cost of issuance   -     -     (1,776,309 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     (75,000 )
                   
Cash flows provided by financing activities   -     -     16,347,307  
                   
                   
Cash flows from investing activities                  
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   407,493     534,805     43,903  
Exploration advances   -     -     -  
Expenditures on mining interests   (124,034 )   (319,901 )   (10,681,905 )
Due from a related party   -     -     (90,000 )
                   
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $  283,459   $ 214,904   $ (10,741,092 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements

- 6 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                   
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     26, 2004)  
                   
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period $  218,061   $  174,061   $  324,654  
                   
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   106,593     84,856     -  
                   
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $  324,654   $  258,917   $  324,654  
                   
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Transactions                  
Share issuance included in mining interest $  10,800   $  -   $  574,675  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                   
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     26, 2004)  
                   
Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA (Note 6)            
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  5,679,340   $  -  
                   
               Drilling, assays and related field work   -     70,362     4,684,830  
               Project administration and general   -     12,241     96,879  
               Property acquisition and holding costs   -     84,695     1,121,633  
               Write-off   -     -     (5,903,342 )
                   
    -     167,298     -  
                   
               Balance, end of period $  -   $ 5,846,638   $  -  
                   
Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Note 6)                  
Balance, beginning of period $  3,442,793   $ 3,275,971   $  -  
               Drilling, assays and related field work   68,783     87,820     2,998,670  
               Property acquisition and holding costs   -     11,240     512,906  
    68,783     99,060     3,511,576  
                   
               Balance, end of period $  3,511,576   $ 3,375,031   $ 3,511,576  
                   
Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada (Note 6)            
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $ 1,327,639   $  -  
               Drilling, assays and related field work   -     99,417     1,163,762  
               Project administration and general   -     226     227  
               Property acquisition and holding costs   -     -     393,123  
               Government refund   -     (35,300 )   -  
               Write off   -     -     (1,557,112 )
    -     64,343     -  
                   
               Balance, end of period $  -   $  1,391,982   $  -  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
                   
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2009     2008     26, 2004)  
                   
Suyo Property,                  
       Peru (Note 6)                  
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  -   $  -  
                   
       Drilling, assays and related field work   13,582     -     13,582  
       Property acquisition and holding costs   41,669     -     41,669  
                   
    55,251     -     55,251  
                   
       Balance, end of period $  55,251   $  -   $  55,251  
                   
Total $  3,566,827   $  10,613,651   $  3,566,827  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 9 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Accounting Policies

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual consolidated financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 10-


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
2.

Accounting Policies (Continued)

   

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

   

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this new accounting standard had no impact on the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of August 31, 2009.

   

Future Accounting Pronouncements

   

International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]

   

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

   

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

   

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

   
3.

Capital Management

   

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

   

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so.

- 11-


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
3.

Capital Management (continued)

     

Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

     
(i)

minimizing discretionary disbursements;

     
(ii)

reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

     
(iii)

exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

     

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

     

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the three months period ended August 31, 2009. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

     
4.

Risk Factors

     

The Company’s significant mineral properties are Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada and Suyo Property, Peru (called the "Properties"). A full des

     

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon these Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

     

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

     

Credit Risk

     

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and cash equivalents, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and cash equivalents are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

     

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of August 31, 2009. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

     

Liquidity Risk

     

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at August 31, 2009, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents and short term investments balance of $324,654 (May 31, 2009 - $514,086) to settle current liabilities of $102,019 (May 31, 2009 - $72,467). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

-12 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
4.

Risk Factors (continued)

     

Market Risk

     

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

     
(a)

Interest Rate Risk

     

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

     
(b)

Foreign Currency Risk

     

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

     
(c)

Price Risk

     

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

     

Sensitivity Analysis

     

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and cash equivalents as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities,

     

which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

     

As of August 31, 2009, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

     

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

     

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a three month period:

     

(i)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

- 13 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
4.

Risk Factors (continued)

     

Sensitivity Analysis (continued)

     

(ii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of August 31, 2009, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

     
5.

Reclamation Bond

     

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

     
6.

Mining Interests

     

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

     

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 8 of the audited financial statements as at May 31, 2009. The following changes to mining interests occurred from June 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009.

     

(a)

Suyo Project, Peru

     

On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) was signed with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Suyo”). The Option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Suyo by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period.

     

The Option also allows the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum.

     

The Memorandum and the transactions contemplated therein and thereby are conditional upon receipt of all required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSX.

- 14-


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
7.

Share Capital

     
(a)

Authorized

     

Unlimited number of common shares

     

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non-participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

     
(b)

Issued


    Number        
    of        
    shares     Amount  
             
             
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $ 3,378,444  
Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
Private placement   120,000     120,000  
Private placement   150,000     150,000  
Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
Private placement   175,000     175,000  
Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
             
             
Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $ 4,781,750  
Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
Private placement   590,320     737,900  
Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
Private placement   400,000     500,000  
Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $ 9,543,301  

- 15 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
7.

Share Capital (Continued)

   

(b) Issued (Continued)


    Number        
    of        
    shares     Amount  
             
Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (563,472 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
Private placement   11,169,000     4,950,150  
Warrant valuation   -     (940,212 )
Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (260,255 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (120,833 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2009 and August 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  14,430,400  

- 16 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
8.

Warrants


    Number of     Weighted Average  
    Warrants     Exercise Price  
             
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
Issued   602,500     1.44  
Expired/cancelled   -     -  
             
Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
Expired/cancelled   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $ 1.63  
Issued   4,189,999     0.91  
Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
             
Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583   $  1.18  
Issued   5,853,480     0.62  
Issued   73,937     0.65  
Exercised   (147,875 )   0.45  
             
Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
Issued   666,666     0.05  
             
Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
Expired   (5,044,120 )   (0.62 )
             
Balance, August 31, 2009   1,676,026   $  0.52  

The following are the warrants outstanding at August 31, 2009:

Number of   Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
Warrants   Value     Price ($)        
                   
656,000 $  225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
153,360   55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
200,000   32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
666,666   30,666     0.05     December 4, 2010  
                   
1,676,026 $  343,586              

- 17 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
9.

Stock Options


    Number     Weighted
Average
 
    of Stock Options     Exercise
Price
 
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
             
Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
             
Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
Granted   2,700,000     0.63  
Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
             
Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
             
Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
Issued (i)   3,350,000     0.15  
             
Balance, August 31, 2009   7,750,000   $  0.57  


  (i)

On June 23, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,350,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $368,500. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.55%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 155% and an expected life of 5 years.

- 18 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited
)

   
9.

Stock options (Continued)

   

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at August 31, 2009:


                      Options        
   

Options outstanding

          exercisable        
          Weighted                    
          average     Weighted              
          remaining     average              Weighted  
    Number of     contractual     exercise     Number of          average  
Expiry Date   Options     life     price      options     exercise price  
                               
October 1, 2009   600,000     0.08 years   $  1.00     600,000          $ 1.00  
December 20, 2009   75,000     0.30     1.10     75,000                              1.10  
April 15, 2010   700,000     0.62     0.50     700,000                              0.50  
January 6, 2011   150,000     1.35     1.25     150,000                              1.25  
April 3, 2011   550,000     1.59     1.80     550,000                              1.10  
October 31, 2011   500,000     2.17     1.00     500,000                              1.00  
September 27, 2012   1,825,000     3.08     0.68     1,825,000                              0.68  
June 23, 2014   3,350,000     4.81     0.15     3,350,000                              0.15  
                               
                               
    7,750,000     3.15 years   $  0.57     7,750,000          $ 0.57  


10.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

   

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.


    Three Months Ended  
    August 31,  
    2009     2008  
             
Numerator for basic loss per share $  (463,040 ) $  138,389 )
Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (463,040 ) $  (138,389 )
             
Denominator:            
Weighted average number of common shares - basic   44,652,098     36,305,532  
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted   44,652,098     36,305,532  
             
Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.01 ) $  (0.00 )

- 19 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
11.

Segmented Information

   

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2008 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

   

The Company operates in two geographic segments for the three months ended August 31, 2009, and year ended May 31, 2009 as follows.


    August 31,     May 31,  
    2009     2009  
             
Canada $  3,905,251   $  3,999,201  
Peru   29,005     -  
             
Total assets $  3,934,256   $  3,999,201  


12.

Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

     
(i)

For three months period ended August 31, 2009, $Nil (three months ended August 31, 2008 - $15,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

     
(ii)

For three months period ended August 31, 2009, $37,500 (three months ended August 31, 2008 - $43,500) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $26,500 (three months ended August 31, 2008 - $15,000) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil (three months ended August 31, 2008 - $6,000) in car and office allowances was included in this amount.

     
(iii)

For three months period ended August 31, 2009, $9,000 (three months ended August 31, 2008 - $17,638) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

     
(iv)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

     

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

- 20 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

The Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2009 consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

For the three months ended August 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the three months ended August 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for-sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 13 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

- 21 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2008 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:

    August 31, 2009     May 31, 2009  
             
Assets            
Current assets            
Cash $  324,654   $  106,593  
Short term investments   -     407,493  
GST and sundry receivable   10,084     5,707  
Prepaid expenses   8,316     12,283  
Due from a related party   12,929     12,803  
    355,983     544,879  
Reclamation bond   14,375     14,332  
Mineral property rights   554,575     512,906  
             
  $  924,933   $  1,072,117  
             
             
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
Accounts payable $  82,011   $  9,017  
Accrued liabilities   20,008     63,450  
             
    102,019     72,467  
Assets retirement obligation   14,375     14,332  
             
    116,394     86,799  
             
Shareholders' Equity            
Share capital            
Authorized - unlimited common shares            
Issued            
           Common shares   16,106,390     16,106,390  
           Additional paid in capital   4,077,994     3,217,776  
           Warrants   343,586     1,203,804  
           Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
           Deferred share-based payments   4,510,100     4,141,600  
           Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
           Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (20,770,283 )   (20,225,004 )
             
    808,539     985,318  
             
  $  924,933   $  1,072,117  

- 22 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss  
                         
                      Cumulative  
    Three Months Ended     from date  
    August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     of inception  
    2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")  
Expenses                        
General exploration $  82,425   $  234,766   $  1,152,704   $  9,373,771  
Management services   388,500     74,214     76,250     5,614,861  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   17,393     16,824     152,658     1,964,454  
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Professional fees   42,438     30,729     72,496     1,266,082  
Office and administration   11,934     17,185     74,407     681,072  
Flow-through interest expense   -     -     -     188,801  
Gain on forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
Failed merger costs   -     -     -     170,000  
Site restoration costs   -     -     30,000     -  
                         
Loss before the under noted   (542,690 )   (373,718 )   (1,558,515 )   (19,224,609 )
Interest income   (2,589 )   1,842     16,026     101,582  
Write-off mineral property rights   -     -     -     (1,647,256 )
                         
Net loss for the period   (545,279 )   (371,876 )   (1,542,489 )   (20,770,283 )
                         
Comprehensive (loss) items:                        
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     (25,000 )
Comprehensive loss for the period $  (545,279 ) $  (371,876 ) $  (1,542,489 ) $  (20,795,283 )
                         
Loss per common share                        
Basic $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.05 )      
Diluted $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.05 )      
                         
Comprehensive loss per common share                        
Basic $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.05 )      
Diluted $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.05 )      

- 23 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

   

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


          Amount  
          Under  
Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
             
Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
Private placement   120,000     120,000  
Private placement   150,000     150,000  
Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
Private placement   175,000     175,000  
Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
Debt conversation   80,000     100,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
Private placement   590,320     737,900  
Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
Private placement   400,000     500,000  
Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 24 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


          Amount  
          Under  
Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
             
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
Private placements   11,169,000     4,950,150  
Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
             
Balance, May 31, 2009 and August 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  

Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

Additional Paid in Capital      
Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005 $  25,000  
Expired warrants   173,388  
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  198,388  
Expired warrants   449,956  
Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 $  648,344  
Expired warrants   2,569,432  
Balance, May 31, 2009 $  3,217,776  
Expired warrants   860,218  
Balance, August 31, 2009 $  4,077,994  

- 25 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


Warrants      
       
Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
Issued   173,388  
       
Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
Issued   2,086,995  
Expired   (173,388 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
Issued   974,575  
Expired   (449,956 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
Issued   1,167,629  
Exercised   (36,673 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
Expired   (2,569,432 )
Issued   30,666  
       
Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
Expired   (860,218 )
       
Balance, August 31, 2009 $  343,586  
       
       
Cumulative Adjustments to Marketable Securities      
       
Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
       
Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 $  (315,539 )
Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
       
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (325,305 )
Comprehensive loss items-   -  
       
Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009 and August 31, 2009 $  (325,305 )

- 26 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


Deferred Share-Based Payments      
Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
Vesting of stock options   775,613  
Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
Vesting of stock options   573,700  
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009 $  4,141,600  
Vesting of stock options   368,500  
Balance, August 31, 2009 $  4,510,100  
       
Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage      
Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
Net loss   4,678  
Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
Net loss   (1,743,463 )
Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
Net loss   (3,673,388 )
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
Net loss   (6,052,723 )
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
Net loss   (6,157,896 )
Balance, May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
Net loss   (2,586,978 )
Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
Net loss   (545,279 )
Balance, August 31, 2009 $  (20,770,283 )

- 27 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

   

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Cash Flows


                      Cumulative  
                             Three Months Ended     from date  
    August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     of inception  
    2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")  
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net loss for the period $  (545,279 ) $  (371,876 ) $  (1,542,489 ) $  (20,770,283 )
Items not involving cash:                        
Forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Share-based payments   368,500     -     -     4,398,625  
Accrued Interest income   (126 )   (1,279 )   -     (59,128 )
Write-off of mineral property rights   -     -     -     1,647,256  
Change in non-cash operating working activities:                        
GST and sundry receivable   (4,377 )   27,114     119,760     (15,264 )
Prepaid expenses   3,967     (28,456 )   (84,923 )   (2,646 )
Due from a related party   -     -     -     2,296  
Accounts payable   72,994     143,889     95,201     153,030  
Accrued liabilities   (43,442 )   (45,000 )   -     (44,280 )
Cash flows used in operating activities   (147,763 )   (275,608 )   (1,412,451 )   (14,724,826 )
Cash flows from financing activities                        
Repayment of loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   -     -     3,485,600     18,052,210  
Cost of issue   -     -     (378,345 )   (1,776,309 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
                         
Cash flows provided by financing activities   -     -     3,107,255     16,347,307  
                         
Cash flows from investing activities                        
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     (13,896 )   (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   407,493     534,804     (2,538,979 )   43,903  
Exploration advances   -     -     312,491     -  
Purchase of mineral property rights   (41,669 )   (85,135 )   (326,929 )   (1,328,641 )
                         
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities   365,824     449,669     (2,567,313 )   (1,297,828 )
                         
Change in cash during the period   218,061     174,061     (872,509 )   324,653  
Cash, beginning of period   106,593     84,856     1,299,277     1  
                         
Cash, end of period $  324,654   $  258,917   $  426,768   $  324,654  

- 28 -


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

   
13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued) Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


                      Cumulative  
    Three Months Ended     from date  
    August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     of inception  
    2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")  
                         
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transaction        
Share issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  10,800   $  35,000   $  563,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  


14.

Comparative Figures

   

Certain prior year figures have been reclassified to conform with the current year's presentation.

- 29 -


EX-99.25 26 exhibit99-25.htm EXHIBIT 99.25 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.25 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.25

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three months ended August 31, 2009 (“first quarter 2010”) and its financial position as at August 31, 2009. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2009. The comparative reporting period is the three-month period ended August 31, 2008 (“first quarter 2009”)

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13 to the interim consolidated financial statements for the first quarter 2010.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

This MD&A was prepared on October 15, 2009.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing gold properties in North America. Grandview continues to be involved in the acquisition, exploration and, if warranted, the development of properties for the mining of precious metals in Ontario and Manitoba, Canada.

Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS). Grandview pursued this investment opportunity, but subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.


Economic Situation and Company Response

The Company has taken firm measures in response to the global financial and commodity price crisis. Management is strongly committed to ensuring that the Company survives the current market turmoil and is implementing a strategy to ensure this goal. The Company reduced expenditures to a minimum during 2009 through significant cost reductions at all its operations and the corporate head office.

However, current market conditions and the difficulty of obtaining financing during the current economic downturn substantially increases concerns regarding the ability of the Company to raise additional capital and to continue as a going concern.

The realization of shareholder value will continue to be the Company’s key objective, and continuing advancement of the Company’s projects will be fundamental to this objective. Although the current cash position of the Company is sufficient to cover corporate activities and minor operational activities, including the maintenance of royalty, option and other property commitments, the Company is actively seeking to raise additional funding to achieve its goal of advancing its exploration and development activities at its properties of merit.

The Company had available to it at August 31, 2009 $324,654 (May 31, 2009 $514,086) in cash and short-term investments and does not earn any revenue from any of its properties. Such circumstances, in addition to uncertainty relating to the Company’s ability to obtain the necessary funding to complete exploration and development work, lend substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to achieve future profitable production and, accordingly, the appropriateness of the use of accounting principles applicable to a going concern. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital, exploration and development requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties.

Properties and Projects

The Company did not engage in any substantial level of exploration activity during the first quarter 2010, substantially distorting comparisons with previous financial reporting periods.

Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

The cumulative exploration costs and acquisition costs originally capitalized for these properties were written off at year-end (May 31, 2009), as the Company no longer considered it feasible to continue incurring the property payments required to maintain its interest. The total write-off incurred during 2009 was $5,903,342. The Company incurred expenditures of $Nil for the first quarter 2010, compared with $167,298 for the first quarter 2009.

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

Grandview has also acquired a 60% interest in ten (10) unpatented and two (2) patented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”).

2


Exploration costs of $68,783 were incurred during the first quarter 2010 on the Red Lake Properties (first quarter 2009: $99,060). Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to August 31, 2009 were $3,511,576.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, Gem, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in three (3) mining claims, located in Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”.

Grandview has an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven (7) claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, Manitoba (the “Gem Property”). Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

The Company wrote off at year-end (May 31, 2009) the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred on these properties of $1,557,112. The Company incurred expenditures of $Nil during the first quarter 2010, compared with $63,343 for the first quarter 2009.

Rocky Ridge Property in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview had an option to acquire a 70% interest in 7 mining claims, located in the Lac du Bonnet mining district of Manitoba (the “Rocky Ridge Property”). The Company allowed its option to lapse on this property during 2008, due to poor drill results.

Results of Operations

First quarter 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $463,040 for the first quarter 2010, compared with $138,389 for the first quarter 2009. The increase in net loss for the first quarter 2010 compared with the corresponding period last year is predominantly attributable to share-based payment expense of $368,500 incurred during the first quarter 2010, compared with $Nil for the first quarter 2009.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the first quarter 2010 of $65,398 compares with $40,843 for the first quarter 2009.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

  First Fourth Third Second
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  Aug. 31, May. 31, Feb. 28, Nov. 30,
  2009 2009 2009 2008
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 460,325 74,970 243,077 98,801
Net loss (463,040) (6,063,504) (1,589,709) (96,316)
Net loss per share (0.01) (0.16) (0.04) (0.00)
Cash flows used in operating activities (65,398) (70,034) (112,647) (125,485)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 324,654 514,086 694,958 479,071
Assets 3,934,256 3,999,201 10,094,150 11,369,813

3



 

  First Fourth Third Second
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  Aug. 31, May 31, Feb. 28, Nov. 30,
  2008 2008 2008 2007
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 138,952 425,903 264,491 1,731,395
Net income (loss) (138,389) (870,408) (34,115) (1,711,526)
Net income (loss) per share (0.00) (0.03) (0.00) (0.05)
Cash flows used in operating activities (40,843) (244,135) (99,957) (956,614)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 735,523 1,096,266 1,927,043 1,146,482
Assets 11,645,288 11,673,136 12,383,498 11,312,038

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Grandview’s working capital on August 31, 2009 was $251,035, compared with $469,609 on May 31, 2009. The cash balance August 31,2009 was $324,654, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2009 of $106,593 and $407,493 respectively.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and continues to incur net losses. Other than a brokered private placement completed on December 5, 2008 for gross proceeds of $416,666, the Company procured no other sources of funding during fiscal 2009 or the first quarter 2010.

5,044,120 warrants expired during the first quarter 2010.

3,350,000 stock options were issued during the first quarter 2010. The estimated fair market value of these options, expensed during the first quarter 2010, was $368,500.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

Disclosure of Outstanding Share Data

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of August 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,652,098 common shares, 1,676,026 warrants and 7,750,000 stock options.

As of October 15, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,985,431 common shares, 1,342,693 warrants and 7,150,000 stock options.

4


RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For first quarter 2010, $Nil (first quarter 2009: $15,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

For the first quarter 2010, $37,500 (first quarter 2009: $43,500) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $26,500 (first quarter 2009: $15,000) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil (first quarter 2009: $6,000) in car and office allowances was included in this amount.

For the first quarter 2010, $9,000 (first quarter 2009: $17,638) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

5


Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at August 31, 2009 of $14,375, compared with $13,332 as at May 31, 2009.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

6


Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as at August 31, 2009.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of August 31, 2009, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of August 31, 2009, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

7


Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the first quarter 2010 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The Company continues to monitor the deliberations and progress on plans to converge to International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") by accounting standard setting bodies and securities regulators in Canada.

Due to resource constraints the Company has not performed any additional assessment work related to its IFRS conversion project during 2009. The Company must still establish a team that will focus its efforts on this initiative. The Company’s search for additional staff for this project is on-going and more IFRS training will be needed for all levels of management. Despite these limitations in personnel, management has made an initial internal assessment of the accounting standards that will be impacted by the transition to IFRS.

The Company will follow the key events timeline proposed by the AcSB to obtain training and thorough knowledge of IFRS, and continue its assessment of accounting policies with reference to IFRS and plan for convergence to be ready for the 2011 changeover.

OUTLOOK

During this recent quarter the company focused efforts on exploration efforts in Ontario and maintaining its land position in good standing. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario and has now substantially completed its exploration program in the Red Lake area.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

8


EX-99.26 27 exhibit99-26.htm EXHIBIT 99.26 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.26 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.26

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended August 31, 2009.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on June 1, 2009 and ended on August 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: October 15, 2009

“Ernest Cleave”              
[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.27 28 exhibit99-27.htm EXHIBIT 99.27 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.27 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.27

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended August 31, 2009.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on June 1, 2009 and ended on August 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: October 15, 2009

“Paul Sarjeant”              
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.28 29 exhibit99-28.htm EXHIBIT 99.28 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.28 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.28

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. ANNOUNCES PRIVATE PLACEMENT

October 16, 2009: Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX: GVX) ("Grandview") is pleased to announce that it has entered into a unit purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with Centerpoint Resources Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia ("Centerpoint").

The Purchase Agreement provides for an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit will consist of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. In addition, Grandview will concurrently be completing a non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of up to an additional 6,666,667 Units, some of which Units may be acquired by directors and officers of Grandview (with t he Centerpoint investment and the concurrent non-brokered placement being referred to collectively as the "Private Placement").

Following completion of the Private Placement, there will be 71,318,765 common shares issued and outstanding in the capital of Grandview, approximately 28.04% of which will be held by Centerpoint (prior to any exercise of warrants). In addition, to the foregoing, Centerpoint will have the right to nominate two directors to the Board of Directors of Grandview.

"I am extraordinarily pleased by the opportunities this Agreement with Centerpoint affords Grandview," says Company President and CEO Paul Sarjeant. "As a Company, we made a decision to pursue low-cost production opportunities in politically stable environments abroad; cash-flowing opportunities that would both lessen our reliance on capital markets and help fund our highly prospective projects in the Red Lake and Rice Lake gold districts. We believe that this opportunity, and Centerpoint's demonstrable interest in growing the Company are timely, and in the best interest of shareholders."

Shareholder approval will be required for the Private Placement as (i) the total number of common shares issuable in connection with the private placement is 46,666,667, which number exceeds 25% of the total issued and outstanding capital of Grandview at the date of this press release; and (ii) the price per Unit under the Private Placement represents a 29% discount to the five day volume weighted average trading price of Grandview common shares on the date of the Purchase Agreement, which number is greater than the allowable 25% discount. Assuming completion of the private placement by Centerpoint described above, Centerpoint would become a new insider and control person of Grandview.


The transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement are subject to receipt by Grandview of the required regulatory and shareholder approvals and completion of certain closing conditions in favour of Centerpoint on or before December 11, 2009. Grandview anticipates holding an annual and special meeting in late November at which the requisite shareholder approvals will be sought.

The proceeds from the private placement will be used primarily to fund Grandview's program on its Giulianata property in Peru as well as to meet working capital and general corporate purposes.

Centerpoint Resources Inc. is a privately held British Columbia corporation which invests in natural resource properties and also makes investments in companies, public and private, which operate in the natural resource sector.

For further information contact Paul Sarjeant, President and CEO of Grandview at 416.486.3444 or visit Grandview's website at www.grandviewgold.com.

-30-


EX-99.29 30 exhibit99-29.htm EXHIBIT 99.29 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.29 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.29

Steven Nguyen
Account Manager, Client Services
Telephone: 416.361.0930 ext.252
snguyen@equitytransfer.com

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

October 19, 2009

TO ALL APPLICABLE EXCHANGES AND COMMISSIONS:

RE: GRANDVIEW GOLD INC
  Notice of Record and Meeting Date

We are pleased to confirm that Notice of Record and Meeting Date was sent to The Canadian Depository for Securities.

We advise the following with respect to the Annual & Special Meeting of Shareholders for the subject company.

  1. ISIN: CA3866711011
    CUSIP:         386671101
       
  2. Date Fixed for the Meeting: November 30, 2009
       
  3. Record Date for Notice: October 30, 2009
       
  4. Record Date for Voting: October 30, 2009
       
  5. Beneficial Ownership Determination Date: October 30, 2009
       
6. Classes or Series of Securities that entitle the holder to receive Notice of the Meeting: Common Shares
       
7. Classes of Series of Securities that entitle the holder to vote at the meeting: Common Shares
       
  8. Business to be conducted at the meeting: Annual & Special

Yours Truly,
EQUITY TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY

Per

“Shawn McGowan”
Administrator, Client Services



EX-99.30 31 exhibit99-30.htm EXHIBIT 99.30 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.30 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.30

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 2S8

FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUEST FORM
 

In accordance with National Instrument 51-102 - Continuous Disclosure Obligations of the Canadian Securities Administrators, Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") will send its annual and interim consolidated financial statements and the Management's Discussion & Analysis ("MD&A") related to such financial statements to only those registered holders or beneficial owners of securities (other than debt instruments) that request that copies be sent to them. If you wish to receive either the Corporation's annual consolidated financial statements and related MD&A or interim consolidated financial statements and related MD&A, or both, please complete the information below and mail this form to the Corporation at the above-noted address, Attention: President, or e-mail the information on this form to psarjeant@grandviewgold.com.

If this form is not returned to the address above, the Corporation will assume that you DO NOT wish to receive any of the above-noted documents and you will NOT automatically receive copies of such documents for the ensuing year. Please note that you will receive a request form regarding these matters on an annual basis and that each request form is only valid for the ensuing year.

I, the undersigned, HEREBY CERTIFY that I am a registered holder or beneficial owner of securities (other than debt instruments) of the Corporation and, as such, request to be sent the following documents for the ensuing year: (Check one or both, as necessary)

 _______   Annual consolidated financial statements and MD&A 

 _______    Interim consolidated financial statements and MD&A

which should be sent to:

FIRST & LAST NAME (please print)  
   
APT. NO. STREET NO. STREET
     
PROVINCE/STATE COUNTRY POSTAL/ZIP CODE
     
Date:                                         Signature: 

* * * * * * *

To allow the Corporation to use electronic methods for delivery of the documents requested above, please insert your e-mail address and sign and date below to indicate your consent to receive electronic copies of the documents requested above in lieu of delivery of paper copies by post.

I HEREBY CONSENT to the delivery of the documents requested above via e-mail to the following address:

E-MAIL ADDRESS    
     
Date:   Signature:


EX-99.31 32 exhibit99-31.htm EXHIBIT 99.31 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.31 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.31

October 30, 2009

Dear Shareholders:

I write today to request your consideration of what I believe is a restorative opportunity for Grandview Gold, and to share my confidence in your company.

As you know, the economic winter was particularly difficult for junior gold companies. For Grandview, caught on the downswing of the exploration and funding cycle, it was even more so. Due in large part to the wisdom and leadership of our President and CEO Paul Sarjeant and an excellent board of directors, the company negotiated the convergence of unprecedented challenges and has emerged on the upside – battleworn, but prepared for and confident in the future.

Over the recent months, we explored a variety of funding options, weighing each against the new direction we have planned for Grandview. One potential funding partner shares both our long-term vision for the company and our passion for the particular gold districts in which we are already invested.

Our goals moving forward are simple. To increase shareholder value and the capitalization of the company by focusing on highly prospective and cash-flowing domestic and Latin American opportunities that, a) lessen our dependence on the capital markets, b) concentrate geological and financial assets on/in the ground, and c) create an accessible acquisitions mechanism within the company. Moving forward, we fully expect our market cap to be measured on the basis of production ounces and reserves, not primarily at the discretion of the markets.

This package contains details of a strong funding proposal presented by Centerpoint Resources, Inc, a private Canadian company that invests in natural resource properties and in highly-prospective companies that operate in the natural resource sector. I believe, and the board believes, that the Centerpoint proposal is worth our enthusiastic support.

From our perspective we are a newly energized and more narrowly-focussed company; a company with excellent Canadian gold districts prospects, and a new small gold-producing property in Peru. The distance between where the company is now and the gold-producing future we see for ourselves in the relative near term, can be filled by a small turn-key mill. This funding should allow us to finance and install that mill and become a small producing mining company with a positive cash flow. A cash flow to fund future small mine project acquisition and accelerate exploration at our Red Lake and Rice Lake gold district projects.

We believe that this new direction is the best one for Grandview, and we believe that the small mines concept, with its high profit to capital cost ratio, is the catalyst for reduced funding pressure, substantial growth and increased capitalization. Be assured the all monies raised by the proposed $1.5 million financing would be spent judiciously to develop the Peruvian gold property, not to pay debt or to support overhead.

During this last year, we trimmed our already low overhead costs to maintenance levels. Proceeds from the concurrent $500,000 non-brokered financing which may in part be fulfilled by directors and officers of the company, would be used for Canadian exploration and for general corporate purposes including an update of corporate collateral and website.

In closing then I thank you once again for your continued support of Grandview Gold through this extraordinarily difficult time, and ask that you consider the enclosed proposal with the same degree of diligence and forward thinking that we did these past several months.

If you have any questions whatsoever with respect to the contents of this package, please feel free to call us at 416.486.3444 or send an email to ir@grandviewgold.com . As always, we welcome dialogue with our shareholders.

"Michael Hitch"

Yours most sincerely,

Dr. Michael Hitch, Ph.D. P.Geo
Chairman


EX-99.32 33 exhibit99-32.htm EXHIBIT 99.32 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.32 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.32

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on November 30, 2009

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 30, 2009 for the following purposes:

1.

to receive the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2009, together with the auditors' report thereon;

   
2.

to elect the directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

   
3.

to appoint the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration;

   
4.

to consider, and if thought advisable, to pass, as required by the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange, an ordinary resolution of the Shareholders ratifying the Corporation's 2004 stock option plan, reserving for grant options to acquire up to a maximum of twenty percent (20%) of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation calculated at the time of each stock option grant, which was previously approved by the Shareholders of the Corporation at the annual and special meeting of Shareholders held on November 30, 2006, and approving certain amendments to such stock option plan, as more fully set out in this Circular;

   
5.

to consider, and if thought fit, to pass an ordinary resolution of the disinterested Shareholders approving a private placement (the "Private Placement") of common shares as more fully set out in this Circular;

   
6.

to consider, and if thought fit, conditional upon the Private Placement being completed, to pass a special resolution of the Shareholders changing the number of directors of the Corporation to seven and to elect two (2) new directors of the Corporation as more fully set out in this Circular; and

   
7.

to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The specific details of the matters to be put before the Meeting as identified above are set forth in a management information circular (the "Circular") of the Corporation accompanying and forming part of this notice. Shareholders should refer to the Circular for more detailed information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

If you are a registered shareholder of the Corporation and are unable to attend the Meeting in person, please date and execute the accompanying form of proxy and return it in the envelope provided to Equity Transfer & Trust Company, the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 27, 2009, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting.

If you are not a registered shareholder of the Corporation and receive these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the form of proxy in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary.


The directors of the Corporation have fixed the close of business on October 30, 2009 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Corporation entitled to receive notice of the Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors

"Dr. Michael Hitch"

_________________________________
DR. MICHAEL HITCH, PhD., P. Geo

Chairman of the Board of Directors

October 30, 2009

- 2 -


EX-99.33 34 exhibit99-33.htm EXHIBIT 99.33 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.33 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.33

 

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

Notice of Meeting

and

Management Information Circular

in respect of the

Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders

to be held on November 30, 2009

OCTOBER 30, 2009


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on November 30, 2009

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 30, 2009 for the following purposes:

1.

to receive the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2009, together with the auditors' report thereon;

   
2.

to elect the directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

   
3.

to appoint the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration;

   
4.

to consider, and if thought advisable, to pass, as required by the policies of the Toronto Stock Exchange, an ordinary resolution of the Shareholders ratifying the Corporation's 2004 stock option plan, reserving for grant options to acquire up to a maximum of twenty percent (20%) of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation calculated at the time of each stock option grant, which was previously approved by the Shareholders of the Corporation at the annual and special meeting of Shareholders held on November 30, 2006, and approving certain amendments to such stock option plan, as more fully set out in this Circular;

   
5.

to consider, and if thought fit, to pass an ordinary resolution of the disinterested Shareholders approving a private placement (the "Private Placement") of common shares as more fully set out in this Circular;

   
6.

to consider, and if thought fit, conditional upon the Private Placement being completed, to pass a special resolution of the Shareholders changing the number of directors of the Corporation to seven and to elect two (2) new directors of the Corporation as more fully set out in this Circular; and

   
7.

to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The specific details of the matters to be put before the Meeting as identified above are set forth in a management information circular (the "Circular") of the Corporation accompanying and forming part of this notice. Shareholders should refer to the Circular for more detailed information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

If you are a registered shareholder of the Corporation and are unable to attend the Meeting in person, please date and execute the accompanying form of proxy and return it in the envelope provided to Equity Transfer & Trust Company, the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 27, 2009, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting.

If you are not a registered shareholder of the Corporation and receive these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the form of proxy in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary.


The directors of the Corporation have fixed the close of business on October 30, 2009 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Corporation entitled to receive notice of the Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors

"Dr. Michael Hitch"                             
DR. MICHAEL HITCH, PhD., P. Geo
Chairman of the Board of Directors

October 30, 2009

- 2 -


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

FOR THE ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2009

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

This Information Circular is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the management ("Management") of Grandview Gold Inc. ("Grandview" or the "Corporation") for use at the annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of the shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of the Corporation.

The Meeting will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 30, 2009, and at any adjournments thereof for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders accompanying this Information Circular. Information contained herein is given as of October 30, 2009 unless otherwise specifically stated.

Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail but may be supplemented by solicitation personally by directors, officers and employees of the Corporation without special compensation. The cost of solicitation by Management will be borne by the Corporation.

APPOINTMENT AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

Enclosed herewith is a form of proxy for use at the Meeting. The persons named in the form of proxy are directors and officers of the Corporation. A Shareholder submitting a proxy has the right to appoint a nominee (who need not be a Shareholder) to represent him at the Meeting other than the persons designated in the enclosed proxy form by inserting the name of his chosen nominee in the space provided for that purpose on the form and by striking out the printed names.

A form of proxy will not be valid for the Meeting or any adjournment thereof unless it is signed by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder's attorney authorized in writing or, if the Shareholder is a corporation, it must be executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof. The proxy, to be acted upon, must be deposited with the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, Equity Transfer & Trust Company at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 27, 2009, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting, or delivering it to the Chairman of the Meeting, on the day of the meeting or any adjournment thereof prior to the time of the voting.

A Shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it prior to its use, in any manner permitted by law, including by instrument in writing executed by the Shareholder or by his attorney authorized in writing or, if the Shareholder is a corporation, executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof and deposited at the office of the Equity Transfer & Trust Company at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, at which the proxy is to be used, or with the chairman of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

ADVICE TO BENEFICIAL HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES

The information set forth in this section is of significant importance to many Shareholders as a substantial number of Shareholders do not hold shares in their own name. Shareholders who do not hold their shares in their own name (referred to in this Information Circular as "Beneficial Shareholders") should note that only proxies deposited by Shareholders whose names appear on the records of Grandview as the registered holders of Common Shares can be recognized and acted upon at the Meeting. If Common Shares are listed in an account statement provided to a Shareholder by a broker, then in almost all cases those Common Shares will not be registered in the Shareholder's name on the records of Grandview. Such Common Shares will more likely be registered under the names of the Shareholder's broker or an agent of that broker. In Canada, the vast majority of such shares are registered under the names of CDS & Co. (the registration name for CDS Depository and Clearing Services Inc., which acts as nominee for many Canadian brokerage firms). Common Shares held by brokers or their agents or nominees can only be voted (for or against resolutions) upon the instructions of the Beneficial Shareholder. Without specific instructions, brokers and their agents and nominees are prohibited from voting shares for the broker's clients. Therefore, Beneficial Shareholders should ensure that instructions respecting the voting of their Common Shares are communicated to the appropriate person.


Applicable regulatory policy requires intermediaries/brokers to seek voting instructions from Beneficial Shareholders in advance of shareholders' meetings. Every intermediary/broker has its own mailing procedures and provides its own return instructions which should be carefully followed by Beneficial Shareholders in order to ensure that their Common Shares are voted at the Meeting. Often, the form of proxy supplied to a Beneficial Shareholder by its broker is identical to the form of proxy provided to registered shareholders; however, its purpose is limited to instructing the registered shareholder how to vote on behalf of the Beneficial Shareholder. The majority of brokers now delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from clients to Broadridge Financial Services, Inc. ("Broadridge"). Broadridge typically mails a scanable voting instruction form in lieu of the form of proxy. The Beneficial Shareholder is requested to complete and return the voting instruction form to them by mail or facsimile. Alternatively, the Beneficial Shareholder can call a toll-free telephone number to vote the Common Shares held by the Beneficial Shareholder. Broadridge then tabulates the results of all instructions received and provides appropriate instructions respecting the voting of Common Shares to be represented at the Meeting. A Beneficial Shareholder receiving a voting instruction form cannot use that voting instruction form to vote Common Shares directly at the Meeting as the voting instruction form must be returned as directed by Broadridge well in advance of the Meeting in order to have the Common Shares voted.

Although a Beneficial Shareholder may not be recognized directly at the Meeting for the purposes of voting Common Shares registered in the name of his broker (or agent of the broker), a Beneficial Shareholder may attend at the Meeting as proxyholder for a registered shareholder and vote the Common Shares in that capacity. Beneficial Shareholders who wish to attend at the Meeting and indirectly vote their Common Shares as proxyholder for a registered shareholder should enter their own names in the blank space on the instrument of proxy provided to them and return the same to their broker (or the broker's agent) in accordance with the instructions provided by such broker (or agent), well in advance of the Meeting.

VOTING OF PROXIES

All Common Shares represented at the Meeting by properly executed proxies will be voted on any ballot that may be called for and, where a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon has been specified in the accompanying form of proxy, the Common Shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with such instructions. In the absence of any such instruction, the persons whose names appear on the printed form of proxy will vote in favour of all the matters set out thereon. The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein. If any other business or amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting properly comes before the Meeting then discretionary authority is conferred upon the person appointed in the proxy to vote in the manner they see fit, in accordance with their best judgment. At the time of the printing of this Information Circular, Management knows of no such amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Meeting.

SUPPLEMENTAL MAILING LIST

Under National Instrument 51-102 - Continuous Disclosure Obligations, a person or corporation who in the future wishes to receive financial statements and the related management's discussion and analysis from the Corporation must deliver a written request for such material to the Corporation, together with a signed statement that the person or corporation is the owner of securities (other than debt instruments) of the Corporation. Shareholders who wish to receive financial statements and the related management's discussion and analysis are encouraged to send the enclosed mail card, together with the completed form of proxy to Equity Transfer & Trust Company, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1. Copies of the Corporation's annual and interim financial statements are also available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

- 2 -


APPROVAL OF MATTERS

Unless otherwise noted, approval of matters to be placed before the Meeting is by an "ordinary resolution", which is a resolution passed by a simple majority (50% plus 1) of the votes cast by Shareholders of the Corporation present and entitled to vote in person or by proxy.

The "special resolution" being proposed requires a two-thirds majority (66.67%) of the votes cast by Shareholders of the Corporation present and entitled to vote in person or by proxy to be passed.

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

The authorized capital of the Corporation consists of an unlimited number of common shares (the "Common Shares") and an unlimited number of convertible, redeemable, voting, non-participating shares (the "Preference Shares") of which, on the date of this Circular, 44,985,431 Common Shares and no Preference Shares were issued and outstanding.

Common Shares

The holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meeting of the Shareholders (except meetings at which only the holders of another class of shares are entitled to vote) and are entitled to one vote for each Common Share held. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the Preference Shares or any other shares ranking senior to the Common Shares, the holders of the Common Shares are entitled to: (a) receive any dividends as and when declared by the board of directors of the Corporation (the "Board") out of the assets of the Corporation properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the Board may from time to time determine; and (b) receive the remaining property of the Corporation in the event of any liquidation, dissolution of winding-up of the Corporation.

Each Shareholder is entitled to one vote for each Common Share shown as registered in his or her name on the list of Shareholders. The list of Shareholders will be prepared as of October 30, 2009, the record date fixed for determining shareholders entitled to the notice of the Meeting.

To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Corporation, as of the date hereof, no person or company beneficially owns, or controls or directs, directly or indirectly, voting securities carrying ten percent (10%) or more of the voting rights attached to any class of voting securities of the Corporation.

DIVIDEND POLICY

The Corporation has not paid any dividends on the Common Shares to date and does not expect to pay dividends on such shares in the foreseeable future. It is anticipated that all available funds will be used to finance the future development of the Corporation.

INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS OR COMPANIES IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED ON

Management is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, of any director or executive officer or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing in any matter to be acted on at the Meeting other than the election of directors or the appointment of auditors.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth the number of Common Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ("Options") issued pursuant to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance, the weighted average exercise price of such outstanding Options and the number of Common Shares remaining available for future issuance under such compensation plans as at May 31, 2009.

- 3 -







Plan Category


Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding Options(1)



Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding Options
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
the first column)(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) 4,400,000 $0.90 4,530,420
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A N/A N/A
TOTAL 4,400,000 $0.90 4,530,420

Note:  
(1) The Corporation currently has a rolling 20% stock option plan. As at May 31, 2009, 44,652,098 Common Shares were issued and outstanding.

INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Corporation provided a loan of CDN$90,000.00 to the current President and CEO of the Corporation. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due October 31, 2009. As at May 31, 2009, the remaining balance of the loan was CDN$10,000.00 and was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO of the Corporation.

Other than as set forth above, none of the directors or executive officers of the Corporation were indebted to the Corporation as at May 31, 2009.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Management functions of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are not to any substantial degree performed by persons other than the directors or executive officers of the Corporation or subsidiary of the Corporation.

INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

The directors and officers of the Corporation are not aware of any transaction since the beginning of the Corporation's last completed financial year or any proposed transaction that has materially affected or will materially affect the Corporation in which any director or senior officer of the Corporation, any proposed Management nominee for election as a director, any person beneficially owning or exercising control or direction over more than 10% of the Common Shares of the Corporation or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing has or had a material interest, direct or indirect.

ORDINARY BUSINESS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDITORS' REPORT

At the Meeting, Shareholders will consider the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2009 and the auditors' report thereon, but no vote by the Shareholders with respect thereto is required or proposed to be taken.

APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS

McCarney Greenwood LLP, Chartered Accountants are the current auditors of the Corporation and were first appointed auditors of the Corporation on August 30, 2004. Shareholders of the Corporation will be asked at the Meeting to reappoint McCarney Greenwood LLP, Chartered Accountants as the Corporation's auditors to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation, and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix the auditors' remuneration.

- 4 -


UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MCCARNEY GREENWOOD LLP, CHATERED ACCOUNTANTS AS AUDITORS OF THE CORPORATION UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND FOR THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE DIRECTORS TO FIX THEIR REMUNERATION.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The articles of the Corporation provide for a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of ten (10) directors. The Corporation has determined that five (5) directors will be elected at the Meeting.

UNLESS A CHOICE IS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, IT IS INTENDED THAT THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE PROXIES HEREBY SOLICITED WILL BE VOTED BY THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES WHOSE NAMES ARE SET FORTH BELOW, ALL OF WHOM ARE NOW MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND HAVE BEEN SINCE THE DATES INDICATED.

Management does not contemplate that any nominee will be unwilling or unable to serve as director but, if that should occur for any reason prior to the Meeting, it is intended that the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy shall reserve the right to vote for another nominee in his discretion. Each of the following persons is nominated to hold office as a director until the next annual meeting or until his successor is duly elected, unless his office is earlier vacated in accordance with the by-laws of the Corporation.


Name and Municipality of
Residence

Office held with
Grandview


Director Since


Principal Occupation
Common Shares
Beneficially Owned
Directly or Indirectly(1)
Paul Sarjeant
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer November 7, 2006

From 1999 until November, 2006 operated a securities business focused on strategic planning and investment analysis. Since his appointment, Mr. Sarjeant's full time employment has been with the Corporation.

Nil(2)
D. Richard Brown(3)(4)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Director March 26, 2004

Partner at Osprey Capital Partners.

5,000(5)
Michael Hitch(4)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Chairman and Director November 8, 2005

Professor Assistant, Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia. In the past five years, Dr. Hitch has acted as COO and Managing Director of Golden China Management.

Nil(6)
Peter Born
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Director June, 2007

Ph.D., professional registered geologist (ON) and President of 1727856 Ontario Ltd.

Nil(7)

- 5 -




Name and Municipality of
Residence

Office held with
Grandview


Director Since


Principal Occupation
Common Shares
Beneficially Owned
Directly or Indirectly(1)
Ken Hight
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Director May 12, 2008

From 2000-2005 served as CEO of ITG Canada and from 2005 – 2008 served as CEO of ETrade Canada and concurrently EVP, E Trade Financial New York. From March 2008 thru Sept CEO Liquidnet Canada and concurrently Head of Global Equities, Liquidnet Inc, New York.

Nil(8) 2009.

Notes:  
   
(1)

The information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, not being within the knowledge of the Corporation, has been furnished by the respective directors and executive officers individually.

(2)

Paul Sarjeant holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,750,000 common shares of the Corporation, 500,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.00 per common share expiring on October 31, 2011, 600,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 650,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Sarjeant under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

(3)

Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Peter Born.

(4)

Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Dr. Michael Hitch.

(5)

D Richard Brown holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,000,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.00 per common share expiring on October 1, 2009, 200,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.80 per common share expiring on April 3, 2011, 200,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Brown under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

(6)

Dr. Michael Hitch holds options to purchase up to a total of 925,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.25 per common share expiring on January 6, 2011, 100,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $1.80 per common share expiring on April 3, 2011, 225,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Dr. Hitch under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

(7)

Dr. Peter Born holds options to purchase up to a total of 675,000 common shares of the Corporation, 225,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014.

(8)

Ken Hight holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014.

- 6 -


Corporate Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

To the best knowledge of the Corporation, no director or officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation is, as at the date hereof or has been within the last ten years prior to the date hereof, (a) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued while the director or officer of the Corporation was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; (b) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued after the director or officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in such capacity; (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (d) became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director or executive officer of the Corporation, (a) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory or (b) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

Individual Bankruptcies

To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director of the Corporation is, or has within the ten years prior to the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of that individual.

STATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Corporation's Statement of Executive Compensation, in accordance with the requirements of Form 51-102F6 – Statement of Executive Compensation, is set forth below, which contains information about the compensation paid to, or earned by, the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and each of the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation earning more than CDN$150,000.00 in total compensation as at May 31, 2009 (the "Named Executive Officers" or "NEO's") during the Corporation's last three most recently completed financial years. Based on the foregoing: (a) Dr. Michael Hitch, Chairman and former interim CEO of the Corporation; (b) Paul Sarjeant, President, CEO and a director of the Corporation; and (c) Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, are the Corporation's only Named Executive Officers as at May 31, 2009.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Review Process

The Corporation has a Compensation Committee (the "Committee") but does not retain a compensation consultant. The Committee oversees an annual review of director and executive compensation to ensure development of a compensation strategy that properly aligns the interests of directors and executives with the long-term interests of the Corporation and its Shareholders. The Compensation Committee is comprised of D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Dr. Michael Hitch.

- 7 -


The Compensation Committee reviews on an annual basis the cash compensation, performance and overall compensation package for each NEO. It then submits to the Board recommendations with respect to the basic salary, bonus and participation in share compensation arrangements for each NEO. After discussing various factors with both Management and peers in the industry, and receiving recommendations from for bonuses 2009 salaries for executive officers, the Compensation Committee made its recommendations to the Board for approval. In conducting its review of Management’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee was satisfied that all recommendations complied with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy and guidelines set forth above.

Objectives of the Compensation Program

The objectives of the Corporation's compensation program are to attract, hold and inspire performance of members of Management of a quality and nature that will enhance the sustainable growth of the Corporation.

To determine compensation payable, the compensation committee of the Corporation (the "Compensation Committee") reviews compensation paid for directors and officers of companies of similar business, size and stage of development and determine an appropriate compensation reflecting the need to provide incentive and compensation for the time and effort expended by the directors and NEO's while taking into account the financial and other resources of the Corporation.

The annual salaries for NEOs are designed to be comparable to executive compensation packages for similar positions at companies with similar financial, operating and industrial characteristics. The NEOs will be paid an annual salary that also takes into account his or her existing professional qualifications and experience. The NEOs' performances and salaries are to be reviewed periodically on the anniversary of their appointment to their respective officer-ships with the Corporation. Increases in salary are to be evaluated on an individual basis and are performance and market-based.

The Board is given discretion to determine and adjust, year to year, the relative weighting of each form of compensation discussed above in a manner which best measures the success of the Corporation and its NEO's.

Elements of Executive Compensation

The Corporation's executive compensation program is based on the objectives of: (a) recruiting and retaining the executives critical to the success of the Corporation; (b) providing fair and competitive compensation; (c) balancing the interests of Management and Shareholders; and (d) rewarding performance, on the basis of both individual and corporate performance.

For the financial year ended May 31, 2009, the Corporation's executive compensation program consisted of the following elements:

  (a)

a base salary, incentive cash bonuses and other compensation (together, a "Short-Term Incentive"); and

     
  (b)

a long-term equity compensation consisting of stock options granted under the Corporation's stock incentive plan (each, a "Long-Term Incentive").

The specific rationale and design of each of these elements are outlined in detail below.

Element of Compensation Summary and Purpose of Element
   
Short-Term Incentive Plan  
   

Base Salary

Executive annual base salaries are set at a level that is competitive with compensation for executive officers of peer group oil and gas companies and having regard to the potential longer term compensation provided by the Option Plan. Salaries form an essential element of the Corporation's compensation mix as they are the first base measure to compare and remain competitive relative to peer groups. Base salaries are fixed and therefore not subject to uncertainty and are used as the base to determine other elements of compensation and benefits.

- 8 -



The Compensation Committee and the Board review NEO salaries at least annually. Typically, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, makes annual salary adjustments no later than April 15th of each year for the 12 month period from June 1st to May 31st.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

Any bonus paid to the NEO's is entirely within the discretion of the Board, following consideration by the Compensation Committee. In making bonus determinations, the Board reviews corporate and individual performance.

Annual performance-based cash bonuses are a variable component of compensation designed to reward the Corporation’s executive officers for maximizing annual operating performance.

 

Other Compensation (Perquisites)

There are currently no other forms of compensation.

 

Long-Term Incentive Plan

 

Stock Options

The granting of stock options is a variable component of compensation intended to reward the NEO's for their success in achieving sustained, long-term profitability and increases in stock value.

The executive officers are entitled to participate in the Option Plan which forms an important element of the Corporations compensation policies. Options grants are periodically made to recognize exemplary performance (including in connection with a promotion within the Corporation) and provide for long-term reward and incentive for increasing shareholder value and align the interests of the executive officers with the long- term interests of shareholders. Options may also be granted to executive officers upon their commencement of service.

Base Salary

In determining the base salary of an NEO, the Board's practice in recent years has been to consider the recommendations made by the Compensation Committee and then review and summarize these recommendations as well as the previous year’s remuneration paid to executives with similar titles at a comparative group of companies in the marketplace. In determining the base salary to be paid to a particular executive officer, the Board also considers the particular responsibilities related to the position, the experience level of the NEO, and his or her past performance at the Corporation.

The Board believes that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels based in large part on a general consideration against similar companies, both in terms of compensation practices as well as levels of compensation. In this way, the Corporation can gauge if its compensation is competitive in the marketplace for its talent, as well as ensure that the Corporation's compensation is reasonable. Accordingly, the Board reviews compensation levels for the Named Executive Officers against compensation levels of the comparison companies which are identified by the Board.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

NEO's are eligible for annual cash bonuses, and the Board considers both corporate and the individual performance of each NEO. There is no policy currently in place for determining bonuses, and the Board reviews generally the individual’s impact on maximizing operating performance. In general the Corporation will consider the following factors, depending on the relevance of these factors to the particular NEO, when determining potential bonuses:

  (a)

performance against budget;

     
  (b)

expense control;

     
  (c)

performance factors; and

     
  (d)

other exceptional or unexpected factors.

In taking into account the financial performance aspect, it is recognized that NEO's cannot control certain factors, such as overall market conditions. When applying the financial performance criteria, the Board considers factors over which the NEO's can exercise control, such as meeting budget targets established by the Board at the beginning of each year, controlling costs, taking successful advantage of business opportunities and enhancing the competitive and business prospects of the Corporation.

- 9 -


With respect to the financial year ended May 31, 2009, no bonuses were awarded to any Named Executive Officers, except for Paul Sarjeant, who was awarded a bonus of CDN$80,000.00 during the financial year ended May 31, 2009.

Other Compensation – Perquisites

With respect to the financial year ended May 31, 2009, no perquisites were paid for by the Corporation in respect of the NEO’s.

Stock Options

To determine the granting of stock options to its NEO's, the Committee reviews the matter and makes a recommendation to the Board. The Board reviews each recommendation and decides whether to accept, reject or alter such recommendation. The Board considers prior grants, the role of the individual in the operating performance of the company, and salary and cash bonuses being paid.

During the financial year ended May 31, 2009, no stock options were granted to the Named Executive Officers.

Other Long-Term Incentive Plans

The Corporation does not have any other long-term incentive plans and does not provide retirement benefits to its employees.

Overview of How the Compensation Program Fits with Compensation Goals

1.

Attract, Hold and Inspire Key Talent

The compensation package meets the goal of attracting, holding and motivating key talent in a highly competitive mineral exploration environment through the following elements:

  (a)

A competitive cash compensation program, consisting of base salary and bonus opportunity, which is generally above similar opportunities.

     
  (b)

Providing an opportunity to participate in the Corporation's growth through options.


2.

Alignment of Interests of NEO's with Interests of the Shareholders

The compensation package meets the goal of aligning the interests of the NEO's with the interests of Shareholders through the following elements:

  (a)

Through the grant of stock options, if the price of the Corporation shares increases over time, both NEO's and Shareholders will benefit.

     
  (b)

By providing a vesting period on stock awards, NEO's have an interest in increasing the price of the Corporation's shares over time, rather than focusing on short-term increases.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming an initial investment of $100 in Common Shares on May 31, 2006 against the cumulative total shareholder return of the S&P/TSX Composite Index for all of the Corporation's most recently completed financial years since it became a reporting issuer, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.

- 10 -



                                     (in C$) May 31, 2006 May 31, 2007 May 31, 2008 May 31, 2009
Grandview Gold Inc.(1) $100.00 $53.33 $33.89 $8.89
TSX Venture Exchange $100.00 $114.34 $93.72 $39.65
S&P/TSX Composite Index $100.00 $119.69 $125.29 $90.29

Note:  
(1) Listed as "GVX" on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Summary Compensation Table

The following tables provide information for the three most recently completed financial years ended May 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 regarding compensation earned by each of the following Named Executive Officers of the Corporation: (a) Dr. Michael Hitch, Chairman and former interim CEO of the Corporation; (b) Paul Sarjeant, President, CEO and a director of the Corporation; and (c) Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.

The first table outlines the information for the financial year ended May 31, 2009 in accordance with the new Form 51-102F6 and the second table outlines the information for the financial years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 in accordance with the old Form 51-102F6.

Unless otherwise noted, salaries for the Named Executive Officers are paid in Canadian dollars.

Financial Year Ended May 31, 2009





Name and principal
position




Salary
($)


Share-
based
awards
($)



Option-based
awards
($)
Non-equity incentive plan
compensation



Pension
Value
($)



All other
compensation
($)



Total
compensation
($)
($)
Annual
incentive
plans

Long-term
incentive
plans
Dr. Michael Hitch
Chairman and Former
Interim CEO

35,000.00

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

35,000.00
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a
Director

150,010.00

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

94,000

244,010.00
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
51,794.00
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
51,794.00

- 11 -


Financial Years Ended May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007

Name and Principal
Position
Year                    Annual Compensation              Long-Term Compensation

All Other
Compensation
($)

Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Other Annual
Compensation
($)
Awards Payouts
Securities
Under
Options
Granted
(#)
Shares or
Units Subject
to Resale
Restrictions
($)

 LTIP
Payouts
($)

Dr. Michael Hitch
Chairman and Former Interim CEO
2008
2007
66,000.00
71,750.00
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
225,000
Nil
Nil
Nil
N/A
N/A
Nil
Nil
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
2008
2007
150,000.00
91,000.00
Nil
Nil
24,000.00
14,000.00
600,000
500,000
Nil
Nil
N/A
N/A
Nil
Nil
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
2008
2007
76,974.00
21,000.00
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
250,000
Nil
Nil
Nil
N/A
N/A
Nil
Nil

Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion

The Corporation has entered into executive employment agreements with each of its Named Executive Officers, as described below.

Dr. Michael Hitch

The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Hitch Agreement") with Michael Hitch whereby Dr. Hitch agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Hitch Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Dr. Hitch CDN$6,250.00 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Hitch Agreement had a three month term ending September 12, 2006. Although Dr. Hitch was no longer serving as Chief Executive Officer, he continued to provide consulting services to the Corporation and the contract was extended to December 31, 2007, with a further option for renewal until December 31, 2008. The Hitch Agreement was renewed in December 2007 for a further one year term but the payments under the Hitch Contract were reduced to CDN$5,000.00 per month. The option was not renewed by the Corporation in 2008 and Dr. Hitch no longer receives any compensation from the Corporation.

Paul Sarjeant

The Corporation entered into a consulting agreement made effective as of the 31st day of October, 2006 (the "Sarjeant Agreement") with Paul Sarjeant and his duly registered sole proprietorship (the "Consultant"), engaging Mr. Sarjeant to act as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. The compensation payable for such services is a base salary of CDN$150,000.00 per year, payable in monthly payments of CDN$12,500.00, subject to review by the Board, the payment of business expenses, the provision of consultant benefits and the awarding of bonuses at the option and discretion of the Board, to be payable in either cash or Common Shares. The initial term of the Sarjeant Agreement was three (3) years, subject to additional one (1) year extensions.

- 12 -


Ernest Cleave

The Corporation entered into a consulting contract agreement made as of the 10th day of November, 2005 with Ernest Cleave (the "Cleave Agreement"), engaging Mr. Cleave to act as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. The compensation payable for such services is a contract fee of CDN$36,000.00, payable in monthly payments of CDN$3,000.00, subject to review by the board, and compensation of expenses. The initial term of the Cleave Agreement was from November 10, 2005 to May 31, 2006, which term shall be automatically extended for additional one (1) year terms.

Incentive Plan Awards

The following table provides information regarding the incentive plan awards for each Named Executive Officer outstanding as of May 31, 2009.

Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards






Name and principal
position


Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
               Option-based Awards


Value of
unexercised
in-the-money
options ($) (1)
                 Share-based Awards



Option
exercise price
(C$)




Option
expiration date


Number of shares
or units of shares
that have not vested
(#)

Market or
payout value of
share-based
awards that have
not vested ($)
Dr. Michael Hitch
Chairman and
Former Interim CEO
150,000
100,000
225,000
1.25
1.80
0.68
January 6, 2011
April 3, 2011
September 27, 2012
117,150
120,500
130,784
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
500,000
600,000
1.00
0.68
October 31, 2011
September 27, 2012
365,000
348,758
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
250,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 145,316 Nil Nil

The following table provides information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for the financial year ended May 31, 2009.

Value Vested or Earned During the Financial Year Ended May 31, 2009


Name and principal
position

Option-based awards – Value
vested during the year ($)

Share-based awards – Value
vested during the year ($)
Non-equity incentive plan
compensation – Value earned during
the year ($)
Dr. Michael Hitch
Chairman and Former Interim CEO
Nil Nil Nil
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
Nil Nil Nil
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
Nil Nil Nil

- 13 -


Incentive Plan Awards – Narrative Discussion

Pension Plan Benefits

The Corporation does not currently provide pension plan benefits to its Named Executive Officers.

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

The termination and change of control benefits set forth in the executive employment agreements entered into between the Corporation and each of its Named Executive Officers are described below.

Paul Sarjeant

The Sarjeant Agreement, described in "Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion", above, does not contain any change of control provisions. The termination provisions are as follows:

  (a)

If the Corporation terminates the Sarjeant Agreement at will, without cause, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant within sixty (60) days of the date of termination a settlement amount equal to nine (9) months' of the base salary at the rate in effect immediately prior to the effective date of termination and, to the extent earned, pay to the Consultant within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement;

     
  (b)

If the Corporation terminates the Sarjeant Agreement for cause or if, during the term of the Sarjeant Agreement, Mr. Sarjeant, in the reasonable judgment of the Board, acting in good faith, becomes unable, by reason of physical or mental disability, with or without reasonable accommodation, to adequately perform the duties and obligations under the Sarjeant Agreement, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant, to the extent earned, within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement;

     
  (c)

If the Consultant terminates the Sarjeant Agreement at will by giving three (3) months' prior written notice to the Board, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement

     
  (d)

In the event of dissolution of the Consultant or the death of Mr. Sarjeant, the Corporation shall pay all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement and such other death benefits that Mr. Sarjeant's survivors may be entitled to under such plans, programs and policies maintained by the Corporation;

     
  (e)

In the event of termination of the Sarjeant Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (b) and (c), above, any stock options held by the Consultant that have not vested as of the date of such termination shall be deemed to be terminated and any stock options held by the Consultant that have vested as of the date of such termination shall remain exercisable subject to the terms of the stock option plan and/or agreement pursuant to which said stock options were originally granted;

     
  (f)

In the event of termination of the Sarjeant Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (d), above, all unvested stock options held by the Consultant shall be deemed to have vested as of the effective date of termination or deemed termination to allow the Consultant (or his personal representatives) to exercise the options to purchase shares granted thereby with regard to that number of shares that the Consultant would have been entitled to purchase had his employment continued for a period of three (3) months from the effective date of such termination or deemed termination; and

- 14 -



  (g)

In the event that any of the terms of such options set forth in paragraphs (e) and (f), above, are not ascertainable or in the event that applicable securities legislation precludes the acceleration of the vesting dates in the manner described herein, the Corporation agrees to compensate the Consultant by way of a cash payment, paid within one hundred twenty (120) days of the effective date of termination of the Consultant, of that amount of money which the Consultant would have been entitled to if it had exercised any such options on the effective date of termination or deemed termination at the applicable exercise price and sold the securities on the exchange or market where the majority of the Company's shares are then traded, at a price equal to the average trading price for the last ten (10) business days preceding the effective date of termination on which the subject securities were traded.

Ernest Cleave

The Cleave Agreement, described in "Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion", above, does not contain any change of control provisions. The termination provisions are as follows:

  (a)

If the Corporation terminates the Cleave Agreement at will, the Corporation shall pay to Mr. Cleave an amount equal to three (3) months of the contract fee at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, payable in one lump sum on the date of termination; and

     
  (b)

If Mr. Cleave terminates the Cleave Agreement for "good reason", the Corporation shall pay to Mr. Cleave an amount equal to one (1) month of the contract fee at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, payable in one lump sum on the date of termination, where the term "good reason" means, if, without Mr. Cleave's consent, there is a material reduction in his duties and responsibilities, there is a material reduction of the contract fee or the Corporation breaches any material provision of the Cleave Agreement and such breach is not remedied within thirty (30) days' notice.

Estimated Incremental Payment on Change of Control or Termination

The following table provides details regarding the estimated incremental payments from the Corporation to each of Paul Sarjeant and Ernest Cleave upon a change of control or on termination by the Corporation without cause, assuming a triggering event occurred on May 31, 2009. The Hitch Agreement terminated December 31, 2008.


NEO and Agreement
Severance Period
(# of months)
Base Salary
(CDN$)
Total Incremental Payment
(CDN$)
Paul Sarjeant – Sarjeant Agreement 9 150,000.00 112,500.00
Ernest Cleave – Cleave Agreement 3 36,000.00 9,000.00
TOTALS 12 186,000.00 121,500.00

Director Compensation

The Corporation has no standard arrangement pursuant to which directors are compensated for their services as directors, except for the granting from time to time of incentive stock options in accordance with the Corporation's 2004 stock option plan (discussed below under "Special Business – Ratification of Stock Option Plan"). Currently, the directors of the Corporation do not receive any compensation for attending meetings of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors.

Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding compensation paid to the Corporation's non-executive directors during the financial year ended May 31, 2009. Information regarding the compensation paid to each of Dr. Michael Hitch and Paul Sarjeant during the financial year ended May 31, 2009 (including as a director) is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

- 15 -





Name

Fees
earned ($)
Share-based
awards
($) (1)
Option-based
awards
($)
Non-equity incentive
plan compensation
($)

All other
compensation ($)

Total
($)
D. Richard Brown Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Peter Born Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Ken Hight Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Harold Wolkin Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
TOTALS Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

Director Compensation – Narrative Discussion

Incentive Plan Awards

The following table provides information regarding the incentive plan awards for each non-executive director outstanding as of May 31, 2009. Information regarding the incentive plan awards for each of Dr. Michael Hitch and Paul Sarjeant during the financial year ended May 31, 2009 is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards







Name


Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
               Option-based Awards


Value of
unexercised in-
the-money
options ($)
                 Share-based Awards



Option
exercise price
(C$)




Option
expiration date


Number of shares
or units of shares
that have not vested
(#)

Market or
payout value of
share-based
awards that have
not vested ($)
D. Richard Brown(1) 150,000
200,000
200,000
1.00
1.80
0.68
October 1, 2009
April 3, 2011
September 27, 2012
114,300
241,000
116,253
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Peter Born(2) 225,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 130,784 Nil Nil
Ken Hight(3) Nil N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Harold Wolkin(4) Nil N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Notes:  
   
(1) Mr. Brown was granted 450,000 options on June 23, 2009, exercisable at a price of $0.15 per common share expiring on June 23, 2014.
(2) Mr. Born was granted 450,000 options on June 23, 2009, exercisable at a price of $0.15 per common share expiring on June 23, 2014.
(3) Mr. Hight was granted 650,000 options on June 23, 2009, exercisable at a price of $0.15 per common share expiring on June 23, 2014.
(4) Mr. Wolkin was granted 650,000 options on June 23, 2009, exercisable at a price of $0.15 per common share expiring on June 23, 2014.

The following table provides information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for each non-executive director for the financial year ended May 31, 2009. Information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for each of Dr. Michael Hitch and Paul Sarjeant for the financial year ended May 31, 2009 is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

- 16 -


Value Vested or Earned During the Financial Year Ended May 31, 2009



Name

Option-based awards – Value
vested during the year ($)

Share-based awards – Value
vested during the year ($)
Non-equity incentive plan
compensation – Value earned during
the year ($)
D. Richard Brown Nil Nil Nil
Peter Born Nil Nil Nil
Ken Hight Nil Nil Nil
Harold Wolkin Nil Nil Nil

Incentive Plan Awards – Narrative Discussion

Retirement Policy for Directors

The Corporation does not have a retirement policy for its directors.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

The Corporation procured and funded a directors' and officers' insurance policy with a limit of $2,000,000 liability and carrying $25,000 deductible for an annual premium of $13,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Statement of Corporate Governance

Effective June 30, 2005 National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices ("NI 58-101") of the Canadian Securities Administrators was adopted. Pursuant to NI 58-101 an issuer whose common shares are traded on the TSX and which issuer is seeking proxies from its security holders for the purposes of electing directors must include in its management information circular the corporate governance practices which have been adopted by the issuer as more fully set out in NI 58-101.

Corporate governance refers to the manner in which a board of directors oversees the management and direction of a corporation. Governance is not a static issue, and must be judged from time-to-time based on the evolution of a corporation with respect to its size and the nature or its business, and upon the changing standards of the community. Not all corporate governance systems are alike. The Corporation's approach has been developed with respect to the Corporation's growth and current status. The composition of the Board is reviewed on an annual basis by the full Board and Management.

In reviewing the issue of corporate governance, the Board has determined to perform the function as an entire Board. The Board's mandate was to consider corporate governance matters and make recommendations consistent with the Corporation's position and size as a junior mining corporation. The resulting approach to corporate governance adopted by the Board reflects these recommendations and recognizes the responsibility of the Board for the stewardship of the Corporation.

The Corporation's approach to corporate governance is set out in Schedule "A" attached to this Circular. Through regular review at quarterly meetings, the Board will continue to examine these issues in light of the Corporation's development in the mineral exploration business. In addition, and as required by Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees ("MI 52-110"), the Corporation is required to set out detailed information concerning its Audit Committee in the Corporation's Annual Information Form which was dated August 28, 2009 (the "AIF") and as such information concerning the Audit Committee of the Corporation can be found on pages 39-41 of the AIF and the full text of the Audit Committee Charter is set out in Schedule "A" of the AIF.

- 17 -


The Board is currently composed of six (6) directors. One (1) of these directors is a member of Management and five (5) are outside directors who are unrelated as such term is described in the TSX Guidelines for Corporate Governance (the "Guidelines").

For the Corporation, the implementation of a detailed system to address every issue of corporate governance would be an undue strain on the resources and finances of a junior corporation. In order to address a wide range of issues of governance more effectively, the board has elected to undertake three (3) areas of activity through board discussion, consensus or through the partial assistance of the Board, as follows:

The tasks of appointing and assessing directors, and the assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors, are carried out by the full Board, rather than by appointed committees. New directors are given background materials and a review of the Corporation's development.

  (a)

The Board monitors Management on a regular basis. The annual budget is reviewed regularly by the Board and by the Audit Committee as a basis to assess performance and progress. This procedure is favoured over the use of formal mandates which would define limits to Management's responsibilities, or the use of procedures to approve the Chief Executive Officer's corporate objectives to ensure the Board can function independently of Management. However, the Board will consider, on an ongoing basis, issues concerning the independence of the Board from Management.

     
  (b)

The Board has not adopted a system that would enable an individual director to engage an advisor at the expense of the Corporation in appropriate circumstances. At this time, agreement by the Board to any such retainer, if at the expense of the Corporation, would be required.

The Board has appointed a Chairman who is other than the Chief Executive Officer.

The committees of the Board are comprised primarily of outside directors and function as set out below.

The Audit Committee meets as required to review the annual and quarterly financial statements, matters relating to the securities commissions, investments and transactions that could adversely affect the well-being of the Corporation and Management's recommendations regarding share issues of the Corporation. The Audit Committee also establishes and monitors procedures to reduce conflicts of interest and for reviewing audit and financial matters. Through meetings with external auditors and senior Management, the Audit Committee discusses, among other things, the effectiveness of the internal control procedures established for the Corporation. At all times, at least one (1) Audit Committee member possesses accounting or related financial expertise, while the remaining members are, at minimum, possessed of significant experience in analyzing the financial condition of corporations. The Board has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee which sets out the responsibilities of the Audit Committee and provides guidance to Audit Committee members as to their duties which charter is attached to the Corporation's AIF, as described above. The Audit Committee of the Corporation currently consists of three (3) members: D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Peter Born. Each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Wolkin and Dr. Born all qualify as independent directors and are financially literate as defined in MI 51-110.

The Compensation Committee reviews compensation practices and Management succession and approves the remuneration of the Corporation's senior executives, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also monitors the integrity of Management through periodic meetings with the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three (3) directors: D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Dr. Michael Hitch. Each of Mr. Brown, Dr. Hitch and Mr. Wolkin qualify as independent directors as defined in MI 52-110.

Finally, although the Guidelines do not emphasize issues of environmental concern, the Board recognizes its responsibility to ensure that the Corporation's operations do not result in an adverse impact on the environment.

- 18 -


The Board remains committed to the ongoing development and improvement of the Corporation, its systems and in particular corporate governance. Shareholder feedback is encouraged at all times and commentary is always welcome. Shareholders are invited to address their comments to the attention of Chairman.

SPECIAL BUSINESS

APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION OF STOCK OPTION PLAN

The Corporation's 2004 stock option plan, as amended November 30, 2006 ("Option Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule "B", was previously adopted by the directors, introduced to and approved by the Shareholders on March 26, 2004, ratified on November 8, 2005 and amended and approved by the Shareholders on November 30, 2006. Amendments to the Option Plan were approved by the Board effective October 30, 2009. Shareholder approval is required to ratify these amendments. Pursuant to the rules of the TSX, the Corporation is required to receive shareholder renewal approval of the Option Plan every three (3) years. Shareholders will therefore be asked at the Meeting to consider and, if thought advisable, to ratify and approve the Option Plan, as amended October 30, 2009.

The Corporation had 44,985,431 issued and outstanding Common Shares on October 23, 2009 and the aggregate maximum number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance under the Option Plan is 20% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation, which as at October 23, 2009 was equal to 8,997,086 Common Shares.

As of October 23, 2009, there were 7,150,000 Options outstanding under the Option Plan, representing approximately 15.89% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Common Shares. Accordingly, as of October 23, 2009 there were 1,847,086 unallocated Options available for issuance under the Option Plan, representing approximately 4.11% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Common Shares.

Description of the Option Plan

The purpose of the 2004 Plan is to assist the Corporation in attracting, retaining and motivating directors, officers and employees of the Corporation and to closely align the personal interests of such directors, officers and employees with the interests of the Corporation and its Shareholders.

The Board of Directors may grant stock options to eligible directors, employees and consultants of the Corporation (and, when applicable, companies wholly-owned by any such director or employee).

Under the Option Plan:

1.

options may be granted in such numbers and with such vesting provisions as the Board may determine, where stock options granted to consultants engaged to provide investor relations activities shall vest in stages over a period of twelve (12) months from the grant date of such stock options with no more than ¼ of any such stock options granted vesting in any three-month period;

   
2.

in accordance with TSX requirements, in no case will the grant of options under the Plan result in:


  (a)

the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to stock options granted to insiders and their associates (as those terms are defined in the Securities Act (Ontario)) at any time under all security based compensation arrangements exceeding ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding common shares;

     
  (b)

the grant to insiders, within any twelve (12) month period, of stock options reserving for issuance a number of Common Shares exceeding in the aggregate ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation;

- 19 -



  (c)

the grant to any single individual within any twelve (12) month period, of stock options reserving for issuance a number of Common Shares of the Corporation exceeding in the aggregate five percent (5%) of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation;

     
  (d)

the grant to any consultant engaged by the Corporation to provide investor relations activities, within any twelve-month period, of stock options reserving for issuance a number of Common Shares exceeding in the aggregate one percent (1%) of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Common Shares; or

     
  (e)

the grant to any one consultant, in any twelve-month period, of stock options reserving for issuance a number of Common Shares exceeding in the aggregate two percent (2%) of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Common Shares;


3.

the Board shall determine the exercise price of stock options granted under the Option Plan, where the exercise price of Options shall not be less than the "discounted market price" of the Common Shares at the date of granting such stock option, where in no case will the "discounted market price"be less than the minimum prescribed by each of the organized trading facilities as would apply to the grant date in question ("discounted market price" means the greater of the closing market price of the underlying securities on (a) the trading day prior to the date of grant of the option; and (b) the date of grant of the option);

   
4.

the term and expiry date of any stock options granted shall be determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of granting of such stock option, where the maximum term shall be five years;

   
5.

the stock options are not assignable or transferable, with the exception of an assignment made to a personal representative of a deceased option holder;

   
6.

in the event of the resignation or retirement of a director prior to the expiry time of a stock option, such stock option shall cease and terminate on the ninetieth day following the effective date of such resignation or retirement (or the expiry time of such stock option, whichever occurs first, and thereafter shall be of no further force or effect whatsoever as to the Common Shares in respect of which such stock option has not previously been exercised), unless the director ceases to be director of the Corporation as a result of: (i) ceasing to meet the qualifications of a director as set forth in the Business Corporations Act (Ontario); (ii) a shareholders' resolution removing such director; or (iii) an order made by a regulatory authority having jurisdiction to so order, in which instances such stock option shall cease and terminate on the effective date of such director ceasing to be a director of the Corporation;

   
7.

in the event of the termination of the employment of an employee or consultant of the Corporation prior to the expiry time of a stock option, such stock option shall cease and terminate on the thirtieth day following the effective date of such termination (or the expiry time of such stock option, whichever occurs first, and thereafter shall be of no further force or effect whatsoever as to the Common Shares in respect of which such stock option has not previously been exercised), unless the employee or consultant ceases to be an employee or consultant as a result of: (i) termination for cause; or (ii) an order made by a regulatory authority having jurisdiction to so order, in which instances such stock option shall cease and terminate on the date of termination of such employee or consultant;

   
8.

in the event of the death of an option holder prior to the expiry time of a stock option, such stock option shall be exercisable until the earlier of one (1) year following the death of the holder (or the expiry time of such stock option, whichever occurs first, and thereafter shall be of no further force or effect whatsoever as to the Common Shares in respect of which such stock option has not previously been exercised);

   
9.

in the event that an option holder commits an act of bankruptcy or insolvency and such proceeding remains undismissed for a period of thirty (30) days, no stock option held by such option holder may be exercised following the date on which such option holder commits such act of bankruptcy or such proceeding remains undismissed, as the case may be;

- 20 -



10.

in the event the Corporation proposes to amalgamate, merge or consolidate with any other corporation (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary) or to liquidate, dissolve or wind-up, or in the event an offer to purchase or repurchase the Common Shares of the Corporation or any part thereof shall be made to all or substantially all holders of Common Shares of the Corporation, the Corporation shall have the right, upon written notice thereof to each option holder holding stock options, to permit the exercise of all such stock options within the twenty (20) day period next following the date of such notice and to determine that upon the expiration of such twenty (20) day period, all such stock options shall terminate;

   
11.

in the event of the sale by the Corporation of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation, any outstanding stock option may be exercised as to all or any part of the optioned Common Shares in respect of which the option holder would have been entitled to exercise the stock option at the date of completion of any such sale at any time up to and including, but not after the earlier of: (i) the close of business on that date which is thirty (30) days following the date of completion of such sale; and (ii) the close of business on the expiry date of such stock option;

   
12.

the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance under the Option Plan, together with any Common Shares reserved for issuance under any other share compensation arrangement must not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the number of Common Shares, on a non-diluted basis, outstanding at the time; and

   
13.

The Board may terminate the Option Plan at any time provided that such termination will not alter the terms or conditions of any option or impair any right of any option holder pursuant to any option granted prior to the date of such termination, which will continue to be governed by the provisions of the Option Plan.

Effective October 30, 2009, the Board approved the following amendments to the Option Plan:

1.

Section 3.8, which deals with the adjustment provisions of the Option Plan, was revised to specify that any adjustments made shall be subject to the approval of the TSX, if required;

   
2.

Section 6.6, which deals with the termination provisions of the Option Plan, was revised to specify that the Board may terminate the Option Plan at any time upon receipt of requisite regulatory approval;

   
3.

Section 6.1, which relates to the amendment provisions of the Option Plan, was revised to clarify the powers of the Board to amend the Option Plan. Section 6.1 was amended to specify that the Board has the discretion to make any amendments to the Option Plan that it may deem necessary, without having to obtain shareholder approval, including, without limitation:


  (a)

minor changes of a "house-keeping nature";

     
  (b)

amending options under the Option Plan, including with respect to the option period (provided that the period during which an option is exercisable does not exceed ten (10) years from the date the option is granted and that such option is not held by an "insider"), vesting period, exercise method and frequency, subscription price (provided that such option is not held by an "insider") and method of determining the subscription price, assignability and effect of termination of a participant's employment or cessation of a participant's directorship;

     
  (c)

changing the class of participants eligible to participate under the Option Plan;

     
  (d)

advancing the date on which any option may be exercised or extending the expiration date of any option, provided that the period during which an option is exercisable does not exceed ten (10) years from the date the option is granted;

     
  (e)

changing the terms and conditions of any financial assistance that may be provided by the Corporation to participants to facilitate the purchase of Common Shares under the Option Plan; and

- 21 -



  (f)

adding a cashless exercise feature, payable in cash or securities, whether or not providing for a full deduction of the number of underlying Common Shares from the Option Plan reserve; and


4.

The Option Plan was further amended to specify in Section 6.2 that:


  (a)

shareholder approval must be obtained in the case of any amendment to the amendment provisions of the Option Plan, any increase in the maximum number of Common Shares issuable under the Option Plan and any reduction in the exercise price or extension of the option period benefiting an insider, in addition to such other matters that may require shareholder approval under the rules and policies of the TSX; and

     
  (b)

disinterested shareholder approval must be obtained for any changes to the insider participation limits in the Option Plan or if the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance to any one (1) person exceeds five percent (5%) of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.

Accordingly, at the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and, if thought fit, approve an ordinary resolution in the following form:

"WHEREAS:

1.

The Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted the Corporation's stock option plan, introduced to and approved by the Shareholders on March 26, 2004, ratified on November 8, 2005, amended and approved by the Shareholders on November 30, 2006 (the "Option Plan"), which does not have a fixed maximum number of common shares issuable;

   
2.

The Board of Directors approved certain amendments (the "Amendments") to the Option Plan effective October 30, 2009, as more particularly set forth in the accompanying management information circular, where shareholder approval is required to ratify the Amendments; and

   
3.

The rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange provide that all unallocated options, rights or other entitlements under a security-based compensation arrangement that does not have a fixed number of maximum securities issuable be approved every three (3) years.

BE IT RESOLVED as an ordinary resolution of the shareholders of the Corporation that:

1.

The Amendments are hereby ratified and approved;

   
2.

All unallocated options under the Option Plan be and are hereby approved;

   
3.

The Corporation has the ability to continue granting options under the Option Plan until November 30, 2012, being the date that is three (3) years from the date where shareholder approval is being sought; and

   
4.

Any one (1) director or officer of the Corporation be and he or she is hereby authorized and directed to do all acts and things and to execute, whether under the corporate seal of the Corporation or otherwise, and deliver all agreements, certificates and documents necessary or desirable to fully effect the forgoing resolutions."

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED RATIFICATION OF THE OPTION PLAN, UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER HAS SPECIFIED IN THE PROXY THAT SUCH SHARES ARE TO BE VOTED AGAINST SUCH ORDINARY RESOLUTION

- 22 -


PRIVATE PLACEMENT FINANCING

The Corporation wishes to complete a non-brokered private placement (the "Private Placement") to be comprised of up to a total of 26,666,667 units (each a "Unit") in the capital of the Corporation, at a price per Unit equal to $0.075 (the "Offering Price"). Each Unit shall be comprised of one (1) common share in the capital of the Corporation and one (1) common share purchase warrant (each, a "Warrant"), with each Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire a further common share of the Corporation at an exercise price equal to $0.12 until the second anniversary following the closing of the Private Placement. The Warrants will contain standard anti-dilution provisions which would result in an adjustment to the number or exercise price of the Warrants upon the occurrence of certain events.

The Corporation has entered into a unit purchase agreement dated October 16, 2009 (the "Centerpoint Agreement") with Centerpoint Resources, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia ("Centerpoint"). Pursuant to the Centerpoint Agreement, Centerpoint has agreed to subscribe for 20,000,000 Units under the Private Placement. Centerpoint does not currently own or exercise control over any common shares in the capital of the Corporation.

In addition to containing the representations and warranties standard in a transaction of this type, the Centerpoint Agreement also contains certain closing conditions in favour of Centerpoint. These closing condition include, among others, receipt of satisfactory title opinions in respect of the Corporation's properties located in Ontario and evidence of the receipt of all permits in respect of all of the Corporation's properties required for work to be completed on the properties. Centerpoint’s obligation to purchase the 20,000,000 Units is also subject to receipt by the Corporation of the required regulatory and shareholder approvals and satisfaction by the Corporation of the closing conditions (including those listed herein) on or before December 11, 2009. Centerpoint's acquisition of the 20,000,000 Units will result in its holding 44.46% (47.07% on a fully diluted basis) of the Corporation's issued and outstanding share capital on closing.

The details of the Private Placement are more particularly set out on the Terms of the Offering annexed hereto as Schedule "C".

As (i) the number of Common Shares to be issued or reserved for issuance pending completion of the Private Placement (being up to a maximum of 53,333,334 Common Shares or approximately 118.6% of the current issued share capital) exceeds 25% of the Corporation's currently issued and outstanding Common Shares; (ii) 20,000,000 of the Units subscribed for under the Private Placement will be issued to Centerpoint which will materially affect control of the Corporation; and (iii) the Offering Price is at a 29% discount to the market price on the date the Centerpoint Agreement was entered into which is greater than the 25% discount permitted under the terms of the TSX Company Manual, the Toronto Stock Exchange requires the Corporation to obtain the approval of its shareholders for the Private Placement.

Insiders of the Corporation will be permitted to participate in the Private Placement, but in no event will they be permitted to acquire more than 2,249,271 Units being the number of Units (on a fully diluted basis) which is equal to 10% of the number of Common Shares outstanding on the date hereof. Insider participation in the Private Placement will be as follows:

- 23 -



Insider


Current
Holdings

% of issued and
outstanding prior to
Private Placement
Maximum # of
Units to be
Purchased1
% of issued and
outstanding
following Private
Placement2
% of issued and
outstanding following
Private Placement (fully
diluted)2
Richard Brown 5,000 0.01% 266,667 0.60% 1.18%
Paul Sarjeant Nil 0% 200,000 0.44% 0.88%
Michael Hitch Nil 0% 200,000 0.44% 0.88%
Ken Hight Nil 0% 133,333 0.30% 0.59%
Peter Born Nil 0 266,667 0.59% 1.17%

The full text of the resolution shareholders will be asked to approve is attached to this Circular as Schedule "D". To be approved, the resolution must be passed by a majority of the disinterested votes entitled to be cast and counted by shareholders at the Meeting in respect of this resolution. Unless otherwise specified, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote FOR the resolution approving, ratifying and confirming the Private Placement.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The shareholders of the Corporation are scheduled to elected a slate of directors five (5) directors at this meeting. It is proposed that conditional upon the completion of the terms of the Centerpoint Agreement including the closing of the purchase by Centerpoint of 20,000,000 Units under the Private Placement, the Board of Directors be increased to seven (7) directors by adding an additional two (2) directors nominated by Centerpoint to serve alongside the five directors elected at this meeting. Shareholders must approve this increase to the Board by special resolution. Centerpoint has nominated Mr. Jack Ausitn and Mr. Tedd Nunnn to fill the vacancies that will be created and information concerning these two candidates is found below.

Jack Austin - The Hon. Jack Austin, P.C, Q.C. is a graduate in law from the University of British Columbia and Harvard Law School. He practised law in Vancouver for nearly 20 years specializing in natural resource law, securities and finance. In public life he served for four years as Deputy Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources in Ottawa, one and a half years as Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Trudeau, Cabinet Minister in the Trudeau government (1981-1984), and in the Martin government (2003-2006). Mr. Austin served as a Senator representing British Columbia from 1975 to 2007. Currently he is Senior Advisor-International to Stern Partners Inc. a private investment group, a director of two public companies, and President of Centerpoint Resources Inc. of Vancouver, a private company owned by Canadian and Chinese investors in the natural resources sector.

Ted Nunn – Mr. Nunn has been associated with the mining industry for 41 years primarily working in project engineering and management for mine operating companies. Twenty of these years were experienced in the coal and industrial mineral industries for: Kaiser Resources, An Tai Bao Surface Coal Mine (China), Greymouth Coal (New Zealand), and Crystal Graphite Corporation (Canada & China). His metal mining experience included Cominco (four operations), Lornex Mining Corp., Echo Bay Mines, and Granduc Operating Company. His experience includes exploration, geological engineering, civil/structural engineering, mine engineering, contract management, financial analyses, governmental affairs, and project/construction management in both open pit and

__________________________
1
Insiders may purchase less than the number of units set out in this chart but in no event will they acquire more than the allotted number.
2 Assumes completion of only the Insider's portion of the Private Placement. If the Private Placement is fully subscribed, the percentages will be substantially lower.

- 24 -


underground mining environments. Mr. Nunn is a Registered Professional Engineer in British Columbia graduating in Mining Engineering from Queen’s University in 1975. Mr. Nunn is presently Vice President – Technical Services for Centerpoint Resources Inc., President of Centershield Gold Mines Inc., and a Director for Anglo Swiss Resources Inc.

UNLESS A CHOICE IS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, IT IS INTENDED THAT THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE PROXIES HEREBY SOLICITED WILL BE VOTED BY THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN FOR THE SPECIAL RESOLUTION OF SHAREHOLERS INCREASING THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS FROM FIVE (5) TO SEVEN (7) AND FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES PUT FORTH BY CENTERPOINT, AS SET FORTH ABOVE.

OTHER MATTERS

Management is not aware of any other business to come before the Meeting other than as set forth in the Notice of Meeting accompanying this Information Circular. If any other business properly comes before the Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the Instrument of Proxy to vote the Common Shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment on such matter.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Corporation may be found on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the year ended May, 31, 2009. Shareholders may contact the Corporation at Grandview Gold Inc., 330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8, Attention: Paul Sarjeant to request copies of the Corporation's financial statements and accompanying management's discussion and analyses.

GENERAL

Information contained herein is given as of the October 30, 2009. Save for the matters referred to herein, Management knows of no other matters intended to be brought before the Meeting. However, if any matters, which are not now known to management of the Corporation, shall properly come before the Meeting, the Proxy given pursuant to this solicitation by Management will be voted on such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the person voting the Proxy, in the event such discretionary authority is provided in the Proxy. The contents and sending of this Information Circular have been approved by the Directors of the Corporation.

) BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
)
)
) "Dr. Michael Hitch"                                         
) DR. MICHAEL HITCH, PHD., P. GEO
) Chairman of the Board

- 25 -


SCHEDULE "A"

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

The following table details the Corporation’s corporate governance practices and addresses the disclosure requirements set out in Form 58-101F1 - Corporate Governance Disclosure:

1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Independent Directors The Corporation's four independent directors are: D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin, Ken Hight and Peter Born.
Composition of the Board The Board is composed of five (5) independent directors and one (1) non- independent director.
Non-independent directors The Corporation's non-independent director is Paul Sarjeant. Mr. Sarjeant is the President and CEO of the Corporation.
Other directorships





 
Directors
Issuers
Issuer Reporting
Jurisdiction
Stock Exchange
D. Richard Brown Asia Now Resources Corp. Ontario TSX Venture Exchange: NOW
Peter Born Cuda Capital Corp.
Alderon Resources Corp.
British Columbia
British Columbia
Alberta
TSX Venture Exchange: CDP
TSX : ADP
Ken Hight Lucrum Capital Corp. British Columbia TSX Venture Exchange: LRU
Paul Sarjeant Golden Harp Resources Inc. British Columbia
Alberta
Ontario
TSX Venture Exchange: GHR

Board meetings held

The independent directors of the Board do not hold meetings at which non- independent directors and members of management are not in attendance. The Corporation holds quarterly meetings and other meetings as required, at which the opinion of the independent directors is sought and duly acted upon for all material matters related to the Corporation.

Chair of the Board

The Board has an independent director as the chair of the board. Michael Hitch chairs the meetings of the Board and actively seeks out the views of all directors on all Board matters.

Board meeting attendance

With the exception of Richard Brown and Ken Hight, who missed 1 and 2 meetings, respectively, the directors attended all Board meetings in fiscal 2009.

2. BOARD MANDATE

The Board assumes responsibility for stewardship of the corporation, including overseeing all of the operation of the business, supervising management and setting milestones for the Corporation. The Board reviews the statements of responsibilities for the Corporation including, but not limited to, the code of ethics and expectations for business conduct.

The Board approves all significant decisions that affect the Corporation and its subsidiaries and sets specific milestones towards which management directs their efforts.




The Board ensures, at least annually, that there are long-term goals and a strategic planning process in place for the Corporation and participates with Management directly or through its committees in developing and approving the mission of the business of the Corporation and the strategic plan by which it proposes to achieve its goals, which strategic plan takes into account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of the Corporation's business. The strategic planning process is carried out at each Board meeting where there are regularly reviewed specific milestones for the Corporation.

The strategic planning process incorporates identifying the main risks to the Corporation's objectives and ensuring that mitigation plans are in place to manage and minimize these risks. The Board also takes responsibility for identifying the principal risks of the Corporation's business and for ensuring these risks are effectively monitored and mitigated to the extent practicable. The Board appoints senior Management. As the Corporation has grown it has seen that Management has also grown, mitigating risk with respect to succession planning.

The Corporation adheres to all regulatory requirements with respect to the timeliness and content of its disclosure. The Board approves all of the Corporation's major communications, including annual and quarterly reports and press releases. The CEO or Chair (on behalf of the Board) authorizes the issuance of news releases. The CEO and the Chair are generally the only individuals authorized to communicate with analysts, the news media and investors about information concerning the Corporation.

The Board and the Audit Committee examine the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control processes and information systems.

The Board as a whole, given its small size, is involved in developing the Corporation's approach to corporate governance. The number of scheduled meetings of the Board varies with circumstances. In addition, special meetings are called as necessary. The Chair establishes the agenda at each Board meeting and submits a draft to each director for their review and recommendation for items for inclusion on the agenda. Each director has the ability to raise subjects that are not on the agenda at any meeting of the Board. Meeting agendas and other materials to be reviewed and/or discussed for action by the Board are distributed to directors in time for review prior to each meeting.

Board members have full and free access to senior Management and employees of the Corporation

3. POSITION DESCRIPTION

Chairman of the Board and Committee Chairs: role and responsibilities

The Board does not currently have a separate written description for the chair. The Board as a whole is responsible for and is continuing to develop recommendations for structures and procedures to clearly define the role and responsibilities of the Chair and the chair of each Board committee. The Chair of the Board is independent of Management and is responsible for leading the discussion and ensuring that the Board convenes as often as is required in order to meet the needs of the Corporation. In addition, the Chair also meets with the CEO on a regular basis to help with this function. The Audit Committee has a chair and a charter which charter provides structure and guidance with respect to the roles of the board, committee and the chair. In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee is independent of Management. The Compensation Committee does not have a written description for the chair. The Chair of the Compensation Committee is independent from Management and the Compensation Committee is currently reviewing documentation which would help to better delineate the roles of the members of the committee.

Office of the CEO: role and responsibilities

The Board and the CEO have not developed formal documented position description for the CEO. The Board is currently of the view that the respective corporate governance roles of the Board and Management, as represented by the CEO, are clear and that the limits to Management's responsibility and authority are well-defined. In order to monitor and ensure

- 2 -



that these roles are defined, the Chairman meets with the CEO and CFO on a regular basis to ensure that all matters requiring Board review and/or approval are brought before the Board and that Management is working within the bounds of their authority. As the Corporation is a junior mining corporation there are only two senior officer positions and as such the role of the CEO is broad but the Board believes that as a result of relevant corporate governance initiatives and the frequent meeting of the Chairman and the CEO, there is sufficient delineation.

4. ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
New director orientation

The Corporation does not have a formal orientation and education program for new directors. However, new directors are provided with relevant materials with respect to the Corporation as well as being oriented on relevant corporate issues by senior management and legal counsel.

Continuing education of the board

The Board currently does not provide continuing education for its directors. By using a Board composed of experienced professionals with a wide range of financial, exploration and mining expertise, the Corporation ensures that the Board operates effectively and efficiently. Currently, the Board members have access to and actively consult with legal counsel to the Corporation on various matters with respect to their duties and obligations to the Corporation. The Board is currently working to implement formal policies on a number of corporate governance matters and upon implementation also plans to provide written information and orientation with respect to such policies to the Board members.

5. ETHICAL BUSINESS CONDUCT
Code of ethics

The Board has not adopted a written code of ethics and expectations for business conduct for the directors, officers and employees of the Corporation.

Handling non-arm’s length transactions

Directors with an interest in a material transaction are required to declare their interest and abstain from voting on such transactions. A thorough discussion of the documentation related to material transaction is required for review by the Board, particularly independent directors.

Culture of ethical conduct

The Board seeks directors who have solid track records in spheres ranging from financial to exploration and mining in order to ensure a culture of ethical business conduct.

6. NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS
Identifying nominees

All of the Corporation's directors are involved in the search for new directors.

Nominating committee

The Board does not have a nominating committee. A new director should have direct experience in the mining business and significant public company experience. The nominee must not have a significant conflicting public company association. Experienced mining directors are currently difficult to source as a result of the high level of activity in the mining sector.

Role and responsibilities of the nominating committee

The Board does not have a nominating committee at the present time.

7. COMPENSATION
Determining directors’ and officers’ compensation

The Board reviews the adequacy and form of compensation and compares it to other companies of similar size and stage of development. There is no minimum share ownership requirement of directors. Director's compensation is in the form of stock options. The Corporation's compensation committee reviews the amounts and effectiveness of stock option compensation.

Composition of the compensation committee

The Compensation Committee consists of three (3) directors: D. Richard Brown, Harold Wolkin and Michael Hitch. Messrs. Brown, Hitch and Wolkin are independent.

- 3 -



Roles and responsibilities of the compensation committee

The Compensation Committee convenes at least once annually to review director and officer compensation and status of stock options. The Compensation Committee also responds to requests from Management and the Board to review recommendations of Management for new senior employees and their compensation. The Compensation Committee has the power to approve and/or amend these recommendations.

Use of a compensation consultant or advisor

The Corporation has felt no need to retain any compensation consultants or advisors at any time since the beginning of the Corporation's most recently completed financial year.

8. OTHER BOARD COMMITTEES
Other board committees

The Corporation does not currently have any other committees.

9. ASSESSMENTS
Board and committee effectiveness

The Board does not, at present, have a formal process in place for assessing the effectiveness of the Board as a whole, its committees or individual directors. The Audit Committee, as part of their annual review, assesses the effectiveness of the Board and its independence. The Audit Committee assesses the adequacy of the information provided, the regular nature of the communication between the Board and Management and reviews whether Management is following the mandated strategic direction as set out in the Board's direction and Management milestones.

The Board assesses the CEO's effectiveness in attaining the Corporation's corporate objectives, budgets and milestones.

Management and directors communicate with shareholders on an ongoing basis, and shareholders are regularly consulted on the effectiveness of Board members and senior staff.

- 4 -


SCHEDULE "B"

2004 STOCK OPTION PLAN


STOCK OPTION PLAN
(AS AMENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2006 AND OCTOBER 30, 2009 BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS)

WHEREAS the Board (as defined below) has decided it to be in the best interest of GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. (the "Corporation") to implement a stock option plan (the "2004 Plan") as a "rolling" plan and to establish the number of shares reserved for issuance following the due exercise of Options (as defined below) under the 2004 Plan (as amended) as 20% of the issued and outstanding Shares in the capital of the Corporation from time to time.

ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

1.1 Definitions. Where used in this 2004 Plan, unless there is something in the subject matter or context inconsistent therewith, the following terms will have the meanings set forth below:

  (a)

"2004 Plan" means the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan as approved by the shareholders of Grandview Gold Inc. on March 26, 2004, as amended and approved by the shareholders of the Corporation on November 30, 2006 and as amended effective October 30, 2009 by the Board.

     
  (b)

"Administrator" means, initially, the President or Secretary of the Corporation and thereafter will mean such director or other senior officer or employee of the Corporation or a duly appointed committee thereof as may be designated as Administrator by the Board from time to time.

     
  (c)

"Associate" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 1(1) of the Securities Act.

     
  (d)

"Board" means the board of directors of the Corporation, or any duly appointed committee thereof to which the board of directors of the Corporation has delegated the power to administer and grant Options under this 2004 Plan, as constituted from time to time.

     
  (e)

"Cause" means:


  (i)

"cause" as such term is defined in the written employment agreement between the Corporation and the Employee; or

     
  (ii)

in the event there is no written employment agreement between the Corporation and the Employee or "cause" is not defined in the written employment agreement between the Corporation and the Employee, the usual meaning of cause under the laws of Ontario.


  (f)

"Company" unless specifically indicated otherwise, means a corporation, incorporated association or organization, body corporate, partnership, trust, association, or other entity other than an individual.

     
  (g)

"Consultant" means an individual or a Company of which the said individual is an employee, shareholder or partner, other than an Employee or Director of the Corporation, who:


  (i)

is engaged to provide on a ongoing bona fide basis, consulting, technical, management or other services to the Corporation or to a subsidiary of the Corporation, other than services provided in relation to a distribution of the Corporation's securities;

     
  (ii)

provides the services under a written contract between the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation and the individual or the Consultant's Company;



2

  (iii)

in the reasonable opinion of the Corporation, spends or will spend a significant amount of time and attention on the business and affairs of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation; and

     
  (iv)

has a relationship with the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation that enables the individual to be knowledgeable about the business and affairs of the Corporation.


  (h)

"Corporation" means Grandview Gold Inc.

     
  (i)

"Directors" means directors and senior officers of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation to whom stock options may be granted in reliance on a prospectus exemption under applicable Securities Laws.

     
  (j)

"Discounted Market Price" means the greater of the closing market price of the underlying securities on (a) the trading day prior to the date of grant of the option; and (b) the date of grant of the option.

     
  (k)

"disinterested Shareholder approval" means approval by a majority of the votes cast by all shareholders of the Corporation at a duly called and held meeting of shareholders of the Corporation, excluding votes attaching to Shares beneficially owned by:


  (i)

Insiders to whom Options may be granted under this 2004 Plan; and

     
  (ii)

Associates of Persons referred to in (k)(i) above.


  (l)

"Effective Date" means the effective date of this 2004 Plan being October 1, 2004.

     
  (m)

"Employee" means an individual who:


  (i)

is considered an employee of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (i.e. for whom income tax, employment insurance and CPP deductions must be made at source); or

     
  (ii)

works full-time for the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source; or

     
  (iii)

works for the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation on a continuing and regular basis for a minimum amount of time per week providing services normally provided by an employee and who is subject to the same control and direction by the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation over the details and methods of work as an employee of the Corporation, but for whom income tax deductions are not made at source.


  (n)

"Exercise Notice" means the notice respecting the exercise of an Option, in the form set out in Exhibit "I" of the Option Agreement, duly executed by the Option Holder.

     
  (o)

"Exercise Period" means the period during which a particular Option may be exercised and, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms hereof, is the period from and including the Grant Date through to and including the Expiry Date.



3

  (p)

"Exercise Price" means the price per Share at which Shares may be purchased under an Option duly granted under this 2004 Plan as determined in accordance with Section 3.5 of this 2004 Plan and, if applicable, adjusted in accordance with Section 3.8 of this 2004 Plan.

     
  (q)

"Existing Options" has the meaning given in Section 3.2 of this 2004 Plan.

     
  (r)

"Expiry Date" means the date determined in accordance with Section 3.3 of this 2004 Plan and after which a particular Option cannot be exercised and is deemed to be null and void and of no further force or effect.

     
  (s)

"Grant Date" means the date on which the Board grants a particular Option.

     
  (t)

"Insider" means:


  (i)

a director or senior officer of the Corporation;

     
  (ii)

a director or senior officer of a Company that is an Insider or subsidiary of the Corporation;

     
  (iii)

a Person that beneficially owns or controls, directly or indirectly, Voting Shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all Voting Shares of the Corporation; or

     
  (iv)

the Corporation itself if it holds any of its own securities.


  (u)

"Limit" shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 3.2 of this 2004 Plan.

     
  (v)

"Market Price" means the last closing price of the Corporation's Shares before the issuance of the required news release disclosing the grant of an Option.

     
  (w)

"OBCA" means the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), as amended from time to time.

     
  (x)

"Option" means an option to acquire Shares granted to a Director, Employee or Consultant pursuant to this 2004 Plan.

     
  (y)

"Option Agreement" means an agreement, in the form substantially similar as that set out in Schedule "A" hereto, evidencing an Option granted under this 2004 Plan.

     
  (z)

"Option Holder" means a Director, Employee or Consultant or former Director, Employee or Consultant, to whom an Option has been granted and who continues to hold an unexercised and unexpired Option or, where applicable, the Personal Representative of such person.

     
  (aa)

"Plan" means this stock option plan as may be amended from time to time.

     
  (bb)

"Person" means a Company or an individual.

     
  (cc)

"Personal Representative" means:


  (i)

in the case of a deceased Option Holder, the executor or administrator of the deceased duly appointed by a court or public authority having jurisdiction to do so; and

     
  (ii)

in the case of an Option Holder who, for any reason, is unable to manage his or her affairs, the person entitled by law to act on behalf of such Option Holder.



4

  (dd)

"Regulatory Authorities" means all stock exchanges and other organized trading facilities on which the Corporation's Shares are listed and all securities commissions or similar securities regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Corporation.

     
  (ee)

"Re-Organization Event" has the meaning given in Section 3.8 of this 2004 Plan.

     
  (ff)

"Securities Laws" means securities legislation, securities regulation and securities rules, as amended, and the policies, notices, instruments and blanket orders in force from time to time that govern or are applicable to the Corporation or to which it is subject.

     
  (gg)

"Share" or "Shares" means, as the case may be, one or more common shares without par value in the capital stock of the Corporation as constituted on the Effective Date or, in the event of an adjustment contemplated by Section 3.5 of this 2004 Plan, such other shares or securities to which an Option Holder may be entitled upon the due exercise of an Option as a result of such adjustment.

     
  (hh)

"Share Compensation Arrangement" means a stock option, stock option plan, employee stock purchase plan or any other compensation or incentive mechanism of the Corporation involving the issuance or potential issuance of Shares to one or more Directors, Employees or Consultants, including a share purchase from treasury which is financially assisted by the Corporation by way of a loan, guarantee or otherwise.

     
  (ii)

"Termination Date" means:


  (i)

in the case of the resignation of the Option Holder as an Employee of the Corporation, the date that the Option Holder provides notice of his or her resignation as an Employee of the Corporation to the Corporation; or

     
  (ii)

in the case of the termination of the Option Holder as an Employee of the Corporation by the Corporation for any reason other than death, the effective date of termination set out in the Corporation's notice of termination of the Option Holder as an Employee of the Corporation to the Option Holder; or

     
  (iii)

the effective date of termination of a Director, Employee or Consultant pursuant to an order made by any Regulatory Authority having jurisdiction to so order.


  (jj)

"TSX" means the Toronto Stock Exchange.

     
  (kk)

"Voting Share" means a security of the Corporation that:


  (i)

is not a debt security; and

     
  (ii)

carries a voting right either under all circumstances or under some circumstances that have occurred and are continuing.

1.2 Choice of Law. This 2004 Plan is established under and the provisions of this 2004 Plan will be subject to and interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario.

1.3 Headings. The headings used herein are for convenience only and are not to affect the interpretation of this 2004 Plan.


5

ARTICLE II
PURPOSE AND PARTICIPATION

2.1 Purpose. The purpose of this 2004 Plan is to provide the Corporation with a share-related mechanism to attract, retain and motivate qualified Directors, Employees and Consultants, to reward such of those Directors, Employees and Consultants as may be granted Options under this 2004 Plan by the Board from time to time for their contributions toward the long term goals and success of the Corporation and to enable and encourage such Directors, Employees and Consultants to acquire Shares as long term investments and proprietary interests in the Corporation.

2.2 Participation. The Board will, from time to time and in its sole discretion, determine those Directors, Employees and Consultants (and, when applicable, to a Company wholly owned by any such Director or Employee), if any, to whom Options are to be granted. The Board may only grant options to an Employee or Consultant if such Employee or Consultant is a bona fide Employee or Consultant of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation, as the case may be. The Board may, in its sole discretion, grant the majority of the Options to Insiders of the Corporation. However, in no case will the issuance of Shares upon the due exercise of Options granted under this 2004 Plan, or in any proposed or previously existing Share Compensation Arrangement, result in (in each case, as determined on the Grant Date):

  (a)

the number of Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to stock options granted to Insiders at any time under all security based compensation arrangements exceeding 10% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Shares;

     
  (b)

the grant to Insiders, within any twelve-month period, of Options reserving for issuance a number of Shares exceeding in the aggregate 10% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Shares;

     
  (c)

the grant to any one individual, within any twelve-month period, Options reserving for issuance a number of Shares exceeding in the aggregate 5% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Shares;

     
  (d)

the grant to any Consultant engaged by the Corporation to provide investor relations activities, within any twelve-month period, of Options reserving for issuance a number of Shares exceeding in the aggregate 1% of the Corporation's outstanding number of listed securities;

     
  (e)

the grant to any one Consultant, in any twelve-month period, of Options reserving for issuance a number of Shares exceeding in the aggregate 2% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding Shares.

2.3 Notification of Grant. Following the approval by the Board of the granting of an Option, the Administrator will notify the Option Holder in writing of the award and will enclose with such notice the Option Agreement representing the Option so granted.

2.4 Copy of Plan. Each Option Holder, concurrently with the notice of the award of the Option, will, upon written request, be provided with a copy of this 2004 Plan and a copy of any amendment to this 2004 Plan will be promptly provided by the Administrator to each Option Holder.

2.5 Limitation. This 2004 Plan does not give any Option Holder that is a Director the right to serve or continue to serve as a Director of the Corporation, does not give any Option Holder that is an Employee the right to be or to continue to be employed by the Corporation and does not give any Option Holder that is a Consultant the right to be or continue to be retained or engaged by the Corporation as a consultant for the Corporation.

2.6 Filing Requirements. Each Option Holder, as a pre-condition of any grant of Options under this 2004 Plan, shall execute and deliver to the Corporation all forms and documents required to be filed with any Regulatory Authority or under Securities Laws.


6

ARTICLE III
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS

3.1 Board to Issue Shares. The Shares to be issued to Option Holders upon the exercise of Options will be previously authorized but unissued Shares in the capital stock of the Corporation.

3.2 Number of Shares Reserved. Subject to adjustment as provided for in Section 3.8 of this 2004 Plan and any subsequent amendment to this 2004 Plan, the number of Shares reserved for issuance and which will be available for purchase pursuant to Options granted under this 2004 Plan will not exceed that number (the "Limit") which represents 20% of the issued and outstanding Shares in the capital of the Corporation from time to time. If any Option expires or otherwise terminates for any reason without having been exercised in full, the number of Shares in respect of which Option expired or terminated, as the case may be, will again be available for the purposes of this 2004 Plan.

3.3 Term of Option. Subject to Section 3.4, the Expiry Date of an Option will be the date so fixed by the Board at the time the particular Option is granted, provided that such date will be no later than the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Grant Date of such Option.

3.4 Termination of Option. Subject to such other terms or conditions that may be attached to Options granted hereunder, an Option Holder may exercise an Option in whole or in part at any time or from time to time during the Exercise Period. Any Option or part thereof not exercised within the Exercise Period will terminate and become null, void and of no effect as of 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the Expiry Date. The Expiry Date of an Option will be the earlier of the date so fixed by the Board at the time the Option is granted and the date established, if applicable, in sub-sections (a) to (d) below:

  (a)

Death of Option Holder

     
 

In the event that the Option Holder should die while he or she is still a Director (if he or she holds his or her Option as a Director), an Employee (if he or she holds his or her Option as an Employee) or a Consultant (if he or she holds his or her Option as a Consultant), the Expiry Date will be the first anniversary of the Option Holder's date of death.

     
  (b)

Ceasing to Hold Office

     
 

In the event that the Option Holder holds his or her Option as a Director of the Corporation and such Option Holder ceases to be a Director of the Corporation other than by reason of death, the Expiry Date of the Option will not exceed the 90th day following the date the Option Holder ceases to be a Director of the Corporation unless the Option Holder ceases to be a Director of the Corporation as a result of:


  (i)

ceasing to meet the qualifications of a director set forth in section 118 of the OBCA; or

     
  (ii)

an ordinary resolution having been passed by the shareholders of the Corporation pursuant to subsection 122(1) of the OBCA; or

     
  (iii)

an order made by any Regulatory Authority having jurisdiction to so order,


 

in which case the Expiry Date will be the date the Option Holder ceases to be a Director of the Corporation.

     
  (c)

Ceasing to be an Employee or Consultant

     
 

In the event that the Option Holder holds his or her Option as an Employee or Consultant of the Corporation and such Option Holder ceases to be an Employee or Consultant of the Corporation other than by reason of death, the Expiry Date of the Option will not exceed the 30th day following the Termination Date unless the Option Holder ceases to be:



7

  (i)

an Employee of the Corporation as a result of termination for Cause; or

     
  (ii)

an Employee or Consultant of the Corporation as a result of an order made by any Regulatory Authority having jurisdiction to so order,


 

in which case the Expiry Date will be the Termination Date.

     
  (d)

Bankruptcy

     
 

In the event that an Option Holder commits an act of bankruptcy or any proceeding is commenced against the Option Holder under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) or other applicable bankruptcy or insolvency legislation in force at the time of such bankruptcy or insolvency and such proceeding remains undismissed for a period of thirty (30) days, no Option held by such Option Holder may be exercised following the date on which such Option Holder commits such act of bankruptcy or such proceeding remains undismissed, as the case may be.

Notwithstanding anything contained in this 2004 Plan, in no case will an Option be exercisable after the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Grant Date of the Option.

3.5 Exercise Price. The price at which an Option Holder may purchase a Share upon the exercise of an Option (the "Exercise Price") will be determined by the Board and set forth in the Option Agreement issued in respect of such Option and, in any event, will not be less than the Discounted Market Price . Notwithstanding anything else contained in this 2004 Plan, in no case will the Discounted Market Price be less than the minimum prescribed by each of the organized trading facilities as would apply to the Grant Date in question.

3.6 Additional Terms. Subject to all applicable Securities Laws of all applicable Regulatory Authorities, the Board may attach other terms and conditions to the grant of a particular Option, such terms and conditions to be referred to in the Option Agreement at the time of grant. These terms and conditions may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

  (a)

providing that an Option expires on a date other than as provided for herein;

     
  (b)

providing that a portion or portions of an Option vest after certain periods of time or upon the occurrence of certain events, or expire after certain periods of time or upon the occurrence of certain events;

     
  (c)

providing that an Option be exercisable immediately, in full, notwithstanding that it has vesting provisions, upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a friendly or hostile take-over bid for the Corporation; and

     
  (d)

providing that an Option issued to, held by or exercised by an Option Holder who is a citizen or resident of the United Sates of America, and otherwise meeting the statutory requirements, be treated as an "Incentive Stock Option" as that term is defined for purposes of the United States of America Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

3.7 Non-Transferability of Options. The Options are not assignable, transferable or negotiable (whether by operation of law or otherwise) and may not be assigned or transferred, provided however that the Personal Representative of an Option Holder may, to the extent permitted by Section 4.1 of this 2004 Plan, exercise the Option within the Exercise Period. Upon any attempt to assign, transfer, negotiate, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of or transfer an Option contrary to this Section 3.7 of this 2004 Plan, or upon the levy of any attachment or similar process upon an Option, the Option and all rights, benefits and privileges arising thereunder or therefrom, at the sole discretion and election of the Corporation, shall cease and terminate and be of no further force or affect whatsoever.


8

3.8 Adjustments. If prior to the complete exercise of an Option the Shares are consolidated, subdivided, converted, exchanged or reclassified or in any way substituted for (collectively, a "Re-Organization Event"), an Option, to the extent that it has not been exercised, will be adjusted by the Board in accordance with such ReOrganization Event in the manner the Board deems appropriate, subject to the approval of the TSX, if required. No fractional Shares will be issued upon the exercise of the Options and accordingly, if as a result of the ReOrganization Event, an Option Holder would become entitled to a fractional Share, such Option Holder will have the right to purchase only the next lowest whole number of Shares and no payment or other adjustment will be made with respect to the fractional interest so disregarded.

3.9 Vesting Requirement for Consultants engaged in investor relation activities. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, Options granted to Consultants engaged to provide investor relations activities shall vest in stages over a period of 12 months from the Grant Date with no more than ¼ of any such Options granted vesting in any three-month period.

3.10 No Rights as Shareholders. An Option Holder shall not have any rights as a shareholder of the Corporation with respect to any of the Shares covered by such Option until the date of issuance of a certificate for Shares upon the due exercise of such Option, in full or in part, and then only with respect to the Shares represented by such certificate or certificates. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, no adjustment shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date such share certificate is issued.

ARTICLE IV
EXERCISE OF OPTION

4.1 Exercise of Option. An Option may be exercised only by the Option Holder or the Personal Representative of the Option Holder. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, an Option Holder or the Personal Representative of an Option Holder may exercise an Option in whole or in part at any time or from time to time during the Exercise Period up to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on the Expiry Date by delivering to the Administrator an Exercise Notice, the applicable Option Agreement and a certified cheque or bank draft payable to the Corporation in an amount equal to the aggregate Exercise Price of the Shares to be purchased pursuant to the exercise of the Option.

4.2 Issue of Share Certificates. As soon as practicable following the receipt of the Exercise Notice, the Administrator will cause to be delivered to the Option Holder a certificate for the Shares so purchased. If the number of Shares so purchased is less than the number of Shares subject to the Option Agreement, the Option Holder will surrender the Option Agreement and the Administrator will forward a new Option Agreement to the Option Holder concurrently with delivery of the Share certificate for the balance of Shares available under the Option.

4.3 Condition of Issue. The Options and the issue of Shares by the Corporation pursuant to the exercise of Options are subject to the terms and conditions of this 2004 Plan and compliance with the rules and policies of all applicable Regulatory Authorities to the granting of such Options and to the issuance and distribution of such Shares, and to all applicable Securities Laws. The Option Holder agrees to comply with all such laws, regulations, rules and policies and agrees to furnish to the Corporation any information, reports or undertakings required to comply with and to fully cooperate with, the Corporation in complying with such laws, regulations, rules and policies. Notwithstanding any of the provisions contained in the Plan or in any Option, the Corporation's obligation to issue Shares to an Option Holder pursuant to the exercise of any Option granted under the Plan shall be subject to:

  (a)

completion of such registration or other qualification of such Shares or obtaining approval of such Regulatory Authority as the Corporation shall determine to be necessary or advisable in connection with the authorization, issuance or sale thereof;



9

  (b)

the admission of such Shares to listing on any stock exchange on which the Shares may then be listed;

     
  (c)

the receipt from the Option Holder of such representations, warranties, agreements and undertakings, as the Corporation determines to be necessary or advisable in order to safeguard against the violation of the Securities Laws of any jurisdiction; and

     
  (d)

the satisfaction of any conditions on exercise prescribed pursuant to Section 3.6 and Article 5 of this 2004 Plan.

ARTICLE V
ADMINISTRATION

5.1 Administration. This 2004 Plan will be administered by the Administrator on the instructions of the Board. The Board may make, amend and repeal at any time and from time to time such regulations not inconsistent with this 2004 Plan as it may deem necessary or advisable for the proper administration and operation of this 2004 Plan and such regulations will form part of this 2004 Plan. The Board may delegate to the Administrator or any director or other senior officer or employee of the Corporation such administrative duties and powers as it may see fit.

5.2 Board Powers. The Board shall have the power, where consistent with the general purpose and intent of the Plan and subject to the specific provisions of the Plan:

  (a)

to establish policies and to adopt rules and regulations for carrying out the purposes, provisions and administration of the Plan;

     
  (b)

to interpret and construe the Plan and to determine all questions arising out of the Plan or any Option, and any such interpretation, construction or determination made by the Board shall be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes;

     
  (c)

to determine the number of Shares reserved for issuance by each Option;

     
  (d)

to determine the Exercise Price of each Option;

     
  (e)

to determine the time or times when Options will be granted and exercisable;

     
  (f)

to determine if the Shares which are issuable on the due exercise of an Option will be subject to any restrictions upon the due exercise of such Option; and

     
  (g)

to prescribe the form of the instruments and certificates relating to the grant, exercise and other terms of Options.

5.3 Board Discretion. The Board may, in its discretion, require as conditions to the grant or exercise of any Option that the Option Holder shall have:

  (a)

represented, warranted and agreed in form and substance satisfactory to the Corporation that the Option Holder is acquiring and will acquire such Option and the Shares to be issued upon the exercise thereof or, as the case may be, is acquiring such Shares, for his, her or its own account, for investment and not with a view to or in connection with any distribution, that the Option Holder has had access to such information as is necessary to enable him, her or it to evaluate the merits and risks of such investment and that the Option Holder is able to bear the economic risk of holding such Shares for an indefinite period;



10

  (b)

agreed to restrictions on transfer in form and substance satisfactory to the Corporation and to an endorsement on any option agreement or certificate representing the Shares making appropriate reference to such restrictions; and

     
  (c)

agreed to indemnify the Corporation in connection with the foregoing.

5.4 Board Requirements. Any Option granted under the Plan shall be subject to the requirement that, if at any time counsel to the Corporation shall determine that the listing, registration or qualification of the Shares issuable upon due exercise of such Option upon any securities exchange or under any Securities Laws of any jurisdiction, or the consent or approval of Regulatory Authority, is necessary as a condition of, or in connection with, the grant or exercise of such Option or the issuance or purchase of Shares thereunder, such Option may not be accepted or exercised in whole or in part unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval shall have been effected or obtained on conditions acceptable to the Board. Nothing herein shall be deemed to require the Corporation to apply for or to obtain such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval.

5.5 Interpretation. The interpretation by the Board of any of the provisions of this 2004 Plan and any determination by it pursuant thereto will be final and conclusive and will not be subject to any dispute by any Option Holder. No member of the Board or any person acting pursuant to authority delegated by it hereunder will be liable for any action or determination in connection with this 2004 Plan made or taken in good faith and each member of the Board and each such person will be entitled to indemnification with respect to any such action or determination in the manner provided for by the Corporation.

ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 Prospective Amendment. Subject to Section 6.2, the Board has the discretion to make any amendments to the 2004 Plan that it may deem necessary, without having to obtain shareholder approval, including, without limitation: (i) minor changes of a "house-keeping nature"; (ii) amending options under the 2004 Plan, including with respect to the option period (provided that the period during which an option is exercisable does not exceed ten (10) years from the date the option is granted and that such option is not held by an Insider), vesting period, exercise method and frequency, subscription price (provided that such option is not held by an Insider) and method of determining the subscription price, assignability and effect of termination of an Option Holder's employment or cessation of the Option Holder's directorship; (iii) changing the class of participants eligible to participate under the 2004 Plan; (iv) advancing the date on which any option may be exercised or extending the expiration date of any option, provided that the period during which an option is exercisable does not exceed ten (10) years from the date the option is granted; (v) changing the terms and conditions of any financial assistance that may be provided by the Corporation to Option Holders to facilitate the purchase of Shares under the 2004 Plan; and (vi) adding a cashless exercise feature, payable in cash or securities, whether or not providing for a full deduction of the number of underlying Shares from the 2004 Plan reserve.

6.2 Shareholder Approval and Disinterested Shareholder Approval. Shareholder approval must be obtained in the case of: (i) any amendment to the amendment provisions of the 2004 Plan; (ii) any increase in the maximum number of Shares issuable under the 2004 Plan; and (iii) any reduction in the exercise price or extension of the option period benefiting an Insider, in addition to such other matters that may require shareholder approval under the rules and policies of the TSX. Disinterested Shareholder approval must be obtained for any changes to the Insider participation limits in the 2004 Plan or if the number of Shares reserved for issuance to any one (1) person exceeds five percent (5%) of the issued and outstanding Shares.

6.3 Retrospective Amendment. The Board may from time to time retrospectively amend this 2004 Plan and, with the consent of the affected Option Holders, retrospectively amend the terms and conditions of any Options that have been previously granted.


11

6.4 Sale of Corporation, Extension of Expiration Date, Non-Applicability of Termination of Employment Provisions. Notwithstanding anything contained to the contrary in this 2004 Plan or in any resolution of the Board in implementation thereof:

  (a)

in the event the Corporation proposes to amalgamate, merge or consolidate with any other corporation (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary) or to liquidate, dissolve or wind-up, or in the event an offer to purchase or repurchase the Shares of the Corporation or any part thereof shall be made to all or substantially all holders of Shares of the Corporation, the Corporation shall have the right, upon written notice thereof to each Option Holder holding Options under the 2004 Plan, to permit the exercise of all such Options within the 20 day period next following the date of such notice and to determine that upon the expiration of such 20 day period, all rights of the Option Holder to such Options or to exercise same (to the extent not theretofore exercised) shall ipso facto terminate and cease to have further force or effect whatsoever;

     
  (b)

in the event of the sale by the Corporation of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation as an entirety or substantially as an entirety so that the Corporation shall cease to operate as an active business, any outstanding Option may be exercised as to all or any part of the Optioned Shares in respect of which the Option Holder would have been entitled to exercise the Option in accordance with the provisions of the Plan at the date of completion of any such sale at any time up to and including, but not after the earlier of: (i) the close of business on that date which is thirty (30) days following the date of completion of such sale; and (ii) the close of business on the Expiry Date of the Option; but the Option Holder shall not be entitled to exercise the Option with respect to any other Shares;

     
  (c)

subject to the rules of any relevant Regulatory Authority, the Board may, by resolution, extend the expiration date of any Option. The Board shall not, in the event of any such advancement or extension, be under any obligation to advance or extend the date on or by which Options may be exercised by any other Option Holder; and

     
  (d)

the Board may, by resolution, but subject to requirements of applicable Regulatory Authorities and Securities Laws, decide that any of the provisions hereof concerning the effect of termination of the Option Holder's employment shall not apply to any Option Holder for any reason acceptable to the Board.

Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 6.4, should changes be required to the Plan by any Regulatory Authority of any jurisdiction to which the 2004 Plan or the Corporation now is or hereafter becomes subject, such changes shall be made to the 2004 Plan as are necessary to conform with such requirements and, if such changes are approved by the Board, the 2004 Plan, as amended, shall be filed with the records of the Corporation and shall remain in full force and effect in its amended form as of and from the date of its adoption by the Board.

6.5 Regulatory Authority Approval. This 2004 Plan and any amendments hereto are subject to all necessary approvals of the applicable Regulatory Authorities.

6.6 Termination. The Board may terminate this 2004 Plan at any time upon receipt of requisite regulatory approval and provided that such termination will not alter the terms or conditions of any Option or impair any right of any Option Holder pursuant to any Option granted prior to the date of such termination, which will continue to be governed by the provisions of this 2004 Plan.

6.7 Agreement. The Corporation and every Option granted hereunder will be bound by and subject to the terms and conditions of this 2004 Plan. By accepting an Option granted hereunder, the Option Holder has expressly agreed with the Corporation to be bound by the terms and conditions of this 2004 Plan.

6.8 Effective Date of 2004 Plan. Upon approval by the Board, this 2004 Plan shall be deemed to be effective as of the Effective Date.


12

6.9 Governing Law. This 2004 Plan and all matters to which reference is made herein shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.


SCHEDULE "A"

Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms will have the meanings specified in a stock option plan adopted by Grandview Gold Inc. effective as of October 1, 2004, as amended (the "Plan").

OPTION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made as of •, 200• (the "Effective Date").

BETWEEN:

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC., a corporation continued pursuant to the laws of the Province of Ontario,

(the "Corporation")

OF THE FIRST PART

- and -

•,

(the "Optionee")

OF THE SECOND PART

For good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto), the Corporation and the Optionee hereby agree as follows:

1. Grant of Option

1.1 The Corporation hereby grants to the Optionee pursuant to the terms of the Plan the right and option (the "Option") to purchase all or any part of an aggregate of up to • Shares at a purchase price of $• per Share expiring on • and on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

2. Vesting

2.1 Notwithstanding Section 1 above or any other provision of this Agreement, legal and beneficial title to the Option granted to the Optionee hereunder, in respect of the Shares and all rights, privileges and benefits arising and flowing therefrom or to arise or flow therefrom hereafter, shall vest in the Optionee and the Optionee shall be entitled to exercise said Option to purchase the Shares only in the proportion and on the dates (the "Vesting Dates") set out below, provided that the Optionee is a [Consultant or Employee or Director] of the Corporation on such Vesting Date (and has been a [Consultant or Employee or Director] of the Corporation continuously from the date hereof):

NON- TRANSFERABLE



Vesting Date Number of Shares subject to the Option Exercise Price
     
     
     
     
Total:    

3. Exercise of Option

3.1 Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 2 above, the Option may be exercised from time to time prior to the Expiry Time (as hereinafter defined) by delivery to the Corporation at its registered office of an executed Exercise Notice (attached to the Option Agreement as Exhibit "I") addressed to the President of the Corporation specifying the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is being exercised and accompanied by payment in full, by cash or certified cheque, of the purchase price of the Shares then being purchased. Subject to any provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, certificates for such Shares shall be issued and delivered to the Optionee within a reasonable time following the receipt of such notice and payment.

3.2 Notwithstanding any provisions contained in this Agreement, the Corporation's obligation to issue Shares to the Optionee pursuant to the exercise of the Option shall be subject to: (i) receipt of any required shareholder approval; (ii) completion of such registration or other qualification of such Shares or obtaining approval of such governmental or regulatory authority as the Corporation shall determine to be necessary or advisable in connection with the authorization, issuance or sale thereof; (iii) the admission of such Shares to listing on any stock exchange or market on which the Shares may then be listed; and (iv) the receipt from the Optionee of such representations, warranties, agreements and undertakings as the Corporation determines to be necessary or advisable in order to safeguard against the violation of the securities laws of any jurisdictions. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to require the Corporation to apply for or obtain any such registration, qualification, approval or listing. The Optionee hereby acknowledges and agrees that he has had access to such information as is necessary to enable him to evaluate the merits and risks of acquiring Shares pursuant to the exercise of the Option and that he is able to bear the economic risk of holding such Shares for an indefinite period.

4. No Assignment

4.1 The Option is personal to the Optionee and non-assignable (whether by operation of law or otherwise). Upon any attempt to transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of the Option contrary to the provisions of this Agreement, or upon the levy of any attachment or similar process upon the Option, the Option shall, at the election of the Corporation, cease and terminate and be of no further force or effect whatsoever.

5. Expiration

5.1 Subject to the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement, including the vesting conditions set out in Section 2 above and the termination provisions set out in Section 6 below, the Optionee shall have the right to exercise the Option with respect to all or any part of the Shares to the extent vested at any time or from time to time after the date hereof and prior to the close of business on (the "Expiry Time"). On the Expiry Time, the Option shall forthwith expire and terminate and be of no further force or effect whatsoever with respect to the unexercised balance of the Shares available under the Option, whether vested or not.

6. Termination of Employment; Death; Bankruptcy

6.1 Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and this Section 6 and to any express resolution passed with respect to the Option by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the "Board") or by any committee of the Board established by the Board to administer the Plan (the "Committee"), the Option and all rights to purchase Shares pursuant thereto shall immediately expire, except to the extent vested in which case they shall expire and terminate on the [thirtieth (30th)] day following the date the Optionee ceases to be a ["Consultant" or "Employee" or "Director"] within the meaning of Section 1.1 of the Plan.


6.2 Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and this Section 6, if the Optionee shall die prior to the full exercise of the Option, his personal representatives, heirs or legatees may, at any time within [one (1)] year after the date of such death, exercise the Option with respect to the unexercised balance of the Shares to the extent vested, subject to the terms of the Option but only to the same extent to which the Optionee could have exercised the Option immediately before the date of such death. In no event, however, shall the Option be exercisable after the Expiry Time.

6.3 In the event that the Optionee commits an act of bankruptcy or any proceeding is commenced against the Optionee under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) or other applicable bankruptcy or insolvency legislation in force at the time of such bankruptcy and such proceeding remains undismissed for a period of [thirty (30)] days, the Option may not be exercised following the date on which the Optionee commits such act of bankruptcy or such proceeding remains undismissed, as the case may be.

7. Rights as a Shareholder

7.1 An Optionee shall not have any rights as a shareholder of the Corporation with respect to any of the Shares subject to the Option until the date of issuance of a certificate for such Shares upon the exercise of the Option, in full or in part, and then only with respect to the Shares represented by such certificate or certificates. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, no adjustment shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date such share certificate is issued.

8. Inconsistency with Plan

8.1 The parties hereto agree that in the event this Agreement is inconsistent with the Plan the Plan shall prevail.

9. Certain Adjustments

9.1 In the event that the Shares are at any time changed or affected as a result of the declaration of a stock dividend thereon or their subdivision or consolidation, the number of Shares reserved for the Option shall be adjusted accordingly by the Board or the Committee to such extent as they deem proper in their discretion. In such event, the number of, and the price payable for, the Shares that are then subject to the Option may also be adjusted by the Board or the Committee to such extent, if any, as they deem proper in their discretion.

9.2 If at any time after the date of this Agreement and prior to the expiration of the term of the Option, the Shares shall be reclassified, reorganized or otherwise changed, otherwise than as specified in Section 8.1 of this Agreement or, subject to the provisions of subsection 9.1(a) of this Agreement, the Corporation shall consolidate, merge or amalgamate with or into another corporation (the corporation resulting or continuing from such consolidation, merger or amalgamation being herein called the "Successor Corporation"), the Optionee shall be entitled to receive upon the subsequent exercise of the Option in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and shall accept in lieu of the number of Shares to which he was theretofore entitled upon such exercise but for the same aggregate consideration payable therefor, the aggregate number of shares of the appropriate class and/or other securities of the Corporation or the Successor Corporation (as the case may be) and/or other consideration from the Corporation or the Successor Corporation (as the case may be) that the Optionee would have been entitled to receive as a result of such reclassification, reorganization or other change or, subject to the provisions of subsection 9.1(a) of this Agreement, as a result of such consolidation, merger or amalgamation, if on the record date of such reclassification, reorganization or other change or the effective date of such consolidation, merger or amalgamation, as the case may be, he had been the registered holder of the number of Shares to which he was theretofore entitled upon such exercise.


10. Amendments to the Option

10.1 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement:

(a)

in the event the Corporation proposes to amalgamate, merge or consolidate with any other corporation (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary) or to liquidate, dissolve or wind-up, or in the event an offer to purchase or repurchase the Shares or any part thereof shall be made to all or substantially all holders of the Shares, the Corporation shall have the right, upon written notice thereof to the Optionee, to permit the exercise of the Option within the [20 day] period next following the date of such notice and to determine that upon the expiration of such [20 day] period, all rights of the Optionee to the Option or to exercise same (to the extent not theretofore exercised) shall ipso facto terminate and cease to have further force or effect whatsoever;

   
(b)

in the event of the sale by the Corporation of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation as an entirety or substantially as an entirety so that the Corporation shall cease to operate as an active business, the Option may be exercised as to all or any part of the Shares subject to the Option in respect of which the Optionee would have been entitled to exercise the Option in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement at the date of completion of any such sale at any time up to and including, but not after the earlier of: (i) the close of business on that date which is [thirty (30)] days following the date of completion of such sale; and (ii) the close of business on the expiration date of the Option; but the Optionee shall not be entitled to exercise the Option with respect to any other Shares; and

   
(c)

subject to the rules of any relevant stock exchange or other regulatory authority, the Board may, by resolution, advance the date on which any Option may be exercised or extend the expiration date of the Option.

   
(d)

The Optionee hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Board may at any time by resolution terminate the Plan. In such event, the Option if vested and outstanding may be exercised by the Optionee for a period of [thirty (30)] days after the date on which the Corporation shall have notified the Optionee of the termination of the Plan, but only to the same extent as the Optionee could have exercised the Option immediately prior to the date of such notification.

11. Notice

11.1 All communications and payments provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered in person or deposited in the mail, first class, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with proper postage prepaid and,

(a)

if to the Optionee, addressed to:

   

Phone No.:
Fax No.:

   
(b)

if to the Corporation, addressed to:

   

Grandview Gold Inc.

   

330 Bay Street, Suite 820
Toronto, ON, M5H 2S8



Attention: Paul Sarjeant

Phone No.: 416-486-3444
Fax No.: 416-486-9577

in either case with a copy to:

WeirFoulds LLP
130 King Street West
Suite 1600, Exchange Tower
Toronto, ON M5X 1J5
Attention: R. Ian Mitchell

Phone No. 416-947-5088
Fax No. 416-365-1876

12. Time of Essence

12.1 Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement and each and every part hereof.

13. Binding Effect

13.1 This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, the successors of the Corporation and the executor, administrator, heirs and personal representatives of the Optionee. This Agreement shall not be assignable by the Optionee.

14. Headings

14.1 The section headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

15. Amendment

15.1 This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by each of the parties hereto.

16. Governing Law

16.1 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.

17. Duplicate Originals

17.1 It is hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto that this Agreement has been signed in duplicate only, one original executed copy delivered to the Optionee and one delivered to the Corporation.

18. Paramountcy

18.1 To the extent there is any inconsistency or ambiguity between this Agreement and any other employment or consulting agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern to the extent of such inconsistency or ambiguity.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED ) GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
         in the presence of )  
  )  
  ) Per: ________________________________
  )        Name:
  )        Title:
  )  
  )  
  )  
  )  
Witness:    


SCHEDULE "C"

TERM SHEET

$2,000,000 PRIVATE PLACEMENT OF COMMON SHARES

AND COMMON SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS

Issuer:   Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation").
   

Offering:  

Private placement (the "Offering") of units (“Units") in the capital stock of the Corporation in the provinces of Ontario and British Columbia (the "Offering Jurisdictions").

   

Issue Price:  

$0.075 per Unit.

   

Offering Amount:  

Maximum of up to 26,666,667 Units ($2,000,000).

   

Units:  

Each Unit is comprised of one common share of the Corporation (each a "Common Share") and one common share purchase warrant (each a "Warrant").

   

Common Share Purchase Warrants:  

Each Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one Common Share for a period of 24 months after the Closing Date (as defined below) at a price of $0.12.

   

Lead Investor  

Centerpoint Resources, Inc. ("Centerpoint") has, subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, agreed to purchase 20,000,000 of the Units made available under the Offering.

   

Use of Proceeds:  

The proceeds of the Units sold under the Offering shall be used by the Corporation to finance the exploration of the Corporation’s Giulianita property in Peru and for working capital purposes.

   

Listing:

The common shares of the Corporation are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "GVX". The Corporation is a reporting issuer in the Province of Ontario.

   

Resale Restrictions:

The Corporation is a reporting issuer under the securities legislation of the Province of Ontario. The Common Shares and Warrants sold under the Offering will not be subject to any restricted period, statutory hold period or other resale restriction which extends beyond four months and one day after the Closing Date (as defined below), for Canadian resident purchasers only.

   

Closing Date:

On or about December 11, 2009 or such other date as is agreed to between the Corporation and Centerpoint (the "Closing Date").

   

Regulatory Approval

The completion of the Offering is subject to receipt of both shareholder and regulatory approval.

   

Currency:  

All figures contained herein are in Canadian dollars.



SCHEDULE "D"

PRIVATE PLACEMENT RESOLUTION

BE IT RESOLVED BY ORDINARY RESOLUTION THAT:

1.

The Private Placement, including the issuance of up to 26,666,667 Units (resulting in the issuance on a fully diluted basis of up to 53,333,334 common shares), all as more particularly described in the accompanying Information Circular and Schedule "C" thereto, and the transactions contemplated therein are hereby approved; and

   
2.

Any director or officer of the Corporation is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to deliver, under corporate seal or otherwise, all such documents and instruments and to do all such acts as in the opinion of such director or officer may be necessary or desirable to give effect to this resolution.



EX-99.34 35 exhibit99-34.htm EXHIBIT 99.34 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.34 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.34

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 2S8

PROXY SOLICITED BY MANAGEMENT FOR USE AT AN ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2009

The undersigned shareholder(s) of GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. (the "Corporation") hereby appoint(s) in respect of all of his/her/its shares of the Corporation, DR. MICHAEL HITCH, Chairman of the board of directors of the Corporation, or, failing him, PAUL SARJEANT, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Corporation, or, in lieu of the foregoing ____________________________ as nominee of the undersigned, with power of substitution, to attend, act and vote for the undersigned at an annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders of the Corporation to be held on Monday, the 30th day of November, 2009 at the hour of 10 o'clock in the forenoon (Toronto time), and at any and every adjournment or adjournments thereof, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned shareholder(s) was (were) present at the Meeting or adjournment(s) thereof, and hereby direct(s) the nominee to vote the shares of the undersigned in the manner indicated below (for full details of each item, please see the enclosed Notice of Meeting and Management Information Circular):

  1.

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING (    ) in the election of directors.

     
  2.

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING (    ) on the re- appointment of McCarney Greenwood LLP, Chartered Accountants, as auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix their remuneration.

     
  3.

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR AGAINST (    ) an ordinary resolution of the shareholders ratifying the Corporation's 2004 stock option plan, which was previously approved by the shareholders of the Corporation at the annual and special meeting of shareholders held on November 30, 2006, and approving certain amendments to such stock option plan.

     
  4.

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR AGAINST (    ) an ordinary resolution of the disinterested shareholders approving a private placement (the "Private Placement") of common shares and warrants of the Corporation.

     
  5.

Conditional upon the Private Placement being completed:


  (a)

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR AGAINST (    ) a special resolution of the shareholders increasing the number of directors of the Corporation from five (5) to seven (7); and

     
  (b)

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING (    ) in the election of the two (2) additional directors.

If any amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting are proposed at the Meeting or if any other matters properly come before the Meeting, this proxy confers discretionary authority to vote on such amendments or variations or such other matters according to the best judgment of the person voting the proxy at the Meeting. By signing, the shareholder(s) revoke(s) any proxy previously given to attend and vote at said Meeting.

DATED __________________________, 2009.

___________________________
Signature of Shareholder

___________________________
Name of Shareholder

(THIS PROXY MAY NOT BE VALID UNLESS IT IS SIGNED AND DATED. SEE IMPORTANT
INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE)


INSTRUCTIONS:

  1.

This form of proxy must be dated and signed by the appointor or his or her attorney authorized in writing or, if the appointor is a body corporate, this form of proxy must be executed by a duly authorized and appointed officer, attorney or representative thereof. If executed by an officer, attorney or other duly appointed representative, the original or notarial copy of the instrument so empowering such person, or such other documentation in support as shall be acceptable to the Chairman of the Meeting, must accompany this proxy. If the proxy is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it was mailed.

     
  2.

The shares represented by this proxy will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder on any ballot that may be called for and if the shareholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares represented by this proxy shall be voted accordingly.

     
  3.

A SHAREHOLDER HAS THE RIGHT TO APPOINT A PERSON OR COMPANY (WHO NEED NOT BE A SHAREHOLDER) TO ATTEND AND ACT FOR HIM/HER/IT AND ON HIS/HER/ITS BEHALF AT THE MEETING OTHER THAN THE PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY. SUCH RIGHT MAY BE EXERCISED BY STRIKING OUT THE NAMES OF THE TWO (2) PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY AND BY INSERTING IN THE BLANK SPACE PROVIDED FOR THAT PURPOSE THE NAME OF THE DESIRED PERSON OR COMPANY OR BY COMPLETING ANOTHER FORM OF PROXY AND, IN EITHER CASE, DELIVERING THE COMPLETED AND EXECUTED PROXY TO THE CORPORATION C/O EQUITY TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, 200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 400, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 4H1, AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. (TORONTO TIME) ON NOVEMBER 27, 2009, OR IN THE CASE OF ANY ADJOURNMENT OF THE MEETING, NOT LESS THAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SUCH MEETING.

     
  4.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CORPORATION. IN THE ABSENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THIS PROXY WILL VOTE FOR EACH OF THE MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PROXY.

     
  5.

This proxy ceases to be valid one year from its date.

     
  6.

If your address as shown is incorrect, please give your correct address when returning this proxy.

     
  7.

If you are a non-registered shareholder of the Corporation and you received these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the materials in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary. Failure to do so may result in your shares not being eligible to be voted by proxy at the Meeting. Please contact your broker or the Corporation if you have questions.

     
  8.

If a registered shareholder has returned this proxy, the said shareholder may still attend the Meeting and may vote in person should the shareholder later decide to do so. However, to do so, the shareholder must record his/her attendance with the scrutineers at the Meeting and revoke the returned proxy in accordance with the instructions provided in the accompanying Management Information Circular.



EX-99.35 36 exhibit99-35.htm EXHIBIT 99.35 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.35 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.35

 

Rosa Vieira
Senior Account Manager, Client Services
Telephone: 416.361.0930 ext.227
rvieira@equitytransfer.com

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

November 6, 2009

TO ALL APPLICABLE EXCHANGES AND COMMISSIONS:

RE: Grandview Gold Inc.

We are pleased to confirm that copies of the following materials were mailed to registered shareholders and to the Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners on November 5, 2009.

  1.

Proxy

     
  2.

Financial Statement Request Form

     
  3.

Letter to Shareholders

     
  4.

Notice of Meeting and Management Information Circular

     
  5.

Online Voting Card

     
  6.

Proxy Return Envelope

Yours Truly,
EQUITY TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
Per:

“Lindsay Andrews”
Administrator, Client Services



EX-99.36 37 exhibit99-36.htm EXHIBIT 99.36 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.36 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.36

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release   OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Inc. Closes $2M Private Placement
to Fund Exploration and Development of Giulianita Project

December 8, 2009, - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that is has closed the private placement purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Centerpoint Resources Inc, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia (“Centerpoint”), and 10 other placees resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $2M CAD to fund exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru and to maintain Canadian operations.

The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview (with the Centerpoint investment and the concurrent non-brokered placement being referred to collectively as the "Private Placement").

“We are extraordinarily pleased by the completion of this transaction, and also with the quality and integrity of the new significant shareholder partner we have in Centerpoint,” says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant. “Dr. Hitch (Grandview’s Chairman) and I have worked closely with Centerpoint these past many months to forge a common vision for the Company and we couldn’t be more confident in the future. The time is right to aggressively pursue potential cash-flowing opportunities like our Giulianita project in Peru. The small mines model is an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate our own exploration funds.” The $2M Private Placement will allow the Company to refine and pursue its 2010 acquisition and work program, news of which will be released as it develops over the coming weeks.

"Centerpoint is confident in making this investment that it is backing an excellent team and a worthy project", says Jack Austin, President. " We join with Grandview in the desire to build an active member of the Canadian mining industry".

The private placement required the approval of the Company’s shareholders which was obtained at the Annual and Special Meeting of the Company which was held on November 30, 2009. Centerpoint will hold approximately 28.04% (prior to exercise of the warrants) of the outstanding shares on the Company. The Company also welcomes Mr. Jack Austin and Mr. Ted Nunn to the Board of Directors of the Company.

About Centerpoint

Centerpoint Resources Inc. is a privately held British Columbia corporation which invests in natural resource properties and also makes investments in companies, public and private, which operate in the natural resource sector.


About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by applying advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North and South America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.37 38 exhibit99-37.htm EXHIBIT 99.37 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.37 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.37

EARLY WARNING REPORT PURSUANT TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 62-103

1.

Name and Address of Offeror:

   

Centerpoint Resources Inc. (the “Offeror”)
Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre
P.O. Box 49314, 595 Burrard Street
Vancouver, BC, V7X 1L3

   
2.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the Offeror's securityholding percentage in the class of securities of which the Offeror acquired ownership or control in the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the obligation to file this report, and whether it was ownership or control that was acquired in those circumstances:

   

On December 8, 2009 the Offeror acquired 20,000,000 units (“Units”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview”). Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (the a “Warrants”). As a result of this transaction the Offeror controls 20,000,000 common shares of Grandview representing 27.91% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Grandview. Assuming the exercise of the Warrants the Offeror will control 40,000,000 common shares of Grandview representing 43.64% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Grandview.

   
3.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the Offeror's securityholding percentage in the class of securities immediately after the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the reporting obligation:

   

See paragraph 2 above.

   
4.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the percentage of outstanding securities of the class of securities referred to in paragraph 3 over which:


  (a)

the Offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership and control;

     
 

The Offeror has ownership and control over 20,000,000 common shares (27.91%) of Grandview and assuming the exercise of the Warrants the Offeror will have ownership and control over 40,000,000 common shares (43.64%) of Grandview.

     
  (b)

the Offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership but control is held by other persons or companies other than the Offeror or any joint actor; and

     
 

Not applicable.




  (c)

the Offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has exclusive or shared control but does not have ownership.

     
    Not applicable.
     
5.

The name of the market in which the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the reporting obligation took place:

   

Not applicable.

   
6.

Purpose of the Offeror and any joint actors in effecting the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the reporting obligation, including any future intention to acquire ownership of, or control over, additional securities of the reporting issuer:

   

Investment purposes only. The Offeror may acquire ownership or control over additional securities of Grandview in the future.

   
7.

General nature and the material terms of any agreement, other than lending arrangements, with respect to securities of the reporting issuer entered into by the Offeror, or any joint actor, and the issuer of the securities or any other entity in connection with the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the reporting obligation, including agreements with respect to the acquisition, holding, disposition or voting of any of the securities:

   

Not applicable.

   
8.

Names of any joint actors in connection with the disclosure required herein:

   

None.

   
9.

In the case of a transaction or occurrence that did not take place on a stock exchange or other market that represents a published market for the securities, including an issuance from treasury, the nature and value of the consideration paid by the Offeror:

   

The Offeror acquired the Units pursuant to a private placement whereby the value of each Unit was CAD$0.075 and the value of the consideration paid by the Offeror for the Units was CAD$1,500,000.

   
10.

If applicable, a description of any change in any material fact set out in a previous report by the entity under the early warning requirements or Part 4 of National Instrument 62-103 in respect of the reporting issuer's securities:

   

Not applicable.

DATED this 8th day of December 2009.


EX-99.38 39 exhibit99-38.htm EXHIBIT 99.38 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.38 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.38

Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to

provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial

standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at November 30, 2009.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at November 30, 2009.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and

are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
Toronto, Canada  
January 14, 2010  


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

  November 30,     May 31,  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2009  

Assets

           

Current assets

           

             Cash and cash equivalents

$  207,744   $  106,593  

             Short term investments

  25,000     407,493  

             GST and sundry receivable

  12,822     5,707  

             Prepaid expenses

  29,242     12,283  

             Due from a related party (Note 12(iv))

  10,000     10,000  

 

  284,808     542,076  

Reclamation bond (Note 5)

  13,858     14,332  

Mining interests (Note 6)

  3,794,647     3,442,793  

 

$  4,093,313   $  3,999,201  

Liabilities

           

Current liabilities

           

             Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$  352,605   $  72,467  

Asset retirement obligation

  13,858     14,332  

 

  366,463     86,799  

 

           

Shareholders' equity

  3,726,850     3,912,402  

 

$  4,093,313   $  3,999,201  

Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1)
Subsequent event (Note 14)

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

                          Cumulative  

 

                          from date of  

 

                          inception  

 

                          of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  

 

  November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)  

 

                             

Expenses

                             

Share-based payments

$  -   $  -   $  368,500   $  -   $  4,398,625  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  15,683     22,523     33,076     39,347     1,820,887  

Professional fees

  47,976     33,528     90,414     64,257     1,314,058  

Management services (Note 12)

  23,250     38,863     43,250     113,077     1,386,440  

Office and administration

  13,311     (769 )   25,245     16,416     694,383  

Exploration evaluation expenses

  7,589     4,656     7,649     4,656     27,534  

Flow-through interest expense

  -     -     -     -     188,801  

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

Bad debt

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

 

                             

 

  107,809     98,801     568,134     237,753     9,856,963  

 

                             

Loss before the under noted

  (107,809 )   (98,801 )   (568,134 )   (237,753 )   (9,856,963 )

Interest income

  130     2,485     (2,585 )   3,048     86,487  

Write-off of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     (7,988,830 )

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     35,667  

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     -     (170,000 )

 

                             

Loss before income taxes

  (107,679 )   (96,316 )   (570,719 )   (234,705 )   (17,893,639 )

Future income tax recovery

  -     -     -     -     1,675,990  

 

                             

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period

$  (107,679 ) $  (96,316 ) $  (570,719 ) $  (234,705 ) $  (16,217,649 )

 

                             

Basic and diluted loss per share (Note 10)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 )    

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

                          Cumulative  

 

                          from date of  

 

                          inception  

 

                          of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  

 

  November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Accumulated Deficit

                             

Balance at beginning of period

$  (19,544,218 ) $  (11,331,649 ) $  (19,081,178 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (3,434,248 )

Net loss for the period

  (107,679 )   (96,316 )   (570,719 )   (234,705 )   (16,217,649 )

 

                             

Balance at end of period

$  (19,651,897 ) $  (11,427,965 ) $  (19,651,897 ) $  (11,427,965 ) $  (19,651,897 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 4 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

              Contributed     Accumulated        

(Unaudited)

  Share Capital     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  

 

                             

 

                             

At May 31, 2008

$  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  

Mineral property acquisition

  10,800     -     -     -     10,800  

Private placement

  416,666     -     -     -     416,666  

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  

Flow-through cost of issue

  (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )

Warrants expired

  -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  

Net loss for the year

  -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )

 

                             

At May 31, 2009

  14,430,400     1,203,804     7,359,376     (19,081,178 )   3,912,402  

Share-based payments

  -     -     368,500     -     368,500  

Exercise of warrants

  16,667     -     -     -     16,667  

Fair value of warrants exercised

  15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  

Warrants expired

  -     (860,218 )   860,218     -     -  

Net loss for the period

  -     -     -     (570,719 )   (570,719 )

 

                             

At November 30, 2009

$  14,462,400   $  328,253   $  8,588,094   $ (19,651,897 ) $  3,726,850  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

                          Cumulative  

 

                          from date of  

 

                          inception  

 

                          of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  

 

  November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Cash flows from operating activities

                             

Net loss for the period

$ (107,679 ) $  (96,316 ) $  (570,719 ) $  (234,705 ) $  (16,217,649 )

Items not involving cash:

                             

       Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

       Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     (35,667 )

       Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

       Share-based payments

  -     -     368,500     -     4,398,625  

       Future income tax recovery

  -     -     -     -     (1,675,990 )

       Accrued interest income

  -     -     -     -     (43,903 )

       Write-off of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     7,988,830  

Changes in non-cash working capital items:

                             

       GST and sundry receivable

  (2,738 )   5,097     (7,115 )   32,211     (12,332 )

       Prepaid expenses

  (20,926 )   147,190     (16,959 )   118,734     (29,242 )

       Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     80,000  

       Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  250,586     (181,456 )   280,138     (82,567 )   358,775  

 

                             

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

  119,243     (125,485 )   53,845     (166,327 )   (5,162,318 )

 

                             

Cash flows from financing activities

                             

Loans from related parties

  -     -     -     -     (28,594 )

Share/warrant issuance

  16,667     -     16,667     -     18,068,877  

Cost of issuance

  -     -     -     -     (1,776,309 )

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     -     175,000  

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     -     (75,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  16,667     -     16,667     -     16,363,974  

 

                             

Cash flows from investing activities

                             

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     -     -     -     (13,090 )

(Purchase) redemption of short term investments

  (25,000 )   73,070     382,493     607,874     18,903  

Exploration advances

  -     -     -     -     -  

Expenditures on mining interests

  (227,820 )   (130,967 )   (351,854 )   (450,868 )   (10,909,725 )

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     (90,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

$  (252,820 ) $  (57,897 ) $  30,639   $  157,006   $  (10,993,912 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)  

 

                             

Change in cash during the period

$  (116,910 ) $  (183,382 ) $  101,151   $  (9,321 ) $  207,744  

 

                             

Cash, beginning of period

  324,654     258,917     106,593     84,856     -  

 

                             

Cash, end of period

$  207,744   $  75,535   $  207,744   $  75,535   $  207,744  

 

                             

Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Transactions

                   

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  10,800   $  563,875  

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  

Share-based payments included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

                          Cumulative  

 

                          from date of  

 

                          inception  

 

                          of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  

 

  November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

Balance, beginning of period

$   -   $  5,846,638   $  -   $  5,679,340   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     26,233     -     96,595     4,684,830  

       Project administration and general

  -     1,849     -     14,090     96,879  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     9,671     -     94,366     1,121,633  

       Write-off

  -     -     -     -     (5,903,342 )

 

  -     37,753     -     205,051     -  

       Balance, end of period

$       -   $  5,884,391   $  -   $  5,884,391   $  -  

 

                             

Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  3,511,576   $  3,375,031   $  3,442,793   $  3,275,971   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  195,595     30,813     264,378     118,633     3,194,265  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     11,240     512,906  

 

  195,595     30,813     264,378     129,873     3,707,171  

       Balance, end of period

$  3,707,171   $  3,405,844   $  3,707,171   $  3,405,844   $  3,707,171  

 

                             

Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$    -   $  1,391,982   $  -   $  1,327,639   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     62,320     -     161,737     1,163,762  

       Project administration and general

  -     81     -     307     227  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     -     393,123  

       Government refund

  -     -     -     (35,300 )   -  

       Write-off

  -     -     -     -     (1,557,112 )

 

  -     62,401     -     126,744     -  

       Balance, end of period

$    -   $  1,454,383   $  -   $  1,454,383   $  -  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2009     2008     2009     2008     26, 2004)

 

                             

Giulianita Property, Peru (Note 6(a))

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  55,251   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  22,340     -     35,922     -     35,922  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  9,885     -     51,554     -     51,554  

 

  32,225     -     87,476     -     87,476  

       Balance, end of period

$  87,476   $  -   $  87,476   $  -   $  87,476  

 

                             

Total

$  3,794,647   $  10,744,618   $  3,794,647   $  10,744,618   $  3,794,647  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 9 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual consolidated financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 10 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)

   

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

   

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this new accounting standard had no impact on the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of November 30, 2009.

   

Future Accounting Pronouncements

   

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

   

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

   

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

   

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

   
3.

Capital Management

   

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

   

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so.

- 11 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.

Capital Management (continued)

   

Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:


  i)

minimizing discretionary disbursements;

  ii)

reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

  iii)

exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the three and six months ended November 30, 2009. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

4.

Risk Factors

   

The Company’s significant mineral properties are Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada and Guilianita Property, Peru (called the "Properties").

   

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon these Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

   

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

   

Credit Risk

   

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash, short term investments, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

   

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable anddue from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of November 30, 2009. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

   

Liquidity Risk

   

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at November 30, 2009, the Company had a cash and short term investments balance of $232,744 (May 31, 2009 - $514,086) to settle current liabilities of $352,605 (May 31, 2009 - $72,467). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

- 12 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors (continued)

     

Market Risk

     

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

     
(a)

Interest Rate Risk

     

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

     
(b)

Foreign Currency Risk

     

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

     
(c)

Price Risk

     

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

Sensitivity Analysis

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and short term investments as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

As of November 30, 2009, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are

approximately equivalent.

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the

following movements are "reasonably possible" over a six month period:

  (i)

Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at November 30, 2009, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the six months ended November 30, 2009 would have been approximately $100 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at November 30, 2009, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $100 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.

     
  (ii)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

- 13 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors (continued)

     

Sensitivity Analysis (continued)

     
(iii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of November 30, 2009, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

     
5.

Reclamation Bond

     

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

     
6.

Mining Interests

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 8 of the audited consolidated financial statements as at May31, 2009. There following changes to mining interests occurred from June 1, 2009 to November 30, 2009.

(a) Guilianita Project, Peru

On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) was signed with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Guilianita”). The Option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Guilianita by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period.

The Option also allows the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 (CAD$317,220) and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum.

The Memorandum and the transactions contemplated therein and thereby are conditional upon receipt of allrequired regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSX.

- 14 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital

(a) Authorized

Unlimited number of common shares

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non-participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

(b) Issued

      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
  Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
  Private placement   120,000     120,000  
  Private placement   150,000     150,000  
  Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
  Private placement   175,000     175,000  
  Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
  Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
  Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
  Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
  Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
  Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
  Private placement   590,320     737,900  
  Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
  Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
  Private placement   400,000     500,000  
  Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
  Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  

- 15 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital (continued)

(b) Issued (continued)

      Number        
      of        
      Shares     Amount  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
  Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
  Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
  Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
  Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
  Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
  Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
  Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (563,472 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
  Private placement   11,169,000     4,950,150  
  Warrant valuation   -     (940,212 )
  Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
  Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (260,255 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
  Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
  Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (120,833 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  14,430,400  
  Exercise of warrants   333,333     16,667  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     15,333  
               
  Balance, November 30, 2009   44,985,431   $  14,462,400  

- 16 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

8.

Warrants


      Number of     Weighted Average  
      Warrants     Exercise Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Issued   602,500     1.44  
  Expired/cancelled   -     -  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
  Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
  Expired/cancelled   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
  Issued   4,189,999     0.91  
  Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583   $  1.18  
  Issued   5,853,480     0.62  
  Issued   73,937     0.65  
  Exercised   (147,875 )   0.45  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
  Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
  Issued   666,666     0.05  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
  Expired   (5,044,120 )   (0.62 )
  Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
               
  Balance, November 30, 2009   1,342,693   $  0.63  

The following are the warrants outstanding at November 30, 2009:

      Number of     Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
      Warrants     Value     Price ($)     Date  
                           
      656,000   $  225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
      153,360     55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
      200,000     32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
      333,333     15,333     0.05     December 4, 2010  
                           
      1,342,693   $  328,253              

- 17 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

9.

Stock Options


      Number     Weighted Average  
      of     Exercise  
      Stock Options     Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
  Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
  Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
  Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
  Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
  Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
  Granted   2,700,000     0.63  
  Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
  Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
  Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
  Granted (i)   3,350,000     0.15  
  Expired   (600,000 )   1.00  
               
  Balance, November 30, 2009   7,150,000   $  0.54  

  (i)

On June 23, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,350,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $368,500. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.55%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 155% and an expected life of 5 years.

     
  (ii)

The weighted average fair value of the total options granted during the period ended November 30, 2009, on the grant date was $0.11.

- 18 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

9.

Stock Options (continued)


      Options Outstanding           Options Exercisable  
            Weighted                    
            Average                    
            Remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
      Number     Contractual     Average     Number     Average  
  Expiry Date   of Options     Life (years)     Exercise Price     of Options     Exercise Price  
                                 
  December 20, 2009   75,000     0.05   $  1.10     75,000   $  1.10  
  April 15, 2010   700,000     0.37     0.50     700,000     0.50  
  January 6, 2011   150,000     1.10     1.25     150,000     1.25  
  April 3, 2011   550,000     1.34     1.80     550,000     1.80  
  October 31, 2011   500,000     1.92     1.00     500,000     1.00  
  September 27, 2012   1,825,000     2.83     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
  June 23, 2014   3,350,000     4.56     0.15     3,350,000     0.15  
                                 
      7,150,000     3.16   $  0.54     7,150,000   $  0.54  

10.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

   

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.


 

 

  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
 

 

  November 30,     November 30,  
 

 

  2009     2008     2009     2008  
 

 

                       
 

Numerator for basic loss per share

$  (107,679 ) $  (96,316 ) $  (570,719 ) $  (234,705 )
 

 

                       
 

Numerator for diluted loss per share

$  (107,679 ) $  (96,316 ) $  (570,719 ) $  (234,705 )
 

 

                       
 

Denominator:

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - basic

  44,843,606     36,318,765     44,748,902     36,312,107  
 

 

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - diluted

  44,843,606     36,318,765     44,748,902     36,312,107  
 

 

                       
 

Basic and diluted loss per share

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 )

- 19 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

11.

Segmented Information

   

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2008 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

   

The Company operates in the following geographic segments for the six months ended November 30, 2009, and year ended May 31, 2009:


      November 30,     May 31,  
      2009     2009  
               
  Canada $  4,005,837   $  3,999,201  
  Peru   87,476     -  
               
  Total assets $  4,093,313   $  3,999,201  

12.

Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere


  i)

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2009, $Nil and $Nil, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2008 - $15,000 and $30,000, respectively) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

     
  ii)

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2009, $37,500 and $75,000, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2008 - $43,500 and $87,000, respectively) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $26,250 and $52,750, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2008 - $5,000 and $20,000, respectively) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil and $Nil, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2008 - $6,000 and $12,000, respectively) in car and office allowances was included in this amount.

     
  iii)

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2009, $12,000 and $21,000, respectively (three and six months ended November 30, 2008 - $15,000 and $32,638, respectively) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the CFO of the Company.

     
  iv)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009 but has not been repaid as at November 30, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

- 20 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

   

The Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2009 audited consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share- Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

   

For the six months ended November 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the six months ended November 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

   

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for- sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

   

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow- through share investors (see Note 13 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

- 21 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at November 30, 2009 and May 31, 2009 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:


      November 30, 2009     May 31, 2009  
               
 

Assets

           
 

Current assets

           
 

Cash

$  207,744   $  106,593  
 

Short term investments

  25,000     407,493  
 

GST and sundry receivable

  12,822     5,707  
 

Prepaid expenses

  29,242     12,283  
 

Due from a related party

  13,054     12,803  
 

 

  287,862     544,879  
 

 

           
 

Reclamation bond

  13,858     14,332  
 

Mineral property rights

  564,460     512,906  
 

 

$  866,180   $  1,072,117  
 

 

           
 

Liabilities

           
 

Current liabilities

           
 

Accounts payable

$  279,905   $  9,017  
 

Accrued liabilities

  72,700     63,450  
 

 

  352,605     72,467  
 

Assets retirement obligation

  13,858     14,332  
 

 

  366,463     86,799  
 

 

           
 

Shareholders' Equity

           
 

Share capital

           
 

Authorized - unlimited common shares

           
 

Issued

           
 

     Common shares

  16,138,390     16,106,390  
 

     Additional paid in capital

  4,077,994     3,217,776  
 

     Warrants

  328,253     1,203,804  
 

     Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities

  (325,305 )   (325,305 )
 

     Deferred share-based payments

  4,510,100     4,141,600  
 

     Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company

  (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
 

     Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage

  (21,095,772 )   (20,225,004 )
 

 

           
 

 

  499,717     985,318  
 

 

           
    $  866,180   $  1,072,117  

- 22 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

        Cumulative
    Six Months Ended from date
    November 30,   of inception
  2009 2008 2007 ("March 26, 2004")
         

Expenses

                       

General exploration

$  307,949 $  360,718 $  2,204,788 $  9,599,295

Management services

  411,750     113,077     145,036     5,638,111  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

33,076 39,347 670,965 1,980,137

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     1,235  

Professional fees

90,414 64,257 162,807 1,314,058

Office and administration

  25,245     16,416     125,123     694,383  

Flow-through interest expense

- - - 188,801

Gain on forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )

Share-based payments

- - 1,003,275 -

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     170,000  

Site restoration costs

- - 30,000 -

 

                       

Loss before the under noted

(868,434 ) (593,815 ) (4,341,994 ) (19,550,353 )

Interest income

  (2,334 )   5,304     35,895     101,837  

Write-off mineral property rights

- - - (1,647,256 )

 

                       

Net loss for the period

(870,768 ) (588,511 ) (4,306,099 ) (21,095,772 )

 

                       

Comprehensive loss items:

       

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     (25,000 )

 

       

Comprehensive loss for the period

$  (870,768 ) $  (588,511 ) $  (4,306,099 ) $ (21,120,772 )

 

       

Loss per common share

                       

Basic

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 )  

Diluted

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 )      

 

       

Comprehensive loss per common share

               

Basic

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 )  

Diluted

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.13 )      

- 23 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

   

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


 

 

        Amount  
 

 

        Under  
 

Common Shares

  Shares     US GAAP  
 

 

           
               
 

Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversation

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 24 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


 

 

        Amount  
 

 

        Under  
 

Common Shares (continued)

  Shares     US GAAP  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
 

Private placements

  11,169,000     4,950,150  
 

Warrants valuation

  -     (940,212 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  130,000     45,800  
 

Exercise of warrants

  147,875     66,544  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     36,673  
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (488,720 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (227,417 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  30,000     10,800  
 

Private placement

  8,333,333     416,666  
 

Cost of issue - cash

  -     (47,833 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (30,666 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

  44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
 

Exercise of warrants

  333,333     16,667  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     15,333  
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2009

  44,985,431   $  16,138,390  
 

 

           
 

Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

           
 

 

           
 

Additional Paid in Capital

           
 

 

           
 

Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005

      $  25,000  
 

Expired warrants

        173,388  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

      $  198,388  
 

Expired warrants

        449,956  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008

      $  648,344  
 

Expired warrants

        2,569,432  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

      $  3,217,776  
 

Expired warrants

        860,218  
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2009

      $  4,077,994  

- 25 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Warrants      
         
  Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Issued   173,388  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
  Issued   2,086,995  
  Expired   (173,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
  Issued   974,575  
  Expired   (449,956 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
  Issued   1,167,629  
  Exercised   (36,673 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
  Expired   (2,569,432 )
  Issued   30,666  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
  Expired   (860,218 )
  Exercised   (15,333 )
         
  Balance, November 30, 2009 $  328,253  
         
  Cumulative Adjustments to Marketable Securities      
         
  Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 $  (315,539 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (325,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   -  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 and November 30, 2009 $  (325,305 )

- 26 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Deferred Share-Based Payments      
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Vesting of stock options   775,613  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
  Vesting of stock options   573,700  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
  Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
  Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 $  4,141,600  
  Vesting of stock options   368,500  
         
  Balance, November 30, 2009 $  4,510,100  
         
  Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage      
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
  Net loss   4,678  
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
  Net loss   (1,743,463 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
  Net loss   (3,673,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
  Net loss   (6,052,723 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
  Net loss   (6,157,896 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
  Net loss   (2,586,978 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
  Net loss   (870,768 )
         
  Balance, November 30, 2009 $  (21,095,772 )

- 27 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Cash Flows


 

 

                    Cumulative  
 

 

        Six Months Ended           from date  
 

 

        November 30,           of inception  
 

 

  2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from operating activities

                       
 

Net loss for the period

$  (870,768 ) $  (588,511 ) $  (4,306,099 ) $  (21,095,772 )
 

Items not involving cash:

                       
 

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )
 

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     1,235  
 

Share-based payments

  368,500     -     1,274,000     4,398,625  
 

Accrued interest income

  (251 )   (2,256 )   (18,146 )   (59,253 )
 

Write-off of mineral property rights

  -     -     -     1,647,256  
 

Change in non-cash operating working activities:

               
 

GST and sundry receivable

  (7,115 )   32,211     70,465     (18,002 )
 

Prepaid expenses

  (16,959 )   118,734     (50,935 )   (23,572 )
 

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     2,296  
 

Accounts payable

  270,888     (37,567 )   (278,959 )   350,924  
 

Accrued liabilities

  9,250     (45,000 )   -     8,412  
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (246,455 )   (522,389 )   (3,309,674 )   (14,823,518 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from financing activities

                       
 

Repayment of loans from related parties

  -     -     -     (28,594 )
 

Share/warrant issuance

  16,667     -     3,552,144     18,068,877  
 

Cost of issue

  -     -     (385,845 )   (1,776,309 )
 

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     175,000  
 

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     (75,000 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  16,667     -     3,166,299     16,363,974  
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from investing activities

                       
 

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     -     (13,128 )   (13,090 )
 

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  382,493     607,874     (975,000 )   18,903  
 

Exploration advances

  -     -     312,491     -  
 

Purchase of mineral property rights

  (51,554 )   (94,806 )   (326,929 )   (1,338,526 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  330,939     513,068     (1,002,566 )   (1,332,713 )
 

 

                       
 

Change in cash during the period

  101,151     (9,321 )   (1,145,941 )   207,743  
 

Cash, beginning of period

  106,593     84,856     1,299,277     1  
 

 

                       
 

Cash, end of period

$  207,744   $  75,535   $  153,336   $  207,744  

- 28 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Statements of Cash Flows (continued)                        
                           
                        Cumulative  
            Six Months Ended           from date  
            November 30,           of inception  
      2009     2008     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
                           
 

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transaction

                       
 

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  10,800   $  35,000   $  563,875  
 

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
 

Share-based payments included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  111,475   $  111,475  
  Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

14.

Subsequent Event

   

On December 8, 2009, the Company announced that it has closed the private placement purchase agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint"), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, and 10 other placees resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $2M to fund exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru and to maintain Canadian operations.

   

The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units ("Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1.5M. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview.

- 29 -


EX-99.39 40 exhibit99-39.htm EXHIBIT 99.39 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.39 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.39

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2009

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three months ended November 30, 2009 (“second quarter 2010”), the six-month period ended November 30, 2009 “(six-month period 2010”) and its financial position as at November 30, 2009. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2009. The comparative reporting periods are the three-month period ended November 30, 2008 (“second quarter 2009”) and the six-month period ended November 30, 2008 (“six-month period 2009”).

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13 to the interim consolidated financial statements for the second quarter 2010.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

This MD&A was prepared on January 14, 2010.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in Peru and the provinces of Ontario and Manitoba in Canada.

Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Economic Outlook

The Company reduced expenditures to a minimum during the six-month period 2010, through significant cost reductions at all its operations and the corporate head office, thereby ensuring the Company’s sustainability during the economic downturn. During this time, the Company’s management and Board were active with efforts to re-focus the Company’s exploration and development strategy and adopted a corporate strategy that focused on pursuing the acquisition and development of mineral properties with near-term production potential.

Activities Subsequent to the Second Quarter 2010

On December 8, 2009, the Company closed a private placement purchase agreement with Centerpoint Resources Inc. (“Centerpoint”), resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $1.5 million, to fund the exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru, and for the purpose of maintaining Canadian operations. The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview, comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue.

In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview, resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $0.5 million.

Management and the Board believe that the financing of the Giulianita project in Peru is aligned with the enhanced corporate strategy of aggressively pursuing potential cash-flow opportunities and that such small-scale mining opportunities represent an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate its own exploration funds.

In connection with the investment by Centerpoint, the Company also welcomed Mr. Jack Austin and Mr. Ted Nunn to the Board of Directors of the Company.

Properties and Projects

The Company did not engage in any substantial level of exploration activity during the second quarter 2010 and the six-month period 2010.

Giulianita Property, Peru

The Company has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

2


The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,00 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

During the second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010, the Company spent $32,225 and $87,476 respectively on preliminary exploration and fieldwork, compared with $Nil for both comparative periods last year.

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

Grandview has also acquired a 60% interest in ten (10) unpatented and two (2) patented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”).

During the second quarter 2010 the Company received its assays for the 2009 diamond drilling program at its Dixie Lake Property and its findings indicated continuity between gold zones 88-4 and 88-4 Extension, and the existence of additional priority targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone.

The drill program was designed to test mineralization intersected from previous drilling, specifically, extensions to and infill of, the 88-4 Zone, continuity between the 88-4 Zone and the 88-4 extension, and the more recently discovered NS Zone. The Dixie Lake Property, located just 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine is considered highly prospective for high-grade, narrow vein gold typical of the Red Lake gold district.

The Company’s objectives were to more narrowly define its Dixie Lake targets, target additional gold on the NS Zone, and determine continuity of mineralized zones like 88-4, which previously assayed 3.147 g/T Au over 9.94 metres from 67.9 to 77.85 metres, and 6.89 g/T over 4.68 metres from 124.36 to 129.05.

On the so-called 88-4 ‘Extension’, which the Company believes contiguous, previous assays include 5.85 g/T au over 4.5 metres from 181.7 to 186.2 metres. The zone correlates with the deeper mineralization intersected in DC-01-07, 1.56 g/T Au over 13.13 metres, and indicates that mineralization within the extension of the 88-4 Zone is continuous vertically.

Significant Results: Dixie Lake NS Zone, NS Zone, 88-4 Zone & 88-4 extension

Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T Comments
DL-09-01 138.1 138.6 0.5 16.32 NS Zone
DL-09-02 135.6 138.0 2.4 1.99 NS Zone quartz vein
DL-09-02 148.2 149.6 2.3 2.85 NS Zone quartz vein
DL-09-03 26.1 30.5 4.4 2.17 88-4 East end
Including 29.5 30.5 1.0 4.79  
DL-09-03 178.8 180.2 1.4 5.35 Quartz vein, NS Zone at depth?
DL-09-05 91.2 99.3 8.1 2.08 88-4 Zone
Including 96.6 97.7 1.1 3.58  
Including 97.6 99.3 1.7 2.28  
DL-09-06 228.4 233.6 5.2 2.01 Between 88-4 & 88-4 Extension
Including 230.3 231.8 1.5 3.52  

3


In general, gold intersections returned from the drilling reflected successful intersections of the high-grade quartz vein set in the NS Zone. Holes DL-09-01, and DL-09-02 intersected auriferous massive quartz veining is considered similar to intersects from previous drill programs (2007-2008). The Company believes that results indicate continuity of the vein set.

The Company believes that the same quartz vein set was also intersected in DDH DL-09-03, collared some 60 metres north west. Based on a west north-west strike & sub-vertical dip to the vein set, the massive quartz veining intersected therein would be intersected at the depth recorded from drilling (c. 180 metres) and the Company therefore concludes that the potential for additional gold would increase significantly upon additional drilling.

The gold mineralization on 88-4 Zone and the NS Zone remain open at depth, both down-dip and down-plunge. Additional targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone are indicated by highly anomalous precious & base metal values (Cu-Zn-Ni), obtained from past geochemical sampling, associated with the emplacement of an intrusion East of the historic drilling. These have not been drill tested & are considered priority targets.

The Company is very pleased by the results of the 2009 program and believes that previous core results coupled with the latest assays suggest that the NS Zone has greater continuity and that this target represents the more typical, high-grade, narrow vein gold system associated with producing Red Lake gold district mines.

Exploration costs of $195,595 were incurred during the second quarter 2010 on the Red Lake Properties (second quarter 2009: $30,813). Exploration costs of $264,378 were incurred during the six-month period 2010, compared with $129,873 for the six-month period 2009. Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2009 were $3,707,171.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, Gem, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in three (3) mining claims, located in Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”.

Grandview has an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven (7) claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, Manitoba (the “Gem Property”). Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

The Company wrote off at year-end (May 31, 2009) the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred on these properties of $1,557,112. The Company incurred expenditures of $Nil during both the second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010, compared with $62,401 for the second quarter 2009 and $126,744 for the six-month period 2009.

4


Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

The cumulative exploration costs and acquisition costs originally capitalized for these properties were written off at year-end (May 31, 2009), as the Company no longer considered it feasible to continue incurring the property payments required to maintain its interest. The total write-off incurred during 2009 was $5,903,342. The Company incurred expenditures of $Nil for the second quarter 2010, compared with $37,753 for the first second quarter 2009. The Company incurred expenditures of $Nil for the six-month period 2010, compared with $205,051 for the six-month period 2009.

The Company is in the process of returning the claims to the underlying property owner.

Results of Operations

Second quarter 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $107,679 for the second quarter 2010, compared with $93,316 for the second quarter 2009.

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the second quarter 2010 of $119,243 compares with cash flow used in operating activities of $125,485 for the second quarter 2009. The reason for the variance is attributable to growth in accounts payable and accruals during the second quarter 2010 of $250,586, versus cash outflows related to payables of $181,456 during the second quarter 2009. The Company also drew down $147,190 in pre-paid expenses during the second quarter 2009, compared with an increase in pre-paid expenses of $20,926 during the second quarter 2010, offsetting the effect of the payables and accruals.

Six-month period 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $570,719 for the six-month period 2010, compared with $234,705 for the corresponding period last year. The variance is predominantly attributable to share-based payment expense of $368,500 incurred during the six-month period 2010, compared with $Nil for the six-month period 2009.

Cash flows provided by operating activities of $53,845 for the six-month period 2010 compares with cash used in operating activities of $166,327 for the six-month period 2009. As the Company was accruing payments during the six-month period due to cash constraints, the reasons for variance are consistent with reasons for variances during the second quarter 2010. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities grew by $280,138 during the six-month period 2010, versus cash payments related to payables of $82,567 during the six-month period 2009. This effect was also offset by drawdown in prepayments of $118,734 during the six-month period 2009, compared with an increase in prepaid expenses of $16,959 during the six-month period 2010.

5


SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

 

 

Second

 

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Third

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

Nov. 30,

 

 

Aug. 31,

 

 

May. 31,

 

 

Feb. 28,

 

 

 

2009

 

 

2009

 

 

2009

 

 

2009

 

Revenue

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

Expenses

 

107,809

 

 

460,325

 

 

74,970

 

 

243,077

 

Net loss

 

(107,679

)

 

(463,040

)

 

(6,063,504

)

 

(1,589,709

)

Net loss per share

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.01

)

 

(0.16

)

 

(0.04

)

Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities

 

119,243

 

 

(65,398

)

 

(70,034

)

 

(112,647

)

Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period

 

232,744

 

 

324,654

 

 

514,086

 

 

694,958

 

Assets

 

4,093,313

 

 

3,934,256

 

 

3,999,201

 

 

10,094,150

 

 

 

Second

 

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Third

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

Nov. 30,

 

 

Aug. 31,

 

 

May 31,

 

 

Feb. 28,

 

 

 

2008

 

 

2008

 

 

2008

 

 

2008

 

Revenue

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

Expenses

 

98,801

 

 

138,952

 

 

425,903

 

 

264,491

 

Net income (loss)

 

(96,316

)

 

(138,389

)

 

(870,408

)

 

(34,115

)

Net income (loss) per share

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.03

)

 

(0.00

)

Cash flows used in operating activities

 

(125,485

)

 

(40,843

)

 

(244,135

)

 

(99,957

)

Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period

 

479,071

 

 

735,523

 

 

1,096,266

 

 

1,927,043

 

Assets

 

11,369,813

 

 

11,645,288

 

 

11,673,136

 

 

12,383,498

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Grandview’s working capital on November 30, 2009 was negative $67,797, compared with $469,609 on May 31, 2009. The cash and short-term investment balance on November 30, 2009 was $207,744 and $25,000 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2009 of $106,593 and $407,493 respectively.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and continues to incur net losses. The Company secured additional financing for aggregate proceeds to the Company’s treasury of $2 million (refer Events subsequent to the Second Quarter 2010 above). As mentioned, the Company will utilize these proceeds for developing its Giulianita project, its Canadian projects, specifically Red Lake, and for corporate purposes.

333,333 warrants were exercised during the second quarter 2010, for proceeds of $16,667.

5,044,120 warrants expired during the six-month period 2010, resulting in a charge to contributed surplus of $860,218.

3,350,000 stock options were issued during the six-month period 2010. The estimated fair market value of these options, and expensed during the six-month period 2010, was $368,500.

6


The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at January 14, 2009 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of November 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding 44,985,431 common shares, 1,342,693 warrants and 7,150,000 stock options.

As of January 14, 2010, the Company had outstanding 71,652,096 common shares, 26,999,998 warrants and 7,075,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the second quarter and six-month period ended 2010, $Nil and $Nil respectively (second quarter 2009: $15,000; six-month period 2009: $30,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

For the second quarter and six-month period 2010, $37,500 and $75,000 respectively (second quarter 2009: $43,500; six-month period 2009: $87,000) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in these amount was $26,500 and $52,750 for the second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010 respectively (second quarter 2009: $5,000; six-month period 2010: $20,000) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil and $Nil (second quarter 2009: $6,000; six-month period 2009: $12,000) in car and office allowances was included in this amount.

For the second quarter and six-month period 2010, $9,000 and $18,000 (second quarter 2009: $15,000; six-month period 2010: $32,638) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

7


Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

8


The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at November 30, 2009 of $13,858, compared with $14,332 as at May 31, 2009.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as at November 30, 2009.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

9


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of November 30, 2009, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of November 30, 2009, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the second quarter 2010 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The Company continues to monitor the deliberations and progress on plans to converge to International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") by accounting standard setting bodies and securities regulators in Canada.

Due to resource constraints the Company has not performed any additional assessment work related to its IFRS conversion project during 2009. The Company must still establish a team that will focus its efforts on this initiative. The Company’s search for additional staff for this project is on-going and more IFRS training will be needed for all levels of management. Despite these limitations in personnel, management has made an initial internal assessment of the accounting standards that will be impacted by the transition to IFRS.

The Company will follow the key events timeline proposed by the AcSB to obtain training and thorough knowledge of IFRS, and continue its assessment of accounting policies with reference to IFRS and plan for convergence to be ready for the 2011 changeover.

OUTLOOK

During this recent quarter the company focused efforts on exploration efforts in Ontario and maintaining its land position in good standing. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario and has now substantially completed its exploration program in the Red Lake area.

The Company strategy is to apply advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North and South America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. In this regard, the Company is proceeding to develop its Giulianita project in Peru and will be the focus of the Company’s activity over the next 12 months.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.


Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2009, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company, in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

11


EX-99.40 41 exhibit99-40.htm EXHIBIT 99.40 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.40 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.40

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended November 30, 2009.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

       
  5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

 

  5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A.
     
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on September 1, 2009, and ended on November 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: January 14, 2010

“Ernest Cleave”                   
[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.41 42 exhibit99-41.htm EXHIBIT 99.41 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.41 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.41

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended November 30, 2009.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

       
  5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

 

  5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A.
     
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on September 1, 2009, and ended on November 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: January 14, 2010

“Paul Sarjeant”              
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.42 43 exhibit99-42.htm EXHIBIT 99.42 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.42 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.42


 
Grandview Gold Inc.
 
(An Exploration Stage Company)
 
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
 
For the Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
 
(Unaudited)
 

 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at February 28, 2010.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at February 28, 2010.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
Toronto, Canada  
April 14, 2010  


Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    February 28,     May 31,  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009  
Assets            
Current assets            
             Cash and cash equivalents $  1,729,330   $  106,593  
             Short term investments   25,000     407,493  
             GST and sundry receivable   19,752     5,707  
             Prepaid expenses   15,718     12,283  
             Due from a related party (Note 12(iv))   10,000     10,000  
    1,799,800     542,076  
Reclamation bond (Note 5)   13,817     14,332  
Mining interests (Note 6)   3,884,563     3,442,793  
  $  5,698,180   $  3,999,201  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
             Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  65,388   $  72,467  
Asset retirement obligation   13,817     14,332  
    79,205     86,799  
             
Shareholders' equity   5,618,975     3,912,402  
  $  5,698,180   $  3,999,201  

Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1) Subsequent event (Note 14)

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 

                          Cumulative  

 

                          from date of  

 

                          inception  

 

                          of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  

 

  February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)

 

                             

Expenses

                             

Share-based payments

$  80,991   $  -   $  449,491   $  -   $  4,479,616  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  21,014     35,660     54,090     75,007     1,841,901  

Professional fees

  21,385     47,568     111,799     111,825     1,335,443  

Management services (Note 12)

  29,824     62,769     73,074     175,846     1,416,264  

Office and administration

  10,019     34,333     35,264     50,749     704,402  

Exploration evaluation expenses

  13,232     -     20,881     4,656     40,766  

Flow-through interest expense

  -     2,747     -     2,747     188,801  

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

Bad debt

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

 

                             

 

  176,465     183,077     744,599     420,830     10,033,428  

 

                             

Loss before the under noted

  (176,465 )   (183,077 )   (744,599 )   (420,830 )   (10,033,428 )

Interest income

  2,597     2,204     12     5,252     89,084  

Write-off of mineral properties

  -     (1,469,669 )   -     (1,469,669 )   (7,988,830 )

Forgiveness of debt

  (28,875 )   (60,000 )   (28,875 )   (60,000 )   6,792  

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     -     (170,000 )

 

                             

Loss before income taxes

  (202,743 )   (1,710,542 )   (773,462 )   (1,945,247 )   (18,096,382 )

Future income tax recovery

  -     120,833     -     120,833     1,675,990  

 

                             

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period

$  (202,743 ) $  (1,589,709 ) $  (773,462 ) $  (1,824,414 ) $  (16,420,392 )

 

                             

Basic and diluted loss per share (Note 10)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.04 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.05 )    

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)
                               
Accumulated Deficit                              
Balance at beginning of period $  (19,651,897 ) $  (11,427,965 ) $  (19,081,178 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (202,743 )   (1,589,709 )   (773,462 )   (1,824,414 )   (16,420,392 )
                               
Balance at end of period $  (19,854,640 ) $  (13,017,674 ) $  (19,854,640 ) $  (13,017,674 ) $  (19,854,640 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 4 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                Contributed      Accumulated        
(Unaudited)   Share Capital     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  
                               
                               
At May 31, 2008 $  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
                               
At May 31, 2009   14,430,400     1,203,804     7,359,376     (19,081,178 )   3,912,402  
Share-based payments   -     -     449,491     -     449,491  
Exercise of warrants   16,667     -     -     -     16,667  
Fair value of warrants exercised   15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   20,000     -     -     -     20,000  
Private placement   2,000,000     -     -     -     2,000,000  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (34,998 )   -     -     -     (34,998 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (1,440,000 )   1,440,000     -     -     -  
Debt settlement   28,875     -     -     -     28,875  
Warrants expired   -     (1,173,138 )   1,173,138     -     -  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (773,462 )   (773,462 )
                               
At February 28, 2010 $  15,036,277   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $ (19,854,640 ) $  5,618,975  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)
                               

Cash flows from operating activities

                             

Net loss for the period

$  (202,743 ) $  (1,589,709 ) $  (773,462 ) $  (1,824,414 ) $  (16,420,392 )

Items not involving cash:

                             

       Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

       Forgiveness of debt

  28,875     60,000     28,875     60,000     (6,792 )

       Accrued bonus

  -     20,000     -     20,000     -  

       Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

       Share-based payments

  80,991     -     449,491     -     4,479,616  

       Future income tax recovery

  -     (120,833 )   -     (120,833 )   (1,675,990 )

       Accrued interest income

  -     -     -     -     (43,903 )

       Write-off of mineral properties

  -     1,469,669     -     1,469,669     7,988,830  

Changes in non-cash working capital items:

                             

       GST and sundry receivable

  (6,930 )   2,191     (14,045 )   34,402     (19,262 )

       Prepaid expenses

  13,524     (5,068 )   (3,435 )   113,666     (15,718 )

       Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     80,000  

       Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  (287,217 )   51,103     (7,079 )   (31,464 )   71,558  

 

                             

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

  (373,500 )   (112,647 )   (319,655 )   (278,974 )   (5,535,818 )

 

                             

Cash flows from financing activities

                             

Loans from related parties

  -     -     -     -     (28,594 )

Share/warrant issuance

  2,000,000     416,666     2,016,667     416,666     20,068,877  

Cost of issuance

  (34,998 )   (33,333 )   (34,998 )   (33,333 )   (1,811,307 )

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     -     175,000  

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     -     (75,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  1,965,002     383,333     1,981,669     383,333     18,328,976  

 

                             

Cash flows from investing activities

                             

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     -     -     -     (13,090 )

(Purchase) redemption of short term investments

  -     (2,204 )   382,493     605,670     18,903  

Expenditures on mining interests

  (69,916 )   (54,799 )   (421,770 )   (505,667 )   (10,979,641 )

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     (90,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

$  (69,916 ) $  (57,003 ) $  (39,277 ) $  100,003   $  (11,063,828 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  

 

  February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)

 

                             

Change in cash during the period

$  1,521,586   $  213,683   $  1,622,737   $  204,362   $  1,729,330  

 

                             

Cash, beginning of period

  207,744     75,535     106,593     84,856     -  

 

                             

Cash, end of period

$  1,729,330   $  289,218   $  1,729,330   $  289,218   $  1,729,330  

 

                             

Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Transactions

                   

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  20,000   $  -   $  20,000   $  10,800   $  583,875  

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  

Share-based payments included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)

 

                             

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  -   $  5,884,391   $  -   $  5,679,340   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     -     -     96,595     4,684,830  

       Project administration and general

  -     -     -     14,090     96,879  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     13     -     94,379     1,121,633  

       Write-off

  -     -     -     -     (5,903,342 )

 

                             

 

  -     13     -     205,064     -  

 

                             

       Balance, end of period

$  -   $  5,884,404   $  -   $  5,884,404   $  -  

 

                             

Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  3,707,171   $  3,405,844   $  3,442,793   $  3,275,971   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  3,866     39,264     268,244     157,897     3,198,131  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     236     -     11,476     512,906  

 

                             

 

  3,866     39,500     268,244     169,373     3,711,037  

 

                             

       Balance, end of period

$  3,711,037   $  3,445,344   $  3,711,037   $  3,445,344   $  3,711,037  

 

                             

Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

                   

Balance, beginning of period

$  -   $  1,454,383   $  -   $  1,327,639   $  -  

 

                             

       Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     15,356     -     177,093     1,163,762  

       Project administration and general

  -     (70 )   -     237     227  

       Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     -     -     -     393,123  

       Government refund

  -     -     -     (35,300 )   -  

       Write-off

  -     (1,469,669 )   -     (1,469,669 )   (1,557,112 )

 

                             

 

  -     (1,454,383 )   -     (1,327,639 )   -  

 

                             

       Balance, end of period

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)
                               
Giulianita Property, Peru (Note 6(a))                    
Balance, beginning of period $  87,476   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
                               
      Drilling, assays and related field work   66,085     -     102,007     -     102,007  
      Property acquisition and holding costs   19,965     -     71,519     -     71,519  
                               
    86,050     -     173,526     -     173,526  
                               
       Balance, end of period $  173,526   $  -   $  173,526   $  -   $  173,526  
                               
Total $  3,884,563   $  9,329,748   $  3,884,563   $  9,329,748   $  3,884,563  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 9 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual consolidated financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 10 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued)

   

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

   

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this new accounting standard had no impact on the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of February 28, 2010.

   

Future Accounting Pronouncements

   

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

   

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

   

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

   

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

   

Financial Instruments

   

During 2009, CICA Handbook Section 3862, Financial Instruments - Disclosures ("Section 3862") was amended to require disclosure about the inputs to fair value measurements, including their classification within a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

   

• Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

  • Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, and;

• Level 3 - Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

   

This amendment is effective for the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ending May 31, 2010. The adoption of this amendment will have no impact on the Company's operating results or financial position.

- 11 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

3.

Capital Management

     

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

     

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so.

     

Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

     
i)

minimizing discretionary disbursements;

ii)

reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

iii)

exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

     

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

     
4.

Risk Factors

     

The Company’s significant mineral properties are Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada and Guilianita Property, Peru (called the "Properties").

     

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon these Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

     

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

     

Credit Risk

     

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash, short term investments, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

     

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of February 28, 2010. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

- 12 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors (continued)

     

Liquidity Risk

     

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at February 28, 2010, the Company had a cash and short term investments balance of $1,754,330 (May 31, 2009 - $514,086) to settle current liabilities of $65,388 (May 31, 2009 - $72,467). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

     

Market Risk

     

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

     
(a)

Interest Rate Risk

     

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

     
(b)

Foreign Currency Risk

     

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

     
(c)

Price Risk

     

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

     

Sensitivity Analysis

     

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and short term investments as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

     

As of February 28, 2010, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

     

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

- 13 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors (continued)

     

Sensitivity Analysis (continued)

     

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a nine month period:

     
(i)

Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at February 28, 2010, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the nine months ended February 28, 2010 would have been approximately $200 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at February 28, 2010, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $200 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.

     
(ii)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

     
(iii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of February 28, 2010, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

     
5.

Reclamation Bond

     

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

     
6.

Mining Interests

     

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

     

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 8 of the audited consolidated financial statements as at May 31, 2009. There following changes to mining interests occurred from June 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010.

     
(a)

Guilianita Project, Peru

     

On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) was signed with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Guilianita”). The Option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Guilianita by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period.

- 14 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

6.

Mining interests (Continued)

     
(a)

Guilianita Project, Peru (Continued)

     

The Option also allows the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 (CAD$317,220) and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum.

     

The Memorandum and the transactions contemplated therein and thereby are conditional upon receipt of all required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the TSX.

     
7.

Share Capital

     
(a)

Authorized

     

Unlimited number of common shares

     

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non- participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

     
(b)

Issued


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
  Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
  Private placement   120,000     120,000  
  Private placement   150,000     150,000  
  Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
  Private placement   175,000     175,000  
  Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
  Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
  Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
  Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  

- 15 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital (continued)

     
(b)

Issued (continued)


      Number        
      of        
      Shares     Amount  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
  Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
  Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
  Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
  Private placement   590,320     737,900  
  Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
  Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
  Private placement   400,000     500,000  
  Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
  Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
  Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
  Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
  Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
  Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
  Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
  Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
  Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (563,472 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
  Private placement   11,169,000     4,950,150  
  Warrant valuation   -     (940,212 )
  Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
  Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (260,255 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  

- 16 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital (continued)

     
(b)

 Issued (continued)


      Number        
      of        
      Shares     Amount  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
  Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
  Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
  Flow-through cost of issue   -     (120,833 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  14,430,400  
  Exercise of warrants   333,333     16,667  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     15,333  
  Private placement (i)   26,666,665     2,000,000  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (34,998 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
  Debt conversion (ii)   360,937     28,875  
  Mineral property acquisition (iii)   200,000     20,000  
               
  Balance, February 28, 2010   72,213,033   $  15,036,277  

(i)

December 3, 2009, the Company announced that it has closed the private placement purchase agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint"), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, and 10 other placees resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $2M to fund exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru and to maintain Canadian operations.

   

The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units ("Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1.5M. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview.

   

The fair value of the 26,666,665 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $1,440,000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.12%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 169.78% and an expected life of 24 months.

   
(ii)

On January 7, 2010, the Company issued 360,937 common shares at a price of $0.08 to settle a debt of $28,875 in respect of services rendered by a consultant to the Company.

- 17 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital (continued)

     
(b)

Issued (continued)

     
(iii)

On January 20, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to Miguel Saldana related to the Guilianita Project in Peru.

     
8.

Warrants


      Number of     Weighted Average  
      Warrants     Exercise Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Issued   602,500     1.44  
  Expired/cancelled   -     -  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
  Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
  Expired/cancelled   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
  Issued   4,189,999     0.91  
  Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583   $  1.18  
  Issued   5,853,480     0.62  
  Issued   73,937     0.65  
  Exercised   (147,875 )   0.45  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
  Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
  Issued   666,666     0.05  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
  Expired   (6,053,480 )   (0.60 )
  Issued   26,666,665     0.12  
  Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
               
  Balance, February 28, 2010   26,999,998
 
$  0.12  

- 18 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

10.

Warrants (Continued)

   

The following are the warrants outstanding at February 28, 2010:


  Number of     Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
  Warrants     Value     Price ($)     Date  
                       
  333,333   $  15,333     0.05     December 4, 2010  
  20,666,665     1,440,000     0.12     December 3, 2011  
                       
  20,999,998   $  1,455,333              

9.

Stock Options


      Number     Weighted Average  
      of     Exercise  
      Stock Options     Price  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
  Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
  Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
  Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
  Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
  Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
  Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
  Granted   2,700,000     0.63  
  Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
  Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
  Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
  Granted (i)(ii)   4,250,000     0.15  
  Expired   (675,000 )   1.01  
  Cancelled   (1,400,000 )   0.93  
               
  Balance, February 28, 2010   6,575,000   $  0.40  

- 19 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

9.

Stock Options (continued)

     
(i)

On June 23, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,350,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $368,500. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.55%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 155% and an expected life of 5 years.

     
(ii)

On December 9, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 900,000 options to directors of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $80,991. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.47%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 153% and an expected life of 5 years.

     
(ii)

The weighted average fair value of the total options granted during the period ended February 28, 2010, on the grant date was $0.11.

     

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at February 28, 2010:


      Options Outstanding     Options Exercisable  
            Weighted                    
            Average                    
            Remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
      Number     Contractual     Average     Number     Average  
  Expiry Date   of Options     Life (years)     Exercise Price     of Options     Exercise Price  
                                 
  April 15, 2010   700,000     0.13   $  0.50     700,000   $  0.50  
  April 3, 2011   250,000     1.09     1.80     250,000     1.80  
  September 27, 2012   1,825,000     2.58     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
  June 23, 2014   2,900,000     4.32     0.15     2,900,000     0.15  
  December 9, 2014   900,000     4.78     0.15     900,000     0.15  
                                 
      6,575,000     3.33   $  0.40     6,575,000   $  0.40  

10.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

   

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.

- 20 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

10.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share (Continued)


      Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
      February 28,     February 28,  
      2010     2009     2010     2009  
                           
  Numerator for basic loss per share $  (202,743 ) $  (1,589,709 ) $  (773,462 ) $  (1,824,414 )
                           
  Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (202,743 ) $  (1,589,709 ) $  (773,462 ) $  (1,824,414 )
                           
  Denominator:                        
  Weighted average number of common shares - basic   71,054,405     44,172,646     53,428,906     40,253,842  
                           
  Weighted average number of common shares - diluted   71,054,405     44,172,646     53,428,906     40,253,842  
                           
  Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.00 )    $(0.04 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.05 )

11.

Segmented Information

   

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2008 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

   

The Company operates in the following geographic segments for the nine months ended February 28, 2010, and year ended May 31, 2009:


      February 28,     May 31,  
      2010     2009  
               
  Canada $  5,519,391   $  3,999,201  
  Peru   178,789     -  
               
  Total assets $  5,698,180   $  3,999,201  

- 21 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

12.

Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

     
i)

For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010, $Nil and $Nil, respectively (three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 - $5,000 and $35,000, respectively) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

     
ii)

For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010, $37,500 and $112,500, respectively (three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 - $39,500 and $126,500, respectively) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $18,750 and $71,500, respectively (three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 - $12,750 and $32,750, respectively) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil and $Nil, respectively (three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 - $2,000 and $14,000, respectively) in car and office allowances was included in this amount.

     
iii)

For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2010, $9,000 and $30,000, respectively (three and nine months ended February 28, 2009 - $11,000 and $43,638, respectively) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the CFO of the Company.

     
iv)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009 but has not been repaid as at February 28, 2010. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

- 22 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

   

The Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2009 audited consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share- Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

   

For the nine months ended February 28, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the nine months ended February 28, 2010, 2009, and 2008. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

   

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for- sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

   

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow- through share investors (see Note 13 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2009). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

- 23 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at February 28, 2010 and May 31, 2009 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:


      February 28, 2010     May 31, 2009  
               
  Assets            
  Current assets            
  Cash $  1,729,330   $  106,593  
  Short term investments   25,000     407,493  
  GST and sundry receivable   19,752     5,707  
  Prepaid expenses   15,718     12,283  
  Due from a related party   13,177     12,803  
               
      1,802,977     544,879  
               
  Reclamation bond   13,817     14,332  
  Mineral property rights   584,425     512,906  
               
    $  2,401,219   $  1,072,117  
               
  Liabilities            
  Current liabilities            
  Accounts payable $  41,858   $  9,017  
  Accrued liabilities   23,530     63,450  
               
      65,388     72,467  
  Assets retirement obligation   13,817     14,332  
               
      79,205     86,799  
               
  Shareholders' Equity            
  Share capital            
  Authorized - unlimited common shares            
  Issued            
       Common shares   16,712,267     16,106,390  
       Additional paid in capital   4,390,914     3,217,776  
       Warrants   1,455,333     1,203,804  
       Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
       Deferred share-based payments   4,591,091     4,141,600  
       Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
       Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (21,368,343 )   (20,225,004 )
               
      2,322,014     985,318  
               
    $  2,401,219   $  1,072,117  

- 24 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss


 

 

                    Cumulative  
 

 

  Nine Months Ended     from date  
 

 

  February 28,     of inception  
 

 

  2010     2009     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
 

 

                       
 

Expenses

                       
 

General exploration

$  391,132   $  415,268   $  2,697,260   $  9,682,478  
 

Management services

  522,565     175,846     129,839     5,748,926  
 

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  54,090     75,007     772,967     2,001,151  
 

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     1,235  
 

Professional fees

  111,799     111,825     223,890     1,335,443  
 

Office and administration

  35,264     63,045     197,038     704,402  
 

Flow-through interest expense

  -     2,747     44,688     188,801  
 

Gain on forgiveness of debt

  28,875     -     -     (6,792 )
 

Share-based payments

  -     -     1,003,275     -  
 

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     170,000  
 

Site restoration costs

  -     -     30,000     -  
 

Debt forgiveness

  -     60,000     -     -  
 

 

                       
 

Loss before the under noted

  (1,143,725 )   (903,738 )   (5,098,957 )   (19,825,644 )
 

Interest income

  386     7,929     50,815     104,557  
 

Write-off mineral property rights

  -     (382,313 )   -     (1,647,256 )
 

 

                       
 

Net loss for the period

  (1,143,339 )   (1,278,122 )   (5,048,142 )   (21,368,343 )
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss items:

                       
 

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     (25,000 )
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss for the period

$  (1,143,339 ) $  (1,278,122 ) $  (5,048,142 ) $ (21,393,343 )
 

 

                       
 

Loss per common share

                       
 

Basic

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 )      
 

Diluted

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 )      
 

 

                       
 

Comprehensive loss per

                       
 

common share

                       
 

Basic

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 )      
 

Diluted

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 ) $  (0.15 )      

- 25 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

   

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


            Amount  
            Under  
 

Common Shares

  Shares     US GAAP  
 

 

           
 

Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversation

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 26 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
               
  Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
  Private placements   11,169,000     4,950,150  
  Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
  Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
  Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
  Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
  Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
  Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
               
  Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
  Exercise of warrants   333,333     16,667  
  Exercise of warrants valuation   -     15,333  
  Private placement   26,666,665     2,000,000  
  Cost of issue - cash   -     (34,998 )
  Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
  Debt conversation   360,937     28,875  
  Mineral property acquisition   200,000     20,000  
               
  Balance, February 28, 2010   72,213,033   $  16,712,267  

Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

  Additional Paid in Capital      
  Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005 $  25,000  
  Expired warrants   173,388  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  198,388  
  Expired warrants   449,956  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 $  648,344  
  Expired warrants   2,569,432  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  3,217,776  
  Expired warrants   1,173,138  
         
  Balance, February 28, 2010 $  4,390,914  

- 27 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Warrants      
         
  Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Issued   173,388  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
  Issued   2,086,995  
  Expired   (173,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
  Issued   974,575  
  Expired   (449,956 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
  Issued   1,167,629  
  Exercised   (36,673 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
  Expired   (2,569,432 )
  Issued   30,666  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
  Expired   (1,173,138 )
  Exercised   (15,333 )
  Issued   1,440,000  
         
  Balance, February 28, 2010 $  1,455,333  
         
  Cumulative Adjustments to Marketable Securities      
         
  Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 $  (315,539 )
  Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (325,305 )
  Comprehensive loss items   -  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 and February 28, 2010 $  (325,305 )

- 28 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)


  Deferred Share-Based Payments      
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
  Vesting of stock options   775,613  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
  Vesting of stock options   573,700  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
  Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
  Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 $  4,141,600  
  Vesting of stock options   449,491  
         
  Balance, February 28, 2010 $  4,591,091  
         
  Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage      
         
  Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
  Net loss   4,678  
  Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
  Net loss   (1,743,463 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
  Net loss   (3,673,388 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
  Net loss   (6,052,723 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
  Net loss   (6,157,896 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
  Net loss   (2,586,978 )
         
  Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
  Net loss   (1,143,339 )
         
  Balance, February 28, 2010 $  (21,368,343 )

- 29 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued)

   

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Cash Flows


                        Cumulative  
      Nine Months Ended     from date  
      February 28,     of inception  
      2010     2009     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
                           
  Cash flows from operating activities                        
  Net loss for the period $  (1,143,339 ) $  (1,278,122 ) $  (5,048,142 ) $  (21,368,343 )
  Items not involving cash:                        
  Forgiveness of debt   28,875     60,000     -     (6,792 )
  Accrued bonus   -     20,000     -     -  
  Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
  Share-based payments   449,491     -     1,274,000     4,479,616  
  Accrued interest income   (374 )   9,619     (28,035 )   (59,376 )
  Write-off of mineral property rights   -     382,313     -     1,647,256  
  Change in non-cash operating working activities:                
  GST and sundry receivable   (14,045 )   34,402     198,026     (24,932 )
  Prepaid expenses   (3,435 )   113,666     22,872     (10,048 )
  Due from a related party   -     -     -     2,296  
  Accounts payable   32,841     (32,100 )   (320,824 )   112,877  
  Accrued liabilities   (39,920 )   636     -     (40,758 )
                           
  Cash flows used in operating activities   (689,906 )   (689,586 )   (3,902,103 )   (15,266,969 )
                           
  Cash flows from financing activities                        
  Repayment of loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
  Share/warrant issuance   2,016,667     416,666     5,016,694     20,068,877  
  Cost of issue   (34,998 )   (33,333 )   (487,499 )   (1,811,307 )
  Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
  Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
                           
  Cash flows provided by financing activities   1,981,669     383,333     4,529,195     18,328,976  
                           
  Cash flows from investing activities                        
  Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     (12,923 )   (13,090 )
  Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   382,493     605,670     (975,000 )   18,903  
  Exploration advances   -     -     312,491     -  
  Purchase of mineral property rights   (51,519 )   (95,055 )   (326,929 )   (1,338,491 )
                           
  Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities   330,974     510,615     (1,002,361 )   (1,332,678 )
                           
  Change in cash during the period   1,622,737     204,362     (375,269 )   1,729,329  
  Cash, beginning of period   106,593     84,856     1,299,277     1  
                           
  Cash, end of period $  1,729,330   $  289,218   $  924,008   $  1,729,330  

- 30 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (continued) Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


                        Cumulative  
        Nine Months Ended     from date  
      February 28,     of inception  
      2010     2009     2007     ("March 26, 2004")
                           
  Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transaction                        
  Share issuance included in mining interest $  20,000   $  10,800   $  35,000   $  583,875  
  Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
  Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  111,475   $  111,475  
  Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

14.

Subsequent Event

   

On March 22, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to EMCO related to the Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property.

- 31 -


EX-99.43 44 exhibit99-43.htm EXHIBIT 99.43 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.43 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.43

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three months ended February 28, 2010 (“third quarter 2010”), the nine-month period ended February 28, 2010 “(nine-month period 2010”) and its financial position as at February 28, 2010. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2009. The comparative reporting periods are the three-month period ended February 28, 2009 (“third quarter 2009”) and the nine-month period ended February 28, 2009 (“nine-month period 2009”).

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13 to the interim consolidated financial statements for the third quarter 2010.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

This MD&A was prepared on April 14, 2010.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in Peru and the provinces of Ontario and Manitoba in Canada.

Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Activities during the Third Quarter 2010

During the third quarter 2010, the Company continued with pre-development and other fieldwork activities at its Giulianita property in Peru. The Company also met extensively with the local community to gain the necessary approvals and community involvement for the project.

Management and the Board believe that the financing of the Giulianita project in Peru is aligned with the enhanced corporate strategy of aggressively pursuing potential cash-flow opportunities and that such small-scale mining opportunities represent an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate its own exploration funds.

Private Placement

On December 8, 2009, the Company closed a private placement purchase agreement with Centerpoint Resources Inc. (“Centerpoint”), resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $1.5 million, to fund the exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru, and for the purpose of maintaining Canadian operations. The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview, comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue.

In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview, resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $0.5 million.

Properties and Projects

The Company did not engage in any substantial level of exploration activity during the third quarter 2010 and the nine-month period 2010.

Giulianita Property, Peru

The Company has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,00 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

During the third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010, the Company spent $86,050 and $173,526 respectively on preliminary exploration and fieldwork, compared with $Nil for both comparative periods last year.

2


Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

Grandview has also acquired a 60% interest in ten (10) unpatented and two (2) patented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”).

During the second quarter 2010 the Company received its assays for the 2009 diamond drilling program at its Dixie Lake Property and its findings indicated continuity between gold zones 88-4 and 88-4 Extension, and the existence of additional priority targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone.

The drill program was designed to test mineralization intersected from previous drilling, specifically, extensions to and infill of, the 88-4 Zone, continuity between the 88-4 Zone and the 88-4 extension, and the more recently discovered NS Zone. The Dixie Lake Property, located just 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine is considered highly prospective for high-grade, narrow vein gold typical of the Red Lake gold district.

The Company’s objectives were to more narrowly define its Dixie Lake targets, target additional gold on the NS Zone, and determine continuity of mineralized zones like 88-4, which previously assayed 3.147 g/T Au over 9.94 metres from 67.9 to 77.85 metres, and 6.89 g/T over 4.68 metres from 124.36 to 129.05.

On the so-called 88-4 ‘Extension’, which the Company believes contiguous, previous assays include 5.85 g/T au over 4.5 metres from 181.7 to 186.2 metres. The zone correlates with the deeper mineralization intersected in DC-01-07, 1.56 g/T Au over 13.13 metres, and indicates that mineralization within the extension of the 88-4 Zone is continuous vertically.

Significant Results: Dixie Lake NS Zone, NS Zone, 88-4 Zone & 88-4 extension

Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T Comments
DL-09-01 138.1 138.6 0.5 16.32 NS Zone
DL-09-02 135.6 138.0 2.4 1.99 NS Zone quartz vein
DL-09-02 148.2 149.6 2.3 2.85 NS Zone quartz vein
DL-09-03 26.1 30.5 4.4 2.17 88-4 East end
Including 29.5 30.5 1.0 4.79  
DL-09-03 178.8 180.2 1.4 5.35 Quartz vein, NS Zone at depth?
DL-09-05 91.2 99.3 8.1 2.08 88-4 Zone
Including 96.6 97.7 1.1 3.58  
Including 97.6 99.3 1.7 2.28  
DL-09-06 228.4 233.6 5.2 2.01 Between 88-4 & 88-4 Extension
Including 230.3 231.8 1.5 3.52  

3


In general, gold intersections returned from the drilling reflected successful intersections of the high-grade quartz vein set in the NS Zone. Holes DL-09-01, and DL-09-02 intersected auriferous massive quartz veining is considered similar to intersects from previous drill programs (2007-2008). The Company believes that results indicate continuity of the vein set.

The Company believes that the same quartz vein set was also intersected in DDH DL-09-03, collared some 60 metres north west. Based on a west north-west strike & sub-vertical dip to the vein set, the massive quartz veining intersected therein would be intersected at the depth recorded from drilling (c. 180 metres) and the Company therefore concludes that the potential for additional gold would increase significantly upon additional drilling.

The gold mineralization on 88-4 Zone and the NS Zone remain open at depth, both down-dip and down-plunge. Additional targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone are indicated by highly anomalous precious & base metal values (Cu-Zn-Ni), obtained from past geochemical sampling, associated with the emplacement of an intrusion East of the historic drilling. These have not been drill tested & are considered priority targets.

The Company is very pleased by the results of the 2009 program and believes that previous core results coupled with the latest assays suggest that the NS Zone has greater continuity and that this target represents the more typical, high-grade, narrow vein gold system associated with producing Red Lake gold district mines.

Exploration costs of $3,866 were incurred during the third quarter 2010 on the Red Lake Properties (third quarter 2009: $39,500). Exploration costs of $268,244 were incurred during the nine-month period 2010, compared with $169,373 for the nine-month period 2009. Cumulative exploration costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to February 28, 2010 were $3,711,037.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, Gem, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in three (3) mining claims, located in Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”.

Grandview has an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Gem Property, a property consisting of seven (7) claims covering 1,594 hectares, located near Rice Lake, Manitoba (the “Gem Property”). Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

The Company wrote off at year-end (May 31, 2009) the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred on these properties of $1,557,112.

Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

The cumulative exploration costs and acquisition costs originally capitalized for these properties were written off at year-end (May 31, 2009), as the Company no longer considered it feasible to continue incurring the property payments required to maintain its interest. The total write-off incurred during 2009 was $5,903,342. The Company is in the process of returning the claims to the underlying property owner.

4


Results of Operations

Third quarter 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $202,743 for the third quarter 2010, compared with $1,589,709 for the third quarter 2009. The variance over the corresponding period last year is related to write-offs of capitalized expenditures during the third quarter 2009 in the amount of $1,454,383 as it related to the Company’s Rice Lake properties.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the third quarter 2010 of $373,500 compares with $112,647 for the third quarter 2009. The reason for the variance is attributable net payments of accounts payable during the third quarter 2010 of $373,500, compared with an increase in accounts payable of $51,103 during the third quarter 2009.

Nine-month period 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $773,462 for the nine-month period 2010, compared with $1,824,414 for the corresponding period last year, also attributable to write-off of capitalized development costs related to the Company’s Rice Lake properties in the amount of $1,327,639.

Cash flows used in operating activities of $319,655 for the nine-month period 2010 compares with $278,974 for the nine-month period 2009.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

  Third Second First Fourth
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31, May. 31,
  2010 2009 2009 2009
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 176,465 107,809 460,325 74,970
Net loss (202,743) (107,679) (463,040) (6,063,504)
Net loss per share (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.16)
Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (373,500) 119,243 (65,398) (70,034)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,754,330 232,744 324,654 514,086
Assets 5,698,180 4,093,313 3,934,256 3,999,201

  Third Second First Fourth
  Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
  Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31, May 31,
  2009 2008 2008 2008
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 243,077 98,801 138,952 425,903
Net income (loss) (1,589,709) (96,316) (138,389) (870,408)
Net income (loss) per share (0.04) (0.00) (0.00) (0.03)
Cash flows used in operating activities (112,647) (125,485) (40,843) (244,135)
Cash and cash equivalents &short-term investments, end of period 694,958 479,071 735,523 1,096,266
Assets 10,094,150 11,369,813 11,645,288 11,673,136

5



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Grandview’s working capital on February 28, 2010 was $1,734,412,797, compared with $469,609 on May 31, 2009. The cash and short-term investment balance on February 28, 2010 was $1,729,330 and $25,000 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2009 of $106,593 and $407,493 respectively.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and continues to incur net losses. The Company secured additional financing for aggregate proceeds to the Company’s treasury of $2 million (refer Private Placement above). As mentioned, the Company will utilize these proceeds for developing its Giulianita project, its Canadian projects, specifically Red Lake, and for corporate purposes.

333,333 warrants were exercised during the nine-month period 2010, for proceeds of $16,667.

6,053,480 warrants expired during the nine-month period 2010, resulting in a charge to contributed surplus of $1,173,138.

As a result of its private placement transaction completed on December 8, 2009, the Company issued 26,666,665 common shares of the Company and 26,666,665 full warrants.

4,250,000 stock options were issued during the nine-month period 2010. The estimated fair market value of these options, and expensed during the nine-month period 2010, was $449,491.

On January 7, 2010, the Company issued 360,937 common shares at a price of $0.08 to settle a debt of $28,875 in respect of services rendered by a consultant to the Company.

On January 20, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to Miguel Saldana related to the Guilianita Project in Peru.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at April 14, 2010 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of February 28, 2010 and April 14, 2010, the Company had outstanding 72,213,033 common shares, 26,999,998 warrants and 6,575,000 stock options.

6


RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010, $Nil and $Nil, respectively (third quarter and nine-month period 2009: $5,000 and $35,000, respectively) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

For the third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010, $37,500 and $112,500, respectively (third quarter 2009 and nine-month period 2009: $39,500 and $126,500, respectively) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $18,750 and $71,500, respectively (third quarter 2009 and nine-month period 2009: $12,750 and $32,750, respectively) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil and $Nil, respectively (third quarter 2009 and nine-month period 2009: $2,000 and $14,000, respectively) in car and office allowances was included in this amount.

For the third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010, $9,000 and $30,000, respectively (third quarter 2009 and nine-month period 2009: $11,000 and $43,638, respectively) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the CFO of the Company.

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

7


Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at February 28, 2010 of $13,817, compared with $14,332 as at May 31, 2009.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

8


Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as at November 30, 2009.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

Financial Instruments

During 2009, CICA Handbook Section 3862, Financial Instruments - Disclosures ("Section 3862") was amended to require disclosure about the inputs to fair value measurements, including their classification within a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

• Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, and;

• Level 3 - Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

This amendment is effective for the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ending May 31,2010. The adoption of this amendment will have no impact on the Company's operating results or financial position.

9


FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of February 28, 2010, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of February 28, 2010, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the third quarter 2010 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The Company continues to monitor the deliberations and progress on plans to converge to International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") by accounting standard setting bodies and securities regulators in Canada.

Due to resource constraints the Company has not performed any additional assessment work related to its IFRS conversion project during 2009. The Company must still establish a team that will focus its efforts on this initiative. The Company’s search for additional staff for this project is on-going and more IFRS training will be needed for all levels of management. Despite these limitations in personnel, management has made an initial internal assessment of the accounting standards that will be impacted by the transition to IFRS.

The Company will follow the key events timeline proposed by the AcSB to obtain training and thorough knowledge of IFRS, and continue its assessment of accounting policies with reference to IFRS and plan for convergence to be ready for the 2011 changeover.

OUTLOOK

During this recent quarter the company focused efforts on fieldwork efforts at its Giulianita project in Peru and maintaining its land position in good standing. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario and has now substantially completed its exploration program in the Red Lake area.

The Company strategy is to apply advanced geology, geochemical and geophysical science to reduce exploration and development costs at high-grade gold properties in major gold camps of North and South America, and, in developing low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad. In this regard, the Company is proceeding to develop its Giulianita project in Peru and will be the focus of the Company’s activity over the next 12 months.

10


RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2009, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company, in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

11


EX-99.44 45 exhibit99-44.htm EXHIBIT 99.44 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.44 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.44

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended February 28, 2010.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on December 1, 2009 and ended on February 28, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: April 14, 2010

“Ernest Cleave”

_______________________
[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.45 46 exhibit99-45.htm EXHIBIT 99.45 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.45 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.45

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended February 28, 2010.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on December 1, 2009 and ended on February 28, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: April 14, 2010

“Paul Sarjeant”

_______________________
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.46 47 exhibit99-46.htm EXHIBIT 99.46 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.46 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.46

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release   OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Acquires 100% Undivided Interest in Sanshaw-Bonanza Property
in Red Lake Gold District and Adds Claims to Property Contiguous to Goldcorp-Premier Gold JV

April 28, 2010 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that, through a series of cash and share payments (the “Transaction”), it has:

1.

acquired the remaining 40% interest in its Sanshaw-Bonanza property (the “Property”) in the Red Lake Gold District of Ontario from EMCO Corporation S.A. ("EMCO");

   
2.

acquired four additional claims which are contiguous to the Property from Perry English ("English"); and

   
3.

reduced the existing NSR on the Property,

so that the Company now holds a 100% interest in and to the Property, subject only to an NSR of just 0.375% . The Transaction is strategic for the Company as the Property is contiguous to the west and southern boundary of the Red Lake Gold Mines Limited/Premier Gold Mines Limited (“Goldcorp/Premier Gold”) Rahill-Bonanza Joint Venture property, and is located just four kilometres south of the Bruce Channel discovery which was purchased recently by Goldcorp for $1.5 billion.

Grandview had previously completed expenditure requirements to earn a 60% interest in the Property as per an option agreement with EMCO dated February 7, 2007. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Property, the Company paid EMCO $25,000 CAD in cash and issued 50,000 common shares in its capital. Also, the Company expanded the Property parcel by acquiring two unpatented claims and two patented claims for aggregate consideration of $60,000 CAD in cash and the issuance of 500,000 common shares in its capital. Concurrently, the Company also purchased 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR on the Property for $25,000 CAD cash. Cumulative expenditures related to the Transaction totalled $110,000 CAD cash and 550,000 common shares of the Company.

“Sanshaw-Bonanza is one of the most highly-prospective properties in our Red Lake portfolio, so we are more than pleased to have been able to put this comprehensive package together and re-energize our Canadian program,” says Grandview CEO and President Paul Sarjeant. “Our immediate neighbour to the north-east is the Rahill-Bonanza Goldcorp/Premier Gold JV, and we have been watching with increasing interest their news with respect to possible south-west continuation of the Bonanza Follansbee Zone. Other recent deep drill results by Goldcorp/Premier suggest that we are well situated in a very prospective camp environment. We are anxious to return to Red Lake and our own Canadian exploration program. Currently, we continue to move forward our exploration and development plans at our gold-producing Giulianita property in Peru.”

See the Red Lake Regional Activity Map on the Gold Properties pages of the Grandview website at:
http://www.grandviewgold.com/Gold_Properties/Red_Lake_Gold_District/#
See Premier Gold news including release dated April 21, 2010 at:
http://www.premiergoldmines.com/s/NewsReleases.asp?DateRange=2010/01/01...2010/12/31


In a recent Shareholder Update, the Company announced the addition of a sustainable small-mines gold production component to their business plan. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Recuperación Realzada S.A.C., Grandview is developing Giulianita, a gold-producing, small mines property in Northern Peru, and anticipates that the potential resulting positive cash-flow could in-part fund Canadian exploration programs in the major gold camps of Red Lake, Ontario and Rice Lake, Manitoba.

About Grandview

Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-mines development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 #113 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.47 48 exhibit99-47.htm EXHIBIT 99.47 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.47 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.47

 
NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
For Immediate Release OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Inc. Issues Update to Shareholders

July 8, 2010, - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Mr. Paul Sarjeant, B.Sc., P.Geo., President and Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc. has issued an update to shareholders.

The full text of the update can be found on the Grandview website on the Shareholder Update page.

About Grandview Gold Inc.
Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.48 49 exhibit99-48.htm EXHIBIT 99.48 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.48 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.48

FORM 13-502F1

CLASS 1 REPORTING ISSUERS – PARTICIPATION FEE

Reporting Issuer Name: GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

End date of last completed fiscal year: MAY 31, 2010

Market value of listed or quoted securities:

   

             Total number of securities of a class or series outstanding as at the end of the issuer's last completed fiscal year

72,763,033 (i)

 

   

             Simple average of the closing price of that class or series as of the last trading day of each month in the last completed fiscal year (See clauses 2.7(a)(ii)(A) and (B) of the Rule)

$0.10 (ii)

 

   

             Market value of class or series

(i) X (ii) = $7,276,000 (A)

 

   

             (Repeat the above calculation for each other class or series of securities of the reporting issuer that was listed or quoted on a marketplace in Canada or the United States of America at the end of the last completed fiscal year)

(B)

 

   

Market value of other securities as at the end of the last completed fiscal year:

   

             (See paragraph 2.7(b) of the Rule)

   

             (Provide details of how value was determined)

  (C)

 

   

             (Repeat for each other class or series of securities to which paragraph 2.7(b) of the Rule applies)

  (D)

 

   

Capitalization for the last completed fiscal year

   

             (Add market value of all classes and series of securities)

(A) + (B) + (C) + (D) = $7,276,000

 

   

Participation Fee

                 

             (From Appendix A of the Rule, select the participation fee beside the capitalization calculated above)

  $700

 

   

 

   

Late Fee, if applicable

   

               (As determined under section 2.5 of the Rule)

   


EX-99.49 50 exhibit99-49.htm EXHIBIT 99.49 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.49 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.49

________________________________________________________________________

Grandview Gold Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

 Consolidated Financial Statements

May 31, 2010 and 2009

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

 ________________________________________________________________________

 

 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the year end consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances. Management also accepts responsibility for ensuring the use of appropriate accounting policies and estimates in disclosure of information prepared following accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at May 31, 2010.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at May 31, 2010.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sargeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
   
Toronto, Canada  
August 17, 2010  

 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders of Grandview Gold Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) as at May 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, accumulated deficit, changes in shareholders’ equity, cash flows and mineral properties for each of the three years ended May 31, 2010 and for the period from the date of inception of the exploration stage on March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at May 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years ended May 31, 2010 and for the period from the date of inception of the exploration stage on March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2010 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

  "McCarney Greenwood LLP"
Toronto, Canada  
  McCarney Greenwood LLP
August 17, 2010 Chartered Accountants
  Licensed Public Accountants

Comments by Auditors on United States of America-Canada Reporting Difference

In the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the consolidated financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated August 17, 2010 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such conditions and events in the auditor's report when these are adequately disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.

  "McCarney Greenwood LLP"
Toronto, Canada  
  McCarney Greenwood LLP
August 17, 2010 Chartered Accountants
  Licensed Public Accountants

 



GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)
 
   
As at May 31,   2010     2009  
Assets            
Current assets            
     Cash and cash equivalents $  1,432,824   $  106,593  
     Short term investments (Note 5)   25,037     407,493  
     GST and sundry receivable   26,416     5,707  
     Prepaid expenses   12,876     12,283  
     Due from a related party (Note 14(iv))   -     10,000  
    1,497,153     542,076  
Reclamation bond (Note 6)   13,699     14,332  
Mining interests (Note 7)   4,149,771     3,442,793  
  $  5,660,623   $  3,999,201  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 14) $  89,284   $  72,467  
Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)   13,699     14,332  
    102,983     86,799  
Shareholders' equity   5,557,640     3,912,402  
  $  5,660,623   $  3,999,201  
             
Nature of operations and going concern assumption (Note 1)            
             
The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.            
             
Approved by the Board of Directors:            
             
"Paul T. Sarjeant" , Director            
             
"Richard Brown" , Director            

- 2 -


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of  
                      the  
                      exploration  
          Year ended May 31,     stage (March  
    2010     2009     2008     26, 2004 )
Expenses                        
Share-based payments (Note 10) $  449,491   $  -   $  1,322,125   $  4,479,616  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   115,352     88,716     673,712     1,903,163  
Professional fees   142,354     167,672     322,033     1,365,998  
Management and consulting services (Note 14)   98,750     255,201     238,539     1,441,940  
Office and administration   69,107     21,579     196,503     738,245  
Exploration evaluation expenses   5,000     19,885     -     24,885  
Flow-through interest expense   -     2,747     44,688     188,801  
Bad debt   -     -     -     1,235  
    880,054     555,800     2,797,600     10,143,883  
Loss before the under noted   (880,054 )   (555,800 )   (2,797,600 )   (10,143,883 )
Interest income (expense)   (349 )   7,503     59,887     88,723  
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     (25,000 )
Write-off of mineral properties   -     (5,903,342 )   (528,376 )   (6,431,718 )
Impairment of mineral properties   -     (1,557,112 )   -     (1,557,112 )
Forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     35,667  
Failed merger costs   -     -     -     (170,000 )
Loss before income taxes   (880,403 )   (8,008,751 )   (3,266,089 )   (18,203,323 )
Future income tax recovery (Note 12)   -     (120,833 )   (260,255 )   (1,675,990 )
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 ) $  (16,527,333 )
                         
Basic loss per share (Note 11) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.20 ) $  (0.09 )      
        $                
Diluted loss per share (Note 11) $  (0.02 )   (0.20 ) $  (0.09 )      
                         
The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.                    

- 3 -


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ACCUMULATED DEFICIT
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
                      Cumulative from  
                      date of inception  
                      of the  
                      exploration stage  
          Year ended May 31,     (March  
                      26, 2004 )
    2010     2009     2008        
Accumulated deficit                        
Balance at beginning of period $  (19,081,178 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (8,187,426 ) $  (3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (880,403 )   (7,887,918 )   (3,005,834 )   (16,527,333 )
Balance at end of period $  (19,961,581 ) $  (19,081,178 ) $  (11,193,260 ) $  (19,961,581 )
                         
The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.                    

- 4 -



GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)
   
                Contributed     Accumulated        
    Share capital     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  
At May 31, 2007 $  11,019,703   $  2,611,614   $  3,356,344   $  (8,187,426 ) $  8,800,235  
Private placement   4,950,150     -     -     -     4,950,150  
Warrant valuation   (940,212 )   940,212     -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   45,800     -     -     -     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   66,544     -     -     -     66,544  
Fair value of warrants exercised   36,673     (36,673 )   -     -     -  
Share-based payments   -     -     1,433,600     -     1,433,600  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (488,720 )   -     -     -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   (227,417 )   227,417     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (260,255 )   -     -     -     (260,255 )
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (3,005,834 )   (3,005,834 )
At May 31, 2008   14,202,266     3,742,570     4,789,944     (11,193,260 )   11,541,520  
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
At May 31, 2009 $  14,430,400   $  1,203,804   $  7,359,376   $  (19,081,178 ) $  3,912,402  

See notes 8, 9 and 10 for share capital, warrants and contributed surplus from the date of inception of the exploration stage, March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2010. The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -



GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY - CONTINUED
(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)
 
                Contributed     Accumulated        
    Share capital     Warrants     surplus     deficit     Total  
At May 31, 2008 $  14,430,400   $  1,203,804   $  7,359,376   $  (19,081,178 ) $  3,912,402  
Share-based payments   -     -     449,491     -     449,491  
Exercise of warrants   16,667     -     -     -     16,667  
Fair value of warrants exercised   15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   67,000     -     -     -     67,000  
Private placement   2,000,000     -     -     -     2,000,000  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (36,392 )   -     -     -     (36,392 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   (1,440,000 )   1,440,000     -     -     -  
Debt conversion   28,875     -     -     -     28,875  
Warrants expired   -     (1,173,138 )   1,173,138     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (880,403 )   (880,403 )
At May 31, 2010 $  15,081,883   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $  (19,961,581 ) $  5,557,640  

See notes 8, 9 and 10 for share capital, warrants and contributed surplus from the date of inception of the exploration stage, March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2010. The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6 -



GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)
                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration  
    Year ended May 31,     stage (March  
    2010     2009     2008     26, 2004 )
Cash flows from operating activities                        
Net loss for the period $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 ) $  (16,527,333 )
Items not involving cash:                        
     Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     25,000  
     Debt conversion   28,875     -     -     (6,792 )
     Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
     Share-based payments   449,491     -     1,322,125     4,479,616  
     Future income tax recovery   -     (120,833 )   (260,255 )   (1,675,990 )
     Accrued interest income   (37 )   (7,493 )   (36,410 )   (43,940 )
     Write-off of mineral properties   -     7,460,454     528,376     7,988,830  
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                        
     GST and sundry receivable   (20,709 )   34,957     181,267     (25,926 )
     Prepaid expenses   (593 )   137,883     8,526     (12,876 )
     Due from a related party   10,000     80,000     -     90,000  
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   16,817     (46,059 )   (298,248 )   95,454  
Cash flows used in operating activities   (396,559 )   (349,009 )   (1,560,453 )   (5,612,722 )
Cash flows from financing activities                        
Loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   2,016,667     416,666     5,016,694     20,068,877  
Cost of issuance   (36,392 )   (47,833 )   (488,720 )   (1,812,701 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
Cash flows provided by financing activities   1,980,275     368,833     4,527,974     18,327,582  
Cash flows from investing activities                        
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     (13,090 )   (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   382,493     611,410     (975,000 )   18,903  
Exploration advances   -           312,491     -  
Expenditures on mining interests   (639,978 )   (609,497 )   (3,506,343 )   (11,197,849 )
Due from a related party   -     -     -     (90,000 )
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $  (257,485 ) $  1,913   $  (4,181,942 ) $  (11,282,036 )

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -



GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.    
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)    
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED   
(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)   
                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration stage  
    Year ended May 31,     (March  
    2010     2009     2008     26, 2004 )
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period $  1,326,231   $  21,737   $  (1,214,421 ) $  1,432,824  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   106,593     84,856     1,299,277     -  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $  1,432,824   $  106,593   $  84,856   $  1,432,824  
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions                        
Share issuance included in mining interest $  67,000   $  10,800   $  45,800   $  630,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  111,475   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  23,477   $  45,159  

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



 GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.    
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)    
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MINERAL PROPERTIES   
 (EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)    
                      Cumulative  
                      from date of  
                      inception of the  
                      exploration stage  
    Year ended May 31,     (March  
    2010     2009     2008     26, 2004 )
Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA (Note 7(a))                
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  5,679,340   $  4,386,457   $  -  
     Drilling, assays and related field work   -     90,775     989,754     4,684,830  
     Project administration and general   -     38,848     16,200     96,879  
     Property acquisition and holding costs   -     94,379     286,929     1,121,633  
     Write-off   -     (5,903,342 )   -     (5,903,342 )
     Total activity during the period   -     (5,679,340 )   1,292,883     -  
Balance, end of period $  -   $  -   $  5,679,340   $  -  
Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Note 7(b))                    
Balance, beginning of period $  3,442,793   $  3,275,971   $  1,531,160   $  -  
     Drilling, assays and related field work   272,911     166,146     1,655,011     3,202,798  
     Property acquisition and holding costs   158,263     676     89,800     671,169  
     Total activity during the period   431,174     166,822     1,744,811     3,873,967  
Balance, end of period $  3,873,967   $  3,442,793   $  3,275,971   $  3,873,967  
Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada (Note 7(c))                
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  1,327,639   $  668,597   $  -  
     Drilling, assays and related field work   -     218,436     659,042     1,163,762  
     Project administration and general   -     227     -     227  
     Property acquisition and holding costs   -     10,810     -     393,123  
     Impairment   -     (1,557,112 )   -     (1,557,112 )
     Total activity during the period   -     (1,327,639 )   659,042     -  
Balance, end of period $  -   $  -   $  1,327,639   $  -  

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

-9 -


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MINERAL PROPERTIES - CONTINUED
(EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)

                      Cumulative from  
                      date of inception  
                      of the exploration  
    Year ended May 31,     stage (March  
    2010     2009     2008     26, 2004 )
Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada (Note 7(d))                
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  -   $  548,404   $  -  
     Drilling, assays and related field work   -     -     -     415,904  
     Property acquisition and holding costs   -     -     (20,028 )   112,472  
     Write-off   -     -     (528,376 )   (528,376 )
     Total activity during the period   -     -     (548,404 ) $  -  
Balance, end of period $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
Giulianita Property, Peru (Note 7(e))                
Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -  
     Drilling, assays and related field work   234,872     -     -     234,872  
     Property acquisition and holding costs   40,932     -     -     40,932  
     Total activity during the period   275,804     -     -     275,804  
Balance, end of period $  275,804   $  -   $  -   $  275,804  
                -        
Total $  4,149,771   $  3,442,793   $  10,282,950   $  4,149,771  

The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

1. Nature of Operations and Going Concern

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North and South America.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

- 10 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     

The significant accounting policies for the Company are as follows:

     
(a)

Basis of Presentation

     

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada.

     

A summary of the differences between Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") which affect the Company is contained in Note 15.

- 11 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

   
2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

   
(b)

Basis of Consolidation

   

These consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. ("Grandview USA"), and Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C. ("Recuperacion"). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.

   
(c)

Use of Estimates

   

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination of the recoverability of mining interest costs, the asset retirement obligation, the valuation allowance relating to the future tax asset, the calculation of share-based payments expense and warrants. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

   
(d)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

   

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and balances with banks with original maturities of three months or less and which are readily convertible into cash.

   
(e)

Mineral Property Costs

   

Direct exploration and development costs are deferred in the accounts, net of amounts recovered from third parties, including receipts from options. At production, these costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method based on estimated reserves. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written-off when the decision to abandon is made, or earlier if a determination is made that the property does not have economically recoverable reserves.

   

The recorded book value of the Company's mineral properties is not intended to reflect the present or future value of the gold projects.

   

The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its properties. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. If after the review, it is determined that the carrying amount of a mining interest is impaired, that mining interest is written-down to its estimated net realizable value. A mining interest is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

   

The amounts shown for mining properties do not necessarily represent present or future values. Their recoverability is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof.

- 12 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                             
   
2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

   
(f)

Flow-Through Financing

   

The Company has financed a portion of its exploration activities through the issue of flow-through shares in the past, which transfer the tax deductibility of exploration expenditures to the investor. Proceeds received on the issue of such shares have been credited to share capital and the related exploration costs have been charged to mineral properties. Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration and development activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with income tax legislation. When these expenditures are renounced, temporary taxable differences created by the renunciations reduce share capital.

   
(g)

Short Term Investments

   

Short term investments comprise investments in guaranteed investment certificates due to mature within one year from the date of purchase. These investments are classified as "held-for-trading" and have been recorded at fair value.

   
(h)

Asset Retirement Obligation

   

Section 3110 of the CICA Handbook requires the recognition of a liability for obligations relating to the retirement of property, plant and equipment and obligations arising from acquisition, construction, development or normal operations of those assets. The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") in the year in which a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

   
(i)

Income Taxes

   

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method of tax accounting. Under this method, current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable for the current period. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and on unclaimed losses carried forward and are measured using the substantially enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse or losses are expected to be utilized. Future tax assets are recorded to recognize tax benefits only to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not they will be realized.

   
(j)

Share-Based Payments

   

The fair value of the stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management's assumptions as disclosed in Note 10 and is recorded as share-based payments over the vesting period of the stock-options, with the offsetting credit recorded as an increase in contributed surplus. If the stock options are exercised, the proceeds are credited to share capital and the fair value at the date of grant is reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital.

- 13 -


 

Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

   
2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

     
(k)

Revenue Recognition

     

Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis.

     
(l)

Share Issue Costs and Reorganization Costs

     

Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital. Reorganization costs are charged to deficit.

     
(m)

Translation of Foreign Currencies

     

Foreign currency accounts are translated into Canadian dollars as follows:

     

At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue or expense is translated into Canadian dollars by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the year end date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars by using the exchange rate in effect at that date and the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations in the current period.

     
(n)

Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement

All financial instruments are classified into one of the following five categories: held-for-trading, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, available-for-sale financial assets or other financial liabilities. All financial instruments, including derivatives, are measured in the balance sheet at fair value except for loans and receivables, held to maturity investments and other financial liabilities which are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Subsequent measurement and changes in fair value will depend on their initial classification, as follows: held-for-trading financial assets are measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of operations in the period in which they arise; available-for-sale financial instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income until the investment is de-recognized or becomes impaired at which time the amounts would be recorded in the statement of operations. The Company has made the following classifications:

Cash and cash equivalents

Held-for-trading

Short term investments

Held-for-trading

GST and sundry receivable

Loans and receivable

Due from a related party

Loans and receivable

Reclamation Bond

Loans and receivable

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Other financial liabilities

Transaction costs are expensed as incurred for financial instruments classified as held for trading and transaction costs, other than impairment losses, are included in other comprehensive income until the asset is removed from the balance sheet for financial instruments classified as available-for-sale. For other financial instruments, transaction costs are expensed on initial recognition. The Company accounts for regular purchases and sales of financial assets using trade date accounting.

- 14 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

   
(o)

Capital Disclosures and Financial Instruments – Disclosures and Presentation

   

Capital Disclosures

   

Handbook Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such noncompliance. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook section in Note 3 to these consolidated financial statements.

   

Financial Instruments

   

Handbook Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, "Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation", revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward unchanged its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks. The Company has included disclosures recommended by the new Handbook sections in Note 4 to these consolidated financial statements.

   
(p)

Section 1400, "General Standard of Financial Statement Presentation"

   

This section specifies requirements to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and disclose any material uncertainties that cast doubt on its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's disclosure reflects such assessment.

   
(q)

Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

   

In January 2009, the CICA approved EIC-173, "Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which applies to interim and annual financial statements for periods ending on or after January 20, 2009. The Company has evaluated the new section and determined that adoption of these new requirements has had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

- 15 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

   
(r)

Mining Exploration Costs

   

On March 27, 2009, the CICA approved an abstract EIC-174, “Mining Exploration Costs”, which provides guidance on capitalization of exploration costs related to mining properties in particular, and on impairment of long-lived assets in general. The Company has applied this new abstract for the year ended May 31, 2009 and there was no significant impact on its consolidated financial statements as a result of applying this abstract.

   
(s)

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

   

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaced Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The Company adopted this standard on June 1, 2009, with no impact on its consolidated financial statements.

   
(t)

Fair Value Hierarchy and Liquidity Risk Disclosure

   

In June 2009, the CICA issued an amendment to Handbook Section 3862 to provide improvements to fair value and liquidity risk disclosures. The amendment applies to the Company's fiscal year ending May 31, 2010. This adoption resulted in additional disclosure. See note 4 for relevant disclosure.

   
(u)

Future Accounting Changes

   

International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]

   

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

   

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

   

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

- 16 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
3.

Capital Management

   

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

   

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so. Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

   
i)

minimizing discretionary disbursements;

   
ii)

reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

   
iii)

exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

   

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

   

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year ended May 31, 2010. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

   
4.

Risk Factors

   

The Company’s significant mineral properties are the Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada, and the Guilianta Property, Peru (collectively called the "Properties").

   

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon the Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

   

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

   

Fair Value

The following summarizes the methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company's financial instruments where measurement is required. The fair value of short-term financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity. These include cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Fair value amounts represent point-in-time estimates and may not reflect fair value in the future. The measurements are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and are a matter of significant judgment. The methods and assumptions used to develop fair value measurements, for those financial instruments where fair value is recognized in the balance sheet, have been prioritized into three levels as per the fair value hierarchy included in GAAP. Level one includes quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level two includes inputs that are observable other than quoted prices included in level one. Level three includes inputs that are not based on observable market data.

    Level One   Level Two   Level Three
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,432,824 $  - $  -
Short-term investments $  25,037 $  - $  -
Reclamation bond $ 13,699 $ - $  -

- 17 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
4.

Risk Factors (Continued)

   

Credit Risk

   

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and cash equivalents and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

   

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of May 31, 2010. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

   

Liquidity Risk

   

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at May 31, 2010, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents and short term investments balance of $1,457,861 (May 31, 2009 - $514,086) to settle current liabilities of $89,284 (May 31, 2009 - $72,467). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

   

Market Risk

   

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

   
(a)

Interest Rate Risk

   

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

   
(b)

Foreign Currency Risk

   

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

   
(c)

Price Risk

   

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

- 18 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
4.

Risk Factors (Continued)

   

Sensitivity Analysis

   

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and cash equivalents and short term investments as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost and which also equal fair value.

   

As of May 31, 2010, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

   

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

   

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a twelve month period:

   
(i)

Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at May 31, 2010, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the twelve months ended May 31, 2010 would have been approximately $250 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at May 31, 2010, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $250 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.

   
(ii)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

   
(iii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of May 31, 2010, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

   
5.

Short Term Investments

   

As of May 31, 2010, the Company has $25,000 (2009 - $400,000; 2008 - $975,000) invested in cashable guaranteed investment certificates maturing at various dates to April 8, 2011, bearing interest at a variable rate. As at May 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company had accrued $37, $7,493 and $36,410 respectively as interest receivable on its short term investments.

- 19 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
6.

Reclamation Bond

    

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

    
7.

Mining Interests

    
(a)

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

    

On July 27, 2004, the Company entered into an option agreement with Mill City Gold Corp. (formerly Mill City International Corporation) ("Mill City") to earn a 60% interest in the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome Property (the “Pony Creek”) in the State of Nevada, USA. In order to earn this option the Company must do the following:

    
(i)

After 10 business days of signing the agreement issue 400,000 common shares to Mill City, which were valued at $4,000 (issued);

    
(ii)

Spend or cause to be spent $500,000 US on the properties by July 31, 2005 (completed);

    
(iii)

Spend or cause to be spent $1,000,000 US on the properties by July 31, 2006 (completed);

    
(iv)

During this 2 year period the Company and Mill City will look for a joint venture partner who is a major mining and exploration company ("major"). This major would provide assistance with deep hole structural modelling as well as geological database development. In return for the assistance the major will be offered a 1st right of refusal option to earn a 60% interest in the properties by completing a bankable feasibility study;

    
(v)

Mill City will enter into a Professional Geological Services Contract with the Company specifically mandated to ensure all communications with the major are maximized. The Company will pay Mill City $7,250 US per month for the first year and $8,250 US per month for the second year for the various services outlined in the contract;

    
(vi)

If the Company is able to complete sections (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv), Mill City can elect to convert its 40% interest to a 20% carried interest. If Mill City does not convert to a carried interest, it is responsible for 40% of the costs associated with the project. There is a 4% Net Smelter Return ("NSR") payable to an individual who owned the property and it will be reduced to 2% as the Company has the option to purchase another 1% for each property prior to the commencement of commercial production for $1,500,000 US each, for a total of $3,000,000 US;

- 20 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
7.

Mining Interests (Continued)

    
(a)

Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA (Continued)

    
(vii)

If the Company cannot satisfy the conditions of finding a major it can still earn the 60% interest by spending an additional $2,000,000 US by August 31, 2007 and continue the Professional Geological Services Contract for a further year. The NSR will not be reduced from 4% to 2% but the Company may purchase 1% for each property prior to commencement of commercial production for $1,000,000 US each for a total of $2,000,000 US. As of January 21, 2005, the Company and Mill City have amended the option agreement of July 27, 2004. The Company and Mill City have agreed to revise the Agreement by removing the Company's obligation to enter into a Professional Geological Services Contract with Mill City and add that the Company will be responsible for all future underlying advance royalty payments. The terms of the Agreement, as amended, was contained in a standard form Option Agreement dated April 14, 2005 (the “Option Agreement”).

    

On June 20, 2007, the Company announced that it has fulfilled the terms of its option agreement with Mill City relating to the Company’s right to earn an undivided 60% interest in Pony Creek.

    

Under the terms of the option agreement with Mill City, dated April 14, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 60% interest in Pony Creek by spending US$3,500,000 over three years. The Company presented a detailed accounting of its US$3,500,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward.

    

Mill City accepted in writing on June 20, 2007, the Company’s earn-in and further, Mill City has informed the Company that, as per the terms of the Option Agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 40% participating interest to a 20% carried interest, up to and including the date on which the Bankable Feasibility Study is completed by the Company. At that time Mill City shall convert its 20% carried interest to a 20% participating interest. The acceptance by Mill City of the terms of the Company’s earn in, immediately converts the Company’s 60% interest to an 80% interest in Pony Creek.

    

The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation on its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project, representing the estimated costs of the Company's obligation to restore the property site to its original condition as required by regulatory authorities. The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation in the amount of $13,699, equal to the amount of reclamation bond posted by the Company with the United States, Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management.

    

In fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the carrying value of its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project in Nevada, USA could not be supported, resulting in a write-off charge of $5,903,342.

- 21 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
7.

Mining Interests (Continued)

     
(b)

Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

     
(i)

The Company owns a 100% interest in 8 mining claims located in the Red Lake Area, District of Kenora, in Northwestern Ontario. The mining claims were written off several years ago when the Company decided to change its business. Since the Company has changed back to resource exploration the Company is once again capitalizing the expenditures related to these claims.

     
(ii)

On October 18, 2005, the Company signed a definitive Option Agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) for Fronteer’s Dixie Lake Property (the “Dixie lake”) located in Ontario’s Red Lake Gold District on the following terms and conditions:

     
(a)

The Company shall earn a 51% interest in the Dixie Lake Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $300,000 (completed), assuming payments totaling $75,000 to the underlying property vendor; and

     
(b)

issuing 160,000 shares of the Company at $1.25 per share for a total value of $200,000, to a third party as a finder’s fee (issued).

     

On October 17, 2007, the Company announced that it has fulfilled the terms of its option agreement with Fronteer relating to the Company’s right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie lake.

     

Under the terms of the option agreement with Fronteer, dated August 26, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie lake by spending US$300,000 over three years, making $75,000 in cash payments and issuing 40,000 shares to the underlying vendor. The Company presented a detailed accounting of its US$1,711,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward.

     

Fronteer accepted in writing, the Company’s earn-in and further, Fronteer has informed the Company that, as per the terms of the Option Agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 49% participating interest to a 36% participating interest in Dixie lake.

     
(iii)

On February 8, 2007, the Company announced it had signed a formal option agreement with EMCO SA, (“EMCO”) relating to the acquisition of an option to acquire a 60 percent interest in the 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims in Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property on the following terms and conditions:

     
(a)

the Company has an option to earn an undivided 60 percent interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property by incurring $250,000 in resource exploration and development expenditures on or before August 31, 2007; and

     
(b)

issuing 115,000 of the Company's common shares (55,000 common shares were issued in February 2007 and valued at $22,000; 30,000 common shares were issued in April 2008 and valued at $10,800; 30,000 commons shares were issued in July 2008 and valued at $10,800) in tranches over an 18-month period and 200,000 warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $1.40 per share which will expire 36 months from the date of issuance.

     

The fair value of the 200,000 common share purchase warrants issued for the 60 percent interest in the 10 claim Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property has been estimated to be $32,200 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.96%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 101% and an expected life of 36 months.

- 22 -


                               
Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
7.

Mining Interests (Continued)

  

(b) Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Continued)

(iii) (b) (Continued)

Terms of the agreement provide for the dilution of EMCO’s interest in the property to 10% on the occurrence of certain events, which would then convert their interest to a 3% NSR. An underlying 1.5% NSR remains with the original property owner.

On June 18, 2007, the Company amended the option agreement with EMCO relating to the Sanshaw-Bonanza property. The Company has agreed to increase the expenditures required to be incurred on or before August 31, 2008 to $500,000 and to issue to EMCO 100,000 common shares in the capital of the Company as consideration for the amended agreement (issued and valued at $35,000).

On September 11, 2008, the Company reported that it has incurred the expenditures required to successfully fulfill the terms of its option agreement with EMCO to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property.

     (iv)

On April 28, 2010, the Company to announced that, through a series of cash and share payments (the “Transaction”), it had:

    
  1.

acquired the remaining 40% interest in its Sanshaw-Bonanza property (the “Property”) in the Red LakeGold District of Ontario from EMCO Corporation S.A. ("EMCO");

    
  2.

acquired four additional claims which are contiguous to the Property from Perry English ("English"); and

    
  3.

reduced the existing NSR on the Property, so that the Company now holds a 100% interest in and to the Property, subject only to an NSR of just 0.375%.

     
 

Grandview had previously completed expenditure requirements to earn a 60% interest in the Property as per an option agreement with EMCO dated February 7, 2007. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Property, the Company paid EMCO $25,000 CAD in cash and issued 50,000 common shares in its capital. Also, the Company expanded the Property parcel by acquiring two unpatented claims and two patented claims for aggregate consideration of $60,000 CAD in cash and the issuance of 500,000 common shares in its capital.

    
 

Concurrently, the Company also purchased 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR on the Property for $25,000 CAD cash. Cumulative expenditures related to the Transaction totalled $110,000 CAD cash and 550,000 common shares of the Company.

- 23 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
7.

Mining Interests (Continued)

     
(c)

Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

     
(i)

The Company currently holds 100% interest in 5 mining claims in close proximity to the Bissett Gold Mine (San Antonio Mine) located on the Rice Lake greenstone belt, in southeastern Manitoba.

     
(ii)

On September 30, 2005, the Company and Marum Resources Inc. (“Marum”) entered into an option agreement to jointly explore Marum’s 100% owned Gem gold property representing 7 mining claims at the eastern end of Manitoba’s Rice Lake Greenstone Belt.

     

The Company can earn a 50% undivided interest in the Gem property by performing $250,000 in exploration work on the Property, at a cumulative rate of $125,000 by September 30, 2006 and $250,000 by September 30, 2007, such work to include a high-resolution aeromagnetic survey with a maximum 50-metre line spacing (completed). The Company will be the operator of the property until such time as its option to earn the 50% interest is exercised.

     

In December 2006, Marum and Grandview agreed to amend their option agreement dated September 30, 2005, whereby Grandview shall earn a 50% interest in the property by spending $250,000 in exploration work before September 30, 2007. Marum and Grandview have agreed to extend the earn-in period to December 31, 2007.

     
(iii)

On February 23, 2007, the Company purchased, from McKeena Gold Inc. (“McKeena”), a 100% interest in the Angelina and the Banksian gold properties (Manitoba). The Angelina gold property consists of 4 unpatented mining claims and the Banksian gold property consists of 14 claims. In order to acquire these properties the Company must do the following:

     
(a)

Issuance of 100,000 common share warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $0.70, initially expiring February 28, 2008, extended to February 28, 2009.

     
(b)

Issuance of 250,000 common share warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $0.70, initially expiring February 28, 2008, extended to February 28, 2009.

     

The fair value of the 350,000 common share purchase warrants issued for the Angelina and Banksian gold properties has been estimated to be $74,550 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.02%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 102% and an expected life of 12 months.

     
(iv)

Grandview has a 100% interest in 16 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba (the "GVG Property"). The Company staked these claims in 2005 and 2006.

     

In fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the carrying value of its Rice Lake Gold Camp in Manitoba, Canada could not be supported, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,557,112.

- 24 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
7.

Mining Interests (Continued)

    
(d)

Rocky Ridge Gold Property, Manitoba, Canada

    

On November 23, 2006, the Company signed a formal option agreement with Harvest Gold Corp ("Harvest Gold") relating to the acquisition of a 70 percent interest in the Rocky Ridge gold property in Manitoba on following terms and conditions:

    
(i)

the Company had an option to earn an undivided 70 percent interest in the Rocky Ridge property by paying an amount of $85,000 and incurring $600,000 in resource exploration; and

    
(ii)

issuing 225,000 shares of the Company, over a two-year period. On signing, the Company was required to make a payment of $20,000 (accrued) and issue 50,000 (valued at $34,500) shares (issued) to Harvest Gold (Note 9(b)). At the end of year one, the Company is required to incur $250,000 in exploration expenditures, make a payment of $30,000, and issue 75,000 shares to Harvest Gold. At the end of year two, the Company is required to make a further $350,000 in exploration expenditures, make a final $35,000 payment, and issue the outstanding 100,000 common shares.

    

Harvest Gold has an option to buy-out up to two percent of a three percent underlying NSR assigned to the original property owner, at a cost of $250,000 per each one percent, for a potential total of $500,000. The one to two percent NSR buy-out would occur on a pro-rata basis, with the Company acquiring 70 percent and Harvest Gold acquiring 30 percent.

    

A finders fee of 250,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable at $1.00 for a period of two years was issued in connection with the transaction. The value assigned to these warrants was $78,000 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 101%; risk-free interest rate - 3.85% and an expected life of 2 years.

    

During 2008, the Company decided not to pursue the exploration of this project and to write off all accumulated deferred exploration costs.

    
(e)

Guilianita Project, Peru

    

On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) was signed with a private Peruvian Group which grants a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Guilianita”). The Option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Guilianita by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum;

    
(ii)

incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period. (issued - 200,000 common shares)

    

The Option also allows the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 (CAD$313,050) and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum.

-25 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
8.

Share Capital

     
(a)

Authorized

     

Unlimited number of common shares

     

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, nonparticipating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

     
(b)

Issued


    Number        
    of        
    shares     Amount  
Balance, March 26, 2004 and May 31, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
Private Placement   120,000     120,000  
Private Placement   150,000     150,000  
Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
Private Placement   175,000     175,000  
Private Placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
Cost of issue – warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  

- 26 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
8.

Share Capital (Continued)

   

(b) Issued (Continued)


    Number        
    of        
    shares     Amount  
Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
Private placement   590,320     737,900  
Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
Shares issued for a finders’ fee   160,000     200,000  
Private placement   400,000     500,000  
Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
Cost of issue – finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (563,472 )
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
Private placement (i) (ii) (iii)   11,169,000     4,950,150  
Warrant valuation (i) (ii)   -     (940,212 )
Mineral property acquisition (Note 7(b)(iii))   130,000     45,800  
Exercise of warrants (Note 9(i))   147,875     66,544  
Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation (Note 8(b)(i)(ii) and Note 9(i))   -     (227,417 )
Flow-through cost of issue (iv)   -     (260,255 )
Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  

- 27 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
8.

Share Capital (Continued)

   

(b) Issued (Continued)


  Number  
  of  
  shares Amount
Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
Mineral property acquisition (Note 7(b)(iii)) 30,000 10,800
Private Placement (v)   8,333,333     416,666  
Cost of issue – cash - (47,833 )
Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
Flow-through cost of issue (v) - (120,833 )
Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098     14,430,400  
Mineral property acquisition (Note 7(b)(iv) and 7(e)) 750,000 67,000
Debt conversion (vii)   360,937     28,875  
Exercise of warrants – cash 333,333 16,667
Exercise of warrants – valuation   -     15,333  
Private placement (vi) 26,666,665 2,000,000
Cost of issue – cash   -     (36,392 )
Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation (vi) - (1,440,000 )
Balance, May 31, 2010   72,763,033   $  15,081,883  

(i)

On July 6, 2007, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Bolder Investment Partners, Ltd. (the "Agent") . The brokered placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,589,000 units in the capital of the Company (the “Units”) at a purchase price of $0.40 per Unit for gross proceeds of $3,435,600. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company at a price of $0.65 for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

The fair value of the 4,294,500 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $704,298 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.72%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 97% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

In connection with the brokered placement, the Company paid a cash fee to the Agent of 8% of the gross proceeds raised for total of $274,848 and also issued broker warrants to acquire 8% of the total number of Units issued at a price of $0.40 per Unit for a period of 24 months from closing. In addition, the Company also paid a cash work fee of $7,500 for certain services of the Agent.

   

The fair value of the 687,120 broker warrants has been estimated to be $145,670 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.72%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 97% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

The Company also closed a non-brokered placement on the same terms as the brokered placement for an additional 125,000 Units and further proceeds of $50,000.

   

Other costs associated to the private placements amounted to $103,497.

- 28 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
8.

Share Capital (Continued)

   
(b)

Issued (Continued)

   
(i)

(Continued)

   

The fair value of the 62,500 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $10,250 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.72%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 97% and an expected life of 24 months.

   
(ii)

On December 21, 2007, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the "Brokered Placement") with Bolder Investment Partners, Ltd. (the "Agent"). The Brokered Placement resulted in the issuance of 1,312,000 units in the capital of the Company (the "Units) at a purchase price of $0.55 per Unit for gross proceeds of $721,600 and 605,000 flow-through shares at a purchase price of $0.65 per share for gross proceeds of $393,250. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company at a price of $0.70 for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

The fair value of the 656,000 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $225,664 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.85%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 133.41% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

In connection with the Brokered Placement, Grandview paid a cash fee to the Agent of 8% of the gross proceeds raised for a total of $89,188 and also issued broker warrants to acquire 8% of the total number of Units issued under the Brokered Placement at a price of $0.60 per Unit for a period of 24 months from closing.

   

The fair value of the 153,360 broker warrants has been estimated to be $55,056 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.85%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 133.41% and an expected life of 24 months.

   

Other costs associated to the private placements amounted to $12,466.

   
(iii)

On December 28, 2007, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the "Non-Brokered Placement"). The Non-Brokered Placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 538,000 flow-through shares (the “Flow-Through Shares”) at a purchase price of $0.65 per Flow-Through Share for gross proceeds of $349,700 under the Non-Brokered Placement.


 

(iv)

During the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,143,000 flow- through common shares for total proceeds of $742,950. Exploration expenditures of $742,950 were renounced effective December 31, 2007. The renunciation created a future income tax recovery of approximately $260,255, which was allocated as a cost of issuing the flow-through shares.

- 29 -


                               
Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
8.

Share Capital (Continued)

   
(b)

Issued (Continued)

   
(v)

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the “Offering”) with Sandfire Securities Inc. The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares (the “Common Shares”) to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666. The securities issued pursuant to Offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance.

   

In connection with the Offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised ($33,333) under the Offering and also issued broker warrants to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months after closing. The fair value of each warrant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 156.7%; risk-free interest rate of 1.52% and an expected average life of 2 years. The value assigned was $30,666.

   

Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through share agreements, the tax attributes of the related expenditures are renounced to subscribers. As a result, the Company is required to recognize a foregone tax benefit of $120,833 at the time of renouncement.


  (vi)

December 3, 2009, the Company announced that it has closed the private placement purchase agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint"), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, and 10 other investors resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $2,000,000 to fund exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru and to maintain Canadian operations.

   
 

The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units ("Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units for aggregate proceeds of $500,000, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview.

   
 

The fair value of the 26,666,665 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $1,440,000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.12%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 169.78% and an expected life of 24 months.

   
  (vii)

On January 7, 2010, the Company issued 360,937 common shares at a price of $0.08 to settle a debt of $28,875 in respect of services rendered by a consultant to the Company.

- 30 -



Grandview Gold Inc.            
(An Exploration Stage Company)            
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements            
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009            
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)            
             
             
9.                  Warrants            
    Number of     Weighted Average  
    Warrants     Exercise Price  
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
Issued   602,500     1.44  
Expired   -     -  
Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
Expired   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
Issued   4,189,999     0.91  
Expired   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583   $  1.18  
Issued (Note 8(b)(i)(ii))   5,853,480     0.62  
Issued (i)   73,937     0.65  
Exercised (i)   (147,875 )   0.45  
Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
Issued (Note 8(b)(vi))   666,666     0.05  
Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
Expired   (6,053,480 )   (0.60 )
Issued (Note 8(b)(vi))   26,666,665     0.12  
Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
Balance, May 31, 2010   26,999,998   $  0.12  

(i)

147,875 warrants at a price of $0.45 expiring March 16, 2009 were exercised. These warrants had a step-up feature resulting in the creation of 73,937 new warrants with an exercise price of $0.65 expiring on March 16, 2009. The fair value of the 73,937 warrants has been estimated to be $26,691 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.16%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 138.81% and an expected life of 1.5 years.

The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2010:

                   
Number of   Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
Warrants   Value     Price     Date  
333,333   15,333     0.05     December 4, 2010  
26,666,665   1,440,000     0.12     December 3, 2011  
26,999,998 $  1,455,333              

- 31 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
                     
9.              Warrants (Continued)                        
                         
The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2009:  
    Number of     Fair     Exercise        
    Warrants     Value     Price ($)     Expiry  
    4,357,000   $  714,548   $  0.65     July 6, 2009  
    687,120     145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
    656,000     225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
    153,360     55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
    200,000     32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
    666,666     30,666     0.05     December 4, 2010  
    6,720,146   $  1,203,804              
                         
The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2008  
   
    Number of     Fair     Exercise        
    Warrants     Value     Price ($)     Expiry  
    250,000     78,000     1.00     November 29, 2008  
    1,199,999     284,400     1.40     December 22, 2008  
    240,000     85,200     0.65     December 22, 2008  
    350,000   $  74,550     0.70     February 28, 2009  
    1,698,937     366,316     0.65     March 16, 2009  
    177,125     43,927     0.45     March 16, 2009  
    1,992,987     1,335,301     1.75     March 27, 2009  
    398,597     301,738     1.10     March 27, 2009  
    4,357,000     714,548     0.65     July 6, 2009  
    687,120     145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
    656,000     225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
    153,360     55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
    200,000     32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
    12,361,125   $  3,742,570              

- 32 -


                               
Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               

 

   
10.

Stock Options

The Company maintains an employee stock option plan under which the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed for such purpose, may from time to time grant to employees, officers, directors or consultants of the Company, options to acquire common shares in such numbers, for such terms and at such exercise prices, as may be determined by the Board of Directors or such committee.

The stock option plan provides that the maximum number of common shares in the capital of the Company that may be reserved for issuance for all purposes under the stock option plan shall be equal to 10% of the total issued and outstanding common shares and that the maximum number of common shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one optionee pursuant to share options may not exceed 5% of the common shares outstanding at the time of grant.

The options are valid for a maximum of 5 years from the date of issue and the normal vesting term is 1/4 immediately and 1/4 after 3, 6 and 9 month period from the date of grant.

The following is continuity of stock options for the period from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2010.

             
    Number     Weighted Average  
    of     Exercise  
    Stock Options     Price  
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
Forfeited   (100,000 )   1.00  
Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
Forfeited   (250,000 )   1.19  
Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
Granted (i)(ii)   2,700,000     0.63  
Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
Forfeited   (125,000 )   1.38  
Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
Forfeited   (175,000 )   0.68  
Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
Granted (iii)(iv)   4,250,000     0.15  
Expired   (1,375,000 )   0.75  
Forfeited   (1,400,000 )   0.93  
Balance, May 31, 2010   5,875,000   $  0.38  

- 33 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
10.

Stock Options (Continued)

     
(i)

On September 28, 2007, the Company granted an aggregate of 2,000,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.68 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $1,274,000. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 4.20%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 161.6% and an expected life of 5 years. The fair value was allocated as follows: directors and management share-based payments - $1,162,525, consulting fees capitalized to mining interests - $111,475.

     
(ii)

On April 15, 2008, the Company granted an aggregate of 700,000 options to a consultant of the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 for a period of two years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $159,600, which was expensed during the year. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.65%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 146.3% and an expected life of 2 years.

     
(iii)

On June 23, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,350,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $368,500. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.55%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 155% and an expected life of 5 years.

     
(iv)

On December 9, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 900,000 options to directors of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $80,991. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.47%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 153% and an expected life of 5 years.

     

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2010:


             
    Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
          Weighted                    
          average remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
    Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise price  
April 3, 2011   250,000     0.84 years   $  1.80     250,000   $  1.80  
September 27, 2012   1,825,000     2.33     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
June 23, 2014   2,900,000     4.07     0.15     2,900,000     0.15  
December 9, 2014   900,000     4.53   $  0.15     900,000   $  0.15  
    5,875,000     3.46 years   $  0.38     5,875,000   $  0.38  

- 34 -



Grandview Gold Inc.          
(An Exploration Stage Company)        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009      
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)        
         
10.

Stock Options (Continued)

The stock options have been expensed as follows:

                Expensed     Expensed     Remainder     Cumulative  
    Number of     Expensed at     at     at     to be     share-based  
    stock options     May 31, 2008     May 31, 2009     May 31, 2010     expensed     payment  
(1)   675,000   $ -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  800,100  
(1)   75,000     -     -     -     -     62,850  
(1)   150,000     -     -     -     -     97,050  
(1)   200,000     -     -     -     -     137,100  
(1)   150,000     -     -     -     -     117,150  
(1)   600,000     -     -     -     -     723,000  
(2)   500,000     -     -     -     -     255,500  
(2)   150,000     -     -     -     -     60,750  
(2)   500,000     -     -     -     -     365,000  
(2)   100,000     -     -     -     -     89,500  
(3)   2,000,000     1,162,525     -     -     -     1,162,525  
(3)   700,000     159,600     -     -     -     159,600  
(4)   3,350,000     -     -     368,500           368,500  
(4)   900,000     -     -     80,991           80,991  
    10,050,000   $  1,322,125   $  -   $  449,491   $  -   $  4,479,616  
   
(1)

The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 103.23% to 167.25%; risk-free interest rates - 3.44% to 4.15% and an expected average life of 2 to 5 years.

   
(2)

The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 92.11% to 131.00%; risk-free interest rates - 3.95% to 4.26% and an expected average life of 1 to 5 years.

   
(3)

The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 146.3% to 161.6%; risk-free interest rates - 2.65% to 4.20% and an expected average life of 2 to 5 years.

   
(4)

The values assigned were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield - 0%; expected volatility - 153% to 155%; risk-free interest rates - 2.47% to 2.55% and an expected average life of 5 years.

- 35 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
                               
10.

Stock Options (Continued)

                               
The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2009:  
                   
    Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
          Weighted                    
          average remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
    Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
  Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise price  
October 1, 2009   600,000     0.34 years   $  1.00     600,000   $  1.00  
December 20, 2009   75,000     0.56     1.10     75,000     1.10  
April 15, 2010   700,000     0.87     0.50     700,000     0.50  
January 6, 2011   150,000     1.60     1.25     150,000     1.25  
April 3, 2011   550,000     1.84     1.80     550,000     1.80  
October 31, 2011   500,000     2.42     1.00     500,000     1.00  
September 27, 2012   1,825,000     3.33     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
    4,400,000     2.13 years     0.90     4,400,000   $  0.90  
                               
The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2008:              
               
    Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
          Weighted                    
          average remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
    Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
  Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise price  
October 1, 2009   600,000     1.33 years   $  1.10     600,000   $  1.10  
December 20, 2009   75,000     1.55     1.00     75,000     1.00  
April 15, 2010   700,000     1.87     0.50     700,000     0.50  
January 6, 2011   150,000     2.60     1.80     150,000     1.80  
April 3, 2011   550,000     2.84     1.00     550,000     1.00  
October 31, 2011   500,000     3.42     1.00     500,000     1.00  
September 27, 2012   2,000,000     4.33     0.45     2,000,000     0.45  
    4,575,000     3.18 years   $  0.89     4,575,000   $  0.89  

- 36 -


                               
Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
11.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.

                   
    2010     2009     2008  
Numerator for basic loss per share $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 )
Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 ) $  (3,005,834 )
Denominator:                  
     Weighted average number of common shares - basic 58,224,647 40,379,322 33,985,825
     Weighted average number of common shares - diluted 58,224,647 40,379,322 33,985,825
Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.02 ) $  (0.20 ) $  (0.09 )

Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

- 37 -



 

Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                    
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                          
                               
   
12.

Income Taxes

Future income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary timing differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts for income tax purposes.

The future tax assets are as follows:

    2010     2009     2008  
Future tax assets                  
           Exploration expenditures $  1,588,778   $  1,842,983   $  199,715  
           Marketable securities   40,663     47,169     47,169  
           Capital losses   -     24,273     48,299  
           Non-capital losses   1,383,953     1,612,960     1,620,056  
           Share issue costs   75,790     175,303     266,499  
Total future tax assets   3,089,184     3,702,688     2,181,738  
Valuation allowance for future tax assets   (3,089,184 )   (3,702,688 )   (2,181,738 )
Net Future tax assets $  -   $  -   $  -  

The Company has provided a valuation allowance equal to the future tax assets because it is not presently more likely than not that they will be realized. The Company’s income tax (recovery) for each of the years ended is made up as follows:

    2010     2009     2008  
Current income tax recovery $  -   $  -   $  -  
Future income tax recovery   -     (120,833 )   (260,255 )
Total income tax recovery $  -   $  (120,833 ) $  (260,255 )

- 38 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                   
   
12.

Income Taxes

   
The Company’s actual income tax expense for each of the years ended is made up as follows:  
   
      2010     2009     2008  
Loss before income taxes   $  (880,403 )   (8,008,751 )   (3,266,089 )
Income tax recovery at combined Federal and Provincial rates of 32.58%, 33.29% and 35.03%     (286,835 )   (2,666,113 )   (1,144,111 )
Non-deductible stock-based compensation     146,444     -     -  
Non-deductible expenses     56     146     2,818  
Non-deductible write-down of mineral properties     -     2,483,585     185,090  
Expiry of warrants     286,143     330,573     -  
Share-based payments     -     -     463,140  
Cost of issue     (110,030 )   (120,610 )   (123,563 )
Potential income tax recovery not recognized     -     -     616,626  
Utilization of losses not previously recognized     (35,778 )   (27,581 )   -  
Resource properties – expenditures renounced     -     (120,833 )   (260,255 )
Income tax recovery   $  -   $  (120,833 ) $  (260,255 )
                     
At May 31, 2010, the Company has non-capital losses of approximately $5,535,000. No benefit from these amounts has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements.  
   
 The non capital losses will expire as follows:  
                     
2015               $  724,000  
2026                 1,366,000  
2027                 1,685,000  
2028                 1,760,000  
                $  5,535,000  
   
13.

Segmented Information

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2009 - same and 2008 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

The Company operates in three geographic segments for the year ended May 31, 2010, and two segments for years ended May 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company's assets by geographic location are:


- 39 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                   
                   
    2010     2009     2008  
Canada $  5,372,915   $  3,999,201   $  5,993,796  
United States of America   -     -     5,679,340  
Peru   287,708     -     -  
Total assets $  5,660,623   $  3,999,201   $  11,673,136  

- 40 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
   
14.

Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

   
i)

For year ended May 31, 2010, $10,000 (2009 - $35,000, 2008 - $66,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

   
ii)

For year ended May 31, 2010, $150,000 (2009 - $150,010, 2008 - $150,000) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $90,250 (2009 - $62,250, 2008 - $150,000) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $nil (2009 - $14,000, 2008 - $24,000) in car and office allowances and $nil (2009 - $607, 2008 - $1,765) were paid.

   
iii)

For year ended May 31, 2010, $39,000 (2009 - $51,794, 2008 - $76,974) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer or a company controlled by the Chief Financial Officer. Included in accounts payable as at May 31, 2010 is $6,000 in relation to consulting services rendered.

   
iv)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The loan was unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

   

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

   

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2010 consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure" effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," (codified within Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718) which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

   

For the years ended ended May 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the years ended May 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010, while under US GAAP, exploration costs (except for property purchase costs) cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

- 41 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments were carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for-sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 12 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010). US GAAP requires the recognition of a deferred tax liability in the difference between the fair value of common shares and the amount received upon issuance of flow-through shares. The deferred income tax liability is relieved at the time the expenditures are renounced. No flow-through shares were issued during the current fiscal year.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

- 42 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:

             
    May 31, 2010     May 31, 2009  
Assets            
Current assets            
Cash $  1,432,824   $  106,593  
Short term investments   25,037     407,493  
GST and sundry receivable   29,179     5,707  
Prepaid expenses   12,876     12,283  
Due from a related party   -     12,803  
    1,500,456     544,879  
Reclamation bond   13,699     14,332  
Mineral property rights   712,101     512,906  
  $  2,226,256   $  1,072,117  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
Accounts payable $  7,835   $  9,017  
Accrued liabilities   81,449     63,450  
    89,284     72,467  
Assets retirement obligation   13,699     14,332  
    102,983     86,799  
Shareholders' Equity            
Share capital            
Authorized - unlimited common shares            
Issued            
           Common shares   16,757,873     16,106,390  
           Additional paid in capital   4,390,914     3,217,776  
           Warrants   1,455,333     1,203,804  
           Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
           Deferred share-based payments   4,591,091     4,141,600  
           Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration            
           stage company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
           Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (21,612,690 )   (20,225,004 )
    2,123,273     985,318  
  $ 2,226,256   $  1,072,117  

- 43 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration of mineral properties as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

                      Cumulative  
                      from date  
          Year ended May 31,     of inception  
    2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004" )
Expenses                        
General exploration $  512,783   $  534,317   $  3,299,979   $  9,804,129  
Management services   548,241     267,497     1,401,414     5,774,602  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   115,352     88,716     832,962     2,062,413  
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Professional fees   142,354     167,672     322,033     1,365,998  
Office and administration   69,107     21,579     196,503     738,245  
Flow-through interest expense   -     2,747     44,688     188,801  
Gain on forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
Failed merger costs   -     -     -     170,000  
Loss before the under noted   (1,387,837 )   (1,082,528 )   (6,097,579 )   (20,069,756 )
Interest income   151     10,306     72,183     104,322  
Write-off mineral property rights   -     (1,514,756 )   (132,500 )   (1,647,256 )
Net loss for the period   (1,387,686 )   (2,586,978 )   (6,157,896 )   (21,612,690 )
Comprehensive (loss) items:                        
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     (25,000 )
Comprehensive loss for the period $ (1,387,686 ) $  (2,586,978 ) $  (6,157,896 ) $ (21,637,690 )
                         
Loss per common share                        
Basic $  (0.02 ) $  (0.06 ) $  (0.18 )      
Diluted $  (0.02 ) $  (0.06 ) $  (0.18 )      
                         
Comprehensive loss per common share
Basic $  (0.02 ) $  (0.06 ) $  (0.29 )      
Diluted $  (0.02 ) $  (0.06 ) $  (0.29 )      

- 44 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP are disclosed below:

          Amount  
          Under  
Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
Common shares before change to an exploration stage company and            
as of March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
Private placement   120,000     120,000  
Private placement   150,000     150,000  
Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
Private placement   175,000     175,000  
Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
Cost of issue – warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
 Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
 Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
 Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
 Private placement   590,320     737,900  
 Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
 Shares issued for a finders’ fee   160,000     200,000  
 Private placement   400,000     500,000  
 Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
 Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
 Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
 Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
 Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
 Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
 Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
 Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
 Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
 Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
 Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
 Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
 Cost of issue – finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
 Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 45 -


                     
Grandview Gold Inc.                    
(An Exploration Stage Company)                    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                    
                     
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

          Amount Under  
Common Shares (continued   Shares     US GAAP  
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
Private placements   11,169,000     4,950,150  
Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
Cost of issue – cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
 Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
 Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
 Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
 Cost of issue – cash   -     (47,833 )
 Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
 Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
 Private placement   26,666,665     2,000,000  
 Cost of issue – cash   -     (36,392 )
 Mineral property acquisition   750,000     67,000  
 Debt conversion   360,937     28,875  
 Exercise of warrants – valuation   -     15,333  
 Exercise of warrants – cash   333,333     16,667  
 Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
 Balance, May 31, 2010   72,763,033   $  16,757,873  

Other changes in shareholders’ equity are presented as follows:

Additional Paid in Capital      
Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005 $  25,000  
Expired warrants   173,388  
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  198,388  
Expired warrants   449,956  
Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 $  648,344  
Expired warrants   2,569,432  
Balance, May 31, 2009   3,217,776  
Expired warrants   1,173,138  
Balance, May 31, 2010 $  4,390,914  

- 46 -



Grandview Gold Inc.      
(An Exploration Stage Company)      
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements      
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009      
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)      
       
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       
Warrants      
 Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
 Issued   173,388  
 Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
 Issued   2,086,995  
 Expired   (173,388 )
 Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
 Issued   974,575  
 Expired   (449,956 )
 Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
 Issued   1,167,629  
 Expired   (36,673 )
 Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
 Issued   (2,569,432 )
 Expired   30,666  
 Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
 Issued   1,440,000  
 Expired   (1,173,138 )
 Exercised   (15,333 )
 Balance, May 31, 2010 $  1,455,333  
       
 Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities      
 Balance June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
 Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
 Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
 Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
 Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
 Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
 Balance, March 26, 2004   (300,305 )
 Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
 Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006   (315,539 )
 Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
 Balance, May 31, 2007   (325,305 )
 Comprehensive loss items   -  
 Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 $  (325,305 )

- 47 -



Grandview Gold Inc.  
(An Exploration Stage Company)  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)  
 
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Deferred share-based payments  
 Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
 Vesting of stock options 775,613
 Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
 Vesting of stock options 573,700
 Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
 Vesting of stock options 1,358,687
 Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
 Vesting of stock options 1,433,600
 Balance, May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2009 $  4,141,600  
 Vesting of stock options   449,491  
 Balance, May 31, 2010 $  4,591,091  
       

- 48 -


Grandview Gold Inc.  
(An Exploration Stage Company)  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)  
 
       
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       
 Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage      
 Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
 Net Loss   4,678  
 Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
 Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
 Net Loss   (1,743,463 )
 Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
 Net Loss   (3,673,388 )
 Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
 Net Loss   (6,052,723 )
 Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
 Net Loss   (6,157,896 )
 Balance, May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
 Net Loss   (2,586,978 )
 Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
 Net Loss   (1,387,686 )
 Balance, May 31, 2010 $  (21,612,690 )

- 49 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                        
(An Exploration Stage Company)                        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
                         
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

  The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:        
Statements of Cash Flows
        Cumulative
         from date
    Year ended May 31,   of inception
  2010 2009 2008 ("March 26, 2004" )  
Cash flows from operating activities                
Net loss for the period $  (1,387,686 ) $  (2,586,978 ) $  (6,157,896 ) $  (21,612,690 )
Items not involving cash:                        
Forgiveness of debt 28,875 - - (6,792 )
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Share-based payments 449,491 - 1,322,125 4,479,616
Accrued interest income   (537 )   (10,296 )   (48,706 )   (59,539 )
Write-off of mineral property rights - 1,514,756 132,500 1,647,256
Change in non-cash operating working activities:                
GST and sundry receivable (23,512 ) 34,957 181,267 (34,399 )
Prepaid expenses   (593 )   137,883     8,526     (7,206 )
Due from a related party 12,803 92,296 - 15,099
Accounts payable   (1,182 )   (64,509 )   (222,129 )   78,854  
Accrued liabilities 17,999 18,450 (76,119 ) 17,161
Cash flows used in operating activities   (904,342 )   (863,441 )   (4,860,432 )   (15,481,405 )
Cash flows from financing activities        
Repayment of loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance 2,016,667 416,666 5,016,694 20,068,877
Cost of issue   (36,392 )   (47,833 )   (488,720 )   (1,812,701 )
Proceeds from loan - - 175,000
Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
Cash flows provided by financing activities 1,980,275 368,833 4,527,974 18,327,582
Cash flows from investing activities                        
Purchase of reclamation bond - - (13,090 ) (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   382,493     611,410     (975,000 )   18,903  
Exploration advances - - 312,491 -
Purchase of mineral property rights   (132,195 )   (95,065 )   (206,364 )   (1,419,167 )
Cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities 250,298 516,345 (881,963 ) (1,413,354 )
Change in cash during the period   1,326,231     21,737     (1,214,421   1,432,823  
Cash, beginning of period 106,593 84,856 1,299,277   1
Cash, end of period $  1,432,824   $  106,593   $  84,856   $  1,432,824  

- 50 -




Grandview Gold Inc.                        
(An Exploration Stage Company)                        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
                         
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

                   
Statements of Cash Flows (continued)                        
                      Cumulative  
                      from date  
          Year ended May 31,     of inception  
    2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004" )
Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions                
Share issuance included in mining interest $  67,000   $  10,800   $  45,800   $  630,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments including mining interest $  -   $  -   $  111,475   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  23,477   $  45,159  

US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Prior Years

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143" (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that conditional asset retirement obligations meet the definition of liabilities and should be recognized when incurred if their fair values can be reasonably estimated. The Company was required to adopt FIN 47 during the year ended May 31, 2007; the implementation did not have any effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements as the Company does not yet have significant assets which the Company is obligated to retire.

In March 2005, the FASB ratified a consensus reached by the EITF on the issue No. 04-6 entitled "Accounting for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry". This Consensus affects the accounting for costs of removing overburden and waste materials during the production phase of a mine. The consensus requires that stripping costs are to be accounted for as variable production costs and charged to operations during the period that the stripping costs are incurred. This consensus is required to be adopted in the fiscal year ending May 31, 2007. This consensus has no effect on the consolidated financial statements since the Company is not yet in the production phase.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections", effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, has been introduced and requires, unless impracticable, retroactive application as the required method for reporting changes in accounting principles in the absence of transitional provisions specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. The adoption of this accounting principle had no effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No.48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The provisions of FIN 48 are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption, with the cumulative effect adjustment reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The adoption of this standard did not have any material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

- 51 -


                         
Grandview Gold Inc.                        
(An Exploration Stage Company)                        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Prior Years (Continued)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"), which provides a consistent definition of fair value that focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. SFAS No. 157 requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 were applied prospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on April 1, 2008. The adoption of this standard did not have any effect on the Company's overall financial condition and results of operations.

SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are described below:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, but do not qualify as Level 1 inputs (i.e., quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities).
Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

As at May 31, 2010, the Company had short term investments totalling $25,037 which are classified as held for trading and measured as level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159 "Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". Statement 159 became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This expands the use of fair value measurement for accounting for financial instruments. The adoption of this standard has not had any material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles". (Superseded by SFAS 168) This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used when preparing financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement was effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles". The adoption of this statement did not have any material impact on the financial and results of operation of the Company.

- 52 -


                         
Grandview Gold Inc.                        
(An Exploration Stage Company)                        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, "Subsequent Events" (ASC Subtopic 855-10) which establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. This Statement sets forth (a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (b) the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (c) the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement shall be applied to the accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. This Statement is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and has been applied prospectively. The adoption of this standard has not had any material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 provides guidance on determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-05 concludes, among other matters, that warrants and options issued by an entity with an exercise price that is different from the entity’s functional currency cannot be classified as equity. EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of EITF 07-05 did not have any material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations" (codified in ASC 805), which retained the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting. However, SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects.

SFAS No. 141(R) requires that: (1) for all business combinations, the acquirer records all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values; (2) certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at their fair values on the acquisition date; (3) contingent consideration be recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings until settled; (4) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included in the amount recorded for assets acquired; (5) in step acquisitions, previous equity interests in an acquiree held prior to obtained control be remeasured to their acquisition-date fair values, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings; and (6) when making adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies revise any previously issued post-acquisition financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if they had been recorded on the acquisition date.

SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of this statement should also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). This standard will be applied to all future business combinations for US GAAP purposes.

- 53 -


                         
Grandview Gold Inc.                        
(An Exploration Stage Company)                        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year (Continued)

In April 2009, FASB amended accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The amended standard, ASC 820, addresses issues related to the determination of fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased, and identifying transactions that are not orderly. The revisions affirm the objective that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction (that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions, even if the market is inactive. The amendment provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased significantly. It also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. If determined that a quoted price is distressed (not orderly), and thereby not representative of fair value, the entity may need to make adjustments to the quoted price or utilize an alternative valuation technique (e.g., income approach or multiple valuation techniques) to determine fair value. Additionally, an entity must incorporate appropriate risk premium adjustments, reflective of an orderly transaction under current market conditions due to uncertainty in cash flows. The revised guidance requires disclosures in interim and annual periods regarding the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques and related inputs, if any, during the period. The changes are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and are to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, FASB revised accounting standards for Financial Instruments. The revised standard, ASC 825, requires fair value disclosures in the notes of an entity’s interim financial statements for all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the statement of financial position. This revision became effective for the interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009 FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the "codification") and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles", ("SFAS No. 168") "-- a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS No. 168 is the new source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. This statement was incorporated into ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles under the new FASB codification which became effective on July 1, 2009. The new Codification supersedes all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. ASC 105, culminated a multi-year project to replace the previous GAAP hierarchy and established Accounting Standard Codification. The Codification is not expected to change US GAAP, but combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. Following this guidance, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates ("ASU") to update the Codification. After the launch of the Codification on July 1, 2009, only one level of authoritative US GAAP for non-governmental entities exists, other than guidance issued by the SEC. This statement is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this new standard only had the effect of amending references to authoritative accounting guidance in the Company’s financial statements.

- 54 -


                         
Grandview Gold Inc.                        
(An Exploration Stage Company)                        
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements              
For the Years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009                    
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                        
   
15.

Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year (Continued)

In June 2009, the ASC guidance for consolidation accounting was updated to require an entity to perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest gives it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity ("VIE"). This analysis identifies a primary beneficiary of a VIE as the entity that has both of the following characteristics: i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The updated guidance also requires ongoing reassessments of the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The provisions of the updated guidance are effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning June 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05 Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, in regard to the fair value measurement of liabilities. FASB ASC 820 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price for an identical liability in an active market is not available, a reporting entity shall utilize one or more of the following techniques: (i) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, (ii) the quoted price for a similar liability or for a similar liability when traded as an asset, or (iii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC 820. In all instances a reporting entity shall utilize the approach that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Also, when measuring the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity shall not include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The adoption of this new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which is included in the ASC Topic 820 (Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures on the amount and reason for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 also requires disclosures of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and a settlement within Level 3 fair value measurements and clarifies existing disclosure requirements on levels of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of ASU 2010-06 and does not expect that it will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, "Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements". The amendment eliminates the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This standard had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by FASB which are not yet effective. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the Company. Management does not believe any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material impact on the Company's financial position or operating results.

- 55 -


EX-99.50 51 exhibit99-50.htm EXHIBIT 99.50 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.50 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.50

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
YEAR ENDED MAY31, 2010

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the year ended May 31, 2010 (“2010”) and its financial position as at May 31, 2010. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2010. Selected information is also presented for the three-month period ended May 31, 2010 (“fourth quarter 2010”). The comparative reporting periods are the year ended May 31, 2009 (“2009”), the year ended May 31, 2008 (“2008”) and the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 (“fourth quarter 2009”).

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 15 to the audited annual consolidated financial statements for 2010.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

This MD&A was prepared on August 27, 2010.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in Peru and the provinces of Ontario and Manitoba in Canada.

Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Activities during fiscal 2010

During fiscal 2010, the Company continued with pre-development and other fieldwork activities at its Giulianita property in Peru. The Company also met extensively with the local community to gain the necessary approvals and community involvement for the project.

Management and the Board believe that the financing of the Giulianita project in Peru is aligned with the enhanced corporate strategy of aggressively pursuing potential cash-flow opportunities and that such small-scale mining opportunities represent an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate its own exploration funds.

On April 28, 2010, the Company to announced that, through a series of cash and share payments, it had:

  • acquired the remaining 40% interest in its Sanshaw-Bonanza property (the “Property”) in the Red Lake Gold District of Ontario from EMCO Corporation S.A. ("EMCO");
  • acquired four additional claims which are contiguous to the Property from Perry English ("English"); and
  • reduced the existing NSR on the Property, so that the Company now holds a 100% interest in and to the Property, subject only to an NSR of just 0.375%.
  • Grandview had previously completed expenditure requirements to earn a 60% interest in the Property as per an option agreement with EMCO dated February 7, 2007. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Property, the Company paid EMCO $25,000 CAD in cash and issued 50,000 common shares in its capital. Also, the Company expanded the Property parcel by acquiring two unpatented claims and two patented claims for aggregate consideration of $60,000 CAD in cash and the issuance of 500,000 common shares in its capital. Concurrently, the Company also purchased 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR on the Property for $25,000 CAD cash.

Cumulative expenditures related to the transaction totalled $110,000 CAD cash and the issuance of 550,000 common shares of the Company.

Private Placement

On December 8, 2009, the Company closed a private placement purchase agreement with Centerpoint Resources Inc. (“Centerpoint”), resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $1.5 million, to fund the exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru, and for the purpose of maintaining Canadian operations. The purchase agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview, comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue.

In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview, resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of approximately $0.5 million.

2


Properties and Projects

The Company did not engage in any substantial level of exploration activity during 2010.

Giulianita Property, Peru

The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion, has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,000 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

Efforts focused on negotiations with various communities for surface access rights to the project area and working with local community groups, government groups and consulting engineering groups in advance of surface exploration work.

During the fourth quarter 2010 and fiscal 2010, the Company spent $102,278 and $275,804 respectively on preliminary exploration and fieldwork and property acquisition costs, compared with $Nil for the fourth quarter 2009 and $Nil for both 2009 and 2008.

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

April 28, 2010 Grandview acquired the final 40% interest in ten (10) unpatented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”) from joint venture partner EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and eliminated all net smelter royalties previously due to EMCO under the terms of the original agreement. The Company negotiated the acquisition of two additional unpatented mining claims and two patented mining claims, and reduced the net smelter royalty on the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property to 0.375% as part of an overall property position.

During fiscal 2010 the Company received its assays for the 2009 diamond drilling program at its Dixie Lake Property and its findings indicated continuity between gold zones 88-4 and 88-4 Extension, and the existence of additional priority targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone.

The drill program was designed to test mineralization intersected from previous drilling, specifically, extensions to and infill of, the 88-4 Zone, continuity between the 88-4 Zone and the 88-4 extension, and the more recently discovered NS Zone. The Dixie Lake Property, located just 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine is considered highly prospective for high-grade, narrow vein gold typical of the Red Lake gold district.

The Company’s objectives were to more narrowly define its Dixie Lake targets, target additional gold on the NS Zone, and determine continuity of mineralized zones like 88-4, which previously assayed 3.147 g/T Au over 9.94 metres from 67.9 to 77.85 metres, and 6.89 g/T over 4.68 metres from 124.36 to 129.05.

3


On the so-called 88-4 ‘Extension’, which the Company now believes contiguous, previous assays include 5.85 g/T au over 4.5 metres from 181.7 to 186.2 metres. The zone correlates with the deeper mineralization intersected in DC-01-07, 1.56 g/T Au over 13.13 metres, and indicates that mineralization within the extension of the 88-4 Zone is continuous vertically.

Significant Results: Dixie Lake NS Zone, NS Zone, 88-4 Zone & 88-4 extension

Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T Comments
DL-09-01 138.1 138.6 0.5 16.32 NS Zone
DL-09-02 135.6 138.0 2.4 1.99 NS Zone quartz vein
DL-09-02 148.2 149.6 2.3 2.85 NS Zone quartz vein
DL-09-03 26.1 30.5 4.4 2.17 88-4 East end
Including 29.5 30.5 1.0 4.79  
DL-09-03 178.8 180.2 1.4 5.35 Quartz vein, NS Zone at depth?
DL-09-05 91.2 99.3 8.1 2.08 88-4 Zone
Including 96.6 97.7 1.1 3.58  
Including 97.6 99.3 1.7 2.28  
DL-09-06 228.4 233.6 5.2 2.01 Between 88-4 & 88-4 Extension
Including 230.3 231.8 1.5 3.52  

In general, gold intersections returned from the drilling reflected successful intersections of the high-grade quartz vein set in the NS Zone. Holes DL-09-01, and DL-09-02 intersected auriferous massive quartz veining is considered similar to intersects from previous drill programs (2007-2008). The Company believes that results indicate continuity of the vein set.

The Company believes that the same quartz vein set was also intersected in DDH DL-09-03, collared some 60 metres north west. Based on a west north-west strike & sub-vertical dip to the vein set, the massive quartz veining intersected therein would be intersected at the depth recorded from drilling (c. 180 metres) and the Company therefore concludes that the potential for additional gold would increase significantly upon additional drilling.

The gold mineralization on 88-4 Zone and the NS Zone remain open at depth, both down-dip and down-plunge. Additional targets outside of the historic 88-4 Zone are indicated by highly anomalous precious & base metal values (Cu-Zn-Ni), obtained from past geochemical sampling, associated with the emplacement of an intrusion East of the historic drilling. These have not been drill tested & are considered priority targets.

The Company is very pleased by the results of the 2009 program and believes that previous core results coupled with the latest assays suggest that the NS Zone has greater continuity and that this target represents the more typical, high-grade, narrow vein gold system associated with producing Red Lake gold district mines.

4


Exploration costs of $162,930 were incurred during the fourth quarter 2010 on the Red Lake Properties (fourth quarter 2009: $8,249). Exploration costs of $431,174 were incurred during 2010. Exploration costs of $166,822 and $1,744,811 respectively were incurred during 2009 and 2008 on the Red Lake Properties. Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to May 31, 2010 were $3,873,967.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in three (3) unpatented mining claims, one patented claim and one mineral lease located near Bissett, Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

At the end of fiscal 2009, the Company wrote offthe total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred on these properties of $1,557,112 (2010: $Nil, 2008: $Nil).

Pony Creek / Elliot Dome Properties in the State of Nevada, USA

In May 2009 the Company announced that it had ceased all operations at the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome project in Nevada and returned the project to Mill City Gold Inc. pursuant to the underlying agreements. At the end of fiscal 2009, and as a result of cessation of operations at the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome during 2009, the Company wrote off the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred on these properties of $5,903,342 (2010: $Nil, 2008: $Nil).

Results of Operations

Fourth quarter 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $106,941 for the fourth quarter 2010, compared with $6,063,504 for the fourth quarter 2009. The variance over the corresponding period last year is related to write-offs of capitalized expenditures related to the Company’s Rice Lake and Pony Creek/Elliot Dome properties of $87,443 and $5,903,342 respectively.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the fourth quarter 2010 of $76,904 compares with $70,035 for the fourth quarter 2009. The reason for the variance is attributable predominantly to diminished operational activities compared to the comparative quarter.

Fiscal 2010

Grandview incurred a net loss of $880,403 for 2010, compared with $7,887,918 for 2009 and $3,005,834 for 2008. The loss recorded during fiscal 2009 compared with 2010 and 2008 is attributable to write-off of capitalized development costs related to the Company’s Rice Lake and Pony Creek/Elliot Dome properties during 2009 of $1,557,112 and $5,903,342 respectively.

Cash flows used in operating activities of $396,559 for 2010 compares with $349,009 for 2009 and $1,560,453 for 2008. The level of corporate and operational activity was more significant during 2008, while 2009 and 2010 has seen low levels of exploration fieldwork and other corporate activities.

5


SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.




Fourth
Quarter
May 31,
2010
Third
Quarter
Feb. 28,
2010
Second
Quarter
Nov. 30,
2009
First
Quarter
Aug. 31,
2009
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 135,455 176,465 107,809 460,325
Net loss (106,941) (202,743) (107,679) (463,040)
Net loss per share (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01)
Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (76,904) (373,500) 119,243 (65,398)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,457,861 1,754,330 232,744 324,654
Assets 5,660,623 5,698,180 4,093,313 3,934,256




Fourth
Quarter
May 31,
2009
Third
Quarter
Feb. 28,
2009
Second
Quarter
Nov. 30,
2008
First
Quarter
Aug. 31,
2008
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 74,970 243,077 98,801 138,952
Net income (loss) (6,063,504) (1,589,709) (96,316) (138,389)
Net income (loss) per share (0.16) (0.04) (0.00) (0.00)
Cash flows used in operating activities (70,034) (112,647) (125,485) (40,843)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 514,086 694,958 479,071 735,523
Assets 3,999,201 10,094,150 11,369,813 11,645,288

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Grandview’s working capital on May31, 2010 was $1,407,869, compared with $469,609 on May 31, 2009. The cash and short-term investment balance on May 31, 2010 was $1,432,824 and $25,037 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2009 of $106,593 and $407,493 respectively.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities and continues to incur net losses. The Company secured additional financing for aggregate proceeds to the Company’s treasury of $2 million (refer to Private Placement above). As mentioned, the Company will utilize these proceeds for developing its Giulianita project, its Canadian projects, specifically Red Lake, and for other corporate purposes.

333,333 warrants were exercised during 2010, for proceeds of $16,667.

6,053,480 warrants expired during the 2010, resulting in a charge to contributed surplus of $1,173,138.

As a result of its private placement transaction completed on December 8, 2009, the Company issued 26,666,665 common shares of the Company and 26,666,665 full warrants.

6


4,250,000 stock options were issued during 2010. The estimated fair market value of these options, and expensed during 2010, was $449,491.

On January 7, 2010, the Company issued 360,937 common shares at a price of $0.08 to settle a debt of $28,875 in respect of services rendered by a consultant to the Company.

On January 20, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to Miguel Saldana related to the Guilianita Project in Peru.

On April 28, 2010, the Company issued 550,000 shares to EMCO Corporation S.A. to acquire the remaining 40% interest in its Sanshaw-Bonanza properties (see “Activities during fiscal 2010 above”).

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at August27, 2010 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of May 31, 2010 and August 27, 2010, the Company had outstanding 72,763,033 common shares, 26,999,998 warrants and 5,875,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For 2010, $10,000 (2009: $35,000, 2008: $66,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

For 2010, $150,000 (2009: $150,010, 2008: $150,000) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $90,250 (2009: $62,250, 2008: $150,000) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $Nil (2009: $14,000, 2008: $24,000) in car and office allowances and $Nil (2009: $607, 2008: $1,765) were paid.

For 2010, $39,000 (2009: $51,794, 2008: $76,974) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer or a company controlled by the Chief Financial officer. Included in accounts payable as at May 31, 2010 is $6,000 in relation to consulting services rendered.

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The remaining balance of the loan is $10,000. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and is due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

7


PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

8


The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at May 31, 2010 of $13,699, compared with $14,332 as at May 31, 2009.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada. A summary of the differences between Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") which affect the Company is contained in Note 15 to the audited consolidated financial statements for 2010.

Basis of consolidation

The audited consolidated financial statements for 2010 include the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. ("Grandview USA") and Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C (“Recuperacion”). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination of the recoverability of mining interest costs, the asset retirement obligation, the valuation allowance of future tax asset, the calculation of stock-based compensation expense and warrants. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

9


Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and balances with banks with original maturities of three months or less and which are readily convertible into cash.

Mineral property costs

Direct exploration and development costs are deferred in the accounts, net of amounts recovered from third parties, including receipts from options. At production, these costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method based on estimated reserves. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written-off when the decision to abandon is made, or earlier if a determination is made that the property does not have economically recoverable reserves. The recorded book value of the Company's mineral properties in North America is not intended to reflect the present or future value of the gold projects.

The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its properties in North and South America. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. If after there view, it is determined that the carrying amount of a mining interest is impaired, that mining interest is written-down to its estimated net realizable value. A mining interest is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The amounts shown for mining properties do not necessarily represent present or future values. Their recoverability is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof.

Flow-through financing

The Company has financed a portion of its exploration activities through the issue of flow-through shares in the past, which transfer the tax deductibility of exploration expenditures to the investor. Proceeds received on the issue of such shares have been credited to share capital and the related exploration costs have been charged to mineral properties. Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration and development activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with income tax legislation. When these expenditures are renounced, temporary taxable differences created by the renunciations reduce share capital.

Short term investments

Short term investments comprise investments in guaranteed investment certificate due to mature within one year from the date of purchase and are classified as "held-for-trading" and have been recorded at fair value.

Asset retirement obligations

Section 3110 of the CICA Handbook requires the recognition of a liability for obligations relating to the retirement of property, plant and equipment and obligations arising from acquisition, construction, development or normal operations of those assets. The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") in the year in which a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

10


Income taxes

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method of tax accounting. Under this method, current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable for the current period. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and on unclaimed losses carried forward and are measured using the substantially enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse or losses are expected to be utilized. Future tax assets are recorded to recognize tax benefits only to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not they will be realized.

Stock-based compensation

The fair value of the stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management's assumptions as disclosed in Note 10 to the annual audited consolidated financial statements and recorded as stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the stock-options, with the offsetting credit recorded as an increase in contributed surplus. If the stock options are exercised, the proceeds are credited to share capital and the fair value at the date of grant is reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital.

Revenue recognition

Gains and losses on sale of marketable securities and properties are recognized when realized. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis.

Share issue costs and reorganization costs

Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital. Reorganization costs are charged to deficit.

Translation of foreign currencies

Foreign currency accounts are translated into Canadian dollars as follows:

At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue or expense is translated into Canadian dollars by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the year end date, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars by using the exchange rate in effect at that date and the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations in the current period.

Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In February 2008, the CICA approved Handbook Section 3064, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” which replaces the existing Handbook Sections 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and 3450 “Research and Development Costs”. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The standard provides guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on its consolidated financial statements.

11


Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

Financial Instruments

During 2009, CICA Handbook Section 3862, Financial Instruments - Disclosures ("Section 3862") was amended to require disclosure about the inputs to fair value measurements, including their classification within a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

  • Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
  • Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, and;
  • Level 3 - Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

This amendment is effective for the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ending May 31,2010. The adoption of this amendment will have no impact on the Company's operating results or financial position.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

12


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of May 31, 2010, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of May 31, 2010, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during 2010 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The CICA announced that publicly accountable enterprises would be required to transition from GAAP to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), effective January 1, 2011. This mandate is first applicable to interim reporting periods during 2011 and also requires the presentation of comparative financial information for 2010. For this reason, the effective conversion for the Company’s reporting purposes is June 1, 2009, even though full disclosure under IFRS will first be required during 2011.

The Company established an IFRS plan and has tasked a service provider and a professional service firm with developing the transitional reporting under IFRS. The plan calls for four phases, being the scoping and planning phase, the assessment phase, the implementation phase and post-implementation.

The scoping and planning phase involves establishing a project team and organizational structure, including oversight of the process and includes a project plan, stakeholder analysis and communication plan. This phase also entails an initial assessment of the key areas where IFRS transition may have a significant impacts. During the year the Company will prepare an initial diagnostic of the key areas in which adjustments are expected, incorporating an analysis of the transition exceptions and exemptions available under IFRS 1 “First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, as well as an assessment of the accounting policy choices available to the Company upon adoption.

The assessment phase will involve technical analysis that will result in understanding potential impacts, quantification of alternatives where there are accounting policy choices, detailed analysis and decisions taken regarding IFRS 1 exemptions and exceptions available to the Company and the drafting of accounting policies in accordance with IFRS. In addition this will result in identifying resource and training requirements, processes for preparing financial statements, and establishing IT system requirements. The Company intends to disclose its progress in accomplishing this phase in its Management Discussion and Analysis documents during 2010.

During the implementation phase, the Company will apply management’s accounting choices, develop sample financial statements, implement business and internal control requirements, calculate the opening balance sheet at June 1, 2009 and other transitional reconciliations and disclosure requirements. The last phase, post-implementation, will involve continuous monitoring of changes in IFRS maintaining IFRS competencies through training and development.

Progress on IFRS Transition Plan

The progress to date may be summarized as follows:

Scoping and planning phase – complete.

Assessment phase – substantially complete, expected to be completed by third quarter 2010.

13


Implementation phase – in progress, expected to completed by fourth quarter 2010.

Post-implementation – Beginning 2011 and thereafter.

To date, the Company’s evaluation of potential changes to accounting policies in key areas are summarized below. The list is in no way intended to represent a complete list of areas where adoption of IFRS will require a change in accounting policies, but does highlight the most significant areas identified to date. Changes and ongoing developments regarding IFRS as developed by the International Accounting Standards Board may have an effect on the changes required to the Company’s accounting policies on adoption of IFRS, but is not anticipated that such changes would require substantial changes to the summary presented below.

First-time Adoption of IFRS

The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS 1”), which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS, effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

The Company has identified the following optional exemptions that it expects to apply in its preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at June 1, 2009:

  • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.
  • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.
  • To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the transition date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the transition date.
  • To apply the transition provisions of IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease, therefore determining if arrangements existing at the transition date contain a lease based on the circumstances existing at that date.
  • To apply IAS 23 Borrowing Costs prospectively from the transition date. IAS 23 requires the capitalization of borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, production or construction of certain assets.

Prior to reporting interim financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the quarter ending August 31, 2010, the Company may decide to apply other optional exemptions contained in IFRS 1. IFRS 1 does not permit changes to estimates that have been made previously. Accordingly, estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s opening IFRS statement of financial position as at the transition date will be consistent with those made under current Canadian GAAP. If necessary, estimates will be adjusted to reflect any difference in accounting policy.

Impact of Adopting IFRS on the Company’s Business

Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

Subject to certain conditions, IFRS currently allows an entity to determine an accounting policy that specifies the treatment of costs related to the exploration for and evaluation of mineral properties. The Company expects to establish an accounting policy to expense, as incurred, all costs relating to

14


exploration and evaluation until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

The application of this policy on the adoption of IFRS will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements to the extent that the value of mineral properties remain unproven. On adoption of IFRS, the carrying value of the unproven mineral properties will be reduced to zero (at the transition date), with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated deficit. All subsequent exploration and evaluation costs will be expensed as incurred until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

Impairment of (Non-financial) Assets

IFRS requires a write down of assets if the higher of the fair market value and the value in use of a group of assets is less than its carrying value. Value in use is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows. Current Canadian GAAP requires a write down to estimated fair value only if the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of a group of assets are less than its carrying value. The Company's accounting policies related to impairment of non-financial assets will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect that this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets. The Company will perform impairment assessments in accordance with IFRS at the transition date.

Share-based Payments

In certain circumstances, IFRS requires a different measurement of stock-based compensation related to stock options than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to share-based payments that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

Asset Retirement Obligations (Decommissioning Liabilities)

IFRS requires the recognition of a decommissioning liability for legal or constructive obligations, while current Canadian GAAP only requires the recognition of such liabilities for legal obligations. A constructive obligation exists when an entity has created reasonable expectations that it will take certain actions. The Company's accounting policies related to decommissioning liabilities will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets.

Property and Equipment

IFRS contains different guidance related to recognition and measurement of property and equipment than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to property and equipment that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

In certain circumstances, IFRS contains different requirements related to recognition and measurement of future (deferred) income taxes. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to income taxes that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

OUTLOOK

During Fiscal 2010 the company focused efforts on at its Giulianita project in Peru and maintaining its land position in good standing at other project areas. At Sanshaw-Bonanza the Company was able to consolidate and increase it property holdings and reduced the overall net smelter royalty on the property that we believe increases the value of the project significantly. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario. The Company also has been evaluating a number of mining projects in Peru as part of the small mines development strategy that was implemented in 2009.

15


The Company strategy is to explore for, acquire and develop high grade, small output (15,000 to 35,000 ounce per year) mines and develop low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad, in particular Peru. In this regard, the Company is proceeding to develop its Giulianita project in Peru and will be the focus of the Company’s activity over the next 12 months. The Company will also aggressively pursue additional exploration/mining opportunities that fit the designated profile.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2010, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion and in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

16


EX-99.51 52 exhibit99-51.htm EXHIBIT 99.51 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.51 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.51

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2010

 

 

AUGUST 27, 2010

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

      Page
       
ITEM 1: CORPORATE STRUCTURE 3
  1.1 Name, Address and Incorporation 3
  1.2 Intercorporate Relationships 3
ITEM 2: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS 3
  2.1 Three Year History 3
ITEM 3: DESCRIBE THE BUSINESS 6
  3.1 General 6
  3.2 Risk Factors 6
  3.3 Companies with Asset-Backed Securities Outstanding 11
  3.4 Companies with Mineral Projects 11
ITEM 4: DIVIDENDS 32
  4.1 Dividend Policy 32
ITEM 5: DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 32
  5.1 General Description of Capital Structure 32
  5.2 Constraint 34
  5.3 Ratings 34
ITEM 6: Market For Securities 34
  6.1 Trading Price and Volume 34
  6.2 Prior Sales 34
ITEM 7: ESCROWED SECURITIES 34
ITEM 8: Directors And Officers 34
  8.1 Names, Addresses, Occupation and Security Holdings 34
  8.2 Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions 37
  8.3 Conflicts of Interest 38
ITEM 9: PROMOTERS 38
  9.1 Promoters 38
ITEM 10: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 38
  10.1 Legal Proceedings 38
ITEM 11: INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS   38


TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)

      Page
       
  11.1 Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions 38
ITEM 12: TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS 39
  12.1 Transfer Agents and Registrars 39
ITEM 13: MATERIAL CONTRACTS 39
  13.1 Material Contracts 39
ITEM 14: INTERESTS OF EXPERTS 40
  14.1 Names of Experts 40
  14.2 Interests of Experts 40
ITEM 15: Audit committee information required in an AIF 40
ITEM 16: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 42

-ii-


PRELIMINARY NOTES

Effective Date of Information

This Annual Information Form ("AIF") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") is dated August 27, 2010. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained herein is current as of May 31, 2010, being the date of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal period.

Information Incorporated by Reference

This AIF is and will be supplemented by, and the following documentation is hereby incorporated by reference as part of this AIF:

  (i)

the Corporation's audited financial statements for the 12 month fiscal period ended May 31, 2010, together with the auditors' report thereon;

     
  (ii)

management's discussion and analysis for the 12 month fiscal period ended May 31, 2010;

     
  (iii)

the "Independent Technical Report on the Dixie Lake Project, Red Lake, Ontario" dated January 13, 2006, prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., which was filed via SEDAR on February 28, 2006 (the "SRK Technical Report");

     
  (iv)

the most recent management information circular of the Corporation dated October 30, 2009 was prepared in respect of the annual and special meeting of shareholders held on Monday November 30th, 2009; and

     
  (v)

all documents, including press releases, material change reports and quarterly and annual financial statements as filed with the the Ontario Securities Commission.

Each of the above-noted documents are available for viewing at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com. Copies are also available upon request from the Corporation's offices.

All financial information in this AIF has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP").

Purpose

This AIF is prepared in accordance with Form 51-102F2 to National Instrument 51-102-Continuous Disclosure Obligations – established by the Canadian Securities Administrators, for the limited purpose of providing material information about the Corporation and its business at a point in time in context of its historical and possible future development.


Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this AIF respecting reserves, resources, plans, objectives and future performance of the Corporation's business are "forward-looking statements". Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "intended", "estimate", "anticipate", "believe" or "continue" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties relating to, among other things, financing, changes in commodity prices, unanticipated reserve and resource grades, geological, processing, transportation, infrastructure and other problems, results of exploration activities, cost overruns, availability of materials and equipment, timeliness of governmental approvals, political risk and related economic risk, actual performance of plant, equipment, and processes relative to specifications and expectations and unanticipated environmental impacts on operations. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those set forth herein under "Risk Factors".

- 2 -


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

     ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

TWELVE MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2010

ITEM 1:          CORPORATE STRUCTURE

1.1          Name, Address and Incorporation

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") was originally incorporated under the Corporation Act of Ontario on November 23, 1945 as Loisan Red Lake Gold Mines Limited ("Loisan"). Articles of Amendment were filed on November 6, 1979, changing the name from Loisan to Grandview Energy Resources Incorporated ("Energy"). On September 22, 1983, further Articles of Amendment were filed to change the Corporation’s name from Energy to Consolidated Grandview Inc. The Corporation filed further Articles of Amendment on April 9, 1987 to increase the authorized capital of the Corporation to an unlimited number of shares of each class. The Corporation again filed Articles of Amendment on July 6, 2004 changing its corporate name to its current name "Grandview Gold Inc". The registered and corporate head office of the Corporation is located at 330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2S8.

The common shares of the Corporation trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") under the symbol "GVX".

1.2          Intercorporate Relationships

The Corporation has a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nevada on July 16, 2008, under the name Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. was incorporated to hold the Corporation's interest in its Nevada property. As of May 22, 2009 the Corporation announced the termination of it’s Nevada operations and no interest exist within the subsidiary.

On July 26, 2009 the Corporation created a wholly owned subsidiary pursuant to the laws of Peru under the name Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C. with the intent to hold the Corporation’s Peruvian interests.

ITEM 2:          GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

2.1          Three Year History

The Corporation is engaged in the exploration and, if warranted, development of gold mineral properties in Canada, South America and United States. The Corporation is an exploration stage company and is not engaged in any mining operations, and there can be no assurance it will ever engage in mining operations.

The Corporation has acquired the following interests: (i) 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the "Dixie Lake Property"); (ii) a 100% interest in three mining claims, one patented claim and one mineral lease located in Manitoba, Canada, (the "Bissett Gold Camp Claims"); (iii) a 100% interest in 12 unpatented claims and 2 patented claims at Red Lake, Ontario (the "Bonanza Property"); (iv) a 100% interest in eight mining claims covering approximately 60 hectares located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the "Loisan Property"); (v) a 100% interest in 23 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, covering approximately 4,297 hectares (the "GVG Property"); (vi) a 100% interest in 14 unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba covering 2,601 hectares (the "Banksian Property"); (vi) a 100% interest in 4 unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in south eastern Manitoba (the "Angelina Property"); and (vii) an option to acquire up to a 100% interest in two mineral claims covering 400 hectares (“Giulianita Property”) near Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru.

-3-


As of May 26, 2009 the Corporation announced that it had ceased all operations at the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome project in Nevada and returned the project to Mill City Gold Inc. pursuant to the underlying agreements. The reader is directed to the 2008 AIF for previous disclosure on this project.

Private Placement Financings

The Corporation has been trading publicly on an intermittent basis since incorporation on November 23, 1945. Prior to listing on the CNQ in October 2004, the Corporation's common shares traded on the Over-the-Counter Automated Quotation System, a predecessor of the Canadian Dealer Network ("CDN"). Over the past three years, the Corporation has completed five exempt financing as follows:

1.

On July 6, 2007, the Corporation completed a private placement offering of 8,589,000 units, with each such unit being comprised of one common share and one half of one purchase warrant where each whole purchase warrant is exercisable into one additional common share upon payment of $0.65, at the subscription price of $0.40 per unit for total gross proceeds of $3,435,600. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian and US properties and for general working capital. The private placement was brokered by Bolder Investment Partners, Inc. At the same time, the Corporation closed a non-brokered placement on the same terms for additional proceeds of $50,000 on the sale of a further 125,000 units.

   

In connection with this offering, the Corporation secured the consent of its shareholders at a special meeting which occurred on May 17, 2007. A special meeting was required to be called in order to approve this placement under TSX policies as the total number of common shares issuable thereunder exceeded 25% of the then issued and outstanding capital of the Corporation.

   
2.

On December 21, 2007, the Corporation completed a private placement offering of 1,312,000 units, with each such unit being comprised of one common share and one half of one purchase warrant where each whole purchase warrant is exercisable into one additional common share upon payment of $0.70, at the subscription price of $0.55 per unit and 605,000 flow through common shares at $0.65 per flow through common share for total gross proceeds of $1,114,850. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian and US properties and for general working capital. The private placement was brokered by Bolder Investment Partners, Inc.

-4-



3.

On December 28, 2007, the Corporation completed a non-brokered private placement resulting in the issuance by the Corporation of a total of 538,000 flow- through common shares at a price of $0.65 per flow through common share for gross proceeds of $349,700. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian properties.

   
4.

On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement with Sandfire Securities Inc. This offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow- through common shares to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,667. In connection with this offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 common shares at a price of $0.05 per common share for a period of 24 months after closing. The securities issued pursuant to this offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold period commencing from the date of issuance.

   
5.

On December 8, 2009, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement with Centerpoint Resources Inc. (“Centerpoint”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, and 10 other placees resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company of $2.0 million Canadian dollars. This offering resulted in the issuance of of an aggregate of 26,666,665 units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit, where each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. Centerpoint acquired 20,00,000 of the Units placed.

TSX Listing

The common shares of the Corporation were posted and listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "GVX".

-5-


ITEM 3:          DESCRIBE THE BUSINESS

3.1          General

The Corporation is a junior mining, exploration and development company. The overall business objective of the Corporation is to acquire, explore for, develop and commence production of mineral resource properties in Canada and South America. More particularly, the Corporation's primary near-term objectives are to complete the current exploration programs and evaluate the ongoing validity of projects in its portfolio. Concurrently with this objective, the Corporation is continuing to seek out and evaluate prospective mineral properties for acquisition and exploration.

3.2          Risk Factors

Due to the nature of the Corporation's business and the present stage of its development, an investment in any of the securities of the Corporation is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the matters set out elsewhere in this AIF, the following are also risks related to the Corporation. The risk factors outlined below are not a definitive list of all risk factors associated with an investment in the Corporation or in connection with the Corporation's operations.

History of Losses

The Corporation is a junior mining, exploration and development corporation with no producing properties. There is no assurance that any of the properties which the Corporation now has or may hereafter acquire or obtain an interest in will generate earnings, operate profitably, or provide a return on investment in the future.

Mining Industry Risks

The operations of the Corporation are speculative due to the high risk nature of its business which involves the acquisition, exploration and development of mining properties and opportunities. Accordingly, the following risks in particular should be considered:

  (a)

The acquisition of, exploration for and development of mineral deposits is an extremely speculative venture involving a high degree of risk. Even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate such risk. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, very few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Unusual or unexpected formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labour disruptions, flooding, cave-ins, landslides, and the inability of the Corporation to obtain suitable machinery, equipment or labour are all risks involved with the conduct of explorations programs and the operation of mines. Substantial expenditures may be required to locate and establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site, and additional financing may be required. It is impossible to ensure that the exploration programs planned by the Corporation will result in a profitable commercial mining operation or venture. The decision as to whether a particular property contains a commercial mineral deposit and should be brought into production will depend on the results of exploration programs and/or feasibility studies, and the recommendations of duly qualified engineers and geologists. Several significant factors will be considered, including, but not limited to: (i) the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; (ii) metal prices, which are highly cyclical; (iii) government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection; (iv) ongoing costs of production; and (v) availability and cost of additional funding. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Corporation not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

-6-



  (b)

The activities of the Corporation are to be directed toward the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Corporation will result in discoveries of economic ore bodies or commercial production thereof.

     
  (c)

Depending upon if and when commercial quantities of ore are found, the Corporation may or may not have the financial resources at that time to bring a mine into production. The only sources of funding which might be available to the Corporation at such time may be limited to the sale of equity capital, mineral properties, royalty interests or the entering into of joint ventures, there being no assurances that any of the foregoing forms of funding will be available to the Corporation.

     
  (d)

All phases of the mineral exploration activities of the Corporation are subject to various laws governing prospecting, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. Mining and exploration activities are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Although the Corporation believes that its exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner that would limit or curtail production or development. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing the operations and activities of the Corporation or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Corporation. In the context of environmental permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, the Corporation must comply with known standards, existing laws and regulations which may entail greater or lesser costs and delays depending on the nature of the activity to be permitted and how stringently the regulations are implemented by the permitting authority. The Corporation is not aware of any material environmental constraint affecting any of its development properties that would preclude the economic development or operation of any specific property.

-7-



  (e)

There is a significant degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of mineral deposit estimates and corresponding mineralization grades. Until the mineralized material is actually mined and processed, mineral deposit estimates and mineralization grades must be considered as estimates only. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any mineral deposit estimates or ore-grade information contained herein (including in the documents incorporated herein by reference) will prove accurate. In addition, the value of mineral deposits may vary depending on mineral prices and other factors. Any material change in ore grades or stripping ratios may affect the economic viability of the Corporation's projects. Furthermore, mineral deposit estimate information should not be interpreted as any assurance of mine life or of the potential profitability of existing or future projects.

     
  (f)

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and requirements may result in enforcement actions including orders issued by regulators or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or to be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

     
  (g)

The profitability of the operations of the Corporation are significantly affected by changes in the market price of mineral commodities. Mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Corporation. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of mineral commodities and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of mineral commodities has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production of a particular mineral property to be impracticable.

     
  (h)

The business of mining is generally subject to a number of risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, labour disputes, encountering unusual or unexpected geologic formations, rock bursts, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions, among several others. Such risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or producing facilities, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. While the Corporation may be able to obtain insurance against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate, the nature of these risks are such that liabilities could exceed policy limits or could be excluded from coverage. There are some risks such as certain environmental risks (including potential for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) in respect of which insurance is not generally available to the Corporation or to other companies within the industry or is prohibitively expensive due to excessive premium costs. The potential costs which could be associated with any liabilities not covered by insurance or in excess of insurance coverage or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations may cause substantial delays and require significant capital outlays, adversely affecting the Corporation's earning and competitive position in the future and, potentially, its financial position. Failure to have insurance coverage for any one or more such risks or hazards could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation, its business, financial condition and results of the operations.

-8-



  (i)

The mineral exploration and mining business is extremely competitive in all of its phases. The Corporation encounters competition from other companies in connection with its search for and acquisition of mining properties and interests which are producing or capable of producing minerals. Some of the Corporation's competitors are large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than the Corporation. As a result of this competition, the Corporation may at any point in time be unable to acquire or develop attractive properties on terms it considers acceptable.

     
  (j)

The Corporation's ability to continue exploration of its properties will be dependent upon its ability to raise significant additional funds in the future. Should the Corporation not be able to obtain such financing, a portion of its interest in properties may be needed to be transferred to potential joint venture partners, or its properties may be lost entirely.

Early Stage Properties

The Dixie Lake Property, Bissett Gold Camp Claims, the Loisan Property, the Bonanza Property, the Banksian Property, the Angelina Property, the GVG Property and the Giulianita Property are in the early or pre-exploration stage only and are each without a known body of commercial ore. There is no certainty that the expenditures made by the Corporation towards the search and evaluation of mineral deposits on either of these or any other properties will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore.

Additional Capital

The ability of the Corporation to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions as well as the business performance of the Corporation. The development and exploration of the Corporation's properties may require substantial additional financing. Failure to obtain such financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of exploration, development or production on any or all of the Corporation's properties or even a loss of property interest. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favourable to the Corporation. If additional financing is raised by the Corporation through the issuance of securities from treasury, control of the Corporation may change and security holders may suffer additional dilution.

-9-


Dilution

In the event the Corporation seeks to procure additional financing through the sale and issuance of its securities, or in the event that current common share option or warrant holders exercise their options or warrants, the then shareholders of the Corporation may suffer immediate and substantive dilution in their percentage ownership of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation. As of the date of this AIF, there were common share purchase warrants outstanding allowing the holders of such warrants to purchase up to 26,999,998 common shares. In addition, 5,875,000 incentive stock options granted to certain directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Corporation, pursuant to the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan, as amended, are also outstanding. As of the date of this AIF, there were 72,763,033 common shares of common stock outstanding, meaning that the exercise of all of the existing common share purchase options and warrants would result in further dilution to the existing shareholders of approximately 45.2%of the outstanding common shares. Should such common share options and warrants be exercised, the increase in the number of common shares issued and outstanding, and the possibility of sales of such shares may have a depressive effect on the price of the common shares. In addition, the voting power of the Corporation's existing shareholders will be diluted.

Dependence on Key Executives

The Corporation is dependent on the services of key executives and a small number of highly skilled and experienced consultants and personnel. Locating mineral deposits depends on a number of factors, not the least of which is the technical skill of the exploration personnel involved. Due to the relatively small size of the Corporation, the loss of these persons or the Corporation's inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect its business and future operations. The Corporation does not currently carry any keyman life insurance on any of its executives. The directors of the Corporation will only devote part of their time to the affairs of the Corporation, while the officers of the Corporation devote their full time to the affairs of the Corporation.

Absence of Dividends

The Corporation has no earnings or dividend record and since it intends to employ available funds for mineral exploration and development it does not intend to pay any dividends in the immediate or foreseeable future. The future dividend policy will be determined by the Board of Directors.

Potential Volatility of Material Price of Common Shares

The TSX has, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Corporation's common shares. In addition, the market price of the common shares is likely to be highly volatile. Factors such as the price of gold, and other minerals, announcements by competitors, changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding the Corporation, and general market conditions and attitudes affecting other exploration and mining companies may have a significant effect on the market price of the common shares. Moreover, it is likely that during the future quarterly periods, the Corporation's results and exploration activities may fluctuate significantly or may fail to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors and, in such event, the market price of the common shares could be materially adversely affected.

-10-


Foreign Operations

At present, a portion of the operations of Grandview are located in Peru, as a result, the operation of the Corporation is exposed to various levels of political, economical and other risks and uncertainties associated with operating in foreign jurisdiction. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, currency exchange rates; price controls, import or export controls, currency remittance, high rates of inflation; labour unrest; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts, changes in taxation policies, restrictions on foreign exchanges; changing political condition, currency controls; and governmental regulations that may require the awarding of contracts of local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction, Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitudes in Peru or other countries in which Grandview conducts business may adversely affect the operations of the Corporation. The Corporation may become subject to local political unrest that could have debilitating impact on operations, and at its extreme, could result in damage and injury to personnel and site infrastructure.

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in enforcement actions and include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installing of additional equipment or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

3.3          Companies with Asset-Backed Securities Outstanding

This is not applicable.

3.4          Companies with Mineral Projects

The following section discloses information regarding the Corporation's material mineral properties, namely, the Dixie Lake Property, the Bissett Gold Camp Claims, the Loisan Property, the Gem Property and the Angelina Property.

DIXIE LAKE PROPERTY

The following information is derived from the "Independent Technical Report on the Dixie Lake Project, Red Lake, Ontario for Grandview Gold Inc." prepared by SRK Consulting and dated January 13, 2006 (the "SRK Report"), which was prepared, in accordance with the requirements of NI-43-101. A complete copy of the SRK Report, portions of which are quoted verbatim or paraphrased herein, is available for inspection upon request from the Corporation's head office, as well as on the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com). The SRK Report was authored by Christopher Lee, M.Sc., P. Geo and he is a "qualified person" and "independent" to the Corporation as those terms are defined in NI 43-101. All references to tables and figures in this section are to the tables and figures accompanying the SRK Report, which have been reproduced herein.

-11-


Property Description and Location

The Dixie Lake property is located in the Red Lake Mining Camp of northwestern Ontario and is centered at coordinates N50 degrees 51 minutes and W93 degrees 36 minutes. The site appears on NTS map sheet 52K/13. The town of Red Lake, Ontario is located 24 kilometres northwest of the property.

The Dixie Lake property comprises approximately 1,793 hectares in 50 claims. The property has not been legally surveyed.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

Access to the Dixie Lake property is via Tyzyk’s Road and former logging roads, which connect to Highway 105 at coordinates: 457264E, 5638306N (UTMZone15, Datum:WGS84). The claims are crossed by several logging roads and roads built to Service mineral exploration work. Drill access to the hanging wall of the zone must Cross Dixie Creek –a~15meter wide stream with year-round flow and limited ice thicknesses in winter. A new bridge was permitted by the Ministry of Fisheries and Oceans and constructed in Spring 2005 to replace an old collapsed bridge over Dixie Creek. This bridge provides access to the88-04 zone hanging wall, eliminating the need for helicopter support on drill moves.

Red Lake, Ontario, is an historic gold mining center with a population of about 5,000. The district has produced more than 21 M oz of gold to date, from four principal mines, two of which are still in operation, with more than 6M oz of combined gold reserves (Placer Dome’s Campbell Mine, and Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine). Gold mining and seasonal tourism activity provide a stable economic base and the town offers all necessary facilities in support of mineral exploration efforts. Supplies and experienced field personnel are available. Hydroelectricpowerlinespassabout1kilometernorthof the property.

The prevailing climate is typically mid-continental: summers are warm, with frequent rain showers and thunderstorms winters are severe, cold and snowy. The Dixie Lake property is partially forested with mature and second growth spruce, poplar, birch and jack pine, and the remainder exhibits the burned remnants of a former wildfire. The regional topography features low rolling hills with a myriad of small lakes, ponds and sloughs. On the property, the terrain is gently sloping and the few streams, including Dixie Creek, have mature, meandering courses. Bedrock occurrences are scarce on the property and, where observed, they are typically glacially polished. In aid of prospecting activities, overburden has been stripped from some areas of the claims (Figure4-2), apparently by using hand tools and high pressure pump techniques.

History

Fingler and Middleton (2003, pp12–13) provide a very detailed account of historical exploration work conducted on the Dixie Lake property. They documented 116 diamond drill holes, by various operators, with total length in excess of 13,046 meters, as well as geological mapping, airborne- and ground-based geophysical surveys, and geochemical surveys. The large amount of historical activity in the area has defined a commensurate number of targets and target areas. Due to the scarcity of outcrop in the area, most of these targets have been interpreted from geophysics, including airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, ground magnetics, VLF-EM, horizontal loop/Max-MinEM and IP. Anomalies and conductors from these surveys predominantly co-incide with iron formation, graphitic argillites, and sulphide-bearing (pyrite and/orpyrrhotite) argillite, ormafic volcanic rocks.

-12-


The 88-04 zone discovery drill hole was targeted on a strong Max-Min (HLEM) conductor, which is also characterized by a northwest trending linear magnetic anomaly, a VLF-EM conductor, and strong chargeability and elevated resistivity in Time Domain Induced Polarization surveys.

The two most significant drilling campaigns on the property were conducted by Teck (1989-90) and Alberta Star/Fronteer Joint Venture(2003-04). Both programs focused onthe88-04zone as their primary target. The Teck campaign concentrated on delineating the strike extents of the 88-04 zone to about 200 m depth, and identified a relatively enriched portion of the zone in its southeastern part. Canadian Golden Dragondrilled10holesintothe88-04zone, in1996-97, further confirming the Presence of relatively high-grade material, locally, in the southeastern part, but effectively closed off the zone to the southeast. Using oriented core measurements, the Alberta Star/Fronteer Joint Venture were able to prove a direct relationship between the plunge of the stretching lineation within the 88-04 zone and enhanced Mineralization within the previously identified southeastern zone. Targeting from this predictive approach, allowed the Alberta Star/Fronteer JV to extended the mineralized ‘shoot’ to a depth of approximately400meters. Teck Explorations Ltd. produced the only published resource estimate for the Dixie Lake property (Janzen, 1989).They calculated a polygonalestimateof417,000tons grading 0.126 ounces of gold per ton(378,296 metric tones @ 4.3g/tAu) for the 88-04 zone, which was subsequently modified with additional drill information to an "optimistic possible tonnage" of 1.1 million short tons grading 0.10oz/ton Au. The estimate used standard methodologies for the time, but does not meet current standards as defined by the CIMM andNI43-101(seeSection16for additional details).

The target objective of the Alberta Star/Fronteer JV was to up grade this resource by defining the controls on the distribution of the higher grade intercepts within the zone. Despite their successful determination of the dominant plunge direction of the high-grade material, the abundance of low-grade material within this shoot significantly impeded their attempts to demonstrate continuity of the higher grades. A structural model was proposed, where in the mineralization was interpreted to be folded and transposed into the dominant penetrative foliation, which actuallytransectsthe88-04 zone. Such a model implies that the mineralization occupies a series of stacked lenses within the 88-04 zone, rather than continuous, down-plunge, shoots. Given the abundance of low-grade material surrounding the lenses, and the apparent geometrical complexity of the mineralization, Alberta Star opted out of further work on the property and backed out of their JV with Fronteer.

 

-13-


Geological Setting

Regional Geology

The Dixie Lake Property lies within the Red Lake greenstone belt of the Uchi Sub province of the Archean Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. Publications by Mary Sanborn-Barrie and co-workers (2001;2004),at the Geological Survey of Canada, provide the most recent and comprehensive geological descriptions of the belt, and are briefly summarized here. The rocks of the Red Lake belt record a protracted (ca. 300Ma) history of episodic magmatism, sedimentation and tectono-thermal activity (Sanborn-Barrie, et al., 2001). Greenstone belt assemblages have been sub-divided into seven distinct units Comprising tholeiitic and calc-alkaline basalts, komatiite, intermediate through felsic tuffs and flows, inter layeredordisconformable with quart-magnetite iron formation, fine to coarse grained clastic rocks and polymictic conglomerates.

Local Geology

The Dixie Lake property lies southeast of the main Red Lake gold mining campin a "...broadly east-west trending belt of mafictofelsicmeta-volcanics and associated metasediments, which are in folded between aseries of granitic batholiths" (Fingler and Middleton, 2003,p. 16). Fingler and Middleton’s(2003) discussion was largely based on Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 5904. Confederation Assemblagecalc-alkaline maficto intermediate volcanic rocks, including pillowed flows and intermediate of felsicpyroclastic members, have been metamorphosedto amphibolitegrade. Meta-sedimentary members include wacke, siltstone, conglomerate and magnetite iron formation. Crystalline rocks in the northern part of the Dixie Lake area include various granites, quartz monzonites and granodiorites; those in the South part of the area consist of tonalite and possibly quartzdiorite.

Property Geology

The following geological description is quoted directly from the 2006 Assessment Report filed by Grandview Gold (Hughes, 2006).

A lack of exposure hampers any comprehensive presentation of the geology of the Dixie Lake property. Most of the information that has been used for interpretation is based on very limited regional scale mapping by government workers, geophysical extrapolation and reviews of the data from drilling.

It is generally agreed that the property is underlain by mainly Confederation Assemblage calc-alkaline mafic to felsic volcanic sequences at the western limit of the Confederation greenstone belt. Marine sediments and pyroclastic deposits appear to be more extensive in the North and eastern portions of the property, though again, hard information is lacking. These deposits include a number of intercalated iron formation units.

Overall, the volcanic suite appears to be lithologically quite variable, this conclusion, based more from drilling than mapping. Gabbros, mafic flows, pillow lavas, and related volcaniclastic rocks are intercalated with felsic volcanic flows, pyroclastic and volcaniclastic rocks and iron formation, wacke, siltstone and argillite. Some gabbros represent high level intrusions or basal flows. Arguably, this holds true for relict pyroxenite and amphibolite units noted in drilling and rarely, in outcrops.

-14-


Relatively small felsic-intermediate intrusive rocks are quite common, though again they are poorly documented. Small plugs are known to underlie portions of the Dixie Lake property, including the largest known, one immediately to the East of the known gold occurrences, appearing as an elliptic feature on magnetic maps.

Interpretation of the sequence on and around the main mineralised zones is thus based on magnetic and to a slightly lesser extent on drill data, with a minor component also from IP surveys. The property is essentially dominated by a relatively high magnetic signature sequence of folded mafic to intermediate volcanic units with the aforementioned intercalated lithotypes. This sequence underlies the central portion of the Dixie Lake property, with northern and southern flanking assemblages apparently more intermediate in nature with a higher component of felsic-intermediate felsic volcanic rocks and interbedded volcaniclastic rocks, silts, iron formations (silicate, oxide and sulphide have been recorded from past drilling), and minor argillites.

Despite the high number of drill holes completed on the property and several geophysical surveys, there appears to be lacking a clear differentiation of the relative high magnetic signatures within different lithologies. An examination of more recent drilling, coupled with the findings from the fall programme herein presented, suggest that at least for the mineralised central mafic volcanic sequence, on and around the 88-4 Zone, (see below), there is a clear stratigraphic sequence of:

Basal mafic volcanic flows and high level sub-volcanic intrusions, including gabbro, sparse amphibolite with rare relict pyroxenitic gabbro noted. These were originally relatively homogeneous and deposited likely in a shallow marine setting. Interflow sediments are common, but thin, silt-argillitic or iron formation in nature.

Slightly higher in the section, (tops were in general consistently down-hole when drilling on the 88-4 zone and to the West, thus, the majority of drilling directed south-west and South has intersected an overturned sequence), increasing volumes of silt-argillite that in some locales have been intruded, with peperitic textures noted within the high level mafic volcanic units. In zones exhibiting lower strain, there is clear evidence that a significant portion of this sequence contains pillow lavas and minor fragmental pillow lavas and sparse pillow breccias.

Mineralised horizons are typically cherty, silicified tuffaceous volcaniclastic rocks or iron formations with variable, multi-phase quartz vein content. Sedimentary sequences are predominantly silt-argillites that may form a significant component of a mineralised intersection. The youngest sequence around the centre of the Dixie Lake claims is a quite homogeneous set of intermediate to mafic volcanic flows (including rare pillows), and minor associated volcanic derived sediments.

"The association of mafic flows, intrusions and intercalated sediments suggests that the Sequence in what is now the centre of the Dixie Lake claims, was formed in a shallow Marine setting relatively close to active venting, with probably several pre-existing Anoxic basins subsequently modified by this activity. Mineralization was at least in part syn-genetic, this including pyrrhotite, pyrite, sphalerite and chalcopyrite. The provenance of arsenopyrite remains unclear.

-15-


"The Fall 2005 and recent past drilling, farther West and East established a similar Stratigraphy but with a significantly higher component offelsic (pyroclastic) volcanism deposited in marine conditions also. Basin development is characterized by relatively thin silt-argillite and commonly iron formation development. The volcanic facies suggests quiescent depositional conditions with ‘low key’ modification of sedimentary sequences by volcanic ingress.

"Without the benefit of extensive study of pre-existing drill core, it is suggested that a significant portion of the felsic volcanics previously logged as ‘intrusive’ (dykes mainly), could be thin volcaniclastic and pyroclastic lenses. These would display some textural characteristics similar to thin dykes. Mafic volcanic intrusions are abundant, and range from lamprophyre, to gabbro/diorite (high level apophyses injected into and disrupting the stratigraphy). Lamprophyres appear to be a common feature, though their deformed habit, thin nature and the prevalent biotite alteration in the area suggests some have been misinterpreted. "Comments on alteration a re-restricted to the area drilled this fall. The predominant Alteration is biotite that over prints to varying degrees, an amphibolite grade Metamorphism that had undergone minor erratic diapthoresis prior to biotite alteration. "Sericite post-dates the above and is prevalent within intermediate-felsic volcanic units, with minor ‘lateral’ and ‘vertical’ overlap into highly altered mafic volcanic flows and cherty tuffaceous sediments. "Carbonate alteration is two-fold, an early calcite-quartz+/-Fe-calcite over printed by calcite+/-quartz. Both types are essentially pre-kinematic, with the second phase in partlateto occasionally post-kinematic. True ankerite and ferroan dolomite is uncommon, with some intersections in the 88-04 zone hosting a small percentage of these (pre-kinematic veins).

Silification is in part remobilized quartz veining (on and around 88-04) and possibly also related to silica gel from chert deposition. Quartz flooding is relatively uncommon and past logging of mineralized zones has overstated the intensity of silicification. "Other significant alteration includes epidote in more distal settings (typical for gold camps), and aluminosilicates. The author (Toby Hughes) and T. Pryslak have noted such alteration that has not been previously documented. Thus its extent is unknown, but likely more prevalent than previously considered.

"The structural geology of the property requires re-interpretation. Whilst the overall geometry of the folded sequence is not a subject for debate, the geometries arising from the successive deformational episodes are worthy of additional comment.

"The overall geometry and deformation described by Lee, 2004, clearly describes and illustrates the effects of an interference pattern folding produced by two major events. Resultant fabrics are a nearly northeast trending S1 overprinted by a northwest S2. In drill core, this is manifest as transposition of S0 into a dominant main fabric, S2. S1 is preserved only as isoclinal features and in meter-scale more open fold sets in low strain zones. The major effect of the D2/S2 event in terms of mineralization is the formation of what several authors consider to be a property scale, if not regional scale west-northwest trending high strain zone with a significant shear component. This feature is understood to host the 88-04 Zone and possibly, the Main, North and C zones.

"A re-examination over the winter is planned for the structural geology. At this stage, the following points and observations are made as they pertain to the 88-04 Zone and any western extension:

-16-


  • The area of highest strain is located either within the 88-04 Zone itself, or in the Hanging wall (younger stratigraphy). The footwall displays much lower strain.

  • Within the mineralized 88-04 Zone, there clearly are sub-sectors with negligible or apparent negligible to low strain that host if not appreciable gold, significant sulphides and/or veining.

  • Despite the efforts of some to undertake detailed structural examination of the drill core, it is clear that the effects of second and third order folding on stratigraphy have not been fully addressed. This phenomenon compounds any complex spatial and genetic relationship between shearing and mineralization.

  • Strain heterogeneity within the 88-04 Zone could be a reflection simply of original basin stratigraphy and in particular, sediment (argillite or iron formation) thickness. Arguably, a case in point is around the original 88-04 drill hole, where appreciable thicknesses of argillite do not necessarily correspond to concomitant increases in either mineralization or alteration.

  • Any postulated high grade ore shoots within, for example, the 88-04 Zone, may reflect the partial preservation of high concentrations of pre-existing quartz veining, chert sediments or proximity to a vent source.

Previous Drilling by the Corporation

In 2005, the Corporation completed a16-hole core drilling program on its Dixie Lake Gold Property in Red Lake, Ontario. The Dixie Lake property is located 25 kilometers south of Goldcorp Inc’s Red Lake and Campbell gold mines. Core hole DL0509 intersected 4.0 gpt Au over 7.0m, including an interval of 9.53 gpt Au over 0.90m, and 3.32gpt Au over 1.90m.

Twelve of the sixteen drill holes were designed to test the lateral and vertical extensions to the 88-04 Zone, mostly to the West of the principal "mineralization shoot" of previous drill programs. Two holes (DL0502 and DL0516) tested a parallel magnetic anomaly, co-incident with an elevated Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) Au response ratio. An entirely new area defined by a high MMI Au response ratio in the East of the property was also tested by two holes (DL0503 and DL0504). Holes DL0505 and DL0510 were drilled in the original 88-04 Zone shoot. They returned values of 1.47 gpt Au over 5.95m and 1.66 gpt Au over 8.50m. These holes are drilled on the 88-04 Zone shoot and are shallow intersections into the zone. This zone remains open at depth and downplunge to the west.

Certain areas within the shoot also require additional infill drilling. A new shoot of mineralization, the "GVX shoot" was intersected in four holes from the 2005 campaign brings together continuity with five historical holes. The "GVX shoot" now has 9 holes intersecting the horizon, which grade from 0.70 gpt Au over 1.5 m to 5.85 gpt Au over 4.5 m and 10.1 gpt over 1.1m. Grandview holes DL0506, 08, 09 and 11 intersected this shoot, and encouraging mineralization, as seen in the table above. Historical holes in this zone include DL8920, 22, 29, 39 and DL0309. Hole DL0512 and DL0513 tested the 88-04 Zone horizon between the 88-04 Zone shoot and the GVX shoot. Both holes intersected gold mineralization in the 88-04 Zone horizon and returned results of1.69 gpt Au over 1.50m in hole DL0512 and 1.56 gpt Au over 1.30m in hole DL0513.

-17-


The remaining holes, DL0501, 02, 07, 14, 15 and 16 tested the 88-04 zone west of the "GVX shoot". Hole DL0501 was the western most hole, more then 200m west of the "GVX shoot’. An intersection of 1.22 gpt Au over 1.40 m was returned in the 88-04 zone. Hole DL0515 returned no significant assays, and was drilled approximately 150m west of the "GVX shoot". Holes DL0507 and DL0514 return results of 1.38 gpt Au over 2.30m and 0.56 gpt Au over 1.75m, respectively. These holes tested 100m gaps in drilling and show the continuity of the 88-04 zone. Holes DL0501, 02 and 16 tested the far west extension of the 88-04 zone where it swings to the north. Holes DL0502 and DL0516 are more then 400m away from the 88-04 shoot and returned encouraging results of 1.00 gpt Au over 0.50m and 1.27 gpt Au over 2.00m respectively. Hole DL0502 returned a second zone of mineralization more then 200m downhole from the first zone, which returned 0.53 gpt Au over 1.0m. Hole RL0501 was drilled approximately 50m west of hole DL0515, and 200m west of the "GVX shoot", where it returned 1.22gpt Au over 1.40m

Holes DL0503 and DL0504 tested a high MMI Au response ratio, more then 800m east of the 88-04 Zone.

These are the first two holes in the vicinity and returned extremely encouraging results for a first phase program on a grass roots target of 3.32 gpt Au over 1.90m in hole DL0503 including a higher grade section running 6.73 gpt Au over 0.50m. In hole DL0504, encouraging values of 0.98 gpt Au over 0.50m were returned. It should be understood that these holes were not ideally situated, and topography and a creek crossing made drill set up less then ideal. Even with these technical challenges, these two holes are considered a great success and additional holes were planned for the next drill program, slated for early 2006

Results from the 2005 drill program point to two high priority targets. The newly identified "GVX shoot" is open to depth and should be followed up down-plunge. The identification of this second shoot to the 88-04 zone also leads to the potential of discovering further high-grade shoots in the 88-04 system. A second high priority target that was developed from the results of the 2005 drilling is the strike extension of the anomalous Au mineralization encountered in hole DL0503 and DL0504. Further, the far west holes DL0501, DL0502 and DL0516 all point to the mineralization of the 88-04 zone continuing to the west, and leave open the potential for additional higher grade shoots west of the "GVX shoot".

While the grades encountered in these zones are moderate, relative to typical operating underground mines in comparable environments, the widths can be quite large, and local high-grade occurrences and proximity to Goldcorp’s Campbell Mine and Red Lake Mine existing infrastructure make this project economically interesting.

The "88-04" zone is a silicified and sulphidized sedimentary rock occurring within a sequence of mafic volcanic rocks. Silica-carbonate alteration occurs as replacement style alteration and in quartz-calcite veins. Pyrrhotite is the most dominant sulphide followed by pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite. Visible gold is not uncommon, and is commonly associated with strong pyrrhotite and weak pyrite-arsenopyrite mineralization, as well as in quartz only veins.

-18-


Previous work has identified the presence of gold-silver and lead tellurides, locally encapsulated in arsenopyrite. Native gold occurs as free gold crystals up to 50 microns in size.

The Spring 2006 drill programme comprised the completion of 5 NQ drill holes for a total of 1032.7 metres, commencing on 4.4.05 & finished on 18.4.06.

Initial plans called for a larger drill programme, testing extensions to the recently discovered MMIEast zone, plus further drilling on the 88-4 Extension & targets proposed in the winter of 2005-2006 (see Fall Drilling Report). Due to the timing of the programme, & associated difficulties with Spring run-off, targets East of the MMI-East could not be drilled. Access across Dixie Creek to the other targets was hampered by ground conditions at & close to the only bridge crossing, & it was concluded that for environmental reasons, the drilling should be suspended until a later date.

Recent Work by the Corporation

During fiscal 2010 the Company completed a seven hole diamond drilling program for a total of 1,556.8 meters of core at the Dixie Lake project. The holes were designed to test mineralisation intersected from previous drilling, specifically, extensions to and infill of the 88-4 Zone, continuity between the 88-4 Zone & the 88-4 extension, and the high grade quartz veining (NS Zone). Overall the program was successful in establishing the possible continuity between the 88-4 Zone and the 88-4 Extension at depth which had previously described as two separate, but related zones of mineralization. Continuity between the zones could have important ramifications for additional tonnage potential for the zone.

Three holes tested extensions of the high grade NS Zone. Holes DL-09-01, DL-09-02 intersected auriferous massive quartz veining that is considered to be the same as that previously intersected from previous drill programmes (2007-2008). The results indicate continuity of the vein set. Arguably, the same quartz vein set was also intersected in DDH DL-09-03, some 60 metres north west. These results indicate the potential for additional gold in the structure and it’s extension increase significantly.

The following tables outlines significant intercepts from the described exploration program.

Significant Results: Dixie Lake Project; NS Zone, 88-4 Zone & 88-4 extension

Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T Comments
DL-09-01 138.1 138.6 0.5 16.32 NS Zone
           
DL-09-02 135.6 138.0 2.4 1.99 NS Zone quartz vein
           
DL-09-02 148.2 149.6 2.3 2.85 NS Zone quartz vein
           
DL-09-03 26.1 30.5 4.4 2.17 88-4 East end
including 29.5 30.5 1.0 4.79  
           
DL-09-03 178.8 180.2 1.4 5.35 Quartz vein, NS Zone at depth?
           
DL-09-05 91.2 99.3 8.1 2.08 88-4 Zone
including 96.6 97.7 1.1 3.58  
including 97.6 99.3 1.7 2.28  
           
DL-09-06 228.4 233.6 5.2 2.01 Between 88-4& 88-4 Extension
including 230.3 231.8 1.5 3.52  

-19-


The Company is evaluating results and contemplating additional work programs for the property.

Previous Work by the Corporation

In 2009 work centered primarily on report writing with respect to the 2009 winter drilling program and further geological interpretation and computer modeling. Gemcom was contracted to consolidate all drilling data and model mineralised zones at both the 88-04 Zone and limited information on the NS Zone. That modeling was used as the basis for an exploration program to be carried our in the summer of 2009 on the Property.

The Corporation completed two drilling campaigns between the summer of 2007 and the end of the winter 2008 on the Dixie Lake property. The summer program included 18 diamond drill holes (4,563 meters of core) drilled on a number of known zones including the; 88-04 Zone, Main Zone, South Zone, C-Zone, and the MMI-East Zone. Drilling also made a significant discovery of a new zone of quartz veining with high grade mineralization and abundant visible gold. Based on these results, the Corporation carried out a brief two hole (575 meter) drill program in early January 2008 to follow up on the first pass results.

Previously unrecognized lode gold style mineralization was encountered in the New South (NS) Zone. Excellent grades from this discovery were. Overall, six diamond drill holes were drilled into the NS zone subsequent to the discovery, with four drill holes intersecting mineralization (DC-10-07, DC-15-07, DC-18-07, and DL-08-01R (see chart below). The Corporation is currently evaluating additional drilling to fully constrain the geometry of the lode gold bearing quartz veins.

Hole Number Azimuth Dip From (m) To (m) Length
(m)
Grade (g/t Au)
DC-10-07 090o -60o 181.83 182.30 0.47 163.75
      200.62 203,48 2.86 22.90
               Incl     202.12 203.12 1.00 61.97
             
DC -15-07 070o -55o 176.60 182.95 6.35 4.28
               Incl     176.60 178.30 1.70 11.30
             
DC-18-07 070o -55o 156.83 158.17 1.34 7.04
             
DC-08-1R 090o -60o 127.60 129.80 2.20 18.26

Drilling of the 88-04 Zone (1.57 g/t Au over 13.13 meters and 2.43 g/t Au over 4.0 meters) indicated the one continues to be open to depth and along strike to the east. Additional results from holes DC-01-07 (9.25 g/t Au and 6.02 g/t over 1 meter widths) and DC-04-07 (3.55 g/t Au over 3.0 meters) are encouraging as they continue to demonstrate the mineralizing potential of the Dixie Lake property.

-20-


The Corporation is continuing to evaluate future work plans on the Dixie Lake property.

BONANZA PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

April 28, 2010 the Company announced that it had acquired the remaining 40% interest in the Property from EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and had also acquired two additional patented claims and two additional unpatented claims from Perry English (“English”) to complete the current property package. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Bonanza Property and eliminate the previously negotiated NSR in favour of EMCO, Grandview paid EMCO $25,000 in cash and issued 50,000 common shares. In order to acquire the four claims from English and purchase 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR due to English on the Bonanza Property, Grandview paid to English aggregate consideration of $60,000 cash and issuing 500,000 common shares.

The Corporation now holds 100% undivided interest in the Bonanza Property. The Bonanza Property now consists of 12 unpatented and 2 patented claims, located on Red Lake, approximately 1.5 km north of the town of Red Lake, Ontario. Much of the property area is overlain by Red Lake, with the exception of two claims on Whitehorse Island. Access to the area during summer months is most easily accomplished via boat and in the winter months via ice roads from the town of Red Lake.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The region is covered with a variable layer of poorly documented till & associated fluvioglacial & lacustrine sediments, in the order of 0 to 15 m in thickness. Outcrop percentage overall is less than 1%. On Whitehorse Island, there is negligible outcrop, though a few scattered exposures of Dome Stock intrusive rock have been cursorily mapped by previous workers.

Topographically, the area is characterised as low rolling relief, with moderate drainage on thin to medium thickness glacial & fluvioglacial deposits. Known maximum thicknesses of these on the property are 45 metres. Elevations range from about 350 to 400 metres above sea-level.

Nearly all of the original vegetation has either been logged off or burnt.

Red Lake is located at the terminus of Highway 105, some 175 km North of Kenora, & reached via the Trans Canada Highway. The Municipality of Red Lake is serviced by regular flights from Winnipeg & Thunder Bay, seven days a week.

-21-


History

Exploration was conducted in the mid-late 1930’s & to 1948, when drilling intersected visible gold in a quartz veined, strongly silicic granodiorite/granite contact zone separating the Howey Stock from intermediate volcanic rocks of the Ball assemblage. A shaft was sunk & underground development was carried out on 2 levels with minor bulk sampling providing the above mentioned resource.

During this period, further drilling underground & on Red Lake failed to prove up additional grade & tons & significant exploration was not resumed until the 1970’s, when Bonanza Red Lake Explorations drilled additional holes on the Lake to trace previous known mineralised trends, this part of a feasibility study to include consideration of dewatering the shaft.

In 1987-89, Pure Gold Resources & Noramco resumed exploration with a large drill program, effectively replicating old drilling, outlined a 300 metre wide, 125 m deep, 125 metre long mineralised system with a calculated resource of 300,000 tons grading 0.08 oz per ton Au. Other drilling on a smaller scale, returned generally disappointing results as efforts were made to drill deeper targets along strike.

Numerous geophysical surveys have been completed by various operators and that data has been compiled with other relevant data for future use.

Regional Geology

The Bonanza Property is located on Red Lake, Ontario, within the Uchi Subprovince of the Archæan Province, north-western Ontario. The region is typically sub-divided into four major subprovinces, specifically the Uchi which contains the Red Lake & Confederation Lake greenstone belts, the South adjacent, predominantly metasedimentary & igneous intrusive English River Subprovince, & the North adjacent Berens River Subprovince. The Bonanza Property lies within the Red Lake greenstone belt that hosts the world class gold deposits now held by Goldcorp Inc.

In summary, the Uchi Subprovince contains the most significant gold deposits in the entire north-west of Ontario. Five major assemblages, the Confederation dated around 2730-2800 MY, Woman River, Bruce Channel, dated at around 2800-2900 MY, Ball, dated at 2940-2925 MY,& Balmer, considered the oldest of the assemblages at around 2940-2925 MY, comprise the vast majority of the underlying geology.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out mining operations on the property, but there have been historical operations. The deposit has a historical resource of some 175,000 tons grading 0.2 oz Au above the 375 ft Level (not NI 43-101 compliant). Orlac Red Lake Mines Ltd., (subsequently Sanshaw Mines Ltd.), MacKenzie Red Lake Mines Ltd., & Cable Mines Oils Ltd. conducted drilling & underground work over this period. Caution should be used when evaluating this historical data as it was calculated prior to NI 43-101 coming into force and a qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical data as a current mineral resource within the meaning of NI 43-101.

-22-


Exploration and Development

A compilation of historical data and a resource modeling program was carried out. The objective of the compilation was an assessment of the drilling on & around the Orlac deposit, with ultimately, targeting areas for additional drilling. There have been previous efforts to understand the geology & geometry of the deposit using non-digital means. Many sections are simply paper plans & whenever possible, drill information was entered into excel format for processing into MapInfo GIS & Gemcom, the latter to provide more accurate information on the geometry of the gold mineralisation & associated alteration.

In the 2008 fiscal year, the Corporation completed a five (5) hole diamond drill program totalling 1,087 meters. The drill program targeted geophysical and structural targets beneath the waters of Red Lake and thus drilling was carried out during the winter months in early 2008 when sufficient ice thickness was present.

Three holes targeted what is believed to be the southwest extension of a structural corridor from the Goldcorp/Premier Gold Bonanza Property immediately adjacent to the Corporation's property. The drilling contractor had difficulties reaching bedrock and coring and after several attempts the holes were abandoned. The drill was pulled back to a land based setup and two holes were successfully drilled on the margin of the historic Orlac Deposit. Gold bearing mineralization was encountered in holes BS-08-03 and BS-08-04 in proximity to a granite-volcanoclastic contact zone. The following tables summarizes these results:

Hole Number From (m) To (m) Length (m) Grade (g/tonne Au)
PC-08-03 295.7 298.7 3.0 2.41
               Incl 296.7 297.7 1.0 3.50
         
PC-08-04 298.4 302.9 4.5 2.03

In fiscal 2010, work on the project was limited to negotiations to acquire 100% interest in the project from EMCO Corporation S.A. and the acquisition of additional mining claims to complement the Bonanza Property.

LOISAN PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Corporation currently holds 100% interest in the Loisan Property. The Red Lake area currently hosts two high-grade, world-class gold mines, Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine and Placer Dome’s Campbell Gold Mine.

-23-


Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The Red Lake area is serviced by paved provincial highway 105 from the Trans Canada highway. The property is covered by relatively thin glacial debris. Much of the claims have waterfront access to Red Lake. A paved road, Sandy Point Road, transects many of the claims. Electric power and telephone lines also cross the property. Several year round homes are located on surface rights of some of the claims.

There are no parks or developments other then several year round homes are located on surface rights of some of the claims. The property can be easily accessed by boat, ski-doo, motor vehicle, or float plane.

The property has a small slope from its maximum elevation down to the shoreline, a drop of up to 15m.

The climate is typical mid-latitude continental. Field operations on most of the property are possible year round.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Loisan Property.

Exploration and Development

To date, the Corporation has not carried out any significant exploration or development on the Loisan Property.

BISSETT GOLD CAMP CLAIMS

Property Description and Location

Grandview owns a 100% interest in three (3) unpatented mining claims, one patented claim and one mineral lease located near Bissett, Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”).

The Bissett Gold Camp Claims are located on the Rice Lake greenstone belt, near the Manitoba/Ontario border and approximately 240 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg, and approximately 90 kilometres west of the Corporation’s Loisan Property.

The following table lists the Bissett Gold Camp Claims:

Bissett Cold Camp mining claims and Due Date

  Area
Claim# Name (Ha) Due Date
W53272 CUPP 2 FR. 14      08/3/2011
W53561 CUPP 3 8      08/4/2011

-24-



    Area  
Claim# Name (Ha) Due Date
W46040 MEL 14 02/2/2026
ML 26 * PACKSACK 18.7 04/30/2011
357** CLAPPELOU 16 12/31/2011
TOTALS 3 CLAIMS 70.7

* Mineral Lease
** Patented Claim

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The area was covered by the most recent continental glaciers, which scoured the property and exposed many rock outcrops throughout the property. The vegetation is predominantly deciduous, with birch, poplar mixed with tamarack, with lesser second or third growth spruce and jack pine.

Access to the Bissett Gold Camp Claims is by car or truck along Provincial Highway 304 and simply parking anywhere along the side of the road. The mining town of Bissett is located less than 10 km from nine of the eleven mining claims.

The weather, climate and seasons should not significantly affect the length of the operating season on this property because the terrain is flat and all-weather-road accessible.

History

The Bissett Gold Camp Claims contain two patented mining claims, namely the Clappelou and Packsack claims. Gold mineralization on the Packsack claim was first discovered and explored in 1919 and subsequently held by Packsack Mines Limited during the period 1934-1937. Significant gold mineralization was discovered; a mining lease was obtained and a shaft was sunk down to the 525-foot level. Additional mine shafts were sunk and gold mineralization was discovered on Claims # W46039 and W46040.

Geological Setting

The Bissett Gold Camp Claims are located in the Rice Lake greenstone belt, a region in southeastern Manitoba known as the Superior Province. The Superior Province is a terrain of large granitic masses separated by greenstone belts, which consists of rocks and volcanic of sedimentary origin. Rice Lake is an Archean lode gold mining area.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims

Exploration and Development

To date, the Corporation has not carried out any exploration or development on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims.

-25-


Environmental Considerations

The Corporation is taking the necessary steps to ensure a minimal impact to the local environment as a result of its exploration activities. Added care is taken to ensure no drill cuttings flow into the local watershed and absorbent fibres are used around all motors and working parts to collect any inadvertent drips of petrochemical. All wastes are transported from the site and deposited into a licensed land fill or recycling facility.

GVG PROPERTY

In the fall of 2005, the Corporation undertook to stake 20 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, near the town of Bissett where San Gold Corporation is currently producing gold. The property currently consists of 23 claims and is approximately 4,297 hectares in area, and is believed to cover similar geology that hosts the Red Lake Mine, Campbell Mine, and Madsen Mine, in Red Lake, Ontario, located less then 100 kilometres to the east of the GVG Property.

Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the GVG Property.

Exploration and Development

During the summer of 2008, the Corporation carried out geological and structural mapping, rock sampling, compilation of historical data, air photo and satellite interpretation over the project area that included the Gem claims, GVG claims and the Grand claims. The project is collectively referred to as the Rice Lake Reconnaissance Project (“RLRP”). In total, 179 rock samples were collected and analysed for gold and multi-element geochemistry. Approximately 23% of all samples collected contained anomalous gold concentrations (< 0.10 g/t). Many of these anomalous samples came from two newly discovered showings. One new showing was a narrow white quartz vein hosted in a dacitic volcaniclastic cobble conglomerate unit South of Gem Lake that returned two bonanza grade samples of 30.79 g/t and 21.83 g/t gold. The other showing was a zone of sparse light bluish-grey/white quartz veinlets (0.5%) hosted by a sulphide bearing (pyritic clots and stringers) granite intrusion east of Gem Lake that returned assays of 8.30 g/t, 5.74 g/t and 5.01 g/t gold. A total of $125,506.77 dollars was spent on the geological mapping program of Grandview’s RLRP.

In the fall of 2005, the Corporation contracted Firefly Aviation to conduct a fixed wing airborne magnetic survey covering the GVG Property. Results have been received and are being integrated with the Corporation model and regional data with the intent to have follow up ground work, including prospecting and mapping, in the future.

The Corporation carried out limited geological mapping, prospecting and sampling in the summer of 2007 and has plans to continue grass roots exploration efforts to understand the mineral potential of the belt in the 2008 summer field season.

-26-


BANKSIAN PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”). The Corporation acquired 100% interest in the claims in March 2007, from McKeena Gold who had staked the ground in the prior year.

Lake Gold Mine, Bissett, Manitoba (formerly the San Antonio Mine) operated by San Gold Corporation. The Rice Lake Greenstone Belt accounts for nearly two million ounces of past gold production, most coming from the San Antonio Mine. Access to the property from the north is aided by highway #304 and from the south out of Lac de Bonnett via highway #314. Most of the project area is only accessible by traversing and limited tertiary roads. The property consists of 14 mining claims covering an area of 2,601 hectares.

History

Most historical work in the project area occurred between the late 1950’s and mid 1970’s. There was a pause activity until the mid 1980’s when exploration activity in the area picked up for approximately 5 years. Recent exploration work commenced around 2003 and has stayed relatively quiet to this point.

The Corporation flew an airborne geophysical survey over the project area in conjunction with other projects in the Rice Lake Belt in 2006. At this time the Corporation has begun acquiring historical assessment reports and completed a 7 week prospecting program over the area. As of the writing of this document the results of the program have not been compiled. Future exploration work will hinge on any positive results of the compilation program and prospecting results.

Geological Setting

The Rice Lake Belt covers the western extent of the Uchi geologic terrain. In fact, the Rice Lake greenstone belt, in Manitoba, together with the Red Lake, Bee Lake, and Pickle Lake greenstone belts, in Ontario, form the Uchi subprovince.

The Uchi terrain consists mainly of volcanic rocks that formed in an ancient ocean as well as intrusive and sedimentary rocks. These rocks are home to the important Balmer formation, which is the host to the world class gold deposits discovered at Red Lake 80 km to the east and further east at the Pickle Lake Gold Camp.

Rocks in the Rice Lake Gold Belt are similar in age to those at Red Lake. Gold mineralization is present in both older rocks in the northern part of the Belt and younger rocks in the southern part of the belt. The San Antonio mine, which has contributed over 80% of the gold production from the belt to date, is hosted in the younger southern package of rocks. Limited production has been obtained from deposits in the northern part of the Belt.

-27-


Recent Work by the Corporation

During the summer of 2008, the Corporation carried out geological and structural mapping, rock sampling, compilation of historical data, air photo and satellite interpretation over the project area that included the Gem claims, GVG claims and the Grand claims. The project is collectively referred to as the Rice Lake Reconnaissance Project (“RLRP”). In total, 179 rock samples were collected and analysed for gold and multi-element geochemistry. Approximately 23% of all samples collected contained anomalous gold concentrations (< 0.10 g/t). Many of these anomalous samples came from two newly discovered showings. One new showing was a narrow white quartz vein hosted in a dacitic volcaniclastic cobble conglomerate unit South of Gem Lake that returned two bonanza grade samples of 30.79 g/t and 21.83 g/t gold. The other showing was a zone of sparse light bluish-grey/white quartz veinlets (0.5%) hosted by a sulphide bearing (pyritic clots and stringers) granite intrusion east of Gem Lake that returned assays of 8.30 g/t, 5.74 g/t and 5.01 g/t gold. A total of $125,506.77 dollars was spent on the geological mapping program of Grandview’s RLRP.

In the fall of 2005, the Corporation contracted Firefly Aviation to conduct a fixed wing airborne magnetic survey covering the Banksian Property. Results have been received and are being integrated with the Corporation's model and regional data with the intent to have follow up ground work, including prospecting and mapping, in the future.

The Corporation carried out limited geological mapping, prospecting and sampling in the summer of 2007 and has plans to continue grass roots exploration efforts to understand the mineral potential of the belt in the 2008 summer field season.

ANGELINA PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Corporation acquired 100% interest in the property from McKeena Gold in March 2007.

The property is located approximately 25 km southeast of the town of Bissett in southeastern Manitoba within an area commonly referred to as the Rice Lake Greenstone Belt. The Rice Lake Greenstone belt accounts for nearly two million ounces of past gold production. Most historical production has come from the Rice Lake Gold Mine (formerly the San Antonio Gold Mine) in Bissett, Manitoba. The property consists of 4 mining claims covering an area of 351 hectares.

History

The area was first staked in 1925 and assigned to Moore Lake Mines in 1927. Several shear zones with gold bearing veins were discovered and several trenches and small pits were sunk along a number of veins. There are reports of economic exploitation, but no historical records are available. Moore Lake Mines reportedly suspended operations in 1934. Little work was carried out in the area for a number of years.

-28-


The lease was cancelled in 1975. Hans Steinleitner staked over the property in 1976 and converted the claim into Production Lease 29 in January 1980. In June 1983, the lease was transferred to Evan A. Koblanski and then transferred back to Hans G. Steinleitner in April 1985.

In 1987 Rhino Resources Inc. optioned the property from Hans G. Steinleitner and drilled three holes. From July to August 1988, Rhino Resources Inc. conducted geophysical surveys over portions of the Angelina, and Angela claims. Presumably the option reverted to Hans Steinleitner in or before 1993.

In August 1998 the Two Bits claim was acquired by 3469264 Manitoba Limited. Following the recommendations of the Whittles report for Rhino Resources a sample of rock was collected to determine the feasibility of bringing the “Two Bits” vein (on the Angelina claim) into production. A bench milling test conducted by Knelson Concentrators in Langley, B.C. determined the project should move ahead to lab scale tests to confirm the current results and /or move straight into pilot or full scale tests. However, due to lack of funds this did not occur.

W. Kuran staked the Angela and Angelina claims in 2001 and optioned the property to Gossan Resources Limited in 2003. Gossan Resources conducted preliminary geological mapping in 2003 and flew an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in early 2004.

Geological Setting

Geologically the Angelina Claim Block is comprised of basalts, metasediments, gabbro, pyroclastic tuffs and breccias and feldspathic dykes. This assemblage has been isoclinaly folded and boudinaged, sheared parallel to fold axes, faulted to offset the shear zones and thrust in a south westerly direction. Gold mineralization was found along shear zones striking in a NNW direction and dipping from 50 to 80 degrees to the ENE, containing quartz and carbonate veins and stringers. Historically gold mineralization has been found on six parallel shear zones. Although higher assays have been recorded in the past, up to 261 g/t in a grab sample, the highest assays found by Gossan Resources included 0.53 oz/t over 3.7m and 0.26oz/t over 7.92m in drill core. Historically a seventh mineralized shear zone was identified at depth in diamond drill hole E-88-03, a zone of 0.3oz/t Au over 6’.

Exploration and Development

In 1987 Rhino Resources Inc drills three holes, TB1, TB2 & TB3, under the vein to intersect the interpreted main break. Logs indicate trace to 0.04 oz/ton gold detected over widths ranging from 1’ to 5.7’ in sheared tuffaceous mafic volcanics. In 1988 Rhino Resources Inc. conducted magnetometer, VLF-EM surveying and an IP/Resistivity survey over portions of the Angelina, and Angela claims. From this surveying Rhino identified a number of drill targets and drilled three holes. A zone containing 0.3oz/t Au over 6’ was intersected in hole E88-03.

Hans Steinleitner started his own drill program in July 1993 and reached 30’ before mechanical failure forced the hole to be stopped. Also, samples were taken from a pit at Rhino Grid reference 900E, 350S (shear zone south of the south break) which returned assays up to 1.35 oz in a 2 3/8lb sample.

-29-


Following the recommendations of the Whittles report for Rhino Resources 3469264 Manitoba Ltd. collected samples of “ore material” from the “Two Bits” vein (on the Angelina claim) to determine mining feasibility. A bench milling test conducted by Knelson Concentrators in Langley, B.C. determined the project should move ahead to lab scale tests to confirm the current results and /or move straight into pilot or full scale tests. However, due to lack of funds this did not occur.

W. Kuran staked the Angela and Angelina claims in 2001 and optioned the property to Gossan Resources Limited in 2003. Gossan Resources Limited conducted preliminary geological mapping in 2003 and flew an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in early 2004 and drilled ten diamond drill hole to test gold bearing zones that had been previously identified.

Recent Work by the Corporation

In the fall of 2007 a limited 7 diamond drill hole program (1,193 m) was completed on three targeted zones; the Discovery Shear, the Contact Zone and the Beaver Pond Vein.

Four drill holes tested a 350 meter extension of the Discovery Shear zone to the west where surface sampling had encounter grab samples of 15.2 g/t, 16.5 g/t and 10.8 g/t. Visually the shear zone appeared to improve with depth, only two holes returned significant gold values. Best results were from holes AN-07-01 which intersected 2.08 g/t over 0.50 meters at a depth of 77.5 meters, and hole AN-07-04 which intersected 2.13 g/t over 1.50 meters at a drill hole depth of 85.25 meters.

Two diamond drill holes tested a +50 meter thick zone of moderately veined, sericite-ankerite alteration zone north of the Discovery Zone. The best result was in hole AN-07-06 which intersected 1.40 g/t over 1.50 meters at a drill hole depth of 50 meters.

The final hole of the program was designed to test a quartz-ankerite vein at depth previous drilled by Gossan Resources. No significant assays were returned.

GIULIANITA PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Corporation currently holds an option to acquire 100% interest in the Giulianita Property located in northwest Peru, near the town of Suyo, in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, in the Department of Piura.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

The project is easily accessed from the Pan-American Highway, approximately 100 kilometers from the city of Puira via paved highway and then approximately 15 km along well developed gravel roads to the central part of the property.

This area of northwestern Peru is temperate to hot, with abundant precipitation in the rainy season (January to March) and extremely arid conditions the remainder of the year. Field operations can be carried out throughout the year. Vegetation includes various species of mid-sized deciduous trees (3 meters in height) and limited undergrowth.

-30-


The property covers an area of relatively low elevation with most hills no greater than 350 meters above sea level, and relative relief between hills and valleys of less than 50 meters.

The main water source is the Quiroz River which lies just 2 kilometers to the northeast of the project area. Accommodation, food, power and internet access is available in a number of small towns near the project.

History

Little historic work or information is available for the project as this area of Peru has seen little in the way of modern exploration work. Records indicate that some alluvial gold extraction was carried out briefly in the mid 1970’s. Local artisanal mining and processing of ores has only occurred within the last three years and remains relatively unorganized by typical Peruvian standards.

Geological Setting

The project area is covered with an extensive layers of basaltic to andesitic volcanic flows and pyroclastics and arcosic sediments of Middle Cretaceous age. Units are fractured and argillically altered in the volcanic outcroppings studied in the area of the prospect. Intrusive units of Upper Cretaceous to Tertiary age have been mapped in the project area and felsic domes are locally present.

Numerous NNW trending faults/veins are observed on the Property which control both high grade gold mineralization and well disseminated gold targets. Mineralization is associated with highly altered (argillic and silicic) vein/fault system hosted within volcanic flows and volcanoclastic units of basaltic to andesitic composition. Several zones of mineralization have been identified on the property, but have not been actively explored in any detail. Zone One can be traced for approximately 400m south-southeast on surface, and has at least three adits/shafts that host small-scale mining. Previous exploration work done in Zone One indicates that, at the primary outcropping the overall width reaches 4.5m, with individual continuous chip samples returning 25.6 g/T Au over 1.10m, 30.6 g/T Au over 1.5m, and 12.3 g/T Au over 1.6m from within the volcanic breccia unit, and 6.19 g/T Au over 2.6m from the hanging wall fractured volcanic unit. The southern extension of Zone One connects with Zone Four were previous work indicates gold mineralization is present at surface. Zones Two and Three are located 500 meters southeast of the previously mentioned targets and again demonstrate both high-grade gold vein and disseminated gold targets.

Zone Five is located 400 meters southwest of Zone One and hosts high-grade gold vein/shear structures similar to other targets. These areas of mineralization provide significant exploration potential on the property.

-31-


Mining Operations

The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Giulianta Property.

Exploration and Development

To date, the Corporation has not carried out any significant exploration or development on the Giulianita Property. During the current fiscal year the company has been working with local community groups to acquire necessary surface rights permission necessary to carry on exploration and development activities in the future.

GEM PROPERTY

Due to limited exploration results on the Gem Property the Company decided to no longer pursue further work on the property and subsequently relinquished any interest in the property.

ITEM 4:          DIVIDENDS

4.1          Dividend Policy

The Corporation has neither declared nor paid any dividends on its common shares. The Corporation intends to retain its earnings, if any, to finance growth and expand its operations and does not anticipate paying any dividends on its common shares in the foreseeable future. The actual timing, payment and amount of any dividends declared and paid by the Corporation will be determined by and at the sole discretion of the board of directors of the Corporation from time to time based upon, among other factors, the cash flow, results of operations and financial condition of the Corporation, the need for funds to finance ongoing operations and exploration and such other considerations as the board of directors in its discretion may consider or deem relevant. At this time, the Corporation anticipates that payment of dividends would only be possible in the event it successfully brings one of its mining properties into commercial production.

ITEM 5:          DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

5.1          General Description of Capital Structure

The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, of which 72,763,033 were issued and outstanding as at the date of this AIF. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of any meeting of shareholders of the Corporation, and to attend and to cast one vote per common share at all such meetings. Holders of common shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and, accordingly, holders of a majority of the common shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors standing for election. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends, if any, on a pro rata basis, such dividends, as and when declared by the Corporation's board of directors in its discretion (please see "Dividend Policy" above). Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, holders of common shares are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis the net assets of the Corporation after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attending to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro rata basis with the holders of common shares with respect to dividends or liquidation. The common shares do not carry any pre-emptive subscription, redemption or conversion rights.

-32-


The Corporation is also authorised to issue an unlimited number of special preference voting shares (the "Preference Shares") of which there are none outstanding as of the date of this AIF. The Preference Shares have no par value have been designated as redeemable, voting, and non-participating. No dividends are to be declared, set aside or paid on the Preference Shares. In the event of the liquidation of the Corporation or other distribution of assets or property of the Corporation among shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs the holders of the Preference Shares shall be entitled to receive from the assets and property of the Corporation a sum equivalent to the aggregate paid up capital of the Preference Shares held by them respectively before any amount shall be paid or any property or assets of the Corporation distributed to the holders of any Common Shares or shares of any other class ranking junior to the Preference Shares. After payment to them as above provided the holders of the Preference Shares shall not be entitled to share in the property of the Corporation. The Corporation may not redeem the Preference Shares or any of them prior to the expiration of five years from the respective date of issuance thereof, without prior consent of the holders of the Preference Shares to be redeemed. The Corporation shall redeem the then outstanding Preference Shares five years from the respective dates of issue of the Preference Shares. In the case of a redemption of the Preference Shares, the Corporation shall at least thirty (30) days prior to the date specified for redemption mail to each person who at the date of the mailing is a registered holder of Preference Shares to be redeemed a notice in writing of the intention of the Corporation to redeem such Preference shares. On or after the date so specified for redemption, the Corporation shall pay or cause to be paid to or to the order of the registered holders of the Preference Shares to be redeemed the redemption price thereof on presentation and surrender at the head office of the Corporation or any other place designated in such notice of the certificates representing the Preference Shares called for redemption. From and after the date specified for redemption in any such notice the holders thereof shall not be entitled to exercise any of the rights of Preference Share holders in respect thereof unless payment of the redemption price shall not be made on presentation of certificates in accordance with the foregoing, in which case the rights of the Preference Share holders shall remain unaffected. The Corporation may at any time or times purchase for cancellation all or any part of the Preference Shares outstanding from time to time from the holders thereof, at a price not exceeding the paid up capital thereof, with the consent of the holders thereof. The holders of Preference Shares shall be entitled to receive notice of and attend all meetings of shareholders of the Corporation and shall have one (1) vote for each Preference Share held at all meetings of the shareholders of the Corporation. No holder shall sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of any Preference Share or Preference Shares without prior approval of the board of directors of the Corporation and prior approval of the Ontario Securities Commission. For each five (5) Preference Shares held the holder may at his or her option convert such five (5) Preference Shares into one (1) Share but in no event shall the total number of Shares issued on the conversion of Preference Shares exceed 100,000 Shares in the aggregate.

-33-


5.2          Constraint

This is not applicable.

5.3          Ratings

This is not applicable.

ITEM 6:          MARKET FOR SECURITIES

6.1          Trading Price and Volume

The common shares of the Corporation are currently listed for trading on the TSX under the trading symbol "GVX". Prior to April, 2006, the common shares of the Corporation were listed and posted for trading the CNQ. The following chart lists the price ranges and volumes traded for such shares on the TSX for each month during the 12 month period ended May 31, 2009:

                 Month High Low Close Volume
May, 2010  0.09 0.08 0.08 1,217,634
April, 2010  0.095 0.07 0.085 2,048,371
March, 2010  0.10 0.08 0.085 718,452
February, 2010  0.105 0.09 0.085 1,104,671
January, 2010  0.13 0.10 0.010 1,237,324
December, 2009  0.13 0.09 0.12 2,055,900
November, 2009  0.095 0.07 0.09 1,975,651
October, 2009  0.12 0.08 0.08 2,483,061
September, 2009  0.135 0.09 0.115 957,640
August, 2009  0.11 0.08 0.095 1,127,350
July, 2009  0.12 0.08 0.08 786,696
June, 2009  0.14 0.05 0.115 5,909,418

6.2          Prior Sales

This is not applicable

ITEM 7:          ESCROWED SECURITIES

This is not applicable.

ITEM 8:          DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

8.1          Names, Addresses, Occupation and Security Holdings

The following table and the notes thereto set out the name, province and country of residence of each director and executive officer of the Corporation, their current position and office with the Corporation, their present principal occupation or employment, the date on which they were first elected or appointed a director or officer of the Corporation, the approximate number of common shares of the Corporation beneficially owned directly or indirectly or over which they exercise control or direction as at the date of this AIF, and the percentage of the total issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation represented by such shares:

-34-



Name, Current Position(s)
with the Corporation and
Province and Country
Principal Occupation(s)
During Last Five (5) Years
If Different from Office Held
Director /
Officer
Since
No. and percentage of Shares
beneficially owned, or
controlled or directed, directly
or indirectly as at the date of
this AIF(1)
Paul Sarjeant(2) 
Director and
Chief Executive Officer
Ontario, Canada

From 1999 until November, 2006 operated a securities business focused on strategic planning and investment analysis. Since his appointment, Mr. Sarjeant's full time employment has been with the Corporation.

November 2006 133,333/0.18%
D. Richard Brown( 3)(4) 
Director
Ontario, Canada

Partner at Osprey Capital Partners

March 2004 105,000/0.14%
Michael Hitch(5)(6)
Chairman and Director
BC, Canada

Professor , Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia

November 2005 66,666/0.09%
Peter Born(4)(8) 
Director
Ontario, Canada

Ph.D., professional registered geologist (ON) and President of 1727856 Ontario Ltd.

June 2007 133,333/0.18%
Ken Hight(5)(9)
Director
Ontario, Canada

From 2000-2005 served as CEO of ITG Canada, from 2005 – 2008 served as CEO of ETrade Canada, and concurrently EVP, E Trade Financial New York, currently, CEO of Liquidnet Canada until September 2009. Currently Chair and CEO of Rockport Mining Corp, and director of 2 other TSX-V companies.

May 2008 133,333/0.18%
Jack Austin(4)(10)
Director
BC, Canada

Currently Senior Advisor- International to Stern Partners, President of Centerpoint Resources Inc.

December 2009 600,000/0.82%
Ted Nunn(5)(11)
Director
BC, Canada

President of Centershield Gold Mines Inc., and VP Technical services for Centerpoint Resources Inc.

December 2009 Nil
Ernest Cleave(7) 
Chief Financial Officer
Ontario, Canada

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Cline Mining; Consultant

November 2005 Nil
R. Ian Mitchell
Corporate Secretary
Ontario, Canada

Corporate lawyer. Associate at WeirFoulds LLP, a full-service downtown Toronto law firm and corporate and securities counsel to the Corporation.

November 2005 Nil

-35-


Note(s):

(1)

The information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, not being within the knowledge of the Corporation, has been furnished by the respective directors and executive officers individually.

   

  (2)

Paul Sarjeant holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,250,000 common shares of the Corporation, 600,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 650,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Sarjeant under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Sarjeant also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

   

  (3)

D Richard Brown holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation,200,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Brown under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

   

  (4)

Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown (Chairman), Jack Austin and Peter Born.

   

  (5)

Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ken Hight (Chairman), Ted Nunnand Michael Hitch.

   

  (6)

Michael Hitch holds options to purchase up to a total of 675,000 common shares of the Corporation,225,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Hitch under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Hitch also holds 66,666 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

   

  (7)

Ernest Cleave holds options to purchase up to a total of 475,000 common shares of the Corporation 250,000 which are exercisable at the price of $0.68per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 225,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Cleave under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

   

  (8)

Dr. Peter Born holds options to purchase up to a total of 600,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Mr. Born also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

   

  (9)

Ken Hight holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Mr. Hight also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

-36-



  (10)

Jack Austin holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014. Mr. Austin also holds 600,000 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

     
  (11)

Ted Nunn holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014.

The directors of the Corporation are elected by the shareholders at each annual general meeting and serve until the next annual general meeting, or until their successors are duly elected or appointed. Officers of the Corporation are appointed by the board of directors.

As of the date of this AIF, approximately 1,271,665common shares of the Corporation were beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the current directors and officers of the Corporation as a group representing approximately 1.75%of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation on a non-diluted basis.

8.2          Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

To the best knowledge of the Corporation, no director or officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation is, as at the date hereof or has been within the last ten years prior to the date hereof, (a) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued while the director or officer of the Corporation was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; (b) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued after the director or officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in such capacity; (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (d) became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director or executive officer of the Corporation, (a) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory or (b) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

-37-


8.3          Conflicts of Interest

Certain directors and officers of the Corporation are also directors, officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and exploiting natural resource properties. Such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time.

ITEM 9          Promoters

9.1          Not Applicable.

ITEM 10          LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS

10.1          Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Actions

There are no legal proceedings or regulatory actions, involving the Corporation or its properties as of the date of this AIF and the Corporation knows of no such proceedings currently contemplated.

ITEM 11          INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

11.1          Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions

Except as disclosed below or elsewhere in this AIF the Corporation is not aware of any material interest direct or indirect in which management, insiders or significant shareholders also have an interest.

Services Agreement

The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Services Agreement") with Paul Sarjeant and his duly registered sole proprietorship whereby Mr. Sarjeant agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Sarjeant CDN $12,500 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Services Agreement has a three year term and was renewed during October 2009.

Consulting Services Agreement with Dr. Hitch

The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Consulting Services Agreement") with Dr. Michael Hitch whereby Dr. Hitch agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Consulting services Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Dr. Hitch CDN $6,250 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Consulting Services Agreement had a three month term ending September 12, 2006. Although Dr. Hitch is no longer serving as Chief Executive Officer, he continues to provide consulting services to the Corporation and the contract has been extended to December 31, 2007, with a further option for renewal until December 31, 2008. The Consulting Agreement was renewed in December 2007 for a further one year term but the payments under the Consulting Contract were reduced to CDN $5,000 per month. The option was not renewed by the Corporation in 2008. Subsequently, the Company entered into a new consulting services contract with Treswell Renewable Energy Corporation (“Treswell”), a corporation controlled by Dr. Hitch on April 1, 2010, through which Treswell has agreed to provide the services of Dr. Michael Hitch as an operational consultant to various projects the Company undertakes. The agreement has a one year term ending April 30, 2011 and can be renewed for one additional year upon agreement.

-38-


Personal Services Agreement

The Corporation entered into a consulting agreement (the "Personal Services Agreement") dated November 15, 2005 with Ernest M. Cleave. Pursuant to the Personal Services Agreement, Mr. Cleave was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. Under the Personal Services Agreement Mr. Cleave receives $60,000 per year. The payments under the Personal Services Agreement were reduced to CDN $3,000 per month.

ITEM 12:          Transfer Agents and Registrars

12.1          Transfer Agents and Registrars

Equity Transfer & Trust Company ("Equity") is the Corporation's transfer agent and registrar. Equity is located at Suite 400, 200 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4H1.

ITEM 13:          MATERIAL CONTRACTS

13.1          Material Contracts

The following is a list of material contracts entered into by the Corporation since June, 2004 and still in effect at May 31, 2010. These do not include contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business:

  (a)

Dixie Lake Property - Option agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. and the Corporation, effective dated as of August 26, 2005, relating to the Corporation’s option to acquire an interest in the Dixie Lake Property, Red Lake, Ontario.

     
  (b)

Giulianta Property – Agreement dated July 2, 2009 between the Corporation and Mr. Miguel Angel Saldana Mujica relating to the Corporation’s option to acquire up to 100% interest in the Giulianita Property located in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru.

Particulars of each of these agreements have been provided elsewhere in this AIF.

-39-


ITEM 14          INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

14.1          Names of Experts

Christopher Lee, M.Sc., P. Geoand SRK Consulting were both involved in the preparation and compilation of the SRK Report.

14.2          Interests of Experts

None.

ITEM 15          AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN AN AIF

The following information regarding the Audit Committee of the Corporation's Board of Directors is required to be disclosed pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees ("MI 52-110").

Audit Committee Charter

The text of the Audit Committee's charter is set out as Schedule "A" to this AIF.

Composition of the Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown, Jack Austin and Peter Born. Each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Austin and Dr. Born are "independent" and "financially literate", as those terms are defined MI 52-110.

Relevant Education and Experience

The education and experience of each Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as an audit committee member is as follows:

Mr. Brown holds a Masters degree in finance from the Daniels School of Business at the University of Denver and a BA in Economics from the University of Guelph and has over 15 years experience in public company financing, corporate/capital structuring and development. Mr. Brown is on the board of a number of junior resource companies and is also a partner at Osprey Capital, a successful Toronto Investment Banking firm.

Dr. Bornholds a PhD in Earth Sciences received from Carleton University in 1996. Dr. Born has been involved in the mining industry since 1978 and has worked for both private and governmental entities. Throughout his career Dr. Born has, in addition to his scientific responsibilities, been responsible for overseeing the financial budgets and reporting requirements for teams of up to 30 people.

The Honourable Jack Austin, P.C., Q.C. is a graduate of law from University of British Columbia and Harvard Law School. He practiced law for nearly 20 years specializing in natural resource law, securities and finance. In public life he served for four years as Deputy Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources in Ottawa and thereafter as Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Trudeau, Cabinet Minister in the Trudeau government (1981-1984), and in the Martin Government (2003-2006). Mr. Austin served as a Senator representing British Columbia from 1975 to 2007. He is currently Senior Advisor-International to Stern Partners and is a director of two public companies, and President of Centerpoint Resources.

-40-


Reliance on Certain Exemptions in Sections 2.4, 3.2, 3.4 or 3.5 of MI 52-110

This is not applicable.

Reliance on the Exemptions in Subsection 3.3(2) or Section 3.6 of MI 52-110

This is not applicable.

Reliance on Section 3.8 of MI 52-110

This is not applicable.

Audit Committee Oversight

This is not applicable.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The policy of the Audit Committee regarding the engagement of non-audit services is set out at Section 7 of the Audit Committee's Charter, which is disclosed in its entirety as Schedule "A" hereto.

External Auditor Service Fees (By Category)

Audit Fees

For its financial year ended May 31, 2010, $48,000 was accrued in favour of the Corporation's external auditors, McCarney Greenwood LLP, for audit services.

Audit-Related Fees

For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2010, $Nil was paid or accrued to McCarney Greenwood LLP in respect of assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Corporation's financial statements which are not included in "Audit Fees", above.

Tax Fees

For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2010, $3,000 was accrued in favour of McCarney Greenwood LLP in respect of tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

-41-


All Other Fees

For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2010, $Nil was paid or accrued to McCarney Greenwood LLP in respect of products or services other than those reported under "Audit Fees", "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees", above.

ITEM 16          ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Corporation may be found on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com.

Information regarding directors' and officers' remuneration, principal holders of the Corporation's securities and securities authorized for issuance pursuant to equity compensation plans is contained in the Corporation's management proxy information circular for the last annual and special meeting of shareholders held on November28, 2008.

Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the year ended May, 31, 2008.

-42-


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
SCHEDULE "A"
TO ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2005

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Name

There shall be a committee of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") known as the Audit Committee.

General Purpose

The Audit Committee has been established to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the following areas: the Corporation's external audit function; internal control and management information systems; the Corporation's accounting and financial reporting requirements; the Corporation's compliance with law and regulatory requirements; the Corporation's risks and risk management policies and such other functions as are delegated to it by the Board. Specifically, with respect to the Corporation's external audit function, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: the quality and integrity of the Corporation's financial statements; the independent auditors' qualifications; and the performance of the Corporation's independent auditors.

The Audit Committee is intended to facilitate and provide a means of open communication between management, the external auditors and the Board.

Composition and Qualifications

The Audit Committee shall consist of as many members as the Board shall determine, but in any event not fewer than three (3) members who are appointed by the Board. The composition of the Audit Committee shall meet all applicable independence, financial literacy and other legal and regulatory requirements. More specifically, all members of the Audit Committee shall be "unrelated"1 and "financially literate"2 and at least one (1) member shall have "accounting or related financial experience"3.

The Board shall designate the Chairman of the Audit Committee and in so doing shall consider the recommendation of the Governance and Compensation Committee. The Chairman shall have responsibility for overseeing that the Committee fulfills its mandate and duties effectively.

____________________________
1 a director who is independent of management and is free from any interest and any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the director’s ability to act with a view to the best interests of the company, other than interests and relationships arising from shareholding.
2 the ability to read and understand a balance sheet, an income statement, a cash flow statement and the notes attached thereto.
3 the ability to analyse and interpret a full set of financial statements including the notes attached thereto, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

-1-


Each member of the Audit Committee shall continue to be a member until a successor is appointed, unless the member resigns, is removed or ceases to be a director. The Board, following consideration of the recommendation of the Governance and Compensation Committee, may fill a vacancy which occurs in the Audit Committee at any time.

Meetings

The Chairman of the Audit Committee, in consultation with the Audit Committee members, shall determine the schedule and frequency of the Audit Committee meetings provided that the Audit Committee will meet at least four (4) times in each fiscal year and at least once in every fiscal quarter. The Audit Committee shall have the authority to convene additional meetings as circumstances require. A schedule for each of the meetings will be disseminated to Audit Committee members prior to the start of each fiscal year. A detailed agenda for each meeting will be disseminated to Audit Committee members as far in advance of each meeting as is practicable.

The Audit Committee shall meet separately, periodically, with management, counsel and the external auditors. The Audit Committee shall meet separately with the external auditors at every meeting of the Audit Committee at which external auditors are present.

Responsibilities

The Audit Committee is mandated to carry out the following responsibilities:

6.

External Auditors

   
(a)

Subject to applicable law, the Audit Committee shall be responsible for the appointment, compensation, oversight and termination of the external auditor. The external auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee and shall be accountable to the Board and Audit Committee as representatives of the shareholders.

   
(b)

The Audit Committee shall pre-approve all non-audit mandates for services the external auditor shall undertake.

   
(c)

The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself, on behalf of the Board, that the external auditor is independent of management. In assessing such independence, the Audit Committee shall discuss with the external auditors, and may require a letter from the external auditor outlining, any relationships between the external auditors and the Corporation or its affiliates.

   
(d)

The Audit Committee shall review the audit plan of the external auditors, the integration of the external audit with the internal control program, and the results of the audit, which shall include reviewing the external auditor’s letter to management and management’s response thereto and other material written communications between management and the external auditors.

-2-



(e)

The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself, annually or more frequently as the Audit Committee considers appropriate, as to the external auditors' internal quality control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the external auditor, or by any public enquiry, review, or investigation by governmental, professional or other regulatory authorities.

   
(f)

The Audit Committee shall periodically review and discuss with management and the external auditors the quality and acceptability of the Corporation’s accounting policies and practices, the materiality levels which the external auditors propose to employ, any significant changes in the accounting policies and any proposed changes in accounting or financial reporting that may have a significant impact on the Corporation.

   
(g)

The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management by the external auditors, the ramifications of these alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by the external auditors.

   
7.

Financial Information

   
(a)

The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors whether the audited annual financial statements present fairly (in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles) in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of and for the periods presented and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board, the annual audited financial statements of the Corporation.

   
(b)

The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors whether the unaudited quarterly financial statements present fairly (in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of and for the periods presented and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board, the unaudited quarterly financial statements of the Corporation.

   
(c)

The Audit Committee shall review the Annual Report to Shareholders and other financial information (including the annual and quarterly Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Annual Information Form and any prospectus or offering circular) prepared by the Corporation with management and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board and recommend for filing with regulatory bodies.

   
(d)

The Audit Committee shall review any news releases and reports to be issued by the Corporation containing earnings guidance or financial information for research, analysts and rating agencies. The Audit Committee shall also review the Corporation's policies relating to financial disclosure and the release of earnings guidance and the Corporation's compliance with financial disclosure rules and regulations.

-3-



The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors important trends and developments in financial reporting practices and requirements and their effect on the Corporation's financial statements.

8.

Internal Control

(a)

The Audit Committee shall oversee the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control systems, through discussions with the Corporation’s external auditors and management and shall report to the Board on an annual basis.

(b)

The Audit Committee shall review annually the Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and its effectiveness and enforcement.

9.

Risk Management

(a)

The Audit Committee shall review with management the principal risks facing the Corporation, and the policies, processes and procedures for management’s monitoring and managing of such risks or exposures. If necessary, the Audit Committee will mandate, monitor and evaluate the steps management has taken to monitor and manage such exposures, including insuring against such risks, where appropriate.

10.

Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Requirements

(a)

The Audit Committee shall review with management, and any internal or external counsel as the Committee considers appropriate, any legal matters (including the status of pending litigation) that may have a material impact on the Corporation and any material reports or inquiries from regulatory or governmental agencies.

(b)

The Audit Committee shall review with counsel the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation's procedures to ensure compliance with the legal and regulatory responsibilities.

11.

Other

(a)

The Audit Committee shall also perform such other activities related to this Charter as requested by the Board.

(b)

The Audit Committee shall review and assess the adequacy of this Charter annually and shall submit any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

(c)

The Audit Committee may delegate its authority and duties to subcommittees or individual members of the Committee as it deems appropriate.

-4-


Reporting

The Audit Committee shall report its deliberations and discussions regularly to the Board and shall submit to the Board the minutes of its meetings.

Resources

The Audit Committee shall have the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain independent legal, accounting and other consultants to advise the Audit Committee at the expense of the Corporation. The Audit Committee shall be provided with the necessary funding to compensate the external auditors and any other advisors they engage.

The Audit Committee may request any officer or employee of the Corporation or the Corporation’s external counsel or external auditors to attend a meeting of the Audit Committee or to meet with any member of, or consultants to, the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall have full access to all of the Corporation's books, records, facilities and personnel.

Complaints Procedure

Any director, officer or employee who has any concern or complaints regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters or any potential violations of law or regulatory provisions may, in accordance with the Code of Business Conduct, make an anonymous submission to any member of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall establish procedures for the review and resolution of such complaints.

Limitation on the Oversight Role of the Audit Committee

Nothing in this Charter is intended, or may be construed, to impose on any member of the Committee a standard of care or diligence that is in any way more onerous or extensive than the standard to which all members of the Board are subject. Each member of the Committee shall be entitled, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to rely on the integrity of those persons and organizations within and outside the Corporation from whom he or she receives financial and other information, and the accuracy of the information provided to the Corporation by such persons or organizations.

While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Corporation’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada and applicable rules and regulations. These are the responsibility of management and the external auditors.

-5-


EX-99.52 53 exhibit99-52.htm EXHIBIT 99.52 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.52 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.52

FORM 52-109F1
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc. certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended May 31, 2010.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

       
6.

Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have

       
(a)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

       
(b)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A

       
(i)

our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

       
(ii)

N/A.




7.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2010 and ended on May 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

  
8.

Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: August 27, 2010

“Ernest Cleave”

[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.53 54 exhibit99-53.htm EXHIBIT 99.53 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.53 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.53

FORM 52-109F1
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc. certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended May 31, 2010.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

       
6.

Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have

       
(a)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

       
(b)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A

       
(i)

our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

       
(ii)

N/A.




7.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2010 and ended on May 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

   
8.

Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: August 27, 2010

“Paul Sarjeant”

_______________________
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.54 55 exhibit99-54.htm EXHIBIT 99.54 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.54 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.54

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

October 8, 2010

TO ALL APPLICABLE EXCHANGES AND COMMISSIONS:

RE: GRANDVIEW GOLD INC
  Confirmation of Notice of Record and Meeting Dates

We are pleased to confirm that Notice of Record and Meeting Dates was sent to The Canadian Depository for Securities.

We advise the following with respect to the Annual Meeting of Securityholders for GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

  1. ISIN: CA3866711011
    CUSIP: 386671101
       
  2. Date Fixed for the Meeting: November 29, 2010
       
  3. Record Date For Notice: October 25, 2010
       
  4. Record Date For Voting: October 25, 2010
       
  5. Beneficial Ownership Determination Date: October 25, 2010
       
6. Classes or Series of Securities that entitle the holder to receive Notice of the Meeting: Common Shares
       
7. Classes of Series of Securities that entitle the holder to vote at the meeting: Common Shares
       
  8. Business to be conducted at the meeting: Annual

Yours Truly,
EQUITY FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY

Rosa Vieira
Senior Manager, Client Relations
Telephone: 416-361-0930 ext.227
rvieira@equityfinancialtrust.com

c.c. Jenn Javier, Administrator, Client Relations


EX-99.55 56 exhibit99-55.htm EXHIBIT 99.55 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.55 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.55

__________________________________________________________________

Grandview Gold Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2010

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

(Unaudited)

___________________________________________________________________

 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting –Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at August 31, 2010.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at August 31, 2010.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.

(signed) (signed)
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Toronto, Canada  
October 14, 2010  



Grandview Gold Inc.            
(An Exploration Stage Company)            
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets            
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)            
    August 31,        
(Unaudited)   2010     May 31, 2010  
Assets            
Current assets            
             Cash and cash equivalents $  1,226,090   $  1,432,824  
             Short term investments   25,099     25,037  
             GST and sundry receivable   40,118     26,416  
             Prepaid expenses   12,777     12,876  
    1,304,084     1,497,153  
Reclamation bond (Note 5)   14,001     13,699  
Mining interests (Note 6)   4,247,910     4,149,771  
  $  5,565,995   $  5,660,623  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
             Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  78,612   $  89,284  
Asset retirement obligation   14,001     13,699  
    92,613     102,983  
Shareholders' equity   5,473,382     5,557,640  
  $  5,565,995   $  5,660,623  

Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1)

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                  
(An Exploration Stage Company)                  
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss              
(Expressed in Canadian Dollar)                  
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
    Three Months Ended     of the exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     26, 2004 )
Expenses                  
Share-based payments $  -   $  368,500   $  4,479,616  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   13,509     17,393     1,916,672  
Professional fees   31,169     42,438     1,397,167  
Management services (Note 12)   27,750     20,000     1,469,690  
Office and administration   9,499     11,934     747,744  
Exploration evaluation expenses   2,394     60     27,279  
Flow-through interest expense   -     -     188,801  
Bad debt   -     -     1,235  
    84,321     460,325     10,228,204  
Loss before the under noted   (84,321 )   (460,325 )   (10,228,204 )
Interest income   63     (2,715 )   88,786  
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     (25,000 )
Write-off of mineral properties   -     -     (6,431,718 )
Impairment of mineral properties   -     -     (1,557,112 )
Forgiveness of debt   -     -     35,667  
Failed merger costs   -     -     (170,000 )
Loss before income taxes   (84,258 )   (463,040 )   (18,287,581 )
Future income tax recovery   -     -     1,675,990  
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period $  (84,258 ) $  (463,040 ) $  (16,611,591 )
Basic loss per share (Note 10) $ (0.00 ) $ (0.01 )      
Diluted loss per share (Note 10) $ (0.00 ) $ (0.01 )      

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                  
(An Exploration Stage Company)                  
Interim Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit                  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                  
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     26, 2004 )
Accumulated Deficit                  
Balance at beginning of period $  (19,961,581 ) $  (19,081,178 ) $  ( 3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (84,258 )   (463,040 )   (16,611,591 )
Balance at end of period $  (20,045,839 ) $  (19,544,218 ) $  (20,045,839 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 4 -



Grandview Gold Inc.                              
(An Exploration Stage Company)                          
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity                          
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                              
                Contributed     Accumulated        
(Unaudited)   Share Capital     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  
At May 31, 2008 $  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $  (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
At May 31, 2009   14,430,400     1,203,804     7,359,376     (19,081,178 )   3,912,402  
Share-based payments   -     -     449,491     -     449,491  
Exercise of warrants   16,667     -     -     -     16,667  
Fair value of warrants exercised   15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   67,000     -     -     -     67,000  
Private placement   2,000,000     -     -     -     2,000,000  
Cost of issue – cash laid out   (36,392 )   -     -     -     (36,392 )
Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   (1,440,000 )   1,440,000     -     -     -  
Debt conversion   28,875     -     -     -     28,875  
Warrants expired   -     (1,173,138 )   1,173,138     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (880,403 )   (880,403 )
At May 31, 2010 $  15,081,883   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $  (19,961,581 ) $  5,557,640  
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (84,258 )   (84,258 )
                               
At August 31, 2010 $  15,081,883   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $  (20,045,839 ) $  5,473,382  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -


                   
Grandview Gold Inc.                  
(An Exploration Stage Company)                  
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                  
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     26, 2004 )
Cash flows from operating activities                  
Net loss for the period $  (84,258 ) $  (463,040 ) $  (16,611,591 )
Items not involving cash:                  
           Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     25,000  
           Debt conversion   -     -     (6,792 )
           Write-off of bad debts   -     -     1,235  
           Share-based payments   -     368,500     4,479,616  
           Future income tax recovery   -     -     (1,675,990 )
           Accrued interest income   (63 )   -     (44,003 )
           Write-off of mineral properties   -     -     6,431,718  
           Impairment of mineral properties   -     -     1,557,112  
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                  
           GST and sundry receivable   (13,702 )   (4,377 )   (39,628 )
           Prepaid expenses   99     3,967     (12,777 )
           Due from a related party   -     -     90,000  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (10,671 )   29,552     84,783  
Cash flows used in operating activities   (108,595 )   (65,398 )   (5,721,317 )
Cash flows from financing activities                  
Loans from related parties   -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   -     -     20,068,877  
Cost of issuance   -     -     (1,812,701 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     (75,000 )
Cash flows provided by financing activities   -     -     18,327,582  
Cash flows from investing activities                  
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   -     407,493     18,903  
Exploration advances   -     -     -  
Expenditures on mining interests   (98,139 )   (124,034 )   (11,295,988 )
Due from a related party   -     -     (90,000 )
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $  (98,139 ) $  283,459   $  (11,380,175 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6-


Grandview Gold Inc.                  
(An Exploration Stage Company)                  
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Continued              
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                  
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     26, 2004 )
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period $  (206,734 ) $  218,061   $  1,226,090  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   1,432,824     106,593     -  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $  1,226,090   $  324,654   $  1,226,090  
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Transactions                  
Share issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  10,800   $  630,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -


Grandview Gold Inc.                  
(An Exploration Stage Company)                  
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties              
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)                  
                Cumulative  
                from date of  
                inception  
                of the  
    Three Months Ended     exploration  
    August 31,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     26, 2004 )
Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada                  
Balance, beginning of period $  3,873,967   $  3,442,793   $  -  
             Drilling, assays and related field work   -     68,783     3,202,798  
             Property acquisition and holding costs   1,353     -     672,522  
    1,353     68,783     3,875,320  
             Balance, end of period $  3,875,320   $  3,511,576   $  3,875,320  
Guilianita Property, Peru                  
Balance, beginning of period $  275,804   $  -   $  -  
             Drilling, assays and related field work   57,600     13,582     292,472  
             Project administration and general   39,186     -     39,186  
             Property acquisition and holding costs   -     41,669     40,932  
    96,786     55,251     372,590  
             Balance, end of period $  372,590   $  55,251   $  372,590  
Total $  4,247,910   $  3,566,827   $  4,247,910  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



1.  Nature of Operations and Going Concern

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

2.  Accounting Policies

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual consolidated financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2010, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 9-


2. Accounting Policies (Continued)

Future Accounting Pronouncements

International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

3. Capital Management

The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so.

- 10 -



3. Capital Management (continued)

 Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

                               i) minimizing discretionary disbursements;

                               ii) reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

                               iii) exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the three months period ended August 31, 2010. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

4. Risk Factors

The Company’s significant mineral properties are Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada and Guilianta Property, Peru (called the "Properties"). A full description of these properties may be found in Note 7 of the May 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements.

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon these Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

Fair Value

The following summarizes the methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company's financial instruments where measurement is required. The fair value of short-term financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity. These include cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Fair value amounts represent point-in-time estimates and may not reflect fair value in the future. The measurements are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and are a matter of significant judgment. The methods and assumptions used to develop fair value measurements, for those financial instruments where fair value is recognized in the balance sheet, have been prioritized into three levels as per the fair value hierarchy included in GAAP. Level one includes quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level two includes inputs that are observable other than quoted prices included in level one. Level three includes inputs that are not based on observable market data.

    Level One     Level Two     Level Three  
Cash and cash equivalents $  1,226,090   $  -   $  -  
Short-term investments $  25,099   $  -   $  -  
Reclamation bond $  14,001   $  -   $  -  

- 11 -


4.  Risk Factors (continued)

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and cash equivalents, GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and cash equivalents are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

Financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of August 31, 2010. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

Liquidity Risk

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at August 31, 2010, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents and short term investments balance of $1,251,189 (May 31, 2010 - $1,457,861) to settle current liabilities of $78,612 (May 31, 2010 - $89,284). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

(a)

Interest Rate Risk

  

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

  
(b)

Foreign Currency Risk

  

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

  
(c)

Price Risk

  

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

- 12 -


4. Risk Factors (continued)

Sensitivity Analysis

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and cash equivalents as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. GST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

As of August 31, 2010, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a three month period:

(i)

Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at August 31, 2010, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the three months ended August 31, 2010 would have been approximately $63 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at August 31, 2010, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $63 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.

     
(ii)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

     
(iii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of August 31, 2010, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.


5.

Reclamation Bond

   

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

   
6.

Mining Interests

   

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

   

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 7 of the audited financial statements as at May 31, 2010.

- 13 -



7.

Share Capital

     
(a)

Authorized

     

Unlimited number of common shares

     

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non-participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

     
(b)

Issued


             
    Number        
    of        
    shares     Amount  
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
Private placement   120,000     120,000  
Private placement   150,000     150,000  
Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
Private placement   175,000     175,000  
Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
Private placement   590,320     737,900  
Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
Private placement   400,000     500,000  
Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  $9,543,301  

 - 14 -
 


7. Share Capital (Continued)

(b) Issued (Continued)

               
      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
Balance, May 31, 2006     19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
Private placement     2,399,998     1,559,999  
Warrant valuation     -     (284,400 )
Mineral property acquisition     50,000     34,500  
Mineral property acquisition     55,000     22,000  
Private placement     3,250,000     1,462,500  
Warrant valuation     -     (339,625 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out     -     (249,300 )
Cost of issue - finder options valuation     -     (165,800 )
Flow-through cost of issue     -     (563,472 )
Balance, May 31, 2007     24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
Private placement     11,169,000     4,950,150  
Warrant valuation     -     (940,212 )
Mineral property acquisition     130,000     45,800  
Exercise of warrants     147,875     66,544  
Exercise of warrants valuation     -     36,673  
Cost of issue - cash laid out     -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation     -     (227,417 )
Flow-through cost of issue     -     (260,255 )
Balance, May 31, 2008     36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
Mineral property acquisition     30,000     10,800  
Private placement     8,333,333     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation     -     (30,666 )
Flow-through cost of issue     -     (120,833 )
Balance, May 31, 2009     44,652,098   $  14,430,400  
Mineral property acquisition     750,000     67,000  
Debt conversion     360,937     28,875  
Exercise of warrants – cash     333,333     16,667  
Exercise of warrants – valuation     -     15,333  
Private placement     26,666,665     2,000,000  
Cost of issue – cash     -     (36,392 )
Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation     -     (1,440,000 )
Balance, May 31, 2010 and August 31, 2010     72,763,033   $  15,081,883  
               

- 15 -


8.  Warrants

          Weighted Average  
    Number of Warrants     Exercise Price  
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004  

-

  $

-

 
Issued 602,500 1.44  
Expired/cancelled   -     -  
Balance, May 31, 2005 602,500 $  1.44  
Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
Expired/cancelled (602,500 (1.44  
Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
Issued 4,189,999 0.91  
Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654     1.60  
Balance, May 31, 2007 6,581,583 $  1.18  
Issued   5,853,480     0.62  
Issued 73,937 0.65  
Exercised   (147,875     0.45  
Balance, May 31, 2008 12,361,125 $  0.92  
Expired   (6,307,645     (1.18  
Issued 666,666 0.05  
Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
Expired (6,053,480 (0.60  
Issued   26,666,665     0.12  
Exercised (333,333 (0.65  
Balance, May 31, 2010 and August 31, 2010   26,999,998   $  0.12  

The following are the warrants outstanding at August 31, 2010:

                   
Number of   Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
Warrants   Value     Price ($)        
333,333   15,333     0.05     December 4, 2010  
26,666,665   1,440,000     0.12     December 3, 2011  
26,999,998 $  1,455,333              

- 16 -



9. Stock Options
 
           
    Number     Weighted Average  
    of     Exercise  
    Stock Options     Price  
Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
Granted   2,700,000     0.63  
Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
Granted   4,250,000     0.15  
Expired   (1,375,000 )   0.75  
Forfeited   (1,400,000 )   0.93  
Balance, May 31, 2010   5,875,000   $  0.38  
Cancelled   (225,000 )   (0.15 )
Balance, August 31, 2010   5,650,000   $  0.39  

 

- 17 -
 


9. Stock Options (Continued)

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at August 31, 2010:

                   
    Options outstanding           Options exercisable  
          Weighted average                 Weighted  
          remaining     Weighted           average  
    Number     contractual     average     Number     exercise  
Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     price  
April 3, 2011   250,000     0.84     1.80     250,000     1.80  
December 9, 2014   900,000     4.53     0.15     900,000     0.15  
September 27, 2012   1,825,000     2.33     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
June 23, 2014   2,675,000     4.07     0.15     2,675,000     0.15  
    5,650,000     3.44 years   $  0.39     5,650,000     0.39  

10. Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.

       
    Three Months Ended  
    August 31,  
    2010     2009  
Numerator for basic loss per share $  (84,258 ) $  (463,040 )
Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (84,258 ) $  (463,040 )
Denominator:            
Weighted average number of common shares - basic   72,763,033     44,652,098  
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted   72,763,033     44,652,098  
Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )

Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.  

- 18-


11. Segmented Information

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2009 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

The Company operates in two geographic segments for the three months ended August 31, 2010, and year ended May 31, 2010 as follows.

             
    August 31,     May 31,  
    2010     2010  
Canada $  5,167,437   $  5,372,915  
Peru   398,558     287,708  
Total assets $  5,565,995   $  5,660,623  

12.  Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

(i)

For three months period ended August 31, 2010, $37,500 (three months ended August 31, 2009 - $37,500) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $18,750 (three months ended August 31, 2009 - $26,500) capitalized to mining interests.

     
(ii)

For three months period ended August 31, 2010, $9,000 (three months ended August 31, 2009 - $9,000) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

     
(iii)

The Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The loan is unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO.

     

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

- 19 -


13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

The Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2010 consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share- Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

For the three months ended August 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the three months ended August 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for-sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 12 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

- 20 -


13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at August 31, 2010 and May 31, 2010 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:

    August 31, 2010     May 31, 2010  
Assets            
Current assets            
Cash $  1,226,090   $  1,432,824  
Short term investments   25,099     25,037  
GST and sundry receivable   40,118     29,719  
Prepaid expenses   12,777     12,876  
Due from a related party   2,929     -  
    1,307,013     1,500,456  
Reclamation bond   14,001     13,699  
Mineral property rights   713,454     712,101  
  $  2,034,468   $  2,226,256  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
Accounts payable $  78,610   $  7,835  
Accrued liabilities   -     81,449  
    78,610     89,284  
Assets retirement obligation   14,001     13,699  
    92,611     102,983  
Shareholders' Equity            
Share capital            
Authorized - unlimited common shares            
Issued            
       Common shares   16,757,873     16,757,873  
       Additional paid in capital   4,390,914     4,390,914  
       Warrants   1,455,333     1,455,333  
       Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
       Deferred share-based payments   4,591,091     4,591,091  
       Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
       Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (21,794,106 )   (21,612,690 )
    1,941,857     2,123,273  
  $  2,034,468   $  2,226,256  

- 21 -
 


13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss                    
          Three              
            Months           Cumulative  
            Ended           from date  
    August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     of inception  
    2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004" )
Expenses                        
General exploration $  99,552   $  82,425   $  234,766   $  9,390,898  
Management services   27,750     388,500     74,214     5,254,111  
Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   13,509     17,393     16,824     1,960,570  
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Professional fees   31,169     42,438     30,729     1,254,813  
Office and administration   9,499     11,934     17,185     678,637  
Flow-through interest expense   -     -     -     188,801  
Gain on forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (35,667 )
Failed merger costs   -     -     -     170,000  
Loss before the under noted   (181,479 )   (542,690 )   (373,718 )   (18,863,398 )
Interest income   63     (2,589 )   1,842     104,234  
Write-off mineral property rights   -     -     -     (90,144 )
Net loss for the period   (181,416 )   (545,279 )   (371,876 )   (18,849,308 )
Comprehensive (loss) items:                        
Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     (25,000 )
Comprehensive loss for the period $  (181,416 ) $  (545,279 ) $  (371,876 ) $  (18,874,308 )
Loss per common share                        
Basic $  (0.00 )   (0.01 )   (0.01 )      
Diluted $  (0.00 )   (0.01 )   (0.01 )      
Comprehensive loss per                        
common share                        
Basic $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 )      
Diluted $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.01 )      

- 22 -
 


13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:

          Amount  
          Under  
Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
Private placement   120,000     120,000  
Private placement   150,000     150,000  
Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
Private placement   175,000     175,000  
Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
Debt conversation   80,000     100,000  
Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
Private placement   590,320     737,900  
Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
Private placement   400,000     500,000  
Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 23 -



13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)            
          Amount  
          Under  
Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
Private placements   11,169,000     4,950,150  
Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
Private placements   26,666,665     2,000,000  
Cost of issue – cash   -     (36,392 )
Mineral property acquisition   750,000     67,000  
Debt conversion   360,937     28,875  
Exercise of warrants - valuation   -     15,333  
Exercise of warrants – cash   333,333     16,667  
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
Balance, May 31, 2010 and August 31, 2010   72,763,033   $  16,757,873  
             
                   Other charges in shareholders’ equity are presented as follows:            
             
Additional Paid in Capital            
Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005     $ 25,000  
Expired warrants         173,388  
Balance, May 31, 2006     $ 198,388  
Expired warrants         449,956  
Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008     $ 648,344  
Expired warrants         2,569,432  
Balance, May 31, 2009     $ 3,217,776  
Expired warrants         1,173,138  
Balance, May 31, 2010 and August 31, 2010     $ 4,390,914  

- 24 -



13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)      
       
Warrants      
Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
Issued   173,388  
Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
Issued   2,086,995  
Expired   (173,388 )
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
Issued   974,575  
Expired   (449,956 )
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
Issued   1,167,629  
Exercised   (36,673 )
Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
Issued   30,666  
Expired   (2,569,432 )
Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
Issued   1,440,000  
Exercised   (15,333 )
Expired   (1,173,138 )
Balance, May 31, 2010 and August 31, 2010 $  1,455,333  
       
Cumulative Adjustments to Marketable Securities      
Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 $  (315,539 )
Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (325,305 )
Comprehensive loss items   -  
Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and August 31, 2010 $  (325,305 )

 - 25 -


13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       
Deferred Share-Based Payments      
Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
Vesting of stock options   775,613  
Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
Vesting of stock options   573,700  
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 $  4,141,600  
Vesting of stock options   449,491  
Balance, May 31, 2010 and August 31, 2010 $  4,591,091  

       
Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage      
Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
Net loss   4,678  
Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
Net loss   (1,743,463 )
Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
Net loss   (3,673,388 )
Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
Net loss   (6,052,723 )
Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
Net loss   (6,157,896 )
Balance, May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
Net loss   (2,586,978 )
Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
Net loss   (1,387,686 )
Balance, May 31, 2010 $  (21,612,690 )
Net loss   (181,416 )
Balance, August 31, 2010 $  (21,794,106 )

 - 26 -



13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)              
               
    The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:              
               
    Statements of Cash Flows                        
                      Cumulative  
          Three Months Ended           from date  
    August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     of inception  
    2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004" )
Cash flows from operating activities                        
Net loss for the period $  (181,416 ) $  (545,279 ) $  (371,876 ) $  (18,849,308 )
Items not involving cash:                        
Forgiveness of debt   -     -     -     (6,792 )
Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
Share-based payments   -     368,500     -     4,479,616  
Accrued Interest income   -     (126 )   (1,279 )   (59,539 )
Write-off of mineral property rights   -     -     -     90,144  
Change in non-cash operating working activities:                
GST and sundry receivable   (13,702 )   (4,377 )   27,114     (48,101 )
Prepaid expenses   99     3,967     (28,456 )   (7,107 )
Due from a related party   -     -     -     15,099  
Accounts payable   70,775     72,994     143,889     149,629  
Accrued liabilities   (81,449 )   (43,442 )   (45,000 )   (64,288 )
Cash flows used in operating activities   (205,693 )   (147,763 )   (275,608 )   (14,299,412 )
Cash flows from financing activities                        
Repayment of loans from related                        
parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   -     -     -     20,068,877  
Cost of issue   -     -     -     (1,812,701 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
Cash flows provided by financing activities - - -

18,327,582

Cash flows from investing activities                        
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     -     (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   (62 )   407,493     534,804     18,841  
Exploration advances   -     -     -     -  
Purchase of mineral property rights   (979 )   (41,669 )   (85,135 )   (2,807,832 )
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities   (1,041 )   365,824     449,669     (2,802,081 )
Change in cash during the period   (206,734 )   218,061     174,061     1,226,089  
Cash, beginning of period   1,432,824     106,593     84,856     1  
Cash, end of period $  1,226,090   $  324,654   $  258,917   $  1,226,090  

- 27 -


13. Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

                      Cumulative  
    Three Months Ended           from date  
    August 31,     August 31,     August 31,     of inception  
    2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004" )
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transaction                        
Share issuance included in mining Interest $ - $ - $ 10,800 $ 563,875
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

14. Comparative Figures

Certain prior year figures have been reclassified to conform with the current period’s presentation.

 - 28 -


EX-99.56 57 exhibit99-56.htm EXHIBIT 99.56 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.56 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.56

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three months ended August 31, 2010 (“first quarter 2011”) and its financial position as at August 31, 2010. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2010. The comparative reporting period is the three-month period ended August 31, 2009 (“first quarter 2010”)

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13 to the interim consolidated financial statements for the first quarter 2011.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

This MD&A was prepared on October 15, 2010.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in Peru and the provinces of Ontario and Manitoba in Canada.

Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Activities during the first quarter 2011

During fiscal 2010, the Company continued with pre-development and other fieldwork activities at its Giulianita property in Peru. The Company also met extensively with the local community to gain the necessary approvals and community involvement for the project.

Management and the Board believe that the financing of the Giulianita project in Peru is aligned with the enhanced corporate strategy of aggressively pursuing potential cash-flow opportunities and that such small-scale mining opportunities represent an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate its own exploration funds.

Properties and Projects

The Company focused its fieldwork and exploration activities on the Giulianita Property during the first quarter 2011.

Giulianita Property, Peru

The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion, has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,000 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

Efforts focused on negotiations with various communities for surface access rights to the project area and working with local community groups, government groups and consulting engineering groups in advance of surface exploration work.

During the first quarter 2011, the Company spent $96,786 on preliminary exploration and fieldwork and property acquisition costs, compared with $55,251 for the first quarter 2010. Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to August 31, 2010 were $372,590.

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 67% [I JUST RECEIVED A LETTER FROM FRONTEER ACKNOWLEDGING OUR WORKING INTEREST HAS INCREASED TO 67% AT DIXIE AS A RESULT OF PAST DRILL PROGRAMS ON THE PROPERTY – I PRESUME WE SHOULD MAKE THE CHANGE] interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

2


April 28, 2010 Grandview acquired the final 40% interest in ten (10) unpatented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”) from joint venture partner EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and eliminated all net smelter royalties previously due to EMCO under the terms of the original agreement. The Company negotiated the acquisition of two additional unpatented mining claims and two patented mining claims, and reduced the net smelter royalty on the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property to 0.375% as part of an overall property position.

Exploration costs of $1,353 were incurred during the first quarter 2011 on the Red Lake Properties (first quarter 2010: $68,783). Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to August 31, 2010 were $3,875,320.

Rice Lake Properties – Bissett, GVG, Angelina and Banksian in Manitoba, Canada

Grandview owns a 100% interest in three (3) unpatented mining claims, one patented claim and one mineral lease located near Bissett, Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claims”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in sixteen (16) unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering approximately 3,187 hectares (the “GVG Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in four (4) unpatented mining claims covering 351 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in southeastern Manitoba (the “Angelina Property”).

Grandview has a 100% interest in fourteen (14) unpatented mining claims in the Banksian Lake area of southeastern Manitoba, covering 2,824 hectares (the “Banksian Property”).

At the end of fiscal 2009, the Company wrote off the total accumulated capitalized exploration expenditures incurred on these properties of $1,557,112 (2010: $Nil, 2008: $Nil).

Results of Operations

First Quarter 2011

Grandview incurred a net loss of $84,258 for the first quarter 2011, compared with $463,040 for the first quarter 2010. The increase in net loss for the first quarter 2011 compared with the corresponding period last year is predominantly attributable to share-based payment expense of $368,500 incurred during the first quarter 2010.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the first quarter 2011 of $108,595 compares with $65,398 for the first quarter 2010. The reason for the variance is attributable predominantly to diminished operational activities at the Giulianita Project during the comparative quarter.

3


SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.




First
Quarter
Aug. 31,
2010
Fourth
Quarter
May 31,
2010
Third
Quarter
Feb. 28,
2010
Second
Quarter
Nov. 30,
2009
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 84,321 135,455 176,465 107,809
Net loss (84,258) (106,941) (202,743) (107,679)
Net loss per share (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00)
Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (108,595) (76,904) (373,500) 119,243
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,251,189 1,457,861 1,754,330 232,744
Assets 5,565,995 5,660,623 5,698,180 4,093,313




First
Quarter
Aug. 31,
2009
Fourth
Quarter
May 31,
2009
Third
Quarter
Feb. 28,
2009
Second
Quarter
Nov. 30,
2008
Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Expenses 460,325 74,970 243,077 98,801
Net income (loss) (463,040) (6,063,504) (1,589,709) (96,316)
Net income (loss) per share (0.01) (0.16) (0.04) (0.00)
Cash flows used in operating activities (65,398) (70,034) (112,647) (125,485)
Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 324,654 514,086 694,958 479,071
Assets 3,934,256 3,999,201 10,094,150 11,369,813

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Grandview’s working capital on August 31, 2010 was $1,225,472 compared with $1,407,869 on May 31, 2010. The cash and short-term investment balance on August 31, 2010 was $1,226,090 and $25,099 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2010 of $1,432,824 and $25,037 respectively.

225,000 stock options were cancelled during the first quarter 2011.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at October 15, 2010 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

4


DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of August 31, 2010 and October 15, 2010, the Company had outstanding 72,763,033 common shares, 26,999,998 warrants and 5,650,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For first quarter 2011, $37,500 (first quarter 2010: $37,500) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $18,750 (first quarter 2010: $26,500) capitalized to mining interests.

For first quarter 2011, $9,000 (first quarter 2010: $9,000) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

5


Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at August 31, 2010 of $14,001, compared with $13,699 as at May 31, 2010.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

6


Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of August 31, 2010, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of August 31, 2010, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during first quarter 2011 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The CICA announced that publicly accountable enterprises would be required to transition from GAAP to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), effective January 1, 2011. This mandate is first applicable to interim reporting periods during 2011 and also requires the presentation of comparative financial information for 2010. For this reason, the effective conversion for the Company’s reporting purposes is June 1, 2009, even though full disclosure under IFRS will first be required during 2011.

7


The Company established an IFRS plan and has tasked a service provider and a professional service firm with developing the transitional reporting under IFRS. The plan calls for four phases, being the scoping and planning phase, the assessment phase, the implementation phase and post-implementation.

The scoping and planning phase involves establishing a project team and organizational structure, including oversight of the process and includes a project plan, stakeholder analysis and communication plan. This phase also entails an initial assessment of the key areas where IFRS transition may have a significant impacts. During the year the Company will prepare an initial diagnostic of the key areas in which adjustments are expected, incorporating an analysis of the transition exceptions and exemptions available under IFRS 1 “First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, as well as an assessment of the accounting policy choices available to the Company upon adoption.

The assessment phase will involve technical analysis that will result in understanding potential impacts, quantification of alternatives where there are accounting policy choices, detailed analysis and decisions taken regarding IFRS 1 exemptions and exceptions available to the Company and the drafting of accounting policies in accordance with IFRS. In addition this will result in identifying resource and training requirements, processes for preparing financial statements, and establishing IT system requirements. The Company intends to disclose its progress in accomplishing this phase in its Management Discussion and Analysis documents during 2010.

During the implementation phase, the Company will apply management’s accounting choices, develop sample financial statements, implement business and internal control requirements, calculate the opening balance sheet at June 1, 2009 and other transitional reconciliations and disclosure requirements. The last phase, post-implementation, will involve continuous monitoring of changes in IFRS maintaining IFRS competencies through training and development.

Progress on IFRS Transition Plan

The progress to date may be summarized as follows:

Scoping and planning phase – complete.

Assessment phase – substantially complete, expected to be completed by third quarter of fiscal 2010.

Implementation phase – in progress, expected to completed by fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

Post-implementation – Beginning 2011 and thereafter.

To date, the Company’s evaluation of potential changes to accounting policies in key areas are summarized below. The list is in no way intended to represent a complete list of areas where adoption of IFRS will require a change in accounting policies, but does highlight the most significant areas identified to date. Changes and ongoing developments regarding IFRS as developed by the International Accounting Standards Board may have an effect on the changes required to the Company’s accounting policies on adoption of IFRS, but is not anticipated that such changes would require substantial changes to the summary presented below.

First-time Adoption of IFRS

The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS 1”), which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS, effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

8


The Company has identified the following optional exemptions that it expects to apply in its preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at June 1, 2009:

  • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.
  • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.
  • To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the transition date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the transition date.
  • To apply the transition provisions of IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease, therefore determining if arrangements existing at the transition date contain a lease based on the circumstances existing at that date.
  • To apply IAS 23 Borrowing Costs prospectively from the transition date. IAS 23 requires the capitalization of borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, production or construction of certain assets.

Prior to reporting interim financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the quarter ending August 31, 2010, the Company may decide to apply other optional exemptions contained in IFRS 1. IFRS 1 does not permit changes to estimates that have been made previously. Accordingly, estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s opening IFRS statement of financial position as at the transition date will be consistent with those made under current Canadian GAAP. If necessary, estimates will be adjusted to reflect any difference in accounting policy.

Impact of Adopting IFRS on the Company’s Business

Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

Subject to certain conditions, IFRS currently allows an entity to determine an accounting policy that specifies the treatment of costs related to the exploration for and evaluation of mineral properties. The Company expects to establish an accounting policy to expense, as incurred, all costs relating to exploration and evaluation until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

The application of this policy on the adoption of IFRS will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements to the extent that the value of mineral properties remain unproven. On adoption of IFRS, the carrying value of the unproven mineral properties will be reduced to zero (at the transition date), with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated deficit. All subsequent exploration and evaluation costs will be expensed as incurred until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

Impairment of (Non-financial) Assets

IFRS requires a write down of assets if the higher of the fair market value and the value in use of a group of assets is less than its carrying value. Value in use is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows. Current Canadian GAAP requires a write down to estimated fair value only if the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of a group of assets are less than its carrying value. The Company's accounting policies related to impairment of non-financial assets will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect that this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets. The Company will perform impairment assessments in accordance with IFRS at the transition date.

9


Share-based Payments

In certain circumstances, IFRS requires a different measurement of stock-based compensation related to stock options than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to share-based payments that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

Asset Retirement Obligations (Decommissioning Liabilities)

IFRS requires the recognition of a decommissioning liability for legal or constructive obligations, while current Canadian GAAP only requires the recognition of such liabilities for legal obligations. A constructive obligation exists when an entity has created reasonable expectations that it will take certain actions. The Company's accounting policies related to decommissioning liabilities will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets.

Property and Equipment

IFRS contains different guidance related to recognition and measurement of property and equipment than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to property and equipment that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

In certain circumstances, IFRS contains different requirements related to recognition and measurement of future (deferred) income taxes. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to income taxes that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

OUTLOOK

During the first quarter 2011 the company focused efforts on at its Giulianita project in Peru and maintaining its land position in good standing at other project area in Canada. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario. The Company also has been evaluating a number of mining projects in Peru as part of the small mines development strategy that was implemented in 2009. The Company continues to work with local stake holders, community groups and government representatives to obtain various agreements and approvals to carry out detailed exploration and development work on the Giulianita project in Piura, Peru.

The Company strategy is to explore for, acquire and develop high grade, small output (15,000 to 35,000 ounce per year) mines and develop low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad, in particular Peru. In this regard, the Company is proceeding to develop its Giulianita project in Peru and will be the focus of the Company’s activity over the next 12 months. The Company will also aggressively pursue additional exploration/mining opportunities that fit the designated profile.

10


RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2010, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion and in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

11


EX-99.57 58 exhibit99-57.htm EXHIBIT 99.57 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.57 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.57

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended August 31, 2010.

   
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

   
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

   
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

   
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings


  (a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that


  (i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

     
  (ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and


  (b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.


5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

   
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

   
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

   
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on June 1, 2010, and ended on August 31, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: October 15, 2010

“Ernest Cleave”                  
[Signature]
Chief Financial Officer


EX-99.58 59 exhibit99-58.htm EXHIBIT 99.58 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.58 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.58

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended August 31, 2010.

   
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

   
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

   
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

   
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings


  (a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that


  (i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

     
  (ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and


  (b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.


5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

   
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

   
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

   
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on June 1, 2010, and ended on August 31, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: October 15, 2010

“Paul Sarjeant”                    
[Signature]
Chief Executive Officer


EX-99.59 60 exhibit99-59.htm EXHIBIT 99.59 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.59 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.59



EX-99.60 61 exhibit99-60.htm EXHIBIT 99.60 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.60 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.60



EX-99.61 62 exhibit99-61.htm EXHIBIT 99.61 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.61 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.61

October 26, 2010

Ontario Securities Commission

Dear Sir or Madam:

Re: Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") – Notice of Change of Auditor

We acknowledge receipt of a Notice of Change of Auditor (the “Notice”) dated October 26, 2010 delivered to us by the Corporation in respect of the change of auditor of the Corporation, to be effective as of October 26, 2010.

Pursuant to National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations (Part 4.11) of the Canadian Securities Administrators, please accept this letter as confirmation by McCarney Greenwood LLP, that we have reviewed the Notice and, based on our knowledge as at the time of receipt of the Notice, we agree with each of the statements contained therein.

We trust the foregoing is satisfactory.

Yours very truly,

“McCarney Greenwood LLP”

McCarney Greenwood LLP
Chartered Accountants
License Public Accountants



EX-99.62 63 exhibit99-62.htm EXHIBIT 99.62 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.62 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.62

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on November 29, 2010

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an annual meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 29, 2010 for the following purposes:

1.

to receive the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2010, together with the auditors' report thereon;

   
2.

to elect the directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

   
3.

to appoint the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration; and

   
4.

to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The specific details of the matters to be put before the Meeting as identified above are set forth in a management information circular (the "Circular") of the Corporation accompanying and forming part of this notice. Shareholders should refer to the Circular for more detailed information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

If you are a registered shareholder of the Corporation and are unable to attend the Meeting in person, please date and execute the accompanying form of proxy and return it in the envelope provided to Equity Financial Trust Company, the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 25, 2010, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting.

If you are not a registered shareholder of the Corporation and receive these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the form of proxy in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary.

The directors of the Corporation have fixed the close of business on October 25, 2010 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Corporation entitled to receive notice of the Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors

"Dr. Michael Hitch"

DR. MICHAEL HITCH, PhD., P. Geo
Chairman of the Board of Directors

October 25, 2010


EX-99.63 64 exhibit99-63.htm EXHIBIT 99.63 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.63 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.63

 

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

 

Notice of Meeting

and

Management Information Circular

in respect of the

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

to be held on November 29, 2010

 

OCTOBER 25, 2010


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on November 29, 2010

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an annual meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 29, 2010 for the following purposes:

1.

to receive the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2010, together with the auditors' report thereon;

   
2.

to elect the directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

   
3.

to appoint the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration; and

   
4.

to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The specific details of the matters to be put before the Meeting as identified above are set forth in a management information circular (the "Circular") of the Corporation accompanying and forming part of this notice. Shareholders should refer to the Circular for more detailed information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

If you are a registered shareholder of the Corporation and are unable to attend the Meeting in person, please date and execute the accompanying form of proxy and return it in the envelope provided to Equity Financial Trust Company, the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 25, 2010, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting.

If you are not a registered shareholder of the Corporation and receive these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the form of proxy in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary.

The directors of the Corporation have fixed the close of business on October 25, 2010 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Corporation entitled to receive notice of the Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors

"Dr. Michael Hitch"

DR. MICHAEL HITCH, PhD., P. Geo
Chairman of the Board of Directors

October 25, 2010


GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 29, 2010

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

This Information Circular is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the management ("Management") of Grandview Gold Inc. ("Grandview" or the "Corporation") for use at the annual meeting (the "Meeting") of the shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of the Corporation.

The Meeting will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 29, 2010, and at any adjournments thereof for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders accompanying this Information Circular. Information contained herein is given as of October 25, 2010 unless otherwise specifically stated.

Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail but may be supplemented by solicitation personally by directors, officers and employees of the Corporation without special compensation. The cost of solicitation by Management will be borne by the Corporation.

APPOINTMENT AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

Enclosed herewith is a form of proxy for use at the Meeting. The persons named in the form of proxy are directors and officers of the Corporation. A Shareholder submitting a proxy has the right to appoint a nominee (who need not be a Shareholder) to represent him at the Meeting other than the persons designated in the enclosed proxy form by inserting the name of his chosen nominee in the space provided for that purpose on the form and by striking out the printed names.

A form of proxy will not be valid for the Meeting or any adjournment thereof unless it is signed by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder's attorney authorized in writing or, if the Shareholder is a corporation, it must be executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof. The proxy, to be acted upon, must be deposited with the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, Equity Financial Trust Company at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 25, 2010, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting, or delivering it to the Chairman of the Meeting, on the day of the meeting or any adjournment thereof prior to the time of the voting.

A Shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it prior to its use, in any manner permitted by law, including by instrument in writing executed by the Shareholder or by his attorney authorized in writing or, if the Shareholder is a corporation, executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof and deposited at the office of the Equity Financial Trust Company at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, at which the proxy is to be used, or with the chairman of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

ADVICE TO BENEFICIAL HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES

The information set forth in this section is of significant importance to many Shareholders as a substantial number of Shareholders do not hold shares in their own name. Shareholders who do not hold their shares in their own name (referred to in this Information Circular as "Beneficial Shareholders") should note that only proxies deposited by Shareholders whose names appear on the records of Grandview as the registered holders of Common Shares can be recognized and acted upon at the Meeting. If Common Shares are listed in an account statement provided to a Shareholder by a broker, then in almost all cases those Common Shares will not be registered in the Shareholder's name on the records of Grandview. Such Common Shares will more likely be registered under the names of the Shareholder's broker or an agent of that broker. In Canada, the vast majority of such shares are registered under the names of CDS & Co. (the registration name for CDS Depository and Clearing Services Inc., which acts as nominee for many Canadian brokerage firms). Common Shares held by brokers or their agents or nominees can only be voted (for or against resolutions) upon the instructions of the Beneficial Shareholder. Without specific instructions, brokers and their agents and nominees are prohibited from voting shares for the broker's clients. Therefore, Beneficial Shareholders should ensure that instructions respecting the voting of their Common Shares are communicated to the appropriate person.


Applicable regulatory policy requires intermediaries/brokers to seek voting instructions from Beneficial Shareholders in advance of shareholders' meetings. Every intermediary/broker has its own mailing procedures and provides its own return instructions which should be carefully followed by Beneficial Shareholders in order to ensure that their Common Shares are voted at the Meeting. Often, the form of proxy supplied to a Beneficial Shareholder by its broker is identical to the form of proxy provided to registered shareholders; however, its purpose is limited to instructing the registered shareholder how to vote on behalf of the Beneficial Shareholder. The majority of brokers now delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from clients to Broadridge Financial Services, Inc. ("Broadridge"). Broadridge typically mails a scanable voting instruction form in lieu of the form of proxy. The Beneficial Shareholder is requested to complete and return the voting instruction form to them by mail or facsimile. Alternatively, the Beneficial Shareholder can call a toll-free telephone number to vote the Common Shares held by the Beneficial Shareholder. Broadridge then tabulates the results of all instructions received and provides appropriate instructions respecting the voting of Common Shares to be represented at the Meeting. A Beneficial Shareholder receiving a voting instruction form cannot use that voting instruction form to vote Common Shares directly at the Meeting as the voting instruction form must be returned as directed by Broadridge well in advance of the Meeting in order to have the Common Shares voted.

Although a Beneficial Shareholder may not be recognized directly at the Meeting for the purposes of voting Common Shares registered in the name of his broker (or agent of the broker), a Beneficial Shareholder may attend at the Meeting as proxyholder for a registered shareholder and vote the Common Shares in that capacity. Beneficial Shareholders who wish to attend at the Meeting and indirectly vote their Common Shares as proxyholder for a registered shareholder should enter their own names in the blank space on the instrument of proxy provided to them and return the same to their broker (or the broker's agent) in accordance with the instructions provided by such broker (or agent), well in advance of the Meeting.

VOTING OF PROXIES

All Common Shares represented at the Meeting by properly executed proxies will be voted on any ballot that may be called for and, where a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon has been specified in the accompanying form of proxy, the Common Shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with such instructions. In the absence of any such instruction, the persons whose names appear on the printed form of proxy will vote in favour of all the matters set out thereon. The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein. If any other business or amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting properly comes before the Meeting then discretionary authority is conferred upon the person appointed in the proxy to vote in the manner they see fit, in accordance with their best judgment. At the time of the printing of this Information Circular, Management knows of no such amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Meeting.

SUPPLEMENTAL MAILING LIST

Under National Instrument 51-102 - Continuous Disclosure Obligations, a person or corporation who in the future wishes to receive financial statements and the related management's discussion and analysis from the Corporation must deliver a written request for such material to the Corporation, together with a signed statement that the person or corporation is the owner of securities (other than debt instruments) of the Corporation. Shareholders who wish to receive financial statements and the related management's discussion and analysis are encouraged to send the enclosed mail card, together with the completed form of proxy to Equity Financial Trust Company, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1. Copies of the Corporation's annual and interim financial statements are also available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

- 2 -


APPROVAL OF MATTERS

Unless otherwise noted, approval of matters to be placed before the Meeting is by an "ordinary resolution", which is a resolution passed by a simple majority (50% plus 1) of the votes cast by Shareholders of the Corporation present and entitled to vote in person or by proxy.

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

The authorized capital of the Corporation consists of an unlimited number of common shares (the "Common Shares") and an unlimited number of convertible, redeemable, voting, non-participating shares (the "Preference Shares") of which, on the date of this Circular, 72,763,033 Common Shares and no Preference Shares were issued and outstanding.

Common Shares

The holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meeting of the Shareholders (except meetings at which only the holders of another class of shares are entitled to vote) and are entitled to one vote for each Common Share held. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the Preference Shares or any other shares ranking senior to the Common Shares, the holders of the Common Shares are entitled to: (a) receive any dividends as and when declared by the board of directors of the Corporation (the "Board") out of the assets of the Corporation properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the Board may from time to time determine; and (b) receive the remaining property of the Corporation in the event of any liquidation, dissolution of winding-up of the Corporation.

Each Shareholder is entitled to one vote for each Common Share shown as registered in his or her name on the list of Shareholders. The list of Shareholders will be prepared as of October 25, 2010, the record date fixed for determining shareholders entitled to the notice of the Meeting.

Other than as set out below, to the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Corporation, as of the date hereof, no person or company beneficially owns, or controls or directs, directly or indirectly, voting securities carrying ten percent (10%) or more of the voting rights attached to any class of voting securities of the Corporation.

Shareholder Number of Securities Held % of Issued and
Outstanding Voting
Securities Held
Centerpoint Resources Inc. 20,000,000 Common Shares 27.49%

DIVIDEND POLICY

The Corporation has not paid any dividends on the Common Shares to date and does not expect to pay dividends on such shares in the foreseeable future. It is anticipated that all available funds will be used to finance the future development of the Corporation.

INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS OR COMPANIES IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED ON

Management is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, of any director or executive officer or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing in any matter to be acted on at the Meeting other than the election of directors or the appointment of auditors.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth the number of Common Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ("Options") issued pursuant to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance, the weighted average exercise price of such outstanding Options and the number of Common Shares remaining available for future issuance under such compensation plans as at May 31, 2010.

- 3 -



Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding Options(1) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding Options Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) 5,875,000 $0.38 8,677,607
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A N/A N/A
TOTAL 5,875,000 0.38 8,677,607

_________
Note:

(1) The Corporation currently has a rolling 20% stock option plan. As at May 31, 2010, 72,763,033 Common Shares were issued and outstanding.

INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Corporation provided a loan of CDN$90,000.00 to the current President and CEO of the Corporation. The loan was unsecured, bore no interest and was due October 31, 2009. As at October 25, 2010, the total balance of the loan had been repaid in full through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO of the Corporation.

Other than as set forth above, none of the directors or executive officers of the Corporation were indebted to the Corporation as at May 31, 2010.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Management functions of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are not to any substantial degree performed by persons other than the directors or executive officers of the Corporation or subsidiary of the Corporation.

INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

The directors and officers of the Corporation are not aware of any transaction since the beginning of the Corporation's last completed financial year or any proposed transaction that has materially affected or will materially affect the Corporation in which any director or senior officer of the Corporation, any proposed Management nominee for election as a director, any person beneficially owning or exercising control or direction over more than 10% of the Common Shares of the Corporation or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing has or had a material interest, direct or indirect.

ORDINARY BUSINESS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDITORS' REPORT

At the Meeting, Shareholders will consider the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2010 and the auditors' report thereon, but no vote by the Shareholders with respect thereto is required or proposed to be taken.

- 4 -


APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS

Effective October 26, 2010, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PWC"), Chartered Accountants were appointed auditors of the Corporation in place of McCarney Greenwood LLP. Shareholders of the Corporation will be asked at the Meeting to appoint PWC as the Corporation's auditors to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation, and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix the auditors' remuneration.

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, CHATERED ACCOUNTANTS AS AUDITORS OF THE CORPORATION UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND FOR THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE DIRECTORS TO FIX THEIR REMUNERATION.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The articles of the Corporation provide for a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of ten (10) directors. The Corporation has determined that seven (7) directors will be elected at the Meeting.

UNLESS A CHOICE IS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, IT IS INTENDED THAT THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE PROXIES HEREBY SOLICITED WILL BE VOTED BY THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES WHOSE NAMES ARE SET FORTH BELOW, ALL OF WHOM ARE NOW MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND HAVE BEEN SINCE THE DATES INDICATED.

Management does not contemplate that any nominee will be unwilling or unable to serve as director but, if that should occur for any reason prior to the Meeting, it is intended that the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy shall reserve the right to vote for another nominee in his discretion. Each of the following persons is nominated to hold office as a director until the next annual meeting or until his successor is duly elected, unless his office is earlier vacated in accordance with the by-laws of the Corporation.

Name and Municipality of Residence Office held with Grandview Director Since Principal Occupation Common Shares Beneficially Owned Directly or Indirectly(1)
Paul Sarjeant
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Director and Chief Executive Officer November 7, 2006 From 1999 until November, 2006 operated a securities business focused on strategic planning and investment analysis. Since his appointment, Mr. Sarjeant's full time employment has been with the Corporation. 133,333(2)
D. Richard Brown(3)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Director March 26, 2004 Partner at Osprey Capital Partners. 105,000(4)
Michael Hitch(5)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Chairman and Director November 8, 2005 Professor, Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia 66,666(6)
 Peter Born(3)
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Director June, 2007 Ph.D., professional registered geologist (ON) and President of 1727856 Ontario Ltd. 133,333 (7)

- 5 -



Name and Municipality of Residence Office held with Grandview Director Since Principal Occupation Common Shares Beneficially Owned Directly or Indirectly(1)
 Ken Hight (5)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Director May 12, 2008 From 2000-2005 served as CEO of ITG Canada and from 2005 – 2008 served as CEO of E*Trade Canada and concurrently EVP, E*Trade Financial New York, currently, CEO of Liquidnet Cnada until September 2009. Currently Chair and CEO of Rockport Mining Corp. and director of two other TSX-V companies. 133,333(8)
Jack Austin(3)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Director December 3, 2009 Currently Senior Advisor- International to Stern Partners Inc., President of Centerpoint Resources Inc., Chairman and director of New Pacific Minerals Corp. and Director of Yalian Steel Corporation. 600,000(9)
Ted Nunn(5)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Director December 3, 2009 President of Centershield Gold Mines Inc and VP Technical Services for Centerpoint Resources Inc. (10) Nil

_________
Notes:

(1)

The information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, not being within the knowledge of the Corporation, has been furnished by the respective directors and executive officers individually.

(2)

Paul Sarjeant holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,250,000 common shares of the Corporation, 600,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 650,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Sarjeant under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Sarjeant also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

(3)

Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown (Chairman), Jack Austin and Peter Born.

(4)

D. Richard Brown holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation, 200,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Brown under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

(5)

Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ken Hight (Chairman), Ted Nunn and Michael Hitch.

(6)

Dr. Michael Hitch holds options to purchase up to a total of 675,000 common shares of the Corporation, 225,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Dr. Hitch under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan. Dr. Hitch also holds 66,666 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

(7)

Dr. Peter Born holds options to purchase up to a total of 600,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Dr. Born also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

(8)

Ken Hight holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Mr. Hight also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

(9)

Jack Austin holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014. Mr. Austin also holds 600,000 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

(10)

Ted Nunn holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014.

- 6 -


Corporate Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

To the best knowledge of the Corporation, no director or officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation is, as at the date hereof or has been within the last ten years prior to the date hereof, (a) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued while the director or officer of the Corporation was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; (b) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued after the director or officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in such capacity; (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (d) became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director or executive officer of the Corporation, (a) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory or (b) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

Individual Bankruptcies

To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director of the Corporation is, or has within the ten years prior to the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of that individual.

STATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Corporation's Statement of Executive Compensation, in accordance with the requirements of Form 51-102F6 – Statement of Executive Compensation, is set forth below, which contains information about the compensation paid to, or earned by, the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and each of the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation earning more than CDN$150,000.00 in total compensation as at May 31, 2010 (the "Named Executive Officers" or "NEO's") during the Corporation's last three most recently completed financial years. Based on the foregoing, Paul Sarjeant, President, CEO and a director of the Corporation, and Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, are the Corporation's only Named Executive Officers as at May 31, 2010.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Review Process

The Corporation has a Compensation Committee (the "Committee") but does not retain a compensation consultant. The Committee oversees an annual review of director and executive compensation to ensure development of a compensation strategy that properly aligns the interests of directors and executives with the long-term interests of the Corporation and its Shareholders. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Ken Hight, Ted Nunn and Dr. Michael Hitch.

The Compensation Committee reviews on an annual basis the cash compensation, performance and overall compensation package for each NEO. It then submits to the Board recommendations with respect to the basic salary, bonus and participation in share compensation arrangements for each NEO. After discussing various factors with both Management and peers in the industry, and receiving recommendations for bonuses and 2010 salaries for executive officers, the Compensation Committee made its recommendations to the Board for approval. In conducting its review of Management’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee was satisfied that all recommendations complied with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy and guidelines set forth above.

- 7 -


Objectives of the Compensation Program

The objectives of the Corporation's compensation program are to attract, hold and inspire performance of members of Management of a quality and nature that will enhance the sustainable growth of the Corporation.

To determine compensation payable, the compensation committee of the Corporation (the "Compensation Committee") reviews compensation paid for directors and officers of companies of similar business, size and stage of development and determine an appropriate compensation reflecting the need to provide incentive and compensation for the time and effort expended by the directors and NEO's while taking into account the financial and other resources of the Corporation.

The annual salaries for NEOs are designed to be comparable to executive compensation packages for similar positions at companies with similar financial, operating and industrial characteristics. The NEOs will be paid an annual salary that also takes into account his or her existing professional qualifications and experience. The NEOs' performances and salaries are to be reviewed periodically on the anniversary of their appointment to their respective officer-ships with the Corporation. Increases in salary are to be evaluated on an individual basis and are performance and market-based.

The Board is given discretion to determine and adjust, year to year, the relative weighting of each form of compensation discussed above in a manner which best measures the success of the Corporation and its NEO's.

Elements of Executive Compensation

The Corporation's executive compensation program is based on the objectives of: (a) recruiting and retaining the executives critical to the success of the Corporation; (b) providing fair and competitive compensation; (c) balancing the interests of Management and Shareholders; and (d) rewarding performance, on the basis of both individual and corporate performance.

For the financial year ended May 31, 2010, the Corporation's executive compensation program consisted of the following elements:

  (a)

a base salary, incentive cash bonuses and other compensation (together, a "Short-Term Incentive"); and

     
  (b)

a long-term equity compensation consisting of stock options granted under the Corporation's stock incentive plan (each, a "Long-Term Incentive").

The specific rationale and design of each of these elements are outlined in detail below.

Element of Compensation Summary and Purpose of Element
   
Short-Term Incentive Plan  
   
Base Salary Executive annual base salaries are set at a level that is competitive with compensation for executive officers of peer group oil and gas companies and having regard to the potential longer term compensation provided by the Option Plan.
Salaries form an essential element of the Corporation's compensation mix as they are the first base measure to compare and remain competitive relative to peer groups. Base salaries are fixed and therefore not subject to uncertainty and are used as the base to determine other elements of compensation and benefits.
The Compensation Committee and the Board review NEO salaries at least annually. Typically, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, makes annual salary adjustments no later than April 15th of each year for the 12 month period from June 1st to May 31st .

- 8 -



Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives Any bonus paid to the NEO's is entirely within the discretion of the Board, following consideration by the Compensation Committee. In making bonus determinations, the Board reviews corporate and individual performance.
Annual performance-based cash bonuses are a variable component of compensation designed to reward the Corporation’s executive officers for maximizing annual operating performance.
   
Other Compensation (Perquisites) There are currently no other forms of compensation.
   
Long-Term Incentive Plan  
   
Stock Options The granting of stock options is a variable component of compensation intended to reward the NEO's for their success in achieving sustained, long-term profitability and increases in stock value.
The executive officers are entitled to participate in the Option Plan which forms an important element of the Corporations compensation policies. Options grants are periodically made to recognize exemplary performance (including in connection with a promotion within the Corporation) and provide for long-term reward and incentive for increasing shareholder value and align the interests of the executive officers with the long- term interests of shareholders. Options may also be granted to executive officers upon their commencement of service.

Base Salary

In determining the base salary of an NEO, the Board's practice in recent years has been to consider the recommendations made by the Compensation Committee and then review and summarize these recommendations as well as the previous year’s remuneration paid to executives with similar titles at a comparative group of companies in the marketplace. In determining the base salary to be paid to a particular executive officer, the Board also considers the particular responsibilities related to the position, the experience level of the NEO, and his or her past performance at the Corporation.

The Board believes that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels based in large part on a general consideration against similar companies, both in terms of compensation practices as well as levels of compensation. In this way, the Corporation can gauge if its compensation is competitive in the marketplace for its talent, as well as ensure that the Corporation's compensation is reasonable. Accordingly, the Board reviews compensation levels for the Named Executive Officers against compensation levels of the comparison companies which are identified by the Board.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

NEO's are eligible for annual cash bonuses, and the Board considers both corporate and the individual performance of each NEO. There is no policy currently in place for determining bonuses, and the Board reviews generally the individual’s impact on maximizing operating performance. In general the Corporation will consider the following factors, depending on the relevance of these factors to the particular NEO, when determining potential bonuses:

  (a)

performance against budget;

     
  (b)

expense control;

     
  (c)

performance factors; and

     
  (d)

other exceptional or unexpected factors.

In taking into account the financial performance aspect, it is recognized that NEO's cannot control certain factors, such as overall market conditions. When applying the financial performance criteria, the Board considers factors over which the NEO's can exercise control, such as meeting budget targets established by the Board at the beginning of each year, controlling costs, taking successful advantage of business opportunities and enhancing the competitive and business prospects of the Corporation.

- 9 -


With respect to the financial year ended May 31, 2010, no bonuses were awarded to any Named Executive Officers. Paul Sarjeant was awarded a bonus of CDN$10,000.00 on August 25, 2010.

Other Compensation – Perquisites

With respect to the financial year ended May 31, 2010, no perquisites were paid for by the Corporation in respect of the NEO’s.

Stock Options

To determine the granting of stock options to its NEO's, the Committee reviews the matter and makes a recommendation to the Board. The Board reviews each recommendation and decides whether to accept, reject or alter such recommendation. The Board considers prior grants, the role of the individual in the operating performance of the company, and salary and cash bonuses being paid.

During the financial year ended May 31, 2010, no stock options were granted to the Named Executive Officers.

Other Long-Term Incentive Plans

The Corporation does not have any other long-term incentive plans and does not provide retirement benefits to its employees.

Overview of How the Compensation Program Fits with Compensation Goals

1. Attract, Hold and Inspire Key Talent

The compensation package meets the goal of attracting, holding and motivating key talent in a highly competitive mineral exploration environment through the following elements:

  (a)

A competitive cash compensation program, consisting of base salary and bonus opportunity, which is generally above similar opportunities.

     
  (b)

Providing an opportunity to participate in the Corporation's growth through options.

2. Alignment of Interests of NEO's with Interests of the Shareholders

The compensation package meets the goal of aligning the interests of the NEO's with the interests of Shareholders through the following elements:

  (a)

Through the grant of stock options, if the price of the Corporation shares increases over time, both NEO's and Shareholders will benefit.

     
  (b)

By providing a vesting period on stock awards, NEO's have an interest in increasing the price of the Corporation's shares over time, rather than focusing on short-term increases.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming an initial investment of $100 in Common Shares on May 31, 2006 against the cumulative total shareholder return of the S&P/TSX Composite Index for all of the Corporation's most recently completed financial years since it became a reporting issuer, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.

- 10 -


(in C$)   May 31, 2006     May 31, 2007     May 31, 2008     May 31, 2009     May 31, 2010  
Grandview Gold Inc.(1) $ 100.00   $ 53.33   $ 33.89   $ 7.78   $ 8.89  
TSX Venture Exchange $ 100.00   $ 114.34   $ 93.72   $ 39.65   $ 53.04  
S&P/TSX Composite Index $ 100.00   $ 119.69   $ 125.29   $ 90.29   $ 100.16  

_______
Note:

(1) Listed as "GVX" on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Summary Compensation Table

The following tables provide information for the three most recently completed financial years ended May 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 regarding compensation earned by each of the following Named Executive Officers of the Corporation: (a) Paul Sarjeant, President, CEO and a director of the Corporation; and (b) Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.

The first table outlines the information for the financial year ended May 31, 2010 in accordance with the new Form 51-102F6 and the second table outlines the information for the financial years ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 in accordance with the old Form 51-102F6.

Unless otherwise noted, salaries for the Named Executive Officers are paid in Canadian dollars.

Financial Year Ended May 31, 2010


Name and principal position

Salary
($)

Share- based awards
($)

Option-based awards
($)
Non-equity incentive plan compensation
($)

Pension Value
($)

All other compensation
($)

Total compensation
($)
Annual incentive plans Long-term incentive plans
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
150,000.00 Nil 71,500 Nil Nil Nil 10,000 231,500
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
36,000 Nil 24,750 Nil Nil Nil Nil 60,750

- 11 -


Financial Years Ended May 31, 2010 ¸May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2008



Name and Principal Position


Year
                   Annual Compensation              Long-Term Compensation

All Other Compensation
($)

Salary
($)

Bonus
($)

Other Annual Compensation
($)
Awards Payouts
Securities Under Options Granted
(#)
Shares or Units Subject to Resale Restrictions
($)
LTIP Payouts
($)
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
2010 150,000.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil N/A 10,000
2009 150,010.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil N/A 94,000
2008 150,000.00 Nil 24,000.00 650,000 Nil N/A Nil
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
2010 36,000 Nil Nil Nil Nil N/A Nil
2009 51,794.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil N/A Nil
2008 76,974.00 Nil Nil 225,000 Nil N/A Nil

Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion

The Corporation has entered into executive employment agreements with each of its Named Executive Officers, as described below.

Paul Sarjeant

The Corporation entered into a consulting agreement made effective as of the 31st day of October, 2006 (the "Sarjeant Agreement") with Paul Sarjeant and his duly registered sole proprietorship (the "Consultant"), engaging Mr. Sarjeant to act as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. The compensation payable for such services is a base salary of CDN$150,000.00 per year, payable in monthly payments of CDN$12,500.00, subject to review by the Board, the payment of business expenses, the provision of consultant benefits and the awarding of bonuses at the option and discretion of the Board, to be payable in either cash or Common Shares. The initial term of the Sarjeant Agreement was three (3) years, subject to additional one (1) year extensions, and was renewed on October 31, 2009 for a further two (2) year term.

Ernest Cleave

The Corporation entered into a consulting contract agreement made as of the 10th day of November, 2005 with Ernest Cleave (the "Cleave Agreement"), engaging Mr. Cleave to act as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. The compensation payable for such services is a contract fee of CDN$36,000.00, payable in monthly payments of CDN$3,000.00, subject to review by the board, and compensation of expenses. The initial term of the Cleave Agreement was from November 10, 2005 to May 31, 2006, which term is automatically extended for additional two (2) year terms until otherwise terminated.

Incentive Plan Awards

The following table provides information regarding the incentive plan awards for each Named Executive Officer outstanding as of May 31, 2010.

- 12 -


Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards


Name and principal position
                 Option-based Awards                    Share-based Awards
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Option exercise price (C$) Option expiration date Value of unexercised in-the-money options ($) (1) Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested (#) Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested ($)
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
600,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 Nil Nil Nil
650,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
250,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 Nil Nil Nil
225,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil

The following table provides information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for the financial year ended May 31, 2010.

Value Vested or Earned During the Financial Year Ended May 31, 2010

Name and principal position Option-based awards – Value vested during the year ($) Share-based awards – Value vested during the year ($) Non-equity incentive plan compensation – Value earned during the year ($)
Paul Sarjeant
President, CEO and a Director
71,500 Nil Nil
Ernest Cleave
Chief Financial Officer
24,750 Nil Nil

Incentive Plan Awards – Narrative Discussion

Pension Plan Benefits

The Corporation does not currently provide pension plan benefits to its Named Executive Officers.

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

The termination and change of control benefits set forth in the executive employment agreements entered into between the Corporation and each of its Named Executive Officers are described below.

Paul Sarjeant

The Sarjeant Agreement, described in "Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion", above, does not contain any change of control provisions. The termination provisions are as follows:

  (a)

If the Corporation terminates the Sarjeant Agreement at will, without cause, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant within sixty (60) days of the date of termination a settlement amount equal to nine (9) months' of the base salary at the rate in effect immediately prior to the effective date of termination and, to the extent earned, pay to the Consultant within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement;

- 13 -



   
     
  (b)

If the Corporation terminates the Sarjeant Agreement for cause or if, during the term of the Sarjeant Agreement, Mr. Sarjeant, in the reasonable judgment of the Board, acting in good faith, becomes unable, by reason of physical or mental disability, with or without reasonable accommodation, to adequately perform the duties and obligations under the Sarjeant Agreement, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant, to the extent earned, within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement;

     
  (c)

If the Consultant terminates the Sarjeant Agreement at will by giving three (3) months' prior written notice to the Board, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement

     
  (d)

In the event of dissolution of the Consultant or the death of Mr. Sarjeant, the Corporation shall pay all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement and such other death benefits that Mr. Sarjeant's survivors may be entitled to under such plans, programs and policies maintained by the Corporation;

     
  (e)

In the event of termination of the Sarjeant Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (b) and (c), above, any stock options held by the Consultant that have not vested as of the date of such termination shall be deemed to be terminated and any stock options held by the Consultant that have vested as of the date of such termination shall remain exercisable subject to the terms of the stock option plan and/or agreement pursuant to which said stock options were originally granted;

     
  (f)

In the event of termination of the Sarjeant Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (d), above, all unvested stock options held by the Consultant shall be deemed to have vested as of the effective date of termination or deemed termination to allow the Consultant (or his personal representatives) to exercise the options to purchase shares granted thereby with regard to that number of shares that the Consultant would have been entitled to purchase had his employment continued for a period of three (3) months from the effective date of such termination or deemed termination; and

     
  (g)

In the event that any of the terms of such options set forth in paragraphs (e) and (f), above, are not ascertainable or in the event that applicable securities legislation precludes the acceleration of the vesting dates in the manner described herein, the Corporation agrees to compensate the Consultant by way of a cash payment, paid within one hundred twenty (120) days of the effective date of termination of the Consultant, of that amount of money which the Consultant would have been entitled to if it had exercised any such options on the effective date of termination or deemed termination at the applicable exercise price and sold the securities on the exchange or market where the majority of the Company's shares are then traded, at a price equal to the average trading price for the last ten (10) business days preceding the effective date of termination on which the subject securities were traded.

Ernest Cleave

The Cleave Agreement, described in "Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion", above, does not contain any change of control provisions. The termination provisions are as follows:

  (a)

If the Corporation terminates the Cleave Agreement at will, the Corporation shall pay to Mr. Cleave an amount equal to three (3) months of the contract fee at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, payable in one lump sum on the date of termination; and

- 14 -



  (b)

If Mr. Cleave terminates the Cleave Agreement for "good reason", the Corporation shall pay to Mr. Cleave an amount equal to one (1) month of the contract fee at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, payable in one lump sum on the date of termination, where the term "good reason" means, if, without Mr. Cleave's consent, there is a material reduction in his duties and responsibilities, there is a material reduction of the contract fee or the Corporation breaches any material provision of the Cleave Agreement and such breach is not remedied within thirty (30) days' notice.

Estimated Incremental Payment on Change of Control or Termination

The following table provides details regarding the estimated incremental payments from the Corporation to each of Paul Sarjeant and Ernest Cleave upon a change of control or on termination by the Corporation without cause, assuming a triggering event occurred on May 31, 2010. The Hitch Agreement terminated December 31, 2008.

NEO and Agreement Severance Period
(# of months)
Base Salary
(CDN$)
Total Incremental Payment
(CDN$)
Paul Sarjeant – Sarjeant Agreement 9 150,000.00 112,500.00
Ernest Cleave – Cleave Agreement 3 36,000.00 9,000.00
                                                                               TOTALS 12 186,000.00 121,500.00

Director Compensation

The Corporation has no standard arrangement pursuant to which directors are compensated for their services as directors, except for the granting from time to time of incentive stock options in accordance with the Corporation's 2004 stock option plan. Currently, the directors of the Corporation do not receive any compensation for attending meetings of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors.

Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding compensation paid to the Corporation's non-executive directors during the financial year ended May 31, 2010. Information regarding the compensation paid to Paul Sarjeant during the financial year ended May 31, 2010 (including as a director) is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

Name Fees earned ($) Share-based awards ($) (1) Option-based awards ($) Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($) All other compensation ($) Total ($)
D. Richard Brown Nil Nil 49,500 Nil Nil 49,500
Michael Hitch Nil Nil 49,500 Nil 10,000 59,500
Peter Born Nil Nil 49,500 Nil Nil 49,500
Ken Hight Nil Nil 49,500 Nil Nil 49,500
Jack Austin Nil Nil 40,496 Nil Nil 40,496
Ted Nunn Nil Nil 40,496 Nil Nil 40,496
TOTALS Nil Nil 278,992 Nil Nil 278,992

- 15 -


Director Compensation – Narrative Discussion

Incentive Plan Awards

The following table provides information regarding the incentive plan awards for each non-executive director outstanding as of May 31, 2010. Information regarding the incentive plan awards for Paul Sarjeant during the financial year ended May 31, 2010 is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards


Name
                 Option-based Awards                    Share-based Awards
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Option exercise price (C$) Option expiration date Value of unexercised in- the-money options ($) Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested (#) Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested ($)
D. Richard Brown
200,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 Nil Nil Nil
450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Michael Hitch
225,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 Nil Nil Nil
450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Peter Born
150,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 Nil Nil Nil
450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Ken Hight 450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Jack Austin 450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Ted Nunn 450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
Michael Hitch
225,000 0.68 September 27, 2012 Nil Nil Nil
450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil

- 16 -


The following table provides information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for each non-executive director for the financial year ended May 31, 2010. Information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for each of Dr. Michael Hitch and Paul Sarjeant for the financial year ended May 31, 2010 is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

Value Vested or Earned During the Financial Year Ended May 31, 2010

Name Option-based awards – Value vested during the year ($) Share-based awards – Value vested during the year ($) Non-equity incentive plan compensation – Value earned during the year ($)
D. Richard Brown Nil Nil Nil
Michael Hitch Nil Nil Nil
Peter Born Nil Nil Nil
Ken Hight Nil Nil Nil
Jack Austin Nil Nil Nil
Ted Nunn Nil Nil Nil

Incentive Plan Awards – Narrative Discussion

Retirement Policy for Directors

The Corporation does not have a retirement policy for its directors.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

The Corporation procured and funded a directors' and officers' insurance policy with a limit of $2,000,000 liability and carrying $25,000 deductible for an annual premium of $13,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Statement of Corporate Governance

Effective June 30, 2005 National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices ("NI 58-101") of the Canadian Securities Administrators was adopted. Pursuant to NI 58-101 an issuer whose common shares are traded on the TSX and which issuer is seeking proxies from its security holders for the purposes of electing directors must include in its management information circular the corporate governance practices which have been adopted by the issuer as more fully set out in NI 58-101.

Corporate governance refers to the manner in which a board of directors oversees the management and direction of a corporation. Governance is not a static issue, and must be judged from time-to-time based on the evolution of a corporation with respect to its size and the nature or its business, and upon the changing standards of the community. Not all corporate governance systems are alike. The Corporation's approach has been developed with respect to the Corporation's growth and current status. The composition of the Board is reviewed on an annual basis by the full Board and Management.

In reviewing the issue of corporate governance, the Board has determined to perform the function as an entire Board. The Board's mandate was to consider corporate governance matters and make recommendations consistent with the Corporation's position and size as a junior mining corporation. The resulting approach to corporate governance adopted by the Board reflects these recommendations and recognizes the responsibility of the Board for the stewardship of the Corporation.

- 17 -


The Corporation's approach to corporate governance is set out in Schedule "A" attached to this Circular. Through regular review at quarterly meetings, the Board will continue to examine these issues in light of the Corporation's development in the mineral exploration business. In addition, and as required by Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees ("MI 52-110"), the Corporation is required to set out detailed information concerning its Audit Committee in the Corporation's Annual Information Form which was dated August 27, 2010 (the "AIF") and as such information concerning the Audit Committee of the Corporation can be found on pages 39-41 of the AIF and the full text of the Audit Committee Charter is set out in Schedule "A" of the AIF.

The Board is currently composed of six (7) directors. One (1) of these directors is a member of Management and five (5) are outside directors who are unrelated as such term is described in the TSX Guidelines for Corporate Governance (the "Guidelines").

For the Corporation, the implementation of a detailed system to address every issue of corporate governance would be an undue strain on the resources and finances of a junior corporation. In order to address a wide range of issues of governance more effectively, the board has elected to undertake three (3) areas of activity through board discussion, consensus or through the partial assistance of the Board, as follows:

The tasks of appointing and assessing directors, and the assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors, are carried out by the full Board, rather than by appointed committees. New directors are given background materials and a review of the Corporation's development.

  (a)

The Board monitors Management on a regular basis. The annual budget is reviewed regularly by the Board and by the Audit Committee as a basis to assess performance and progress. This procedure is favoured over the use of formal mandates which would define limits to Management's responsibilities, or the use of procedures to approve the Chief Executive Officer's corporate objectives to ensure the Board can function independently of Management. However, the Board will consider, on an ongoing basis, issues concerning the independence of the Board from Management.

     
  (b)

The Board has not adopted a system that would enable an individual director to engage an advisor at the expense of the Corporation in appropriate circumstances. At this time, agreement by the Board to any such retainer, if at the expense of the Corporation, would be required.

The Board has appointed a Chairman who is other than the Chief Executive Officer.

The committees of the Board are comprised primarily of outside directors and function as set out below.

The Audit Committee meets as required to review the annual and quarterly financial statements, matters relating to the securities commissions, investments and transactions that could adversely affect the well-being of the Corporation and Management's recommendations regarding share issues of the Corporation. The Audit Committee also establishes and monitors procedures to reduce conflicts of interest and for reviewing audit and financial matters. Through meetings with external auditors and senior Management, the Audit Committee discusses, among other things, the effectiveness of the internal control procedures established for the Corporation. At all times, at least one (1) Audit Committee member possesses accounting or related financial expertise, while the remaining members are, at minimum, possessed of significant experience in analyzing the financial condition of corporations. The Board has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee which sets out the responsibilities of the Audit Committee and provides guidance to Audit Committee members as to their duties which charter is attached to the Corporation's AIF, as described above. The Audit Committee of the Corporation currently consists of three (3) members: D. Richard Brown, Jack Austin and Peter Born. Each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Austin and Dr. Born all qualify as independent directors and are financially literate as defined in MI 51-110.

The Compensation Committee reviews compensation practices and Management succession and approves the remuneration of the Corporation's senior executives, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also monitors the integrity of Management through periodic meetings with the Chief Executive Officer.

- 18 -


The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three (3) directors: Ken Height, Ted Nunn and Dr. Michael Hitch. Each of Mr.Hight, Mr. Nunn and Dr. Hitch qualify as independent directors as defined in MI 52-110.

Finally, although the Guidelines do not emphasize issues of environmental concern, the Board recognizes its responsibility to ensure that the Corporation's operations do not result in an adverse impact on the environment.

The Board remains committed to the ongoing development and improvement of the Corporation, its systems and in particular corporate governance. Shareholder feedback is encouraged at all times and commentary is always welcome. Shareholders are invited to address their comments to the attention of Chairman.

OTHER MATTERS

Management is not aware of any other business to come before the Meeting other than as set forth in the Notice of Meeting accompanying this Information Circular. If any other business properly comes before the Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the Instrument of Proxy to vote the Common Shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment on such matter.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Corporation may be found on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the year ended May, 31, 2010. Shareholders may contact the Corporation at Grandview Gold Inc., 330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8, Attention: Paul Sarjeant to request copies of the Corporation's financial statements and accompanying management's discussion and analyses.

GENERAL

Information contained herein is given as of October 25, 2010. Save for the matters referred to herein, Management knows of no other matters intended to be brought before the Meeting. However, if any matters, which are not now known to management of the Corporation, shall properly come before the Meeting, the Proxy given pursuant to this solicitation by Management will be voted on such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the person voting the Proxy, in the event such discretionary authority is provided in the Proxy. The contents and sending of this Information Circular have been approved by the Directors of the Corporation.

  ) BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
  )  
  ) "Dr. Michael Hitch"
  )  
  ) DR. MICHAEL HITCH, PHD., P. GEO
  ) Chairman of the Board

- 19 -


SCHEDULE "A"

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

The following table details the Corporation’s corporate governance practices and addresses the disclosure requirements set out in Form 58-101F1 - Corporate Governance Disclosure:

1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Independent Directors The Corporation's four independent directors are: D. Richard Brown, Ken Hight, Peter Born, Jack Austin and Ted Nunn.
Composition of the Board The Board is composed of five (6) independent directors and one (1) non- independent director.
Non-independent directors The Corporation's non-independent director is Paul Sarjeant. Mr. Sarjeant is the President and CEO of the Corporation.
Other directorships




Directors Issuers Issuer Reporting Jurisdiction Stock Exchange
D. Richard Brown Asia Now Resources Corp. Ontario TSX Venture Exchange: NOW
Peter Born

August Metal Corporation

Unity Energy Corp.

British Columbia and Alberta

British Columbia and Alberta

TSX Venture Exchange: AGP

TSX Venture Exchange: UTY

Ken Hight

Lucrum Capital Corp.

Zuni Holdings Inc

Sheltered Oak Resources Corp.

British Columbia

Alberta and Ontario

British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario

TSX Venture Exchange: LRU

NEX: H:ZNI

TSX Venture Exchange: OAK

Paul Sarjeant Golden Harp Resources Inc. British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario TSX Venture Exchange: GHR
Jack Austin

New Pacific Metals Corp.

Yalian Steel Corporation

Tagish Lake Gold Corp.

British Columbia and Alberta

British Columbia and Alberta

British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba and Ontario

TSX Venture Exchange: NUX

TSX Venture Exchange: NUX

TSX Venture Exchange: TLG

Board meetings held The independent directors of the Board do not hold meetings at which non-independent directors and members of management are not in attendance. The Corporation holds quarterly meetings and other meetings as required, at which the opinion of the independent directors is sought and duly acted upon for all material matters related to the Corporation.
Chair of the Board The Board has an independent director as the chair of the board. Michael Hitch chairs the meetings of the Board and actively seeks out the views of all directors on all Board matters.



Board meeting attendance The Board held four (4) meetings in the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2010. All directors attended all Board meetings, with the exception of Richard Brown and Ken Hight, who were each absent from one meeting.
2. BOARD MANDATE  

The Board assumes responsibility for stewardship of the corporation, including overseeing all of the operation of the business, supervising management and setting milestones for the Corporation. The Board reviews the statements of responsibilities for the Corporation including, but not limited to, the code of ethics and expectations for business conduct.

The Board approves all significant decisions that affect the Corporation and its subsidiaries and sets specific milestones towards which management directs their efforts.

The Board ensures, at least annually, that there are long-term goals and a strategic planning process in place for the Corporation and participates with Management directly or through its committees in developing and approving the mission of the business of the Corporation and the strategic plan by which it proposes to achieve its goals, which strategic plan takes into account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of the Corporation's business. The strategic planning process is carried out at each Board meeting where there are regularly reviewed specific milestones for the Corporation.

The strategic planning process incorporates identifying the main risks to the Corporation's objectives and ensuring that mitigation plans are in place to manage and minimize these risks. The Board also takes responsibility for identifying the principal risks of the Corporation's business and for ensuring these risks are effectively monitored and mitigated to the extent practicable. The Board appoints senior Management. As the Corporation has grown it has seen that Management has also grown, mitigating risk with respect to succession planning.

The Corporation adheres to all regulatory requirements with respect to the timeliness and content of its disclosure. The Board approves all of the Corporation's major communications, including annual and quarterly reports and press releases. The CEO or Chair (on behalf of the Board) authorizes the issuance of news releases. The CEO and the Chair are generally the only individuals authorized to communicate with analysts, the news media and investors about information concerning the Corporation.

The Board and the Audit Committee examine the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control processes and information systems.

The Board as a whole, given its small size, is involved in developing the Corporation's approach to corporate governance. The number of scheduled meetings of the Board varies with circumstances. In addition, special meetings are called as necessary. The Chair establishes the agenda at each Board meeting and submits a draft to each director for their review and recommendation for items for inclusion on the agenda. Each director has the ability to raise subjects that are not on the agenda at any meeting of the Board. Meeting agendas and other materials to be reviewed and/or discussed for action by the Board are distributed to directors in time for review prior to each meeting.

Board members have full and free access to senior Management and employees of the Corporation

3. POSITION DESCRIPTION
Chairman of the Board and Committee Chairs: role and responsibilities The Board does not currently have a separate written description for the chair. The Board as a whole is responsible for and is continuing to develop recommendations for structures and procedures to clearly define the role and responsibilities of the Chair and the chair of each Board committee. The Chair of the Board is independent of Management and is responsible for leading the discussion and ensuring that the Board convenes as often as is required in order to meet the needs of the Corporation. In addition, the Chair also meets with the CEO on a regular basis to help with this function. The Audit Committee has a chair and a charter which charter provides structure and guidance with respect to the roles of the board, committee and the chair. In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee is independent of Management. The Compensation Committee does not have a written description for the chair. The Chair of the Compensation Committee is independent from Management and the Compensation Committee is currently reviewing documentation which would help to better delineate the roles of the members of the committee.

- 2 -



Office of the CEO: role and responsibilities

The Board and the CEO have not developed formal documented position description for the CEO. The Board is currently of the view that the respective corporate governance roles of the Board and Management, as represented by the CEO, are clear and that the limits to Management's responsibility and authority are well-defined. In order to monitor and ensure that these roles are defined, the Chairman meets with the CEO and CFO on a regular basis to ensure that all matters requiring Board review and/or approval are brought before the Board and that Management is working within the bounds of their authority. As the Corporation is a junior mining corporation there are only two senior officer positions and as such the role of the CEO is broad but the Board believes that as a result of relevant corporate governance initiatives and the frequent meeting of the Chairman and the CEO, there is sufficient delineation.

4. ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
New director orientation

The Corporation does not have a formal orientation and education program for new directors. However, new directors are provided with relevant materials with respect to the Corporation as well as being oriented on relevant corporate issues by senior management and legal counsel.

Continuing education of the board

The Board currently does not provide continuing education for its directors. By using a Board composed of experienced professionals with a wide range of financial, exploration and mining expertise, the Corporation ensures that the Board operates effectively and efficiently. Currently, the Board members have access to and actively consult with legal counsel to the Corporation on various matters with respect to their duties and obligations to the Corporation. The Board is currently working to implement formal policies on a number of corporate governance matters and upon implementation also plans to provide written information and orientation with respect to such policies to the Board members.

5. ETHICAL BUSINESS CONDUCT
Code of ethics

The Board has not adopted a written code of ethics and expectations for business conduct for the directors, officers and employees of the Corporation.

Handling non-arm’s length transactions

Directors with an interest in a material transaction are required to declare their interest and abstain from voting on such transactions. A thorough discussion of the documentation related to material transaction is required for review by the Board, particularly independent directors.

Culture of ethical conduct

The Board seeks directors who have solid track records in spheres ranging from financial to exploration and mining in order to ensure a culture of ethical business conduct.

- 3 -



6. NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS
Identifying nominees

All of the Corporation's directors are involved in the search for new directors.

Nominating committee

The Board does not have a nominating committee. A new director should have direct experience in the mining business and significant public company experience. The nominee must not have a significant conflicting public company association. Experienced mining directors are currently difficult to source as a result of the high level of activity in the mining sector.

Role and responsibilities of the nominating committee

The Board does not have a nominating committee at the present time.

7. COMPENSATION
Determining directors’ and officers’ compensation

The Board reviews the adequacy and form of compensation and compares it to other companies of similar size and stage of development. There is no minimum share ownership requirement of directors. Director's compensation is in the form of stock options. The Corporation's compensation committee reviews the amounts and effectiveness of stock option compensation.

Composition of the compensation committee

The Compensation Committee consists of three (3) directors: Ken Hight, Ted Nunn and Michael Hitch. Messrs. Hight, Nunn and Hitch are independent.

Roles and responsibilities of the compensation committee

The Compensation Committee convenes at least once annually to review director and officer compensation and status of stock options. The Compensation Committee also responds to requests from Management and the Board to review recommendations of Management for new senior employees and their compensation. The Compensation Committee has the power to approve and/or amend these recommendations.

Use of a compensation consultant or advisor

The Corporation has felt no need to retain any compensation consultants or advisors at any time since the beginning of the Corporation's most recently completed financial year.

8. OTHER BOARD COMMITTEES
Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consists of three (3) directors: D. Richard Brown, Jack Austin and Peter Born. Messrs. Brown, Austin and Born are independent.

Other board committees

The Corporation does not currently have any other committees.

9. ASSESSMENTS
Board and committee effectiveness

The Board does not, at present, have a formal process in place for assessing the effectiveness of the Board as a whole, its committees or individual directors. The Audit Committee, as part of their annual review, assesses the effectiveness of the Board and its independence. The Audit Committee assesses the adequacy of the information provided, the regular nature of the communication between the Board and Management and reviews whether Management is following the mandated strategic direction as set out in the Board's direction and Management milestones.

The Board assesses the CEO's effectiveness in attaining the Corporation's corporate objectives, budgets and milestones.

Management and directors communicate with shareholders on an ongoing basis, and shareholders are regularly consulted on the effectiveness of Board members and senior staff.

- 4 -


EX-99.64 65 exhibit99-64.htm EXHIBIT 99.64 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.64 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.64

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
330 Bay Street, Suite 820
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 2S8

PROXY SOLICITED BY MANAGEMENT FOR USE AT AN ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO
BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 29, 2010

The undersigned shareholder(s) of GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. (the "Corporation") hereby appoint(s) in respect of all of his/her/its shares of the Corporation, DR. MICHAEL HITCH, Chairman of the board of directors of the Corporation, or, failing him, PAUL SARJEANT, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Corporation, or, in lieu of the foregoing ____________________________ as nominee of the undersigned, with power of substitution, to attend, act and vote for the undersigned at an annual meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders of the Corporation to be held on Monday, the 29th day of November, 2010 at the hour of 10 o'clock in the forenoon (Toronto time), and at any and every adjournment or adjournments thereof, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned shareholder(s) was (were) present at the Meeting or adjournment(s) thereof, and hereby direct(s) the nominee to vote the shares of the undersigned in the manner indicated below (for full details of each item, please see the enclosed Notice of Meeting and Management Information Circular):

  1.

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING (    ) in the election of directors.

     
  2.

TO VOTE FOR (    ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING (    ) on the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix their remuneration.

If any amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting are proposed at the Meeting or if any other matters properly come before the Meeting, this proxy confers discretionary authority to vote on such amendments or variations or such other matters according to the best judgment of the person voting the proxy at the Meeting. By signing, the shareholder(s) revoke(s) any proxy previously given to attend and vote at said Meeting.

DATED __________________________, 2010.

_________________________________
Signature of Shareholder

_________________________________
Name of Shareholder

(THIS PROXY MAY NOT BE VALID UNLESS IT IS SIGNED AND DATED. SEE IMPORTANT
INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE)


INSTRUCTIONS:

  1.

This form of proxy must be dated and signed by the appointor or his or her attorney authorized in writing or, if the appointor is a body corporate, this form of proxy must be executed by a duly authorized and appointed officer, attorney or representative thereof. If executed by an officer, attorney or other duly appointed representative, the original or notarial copy of the instrument so empowering such person, or such other documentation in support as shall be acceptable to the Chairman of the Meeting, must accompany this proxy. If the proxy is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it was mailed.

     
  2.

The shares represented by this proxy will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder on any ballot that may be called for and if the shareholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares represented by this proxy shall be voted accordingly.

     
  3.

A SHAREHOLDER HAS THE RIGHT TO APPOINT A PERSON OR COMPANY (WHO NEED NOT BE A SHAREHOLDER) TO ATTEND AND ACT FOR HIM/HER/IT AND ON HIS/HER/ITS BEHALF AT THE MEETING OTHER THAN THE PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY. SUCH RIGHT MAY BE EXERCISED BY STRIKING OUT THE NAMES OF THE TWO (2) PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY AND BY INSERTING IN THE BLANK SPACE PROVIDED FOR THAT PURPOSE THE NAME OF THE DESIRED PERSON OR COMPANY OR BY COMPLETING ANOTHER FORM OF PROXY AND, IN EITHER CASE, DELIVERING THE COMPLETED AND EXECUTED PROXY TO THE CORPORATION C/O EQUITY FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, 200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 400, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 4H1, AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. (TORONTO TIME) ON NOVEMBER 26, 2010, OR IN THE CASE OF ANY ADJOURNMENT OF THE MEETING, NOT LESS THAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SUCH MEETING.

     
  4.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CORPORATION. IN THE ABSENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THIS PROXY WILL VOTE FOR EACH OF THE MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PROXY.

     
  5.

This proxy ceases to be valid one year from its date.

     
  6.

If your address as shown is incorrect, please give your correct address when returning this proxy.

     
  7.

If you are a non-registered shareholder of the Corporation and you received these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the materials in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary. Failure to do so may result in your shares not being eligible to be voted by proxy at the Meeting. Please contact your broker or the Corporation if you have questions.

     
  8.

If a registered shareholder has returned this proxy, the said shareholder may still attend the Meeting and may vote in person should the shareholder later decide to do so. However, to do so, the shareholder must record his/her attendance with the scrutineers at the Meeting and revoke the returned proxy in accordance with the instructions provided in the accompanying Management Information Circular.



EX-99.65 66 exhibit99-65.htm EXHIBIT 99.65 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.65 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.65


VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

November 2, 2010

TO ALL APPLICABLE EXCHANGES AND COMMISSIONS:

RE: GRANDVIEW GOLD INC

We are pleased to confirm that copies of the following materials were mailed to registered shareholders and to the Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners on November 2, 2010.

  1.

Proxy

     
  2.

Notice of Meeting and Management Information Circular

     
  3.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Consolidated Financial Statements

     
  4.

Online Voting Insert

     
  5.

Postage Paid Proxy Return Envelope

Yours Truly,
EQUITY FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY

Rosa Vieira
Senior Manager, Client Relations
Telephone: 416.361.0930 ext.227
rvieira@equityfinancialtrust.com

c.c. Jenn Javier, Administrator, Client Relations


EX-99.66 67 exhibit99-66.htm EXHIBIT 99.66 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.66 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.66

 
For Immediate Release TSX: GVX
  OTCBB: GVGDF

Grandview Gold Inc. Closes $605,000 Flow-Through Financing with MineralFields Group;
To Continue Red Lake Drilling to Verify Historic Resource at Dixie Lake Project

January 4, 2011 – Toronto, Ontario – Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that, it has closed a non-brokered private placement (the "Placement") with the MineralFields Group. The Placement resulted in the issuance by Grandview of a total of 8,066,666 flow-through units in the capital of Grandview (the “Flow-Through Units”) at a purchase price of $0.075 (CAD) per Flow-Through Unit for gross proceeds to Grandview of $605,000. Each Flow-Through Unit consists of one common share of Grandview issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of Grandview on a non-flow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the second twelve months.

In connection with the Placement, the Company paid eligible persons (the "Finders") a cash fee of 6.0% of the gross proceeds raised through each Finder under the Offering and also issued finder's warrants (each a "Finder's Warrant") equal to 7.5% of the total number of Flow-Through Units placed by such Finders. Each Finder's Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit (each a "Finder's Unit" and collectively the "Finder's Units") with each Finder's Unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one Warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, the Company paid $36,300.00 in cash fees to the Finders and issued 604,999 Finder's Warrants to the Finders. In addition, Grandview also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,254.75 in connection with the Placement.

“The Company will use the proceeds of this financing for continuation of drilling at our Dixie Lake Property in the Red Lake Gold District,” says Grandview President & CEO Paul Sarjeant. “The program is intended to bring a historic non-43-101 mineral resource of 1.1 million short tons at 0.1 ounces per ton estimated by Teck Exploration Ltd (1989-90) to 43-101 compliance, and also pursue down-dip extensions of the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones which assayed highly prospectively during our 2008 and 2009 drill programs.

At Grandview’s near-term gold-producing property, Giulianita, in Piura, Peru, the Company’s South American team continues working with local authorities and community groups, strengthening relationships and evolving the environmental and geological assessment protocols necessary for sustainable development of the project. “It is our goal to implement our small-scale mines model as soon as possible in the new year, and move closer to a cash-flow-positive environment to help fund Canadian exploration programs, including a geophysics program at our Sanshaw-Bonanza Property, contiguous to the west and southern boundary of the Red Lake Gold Mines Limited/Premiere Gold Mines Limited Rahill-Bonanza JV property.” In the interim, this flow-thru financing should help us establish a 43-101 compliant resource at Dixie Lake, and improve the net asset value of the Company,” adds Mr. Sarjeant.

The securities issued pursuant to the Placement will all be subject to a four (4) month statutory hold period commencing from the date of issuance. All proceeds raised from the sale of Flow-Through Units will be used by the Company to finance qualified Canadian exploration and development expenditures on its Canadian resource properties.

About Dixie Lake

Grandview has an option agreement with Fronteer Development Group and has earned a 67% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property located 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine. The Property has an established gold resource (Teck, 1989), estimating a tonnage for the 88-4 zone of 1.1 million tons grading 0.10 ounces gold per ton. This gold resource included high grade intercepts up to 15.60 g/t gold over 2.83m (from DL89-09) at depths of less than 50m. Grandview has not completed the work required to verify this historical estimate and is not treating this historical estimate as being compliant with current standards under 43-101 and as such this historical estimate should not be relied upon.


About MineralFields, Pathway and First Canadian Securities ®

MineralFields Group (a division of Pathway Asset Management), based in Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal and Calgary, is a mining fund with significant assets under administration that offers its tax-advantaged super flow-through limited partnerships to investors throughout Canada as well as hard-dollar resource limited partnerships to investors throughout the world. Pathway Asset Management also specializes in the manufacturing and distribution of structured products and mutual funds (including the Pathway Multi Series Fund Inc. corporate-class mutual fund series). Information about MineralFields Group is available at www.mineralfields.com. First Canadian Securities ® (a division of Limited Market Dealer Inc.) is active in leading resource financings (both flow-through and hard dollar PIPE financings) on competitive, effective and service-friendly terms, and offers investment banking, mergers and acquisitions, and mining industry consulting, services to resource companies. MineralFields and Pathway have financed several hundred mining and oil and gas exploration companies to date through First Canadian Securities ®.

About Grandview Gold Inc.
Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444, or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This is not an offer for sale, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, in the United States or to any US Person (as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") of any equity shares or any other securities of Grandview Gold Inc. Securities ("securities") of Grandview Gold Inc. are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and on the OTC BB. This does not constitute, and should not be construed as, "general solicitation or general advertising" as defined under Regulation D of the Securities Act, or "directed selling efforts" under Regulation S of the Securities Act.


EX-99.67 68 exhibit99-67.htm EXHIBIT 99.67 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.67 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.67

EARLY WARNING REPORT AND PRESS RELEASE FILED PURSUANT TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 62-103

1.

Name and address of the offeror:

   

Joe Dwek Management Consultants Inc. (“JDM”)
1110 Finch Avenue West, Suite 210
Toronto, ON M5A 2K7

   
2.

Name of reporting issuer with respect to which this report is filed:

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview”)

   
3.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the offeror’s security-holding percentage in the class of securities of which the offeror acquired ownership or control in the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the obligation to file the news release and whether it was ownership or control that was acquired in those circumstances:

   

JDM has indirect control and direction over 12,400,332 common shares of Grandview (the “Shares”), 604,999 options to purchase units (the “Units”) comprised of one share and one-half (1/2) of one warrant with a total number of 302,500 underlying warrants to purchase shares, and 4,033,333 warrants to purchase shares (the “Warrants”) representing approximately 20.12% of the outstanding Shares on a partially diluted basis.

   
4.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the offeror’s securityholding percentage in the class of securities immediately after the transaction or occurrence giving rise to obligation to file the news release.

   

As set out in paragraph 3 above.

   
5.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the percentage of outstanding securities of the class of securities referred to in paragraph (4) over which:


  (a)

the offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership and control

     
 

Not applicable.

     
  (b)

the offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership but control is held by other persons or companies other than the offeror or any joint actor, and

     
  (c)

Joe Dwek Management Consultants Inc. 2007 has exclusive control of the Grandview securities set out in paragraph three but it does not have ownership of the same

     
  (d)

the offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has exclusive or shared control but does not have ownership

Not applicable.


   
6.

Name of the market in which the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the news release took place.

   

8,066,666 units, each unit comprised of one common share and one-half (1/2) of one warrant, were acquired in private placement at a price of $0.075 each on December 30, 2010. The reporting issuer’s shares trade on the TSX Group under the call symbol GVX.

   
7.

Purpose of the offeror and any joint actors in effecting the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the news release, including any future intention to acquire ownership of, or control over, additional securities of the reporting issuer.

   

JDM intends to hold the securities for investment purposes. JDM may, depending on market and other conditions, increase its beneficial ownership, control or direction over the common shares or other securities of Grandview, through market transactions, private agreements, treasury issuances, exercise of convertible securities or otherwise.

   
8.

General nature and the material terms of any agreement, other than lending arrangements, with respect to securities of the reporting issuer entered into by the offeror, or any joint actor, and the issuer of the securities or any other entity in connection with the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the news release, including agreements with respect to the acquisition, holding, disposition or voting of any of the securities.

   

Not applicable.

   
9.

Names of any joint actors in connection with the disclosure required by this report.

   

As set out in paragraph 5(c).

   
10.

In the case of a transaction or occurrence that did not take place on a stock exchange or other market that represents a published market for the securities, including an issuance from treasury, the nature and value of the consideration paid by the offeror.

   

Not applicable.

   
11.

If applicable, a description of any change in any material fact set out in a previous report by entity under the early warning requirements or Part 4 of National Instrument 62-103 in respect of the reporting issuer’s securities.

   

Not applicable.

DATED: January 4, 2011.
Joe Dwek
President: Joe Dwek Management Consultants Inc.


EX-99.68 69 exhibit99-68.htm EXHIBIT 99.68 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.68 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.68

EARLY WARNING REPORT AND PRESS RELEASE FILED PURSUANT TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 62-103

1.

Name and address of the offeror:

   

Joe Dwek Management Consultants Inc. (“JDM”)
1110 Finch Avenue West, Suite 210
Toronto, ON M5A 2K7

   
2.

Name of reporting issuer with respect to which this report is filed:

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview”)

   
3.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the offeror’s security-holding percentage in the class of securities of which the offeror acquired ownership or control in the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the obligation to file the news release and whether it was ownership or control that was acquired in those circumstances:

   

JDM has indirect control and direction over 12,066,999 common shares of Grandview (the “Shares”), 604,999 options to purchase units (the “Units”) comprised of one share and one-half (1/2) of one warrant with a total number of 302,500 underlying warrants to purchase shares, and 4,033,333 warrants to purchase shares (the “Warrants”) representing approximately 19.74% of the outstanding Shares on a partially diluted basis.

   
4.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the offeror’s securityholding percentage in the class of securities immediately after the transaction or occurrence giving rise to obligation to file the news release.

   

As set out in paragraph 3 above.

   
5.

Designation and number or principal amount of securities and the percentage of outstanding securities of the class of securities referred to in paragraph (4) over which:


  (a)

the offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership and control

     
 

Not applicable.

     
  (b)

the offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has ownership but control is held by other persons or companies other than the offeror or any joint actor, and

     
  (c)

Joe Dwek Management Consultants Inc. 2007 has exclusive control of the Grandview securities set out in paragraph three but it does not have ownership of the same

     
  (d)

the offeror, either alone or together with any joint actors, has exclusive or shared control but does not have ownership

Not applicable.



6.

Name of the market in which the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the news release took place.

   

333,333 Shares were sold on the open market at a price of $0.065 per Share on January 5, 2011. The reporting issuer’s shares trade on the TSX Group under the call symbol GVX.

   
7.

Purpose of the offeror and any joint actors in effecting the transaction or occurrence that gave rise to the news release, including any future intention to acquire ownership of, or control over, additional securities of the reporting issuer.

   

JDM intends to hold the securities for investment purposes. JDM may, depending on market and other conditions, increase its beneficial ownership, control or direction over the common shares or other securities of Grandview, through market transactions, private agreements, treasury issuances, exercise of convertible securities or otherwise.

   
8.

General nature and the material terms of any agreement, other than lending arrangements, with respect to securities of the reporting issuer entered into by the offeror, or any joint actor, and the issuer of the securities or any other entity in connection with the transaction or occurrence giving rise to the news release, including agreements with respect to the acquisition, holding, disposition or voting of any of the securities.

   

Not applicable.

   
9.

Names of any joint actors in connection with the disclosure required by this report.

   

As set out in paragraph 5(c).

   
10.

In the case of a transaction or occurrence that did not take place on a stock exchange or other market that represents a published market for the securities, including an issuance from treasury, the nature and value of the consideration paid by the offeror.

   

Not applicable.

   
11.

If applicable, a description of any change in any material fact set out in a previous report by entity under the early warning requirements or Part 4 of National Instrument 62-103 in respect of the reporting issuer’s securities.

   

Not applicable.

DATED: January 7, 2011.
Joe Dwek
President: Joe Dwek Management Consultants Inc.


EX-99.69 70 exhibit99-69.htm EXHIBIT 99.69 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.69 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.69

 
Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)
 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to

provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial

standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at November 30, 2010.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at November 30, 2010.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and

are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
Toronto, Canada  
January 14, 2011  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    November 30,     May 31,  
(Unaudited)   2010     2010  

Assets

           

Current assets

           

Cash and cash equivalents

$  993,568   $  1,432,824  

Short-term investments

  25,163     25,037  

HST and sundry receivable

  46,058     26,416  

Prepaid expenses

  7,497     12,876  
    1,072,286     1,497,153  

Reclamation bond (Note 5)

  13,477     13,699  

Mining interests (Note 6)

  4,356,866     4,149,771  
  $  5,442,629   $  5,660,623  

Liabilities

           

Current liabilities

           

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$  27,070   $  89,284  

Asset retirement obligation

  13,477     13,699  
    40,547     102,983  
             

Shareholders' equity

  5,402,082     5,557,640  
  $  5,442,629   $  5,660,623  

Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1)
Subsequent event (Note 15)

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 2 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)  
                               

Expenses

                             

Share-based payments

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  368,500   $  4,479,616  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  26,238     15,683     39,747     33,076     1,942,910  

Professional fees

  10,996     47,976     42,165     90,414     1,408,163  

Management services (Note 12)

  27,750     23,250     55,500     43,250     1,497,440  

Office and administration

  19,271     13,311     28,770     25,245     767,015  

Exploration evaluation expenses

  4,075     7,589     6,469     7,649     31,354  

Flow-through interest expense

  -     -     -     -     188,801  

Bad debt

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

 

                             

 

  88,330     107,809     172,651     568,134     10,316,534  

 

                             

Loss before the under noted

  (88,330 )   (107,809 )   (172,651 )   (568,134 )   (10,316,534 )

Interest income

  363     130     426     (2,585 )   89,149  

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     (25,000 )

Write-off of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     (6,431,718 )

Impairment of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     (1,557,112 )

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     -     35,667  

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     -     (170,000 )

 

                             

Loss before income taxes

  (87,967 )   (107,679 )   (172,225 )   (570,719 )   (18,375,548 )

Future income tax recovery

  -     -     -     -     1,675,990  

 

                             

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period

$  (87,967 ) $  (107,679 ) $  (172,225 ) $  (570,719 ) $  (16,699,558 )

 

                             

Basic loss per share (Note 10)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )      

 

                             

Diluted loss per share (Note 10)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )      

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 3 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)  
                               

Accumulated Deficit

                             

Balance at beginning of period

$  (20,045,839 ) $  (19,544,218 ) $  (19,961,581 ) $  (19,081,178 ) $  (3,434,248 )

Net loss for the period

  (87,967 )   (107,679 )   (172,225 )   (570,719 )   (16,699,558 )

 

                             

Balance at end of period

$  (20,133,806 ) $  (19,651,897 ) $  (20,133,806 ) $  (19,651,897 ) $  (20,133,806 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 4 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

          Shares to           Contributed     Accumulated        
(Unaudited)   Share Capital     be Issued     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  
                                     
                                     

At May 31, 2008

$  14,202,266   $  -   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  

 

                                   

Mineral property acquisition

  10,800     -     -     -     -     10,800  

Private placement

  416,666     -     -     -     -     416,666  

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  (47,833 )   -     -     -     -     (47,833 )

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  (30,666 )   -     30,666     -     -     -  

Flow-through cost of issue

  (120,833 )   -     -     -     -     (120,833 )

Warrants expired

  -     -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  

Net loss for the year

  -     -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )

 

                                   

At May 31, 2009

  14,430,400     -     1,203,804     7,359,376     (19,081,178 )   3,912,402  

Share-based payments

  -     -     -     449,491     -     449,491  

Exercise of warrants

  16,667     -     -     -     -     16,667  

Fair value of warrants exercised

  15,333     -     (15,333 )   -     -     -  

Mineral property acquisition

  67,000     -     -     -     -     67,000  

Private placement

  2,000,000     -     -     -     -     2,000,000  

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  (36,392 )   -     -     -     -     (36,392 )

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  (1,440,000 )   -     1,440,000     -     -     -  

Debt conversion

  28,875     -     -     -     -     28,875  

Warrants expired

  -     -     (1,173,138 )   1,173,138     -     -  

Net loss for the year

  -     -     -     -     (880,403 )   (880,403 )

 

                                   

At May 31, 2010

$  15,081,883   $  -   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $ (19,961,581 ) $  5,557,640  

Net loss for the period

  -     -     -     -     (172,225 )   (172,225 )

Fair value of warrants exercised

  -     32,000     (15,333 )   -     -     16,667  

 

                                   

At November 30, 2010

$  15,081,883   $  32,000   $  1,440,000   $  8,982,005   $ (20,133,806 ) $  5,402,082  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 5 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)  
                               

Cash flows from operating activities

                             

Net loss for the period

$  (87,967 ) $  (107,679 ) $  (172,225 ) $  (570,719 ) $  (16,699,558 )

Items not involving cash:

                             

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     25,000  

Debt conversion

  -     -     -     -     (6,792 )

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

Share-based payments

  -     -     -     368,500     4,479,616  

Future income tax recovery

  -     -     -     -     (1,675,990 )

Accrued interest income

  (63 )   -     (126 )   -     (44,066 )

Write-off of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     6,431,718  

Impairment of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     1,557,112  

Changes in non-cash working capital items:

                             

GST and sundry receivable

  (5,940 )   (2,738 )   (19,642 )   (7,115 )   (45,568 )

Prepaid expenses

  5,280     (20,926 )   5,379     (16,959 )   (7,497 )

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     90,000  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(51,543 ) 250,586 (62,214 ) 280,138 33,240
                               

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (140,233 )   119,243     (248,828 )   53,845     (5,861,550 )

 

                             

Cash flows from financing activities

                             

Loans from related parties

  -     -     -     -     (28,594 )

Share/warrant issuance

  16,667     16,667     16,667     16,667     20,085,544  

Cost of issuance

  -     -     -     -     (1,812,701 )

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     -     175,000  

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     -     (75,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  16,667     16,667     16,667     16,667     18,344,249  

 

                             

Cash flows from investing activities

                             

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     -     -     -     (13,090 )

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  -     (25,000 )   -     382,493     18,903  

Exploration advances

  -     -     -     -     -  

Expenditures on mining interests

  (108,956 )   (227,820 )   (207,095 )   (351,854 )   (11,404,944 )

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     -     (90,000 )

 

                             

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

$  (108,956 ) $  (252,820 ) $  (207,095 ) $  30,639   $  (11,489,131 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 6 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)  
                               

Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period

$  (232,522 ) $  (116,910 ) $  (439,256 ) $  101,151   $  993,568  

 

                             

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

  1,226,090     324,654     1,432,824     106,593     -  

 

                             

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  993,568   $  207,744   $  993,568   $  207,744   $  993,568  

 

                             

Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Transactions

                             

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  630,875  

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  

Share-based payments included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 7 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended     exploration  
    November 30,     November 30,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2010     2009     2010     2009     26, 2004)  
                               

Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

                             

Balance, beginning of period

$  3,875,320   $  3,511,576   $  3,873,967   $  3,442,793   $  -  
                               

Drilling, assays and related field work

  -     195,595     -     264,378     3,202,798  

Property acquisition and holding costs

- - 1,353 - 672,522
                               
    -     195,595     1,353     264,378     3,875,320  
                               
       Balance, end of period $  3,875,320   $  3,707,171   $  3,875,320   $  3,707,171   $  3,875,320  
                               
                               

Guilianita Property, Peru

                             

Balance, beginning of period

$  372,590   $  55,251   $  275,804   $  -   $  -  
                               

Drilling, assays and related field work

  66,264     22,340     123,864     35,922     358,736  

Project administration and general

  42,692     -     81,878     -     81,878  

Property acquisition and holding costs

  -     9,885     -     51,554     40,932  
                               
    108,956     32,225     205,742     87,476     481,546  
                               

Balance, end of period

$  481,546   $  87,476   $  481,546   $  87,476   $  481,546  
                               

Total

$  4,356,866   $  3,794,647   $  4,356,866   $  3,794,647   $  4,356,866  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

- 8 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North America.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Accounting Policies

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual consolidated financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2010, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.

- 9 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.

Accounting Policies (Continued)

   

Future Accounting Pronouncements

   

International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]

   

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

   

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

   

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

   
3.

Capital Management

   

The Company manages its capital with the following objectives:

  • to ensure sufficient financial flexibility to achieve the ongoing business objectives including funding of future growth opportunities, and pursuit of accretive acquisitions; and

  • to maximize shareholder return through enhancing the share value.

The Company monitors its capital structure and makes adjustments according to market conditions in an effort to meet its objectives given the current outlook of the business and industry in general. The Company may manage its capital structure by issuing new shares, repurchasing outstanding shares, adjusting capital spending, or disposing of assets. The capital structure is reviewed by Management and the Board of Directors on an ongoing basis. The Company considers its capital to be equity, comprising share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit which at November 30, 2010 totaled $5,402,082 (May 31, 2010 -$5,557,640).

The Company manages capital through its financial and operational forecasting processes. The Company reviews its working capital and forecasts its future cash flows based on operating expenditures, and other investing and financing activities. The forecast is regularly updated based on activities related to its mineral properties. Selected information is frequently provided to the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company’s capital management objectives, policies and processes have remained unchanged during the three and six months ended November 30, 2010. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

- 10 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors

   

The Company’s significant mineral properties are Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada and Guilianta Property, Peru (called the "Properties"). A full description of these properties may be found in Note 7 of the May 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements.

   

Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon these Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

   

The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

   

Fair Value

   

The following summarizes the methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company's financial instruments where measurement is required. The fair value of short-term financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity. These include cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Fair value amounts represent point-in-time estimates and may not reflect fair value in the future. The measurements are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and are a matter of significant judgment. The methods and assumptions used to develop fair value measurements, for those financial instruments where fair value is recognized in the balance sheet, have been prioritized into three levels as per the fair value hierarchy included in GAAP. Level one includes quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level two includes inputs that are observable other than quoted prices included in level one. Level three includes inputs that are not based on observable market data.


      Level One     Level Two     Level Three  
                     
 

Cash and cash equivalents

$  993,568   $  -   $  -  
 

Short-term investments

$  25,163   $  -   $  -  
 

Reclamation bond

$  13,477   $  -   $  -  

- 11 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors (continued)

   

Credit Risk

   

Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and cash equivalents, HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash and cash equivalents are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

   

Financial instruments included in HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of November 30, 2010. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

   

Liquidity Risk

   

The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at November 30, 2010, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents and short term investments balance of $1,018,731 (May 31, 2010 - $1,457,861) to settle current liabilities of $27,070 (May 31, 2010 - $89,284). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

   

Market Risk

   

Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.


  (a)

Interest Rate Risk

     
 

The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

     
  (b)

Foreign Currency Risk

     
 

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

     
  (c)

Price Risk

     
 

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

- 12 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

4.

Risk Factors (continued)

   

Sensitivity Analysis

   

The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash and cash equivalents as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

   

As of November 30, 2010, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

   

The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

   

Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a three and six month period:


  (i)

Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at November 30, 2010, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the three and six months ended November 30, 2010 would have been approximately $63 and $125 higher/lower respectively, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short-term investments. As at November 30, 2010, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $63 and $125 lower/higher respectively as a result of lower/higher interest income from short-term investments.

     
  (ii)

The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

     
  (iii)

Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of November 30, 2010, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.


5.

Reclamation Bond

   

The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

   
6.

Mining Interests

   

On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

   

For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 7 of the audited financial statements as at May 31, 2010.

- 13 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital

   
(a) Authorized
   

Unlimited number of common shares

   

Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non- participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

   
(b) Issued

      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversion

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (731,430 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  9,543,301  

- 14 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.

Share Capital (Continued)

   

(b) Issued (Continued)


      Number        
      of        
      shares     Amount  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (563,472 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
 

Private placement

  11,169,000     4,950,150  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (940,212 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  130,000     45,800  
 

Exercise of warrants

  147,875     66,544  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     36,673  
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (488,720 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (227,417 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (260,255 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  30,000     10,800  
 

Private placement

  8,333,333     416,666  
 

Cost of issue - cash

  -     (47,833 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (30,666 )
 

Flow-through cost of issue

  -     (120,833 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

  44,652,098   $  14,430,400  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  750,000     67,000  
 

Debt conversion

  360,937     28,875  
 

Exercise of warrants - cash

  333,333     16,667  
 

Exercise of warrants - valuation

  -     15,333  
 

Private placement

  26,666,665     2,000,000  
 

Cost of issue - cash

  -     (36,392 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (1,440,000 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2010

  72,763,033   $  15,081,883  

- 15 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

8.

Warrants


      Number of     Weighted Average  
      Warrants     Exercise Price  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  -   $  -  
 

Issued

  602,500     1.44  
 

Expired/cancelled

  -     -  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  602,500   $  1.44  
 

Issued

  3,435,238     1.63  
 

Expired/cancelled

  (602,500 )   (1.44 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  3,435,238   $  1.63  
 

Issued

  4,189,999     0.91  
 

Expired/cancelled

  (1,043,654 )   1.60  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  6,581,583   $  1.18  
 

Issued

  5,853,480     0.62  
 

Issued

  73,937     0.65  
 

Exercised

  (147,875 )   0.45  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  12,361,125   $  0.92  
 

Expired

  (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
 

Issued

  666,666     0.05  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

  6,720,146   $  0.59  
 

Expired

  (6,053,480 )   (0.60 )
 

Issued

  26,666,665     0.12  
 

Exercised

  (333,333 )   (0.05 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2010

  26,999,998   $  0.12  
 

Exercised

  (333,333 )   (0.05 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2010

  26,666,665   $  0.12  

During the quarter ended November 30, 2010, 333,333 warrants were exercised. The underlying shares, with a value of $32,000, remain to be issued.

The following are the warrants outstanding at November 30, 2010:

  Number of Fair Exercise Expiry
  Warrants Value Price  
         
  26,666,665 $ 1,440,000 $ 0.12 December 3, 2011

- 16 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

9.

Stock Options


      Number     Weighted Average  
      of     Exercise  
      Stock Options     Price  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004

  -   $  -  
 

Granted

  1,225,000     1.01  
 

Cancelled

  (100,000 )   1.00  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  1,125,000   $  1.06  
 

Granted

  1,100,000     1.55  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  2,225,000   $  1.28  
 

Granted

  1,250,000     1.06  
 

Expired

  (375,000 )   1.00  
 

Cancelled

  (250,000 )   1.19  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  2,850,000   $  1.22  
 

Granted

  2,700,000     0.63  
 

Expired

  (850,000 )   1.13  
 

Cancelled

  (125,000 )   1.38  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  4,575,000   $  0.89  
 

Cancelled

  (175,000 )   0.68  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

  4,400,000   $  0.90  
 

Granted

  4,250,000     0.15  
 

Expired

  (1,375,000 )   0.75  
 

Forfeited

  (1,400,000 )   0.93  
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2010

  5,875,000   $  0.38  
 

Cancelled

  (225,000 )   (0.15 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, November 30, 2010

  5,650,000   $  0.39  

- 17 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

9.

Stock Options (Continued)

   

The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2010:


    Options outstanding Options exercisable
            Weighted                    
            average                    
            remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
      Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
  Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise price  
                                 
 

April 3, 2011

  250,000     0.34   $  1.80     250,000   $  1.80  
 

December 9, 2014

  900,000     4.03     0.15     900,000     0.15  
 

September 27, 2012

  1,825,000     1.83     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
 

June 23, 2014

  2,675,000     3.56     0.15     2,675,000     0.15  
                                 
      5,650,000     2.93 years   $  0.39     5,650,000   $  0.39  

10.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

   

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.


      Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
      November 30,     November 30,  
      2010     2009     2010     2009  
                           
 

Numerator for basic loss per share

$  (87,967 ) $  (107,679 ) $  (172,225 ) $  (570,719 )
 

 

                       
 

Numerator for diluted loss per share

$  (87,967 ) $  (107,679 ) $  (172,225 ) $  (570,719 )
 

 

                       
 

Denominator:

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - basic

  72,763,033     44,843,606     72,763,033     44,748,902  
 

 

                       
 

Weighted average number of common shares - diluted

  72,763,033     44,843,606     72,763,033     44,748,902  
 

 

                       
 

Basic and diluted loss per share

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )

Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

- 18 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

11.

Segmented Information

   

The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2009 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

   

The Company operates in two geographic segments for the three and six months ended November 30, 2010, and year ended May 31, 2010 as follows.


      November 30,     May 31,  
      2010     2010  
               
  Canada $  5,188,864   $  5,372,915  
  Peru   253,765     287,708  
               
  Total assets $  5,442,629   $  5,660,623  

12.

Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere


  i)

For the three and six months period ended November 30, 2010, $37,500 and $75,000 (three and six months ended November 30, 2009 - $37,500 and $75,000, respectively) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $37,500 (three and six months ended November 30, 2009 - $26,250 and 52,750, respectively) capitalized to mining interests.

     
  ii)

For the three and six months period ended November 30, 2010, $15,000 and $24,000 respectively (three and six months ended November, 2009 - $12,000 and $21,000, respectively) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

- 19 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

   

The Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2010 consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share- Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

   

For the three and six months ended November 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the three and six months ended November 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

   

Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for- sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

   

Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow- through share investors (see Note 12 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

   

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

- 20 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

   

Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at November 30, 2010 and May 31, 2010 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:


      November 30, 2010     May 31, 2010  
               
 

Assets

           
 

Current assets

           
 

Cash

$  993,568   $  1,432,824  
 

Short term investments

  25,163     25,037  
 

GST and sundry receivable

  46,058     29,719  
 

Prepaid expenses

  7,497     12,876  
 

Due from a related party

  2,929     -  
 

 

           
 

 

  1,075,215     1,500,456  
 

 

           
 

Reclamation bond

  13,477     13,699  
 

Mineral property rights

  713,454     712,101  
 

 

           
 

 

$  1,802,146   $  2,226,256  
 

 

           
 

Liabilities

           
 

Current liabilities

           
 

Accounts payable

$  27,068   $  7,835  
 

Accrued liabilities

  -     81,449  
 

 

           
 

 

  27,068     89,284  
 

Asset retirement obligation

  13,477     13,699  
 

 

           
 

 

  40,545     102,983  
 

 

           
 

Shareholders' Equity

           
 

Share capital

           
 

Authorized - unlimited common shares

           
 

Issued

           
 

Common shares

  16,757,873     16,757,873  
 

Shares to be issued

  32,000     -  
 

Additional paid in capital

  4,390,914     4,390,914  
 

Warrants

  1,440,000     1,455,333  
 

Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities

  (325,305 )   (325,305 )
 

Deferred share-based payments

  4,591,091     4,591,091  
 

Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company

  (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
 

Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage

  (21,991,029 )   (21,612,690 )
               
      1,761,601     2,123,273  
               
    $  1,802,146   $  2,226,256  

- 21 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

   

Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

   

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss


                      Cumulative  
                      from date  
    Six Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
    2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004")  
                         

Expenses

                       

General exploration

$  212,583   $  307,949   $  360,718   $  9,503,929  

Management services

  55,500     411,750     113,077     5,281,861  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  39,747     33,076     39,347     1,986,808  

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     1,235  

Professional fees

  42,165     90,414     64,257     1,265,809  

Office and administration

  28,770     25,245     16,416     697,908  

Flow-through interest expense

  -     -     -     188,801  

Gain on forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (35,667 )

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     170,000  

 

                       

Loss before the under noted

  (378,765 )   (868,434 )   (593,815 )   (19,060,684 )

Interest income

  426     (2,334 )   5,304     104,597  

Write-off mineral property rights

  -     -     -     (90,144 )

 

                       

Net loss for the period

  (378,339 )   (870,768 )   (588,511 )   (19,046,231 )

 

                       

Comprehensive (loss) items:

                       

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     (25,000 )

 

                       

Comprehensive loss for the period

$  (378,339 ) $  (870,768 ) $  (588,511 ) $ (19,071,231 )

 

                       

Loss per common share

                       

Basic

$  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 )      

Diluted

$  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 )      

 

                       

Comprehensive loss per common share

               

Basic

$  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 )      

Diluted

$  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 )      

- 22 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

   

The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
               
 

Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and

           
 

as of March 26, 2004

  3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
 

Stock split (3 for 1)

  6,541,996     -  
 

Private placement

  120,000     120,000  
 

Private placement

  150,000     150,000  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  400,000     4,000  
 

Private placement

  175,000     175,000  
 

Private placement

  1,005,000     1,005,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (138,188 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  118,500     159,975  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  70,000     86,800  
 

Cost of issue - warrant valuation

  -     (35,200 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (124,081 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

  11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
 

Private placement

  2,019,104     2,523,880  
 

Debt conversation

  80,000     100,000  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (178,023 )
 

Private placement

  590,320     737,900  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (111,498 )
 

Shares issued for a finders' fee

  160,000     200,000  
 

Private placement

  400,000     500,000  
 

Private placement

  3,985,974     4,384,571  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (1,335,301 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation

  -     (462,173 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (866,375 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

  19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
 

Private placement

  2,399,998     1,559,999  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (284,400 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  50,000     34,500  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  55,000     22,000  
 

Private placement

  3,250,000     1,462,500  
 

Warrant valuation

  -     (339,625 )
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (249,300 )
 

Cost of issue - finder options valuation

  -     (165,800 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

- 23 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


            Amount  
            Under  
  Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
               
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

  24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
 

Private placements

  11,169,000     4,950,150  
 

Warrants valuation

  -     (940,212 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  130,000     45,800  
 

Exercise of warrants

  147,875     66,544  
 

Exercise of warrants valuation

  -     36,673  
 

Cost of issue - cash laid out

  -     (488,720 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (227,417 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

  36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
 

Mineral property acquisition

  30,000     10,800  
 

Private placement

  8,333,333     416,666  
 

Cost of issue - cash

  -     (47,833 )
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (30,666 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

  44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
 

Private placement

  26,666,665     2,000,000  
 

Cost of issue - cash

  -     (36,392 )
 

Mineral property acquisition

  750,000     67,000  
 

Debt conversion

  360,937     28,875  
 

Exercise of warrants - valuation

  -     15,333  
 

Exercise of warrants - cash

  333,333     16,667  
 

Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation

  -     (1,440,000 )
 

 

           
 

Balance, May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2010

  72,763,033   $  16,757,873  

Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

  Additional Paid in Capital      
 

Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005

$  25,000  
 

Expired warrants

  173,388  
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  198,388  
 

Expired warrants

  449,956  
 

Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008

$  648,344  
 

Expired warrants

  2,569,432  
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

$  3,217,776  
 

Expired warrants

  1,173,138  
 

Balance, May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2010

$  4,390,914  

- 24 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


  Warrants      
         
 

Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004

$  -  
 

Issued

  173,388  
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

$  173,388  
 

Issued

  2,086,995  
 

Expired

  (173,388 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  2,086,995  
 

Issued

  974,575  
 

Expired

  (449,956 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

$  2,611,614  
 

Issued

  1,167,629  
 

Exercised

  (36,673 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

$  3,742,570  
 

Issued

  30,666  
 

Expired

  (2,569,432 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

$  1,203,804  
 

Issued

  1,440,000  
 

Exercised

  (15,333 )
 

Expired

  (1,173,138 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2010

$  1,455,333  
 

Exercised

  (15,333 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, November 30, 2010

$  1,440,000  

 

Cumulative Adjustments to Marketable Securities

     
 

Balance, June 1, 2001

$  (85,625 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (121,100 )
 

Balance, May 31, 2002

$  (206,725 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (88,580 )
 

Balance, May 31, 2003

$  (295,305 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (5,000 )
 

Balance, March 26, 2004

$  (300,305 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (15,234 )
 

Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006

$  (315,539 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (9,766 )
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

$  (325,305 )
 

Comprehensive loss items

  -  
 

Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and November 30, 2010

$  (325,305 )

- 25 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


 

Deferred Share-Based Payments

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2004

$  -  
 

Vesting of stock options

  775,613  
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

$  775,613  
 

Vesting of stock options

  573,700  
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  1,349,313  
 

Vesting of stock options

  1,358,687  
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

$  2,708,000  
 

Vesting of stock options

  1,433,600  
 

Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009

$  4,141,600  
 

Vesting of stock options

  449,491  
 

Balance, May 31, 2010 and November 30, 2010

$  4,591,091  

 

Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage

     
 

 

     
 

Balance, March 26, 2004

$  -  
 

Net loss

  4,678  
 

Comprehensive loss items

  (15,234 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2004

$  (10,556 )
 

Net loss

  (1,743,463 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2005

$  (1,754,019 )
 

Net loss

  (3,673,388 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2006

$  (5,427,407 )
 

Net loss

  (6,052,723 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2007

$  (11,480,130 )
 

Net loss

  (6,157,896 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2008

$  (17,638,026 )
 

Net loss

  (2,586,978 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2009

$  (20,225,004 )
 

Net loss

  (1,387,686 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, May 31, 2010

$  (21,612,690 )
 

Net loss

  (378,339 )
 

 

     
 

Balance, November 30, 2010

$  (21,991,029 )

- 26 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

   

The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:


  Statements of Cash Flows                        
                        Cumulative  
                        from date  
      Six Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
      2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004")  
                           
 

Cash flows from operating activities

                       
 

Net loss for the period

$  (378,339 ) $  (870,768 ) $  (588,511 ) $  (19,046,231 )
 

Items not involving cash:

                       
 

Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     -     (6,792 )
 

Write-off of bad debts

  -     -     -     1,235  
 

Share-based payments

  -     368,500     -     4,479,616  
 

Accrued Interest income

  -     (251 )   (2,256 )   (59,539 )
 

Write-off of mineral property rights

  -     -     -     90,144  
 

Change in non-cash operating working activities:

               
 

GST and sundry receivable

  (19,642 )   (7,115 )   32,211     (54,041 )
 

Prepaid expenses

  5,379     (16,959 )   118,734     (1,827 )
 

Due from a related party

  -     -     -     15,099  
 

Accounts payable

  19,233     270,888     (37,567 )   98,087  
 

Accrued liabilities

  (81,449 )   9,250     (45,000 )   (64,288 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows used in operating activities

  (454,818 )   (246,455 )   (522,389 )   (14,548,537 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from financing activities

                       
 

Repayment of loans from related parties

  -     -     -     (28,594 )
 

Share/warrant issuance

  16,667     16,667     -     20,085,544  
 

Cost of issue

  -     -     -     (1,812,701 )
 

Proceeds from loan

  -     -     -     175,000  
 

Repayment of loan

  -     -     -     (75,000 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by financing activities

  16,667     16,667     -     18,344,249  
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows from investing activities

                       
 

Purchase of reclamation bond

  -     -     -     (13,090 )
 

Redemption (purchase) of short term investments

  (126 )   382,493     607,874     18,777  
 

Exploration advances

  -     -     -     -  
 

Purchase of mineral property rights

  (979 )   (51,554 )   (94,806 )   (2,807,832 )
 

 

                       
 

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

  (1,105 )   330,939     513,068     (2,802,145 )
 

 

                       
 

Change in cash during the period

  (439,256 )   101,151     (9,321 )   993,567  
 

Cash, beginning of period

  1,432,824     106,593     84,856     1  
 

 

                       
 

Cash, end of period

$  993,568   $  207,744   $  75,535   $  993,568  

- 27 -



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended November 30, 2010
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

13.

Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued) Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


                        Cumulative  
                        from date  
      Six Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
      2010     2009     2008     ("March 26, 2004")
                           
 

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transaction

                       
 

Share issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  10,800   $  563,875  
 

Warrant issuance included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
 

Share-based payments included in mining interest

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
 

Interest paid

$  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

14.

Comparative Figures

   

Certain prior year figures have been reclassified to conform with the current period financial statement presentation.

   
15.

Subsequent Event

   

On January 4, 2011, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the "Placement") with the MineralFields Group. The Placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,066,666 flow- through units in the capital of the Company (the “Flow-Through Units”) at a purchase price of $0.075 per Flow- Through Unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $605,000. Each Flow-Through Unit consists of one common share of the Company issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company on a non-flow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the second twelve months.

   

In connection with the Placement, the Company paid eligible persons (the "Finders") a cash fee of 6.0% of the gross proceeds raised through each Finder under the Offering and also issued finder's warrants (each a "Finder's Warrant") equal to 7.5% of the total number of Flow-Through Units placed by such Finders. Each Finder's Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit (each a "Finder's Unit" and collectively the "Finder's Units") with each Finder's Unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one Warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, the Company paid $36,300 in cash fees to the Finders and issued 604,999 Finder's Warrants to the Finders. In addition, the Company also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,255 in connection with the Placement.

- 28 -


EX-99.70 71 exhibit99-70.htm EXHIBIT 99.70 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.70 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.70

GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER30, 2010

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and resultsof operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated GrandviewInc., for the three months ended November 30, 2010 (“second quarter 2011”), the six months ended November 30, 2010 (“six-month period 2011”) and its financial position as at November 30, 2010. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2010. The comparative reporting periods are the three months ended November 30, 2009 (“second quarter 2010”) and the six months ended November 30, 2009 (“six-month period 2010”).

Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13to the interim consolidated financial statements for the second quarter 2011.

Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

This MD&A was prepared on January 14, 2011.

Forward Looking Statements

This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

Overview and Corporate History

Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in Peru and the province of Ontario in Canada.

Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Activities during the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011

The Company continued with pre-development and other fieldwork activities at its Giulianita property in Peru. The Company also met extensively with the local community to gain the necessary approvals and community involvement for the project.

Management and the Board believe that the financing of the Giulianita project in Peru is aligned with the enhanced corporate strategy of aggressively pursuing potential cash-flow opportunities and that such small-scale mining opportunities represent an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate its own exploration funds.

Activities subsequent to the second quarter 2011

On January 4, 2011, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement with the MineralFields Group. This placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,066,666 flow-throughunits in the capital of the Company at a purchase price of $0.075 per flow-through unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $605,000. Each flow-through unit consists of one commonshare of the Company issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company on a nonflow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the secondtwelve months.

In connection with this placement, the Company paid eligible persons a cash fee of 6.0% of thegross proceeds raised through each finder under the offering and also issued finder's warrants equal to 7.5% of the total number of flow-through units placed by such finders. Each finder's warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit with each finder's unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, theCompany paid $36,300 in cash fees to the finders and issued 604,999 finder's warrants to the finders. Inaddition, the Company also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,255 in connection with the placement.

Properties and Projects

The Companyfocused its fieldwork and exploration activitieson the Giulianita Property during the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011.

Giulianita Property, Peru

The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion, has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,000 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

2


Efforts focused on negotiations with various communities for surface access rights to the project area and working with local community groups, government groups and consulting engineering groups in advance of surface exploration work.

During the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011, the Company spent $108,956 and $205,742 respectively on preliminary exploration and fieldwork and property acquisition costs, compared with $32,225 and $87,476 respectively for the second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010.Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2010 were $481,546.

Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

Grandview has a 64% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”).

April 28, 2010 Grandview acquired the final 40% interest in ten (10) unpatented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”) from joint venture partner EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and eliminated all net smelter royalties previously due to EMCO under the terms of the original agreement. The Company negotiated the acquisition of two additional unpatented mining claims and two patented mining claims, and reduced the net smelter royalty on the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property to 0.375% as part of an overall property position.

Exploration costs of $Nil and $1,353respectively were incurred during the second quarter 2011and six-month period 2011 on the Red Lake Properties (second quarter 2010: $195,595; six-month period 2010: $264,378). Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to November 30, 2010 were $3,875,320.

Results of Operations

Second quarter 2011

Grandview incurred a net loss of $87,967 for the scond quarter 2011, compared with $107,679 for the second quarter 2010. Professional fees of $10,996 for the second quarter 2011 compares with $47,976 for the second quarter 2010, accounting for the variance.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the second quarter 2011 of $140,233 compares with cash provided by operating activities of $119,243 for the second quarter 2010. The reason for the variance is attributable predominantly to positive working capital variances related to the second quarter 2010.

Six-month period 2011

Grandview incurred a net loss of $172,225 for the six-month period 2011, compared with $570,719 for the corresponding period last year. The reason for the variance is attributable to share-based payment expense of $368,500 recorded during the six-month period 2010.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

3



 

 

Second

 

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Third

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

Nov. 30,

 

 

Aug. 31,

 

 

May 31,

 

 

Feb. 28,

 

 

 

2010

 

 

2010

 

 

2010

 

 

2010

 

Revenue

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

Expenses

 

88,330

 

 

84,321

 

 

135,455

 

 

176,465

 

Net loss

 

(87,967

)

 

(84,258

)

 

(106,941

)

 

(202,743

)

Net loss per share

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.00

)

Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities

 

(140,233

)

 

(108,595

)

 

(76,904

)

 

(373,500

)

Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period

 

993,568

 

 

1,251,189

 

 

1,457,861

 

 

1,754,330

 

Assets

 

5,442,629

 

 

5,565,995

 

 

5,660,623

 

 

5,698,180

 


 

 

Second

 

 

First

 

 

Fourth

 

 

Third

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

Nov. 30,

 

 

Aug. 31,

 

 

May 31,

 

 

Feb. 28,

 

 

 

2009

 

 

2009

 

 

2009

 

 

2009

 

Revenue

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

$

 0

 

Expenses

 

107,809

 

 

460,325

 

 

74,970

 

 

243,077

 

Net income (loss)

 

(107,679

)

 

(463,040

)

 

(6,063,504

)

 

(1,589,709

)

Net income (loss) per share

 

(0.00

)

 

(0.01

)

 

(0.16

)

 

(0.04

)

Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities

 

119,243

 

 

(65,398

)

 

(70,034

)

 

(112,647

)

Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period

 

232,744

 

 

324,654

 

 

514,086

 

 

694,958

 

Assets

 

4,093,313

 

 

3,934,256

 

 

3,999,201

 

 

10,094,150

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Grandview’s working capital on November 30, 2010 was $1,045,216 compared with $1,407,869 on May 31, 2010. The cash and short-term investment balance on November 30, 2010 was $993,568 and $25,163 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2010 of $1,432,824 and $25,037respectively.

225,000 stock options were cancelled during the six-month period 2011 (no financial impact).

333,333 warrants were exercised during the six-month period 2011 for gross proceeds of $16,667.

The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at January14, 2011 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. In this regard, see also the funding raised in the section “Activities subsequent to the second quarter 2011” above. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

4


DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of November 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding 72,763,033 common shares, 26,666,665 warrants and 5,650,000 stock options.As of January 14, 2011, the Company had outstanding 80,829,699 common shares, 31,304,997 warrants and 5,650,000 stock options.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011, $37,500 and $75,000 (second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010: $37,500 and $75,000, respectively) was paid to the President andCEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $37,500 (second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010: $26,250 and 52,750, respectively) capitalized to mining interests.

For the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011, $15,000 and $24,000 respectively (second quarter 2010 and six-month period 2010: $12,000 and $21,000, respectively) in consulting fees was alsopaid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

5


Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

Going Concern Assumption

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at November 30, 2010 of $13,477, compared with $13,699 as at May 31, 2010.

The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

Future Accounting Changes

International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

6


In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of November 30, 2010, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

Management has concluded that, as of November 30, 2010, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

The CICA announced that publicly accountable enterprises would be required to transition from GAAP to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), effective January 1, 2011. This mandate is first applicable to interim reporting periods during 2011 and also requires the presentation of comparative financial information for 2010. For this reason, the effective conversion for the Company’s reporting purposes is June 1, 2009, even though full disclosure under IFRS will first be required during 2011.

The Company established an IFRS plan and has tasked a service provider and a professional service firm with developing the transitional reporting under IFRS. The plan calls for four phases, being the scoping and planning phase, the assessment phase, the implementation phase and post-implementation.

7


The scoping and planning phase involves establishing a project team and organizational structure, including oversight of the process and includes a project plan, stakeholder analysis and communication plan. This phase also entails an initial assessment of the key areas where IFRS transition may have a significant impacts. During the year the Company will prepare an initial diagnostic of the key areas in which adjustments are expected, incorporating an analysis of the transition exceptions and exemptions available under IFRS 1 “First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, as well as an assessment of the accounting policy choices available to the Company upon adoption.

The assessment phase will involve technical analysis that will result in understanding potential impacts, quantification of alternatives where there are accounting policy choices, detailed analysis and decisions taken regarding IFRS 1 exemptions and exceptions available to the Company and the drafting of accounting policies in accordance with IFRS. In addition this will result in identifying resource and training requirements, processes for preparing financial statements, and establishing IT system requirements. The Company intends to disclose its progress in accomplishing this phase in its Management Discussion and Analysis documents during 2010.

During the implementation phase, the Company will apply management’s accounting choices, develop sample financial statements, implement business and internal control requirements, calculate the opening balance sheet at June 1, 2009 and other transitional reconciliations and disclosure requirements. The last phase, post-implementation, will involve continuous monitoring of changes in IFRS maintaining IFRS competencies through training and development.

Progress on IFRS Transition Plan

The progress to date may be summarized as follows:

Scoping and planning phase – complete.

Assessment phase – substantially complete, expected to be completed by fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

Implementation phase – in progress, expected to completed by fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

Post-implementation – Beginning 2011 and thereafter.

To date, the Company’s evaluation of potential changes to accounting policies in key areas are summarized below. The list is in no way intended to represent a complete list of areas where adoption of IFRS will require a change in accounting policies, but does highlight the most significant areas identified to date. Changes and ongoing developments regarding IFRS as developed by the International Accounting Standards Board may have an effect on the changes required to the Company’s accounting policies on adoption of IFRS, but is not anticipated that such changes would require substantial changes to the summary presented below.

First-time Adoption of IFRS

The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS 1”), which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS, effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

The Company has identified the following optional exemptions that it expects to apply in its preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at June 1, 2009:

8


  • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.

  • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.

  • To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the transition date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the transition date.

  • To apply the transition provisions of IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease, therefore determining if arrangements existing at the transition date contain a lease based on the circumstances existing at that date.

  • To apply IAS 23 Borrowing Costs prospectively from the transition date. IAS 23 requires the capitalization of borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, production or construction of certain assets.

Prior to reporting interim financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the quarter ending August 31, 2011, the Company may decide to apply other optional exemptions contained in IFRS 1. IFRS 1 does not permit changes to estimates that have been made previously. Accordingly, estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s opening IFRS statement of financial position as at the transition date will be consistent with those made under current Canadian GAAP. If necessary, estimates will be adjusted to reflect any difference in accounting policy.

Impact of Adopting IFRS on the Company’s Business

Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

Subject to certain conditions, IFRS currently allows an entity to determine an accounting policy that specifies the treatment of costs related to the exploration for and evaluation of mineral properties. The Company expects to establish an accounting policy to expense, as incurred, all costs relating to exploration and evaluation until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

The application of this policy on the adoption of IFRS will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements to the extent that the value of mineral properties remain unproven. On adoption of IFRS, the carrying value of the unproven mineral properties will be reduced to zero (at the transition date), with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated deficit. All subsequent exploration and evaluation costs will be expensed as incurred until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

Impairment of (Non-financial) Assets

IFRS requires a write down of assets if the higher of the fair market value and the value in use of a group of assets is less than its carrying value. Value in use is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows. Current Canadian GAAP requires a write down to estimated fair value only if the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of a group of assets are less than its carrying value. The Company's accounting policies related to impairment of non-financial assets will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect that this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets. The Company will perform impairment assessments in accordance with IFRS at the transition date.

Share-based Payments

In certain circumstances, IFRS requires a different measurement of stock-based compensation related to stock options than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to share-based payments that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

9


Asset Retirement Obligations (Decommissioning Liabilities)

IFRS requires the recognition of a decommissioning liability for legal or constructive obligations, while current Canadian GAAP only requires the recognition of such liabilities for legal obligations. A constructive obligation exists when an entity has created reasonable expectations that it will take certain actions. The Company's accounting policies related to decommissioning liabilities will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets.

Property and Equipment

IFRS contains different guidance related to recognition and measurement of property and equipment than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to property and equipment that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

Income Taxes

In certain circumstances, IFRS contains different requirements related to recognition and measurement of future (deferred) income taxes. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to income taxes that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

OUTLOOK

During the second quarter 2011 and six-month period 2011 the company focused efforts on at its Giulianita project in Peru and maintaining its land position in good standing at other project areas. At Sanshaw-Bonanza the Company was able to consolidate and increase it property holdings and reduced the overall net smelter royalty on the property that we believe increases the value of the project significantly. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities in and around its centers of exploration, more specifically Red Lake and Northwestern Ontario. The Company also has been evaluating a number of mining projects in Peru as part of the small mines development strategy that was implemented in 2009.

The Company strategy is to explore for, acquire and develop high grade, small output (15,000 to 35,000 ounce per year) mines and develop low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad, in particular Peru. In this regard, the Company is proceeding to develop its Giulianita project in Peru and will be the focus of the Company’s activity over the next 12 months. The Company will also aggressively pursue additional exploration/mining opportunities that fit the designated profile.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

10


For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2010, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion and in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

11


EX-99.71 72 exhibit99-71.htm EXHIBIT 99.71 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.71 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.71

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended November 30, 2010.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on September 1, 2010, and ended on November 30, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: January 14, 2011

Ernest Cleave”                            
[Signature]  
Chief Financial Officer  


EX-99.72 73 exhibit99-72.htm EXHIBIT 99.72 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.72 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.72

FORM 52-109F2
CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

1.

Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended November 30, 2010.

       
2.

No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

       
3.

Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

       
4.

Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

       
5.

Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

       
(a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

       
(i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

       
(ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

       
(b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

       
5.1

Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

       
5.2

ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

       
5.3

Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

       
6.

Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on September 1, 2010, and ended on November 30, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

Date: January 14, 2011

Paul Sarjeant”                             
[Signature]  
Chief Executive Officer  


EX-99.73 74 exhibit99-73.htm EXHIBIT 99.73 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.73 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.73



EX-99.74 75 exhibit99-74.htm EXHIBIT 99.74 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.74 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.74

TSX: GVX
NEWS RELEASE OTCBB: GVGDF
For Immediate Release  

Grandview Gold Inc. Issues Update to Shareholders

February 2, 2011 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) ("Grandview" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that Mr. Paul Sarjeant, B.Sc., P.Geo., President and Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc. has issued a bi-annual update to shareholders.

The full text of the update can be found on the Grandview website on the Shareholder Update page.

About Grandview Gold Inc.
Grandview Gold Inc is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview Gold’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

-30-


EX-99.75 76 exhibit99-75.htm EXHIBIT 99.75 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.75 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Exhibit 99.75

 
Grandview Gold Inc.
 
(An Exploration Stage Company)
 
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
 
For the Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
 
(Unaudited)
 


Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (A Development Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The most significant of these accounting principles have been set out in the May 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements. Only changes in accounting policies have been disclosed in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances. Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the period end unaudited interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

Management's Report on Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at February 28, 2011.

Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at February 28, 2011.

Notice to Reader

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.

(signed) (signed)
   
Paul T. Sarjeant Ernest Cleave
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
Toronto, Canada  
April 14, 2011  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    February 28,     May 31,  
(Unaudited)   2011     2010  
Assets            
Current assets            
             Cash $  1,327,653   $  1,432,824  
             Short-term investments   25,223     25,037  
             HST and sundry receivable   54,885     26,416  
             Prepaid expenses   16,486     12,876  
    1,424,247     1,497,153  
Reclamation bond (Note 5)   12,753     13,699  
Mining interests (Note 6)   4,419,855     4,149,771  
  $  5,856,855   $  5,660,623  
Liabilities            
Current liabilities            
             Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  22,319   $  89,284  
Asset retirement obligation   12,753     13,699  
    35,072     102,983  
             
Shareholders' equity   5,821,783     5,557,640  
  $  5,856,855   $  5,660,623  

Nature of operations and going concern (Note 1)

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 2 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  

 

  Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  

 

  February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  

(Unaudited)

  2011     2010     2011     2010     26, 2004)

 

                             

Expenses

                             

Share-based payments

$  -   $  80,991   $  -   $  449,491   $  4,479,616  

Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

  29,109     21,014     68,856     54,090     1,972,019  

Professional fees

  23,987     21,385     66,152     111,799     1,432,150  

Management services (Note 12)

  27,500     29,824     83,000     73,074     1,524,940  

Office and administration

  16,120     10,019     44,890     35,264     783,135  

Exploration evaluation expenses

  1,920     13,232     8,389     20,881     33,274  

Flow-through interest expense

  -     -     -     -     188,801  

Bad debt

  -     -     -     -     1,235  

 

                             

 

  98,636     176,465     271,287     744,599     10,415,170  

 

                             

Loss before the under noted

  (98,636 )   (176,465 )   (271,287 )   (744,599 )   (10,415,170 )

Interest income

  176     2,597     602     12     89,325  

Write-down of marketable securities

  -     -     -     -     (25,000 )

Write-off of mineral properties (Note 6)

  (40,274 )   -     (40,274 )   -     (6,471,992 )

Impairment of mineral properties

  -     -     -     -     (1,557,112 )

Forgiveness of debt

  -     (28,875 )   -     (28,875 )   35,667  

Failed merger costs

  -     -     -     -     (170,000 )

 

                             

Loss before income taxes

  (138,734 )   (202,743 )   (310,959 )   (773,462 )   (18,514,282 )

Future income tax recovery

  -     -     -     -     1,675,990  

 

                             

Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period

$  (138,734 ) $  (202,743 ) $  (310,959 ) $  (773,462 ) $  (16,838,292 )

 

                             

Basic loss per share (Note 10)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )      

 

                             

Diluted loss per share (Note 10)

$  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )      

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 3 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Deficit
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2011     2010     2011     2010     26, 2004)
                               
Accumulated Deficit                              
Balance at beginning of period $  (20,133,806 ) $  (19,651,897 ) $  (19,961,581 ) $  (19,081,178 ) $  (3,434,248 )
Net loss for the period   (138,734 )   (202,743 )   (310,959 )   (773,462 )   (16,838,292 )
                               
Balance at end of period $  (20,272,540 ) $  (19,854,640 ) $  (20,272,540 ) $  (19,854,640 ) $  (20,272,540 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 4 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                Contributed Accumulated        
(Unaudited)   Share Capital     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  
                               
                               
At May 31, 2008 $  14,202,266   $  3,742,570   $  4,789,944   $ (11,193,260 ) $  11,541,520  
                               
Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -     -     (120,833 )
Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
                               
At May 31, 2009 $  14,430,400   $  1,203,804   $  7,359,376   $ (19,081,178 ) $  3,912,402  
Share-based payments   -     -     449,491     -     449,491  
Exercise of warrants   16,667     -     -     -     16,667  
Fair value of warrants exercised   15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  
Mineral property acquisition   67,000     -     -     -     67,000  
Private placement   2,000,000     -     -     -     2,000,000  
Cost of issue - cash laid out   (36,392 )   -     -     -     (36,392 )
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   (1,440,000 )   1,440,000     -     -     -  
Debt conversion   28,875     -     -     -     28,875  
Warrants expired   -     (1,173,138 )   1,173,138     -     -  
Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (880,403 )   (880,403 )
                               
At May 31, 2010 $  15,081,883   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $ (19,961,581 ) $  5,557,640  
Exercise of warrants   32,000     (15,333 )   -     -     16,667  
Private placement   605,000     -     -     -     605,000  
Warrant valuation   (43,776 )   43,776     -     -     -  
Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   (25,591 )   25,591     -     -     -  
Cost of issue - cash   (46,565 )   -     -     -     (46,565 )
Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (310,959 )   (310,959 )
                               
At February 28, 2011 $  15,602,951   $  1,509,367   $  8,982,005   $ (20,272,540 ) $  5,821,783  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 5 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2011     2010     2011     2010     26, 2004)  
                               
Cash flows from operating activities                              
Net loss for the period $  (138,734 ) $  (202,743 ) $  (310,959 ) $  (773,462 ) $  (16,838,292 )
Items not involving cash:                              
       Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     -     25,000  
       Debt conversion   -     28,875     -     28,875     (6,792 )
       Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     -     1,235  
       Share-based payments   -     80,991     -     449,491     4,479,616  
       Future income tax recovery   -     -     -     -     (1,675,990 )
       Accrued interest income   (60 )   -     (186 )   -     (44,126 )
       Write-off of mineral properties   40,274     -     40,274     -     6,471,992  
       Impairment of mineral properties   -     -     -     -     1,557,112  
Changes in non-cash working capital items:                              
       GST and sundry receivable   (8,827 )   (6,930 )   (28,469 )   (14,045 )   (54,395 )
       Prepaid expenses   (8,989 )   13,524     (3,610 )   (3,435 )   (16,486 )
       Due from a related party   -     -     -     -     90,000  
       Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (4,751 )   (287,217 )   (66,965 )   (7,079 )   28,489  
                               
Cash flows used in operating activities   (121,087 )   (373,500 )   (369,915 )   (319,655 )   (5,982,637 )
                               
Cash flows from financing activities                              
Loans from related parties   -     -     -     -     (28,594 )
Share/warrant issuance   605,000     2,000,000     621,667     2,016,667     20,690,544  
Cost of issuance   (46,565 )   (34,998 )   (46,565 )   (34,998 )   (1,859,266 )
Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     -     175,000  
Repayment of loan   -     -     -     -     (75,000 )
                               
Cash flows provided by financing activities   558,435     1,965,002     575,102     1,981,669     18,902,684  
                               
Cash flows from investing activities                              
Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     -     -     (13,090 )
Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   -     -     -     382,493     18,903  
Expenditures on mining interests   (103,263 )   (69,916 )   (310,358 )   (421,770 )   (11,508,207 )
Due from a related party   -     -     -     -     (90,000 )
                               
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $  (103,263 ) $  (69,916 ) $  (310,358 ) $  (39,277 ) $  (11,592,394 )

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 6 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2011     2010     2011     2010     26, 2004)
                               
Change in Cash during the period $  334,085   $  1,521,586   $  (105,171 ) $  1,622,737   $  1,327,653  
                               
Cash, beginning of period   993,568     207,744     1,432,824     106,593     -  
                               
Cash, end of period $  1,327,653   $  1,729,330   $  1,327,653   $  1,729,330   $  1,327,653  
                               
                               
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Transactions                          
Share issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  20,000   $  -   $  20,000   $  630,875  
Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 7 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Mineral Properties
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date of  
                            inception  
                            of the  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     exploration  
    February 28,     February 28,     stage (March  
(Unaudited)   2011     2010     2011     2010     26, 2004)
                               
Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada                              
Balance, beginning of period $  3,875,320   $  3,707,171   $  3,873,967   $  3,442,793   $  -  
                               
       Drilling, assays and related field work   -     3,866     -     268,244     3,202,798  
       Property acquisition and holding costs   7,381     -     8,734     -     679,903  
         Write-off (Note 6)   (42,274 )   -     (42,274 )   -     (42,274 )
                               
    (34,893 )   3,866     (33,540 )   268,244     3,840,427  
                               
       Balance, end of period $  3,840,427   $  3,711,037   $  3,840,427   $  3,711,037   $  3,840,427  
                               
                               
Guilianita Property, Peru                              
Balance, beginning of period $  481,546   $  87,476   $  275,804   $  -   $  -  
                               
       Drilling, assays and related field work   57,401     66,085     181,265     102,007     416,137  
       Project administration and general   40,481     -     122,359     -     122,359  
       Property acquisition and holding costs   -     19,965     -     71,519     40,932  
                               
    97,882     86,050     303,624     173,526     579,428  
                               
       Balance, end of period $  579,428   $  173,526   $  579,428   $  173,526   $  579,428  
                               
Total $ 4,419,855   $  3,884,563   $  4,419,855   $  3,884,563   $  4,419,855  

The notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

  - 8 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.

Nature of Operations and Going Concern

   

Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps in North America and Peru.

   

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The Company was previously in the business of investing significant equity interests in high-technology companies. As at March 26, 2004, the Company changed its direction to a gold exploration company. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company will be applying Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook effective March 26, 2004 onward.

   

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), as applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of a mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. Accordingly, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

   

The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management expects that the Company, based upon the underlying value of its exploration projects, will be able to secure the necessary financing to meet the Company’s requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful.

   
2.

Accounting Policies

   

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements is based on accounting policies and practices consistent with those used in the preparation of the audited annual consolidated financial statements except as noted below. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2010, since they do not contain all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the respective unaudited interim periods presented.


  - 9 -  



Grandview Gold Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.

Accounting Policies (Continued)

     

Future Accounting Pronouncements

     

International Financial Reporting Standards [“IFRS”]

     

In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

     

Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

     

The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

     
3.

Capital Management

     

The Company manages its capital with the following objectives:

     
  •  
  • to ensure sufficient financial flexibility to achieve the ongoing business objectives including funding of future growth opportunities, and pursuit of accretive acquisitions; and

  •  
  • to maximize shareholder return through enhancing the share value.

         

    The Company monitors its capital structure and makes adjustments according to market conditions in an effort to meet its objectives given the current outlook of the business and industry in general. The Company may manage its capital structure by issuing new shares, repurchasing outstanding shares, adjusting capital spending, or disposing of assets. The capital structure is reviewed by Management and the Board of Directors on an ongoing basis. The Company considers its capital to be equity, comprising share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit which as of February 28, 2011 totaled $5,821,783 (May 31, 2010 - $5,557,640).

         

    The Company manages capital through its financial and operational forecasting processes. The Company reviews its working capital and forecasts its future cash flows based on operating expenditures, and other investing and financing activities. The forecast is regularly updated based on activities related to its mineral properties. Selected information is frequently provided to the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company’s capital management objectives, policies and processes have remained unchanged during the three and nine months ended February 28, 2011. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.


      - 10 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    4.

    Risk Factors

       

    The Company’s significant mineral properties are Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada and Guilianta Property, Peru (called the "Properties"). A full description of these properties may be found in Note 7 of the May 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements.

       

    Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon these Properties. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

       

    The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

       

    Fair Value

       

    The following summarizes the methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company's financial instruments where measurement is required. The fair value of short-term financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity. These include cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Fair value amounts represent point-in-time estimates and may not reflect fair value in the future. The measurements are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and are a matter of significant judgment. The methods and assumptions used to develop fair value measurements, for those financial instruments where fair value is recognized in the balance sheet, have been prioritized into three levels as per the fair value hierarchy included in GAAP. Level one includes quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level two includes inputs that are observable other than quoted prices included in level one. Level three includes inputs that are not based on observable market data.


          Level One     Level Two     Level Three  
                         
      Cash $  1,327,653   $  -   $  -  
      Short-term investments $  25,223   $  -   $  -  
      Reclamation bond $  12,753   $  -   $  -  

      - 11 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    4.

    Risk Factors (continued)

         

    Credit Risk

         

    Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash, HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party. Cash are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

         

    Financial instruments included in HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party consist of sales tax receivable from government authorities in Canada, deposits held with service providers and a loan provided to the President and CEO of the Company. HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are in good standing as of February 28, 2011. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party is minimal.

         

    Liquidity Risk

         

    The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at February 28, 2011, the Company had a cash and short term investments balance of $1,352,876 (May 31, 2010 - $1,457,861) to settle current liabilities of $22,319 (May 31, 2010 - $89,284). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

         

    Market Risk

         

    Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

         
    (a)

    Interest Rate Risk

         

    The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

         
    (b)

    Foreign Currency Risk

         

    The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company's exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.

         
    (c)

    Price Risk

         

    The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.


      - 12 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    4.

    Risk Factors (continued)

         

    Sensitivity Analysis

         

    The Company has, for accounting purposes, designated its cash as held for trading, which is measured at fair value. HST and sundry receivable and due from a related party are classified for accounting purposes as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost which equals fair value. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are classified for accounting purposes as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost which also equals fair value.

         

    As of February 28, 2011, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

         

    The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

         

    Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a three and nine month period:

         
    (i)

    Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at February 28, 2011, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2011 would have varied by $64 and $189 respectively, as a result of a variance in interest income from short-term investments. As at February 28, 2011, reported shareholders' equity would have varied by $64 and $189 respectively as a result of a variance in interest income from short-term investments.

         
    (ii)

    The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

         
    (iii)

    Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of February 28, 2011, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

         
    5.

    Reclamation Bond

         

    The Company has posted reclamation bonds for its mining projects, as required by the United States, Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on projects that are abandoned or closed.

         
    6.

    Mining Interests

         

    On a quarterly basis, management of the Company reviews exploration expenditures to ensure mining interests include only costs and projects that are eligible for capitalization.

         

    For a description of mining interests, refer to Note 7 of the audited financial statements as at May 31, 2010.

         

    During the quarter ended February 28, 2011, the Company disposed the Bissett properties within it's Rice Lake Gold Camp for $2,000. The disposition of the property resulted in a charge to expense of $40,274. The Company received a 1% Net Smelter Return on the disposed property.


      - 13 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    7.

    Share Capital

         
    (a)

    Authorized

         

    Unlimited number of common shares

         

    Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non- participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

         
    (b)

    Issued


          Number        
          of        
          shares     Amount  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
      Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
      Private placement   120,000     120,000  
      Private placement   150,000     150,000  
      Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
      Private placement   175,000     175,000  
      Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
      Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
      Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
      Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
      Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
      Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
      Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
      Debt conversion   80,000     100,000  
      Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
      Private placement   590,320     737,900  
      Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
      Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
      Private placement   400,000     500,000  
      Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
      Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
      Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
      Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
      Flow-through cost of issue   -     (731,430 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  

      - 14 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    7.

    Share Capital (Continued)

       

    (b) Issued (Continued)


        Number        
        of        
        shares     Amount  
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  9,543,301  
    Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
    Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
    Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
    Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
    Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
    Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
    Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
    Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
    Flow-through cost of issue   -     (563,472 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  11,019,703  
    Private placement   11,169,000     4,950,150  
    Warrant valuation   -     (940,212 )
    Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
    Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
    Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
    Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
    Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
    Flow-through cost of issue   -     (260,255 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
    Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
    Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
    Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
    Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
    Flow-through cost of issue   -     (120,833 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  14,430,400  
    Mineral property acquisition   750,000     67,000  
    Debt conversion   360,937     28,875  
    Exercise of warrants - cash   333,333     16,667  
    Exercise of warrants - valuation   -     15,333  
    Private placement   26,666,665     2,000,000  
    Cost of issue - cash   -     (36,392 )
    Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2010   72,763,033     15,081,883  
    Exercise of warrants   333,333     32,000  
    Private placement   8,066,666     605,000  
    Warrant valuation   -     (43,776 )
    Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (25,591 )
    Cost of issue - cash   -     (46,565 )
                 
    Balance, February 28, 2011   81,163,032   $  15,602,951  

      - 15 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    7.

    Share Capital (Continued)

    On December 31, 2010, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the "Placement") with the MineralFields Group. The Placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,066,666 flow-through units in the capital of the Company (the “Flow-Through Units”) at a purchase price of $0.075 per Flow-Through Unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $605,000. Each Flow-Through Unit consists of one common share of the Company issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company on a non-flow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the second twelve months.

    The fair value of the 4,033,332 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $43,776 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.66%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 112.13% and an expected life of 12 months.

    In connection with the Placement, the Company paid eligible persons (the "Finders") a cash fee of 6.0% of the gross proceeds raised through each Finder under the Offering and also issued finder's warrants (each a "Finder's Warrant") equal to 7.5% of the total number of Flow-Through Units placed by such Finders. Each Finder's Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit (each a "Finder's Unit" and collectively the "Finder's Units") with each Finder's Unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one Warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, the Company paid $36,300 in cash fees to the Finders and issued 604,999 Finder's Warrants to the Finders. In addition, the Company also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,265 in connection with the Placement.

    The fair value of the 604,999 Finder's Warrants has been estimated to be $25,591 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.66%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 137.49% and an expected life of 24 months.

      - 16 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    8.

    Warrants


          Number of     Weighted Average  
          Warrants     Exercise Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
      Issued   602,500     1.44  
      Expired/cancelled   -     -  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2005   602,500   $  1.44  
      Issued   3,435,238     1.63  
      Expired/cancelled   (602,500 )   (1.44 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2006   3,435,238   $  1.63  
      Issued   4,189,999     0.91  
      Expired/cancelled   (1,043,654 )   1.60  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2007   6,581,583   $  1.18  
      Issued   5,853,480     0.62  
      Issued   73,937     0.65  
      Exercised   (147,875 )   0.45  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
      Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
      Issued   666,666     0.05  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
      Expired   (6,053,480 )   (0.60 )
      Issued   26,666,665     0.12  
      Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010   26,999,998   $  0.12  
      Issued   4,638,331     0.16  
      Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
                   
      Balance, February 28, 2011   31,304,996   $  0.12  

    The following are the warrants outstanding at February 28, 2011:

      Number of   Fair     Exercise     Expiry  
      Warrants   Value     Price        
                         
      26,666,665 $  1,440,000   $  0.12     December 3, 2011  
      4,033,332   43,776     0.18     December 30, 2012  
      604,999   25,591     0.08     December 31, 2012  
                         
      31,304,996 $  1,509,367              

      - 17 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    9.

    Stock Options


          Number     Weighted Average  
          of     Exercise  
          Stock Options     Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2004 and March 26, 2004   -   $  -  
      Granted   1,225,000     1.01  
      Cancelled   (100,000 )   1.00  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2005   1,125,000   $  1.06  
      Granted   1,100,000     1.55  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2006   2,225,000   $  1.28  
      Granted   1,250,000     1.06  
      Expired   (375,000 )   1.00  
      Cancelled   (250,000 )   1.19  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2007   2,850,000   $  1.22  
      Granted   2,700,000     0.63  
      Expired   (850,000 )   1.13  
      Cancelled   (125,000 )   1.38  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
      Cancelled   (175,000 )   0.68  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
      Granted   4,250,000     0.15  
      Expired   (1,375,000 )   0.75  
      Forfeited   (1,400,000 )   0.93  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010   5,875,000   $  0.38  
      Cancelled   (225,000 )   (0.15 )
                   
      Balance, February 28, 2011   5,650,000   $  0.39  

      - 18 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    9.

    Stock Options (Continued)

       

    The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at February 28, 2011:


          Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
                Weighted                    
                average                    
                remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
          Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
      Expiry Date   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise price  
                                     
      April 3, 2011   250,000     0.09   $  1.80     250,000   $  1.80  
      December 9, 2014   900,000     3.78     0.15     900,000     0.15  
      September 27, 2012   1,825,000     1.58     0.68     1,825,000     0.68  
      June 23, 2014   2,675,000     3.31     0.15     2,675,000     0.15  
                                     
          5,650,000     2.69 years    $ 0.39     5,650,000   $  0.39  

    10.

    Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

       

    Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.


          Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
          February 28,     February 28,  
          2011     2010     2011     2010  
                               
      Numerator for basic loss per share $  (138,734 ) $  (202,743 ) $  (310,959 ) $  (773,462 )
                               
      Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (138,734 ) $  (202,743 ) $  (310,959 ) $  (773,462 )
                               
      Denominator:                        
      Weighted average number of common shares - basic   78,406,736     71,054,405     74,625,300     53,428,906  
                               
      Weighted average number of common shares - diluted   78,406,736     71,054,405     74,625,300     53,428,906  
                               
      Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.01 )

    Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

      - 19 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Segmented Information

       

    The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration (2009 - same). As the operations comprise a single reporting segment, amounts disclosed in the consolidated financial statements for loss for the periods presented also represent segment amounts.

       

    The Company operates in two geographic segments for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2011, and year ended May 31, 2010 as follows.


          February 28,     May 31,  
          2011     2010  
                   
      Canada $  5,544,088   $  5,372,915  
      Peru   312,767     287,708  
                   
      Total assets $  5,856,855   $  5,660,623  

    12.

    Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

         
    i)

    For the three and nine months period ended February 28, 2011, $31,125 and $106,125 (three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 - $37,500 and $112,500, respectively) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $19,000 and $56,500 (three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 - $18,750 and $71,500, respectively) capitalized to mining interests.

         
    ii)

    For the three and nine months period ended February 28, 2011, $9,000 and $33,000 respectively (three and nine months ended February 28, 2010 - $9,000 and $30,000, respectively) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

         

    These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.


      - 20 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

    The Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows: Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounted for its stock compensation plan as described in Note 2(j) in the fiscal 2010 consolidated financial statements under which CICA Handbook Section 3870 requires that compensation for option awards to employees and consultants be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value for options granted in fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. The Company, as permitted by CICA Handbook Section 3870, has adopted this section prospectively for new option awards granted on or after June 1, 2003. Accordingly, a fair value compensation expense is reported for any options that were granted and vested during an interim or fiscal period. Prior to this accounting policy, no compensation expense was required to be recorded for stock option grants under Canadian GAAP for fiscal 2004. For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement 148 effective as of June 1, 2003, which provisions allow the Company to record compensation expense for stock options granted in fiscal 2004 and all future periods based on the estimated fair value of such option, using the prospective method. In December 2004, FASB issued Statement 123 (Revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," which mandates the recording of compensation expense based on the fair value of such options.

    For the three and nine months ended February 28, 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Company's accounting for stock option grants under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP. As such, the expense recorded for US GAAP purposes would be equal to the expense recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2011, 2010, and 2009. Had the Company adopted (FASB) Statement 148 for fiscal 2004, there would be no affect on earnings since no stock options were issued in that year.

    Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e) of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010, while under US GAAP, exploration costs cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

    Prior to June 1, 2007, under Canadian GAAP marketable securities and long-term investments are carried at the lower of cost or market, and adjustments to the carrying value are shown as an expense on the statement of operations. Under US GAAP marketable equity securities are carried at market value, and changes to the market value are shown as a component of shareholder's equity (if the securities are classified as available-for-sale securities) or as gain or loss in the statement of operations (if the securities are classified as trading securities). Effective June 1, 2007, the Company's accounting for financial instruments, equity and comprehensive income under US GAAP is substantially equivalent to the accounting under Canadian GAAP.

    Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 12 of the annual consolidated financial statements for May 31, 2010). US GAAP has no such provision; consequently, the US GAAP statement of operations contains no such tax benefit.

    Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

      - 21 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at February 28, 2011 and May 31, 2010 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:


          February 28, 2011     May 31, 2010  
                   
      Assets            
      Current assets            
      Cash $  1,327,653   $  1,432,824  
      Short term investments   25,223     25,037  
      GST and sundry receivable   54,885     29,719  
      Prepaid expenses   16,486     12,876  
                   
          1,424,247     1,500,456  
                   
      Reclamation bond   12,753     13,699  
      Mineral property rights   720,835     712,101  
                   
        $  2,157,835   $  2,226,256  
                   
      Liabilities            
      Current liabilities            
      Accounts payable $  22,319   $  7,835  
      Accrued liabilities   -     81,449  
                   
          22,319     89,284  
      Asset retirement obligation   12,753     13,699  
                   
          35,072     102,983  
                   
      Shareholders' Equity            
      Share capital            
      Authorized - unlimited common shares            
      Issued            
           Common shares   17,278,941     16,757,873  
           Additional paid in capital   4,390,914     4,390,914  
           Warrants   1,509,367     1,455,333  
           Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
           Deferred share-based payments   4,591,091     4,591,091  
           Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
           Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (22,188,302 )   (21,612,690 )
                   
          2,122,763     2,123,273  
                   
        $  2,157,835   $  2,226,256  

      - 22 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    Under US GAAP, exploration stage companies are required to provide cumulative-from-inception information relating to income statements, statements of cash flows, and statements of changes in shareholders' equity. Inception has been deemed to be March 26, 2004, the date on which the Company, at a shareholders' meeting, made the decision to return to the business of exploration as its primary business focus. The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

       

    Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss


                            Cumulative  
                            from date  
          Nine Months Ended February 28,     of inception  
          2011     2010     2009     ("March 26, 2004")
                               
     

    Expenses

                           
     

    General exploration

    $  313,316   $  391,132   $  415,268   $  9,604,662  
     

    Management services

      83,000     522,565     175,846     5,309,361  
     

    Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

      68,856     54,090     75,007     2,015,917  
     

    Write-off of bad debts

      -     -     -     1,235  
     

    Professional fees

      66,152     111,799     111,825     1,289,796  
     

    Office and administration

      44,890     35,264     63,045     714,028  
     

    Flow-through interest expense

      -     -     2,747     188,801  
     

    Gain on forgiveness of debt

      -     28,875     -     (35,667 )
     

    Failed merger costs

      -     -     -     170,000  
     

    Debt forgiveness

      -     -     60,000     -  
     

     

                           
     

    Loss before the under noted

      (576,214 )   (1,143,725 )   (903,738 )   (19,258,133 )
     

    Interest income

      602     386     7,929     104,773  
     

    Write-off mineral property rights

      -     -     (382,313 )   (90,144 )
     

     

                           
     

    Net loss for the period

      (575,612 )   (1,143,339 )   (1,278,122 )   (19,243,504 )
     

     

                           
     

    Comprehensive (loss) items:

                           
     

    Write-down of marketable securities

      -     -     -     (25,000 )
     

     

                           
     

    Comprehensive loss for the period

    $  (575,612 ) $  (1,143,339 ) $  (1,278,122 ) $ (19,268,504 )
     

     

                           
     

    Loss per common share

                           
     

    Basic

    $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 )      
     

    Diluted

    $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 )      
     

     

                           
     

    Comprehensive loss per

                           
     

    common share

                           
      Basic $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 )      
      Diluted $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.03 )      

      - 23 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

       

    The changes in common shares from March 26, 2004 (date the Company became a exploration stage enterprise) as required by US GAAP is disclosed below:


                Amount  
                Under  
      Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
                   
      Common shares before change to a exploration stage company and as of March 26, 2004   3,270,998   $  3,378,444  
      Stock split (3 for 1)   6,541,996     -  
      Private placement   120,000     120,000  
      Private placement   150,000     150,000  
      Mineral property acquisition   400,000     4,000  
      Private placement   175,000     175,000  
      Private placement   1,005,000     1,005,000  
      Warrant valuation   -     (138,188 )
      Mineral property acquisition   118,500     159,975  
      Mineral property acquisition   70,000     86,800  
      Cost of issue - warrant valuation   -     (35,200 )
      Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (124,081 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2005   11,851,494   $  4,781,750  
      Private placement   2,019,104     2,523,880  
      Debt conversation   80,000     100,000  
      Warrant valuation   -     (178,023 )
      Private placement   590,320     737,900  
      Warrant valuation   -     (111,498 )
      Shares issued for a finders' fee   160,000     200,000  
      Private placement   400,000     500,000  
      Private placement   3,985,974     4,384,571  
      Warrant valuation   -     (1,335,301 )
      Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (462,173 )
      Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (866,375 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2006   19,086,892   $  10,274,731  
      Private placement   2,399,998     1,559,999  
      Warrant valuation   -     (284,400 )
      Mineral property acquisition   50,000     34,500  
      Mineral property acquisition   55,000     22,000  
      Private placement   3,250,000     1,462,500  
      Warrant valuation   -     (339,625 )
      Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (249,300 )
      Cost of issue - finder options valuation   -     (165,800 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  

      - 24 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


                Amount  
                Under  
      Common Shares (continued)   Shares     US GAAP  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2007   24,841,890   $  12,314,605  
      Private placements   11,169,000     4,950,150  
      Warrants valuation   -     (940,212 )
      Mineral property acquisition   130,000     45,800  
      Exercise of warrants   147,875     66,544  
      Exercise of warrants valuation   -     36,673  
      Cost of issue - cash laid out   -     (488,720 )
      Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (227,417 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
      Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
      Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
      Cost of issue - cash   -     (47,833 )
      Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
      Private placement   26,666,665     2,000,000  
      Cost of issue - cash   -     (36,392 )
      Mineral property acquisition   750,000     67,000  
      Debt conversion   360,937     28,875  
      Exercise of warrants - valuation   -     15,333  
      Exercise of warrants - cash   333,333     16,667  
      Cost of issue - broker warrants valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010   72,763,033     16,757,873  
      Exercise of warrants   333,333     32,000  
      Private placement   8,066,666     605,000  
      Warrant valuation   -     (43,776 )
      Cost of issue - broker warrant valuation   -     (25,591 )
      Cost of issue - cash   -     (46,565 )
                   
      Balance, February 28, 2011   81,163,032   $  17,278,941  

      - 25 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

    Other changes in shareholders' equity are presented as follows:

      Additional Paid in Capital      
      Balance from inception and as of May 31, 2004 and 2005 $  25,000  
      Expired warrants   173,388  
      Balance, May 31, 2006 $  198,388  
      Expired warrants   449,956  
      Balance, May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 $  648,344  
      Expired warrants   2,569,432  
      Balance, May 31, 2009 $  3,217,776  
      Expired warrants   1,173,138  
      Balance, May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2011 $  4,390,914  

      Warrants      
             
      Balance from March 26, 2004 to May 31, 2004 $  -  
      Issued   173,388  
             
      Balance, May 31, 2005 $  173,388  
      Issued   2,086,995  
      Expired   (173,388 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2006 $  2,086,995  
      Issued   974,575  
      Expired   (449,956 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,611,614  
      Issued   1,167,629  
      Exercised   (36,673 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2008 $  3,742,570  
      Issued   30,666  
      Expired   (2,569,432 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2009 $  1,203,804  
      Issued   1,440,000  
      Exercised   (15,333 )
      Expired   (1,173,138 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2010 $  1,455,333  
      Issued   69,367  
      Exercised   (15,333 )
             
      Balance, February 28, 2011 $  1,509,367  

      - 26 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

      Cumulative Adjustments to Marketable Securities      
      Balance, June 1, 2001 $  (85,625 )
      Comprehensive loss items   (121,100 )
      Balance, May 31, 2002 $  (206,725 )
      Comprehensive loss items   (88,580 )
      Balance, May 31, 2003 $  (295,305 )
      Comprehensive loss items   (5,000 )
      Balance, March 26, 2004 $  (300,305 )
      Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
      Balance, May 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 $  (315,539 )
      Comprehensive loss items   (9,766 )
      Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (325,305 )
      Comprehensive loss items   -  
      Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and February 28, 2011 $  (325,305 )
             
      Deferred Share-Based Payments      
      Balance, May 31, 2004 $  -  
      Vesting of stock options   775,613  
      Balance, May 31, 2005 $  775,613  
      Vesting of stock options   573,700  
      Balance, May 31, 2006 $  1,349,313  
      Vesting of stock options   1,358,687  
      Balance, May 31, 2007 $  2,708,000  
      Vesting of stock options   1,433,600  
      Balance, May 31, 2008 and 2009 $  4,141,600  
      Vesting of stock options   449,491  
      Balance, May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2011 $  4,591,091  

      - 27 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


      Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage      
             
      Balance, March 26, 2004 $  -  
      Net loss   4,678  
      Comprehensive loss items   (15,234 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2004 $  (10,556 )
      Net loss   (1,743,463 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2005 $  (1,754,019 )
      Net loss   (3,673,388 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2006 $  (5,427,407 )
      Net loss   (6,052,723 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2007 $  (11,480,130 )
      Net loss   (6,157,896 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
      Net loss   (2,586,978 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
      Net loss   (1,387,686 )
             
      Balance, May 31, 2010 $  (21,612,690 )
      Net loss   (575,612 )
             
      Balance, February 28, 2011 $  (22,188,302 )

      - 28 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

    The Company's statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:

    Statements of Cash Flows

                            Cumulative  
                            from date  
          Nine Months Ended February 28,     of inception  
          2011     2010     2009     ("March 26, 2004")  
                               
      Cash flows from operating activities                        
      Net loss for the period $  (575,612 ) $  (1,143,339 ) $  (1,278,122 ) $  (19,243,504 )
      Items not involving cash:                        
      Forgiveness of debt   -     28,875     60,000     (6,792 )
      Accrued bonus   -     -     20,000     -  
      Write-off of bad debts   -     -     -     1,235  
      Share-based payments   -     449,491     -     4,479,616  
      Accrued Interest income   -     (374 )   9,619     (59,539 )
      Write-off of mineral property rights   -     -     382,313     90,144  
      Change in non-cash operating working activities:                
      GST and sundry receivable   (28,469 )   (14,045 )   34,402     (62,868 )
      Prepaid expenses   (3,610 )   (3,435 )   113,666     (10,816 )
      Due from a related party   -     -     -     15,099  
      Accounts payable   14,484     32,841     (32,100 )   93,338  
      Accrued liabilities   (81,449 )   (39,920 )   636     (64,288 )
                               
      Cash flows used in operating activities   (674,656 )   (689,906 )   (689,586 )   (14,768,375 )
                               
      Cash flows from financing activities                        
      Repayment of loans from related parties   -     -     -     (28,594 )
      Share/warrant issuance   621,667     2,016,667     416,666     20,690,544  
      Cost of issue   (46,565 )   (34,998 )   (33,333 )   (1,859,266 )
      Proceeds from loan   -     -     -     175,000  
      Repayment of loan   -     -     -     (75,000 )
                               
      Cash flows provided by financing activities   575,102     1,981,669     383,333     18,902,684  
                               
      Cash flows from investing activities                        
      Purchase of reclamation bond   -     -     -     (13,090 )
      Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   (186 )   382,493     605,670     18,717  
      Exploration advances   -     -     -     -  
      Disposition of mineral property rights   1,998     -     -     1,998  
      Purchase of mineral property rights   (7,429 )   (51,519 )   (95,055 )   (2,814,282 )
                               
      Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities   (5,617 )   330,974     510,615     (2,806,657 )
                               
      Change in cash during the period   (105,171 )   1,622,737     204,362     1,327,652  
      Cash, beginning of period   1,432,824     106,593     84,856     1  
                               
      Cash, end of period $  1,327,653   $  1,729,330   $  289,218   $  1,327,653  

      - 29 -  



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2011
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

    13.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

    Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

                            Cumulative  
                            from date  
          Nine Months Ended November 30,     of inception  
          2011     2010     2009     ("March 26, 2004")
                               
      Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Transaction                    
      Share issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  20,000   $  10,800   $  563,875  
      Warrant issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  184,750  
      Share-based payments included in mining interest $  -   $  -   $  -   $  111,475  
      Interest paid $  -   $  -   $  -   $  45,159  

    14.

    Comparative Figures

    Certain prior year figures have been reclassified to conform with the current period financial statement presentation.

      - 30 -  


    EX-99.76 77 exhibit99-76.htm EXHIBIT 99.76 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.76 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.76

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
    THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2011

    The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”), formerly Consolidated Grandview Inc., for the three months ended February 28, 2011 (“third quarter 2011”), the nine months ended February 28, 2011 (“nine-month period 2011”) and its financial position as at February 28, 2011. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2010. The comparative reporting periods are the three months ended February 28, 2010 (“third quarter 2010”) and the nine months ended February 28, 2010 (“nine-month period 2010”).

    Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 13 to the interim consolidated financial statements for the third quarter 2011.

    Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

    The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

    This MD&A was prepared on April 14, 2011.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

    OVERALL PERFORMANCE

    Overview and Corporate History

    Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in Peru and the province of Ontario in Canada.

    Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


    Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

    Activities during the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011

    Management and the Board believe that the financing of the Giulianita project in Peru is aligned with the enhanced corporate strategy of aggressively pursuing potential cash-flow opportunities and that such small-scale mining opportunities represent an excellent base upon which to both lessen the Company’s dependence on the capital markets and generate its own exploration funds.

    The initial modeling for the Company’s Dixie Lake project in Red Lake is promising, and dictates a 2,200 meter diamond drill program to complete our objectives to confirm historic intercepts, define additional mineralization, and allow Grandview to bring to 43-101 standard, the historic resource at the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones.

    The Company continued to pursue additional opportunities within Peru, South America and Canada that meet our corporate objective of identifying small-scale, high-grade development opportunities.

    Private Placement

    On December 31,2010, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement with the MineralFields Group. This placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,066,666 flow-through units in the capital of the Company at a purchase price of $0.075 per flow-through unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $605,000. Each flow-through unit consists of one common share of the Company issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company on a non flow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the second twelve months.

    In connection with this placement, the Company paid eligible persons a cash fee of 6.0% of the gross proceeds raised through each finder under the offering and also issued finder's warrants equal to 7.5% of the total number of flow-through units placed by such finders. Each finder's warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit with each finder's unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, the Company paid $36,300 in cash fees to the finders and issued 604,999 finder's warrants to the finders. In addition, the Company also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,255 in connection with the placement.

    Properties and Projects

    The Company focused its fieldwork and exploration activities on the Giulianita Property during the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011.

    Giulianita Property, Peru

    The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion, has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

    2


    The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,000 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

    Efforts are currently focused on negotiations with the local community for surface access rights to the project area and working with local community groups, government groups and consulting engineering groups in advance of surface exploration work.

    During the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011, the Company spent $97,882 and $303,624 respectively on preliminary exploration and fieldwork and property acquisition costs, compared with $86,050 and $173,526 respectively for the third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010. Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to February 28, 2011 were $579,428.

    Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

    Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

    Grandview has a 67% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”). During the previous quarter Fronteer Gold Corp. accepted additional expenditures that increased the Companies holding in the Dixie Lake property to 67% from the previous 64% level.

    April 28, 2010 Grandview acquired the final 40% interest in ten (10) unpatented mining claims, located on Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”) from joint venture partner EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and eliminated all net smelter royalties previously due to EMCO under the terms of the original agreement. The Company negotiated the acquisition of two additional unpatented mining claims and two patented mining claims, and reduced the net smelter royalty on the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property to 0.375% as part of an overall property position.

    Exploration costs of $(34,893) and $(33,540) respectively were incurred during the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011 on the Red Lake Properties (third quarter 2010: $3,866; nine-month period 2010: $268,244). Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to February 28, 2011 were $3,840,427.

    Results of Operations

    Third quarter 2011

    Grandview incurred a net loss of $138,734 for the third quarter 2011, compared with $202,743 for the third quarter 2010. The reason for the variance is attributable to share-based payments of $80,991 recognized during the third quarter 2010.

    Cash flows used in operating activities for the third quarter 2011 of $121,087 compares with $373,500 for the third quarter 2010. The reason for the variance is attributable predominantly to working capital variances related to the third quarter 2010 of $280,623.

    Nine-month period 2011

    Grandview incurred a net loss of $310,959 for the nine-month period 2011, compared with $773,462 for the corresponding period last year. The reason for the variance is attributable to share-based payment expense of $449,491 recorded during the nine-month period 2010.

    3


    SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

    The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

     

     

    Third

     

     

    Second

     

     

    First

     

     

    Fourth

     

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

     

    Feb. 28,

     

     

    Nov. 30,

     

     

    Aug. 31,

     

     

    May 31,

     

     

     

    2011

     

     

    2010

     

     

    2010

     

     

    2010

     

    Revenue

    $

     0

     

    $

     0

     

    $

     0

     

    $

     0

     

    Expenses

     

    98,636

     

     

    88,330

     

     

    84,321

     

     

    135,455

     

    Net loss

     

    (138,734

    )

     

    (87,967

    )

     

    (84,258

    )

     

    (106,941

    )

    Net loss per share

     

    (0.00

    )

     

    (0.00

    )

     

    (0.00

    )

     

    (0.00

    )

    Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities

     

    (121,087

    )

     

    (140,233

    )

     

    (108,595

    )

     

    (76,904

    )

    Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period

     

    1,327,653

     

     

    993,568

     

     

    1,251,189

     

     

    1,457,861

     

    Assets

     

    5,856,855

     

     

    5,442,629

     

     

    5,565,995

     

     

    5,660,623

     


     

     

    Third

     

     

    Second

     

     

    First

     

     

    Fourth

     

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

    Quarter

     

     

     

    Feb. 28,

     

     

    Nov. 30,

     

     

    Aug. 31,

     

     

    May 31,

     

     

     

    2010

     

     

    2009

     

     

    2009

     

     

    2009

     

    Revenue

    $

     0

     

    $

     0

     

    $

     0

     

    $

     0

     

    Expenses

     

    176,465

     

     

    107,809

     

     

    460,325

     

     

    74,970

     

    Net income (loss)

     

    (202,743

    )

     

    (107,679

    )

     

    (463,040

    )

     

    (6,063,504

    )

    Net income (loss) per share

     

    (0.00

    )

     

    (0.00

    )

     

    (0.01

    )

     

    (0.16

    )

    Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities

     

    (373,500

    )

     

    119,243

     

     

    (65,398

    )

     

    (70,034

    )

    Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period

     

    1,754,330

     

     

    232,744

     

     

    324,654

     

     

    514,086

     

    Assets

     

    5,698,180

     

     

    4,093,313

     

     

    3,934,256

     

     

    3,999,201

     

    LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

    Grandview’s working capital on February 28, 2011 was $1,401,928 compared with $1,407,869 on May 31, 2010. The cash and short-term investment balance on February 28, 2010 was $1,327,653 and $25,223 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2010 of $1,432,824 and $25,037 respectively.

    The private placement of January 14, 2011 resulted in the issuance of 8,066,666 flow-through units, in turn comprised of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (4,033,332 common shares equivalent), for gross proceeds of $605,000. In addition finder’s warrants (604,999 common shares equivalent).

    225,000 stock options were cancelled during the nine-month period 2011 (no financial impact).

    333,333 warrants were exercised during the nine-month period 2011 for gross proceeds of $16,667.

    The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

    4


    The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at April 14, 2011 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

    DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

    The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of February 28, 2011 and April 14, 2011, the Company had outstanding 81,163,032 common shares, 31,304,996 warrants and 5,650,000 stock options.

    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

    For the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011, $31,125 and $106,125 (third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010: $37,500 and $112,500, respectively) were paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in these amounts was $19,000 and $56,500 (third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010: $18,750 and $71,500, respectively) capitalized to mining interests.

    For the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011, $9,000 and $33,000 respectively (third quarter 2010 and nine-month period 2010: $9,000 and $30,000, respectively) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

    OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

    See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

    PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

    There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

    CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

    The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

    Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

    Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

    The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

    Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

    In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

    5


    Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

    The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

    Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

    The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

    Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

    Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

    Going Concern Assumption

    These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

    The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

    Asset Retirement Obligations

    Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

    The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at February 28, 2011 of $12,753, compared with $13,699 as at May 31, 2010.

    The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

    6


    Future Accounting Changes

    International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

    In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. On February 13, 2008 the AcSB confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises. For these entities, IFRS will be required for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

    Business Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling Interests

    The CICA issued three new accounting standards in January 2009: Section 1582, "Business Combinations", Section 1601, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Section 1602, "Non-Controlling interests". These new standards will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Section 1582 replaces section 1581 and establishes standards for the accounting for a business combination. It provides the Canadian equivalent to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations. Sections 1601 and 1602 together replace section 1600, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Section 1601, establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements. Section 1602 establishes standards for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary in consolidated financial statements subsequent to a business combination. It is equivalent to the corresponding provisions of IFRS lAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the requirements of the new standards.

    FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

    At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, due to a related party, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

    The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of February 28, 2011, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

    Management has concluded that, as of February 28, 2011, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

    Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

    STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

    The CICA announced that publicly accountable enterprises would be required to transition from GAAP to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), effective January 1, 2011. This mandate is first applicable to interim reporting periods during 2011 and also requires the presentation of comparative financial information for 2010. For this reason, the effective conversion for the Company’s reporting purposes is June 1, 2009, even though full disclosure under IFRS will first be required during 2011.

    The Company established an IFRS plan and has tasked a service provider and a professional service firm with developing the transitional reporting under IFRS. The plan calls for four phases, being the scoping and planning phase, the assessment phase, the implementation phase and post-implementation.

    7


    The scoping and planning phase involves establishing a project team and organizational structure, including oversight of the process and includes a project plan, stakeholder analysis and communication plan. This phase also entails an initial assessment of the key areas where IFRS transition may have a significant impacts. During the year the Company will prepare an initial diagnostic of the key areas in which adjustments are expected, incorporating an analysis of the transition exceptions and exemptions available under IFRS 1 “First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, as well as an assessment of the accounting policy choices available to the Company upon adoption.

    The assessment phase will involve technical analysis that will result in understanding potential impacts, quantification of alternatives where there are accounting policy choices, detailed analysis and decisions taken regarding IFRS 1 exemptions and exceptions available to the Company and the drafting of accounting policies in accordance with IFRS. In addition this will result in identifying resource and training requirements, processes for preparing financial statements, and establishing IT system requirements. The Company intends to disclose its progress in accomplishing this phase in its Management Discussion and Analysis documents during 2010.

    During the implementation phase, the Company will apply management’s accounting choices, develop sample financial statements, implement business and internal control requirements, calculate the opening balance sheet at June 1, 2009 and other transitional reconciliations and disclosure requirements. The last phase, post-implementation, will involve continuous monitoring of changes in IFRS maintaining IFRS competencies through training and development.

    Progress on IFRS Transition Plan

    The progress to date may be summarized as follows:

    Scoping and planning phase – complete.

    Assessment phase – substantially complete, expected to be completed by fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

    Implementation phase – in progress; to be finalized before the May 31, 2011.

    Post-implementation – June 2011 and thereafter.

    To date, the Company’s evaluation of potential changes to accounting policies in key areas are summarized below. The list is in no way intended to represent a complete list of areas where adoption of IFRS will require a change in accounting policies, but does highlight the most significant areas identified to date. Changes and ongoing developments regarding IFRS as developed by the International Accounting Standards Board may have an effect on the changes required to the Company’s accounting policies on adoption of IFRS, but is not anticipated that such changes would require substantial changes to the summary presented below.

    First-time Adoption of IFRS

    The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS 1”), which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS, effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

    The Company has identified the following optional exemptions that it expects to apply in its preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at June 1, 2009:

    8


    • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.

    • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.

    • To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the transition date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the transition date.

    • To apply the transition provisions of IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease, therefore determining if arrangements existing at the transition date contain a lease based on the circumstances existing at that date.

    • To apply IAS 23 Borrowing Costs prospectively from the transition date. IAS 23 requires the capitalization of borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, production or construction of certain assets.

    Prior to reporting interim financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the quarter ending August 31, 2011, the Company may decide to apply other optional exemptions contained in IFRS 1. IFRS 1 does not permit changes to estimates that have been made previously. Accordingly, estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s opening IFRS statement of financial position as at the transition date will be consistent with those made under current Canadian GAAP. If necessary, estimates will be adjusted to reflect any difference in accounting policy.

    Impact of Adopting IFRS on the Company’s Business

    Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

    Subject to certain conditions, IFRS currently allows an entity to determine an accounting policy that specifies the treatment of costs related to the exploration for and evaluation of mineral properties. The Company expects to establish an accounting policy to expense, as incurred, all costs relating to exploration and evaluation until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

    The application of this policy on the adoption of IFRS will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements to the extent that the value of mineral properties remain unproven. On adoption of IFRS, the carrying value of the unproven mineral properties will be reduced to zero (at the transition date), with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated deficit. All subsequent exploration and evaluation costs will be expensed as incurred until such time as it has been determined that a property has economically recoverable reserves.

    Impairment of (Non-financial) Assets

    IFRS requires a write down of assets if the higher of the fair market value and the value in use of a group of assets is less than its carrying value. Value in use is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows. Current Canadian GAAP requires a write down to estimated fair value only if the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of a group of assets are less than its carrying value. The Company's accounting policies related to impairment of non-financial assets will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect that this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets. The Company will perform impairment assessments in accordance with IFRS at the transition date.

    Share-based Payments

    In certain circumstances, IFRS requires a different measurement of stock-based compensation related to stock options than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to share-based payments that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

    9


    Asset Retirement Obligations (Decommissioning Liabilities)

    IFRS requires the recognition of a decommissioning liability for legal or constructive obligations, while current Canadian GAAP only requires the recognition of such liabilities for legal obligations. A constructive obligation exists when an entity has created reasonable expectations that it will take certain actions. The Company's accounting policies related to decommissioning liabilities will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets.

    Property and Equipment

    IFRS contains different guidance related to recognition and measurement of property and equipment than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to property and equipment that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

    Income Taxes

    In certain circumstances, IFRS contains different requirements related to recognition and measurement of future (deferred) income taxes. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to income taxes that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

    OUTLOOK

    During the third quarter 2011 and nine-month period 2011 the company focused efforts on at its Giulianita project in Peru and maintaining its land position in good standing at other project areas.

    The company continues to push forward on discussions at the Giulianita project in Peru. Every effort is being made to address small community groups within the area of influence of the project to ensure the Company is successful in its goal of developing the project.

    Preliminary organization efforts are underway to move forward on additional diamond drilling and modeling at the Dixie Lake project, Red Lake, Ontario. The Company plans to execute a 2,200 m drill program to confirm and update a historical resource to a 43-101 standard. As part of the exploration program a 3-D geological model and resource model has been updated and drill targets have been identified. The Company plans to execute this program and complete a new resource model during the summer of 2011.

    The Company continues to identify and evaluate high grade, near term production projects within Canada, Peru and South America in general.

    The Company’s strategy is to explore for, acquire and develop high grade, small output (15,000 to 35,000 ounce per year) mines and develop low-cost production, cash-flowing gold projects in politically stable environments abroad, in particular Peru. In this regard, the Company is proceeding to develop its Giulianita project in Peru and will be the focus of the Company’s activity over the next 12 months. The Company will also aggressively pursue additional exploration/mining opportunities that fit the designated profile.

    RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

    At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

    10


    Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

    For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2010, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

    The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion and in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

    MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

    11


    EX-99.77 78 exhibit99-77.htm EXHIBIT 99.77 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.77 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.77

    FORM 52-109F2
    CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
    FULL CERTIFICATE

    I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

    1.

    Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended February 28, 2011.

           
    2.

    No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

           
    3.

    Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

           
    4.

    Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

           
    5.

    Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

           
    (a)

    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

           
    (i)

    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

           
    (ii)

    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

           
    (b)

    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

           
    5.1

    Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework..

           
    5.2

    ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

           
    5.3

    Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

           
    6.

    Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on December 1, 2010, and ended on February 28, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

    Date: April 14, 2011

    “Ernest Cleave”                        
    [Signature]  
    Chief Financial Officer  


    EX-99.78 79 exhibit99-78.htm EXHIBIT 99.78 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.78 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.78

    FORM 52-109F2
    CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
    FULL CERTIFICATE

    I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

    1.

    Review: I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended February 28, 2011.

           
    2.

    No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

           
    3.

    Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

           
    4.

    Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

           
    5.

    Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

           
    (a)

    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

           
    (i)

    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

           
    (ii)

    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

           
    (b)

    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

           
    5.1

    Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

           
    5.2

    ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A.

           
    5.3

    Limitation on scope of design: N/A.

           
    6.

    Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on December 1, 2010, and ended on February 28, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

    Date: April 14, 2011

    “Paul Sarjeant”                              
    [Signature]  
    Chief Executive Officer  


    EX-99.79 80 exhibit99-79.htm EXHIBIT 99.79 Grandview Gold Inc.: Exhibit 99.79 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

     Exhibit 99.79

    TSX: GVX
    NEWS RELEASE OTCBB: GVGDF
    For Immediate Release  

    Grandview Gold Inc. Signs Drill Contract; Plans to Verify Historic Red Lake Resource

    May 25, 2011 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) (“Grandview” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the signing of a diamond drill contract with Platinum Diamond Drilling of Winnipeg for work on the Company’s Dixie Lake property (the “Property”), in the Red Lake Gold District. The 2,200 m, 10 hole program, will focus on verifying and extending the historic resources identified by previous workers at the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones. The program is expected to begin mid-June and will run through to the end of July or early August, 2011.

    “The Red Lake area has been spared from the prohibitive flooding and extreme weather conditions occurring elsewhere in Ontario and Manitoba, and we are pleased to be able to begin our Canadian exploration program, as planned,” says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant, B.Sc, P.Geo. “Proceeds of our December flow-through financing will be used to continue drilling at the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones at Dixie Lake. Our goal is to bring the historic non-NI 43-101 compliant mineral resource originally estimated by Teck Exploration (1989-90) of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton, and later estimated by Teck to indicate a possible tonnage of 1.1 million short tons at 0.1 ounces per ton, to formal NI 43-101 compliance. The program will also target select areas within the mineralized zones that currently lack information as we believe the 88-4 and 88-4 West zones are connected.”

    “Dixie Lake is highly prospective for Grandview due to its location in the Red Lake area, the historic work that has been done in and around the 88-4 Zone since 1945, and significant results of work undertaken by Grandview elsewhere on the Property from 2005 through 2009 - including NS Zone assays of 22.90 g/T Au over 2.86 m and 18.29 g/T over 2.20 m, with considerable visible gold in core. We reviewed the historic materials over the winter and together with our more recent data, created a new model and target map that indicates mineralization continues at depth and is open along strike in at least one direction on the Property,” adds Mr. Sarjeant.

    About Dixie Lake
    Grandview has an option agreement with Newmont Mining Corporation (formerly Fronteer Gold Inc.) and has earned a 67% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property located 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine. The Property has an established gold resource (Teck, 1989), estimating a tonnage for the 88-4 zone of 1.1 million tons grading 0.10 ounces gold per ton; upgraded from an original estimate of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton. Grandview has not completed the work required to verify this historical estimate and is not treating this historical estimate as being compliant with current standards under NI 43-101 and as such this historical estimate should not be relied upon.

    About the Red Lake Gold District
    The Red Lake Gold Mining District in northwestern Ontario is the most prolific gold producing region in Canada. Since the mid-1960's The Red Lake District has yielded over 30-million ounces of and is home to Goldcorp's Red Lake and Campbell Mines. Grandview has three projects in the Red Lake Gold District, namely Sanshaw-Bonanza, Dixie Lake and Loisan.


    About Grandview Gold Inc.
    Grandview is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

    For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

    This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    -30-


    EX-99.80 81 exhibit99-80.htm EXHIBIT 99.80 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.80 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.80

     
    NEWS RELEASE OTCBB: GVGDF
    For Immediate Release TSX: GVX

    Grandview Gold Inc. Begins Drilling at Dixie Lake Project, in Red Lake Gold District

    June 21, 2011 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) (“Grandview” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that, its 2011 Canadian Exploration Program (the “Program”) has begun at the Company’s Dixie Lake property (the “Property”), in the Red Lake Gold District. The geological team has collared the first of up to 10 holes planned for the 2,200m Program and diamond drilling will begin immediately, continuing through to the end of July or early August, 2011.

    “I spoke with the team on Sunday and everything looks good on the Property,” says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant B.Sc, P.Geo. “We are proceeding with confidence and optimism that our Program will deliver the results we forecast through our exploration and modelling, and that Teck Exploration indicated when they worked the Property in 1989-1990.”

    The Company’s exploration Program for the Property focuses on continued drilling at the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones, to bring the historic non-NI 43-101 compliant mineral resource originally estimated by Teck Exploration (1989-90) of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton, and later estimated by Teck to indicate a possible tonnage of 1.1 million short tons at 0.1 ounces per ton, to formal NI 43-101 compliance. In addition, drilling in select target areas within the mineralized zones is planned to confirm that the 88-4 and 88-4 West zones are connected, as indicated by recent modelling.

    About Dixie Lake

    Grandview has an option agreement with Newmont Mining Corporation (formerly Fronteer Gold Inc.) and has earned a 67% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property located 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine. The Property has an established gold resource (Teck, 1989), estimating a tonnage for the 88-4 zone of 1.1 million tons grading 0.10 ounces gold per ton; upgraded from an original estimate of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton.

    Dixie Lake is highly prospective for Grandview due to its location in the Red Lake area, the historic work that has been done in and around the 88-4 Zone since 1945, and significant results of work undertaken by Grandview elsewhere on the Property from 2005 through 2009 - including NS Zone assays of 22.90 g/T Au over 2.86 m and 18.29 g/T over 2.20 m, with considerable visible gold in core. Grandview has not completed the work required to verify this historical estimate and is not treating this historical estimate as being compliant with current standards under NI 43-101 and as such this historical estimate should not be relied upon.

    About the Red Lake Gold District

    The Red Lake Gold Mining District in northwestern Ontario is the most prolific gold producing region in Canada. Since the mid-1960's The Red Lake District has yielded over 30-million ounces of gold and is home to Goldcorp's Red Lake and Campbell Mines. Grandview has three projects in the Red Lake Gold District, namely Sanshaw-Bonanza, Dixie Lake and Loisan.

    About Grandview Gold Inc.

    Grandview is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview’s projects are available on the Company’s website.


    For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

    This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    -30-


    EX-99.81 82 exhibit99-81.htm EXHIBIT 99.81 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.81 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.81

     
    NEWS RELEASE TSX: GVX
    For Immediate Release   OTCBB: GVGDF

    Grandview Gold Inc. Issues Update to Shareholders

    June 28, 2011 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) (“Grandview” or the “Company”) announces that the Company’s Board of Directors has conducted a biannual strategic review of the Company's early and mid-stage exploration projects and issues the following update to shareholders:

    Ontario

    In Ontario, the Company holds three key properties in the Red Lake Gold District, namely Dixie Lake, Sanshaw-Bonanza and Loisan. Grandview currently holds a 67% interesting the Dixie lake property that consists of 48 claims covering approximately 1,664 hectares. The Sanshaw-Bonanza property consists of 14 unpatented claims and two additional patented mining claims. Grandview holds a 100% interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property subject to a 0.375% net smelter royalty. The Company holds a 100% interest in the Loisan property, consisting of eight patented mining claims covering approximately 60 hectares.

    Grandview is currently undertaking a 2,240 meter drill program at its Dixie Lake property to bring historical estimates by Teck Exploration (1989-1990) of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton, and later estimated by Teck to indicate a possible tonnage of 1.1 million short tons at 0.1 ounces per ton into compliance with National Instrument 43-101 standards. The drill program, now underway, is expected to be completed mid to late July at a budgeted cost of approximately $500,000. Dixie Lake is a highly prospective property for Grandview due to its location in the Red Lake area, the historic work that has been done in and around the 88-4 Zone since 1945, and significant results of work undertaken by Grandview elsewhere on the property from 2005 through 2009 - including NS Zone assays of 22.90 g/T Au over 2.86 m and 18.29 g/T over 2.20 m, with considerable visible gold in core. Recent modelling and target maps indicate that, mineralization continues at depth and is open along strike in at least one direction on the Property. The historical estimates included in this paragraph should not be relied upon. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current mineral resources or reserves and the Company is not treating the historical estimates as current mineral resources or reserves.

    With respect to our Red Lake holdings the Board of Directors is of the view that overall developments in the Red Lake District are favourable to the gold mining sector and that continued development of our Red Lake properties should remain a Company priority.

    Peru

    Over two years ago we entered into agreements to acquire the right to explore and develop the Giulianita gold property located in Northern Peru within the community boundaries of San Sebastian. While we are attracted to the potential of the property and district for their early production and cash flow potential, a significant deterrent has been the lack of documented community approval granting surface access rights. Without such approval we cannot proceed. Management has been repeatedly assured by all levels of community stakeholders and representatives that, such approval was forthcoming and that our project had the support of the community. Yet, the required documentation has not been forthcoming. During the last two years we have had qualified personnel on the property doing such work as our existing mineral title permitted, and ready to proceed immediately once formal development approvals were secured. In good faith and spirit of cooperation, the Company set up a variety of community programs and maintained those programs for the duration.


    Grandview’s development window started closing in Peru when, after advising the community leadership that our deadline was May 31, 2011, there remained no documented movement in the community. In the three weeks following, we discontinued all operations and cancelled all community spending. We will fully protect the Company’s interest in mineral titles in Peru, but we will remain in full shutdown mode until favourable community action is taken. As a Company, we remain committed to honour our proposal to the Giulianita community, should we receive the surface access rights title documents we seek.

    Finance

    Grandview's free cash position at June 15th, 2011, is approximately $1,154,000.

    New Opportunities

    It is the intention of the Board of Directors to seek out and evaluate new opportunities in gold exploration focusing in particular on Canadian projects.

    About Grandview Gold Inc.

    Grandview is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

    For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

    This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company's operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc's operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc's control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    -30-


    EX-99.82 83 exhibit99-82.htm EXHIBIT 99.82 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.82 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.82

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

    FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2011

     

    AUGUST 29 2011

     


    TABLE OF CONTENTS

          Page
           
    ITEM 1: CORPORATE STRUCTURE 3
      1.1 Name, Address and Incorporation 3
      1.2 Intercorporate Relationships 3
    ITEM 2: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS 3
      2.1 Three Year History 3
    ITEM 3: DESCRIBE THE BUSINESS 5
      3.1 General 5
      3.2 Risk Factors 5
      3.3 Companies with Asset-Backed Securities Outstanding 10
      3.4 Companies with Mineral Projects 11
    ITEM 4: DIVIDENDS 31
      4.1 Dividend Policy 31
    ITEM 5: DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 31
      5.1 General Description of Capital Structure 31
      5.2 Constraint 32
      5.3 Ratings 32
    ITEM 6: Market For Securities 32
      6.1 Trading Price and Volume 33
      6.2 Prior Sales 33
    ITEM 7: ESCROWED SECURITIES 33
    ITEM 8: Directors And Officers 33
      8.1 Names, Addresses, Occupation and Security Holdings 33
      8.2 Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions 36
      8.3 Conflicts of Interest 37
    ITEM 9: PROMOTORS 37
    ITEM 10: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULARTORY ACTIONS  37
      10.1 Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Actions 37
    ITEM 11: INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS   37
      11.1 Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions 37


    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    (continued)

          Page
           
    ITEM 12: TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS 38
    ITEM 13: MATERIAL CONTRACTS 38
      13.1 Material Contracts 38
    ITEM 14: INTERESTS OF EXPERTS 39
      14.1 Names of Experts 39
      14.2 Interests of Experts 39
    ITEM 15: AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN AN AIF 39
    ITEM 16: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 41

    -ii-


    PRELIMINARY NOTES

    Effective Date of Information

    This Annual Information Form ("AIF") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation" or “Grandview”) is dated August 29, 2011. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained herein is current as of May 31, 2011, being the date of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal period.

    Information Incorporated by Reference

    This AIF is and will be supplemented by, and the following documentation is hereby incorporated by reference as part of this AIF:

      (i)

    the Corporation's audited financial statements for the 12 month fiscal period ended May 31, 2011, together with the auditors' report thereon;

         
      (ii)

    management's discussion and analysis for the 12 month fiscal period ended May 31, 2011;

         
      (iii)

    the "Independent Technical Report on the Dixie Lake Project, Red Lake, Ontario" dated January 13, 2006, prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., which was filed via SEDAR on February 28, 2006 (the "SRK Technical Report");

         
      (iv)

    the most recent management information circular of the Corporation dated October 25, 2010 was prepared in respect of the annual and special meeting of shareholders held on Monday November 29th, 2010; and

         
      (v)

    all documents, including press releases, material change reports and quarterly and annual financial statements as filed with the Ontario Securities Commission.

    Each of the above-noted documents are available for viewing at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com. Copies are also available upon request from the Corporation's offices.

    All financial information in this AIF has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP").

    Purpose

    This AIF is prepared in accordance with Form 51-102F2 to National Instrument 51-102-Continuous Disclosure Obligations – established by the Canadian Securities Administrators, for the limited purpose of providing material information about the Corporation and its business at a point in time in context of its historical and possible future development.


    Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements contained in this AIF respecting reserves, resources, plans, objectives and future performance of the Corporation's business are "forward-looking statements". Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "intended", "estimate", "anticipate", "believe" or "continue" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties relating to, among other things, financing, changes in commodity prices, unanticipated reserve and resource grades, geological, processing, transportation, infrastructure and other problems, results of exploration activities, cost overruns, availability of materials and equipment, timeliness of governmental approvals, political risk and related economic risk, actual performance of plant, equipment, and processes relative to specifications and expectations and unanticipated environmental impacts on operations. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those set forth herein under "Risk Factors".

    - 2 -


    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

    TWELVE MONTH FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2011

    ITEM 1          CORPORATE STRUCTURE

    1.2          Name, Address and Incorporation

    Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation" or “Grandview”) was originally incorporated under the Corporation Act of Ontario on November 23, 1945 as Loisan Red Lake Gold Mines Limited ("Loisan"). Articles of Amendment were filed on November 6, 1979, changing the name from Loisan to Grandview Energy Resources Incorporated ("Energy"). On September 22, 1983, further Articles of Amendment were filed to change the Corporation’s name from Energy to Consolidated Grandview Inc. The Corporation filed further Articles of Amendment on April 9, 1987 to increase the authorized capital of the Corporation to an unlimited number of shares of each class. The Corporation again filed Articles of Amendment on July 6, 2004 changing its corporate name to its current name "Grandview Gold Inc". The registered and corporate head office of the Corporation is located at 330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2S8.

    The common shares of the Corporation trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") under the symbol "GVX".

    1.3          Intercorporate Relationships

    The Corporation has a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nevada on July 16, 2008, under the name Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. was incorporated to hold the Corporation's interest in its Nevada property. As of May 22, 2009 the Corporation announced the termination of its Nevada operations and no interest exist within the subsidiary.

    On July 26, 2009 the Corporation created a wholly owned subsidiary pursuant to the laws of Peru under the name Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C. with the intent to hold the Corporation’s Peruvian interests.

    ITEM 2          GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

    1.4          Three Year History

    The Corporation is engaged in the exploration and, if warranted, development of gold mineral properties in Canada and South America. The Corporation is an exploration stage company and is not engaged in any mining operations, and there can be no assurance it will ever engage in mining operations.

    The Corporation has acquired the following interests: (i) 67% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the "Dixie Lake Property"); (ii) a 100% interest in 12 unpatented claims and 2 patented claims at Red Lake, Ontario (the "Bonanza Property"); (iii) a 100% interest in eight mining claims covering approximately 60 hectares located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the "Loisan Property"); (iv) a 100% interest in one unpatented mineral claim located in Manitoba, Canada, (the "Bissett Gold Camp Claim"); (v) a 100% interest in 7 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, covering approximately 1,110 hectares (the "GVG Property"); (vi) a 100% interest in 3 unpatented mining claims covering 160 hectares in the Rice Lake belt in south eastern Manitoba (the "Angelina Property"); and (vii) an option to acquire up to a 100% interest in two mineral claims covering 400 hectares (“Giulianita Property”) near Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru.

    -3-


    Private Placement Financings

    The Corporation has been trading publicly on an intermittent basis since incorporation on November 23, 1945. Prior to listing on the CNQ in October 2004, the Corporation's common shares traded on the Over-the-Counter Automated Quotation System, a predecessor of the Canadian Dealer Network ("CDN"). Over the past three years, the Corporation has completed three exempt financing as follows:

    1.

    On December 5, 2008, the Corporation closed a brokered private placement with Sandfire Securities Inc. This offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow- through common shares to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,667. In connection with this offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued broker options to acquire 666,666 common shares at a price of $0.05 per common share for a period of 24 months after closing. The securities issued pursuant to this offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold period commencing from the date of issuance.

       
    2.

    On December 8, 2009, the Corporation closed a non-brokered private placement with Centerpoint Resources Inc. (“Centerpoint”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, and 10 other placees resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Corporation of $2.0 million Canadian dollars. This offering resulted in the issuance of of an aggregate of 26,666,665 units (a "Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit, where each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a "Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. Centerpoint acquired 20,00,000 of the Units placed.

       
    3.

    On December 31, 2010 the Corporation closed a non-brokered private placement with MineralFields Group resulting in the issuance by the Corporation of a total of 8,066,666 flow through units at a purchase price of $0.075 per unit for gross proceeds to the Corporation of $605,000. Each flow-through unit consists of 1 commons share of Grandview issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share on a non-flow through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months and following issuance and $0.20 for the second 12 months following issuance. In connection with this offering Grandview also paid a cash fee of 6% of the gross proceeds raised under the offering and also issued 604,999 finder’s warrants each entitling the holder to acquire one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant at an exercise price of $0.075 per finder's warrant. The warrants underlying the finder's warrants are exercisable on the same terms as the offering. The proceeds from the offering are being used by the Corporation to fund its exploration programs on its Canadian properties.

    -4-


    TSX Listing

    The common shares of the Corporation were posted and listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol "GVX".

    ITEM 3          DESCRIBE THE BUSINESS

    1.5          General

    The Corporation is a junior mining, exploration and development company. The overall business objective of the Corporation is to acquire, explore for, develop and commence production of mineral resource properties in Canada and South America. More particularly, the Corporation's primary near-term objectives are to complete the current exploration programs and evaluate the ongoing validity of projects in its portfolio. Concurrently with this objective, the Corporation is continuing to seek out and evaluate prospective mineral properties for acquisition and exploration.

    1.6          Risk Factors

    Due to the nature of the Corporation's business and the present stage of its development, an investment in any of the securities of the Corporation is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the matters set out elsewhere in this AIF, the following are also risks related to the Corporation. The risk factors outlined below are not a definitive list of all risk factors associated with an investment in the Corporation or in connection with the Corporation's operations.

    History of Losses

    The Corporation is a junior mining, exploration and development corporation with no producing properties. There is no assurance that any of the properties which the Corporation now has or may hereafter acquire or obtain an interest in will generate earnings, operate profitably, or provide a return on investment in the future.

    Mining Industry Risks

    The operations of the Corporation are speculative due to the high risk nature of its business which involves the acquisition, exploration and development of mining properties and opportunities. Accordingly, the following risks in particular should be considered:

    -5-



      (a)

    The acquisition of, exploration for and development of mineral deposits is an extremely speculative venture involving a high degree of risk. Even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate such risk. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, very few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Unusual or unexpected formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labour disruptions, flooding, cave-ins, landslides, and the inability of the Corporation to obtain suitable machinery, equipment or labour are all risks involved with the conduct of explorations programs and the operation of mines. Substantial expenditures may be required to locate and establish ore reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site, and additional financing may be required. It is impossible to ensure that the exploration programs planned by the Corporation will result in a profitable commercial mining operation or venture. The decision as to whether a particular property contains a commercial mineral deposit and should be brought into production will depend on the results of exploration programs and/or feasibility studies, and the recommendations of duly qualified engineers and geologists. Several significant factors will be considered, including, but not limited to: (i) the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; (ii) metal prices, which are highly cyclical; (iii) government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection; (iv) ongoing costs of production; and (v) availability and cost of additional funding. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in the Corporation not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

         
      (b)

    The activities of the Corporation are to be directed toward the search, evaluation and development of mineral deposits. There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Corporation will result in discoveries of economic ore bodies or commercial production thereof.

         
      (c)

    Depending upon if and when commercial quantities of ore are found, the Corporation may or may not have the financial resources at that time to bring a mine into production. The only sources of funding which might be available to the Corporation at such time may be limited to the sale of equity capital, mineral properties, royalty interests or the entering into of joint ventures, there being no assurances that any of the foregoing forms of funding will be available to the Corporation.

         
      (d)

    All phases of the mineral exploration activities of the Corporation are subject to various laws governing prospecting, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. Mining and exploration activities are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Although the Corporation believes that its exploration activities are currently carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner that would limit or curtail production or development. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing the operations and activities of the Corporation or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Corporation. In the context of environmental permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, the Corporation must comply with known standards, existing laws and regulations which may entail greater or lesser costs and delays depending on the nature of the activity to be permitted and how stringently the regulations are implemented by the permitting authority. The Corporation is not aware of any material environmental constraint affecting any of its development properties that would preclude the economic development or operation of any specific property.

    -6-



      (e)

    There is a significant degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of mineral deposit estimates and corresponding mineralization grades. Until the mineralized material is actually mined and processed, mineral deposit estimates and mineralization grades must be considered as estimates only. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any mineral deposit estimates or ore-grade information contained herein (including in the documents incorporated herein by reference) will prove accurate. In addition, the value of mineral deposits may vary depending on mineral prices and other factors. Any material change in ore grades or stripping ratios may affect the economic viability of the Corporation's projects. Furthermore, mineral deposit estimate information should not be interpreted as any assurance of mine life or of the potential profitability of existing or future projects.

         
      (f)

    Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and requirements may result in enforcement actions including orders issued by regulators or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or to be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

         
      (g)

    The profitability of the operations of the Corporation are significantly affected by changes in the market price of mineral commodities. Mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Corporation. The level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, world supply of mineral commodities and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The price of mineral commodities has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future serious price declines could cause commercial production of a particular mineral property to be impracticable.

    -7-



      (h)

    The business of mining is generally subject to a number of risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, labour disputes, encountering unusual or unexpected geologic formations, rock bursts, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions, among several others. Such risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or producing facilities, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. While the Corporation may be able to obtain insurance against certain risks in such amounts as it considers adequate, the nature of these risks are such that liabilities could exceed policy limits or could be excluded from coverage. There are some risks such as certain environmental risks (including potential for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) in respect of which insurance is not generally available to the Corporation or to other companies within the industry or is prohibitively expensive due to excessive premium costs. The potential costs which could be associated with any liabilities not covered by insurance or in excess of insurance coverage or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations may cause substantial delays and require significant capital outlays, adversely affecting the Corporation's earning and competitive position in the future and, potentially, its financial position. Failure to have insurance coverage for any one or more such risks or hazards could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation, its business, financial condition and results of the operations.

         
      (i)

    The mineral exploration and mining business is extremely competitive in all of its phases. The Corporation encounters competition from other companies in connection with its search for and acquisition of mining properties and interests which are producing or capable of producing minerals. Some of the Corporation's competitors are large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than the Corporation. As a result of this competition, the Corporation may at any point in time be unable to acquire or develop attractive properties on terms it considers acceptable.

         
      (j)

    The Corporation's ability to continue exploration of its properties will be dependent upon its ability to raise significant additional funds in the future. Should the Corporation not be able to obtain such financing, a portion of its interest in properties may be needed to be transferred to potential joint venture partners, or its properties may be lost entirely.

    Early Stage Properties

    The Dixie Lake Property, the Loisan Property, the Bonanza Property, the Angelina Property, the Bissett Gold Camp Claim, the GVG Property and the Giulianita Property are in the early or pre-exploration stage only and are each without a known body of commercial ore. There is no certainty that the expenditures made by the Corporation towards the search and evaluation of mineral deposits on either of these or any other properties will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of ore.

    -8-


    Additional Capital

    The ability of the Corporation to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions as well as the business performance of the Corporation. The development and exploration of the Corporation's properties may require substantial additional financing. Failure to obtain such financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of exploration, development or production on any or all of the Corporation's properties or even a loss of property interest. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favourable to the Corporation. If additional financing is raised by the Corporation through the issuance of securities from treasury, control of the Corporation may change and security holders may suffer additional dilution.

    Dilution

    In the event the Corporation seeks to procure additional financing through the sale and issuance of its securities, or in the event that current common share option or warrant holders exercise their options or warrants, the then shareholders of the Corporation may suffer immediate and substantive dilution in their percentage ownership of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation. As of the date of this AIF, there were common share purchase warrants outstanding allowing the holders of such warrants to purchase up to 31,304,996 common shares. In addition, 5,250,000 incentive stock options granted to certain directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Corporation, pursuant to the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan, as amended, are also outstanding. As of the date of this AIF, there were 81,163,032 common shares of common stock outstanding, meaning that the exercise of all of the existing common share purchase options and warrants would result in further dilution to the existing shareholders of approximately 45.0% of the outstanding common shares. Should such common share options and warrants be exercised, the increase in the number of common shares issued and outstanding, and the possibility of sales of such shares may have a depressive effect on the price of the common shares. In addition, the voting power of the Corporation's existing shareholders will be diluted.

    Dependence on Key Executives

    The Corporation is dependent on the services of key executives and a small number of highly skilled and experienced consultants and personnel. Locating mineral deposits depends on a number of factors, not the least of which is the technical skill of the exploration personnel involved. Due to the relatively small size of the Corporation, the loss of these persons or the Corporation's inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect its business and future operations. The Corporation does not currently carry any key man life insurance on any of its executives. The directors and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation will only devote part of their time to the affairs of the Corporation, while the remaining officers of the Corporation devote their full time to the affairs of the Corporation.

    -9-


    Absence of Dividends

    The Corporation has no earnings or dividend record and since it intends to employ available funds for mineral exploration and development it does not intend to pay any dividends in the immediate or foreseeable future. The future dividend policy will be determined by the Board of Directors.

    Potential Volatility of Material Price of Common Shares

    The TSX has, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Corporation's common shares. In addition, the market price of the common shares is likely to be highly volatile. Factors such as the price of gold, and other minerals, announcements by competitors, changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding the Corporation, and general market conditions and attitudes affecting other exploration and mining companies may have a significant effect on the market price of the common shares. Moreover, it is likely that during the future quarterly periods, the Corporation's results and exploration activities may fluctuate significantly or may fail to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors and, in such event, the market price of the common shares could be materially adversely affected.

    Foreign Operations

    The Corporation has had and may continue in the future to have a portion of Grandview's operations located in Peru, as a result, the operation of the Corporation is exposed to various levels of political, economical and other risks and uncertainties associated with operating in foreign jurisdiction. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, currency exchange rates; price controls, import or export controls, currency remittance, high rates of inflation; labour unrest; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts, changes in taxation policies, restrictions on foreign exchanges; changing political condition, currency controls; and governmental regulations that may require the awarding of contracts of local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction, Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitudes in Peru or other countries in which Grandview conducts business may adversely affect the operations of the Corporation. The Corporation may become subject to local political unrest that could have debilitating impact on operations, and at its extreme, could result in damage and injury to personnel and site infrastructure.

    Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in enforcement actions and include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installing of additional equipment or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

    1.7          Companies with Asset-Backed Securities Outstanding

    This is not applicable.

    -10-


    1.8          Companies with Mineral Projects

    The following section discloses information regarding the Corporation's material mineral properties, namely, the Dixie Lake Property, the Bissett Gold Camp Claims, the Loisan Property, the Gem Property and the Angelina Property.

    DIXIE LAKE PROPERTY

    The following information is derived from the "Independent Technical Report on the Dixie Lake Project, Red Lake, Ontario for Grandview Gold Inc." prepared by SRK Consulting and dated January 13, 2006 (the "SRK Report"), which was prepared, in accordance with the requirements of NI-43-101. A complete copy of the SRK Report, portions of which are quoted verbatim or paraphrased herein, is available for inspection upon request from the Corporation's head office, as well as on the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com). The SRK Report was authored by Christopher Lee, M.Sc., P. Geo and he is a "qualified person" and "independent" to the Corporation as those terms are defined in NI 43-101. All references to tables and figures in this section are to the tables and figures accompanying the SRK Report, which have been reproduced herein.

    Property Description and Location

    The Dixie Lake property is located in the Red Lake Mining Camp of northwestern Ontario and is centered at coordinates N50 degrees 51 minutes and W93 degrees 36 minutes. The site appears on NTS map sheet 52K/13. The town of Red Lake, Ontario is located 24 kilometres northwest of the property.

    The Dixie Lake property comprises approximately 1,793 hectares in 50 claims. The property has not been legally surveyed.

    Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

    Access to the Dixie Lake property is via Tyzyk’s Road and former logging roads, which connect to Highway 105 at coordinates: 457264E, 5638306N (UTM Zone15, Datum: WGS84). The claims are crossed by several logging roads and roads built to Service mineral exploration work. Drill access to the hanging wall of the zone must Cross Dixie Creek –a~15 meter wide stream with year-round flow and limited ice thicknesses in winter. A new bridge was permitted by the Ministry of Fisheries and Oceans and constructed in Spring 2005 to replace an old collapsed bridge over Dixie Creek. This bridge provides access to the 88-04 zone hanging wall, eliminating the need for helicopter support on drill moves.

    Red Lake, Ontario, is an historic gold mining center with a population of about 5,000. The district has produced more than 21 M oz of gold to date, from four principal mines, two of which are still in operation, with more than 6M oz of combined gold reserves (Placer Dome’s Campbell Mine, and Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine). Gold mining and seasonal tourism activity provide a stable economic base and the town offers all necessary facilities in support of mineral exploration efforts. Supplies and experienced field personnel are available. Hydroelectric power lines pass about 1 kilometer north of the property.

    -11-


    The prevailing climate is typically mid-continental: summers are warm, with frequent rain showers and thunderstorms winters are severe, cold and snowy. The Dixie Lake property is partially forested with mature and second growth spruce, poplar, birch and jack pine, and the remainder exhibits the burned remnants of a former wildfire. The regional topography features low rolling hills with a myriad of small lakes, ponds and sloughs. On the property, the terrain is gently sloping and the few streams, including Dixie Creek, have mature, meandering courses. Bedrock occurrences are scarce on the property and, where observed, they are typically glacially polished. In aid of prospecting activities, overburden has been stripped from some areas of the claims (Figure 4-2), apparently by using hand tools and high pressure pump techniques.

    History

    Fingler and Middleton (2003, pp12–13) provide a very detailed account of historical exploration work conducted on the Dixie Lake property. They documented 116 diamond drill holes, by various operators, with total length in excess of 13,046 meters, as well as geological mapping, airborne- and ground-based geophysical surveys, and geochemical surveys. The large amount of historical activity in the area has defined a commensurate number of targets and target areas. Due to the scarcity of outcrop in the area, most of these targets have been interpreted from geophysics, including airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, ground magnetics, VLF-EM, horizontal loop/Max-Min EM and IP. Anomalies and conductors from these surveys predominantly co-incide with iron formation, graphitic argillites, and sulphide-bearing (pyrite and/or pyrrhotite) argillite, or mafic volcanic rocks.

    The 88-04 zone discovery drill hole was targeted on a strong Max-Min (HLEM) conductor, which is also characterized by a northwest trending linear magnetic anomaly, a VLF-EM conductor, and strong chargeability and elevated resistivity in Time Domain Induced Polarization surveys.

    The two most significant drilling campaigns on the property were conducted by Teck (1989-90) and Alberta Star/Fronteer Joint Venture (2003-04). Both programs focused on the 88-04 zone as their primary target. The Teck campaign concentrated on delineating the strike extents of the 88-04 zone to about 200 m depth, and identified a relatively enriched portion of the zone in its southeastern part. Canadian Golden Dragon drilled 10 holes in to the 88-04 zone, in 1996-97, further confirming the Presence of relatively high-grade material, locally, in the southeastern part, but effectively closed off the zone to the southeast. Using oriented core measurements, the Alberta Star/Fronteer Joint Venture were able to prove a direct relationship between the plunge of the stretching lineation within the 88-04 zone and enhanced mineralization within the previously identified southeastern zone. Targeting from this predictive approach, allowed the Alberta Star/Fronteer JV to extend the mineralized “shoot” to a depth of approximately 400 meters. Teck Explorations Ltd. produced the only published resource estimate for the Dixie Lake property (Janzen, 1989). They calculated a polygonal estimate of 417,000 tons grading 0.126 ounces of gold per ton (378,296 metric tones @ 4.3g/tAu) for the 88-04 zone, which was subsequently modified with additional drill information to an "optimistic possible tonnage" of 1.1 million short tons grading 0.10oz/tonAu. The estimate used standard methodologies for the time, but does not meet current standards as defined by the CIMM and NI43-101 (see Section 16 for additional details).

    -12-


    The target objective of the Alberta Star/Fronteer JV was to upgrade this resource by defining the controls on the distribution of the higher-grade intercepts within the zone. Despite their successful determination of the dominant plunge direction of the high-grade material, the abundance of low-grade material within this shoot significantly impeded their attempts to demonstrate continuity of the higher grades. A structural model was proposed, where in the mineralization was interpreted to be folded and transposed into the dominant penetrative foliation, which actually transects the 88-04 zone. Such a model implies that the mineralization occupies a series of stacked lenses within the 88-04 zone, rather than continuous, down-plunge, shoots. Given the abundance of low-grade material surrounding the lenses, and the apparent geometrical complexity of the mineralization, Alberta Star opted out of further work on the property and backed out of their JV with Fronteer.

    Geological Setting

    Regional Geology

    The Dixie Lake Property lies within the Red Lake greenstone belt of the Uchi Sub province of the Archean Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. Publications by Mary Sanborn-Barrie and co-workers (2001; 2004), at the Geological Survey of Canada, provide the most recent and comprehensive geological descriptions of the belt, and are briefly summarized here. The rocks of the Red Lake belt record a protracted (ca. 300Ma) history of episodic magmatism, sedimentation and tectono-thermal activity (Sanborn-Barrie, et al., 2001). Greenstone belt assemblages have been sub-divided into seven distinct units Comprising tholeiitic and calc-alkaline basalts, komatiite, intermediate through felsic tuffs and flows, inter layered or disconformable with quart-magnetite iron formation, fine to coarse grained clastic rocks and polymictic conglomerates.

    Local Geology

    The Dixie Lake property lies southeast of the main Red Lake gold mining camp in a "...broadly east-west trending belt of mafic to felsic meta-volcanics and associated metasediments, which are in folded between a series of granitic batholiths"(Fingler and Middleton, 2003, p. 16). Fingler and Middleton’s (2003) discussion was largely based on Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 5904. Confederation Assemblage calc-alkaline mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks, including pillowed flows and intermediate of felsic pyroclastic members, have been metamorphosed to amphibolite grade. Meta-sedimentary members include wacke, siltstone, conglomerate and magnetite iron formation. Crystalline rocks in the northern part of the Dixie Lake area include various granites, quartz monzonites and granodiorites; those in the South part of the area consist of tonalite and possibly quartz diorite.

    Property Geology

    The following geological description is quoted directly from the 2006 Assessment Report filed by Grandview Gold (Hughes, 2006).

    -13-


    A lack of exposure hampers any comprehensive presentation of the geology of the Dixie Lake property. Most of the information that has been used for interpretation is based on very limited regional scale mapping by government workers, geophysical extrapolation and reviews of the data from drilling.

    It is generally agreed that the property is underlain by mainly Confederation Assemblage calc-alkaline mafic to felsic volcanic sequences at the western limit of the Confederation greenstone belt. Marine sediments and pyroclastic deposits appear to be more extensive in the North and eastern portions of the property, though again, hard information is lacking. These deposits include a number of intercalated iron formation units.

    Overall, the volcanic suite appears to be lithologically quite variable, this conclusion, based more from drilling than mapping. Gabbros, mafic flows, pillow lavas, and related volcaniclastic rocks are intercalated with felsic volcanic flows, pyroclastic and volcaniclastic rocks and iron formation, wacke, siltstone and argillite. Some gabbros represent high level intrusions or basal flows. Arguably, this holds true for relict pyroxenite and amphibolite units noted in drilling and rarely, in outcrops.

    Relatively small felsic-intermediate intrusive rocks are quite common, though again they are poorly documented. Small plugs are known to underlie portions of the Dixie Lake property, including the largest known, one immediately to the East of the known gold occurrences, appearing as an elliptic feature on magnetic maps.

    Interpretation of the sequence on and around the main mineralised zones is thus based on magnetic and to a slightly lesser extent on drill data, with a minor component also from IP surveys. The property is essentially dominated by a relatively high magnetic signature sequence of folded mafic to intermediate volcanic units with the aforementioned intercalated lithotypes. This sequence underlies the central portion of the Dixie Lake property, with northern and southern flanking assemblages apparently more intermediate in nature with a higher component of felsic-intermediate felsic volcanic rocks and interbedded volcaniclastic rocks, silts, iron formations (silicate, oxide and sulphide have been recorded from past drilling), and minor argillites.

    Despite the high number of drill holes completed on the property and several geophysical surveys, there appears to be lacking a clear differentiation of the relative high magnetic signatures within different lithologies. An examination of more recent drilling, coupled with the findings from the fall programme herein presented, suggest that at least for the mineralised central mafic volcanic sequence, on and around the 88-4 Zone, (see below), there is a clear stratigraphic sequence of basal mafic volcanic flows and high level sub-volcanic intrusions, including gabbro, sparse amphibolite with rare relict pyroxenitic gabbro noted. These were originally relatively homogeneous and deposited likely in a shallow marine setting. Interflow sediments are common, but thin, silt-argillitic or iron formation in nature.

    Slightly higher in the section, (tops were in general consistently down-hole when drilling on the 88-4 zone and to the West, thus, the majority of drilling directed south-west and South has intersected an overturned sequence), increasing volumes of silt-argillite that in some locales have been intruded, with peperitic textures noted within the high level mafic volcanic units. In zones exhibiting lower strain, there is clear evidence that a significant portion of this sequence contains pillow lavas and minor fragmental pillow lavas and sparse pillow breccias.

    -14-


    Mineralised horizons are typically cherty, silicified tuffaceous volcaniclastic rocks or iron formations with variable, multi-phase quartz vein content. Sedimentary sequences are predominantly silt-argillites that may form a significant component of a mineralised intersection. The youngest sequence around the centre of the Dixie Lake claims is a quite homogeneous set of intermediate to mafic volcanic flows (including rare pillows), and minor associated volcanic derived sediments.

    "The association of mafic flows, intrusions and intercalated sediments suggests that the Sequence in what is now the centre of the Dixie Lake claims, was formed in a shallow Marine setting relatively close to active venting, with probably several pre-existing Anoxic basins subsequently modified by this activity. Mineralization was at least in part syn-genetic, this including pyrrhotite, pyrite, sphalerite and chalcopyrite. The provenance of arsenopyrite remains unclear.

    "The Fall 2005 and recent past drilling, farther West and East established a similar Stratigraphy but with a significantly higher component of felsic (pyroclastic) volcanism deposited in marine conditions also. Basin development is characterized by relatively thin silt-argillite and commonly iron formation development. The volcanic facies suggests quiescent depositional conditions with ‘low key’ modification of sedimentary sequences by volcanic ingress.

    "Without the benefit of extensive study of pre-existing drill core, it is suggested that a significant portion of the felsic volcanics previously logged as ‘intrusive’ (dykes mainly), could be thin volcaniclastic and pyroclastic lenses. These would display some textural characteristics similar to thin dykes. Mafic volcanic intrusions are abundant, and range from lamprophyre, to gabbro/diorite (high level apophyses injected into and disrupting the stratigraphy). Lamprophyres appear to be a common feature, though their deformed habit, thin nature and the prevalent biotite alteration in the area suggests some have been misinterpreted. "Comments on alteration a re-restricted to the area drilled this fall. The predominant Alteration is biotite that over prints to varying degrees, an amphibolite grade Metamorphism that had undergone minor erratic diapthoresis prior to biotite alteration. "Sericite post-dates the above and is prevalent within intermediate-felsic volcanic units, with minor ‘lateral’ and ‘vertical’ overlap into highly altered mafic volcanic flows and cherty tuffaceous sediments. "Carbonate alteration is two-fold, an early calcite-quartz+/-Fe-calcite over printed by calcite+/-quartz. Both types are essentially pre-kinematic, with the second phase in part late to occasionally post-kinematic. True ankerite and ferroan dolomite is uncommon, with some intersections in the 88-04 zone hosting a small percentage of these (pre-kinematic veins).

    Silification is in part remobilized quartz veining (on and around 88-04) and possibly also related to silica gel from chert deposition. Quartz flooding is relatively uncommon and past logging of mineralized zones has overstated the intensity of silicification. "Other significant alteration includes epidote in more distal settings (typical for gold camps), and aluminosilicates. The author (Toby Hughes) and T. Pryslak have noted such alteration that has not been previously documented. Thus its extent is unknown, but likely more prevalent than previously considered.

    -15-


    "The structural geology of the property requires re-interpretation. Whilst the overall geometry of the folded sequence is not a subject for debate, the geometries arising from the successive deformational episodes are worthy of additional comment.

    "The overall geometry and deformation described by Lee, 2004, clearly describes and illustrates the effects of an interference pattern folding produced by two major events. Resultant fabrics are a nearly northeast trending S1 overprinted by a northwest S2. In drill core, this is manifest as transposition of S0 into a dominant main fabric, S2. S1 is preserved only as isoclinal features and in meter-scale more open fold sets in low strain zones. The major effect of the D2/S2 event in terms of mineralization is the formation of what several authors consider to be a property scale, if not regional scale west-northwest trending high strain zone with a significant shear component. This feature is understood to host the 88-04 Zone and possibly, the Main, North and C zones.

    "A re-examination over the winter is planned for the structural geology. At this stage, the following points and observations are made as they pertain to the 88-04 Zone and any western extension:

    • The area of highest strain is located either within the 88-04 Zone itself, or in the Hanging wall (younger stratigraphy). The footwall displays much lower strain.

    • Within the mineralized 88-04 Zone, there clearly are sub-sectors with negligible or apparent negligible to low strain that host if not appreciable gold, significant sulphides and/or veining.

    • Despite the efforts of some to undertake detailed structural examination of the drill core, it is clear that the effects of second and third order folding on stratigraphy have not been fully addressed. This phenomenon compounds any complex spatial and genetic relationship between shearing and mineralization.

    • Strain heterogeneity within the 88-04 Zone could be a reflection simply of original basin stratigraphy and in particular, sediment (argillite or iron formation) thickness. Arguably, a case in point is around the original 88-04 drill hole, where appreciable thicknesses of argillite do not necessarily correspond to concomitant increases in either mineralization or alteration.

    • Any postulated high grade ore shoots within, for example, the 88-04 Zone, may reflect the partial preservation of high concentrations of pre-existing quartz veining, chert sediments or proximity to a vent source.

    Previous Work by the Corporation

    In 2005, the Corporation completed a 16-hole core drilling program on its Dixie Lake Gold Property in Red Lake, Ontario. The Dixie Lake property is located 25 kilometers south of Goldcorp Inc’s Red Lake and Campbell gold mines. Core hole DL0509 intersected 4.0 gpt Au over 7.0m, including an interval of 9.53 gpt Au over 0.90m, and 3.32gpt Au over 1.90m.

    -16-


    Twelve of the sixteen drill holes were designed to test the lateral and vertical extensions to the 88-04 Zone, mostly to the West of the principal "mineralization shoot" of previous drill programs. Two holes (DL0502 and DL0516) tested a parallel magnetic anomaly, co-incident with an elevated Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) Au response ratio. An entirely new area defined by a high MMI Au response ratio in the East of the property was also tested by two holes (DL0503 and DL0504). Holes DL0505 and DL0510 were drilled in the original 88-04 Zone shoot. They returned values of 1.47 gpt Au over 5.95m and 1.66 gpt Au over 8.50m. These holes are drilled on the 88-04 Zone shoot and are shallow intersections into the zone. This zone remains open at depth and down plunge to the west.

    Certain areas within the shoot also require additional infill drilling. A new shoot of mineralization, the "GVX shoot" was intersected in four holes from the 2005 campaign brings together continuity with five historical holes. The "GVX shoot" now has 9 holes intersecting the horizon, which grade from 0.70 gpt Au over 1.5 m to 5.85 gpt Au over 4.5 m and 10.1 gpt over 1.1m. Grandview holes DL0506, 08, 09 and 11 intersected this shoot, and encouraging mineralization, as seen in the table above. Historical holes in this zone include DL8920, 22, 29, 39 and DL0309. Hole DL0512 and DL0513 tested the 88-04 Zone horizon between the 88-04 Zone shoot and the GVX shoot. Both holes intersected gold mineralization in the 88-04 Zone horizon and returned results of 1.69 gpt Au over 1.50m in hole DL0512 and 1.56 gpt Au over 1.30m in hole DL0513.

    The remaining holes, DL0501, 02, 07, 14, 15 and 16 tested the 88-04 zone west of the "GVX shoot". Hole DL0501 was the western most hole, more then 200m west of the "GVX shoot’. An intersection of 1.22 gpt Au over 1.40 m was returned in the 88-04 zone. Hole DL0515 returned no significant assays, and was drilled approximately 150m west of the "GVX shoot". Holes DL0507 and DL0514 return results of 1.38 gpt Au over 2.30m and 0.56 gpt Au over 1.75m, respectively. These holes tested 100m gaps in drilling and show the continuity of the 88-04 zone. Holes DL0501, 02 and 16 tested the far west extension of the 88-04 zone where it swings to the north. Holes DL0502 and DL0516 are more then 400m away from the 88-04 shoot and returned encouraging results of 1.00 gpt Au over 0.50m and 1.27 gpt Au over 2.00m respectively. Hole DL0502 returned a second zone of mineralization more then 200m down hole from the first zone, which returned 0.53 gpt Au over 1.0m. Hole RL0501 was drilled approximately 50m west of hole DL0515, and 200m west of the "GVX shoot", where it returned 1.22gpt Au over 1.40m

    Holes DL0503 and DL0504 tested a high MMI Au response ratio, more then 800m east of the 88-04 Zone.

    These are the first two holes in the vicinity and returned extremely encouraging results for a first phase program on a grass roots target of 3.32 gpt Au over 1.90m in hole DL0503 including a higher grade section running 6.73 gpt Au over 0.50m. In hole DL0504, encouraging values of 0.98 gpt Au over 0.50m were returned. It should be understood that these holes were not ideally situated, and topography and a creek crossing made drill set up less then ideal. Even with these technical challenges, these two holes are considered a great success and additional holes were planned for the next drill program, slated for early 2006

    Results from the 2005 drill program point to two high priority targets. The newly identified "GVX shoot" is open to depth and should be followed up down-plunge. The identification of this second shoot to the 88-04 zone also leads to the potential of discovering further high-grade shoots in the 88-04 system. A second high priority target that was developed from the results of the 2005 drilling is the strike extension of the anomalous Au mineralization encountered in hole DL0503 and DL0504. Further, the far west holes DL0501, DL0502 and DL0516 all point to the mineralization of the 88-04 zone continuing to the west, and leave open the potential for additional higher grade shoots west of the "GVX shoot".

    -17-


    While the grades encountered in these zones are moderate, relative to typical operating underground mines in comparable environments, the widths can be quite large, and local high-grade occurrences and proximity to Goldcorp’s Campbell Mine and Red Lake Mine existing infrastructure make this project economically interesting.

    The "88-04" zone is a silicified and sulphidized sedimentary rock occurring within a sequence of mafic volcanic rocks. Silica-carbonate alteration occurs as replacement style alteration and in quartz-calcite veins. Pyrrhotite is the most dominant sulphide followed by pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite. Visible gold is not uncommon, and is commonly associated with strong pyrrhotite and weak pyrite-arsenopyrite mineralization, as well as in quartz only veins. Previous work has identified the presence of gold-silver and lead tellurides, locally encapsulated in arsenopyrite. Native gold occurs as free gold crystals up to 50 microns in size.

    The Spring 2006 drill programme comprised the completion of 5 NQ drill holes for a total of 1032.7 metres, commencing on 4.4.05 & finished on 18.4.06.

    Initial plans called for a larger drill programme, testing extensions to the recently discovered MMI East zone, plus further drilling on the 88-4 Extension & targets proposed in the winter of 2005-2006 (see Fall Drilling Report). Due to the timing of the programme, & associated difficulties with Spring run-off, targets East of the MMI-East could not be drilled. Access across Dixie Creek to the other targets was hampered by ground conditions at & close to the only bridge crossing, & it was concluded that for environmental reasons, the drilling should be suspended until a later date.

    The Corporation completed two drilling campaigns between the summer of 2007 and the end of the winter 2008 on the Dixie Lake property. The summer program included 18 diamond drill holes (4,563 meters of core) drilled on a number of known zones including the; 88-04 Zone, Main Zone, South Zone, C-Zone, and the MMI-East Zone. Drilling also made a significant discovery of a new zone of quartz veining with high grade mineralization and abundant visible gold. Based on these results, the Corporation carried out a brief two hole (575 meter) drill program in early January 2008 to follow up on the first pass results.

    Previously unrecognized lode gold style mineralization was encountered in the New South (NS) Zone. Excellent grades from this discovery were. Overall, six diamond drill holes were drilled into the NS zone subsequent to the discovery, with four drill holes intersecting mineralization (DC-10-07, DC-15-07, DC-18-07, and DL-08-01R (see chart below). The Corporation is currently evaluating additional drilling to fully constrain the geometry of the lode gold bearing quartz veins.

    -18-



    Hole Number Azimuth Dip From (m) To (m) Length
    (m)
    Grade (g/t Au)
    DC-10-07 090o -60o 181.83 182.30 0.47 163.75
          200.62 203,48 2.86 22.90
                   Incl     202.12 203.12 1.00 61.97
                 
    DC -15-07 070o -55o 176.60 182.95 6.35 4.28
                   Incl     176.60 178.30 1.70 11.30
                 
    DC-18-07 070o -55o 156.83 158.17 1.34 7.04
                 
    DC-08-1R 090o -60o 127.60 129.80 2.20 18.26

    Drilling of the 88-04 Zone (1.57 g/t Au over 13.13 meters and 2.43 g/t Au over 4.0 meters) indicated the one continues to be open to depth and along strike to the east. Additional results from holes DC-01-07 (9.25 g/t Au and 6.02 g/t over 1 meter widths) and DC-04-07 (3.55 g/t Au over 3.0 meters) are encouraging as they continue to demonstrate the mineralizing potential of the Dixie Lake property.

    In 2009 work centered primarily on report writing with respect to the 2009 winter drilling program and further geological interpretation and computer modeling. Gemcom was contracted to consolidate all drilling data and model mineralised zones at both the 88-04 Zone and limited information on the NS Zone. That modeling was used as the basis for an exploration program to be carried our in the summer of 2009 on the Property.

    The Corporation is continuing to evaluate future work plans on the Dixie Lake property.

    Recent Work by the Corporation

    In June 2011 the Corporation initiated an eight holes (~ 2,200m ) drilling program with the intent to bring historic resource estimates to NI 43-101 standards. At the time of this AIF field results are being still being received and a full interpretation is ongoing. The Corporation will report results as they become available.

    During fiscal 2010 the Corporation completed a seven hole diamond drilling program for a total of 1,556.8 meters of core at the Dixie Lake project. The holes were designed to test mineralisation intersected from previous drilling, specifically, extensions to and infill of the 88-4 Zone, continuity between the 88-4 Zone & the 88-4 extension, and the high grade quartz veining (NS Zone). Overall the program was successful in establishing the possible continuity between the 88-4 Zone and the 88-4 Extension at depth which had previously described as two separate, but related zones of mineralization. Continuity between the zones could have important ramifications for additional tonnage potential for the zone.

    Three holes tested extensions of the high grade NS Zone. Holes DL-09-01, DL-09-02 intersected auriferous massive quartz veining that is considered to be the same as that previously intersected from previous drill programmes (2007-2008). The results indicate continuity of the vein set. Arguably, the same quartz vein set was also intersected in DDH DL-09-03, some 60 metres north west. These results indicate the potential for additional gold in the structure and it’s extension increase significantly.

    -19-


    The following tables outlines significant intercepts from the described exploration program.

    Significant Results: Dixie Lake Project; NS Zone, 88-4 Zone & 88-4 extension

    Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T Comments
    DL-09-01 138.1 138.6 0.5 16.32 NS Zone
               
    DL-09-02 135.6 138.0 2.4 1.99 NS Zone quartz vein
               
    DL-09-02 148.2 149.6 2.3 2.85 NS Zone quartz vein
               
    DL-09-03 26.1 30.5 4.4 2.17 88-4 East end
    including 29.5 30.5 1.0 4.79  
               
    DL-09-03 178.8 180.2 1.4 5.35 Quartz vein, NS Zone at depth?
               
    DL-09-05 91.2 99.3 8.1 2.08 88-4 Zone
    including 96.6 97.7 1.1 3.58  
    including 97.6 99.3 1.7 2.28  
               
    DL-09-06 228.4 233.6 5.2 2.01 Between 88-4 & 88-4 Extension
    including 230.3 231.8 1.5 3.52  

    The Corporation is evaluating results and contemplating additional work programs for the property.

    Previous Work by the Corporation

    BONANZA PROPERTY ("BONANZA’)

    Property Description and Location

    On April 28, 2010 the Corporation announced that it had acquired the remaining 40% interest in the Property from EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and had also acquired two additional patented claims and two additional unpatented claims from Perry English (“English”) to complete the current property package. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Bonanza Property and eliminate the previously negotiated NSR in favour of EMCO, Grandview paid EMCO $25,000 in cash and issued 50,000 common shares. In order to acquire the four claims from English and purchase 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR due to English on the Bonanza Property, Grandview paid to English aggregate consideration of $60,000 cash and issued 500,000 common shares.

    -20-


    The Corporation now holds 100% undivided interest in the Bonanza Property. The Bonanza Property now consists of 12 unpatented and 2 patented claims, located on Red Lake, approximately 1.5 km north of the town of Red Lake, Ontario. Much of the property area is overlain by Red Lake, with the exception of two claims on Whitehorse Island. Access to the area during summer months is most easily accomplished via boat and in the winter months via ice roads from the town of Red Lake.

    Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

    The region is covered with a variable layer of poorly documented till & associated fluvioglacial & lacustrine sediments, in the order of 0 to 15 m in thickness. Outcrop percentage overall is less than 1%. On Whitehorse Island, there is negligible outcrop, though a few scattered exposures of Dome Stock intrusive rock have been cursorily mapped by previous workers.

    Topographically, the area is characterised as low rolling relief, with moderate drainage on thin to medium thickness glacial & fluvioglacial deposits. Known maximum thicknesses of these on the property are 45 metres. Elevations range from about 350 to 400 metres above sea-level.

    Nearly all of the original vegetation has either been logged off or burnt.

    Red Lake is located at the terminus of Highway 105, some 175 km North of Kenora, & reached via the Trans Canada Highway. The Municipality of Red Lake is serviced by regular flights from Winnipeg & Thunder Bay, seven days a week.

    History

    Exploration was conducted in the mid-late 1930’s & to 1948, when drilling intersected visible gold in a quartz veined, strongly silicic granodiorite/granite contact zone separating the Howey Stock from intermediate volcanic rocks of the Ball assemblage. A shaft was sunk & underground development was carried out on 2 levels with minor bulk sampling providing the above mentioned resource.

    During this period, further drilling underground & on Red Lake failed to prove up additional grade & tons & significant exploration was not resumed until the 1970’s, when Bonanza Red Lake Explorations drilled additional holes on the Lake to trace previous known mineralised trends, this part of a feasibility study to include consideration of dewatering the shaft.

    In 1987-89, Pure Gold Resources & Noramco resumed exploration with a large drill program, effectively replicating old drilling, outlined a 300 metre wide, 125 m deep, 125 metre long mineralised system with a calculated resource of 300,000 tons grading 0.08 oz per ton Au. Other drilling on a smaller scale, returned generally disappointing results as efforts were made to drill deeper targets along strike.

    Numerous geophysical surveys have been completed by various operators and that data has been compiled with other relevant data for future use.

    -21-


    Regional Geology

    The Bonanza property is located at Red Lake, Ontario, within the Uchi Subprovince of the Archæan Province, north-western Ontario. The region is typically sub-divided into four major subprovinces, specifically the Uchi which contains the Red Lake & Confederation Lake greenstone belts, the South adjacent, predominantly metasedimentary & igneous intrusive English River Subprovince, & the North adjacent Berens River Subprovince. The Bonanza property lies within the Red Lake greenstone belt that hosts the world class gold deposits now held by Goldcorp Inc.

    In summary, the Uchi Subprovince contains the most significant gold deposits in the entire north-west of Ontario. Five major assemblages, the Confederation dated around 2730-2800 MY, Woman River, Bruce Channel, dated at around 2800-2900 MY, Ball, dated at 2940-2925 MY,& Balmer, considered the oldest of the assemblages at around 2940-2925 MY, comprise the vast majority of the underlying geology.

    Mining Operations

    The Corporation has not carried out mining operations on the property, but there have been historical operations. The deposit has a historical resource of some 175,000 tons grading 0.2 oz Au above the 375 ft Level (not NI 43-101 compliant). Orlac Red Lake Mines Ltd., (subsequently Sanshaw Mines Ltd.), MacKenzie Red Lake Mines Ltd., & Cable Mines Oils Ltd. conducted drilling & underground work over this period. Caution should be used when evaluating this historical data as it was calculated prior to NI 43-101 coming into force and a qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical data as a current mineral resource within the meaning of NI 43-101.

    Exploration and Development

    A compilation of historical data and a resource modeling program was carried out. The objective of the compilation was an assessment of the drilling on & around the Orlac deposit, with ultimately, targeting areas for additional drilling. There have been previous efforts to understand the geology & geometry of the deposit using non-digital means. Many sections are simply paper plans & whenever possible, drill information was entered into excel format for processing into MapInfo GIS & Gemcom, the latter to provide more accurate information on the geometry of the gold mineralisation & associated alteration.

    In the 2008 fiscal year, the Corporation completed a five (5) hole diamond drill program totalling 1,087 meters. The drill program targeted geophysical and structural targets beneath the waters of Red Lake and thus drilling was carried out during the winter months in early 2008 when sufficient ice thickness was present.

    -22-


    Three holes targeted what is believed to be the southwest extension of a structural corridor from the Goldcorp/Premier Gold Bonanza property immediately adjacent to the Corporation's property. The drilling contractor had difficulties reaching bedrock and coring and after several attempts the holes were abandoned. The drill was pulled back to a land based setup and two holes were successfully drilled on the margin of the historic Orlac Deposit. Gold bearing mineralization was encountered in holes BS-08-03 and BS-08-04 in proximity to a granite-volcanoclastic contact zone. The following tables summarize these results:

    Hole Number From (m) To (m) Length (m) Grade (g/tonne Au)
    PC-08-03 295.7 298.7 3.0 2.41
                   Incl 296.7 297.7 1.0 3.50
             
    PC-08-04 298.4 302.9 4.5 2.03

    In fiscal 2010, work on the project was limited to negotiations to acquire 100% interest in the project from EMCO Corporation S.A. and the acquisition of additional mining claims to complement the Bonanza Property.

    LOISAN PROPERTY

    Property Description and Location

    The Corporation currently holds 100% interest in the Loisan Property. The Red Lake area currently hosts two high-grade, world-class gold mines, Goldcorp’s Red Lake Mine and Placer Dome’s Campbell Gold Mine.

    Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

    The Red Lake area is serviced by paved provincial highway 105 from the Trans Canada highway. The property is covered by relatively thin glacial debris. Much of the claims have waterfront access to Red Lake. A paved road, Sandy Point Road, transects many of the claims. Electric power and telephone lines also cross the property. Several year round homes are located on surface rights of some of the claims.

    There are no parks or developments other then several year round homes are located on surface rights of some of the claims. The property can be easily accessed by boat, ski-doo, motor vehicle, or float plane.

    The property has a small slope from its maximum elevation down to the shoreline, a drop of up to 15m.

    The climate is typical mid-latitude continental. Field operations on most of the property are possible year round.

    -23-


    Mining Operations

    The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Loisan Property.

    Exploration and Development

    To date, the Corporation has not carried out any significant exploration or development on the Loisan Property.

    BISSETT GOLD CAMP CLAIMS

    Property Description and Location

    Grandview owns a 100% interest in one (1) unpatented mining claim, located near Bissett, Manitoba, Canada (the “Bissett Gold Camp Claim”).

    Effective November 30, 2010, Grandview entered into two agreements in respect of the sale of four mining claims owned by it and located in Manitoba, being the Packsak, Clapelou Patent Claims, CUPP2 Frac and CUPP3 Frac (collectively, the "Claims"). Two of the four Claims were transferred to Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint") and the remaining two were transferred to Centershield Gold Mines Inc., a subsidiary of Centerpoint. The Claims are not material to Grandview's exploration programs or strategy moving forward. Grandview received nominal cash consideration on closing and retained a 1% NSR over the Claims.

    Centerpoint is a related party of Grandview, and the agreement for Grandview to transfer the Claims constituted a related party transaction under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Take-Over Bids and Special Transactions ("MI 61-101"). There had been no prior valuation in respect of the Claims and the transaction was not subject to the formal valuation requirements of MI 61-101 by virtue of subsection 5.5(a) thereof and was also exempt from minority shareholder approval requirements by virtue of subsection 5.7(1)(a) thereof, as at the relevant time neither the fair market value of the Claims nor the fair market value of the consideration being paid for the Claims exceeded 25% of Grandview's market capitalization as calculated in compliance with MI 61-101. The independent members of Grandview's Board considered and approved the sale transaction.

    The Bissett Gold Camp Claim is located on the Rice Lake greenstone belt, near the Manitoba/Ontario border and approximately 240 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg, and approximately 90 kilometres west of the Corporation’s Loisan Property.

    The following table lists the Bissett Gold Camp Claims:

    Bissett Cold Camp mining claim and Due Date

    Area
       Claim# Name (Ha) Due Date
    W46040 MEL 14 02/2/2026

    -24-


    Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

    The area was covered by the most recent continental glaciers, which scoured the property and exposed many rock outcrops throughout the property. The vegetation is predominantly deciduous, with birch, poplar mixed with tamarack, with lesser second or third growth spruce and jack pine.

    Access to the Bissett Gold Camp Claim is by car or truck along Provincial Highway 304 and simply parking anywhere along the side of the road. The mining town of Bissett is located less than 10 km from nine of the eleven mining claims.

    The weather, climate and seasons should not significantly affect the length of the operating season on this property because the terrain is flat and all-weather-road accessible.

    History

    The Bissett Gold Camp Claim contained two patented mining claims, namely the Clappelou and Packsack claims. Gold mineralization on the Packsack claim was first discovered and explored in 1919 and subsequently held by Packsack Mines Limited during the period 1934-1937. Significant gold mineralization was discovered; a mining lease was obtained and a shaft was sunk down to the 525-foot level. Additional mine shafts were sunk and gold mineralization was discovered nearby claims.

    Geological Setting

    The Bissett Gold Camp Claims are located in the Rice Lake greenstone belt, a region in southeastern Manitoba known as the Superior Province. The Superior Province is a terrain of large granitic masses separated by greenstone belts, which consists of rocks and volcanic of sedimentary origin. Rice Lake is an Archean lode gold mining area.

    Mining Operations

    The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims

    Exploration and Development

    To date, the Corporation has not carried out any exploration or development on the Bissett Gold Camp Claims.

    Environmental Considerations

    The Corporation is taking the necessary steps to ensure a minimal impact to the local environment as a result of its exploration activities. Added care is taken to ensure no drill cuttings flow into the local watershed and absorbent fibres are used around all motors and working parts to collect any inadvertent drips of petrochemical. All wastes are transported from the site and deposited into a licensed land fill or recycling facility.

    -25-


    GVG PROPERTY

    In the fall of 2005, the Corporation undertook to stake 20 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake – Cat Lake area of south-eastern Manitoba, near the town of Bissett where San Gold Corporation is currently producing gold. The property currently consists of 7 unpatented claims and is approximately 1,110 hectares in area, and is believed to cover similar geology that hosts the Red Lake Mine, Campbell Mine, and Madsen Mine, in Red Lake, Ontario, located less then 100 kilometres to the east of the GVG Property. Due to past exploration results and lack of interested parties, the Corporation decided to let claims reaching expiry period lapse over the past year and will not expend any further exploration dollars to maintain the GVG Property.

    Mining Operations

    The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the GVG Property.

    Exploration and Development

    During the summer of 2008, the Corporation carried out geological and structural mapping, rock sampling, compilation of historical data, air photo and satellite interpretation over the project area that included the Gem claims, GVG claims and the Grand claims. The project is collectively referred to as the Rice Lake Reconnaissance Project (“RLRP”). In total, 179 rock samples were collected and analysed for gold and multi-element geochemistry. Approximately 23% of all samples collected contained anomalous gold concentrations (< 0.10 g/t). Many of these anomalous samples came from two newly discovered showings. One new showing was a narrow white quartz vein hosted in a dacitic volcaniclastic cobble conglomerate unit South of Gem Lake that returned two bonanza grade samples of 30.79 g/t and 21.83 g/t gold. The other showing was a zone of sparse light bluish-grey/white quartz veinlets (0.5%) hosted by a sulphide bearing (pyritic clots and stringers) granite intrusion east of Gem Lake that returned assays of 8.30 g/t, 5.74 g/t and 5.01 g/t gold. A total of $125,506.77 dollars was spent on the geological mapping program of Grandview’s RLRP.

    In the fall of 2005, the Corporation contracted Firefly Aviation to conduct a fixed wing airborne magnetic survey covering the GVG Property. Results have been received and are being integrated with the Corporation model and regional data with the intent to have follow up ground work, including prospecting and mapping, in the future.

    The Corporation carried out limited geological mapping, prospecting and sampling in the summer of 2007 and has plans to continue grass roots exploration efforts to understand the mineral potential of the belt in the 2008 summer field season.

    As a result of limited exploration success on the GVG Property the Corporation has decided to suspend further exploration work.

    -26-


    BANKSIAN PROPERTY

    Property Description and Location

    Due to past exploration results and lack of interested joint venture parties, the Corporation decided to let claims reaching their expiry period lapse over the past year and will not expend any further exploration dollars to maintain the Banksian Property. As a result the land package has lapsed and the Corporation no longer retains any claims in the Banksian Property land package.

    ANGELINA PROPERTY

    Property Description and Location

    The Corporation acquired 100% interest in the property from McKeena Gold in March 2007.

    The property is located approximately 25 km southeast of the town of Bissett in southeastern Manitoba within an area commonly referred to as the Rice Lake Greenstone Belt. The Rice Lake Greenstone belt accounts for nearly two million ounces of past gold production. Most historical production has come from the Rice Lake Gold Mine (formerly the San Antonio Gold Mine) in Bissett, Manitoba. The property consists of 3 unpatented mining claims covering an area of approximately 160 hectares.

    History

    The area was first staked in 1925 and assigned to Moore Lake Mines in 1927. Several shear zones with gold bearing veins were discovered and several trenches and small pits were sunk along a number of veins. There are reports of economic exploitation, but no historical records are available. Moore Lake Mines reportedly suspended operations in 1934. Little work was carried out in the area for a number of years.

    The lease was cancelled in 1975. Hans Steinleitner staked over the property in 1976 and converted the claim into Production Lease 29 in January 1980. In June 1983, the lease was transferred to Evan A. Koblanski and then transferred back to Hans G. Steinleitner in April 1985.

    In 1987 Rhino Resources Inc. optioned the property from Hans G. Steinleitner and drilled three holes. From July to August 1988, Rhino Resources Inc. conducted geophysical surveys over portions of the Angelina, and Angela claims. Presumably the option reverted to Hans Steinleitner in or before 1993.

    In August 1998 the Two Bits claim was acquired by 3469264 Manitoba Limited. Following the recommendations of the Whittles report for Rhino Resources a sample of rock was collected to determine the feasibility of bringing the “two Bits” vein (on the Angelina claim) into production. A bench milling test conducted by Knelson Concentrators in Langley, B.C. determined the project should move ahead to lab scale tests to confirm the current results and /or move straight into pilot or full scale tests. However, due to lack of funds this did not occur.

    -27-


    W. Kuran staked the Angela and Angelina claims in 2001 and optioned the property to Gossan Resources Limited in 2003. Gossan Resources conducted preliminary geological mapping in 2003 and flew an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in early 2004.

    Geological Setting

    Geologically the Angelina Claim Block is comprised of basalts, metasediments, gabbro, pyroclastic tuffs and breccias and feldspathic dykes. This assemblage has been isoclinaly folded and boudinaged, sheared parallel to fold axes, faulted to offset the shear zones and thrust in a south westerly direction. Gold mineralization was found along shear zones striking in a NNW direction and dipping from 50 to 80 degrees to the ENE, containing quartz and carbonate veins and stringers. Historically gold mineralization has been found on six parallel shear zones. Although higher assays have been recorded in the past, up to 261 g/t in a grab sample, the highest assays found by Gossan Resources included 0.53 oz/t over 3.7m and 0.26oz/t over 7.92m in drill core. Historically a seventh mineralized shear zone was identified at depth in diamond drill hole E-88-03, a zone of 0.3oz/t Au over 6’.

    Exploration and Development

    In 1987 Rhino Resources Inc drills three holes, TB1, TB2 & TB3, under the vein to intersect the interpreted main break. Logs indicate trace to 0.04 oz/ton gold detected over widths ranging from 1’ to 5.7’ in sheared tuffaceous mafic volcanics. In 1988 Rhino Resources Inc. conducted magnetometer, VLF-EM surveying and an IP/Resistivity survey over portions of the Angelina, and Angela claims. From this surveying Rhino identified a number of drill targets and drilled three holes. A zone containing 0.3oz/t Au over 6’ was intersected in hole E88-03.

    Hans Steinleitner started his own drill program in July 1993 and reached 30’ before mechanical failure forced the hole to be stopped. Also, samples were taken from a pit at Rhino Grid reference 900E, 350S (shear zone south of the south break) which returned assays up to 1.35 oz in a 2 3/8lb sample.

    Following the recommendations of the Whittles report for Rhino Resources 3469264 Manitoba Ltd. collected samples of “ore material” from the “Two Bits” vein (on the Angelina claim) to determine mining feasibility. A bench milling test conducted by Knelson Concentrators in Langley, B.C. determined the project should move ahead to lab scale tests to confirm the current results and /or move straight into pilot or full scale tests. However, due to lack of funds this did not occur.

    W. Kuran staked the Angela and Angelina claims in 2001 and optioned the property to Gossan Resources Limited in 2003. Gossan Resources Limited conducted preliminary geological mapping in 2003 and flew an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in early 2004 and drilled ten diamond drill hole to test gold bearing zones that had been previously identified.

    Recent Work by the Corporation

    In the fall of 2007 a limited 7 diamond drill hole program (1,193 m) was completed on three targeted zones; the Discovery Shear, the Contact Zone and the Beaver Pond Vein.

    -28-


    Four drill holes tested a 350 meter extension of the Discovery Shear zone to the west where surface sampling had encounter grab samples of 15.2 g/t, 16.5 g/t and 10.8 g/t. Visually the shear zone appeared to improve with depth, only two holes returned significant gold values. Best results were from holes AN-07-01 which intersected 2.08 g/t over 0.50 meters at a depth of 77.5 meters, and hole AN-07-04 which intersected 2.13 g/t over 1.50 meters at a drill hole depth of 85.25 meters.

    Two diamond drill holes tested a +50 meter thick zone of moderately veined, sericite-ankerite alteration zone north of the Discovery Zone. The best result was in hole AN-07-06 which intersected 1.40 g/t over 1.50 meters at a drill hole depth of 50 meters.

    The final hole of the program was designed to test a quartz-ankerite vein at depth previous drilled by Gossan Resources. No significant assays were returned.

    GIULIANITA PROPERTY

    Property Description and Location

    The Corporation currently holds an option to acquire 100% interest in the Giulianita Property located in northwest Peru, near the town of Suyo, in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, in the Department of Piura.

    Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography

    The project is easily accessed from the Pan-American Highway, approximately 100 kilometers from the city of Puira via paved highway and then approximately 15 km along well developed gravel roads to the central part of the property.

    This area of northwestern Peru is temperate to hot, with abundant precipitation in the rainy season (January to March) and extremely arid conditions the remainder of the year. Field operations can be carried out throughout the year. Vegetation includes various species of mid-sized deciduous trees (3 meters in height) and limited undergrowth.

    The property covers an area of relatively low elevation with most hills no greater than 350 meters above sea level, and relative relief between hills and valleys of less than 50 meters.

    The main water source is the Quiroz River which lies just 2 kilometers to the northeast of the project area. Accommodation, food, power and internet access is available in a number of small towns near the project.

    -29-


    History

    Little historic work or information is available for the project as this area of Peru has seen little in the way of modern exploration work. Records indicate that some alluvial gold extraction was carried out briefly in the mid 1970’s. Local artisanal mining and processing of ores has only occurred within the last three years and remains relatively unorganized by typical Peruvian standards.

    Geological Setting

    The project area is covered with an extensive layers of basaltic to andesitic volcanic flows and pyroclastics and arcosic sediments of Middle Cretaceous age. Units are fractured and argillically altered in the volcanic outcroppings studied in the area of the prospect. Intrusive units of Upper Cretaceous to Tertiary age have been mapped in the project area and felsic domes are locally present.

    Numerous NNW trending faults/veins are observed on the Property that controls both high grade gold mineralization and well disseminated gold targets. Mineralization is associated with highly altered (argillic and silicic) vein/fault system hosted within volcanic flows and volcanoclastic units of basaltic to andesitic composition. Several zones of mineralization have been identified on the property, but have not been actively explored in any detail. Zone One can be traced for approximately 400 m south-southeast on surface, and has at least three adits/shafts that host small-scale mining. Previous exploration work done in Zone One indicates that, at the primary outcropping the overall width reaches 4.5m, with individual continuous chip samples returning 25.6 g/T Au over 1.10m, 30.6 g/T Au over 1.5m, and 12.3 g/T Au over 1.6m from within the volcanic breccia unit, and 6.19 g/T Au over 2.6m from the hanging wall fractured volcanic unit. The southern extension of Zone One connects with Zone Four were previous work indicates gold mineralization is present at surface. Zones Two and Three are located 500 meters southeast of the previously mentioned targets and again demonstrate both high-grade gold vein and disseminated gold targets.

    Zone Five is located 400 meters southwest of Zone One and hosts high-grade gold vein/shear structures similar to other targets. These areas of mineralization provide significant exploration potential on the property.

    Mining Operations

    The Corporation has not carried out any mining operations on the Giulianta Property.

    Exploration and Development

    During the 2011 fiscal year the Corporation the continued to work with local community representatives and groups to gain the surface access rights permission necessary to carry out exploration and development on the property. On June 28th, 2011 the Corporation issued a press release announcing that the Corporation would cease funding work efforts at the Property until such time as the local community was able to deliver the necessary documentation and permissions for the Corporation to carry out unfettered exploration and development work. The Corporation intends to fully protect its mineral titles in Peru and remains committed to honour the community proposal that has been in the hands of the community executive for many months.

    -30-


    GEM PROPERTY

    Due to limited exploration results on the Gem Property the Corporation decided to no longer pursue further work on the property and subsequently relinquished any interest in the property.

    ITEM 4          DIVIDENDS

    1.9          Dividend Policy

    The Corporation has neither declared nor paid any dividends on its common shares. The Corporation intends to retain its earnings, if any, to finance growth and expand its operations and does not anticipate paying any dividends on its common shares in the foreseeable future. The actual timing, payment and amount of any dividends declared and paid by the Corporation will be determined by and at the sole discretion of the board of directors of the Corporation from time to time based upon, among other factors, the cash flow, results of operations and financial condition of the Corporation, the need for funds to finance ongoing operations and exploration and such other considerations as the board of directors in its discretion may consider or deem relevant. At this time, the Corporation anticipates that payment of dividends would only be possible in the event it successfully brings one of its mining properties into commercial production.

    ITEM 5          DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

    5.1          General Description of Capital Structure

    The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, of which 81,163,032 were issued and outstanding as at the date of this AIF. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of any meeting of shareholders of the Corporation, and to attend and to cast one vote per common share at all such meetings. Holders of common shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and, accordingly, holders of a majority of the common shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors standing for election. Holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends, if any, on a pro rata basis, such dividends, as and when declared by the Corporation's board of directors in its discretion (please see "Dividend Policy" above). Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, holders of common shares are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis the net assets of the Corporation after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attending to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro rata basis with the holders of common shares with respect to dividends or liquidation. The common shares do not carry any pre-emptive subscription, redemption or conversion rights.

    The Corporation is also authorised to issue an unlimited number of special preference voting shares (the "Preference Shares") of which there are none outstanding as of the date of this AIF.

    -31-


    The Preference Shares have no par value have been designated as redeemable, voting, and non-participating. No dividends are to be declared, set aside or paid on the Preference Shares. In the event of the liquidation of the Corporation or other distribution of assets or property of the Corporation among shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs the holders of the Preference Shares shall be entitled to receive from the assets and property of the Corporation a sum equivalent to the aggregate paid up capital of the Preference Shares held by them respectively before any amount shall be paid or any property or assets of the Corporation distributed to the holders of any Common Shares or shares of any other class ranking junior to the Preference Shares. After payment to them as above provided the holders of the Preference Shares shall not be entitled to share in the property of the Corporation. The Corporation may not redeem the Preference Shares or any of them prior to the expiration of five years from the respective date of issuance thereof, without prior consent of the holders of the Preference Shares to be redeemed. The Corporation shall redeem the then outstanding Preference Shares five years from the respective dates of issue of the Preference Shares. In the case of a redemption of the Preference Shares, the Corporation shall at least thirty (30) days prior to the date specified for redemption mail to each person who at the date of the mailing is a registered holder of Preference Shares to be redeemed a notice in writing of the intention of the Corporation to redeem such Preference shares. On or after the date so specified for redemption, the Corporation shall pay or cause to be paid to or to the order of the registered holders of the Preference Shares to be redeemed the redemption price thereof on presentation and surrender at the head office of the Corporation or any other place designated in such notice of the certificates representing the Preference Shares called for redemption. From and after the date specified for redemption in any such notice the holders thereof shall not be entitled to exercise any of the rights of Preference Share holders in respect thereof unless payment of the redemption price shall not be made on presentation of certificates in accordance with the foregoing, in which case the rights of the Preference Share holders shall remain unaffected. The Corporation may at any time or times purchase for cancellation all or any part of the Preference Shares outstanding from time to time from the holders thereof, at a price not exceeding the paid up capital thereof, with the consent of the holders thereof. The holders of Preference Shares shall be entitled to receive notice of and attend all meetings of shareholders of the Corporation and shall have one (1) vote for each Preference Share held at all meetings of the shareholders of the Corporation. No holder shall sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of any Preference Share or Preference Shares without prior approval of the board of directors of the Corporation and prior approval of the Ontario Securities Commission. For each five (5) Preference Shares held the holder may at his or her option convert such five (5) Preference Shares into one (1) Share but in no event shall the total number of Shares issued on the conversion of Preference Shares exceed 100,000 Shares in the aggregate.

    5.2          Constraint

    This is not applicable.

    5.3          Ratings

    This is not applicable.

    ITEM 6          MARKET FOR SECURITIES

    -32-


    6.1          Trading Price and Volume

    The common shares of the Corporation are currently listed for trading on the TSX under the trading symbol "GVX". Prior to April, 2006, the common shares of the Corporation were listed and posted for trading the CNQ. The following chart lists the price ranges and volumes traded for such shares on the TSX for each month during the 12 month period ended May 31, 2011:

    Month

    High Low Close Volume
    May, 2011  0.08  0.055 0.075 2,316,600
    April, 2011  0.07  0.05 0.06 2,245,640
    March, 2011  0.07  0.05 0.065 1,949,583
    February, 2011  0.075  0.06 0.07 1,506,544
    January, 2011  0.075  0.065 0.07 2,104,053
    December, 2010  0.08  0.06 0.65 1,349,495
    November, 2010  0.09  0.065 0.065 1,633,400
    October, 2010  0.095  0.07 0.085 773,400
    September, 2010  0.095  0.060 0.07 1,552,230
    August, 2010  0.065  0.055 0.06 747,776
    July, 2010  0.07  0.05 0.06 2,403,711
    June, 2010  0.085  0.055 0.06 1,340,112

    6.2          Prior Sales

    This is not applicable

    ITEM 7          ESCROWED SECURITIES

    This is not applicable.

    ITEM 8          DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

    8.1          Names, Addresses, Occupation and Security Holdings

    The following table and the notes thereto set out the name, province and country of residence of each director and executive officer of the Corporation, their current position and office with the Corporation, their present principal occupation or employment, the date on which they were first elected or appointed a director or officer of the Corporation, the approximate number of common shares of the Corporation beneficially owned directly or indirectly or over which they exercise control or direction as at the date of this AIF, and the percentage of the total issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation represented by such shares:

    -33-



    Name, Current Position(s)
    with the Corporation and
    Province and Country
    Principal Occupation(s)
    During Last Five (5) Years If
    Different from Office Held
    Director /
    Officer
    Since
    No. and percentage of Shares
    beneficially owned, or
    controlled or directed, directly
    or indirectly as at the date of
    this AIF(1)
    Paul Sarjeant(2) 
    Director and
    Chief Executive Officer
    Ontario, Canada

    From 1999 until November, 2006 operated a securities business focused on strategic planning and investment analysis. Since his appointment, Mr. Sarjeant's full time employment has been with the Corporation.

    November 2006 133,333/0.16%
    D. Richard Brown( 3)(4) 
    Director
    Ontario, Canada

    Partner at Osprey Capital Partners

    March 2004 105,000/0.13%
    Michael Hitch(5)(6)
    Chairman and
    Director
    BC, Canada

    Professor , Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering, University of British Columbia

    November 2005 66,666/0.08%
    Peter Born(4)(8)
    Director
    Ontario, Canada

    Ph.D., professional registered geologist (ON) and President of 1727856 Ontario Ltd. Director of 3 other TSX:V companies and VP exploration for another TSX:V company, namely Athabasca Uranium Inc.

    June 2007 133,333/0.16%
    Ken Hight(5)(9) 
    Director
    Ontario, Canada

    From 2000-2005 served as CEO of ITG Canada, from 2005 – 2008 served as CEO of ETrade Canada, and concurrently EVP, E Trade Financial New York, currently, CEO of Liquidnet Canada until September 2009. Currently Chair and CEO of Portage Minerals Inc., and director of 2 other TSX:V companies.

    May 2008 133,333/0.16%
    Jack Austin(4)(10)
    Director
    BC, Canada

    Currently Senior Advisor- International to Stern Partners, President of Centerpoint Resources Inc.

    December 2009 600,000/0.74%
    Ted Nunn (5)(11)
    Director
    BC, Canada

    President of Centershield Gold Mines Inc., and VP Technical services for Centerpoint Resources Inc.

    December 2009 Nil
    Ernest Cleave(7) 
    Chief Financial Officer
    Ontario, Canada

    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Cline Mining; Consultant

    November 2005 Nil
    R. Ian Mitchell
    Corporate Secretary
    Ontario, Canada
    Corporate lawyer. Partner at WeirFoulds LLP, a full-service downtown Toronto law firm and corporate and securities counsel to the Corporation. November 2005 Nil

    -34-



    Note(s)
    :
      (1)

    The information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, not being within the knowledge of the Corporation, has been furnished by the respective directors and executive officers individually.

         
      (2)

    Paul Sarjeant holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,250,000 common shares of the Corporation, 600,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 650,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Sarjeant under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Sarjeant also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

         
      (3)

    D Richard Brown holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation, 200,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Brown under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

         
      (4)

    Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown (Chairman), Jack Austin and Peter Born.

         
      (5)

    Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ken Hight (Chairman), Ted Nunn and Michael Hitch.

         
      (6)

    Michael Hitch holds options to purchase up to a total of 675,000 common shares of the Corporation, 225,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Hitch under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Hitch also holds 66,666 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

         
      (7)

    Ernest Cleave holds options to purchase up to a total of 475,000 common shares of the Corporation 250,000 which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 225,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Cleave under the Corporation's 2004 Stock Option Plan.

         
      (8)

    Dr. Peter Born holds options to purchase up to a total of 600,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Mr. Born also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

         
      (9)

    Ken Hight holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014. Mr. Hight also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

    -35-



      (10)

    Jack Austin holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014. Mr. Austin also holds 600,000 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 good until December 3, 2012.

         
      (11)

    Ted Nunn holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014.

    The directors of the Corporation are elected by the shareholders at each annual general meeting and serve until the next annual general meeting, or until their successors are duly elected or appointed. Officers of the Corporation are appointed by the board of directors.

    As of the date of this AIF, approximately 1,171,665 common shares of the Corporation were beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the current directors and officers of the Corporation as a group representing approximately 1.44% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Corporation on a non-diluted basis.

    8.2          Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

    To the best knowledge of the Corporation, no director or officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation is, as at the date hereof or has been within the last ten years prior to the date hereof, (a) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued while the director or officer of the Corporation was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; (b) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued after the director or officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in such capacity; (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (d) became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

    To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director or executive officer of the Corporation, (a) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory or (b) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

    -36-


    8.3          Conflicts of Interest

    Certain directors and officers of the Corporation are also directors, officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and exploiting natural resource properties. Such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time.

    ITEM 9          PROMOTORS

    9.1          Not applicable.

    ITEM 10          LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS

    10.1          Legal Proceedings and Regulatory Actions

    There are no legal proceedings or regulatory actions, involving the Corporation or its properties as of the date of this AIF and the Corporation knows of no such proceedings currently contemplated.

    ITEM 11          INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

    11.1          Interest of Management and Others in Material Transactions

    Except as disclosed below or elsewhere in this AIF the Corporation is not aware of any material interest direct or indirect in which management, insiders or significant shareholders also have an interest.

    Services Agreement

    The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Services Agreement") with Paul Sarjeant and his duly registered sole proprietorship whereby Mr. Sarjeant agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Services Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Sarjeant CDN $12,500 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Services Agreement had a three year term ending October 27, 2009. The Services Agreement was extended under the same terms in October, 2009 and has a two year term ending October 27, 2011.

    Consulting Services Agreement

    The Corporation entered into a consulting services agreement (the "Consulting Services Agreement") with Michael Hitch whereby Mr. Hitch agreed to serve as the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the Consulting services Agreement, the Corporation agreed to pay Mr. Hitch CDN $6,250 per month in exchange for management, leadership and strategic business development services. The Consulting Services Agreement had a three month term ending September 12, 2006. Although Mr. Hitch is no longer serving as Chief Executive Officer, he continues to provide consulting services to the Corporation and the contract has been extended to December 31, 2007, with a further option for renewal until December 31, 2008. The Consulting Agreement was renewed in December 2007 for a further one year term but the payments under the Consulting Contract were reduced to CDN $5,000 per month. The option was not renewed by the Corporation in 2008 and Mr. Hitch no longer receives any compensation from the Corporation. The Corporation entered into a subsequent consulting services contract with Treswell Renewable Energy Corporation (“Treswell”) on April 1, 2010, through which Treswell has agreed to provide the services of Dr. Michael Hitch as an operational consultant to various projects the Corporation undertakes. The agreement has a one year term ending April 30, 2011 and can be renewed for one additional year upon agreement. Effective April 30, 2011 the contract was terminated.

    -37-


    July 21, 2009, the Corporation entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Miguel Angel Saldana Mujica to provide consulting services as they apply to the exploration, development and ancillary matters in connection with the Giulianita Project in Peru. Mr. Saldana receives compensation for his services of $US7,500 per month. The term of the contract is for a minimum one year, to a maximum of three years at the discretion of the Corporation based on certain accomplishments. Effective June 30, 2011 the contract was terminated.

    Personal Services Agreement

    The Corporation entered into a consulting agreement (the "Personal Services Agreement") dated November 10, 2005 with Ernest M. Cleave. Pursuant to the Personal Services Agreement, Mr. Cleave was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. Under the Personal Services Agreement Mr. Cleave receives $36,000 per year.

    ITEM 12          TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS

    12.1          Transfer Agents and Registrars

    Equity Financial Trust Company ("Equity") is the Corporation's transfer agent and registrar. Equity is located at Suite 400, 200 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 4H1.

    ITEM 13          MATERIAL CONTRACTS

    13.1          Material Contracts

    The following is a list of material contracts entered into by the Corporation since June, 2004 and still in effect at May 31, 2011. These do not include contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business:

      (a)

    Dixie Lake Property - Option agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. and the Corporation, effective dated as of August 26, 2005, relating to the Corporation’s option to acquire an interest in the Dixie Lake Property, Red Lake, Ontario.

         
      (b)

    Giulianta Property – Agreement dated July 2, 2009 between the Corporation and Mr. Miguel Angel Saldana Mujica relating to the Corporation’s option to acquire up to 100% interest in the Giulianita Property located in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru.

    -38-


    Particulars of each of these agreements have been provided elsewhere in this AIF.

    ITEM 14          INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

    14.1          Names of Experts

    Christopher Lee, M.Sc., P. Geo and SRK Consulting were both involved in the preparation and compilation of the SRK Report.

    14.2          Interests of Experts

    None.

    ITEM 15          AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN AN AIF

    The following information regarding the Audit Committee of the Corporation's Board of Directors is required to be disclosed pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees ("MI 52-110").

    Audit Committee Charter

    The text of the Audit Committee's charter is set out as Schedule "A" to this AIF.

    Composition of the Audit Committee

    The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown, Jack Austin and Peter Born. Each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Austin and Dr. Born are "independent" and "financially literate", as those terms are defined MI 52-110.

    Relevant Education and Experience

    The education and experience of each Audit Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as an audit committee member is as follows:

    Mr. Brown holds a Masters degree in finance from the Daniels School of Business at the University of Denver and a BA in Economics from the University of Guelph and has over 15 years experience in public company financing, corporate/capital structuring and development. Mr. Brown is on the board of a number of junior resource companies and is also a partner at Osprey Capital, a successful Toronto Investment Banking firm.

    Dr. Born holds a PhD in Earth Sciences received from Carleton University in 1996. Dr. Born has been involved in the mining industry since 1978 and has worked for both private and governmental entities. Throughout his career Dr. Born has, in addition to his scientific responsibilities, been responsible for overseeing the financial budgets and reporting requirements for teams of up to 30 people.

    -39-


    The Honourable Jack Austin, P.C., Q.C. is a graduate of law from University of British Columbia and Harvard Law School. He practiced law for nearly 20 years specializing in natural resource law, securities and finance. In public life he served for four years as Deputy Minister of Energy, Mines and Resources in Ottawa and thereafter as Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Trudeau, Cabinet Minister in the Trudeau government (1981-1984), and in the Martin Government (2003-2006). Mr Austin served as a Senator representing British Columbia from 1975 to 2007. He is currently Senior Advisor-International to Stern Partners and is a director of two public companies, and President of Centerpoint Resources.

    Reliance on Certain Exemptions in Sections 2.4, 3.2, 3.4 or 3.5 of MI 52-110

    This is not applicable.

    Reliance on the Exemptions in Subsection 3.3(2) or Section 3.6 of MI 52-110

    This is not applicable.

    Reliance on Section 3.8 of MI 52-110

    This is not applicable.

    Audit Committee Oversight

    This is not applicable.

    Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

    The policy of the Audit Committee regarding the engagement of non-audit services is set out at Section 7 of the Audit Committee's Charter, which is disclosed in its entirety as Schedule "A" hereto.

    External Auditor Service Fees (By Category)

    Audit Fees

    For its financial year ended May 31, 2011, $65,000 was accrued in favour of the Corporation's external auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, for audit services.

    Audit-Related Fees

    For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2011, $Nil was paid or accrued to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Corporation's financial statements which are not included in "Audit Fees", above.

    -40-


    Tax Fees

    For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2011, $Nil was accrued in favour of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

    All Other Fees

    For the Corporation's financial year ended May 31, 2011, $Nil was paid or accrued to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of products or services other than those reported under "Audit Fees", "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees", above.

    ITEM 16          ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Additional information relating to the Corporation may be found on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com.

    Information regarding directors' and officers' remuneration, principal holders of the Corporation's securities and securities authorized for issuance pursuant to equity compensation plans is contained in the Corporation's management proxy information circular for the last annual and special meeting of shareholders held on November 29, 2010.

    Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the year ended May, 31, 2011.

    -41-


    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
    SCHEDULE "A"
    TO ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
    FISCAL PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2011

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
    AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

    Name

    There shall be a committee of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") known as the Audit Committee.

    General Purpose

    The Audit Committee has been established to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the following areas: the Corporation's external audit function; internal control and management information systems; the Corporation's accounting and financial reporting requirements; the Corporation's compliance with law and regulatory requirements; the Corporation's risks and risk management policies and such other functions as are delegated to it by the Board. Specifically, with respect to the Corporation's external audit function, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: the quality and integrity of the Corporation's financial statements; the independent auditors' qualifications; and the performance of the Corporation's independent auditors.

    The Audit Committee is intended to facilitate and provide a means of open communication between management, the external auditors and the Board.

    Composition and Qualifications

    The Audit Committee shall consist of as many members as the Board shall determine, but in any event not fewer than three (3) members who are appointed by the Board. The composition of the Audit Committee shall meet all applicable independence, financial literacy and other legal and regulatory requirements. More specifically, all members of the Audit Committee shall be "unrelated"1 and "financially literate"2 and at least one (1) member shall have "accounting or related financial experience"3.

    The Board shall designate the Chairman of the Audit Committee and in so doing shall consider the recommendation of the Governance and Compensation Committee. The Chairman shall have responsibility for overseeing that the Committee fulfills its mandate and duties effectively.

    ____________________
    1 a director who is independent of management and is free from any interest and any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the director’s ability to act with a view to the best interests of the company, other than interests and relationships arising from shareholding.
    2 the ability to read and understand a balance sheet, an income statement, a cash flow statement and the notes attached thereto.
    3 the ability to analyse and interpret a full set of financial statements including the notes attached thereto, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

    -1-


    Each member of the Audit Committee shall continue to be a member until a successor is appointed, unless the member resigns, is removed or ceases to be a director. The Board, following consideration of the recommendation of the Governance and Compensation Committee, may fill a vacancy which occurs in the Audit Committee at any time.

    Meetings

    The Chairman of the Audit Committee, in consultation with the Audit Committee members, shall determine the schedule and frequency of the Audit Committee meetings provided that the Audit Committee will meet at least four (4) times in each fiscal year and at least once in every fiscal quarter. The Audit Committee shall have the authority to convene additional meetings as circumstances require. A schedule for each of the meetings will be disseminated to Audit Committee members prior to the start of each fiscal year. A detailed agenda for each meeting will be disseminated to Audit Committee members as far in advance of each meeting as is practicable.

    The Audit Committee shall meet separately, periodically, with management, counsel and the external auditors. The Audit Committee shall meet separately with the external auditors at every meeting of the Audit Committee at which external auditors are present.

    Responsibilities

    The Audit Committee is mandated to carry out the following responsibilities:

    4.

    External Auditors

         
    (a)

    Subject to applicable law, the Audit Committee shall be responsible for the appointment, compensation, oversight and termination of the external auditor. The external auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee and shall be accountable to the Board and Audit Committee as representatives of the shareholders.

         
    (b)

    The Audit Committee shall pre-approve all non-audit mandates for services the external auditor shall undertake.

         
    (c)

    The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself, on behalf of the Board, that the external auditor is independent of management. In assessing such independence, the Audit Committee shall discuss with the external auditors, and may require a letter from the external auditor outlining, any relationships between the external auditors and the Corporation or its affiliates.

         
    (d)

    The Audit Committee shall review the audit plan of the external auditors, the integration of the external audit with the internal control program, and the results of the audit, which shall include reviewing the external auditor’s letter to management and management’s response thereto and other material written communications between management and the external auditors.

    -2-



    (e)

    The Audit Committee shall satisfy itself, annually or more frequently as the Audit Committee considers appropriate, as to the external auditors' internal quality control procedures and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the external auditor, or by any public enquiry, review, or investigation by governmental, professional or other regulatory authorities.

       
    (f)

    The Audit Committee shall periodically review and discuss with management and the external auditors the quality and acceptability of the Corporation’s accounting policies and practices, the materiality levels which the external auditors propose to employ, any significant changes in the accounting policies and any proposed changes in accounting or financial reporting that may have a significant impact on the Corporation.

       
    (g)

    The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management by the external auditors, the ramifications of these alternative treatments and the treatment preferred by the external auditors.

       
    5.

    Financial Information

       
    (a)

    The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors whether the audited annual financial statements present fairly (in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles) in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of and for the periods presented and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board, the annual audited financial statements of the Corporation.

       
    (b)

    The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors whether the unaudited quarterly financial statements present fairly (in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of and for the periods presented and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board, the unaudited quarterly financial statements of the Corporation.

       
    (c)

    The Audit Committee shall review the Annual Report to Shareholders and other financial information (including the annual and quarterly Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Annual Information Form and any prospectus or offering circular) prepared by the Corporation with management and, where appropriate, recommend for approval to the Board and recommend for filing with regulatory bodies.

       
    (d)

    The Audit Committee shall review any news releases and reports to be issued by the Corporation containing earnings guidance or financial information for research, analysts and rating agencies. The Audit Committee shall also review the Corporation's policies relating to financial disclosure and the release of earnings guidance and the Corporation's compliance with financial disclosure rules and regulations.

    -3-


    The Audit Committee shall discuss with management and the external auditors important trends and developments in financial reporting practices and requirements and their effect on the Corporation's financial statements.

    6.

    Internal Control

       
    (a)

    The Audit Committee shall oversee the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control systems, through discussions with the Corporation’s external auditors and management and shall report to the Board on an annual basis.

       
    (b)

    The Audit Committee shall review annually the Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and its effectiveness and enforcement.

       
    7.

    Risk Management

       
    (a)

    The Audit Committee shall review with management the principal risks facing the Corporation, and the policies, processes and procedures for management’s monitoring and managing of such risks or exposures. If necessary, the Audit Committee will mandate, monitor and evaluate the steps management has taken to monitor and manage such exposures, including insuring against such risks, where appropriate.

       
    8.

    Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Requirements

       
    (a)

    The Audit Committee shall review with management, and any internal or external counsel as the Committee considers appropriate, any legal matters (including the status of pending litigation) that may have a material impact on the Corporation and any material reports or inquiries from regulatory or governmental agencies.

       
    (b)

    The Audit Committee shall review with counsel the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation's procedures to ensure compliance with the legal and regulatory responsibilities.

       
    9.

    Other

       
    (a)

    The Audit Committee shall also perform such other activities related to this Charter as requested by the Board.

       
      (b)

    The Audit Committee shall review and assess the adequacy of this Charter annually and shall submit any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

         
    (c)

    The Audit Committee may delegate its authority and duties to subcommittees or individual members of the Committee as it deems appropriate.

    -4-



    Reporting

    The Audit Committee shall report its deliberations and discussions regularly to the Board and shall submit to the Board the minutes of its meetings.

    Resources

    The Audit Committee shall have the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain independent legal, accounting and other consultants to advise the Audit Committee at the expense of the Corporation. The Audit Committee shall be provided with the necessary funding to compensate the external auditors and any other advisors they engage.

    The Audit Committee may request any officer or employee of the Corporation or the Corporation’s external counsel or external auditors to attend a meeting of the Audit Committee or to meet with any member of, or consultants to, the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall have full access to all of the Corporation's books, records, facilities and personnel.

    Complaints Procedure

    Any director, officer or employee who has any concern or complaints regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters or any potential violations of law or regulatory provisions may, in accordance with the Code of Business Conduct, make an anonymous submission to any member of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall establish procedures for the review and resolution of such complaints.

    Limitation on the Oversight Role of the Audit Committee

    Nothing in this Charter is intended, or may be construed, to impose on any member of the Committee a standard of care or diligence that is in any way more onerous or extensive than the standard to which all members of the Board are subject. Each member of the Committee shall be entitled, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to rely on the integrity of those persons and organizations within and outside the Corporation from whom he or she receives financial and other information, and the accuracy of the information provided to the Corporation by such persons or organizations.

    While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Corporation’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada and applicable rules and regulations. These are the responsibility of management and the external auditors.

    -5-


    EX-99.83 84 exhibit99-83.htm EXHIBIT 99.83 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.83 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.83

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
    YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2011

    The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2011 (“2011”), the three months ended May 31, 2011 (“fourth quarter 2011”) and its financial position as at May 31, 2011. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2011. The comparative reporting periods are the year ended May 31, 2010 (“2010”) and the three months ended May 31, 2010 (“fourth quarter 2010”).

    Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (“Canadian GAAP”). Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars. A summary of the differences in Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”), which affects the Company, is contained in Note 15 to the audited annual consolidated financial statements for 2011.

    Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

    The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

    This MD&A was prepared on August 29, 2011.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

    OVERALL PERFORMANCE

    Overview and Corporate History

    Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in the province of Ontario, Canada and in Peru.

    Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).


    Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

    Activities during 2011

    During 2011 the Company started and currently continues with its diamond drill program at its Dixie Lake project in Red Lake, Ontario. The Company has completed the drilling phase of the program and are currently awaiting results. In total, 9 holes were drilled for approximately 2,100 meters of core. The objectives of the program are to confirm historic intercepts, define additional mineralization and to allow Grandview to bring to NI 43-101 standard the historic resource at the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones. Once all data is received the Company will undertake a study of past drill results, current information and will work towards creating new geological and resource models.

    During 2011 Grandview continued it’s strong on the ground presence within communities associated with the Giulianita project in Piura, northern Peru. The Company’s Peruvian based community relations team continued to work with local community and special interest groups to further community and corporate interests. Grandview management made several trips to the project site to aid in moving ahead discussion. Importantly however, the Company was unable to make any further headway with the local community council during the fourth quarter 2011 and Grandview has temporarily ceased funding this project. The Company is committed to honouring its agreements with local community members and groups if the local community council is prepared to deliver to the Company the necessary rights required to advance exploration and development work.

    The Company continued to pursue additional opportunities within Peru, South America and Canada that meet our corporate objective of identifying small-scale, high-grade development opportunities.

    Private Placement

    On December 31, 2010 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement with the MineralFields Group. This placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,066,666 flow-through units in the capital of the Company at a purchase price of $0.075 per flow-through unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $605,000. Each flow-through unit consists of one common share of the Company issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company on a non flow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the second twelve months.

    In connection with this placement, the Company paid eligible persons a cash fee of 6.0% of the gross proceeds raised through each finder under the offering and also issued finder's warrants equal to 7.5% of the total number of flow-through units placed by such finders. Each finder's warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit with each finder's unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, the Company paid $36,300 in cash fees to the finders and issued 604,999 finder's warrants to the finders. In addition, the Company also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,255 in connection with the placement.

    Properties and Projects

    The Company focused its fieldwork and exploration activities on the Giulianita Property and Red Lake Property during 2011.

    Giulianita Property, Peru

    The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C., has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

    2


    The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,000 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

    Efforts focused on negotiations with the local community for surface access rights to the project area and working with local community groups, government groups and consulting engineering groups in advance of surface exploration work.

    During 2011 and the fourth quarter 2011, the Company spent $370,916 and $67,292 respectively on preliminary exploration and fieldwork and property acquisition costs, compared with $275,804 and $102,278 respectively for 2010 and the fourth quarter 2010. Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to May 31, 2011 were $646,720. In June 2011 the Company suspended expenditures until the local community is able to deliver key surface access rights to allow the Company to carry out advanced exploration and development plans on the Giulianita property. The Company will continue to monitor developments in the region and will access its position over the coming months.

    Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

    Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

    Grandview has a 67% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”). During the previous quarter Fronteer Gold Corp. accepted additional expenditures that increased the Companies holding in the Dixie Lake property to 67% from the previous 64% level.

    April 28, 2010 Grandview acquired the final 40% interest and now has a 100% interest in ten (10) unpatented mining claims, located in Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”) from joint venture partner EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and eliminated all net smelter royalties previously due to EMCO under the terms of the original agreement. The Company negotiated the acquisition of two additional unpatented mining claims and two patented mining claims, and reduced the net smelter royalty on the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property to 0.375% as part of an overall property position.

    Exploration costs of $48,070 and $41,336 respectively were incurred during 2011 and the fourth quarter 2011 on the Red Lake Properties (2010: $431,174; fourth quarter 2010: $162,930). Cumulative exploration and acquisition costs incurred from the inception of the exploration stage to May 31, 2011 were $3,922,037.

    Results of Operations

    2011

    Grandview incurred a net loss of $408,907 for 2011, compared with $880,403 for 2010. The reason for the variance is attributable to share-based payment expense of $449,491 incurred during 2010, compared with $Nil for 2011.

    Cash flows used in operating activities for 2011 of $413,261 compares with $396,559 for 2010.

    3


    Fourth quarter 2011

    Grandview incurred a net loss of $138,222 for the fourth quarter 2011, compared with $106,941 for the corresponding period last year. Cash used in operating activities of $43,346 for the fourth quarter compares with $76,904 for the corresponding period last year.

    SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

    The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.

      Fourth Third Second First
      Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
      May. 31, Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31,
      2011 2011 2010 2010
    Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
    Expenses 140,298 98,636 88,330 84,321
    Net loss (138,222) (98,460) (87,967) (84,258)
    Net loss per share (0.01) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00)
    Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (43,346) (121,087) (140,233) (108,595)
    Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,202,965 1,327,653 993,568 1,251,189
    Assets 5,865,572 5,856,855 5,442,629 5,565,995

      Fourth Third Second First
      Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
      May 31, Feb. 28, Nov. 30, Aug. 31,
      2010 2010 2009 2009
    Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
    Expenses 135,455 176,465 107,809 460,325
    Net income (loss) (106,941) (202,743) (107,679) (463,040)
    Net income (loss) per share (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01)
    Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (76,904) (373,500) 119,243 (65,398)
    Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,457,861 1,754,330 232,744 324,654
    Assets 5,660,623 5,698,180 4,093,313 3,934,256

    LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

    Grandview’s working capital on May 31, 2011 was $1,155,078 compared with $1,407,869 on May 31, 2010. The cash and short-term investment balance on May 31, 2011 was $1,177,679 and $25,286 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2010 of $1,432,824 and $25,037 respectively.

    The private placement of December 31, 2010 resulted in the issuance of 8,066,666 flow-through units, in turn comprised of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (4,033,332 common shares equivalent), for gross proceeds of $605,000. In addition finder’s warrants (604,999 common shares equivalent) were issued as part of the transaction.

    375,000 stock options were cancelled during 2011 and 250,00 stock options expired (no financial impact).

    333,333 warrants were exercised during 2011 for gross proceeds of $16,667.

    4


    The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

    The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at August 29, 2011 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

    DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

    The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of May 31, 2011 and April 14, 2011, the Company had outstanding 81,163,032 common shares, 31,304,996 warrants and 5,400,000 stock options.

    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

    For 2011, $Nil (2010: $10,000, 2009: $35,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

    For 2011, $150,000 (2010: $150,010, 2009: $150,000) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $75,250 (2010: $90,250, 2009: $62,250) capitalized to mining interests. Also, during 2011, car allowances of $Nil (2010: $Nil, 2009: $14,000) and office allowances of $Nil (2010: $Nil, 2009: $607) were paid.

    For 2011, $33,000 (2010: $39,000, 2009 - $51,794) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer or a company controlled by the Chief Financial officer. Included in accounts payable as at May 31, 2011 is $Nil (2010: $6,000, 2009: $Nil) in relation to consulting services rendered.

    In 2007, the Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The loan was unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO in 2009 and 2010.

    Effective November 30, 2010, the Company entered into two agreements in respect of the sale of four mining claims owned by it and located in Manitoba, being the Packsak, Clapelou Patent Claims, CUPP2 Frac and CUPP3 Frac (collectively, the "Claims"). Two of the four Claims were transferred to Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint") and the remaining two were transferred to Centershield Gold Mines Inc., a subsidiary of Centerpoint. The Company received nominal cash consideration on closing and retained a 1% NSR over the Claims. Two directors of the Company are senior officers with Centrepoint.

    OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

    See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

    PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

    There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

    5


    CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

    The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

    Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

    Assessment of Recoverability of Mineral Property Costs

    The Company’s recorded value of its exploration properties is based on historical costs that expect to be recovered in the future. The Company’s recoverability evaluation is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineral resources associated with the properties and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.

    Assessment of Recoverability of Future Income Tax Assets

    In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income tax obligations. This process involves estimating the actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company assesses, based on all available evidence, the likelihood that the future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that recovery cannot be considered “more likely than not,” a valuation allowance is established. If the valuation allowance is changed in a period, an expense or benefit must be included within the tax provision on the consolidated income statement.

    Estimate of Stock Based Compensation and Associated Assumptions

    The Company recorded stock-based compensation based on an estimate of the fair value on the grant date of stock options issued. This accounting required estimates of interest rate, life of options, stock price volatility and the application of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

    Assessment of Recoverability of Receivables Including VAT

    The carrying amount of accounts receivables, and Value Added Tax are considered representative of their respective values. The Company assesses the likelihood that these receivables will be recovered and, to the extent that recovery is considered doubtful a provision for doubtful accounts is recorded.

    Estimate of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

    Where the fair value of a financial instrument is different than its carrying value disclosure of the estimated fair value is required. The fair value disclosed is based on management estimates using assumptions such as market interest rates.

    Going Concern Assumption

    These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business as they come due.

    The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to fund its working capital and exploration requirements and eventually to generate positive cash flows, either from operations or sale of properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the reported expenses and balance sheet classifications that would be necessary were the going concern assumption inappropriate, and these adjustments could be material.

    6


    Asset Retirement Obligations

    Future costs to retire an asset including dismantling, remediation and ongoing treatment, and monitoring of the site are recognized and recorded as a liability at fair value. The liability is accreted, over time through periodic charges to earnings. In addition, asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the asset's carrying value and amortized over the asset’s useful life.

    The Company has an obligations relating to the retirement of its assets and a liability has been recognized as at May 31, 2011 of $12,718, compared with $13,699 as at May 31, 2010.

    The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is quite possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

    Significant Accounting Policies

    Please refer to Note 2 to the Company’s audited annual consolidated financials statements for a full discussion of its significant accounting policies.

    Future Accounting Changes

    International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

    In January 2006, the CICA’s Accounting Standards Board ("AcSB") formally adopted the strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with IFRS for Canadian enterprises with public accountability. The current conversion timetable calls for financial reporting under IFRS for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of IFRS on its consolidated financial statements.

    FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

    At the close of the most recent fiscal period, the financial instruments of the Company consisted of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, sundry receivable, reclamation bond and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Grandview does not expect to be exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The Company estimates that the fair values of all its financial instruments approximate their carrying values.

    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

    The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of May 31, 2011, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

    Management has concluded that, as of May 31, 2011, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

    Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during 2011 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

    7


    STATUS OF GRANDVIEW’S TRANSITION TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (“IFRS”)

    The CICA announced that publicly accountable enterprises would be required to transition from GAAP to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), effective January 1, 2011. This mandate is first applicable to interim reporting periods during fiscal 2012 and also requires the presentation of comparative financial information for 2011. For this reason, the effective conversion for the Company’s reporting purposes is June 1, 2010.

    The Company established an IFRS plan and has tasked a service provider and a professional service firm with developing the transitional reporting under IFRS. The plan calls for four phases, being the scoping and planning phase, the assessment phase, the implementation phase and post-implementation.

    Progress on IFRS Transition Plan

    The progress to date may be summarized as follows:

    Scoping and planning phase – complete.

    Assessment phase – substantially complete, expected to be completed by fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

    Implementation phase – in progress; to be finalized before October 15, 2011.

    Post-implementation – November 2011 and thereafter.

    To date, the Company’s evaluation of potential changes to accounting policies in key areas are summarized below. The list is in no way intended to represent a complete list of areas where adoption of IFRS will require a change in accounting policies, but does highlight the most significant areas identified to date. Changes and ongoing developments regarding IFRS as developed by the International Accounting Standards Board may have an effect on the changes required to the Company’s accounting policies on adoption of IFRS, but is not anticipated that such changes would require substantial changes to the summary presented below.

    First-time Adoption of IFRS

    The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS 1”), which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS, effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

    The Company has identified the following optional exemptions that it expects to apply in its preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at June 1, 2009:

    • To apply IFRS 2 Share-based Payments only to equity instruments issued after November 7, 2002, and that had not vested by the transition date.
    • To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the transition date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the transition date.
    • To apply the Fair Value as Deemed Cost election to certain assets that have previously been impaired under Canadian GAAP in prior periods.

    Prior to reporting interim financial statements in accordance with IFRS for the quarter ending August 31, 2011, the Company may decide to apply other optional exemptions contained in IFRS 1. IFRS 1 does not permit changes to estimates that have been made previously. Accordingly, estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s opening IFRS statement of financial position as at the transition date will be consistent with those made under current Canadian GAAP. If necessary, estimates will be adjusted to reflect any difference in accounting policy.

    8


    Impact of Adopting IFRS on the Company’s Business

    Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

    Subject to certain conditions, IFRS currently allows an entity to determine an accounting policy that specifies the treatment of costs related to the exploration for and evaluation of mineral properties. The Company expects to establish an accounting policy to continue to capitalise exploration and evaluation expenditures under IFRS.

    The application of this policy on the adoption of IFRS will not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    Impairment of (Non-financial) Assets

    IFRS requires a write down of assets if the higher of the fair market value and the value in use of a group of assets is less than its carrying value. Value in use is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows. Current Canadian GAAP requires a write down to estimated fair value only if the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of a group of assets are less than its carrying value. The Company's accounting policies related to impairment of non-financial assets will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect that this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets. The Company will perform impairment assessments in accordance with IFRS at the transition date.

    Share-based Payments

    In certain circumstances, IFRS requires a different measurement of stock-based compensation related to stock options than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to share-based payments that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

    Asset Retirement Obligations (Decommissioning Liabilities)

    IFRS requires the recognition of a decommissioning liability for legal or constructive obligations, while current Canadian GAAP only requires the recognition of such liabilities for legal obligations. A constructive obligation exists when an entity has created reasonable expectations that it will take certain actions. The Company's accounting policies related to decommissioning liabilities will be changed to reflect these differences. However, the Company does not expect this change will have an immediate impact on the carrying value of its assets.

    Property and Equipment

    IFRS contains different guidance related to recognition and measurement of property and equipment than current Canadian GAAP. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to property and equipment that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

    Income Taxes

    In certain circumstances, IFRS contains different requirements related to recognition and measurement of future (deferred) income taxes. The Company does not expect any changes to its accounting policies related to income taxes that would result in a significant change to line items within its consolidated financial statements.

    9


    OUTLOOK

    The Company has ceased funding its Giulianita project in Peru and is currently focusing it attention on the diamond drilling program and modeling at the Dixie Lake project, Red Lake, Ontario. The company plans to execute a 2,200 m drill program to confirm and update a historical resource to a 43-101 standard. As part of the exploration program a 3-D geological model and resource model has been updated and drill targets have been identified. The Company plans to execute this program and complete a new resource model during late 2011.

    The Company continues to identify and evaluate high grade, near term production projects within Canada, Peru and South America in general.

    RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

    At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

    Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

    For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2011, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

    The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion and in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

    The Company is committed to spend $605,000 raised in conjunction with the December 31, 2010 flow-through private placement on eligible Canadian exploration expenditures by on or before December 31, 2011.

    MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

    10


    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

    11


    EX-99.84 85 exhibit99-84.htm EXHIBIT 99.84 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.84 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.84

    FORM 52-109F1
    CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
    FULL CERTIFICATE

    I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

    1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc., (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended May 31, 2011.

    2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

    3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

    4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

    5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

      1.

    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

           
      1.

    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

           
      2.

    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

           
      2.

    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

    5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

    5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

    5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A

    6. Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have

      1.

    evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

         
      2.

    evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A




      1.

    our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

         
      2.

    N/A

    7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2011 and ended on May 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

    8. Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

    Date: August 29, 2011

              ”Ernest Cleave”          
    Ernest Cleave
    Chief Financial Officer


    EX-99.85 86 exhibit99-85.htm EXHIBIT 99.85 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.85 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.85

    FORM 52-109F1
    CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
    FULL CERTIFICATE

    I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

    1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc., (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended May 31, 2011.

    2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

    3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

    4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

    5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

      1.

    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

           
      1.

    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

           
      2.

    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

           
      2.

    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

    5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

    5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

    5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A

    6. Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have

      1.

    evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

         
      2.

    evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A




      1.

    our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

         
      2.

    N/A

    7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2011 and ended on May 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

    8. Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR.

    Date: August 29, 2011

              ”Paul Sargeant”       
    Paul Sargeant
    Chief Executive Officer


    EX-99.86 87 exhibit99-86.htm EXHIBIT 99.86 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.86 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.86

    FORM 13-502F1
    CLASS 1 REPORTING ISSUERS – PARTICIPATION FEE

    Reporting Issuer Name: Grandview Gold, Inc.

    End date of last completed fiscal year: May 31, 2011

    Market value of listed or quoted securities:      
    Total number of securities of a class or series outstanding as at the end of the issuer’s last completed fiscal year 81,163,032 (i)  
           
           
    Simple average of the closing price of that class or series as of the last trading day of each month in the last completed fiscal year (See clauses 2.7(a)(ii)(A) and (B) of the Rule) 0.069 (ii)  
           
           
    Market value of class or series (i) X (ii) =   5,613,770 (A)
           
           
    (Repeat the above calculation for each other class or series of securities of the reporting issuer that was listed or quoted on a marketplace in Canada or the United States of America at the end of the last completed fiscal year)   (B)
           
           
    Market value of other securities at end of the last completed fiscal year:  
    (See paragraph 2.7(b) of the Rule) (Provide details of how value was determined)   (C)
           
           
    (Repeat for each other class or series of securities to which paragraph 2.7(b) of the Rule applies)   (D)
           
    Capitalization for the last completed fiscal year      
    (Add market value of all classes and series of securities) (A) + (B) + (C) + (D) =   5,613,770
           
           
    Participation Fee      
    (From Appendix A of the Rule, select the participation fee beside the capitalization calculated above)   $820
           
           
    Late Fee, if applicable      
    (As determined under section 2.5 of the Rule)      


    EX-99.87 88 exhibit99-87.htm EXHIBIT 99.87 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.87 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.87

     
     
     

    Grandview Gold Inc.

    (An Exploration Stage Company)

    Consolidated Financial Statements

    May 31, 2011 and 2010

    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

     

     


    Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

    The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise) were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the year end consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances. Management also accepts responsibility for ensuring the use of appropriate accounting policies and estimates in disclosure of information prepared following accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

    Management has established systems of internal control over the financial reporting process, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that relevant and reliable financial information is produced.

    The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities and for reviewing and approving the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the internal controls over the financial reporting process and the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the year end consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

    Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

    Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

    Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on “Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Guidance For Smaller Public Companies” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at May 31, 2011.

    Conclusion Relating to Disclosure Controls and Procedures

    An evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Multilateral Instrument 52-109. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at May 31, 2011.

    (signed) (signed)
       
    Paul T. Sargeant Ernest Cleave
    Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
       
       
       
    Toronto, Canada  
    August 29, 2011  

     


    August 29, 2011

    Independent Auditor’s Report

    To the shareholders of Grandview Gold Inc.

    We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. (the Company), which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at May 31, 2011 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes, which comprise a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

    Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements

    Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

    Auditor’s responsibility

    Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. Canadian generally accepted auditing standards require that we comply with ethical requirements.

    An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audit is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.


    Opinion

    In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Grandview Gold Inc. as at May 31, 2011 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

    Emphasis of matter

    Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to note 1 in the consolidated financial statements which describes matters and conditions that indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

    Other matter

    The consolidated financial statements of the Company as at May 31, 2010 and for the years ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 were audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on those statements on August 17, 2010. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.

    (Signed) “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”
    Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
    Toronto, Ontario

     



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    As at May 31,
      2011     2010  
    Assets            
    Current assets            
         Cash and cash equivalents $  1,177,679   $  1,432,824  
         Short term investments (Note 5)   25,286     25,037  
         GST and sundry receivable   63,414     26,416  
         Prepaid expenses   17,718     12,876  
        1,284,097     1,497,153  
    Reclamation bond (Note 6)   12,718     13,699  
    Mining interests (Note 7)   4,568,757     4,149,771  
      $  5,865,572   $  5,660,623  
    Liabilities            
    Current liabilities            
         Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 14) $  129,019   $  89,284  
    Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)   12,718     13,699  
        141,737     102,983  
    Shareholders' equity   5,723,835     5,557,640  
      $  5,865,572   $  5,660,623  

    Nature of operations and going concern assumption (Note 1)

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    Approved by the Board of Directors:
    "Paul T. Sarjeant" , Director
    "Richard Brown" , Director

    2



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

    For the Year Ended May 31,
      2011     2010     2009  
                       
    Expenses                  
    Share-based payments (Note 10) $  -   $  449,491   $  -  
    Investor relations, business development                  
         and reporting issuer maintenance costs   85,387     115,352     88,716  
    Professional fees   153,760     142,354     167,672  
    Management and consulting services (Note 14)   107,750     98,750     255,201  
    Office and administration   58,120     69,107     21,579  
    Exploration evaluation expenses   8,568     5,000     19,885  
    Flow-through interest expense   -     -     2,747  
    Gain on disposition of mineral property rights   (2,000 )   -     -  
    Write-off of mineral properties (Note 7)   -     -     7,460,454  
                       
        411,585     880,054     8,016,254  
                       
    Loss before the under noted   (411,585 )   (880,054 )   (8,016,254 )
    Future tax expense   2,678     (349 )   7,503  
                       
    Loss before income taxes   (408,907 )   (880,403 )   (8,008,751 )
    Future tax expense   -     -     (120,833 )
                       
    Net loss and comprehensive loss for the year $  (408,907 ) $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 )
                       
    Loss per share – Basic and diluted (Note 11) $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.20 )

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    3



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


        Share     Warrants     Contributed     Accumulated     Total  
        Capital           Surplus     Deficit        
                                   
    At May 31, 2008   14,202,266     3,742,570     4,789,944     (11,193,260 )   11,541,520  
                                   
    Mineral property acquisition   10,800     -     -     -     10,800  
    Private placement   416,666     -     -     -     416,666  
    Cost of issue – cash   (47,833 )   -     -     -     (47,833 )
    Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   (30,666 )   30,666     -     -     -  
    Flow-through cost of issue   (120,833 )   -     -           (120,833 )
    Warrants expired   -     (2,569,432 )   2,569,432     -     -  
    Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (7,887,918 )   (7,887,918 )
                                   
    At May 31, 2009 $ 14,430,400   $ 1,203,804   $  7,359,376   $  (19,081,178 ) $  3,912,402  

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    4



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company
    Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


                    Contributed     Accumulated        
        Share Capital     Warrants     Surplus     Deficit     Total  
                                   
    At May 31, 2009 $  14,430,400   $  1,203,804   $  7,359,376   $ (19,081,178 ) $  3,912,402  
                          -        
    Share-based payments   28,875     -     449,491     -     478,366  
    Exercise of warrants   16,667     -     -     -     16,667  
    Fair value of warrants exercised   15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  
    Mineral property acquisition   67,000     -     -     -     67,000  
    Private placement   2,000,000     -     -     -     2,000,000  
    Cost of issue – cash   (36,392 )   -     -     -     (36,392 )
    Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   (1,440,000 )   1,440,000     -     -     -  
    Warrants exercised   -     (1,173,138 )   1,173,138     -     -  
    Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (880,403 )   (880,403 )
                                   
    At May 31, 2010 $  15,081,883   $  1,455,333   $ 8,982,005   $ (19,961,581 ) $  5,557,640  
    Exercise of warrants   16,667     -     -     -     16,667  
    Fair value of warrants exercised   15,333     (15,333 )   -     -     -  
    Private placement   605,000     -     -     -     605,000  
    Warrant valuation   (43,776 )   43,776     -     -     -  
    Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   (25,591 )   25,591     -     -     -  
    Cost of issue – cash   (46,565 )   -     -     -     (46,565 )
    Net loss for the year   -     -     -     (408,907 )   (408,907 )
                                   
    At May 31, 2011 $  15,602,951   $  1,509,367   $  8,982,005   $ (20,370,488 ) $  5,723,835  

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    5



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    For the Year Ended May 31,   2011     2010     2009  
                       
    Cash flows from operating activities                  
    Net loss for the year $  (408,907 ) $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 )
    Items not involving cash:                  
           Gain on disposition of mineral property interests   (2,000 )   -     -  
           Share-based payments   -     478,366     -  
           Future income tax recovery   -     -     (120,833 )
           Accrued interest income   (249 )   (37 )   (7,493 )
           Write-off of mineral properties   -     -     7,460,454  
    Changes in non-cash working capital items:                  
           GST and sundry receivable   (36,998 )   (20,709 )   34,957  
           Prepaid expenses   (4,842 )   (593 )   137,883  
           Due from a related party   -     10,000     80,000  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   39,735     16,817     (46,059 )
                       
    Cash flows used in operating activities   (413,261 )   (396,559 )   (349,009 )
                       
    Cash flows from financing activities                  
    Share issuance   621,667     2,016,667     416,666  
    Cost of issuance   (46,565 )   (36,392 )   (47,833 )
                       
    Cash flows provided by financing activities   575,102     1,980,275     368,833  
                       
    Cash flows from investing activities                  
    Redemption of short term investments   -     382,493     611,410  
    Proceeds on disposition of mineral property interests   2,000     -     -  
    Expenditures on mining interests   (418,986 )   (639,978 )   (609,497 )
                       
    Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities $  (416,986 ) $  (257,485 ) $  1,913  
                       
    Change in cash and cash equivalents during the year $  (255,145 ) $  1,326,231   $  21,737  
                       
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year   1,432,824     106,593     84,856  
                       
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $  1,177,679   $  1,432,824   $  106,593  
                       
    Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions                  
    Share issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  67,000   $  10,800  

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    6



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Supplemental Schedule of Mineral Properties
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    For the Year Ended May 31,   2011     2010     2009  
    Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project,                  
           Nevada, USA (Note 7(a))                  
    Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  -   $  5,679,340  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   -     -     90,775  
           Project administration and general   -     -     38,848  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   -     -     94,379  
           Write-off               (5,903,342 )
           Total activity during the period   -     -     (5,679,340 )
    Balance, end of period: $  -   $  -   $  -  
    Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Note 7(b))                  
    Balance, beginning of period $  3,873,967   $  3,442,793   $  3,275,971  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   39,336     272,911     166,146  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   8,734     158,263     676  
           Total activity during the period   48,070     431,174     166,822  
    Balance, end of period $  3,922,037   $  3,873,967   $  3,442,793  
    Rice Lake Gold Camp                  
           Manitoba Canada (Note 7(c))                  
    Balance, beginning of period $  -   $  -   $  1,327,639  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   -     -     218,436  
           Project administration and general   -     -     227  
           Property acquisition and holding costs   -     -     10,810  
           Write-off   -     -     (1,557,112 )
           Total activity during the period   -     -     (1,327,639 )
    Balance, end of end $  275,804   $  -   $  -  
    Giulianita Property                  
           Peru (Note 7(d))                  
    Balance, beginning of period $  275,804   $  -   $  -  
           Drilling, assays and related field work   370,906     234,872     -  
           Project administration and general   -     40,932     -  
           Total activity during the period   370,916     275,804     -  
    Balance, end of period: $  646,720   $  275,804   $  -  
    Total $  4,568,757   $  4,149,771   $  3,442,793  

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    7



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    1.

    Nature of Operations and Going Concern

         

    Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North and South America.

         

    The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage. As such, the Company applies Accounting Guideline 11 "Enterprises in the Development Stage" as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' ("CICA") Handbook.

         

    The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") applicable to a going concern entity which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. The ability of the Company to continue operations is dependent upon obtaining the necessary financing to complete the development of its mineral property. Management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the following paragraph. The consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and liquidate its liabilities and commitments in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

         

    The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management will pursue funding initiatives if, as and when required to meet the Company's requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful or sufficient.

         
    2.

    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

         

    The significant accounting policies for the Company are as follows:

         
    (a)

    Basis of Presentation

         

    The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada.

         

    A summary of the differences between Canadian GAAP and those generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") which affect the Company is contained in Note 15.

    8



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    2.

    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

         
    (b)

    Basis of Consolidation

         

    These consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. ("Grandview USA"), and Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C. ("Recuperacion"). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.

         
    (c)

    Use of Estimates

         

    The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination of the recoverability of mining interest costs, the asset retirement obligation, the valuation allowance relating to the future tax asset, the calculation of share-based payments expense and warrants. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

         
    (d)

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

         

    Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, balances with banks and cash in trust with original maturities of three months or less and which are readily convertible into cash.

         
    (e)

    Mineral Property Costs

         

    Direct exploration and development costs are deferred in the accounts, net of amounts recovered from third parties, including receipts from options. At production, these costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method based on estimated proven and probable reserves. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written-off when the decision to abandon is made, or earlier if a determination is made that the property does not have economically recoverable reserves.

         

    The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its properties. On a regular basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. If after the review, it is determined that the carrying amount of a mining interest is impaired, that mining interest is written- down to its estimated net realizable value. A mining interest is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

         

    The amounts shown for mining properties do not necessarily represent present or future values. Their recoverability is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof.

    9



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    2.

    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

         
    (f)

    Flow-Through Financing

         

    The Company has financed a portion of its exploration activities through the issue of flow-through shares in the past, which transfer the tax deductibility of exploration expenditures to the investor. Proceeds received on the issue of such shares have been credited to share capital and the related exploration costs have been charged to mineral properties. Resource expenditure deductions for income tax purposes related to exploration and development activities funded by flow-through share arrangements are renounced to investors in accordance with income tax legislation. When these expenditures are renounced, temporary taxable differences created by the renunciations reduce share capital.

         
    (g)

    Short Term Investments

         

    Short term investments comprise investments in guaranteed investment certificates due to mature within one year from the date of purchase. These investments are classified as "loans and receivables" and have been recorded at their amortized cost.

         
    (h)

    Asset Retirement Obligation

         

    Section 3110 of the CICA Handbook requires the recognition of a liability for obligations relating to the retirement of property, plant and equipment and obligations arising from acquisition, construction, development or normal operations of those assets. The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation ("ARO") in the year in which a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The estimates are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. It is possible that the Company's estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities associated with any mine or facility built will change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates. Consequently, changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimated undiscounted cash flows will be recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and related long-lived asset. The liability will be increased for the passage of time and reported as an operating expense (accretion cost). The estimated cost associated with the retirement of the mineral properties is capitalized to those assets and will be amortized when these assets are put into production at amortization rates assigned to those assets.

         

    As at May 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not have any asset retirement obligations, except for that described in note 7(a).

         
    (i)

    Income Taxes

         

    Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method of tax accounting. Under this method, current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable for the current period. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and on unclaimed losses carried forward and are measured using the substantially enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse or losses are expected to be utilized. Future tax assets are recorded to recognize tax benefits only to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not they will be realized.

         
    (j)

    Share-Based Payments

         

    The fair value of the stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and management's assumptions as disclosed in Note 10 and is recorded as share-based payments over the vesting period of the stock-options, with the offsetting credit recorded as an increase in contributed surplus. If the stock options are exercised, the proceeds are credited to share capital and the fair value at the date of grant is reclassified from contributed surplus to share capital.

    10



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    2.

    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

         
    (k)

    Share Issue Costs

         

    Share issue costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital.

         
    (l)

    Translation of Foreign Currencies

         

    The Company's subsidiaries are accounted for as an integrated foreign operation. Transactions of the Company and its subsidiaries originating in foreign currencies are translated at the rates in effect at the time of the transaction. Monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are translated to Canadian dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and non-monetary items are translated at historical exchange rates. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations, in the consolidated statement of loss.

         
    (m)

    Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement

         

    All financial instruments are classified into one of the following five categories: held-for-trading, held-to maturity, loans and receivables, available-for-sale financial assets or other financial liabilities. All financial instruments, including derivatives, are measured in the balance sheet at fair value except for loans and receivables, held to maturity investments and other financial liabilities which are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Subsequent measurement and changes in fair value will depend on their initial classification, as follows: held-for-trading financial assets are measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized in the statement of operations in the period in which they arise; available-for-sale financial instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income until the investment is de-recognized or becomes impaired at which time the amounts would be recorded in the statement of operations. The Company has made the following classifications:


    Cash and cash equivalents Loans and receivables
    Short term investments Loans and receivables
    Sundry receivable Loans and receivables
    Reclamation Bond Loans and receivables
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Other financial liabilities


     

    The Company accounts for regular purchases and sales of financial assets using trade date accounting.

         
      (n)

    Future Accounting Changes

         
     

    International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)

         
     

    In 2010, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) handbook was revised to incorporate IFRS and require publicly accountable enterprises to apply such standards effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Accordingly, the Company will commence reporting on this basis effective June 1, 2011.

    11



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    3.

    Capital Management

         

    The Company considers its capital structure to consist of share capital, warrants, contributed surplus and accumulated deficit. When managing capital, the Company’s objective is to ensure the entity continues as a going concern as well as to achieve optimal returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Management adjusts the capital structure as necessary in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of its mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management team to sustain the future development of the business.

         

    The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration program and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts when economic conditions permit it to do so. Management has chosen to mitigate the risk and uncertainty associated with raising additional capital within current economic conditions by:

         
    i)

    minimizing discretionary disbursements;

         
    ii)

    reducing or eliminating exploration expenditures which are of limited strategic value; and

         
    iii)

    exploring alternate sources of liquidity.

         

    In light of the above, the Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire an interest in additional properties if it believes there is sufficient potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so.

         

    There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year ended May 31, 2011. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

         
    4.

    Risk Factors

         

    The Company’s significant mineral properties are the Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada, and the Guilianita Property, Peru.

         

    Unless the Company acquires or develops additional significant properties, the Company will be solely dependent upon the Property. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by the Company, any adverse development affecting the Properties would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

         

    The Company's risk exposures and their impact on the Company's financial instruments are summarized below:

         

    Credit Risk

         

    Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a counterparty’s inability to fulfill its payment obligations. The Company's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, sundry receivable. Cash and cash equivalents and short term investments are held with a reputable Canadian chartered bank, from which management believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

         

    Sundry receivables are in good standing as of May 31, 2011. Management believes that the credit risk concentration with respect to financial instruments included in sundry receivables is minimal.

         

    Liquidity Risk

         

    The Company's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due. As at May 31, 2011, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents and short term investments balance of $1,202,965 (May 31, 2010 - $1,457,861) to settle current liabilities of $129,019 (May 31, 2010 - $89,284). All of the Company's financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

    12



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    4.

    Risk Factors (Continued)

           

    Market Risk

           

    Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices.

           
    (a)

    Interest Rate Risk

         

    The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt. The Company's current policy is to invest excess cash in investment-grade short-term deposit certificates issued by the Company's Canadian chartered bank. The Company periodically monitors the investments it makes and is satisfied with the creditworthiness of its bank.

         
    (b)

    Foreign Currency Risk

         

    The Company's functional and reporting currency is the Canadian dollar. The Company funds its Peru operations, exploration and administrative expenses by means of United States Dollar advances converted from its Canadian Dollar bank account held in Canada.

         
    (c)

    Price Risk

         

    The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. The Company closely monitors commodity prices, as they relate to gold to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

         

    Sensitivity Analysis

           

    As of May 31, 2011, the carrying and fair value amounts of the Company's financial instruments are approximately equivalent.

           

    The sensitivity analysis shown in the notes below may differ materially from actual results.

           

    Based on management's knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are "reasonably possible" over a twelve month period:

           
    (i) Short term investments are subject to floating interest rates. As at May 31, 2011, if interest rates had decreased/increased by 1% with all other variables held constant, the loss for the twelve months ended May 31, 2011 would have been approximately $250 higher/lower, as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments. As at May 31, 2011, reported shareholders' equity would have been approximately $250 lower/higher as a result of lower/higher interest income from short term investments.
           
    (ii)

    The Company does not hold significant balances in foreign currencies to give rise to exposure to foreign exchange risk.

           
    (iii)

     Commodity price risk could adversely affect the Company. In particular, the Company’s future profitability and viability of development depends upon the world market price of gold. Gold has fluctuated widely in recent years. There is no assurance that, even as commercial quantities of gold may be produced in the future, a profitable market will exist for gold. A decline in the market price of gold may also require the Company to reduce its mining interests, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s value. As of May 31, 2011, the Company was not a gold producer. As a result, commodity price risk may affect the completion of future equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. This may also affect the Company's liquidity and its ability to meet its ongoing obligations.

    13



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    5.

    Short Term Investments

             

    As of May 31, 2011, the Company has $25,000 (2010 - $25,000; 2009 - $400,000) invested in cashable guaranteed investment certificates maturing at various dates to April 3, 2012, bearing interest at 0.9%. As at May 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had accrued $249 and $37 respectively as interest receivable on its short term investments.

             
    6.

    Reclamation Bond

             

    The Company has posted a reclamation bond for its mining projects, as required by the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, to secure clean-up costs, if any, on a project that is closed.

             
    7.

    Mining Interests

             
    (a)

    Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

             

    On July 27, 2004, the Company entered into an option agreement with Mill City Gold Corp. (formerly Mill City International Corporation) ("Mill City") to earn a 60% interest in the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome Property (the “Pony Creek”) in the State of Nevada, USA.

             

    The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation on its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project, representing the estimated costs of the Company's obligation to restore the property site to its original condition as required by regulatory authorities. The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation in the amount of $12,718, equal to the amount of reclamation bond posted by the Company with the United States, Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management.

             

    In fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the carrying value of its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project could not be supported, resulting in a write-off charge of $5,903,342.

             
    (b)

    Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

             
    (i)

    The Company owns a 100% interest in 8 mining claims located in the Red Lake Area, District of Kenora, in Northwestern Ontario. The mining claims were written off several years ago when the Company decided to change its business. Since the Company has changed back to resource exploration the Company is once again capitalizing the expenditures related to these claims.

             
    (ii)

    On October 18, 2005, the Company signed a definitive Option Agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) for Fronteer’s Dixie Lake Property (the “Dixie lake”) located in Ontario’s Red Lake Gold District on the following terms and conditions:

             
    (a)

    The Company shall earn a 51% interest in the Dixie Lake Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $300,000 (completed), assuming payments totaling $75,000 to the underlying property vendor; and

             
    (b)

    issuing 160,000 shares of the Company at $1.25 per share for a total value of $200,000, to a third party as a finder’s fee (issued).

    14



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    7.

    Mining Interests (Continued)

             
    (b)

    Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada

             
    (ii)

    (Continued)

             

    On October 17, 2007, the Company announced that it has fulfilled the terms of its option agreement with Fronteer relating to the Company’s right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie Lake.

             

    Under the terms of the option agreement with Fronteer, dated August 26, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie lake by spending US$300,000 over three years, making $75,000 in cash payments and issuing 40,000 shares to the underlying vendor. The Company presented a detailed accounting of its US$1,711,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward.

             

    Fronteer accepted in writing, the Company’s earn-in and further, Fronteer has informed the Company that, as per the terms of the Option Agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 49% participating interest to a 36% participating interest in Dixie lake.

             
    (iii)

    On February 8, 2007, the Company announced it had signed a formal option agreement with EMCO SA, (“EMCO”) relating to the acquisition of an option to acquire a 60 percent interest in the 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims in Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property on the following terms and conditions:

             

    (a)

    the Company has an option to earn an undivided 60 percent interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property by incurring $250,000 in resource exploration and development expenditures on or before August 31, 2007; and
             
    (b)

    issuing 115,000 of the Company's common shares (55,000 common shares were issued in February 2007 and valued at $22,000; 30,000 common shares were issued in April 2008 and valued at $10,800; 30,000 commons shares were issued in July 2008 and valued at $10,800) in tranches over an 18-month period and 200,000 warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $1.40 per share which will expire 36 months from the date of issuance.

             

    The fair value of the 200,000 common share purchase warrants issued for the 60 percent interest in the 10 claim Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property has been estimated to be $32,200 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.96%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 101% and an expected life of 36 months.

    15



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    7. Mining Interests (Continued)  
             
      (b) Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Continued)
             
        (iii) (b) (Continued)  
             
    Terms of the agreement provide for the dilution of EMCO’s interest in the property to 10% on the occurrence of certain events, which would then convert their interest to a 3% NSR. An underlying 1.5% NSR remains with the original property owner.
             
    On June 18, 2007, the Company amended the option agreement with EMCO relating to the Sanshaw-Bonanza property. The Company has agreed to increase the expenditures required to be incurred on or before August 31, 2008 to $500,000 and to issue to EMCO 100,000 common shares in the capital of the Company as consideration for the amended agreement (issued and valued at $35,000).
             
    On September 11, 2008, the Company reported that it has incurred the expenditures required to successfully fulfill the terms of its option agreement with EMCO to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property.
             
    (iv) On April 28, 2010, the Company announced that, through a series of cash and share payments (the “Transaction”), it had:
             
    1. acquired the remaining 40% interest in its Sanshaw-Bonanza property (the “Property”) in the Red LakeGold District of Ontario from EMCO Corporation S.A. ("EMCO");
             
    2. acquired four additional claims which are contiguous to the Property from Perry English ("English");and
             
    3. reduced the existing NSR on the Property, so that the Company now holds a 100% interest in and to the Property, subject only to an NSR of just 0.375%.
             
    Grandview had previously completed expenditure requirements to earn a 60% interest in the Property as per an option agreement with EMCO dated February 7, 2007. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Property, the Company paid EMCO $25,000 in cash and issued 50,000 common shares in its capital. Also, the Company expanded the Property parcel by acquiring two unpatented claims and two patented claims for aggregate consideration of $60,000 in cash and the issuance of 500,000 common shares in its capital.
             
    Concurrently, the Company also purchased 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR on the Property for $25,000 cash. Cumulative expenditures related to the Transaction totalled $110,000 cash and 550,000 common shares of the Company.

    The Company is committed to spend $605,000 raised in conjunction with the December 31, 2010 flow-through private placement on eligible Canadian exploration expenditures by on or before December 31, 2011.

    16



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    7.

    Mining Interests (Continued)

         
    (c)

    Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

         

    Grandview has a 100% interest in 16 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba (the "GVG Property"). The Company staked these claims in 2005 and 2006. In fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the carrying value of its Rice Lake Gold Camp in Manitoba, Canada could not be supported, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,557,112. During the year ended May 31, 2011, the Company disposed the Bissett properties within its Rice Lake Gold Camp for $2,000. The Company received a 1% Net Smelter Return on the disposed property.

         
    (d)

    Guilianita Project, Peru

         

    On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) was signed with a private Peruvian Group which granted a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Guilianita”). The Option provided the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Guilianita by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period. (issued - 200,000 common shares)

         

    The Option also allowed the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 (CAD$313,050) and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum.

    17



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    8.

    Share Capital

         
    (a)

    Authorized

         

    Unlimited number of common shares

         

    Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non-participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

         
    (b)

    Issued


        Number        
        of Common        
        shares     Amount  
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  14,202,266  
    Mineral property acquisition (Note 7(b))   30,000     10,800  
    Private placement (i)   8,333,333     416,666  
    Cost of issue – cash   -     (47,833 )
    Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation (i)   -     (30,666 )
    Flow-through cost of issue (i)   -     (120,833 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  14,430,400  
    Mineral property acquisition (Note 7(b)(iv) and 7(d))   750,000     67,000  
    Share based payment   360,937     28,875  
    Exercise of warrants – cash   333,000     16,667  
    Exercise of warrants – valuation   -     15,333  
    Private placement (ii)   26,666,665     2,000,000  
    Cost of issue – cash (i)   -     (36,392 )
    Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation (ii)   -     (1,440,000 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2010   72,763,033     15,081,883  
    Exercise of warrants   333,333     32,000  
    Private placement (iv)   8,066,666     605,000  
    Warrant valuation (iv)   -     (43,776 )
    Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation (iv)   -     (25,591 )
    Cost of issue – cash (iv)   -     (46,565 )
                 
    Balance, May 31, 2011   81,163,032   $  15,602,951  


      (i)

    On December 5, 2008, the Company closed a brokered private placement (the “Offering”) with Sandfire Securities Inc. The Offering resulted in the issuance of 8,333,333 flow-through common shares (the “Common Shares”) to the MineralFields Group at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $416,666. The securities issued pursuant to Offering were subject to a four (4) month statutory hold commencing from the date of issuance.

         
     

    In connection with the Offering, Grandview paid a cash fee of 8% of the gross proceeds raised ($33,333) under the Offering and also issued broker warrants to acquire 666,666 Common Shares at a price of $0.05 per Common Share for a period of 24 months after closing. The fair value of each warrant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 156.7%; risk-free interest rate of 1.52% and an expected average life of 2 years. The value assigned was $30,666.

    18



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    8.

    Share Capital (Continued)

           
    (b)

    Issued (Continued)

           
    (i)

    Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through share agreements, the tax attributes of the related expenditures are renounced to subscribers. As a result, the Company is required to recognize a foregone tax benefit of $120,833 at the time of renouncement.

           
    (ii)

    December 3, 2009, the Company announced that it has closed the private placement purchase agreement ("Purchase Agreement") with Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint"), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, and 10 other investors resulting in aggregate proceeds to the Company treasury of $2,000,000 to fund exploration and development of the Giulianita project in Peru and to maintain Canadian operations.

           

    The Purchase Agreement represents an investment by Centerpoint in Grandview comprised of a private placement financing consisting of 20 million units ("Unit") at a price of $0.075 per Unit for aggregate proceeds to Grandview of $1,500,000. Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant") with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to acquire one further common share at a price of $0.12, expiring 24 months from the date of issue. In addition, Grandview completed a concurrent non-brokered financing resulting in the issuance of an additional 6,666,665 Units for aggregate proceeds of $500,000, some of which Units were acquired by directors and officers of Grandview.

           

    The fair value of the 26,666,665 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $1,440,000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.12%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 169.78% and an expected life of 24 months.

           
    (iii)

    On January 7, 2010, the Company issued 360,937 common shares at a price of $0.08 to settle a payable of $28,875 in respect of services rendered by a consultant to the Company.

           
    (iv)

    On December 31, 2010, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement (the "Placement") with the MineralFields Group. The Placement resulted in the issuance by the Company of a total of 8,066,666 flow-through units in the capital of the Company (the “Flow-Through Units”) at a purchase price of $0.075 per Flow-Through Unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $605,000. Each Flow-Through Unit consists of one common share of the Company issued on a flow-through basis and one-half of one common share purchase warrant ("Warrant"). Each whole Warrant is exercisable to acquire one further common share of the Company on a non-flow-through basis at a price of $0.15 for the first 12 months following issuance and at $0.20 for the second twelve months.

         

    The fair value of the 4,033,332 common share purchase warrants has been estimated to be $43,776 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.66%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 112.13% and an expected life of 12 months.

         

    In connection with the Placement, the Company paid eligible persons (the "Finders") a cash fee of 6.0% of the gross proceeds raised through each Finder under the Offering and also issued finder's warrants (each a "Finder's Warrant") equal to 7.5% of the total number of Flow-Through Units placed by such Finders. Each Finder's Warrant entitles the holder to acquire one unit (each a "Finder's Unit" and collectively the "Finder's Units") with each Finder's Unit being comprised of one common share of the Company on a non-flow-though basis and one-half of one Warrant on the same terms as above, expiring December 31, 2012. On closing, the Company paid $36,300 in cash fees to the Finders and issued 604,999 Finder's Warrants to the Finders. In addition, the Company also paid a cash diligence fee of $10,265 in connection with the Placement.

         

    The fair value of the 604,999 Finder's Warrants has been estimated to be $25,591 using the Black- Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 1.66%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 137.49% and an expected life of 24 months.

    19



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    9. Warrants


          Number of     Weighted Average  
          Warrants     Exercise Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2008   12,361,125   $  0.92  
      Expired   (6,307,645 )   (1.18 )
      Issued (Note 8(b)(v))   666,666     0.05  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2009   6,720,146   $  0.59  
      Expired   (6,053,480 )   (0.60 )
      Issued (Note 8(b)(vi))   26,666,665     0.12  
      Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010   26,999,998   $  0.12  
      Issued (Note 8(b)(vii))   4,638,331     0.16  
      Exercised   (333,333 )   (0.05 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2011   31,304,996   $  0.12  

    The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2011:

      Number of     Fair     Exercise    
    Expiry
     
      Warrants     Value     Price     Date  
      26,666,665     1,440,000     0.12     December 3, 2011  
      4,033,332     43,776     0.18     December 30, 2012  
      604,999     25,591     0.08     December 31, 2011  
      31,304,996   $  1,509,367              
                           
      The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2010:  
         
                           
      Number of     Fair     Exercise        
      Warrants     Value     Price ($)     Expiry  
      333,333     15,333     0.05     December 4, 2010  
      26,666,665     1,440,000     0.12     December 3, 2011  
      26,999,998   $  1,455,333              

    20



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    9.

    Warrants (Continued)

       

    The following are the warrants outstanding at May 31, 2009


      Number of     Fair     Exercise        
      Warrants     Value     Price ($)     Expiry  
                           
      4,357,000     714,548     0.65     July 6, 2009  
      687,120     145,670     0.40     July 6, 2009  
      656,000     225,664     0.70     December 21, 2009  
      153,360     55,056     0.60     December 21, 2009  
      200,000     32,200     1.40     February 8, 2010  
      666,666     30,666     0.05     December 4,2010  
                           
      6,720,146   $  1,203,804              


    10.

    Stock Options

       

    The Company maintains an employee stock option plan under which the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed for such purpose, may from time to time grant to employees, officers, directors or consultants of the Company, options to acquire common shares in such numbers, for such terms and at such exercise prices, as may be determined by the Board of Directors or such committee.

       

    The stock option plan provides that the maximum number of common shares in the capital of the Company that may be reserved for issuance for all purposes under the stock option plan shall be equal to 10% of the total issued and outstanding common shares and that the maximum number of common shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one optionee pursuant to share options may not exceed 5% of the common shares outstanding at the time of grant.

       

    The options are valid for a maximum of 5 years from the date of issue and the normal vesting term is 1/4 immediately and 1/4 after 3, 6 and 9 month period from the date of grant.

       

    The following is continuity of stock options:


          Number     Weighted Average  
          of     Exercise  
          Stock Options     Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2008   4,575,000   $  0.89  
      Forfeited   (175,000 )   0.68  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2009   4,400,000   $  0.90  
      Granted (i)(ii)   4,250,000     0.15  
      Expired   (1,375,000 )   0.75  
      Forfeited   (1,400,000 )   0.93  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010   5,875,000   $  0.38  
      Cancelled   (375,000 )   (0.15 )
      Expired   (250,000 )   (1.80 )
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2011   5,250,000   $  0.33  

    21



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    10.

    Stock Options (Continued)

         
    (i)

    On June 23, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 3,350,000 options to directors, officers, geologists and consultants of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $368,500. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.55%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 155% and an expected life of 5 years.

         
    (ii)

    On December 9, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 900,000 options to directors of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 for a period of five years. All the options granted vest immediately. The estimated fair market value under the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $80,991. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 2.47%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 153% and an expected life of 5 years.

         

    The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at May 31, 2011:


          Options Outstanding     Options Exercisable  
                                     
                Weighted                    
                average     Weighted              
                remaining     average           Weighted  
          Number     contractual     exercise     Number     average  
      Expiry Date   of Options     life     price     of options     exercise price  
                                     
      September 27, 2012   1,675,000     1.33   $  0.68     1,675,000   $  0.68  
      June 23, 2014   2,675,000     3.07     0.15     2,675,000     0.15  
      December 9, 2014   900,000     3.53     0.15     900,000     0.15  
                                     
          5,400,000     2.56 years   $  0.33     5,250,000   $  0.33  

    22



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    11.

    Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

       

    Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.


          2011     2010     2009  
      Numerator for basic loss per share $  (408,907 ) $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 )
      Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (408,907 ) $  (880,403 ) $  (7,887,918 )
      Denominator:                  
      Weighted average number of common                  
             shares – basic   76,271,891     58,224,647     40,379,322  
      Weighted average number of common                  
             shares - diluted   76,271,891     58,224,647     40,379,322  
                         
      Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.02 )

    Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

    23



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    12.

    Income Taxes

       

    Future income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary timing differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts for income tax purposes.

       

    The future tax assets are as follows:


          2011     2010     2009  
                         
       Future tax assets:                  
               Exploration expenditures $  1,588,778     1,588,778   $  1,842,983  
               Marketable securities   40,663     40,663     47,169  
               Capital losses   -     -     24,273  
               Non-capital losses   1,431,108     1,383,953     1,612,960  
               Share issue costs   43,991     75,790     175,303  
                         
       Total future tax assets   3,104,540     3,089,184     3,702,688  
       Valuation allowance for future tax assets   (3,104,540 )   (3,089,184 )   (3,702,688 )
                         
       Net future tax assets $  -   $  -   $  -  
                         
                         
      The Company has provided a valuation allowance equal to the future tax assets because it is not presently more likely than not that they will be realized. The Company's income tax (recovery) for each of the years ended is made up as follows:  
                       
                         
                         
          2011     2010     2009  
                         
       Current income tax recovery $  -   $  -   $  -  
       Future income tax recovery   -     -     (120,833 )
                         
       Total income tax recovery $  -   $  -   $  (120,833 )

    24



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    12.

    Income Taxes (Continued)

       

    The Company's actual income tax expense for each of the years ended is made up as follows:


          2011     2010     2009  
                         
      Loss before income taxes $  (408,907 ) $  (880,403 )   (8,008,751 )
                         
                       
      Income tax recovery at combined Federal and Provincial rates of 29.54%, 32.58% and 33.29%   (120,791 )   (268,835 )   (2,666,113 )
      Non-deductible stock-based compensation   -     146,444     -  
      Non-deductible expenses   -     56     146  
      Non-deductible write-down of mineral properties   -     -     2,483,585  
      Expiry of warrants   -     286,143     330,573  
      Tax rate changes and other adjustments   116,402     -     -  
      Cost of issue   (51,329 )   (110,030 )   (120,610 )
      Utilization of losses not previously recognized   -     (35,778 )   (27,581 )
      Resource properties – expenditures renounced   -     -     (120,833 )
      Increase in valuation allowance   55,718     -     -  
                         
      Income tax recovery $  -   $  -   $  (120,833 )

    At May 31, 2011, the Company has non-capital losses of approximately $5,724,434. No benefit from these amounts has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

    The non-capital losses will expire as follows:

      2015 $  724,341  
      2026   1,366,077  
      2027   1,685,117  
      2028   1,760,277  
      2031   188,622  
             
        $  5,724,434  


    13.

    Segmented Information

       

    The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration.

       

    The Company operates in two geographic areas as at May 31, 2011, two areas at May 31, 2010 and one area as at May 31, 2009. The Company's assets by geographic location are:


          2011     2010     2009  
      Canada $  5,175,718   $  5,372,915   $  3,999,201  
      Peru   689,854     287,708     -  
      Total Assets $  5,865,572   $  5,660,623   $  3,999,201  

    25



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    14.

    Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

         
    (i)

    For year ended May 31, 2011, $nil (2010 - $10,000, 2009 - $35,000) was paid to the former interim CEO and current chairman of the Company for consulting services.

         
    (ii)

    For year ended May 31, 2011, $150,000 (2010 - $150,010, 2009 - $150,000) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $75,250 (2010 - $90,250, 2009 - $62,250) capitalized to mining interests. Also, $nil (2010 - $nil, 2009 - $14,000) in car and office allowances and $nil (2010 - $nil, 2009 - $607) were paid.

         
    (iii)

    For year ended May 31, 2011, $33,000 (2010 - $39,000, 2009 - $51,794) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer or a company controlled by the Chief Financial Officer. Included in accounts payable as at May 31, 2011 is $nil (2010 - $6,000, 2009 - $nil) in relation to consulting services rendered.

         
    (iv)

    In 2007, the Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The loan was unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO in 2009 and 2010.

         
    (v)

    Effective November 30, 2010, the Company entered into two agreements in respect of the sale of four mining claims owned by it and located in Manitoba, being the Packsak, Clapelou Patent Claims, CUPP2 Frac and CUPP3 Frac (collectively, the "Claims"). Two of the four Claims were transferred to Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint") and the remaining two were transferred to Centershield Gold Mines Inc., a subsidiary of Centerpoint. The Company received nominal cash consideration on closing and retained a 1% NSR over the Claims. Two directors of the Company are senior officers with Centrepoint.

         

    These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange value which is represented by the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

         
    15.

    Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP

         

    The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. These principles, as they pertain to the Company's consolidated financial statements differ from US GAAP as follows:

         

    Under US GAAP, stock options are presented as part of management services on the statement of operations. Under Canadian GAAP they are presented separately.

         

    U.S. GAAP requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. In calculating compensation to be recognized, U.S. GAAP requires the Company to estimate future forfeitures. For Canadian GAAP purposes, the Company uses the fair value method to account for all stock option grants but accounts for forfeitures as they occur. Based on the Company's estimated future forfeiture rates of stock options, the expense recognized for U.S. GAAP purposes is the same in 2010 the amount recorded for Canadian GAAP purposes.

         

    Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for its exploration costs as described in Note 2(e), while under US GAAP, exploration costs (except for property purchase costs) cannot be capitalized and are expensed as incurred. Mineral property rights relating to the properties are capitalized and they are tested for impairment.

         

    Canadian GAAP provides that a tax benefit be recorded in the statement of operations to reflect the recovery of future income taxes relating to the renunciation of resource property expenditures to the Company's flow-through share investors (see Note 12). US GAAP requires the recognition of liability in relation to flow through shares premium upon issuing of those and a deferred tax liability upon renunciation of resource property expenditures. As of May 31, 2011 no expenditures were renounced in relation to resource properties.

    26



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    Under Canadian GAAP, the Company does not impute interest on loans to related parties, while under US GAAP, imputed interest is required to be recorded for the purpose of preparing consolidated financial statements.

       

    Had the Company's consolidated balance sheets as at May 31, 2011 and May 31, 2010 been prepared using US GAAP, such consolidated balance sheets would be presented as follows:


          May 31, 2011     May 31, 2010  
                   
      Assets            
      Current assets            
      Cash $  1,177,679   $  1,432,824  
      Short term investments   25,286     25,037  
      GST and sundry receivable   63,414     29,719  
      Prepaid expenses   17,718     12,876  
                   
          1,284,097     1,500,456  
                   
      Reclamation bond   12,718     13,699  
      Mineral property rights   720,835     712,101  
                   
        $  2,017,650   $  2,226,256  
                   
      Liabilities            
      Current liabilities            
      Accounts payable $  26,589     7,835  
      Accrued liabilities   102,430   $  81,449  
                   
          129,019     89,284  
      Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)   12,718     13,699  
                   
          141,737     102,983  
                   
      Shareholders' equity            
      Share capital            
      Authorized unlimited common shares            
      Issued            
             Common shares   17,278,941     16,757,873  
             Additional paid in capital   4,390,914     4,390,914  
             Warrants   1,509,367     1,455,333  
             Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities   (325,305 )   (325,305 )
             Deferred share-based payments   4,591,091     4,591,091  
             Deficit accumulated before change to an exploration stage company   (3,133,943 )   (3,133,943 )
             Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage   (22,435,152 )   (21,612,690 )
                   
          1,875,913     2,123,273  
                   
        $  2,017,650   $  2,226,256  

    27



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    The Company's statements of operations and comprehensive loss under US GAAP are as follows:

       

    Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss


      For the Year Ended May 31,   2011     2010     2009  
                         
      Expenses                  
      General exploration $  422,123   $  512,783   $  534,317  
      Management services   107,750     548,241     267,497  
      Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs   85,387     115,352     88,716  
      Professional fees   153,760     142,354     167,672  
      Office and administration   58,120     69,107     21,579  
      Flow-through interest expense   -     -     2,747  
      Gain on disposition of mineral property rights   (2,000 )   -     -  
      Write-off mineral property rights   -     -     1,514,756  
                         
      Loss before the under noted   (825,140 )   (1,387,837 )   (2,597,284 )
      Interest income   2,678     151     10,306  
                         
      Net loss for the year   (822,462 )   (1,387,686 )   (2,586,978 )
                         
      Loss per common share – basic and diluted $  (0.01 ) $  (0.02 ) $  (0.06 )

    28



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    The changes in common shares as required by US GAAP are disclosed below:


      Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity            
                   
                Amount  
                Under  
       Common Shares   Shares     US GAAP  
                   
       Balance, May 31, 2008   36,288,765   $  15,757,423  
       Mineral property acquisition   30,000     10,800  
       Private placement   8,333,333     416,666  
       Cost of issue – cash   -     (47,833 )
       Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation   -     (30,666 )
                   
       Balance, May 31, 2009   44,652,098   $  16,106,390  
       Private placement   26,666,665     2,000,000  
       Cost of issue – cash   -     (36,392 )
       Mineral property acquisition   750,000     67,000  
       Debt conversion   360,937     28,875  
       Exercise of warrants – valuation   -     15,333  
       Exercise of warrants – cash   333,333     16,667  
       Cost of issue – broker warrants valuation   -     (1,440,000 )
                   
       Balance, May 31, 2010   72,763,033     16,757,873  
       Exercise of warrants   333,333     32,000  
       Private placement   8,066,666     605,000  
       Warrant valuation   -     (43,776 )
       Cost of issue – broker warrant valuation   -     (25,591 )
       Cost of issue – cash   -     (46,565 )
                   
       Balance, May 31, 2011   81,163,032   $  17,278,941  
                   
       Other changes in shareholders’ equity are presented as follows:            
                   
       Additional Paid in Capital            
       May 31, 2008       $  648,344  
       Expired warrants         2,569,432  
                   
       Balance, May 31, 2009         3,217,776  
       Expired warrants         1,173,138  
                   
       Balance, May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2011       $  4,390,914  

    29



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15. Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)


      Cumulative adjustments to marketable securities      
      Balance, May 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 $  (325,305 )
      Deferred share-based payments      
      Balance, May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2009 $  4,141,600  
      Vesting of stock options   449,491  
      Balance, May 31, 2010 and 2011 $  4,591,091  
             
      Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage      
      Balance May 31, 2008 $  (17,638,026 )
      Net loss   (2,586,978 )
      Balance May 31, 2009 $  (20,225,004 )
      Net loss   (1,387,686 )
      Balance, May 31, 2010 $  (21,612,690 )
      Net loss   (822,462 )
      Balance, May 31, 2011 $  (22,435,152 )

    30



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    For Canadian GAAP, cash flows relating to mineral property exploration costs are reported as investing activities. For US GAAP, these costs are characterized as operating activities.

       

    The Company’s statements of cash flows under US GAAP are as follows:


      Statements of Cash Flows                  
      For the Year Ended May 31,   2011     2010     2009  
                         
      Cash flows used in operating activities                  
      Net loss for the period $  (822,462 ) $  (1,387,686 ) $  (2,586,978 )
      Items not involving cash:                  
      Gain on disposition of mineral property interests   (2,000 )   -     -  
      Share-based payments   -     478,366     -  
      Accrued Interest income   (249 )   (537 )   (10,296 )
      Write-off of mineral property rights   -     -     1,514,756  
      Change in non-cash operating working activities:                  
      GST and sundry receivable   (33,695 )   (23,512 )   34,957  
      Prepaid expenses   (4,842 )   (593 )   137,883  
      Due from a related party   -     12,803     92,296  
      Accounts payable   18,754     (1,182 )   (64,509 )
      Accrued liabilities   20,981     17,999     18,450  
                         
      Cash flows used in operating activities   (823,513 )   (904,342 )   (863,441 )
                         
      Cash flows from financing activities                  
      Share issuance   621,667     2,016,667     416,666  
      Cost of issue   (46,565 )   (36,392 )   (47,833 )
                         
      Cash flows provided by financing activities   575,102     1,980,275     368,833  
                         
      Cash flows from investing activities                  
      Redemption (purchase) of short term investments   -     382,493     611,410  
      Proceeds on disposition of mineral property interests   2,000     -     -  
      Purchase of mineral property rights   (8,734 )   (132,195 )   (95,065 )
                         
      Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities   (6,734 )   250,298     516,345  
                         
      Change in cash and cash equivalents during the year   (255,145 )   1,326,231     21,737  
                         
      Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year   1,432,824     106,593     84,856  
                         
      Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $  1,177,679   $  1,432,824   $  106,593  

    31



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued) Statements of Cash Flows (continued)


      For the Year Ended May 31,   2011     2010     2009  
                         
      Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions                  
      Share issuance included in mining interest $  -   $  67,000   $  10,800  

    US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Prior Years

    In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, "Subsequent Events" (ASC Subtopic 855-10) which establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. This Statement sets forth (a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (b) the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (c) the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This Statement shall be applied to the accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. This Statement is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and has been applied prospectively. The adoption of this standard has not had any material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

    In June 2008, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 provides guidance on determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-05 concludes, among other matters, that warrants and options issued by an entity with an exercise price that is different from the entity’s functional currency cannot be classified as equity. EITF 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of EITF 07-05 did not have any material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations" (codified in ASC 805), which retained the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting. However, SFAS No. 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects.

    SFAS No. 141(R) requires that: (1) for all business combinations, the acquirer records all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values; (2) certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired be recognized at their fair values on the acquisition date; (3) contingent consideration be recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings until settled; (4) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included in the amount recorded for assets acquired; (5) in step acquisitions, previous equity interests in an acquiree held prior to obtained control be re-measured to their acquisition-date fair values, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings; and (6) when making adjustments to finalize initial accounting, companies revise any previously issued post-acquisition financial information in future financial statements to reflect any adjustments as if they had been recorded on the acquisition date.

    32



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Prior Years (Continued)

       

    SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of this statement should also apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R). This standard will be applied to all future business combinations for US GAAP purposes.

       

    In April 2009, FASB amended accounting standards for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The amended standard, ASC 820, addresses issues related to the determination of fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased, and identifying transactions that are not orderly. The revisions affirm the objective that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction (that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions, even if the market is inactive. The amendment provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased significantly. It also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. If determined that a quoted price is distressed (not orderly), and thereby not representative of fair value, the entity may need to make adjustments to the quoted price or utilize an alternative valuation technique (e.g., income approach or multiple valuation techniques) to determine fair value. Additionally, an entity must incorporate appropriate risk premium adjustments, reflective of an orderly transaction under current market conditions due to uncertainty in cash flows. The revised guidance requires disclosures in interim and annual periods regarding the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques and related inputs, if any, during the period. The changes are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and are to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

       

    In April 2009, FASB revised accounting standards for Financial Instruments. The revised standard, ASC 825, requires fair value disclosures in the notes of an entity’s interim financial statements for all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the statement of financial position. This revision became effective for the interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

       

    In June 2009 FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the "codification") and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles", ("SFAS No. 168") "-- a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS No. 168 is the new source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. This statement was incorporated into ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles under the new FASB codification which became effective on July 1, 2009. The new Codification supersedes all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. ASC 105, culminated a multi-year project to replace the previous GAAP hierarchy and established Accounting Standard Codification. The Codification is not expected to change US GAAP, but combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. Following this guidance, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates ("ASU") to update the Codification. After the launch of the Codification on July 1, 2009, only one level of authoritative US GAAP for non-governmental entities exists, other than guidance issued by the SEC. This statement is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this new standard only had the effect of amending references to authoritative accounting guidance in the Company’s financial statements.

    33



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Prior Years (Continued)

       

    In June 2009, the ASC guidance for consolidation accounting was updated to require an entity to perform a qualitative analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest gives it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity ("VIE"). This analysis identifies a primary beneficiary of a VIE as the entity that has both of the following characteristics: i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The updated guidance also requires ongoing reassessments of the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The provisions of the updated guidance are effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning June 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

       

    In August 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05 Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, in regard to the fair value measurement of liabilities. FASB ASC 820 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price for an identical liability in an active market is not available, a reporting entity shall utilize one or more of the following techniques: (i) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, (ii) the quoted price for a similar liability or for a similar liability when traded as an asset, or (iii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC 820. In all instances a reporting entity shall utilize the approach that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Also, when measuring the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity shall not include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The adoption of this new standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

       

    In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which is included in the ASC Topic 820 (Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures on the amount and reason for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 also requires disclosures of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and a settlement within Level 3 fair value measurements and clarifies existing disclosure requirements on levels of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of ASU 2010-06 and does not expect that it will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

       

    In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, "Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements". The amendment eliminates the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This standard had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

    34



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)


    15.

    Differences Between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP (Continued)

       

    US GAAP Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in Prior Years (Continued)

       

    In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades (“ASU 2010-13”). ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

       

    There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by FASB which are not yet effective. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the Company. Management does not believe any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material impact on the Company's financial position or operating results.

    35


    EX-99.88 89 exhibit99-88.htm EXHIBIT 99.88 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.88 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.88

      TSX: GVX
    NEWS RELEASE OTCBB: GVGDF
    For Immediate Release  

    Grandview Gold Inc. Reports Significant Assays at Dixie Lake Property;
    Re-energizes Red Lake Exploration Program

    September 8, 2011 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) (“Grandview” or the “Company”) is pleased to report the receipt of significant assays for the summer 2011 diamond drilling program at its Dixie Lake Property (the "Property") in the Red Lake gold district of Ontario, and those findings confirm historical intercepts within the mineralized zones.

    The Property, located just 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine is considered highly prospective for high-grade gold mineralization typical of the Red Lake gold district. The Company is very pleased to report significant intersections at strategic locations within the 88-4 and 88-4 West zones, including a 11.3 metre interval grading 6.90 g/T Au, including 10.78 g/T Au over 6.3 metres, 5.15 g/T Au over 1.2 metres, and 30.48 g/T Au over 1.2 metres. Five other holes assayed 4.02 g/T Au over 1 metre, 2.13 g/T Au over 1.2 metres, 2.24 g/T Au over 10.9 metres including 4.99 g/T Au over 1.9 metres, and 1.04 g/T Au over 11.1 metres.

    These assays are consistent with previous 88-4 assays like 3.147 g/T Au over 9.94 metres and 6.89 g/T over 4.68, and 88-4 West which assayed 5.85 g/T au over 4.5, and also with the historic 1989-90 results of Teck Resources.

    “Our objectives this summer were to re-drill historic holes as confirmation that the gold zone exist and I think we successfully accomplished that task,” says Grandview President & CEO Paul Sarjeant. “Holes three and five successfully tested for continuation of mineralization from historic holes and hole five seems to support the concept of plunging mineralized shoots within the mineralized structure, demonstrating high-grade targets within an overall mineralized horizon. Holes two and nine have good wide intercepts of just over a gram per tonne and demonstrate that the envelope, or zone of mineralization was repeatable in these instances. We are confident and pleased by our progress to date in redefining the historical resource.”

    The Company will work towards refining a geological model and will look to upgrade the database and complete a NI 43-101 compliant study to confirm the Teck established (1989/90) non-compliant gold resource estimating a tonnage for the 88-4 zone of 1.1 million tons grading 0.10 ounces gold per ton; upgraded from an original estimate of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton.

    Significant Results: Dixie Lake 88-4 Zone & 88-4 West (continuation)

    Hole No. From (m) To (m) Length (m) g/T
    DL-11-01 304.1 305.4 1.4 1.87
             
    DL-11-02 68.5 76.6 11.1 1.04
             incl 68.5 70.3 1.8 2.29
             incl 73.0 74.0 1.0 2.00
             incl 78.3 79.6 1.3 1.95
             
    DL-11-03 232.6 243.5 10.9 2.24
             incl 233.3 235.2 1.9 4.99
             incl 234.2 235.2 1.0 7.35
             incl 242.4 243.5 1.1 6.07
             
    DL-11-04 45.2 46.4 1.2 2.13
      72.0 73.1 1.1 1.12
             
    DL-11-05 128.0 139.3 11.3 6.90
             incl 129.0 130.2 1.2 5.15
             incl 132.2 138.5 6.3 10.78
             incl 135.8 137.0 1.2 30.48
             
    DL-11-08 68.9 71.1 2.2 0.73
             
    DL-11-09 195.3 202.4 7.1 1.21
             incl 195.3 196.3 1.0 4.02
             incl 200.3 202.4 2.1 2.06



    Assay results are from core samples sent to Accurassay Laboratories, an accredited mineral analysis laboratory in Thunder Bay, Ontario, for preparation and analysis utilizing both fire assay and screen metallic methods. The information in this release was reviewed by and prepared under the direction of Paul Sarjeant, P.Geo, President and CEO of Grandview, who is a "qualified person" as defined by NI 43-101.

    About Dixie Lake

    Grandview has an option agreement with Newmont Mining Corporation (formerly Fronteer Gold Inc.) and has earned a 67% interest in the 1,664 hectare Dixie Lake property located 16 miles south of Goldcorp's Red Lake Mine. The Property has an established gold resource (Teck, 1989), estimating a tonnage for the 88-4 zone of 1.1 million tons grading 0.10 ounces gold per ton; upgraded from an original estimate of 417,000 short tons at 0.126 ounces per ton. The historic resource figures are not NI 43-101 compliant and should not be relied upon.

    Dixie Lake is highly prospective for Grandview due to its location in the Red Lake area, the historic work that has been done in and around the 88-4 Zone since 1945, and significant results of work undertaken by Grandview elsewhere on the Property from 2005 through 2009 - including NS Zone assays of 22.90 g/T Au over 2.86 m and 18.29 g/T over 2.20 m, with considerable visible gold in core. Grandview has not completed the work required to verify this historical estimate and is not treating this historical estimate as being compliant with current standards under NI 43-101 and as such this historical estimate should not be relied upon.

    About the Red Lake Gold District

    The Red Lake Gold Mining District in northwestern Ontario is the most prolific gold producing region in Canada. Since the mid-1960's The Red Lake District has yielded over 30-million ounces of gold and is home to Goldcorp's Red Lake and Campbell Mines. Grandview has three projects in the Red Lake Gold District, namely Sanshaw-Bonanza, Dixie Lake and Loisan.

    About Grandview Gold Inc.

    Grandview is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

    For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

    This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company’s operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc’s operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc’s control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    -30-


    EX-99.89 90 exhibit99-89.htm EXHIBIT 99.89 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.89 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.89

    VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

    September 30, 2011

    TO ALL APPLICABLE EXCHANGES AND COMMISSIONS:

    RE: Grandview Gold Inc.
      Confirmation of Notice of Record and Meeting Dates

    We are pleased to confirm that Notice of Record and Meeting Dates was sent to The Canadian Depository for Securities.

    We advise the following with respect to the Annual General & Special Meeting of Securityholders for Grandview Gold Inc.

      1. ISIN: CA3866711011
        CUSIP: 386671101
           
      2. Date Fixed for the Meeting: November 28, 2011
           
      3. Record Date For Notice: October 28, 2011
           
      4. Record Date For Voting: October 28, 2011
           
      5. Beneficial Ownership Determination Date: October 28, 2011
           
    6. Classes or Series of Securities that entitle the holder to receive Notice of the Meeting: Common Shares
           
    7. Classes of Series of Securities that entitle the holder to vote at the meeting: Common Shares
           
      8. Business to be conducted at the meeting: Annual General & Special

    Yours Truly,
    EQUITY FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY

    “Rosa Vieira”
    Senior Manager, Client Relations
    Telephone: 416-361-0930 ext.227
    rvieira@equityfinancialtrust.com

    c.c. Nathaniel Mariano, Administrator, Client Relations


    EX-99.90 91 exhibit99-90.htm EXHIBIT 99.90 Grandview Gold, Inc.: Exhibit 99.90 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.90

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

    NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

    to be held on November 28, 2011

    TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of Grandview Gold Inc. ("Grandview", or the "Corporation") will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on Monday, November 28, 2011 for the following purposes:

    1.

    to receive the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2011, together with the auditors' report thereon;

       
    2.

    to elect the directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

       
    3.

    to appoint the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration;

       
    4.

    to consider and, if deemed advisable, to pass (with or without variation) an ordinary resolution of the disinterested shareholders approving and confirming an extension of the term of Common Share purchase warrants previously issued by the Corporation as set out in the proposed resolution set forth in the management information circular dated October 28, 2011 (the "Circular") of the Corporation, the text of which is incorporated herein by reference;

       
    5.

    to consider and, if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to repeal the existing By-Laws of the Corporation and to adopt new By-Laws, as more particularly described in the accompanying Circular; and

       
    6.

    to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

    The specific details of the matters to be put before the Meeting as identified above are set forth in the Circular of the Corporation accompanying and forming part of this notice. Shareholders should refer to the Circular for more detailed information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

    If you are a registered shareholder of the Corporation and are unable to attend the Meeting in person, please date and execute the accompanying form of proxy and return it in the envelope provided to Equity Financial Trust Company, the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 25, 2011, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting.

    If you are not a registered shareholder of the Corporation and receive these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the form of proxy in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary.

    The directors of the Corporation have fixed the close of business on October 28, 2011 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Corporation entitled to receive notice of the Meeting.

    By order of the Board of Directors

    “Paul Sarjeant”

    PAUL SARJEANT, P. Geo
    Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

    October 28, 2011


    EX-99.91 92 exhibit99-91.htm EXHIBIT 99.91 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.91 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.91


    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    Notice of Meeting

    and

    Management Information Circular

    in respect of the

    Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders

    to be held on November 28, 2011

     

    OCTOBER 28, 2011


    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

    NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

    to be held on November 28, 2011

    TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of Grandview Gold Inc. ("Grandview", or the "Corporation") will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on Monday, November 28, 2011 for the following purposes:

    1.

    to receive the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2011, together with the auditors' report thereon;

       
    2.

    to elect the directors of the Corporation for the ensuing year;

       
    3.

    to appoint the auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration;

       
    4.

    to consider and, if deemed advisable, to pass (with or without variation) an ordinary resolution of the disinterested shareholders approving and confirming an extension of the term of Common Share purchase warrants previously issued by the Corporation as set out in the proposed resolution set forth in the management information circular dated October 28, 2011 (the "Circular") of the Corporation, the text of which is incorporated herein by reference;

       
    5.

    to consider and, if deemed advisable, to pass an ordinary resolution to repeal the existing By-Laws of the Corporation and to adopt new By-Laws, as more particularly described in the accompanying Circular; and

       
    6.

    to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

    The specific details of the matters to be put before the Meeting as identified above are set forth in the Circular of the Corporation accompanying and forming part of this notice. Shareholders should refer to the Circular for more detailed information with respect to the matters to be considered at the Meeting.

    If you are a registered shareholder of the Corporation and are unable to attend the Meeting in person, please date and execute the accompanying form of proxy and return it in the envelope provided to Equity Financial Trust Company, the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 25, 2011, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting.

    If you are not a registered shareholder of the Corporation and receive these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the form of proxy in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary.

    The directors of the Corporation have fixed the close of business on October 28, 2011 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Corporation entitled to receive notice of the Meeting.

    By order of the Board of Directors

    “Paul Sarjeant”
    __________________________________

    PAUL SARJEANT, P. Geo
    Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

    October 28, 2011


    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
    330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8

    MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

    FOR THE ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
    TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 28, 2011

    SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

    This Information Circular is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the management ("Management") of Grandview Gold Inc. ("Grandview" or the "Corporation") for use at the annual and special meeting (the "Meeting") of the shareholders ("Shareholders") of common shares ("Common Shares") of the Corporation.

    The Meeting will be held at 130 King Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, ON M5X 1J5 at 10:00 a.m. (Toronto time) on November 28, 2011, and at any adjournments thereof for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders accompanying this Information Circular. Information contained herein is given as of October 28, 2011 unless otherwise specifically stated.

    Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail but may be supplemented by solicitation personally by directors, officers and employees of the Corporation without special compensation. The cost of solicitation by Management will be borne by the Corporation.

    APPOINTMENT AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

    Enclosed herewith is a form of proxy for use at the Meeting. The persons named in the form of proxy are directors and officers of the Corporation. A Shareholder submitting a proxy has the right to appoint a nominee (who need not be a Shareholder) to represent him at the Meeting other than the persons designated in the enclosed proxy form by inserting the name of his chosen nominee in the space provided for that purpose on the form and by striking out the printed names.

    A form of proxy will not be valid for the Meeting or any adjournment thereof unless it is signed by the Shareholder or by the Shareholder's attorney authorized in writing or, if the Shareholder is a corporation, it must be executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof. The proxy, to be acted upon, must be deposited with the registrar and transfer agent of the Corporation, Equity Financial Trust Company at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1 by 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on November 25, 2011, or in the case of any adjournment of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours prior to the time of such meeting, or delivering it to the Chairman of the Meeting, on the day of the meeting or any adjournment thereof prior to the time of the voting.

    A Shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it prior to its use, in any manner permitted by law, including by instrument in writing executed by the Shareholder or by his attorney authorized in writing or, if the Shareholder is a corporation, executed by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof and deposited at the office of the Equity Financial Trust Company at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, at which the proxy is to be used, or with the chairman of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

    ADVICE TO BENEFICIAL HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES

    The information set forth in this section is of significant importance to many Shareholders as a substantial number of Shareholders do not hold Common Shares in their own name. Shareholders who do not hold their Common Shares in their own name (referred to in this Information Circular as "Beneficial Shareholders") should note that only proxies deposited by Shareholders whose names appear on the records of Grandview as the registered holders of Common Shares can be recognized and acted upon at the Meeting. If Common Shares are listed in an account statement provided to a Shareholder by a broker, then in almost all cases those Common Shares will not be registered in the Shareholder's name on the records of Grandview. Such Common Shares will more likely be registered under the names of the Shareholder's broker or an agent of that broker. In Canada, the vast majority of such Common Shares are registered under the names of CDS & Co. (the registration name for CDS Depository and Clearing Services Inc., which acts as nominee for many Canadian brokerage firms). Common Shares held by brokers or their agents or nominees can only be voted (for or against resolutions) upon the instructions of the Beneficial Shareholder. Without specific instructions, brokers and their agents and nominees are prohibited from voting Common Shares for the broker's clients. Therefore, Beneficial Shareholders should ensure that instructions respecting the voting of their Common Shares are communicated to the appropriate person.


    Applicable regulatory policy requires intermediaries/brokers to seek voting instructions from Beneficial Shareholders in advance of shareholders' meetings. Every intermediary/broker has its own mailing procedures and provides its own return instructions which should be carefully followed by Beneficial Shareholders in order to ensure that their Common Shares are voted at the Meeting. Often, the form of proxy supplied to a Beneficial Shareholder by its broker is identical to the form of proxy provided to registered shareholders; however, its purpose is limited to instructing the registered shareholder how to vote on behalf of the Beneficial Shareholder. The majority of brokers now delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from clients to Broadridge Financial Services, Inc. ("Broadridge"). Broadridge typically mails a scanable voting instruction form in lieu of the form of proxy. The Beneficial Shareholder is requested to complete and return the voting instruction form to them by mail or facsimile. Alternatively, the Beneficial Shareholder can call a toll-free telephone number to vote the Common Shares held by the Beneficial Shareholder. Broadridge then tabulates the results of all instructions received and provides appropriate instructions respecting the voting of Common Shares to be represented at the Meeting. A Beneficial Shareholder receiving a voting instruction form cannot use that voting instruction form to vote Common Shares directly at the Meeting as the voting instruction form must be returned as directed by Broadridge well in advance of the Meeting in order to have the Common Shares voted.

    Although a Beneficial Shareholder may not be recognized directly at the Meeting for the purposes of voting Common Shares registered in the name of his broker (or agent of the broker), a Beneficial Shareholder may attend at the Meeting as proxyholder for a registered shareholder and vote the Common Shares in that capacity. Beneficial Shareholders who wish to attend at the Meeting and indirectly vote their Common Shares as proxyholder for a registered shareholder should enter their own names in the blank space on the instrument of proxy provided to them and return the same to their broker (or the broker's agent) in accordance with the instructions provided by such broker (or agent), well in advance of the Meeting.

    VOTING OF PROXIES

    All Common Shares represented at the Meeting by properly executed proxies will be voted on any ballot that may be called for and, where a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon has been specified in the accompanying form of proxy, the Common Shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with such instructions. In the absence of any such instruction, the persons whose names appear on the printed form of proxy will vote in favour of all the matters set out thereon. The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein. If any other business or amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting properly comes before the Meeting then discretionary authority is conferred upon the person appointed in the proxy to vote in the manner they see fit, in accordance with their best judgment. At the time of the printing of this Information Circular, Management knows of no such amendment, variation or other matter to come before the Meeting other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Meeting.

    SUPPLEMENTAL MAILING LIST

    Under National Instrument 51-102 - Continuous Disclosure Obligations, a person or corporation who in the future wishes to receive financial statements and the related management's discussion and analysis from the Corporation must deliver a written request for such material to the Corporation, together with a signed statement that the person or corporation is the owner of securities (other than debt instruments) of the Corporation. Shareholders who wish to receive financial statements and the related management's discussion and analysis are encouraged to send the enclosed mail card, together with the completed form of proxy to Equity Financial Trust Company, at 200 University Avenue, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5H 4H1. Copies of the Corporation's annual and interim financial statements are also available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

    - 2 -


    APPROVAL OF MATTERS

    Unless otherwise noted, approval of matters to be placed before the Meeting is by an "ordinary resolution", which is a resolution passed by a simple majority (50% plus 1) of the votes cast by Shareholders of the Corporation present and entitled to vote in person or by proxy.

    VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

    The authorized capital of the Corporation consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of convertible, redeemable, voting, non-participating shares (the "Preference Shares") of which, on the date of this Circular, 81,163,032 Common Shares and no Preference Shares were issued and outstanding.

    Common Shares

    The holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meeting of the Shareholders (except meetings at which only the holders of another class of shares are entitled to vote) and are entitled to one vote for each Common Share held. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the Preference Shares or any other shares ranking senior to the Common Shares, the holders of the Common Shares are entitled to: (a) receive any dividends as and when declared by the board of directors of the Corporation (the "Board") out of the assets of the Corporation properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the Board may from time to time determine; and (b) receive the remaining property of the Corporation in the event of any liquidation, dissolution of winding-up of the Corporation.

    Each Shareholder is entitled to one vote for each Common Share shown as registered in his or her name on the list of Shareholders. The list of Shareholders will be prepared as of October 28, 2011, the record date fixed for determining shareholders entitled to the notice of the Meeting.

    Other than as set out below, to the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Corporation, as of the date hereof, no person or company beneficially owns, or controls or directs, directly or indirectly, voting securities carrying ten percent (10%) or more of the voting rights attached to any class of voting securities of the Corporation.



    Shareholder


    Number of Securities Held
    % of Issued and
    Outstanding Voting
    Securities Held
    Centerpoint Resources Inc. 20,000,000 Common Shares 24.64%

    DIVIDEND POLICY

    The Corporation has not paid any dividends on the Common Shares to date and does not expect to pay dividends on such shares in the foreseeable future. It is anticipated that all available funds will be used to finance the future development of the Corporation.

    INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS OR COMPANIES IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED ON

    Management is not aware of any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, of any director or executive officer or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing in any matter to be acted on at the Meeting other than the election of directors or the appointment of auditors.

    STOCK OPTION PLAN

    The Corporation has established a stock option plan, ratified and adopted by the Shareholders on March 26, 2004, amended on October 30, 2006 and October 30, 2009 and ratified and re-confirmed by the Shareholders on November 30, 2009 (the "Option Plan"), for the granting for the granting of incentive stock options ("Options") to directors, officers and employees of the Corporation or to a consultant (the "Participants"). The Option Plan is intended to afford persons who provide services to the Corporation, whether as directors, officers, employees or consultants, an opportunity to obtain a proprietary interest in Grandview by permitting them to purchase Common Shares, thereby more closely aligning the personal interests of such directors, officers, employees and consultants to those of Shareholders, and to aid in attracting as well as retaining and encouraging the continued involvement of such persons with the Corporation.

    - 3 -


    Description of the Option Plan

    Under the Option Plan:

    Options may be granted in such numbers and with such vesting provisions as the Board may determine;

    (a)

    the exercise price of Options shall not be less than the "discounted market price" of the Common Shares at the date of granting such option. For purposes of the Option Plan, "discounted market price" means the greater of the closing market price of the underlying Common Shares on (a) the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on the last business day prior to the date on which the Option is granted, and (b) the date of the grant of the Option;

       
    (b)

    the term and expiry date of the Options granted shall be determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of granting of the Options;

       
    (c)

    the maximum term for Options is five years;

       
    (d)

    the Options are not assignable or transferable, with the exception of an assignment made to a personal representative of a deceased Participant;

       
    (e)

    the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to Options granted to any one person, when combined with any other share compensation arrangement, may not exceed 5% of the outstanding Common Shares (on a non-diluted basis);

       
    (f)

    the number of Common Shares, together with Grandview’s other previously established or proposed share compensation arrangements, (i) issuable (or reserved for issuance) to "insiders" of the Corporation may not exceed 10% of the outstanding Common Shares, or (ii) issued to "insiders" of Grandview within a one year period may not exceed 10% of the outstanding Common Shares;

       
    (g)

    the issuance of Common Shares to any one individual within a one-year period may not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares;

       
    (h)

    the issuance of Common Shares to any one "consultant" of the Corporation, within a one-year period, may not exceed 2% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares;

       
    (i)

    the issuance of Common Shares to any one "consultant" of the Corporation engaged to provide investor relation activities for the Corporation, within a one-year period, may not exceed 1% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares;

       
    (j)

    the vesting period or periods within the ten year maximum term during which an Option or a portion thereof may be exercised by a Participant shall be determined by the Board. Further, the Board may, in its sole discretion at any time or in the Option agreement in respect of any Options granted, accelerate or provide for the acceleration of, vesting of Options previously granted;

       
    (k)

    in the event of the resignation or retirement of a Participant, or the termination of the employment of a Participant, whether with or without cause or reasonable notice, prior to the expiry time of an Option, such Option shall cease and terminate on the ninetieth day following the effective date of such resignation, retirement or termination, and in the event of the death of a holder of Options, such Options shall be exercisable until the earlier of one year following the death of the holder, or the expiry time of such Option, whichever occurs first, and thereafter shall be of no further force or effect whatsoever as to the Common Shares in respect of which such Option has not previously been exercised;

    - 4 -



    (l)

    in the event of a sale of Grandview or all or substantially all of its property and assets or a change of control of Grandview, holders of Options, whether such Options have vested or not in accordance with their terms, may exercise such options until the earlier of the expiry of the Options and the thirtieth day following the sale of Grandview or all or substantially all of its property and assets or a change of control of Grandview;

       
    (m)

    the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance under the Option Plan, together with any Common Shares reserved for issuance under any other share compensation arrangement must not exceed 20% of the number of Common Shares, on a non-diluted basis, outstanding at the time; and

       
    (n)

    the Board retains the right to suspend, terminate, or discontinue the terms and conditions of the Option Plan by resolution of the Board.

    Recent Changes Made to the Stock Option Plans

    Effective October 27, 2011, the Board adopted certain changes to the Corporation's stock option plan in order to comply with the recent tax amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) concerning stock options awarded to employees, which came into force on January 1, 2011. The changes have the sole purpose of allowing the Corporation to establish the necessary measures to comply with the new income tax remittance obligations set out in the Income Tax Act (Canada). The approval of the Shareholders to the amendment was not required under the amendment provisions of the Option Plan or by the TSX and, accordingly, was not sought.

    SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

    The following table sets forth the number of Common Shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ("Options") issued pursuant to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance, the weighted average exercise price of such outstanding Options and the number of Common Shares remaining available for future issuance under such compensation plans as at May 31, 2011.





    Plan Category


    Number of securities to be
    issued upon exercise of
    outstanding Options(1)



    Weighted-average exercise
    price of outstanding Options
    Number of securities remaining
    available for future issuance
    under equity compensation plans
    (excluding securities reflected in
    the first column)(1)
    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) 5,250,000 $0.33 10,982,606
    Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A N/A N/A
    TOTAL 5,250,000 $0.33 10,982,606

    __________________________
    Note:

    (1)

    The Corporation currently has a rolling 20% stock option plan. As at May 31, 2011, 81,163,032 Common Shares were issued and outstanding.

    INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

    None of the directors or executive officers of the Corporation were indebted to the Corporation as at May 31, 2011.

    - 5 -


    MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

    Management functions of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are not to any substantial degree performed by persons other than the directors or executive officers of the Corporation or subsidiary of the Corporation.

    INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

    The directors and officers of the Corporation are not aware of any transaction since the beginning of the Corporation's last completed financial year or any proposed transaction that has materially affected or will materially affect the Corporation in which any director or senior officer of the Corporation, any proposed Management nominee for election as a director, any person beneficially owning or exercising control or direction over more than 10% of the Common Shares of the Corporation or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing has or had a material interest, direct or indirect.

    ORDINARY BUSINESS

    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDITORS' REPORT

    At the Meeting, Shareholders will consider the financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2011 and the auditors' report thereon, but no vote by the Shareholders with respect thereto is required or proposed to be taken.

    APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS

    Shareholders of the Corporation will be asked at the Meeting to appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PWC") as the Corporation's auditors to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation, and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix the auditors' remuneration.

    UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, CHATERED ACCOUNTANTS AS AUDITORS OF THE CORPORATION UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND FOR THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE DIRECTORS TO FIX THEIR REMUNERATION.

    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

    The articles of the Corporation provide for a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of ten (10) directors. The Corporation has determined that six (6) directors will be elected at the Meeting.

    UNLESS A CHOICE IS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, IT IS INTENDED THAT THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE PROXIES HEREBY SOLICITED WILL BE VOTED BY THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES WHOSE NAMES ARE SET FORTH BELOW, ALL OF WHOM ARE NOW MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND HAVE BEEN SINCE THE DATES INDICATED.

    Management does not contemplate that any nominee will be unwilling or unable to serve as director but, if that should occur for any reason prior to the Meeting, it is intended that the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy shall reserve the right to vote for another nominee in his discretion. Each of the following persons is nominated to hold office as a director until the next annual meeting or until his successor is duly elected, unless his office is earlier vacated in accordance with the by-laws of the Corporation.

    - 6 -




    Name and Municipality of
    Residence

    Office held with
    Grandview


    Director Since


    Principal Occupation
    Common Shares
    Beneficially Owned
    Directly or Indirectly(1)
    Paul Sarjeant
    Burlington, Ontario, Canada
    President, Chief Executive Officer and Director November 7, 2006 From 1999 until November, 2006 operated a securities business focused on strategic planning and investment analysis. Since his appointment, Mr. Sarjeant's full time employment has been with the Corporation. 133,333(2)
    D. Richard Brown(3)
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Director March 26, 2004 Partner at Osprey Capital Partners. 105,000(4)
    Peter Born (3)
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Director June, 2007 Ph.D., professional registered geologist (ON) and President of 1727856 Ontario Ltd. 133,333(6)
    Ken Hight(5)
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Director May 12, 2008 From 2000-2005 served as CEO of ITG Canada and from 2005 – 2008 served as CEO of E*Trade Canada and concurrently EVP, E*Trade Financial New York, CEO of Liquidnet Cnada until September 2009. Currently Chair and CEO of Portage Mining Corp. and director of two other TSX-V companies. 133,333(7)
    Jack Austin(3)
    Vancouver, British
    Columbia, Canada
    Director December 3, 2009 Currently Senior Advisor- International to Stern Partners Inc., President of Centerpoint Resources Inc., Chairman and director of New Pacific Minerals Corp. and Director of Yalian Steel Corporation. 600,000(8)
    Ted Nunn(5)
    Vancouver, British
    Columbia, Canada
    Director December 3, 2009 President of Centershield Gold Mines Inc and VP Technical Services for Centerpoint Resources Inc. Nil(9)

    __________________________
    Notes:

    (1)

    The information as to shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, not being within the knowledge of the Corporation, has been furnished by the respective directors and executive officers individually.

    (2)

    Paul Sarjeant holds options to purchase up to a total of 1,250,000 common shares of the Corporation, 600,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 650,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Sarjeant under the Option Plan. Mr. Sarjeant also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 and expiring on December 3, 2011.

    (3)

    Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are D. Richard Brown (Chairman), Jack Austin and Peter Born.

    (4)

    D. Richard Brown holds options to purchase up to a total of 650,000 common shares of the Corporation, 200,000 being exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. These options were granted to Mr. Brown under the Option Plan.

    (5)

    Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Ken Hight (Chairman), Ted Nunn and Michael Hitch. Mr. Hitch is not standing for re-election to the Board.

    (6)

    Dr. Peter Born holds options to purchase up to a total of 600,000 common shares of the Corporation, 150,000 of which are exercisable at the price of $0.68 per common share expiring on September 27, 2012, and the remaining 450,000 exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Dr. Born also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 and expiring on December 3, 2011.

    (7)

    Ken Hight holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring June 23, 2014. Mr. Hight also holds 133,333 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 and expiring on December 3, 2011.

    - 7 -



    (8)

    Jack Austin holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014. Mr. Austin also holds 600,000 warrants exercisable at the price of $0.12 and expiring on December 3, 2011.

    (9)

    Ted Nunn holds options to purchase up to a total of 450,000 common shares of the Corporation which are exercisable at the price of $0.15 per common share expiring December 9, 2014.

    Corporate Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

    To the best knowledge of the Corporation, no director or officer or principal shareholder of the Corporation is, as at the date hereof or has been within the last ten years prior to the date hereof, (a) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued while the director or officer of the Corporation was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; (b) subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied a company access to any exemption under securities legislation that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days that was issued after the director or officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in such capacity; (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or (d) became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

    To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director or executive officer of the Corporation, (a) has been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory or (b) has been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

    Individual Bankruptcies

    To the knowledge of the Corporation, no director of the Corporation is, or has within the ten years prior to the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of that individual.

    SPECIAL BUSINESS

    EXTENSION OF WARRANTS

    The Shareholders of the Corporation will be asked at the Meeting to consider, and if thought advisable, to approve an extension of the expiry date of 26,666,665 common share purchase warrants of Grandview issued on December 3, 2009 (the "Warrants"). The Warrants were originally issued as part of a private placement financing on December 3, 2009. The Warrants are exercisable into Common Shares of the Corporation at an exercise price of $0.12 per Common Share and will expire on December 3, 2011, subject to receipt of the approval of the Shareholders to extend the expiry date by one year to December 3, 2012. Of the 26,666,665 Warrants issued, none of the Warrants have been exercised as of October 28, 2011.

    Of the 26,666,665 Warrants, 21,066,665 are held by insiders of the Corporation as follows: 20,000,000 Warrants are held by Centerpoint Resources Inc., 133,333 Warrants are held by Peter Born, 66,666 Warrants are held by Michael Hitch, 133,333 Warrants are held by Paul Sarjeant, 133,333 Warrants are held by Ken Hight and 600,000 Warrants are held by Jack Austin. As a result, "disinterested" Shareholder approval is required to extend the expiry date of the Warrants.

    - 8 -


    The Warrants are currently significantly out-of-the-money and are not reflective of the economic interest that was contemplated when the Warrants were granted, and the Board decided to give the Warrant holders more time to consider and make a further investment in the Corporation through the exercise of their Warrants. Consequently, on October 6, 2011, the Board adopted a resolution, subject to regulatory approval, authorizing the extension of the expiry date of the Warrants. The Board has unanimously approved the extension of the expiry of the warrants to December 3, 2012, and on October 18, 2011 the Corporation received TSX approval, subject to customary conditions of the TSX, to extend the expiry date of the Warrants. The exercise price of the Warrants will remain the same. To satisfy the conditions of the TSX approval, the Corporation is required to seek "disinterested" Shareholder approval for the extension of the expiry date of the Warrants held by insiders of the Corporation.

    The Board is requesting the shareholders of the Corporation to pass, with or without variation, the following resolution:

    "BE IT RESOLVED THAT, as an ordinary resolution of disinterested Shareholders of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation"):

      1.

    The extension of the expiry date of the Warrants to December 3, 2012, as more particularly described in the information circular of the Corporation dated October 28, 2011, is hereby approved; and

         
      2.

    Any one director or officer of the Corporation be and is hereby authorized to make all such arrangements and do all acts and things, and to sign and execute all documents and instruments in writing, whether under the corporate seal of the Corporation or otherwise, as may be considered necessary or advisable to give full force and effect to the foregoing."

    In order to be effective, the resolution must be passed by a simple majority of the votes cast by Shareholders at the Meeting, excluding the votes held directly or indirectly by the holders or Warrants. The Corporation estimates that votes attached to 26,666,665 Common Shares will be withheld from voting on this matter as they represent Common Shares beneficially owned by the holders of Warrants.

    REPEAL AND ADOPTION OF GENERAL BY-LAWS

    At the Meeting, the Shareholders will be asked to consider, and if deemed advisable, to repeal and replace the Corporation's current By-Law Number 1 and By-Law No. 4 (the "Old By-Laws") with By-Law No. 1 (the "New By-Laws") in order to reflect the current circumstances and practices of Grandview and certain amendments to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (the "OBCA"), which came into force on August 1, 2007. The Corporation's By-Laws have not been updated since 1987, and the New By-Laws are typical of by-laws of public companies incorporated under the OBCA. A copy of the New By-Laws is attached hereto as Schedule "B". The material changes may be summarized as follows:

    (a)

    The quorum necessary for board meetings has changed from requiring the nearest whole number of directors which is equal to or greater than two-fifths of the number of current directors to a majority of the number of directors or minimum number of directors required by the articles, and if the Corporation has fewer than three directors, all of the directors must be present at any meeting of directors to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business;

       
    (b)

    Conflict of interest provisions have been added to reflect amendments to the OBCA prohibiting conflicted directors from attending any part of a meeting during which the contract or transaction creating the conflict is discussed;

       
    (c)

    Indemnity provisions have been added to reflect OBCA amendments which have broadened the language of indemnity coverage to include "investigative or other proceedings in which the indemnitee is involved because of association with the corporation" and which also now permit Grandview to advance monies to an indemnified individual for costs, charges and expenses associated with such proceedings;

    - 9 -



    (d)

    The record date for notice of meetings of shareholders has been added to reflect OBCA amendments (as a result of this amendment, the record date shall not precede by more than sixty days nor by less than thirty days the date on which the meeting is to be held); and

       
    (e)

    The notice and waiver provisions have been amended to reflect OBCA amendments that allow for persons to send notices and consents to waive by electronic means in accordance with the Electronic Commerce Act, 2000.

    Pursuant to the OBCA, in order to be effective, the Shareholders are required by ordinary resolution (the "By-law Resolution"), to confirm the repeal of By-law Number One and the adoption of the New By-Laws. The form of ordinary resolution to approve the By-law Resolution to be considered by the Shareholders at the Meeting is as follows:

    "BE IT RESOLVED THAT, as an ordinary resolution of the Shareholders of Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Corporation"):

      1.

    Pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (the "OBCA"), the repeal of By-Law Number 1 and By-Law No. 4 and their replacement with By-law No. 1 in the form attached as Schedule "B" to the Corporation's Information Circular dated October 28, 2011, prepared for the purpose of the annual and special meeting of shareholders to be held November 28, 2011, is hereby approved, ratified and confirmed; and

         
      2.

    Any one director or officer of the Corporation be and is hereby authorized to make all such arrangements and do all acts and things, and to sign and execute all documents and instruments in writing, whether under the corporate seal of the Corporation or otherwise, as may be considered necessary or advisable to give full force and effect to the foregoing."

    To be approved, the above resolution must be passed by a majority of the votes cast by Shareholders at the Meeting in respect of this resolution.

    STATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    The Corporation's Statement of Executive Compensation, in accordance with the requirements of Form 51-102F6 – Statement of Executive Compensation, is set forth below, which contains information about the compensation paid to, or earned by, the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and each of the other three most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation earning more than CDN$150,000.00 in total compensation as at May 31, 2011 (the "Named Executive Officers" or "NEO's") during the Corporation's last three most recently completed financial years. Based on the foregoing, Paul Sarjeant, President, CEO and a director of the Corporation, and Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, are the Corporation's only Named Executive Officers as at May 31, 2011.

    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    Compensation Review Process

    The Corporation has a Compensation Committee (the "Compensation Committee") but does not retain a compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee oversees an annual review of director and executive compensation to ensure development of a compensation strategy that properly aligns the interests of directors and executives with the long-term interests of the Corporation and its Shareholders. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Ken Hight, Ted Nunn and Dr. Michael Hitch.

    The Compensation Committee reviews on an annual basis the cash compensation, performance and overall compensation package for each NEO. It then submits to the Board recommendations with respect to the basic salary, bonus and participation in share compensation arrangements for each NEO. After discussing various factors with both Management and peers in the industry, and receiving recommendations for bonuses and 2011 salaries for executive officers, the Compensation Committee made its recommendations to the Board for approval. In conducting its review of Management’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee was satisfied that all recommendations complied with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy and guidelines set forth above.

    - 10 -


    Objectives of the Compensation Program

    The objectives of the Corporation's compensation program are to attract, hold and inspire performance of members of Management of a quality and nature that will enhance the sustainable growth of the Corporation.

    To determine compensation payable, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation paid for directors and officers of companies of similar business, size and stage of development and determine an appropriate compensation reflecting the need to provide incentive and compensation for the time and effort expended by the directors and NEO's while taking into account the financial and other resources of the Corporation.

    The annual salaries for NEOs are designed to be comparable to executive compensation packages for similar positions at companies with similar financial, operating and industrial characteristics. The NEOs will be paid an annual salary that also takes into account his or her existing professional qualifications and experience. The NEOs' performances and salaries are to be reviewed periodically on the anniversary of their appointment to their respective officer-ships with the Corporation. Increases in salary are to be evaluated on an individual basis and are performance and market-based.

    The Board is given discretion to determine and adjust, year to year, the relative weighting of each form of compensation discussed above in a manner which best measures the success of the Corporation and its NEO's.

    Elements of Executive Compensation

    The Corporation's executive compensation program is based on the objectives of: (a) recruiting and retaining the executives critical to the success of the Corporation; (b) providing fair and competitive compensation; (c) balancing the interests of Management and Shareholders; and (d) rewarding performance, on the basis of both individual and corporate performance.

    For the financial year ended May 31, 2011, the Corporation's executive compensation program consisted of the following elements:

      (a)

    a base salary, incentive cash bonuses and other compensation (together, a "Short-Term Incentive"); and

         
      (b)

    a long-term equity compensation consisting of stock options granted under the Corporation's stock incentive plan (each, a "Long-Term Incentive").

    The specific rationale and design of each of these elements are outlined in detail below.

    Element of Compensation Summary and Purpose of Element
       
    Short-Term Incentive Plan  
       
    Base Salary Executive annual base salaries are set at a level that is competitive with compensation for executive officers of peer group oil and gas companies and having regard to the potential longer term compensation provided by the Option Plan. Salaries form an essential element of the Corporation's compensation mix as they are the first base measure to compare and remain competitive relative to peer groups. Base salaries are fixed and therefore not subject to uncertainty and are used as the base to determine other elements of compensation and benefits. The Compensation Committee and the Board review NEO salaries at least annually. Typically, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, makes annual salary adjustments no later than April 15th of each year for the 12 month period from June 1st to May 31st.

    - 11 -



    Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

    Any bonus paid to the NEO's is entirely within the discretion of the Board, following consideration by the Compensation Committee. In making bonus determinations, the Board reviews corporate and individual performance.

    Annual performance-based cash bonuses are a variable component of compensation designed to reward the Corporation’s executive officers for maximizing annual operating performance.

     

    Other Compensation (Perquisites)

    There are currently no other forms of compensation.

     

    Long-Term Incentive Plan

     

    Stock Options

    The granting of stock options is a variable component of compensation intended to reward the NEO's for their success in achieving sustained, long-term profitability and increases in stock value.

    The executive officers are entitled to participate in the Option Plan which forms an important element of the Corporations compensation policies. Options grants are periodically made to recognize exemplary performance (including in connection with a promotion within the Corporation) and provide for long-term reward and incentive for increasing shareholder value and align the interests of the executive officers with the long- term interests of shareholders. Options may also be granted to executive officers upon their commencement of service.

    Base Salary

    In determining the base salary of an NEO, the Board's practice in recent years has been to consider the recommendations made by the Compensation Committee and then review and summarize these recommendations as well as the previous year’s remuneration paid to executives with similar titles at a comparative group of companies in the marketplace. In determining the base salary to be paid to a particular executive officer, the Board also considers the particular responsibilities related to the position, the experience level of the NEO, and his or her past performance at the Corporation.

    The Board believes that it is appropriate to establish compensation levels based in large part on a general consideration against similar companies, both in terms of compensation practices as well as levels of compensation. In this way, the Corporation can gauge if its compensation is competitive in the marketplace for its talent, as well as ensure that the Corporation's compensation is reasonable. Accordingly, the Board reviews compensation levels for the Named Executive Officers against compensation levels of the comparison companies which are identified by the Board.

    Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

    NEO's are eligible for annual cash bonuses, and the Board considers both corporate and the individual performance of each NEO. There is no policy currently in place for determining bonuses, and the Board reviews generally the individual’s impact on maximizing operating performance. In general the Corporation will consider the following factors, depending on the relevance of these factors to the particular NEO, when determining potential bonuses:

      (a)

    performance against budget;

         
      (b)

    expense control;

         
      (c)

    performance factors; and

         
      (d)

    other exceptional or unexpected factors.

    In taking into account the financial performance aspect, it is recognized that NEO's cannot control certain factors, such as overall market conditions. When applying the financial performance criteria, the Board considers factors over which the NEO's can exercise control, such as meeting budget targets established by the Board at the beginning of each year, controlling costs, taking successful advantage of business opportunities and enhancing the competitive and business prospects of the Corporation.

    - 12 -


    With respect to the financial year ended May 31, 2011, no bonuses were awarded to any Named Executive Officers.

    Other Compensation – Perquisites

    With respect to the financial year ended May 31, 2011, no perquisites were paid for by the Corporation in respect of the NEO’s.

    Stock Options

    To determine the granting of stock options to its NEO's, the Committee reviews the matter and makes a recommendation to the Board. The Board reviews each recommendation and decides whether to accept, reject or alter such recommendation. The Board considers prior grants, the role of the individual in the operating performance of the company, and salary and cash bonuses being paid.

    During the financial year ended May 31, 2011, no stock options were granted to the Named Executive Officers.

    Other Long-Term Incentive Plans

    The Corporation does not have any other long-term incentive plans and does not provide retirement benefits to its employees.

    Overview of How the Compensation Program Fits with Compensation Goals

    1.        Attract, Hold and Inspire Key Talent

    The compensation package meets the goal of attracting, holding and motivating key talent in a highly competitive mineral exploration environment through the following elements:

      (a)

    A competitive cash compensation program, consisting of base salary and bonus opportunity, which is generally above similar opportunities.

         
      (b)

    Providing an opportunity to participate in the Corporation's growth through options.

    2.        Alignment of Interests of NEO's with Interests of the Shareholders

    The compensation package meets the goal of aligning the interests of the NEO's with the interests of Shareholders through the following elements:

      (a)

    Through the grant of stock options, if the price of the Corporation shares increases over time, both NEO's and Shareholders will benefit.

         
      (b)

    By providing a vesting period on stock awards, NEO's have an interest in increasing the price of the Corporation's shares over time, rather than focusing on short-term increases.

    - 13 -


    Performance Graph

    The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming an initial investment of $100 in Common Shares on May 31, 2006 against the cumulative total shareholder return of the S&P/TSX Composite Index for all of the Corporation's most recently completed financial years since it became a reporting issuer, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.

    __________________________
    Note:

    (1) Listed as "GVX" on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

    Summary Compensation Table

    The following tables provide information for the three most recently completed financial years ended May 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 regarding compensation earned by each of the following Named Executive Officers of the Corporation: (a) Paul Sarjeant, President, CEO and a director of the Corporation; and (b) Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.

    The first table outlines the information for the financial years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 in accordance with the new Form 51-102F6 and the second table outlines the information for the financial years ended May 31, 2009 in accordance with Form 51-102F6 which came into force on March 30, 2004, as amended.

    Unless otherwise noted, salaries for the Named Executive Officers are paid in Canadian dollars.

    Financial Years Ended May 31, 2011 and May 31, 2010





    Name and principal
    position





    Year




    Salary
    ($)


    Share-
    based
    awards
    ($)


    Option-
    based
    awards
    ($)
    Non-equity incentive plan
    compensation
    ($)




    Pension
    Value ($)


    All other
    compensati
    on
    ($)


    Total
    compensati
    on
    ($)
    Annual
    incentive
    plans
    Long-term
    incentive
    plans
    Paul Sarjeant
    President, CEO and a Director
    2011
    2010
    150,000
    150,000
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    71,500
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    10,000
    150,000
    231,500
    Ernest Cleave
    Chief Financial Officer
    2011
    2010
    36,000
    36,000
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    24,750
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    36,000
    60,750

    - 14 -


    Financial Year Ended May 31, 2009

     Name and Principal Position
    Annual Compensation

    Long-Term Compensation






    All Other
    Compensation
    ($)
    Awards Payouts







    Year






    Salary
    ($)






    Bonus
    ($)





    Other Annual
    Compensation
    ($)



    Securities
    Under
    Options
    Granted
    (#)



    Shares or
    Units Subject
    to Resale
    Restrictions
    ($)





    LTIP
    Payouts
    ($)
    Paul Sarjeant
    President, CEO and a
    Director
    2009 150,010.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil N/A 94,000
    Ernest Cleave
    Chief Financial
    Officer
    2009 51,794.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil N/A Nil

    Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion

    The Corporation has entered into executive employment agreements with each of its Named Executive Officers, as described below.

    Paul Sarjeant

    The Corporation entered into a consulting agreement made effective as of the 31st day of October, 2006 (the "Sarjeant Agreement") with Paul Sarjeant and his duly registered sole proprietorship (the "Consultant"), engaging Mr. Sarjeant to act as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. The compensation payable for such services is a base salary of CDN$150,000.00 per year, payable in monthly payments of CDN$12,500.00, subject to review by the Board, the payment of business expenses, the provision of consultant benefits and the awarding of bonuses at the option and discretion of the Board, to be payable in either cash or Common Shares. The initial term of the Sarjeant Agreement was three (3) years, subject to additional one (1) year extensions, and was renewed on October 31, 2009 for a further two (2) year term.

    Ernest Cleave

    The Corporation entered into a consulting contract agreement made as of the 10th day of November, 2005 with Ernest Cleave (the "Cleave Agreement"), engaging Mr. Cleave to act as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. The compensation payable for such services is a contract fee of CDN$36,000.00, payable in monthly payments of CDN$3,000.00, subject to review by the board, and compensation of expenses. The initial term of the Cleave Agreement was from November 10, 2005 to May 31, 2006, which term is automatically extended for additional two (2) year terms until otherwise terminated.

    Incentive Plan Awards

    The following table provides information regarding the incentive plan awards for each Named Executive Officer outstanding as of May 31, 2011.

    - 15 -


    Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards






    Name and principal
    position
    Option-based Awards Share-based Awards

    Number of
    securities
    underlying
    unexercised
    options (#)



    Option
    exercise price
    (C$)




    Option
    expiration date


    Value of
    unexercised
    in-the-money
    options ($) (1)


    Number of shares
    or units of shares
    that have not vested
    (#)

    Market or
    payout value of
    share-based
    awards that have
    not vested ($)
    Paul Sarjeant
    President, CEO and a Director
    600,000
    650,000
    0.68
    0.15
    September 27, 2012
    June 23, 2014
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Ernest Cleave
    Chief Financial Officer
    250,000
    225,000
    0.68
    0.15
    September 27, 2012
    June 23, 2014
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil

    The following table provides information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for the financial year ended May 31, 2011.

    Value Vested or Earned During the Financial Year Ended May 31, 2011


    Name and principal
    position

    Option-based awards – Value
    vested during the year ($)

    Share-based awards – Value
    vested during the year ($)
    Non-equity incentive plan
    compensation – Value earned during
    the year ($)
    Paul Sarjeant
    President, CEO and a
    Director
    Nil Nil Nil
    Ernest Cleave
    Chief Financial Officer
    Nil Nil Nil

    Pension Plan Benefits

    The Corporation does not currently provide pension plan benefits to its Named Executive Officers.

    Termination and Change of Control Benefits

    The termination and change of control benefits set forth in the executive employment agreements entered into between the Corporation and each of its Named Executive Officers are described below.

    Paul Sarjeant

    The Sarjeant Agreement, described in "Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion", above, does not contain any change of control provisions. The termination provisions are as follows:

      (a)

    If the Corporation terminates the Sarjeant Agreement at will, without cause, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant within sixty (60) days of the date of termination a settlement amount equal to nine (9) months' of the base salary at the rate in effect immediately prior to the effective date of termination and, to the extent earned, pay to the Consultant within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement;

    - 16 -



      (b)

    If the Corporation terminates the Sarjeant Agreement for cause or if, during the term of the Sarjeant Agreement, Mr. Sarjeant, in the reasonable judgment of the Board, acting in good faith, becomes unable, by reason of physical or mental disability, with or without reasonable accommodation, to adequately perform the duties and obligations under the Sarjeant Agreement, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant, to the extent earned, within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement;

         
      (c)

    If the Consultant terminates the Sarjeant Agreement at will by giving three (3) months' prior written notice to the Board, the Corporation shall pay to the Consultant within ten (10) business days of such termination, all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement

         
      (d)

    In the event of dissolution of the Consultant or the death of Mr. Sarjeant, the Corporation shall pay all accrued amounts due and owing under the Sarjeant Agreement and such other death benefits that Mr. Sarjeant's survivors may be entitled to under such plans, programs and policies maintained by the Corporation;

         
      (e)

    In the event of termination of the Sarjeant Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (b) and (c), above, any stock options held by the Consultant that have not vested as of the date of such termination shall be deemed to be terminated and any stock options held by the Consultant that have vested as of the date of such termination shall remain exercisable subject to the terms of the stock option plan and/or agreement pursuant to which said stock options were originally granted;

         
      (f)

    In the event of termination of the Sarjeant Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (d), above, all unvested stock options held by the Consultant shall be deemed to have vested as of the effective date of termination or deemed termination to allow the Consultant (or his personal representatives) to exercise the options to purchase shares granted thereby with regard to that number of shares that the Consultant would have been entitled to purchase had his employment continued for a period of three (3) months from the effective date of such termination or deemed termination; and

         
      (g)

    In the event that any of the terms of such options set forth in paragraphs (e) and (f), above, are not ascertainable or in the event that applicable securities legislation precludes the acceleration of the vesting dates in the manner described herein, the Corporation agrees to compensate the Consultant by way of a cash payment, paid within one hundred twenty (120) days of the effective date of termination of the Consultant, of that amount of money which the Consultant would have been entitled to if it had exercised any such options on the effective date of termination or deemed termination at the applicable exercise price and sold the securities on the exchange or market where the majority of the Corporation’s shares are then traded, at a price equal to the average trading price for the last ten (10) business days preceding the effective date of termination on which the subject securities were traded.

    Ernest Cleave

    The Cleave Agreement, described in "Summary Compensation – Narrative Discussion", above, does not contain any change of control provisions. The termination provisions are as follows:

      (a)

    If the Corporation terminates the Cleave Agreement at will, the Corporation shall pay to Mr. Cleave an amount equal to three (3) months of the contract fee at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, payable in one lump sum on the date of termination; and

         
      (b)

    If Mr. Cleave terminates the Cleave Agreement for "good reason", the Corporation shall pay to Mr. Cleave an amount equal to one (1) month of the contract fee at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, payable in one lump sum on the date of termination, where the term "good reason" means, if, without Mr. Cleave's consent, there is a material reduction in his duties and responsibilities, there is a material reduction of the contract fee or the Corporation breaches any material provision of the Cleave Agreement and such breach is not remedied within thirty (30) days' notice.

    - 17 -


    Estimated Incremental Payment on Change of Control or Termination

    The following table provides details regarding the estimated incremental payments from the Corporation to each of Paul Sarjeant and Ernest Cleave upon a change of control or on termination by the Corporation without cause, assuming a triggering event occurred on May 31, 2011.


    NEO and Agreement
    Severance Period
    (# of months)
    Base Salary
    (CDN$)
    Total Incremental Payment
    (CDN$)
    Paul Sarjeant – Sarjeant Agreement 9 150,000.00 112,500.00
    Ernest Cleave – Cleave Agreement 3 36,000.00 9,000.00
     TOTALS: 12 186,000.00 121,500.00

    Director Compensation

    The Corporation has no standard arrangement pursuant to which directors are compensated for their services as directors, except for the granting from time to time of incentive stock options in accordance with the Corporation's 2004 stock option plan. Currently, the directors of the Corporation do not receive any compensation for attending meetings of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors.

    Director Compensation Table

    The following table provides information regarding compensation paid to the Corporation's non-executive directors during the financial year ended May 31, 2011. Information regarding the compensation paid to Paul Sarjeant during the financial year ended May 31, 2011 (including as a director) is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.



    Name

    Fees
    earned ($)
    Share-based
    awards
    ($) (1)
    Option-based
    awards
    ($)
    Non-equity incentive
    plan compensation
    ($)

    All other
    compensation ($)

    Total
    ($)
    D. Richard Brown Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
    Michael Hitch Nil Nil Nil Nil 10,000 Nil
    Peter Born Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
    Ken Hight Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
    Jack Austin Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
    Ted Nunn Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
    TOTALS Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

    Director Compensation – Narrative Discussion

    Incentive Plan Awards

    The following table provides information regarding the incentive plan awards for each non-executive director outstanding as of May 31, 2011. Information regarding the incentive plan awards for Paul Sarjeant during the financial year ended May 31, 2011 is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

    - 18 -


    Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards







    Name
    Option-based Awards Share-based Awards

    Number of
    securities
    underlying
    unexercised
    options (#)



    Option
    exercise price
    (C$)




    Option
    expiration date


    Value of
    unexercised in-
    the-money
    options ($)


    Number of shares
    or units of shares
    that have not vested
    (#)

    Market or
    payout value of
    share-based
    awards that have
    not vested ($)
    D. Richard Brown
    200,000
    450,000
    0.68
    0.15
    September 27, 2012
    June 23, 2014
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Michael Hitch
    225,000
    450,000
    0.68
    0.15
    September 27, 2012
    June 23, 2014
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Peter Born
    150,000
    450,000
    0.68
    0.15
    September 27, 2012
    June 23, 2014
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Ken Hight 450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
    Jack Austin 450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
    Ted Nunn 450,000 0.15 June 23, 2014 Nil Nil Nil
    Michael Hitch
    225,000
    450,000
    0.68
    0.15
    September 27, 2012
    June 23, 2014
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil

    The following table provides information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for each non-executive director for the financial year ended May 31, 2011. Information regarding the value vested or earned of incentive plan awards for each of Dr. Michael Hitch and Paul Sarjeant for the financial year ended May 31, 2011 is disclosed in the sections above relating to executive compensation.

    Value Vested or Earned During the Financial Year Ended May 31, 2011



    Name

    Option-based awards – Value
    vested during the year ($)

    Share-based awards – Value
    vested during the year ($)
    Non-equity incentive plan
    compensation – Value earned during
    the year ($)
    D. Richard Brown Nil Nil Nil
    Michael Hitch Nil Nil Nil
    Peter Born Nil Nil Nil
    Ken Hight Nil Nil Nil
    Jack Austin Nil Nil Nil
    Ted Nunn Nil Nil Nil

    Retirement Policy for Directors

    The Corporation does not have a retirement policy for its directors.

    Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

    The Corporation procured and funded a directors' and officers' insurance policy with a limit of $2,000,000 liability and carrying $25,000 deductible for an annual premium of $13,000 for the year ended December 21, 2011.

    - 19 -


    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

    Statement of Corporate Governance

    Effective June 30, 2005 National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices ("NI 58-101") of the Canadian Securities Administrators was adopted. Pursuant to NI 58-101 an issuer whose common shares are traded on the TSX and which issuer is seeking proxies from its security holders for the purposes of electing directors must include in its management information circular the corporate governance practices which have been adopted by the issuer as more fully set out in NI 58-101.

    Corporate governance refers to the manner in which a board of directors oversees the management and direction of a corporation. Governance is not a static issue, and must be judged from time-to-time based on the evolution of a corporation with respect to its size and the nature or its business, and upon the changing standards of the community. Not all corporate governance systems are alike. The Corporation's approach has been developed with respect to the Corporation's growth and current status. The composition of the Board is reviewed on an annual basis by the full Board and Management.

    In reviewing the issue of corporate governance, the Board has determined to perform the function as an entire Board. The Board's mandate was to consider corporate governance matters and make recommendations consistent with the Corporation's position and size as a junior mining corporation. The resulting approach to corporate governance adopted by the Board reflects these recommendations and recognizes the responsibility of the Board for the stewardship of the Corporation.

    The Corporation's approach to corporate governance is set out in Schedule "A" attached to this Circular. Through regular review at quarterly meetings, the Board will continue to examine these issues in light of the Corporation's development in the mineral exploration business. In addition, and as required by Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees ("MI 52-110"), the Corporation is required to set out detailed information concerning its audit committee (the "Audit Committee") in the Corporation's Annual Information Form which was dated August 29, 2011 (the "AIF") and as such information concerning the Audit Committee of the Corporation can be found on pages 39-41 of the AIF and the full text of the Audit Committee Charter is set out in Schedule "A" of the AIF.

    The Board is currently composed of six (7) directors. One (1) of these directors is a member of Management and six (6) are outside directors who are unrelated as such term is described in the TSX Guidelines for Corporate Governance (the "Guidelines").

    For the Corporation, the implementation of a detailed system to address every issue of corporate governance would be an undue strain on the resources and finances of a junior corporation. In order to address a wide range of issues of governance more effectively, the board has elected to undertake three (3) areas of activity through board discussion, consensus or through the partial assistance of the Board, as follows:

    The tasks of appointing and assessing directors, and the assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors, are carried out by the full Board, rather than by appointed committees. New directors are given background materials and a review of the Corporation's development.

      a.

    The Board monitors Management on a regular basis. The annual budget is reviewed regularly by the Board and by the Audit Committee as a basis to assess performance and progress. This procedure is favoured over the use of formal mandates which would define limits to Management's responsibilities, or the use of procedures to approve the Chief Executive Officer's corporate objectives to ensure the Board can function independently of Management. However, the Board will consider, on an ongoing basis, issues concerning the independence of the Board from Management.

         
      b.

    The Board has not adopted a system that would enable an individual director to engage an advisor at the expense of the Corporation in appropriate circumstances. At this time, agreement by the Board to any such retainer, if at the expense of the Corporation, would be required.

    - 20 -


    The Board has appointed a Chairman who is other than the Chief Executive Officer.

    The committees of the Board are comprised primarily of outside directors and function as set out below.

    The Audit Committee meets as required to review the annual and quarterly financial statements, matters relating to the securities commissions, investments and transactions that could adversely affect the well-being of the Corporation and Management's recommendations regarding share issues of the Corporation. The Audit Committee also establishes and monitors procedures to reduce conflicts of interest and for reviewing audit and financial matters. Through meetings with external auditors and senior Management, the Audit Committee discusses, among other things, the effectiveness of the internal control procedures established for the Corporation. At all times, at least one (1) Audit Committee member possesses accounting or related financial expertise, while the remaining members are, at minimum, possessed of significant experience in analyzing the financial condition of corporations. The Board has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee which sets out the responsibilities of the Audit Committee and provides guidance to Audit Committee members as to their duties which charter is attached to the Corporation's AIF, as described above. The Audit Committee of the Corporation currently consists of three (3) members: D. Richard Brown, Jack Austin and Peter Born. Each of Mr. Brown, Mr. Austin and Dr. Born all qualify as independent directors and are financially literate as defined in MI 51-110.

    The Compensation Committee reviews compensation practices and Management succession and approves the remuneration of the Corporation's senior executives, including the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also monitors the integrity of Management through periodic meetings with the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of three (3) directors: Ken Height, Ted Nunn and Dr. Michael Hitch. Each of Mr. Hight, Mr. Nunn and Dr. Hitch qualify as independent directors as defined in MI 52-110.

    Finally, although the Guidelines do not emphasize issues of environmental concern, the Board recognizes its responsibility to ensure that the Corporation's operations do not result in an adverse impact on the environment.

    The Board remains committed to the ongoing development and improvement of the Corporation, its systems and in particular corporate governance. Shareholder feedback is encouraged at all times and commentary is always welcome. Shareholders are invited to address their comments to the attention of Chairman.

    OTHER MATTERS

    Management is not aware of any other business to come before the Meeting other than as set forth in the Notice of Meeting accompanying this Information Circular. If any other business properly comes before the Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the Instrument of Proxy to vote the Common Shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment on such matter.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Additional information relating to the Corporation may be found on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com. Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited financial statements and management discussion and analysis for the year ended May, 31, 2011. Shareholders may contact the Corporation at Grandview Gold Inc., 330 Bay Street, Suite 820, Toronto, ON M5H 2S8, Attention: Paul Sarjeant to request copies of the Corporation's financial statements and accompanying management's discussion and analyses.

    GENERAL

    Information contained herein is given as of October 28, 2011. Save for the matters referred to herein, Management knows of no other matters intended to be brought before the Meeting. However, if any matters, which are not now known to management of the Corporation, shall properly come before the Meeting, the Proxy given pursuant to this solicitation by Management will be voted on such matters in accordance with the best judgment of the person voting the Proxy, in the event such discretionary authority is provided in the Proxy. The contents and sending of this Information Circular have been approved by the Directors of the Corporation.

    - 21 -



      ) BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
      )  
      ) “Paul Sarjeant”
      )  
      ) PAUL SARJEANT, P. GEO
      ) Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

    - 22 -


    SCHEDULE "A"

    STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

    The following table details the Corporation’s corporate governance practices and addresses the disclosure requirements set out in Form 58-101F1 - Corporate Governance Disclosure:

    1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    Independent Directors

    The Corporation's six independent directors during the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2011 were: D. Richard Brown, Ken Hight, Peter Born, Jack Austin, Ted Nunn and Michael Hitch.

    Composition of the Board

    For the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2011, the Board was composed of six (6) independent directors and one (1) non-independent director.

    Non-independent directors

    The Corporation's non-independent director is Paul Sarjeant. Mr. Sarjeant is the President and CEO of the Corporation.

    Other directorships  

    A - 1


     

       
    Board meetings held

    The independent directors of the Board do not hold meetings at which non-independent directors and members of management are not in attendance. The Corporation holds quarterly meetings and other meetings as required, at which the opinion of the independent directors is sought and duly acted upon for all material matters related to the Corporation.

    Chair of the Board

    The Board has an independent director as the chair of the board. For the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2011, Michael Hitch chaired the meetings of the Board and actively sought out the views of all directors on all Board matters.

    Board meeting attendance

    The Board held six (6) meetings in the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2011. All directors attended all Board meetings, with the exception of Ted Nunn and Ken Hight, who were each absent from one meeting.

    2. BOARD MANDATE

    The Board assumes responsibility for stewardship of the corporation, including overseeing all of the operation of the business, supervising management and setting milestones for the Corporation. The Board reviews the statements of responsibilities for the Corporation including, but not limited to, the code of ethics and expectations for business conduct.

    The Board approves all significant decisions that affect the Corporation and its subsidiaries and sets specific milestones towards which management directs their efforts.

    The Board ensures, at least annually, that there are long-term goals and a strategic planning process in place for the Corporation and participates with Management directly or through its committees in developing and approving the mission of the business of the Corporation and the strategic plan by which it proposes to achieve its goals, which strategic plan takes into account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of the Corporation's business. The strategic planning process is carried out at each Board meeting where there are regularly reviewed specific milestones for the Corporation.

    The strategic planning process incorporates identifying the main risks to the Corporation's objectives and ensuring that mitigation plans are in place to manage and minimize these risks. The Board also takes responsibility for identifying the principal risks of the Corporation's business and for ensuring these risks are effectively monitored and mitigated to the extent practicable. The Board appoints senior Management. As the Corporation has grown it has seen that Management has also grown, mitigating risk with respect to succession planning.

    The Corporation adheres to all regulatory requirements with respect to the timeliness and content of its disclosure. The Board approves all of the Corporation's major communications, including annual and quarterly reports and press releases. The CEO or Chair (on behalf of the Board) authorizes the issuance of news releases. The CEO and the Chair are generally the only individuals authorized to communicate with analysts, the news media and investors about information concerning the Corporation.

    The Board and the Audit Committee examine the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control processes and information systems.

    A - 2



    The Board as a whole, given its small size, is involved in developing the Corporation's approach to corporate governance. The number of scheduled meetings of the Board varies with circumstances. In addition, special meetings are called as necessary. The Chair establishes the agenda at each Board meeting and submits a draft to each director for their review and recommendation for items for inclusion on the agenda. Each director has the ability to raise subjects that are not on the agenda at any meeting of the Board. Meeting agendas and other materials to be reviewed and/or discussed for action by the Board are distributed to directors in time for review prior to each meeting.

    Board members have full and free access to senior Management and employees of the Corporation

    3. POSITION DESCRIPTION
    Chairman of the Board and Committee Chairs: role and responsibilities

    The Board does not currently have a separate written description for the chair. The Board as a whole is responsible for and is continuing to develop recommendations for structures and procedures to clearly define the role and responsibilities of the Chair and the chair of each Board committee. The Chair of the Board is independent of Management and is responsible for leading the discussion and ensuring that the Board convenes as often as is required in order to meet the needs of the Corporation. In addition, the Chair also meets with the CEO on a regular basis to help with this function. The Audit Committee has a chair and a charter which charter provides structure and guidance with respect to the roles of the board, committee and the chair. In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee is independent of Management. The Compensation Committee does not have a written description for the chair. The Chair of the Compensation Committee is independent from Management and the Compensation Committee is currently reviewing documentation which would help to better delineate the roles of the members of the committee.

    Office of the CEO: role and responsibilities

    The Board and the CEO have not developed formal documented position description for the CEO. The Board is currently of the view that the respective corporate governance roles of the Board and Management, as represented by the CEO, are clear and that the limits to Management's responsibility and authority are well-defined. In order to monitor and ensure that these roles are defined, the Chairman meets with the CEO and CFO on a regular basis to ensure that all matters requiring Board review and/or approval are brought before the Board and that Management is working within the bounds of their authority. As the Corporation is a junior mining corporation there are only two senior officer positions and as such the role of the CEO is broad but the Board believes that as a result of relevant corporate governance initiatives and the frequent meeting of the Chairman and the CEO, there is sufficient delineation.

    4. ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
    New director orientation

    The Corporation does not have a formal orientation and education program for new directors. However, new directors are provided with relevant materials with respect to the Corporation as well as being oriented on relevant corporate issues by senior management and legal counsel.

    Continuing education of the board

    The Board currently does not provide continuing education for its directors. By using a Board composed of experienced professionals with a wide range of financial, exploration and mining expertise, the Corporation ensures that the Board operates effectively and efficiently. Currently, the Board members have access to and actively consult with legal counsel to the Corporation on various matters with respect to their duties and obligations to the Corporation. The Board is currently working to implement formal policies on a number of corporate governance matters and upon implementation also plans to provide written information and orientation with respect to such policies to the Board members.

    A - 3


     
    5. ETHICAL BUSINESS CONDUCT
    Code of ethics

    The Board has not adopted a written code of ethics and expectations for business conduct for the directors, officers and employees of the Corporation.

    Handling non-arm’s length transactions

    Directors with an interest in a material transaction are required to declare their interest and abstain from voting on such transactions. A thorough discussion of the documentation related to material transaction is required for review by the Board, particularly independent directors.

    Culture of ethical conduct

    The Board seeks directors who have solid track records in spheres ranging from financial to exploration and mining in order to ensure a culture of ethical business conduct.

    6. NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS
    Identifying nominees

    All of the Corporation's directors are involved in the search for new directors.

    Nominating committee

    The Board does not have a nominating committee. A new director should have direct experience in the mining business and significant public company experience. The nominee must not have a significant conflicting public company association. Experienced mining directors are currently difficult to source as a result of the high level of activity in the mining sector.

    Role and responsibilities of the nominating committee

    The Board does not have a nominating committee at the present time.

    7. COMPENSATION
    Determining directors’ and officers’ compensation

    The Board reviews the adequacy and form of compensation and compares it to other companies of similar size and stage of development. There is no minimum share ownership requirement of directors. Director's compensation is in the form of stock options. The Corporation's compensation committee reviews the amounts and effectiveness of stock option compensation.

    Composition of the Compensation Committee

    For the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2011, the Compensation Committee consisted of three (3) directors: Ken Hight, Ted Nunn and Michael Hitch. Messrs. Hight, Nunn and Hitch are independent.

    Roles and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee

    The Compensation Committee convenes at least once annually to review director and officer compensation and status of stock options. The Compensation Committee also responds to requests from Management and the Board to review recommendations of Management for new senior employees and their compensation. The Compensation Committee has the power to approve and/or amend these recommendations.

    Use of a compensation consultant or advisor

    The Corporation has felt no need to retain any compensation consultants or advisors at any time since the beginning of the Corporation's most recently completed financial year.

    8. OTHER BOARD COMMITTEES

    A - 4



    Audit Committee The Audit Committee consists of three (3) directors: D. Richard Brown, Jack Austin and Peter Born. Messrs. Brown, Austin and Born are independent.
    Other board committees The Corporation does not currently have any other committees.
    9. ASSESSMENTS
    Board and committee effectiveness



    The Board does not, at present, have a formal process in place for assessing the effectiveness of the Board as a whole, its committees or individual directors. The Audit Committee, as part of their annual review, assesses the effectiveness of the Board and its independence. The Audit Committee assesses the adequacy of the information provided, the regular nature of the communication between the Board and Management and reviews whether Management is following the mandated strategic direction as set out in the Board's direction and Management milestones.

    The Board assesses the CEO's effectiveness in attaining the Corporation's corporate objectives, budgets and milestones.

    Management and directors communicate with shareholders on an ongoing basis, and shareholders are regularly consulted on the effectiveness of Board members and senior staff.

    A - 5


    SCHEDULE "B"

    BY-LAW NO. 1

    A by-law relating generally to the
    transaction of the business and affairs of

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.

    (herein called the "Corporation")

    CONTENTS

    1. Interpretation
    2. Business of the Corporation
    3. Directors
    4. Committees
    5. Officers
    6. Protection of Directors, Officers and Others
    7. Shares
    8. Dividends and Rights
    9. Meetings of Shareholders
    10. Information Available to Shareholders
    11. Divisions and Departments
    12. Notices
    13. Borrowing Powers of the Directors
    14. Business of the Corporation

    BE IT ENACTED as a by-law of the Corporation as follows:

    ARTICLE 1
    INTERPRETATION

    1.1          Definitions

     

    In the by-laws of the Corporation, unless the context otherwise requires:

         
      (a)

    "Act" means the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) and the regulations made pursuant thereto, as from time to time amended, and every statute that may be substituted therefor and, in the case of such substitution, any reference in the by-laws of the Corporation to provisions of the Act shall be read as references to the substituted provisions therefor in the new statute or statutes;

         
      (b)

    "appoint" includes "elect" and vice versa;

         
      (c)

    "board" means the board of directors of the Corporation;

         
      (d)

    "by-laws" means this by-law and all other by-laws of the Corporation from time to time in force and effect;

         
      (e)

    "meeting of shareholders" includes an annual meeting of shareholders and a special meeting of shareholders; "special meeting of shareholders" includes a meeting of any class or classes of shareholders and a special meeting of all shareholders entitled to vote at an annual meeting of shareholders;

    B - 1



      (f)

    "non-business day" means Saturday, Sunday and any other day that is a holiday as defined in the Interpretation Act (Ontario);

         
      (g)

    "recorded address" means in the case of a shareholder his address as recorded in the securities register; and in the case of joint shareholders the address appearing in the securities register in respect of such joint holding or the first address so appearing if there is more than one; and in the case of a director, officer, auditor or member of a committee of the board his latest address as recorded in the records of the Corporation;

         
      (h)

    "signing officer" means, in relation to any instrument, any person authorized to sign the same on behalf of the Corporation by paragraph 2.2 or by a resolution passed pursuant thereto;

         
      (i)

    all terms contained in the by-laws and which are defined in the Act shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Act; and

         
      (j)

    the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular; the masculine shall include the feminine and neuter genders; and the word "person" shall include, individuals, bodies corporate, corporations, companies, partnerships, syndicates, trusts, unincorporated organizations and any number or aggregate of persons.

    ARTICLE 2
    BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION

    2.1          Financial Year

                             The financial year of the Corporation shall be as determined by the board from time to time.

    2.2          Execution of Instruments

                             Contracts, documents or instruments in writing requiring the signature of the Corporation may be signed on behalf of the Corporation by any two officers or directors and instruments in writing so signed shall be binding upon the Corporation without any further authorization or formality. The board shall have power from time to time by resolution to appoint any officer or officers or any person or persons on behalf of the Corporation either to sign contracts, documents and instruments in writing generally or to sign specific contracts, documents or instruments in writing.

                             The seal of the Corporation may when required be affixed to contracts, documents and instruments in writing signed as aforesaid or by any officer or officers, person or persons, appointed as aforesaid by resolution of the board.

                             The term "contracts, documents or instruments in writing" as used in this by-law shall include deeds, mortgages, hypothecs, charges, conveyances, transfers and assignments of property, real or personal, movable or immovable, agreements, releases, receipts and discharges for the payment of money or other obligations, conveyances, transfers and assignments of shares, share warrants, stocks, bonds, debentures, notes or other securities and all paper writings.

                             The signature or signatures of the Chairman of the Board (if any), the Vice-Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, any Executive Vice-President, or any Vice-President together with any one of the Secretary, the Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer, an Assistant Secretary, an Assistant Treasurer or any one of the foregoing officers together with any one director of the Corporation and/or any other officer or officers, person or persons, appointed as aforesaid by resolution of the board may, if specifically authorized by resolution of the directors, be printed, engraved, lithographed or otherwise mechanically reproduced upon any contracts, documents or instruments in writing or bonds, debentures, notes or other securities of the Corporation executed or issued by or on behalf of the. Corporation and all contracts, documents or instruments in writing or bonds, debentures, notes or other securities of the Corporation on which the signature or signatures of any of the foregoing officers or directors or persons authorized as aforesaid shall be so reproduced pursuant to special authorization by resolution of the board, shall be deemed to have been manually signed by such officers or directors or persons whose signature or signatures is or are so reproduced and shall be as valid to all intents and purposes as if they had been signed manually and notwithstanding that the officers or directors or persons whose signature or signatures is or are so reproduced may have ceased to hold office at the date of the delivery or issue of such contracts, documents or instruments in writing or bonds, debentures, notes or other securities of the Corporation.

    B - 2


    2.3          Banking Arrangements

                             The banking business of the Corporation, or any part thereof, including, without limitation, the borrowing of money and the giving of security therefor, shall be transacted with such banks, trust companies or other bodies corporate or organizations as may from time to time be designated by or under the authority of the board. Such banking business or any part thereof shall be transacted under such agreements, instructions and delegations of powers as the board may from time to time by resolution prescribe or authorize.

    2.4          Custody of Securities

                             All shares and securities owned by the Corporation shall be lodged (in the name of the Corporation) with a chartered bank or a trust company or in a safety deposit box or, if so authorized by resolution of the board, with such other depositaries or in such other manner as may be determined from time to time by resolution of the board.

                             All share certificates, bonds, debentures, notes or other obligations or securities belonging to the Corporation may be issued or held in the name of a nominee or nominees of the Corporation (and if issued or held in the names of more than one nominee shall be held in the names of the nominees jointly with the right of survivorship) and shall be endorsed in blank with endorsement guaranteed in order to enable transfer to be completed and registration to be effected.

    2.5          Voting Shares and Securities in other Companies

                             All of the shares or other securities carrying voting rights of any other body corporate held from time to time by the Corporation may be voted at any and all meetings of shareholders, bondholders, debenture holders or holders of other securities (as the case may be) of such other body corporate and in such manner and by such person or persons as the board shall from time to time by resolution determine. The proper signing officers of the Corporation may also from time to time execute and deliver for and on behalf of the Corporation proxies and/or arrange for the issuance of voting certificates and/or other evidence of the right to vote in such names as they may determine without the necessity of a resolution or other action by the board.

    B - 3


    ARTICLE 3
    DIRECTORS

    3.1          Number of Directors and Quorum

                             The number of directors of the Corporation shall be the number of directors as specified in the articles or, where a minimum and maximum number of directors is provided for in the articles, the number of directors of the Corporation shall be the number of directors determined from time to time by special resolution or, if a special resolution empowers the directors to determine the number, the number of directors determined by resolution of the board. Notwithstanding the above, the Corporation shall not have fewer than three directors, one-third of which may not be officers or employees of the Corporation. At least one quarter (or such other percentage as may be specified in the Act, from time to time) of the board of directors shall be resident Canadians. The quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of the board shall be a majority of the number of directors or minimum number of directors required by the articles, but in no case shall a quorum be less than two-fifths of the number of directors or minimum number of directors, as the case may be.

    3.2 Qualification

                             No person shall be qualified for election as a director if he is less than 18 years of age; if he is of unsound mind and has been so found by a court in Canada or elsewhere; if he is not an individual; or if he has the status of a bankrupt. A director need not be a shareholder.

    3.3          Election and Term

                             The election of directors shall take place at the first meeting of shareholders and at each succeeding annual meeting of shareholders and all the directors then in office shall retire but, if qualified, shall be eligible for re-election. The number of directors to be elected at any such meeting shall be the number of directors as specified in the articles or, if a minimum and maximum number of directors is provided for in the articles, the number of directors determined by special resolution or, if the special resolution empowers the directors to determine the number, the number of directors determined by resolution of the board. The voting on the election shall be by show of hands unless a ballot is demanded by any shareholder. If an election of directors is not held at the proper time, the incumbent directors shall continue in office until their successors are elected.

    3.4          Removal of Directors

                             Subject to the provisions of the Act, the shareholders may by ordinary resolution passed at a meeting specially called for such purpose remove any director from office and the vacancy created by such removal may be filled at the same meeting failing which it may be filled by a quorum of the directors.

    3.5          Vacancy of Office

                             A director ceases to hold office when: (i) he dies; (ii) he is removed from office by the shareholders; (iii) he ceases to be qualified for election as a director; or (iv) his written resignation is received by the Corporation provided if a time subsequent to its date of receipt by the Corporation is specified in such written resignation the resignation shall become effective at the time so specified.

    3.6          Vacancies

                             Subject to the Act, a quorum of the board may fill a vacancy in the board, except a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number or maximum number of directors or from a failure of the shareholders to elect the number of directors required to be elected at any meeting of shareholders. In the absence of a quorum of the board, or if the vacancy has arisen from a failure of the shareholders to elect the number of directors required to be elected at any meeting of shareholders, the directors then in office shall forthwith call a special meeting of shareholders to fill the vacancy. If the directors then in office fail to call such meeting or if there are no directors then in office, any shareholder may call the meeting.

    B - 4


    3.7          Action by the Board

                             The board shall manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation. The powers of the board may be exercised at a meeting at which a quorum is present or by resolution in writing signed by all the directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the board. Where there is a vacancy in the board, the remaining directors may exercise all the powers of the board so long as a quorum of the board remains in office.

    3.8          Meeting by Telephone

                             If all the directors of the Corporation present or participating in the meeting consent, a director may participate in a meeting of the board or of a committee of the board by means of such telephone, electronic or other communications facilities as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and a director participating in such a meeting by such means is deemed to be present at the meeting. Any such consent shall be effective whether given before or after the meeting to which it relates and may be given with respect to all meetings of the board and of committees of the board held while a director holds office.

    3.9          Place of Meetings

                             Meetings of the board may be held at any place within or outside Ontario.

    3.10         Calling of Meetings

                             Subject to the Act, meetings of the board shall be held from time to time on such day and at such time and at such place as the board, the Chairman of the Board (if any), the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officer or any two directors may determine and the Secretary, when directed by the board, the Chairman of the Board (if any), the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officer or any two directors shall convene a meeting of the board.

    3.11         Notice of Meeting

                             Notice of the date, time and place of each meeting of the board shall be given in the manner provided in paragraph 12.1 to each director not less than 48 hours (exclusive of any part of a non-business day) before the time when the meeting is to be held. A notice of a meeting of directors need not specify the purpose of or the business to be transacted at the meeting except where the Act requires such purpose or business to be specified.

                             A director may in any manner waive notice of or otherwise consent to a meeting of the board. Attendance of a director at such a meeting is a waiver of notice of meeting except where the attendance is for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business on the ground that the meeting is not lawfully called.

    3.12         First Meeting of New Board

                             Provided a quorum of directors is present, each newly elected board may without notice hold, its first meeting immediately following the meeting of shareholders at which such board is elected.

    B - 5


    3.13         Adjourned Meeting

                             Notice of an adjourned meeting of the board is not required if the time and place of the adjourned meeting is announced at the original meeting.

    3.14         Regular Meetings

                             The board may appoint a day or days in any month or months for regular meetings of the board at a place and hour to be named. A copy of any resolution of the board fixing the place and time of such regular meetings shall be sent to each director forthwith after being passed, but no other notice shall be required for any such regular meeting except where the Act requires the purpose thereof or the business to be transacted thereat to be specified.

    3.15         Chairman

                             The chairman of any meeting of the board shall be the first mentioned of such of the following officers as have been appointed and who is a director and is present at the meeting: the Chairman of the Board, the President or a Vice-President. If no such officer is present, the directors present shall choose one of their number to be chairman.

    3.16         Votes to Govern

                             At all meetings of the board every question shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast on the question. In case of an equality of votes the chairman of the meeting shall not be entitled to a second or casting vote.

    3.17        Conflict of Interest

                             A director or officer of the Corporation who is a party to, is a director or officer of, or has a material interest in, another person who is a party to, a material contract or transaction (in either case a "Conflict of Interest Transaction"), whether proposed or made, with the Corporation shall, in accordance with the Act, disclose in writing to the Corporation or request to have entered in the minutes of meetings of the directors or of meetings of committees of directors, the nature and extent of his interest in the Conflict of Interest Transaction. Except as permitted by the Act, a director so interested shall not attend any part of a meeting during which a Conflict of Interest Transaction is discussed, nor vote on any motion to approve the Conflict of Interest Transaction. A general notice to the directors by a director or officer of the Corporation declaring that he is a director or officer of, or has a material interest in, a person and is to be regarded as interested in any contract made or transaction entered into with that person is a sufficient disclosure of interest in relation to any Conflict of Interest Transaction with that person.

    3.18         Effect of Disclosure

                             Where the Corporation enters into a Conflict of Interest Transaction, a director or officer is not accountable to the Corporation or the shareholders of the Corporation for any profit or gain realized from the Conflict of Interest Transaction and the Conflict of Interest Transaction is neither void nor voidable, by reason only of that relationship (or by reason only that the director is present at or is counted to determine the presence of a quorum at the meeting of directors that authorized the Conflict of Interest Transaction), if the director or officer disclosed his interest therein in the manner prescribed by the Act, the directors approved the Conflict of Interest Transaction and the Conflict of Interest Transaction was reasonable and fair to the Corporation at the time it was approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a director or officer of the Corporation, acting honestly and in good faith, is not accountable to the Corporation or to the shareholders of the Corporation for any profit or gain realized from any Conflict of Interest Transaction and the Conflict of Interest Transaction is not void or voidable by reason only of the interest of the director or officer of the Corporation therein, if (a) the Conflict of Interest Transaction was approved or confirmed by special resolution at a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation, (b) disclosure of the interest of the director or officer of the Corporation in the Conflict of Interest Transaction was made to the shareholders of the Corporation in a manner sufficient to indicate its nature before the Conflict of Interest Transaction was approved or confirmed, and (c) the Conflict of Interest Transaction was reasonable and fair to the Corporation at the time it was approved or confirmed. Nothing in this section 3.18 shall be construed as an affirmative statement that, in any particular situation or situations, a director or officer of the Corporation shall be accountable to the Corporation or the shareholders of the Corporation for any profit or gain realized from a Conflict of Interest Transaction or that a Conflict of Interest Transaction is void or voidable due to a failure of the officer or director to comply with the procedures set forth in this section 3.18.

    B - 6


    3.19         Remuneration and Expenses

                             The directors shall be paid such remuneration for their services as the board may from time to time determine. The directors shall also be entitled to be reimbursed for traveling and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending meetings of the shareholders or of the board or any committee thereof or otherwise in the performance of their duties. Nothing herein contained shall preclude any director from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and receiving remuneration therefor.

    ARTICLE 4
    COMMITTEES

    4.1          Committee of Directors

                             The board may appoint a committee of directors, however designated, and delegate to such committee any of the powers of the board except those which pertain to items which, under the Act, a committee of directors has no authority to exercise.

    4.2          Transaction of Business

                             The powers of a committee of directors may be exercised by a meeting at which a quorum is present or by resolution in writing signed by all members of such committee who would have been entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the committee. Meetings of such committee may be held at any place within or outside Ontario.

    4.3          Audit Committee

                             The board shall elect annually from among its number an audit committee to be composed of not fewer than three directors of whom a majority shall not be officers or employees of the Corporation or its affiliates, subject to the restrictions imposed by applicable legislation. The audit committee shall have the powers and duties provided in the Act, and such other applicable legislation.

    4.4          Advisory Committees

                             The board may from time to time appoint such other committees as it may deem advisable, but the functions of any such other committees shall be advisory only.

    4.5          Procedure

                             Unless otherwise determined by the board, each committee shall have power to fix its quorum at not less than a majority of its members, to elect its chairman and to regulate its procedure.

    B - 7


    ARTICLE 5
    OFFICERS

    5.1          Appointment

                        The Chairman of the Board may, but need not be, an officer of the Corporation. The board may from time to time appoint a Chairman of the Board, a Chief Executive Officer, a President, one or more Vice-Presidents (to which title may be added words indicating seniority or function), a Secretary, a Chief Financial Officer, a Treasurer and such other officers as the board may determine, including one or more assistants to any of the officers so appointed. The board may specify the duties of and, in accordance with this by-law and subject to the provisions of the Act, delegate to such officers powers to manage the business and affairs of the Corporation. An officer may but need not be a director and one person may hold more than one office. All officers shall sign such contracts, documents, or instruments in writing as require their respective signatures. In the case of the absence or inability to act of any officer or for any other reason that the board may deem sufficient, the board may delegate all or any of the powers of such officer to any other officer or to any director for the time being.

    5.2          Chairman of the Board

                        The Chairman of the Board, if appointed, shall be a director and shall, when present, preside at all meetings of the board and committees of the board. The Chairman of the Board shall be vested with and may exercise such powers and shall perform such other duties as may from time to time be assigned to him by the board. During the absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board, his duties shall be performed and his powers exercised by the Chief Executive Officer. The board of directors may determine that the chairman of the board shall not be an officer of the Corporation and shall act solely in a non-executive capacity. A non-executive Chairman of the Board shall possess and exercise such authority and powers and perform such duties as may be determined by the by-laws and the board of directors.

    5.3          President

                        The President shall, and unless and until the board designates any other officer of the Corporation to be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, be the Chief Executive Officer and, subject to the authority of the board, shall have general supervision of the business and affairs of the Corporation and such other powers and duties as the board may specify. The President shall be vested with and may exercise all the powers and shall perform all the duties of the Chairman of the Board if none be appointed or if the Chairman of the Board is absent or unable or refuses to act.

    5.4          Vice-President

                        Each Vice-President shall have such powers and duties as the board or the President may specify. The Vice-President or, if more than one, the Vice-President designated from time to time by the board or by the President, shall be vested with all the powers and shall perform all the duties of the President in the absence or inability or refusal to act of the President, provided, however, that a Vice-President who is not a director shall not preside as chairman at any meeting of the board and that a Vice-President who is not a director and shareholder shall not preside as chairman at any meeting of shareholders.

    5.5          Secretary

                        The Secretary shall give or cause to be given as and when instructed, all notices to shareholders, directors, officers, auditors and members of committees of the board; he shall be the custodian of the stamp or mechanical device generally used for affixing the corporate seal of the Corporation and all books, papers, records, documents and instruments belonging to the Corporation, except when some other officer or agent has been appointed for that purpose; and he shall have such other powers and duties as the board may specify.

    B - 8


    5.6          Chief Financial Officer

                             The Chief Financial Officer shall keep proper accounting records in compliance with the Act and shall be responsible for the deposit of money, the safekeeping of securities and the disbursement of the funds of the Corporation; he shall render to the board whenever required an account of all his transactions as Chief Financial Officer and of the financial position of the Corporation; and he shall have such other powers and duties as the board may specify.

    5.7          Powers and Duties of Other Officers

                             The powers and duties of all other officers shall be such as the terms of their engagement call for or as the board may specify. Any of the powers and duties of an officer to whom an assistant has been appointed may be exercised and performed by such assistant, unless the board otherwise directs.

    5.8          Variation of Powers and Duties

                             The board may from time to time and subject to the provisions of the Act, vary, add to or limit the powers and duties of any officer.

    5.9          Term of Office

                             The board, in its discretion, may remove any officer of the Corporation, with or without cause, without prejudice to such officer's rights under any employment contract. Otherwise each officer appointed by the board shall hold office until his successor is appointed or until the earlier of his resignation or death.

    5.10         Terms of Employment and Remuneration

                             The terms of employment and the remuneration of an officer appointed by the board shall be settled by it from time to time. The fact that any officer or employee is a director or shareholder of the Corporation shall not disqualify him from receiving such remuneration as may be so determined.

    5.11         Conflict of Interest

                             An officer shall disclose his interest in any material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with the Corporation in accordance with paragraph 3.17.

    5.12         Agents and Attorneys

                             The board shall have power from time to time to appoint agents or attorneys for the Corporation in or outside Canada with such powers of management or otherwise (including the powers to subdelegate) as may be thought fit.

    5.13         Fidelity Bonds

                             The board may require such officers, employees and agents of the Corporation as the board deems advisable to furnish bonds for the faithful discharge of their powers and duties, in such form and with such surety as the board may from time to time determine but no director shall be liable for failure to require any such bond or for the insufficiency of any such bond or for any loss by reason of the failure of the Corporation to receive any indemnity thereby provided.

    B - 9


    ARTICLE 6
    PROTECTION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND OTHERS

    6.1          Submission of Contracts or Transactions to Shareholders for Approval

                             The board in its discretion may submit any contract, act or transaction for approval, ratification or confirmation at any meeting of the shareholders called for the purpose of considering the same and any contract, act or transaction that shall be approved, ratified or confirmed by a resolution passed by a majority of the votes cast at any such meeting (unless any different or additional requirement is imposed by the Act or by the Corporation's articles or any other by-law) shall be as valid and as binding upon the Corporation and upon all the shareholders as though it had been approved, ratified or confirmed by every shareholder of the Corporation.

    6.2          For the Protection of Directors and Officers

                             In supplement of and not by way of limitation upon any rights conferred upon directors by the provisions of the Act, it is declared that no director shall be disqualified by his office from, or vacate his office by reason of, holding any office or place of profit under the Corporation or under any body corporate in which the Corporation shall be a shareholder or by reason of being otherwise in any way directly or indirectly interested or contracting with the Corporation either as vendor, purchaser or otherwise or being concerned in any contract or arrangement made or proposed to be entered into with the Corporation in which he is in any way directly or indirectly interested either as vendor, purchaser or otherwise nor shall any director be liable to account to the Corporation or any of its shareholders or creditors for any profit arising from any such office or place of profit; and, subject to the provisions of the Act, no contract or arrangement entered into by or on behalf of the Corporation in which any director shall be in any way directly or indirectly interested shall be avoided or voidable and no director shall be liable to account to the Corporation or any of its shareholders or creditors for any profit realized by or from any such contract or arrangement by reason of the fiduciary relationship existing or established thereby. Subject to the provisions of the Act and to paragraph 3.17, no director shall be obliged to make any declaration of interest or refrain from voting in respect of a contract or proposed contract with the Corporation in which such director is in any way directly or indirectly interested.

    6.3          Limitation of Liability

                             Except as otherwise provided in the Act, no director or officer for the time being of the Corporation shall be liable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of any other director or officer or employee or for joining in any receipt or act for conformity or for any loss, damage or expense happening to the Corporation through the insufficiency or deficiency of title to any property acquired by the Corporation or for or on behalf of the Corporation or for the insufficiency or deficiency of any security in or upon which any of the moneys of or belonging to the Corporation shall be placed out or invested or for any loss or damage arising from the bankruptcy, insolvency or tortious act of any persons, firm or corporation including any person, firm or corporation with whom or which any moneys, securities or effects shall be lodged or deposited for any loss, conversion, misapplication or misappropriation of or any damage resulting from any dealings with any moneys, securities or other assets belonging to the Corporation or for any other loss, damage or misfortune whatever which may happen in the execution of the duties of his respective office or trust or in relation thereto unless the same shall happen by or through his failure to exercise the powers and to discharge the duties of his office honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Corporation and in connection therewith to exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. The directors for the time being of the Corporation shall not be under any duty or responsibility in respect of any contract, act or transaction whether or not made, done or entered into in the name or on behalf of the Corporation, except such as shall have been submitted to and authorized or approved by the board. If any director or officer of the Corporation shall be employed by or shall perform services for the Corporation otherwise than as a director or officer or shall be a member of a firm or a shareholder, director or officer of a company which is employed by or performs services for the Corporation, the fact of his being a director or officer of the Corporation shall not disentitle such director or officer or such firm or company, as the case may be, from receiving proper remuneration for such services.

    B - 10


    6.4          Indemnity

                             Subject to the limitations contained in the Act, the Corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless a director or officer, a former director or officer, or an individual who acts or acted at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer or in a similar capacity of another entity, and each of their respective heirs and personal representatives, against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, reasonably incurred by them in respect of any civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or other proceeding to which the individual is made a party by reason of being or having been a director or officer of the Corporation or at the request of the Corporation as a director or officer, or in similar capacity, of another entity, if:

      (a)

    such individual acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Corporation or, as the case may be, to the best interests of the other entity for which such individual acted as director or officer, or in a similar capacity, at the request of the Corporation; and

         
      (b)

    in the case of a criminal or administrative action or proceeding that is enforced by a monetary penalty, such individual had reasonable grounds for believing that his conduct was lawful.

                             The Corporation shall advance moneys to a director, officer or other individual for the costs, charges and expenses of any proceeding referred to in this section 6.4 of this by-law. The individual shall repay the moneys to the Corporation if the individual does not fulfill the relevant conditions specified in the Act. The Corporation shall also indemnify such individual in such other circumstances as the Act permits or requires. Nothing in this by-law shall limit the right of any person entitled to indemnity to claim indemnity apart from the provisions of this by-law.

    6.5          Insurance

                             The Corporation may purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any person referred to in paragraph 6.4 against such liabilities and in such amounts as the board may from time to time determine and are permitted by the Act.

    ARTICLE 7
    SHARES

    7.1          Allotment

                             The board may from time to time allot or grant options to purchase the whole or any part of the authorized and unissued shares of the Corporation at such times and to such persons and for such consideration as the board shall determine, provided that no share shall be issued until it is fully paid as provided by the Act.

    7.2          Commissions

                             The board may from time to time authorize the Corporation to pay a reasonable commission to any person in consideration of his purchasing or agreeing to purchase shares of the Corporation, whether from the Corporation or from any other person, or procuring or agreeing to procure purchasers for any such shares.

    B - 11


    7.3          Registration of Transfers

                             Subject to the provisions of the Act, no transfer of shares shall be registered in a securities register except upon presentation of the certificate representing such shares with an endorsement which complies with the Act made thereon or delivered therewith duly executed by an 'appropriate person as provided by the Act, together with such reasonable assurance that the endorsement is genuine and effective as the board may from time to time prescribe, upon payment of all applicable taxes and any fees prescribed by the board, upon compliance with such restrictions on transfer as are authorized by the articles.

    7.4          Transfer Agents and Registrars

                             The board may from time to time appoint one or more agents to maintain, in respect of each class of securities of the Corporation issued by it in registered form, a securities register and one or more branch securities registers. Such a person may be designated as transfer agent and registrar according to his functions and one person may be designated both registrar and transfer agent. The board may at any time terminate such appointment.

    7.5          Non-recognition of Trusts

                             Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Corporation may treat as absolute owner of any share the person in whose name the share is registered in the securities register as if that person had full legal capacity and authority to exercise all rights of ownership, irrespective of any indication to the contrary through knowledge or notice or description in the Corporation's records or on the share certificate.

    7.6          Share Certificates

                             Every holder of one or more shares of the Corporation shall be entitled, at his option, to a share certificate, or to a non-transferable written acknowledgement of his right to obtain a share certificate, stating the number and class or series of shares held by him as shown on the securities register. Share certificates and acknowledgements of a shareholder's right to a share certificate, respectively, shall be in such form as the board shall from time to time approve. Any share certificate shall be signed in accordance with paragraph 2.2 and need not be under the corporate seal; provided that, unless the board otherwise determines, certificates representing shares in respect of which a transfer agent and/or registrar has been appointed shall not be valid unless countersigned by or on behalf of such transfer agent and/or registrar. The signature of one of the signing officers or, in the case of share certificates which are not valid unless countersigned by or on behalf of a transfer agent and/or registrar, the signatures of both signing officers, may be printed or mechanically reproduced in facsimile upon share certificates and every such facsimile signature shall for all purposes be deemed to be the signature of the officer whose signature it reproduces and shall be binding upon the Corporation. A share certificate executed as aforesaid shall be valid notwithstanding that one or both of the officers whose facsimile signature appears thereon no longer holds office at the date of issue of the certificate.

    7.7          Replacement of Share Certificates

                             The board or any officer or agent designated by the board may in its or his discretion direct the issue of a new share certificate in lieu of and upon cancellation of a share certificate that has been mutilated or in substitution for a share certificate claimed to have been lost, destroyed or wrongfully taken on payment of such fee, not exceeding $5.00, and on such terms as to indemnity, reimbursement of expenses and evidence of loss and of title as the board or any duly appointed transfer agent may from time to time prescribe, whether generally or in any particular case.

    B - 12


    7.8          Joint Shareholders

                             If two or more persons are registered as joint holders of any share, the Corporation shall not be bound to issue more than one certificate in respect thereof, and delivery of such certificate to one of such persons shall be sufficient delivery to all of them. Any one of such persons may give effectual receipts for the certificate issued in respect thereof or for any dividend, bonus, return of capital or other money payable or warrant issuable in respect of such shares.

    7.9          Deceased Shareholders

                             In the event of the death of a holder, or of one of the joint holders, of any share, the Corporation shall not be required to make any entry in the securities register in respect thereof or to make payment of any dividends thereon except upon production of all such documents as may be required by law and upon compliance with the reasonable requirements of the Corporation and its transfer agents.

    ARTICLE 8
    DIVIDENDS AND RIGHTS

    8.1          Dividends

                             Subject to the provisions of the Act, the board may from time to time declare dividends payable to the shareholders according to their respective rights and interest in the Corporation. Dividends may be paid in money or property or by issuing fully paid shares of the Corporation.

    8.2          Dividend Cheques

                             A dividend payable in cash shall be paid by cheque drawn on the Corporation's bankers or one of them to the order of each registered holder of shares of the class or series in respect of which it has been declared and mailed by prepaid ordinary mail to such registered holder at his recorded address, unless such holder otherwise directs. In the case of joint holders the cheque shall, unless such joint holders otherwise direct, be made payable to the order of all of such joint holders and mailed to them at their recorded address. The mailing of such cheque as aforesaid, unless the same is not paid on due presentation, shall satisfy and discharge the liability for the dividend to the extent of the sum represented thereby plus the amount of any tax which the Corporation is required to and does withhold.

    8.3          Non-receipt of Payment

                             In the event' of non-receipt of any dividend cheque by the person to whom it is sent as aforesaid, the Corporation shall issue to such person a replacement cheque for a like amount on such terms as to indemnity, reimbursement of expenses and evidence of non-receipt and of title as the board may from time to time prescribe, whether generally or in any particular case.

    B - 13


    8.4          Record Date for Dividends and Rights

                             The board may fix in advance a date, preceding by not more than 50 days the date for the payment of any dividend or the date -for the issue of any warrant or other evidence of the right to subscribe for securities of the Corporation, as al record date for the determination of the persons entitled to receive payment of such dividend or to exercise the right to subscribe for such securities, and notice of any such record date shall be given not less than seven days before such record date in the manner provided by the Act. If no record date is so fixed, the record date for the determination of the persons entitled to receive payment of any dividend or to exercise the right to subscribe for securities of the Corporation shall be at the close of business on the day on which the resolution relating to such dividend or right to subscribe is passed by the board.

    8.5          Unclaimed Dividends

                             Any dividend unclaimed after a period of six years from the date on which the same has been declared to be payable shall be forfeited and shall revert to the Corporation.

    ARTICLE 9
    MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS

    9.1          Annual Meetings

                             The annual meeting of shareholders shall be held at such time in each year as the board, the Chairman of the Board (if any), The Chief Executive Officer, or the President may from time to time determine, for the purpose of considering the financial statements and reports required by the Act to be placed before the annual meeting, electing directors, appointing an auditor and for the transaction of such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting.

    9.2          Special Meetings

                             The board, the Chairman of the Board (if any) or the President shall have power to call a special meeting of shareholders at any time.

    9.3          Place of Meetings

                             Meetings of shareholders shall be held at such place in or outside Ontario as the board shall so determine.

    9.4          Notice of Meetings

                             Notice of the time and place of each meeting of shareholders shall be given in the manner provided in paragraph 12.1 not less than 21 days nor more than 50 days before the date of the meeting or as otherwise prescribed by applicable laws, to each director, to the auditor and to each shareholder who at the close of business on the record date for notice is entered in the securities register as the holder of one or more shares carrying the right to vote at the meeting. Notice of a meeting of shareholders called for any purpose other than consideration of the financial statements and auditors report, election of directors and reappointment of the incumbent auditor shall state or be accompanied by a statement of the nature of such business in sufficient detail to permit the shareholder to form a reasoned judgment thereon and the text of any special resolution or by-law to be submitted to the meeting. A shareholder and any other person entitled to attend a meeting of shareholders may in any manner waive notice of or otherwise consent to a meeting of shareholders.

    B - 14


    9.5          List of Shareholders Entitled to Notice

                             For every meeting of shareholders, the Corporation shall prepare a list of shareholders entitled to receive notice of the meeting, arranged in alphabetical order and showing the number of shares held by each shareholder entitled to vote at the meeting. If a record date for the meeting is fixed pursuant to paragraph 9.6, the shareholders listed shall be those registered at the close of business on such record date. If no record date is fixed, the shareholders listed shall be those registered at the close of business on the day immediately preceding the day on which notice of the meeting is given, or where no such notice is given, the day on which the meeting is held. The list shall be available for examination by any shareholder during usual business hours at the registered office of the Corporation or at the place where the central securities register is maintained and at the meeting for which the list was prepared.

    9.6          Record Date for Notice

                             The board may fix in advance a date, preceding the date of any meeting of shareholders by not more than 60 days and not less than 30 days, or as otherwise prescribed by applicable laws, as a record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of the meeting, provided that notice of any such record date shall be given not less than seven days before such record date by newspaper advertisement in the manner provided in the Act and by written notice to each stock exchange on which its shares are traded. If no record date is so fixed, the record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of the meeting shall be at the close of business on the day immediately preceding the day on which the notice is given or, if no notice is given, the day on which the meeting is held.

    9.7          Meetings without Notice

                             A meeting of shareholders may be held without notice at any time and place permitted by the Act

      (i)

    if all the shareholders entitled to vote thereat are present in person or represented by proxy waive notice of or otherwise consent to such meeting being held, and

         
      (ii)

    if the auditor and the directors are present or waive notice of or otherwise consent to such meeting being held, so long as such shareholders, auditor and directors present are not attending for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business on the grounds that the meeting is not lawfully called. At such a meeting any business may be transacted which the Corporation at a meeting of shareholders may transact. If the meeting is held at a place outside Canada, shareholders not present or represented by proxy, but who have waived notice of or otherwise consented to such meeting, shall also be deemed to have consented to the meeting being held at such place.

    9.8          Chairman, Secretary and Scrutineers

                             The chairman of any meeting of shareholders shall be the first mentioned of such of the following officers as have been appointed and who is present at the meeting: the Chief Executive Officer, the President or a Vice-President who is a director and a shareholder. If no such officer is present within 15 minutes from the time fixed for holding the meeting, the persons present and entitled to vote shall choose one of their number to be chairman. If the Secretary of the Corporation is absent, the chairman shall appoint some person, who need not be a shareholder, to act as secretary of the meeting. If desired, one or more scrutineers, who need not be shareholders, may be appointed by a resolution or by the chairman with the consent of the meeting.

    B - 15


    9.9          Persons Entitled to be Present

                             The only persons entitled to be present at a meeting of shareholders shall be those entitled to vote thereat, the directors and the auditor of the Corporation and others who, although not entitled to vote are entitled or required under any provision of the Act or the articles or the by-laws to be present at the meeting. Any other person may be admitted only on the invitation of the chairman of the meeting or with the consent of the meeting.

    9.10        Quorum

                             A quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of shareholders shall be 2 persons present in person, each being a shareholder entitled to vote thereat, or a duly appointed proxy or proxyholder for an absent shareholder so entitled, holding or representing in the aggregate not less than 10% of the issued shares of the Corporation enjoying voting rights at such meeting.

    9.11        Right to Vote

                             Subject to the provisions of the Act as to authorized representatives of any other body corporate or association, at any meeting of shareholders for which the Corporation has prepared the list referred to in paragraph 9.5, every person who is named in such list shall be entitled to vote the shares shown opposite his name. At any meeting of shareholders for which the Corporation has not prepared the list referred to in paragraph 9.5, every person shall be entitled to vote at the meeting who at the time is entered in the securities register as the holder of one or more shares carrying the right to vote at such meeting.

    9.12        Proxies

                             Shareholders of the Corporation shall be entitled to vote in person or, if the shareholder is a body corporate, association or other unincorporated entity, by a representative authorized by a resolution of the directors of such body corporate, association or other unincorporated entity. association or other unincorporated entity, entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders may by means of a proxy appoint a proxyholder or alternate proxyholder, who need not be a shareholder of the Corporation, as the nominee thereof to attend and act at the meeting in the manner, to the extent and with the authority conferred by the proxy. Signatures on instruments of proxy need not be witnessed and may be printed, lithographed or otherwise reproduced thereon. The chairman of any meeting of shareholders shall determine the authenticity of all signatures on instruments of proxy, which determination shall be final and conclusive. The chairman of any meeting of shareholders, including any adjournment thereof, may also in his discretion, unless otherwise determined by resolution of the directors, accept any telecopied, telegraphed, telexed, cabled or emailed proxy or other communication as to the authority of anyone claiming to vote on behalf of, or to represent, a shareholder of the Corporation notwithstanding that no instrument of proxy conferring such authority has been lodged with the Corporation and any votes cast in accordance with such telecopied, telegraphed, telexed, cabled or e-mailed proxy or other communication accepted by the chairman shall be valid and any votes cast in accordance therewith shall be counted. An instrument of proxy may be signed and delivered in blank and filled in afterwards by the chairman of the board, the president, the secretary or any assistant-secretary of the Corporation or by any other person designated by the directors. It shall not be necessary for an instrument of proxy to be dated or to have inserted therein the number of shares of the Corporation owned by the appointor thereunder. The directors may, at the expense of the Corporation, send out an instrument of proxy in which certain directors or officers of the Corporation or other persons are named, which may be accompanied by stamped envelopes for the return of such instruments of proxy, even if the directors so named vote the proxies in favour of their own election as directors. The directors may specify in the notice calling a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation a time, not exceeding 48 hours (excluding Saturdays and holidays) preceding the time fixed for the meeting or any adjournment thereof, before which proxies must be deposited with the Corporation or an agent thereof. Unless otherwise determined by the chairman of the meeting, an instrument of proxy shall be acted upon only if, prior to the time so specified, it shall have been deposited with the Corporation or an agent thereof specified in such notice or, where no such time is specified in such notice, if it has been received by the secretary or another officer of the Corporation or the chairman of the meeting or any adjournment thereof before the time of voting on the particular matter. An instrument of proxy shall cease to be valid one year from the date thereof.

    B - 16


    9.13        Revocation of Proxies

                             In addition to revocation in any other manner permitted by law, an instrument of proxy may be revoked by an instrument in writing signed in the same manner as an instrument of proxy may be signed and deposited either at the registered office of the Corporation at any time up to and including the last day (excluding Saturdays and holidays) preceding the date of the meeting of shareholders or any adjournment thereof at which the instrument of proxy is to be used or with the chairman of such meeting or any adjournment thereof before the time of voting on the particular matter.

    9.14        Time for Deposit of Proxies

                             The board may by resolution specify in a notice calling a meeting of shareholders a time, preceding the time of such meeting or an adjournment thereof by not more than 48 hours exclusive of any part of a non-business day, before which time proxies to be used at such meeting must be deposited. A proxy shall be acted upon only if, prior to the time so specified, it shall have been deposited with the Corporation or an agent thereof specified in such notice or, if no such time is specified in such notice, only if it has been received by the Secretary of the Corporation or by the chairman of the meeting or any adjournment thereof prior to the time of voting.

    9.15        Joint Shareholders

                             If two or more persons hold shares jointly, any one of them present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of shareholders may, in the absence of the other or others, vote the shares; but if two or more of those persons .are present in person or represented by proxy and vote, they shall vote as one the shares jointly held by them.

    9.16        Votes to Govern

                             At any meeting of shareholders every question shall, unless otherwise required by the articles or by-laws or by law, be determined by a majority of the votes cast on the question. In case of an equality of votes either upon a show of hands or upon a poll, the chairman of the meeting shall not be entitled to a second or casting vote.

    9.17        Show of Hands

                             Subject to the provisions of the Act, any question at a meeting of shareholders shall be decided by a show of hands unless a ballot thereon is required or demanded as hereinafter provided. Upon a show of hands every person who is present and entitled to vote shall have one vote. Whenever a vote by show of hands shall have been taken upon a question, unless a ballot thereon is so required or demanded, a declaration by the chairman of the meeting that the vote upon the question has been carried or carried by a particular majority or not carried and an entry to that effect in the minutes of the meeting shall be prima facie evidence of the fact without proof of the number or proportion of the votes recorded in favour of or against any resolution or other proceeding in respect of the said question, and the result of the vote so taken shall be the decision of the shareholders upon the said question.

    B - 17


    9.18        Ballots

                             On any question proposed for consideration at a meeting of shareholders, and whether or not a vote by show of hands has been taken thereon, any shareholder or proxyholder entitled to vote at the meeting may require or demand a ballot. A ballot so required or demanded shall be taken in such manner as the chairman shall direct. A requirement or demand for a ballot may be withdrawn at any time prior to the taking of the ballot. If a ballot is taken each person present shall be entitled, in respect of the shares which he is entitled to vote at the meeting upon the question, to that number of votes provided by the Act or the articles, and the result of the ballot so taken shall be the decision of the shareholders upon the said question.

    9.19        Termination, Adjournment and Postponement

                             The chairman of a meeting of shareholders may terminate the meeting following the conclusion of all business which may properly come before the meeting. A meeting of shareholders may be adjourned only upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in respect of the shares present or represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. Any business may be brought before or dealt with at any adjourned meeting which may have been brought up or dealt with at the original meeting. If a meeting of shareholders is adjourned by one or more adjournments for an aggregate of less than 30 days, it is not necessary to give notice of the resumption of the meeting if the time and place for resuming the meeting are announced at the meeting which is adjourned. The directors may postpone any meeting of shareholders previously called by the directors. If a meeting of shareholders is adjourned by one or more adjournments for an aggregate of 30 days or more, notice of the resumption of the meeting shall be given in accordance with the Act.

    9.20        Procedure at Meetings

                             The chairman of any meeting of shareholders shall determine the procedure thereat in all respects and his decision on all matters or things, including but without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any question regarding the validity or invalidity of any instrument of proxy or ballot, shall be conclusive and binding upon all of the shareholders of the Corporation, except as otherwise specifically provided in the by-laws of the Corporation.

    9.21        One-Shareholder Meeting

                             Where all of the outstanding shares of any class or series of shares of the Corporation are held by one shareholder, that shareholder present in person or by proxyholder or by authorized representative shall constitute a meeting of the holders of that class or series of shares of the Corporation.

    9.22        Meetings by Telephonic, Electronic or Other Communication Facility

                             Meetings of shareholders may be held entirely by means of a telephonic, electronic or other communication facility that permits all participants to communicate adequately with each other during the meeting if so determined by the directors or by the shareholders who called the particular meeting of shareholders. Any person entitled to attend a meeting of shareholders may participate in such a meeting by means of a telephonic, electronic or other communication facility that permits all participants to communicate adequately with each other if the Corporation makes available such a communication facility and any person participating in a meeting by such means shall be deemed to be present at the meeting. Any vote at such a meeting may, but is not required to, be held entirely by means of a telephonic, electronic or other communication facility that the Corporation has made available for that purpose.

    9.23        Resolution in Writing

                             A resolution in writing signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of shareholders is as valid as if it had been passed at a meeting of the shareholders unless a written statement with respect to the subject matter of the resolution is submitted by a director or the auditor in accordance with the Act.

    B - 18


    ARTICLE 10
    INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS

    10.1        Information Available to Shareholders

                             Except as provided by the Act, no shareholder shall be entitled to discovery of any information respecting any details or conduct of the Corporation’s business which in the opinion of the directors it would be inexpedient in the interests of the Corporation to communicate to the public.

    10.2        Directors' Determination

                             The directors may from time to time, subject to the rights conferred by the Act, determine whether and to what extent and at what time and place and under what conditions or regulations the documents, books and registers and accounting records of the Corporation or any of them shall be open to the inspection of shareholders and no shareholder shall have any right to inspect any document or book or register or accounting record of the Corporation except as conferred by statute or authorized by the board or by a resolution of the shareholders in general meeting.

    ARTICLE 11
    DIVISIONS AND DEPARTMENTS

    11.1        Creation and Consolidation of Divisions

                             The board may cause the business and operations of the Corporation or any part thereof to be divided or to be segregated into one or more divisions upon such basis, including without limitation, character or type of operation, geographical territory, product manufactured or service rendered, as the board may consider appropriate in each case. The board may also cause the business and operations of any such division to be further divided into sub-units and the business and operations or any such divisions or sub-units to be consolidated upon such basis as the board may consider appropriate in each case.

    11.2        Name of Division

                             Any division or its sub-units may be designated by such name as the board may from time to time determine and may transact business under such name, provided that the Corporation shall set out its name in legible characters in all contracts, invoices, negotiable instruments and orders for goods or services issued or made by or on behalf of the Corporation.

    11.3        Officers of Division

                             From time to time the board or, if authorized by the board, the Chief Executive Officer, may appoint one or more officers for any division, prescribe their powers and duties and settle their terms of employment and remuneration. The board or, if authorized by the board, the Chief Executive Officer, may remove at its or his pleasure any officer so appointed, without prejudice to such officer's rights under any employment contract. Officers of divisions or their sub-units shall not, as such, be officers of the Corporation.

    B - 19


    ARTICLE 12
    NOTICES

    12.1        Method of Giving Notices

                             Any notice (which term includes any communication or document) to be given (which term includes sent, delivered or served) pursuant to the' Act, the regulations thereunder, the articles, the bylaws or otherwise to a shareholder, director, officer, auditor or member of a committee of the board shall be sufficiently given if delivered personally to the person to whom it is to be given or if delivered to his recorded address or if mailed to him at his recorded address by prepaid mail or if sent to him at his recorded address by any means of prepaid transmitted or, recorded communication. A notice so delivered shall be deemed to have been given when it is delivered personally or to the recorded address as aforesaid; a notice so mailed shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in a post office or public letter box and shall be deemed to have been received on the fifth day after so depositing; and a notice so sent by any means of transmitted or recorded communication shall be deemed to have been given when dispatched or delivered to the appropriate communication company or agency or its representative for dispatch. The Secretary may change or cause to be changed the recorded address of any shareholder, director, officer, auditor or member of a committee of the board in accordance with any information believed by him to be reliable.

    12.2        Signature to Notices

                             The signature of any director or officer of the Corporation to any notice or document to be given by the Corporation may be written, stamped, typewritten or printed or partly written, stamped, typewritten or printed.

    12.3        Proof of Service

                             A certificate of the Chairman of the Board (if any), the President, a Vice- President, the Secretary or the Treasurer or of any other officer of the Corporation in office at the time of the making of the certificate or of a transfer officer of any transfer agent or branch transfer agent of shares of any class of the Corporation as to the facts in relation to the mailing or delivery of any notice or other document to any shareholder, director, officer or auditor or publication of any notice or other document shall be conclusive evidence thereof and shall be binding on every shareholder, director, officer or auditor of the Corporation as the case may be.

    12.4        Notice to Joint Shareholders

                             All notices with respect to shares registered in more than one name shall, if more than one address appears on the records of the Corporation in respect of such joint holdings, be given to all of such joint shareholders at the first address so appearing, and notice so given shall be sufficient notice to the holders of such shares.

    12.5        Computation of Time

                             In computing the date when notice must be given under any provision requiring a specified number of days notice of any meeting or other event both the date of giving the notice and the date of the meeting or other event shall be excluded.

    B - 20


    12.6        Undelivered Notices

                             If any notice given to a shareholder pursuant to paragraph 12.1 is returned on three consecutive occasions because he cannot be found, the Corporation shall not be required to give any further notices to such shareholder until he informs the Corporation in writing of his new address.

    12.7        Omissions and Errors

                             The accidental omission to give any notice to any shareholder, director, officer, auditor or member of a committee of the board or the non-receipt of any notice by any such person or any error in any notice not affecting the substance thereof shall not invalidate any action taken at any meeting held pursuant to such notice or otherwise found thereon.

    12.8        Deceased Shareholders

                             Any notice or other document delivered or sent by post or left at the address of any shareholder as the same appears in the records of the Corporation shall, notwithstanding that such shareholder be then deceased, and whether or not the Corporation has notice of his decease, be deemed to have been duly served in respect of the shares held by such shareholder (whether held solely or with any person or persons) until some other person be entered in his stead in the records of the Corporation as the holder or one of the holders thereof and such service shall for all purposes be deemed a sufficient service of such notice or document on his heirs, executors or administrators and on all persons, if any, interested with him in such shares.

    12.9        Persons Entitled by Death or Operation of Law

                             Every person who, by operation of law, transfer, death of a shareholder or any other means whatsoever, shall become entitled to any share, shall be bound by every notice in respect of such share which shall, have been duly given to the shareholder from whom he derives his title to such share prior to his name and address being entered on the securities register (whether such notice was given before or after the happening of the event upon which he became so entitled) and prior to his furnishing to the Corporation the proof of authority or evidence of his entitlement prescribed by the Act.

    12.10       Waiver of Notice

                             Any shareholder (or his duly appointed proxyholder), director, officer, auditor or member of a committee of the board may at any time waive any notice, or waive or abridge the time for any notice, required to be given to him under any provision of the Act, the regulations thereunder, the articles, the bylaws or otherwise and such waiver or abridgement, whether given before or after the meeting or other event of which notice is required to be given shall cure any default in the giving or in the time of such notice, as the case may be. Any such waiver or abridgement shall be in writing except a waiver of notice of a meeting of shareholders or of the board or of a committee of the board which may be given in any manner.

    ARTICLE 13
    BORROWING POWERS OF THE DIRECTORS

    13.1        Borrowing Power.

                             Without limiting the borrowing powers of the Corporation as set forth in the Act, but subject to the provisions of the Act, the board may from time to time, without authorization of the shareholders:

      (a)

    borrow money on the credit of the Corporation;

    B - 21



      (b)

    issue, reissue, sell or pledge debt obligations of the Corporation;

         
      (c)

    give guarantees on behalf of the Corporation to secure performance of an obligation of any person; and

         
      (d)

    mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a security interest in all or any property of the Corporation owned or subsequently acquired, to secure any obligation of the Corporation.

    13.2        The directors may from time to time authorize any director or directors, officer or officers, employee of the Corporation or other person or persons, whether connected with the Corporation or not, to make arrangements with reference to the monies borrowed or to be borrowed as aforesaid and as to the terms and conditions of the loan thereof and as to the securities to be given therefor, with power to vary or modify such arrangements, terms and conditions and to give such additional debt obligations for any monies borrowed or remaining due by the Corporation as the directors of the Corporation may authorize and generally to manage, transact and settle the borrowing of money by the Corporation.

    13.3        The directors may from time to time authorize any director or directors, officer or officers, employee of the Corporation or other person or persons, whether connected with the Corporation or not, to sign, execute and give on behalf of the Corporation all documents, agreements and promises necessary or desirable for the purposes aforesaid and to draw, make, accept, endorse, execute and issue cheques, promissory notes, bills of exchange, bills of lading and other negotiable or transferable instruments and the same and all renewals thereof or substitutions therefor so signed shall be binding upon the Corporation.

    13.4        The words "debt obligations" as used in this Section 13 mean bonds, debentures, notes or other similar obligations or guarantees of such an obligation, whether secured or unsecured.

    ARTICLE 14
    BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION

    14.1        Registered Office.

                             The registered office of the Corporation shall be in the municipality or geographic township specified in its Articles, and at such place therein as the directors of the Corporation may from time to time by resolution determine.

    14.2        Corporate Seal.

                             The corporate seal of the Corporation, if any, shall be such seal as the directors of the Corporation may from time to time by resolution adopt.

    14.3        Banking Arrangements.

                             The banking business of the Corporation or any part thereof shall be transacted with such chartered banks, trust companies or other financial institutions as the board may by resolution from time to time determine.

                             Cheques on the bank accounts, drafts drawn or accepted by the Corporation, promissory notes given by it, acceptances, bills of exchange, orders for the payment of money and other instruments of a like nature may be made, signed, drawn, accepted or endorsed, as the case may be, by such officer or officers, person or persons as the board of directors may by resolution from time to time name for that purpose.

    B - 22


                             Cheques, promissory notes, bills of exchange, orders for the payment of money and other negotiable paper may be endorsed for deposit to the credit of the Corporation’s bank account by such officer or officers, person or persons, as the board of directors may by resolution from time to time name for that purpose, or they may be endorsed for such deposit by means of a stamp bearing the Corporation’s name.

    14.4        Execution of Instruments.

                             Any instruments in writing may be signed in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation by two persons, one of whom holds the office of Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Vice-President or director and the other of whom holds one of the said offices or the office of Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or Treasurer and any instrument in writing so signed shall be binding upon the Corporation without any further authorization or formality. In the event that the Corporation has only one officer and director, that person alone may sign any instruments in writing in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation. The board of directors shall have power from time to time by resolution to appoint any one officer or director or any other officer or officers or any person or persons on behalf of the Corporation either to sign instruments in writing generally or to sign specific instruments in writing. The corporate seal, if any, may be affixed to any instruments in writing on the authority of any of the persons named in this section.

                             The term "instruments in writing" as used herein shall, without limiting the generality thereof, include contracts, documents, deeds, mortgages, hypothecs, charges, security interests, conveyances, transfers and assignments of property (real or personal, immovable or movable), agreements, tenders, releases, proxies, receipts and discharges for the payment of money or other obligations, conveyances, transfers and assignments of shares, stocks, bonds, debentures or other securities and all paper writings.

    14.5        Investments.

                              In particular, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, execution as provided in Section 14.4 hereof shall be adequate to sell, assign, transfer, exchange, convert or convey any securities, rights and warrants.

    14.6        Voting Securities in Other Companies.

                             All securities carrying voting rights in any other body corporate held from time to time by the Corporation may be voted at all meetings of holders of such securities in such manner and by such person or persons as the board of the Corporation from time to time determines. In the absence of action by the board, the proper signing officers of the Corporation may also from time to time execute and deliver for and on behalf of the Corporation instruments of proxy and arrange for the issuance of voting certificates and other evidence of right to vote in such names as they may determine.

    14.7        Solicitors.

                             Either the Chief Executive Officer, President or Chief Financial Officer shall have power from time to time to instruct solicitors to institute or defend actions or other legal proceedings for the Corporation without any specific resolution or retainer or instructions from the board provided, however, that the board may give instructions superseding or varying such instructions.

    14.8        Custody of Securities.

                             The directors may from time to time by resolution provide for the deposit and custody of securities of the Corporation.

    B - 23


                             All share certificates, bonds, debentures, debenture stock certificates, notes or other obligations or securities belonging to the Corporation, may be issued or held in the name of a nominee or nominees of the Corporation (and if issued or held in the name of more than one nominee shall be held in the names of the nominees jointly with right of survivorship) and may be endorsed in blank with endorsement guaranteed in order to enable transfers to be completed and registration to be effected.

    14.9        Charging Assets.

                             The board may from time to time charge, hypothecate, mortgage or pledge any or all of the assets of the Corporation not only by means of bonds and debentures by way of fixed charge or charges or by way of floating charge or charges, but also by any other instrument or instruments for the purposes of securing any past or existing or new or future liability direct or indirect of the Corporation or for the purpose of securing any bonds, debentures or other securities or liabilities of the Corporation or of any other body corporate.

    14.10       Invalidity of Any Provisions of this By-Law.

                             The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this by-law shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions of this by-law.

    14.11       Fiscal Year.

                             The fiscal year of the Corporation shall terminate on such day in each year as is from time to time established by the board of directors.

    ARTICLE 15
    EFFECTIVE DATE

    15.1        Effective date.

                             This by-law shall come into force on the date of the resolution of the shareholders making this by-law a by-law of the Corporation.

    15.2        Registered Office.

                             All previous by-laws of the Corporation are repealed as of the coming into force of this by-law. Such repeal shall not affect the previous operations of any by-law so repealed or affect the validity of any act done or right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired or incurred under, or the validity of any contract or agreement made pursuant to, or the validity of any articles or predecessor charter documents of the Corporation obtained pursuant to, any such by-law prior to its repeal. All officers and persons acting under any by-law so repealed shall continue to act as if appointed under the provisions of this by-law and all resolutions of the shareholders or the directors or a committee of the directors with continuing effect passed under any repealed by-law shall continue good and valid except to the extent inconsistent with this by-law and until amended or repealed.

    B - 24


    EX-99.92 93 exhibit99-92.htm EXHIBIT 99.92 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.92 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.92

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC.
    330 Bay Street, Suite 820
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 2S8

    PROXY SOLICITED BY MANAGEMENT FOR USE AT AN ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF
    SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 28, 2011

    The undersigned shareholder(s) of GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. (the “Corporation”) hereby appoint(s) in respect of all of his/her/its shares of the Corporation, PAUL SARJEANT, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Corporation, or, failing him, ERNEST CLEAVE, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, or, in lieu of the foregoing ____________________________ as nominee of the undersigned, with power of substitution, to attend, act and vote for the undersigned at an annual and special meeting (the “Meeting”) of shareholders of the Corporation to be held on Monday, the 28th day of November, 2011 at the hour of 10 o'clock in the forenoon (Toronto time), and at any and every adjournment or adjournments thereof, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned shareholder(s) was (were) present at the Meeting or adjournment(s) thereof, and hereby direct(s) the nominee to vote the shares of the undersigned in the manner indicated below (for full details of each item, please see the enclosed Notice of Meeting and Management Information Circular (the “Circular”)):

      1.

    TO VOTE FOR ( ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING ( ) in the election of directors.

         
      2.

    TO VOTE FOR ( ) OR WITHHOLD FROM VOTING ( ) on the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as auditors of the Corporation for the ensuing year and to authorize the directors of the Corporation to fix their remuneration.

         
      3.

    TO VOTE FOR ( ) OR AGAINST ( ) on the extension of the term of common share purchase warrants previously issued by the Corporation all as more fully set out in the Circular.

         
      4.

    TO VOTE FOR ( ) OR AGAINST ( ) on the repeal of the existing by- laws of the Corporation and the adoption of new by-laws to govern the affairs of the Corporation all as more fully set out in the Circular.

    If any amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting are proposed at the Meeting or if any other matters properly come before the Meeting, this proxy confers discretionary authority to vote on such amendments or variations or such other matters according to the best judgment of the person voting the proxy at the Meeting. By signing, the shareholder(s) revoke(s) any proxy previously given to attend and vote at said Meeting.

    DATED __________________________, 2011.

       
      Signature of Shareholder
       
       
      Name of Shareholder

    (THIS PROXY MAY NOT BE VALID UNLESS IT IS SIGNED AND DATED. SEE IMPORTANT
    INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ON THE BACK OF THIS PAGE)


    INSTRUCTIONS:

      1.

    This form of proxy must be dated and signed by the appointor or his or her attorney authorized in writing or, if the appointor is a body corporate, this form of proxy must be executed by a duly authorized and appointed officer, attorney or representative thereof. If executed by an officer, attorney or other duly appointed representative, the original or notarial copy of the instrument so empowering such person, or such other documentation in support as shall be acceptable to the Chairman of the Meeting, must accompany this proxy. If the proxy is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it was mailed.

         
      2.

    The shares represented by this proxy will be voted or withheld from voting in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder on any ballot that may be called for and if the shareholder specifies a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares represented by this proxy shall be voted accordingly.

         
      3.

    A SHAREHOLDER HAS THE RIGHT TO APPOINT A PERSON OR COMPANY (WHO NEED NOT BE A SHAREHOLDER) TO ATTEND AND ACT FOR HIM/HER/IT AND ON HIS/HER/ITS BEHALF AT THE MEETING OTHER THAN THE PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY. SUCH RIGHT MAY BE EXERCISED BY STRIKING OUT THE NAMES OF THE TWO (2) PERSONS DESIGNATED IN THIS FORM OF PROXY AND BY INSERTING IN THE BLANK SPACE PROVIDED FOR THAT PURPOSE THE NAME OF THE DESIRED PERSON OR COMPANY OR BY COMPLETING ANOTHER FORM OF PROXY AND, IN EITHER CASE, DELIVERING THE COMPLETED AND EXECUTED PROXY TO THE CORPORATION C/O EQUITY FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, 200 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 400, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 4H1 (FAX #: (416) 595-9593), AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. (TORONTO TIME) ON NOVEMBER 25, 2011, OR IN THE CASE OF ANY ADJOURNMENT OF THE MEETING, NOT LESS THAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SUCH MEETING.

         
      4.

    THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CORPORATION. IN THE ABSENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY, THE PERSONS NAMED IN THIS PROXY WILL VOTE FOR EACH OF THE MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PROXY.

         
      5.

    This proxy ceases to be valid one year from its date.

         
      6.

    If your address as shown is incorrect, please give your correct address when returning this proxy.

         
      7.

    If you are a non-registered shareholder of the Corporation and you received these materials through your broker or through another intermediary, please complete and return the materials in accordance with the instructions provided to you by your broker or by the other intermediary. Failure to do so may result in your shares not being eligible to be voted by proxy at the Meeting. Please contact your broker or the Corporation if you have questions.

         
      8.

    If a registered shareholder has returned this proxy, the said shareholder may still attend the Meeting and may vote in person should the shareholder later decide to do so. However, to do so, the shareholder must record his/her attendance with the scrutineers at the Meeting and revoke the returned proxy in accordance with the instructions provided in the accompanying Management Information Circular.



    EX-99.93 94 exhibit99-93.htm EXHIBIT 99.93 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.93 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.93


    VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

    November 3, 2011

    TO ALL APPLICABLE EXCHANGES AND COMMISSIONS:

    RE: GRANDVIEW GOLD INC

    We are pleased to confirm that copies of the following materials were mailed to registered shareholders and to the Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners on November 3, 2011.

      1.

    Proxy

         
      2.

    Notice of Meeting and Management Information Circular

         
      3.

    Correction Notice

         
      4.

    Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Consolidated Financial Statements

         
      5.

    Online Voting Insert

         
      6.

    Postage Paid Proxy Return Envelope

    Yours Truly,
    EQUITY FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY

    Rosa Vieira
    Senior Manager, Client Relations
    Telephone: 416.361.0930 ext.227
    rvieira@equityfinancialtrust.com

    c.c. Jenn Javier, Administrator, Client Relations



    EX-99.94 95 exhibit99-94.htm EXHIBIT 99.94 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.94 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.94

     
     
    CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    AUGUST 31, 2011
     
    (UNAUDITED)
     


    MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORTING

    The accompanying unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Grandview Gold Inc. [the "Company" or "Grandview"] are the responsibility of the management and Board of Directors of the Company.

    The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management, on behalf of the Board of Directors, in accordance with the accounting policies disclosed in the notes to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements. Where necessary, management has made informed judgments and estimates in accounting for transactions which were not complete at the statement of financial position date. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared within acceptable limits of materiality and are in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 Interim Financial Reporting using accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards appropriate in the circumstances.

    Management has established processes which are in place to provide them sufficient knowledge to support management representations that they have exercised reasonable diligence that (i) the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it is made, as of the date of and for the periods presented by the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements and (ii) the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the Company, as of the date of and for the periods presented by the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements. The Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company and for ensuring that management fulfills its financial reporting responsibilities. An Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling this responsibility. The Audit Committee meets with management to review the financial reporting process and the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for its consideration in approving the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company for issuance to the shareholders.

    Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs in compliance with established financial standards, and applicable laws and regulations, and for maintaining proper standards of conduct for its activities.

    NOTICE TO READER

    Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the condensed interim consolidated financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

    The accompanying unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Company's management.

    The Company's independent auditor has not performed a review of these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity's auditor.


    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

        August 31,     May 31,     June 1,  
        2011     2011     2010  
    As at         (Note 11)   (Note 11)
                       
    Assets                  
                       
    Current                  
           Cash and cash equivalents $  618,300   $  1,177,679   $  1,432,824  
           Short term investments   25,349     25,286     25,037  
           HST and sundry receivable   119,407     63,414     26,416  
           Prepaid expenses   14,402     17,718     12,876  
                       
    Total current assets   777,458     1,284,097     1,497,153  
                       
    Reclamation bond   12,858     12,718     13,699  
    Mining interests (Note 3)   4,982,470     4,568,757     4,149,771  
                       
    Total non-current assets   4,995,328     4,581,475     4,163,470  
                       
    Total assets $  5,772,786   $  5,865,572   $  5,660,623  
                       
    Liabilities                  
                       
    Current                  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  118,406   $  129,019   $  89,284  
                       
    Provision for environmental rehabilitation (Note 3(a))   12,858     12,718     13,699  
    Deferred income tax liability   80,667     80,667     -  
                       
    Total non-current assets   93,525     93,385     13,699  
                       
    Total liabilities   211,931     222,404     102,983  
                       
    Shareholders' equity   5,560,855     5,643,168     5,557,640  
                       
    Total liabilities and shareholder's equity $  5,772,786   $  5,865,572   $  5,660,623  

    Nature of operations and going concern assumption (Note 1)

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

    Approved by the Board of Directors:

    "Paul T. Sargeant"  
    Director  
       
    "Richard Brown"  
    Director  

     
    - 1 -


    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

        Three Months Ended  
        August 31,  
        2011     2010  
              (Note 11 )  
                 
    Expenses            
           General and administration (Note 10) $  82,397   $  84,321  
                 
    Operating loss   (82,397 )   (84,321 )
           Interest income   84     63  
                 
    Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period   (82,313 )   (84,258 )
                 
                 
    Loss per share - basic and diluted (Note 7) $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 )

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

     
    - 2 -


    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited))

              Reserves              
                                   
                    Equity Settled              
                    Share Based              
        Share     Warrant     Payments              
        Capital     Reserve     Reserve     Deficit     Total  
    Three months ended August 31, 2010   (Note 4)   (Note 5)   (Note 6)            
    Balance, June 1, 2010 $  16,093,441   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $  (20,973,139 ) $  5,557,640  
         Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (84,258 )   (84,258 )
                                   
    Balance, August 31, 2010 $  16,093,441   $  1,455,333   $  8,982,005   $  (21,057,397 ) $  5,473,382  

              Reserves              
                                   
                    Equity Settled              
                    Share Based              
        Share     Warrant     Payments              
        Capital     Reserve     Reserve     Deficit     Total  
    Three months ended August 31, 2011   (Note 4)   (Note 5)   (Note 6)            
                                   
    Balance, June 1, 2011 $  16,533,842   $  1,509,367   $  8,982,005   $  (21,382,046 ) $  5,643,168  
         Net loss for the period   -     -     -     (82,313 )   (82,313 )
                                   
    Balance, August 31, 2011 $  16,533,842   $  1,509,367   $  8,982,005   $  (21,464,359 ) $  5,560,855  

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

     
    - 3 -


    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)

        Three Months Ended  
        August 31,  
        2011     2010  
                 
    Cash flows from operating activities            
                 
    Net loss for the period $  (82,313 ) $  (84,258 )
           Accrued interest   (63 )   (63 )
    Net change in non-cash working capital:            
           Sundry receivables   (55,993 )   (13,702 )
           Prepaid expenses   3,316     99  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (10,613 )   (10,671 )
                 
    Cash flows used in operating activities   (145,666 )   (108,595 )
                 
    Cash flows used in investing activities            
           Deferred mineral property expenditures   (413,713 )   (98,139 )
                 
    Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period   (559,379 )   (206,734 )
                 
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   1,177,679     1,432,824  
                 
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $  618,300   $  1,226,090  

    The notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

     
    - 4 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    1.

    Nature of Operations and Going Concern

       

    Grandview Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Grandview") is a gold exploration company focused on exploring and developing gold properties in gold camps of North and South America. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues from gold exploration and is considered to be in the exploration stage.

       

    The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on November 14, 2011.

       

    These unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements were prepared on a going concern basis of presentation, which assumes that the Company will continue operations for the foreseeable future and be able to realize the carrying value of its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenue and has an accumulated deficit of $21,464,359. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional financing and or achieve profitable operations in the future. These unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if the going concern assumption were not appropriate.

       

    The Company's financing efforts to date, while substantial, are not sufficient in and of themselves to enable the Company to fund all aspects of its operations. Management will pursue funding initiatives if, as and when required to meet the Company's requirements on an ongoing basis. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that these initiatives will be successful or sufficient.

       

    As at August 31, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $618,300 (May 31, 2011 - $1,177,679 and June 1, 2010 - $1,432,824) and working capital of $659,052 (May 31, 2011 - $1,155,078 and June 1, 2010 - $1,407,869). Management of the Company believes that it has sufficient funds to pay its ongoing work commitments, administrative expenses and its liabilities for the ensuing twelve months as they normally fall due.

       
    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies

       

    Basis of Presentation

       

    The company prepares its financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles as set out in the Handbook of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA Handbook”). In 2010, the CICA Handbook was revised to incorporate International Financial Reporting Standards, and require publicly accountable enterprises to apply such standards effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Accordingly, the company has commenced reporting on this basis in these interim consolidated financial statements. In the financial statements, the term “Canadian GAAP” refers to Canadian GAAP before the adoption of IFRS.

       

    These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS applicable to the preparation of interim financial statements, including IAS 34 and IFRS 1. Subject to certain transition elections disclosed in note 11, the company has consistently applied the same accounting policies in its opening IFRS statement of financial position at June 1, 2010 and throughout all periods presented, as if these policies had always been in effect. Note 11 discloses the impact of the transition to IFRS on the company's reported financial position, financial performance and cash flows, including the nature and effect of significant changes in accounting policies from those used in the company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2011.


     
    - 5 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

       

    Basis of Presentation (Continued)

       

    The policies applied in these condensed interim consolidated financial statements are based on IFRS issued and outstanding as of November 14, 2011, the date the Board of Directors approved the statements. Any subsequent changes to IFRS that are given effect in the company’s annual consolidated financial statements for the year ending May 31, 2012 could result in restatement of these interim consolidated financial statements, including the transition adjustments recognized on change-over to IFRS.

       

    The condensed interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the company’s Canadian GAAP annual financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2011. Note 11 discloses IFRS information for the year ended May 31, 2011 not provided in the 2010 annual financial statements.

       

    Basis of Consolidation

       

    The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Grandview Gold (USA) Inc. ("Grandview USA"), and Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C. ("Recuperacion"). All intercompany transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated upon consolidation.

       

    Financial Instruments

       

    Financial Assets

       

    All financial assets are recognized and derecognized on the trade date where the purchase or sale of a financial asset is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the financial asset within the time frame established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus transaction costs.

       

    Financial assets are classified into the following categories: financial assets at 'fair value through profit or loss' ("FVTPL") and ‘loans and receivables‘. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.

       

    Impairment of financial assets:

       

    Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Financial assets are impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial assets, the estimated future cash flows of the investments have been negatively impacted. Evidence of impairment could include: significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or default or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or the likelihood that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization.

       

    Financial Liabilities

       

    Financial liabilities are classified as ‘other financial liabilities’ and are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest recognized on an effective yield basis.

       

    The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest costs over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability or to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.


     
    - 6 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

       

    De-recognition of Financial Liabilities

       

    The Company derecognizes financial liabilities when the obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire. The Company’s financial instruments consist of the following:


      Financial Assets: Classification:
         
      Cash and cash equivalents Loans and receivables
      Short term investments FVTPL
      Sundry receivable Loans and receivables
      Reclamation bond Loans and receivables
      Financial Liabilities: Classification:
      Accounts payable and other liabilities Other financial liabilities

    Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value

    Financial instruments recorded at fair value on the unaudited condensed interim consolidated statements of financial position are classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels: Level 1 - valuation based on quoted prices [unadjusted] in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 - valuation techniques based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly [i.e. as prices] or indirectly [i.e. derived from prices]; and Level 3 - valuation techniques using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data [unobservable inputs].

    Mining Interests

    Mining interests include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized as incurred. Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognized in the statement of other comprehensive income (loss). Capitalized costs, including certain operating expenses, are only allocated to the extent that these costs can be related directly to operational activities in the relevant area of interest where it is considered likely to be recoverable by future exploitation or sale or where the activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves.

    Mining interests are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. Exploration and evaluation assets are reviewed for impairment at each cash-generating unit (“CGU”) level. The Company defines CGU on a property by property basis.

    Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested equipment.

    Recoverability of the carrying amount of the mining interests is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.

     
    - 7 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

      

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

      

    Cash and cash equivalents in the statements of financial position comprise cash at banks and on hand, and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less, and which are readily convertible into a known amount of cash. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are invested with major financial institutions in business accounts and higher yield investment and savings accounts that are available on demand by the Company for its programs.

      

    Share Based Payment Transactions

      

    The fair value of share options granted to employees is recognized as an expense over the vesting period with a corresponding increase in equity. An individual is classified as an employee when the individual is an employee for legal or tax purposes [direct employee] or provides services similar to those performed by a direct employee, including directors of the Company.

      

    The fair value is measured at the grant date and recognized over the period during which the options vest. The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. At each financial position reporting date, the amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options that are expected to vest.

      

    Flow Through Shares

      

    Under Canadian income tax legislation, a company is permitted to issue flow-through shares whereby the Company agrees to incur qualifying expenditures and renounce the related income tax deductions to the investors. The Company has adopted a policy to (i) allocate the proceeds between the offering of the shares and the sale of tax benefits when the shares are offered and (ii) recognize an income tax provision upon filing of appropriate renunciation forms with the Canadian taxation authorities for qualifying expenditures previously incurred.

      

    The allocation of the proceeds is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the shares and the amount the investor pays for the flow-through shares. A liability is recognized for the premium paid by the investors. The liability is reduced and the reduction of premium liability is recorded in other income upon filing of appropriate renunciation forms with the Canadian taxation authorities for qualifying expenditures previously incurred.

      

    Share Issuance Costs

      

    Share issuance costs are recorded as a reduction of share capital.

      

    Income Taxes

      

    The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognized in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.

      

    The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the company and its subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.


     
    - 8 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    Income Taxes (Continued)

    Deferred income tax is recognized, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

    Deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.

    Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except for deferred income tax liability where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis.

    Provisions

    A provision is recognized when the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.

    Provision for environmental rehabilitation

    A legal or constructive obligation to incur restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs may arise when environmental disturbance is caused by the exploration, development or ongoing production of a mineral property interest. Such costs arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work, discounted to their net present value, are provided for and capitalized at the start of each project to the carrying amount of the asset, as soon as the obligation to incur such costs arises. Discount rates using a pretax rate that reflects the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. These costs are charged against profit or loss over the economic life of the related asset, through amortization using either a unit-of-production or the straight-line method as appropriate. The related liability is adjusted for each period for the unwinding of the discount rate and for changes to the current market based discount rate, amount or timing of the underlying cash flows needed to settle the obligation. Costs for restoration of subsequent site damage that is created on an ongoing basis during production are provided for at their net present values and charged against profits as extraction progresses.

    As at August 31, 2011, May 31, 2011 and June 1, 2010, the Company did not have any provisions, except for the provision for environmental rehabilitation described in note 3 (a).

    Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

    Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, including contingently issuable shares which are included when the conditions necessary for issuance have been met. Diluted loss per share is calculated in a manner similar to basic loss per share, except the weighted-average shares outstanding are increased to include potential common shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants, if dilutive. The number of additional shares included in the calculation is based on the treasury stock method for options and warrants.


     
    - 9 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

       

    Foreign Currencies

       

    The functional currency, as determined by management, of the Company and each of its subsidiaries is the Canadian Dollar. The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position are expressed in Canadian Dollars.

       

    Management has determined that the functional currencies of the Company's subsidiaries should be the same as the parent for the following reasons:


      a)

    Activities are essentially an extension of the parent

      b)

    Transactions with parent are a high proportion of activities

      c)

    Cash flows directly affect cash flows of parent and are readily available to remit to parent

      d)

    Cash flows are insufficient to service debt obligations without funds from parent

    Furthermore, the functional currencies will always be the same, because it would be contradictory for an integral foreign operation that ‘carries on business as if it were an extension of the reporting enterprise’s operations’ to operate in a primary economic environment different from its parent.

    Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the period end exchange rates are recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not retranslated. The Group then translates the assets and liabilities of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries from their respective functional currency to the Presentation currency at the period end rate. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. The resulting unrealized gain or loss on translation is recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. Equity is translated at historical rates.

    Significant Accounting Judgments and Estimates

    The preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual outcomes could differ from these estimates. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include estimates that, by their nature, are uncertain. The impacts of such estimates are pervasive throughout the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and may require accounting adjustments based on future occurrences. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. These estimates are based on historical experience, current and future economic conditions and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

    Critical Accounting Estimates

    Significant assumptions about the future that management has made that could result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, in the event that actual results differ from assumptions made, relate to, but are not limited to, the following:

     
    - 10 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

       

    Critical Accounting Estimates (Continued)

       

    Recoverability of Mining Interests

       

    When there are indications that an asset may be impaired, management is required to estimate the asset’s recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the greater of the value in use and the fair value less selling costs. Determining the value in use requires management to estimate expected future cash flows associated with the assets and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value. No impairment indicators of nonfinancial assets have been noted for the three months ended August 31, 2011, August 31, 2010 or for the year ended May 31, 2011.

       

    Stock-Based Compensation

       

    Management is required to make certain estimates when determining the fair value of stock options awards, and the number of awards that are expected to vest. These estimates affect the amount recognized as stock- based compensation in the statement of operations based on estimates of forfeiture and expected lives of the underlying stock options. For the three months ended August 31, 2011 the Company recognized $nil stock- based compensation expense (three months ended August 31, 2010 - $nil).

       

    Critical Accounting Judgments

       

    Income taxes and recovery of deferred tax assets

       

    The measurement of income taxes payable and deferred income tax assets and liabilities requires management to make judgments in the interpretation and application of the relevant tax laws. The actual amount of income taxes only becomes final upon filing and acceptance of the tax return by the relevant authorities, which occurs subsequent to the issuance of the financial statements.

       

    New Accounting Standards and Interpretations

       

    IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”)

       

    IFRS 9 was issued by the IASB in October 2010 and will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement [“IAS 39”]. IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. Most of the requirements in IAS 39 for classification and measurement of financial liabilities were carried forward unchanged to IFRS 9. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 9 on the financial statements.

       

    IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”)

       

    IFRS 10 provides a single model to be applied in the control analysis for all investees, including entities that currently are SPEs in the scope of SIC-12. In addition, the consolidation procedures are carried forward substantially unmodified from IAS 27 (2008). IFRS 10 is effective for the annual period beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 10 on its financial statements.



     
    - 11 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

       

    IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”)

       

    IFRS 11 replaces the guidance in IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures. Under IFRS 11, joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures. IFRS 11 essentially carves out of previous jointly controlled entities, those arrangements which although structured through a separate vehicle, such separation is ineffective and the parties to the arrangement have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities and are accounted for as joint operations in a fashion consistent with jointly controlled assets/operations under IAS 31. In addition, under IFRS 11 joint ventures do not have the choice between equity accounting or proportionate consolidation; these entities must now use the equity method.

       

    Upon application of IFRS 11, entities which had previously accounted for joint ventures using proportionate consolidation shall collapse the proportionately consolidated net asset value (including any allocation of goodwill) into a single investment balance at the beginning of the earliest period presented. The investment’s opening balance is tested for impairment in accordance with IAS 28 and IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Any impairment losses are recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented. IFRS 11 is effective for the annual period beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 11 on its financial statements.

       

    IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement ("IFRS 13")

       

    IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement was issued by the IASB on May 12, 2011. The new standard converges IFRS and US GAAP on how to measure fair value and the related fair value disclosures. The new standard creates a single source of guidance for fair value measurements, where fair value is required or permitted under IFRS, by not changing how fair value is used but how it is measured. The focus will be on an exit price. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 13 on its consolidated financial statements.

       
    3.

    Mining Interests


      (a)

    Pony Creek Carlin Trend Project, Nevada, USA

         
     

    On July 27, 2004, the Company entered into an option agreement with Mill City Gold Corp. (formerly Mill City International Corporation) ("Mill City") to earn a 60% interest in the Pony Creek/Elliot Dome Property (the “Pony Creek”) in the State of Nevada, USA.

         
     

    The Company has recorded a provision for environmental rehabilitation on its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project, representing the estimated costs of the Company's obligation to restore the property site to its original condition as required by regulatory authorities. The Company has recorded a provision for environmental rehabilitation in the amount of $12,858, equal to the amount of reclamation bond posted by the Company with the United States, Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management.

         
     

    In fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the carrying value of its Pony Creek Carlin Trend project could not be supported, resulting in a write-off charge of $5,903,342.

         
      (b)

    Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada


      (i)

    The Company owns a 100% interest in 8 mining claims located in the Red Lake Area, District of Kenora, in Northwestern Ontario. The mining claims were written off several years ago when the Company decided to change its business. Since the Company has changed back to resource exploration the Company is once again capitalizing the expenditures related to these claims. However, these events have not indicated a change to the impairment of the previously written off claims.


     
    - 12 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    3.

    Mining Interests (Continued)


      (b)

    Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Continued)


      (ii)

    On October 18, 2005, the Company signed a definitive Option Agreement with Fronteer Development Group Inc. (“Fronteer”) for Fronteer’s Dixie Lake Property (the “Dixie lake”) located in Ontario’s Red Lake Gold District on the following terms and conditions:


      (a)

    The Company shall earn a 51% interest in the Dixie Lake Property by incurring exploration expenditures of $300,000 (completed), assuming payments totaling $75,000 to the underlying property vendor; and

         
      (b)

    issuing 160,000 shares of the Company at $1.25 per share for a total value of $200,000, to a third party as a finder’s fee (issued).


     

    On October 17, 2007, the Company announced that it has fulfilled the terms of its option agreement with Fronteer relating to the Company’s right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie Lake.

         
     

    Under the terms of the option agreement with Fronteer, dated August 26, 2005, the Company had a right to earn an undivided 51% interest in Dixie lake by spending US$300,000 over three years, making $75,000 in cash payments and issuing 40,000 shares to the underlying vendor. The Company presented a detailed accounting of its US$1,711,000 exploration program completed to date, as well as plans for exploration moving forward.

         
     

    Fronteer accepted in writing, the Company’s earn-in and further, Fronteer has informed the Company that, as per the terms of the Option Agreement, it will exercise its option to dilute its 49% participating interest to a 36% participating interest in Dixie lake.

         
      (iii)

    On February 8, 2007, the Company announced it had signed a formal option agreement with EMCO SA, (“EMCO”) relating to the acquisition of an option to acquire a 60 percent interest in the 10 unpatented and 2 patented claims in Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property on the following terms and conditions:


      (a)

    the Company has an option to earn an undivided 60 percent interest in the Sanshaw- Bonanza property by incurring $250,000 in resource exploration and development expenditures on or before August 31, 2007; and

         
      (b)

    issuing 115,000 of the Company's common shares (55,000 common shares were issued in February 2007 and valued at $22,000; 30,000 common shares were issued in April 2008 and valued at $10,800; 30,000 commons shares were issued in July 2008 and valued at $10,800) in tranches over an 18-month period and 200,000 warrants (issued) at an exercise price of $1.40 per share which will expire 36 months from the date of issuance.

         
     

    The fair value of the 200,000 common share purchase warrants issued for the 60 percent interest in the 10 claim Sanshaw-Bonanza gold property has been estimated to be $32,200 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In determining this value, the following assumptions were used: risk-free interest rate of 3.96%, dividend yield of 0%, expected stock volatility of 101% and an expected life of 36 months.

         
     

    Terms of the agreement provide for the dilution of EMCO’s interest in the property to 10% on the occurrence of certain events, which would then convert their interest to a 3% NSR. An underlying 1.5% NSR remains with the original property owner.


     
    - 13 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    3.

    Mining Interests (Continued)


      (b)

    Red Lake Gold Camp, Ontario, Canada (Continued)


      (iii)

    (b) (Continued)

         
     

    On June 18, 2007, the Company amended the option agreement with EMCO relating to the Sanshaw-Bonanza property. The Company has agreed to increase the expenditures required to be incurred on or before August 31, 2008 to $500,000 and to issue to EMCO 100,000 common shares in the capital of the Company as consideration for the amended agreement (issued and valued at $35,000).

         
     

    On September 11, 2008, the Company reported that it has incurred the expenditures required to successfully fulfill the terms of its option agreement with EMCO to earn a 60% undivided interest in the Sanshaw-Bonanza property.

         
      (iv)

    On April 28, 2010, the Company announced that, through a series of cash and share payments (the “Transaction”), it had:


      1.

    acquired the remaining 40% interest in its Sanshaw-Bonanza property (the “Property”) in the Red LakeGold District of Ontario from EMCO Corporation S.A. ("EMCO");

      2.

    acquired four additional claims which are contiguous to the Property from Perry English ("English");and

      3.

    reduced the existing NSR on the Property, so that the Company now holds a 100% interest in and to the Property, subject only to an NSR of just 0.375%.

    Grandview had previously completed expenditure requirements to earn a 60% interest in the Property as per an option agreement with EMCO dated February 7, 2007. To acquire the remaining 40% interest in the Property, the Company paid EMCO $25,000 in cash and issued 50,000 common shares in its capital. Also, the Company expanded the Property parcel by acquiring two unpatented claims and two patented claims for aggregate consideration of $60,000 in cash and the issuance of 500,000 common shares in its capital. Concurrently, the Company also purchased 75% of the outstanding 1.5% NSR on the Property for $25,000 cash. Cumulative expenditures related to the Transaction totalled $110,000 cash and 550,000 common shares of the Company.

    The Company is committed to spend $605,000 raised in conjunction with the December 31, 2010 flow-through private placement on eligible Canadian exploration expenditures by on or before December 31, 2011.

      (c)

    Rice Lake Gold Camp, Manitoba, Canada

         
     

    Grandview has a 100% interest in 16 unpatented mining claims in the Long Lake - Cat Lake area of southeastern Manitoba (the "GVG Property"). The Company staked these claims in 2005 and 2006. In fiscal 2009, the Company determined that the carrying value of its Rice Lake Gold Camp in Manitoba, Canada could not be supported, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,557,112. During the year ended year ended May 31, 2011, the Company disposed the Bissett properties within it's Rice Lake Gold Camp for $2,000. The Company received a 1% Net Smelter Return on the disposed property.


     
    - 14 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    3.

    Mining Interests (Continued)

         
    (d)

    Guilianita Project, Peru

         

    On July 2, 2009, a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum”) was signed with a private Peruvian Group which granted a two-stage option (the "Option") to acquire up to a 100% interest in a property located in the Suyo District, Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru (the “Guilianita”). The Option provided the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in Guilianita by (i) making a US$20,000 cash payment on signing of the Memorandum; (ii) incurring CAD $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (iii) issuing a total of two million common shares of the Company over a three year period. (issued - 200,000 common shares)

         

    The Option also allowed the Company to acquire the remaining 20% subject to it making an additional payment of US$300,000 (CAD$313,050) and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Memorandum.

         
    4.

    Share Capital

    (a)                Authorized

    Unlimited number of common shares

    Unlimited number of preference shares. The preference shares are without par value, redeemable, voting, non-participating, and are convertible into common shares at the rate of one common share for five preference shares (none currently issued and outstanding).

    (b)                Issued

          Number        
          of Common        
      Three months ended August 31, 2010   Shares     Amount  
                (Note 11)  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010, June 1, 2010 and August 31, 2010   72,763,033   $  16,093,441  

          Number        
          of Common        
      Three months ended August 31, 2011   Shares     Amount  
                (Note 11)
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2011   81,163,032   $  16,533,842  

     
    - 15 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    5.

    Warrants


          Number of     Weighted Average  
      Three months ended August 31, 2010   Warrants     Exercise Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010, June 1, 2010 and August 31, 2010   26,999,998   $  0.12  

          Number of     Weighted Average  
      Three months ended August 31, 2011   Warrants     Exercise Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2011   31,304,996   $  0.13  

    The following are the warrants outstanding at August 31, 2011:

      Number of   Fair     Exercise   Expiry  
      Warrants   Value     Price   Date  
                       
      26,666,665   1,440,000     0.12   December 3, 2011  
      4,033,332   43,776     0.18   December 30, 2012  
      604,999   25,591     0.08   December 31, 2011  
                       
      31,304,996 $  1,509,367   $  0.13      

    6.

    Stock Options

       

    The Company maintains an employee stock option plan under which the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed for such purpose, may from time to time grant to employees, officers, directors or consultants of the Company, options to acquire common shares in such numbers, for such terms and at such exercise prices, as may be determined by the Board of Directors or such committee.

       

    The stock option plan provides that the maximum number of common shares in the capital of the Company that may be reserved for issuance for all purposes under the stock option plan shall be equal to 10% of the total issued and outstanding common shares and that the maximum number of common shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one optionee pursuant to share options may not exceed 5% of the common shares outstanding at the time of grant.

       

    The options are valid for a maximum of 5 years from the date of issue and the normal vesting term is 1/4 immediately and 1/4 after 3, 6 and 9 month period from the date of grant.

       

    The following is continuity of stock options:


          Number of     Weighted Average  
      Three months ended August 31, 2010   of Stock Options     Exercise Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2010 and June 1, 2010   5,875,000   $  0.38  
      Cancelled   (225,000 )   (0.15 )
                   
      Balance, August 31, 2010   5,650,000   $  0.39  


     
    - 16 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    6.

    Stock Options (Continued)


          Number of     Weighted Average  
      Three months ended August 31, 2011   of Stock Options     Exercise Price  
                   
      Balance, May 31, 2011 and August 31, 2011   5,250,000   $  0.32  

    The following are the stock options outstanding and exercisable at August 31, 2011:

          Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
                Weighted                    
                average                    
                remaining     Weighted           Weighted  
          Number     contractual     average     Number     average  
      Expiry Date price   of Options     life     exercise price     of options     exercise  
                                     
      September 27, 2012   1,675,000     1.08   $ 0.68     1,675,000   $  0.68  
      June 23, 2014   2,675,000     2.81     0.15     2,675,000     0.15  
      December 9, 2014   900,000     3.28     0.15     900,000     0.15  
                                     
          5,250,000                2.34 years    $ 0.32     5,250,000   $  0.32  

    7.

    Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share


          Three Months Ended  
          August 31,  
          2011     2010  
                   
      Numerator for basic loss per share $  (82,313 ) $  (84,258 )
                   
      Numerator for diluted loss per share $  (82,313 ) $  (84,258 )
                   
      Denominator:            
      Weighted average number of common shares - basic   81,163,032     72,763,033  
                   
      Weighted average number of common shares - diluted   81,163,032     72,763,033  
                   
      Basic and diluted loss per share $  (0.00 ) $  (0.00 )

    Diluted loss per share reflects the maximum possible dilution from the potential exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of convertible securities. However, the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options has not been included as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

     
    - 17 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    8.

    Segmented Information

       

    The Company's operations comprise a single reporting operating segment engaged in mineral exploration.

       

    The Company operates in two geographic areas as at August 31, 2011, two areas at August 31, 2010. The Company's assets by geographic location are:


          August 31, 2011     May 31, 2011     June 1, 2010  
      Canada $  5,414,496   $  5,175,718   $  5,372,915  
      Peru $  358,290     689,854     287,708  
      Total assets $  5,772,786   $  5,865,572     5,660,623  

    9.

    Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

         
    i)

    For the three months ended August 31, 2011, $33,125 (three months ended August 31, 2010 - $37,500) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $25,125 (2010 - $18,750) capitalized to mining interests. Included in accounts payable as at August 31, 2011 is $nil (three months ended August 31, 2010 - $nil) in relation to consulting services rendered.

         
    ii)

    For the three months ended August 31, 2011, $9,000 (three months ended August 31, 2010 - $9,000) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer or a company controlled by the Chief Financial officer. Included in accounts payable as at August 31, 2011 is $13,560 (three months ended August 31, 2010 - $nil) in relation to consulting services rendered.


    These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at fair value.

       
    10.

    General and administration


          Three Months Ended  
          August 30,  
          2011     2010  
                   
      Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer costs $  13,495   $  13,509  
      Professional fees   5,622     31,169  
      Management and consulting services   20,000     27,750  
      Office and administration   43,280     9,499  
      Exploration evaluation expenses   -     2,394  
                   
        $  82,397   $  84,321  

     
    - 18 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Conversion to IFRS


      (i)

    Overview

         
     

    As stated in Significant Accounting Policies note 2, these are the Company’s first unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IAS 34, using accounting policies consistent with IFRS.

         
     

    The accounting policies described in note 2 have been applied in preparing the condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended August 31, 2011 and in preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position at June 1, 2010 (the Company's Transition Date) and May 31, 2011.

         
      (ii)

    First-Time Adoption of IFRS

         
     

    The adoption of IFRS requires the application of IFRS 1, which provides guidance for an entity’s initial adoption of IFRS. IFRS 1 generally requires retrospective application of IFRS as effective at the end of its first annual IFRS reporting period. However, IFRS 1 also provides certain optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions to this retrospective treatment.

         
     

    The Company has elected to apply the following optional exemptions in its preparation of an opening IFRS consolidated statement of financial position as at June 1, 2010.


     

    To apply IFRS 2 Share based Payments only to equity instruments that were issued after November 7, 2002 and had not vested by the Transition Date.

     

    To apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations prospectively from the Transition Date, therefore not restating business combinations that took place prior to the Transition Date.


     

    IFRS 1 does not permit changes to estimates that have been made previously. Accordingly, estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s opening IFRS consolidated statement of financial position as at the Transition Date are consistent with those that were made under Canadian GAAP.

         
     

    The Company’s Transition Date IFRS unaudited consolidated statement of financial position is included as comparative information in the unaudited statements of financial position in these financial statements.

         
      (iii)

    Changes to Accounting Policies

         
     

    The Company has changed certain accounting policies to be consistent with IFRS as is expected to be effective or available on December 31, 2011, the Company’s first annual IFRS reporting date. However, these changes to its accounting policies have not resulted in any significant change to the recognition and measurement of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses or cashflow within its financial statements.


     
    - 19 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Conversion to IFRS (Continued)

       

    The following summarizes the significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies on adoption of IFRS.


      (a)

    Impairment of non-financial assets

         
     

    IFRS requires a write down of assets if the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use of a group of assets is less than its carrying value. Value in use is determined using discounted estimated future cash flows. Current Canadian GAAP requires a write down to estimated fair value only if the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of a group of assets are less than its carrying value.

         
     

    The Company's accounting policies related to impairment of non-financial assets have been changed to reflect these differences. There was no impact on the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

         
      (b)

    Provision for environmental rehabilitation

         
     

    IFRS requires the recognition of a provision for environmental rehabilitation for legal or constructive obligations, while current Canadian GAAP only requires the recognition of such liabilities for legal obligations. A constructive obligation exists when an entity has created reasonable expectations that it will take certain actions.

         
     

    The Company's accounting policies related to environmental rehabilitation have been changed to reflect these differences. There is no impact on the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.

         
      (c)

    Flow through shares and deferred taxes

         
     

    Under Canadian GAAP, the Company recognized the foregone tax benefit on the date the Company renounced the tax credits associated with the exploration expenditures, provided there is reasonable assurance that the expenditures will be made. To recognize the foregone tax benefits to the Company, the carrying value of the shares issued is reduced by the tax effect of the tax benefits renounced to subscribers.

         
     

    As part of the transition to IFRS the Company adopted a policy to (i) allocate the proceeds between the offering of the shares and the sale of tax benefits when the shares are offered and (ii) recognize an income tax provision upon filing of appropriate renunciation forms with the Canadian taxation authorities for qualifying expenditures previously incurred. In particular, the corresponding reduction of share capital in respect of flow-through share financing as previously recorded under Canadian GAAP is now recorded as an expense in the statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

         
     

    Pursuant to the above policy the allocation of the proceeds from flow through share issuance is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the shares and the amount the investor pays for the flow-through shares. A liability is recognized for the premium paid by the investors. The liability is reduced and the reduction of premium liability is recorded in other income upon filing of appropriate renunciation forms with the Canadian taxation authorities for qualifying expenditures previously incurred.

         
      (d)

    Presentation

         
     

    Certain amounts on the unaudited condensed interim consolidated statement of financial position, statement of loss and comprehensive loss and statement of cash flows have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted under IFRS.


     
    - 20 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Conversion to IFRS (Continued)

         
      (iv) Reconciliation between IFRS and Canadian GAAP

    The June 1, 2010 Canadian GAAP consolidated statement of financial position has been reconciled to IFRS as follows:

          Canadian     IFRS     IFRS        
      June 1, 2010   GAAP     Adjustments     Reclassifications     IFRS  
                               
      Assets                        
                               
      Current assets                        
      Cash and cash equivalents $  1,432,824   $  -   $  -   $ 1,432,824  
      Short term investments   25,037     -     -     25,037  
      HST and sundry receivable   26,416     -     -     26,416  
      Prepaid expenses   12,876     -     -     12,876  
                               
          1,497,153     -     -     1,497,153  
      Reclamation bond   13,699     -     -     13,699  
      Mining interests   4,149,771     -     -     4,149,771  
                               
        $  5,660,623   $  -   $  -   $ 5,660,623  
                               
                               
      Liabilities                        
                               
      Current liabilities                        
      Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  89,284   $  -   $  -   $ 89,284  
                               
      Provision for environmental rehabilitation   13,699     -     -     13,699  
                               
          102,983     -     -     102,983  
                               
      Shareholders' equity                        
      Share capital (Note 11(iii)(c))   15,081,883     1,011,558     -     16,093,441  
      Warrants (Note 11(iii)(d))   1,455,333     -     (1,455,333 )   -  
      Contributed surplus (Note 11(iii)(d))   8,982,005     -     (8,982,005 )   -  
      Reserves (Note 11(iii)(d))   -     -     10,437,338     10,437,338  
      Deficit (Note 11(iii)(c))   (19,961,581 )   (1,011,558 )   -     (20,973,139 )
      Accumulated other comprehensive income   -     -     -     -  
                               
          5,557,640     (1,011,558 )   -     5,557,640  
                               
        $  5,660,623   $  -   $  -   $ 5,660,623  

     
    - 21 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Conversion to IFRS (Continued)

         
    (iv)  

    Reconciliation between IFRS and Canadian GAAP (continued)

         

    The August 31, 2010 Canadian GAAP consolidated statement of financial position has been reconciled to IFRS as follows:


          Canadian     IFRS     IFRS        
      August 31, 2010   GAAP     Adjustments     Reclassifications     IFRS  
                               
      Assets                        
                               
      Current assets                        
      Cash and cash equivalents $  1,226,090   $  -   $  -   $ 1,226,090  
      Short term investments   25,099     -     -     25,099  
      HST and sundry receivable   40,118     -     -     40,118  
      Prepaid expense   12,777     -     -     12,777  
                               
          1,304,084     -     -     1,304,084  
      Reclamation bond   14,001     -     -     14,001  
      Mining interests   4,247,910     -     -     4,247,910  
                               
        $  5,565,995   $  -   $  -   $ 5,565,995  
                               
                               
      Liabilities                        
                               
      Current liabilities                        
      Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $  78,612   $  -   $  -   $ 78,612  
      Provision for environmental rehabilitation   14,001     -     -     14,001  
                               
          92,613     -     -     92,613  
                               
      Shareholders' equity                        
      Share capital (Note 11(iii)(c))   15,081,883     1,011,558     -     16,093,441  
      Warrants (Note 11(iii)(d))   1,455,333     -     (1,455,333 )   -  
      Contributed surplus (Note 11(iii)(d))   8,982,005     -     (8,982,005 )   -  
      Reserves (Note 11(iii)(d))   -     -     10,437,338     10,437,338  
      Deficit (Note 11(iii)(c))   (20,045,839 )   (1,011,558 )   -     (21,057,397 )
                               
          5,473,382     (1,011,558 )   -     5,473,382  
                               
        $  5,565,995   $  -   $  -   $ 5,565,995  

     
    - 22 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Conversion to IFRS (Continued)

         
    (iv)   

    Reconciliation between IFRS and Canadian GAAP (continued)

         

    The May 31, 2011 Canadian GAAP consolidated statement of financial position has been reconciled to IFRS as follows:


          Canadian     IFRS     IFRS        
      May 31, 2011   GAAP     Adjustments     Reclassifications     IFRS  
                               
      Assets                        
      Current assets                        
      Cash and cash equivalents $  1,177,679   $  -   $  -   $ 1,177,679  
      Short term investments   25,286     -     -     25,286  
      HST and Sundry receivable   63,414     -     -     63,414  
      Loan receivable   17,718     -     -     17,718  
                               
          1,284,097     -     -     1,284,097  
      Reclamation bond   12,718     -     -     12,718  
      Mining interests   4,568,757     -     -     4,568,757  
                               
        $  5,865,572   $  -   $  -   $ 5,865,572  
                               
                               
      Liabilities                        
      Current liabilities                        
      Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 129,019   $  -   $  -   $ 129,019  
                               
      Provision for environmental rehabilitation   12,718     -     -     12,718  
      Flow through share obligation (Note 11(iii)(c))   -     80,667     -     80,667  
                               
          141,737     80,667     -     222,404  
                               
      Shareholders' equity                        
      Share capital (Note 11(iii)(c))   15,602,951     930,891     -     16,533,842  
      Warrants (Note 11(iii)(d))   1,509,367     -     (1,509,367 )   -  
      Contributed surplus (Note 11(iii)(d))   8,982,005     -     (8,982,005 )   -  
      Reserves (Note 11(iii)(d))   -     -     10,491,372     10,491,372  
      Deficit (Note 11(iii)(c))   (20,370,488 )   (1,011,558 )   -     (21,382,046 )
                               
          5,723,835     (1,011,558 )   -     5,643,168  
                               
        $ 5,865,572   $  (80,667 ) $  -   $ 5,865,572  

     
    - 23 -



    Grandview Gold Inc.
    Notes to Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2011
    (Unaudited)

    11.

    Conversion to IFRS (Continued)

         
    (iv)

    Reconciliation between IFRS and Canadian GAAP (continued)

         

    The year ended May 31, 2011 Canadian GAAP consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss has been reconciled to IFRS as follows:


          Canadian     IFRS     IFRS        
          GAAP     Adjustments     Reclassifications       IFRS  
     

     

                           
     

    Expenses:

                           
     

    Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs

    $  85,387   $  -   $  (85,387 ) $  -  
     

    Professional fees

      153,760     -     (153,760 )   -  
     

    Management and consulting services

      107,750     -     (107,750 )   -  
     

    Office and administration (Note 11(iii)(d))

      58,120     -     353,465     411,585  
     

    Exploration evaluation expenses

      8,568     -     (8,568 )   -  
     

    Gain on disposition of mineral property rights

      (2,000 )   -     2,000     -  
     

     

                           
     

    Operating loss before the following

      (411,585 )   -     -     (411,585 )
     

    Interest income

      2,678     -     -     2,678  
     

     

                           
     

    Net loss and comprehensive loss

    $  (408,907 ) $  -   $  -   $ (408,907 )

    The three months ended August 31, 2010 Canadian GAAP consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss has been reconciled to IFRS as follows:

          Canadian     IFRS     IFRS        
          GAAP     Adjustments     Reclassifications       IFRS  
                               
      Expenses:                        
      Investor relations, business development and reporting issuer maintenance costs $  13,509   $  -   $  (13,509 ) $ -  
      Professional fees   31,169     -     (31,169 )   -  
      Management and consulting services   27,750     -     (27,750 )   -  
      Office and administration (Note 11(iii)(d))   9,499     -     74,822     84,321  
      Exploration evaluation expenses   2,394     -     (2,394 )   -  
                               
      Operating loss before the following   (84,321 )   -     -     (84,321 )
      Interest income   63     -     -     63  
                               
      Net loss and comprehensive loss $  (84,258 ) $  -   $  -   $ (84,258 )

     
    - 24 -


    EX-99.95 96 exhibit99-95.htm EXHIBIT 99.95 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.95 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.95

    GRANDVIEW GOLD INC. – "MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS"
    THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2011

    The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reviews the financial condition and results of operations of Grandview Gold Inc. (“Grandview” or the “Company”) for the three months ended August 31, 2011 (“first quarter 2012”) and its financial position as at August 31, 2011. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with Grandview’s audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes, as at May 31, 2011. The comparative reporting period is the three months ended August 31, 2010 (“first quarter 2011”).

    Grandview’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). It is the first time that the Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS and the Company previously prepared its financial statements in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The disclosures required by the provisions of IFRS 1, “First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” ("IFRS 1"), have been applied and the impact of the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS is explained in Note 15 to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the first quarter 2012.

    The unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the first quarter 2012 have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, Interim Financial Reporting ("IAS 34") and they do not accordingly include all of the information required for full annual financial statements required by IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended May 31, 2011.

    Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed herein are denominated in Canadian dollars.

    Additional information relating to the Company and subsequent press releases, have been filed electronically through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) and is available online at www.sedar.com, or at the Company’s website at www.grandviewgold.com

    The Company’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “GVX”. Grandview also publicly lists its securities on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “GVGDF”.

    This MD&A was prepared on November 14, 2011.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This MD&A includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this MD&A that address activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the near future, including future business strategy, goals, exploration programs or other such matters are forward-looking statements. When used in this MD&A, the words “estimate”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to joint venture operations, actual results of current or planned exploration activities, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, unavailability of financing, fluctuations in precious metal prices and other such factors. Accordingly, the reader should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements by the Company. Statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.


    OVERALL PERFORMANCE

    Overview and Corporate History

    Grandview is a mineral exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by exploring and, if warranted, developing properties of merit for the mining of precious metals and is currently active in the province of Ontario, Canada and in Peru.

    Grandview was incorporated in 1945 and was primarily engaged in the mineral exploration and resource sector up to 1987, when trading of the Company’s securities ceased. In November 1998, Grandview invested in Navitrak International – a company involved in high-technology products involving global positioning systems (GPS).

    Grandview subsequently decided to return to mineral exploration and mining during 2004, after putting a new management team in place and identifying an exploration property of merit with a geological report in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

    Activities during first quarter 2012

    During the first quarter 2012 the Company continued with its diamond drill program at its Dixie Lake project in Red Lake, Ontario. The Company has completed the drilling phase of the program and are currently awaiting results. In total, 9 holes were drilled for approximately 2,100 meters of core. The objectives of the program are to confirm historic intercepts, define additional mineralization and to allow Grandview to bring to NI 43-101 standard the historic resource at the 88-4 and 88-4 West Zones. Once all data is received the Company will undertake a study of past drill results, current information and will work towards creating new geological and resource models.

    The Company continued to pursue additional opportunities within Peru, South America and Canada that meet our corporate objective of identifying small-scale, high-grade development opportunities.

    Properties and Projects

    The Company focused its fieldwork and exploration activities on the Red Lake Property during the first quarter 2012 and incurred $413,713 in deferred mineral property expenditures, predominantly at the Red Lake property.

    Giulianita Property, Peru

    The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion Realzada S.A.C., has an option to acquire 100% of the Giulianita property in Ayabaca Province, Piura Department, Peru, through a two-stage option. The option provides the Company with a right to earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita property by: (i) making a cash payment of $20,000 US dollars upon signing the agreement, which the Company has done, and by incurring $1.4 million in exploration and development expenditures; and (ii) issuing o total of two million common shares of the Company over a three-year period.

    The remaining 20% may be acquired by making an additional payment of $300,000 US dollars and issuing a further 250,000 common shares of the Company prior to the third anniversary date of the agreement.

    In June 2011 the Company suspended expenditures until the local community is able to deliver key surface access rights to allow the Company to carry out advanced exploration and development plans on the Giulianita property. The Company will continue to monitor developments in the region and will access its position over the coming months.

    2


    Red Lake Properties – Loisan, Dixie Lake and Sanshaw-Bonanza in Ontario, Canada

    Grandview has a 100% interest in eight mining claims, covering approximately 60 hectares, located in Red Lake, Ontario, Canada (the “Loisan Property”).

    Grandview has a 67% interest in the Dixie Lake Property, located in the Red Lake Mining District, Ontario, Canada (the “Dixie Lake Property”). During the previous quarter Fronteer Gold Corp. accepted additional expenditures that increased the Companies holding in the Dixie Lake property to 67% from the previous 64% level.

    April 28, 2010 Grandview acquired the final 40% interest and now has a 100% interest in ten (10) unpatented mining claims, located in Red Lake, Ontario (the “Sanshaw-Bonanza Property”) from joint venture partner EMCO Corporation S.A. (“EMCO”) and eliminated all net smelter royalties previously due to EMCO under the terms of the original agreement. The Company negotiated the acquisition of two additional unpatented mining claims and two patented mining claims, and reduced the net smelter royalty on the Sanshaw-Bonanza Property to 0.375% as part of an overall property position.

    Results of Operations

    First quarter 2012

    Grandview incurred a net loss of $82,313 for the first quarter 2012, compared with $84,258 for the first quarter 2011. Cash flows used in operating activities for the first quarter 2012 of $145,666 compares with $108,595 for the first quarter 2011, predominantly attributable to an increase in GST receivable during the first quarter 2012.

    The general and administration expenses for the first quarters 2012 and 2011 respectively are reflected in Note 14 to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the first quarter 2012 and are reasonably consistent over the comparative periods.

    SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

    The following tables set out financial performance highlights for the past eight quarters.





    First
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    Aug. 31,
    2011
    Fourth
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    May. 31,
    2011
    Third
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    Feb. 28,
    2011
    Second
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    Nov. 30,
    2010
    Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
    Expenses 82,397 140,298 98,636 88,330
    Net loss (82,313) (138,222) (98,460) (87,967)
    Net loss per share (0.00) (0.01) (0.00) (0.00)
    Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (145,666) (43,346) (121,087) (140,233)
    Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 643,649 1,202,965 1,327,653 993,568
    Assets 5,772,786 5,865,572 5,856,855 5,442,629

    3







    First
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    Aug. 31,
    2010
    Fourth
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    May 31,
    2010
    Third
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    Feb. 28,
    2010
    Second
    Quarter
    (IFRS)
    Nov. 30,
    2009
    Revenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
    Expenses 84,321 135,455 176,465 107,809
    Net income (loss) (84,258) (106,941) (202,743) (107,679)
    Net income (loss) per share (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00)
    Cash flows provided by / (used in) operating activities (108,595) (76,904) (373,500) 119,243
    Cash and cash equivalents & short-term investments, end of period 1,251,189 1,457,861 1,754,330 232,744
    Assets 5,565,995 5,660,623 5,698,180 4,093,313

    LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

    Grandview’s working capital on August 31, 2011 was $659,052 compared with $1,155,078 on May 31, 2011. The cash and short-term investment balance on May 31, 2011 was $618,300 and $25,349 respectively, compared with cash and short-term investments on May 31, 2011 of $1,177,679 and $25,286 respectively.

    The Company does not earn any revenue from its exploration and development activities. While Grandview is dependant on the success of financing initiatives, management intends to strictly control all expenses and focus on creating value for shareholders by exploring and developing high-grade gold properties which it believes are to be the most promising.

    The Company expects that the cash and cash equivalents as at November 14, 2011 will be sufficient to pay for the continued exploration and overhead expense for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events, the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.

    DISCLOSURE OF OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

    The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. As of August 31, 2011 and November 14, 2011, the Company had outstanding 81,163,032 common shares, 31,304,996 warrants and 5,250,000 stock options.

    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

    For the first quarter 2012, $33,125 (first quarter 2012: $37,500) was paid to the President and CEO of the Company for consulting services. Included in this amount was $25,125 (first quarter 2012: $18,750) capitalized to mining interests. Included in accounts payable as at August 31, 2011 is $Nil (August 31, 2010: $Nil) in relation to consulting services rendered.

    For the first quarter 2012, $9,000 (first quarter 2011: $9,000) in consulting fees was also paid or accrued to the Chief Financial Officer or a company controlled by the Chief Financial officer. Included in accounts payable as at August 31, 2011 is $13,560 (August 31, 2010: $Nil) in relation to consulting services rendered.

    In 2007, the Company provided a loan of $90,000 to the President and CEO of the Company. The loan was unsecured, bears no interest and was due on October 31, 2009. The loan was paid down through the application of various bonuses issued to the President and CEO in 2009 and 2010.

    4


    Effective November 30, 2010, the Company entered into two agreements in respect of the sale of four mining claims owned by it and located in Manitoba, being the Packsak, Clapelou Patent Claims, CUPP2 Frac and CUPP3 Frac (collectively, the "Claims"). Two of the four Claims were transferred to Centerpoint Resources Inc. ("Centerpoint") and the remaining two were transferred to Centershield Gold Mines Inc., a subsidiary of Centerpoint. The Company received nominal cash consideration on closing and retained a 1% NSR over the Claims. Two directors of the Company are senior officers with Centrepoint.

    These transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at fair value.

    OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

    See description of option agreements under the “Properties and Projects” section.

    PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

    There are no proposed transactions at this time, although the Company does continue to evaluate potential merger, acquisition, investment and joint venture opportunities.

    CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

    The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of certain revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the first quarter 2012 include estimates that, by their nature, are uncertain. The impacts of such estimates are pervasive throughout the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and may require accounting adjustments based on future occurrences. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. These estimates are based on historical experience, current and future economic conditions and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

    Critical Accounting Estimates

    Recoverability of Mining Interests

    When there are indications that an asset may be impaired, management is required to estimate the asset’s recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the greater of the value in use and the fair value less selling costs. Determining the value in use requires management to estimate expected future cash flows associated with the assets and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate the present value. No impairment indicators of nonfinancial assets have been noted for the first quarter 2012, first quarter 2011 or for the year ended May 31, 2011.

    Stock-Based Compensation

    Management is required to make certain estimates when determining the fair value of stock options awards, and the number of awards that are expected to vest. These estimates affect the amount recognized as stockbased compensation in the statement of operations based on estimates of forfeiture and expected lives of the underlying stock options. For the first quarter 2012 the Company recognized $Nil stockbased compensation expense (first quarter 2011: $Nil).

    5


    Critical Accounting Judgements

    Income taxes and recovery of deferred tax assets

    The measurement of income taxes payable and deferred income tax assets and liabilities requires management to make judgments in the interpretation and application of the relevant tax laws. The actual amount of income taxes only becomes final upon filing and acceptance of the tax return by the relevant authorities, which occurs subsequent to the issuance of the financial statements.

    New Accounting Standards and Interpretations

    IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”)

    IFRS 9 was issued by the IASB in October 2010 and will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement [“IAS 39”]. IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. Most of the requirements in IAS 39 for classification and measurement of financial liabilities were carried forward unchanged to IFRS 9. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 9 on the financial statements.

    IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”)

    IFRS 10 provides a single model to be applied in the control analysis for all investees, including entities that currently are SPEs in the scope of SIC-12. In addition, the consolidation procedures are carried forward substantially unmodified from IAS 27 (2008). IFRS 10 is effective for the annual period beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 10 on its financial statements.

    IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”)

    IFRS 11 replaces the guidance in IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures. Under IFRS 11, joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures. IFRS 11 essentially carves out of previous jointly controlled entities, those arrangements which although structured through a separate vehicle, such separation is ineffective and the parties to the arrangement have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities and are accounted for as joint operations in a fashion consistent with jointly controlled assets/operations under IAS 31. In addition, under IFRS 11 joint ventures do not have the choice between equity accounting or proportionate consolidation; these entities must now use the equity method. Upon application of IFRS 11, entities which had previously accounted for joint ventures using proportionate consolidation shall collapse the proportionately consolidated net asset value (including any allocation of goodwill) into a single investment balance at the beginning of the earliest period presented. The investment’s opening balance is tested for impairment in accordance with IAS 28 and IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Any impairment losses are recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented. IFRS 11 is effective for the annual period beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 11 on its financial statements.

    IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement ("IFRS 13")

    IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement was issued by the IASB on May 12, 2011. The new standard converges IFRS and US GAAP on how to measure fair value and the related fair value disclosures. The new standard creates a single source of guidance for fair value measurements, where fair value is required or permitted under IFRS, by not changing how fair value is used but how it is measured. The focus will be on an exit price. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the impact of IFRS 13 on its consolidated financial statements.

    6


    Significant Accounting Policies

    Please refer to Note 2 to the Company’s unaudited condensed interim consolidated financials statements for a full discussion of its significant accounting policies.

    FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

    Financial Assets

    All financial assets are recognized and derecognized on the trade date where the purchase or sale of a financial asset is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the financial asset within the time frame established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus transaction costs.

    Financial assets are classified into the following categories: financial assets at 'fair value through profit or loss' ("FVTPL") and ‘loans and receivables‘. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.

    Impairment of financial assets:

    Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Financial assets are impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial assets, the estimated future cash flows of the investments have been negatively impacted. Evidence of impairment could include: significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or default or delinquency in interest or principal payments; or the likelihood that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization.

    Financial Liabilities

    Financial liabilities are classified as ‘other financial liabilities’ and are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs. Financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest recognized on an effective yield basis.

    The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest costs over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability or to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.

    De-recognition of Financial Liabilities:

    The Company derecognizes financial liabilities when the obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire. The Company’s financial instruments consist of the following:

    Financial Assets: Classification:
       
    Cash and cash equivalents Loans and receivables
    Short term investments FVTPL
    Sundry receivable Loans and receivables
    Reclamation bond Loans and receivables
       
    Financial Liabilities: Classification:
       
    Accounts payable and other liabilities Other financial liabilities

    7


    Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value:

    Financial instruments recorded at fair value on the unaudited condensed interim consolidated statements of financial position are classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels: Level 1 - valuation based on quoted prices [unadjusted] in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 - valuation techniques based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly [i.e. as prices] or indirectly [i.e. derived from prices]; and Level 3 - valuation techniques using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

    The CEO and CFO have evaluated the design and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of August 31, 2011, pursuant to the requirements of Multilateral Instrument 52-109.

    Management has concluded that, as of August 31, 2011, such financial reporting disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

    Management is not aware of any changes in its internal controls over financial reporting during the first quarter 2012 that would materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal controls over financial reporting.

    OUTLOOK

    The Company has temporarily ceased funding its Giulianita project in Peru; however negotiations continue with local stakeholders to acquire surface access rights that would allow mining and processing. The Company has also approached small-scale producers in Peru to advance the discussions in this regard.

    The Company is currently completing the modeling of the results from the diamond drilling program and modeling at the Dixie Lake project, Red Lake, Ontario. The company plans to execute a 2,200 m drill program to confirm and update a historical resource to a 43-101 standard. As part of the exploration program a 3-D geological model and resource model has been updated and drill targets have been identified. The Company plans to execute this program and complete a new resource model during late 2011.

    The Company continues to identify and evaluate high grade, near term production projects within Canada, Peru and South America in general.

    RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

    At the present time, Grandview does not hold any interest in a mining property in production. Therefore, the Company’s viability and potential success lies in its ability to develop, exploit and generate revenues from potential mineral deposits discoveries resulting from planned exploration programs on its properties or its option agreements. Revenues, profitability and cash flow from any future mining operations involving the Company will be influenced by precious metal prices and by the relationship of such prices to the production costs. Such prices have fluctuated widely in the past, affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control.

    Grandview has limited financial resources and there are no assurances that additional funding will be available for further exploration and development of it projects or to fulfill its obligations under applicable option agreements. Although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such additional financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favourable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of the property interests of the Company with the possible dilution or loss of such property interest.

    8


    For a comprehensive overview of the risks to which the Company is or may be exposed, please refer the Company’s Annual Information Form as at May 31, 2011, Item 3.2 “Risk Factors”.

    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

    The Company, through its subsidiary Recuperacion and in accordance with an option agreement, may earn an 80% interest in the Giulianita project by spending $1.4 million over a three-year period on the property and issuing two million shares of the Company to a private Peruvian group. The Company may earn the remaining 20% by making an additional payment to this private Peruvian group of $250,000.

    The Company is committed to spend $605,000 raised in conjunction with the December 31, 2010 flow-through private placement on eligible Canadian exploration expenditures by on or before December 31, 2011.

    MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The information provided in this report, including the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, is the responsibility of management. In the preparation of these statements, estimates are sometimes necessary to make a determination of future values for certain assets or liabilities. Management believes such estimates have been based on careful judgments and have been properly reflected in the audited consolidated financial statements.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Additional information relating to the Company is available on the Internet at the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com and at www.grandviewgold.com.

    9


    EX-99.96 97 exhibit99-96.htm EXHIBIT 99.96 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.96 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.96

    FORM 52-109F2
    CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
    FULL CERTIFICATE

    I, Ernest Cleave, Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

    1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended September 30, 2011.

    2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

    3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

    4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

    5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

      A.

    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

           
      I.

    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

           
      II.

    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

           
      B.

    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

    5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

    5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

    5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A


    6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on July 1, 2011 and ended on September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

    Date: November 14, 2011

    ”Ernest Cleave”
    Ernest Cleave
    Chief Financial Officer


    EX-99.97 98 exhibit99-97.htm EXHIBIT 99.97 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.97 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.97

    FORM 52-109F2
    CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS
    FULL CERTIFICATE

    I, Paul Sarjeant, Chief Executive Officer of Grandview Gold Inc., certify the following:

    1. Review: I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together, the “interim filings”) of Grandview Gold Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim period ended September 30, 2011.

    2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.

    3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

    4. Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

    5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the end of the period covered by the interim filings

      A.

    designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

           
      I.

    material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

           
      II.

    information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

           
      B.

    designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

    5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the COSO Framework.

    5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

    5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A


    6. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on July 1, 2011 and ended on September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR.

    Date: November 14, 2011

    ”Paul Sarjeant”
    Paul Sarjeant
    Chief Executive Officer


    EX-99.98 99 exhibit99-98.htm EXHIBIT 99.98 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.98 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.98

      TSX: GVX
    NEWS RELEASE OTCBB: GVGDF
    For Immediate Release  

    Grandview Gold Inc. Announces the Appointment of Mr. Carmello Marrelli as CFO
    and the extension of the expiry date of certain outstanding common share purchase warrants

    December 8, 2011 - Toronto, Ontario - Grandview Gold Inc. (TSX Symbol: GVX, OTC-BB Symbol: GVGDF) (“Grandview” or the “Company”) is pleased to report the appointment of Mr. Carmello Marrelli, B.Com, CA, CGA, to the position of Chief Financial Officer of Grandview Gold Inc.

    “We are very pleased to formalize our relationship with Carmello and welcome him to our management team,” says Grandview President and CEO Paul Sarjeant. “Carmello has been providing accounting and bookkeeping services to the Company for some time now, so he brings with him considerable Grandview experience and knowledge.”

    The Company wishes to thank outgoing CFO, Mr. Ernest M. Cleave for his years of excellent and committed service to Grandview. Mr. Cleave is also the Vice President and CFO of Cline Mining Corporation, an in-production coal mining company that requires his full-time commitment.

    Mr. Carmello Marrelli holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Toronto and is a qualified Chartered Accountant and Certified General Accountant. Mr. Marrelli is currently President of Marrelli Support Services, a bookkeeping firm based in Toronto, Ontario.

    Extension of Warrants
    Grandview is also pleased to announce that it has extended the term of the 26,666,665 warrants issued by the Company on December 3, 2009 (the “Warrants”). The Warrants, which were scheduled to expire on December 3, 2011, will now expire on December 3, 2012. As a number of the Warrants are held by insiders of the Company, final approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange for the extension of the Warrants was contingent upon receipt by the Company of the approval of “disinterested” shareholders. The Company received such “disinterested” shareholder approval at its annual and special meeting which was held on November 28, 2011.

    The Warrants were issued as part of a private placement of the Company's that was completed on December 3, 2009. For further information on the original issuance of the Warrants, please refer to the press release of the Company dated December 8, 2009 filed on SEDAR.

    Warrantholders are advised that replacement Warrant certificates will not be issued and that the original Warrant certificates must be presented to the Company, as warrant agent, in order to effect the exercise or transfer of such Warrants.

    About Grandview Gold Inc.
    Grandview is a gold exploration company focused on creating value for shareholders by balancing sustainable small-scale mine development and gold production, with traditional major gold camp exploration. Details of Grandview’s projects are available on the Company’s website.

    For further information, please contact Paul Sarjeant at 416.486.3444 or visit www.grandviewgold.com.

    This document may contain forward looking statements, relating to the Company’s operations or the environment in which it operates, which are based on Grandview Gold Inc’s operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and/or beyond Grandview Gold Inc’s control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Grandview Gold Inc. disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    -30-


    EX-99.99 100 exhibit99-99.htm EXHIBIT 99.99 Grandview Gold Inc. - Exhibit 99.99 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Exhibit 99.99



    GRAPHIC 101 grandview.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 grandview.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`!$`+<#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MK*FUH+/)#!:3SO&Q4[5XS2B_P"0 M:@U'3!I<,5Y8%E>'`?)SN'J:9ITDL_B5WN8_+E$?W/3@5N:D`VG7(;IY3?RK M.RFFR[\MD.L[A;JUCG7@.N<>E38'YUS&D7NH0V*I;V?G1@G#9]ZT],U.>[NY M;>>!8FC&2`:J-1.PG%JYJT445H0%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1250?5[97*(LLNW@F-,C\Z`+D_^HD_W3_*LGPI_R#'_`.NQ_D*TH9DO M+9FCW`-E?F&"*R+>QU33$:.U:*6,MNP>#FLY74DRXZIH75,Z?K,&H$$Q.-CX M[=O\_2IM>OD73_*A8.]QPH7GBH+B+6+Z%H)8851NI-0QZ%>V>A;8 MR88C#>U2T`%%%%`!114W.*`)Z* M**`,[7I'CTN0(VTN53/H"0#5G$=E:A8XF*(``J#)HOK5;VSDMV.`XX/H>QJH ME]=VZB*YLII'48\R(;@WO3$2K?I<6MTT(=7A!!#K@@XS4>F?:YH8[NXGXDC! M$0'`R.#]:BLH)VAU&1X6C-PQ*(W7[N*F>WG;P^+>/*3_`&<(.<8.WI0!2NKQ M[)1,-26>164-%@8()P<501H\1=FQDC![50N8FGTPVUKICQ.-N M2R`8P0>#WK4,3_VNDNT[!`5)]]PH`CM7G@U!K2:8S*T?F(Q&".<$5#:M=ZDC MW4=R84+$1(%R"`<9-6FB!L;LR2'_9__745C:2OIMQ!=KM> M5WS^)/-)I%O.&DGNT*R$"-0?[H[_`(T`1KJ4J:7),[*9#,8T)Z#G`S3?M4EI M)"[7ZW"NX1TXXSW%(-/FDTIXFC'F+.951NC?-G'XBIK.OVQ+ELM;L3GU7J*CTJ\N'\Y;P@$`2+QT4TW4[.>2]1H%RDX"3'T`. M,VB$[T,+X_A7UH`MZ9-+<6QFE/WV)0>B]JK7:BXURW@DYCCC,FT] M":TH8Q#"D:]%``JG?VLK3Q7=KCSHLC:>`ZGM0!-=7:VOWHI67&243(%5[R^8 MQVR6G^LN3\K$?='K4UF\U]?;U(CFB5`WYT`11+J$UE]L^T`.Z[UAV_+CTJ?03G1K8_P"R?YFH M(9[R&S%H;.0S(NP./N'L#FK6C0R6^E013*5=0<@_4T`7J***0PHHHH`****` K"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@#__V3\_ ` end GRAPHIC 102 large_logo.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 large_logo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`!\`64#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBDS0`M%)FC-`"T4F:,T`+129HS0`M%)1F@!:*2EH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`I*6DH`****`"BBB@!'<(I9B`!R2:SI=;L8C@REC_L@FKL\0FADB8\. MI7\ZR;?PY;H?WTCR?3Y14RYNA2MU'-XCLQT28_11_C2KXCLR>4F7Z@?XU9&B MZ>/^7<$^I)JO>:;IEO`TLL(11W5CG^=1[ZUT&N3;4LP:K9W!Q',`?1N*=<:E M:6W^MF7/H.:Y%(OM5SY=I$X!/`)S^-%Q;26=R$NHR<\\'[P^M9^UEV+]G'N= M$WB.S!X65O<+_B:0>)+,_P#+.8?\!'^-)IMAIEU`LL<.[L0S'(-6VT;3V&#; MC\"16GO]+$OD3L1QZ]8N0/,*Y_O#%:$4J3('C8,IZ$'-95QX=M''[HO&?KD5 MH6-J+.U2`-NV#[V,9YS_`%JH\WVB9 M--="V7[D7)/JU;)UBPQ_Q\K^1KF8S]KU0%CQ++GCTS6-66R74TIQUN=#HNGB MSM@YYDD&6XZ>U6-2L5OK8QL2&'*D>M6U&`!VI:U45:W0SYG>YR&CW36.I>6_ MW7;8V>Q[5UZUQFL)Y.J3;.N[:Z&+6;$1KNN%W8&1@\5C2G:\7T-)QO9F MGD49K._MK3_^?@?D:FMM1M;IRD$H=@,X`[5LI)[,S::Z%NB@450@HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`I:2E MH`****`"DI:2@`HHHH`****`.>\4CY8/J:@TK1X;VS$LCN&W$<58\4_=@^IJ MUX<_Y!@_WS_2N=I2JN_8V3:IIKN1?\(W:_\`/67\Q6';#[-JJ*QP(Y<'/L:[ M:N5\16IBO?/4'RY`#G_:HJP45S);!3DV[,ZE3Q2FL[1KU;NS4%AYB##"I[^\ M2SMFD=@#T4'N:V35KF5M;'+:T_F:K/LYP0/KQ6O'X7\&^VLXH8CT:@#'\4YQ!]32Z#?VL%EY4L MH1PQ/S<5L7%M#=)MFC##MGM6>_AVR8Y#3*/16'^%8N$N?F1HI)QLR^M[:OR+ MB,_\"%5[V2PGMS'<3Q[2/[PXJJ?#5J>DLWXD?X4#PU:CK-,?H0/Z4_??05H] MS"65K&[+6LP8*>&'1A[TES=2W]P&GD"CH/[JUT<.@6,3;CYDG^^W'Z"EN-!L MICD*\9_Z9G%9NG-FBG%=`TMK&V@"17$3$C+-N&2:O-=VP&3/&!_O"LL^&K7M M-/\`B1_A0/#5KGF:8_B/\*T3FM+$6CW':MJ-H]C+"DZN[K@!>:SO#)_XF$F> MOEG^8K1'ANS#`EYV]BP_PJ_:V%O:?ZB(*>F>YITA)/Z&B677(_F\FSE`ZA=P)_,T`;%%,B+-&I==K$XR*UZ`"BDS5?4)6AL)Y$.&5"0:`+-+5#1IY+G389I M6W.PY/XU?H`****`"F]Z=33UH`YX1C6->F6?YH+88"],GZBN@Z<=A6!I)^S: M]?0/PTAW+GOWK?/7B@`!&.#29'0&JATU"Q8W%T,\X$[8K-\+S2RM>":6238Z M@;V+8Z^M`%G5M3>PO;=3CR74EACDXZ8HMSK$\Z32F&&W8@F+JV/KBJ^M1K+K M>GQN,J2>#WK>P`,`=*`*E\U[M1;(1;B?F:3HHJH\.MJI=;NW,_C1?: MLT-T+.TA-Q<'J.@7ZT;==<;MUG%G^'DG^5`$VDZ@=0@)=`DD;%'7WJKJ&K2V M>KK;[0\9CW!0.2QS@5'X;W">]5R-PDYV],TEW&LGBZV5U!'E9P1Z9H`L%-9D M7S/M,$)//E[,X_&G:7JW@&+YL=^#0!I MZGJ":=:F9QN.<*N>IJC;_P!M7,8F,T-N&Y$>S.*BU\>9J6G1/S$TJY4]#\PK M?``X`Q0!RFOW=S]B-I>HHF#!E=/NN*V=:N[BRMHYX0I0,`X([54\6Q1G3TD* MC>'`![XK6N[=+JT>%P"&7'/8T`2P2+-"DB_=89%9NJW\T-Y;6ML%,DIRX_P`]Z`+.KWTUE/9) M%MQ-)M;([9'^-7[FX2VA>60@(@R36/XC_P"/O2_^NW]5I_BIW33E"D@.X#8] M*`$M[G5=2_?0-%:P'[NY=Q84JZC=V%S'!J(1XY3A94&,'WI;>35HX$6*PMP@ M48PX%5M2M]6OX1&]G"A5MRLLG(-`%[4[^6PO+5CM-O(=KDCI[UJ9K+U:S:ZT M=D89FC0,#U.1U_.BRU)7T07:WU M8.H93E2,@^U8ECIPN]&F:=09KK+[CU!_AJ;0[PMI/[\G?;Y1\]>*`'RW\K:Y M'90[=@3=*2.1_GC\ZTQ6-X?C^T&?4)1EYG(4GLH]*VJ`&R,$0LQP%&:P-!A^ MWS2ZE<9"Z9QN4C/U%8WA60"QD@;B2.0[@?\^U`&WC%'!')I M'7>K*21D8R#@UF7MB(;*:5+F[#*I(_?M0!JCCI61?ZK,+S[%81+)-_$S?=2G M^'Y9)='225VDVN(A#);)H1M:08<+QD>]`#_`!+_`*_3 MO^NW]16S<3I;0O+(<(@R36-XE_U^G9_Y[?U%3>*&9=(;;D98`X]*`(;>ZU74 M\S6YBM8,G:67<6IE_<7MK9RQ7VR6.12JS1C&#[BMC3XTCL(%10%V#I]*AUJ* M-])N-X'"9!]#0`WP]_R!K?Z'^=:59GA__D#V_P!#_.M.@`HHHH`*2EI*`,K5 M]+>ZD2YM6\NYCZ-_>]J(+R^C0"\L)`PZM$0P/X`UJTF#D^E`%'^T&(PEG=$^ M\>/U-4_#MCPN+VUMUBO;28E1@/'A\_E5M;N2215CM)]I M."SKLP/QJZ!1B@`KEI-+O4EGLH83]DEF#A\C`7N/\^E=31B@!J((T5%X51@5 MSFH6%]'=W:6D1:&[P6((PI[_`.?>NEI"#VH`ALX!;6L<*C`10*GI`#WI:`$- M8M]I=U#>_;M,(\QOOQD\-6W10!G1W]PB@7%A.C=]@#C]*CO+F6ZM988;*X+. MI`WKL'ZUJTF#0!G:%:S6FFI%<)LD!)(R#W]JJ-9W>GZG)<647G03W]J8;:W=(S]YGP"?8#K6WBC''%`%+189+?3(8I5*NH.0?K5^D` MI:`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ +`HHHH`****`/_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 103 grandlogo.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 grandlogo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`#4`E`,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`$ MH`*`,35=4UBWO1:Z9HINQL#&9Y0B#.>.>IXK&WC;:6FN M%!S[KVHC7G4UA'3U!THP^)FMIFJ:S-?"UU/1#:J5)$Z3!TX[''2M83J-VE&Q MG*,4KQ9N5N9A0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`M`!0`E`!0`PS1*<&101V)I706 M.0")K_Q"E$V)+32HE*)U4R-@Y_S_`'17);VE?7:)T?!3TZA=(N@>/[.:#$=M MJJ,DR#@;Q_%^H_,^M$E[*LFMI`O?IM=CKQ-$2`)$)]`PKKNC"P^F(*`"@`H` M*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`%H`*`$H`*`//].T'3=;\8>(AJ-OYPAE39\[+C.<]"/05 MP0I0J59\R.J4Y0A&Q9\/VMOH'CK4M+B3RH;F%)+<$DY`ZC)^K?E54HJE6<%U M)FW.FI"^)[>#7/&6C:0Z>9'"CRS@$C"G'!(Z?=_445DJE6,`IMP@Y%36/#^F M:'XD\.'3K;R3+=8?YV;."N.I/J:FI2A3J0Y5U*C.4HRN>@UWG*%`!0`4`%`! M0`4`%`!0`4`%`"T`%`%:]OK73K9KB\G2&%3@LYQSV'N?:@-BK9Z[87UP((&G M$A!*B6VDC!`]"R@&G:PKG/\`V+7M#\0ZGJ%EIT5_;WS*VT3!&7&?7Z^]<7+4 MISE**NF=-X2BDW:Q3UBW\0^(IK62+0?[.NK9]R7372DK[8`Y%1456JU:-FNM MRHN$+ZW$TFU\1>'KR[N)]$_M.[N6RUTERHR/0`C@?@/THA&K2;;C=OK<).$T MDG8N2VFOZ_K>EW=WID6GV]C+YF&G#LW(ST^GM5N-2I.+:LD3>$(M)WN=5;WT M5S=W=M&&WVKJDF1QDJ&&/P(KL.=U=E09(12S'Z`=:`):`"@`H`* M`,V\U_3;&Y-M+.SW"@%HH8GE90>F0@)'XT["ND6[.\@OK9;BW8M$V0"5*G@X M/!`(I#)Z`*VGWT6I6274`81N2!N&#P2#_*C8$"WT1U-]/`;SDA68\<;22!^. M5-`%J@`H`Y^Z5;CQO8Q3C,<%G)-"IZ>9N52WU`/_`(\:?074L7.KW-IK-I9R MV`%O=2F*.<3`G(0MRN/]DCK18+E/29+N>[U*_OM2D6UL[J:-(AM5`@[L<9., M^O&*&)%&WU22/5=+:VO=2NK>[F,4C74&R-P49@RG:N#E1TX(S3L%QR?VI>:; MJ]\=7GADM;BX6W2-5V@(S8W`CYNF/H/7FC0-2T+N[UG4[.T2ZDLX/L"7ZU&V@LPBJ+&T> M4L[+N+,P1N@(`'US1;0+ZDFEZMJ'VG3'U,O%'=V\L;+)%Y>)8V)#8(R-R`G' MM0T"97L/$%[;V>I7-^QD+VXOK-"H!".2%C^H(7_OJBP7.HL8YX=/MX[F4RW" MQJ))#@;FQR>/>I*,/PJ9$\(07<$(GO;C=-*"VTO*6.[)]CQ^&*;W)6Q'/X@O M+G3C'#"+*]?4!8;BPD$9X)8<`'C./?%.P7+#?:]%UC38C?SW=K>NT+K/M+(X M0L&!`']T@CW%+<>QE:9/=/IFA:7;7#6PNGN'EE0#>$1CPN00"2PY],TV)=C0 MTRWN+7QK>Q373W*BQB,;R`;PN]^"0!GG//I0]@6YTU24%`&?J>E1:D(7\V2W MN;=BT,\1`:,G@]<@@]P>#33L)HIIHEY+?V=S?ZJUR+1S)&BP+&"Q4KDGG/#' MTHN%BP-$M_[/U&QD=WAOWE:3L1OZ@47"Q530+AY["6\U22X^PR;XE$2H#\I7 MYL=3@]>/I1<+%R#28X-/O;02L5NI)9&;'*^823CZ9HN%BO)H+(;*:RO7MKJU M@%OYFP.)$XX93[C(QCO1<+"V'A^*TAU*.>XDNO[0;=.9`!G*A3T[<=.U%PL, MA\-PQ>&I=&-S(XEW&2=@-[$G.3_+\*+ZW"VEB6YT>;^TI+_3[]K2:9%293&) M$?;T.#T(!QG-%PL)JNA#6-(CL;F[E\Q"&\]0%8G!!Z<#(+#\:$[`U<=J.@V^ MHW>GSL[1BS;(1,8=5)[X./:G<5NPV/PU%_9D]K-=S2337'VHW`"JR2\$,H`P,8''-%PL36^ MC3?VA#>ZA?M>2VX80J(Q&J$C!;`ZMCC/N>*+A8B_X1Q(["RAM[N2&XLI'>&< M*"1N)W`CH00<8]A1<+$NG:*UGJMQJ4][) GRAPHIC 104 grandview3.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 grandview3.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`!X`5L#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`**2B@!:*2B@!:*2C-`"T4E%`"T4E%`"T4E+0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1244` M+1244`%(3@=12U1U:"2YL)(H?OG&!G'>DP6I*U[:H=KW,*GT+@4G]H6?_/W# M_P!]BL>W\-=[BXY_Z9K_`%-6/^$:M?\`GM.?Q'^%9WJ=$7:'CZ:ME;9D4&9^6[X]JP MM$A$VIQ[@#Y8+D?R_G78"L:2YO?9K4]WW4,?UK6FC66)HW&588(KD]%9K;5TC^[DM&_X?\`UQ0_6-U09(`.:Z>U_X]8O\`<'\J6:-98GC;HXP:/9Q: M'SNYS'AM@-28<ENP MZMV[CB<"N)$1O-4:.(X,DK8)^I-=5JMXMG9.^3N8;5`]:Q/#5JSW+W++\J`@ M'_:/^3^=%1-MY/W0179@5@^*?]7; M_5J*D$DV%.;ND2>%Q_H,O_77^@K;["L3PO\`\@^;_KL?Y"MOM6E/X41/XF%% M%%62%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`+1110`E%%133Q0)OFE2-,]68"@"6BL@ZXC\VMI=W"_WXXCMI5UL# MF:PO8D[LT1P*`-7UKD_$9_XF8&<#RU_F:ZK(.".E9VI:3'?R>9YC)(!MSU'Y M5G4BVK(J#L]2Y:,#:Q$'/R#^53'GI7.3>&IACRKB-C_M*5_QJ/\`L34U^[*O M_`96_P`*GFDM'$KEB^IHZQI0O!YL;`2J.G]X5DZ;JLFFK)"\3.I.0I."I[]J ME_X1Z]E8&:6,>Y8L?Y5:B\-(#^^N&8?[*XQ_.I:E>Z5BERVLW`.R"NFTZS2QM1"IW'.6/J:R)/#+8^2Z4^S1_P!U`%VBBC-`!1110`4444`%%%&:`"BBC\:`"BJ=UJ-I:9$\ZJV<;1RWMP*J_ MVTW\&FWSK_>$5`&M16;;:O%-.D$D%S!(_P!U98\9K2H`***`1ZT`%%%9\6H/ M)K3]WM^-`&A11FB@`HK.U?4FT_R-D:OYK[3DXQ6B*`%HHHH` M:2`"3VYKFK6(^(+Z2XN2?LL#;8U7@-SW_#&:Z"[5GM9E7[S(0/RK'\)./[-D M3^(2DG\0*`-S&``!CV%!`(P?3FFR*S1LJ-M)!`;&<&LNZM]2@M9IO[4+>6C- MCR%YP,T`:V/:LR?68K>_FMGB?,2ALKSNSC@#ZFIM&EDN-+@FF.Z1@23@>IK, M6/?XS8GC8FX?]\@?UH`O:=J5Q=W+12Z?+;(JE@SYY/ITJ2_U&2VD6*"SFN7( MR=H^4#Z_A5\\#WK,NM9MK:X^S?/+<9QL4?U/%`$!UNZA.;O2YH8N[@[@/TK6 M@ECGC62)PR,.&'>LN]N[Z6RF5M+/EM&P+&=>!@]J=X9S_8Z`GHS#]:`!-<@+ MW*-$X>%]BQKAFD.2.!^%1-K-Y'\\FE3+%UW#D@>N,57T*!'UW4Y6&6BD(7\6 M;/\`*NBV`GI^-`$-G>0WL"S0/N4_F/8^]0ZAJ=O8*/,R\C8"QH,L?PK-\-#9 M<:C$.$27@?BW^%)'")_&-PTN6\F,,GMPO^)-`$ZZQ?=3H\P3Z_-^6*J-<1W7 MBJPEC.08B"#U4X?@^AKI,#I7-R6Z0>,H"@XE#2$>^U@?Y4`:LVI+!J<5I+&5 M\T?+)GY2?3_/K6AVK&\2VIFL?/3_`%ML=XYQQW_Q_"M%[J-;+[5DF/9O''48 MH`KOJ2_VJMA'&SMMW.P/"_7_`#W%+%J"OJTU@(V#1J'+YXZ#_&J/AR)I1-J, MO,MRW'LH/^/Z"DM?^1QO/^N0_DM`&M=W45I`9IB54?F3Z5F?VS>N"\6D3M'V M+-@_EBHM=N8TU6RBN%9X%S(5'<\@?EC^=2_\)%9X_P!5/^0_QH`N6&I17Q:, M*T4R?>B<88>^/2DM-32XOI[-HVCEB/1C]X>HK,M[V*Y\0V\UO&Z[XV20L`,\ M9'0_2G:T/L&JVFI)T9MD@_#_``S^E`&^2`,GIBLJPUR&]O/LRQM'D$HS='QZ M?K^5.U^Y-OIK)'S).?+3\1S^E4-5L?[,LK&Y@Y>T8!L]P3S^N?SH`Z.J-EJ2 MWMU<11QG9"VTN<8)S3=4OUMM(>ZCYW*-G'Y[5;K'\4(6TAV'\+J3],__7H`-(TU-JZA-A[J<>87 M[+NYX'XUK57TT_\`$LM/^N*?^@BG744TT16"?R&S][8&_G0!*5Z>E.+`*2>` M.YKF]9GU+3(XW&HF7>Q&/)48XK7UA_+TFY8M`!%+'-&KQ.KHPX9>16/;?\C==_\`7`?^RU'X7=D:]M"3G_T&NAV#T_"@#F=;O8[U+,J&1UEP\3C#(>.HKJ! M7->)[9!>6^,8_F:Z44`+1110`W&:YQXY]"U!Y8(FELI>7"C)2NDI M,#G@4`4TU*R905O+?G_IH*AU'4+-].NE6[@9C"X"B122<'WI\NBZ=,VY[1,G MJ5RO\J(]%TZ)@5M5./[Q+?S-`#?#_P`NC6XR,X/_`*$:I1#_`(K&;_KC_1:W ME55`"J`!V`J(6T(N3<"-?-(P7QSB@"4]#7,>'I(8;J[>]D6.[8\^8V,CO^M= M.:JW6FV=XVZXMU=O[V2#^E`%;4]0B^Q31P2)-,ZE5C1MQYX[5%X5_P"0,GKN M;-7[;3[2U4K!;H@88)`Y/X]:EM[>*VCV01B-?[J\"@#%\/\`_(7U?_KJ/_0G MK>J*&UA@DDDBC5'D.7('WOK^=34`8'ASF_U3_KJ/YM3+J5M-\2&ZD!^S7"A" M^.%.!_@/SK@]*`))$66-HW7*L""#Z'BN36\FFTJ/2`,7!E\D@]0@_SCZ5V%5_L5 ML+G[2(4\[^_CF@!UM;I;6\<,?W8U`%8UM_R.-Y_UR'\EK?J%;6%+AKA8QYS# M!?N10!E:T&M;ZTU-4W"$E),?W3W_`%/Z5H1:C9R*&6Z@(/\`TT''ZU990RD% M0P/!!]*H2:%ILK;GM5SZ*Q4?H:`+,-U;3R;(IXI&`R0C`FH-8LQ>Z=+%@[@- MR_4O+ M=;NTE@;($BXSW'O3H+2"W9VAB6,O][:.O^E;VH1-_M=2B1G$?RN`,X&?_KFM2/4[*2,.MU#@C/+@'\>:ME0001D'K6>^AZ=))O- MJ@/H,@?D#B@##UV^%W>VXART$3@>8/NLQQD`^U=:*K/8VKI&C0)LBY1=O"_2 MK(H`6BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB (@`HHHH`__]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 105 equity.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 equity.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`%0!#0,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`$/%`'*^*_'FE>$6BCN]T\T@)$,)!D'3!()X'O\`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`DD#\:Q=KZ&O0\$^*"*OQ24_ MWQ;D^_(']*]K"NV'?S/+Q'\<][-A9G.;6'_OV*\7GEW/3Y8]C`\6>#;#Q#H- MW9PVEI%>NG[B6*1YE\2?%5_J.M1>#-`R@=MX4\%:3X4L4CM8$DN\?O;IU&]S]>P]`*Y:V(G5EK ML=%.C&FK'2%0RE6`(/8U@KHVLF>3_$KX<6G]GS:]HEN+>XMP9)X(AM5U'5E` MZ,.O'7ZUZ.&Q,K\D]4SAQ&'5N:&Y:^%'C>;6H7T34Y3)>VZ;X96.3+&."">Y M''/<&EC,/[-\T=F/"UN=LJ1P;*8'_O@UQTM)Q]3JJ?`SR+X& M*#XCU-^XM`/SIWT_@1DZ+X$TZQN=1OM2MK;4+Z]NI)FDEB#!% M+':HW=,#K[U=3$2:2B[)&<:,8MMD?C31=*MO!&MR0:99Q2+:2%62!00<=>!5 M4*DW4C=A5A%4V['#_!.PL[Z/7!=VD%P%,.WS8PV,[^F179F$G%QL^YRX.*:= MT>B:UX)T+5=*N;9=(LHYWC812I"J,C8X.X#(YK@IUIP=[L[)TH26Q;T?11;> M$K+1=02*<1VJP3+U1\+@]>U3.;=1SB.,+046>(WD%Q\+/B1%+'O>RSN3UDMV M.&7W(_F`>]>O&2Q5"SW_`%/-:>'JWZ'T%;3Q7-O%<0.)(95#HXZ,I&0:\5II MV9ZMT]4<)\5O$#Z?H"Z+9`R:AJQ\A47KL/#?GD+^)]*Z\)33GSRV1S8F=H\J MW9M>"/"D'A/0(K554WD@#W,H'+/Z9]!T'_UZRQ%9UIW>QI1I>SC8Z>L#8*`" M@!#[4`?-OC[0WTS7=2NYF8&XNR8E;JP.9F-*FZDN5'TWH.F?V-H%AIN_> M;6%8RV3R0.3^>:^# MUP]D>5B=*R/:3XM\-CDZ_IN/^OI/\:\GV-7^5GH>UI]64]0\?>%M/M)+B37+ M24(,[()1([?1151P]63LD)UJ:ZFU+J$4>E/J//DK`9^1@[=N[G\*R4;RY31N MT;GAOPF5]8^(\^IW1+S+%+,>H+B@! MKHKJ5894C!![BA:;`U<^;-)!\+_%>&"([4MM2:`?]M4^%GD/P+_`.0_JG_7JO\`Z%7J M9A\,3S\%\3/H?[\O_HL5ZL_]S1P0_WEGM%>6=YXE\=/ M^0KHW_7"7_T):];+_AD>;C=T>L>&?^13T;_KRA_]`%>;5_B2]6=\/@1JXK,L MY[QW_P`B'KO_`%YR?RK;#_Q8F5;^&S@/@3]S7_K!_)Z[LRU<3DP.TCV&O+/0 M$P*`.-^)'A7_`(2;PT_V>/=?V>9K?'5N/F3\1^H%=6%K>RGKLSGQ%/VD/,YG MX0>+4DT:XT6_F6-K!#-"[G'[GDL/^`G]#[5OC:%I*<>ICA:J:Y9=!W@JWD\; M>.;_`,9WB'[':L8+!&'3'0_@#GZM[4J[5&FJ,=^HZ2]K4=1[=#U?&*\\[0H` M*`$)Q0!S>H>-]'L)KZ!&GNY[&,O<);0M((L#.&8#`Z>M;1H2:3VN9.M%778^ M=_$OB;4/%.J-?Z@_J(HEX6)?0?U/>O>ITH48V1X]6HZLKGN/PX\!_P#")6LE MY=S++J-VBAMGW8EZ[0>_/4^PKQ\5B/;2LMD>GAZ/LU<[O%<9U!TH`^?/BJBR M?$U8V&5>.!2/8G%>W@VXT+H\K$J]:QZ@?A3X-/\`S"B/I/)_C7F_6ZW<[?JU M/LM=%'&RYOWCT,:N%BE[B/1] M?MVG\,ZI;0K\TEI+&@'NA`KAINTT_,ZYKW6D>(_!>Z6'QL\+'!N+1U7W(*M_ M(&O7QR;I)GFX1VJ6/H$5XIZHM`"9H`^<]2A-_P#&J2&$9W:JHX_V6&[^1KW8 MOEPMWV/(:OB++N>\>).?"VKX[VI/X&>0?`L@>(-4'?[(O_ M`*$*]3,/AB<&"^)GNE>0>D)18#QC0AN_:"U$KR`TV?\`OV!7J5-,&CSX?[RS MV>O+/0/$OCI_R%=&_P"N$O\`Z$M>ME_PR/-QO0]8\,?\BGHW_7E#_P"@"O-J M_P`27JSOA\*-:LRSG?'?_(AZ[_UYR?RK;#_Q8F5;^&S@/@3]S7OK!_)Z[LQW MBPUY9Z`4`(:`/F_P")FE#P]XXO!9,88KN+SPJ';C?D.O'8D'CWKWL) M/VE'WNAY&)CR5/=ZGO7AG28-#\-Z?I]N,+%"NX_WF(RQ/U))KQ:LW.;;/3I0 M4()(UZS-`H`*`$[4"Z'S;X=COXO$LR75Y)9V-Y/)%>.6^5QN(8,.0>3CD=2! MWKW:BBZ:LKM'D04E-MNR*6G^#KS4]2TJ"$&.#59I/LQD&&\A,$R$=A@\>I%7 M+$1C%WZ"C2;DO,^G454154<*,"OGGJSV5HK#Z8"&@#Y]^*)S\4D]A;C]:]K" M?[LSRL1_&1]!5XIZH=Z0%*RU.RU)KI+.X2M8M;KX=_$<3PQ$Q0S_:+<=!)$VY3:Q%#EZGDS3H5;GT/IFHVNK M:=!?V4HEMITWHP_SU'0BO#E!PERL]:+35T6^U249^M:M;:'H]UJ=VX6&W0N1 MW8]E'N3Q5TX.!_"NZ_L#X MBR:==_NWE62S(/9U.0/_`!TC\:]G&1YZ*E$\O#/DJM,^@LUXIZHV21(HV=V" M(HRS,<``=30M=`N>.?"Y3KGQ"U_Q&%/D?.$)'>1\C_QU?UKT\7[E*-,\_#+F MJ2D>RUYAZ"/$?CH?^)QHZ^EO)_Z$*];+_AD>;C=T>L^&#_Q2>C8_Y\H?_0!7 MFU?XDO5G?#X4:U9EG.^/#CP'KO\`UYR?RK;#_P`6)E6_ALX#X$GY=?'O!_[4 MKNS'>)QX':1[#7EGHA0`AH$>!_&S_D7B_XB/=[7BUA M_P!Q?Y5XTMSU([(FI#"@`H`8QVJ3@G'.!UH`\]L/`LTUU?W-Y''&+T-(8V.= MK23^8RGZ*D0^N:[)8BUDNAR*AJ[DEOIUZVGZ'J5GI[_VUX?_`-"GMY/D$\>T M*^UB,$'AE/X<?VAI\%V;:XM3*N3#<)LD3V8=C7 M+)6=CHB[JY;I#*][-TA`SM&>YIQ5W83=E<\"\3:#X MM\6^);K6(O#5[;+)L"))A64*H'4D<\9KVJ-2E2I\CD>55IU:D^9(ZVU\6_$R MR@6*Z\)"[=1CS`A!;W."1FN5T,,WI,Z8U*R5G$;=>-OB-)"R6_@YK>0C`?R' M?'X9Q35##=9@ZU?I$Z7X8:+?Z-X6?^U(GCOKNY>XE63[X)P/F]^,_C7/BZD9 MU/8YH\F"=!\T9_J#CD5G1K2HRNBZM)559 MGEUAI?Q!^'-S(MA:?VEI[MN9(5,L;>^T?,I^GZUZ$YX?$+WM&<:C6H.T=4=' M#\4==F3RD\"ZBUSZ`/M_]`K%X2"UYT:K$S_E.-\=R^.-1@MK_P`0:6\&EHV\ M6T63&G_73!R">F3C&>,5UX98>-XP>IA7]M+62T._\%_$CP[J%I;:88TTB:-` MD<#D"(X[(W3\#@_6N&OA:L7S;HZ:.(A)@LL M>H<-+#NV>8PZ,I[-P.OH.1W[\-BU!YQ1&-##^\WS,)2JUO=M9'H?ACPW9>%M%BTVRRP4EI)&'S2.>K M'_/0"N&K5E5ES,ZJ=-4U9&P>*R-#P[Q]I_B;QIK-OVB\H"8(&8D MDD_>^E>QA9TJ,6I26IYN(C4JRT1Z!X)U;5%T_3]%U+P[?VRWL.//B4>7& M-W()SG.!Z=ZZL-&*FIRE:QSU^;E<8JYQ'P_M_$O@>ZOWN_"NHW,-VB#$`0LI M4MV)_P!HUV8MTJUN66QRX:,Z3=XGM$$IF@CE,;QEU#%'^\N1T/O7E-=#TD2T M@(Y7,43R!&K>P]Z:%L>$^-]&\4>,]?.I6WAB^MH%@6)%FV!N"3DC/J M:]?#5*5&G9RU/,KPJ5)\RB>J^%]=U'4%CL]0\/7^FRPP@M+,%\MF&!A2#G/4 M].U>;5IQB[QE<[Z;>*OA#IFK&2ZT9ETZZ;DQ;L=&<7#K7CWX<,(+Z&26P0X"SYEAQ_LN.5^F?PKL=/ M#XA76C.=3KT'9ZH[#2?C7HET@&I6=S92=R@\U/S'/Z5RSR^I'X'#63=_;:*/0PR`_EMK!X2NOLFWUBD^I5_P"%F6.HR-!X:TR^URX!Q^ZC M,48/^T[XQ^5/ZK**O-I"]NF[15SMXBQB0LNUB,E@!FF M`9H`,T""@89I:@&:8!FD`4P&E05*D`@]0>]&J"Q@WG@?PO?R&2YT*S9SR66/ M83^6*VCB*L=%(R=&F^@VU\!^%;-P\.@V88="T>_'YYH>(JO>0>QIKH;\4,<$ M2QQ(L<:C"JHP!^%9-W=V:)):(?TXI##)I7`,TP#)H`,T`&:`#-(`S1<`S1<` M[4;`&:`#-,`S0`M`!0`UERI'3-)JZLP7)4PT5BHTKNS3ZG6JC]DY>8:@D-O>:?'-+(L/EN&.]AG`&,XHQ<:=.K3C)M1 ML_R"G>49-%W3))%TF.2X1P MO/TYJ(XB="O*SC."2^*Q8@C6S1 MEOM!F#R88LQ0@$C')QTK#+N1OWKWU]#3$*VUK:!;B+^U;A'^TY6Y`0JS;1P# M@\XZYI4E#ZS-23WT[!._LTU;8-3:"+4YO.FEC7[-N7:[#Y\XSQWI8QPCB)=ZV.6=N9V,[5KB-+RWBF9 MOLXR9@I("YX4G';.:\_&UHQJPA)^[UMT[&M*+<6UOT+ME+$%:U1W=[NS#3A;V47?E,IQ>_*YL-0BL/[2[NXEU)OGY?,I:.^^:Q\F=V M8Q,;A6QY[Y]*Y<#+]Y35-]'?]#2LK*5UZ%ZT&->OAN8@(A`W$@9Z\?A7= M136,J*_1&4_X,60I%,UIJB6S,)?.*I\QX&`<#T[UE&,W3K*GO<=TI1YMB2PC MM+VSD$1FC5F&^,N048=O45>%C1Q%)VNNZ[-"J.5.2N16%DDMY>`R3?N)P$_> MMP``<=>:RPM!2K5+MZ/0JI-J,;=47M4N7M-.EDCX?A5/ID@9_6N[&U71H.4= MS*C%3FKD;:3$8AMDE$PQ^],C;B??FL_J,7%6;OW&JK3\B*%!J-W=M.6,4+^6 MD88@=.2<=365.*Q52?M-HZ(N7[M1Y>I%YLEFVI6ID9HHH?-C+')4$'C/X<5C MSSH.K1OHE=%WS!TX^UO\` M9W(YY#)X5MYM[APL?S!B#G(!Z5-2HY9?&;WT'%)5VBU8$P27LFZ3[$N#'YA) MQ@'=C/..E=&&DZ?M)_86US*:ORKJ0Z%>M.UQ%)('@;M^!XJ,MQ,JDI M0F[O?Y,K$4U%)Q&17LUE?7,D[;K)YRA;_GDW&/P.:RAB*E"O-SU@Y6]"W3C* M"2WM]Y+!:+=0ZA")'4^<0C!SE?E&._O6U*BJT*D4^NA$IN#B_(2R:7498Q,K M(+3Y9`&(W/T_+C/XU.&3DYZ_A7'/#REB8UD]E8U4TJ;@%Q:23:A;7"N@6$,"K#.H!STKG>#J1A*E"?NO MIV-%5C=2:U18GL7:[MKF!UC>(%6!7(93VK:IA6ZD*E-V:_(F,_=<9=1;>S=' MNA,R21W#[MH4\<`8_2JIX=ISYW=2%*>UMT16VEM96MQ#;SE3(VZ-B,[.!Q[] M*SHX-X>$XTI;E3K*174\B7$0CFE$ MC#8N:UG MA7.NZDMFK"53EARK>Y)86L]G'Y+S"6)>$)&&`]">]7AJ-2A'DD[I;$U)1F[I M6(;JPF>[>>WDC'FH(Y$E7&7T(KD6!E&$;2M*/4T]LN9W6C)GL[E;HW4$L:RN@2164E3CH1SQ M6LL/553VT&DVM25./+R-:("2>:5E,TY!;8,`8&!BKH4'"4IR>LA3GS)170;9VDMM62&2:9(]K=`S*;BYP'D*\`>@'I4R MP4I0GK[TMRE546G;1$BZ:@U'[:6^;9@J!QNQC=^7%6L$O;^VOTV_43JODY"O M_94_]D?8//CX8%6V'IG..M8_4:BP_L+]2U6BJG/8MWMM-=6?D+(B%L!R5)!' M<"NNO1G4I\B=NYE3E&$N9C9K)VOX+N!U1HU*."N=RFLY85JK&K3=K*S\QJHN M5QDA;>R9!=)<,DD<[EMH4CKU!JJ6':4XSU4G<)5%HX[H-.L%T^*2)9"ZLY9< M]0,``?I3PF%6%@X)WU"K4=1IL+*TEM9KEGD5A-)YF`.G;^E+#8>5&4VW>[N* MI-2278OUVF84`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0` ;4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'__9 ` end GRAPHIC 106 equity_footer.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 equity_footer.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`#$!8@,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H` MANEN'@*VLL<4F?ONA<`?3(_G35KZB=[:&#!KEY=:5I)3R$N]1G>))=A,>U0[ M>8%SG#*F0,\;AR<<[NE&,I=E_P`#3\3!5).,>[_X(1:W?WT&FP6P@AO;DSB5 MW0NB^4=K8&0>6QCGH30Z<8MM[*WX@JDI));N_P"!KZ/J`U71K._";/M$2R%< MYVDCD5E4AR3<>QK3ESQ4NYEV6NW-Q9:%,\<8;4)VCD`!P`$D;C\4%:RI).2[ M?\`SC4;47W_X);MO$-G=7ZVB1SJ7DEB21DPCO&2'4'VP?8^O!J'2E&-_3\2E M5BW;^M"*S\06HL;:2YN-WFPRS"7RO+4K&?FXR<'!Z9[$TY4G=I+M^(HU59-O MO^!+-XBLX/)+QS@/''+(?+XA5SA2_IDY'&<8)/`S25*3&ZL4.EU^R@EU)9!* MJ:ZN2JJ=[K9V-.RO8K^!IH-VP2/'DC&2K%21[9!K.47%V9I&2DKHR[ M#6IKKQ!=6;QH+0AOLL@ZN8R%ES]&8`?0UI*FHP3Z]?GL9QJ-S:Z=/EN6(/$. MGSJC!V56@DN&++CRU1MK;O0@Y&/8^E)TI+\BE5BR73M6@U(RHDOI]-T>:ZMT!="NYBA<1J6`9RHY.T$G`]*= M**E*S%4DX1NA8-3A2#3A)=)L4BFA7".=K/GJ<#"GO0X.[LK6!35EK>Y!! MK4-[=::;>8K%=K,0C16^1AA@@@X(([$$$?A6U%KB.PEDM98XY44L#)&7&!SC`(_G6<+N><@`9K65)HR.:)4I15V$:BD[(@L/$UIJ46^W@N?FMOM42O'M,T? MJO/KQ@XZCL)H[C1],O6LK@3W\(F2VC`=L;0S$'@$# M(YX)R.,G%.5%J3C?;J)54XIVW-BUN8;RUANK=Q)#,@=&'=2,@UBTXNS-4TU= M&;>WM[)K*:78/#"P@,\DLL9DP-VU5"@CJWOQI&,5#GD9RE)RY8D%MXE1 MM-L99K:5KNZ:2(00#=F2,L'`)P,?*W)Q5.C:32>B_42JKE3:U?Z$A\1Q/=:, MEK:RSP:HI=)1QL7;NY!Y[_A2]D[2N]@]JKQLMRW'JL+:I_9[Q313,K/&77"R MA2`Q7GMN'7&<\9J'!\O,6IKFY2G%K\-]#IES;-)#!=W/E)YL!S*/+9N.1M'' MWCG[IXY!JW2<6T^B_4A55))KJ6(M=M)M0%HJRC=(\,_^?\`D'M&ZO(M MK?Y?YD6A:Y;F<1G)1\IQ[#YC^5%2CR)OL[?F.G5YVDNU_P`B MUXGUB71M&GGM422\\MVB1_N_*I9F..P`/XX'>IHTU.:3V*K3<(MK<;/KT=GJ MMA;WSC)=;?B=/7,=`4`9^M M6$^IZ9)9P70MC+@.Q0ME/XEX((R.,@YYK2G)0ES-7(J1B.\ MM#(?.DBWB3S,E\J".K8;KQ@57M4V^9:/]-A>R:2L]5^IJ:=8Q:9IMM8PDF.W MC6-2>I`&,FLIR2WB$6UP6#`;FSR` M'8#`';/3G655-.RU>YE&DXM:Z+8DM_#XM[BTF^TEOL]U5Y_"<<^@V>EM=L!;R%C($Y=&W!TQGC_\.Q7FL+J`6TG,QJN,>77 MY,W6IY[\OE_G?^ M13LO#GV2UL(C;FTWM^`XTN7EUVO\`B12^ M&#+IQM'GA<1WKWD'F0;E!9V8JZY^8?.PXQV[BFJUI7MTL)TKJWG56,RR\+V6G:M%>VK3)'%;M`L+3.ZX M+`_Q,>..F/>M95I2CRON9QHQC+F1'9^&%BA:"[N?M$"69L85";2L)ZY.3EB` MHSQ]WI1*M=W2MK?YBC1LK-]+?(=%I.I6=M=S17L<^I201V\4C1[%54S@D9.3 MEV)]>.!0YP;2:TW&H2BFT]3:GB\^WEASMWJ5SZ9%8IV=S5JZL8XT&>WMM*%E M>K'R65+6 M,1[2H<@_,<\X`P,`>^:J=7F3TU>XH4N5K7;872O#JZ8+$?:3)]EL!9?.G2E.KSWTW=PA2Y;:[*Q%;^'KJSL=*CM[^-;K3H#;)*T!*O&0HY7=][Y% M.H6-REO>UAT-(;L;M+782T>1(I7:>,\'T//T--U;N5UN"I64;/8CT[PO\`8=:746N4 MD9//`(AQ(XE<-\[Y^;;C`X'%.=;FARV[?@*%'EES>OXD\'A\06&B6OVDG^RY M%<-L_P!9B-DQUX^_G\*EU;RD[;C5*T8J^PD&@/#J$,ANP;2WN9;J*'R\,))- MV[+9Y&9'(&!U'/'(ZMXVMJTE]W_#`J5I7OHFW]YF]OPO_F9PHJ%M=K_B6(]'N)+RZN[V[CDGEMOLR^5"45%R3G!8DDD^ MO;ZTG422C%=;E>S;;@5*2J+4D@TA;>_L[E)F(MK5K8*V6+`E#DDG/\'ZTG4NFN[N-0LT^RL5X_#X MC\,V&C?:21:"`>;L^]Y3*W3/&=OZU3J_O'.V]_Q%[/W%"^UOP-JL34*`(YY1 M!"TI1W"C.U%W,?H*:5W83=D5=+U6WU>W-Q:I,(LX#21%-W)'&?I53@X.S)A- M35T.?5+--7CTHR_Z9)$9@@4_@/?\*)0E!)OJ*,XR;2Z!8:K;ZEO:U$K1#[LIC*H_.#M)Z_7\ MJ)0<-PC-2V$U+5K?28O.NDF\E5+/(D3.L:CJ6QT%$(.;L@G-05V%QJMM;7T= MEB66X=0^R*,MM3.-S8Z#/YX..AH4&US=`E')+EY^@<\>;DZDUY>0V%J]S<,1&N!PI)))P``.222`![THQQ->:M; M626S.)7-RVV)8HR[,=I;H/8$U,8.5[=!RFHV\QM]J]OIUHMU<17`B*&1BD+- MY:@9);`XQGIUZ^AIQIN3L@E-15V7PRL@=2"I&01W%9EE+3-5@U6`3VR3"%E# MH\D10.#T(SUJYP<'9D0FIJZ'7VJ6>FR6L=U+L>ZE$,2A22S'ITZ#WZ;DZB)JMO+J M4EC$LLDD3;9'6,[(VV[@"W3."/S'J*'!J/,P4TYQ'M( MV374==ZU8V"V1NI&A>\D2*&-D.XLQ``([W0TC9LN65[#?VHN+1:?87%[/N\F MWC:1]HR<`9.*J,7*2BNI,I*,7)]"2"1I8$=XFA9ADQL02OL<$BDU9C6Q)2&% M`!0`4`%`!0`4`<[HMI]FT;28;RPE:>.=RN!_J22_S-STP<=_O"NBI*\I.+_K M0PIQM&*:_K4K6^EZM;^+;:ZF2"6)SJ7,GF945*.FNB_'R+?B M??J.AFWBMK\7$\.Z.%(_E9CT24]`,]02!C-11M"=VU9?UH56]Z%DG?\`K_P#P":D9 M*3:WTM_P3:O+:9_%>E7"1L88K>X5W'12QBP#]<'\JRBTJMB:^L'$-K/NL[R"4J5&951T=BG//&1VR1BBG:+U>Z?ZH52\EHMFBF+.YE\ M.^)'6"0/?M.\,3##D&((O';.W.#ZU?,E4AY6_.Y'*W"?G?\`(N:G:VKZ99F\ M@O&>``QFT+B1'V$?P'/0D<\<\U$)-2?+;YESBG%7O\C.OWU-_#6FZ9?07+2W M<*I?S11F0HH4;Q\O\3?=R.!DGL`=(\BJ.4>FQ$G+D49+?DZ9]B\%6\%_;W=UFUC$MH3N8$`951QCGW[5T5)\U5N+2UW.>$.6D ME)7TV(_$&F:O/J27=ND$\8N+81*2P:)5D5G/3')`)/HH]*=*<%&STW_(56$W M*Z\OS-:>WF;Q78W"QL8$LYT9^P8O$0/Q"G\JR37LVO-?J:-/VB?D_P!#$LK' M4;/Q"RQBZ!?4)9I&)/D&W9"?INW$#^]D?W:VE*,H=-EZW_K^KF48RC/Y_*W] M?U8W+V[673G\R'4(`TK19@C)D&"?F&W)VG'!]QTK&,;2TL;2E>/4YW^R[N/3 M?#LES!/-.SWMO_P3#D:C"ZV_KH:$ M]MJ=QX6T>.ZC>2^2YM'G'!8!94+$XXR`,G''!J$X*I*VUG^1;4W3C?>Z_,V+ MTM="XTY8I5\VW;$^!L!/RXSUSSGI6,=+2\S66MXG/6%EJ=RCO;QO8W$6EQV: MO,I`$N3DCU"\8(X.:Z)2@M]5>_R,(QF]M':WS+6@VM[I!UHS62+"CH8(X"6+ MA847"Y`S]T#ZYJ:LHSY;/^KE4E*'-=?U8B&EW=KX:TMI(VDNX;I+RZ1!DLS, M6DP.^"Q('7Y<4^>+J2MM:R_07(U3CWO=_J:GA^"6&TN99HWB-S=2SJCC!52W MRY';(`..V:RJM-I+HD:4DTFWU;.TM)9!ITK3V8'_+7S_O@?[I M+?F*Z(R@TDWOO\C"49IMI;;?,EU/PU.QLM)A60V=S9I:W$RG_5^3ED8_4DBE M"LE>;W3O]^XYTGI!;-6^X7[/JK:`-:^PRIJYN_M1M>-P^7R=O_?>'/R7] MVUK_`(_F%I\G/;6][?A^1+H]AKW^0Z<73;TT6WS#4],NKCQ9YTA=8\V[6TR6QD*;7)=0P/R9[Y'(/?& M*(32IV7G?7^KA.#=2[\K:?U8JW%NUOXDM7N+63[7+JY87.SAH?);:N[T&,;? M4$X[FD[TW9Z6_&Y+5IJZUO\`A8L6-K>)K.GPM:3J+:_O)9)"OR;)-Y0AN^=P MZ=.^*F3CR-WW2_"Q48RYDK;-_CFX MH?R/:FYKFGRO=?Y"C!\L+K9_YEK3K-CXNO+5US:V6^>,'D$W!!(_`K+^#BIG M+]TGU?Z?TON*C']XUT7Z_P!,HZ?H?_$GT&Q?32B6^I2-=1F/:N/+F`8]F7)0 M9Y!XJYU/?E*^ZT_`F%/W(QMUU_$L7%M>S>,K>Y6Q,7DW84R1P??A\DCW1$:&T6VCCMG MAM3+Y$BN22N"/+.-G.,8!'UFG42B^]]==_\`,NI3;EY6TTV_R-"VMVL=>UO4 MY+":5I)X4A9%W,4*1J2N3P`..<7\[)@3L7!0Y_B[D>@XXZ5I5DG%Z]K>1%.+4EIWOYF);>&[N'2K=E MTQTNH]-LR"%^87"R'& M%(WF;?(RC!=NF2>]-R;W$HI;$U(84`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%` M!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4 >`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`?__9 ` end GRAPHIC 107 exhibit99-34x14x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-34x14x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`"W`H0#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MJO/>P6T@CF?:QC:7H?NJ0#_Z$./>@"Q156'4+:>X\B.3,FS?C';"D_CAU_[Z M%6J`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"JMUI]K>L&NH$FPC)M<94J2I/'3J MJG\*M44`5;?3K2UE$L$*QL$V#'0#"CI]$4?\!%4-*T^R2ZU2-+.W5$N@%41* M`!Y,9X&/4G\ZV:S]-_X_M6_Z^U_]$Q4`6/L%G_SZ0?\`?L4?8+/_`)](/^_8 MJQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44`5_L%G_SZ0?\`?L4?8+/_`)]( M/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44`5_L%G_SZ0?\`?L4?8+/_ M`)](/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44`5_L%G_SZ0?\`?L4? M8+/_`)](/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44`5_L%G_SZ0?\` M?L4?8+/_`)](/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44`5_L%G_SZ M0?\`?L4?8+/_`)](/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44`5_L% MG_SZ0?\`?L4?8+/_`)](/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV*L44` M5_L%G_SZ0?\`?L4?8+/_`)](/^_8JQ10!7^P6?\`SZ0?]^Q1]@L_^?2#_OV* ML4A8+U('UH`@^P6?_/I!_P!^Q1]@L_\`GT@_[]BI#-$#@RH#[L*8U[:J"6N8 M0!US(*!70GV"S_Y](/\`OV*/L%G_`,^D'_?L5&=4T\=;ZW_"4&FG6-.!P;V' M\&IV8N>/Y9^P6?_`#Z0?]^Q1]@L_P#GT@_[]BJW]LVO79<;1U;R'P/T MJ>WU&SNO]1FUOS]ZT**`,RRLKR'4/.FGW0^5M"%RQSB,#L,X*N<_[=5- M/L+EKS4P-6O%*W*@D)#\W[F,Y.8_?'&.E;U9^F_\?VK?]?:_^B8J`#^SKK_H M,WW_`'Q!_P#&Z/[.NO\`H,WW_?$'_P`;K0HH`S_[.NO^@S??]\0?_&Z/[.NO M^@S??]\0?_&ZT**`,_\`LZZ_Z#-]_P!\0?\`QNC^SKK_`*#-]_WQ!_\`&ZT* M*`,_^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QNC^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QNM"B@#/_`+.NO^@S??\`?$'_ M`,;H_LZZ_P"@S??]\0?_`!NM"B@#/_LZZ_Z#-]_WQ!_\;H_LZZ_Z#-]_WQ!_ M\;K0J.2:*+_62HG^\P%`%/\`LZZ_Z#-]_P!\0?\`QNC^SKK_`*#-]_WQ!_\` M&Z636=.CX-Y$Q]$.[^50S:];1*&$-RRDX!\HJ,_5L4[,GGCW)?[.NO\`H,WW M_?$'_P`;H_LZZ_Z#-]_WQ!_\;J-M1O6B,L6F-Y87=NDE4 MY=)[N6.).-%!.>V:="?G,T[#CV"XHL'O=B9[.:,9DUV\3_ M`'E@'_M.JDEQ;Q]?$MR?]T0-_*.K%)#T=T\S'Y]:N6MNMO"J80 ML!@LJ!<_@*-`][R,7[1(W^IU'69O]RUB_K&*-FL/_J9=2^LK6R_^TS6II]G- M:>9YUY)<[L8WY^7&?4FG2:;:270NGBS,"&W;CU'3C..U/0?+KK+[E_F8[VVN M1X>;6EMX\X_>>4V?_(8JS'8ZRR*PUP,",@BW0@C\JUI88IE"S1I(H.<.H(S3 MMBB/RPH"8V[1P`/2E<7(GNV9BV&J!OFUEB/06R"I/L-Z?O:K*?I$@_I5JUM8 M[1"D6[:3G#,3C\Z18K@7;2&XW0D<1;!Q^-%P]G'O^+*W]G7!^]JEUGVVC^E( MVD,RX.IZ@/I*!_2K=R;D!/LRQ'GYMY/3VQ3KB4PPM((WD*_PH,DT78>S3,UM M!#==4U/_`+_C_"HV\-HQR=3U+_OZO_Q-:\$OG0K)L=-W\+C!'U%)#<0SEA%* MKE>&`/(HNQ>RCV,/_A$H#UU+4"/0M&1^J4J^$[9>E[=?BD)_]IUT%%%V')'L M80\+P`8%Y/\`C#!_\;IZ^'(E(*WDP(Z'[/;_`/QJMJBB['R1[&2NB,OW=2N1 M](;?_P"-T\:5,HP-6O!](X/_`(W6G12*L9W]G7(Z:S??]\0?_&Z7^SKK_H,W MW_?$'_QNM"B@#/\`[.NO^@S??]\0?_&ZK7&@"Z_U^HW,A]3%!G\_+K9HH$TG MN9$&B/:IBWU2]!'3S&5A^6,5!-9:\CEEU-ID_NHL49_5&K>HIW)Y%TT.=\ZY MB_X_+[5[?'5C#`Z_FL9JU;I]J_U'B&ZD/HH@S^7EUL55N-.L[HYGMHW/][;@ M_GUHT"TD0_V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=']G77_09OO^^(/_C=-_LIXO\`CSOKB'T5 MF\Q1^#?XT;M7@ZQVUVH_NL8V/YY%%@YFMT._LZZ_Z#-]_P!\0?\`QNC^SKK_ M`*#-]_WQ!_\`&Z;_`&Q'%Q=V]Q;8ZEX\K^8R*MV]Y;70S;SQR?[K`T6&I)]2 MM_9UU_T&;[_OB#_XW1_9UU_T&;[_`+X@_P#C=:%%(HS_`.SKK_H,WW_?$'_Q MNC^SKK_H,WW_`'Q!_P#&ZT**`,_^SKK_`*#-]_WQ!_\`&Z/[.NO^@S??]\0? M_&ZT**`,_P#LZZ_Z#-]_WQ!_\;H_LZZ_Z#-]_P!\0?\`QNM"B@#/_LZZ_P"@ MS??]\0?_`!NC^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QNM"B@#/\`[.NO^@S??]\0?_&Z/[.NO^@S M??\`?$'_`,;K0HH`S_[.NO\`H,WW_?$'_P`;H_LZZ_Z#-]_WQ!_\;K0HH`HV M4,D%Y.LES+HK%6'1F<(NI2EB<`#5),EV"$[#OC&<^RLYQWVU5TJ*Y-\99;:6%64X9IG)8C&2020 M`><#K@5N4`9.FWFHSW2)=VODJ8`S\=&VQGK]6D&/]BJ^GW]RMYJ9&DWC%KE2 M0'A^7]S&,',GMGC/6MZL_3?^/[5O^OM?_1,5`!_:-U_T!K[_`+[@_P#CE']H MW7_0&OO^^X/_`(Y6A10!G_VC=?\`0&OO^^X/_CE']HW7_0&OO^^X/_CE:%%` M&?\`VC=?]`:^_P"^X/\`XY1_:-U_T!K[_ON#_P".5H44`9_]HW7_`$!K[_ON M#_XY67-XHF20+_9YCW,5`GE$9XP><].#_G%=)44]O!GKWS2>=K%FF9H(KY44DM$=KL<\87IT/3VZG.*KT) MY2E%:S>6!=:?J]RW]GD`#Z'>,`I#09/_D2M*B@#$D`DNA=/H-\9@0V[S8NHZ<>;CM4UQ=WDT>U M-,U&)LYW*\'_`,N=O_CWZ\4V?7&MGC2;2[U&D M.%!:'G_R)6O2$`C!&:>@[KL9YU&Y`R=&OA_P.#_XY2_VC=?]`:^_[[@_^.5= MFB2>)HY5W(W4>M-MX([:%885VHO09SBD+2Q4_M&Z_P"@-??]]P?_`!RC^T;K M_H#7W_?<'_QRK,$,L3N7N'E5C\JL!\OXTV2YDCO$A-N[1N.)5Y`/OZ4[!;L0 M?VC=?]`:^_[[@_\`CE']HW7_`$!K[_ON#_XY5^EI",_^T;K_`*`U]_WW!_\` M'*/[1NO^@-??]]P?_'*T**`,_P#M&Z_Z`U]_WW!_\#0*WYB3-;=%`FD]SG= ME_#S:6VK1_[,CP2+^LF?UJ>WO]<#8GT@L@_B\R-#^09JVZ*=R>1=-#&N?$*V MN!-IM\I]=J!?S+`5)!K37*Y@TRZD'^Q+`?\`VI6IUZU3GTFQG;<]L@?KN3Y6 M_,4:!:2\QG]HW7_0&OO^^X/_`(Y1_:-U_P!`:^_[[@_^.4W^SKF'_CTU&91_ M=F`D'Z\_K1YVJP?ZVUAN5]87VG\F_P`:+!S6W0[^T;K_`*`U]_WW!_\`'*/[ M1NO^@-??]]P?_'*EM+Y;EV0P3PNHR5ECQ^O0U;I%)I[&?_:-U_T!K[_ON#_X MY1_:-U_T!K[_`+[@_P#CE:%%`S/_`+1NO^@-??\`?<'_`,A&:LMX=TIWF9K7F;._]XW.2#QSQT'3Z=*D\/\`_(O:9_UZ1?\`H`K0 MI\S74#+7P[I2O$PM>8?N9D8_Q;N>>>?6F3:1I"0"S>+9&XVE`[?.-V1N.O4"D!, MFBZ>A@*VXS;G,66)V=.GTP,>G/J:T*AM;<6T(B5LJ.@V@`?@`*FH`S_#_P#R M+VF?]>D7_H`K0K/\/_\`(O:9_P!>D7_H`K0H`****`"F2\Q./E^Z?O=/QI]1 MW`S;RC!/R'@=3Q0!A^'5@6YF8!WN7&9)Y;=HC(.VS(QM'H/;ZUMW-Q':V[SS M-MC098^G^'UK)TF+3DO$-G=M<2F$EA]J>4*,CL2(QR#*G&1G'0 MYH`@@U&VN)Q#$Y,A3?@J1QA2?H<.G'^T*S-/UK2DO-39]3LU#W*LI,ZC1QDJ#B4[/7_)%:]13VT%P,31))P1\RYX M(P1^(IW3W0%3^W=(_P"@K8_^!"?XT?V[H_\`T%;'_P`"$_QJ!="2V_Y!US-: MCDB,-N3.W`X/O@GUH%UJUK*%N+-+F'8,RPM\V[;SQ[GIT`SR>,T6OL!/_;NC M_P#05L?_``(3_&C^W='_`.@K8_\`@0G^--M==L+@[3(8),@;)QL.<9QZ9Q[U MHTFFMP*']NZ/_P!!6Q_\"$_QH_MW1_\`H*V/_@0G^-:%%(#/_MW1_P#H*V/_ M`($)_C1_;NC_`/05L?\`P(3_`!K0HH`S_P"W='_Z"MC_`.!"?XT?V[H__05L M?_`A/\:T**`,_P#MW1_^@K8_^!"?XT?V[H__`$%;'_P(3_&M"B@#/_MW1_\` MH*V/_@0G^-']NZ/_`-!6Q_\``A/\:T**`,_^W='_`.@K8_\`@0G^-']NZ/\` M]!6Q_P#`A/\`&M"B@#/_`+=T?_H*V/\`X$)_C1_;NC_]!6Q_\"$_QK0HH`S_ M`.W='_Z"MC_X$)_C1_;NC_\`05L?_`A/\:T**`,_^W='_P"@K8_^!"?XT?V[ MH_\`T%;'_P`"$_QK0HH`S_[=T?\`Z"MC_P"!"?XT?V[H_P#T%;'_`,"$_P`: MT**`,_\`MW1_^@K8_P#@0G^-']NZ/_T%;'_P(3_&M"B@#'N]1T*\15EU2S^4 MY4K=*"#^=/FU_2XH&:'4;&5U'"?:D&?Q)K5HH'(#`@C(/!J"TM(;-&2`$*S;L$YQ0&A7_`+=T M?_H*V/\`X$)_C1_;NC_]!6Q_\"$_QJ>*6Y-T\D7_H`K0K&TJ^MK+P M]I7VF39OM(]ORDYPB^GUK4N)X[:%IIFVQKU."?;M18=F2T5!:W<%Y&9+=]Z@ M[2<$<_C]:8U]$)TB"R,7)`*H<9!P?R(H!IK&(Q MD#W&GJQK7O MXII[.2.WD,4C8&X<'&1G!['&0#VH`LUGZ;_Q_:M_U]K_`.B8JCL;*^AOA-*5N5!(2'YOW,9RI[\U/_`&==?]!F^_[X@_\`C='] MG77_`$&;[_OB#_XW34F@*ZW>K6DL<=W9K.3@5/::YI]V MIVSB-E8*R2_*58YP.>,\'IZ4O]G77_09OO\`OB#_`.-U7N=!-V/](U.[<]B8 MX,CG/!\O/6G=/<#7ZTM8T&AR6,:I8:C/&%*<2`.,#.1C@AC] M.:O_`-G77_09OO\`OB#_`.-TFFMP-"BL_P#LZZ_Z#-]_WQ!_\;H_LZZ_Z#-] M_P!\0?\`QND!H45G_P!G77_09OO^^(/_`(W1_9UU_P!!F^_[X@_^-T`:%%9_ M]G77_09OO^^(/_C=']G77_09OO\`OB#_`.-T`:%%9_\`9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"- MT?V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=`&A16?_9UU_T&;[_OB#_XW1_9UU_T&;[_`+X@_P#C M=`&A16?_`&==?]!F^_[X@_\`C=']G77_`$&;[_OB#_XW0!H45G_V==?]!F^_ M[X@_^-T?V==?]!F^_P"^(/\`XW0!H45G_P!G77_09OO^^(/_`(W1_9UU_P!! MF^_[X@_^-T`:%%9_]G77_09OO^^(/_C=']G77_09OO\`OB#_`.-T`:%%9_\` M9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"-T?V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=`&A5>:SMYIXYY(P98\;6R015? M^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QNC^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QN@:;6Q8NVN4B#6L:2,#\RL<9'M[U M+YFV'S)<1X7+9/"^O-4O[.NO^@S??]\0?_&Z:^F7$B%'U>]92,$&.`@_^0Z` MN:"LK*&4@@]"#3JS(=)F@C$<6KWJ(.@"0?\`QNH[>QU-FD%SJMTH!^0HL)!' MXQT!8UZ*RUM97E:)==O#(GWEVP9'_D.I/[.NO^@S??\`?$'_`,;H$:%%9_\` M9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"-T?V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=`&A16?_9UU_T&;[_OB#_XW1_9 MUU_T&;[_`+X@_P#C=`&A16?_`&==?]!F^_[X@_\`C=']G77_`$&;[_OB#_XW M0!H45G_V==?]!F^_[X@_^-T?V==?]!F^_P"^(/\`XW0!H45G_P!G77_09OO^ M^(/_`(W1_9UU_P!!F^_[X@_^-T`6$_Y",W_7*/\`F]6*HV4,D%Y.LES+D7_H`K0K/\/\`_(O:9_UZ1?\`H`K0 MH`*HW5U:0W\"3L5F",Z$M@;>C'KVX^E7JKS6<4TPE?>'"[U,SE<,)@"2N<8P?1R/^!58 M&D60"!8F4(JJH5V&`I)4=>Q)QZ9JH/#&EI`T444B`J`#YSG&""#R>Q`_(4`. MLK/1G,RV4D,DXY/N?S MHTW2K?3@3$"9&^^Q)^8^N/7H,]>*OT`9_A__`)%[3/\`KTB_]`%:%9_A_P#Y M%[3/^O2+_P!`%:%`!1110`4UR51F`R0,XSC-.IK*'4JPR",$4`9&GI:-K5S) M%>,]P%(D@+[MF2".Y`Z5LU%;V\-K$L5O$D4:]%10`*9?2S0V7T]\(Y[9HH?*W$L.0=L9'/3JT M@Q_L55T^_N5O-3(TF\8MYS/_:-U_P!`:^_[[@_^.4?VC=?]`:^_ M[[@_^.4U)H"%M/U-"[0:NQ)!PLD*D9P.OZG@#KZ<4I.N1*3BSG.TD#YE.[=P M/IM[^OYU+_:-U_T!K[_ON#_XY1_:-U_T!K[_`+[@_P#CE/F`A;4M0B:3S=(D M**"5:.16+#C&1V/TSR/3F@:_;H4%Q;W5ONZ&6+`'.,D_P_CCCGN*F_M&Z_Z` MU]_WW!_\N9,\G=]G/_`+4JH]E;/)O_`.$;O%8+M!62%<#! M'02^A-'N@=#17,I930J%MK/6H0I)"BX@(Y&#G,F2.!].V*4-KT3CRDOW0*!M ME2W))`ZDB3U[8Z#KGFBR[@=+17.0W_B8(!)I".0?O;T&1CT#G'/\^V.;AU2_ MB+^?H\P"C.8I`^>G``Z\G],T)_+7S0,;\32H4DT.\=3U#-`1_Z,I);Z\,#)#I%[&^W"G=`0/P\ MR@-#4HK*MK_45A47.DW3RCJT;0X/YR5+_:-U_P!`:^_[[@_^.4">AH45G_VC M=?\`0&OO^^X/_CE']HW7_0&OO^^X/_CE`&A16?\`VC=?]`:^_P"^X/\`XY1_ M:-U_T!K[_ON#_P".4`:%%9_]HW7_`$!K[_ON#_XY1_:-U_T!K[_ON#_XY0!8 M3_D(S?\`7*/^;U8JC9323WD[26TML1&@V2E"3R_/RL1^M7J`,_P__P`B]IG_ M`%Z1?^@"M"L/3-4L[#0=*6ZE,9>TB*_(Q!^4=P*G_P"$CTG_`)^__(;_`.%. MS(=2"=FT:M%97_"1Z3_S]_\`D-_\*277[5$$D:2RQLK,K!"N\@$[5SC).,8] M3['!9H:G&6B9K45EPZW!-]G:-':*9"_F`<*!G)/MQUJ0:DX69GLY5\D`D`AC MSC'`YZ'/X4BC0HK/L-4%].T2Q;2J+(3O!&U@"I&.OHK/_MW1_P#H*V/_`($)_C1_ M;NC_`/05L?\`P(3_`!H`T**S_P"W='_Z"MC_`.!"?XT?V[H__05L?_`A/\:` M-"BL_P#MW1_^@K8_^!"?XT?V[H__`$%;'_P(3_&@#0HK/_MW1_\`H*V/_@0G M^-']NZ/_`-!6Q_\``A/\:`-"BL_^W='_`.@K8_\`@0G^-']NZ/\`]!6Q_P#` MA/\`&@#0HK/_`+=T?_H*V/\`X$)_C1_;NC_]!6Q_\"$_QH`T**S_`.W='_Z" MMC_X$)_C1_;NC_\`05L?_`A/\:`-"BL_^W='_P"@K8_^!"?XT?V[H_\`T%;' M_P`"$_QH`T**S_[=T?\`Z"MC_P"!"?XT?V[H_P#T%;'_`,"$_P`:`-"BL_\` MMW1_^@K8_P#@0G^-']NZ/_T%;'_P(3_&@#0HK/\`[=T?_H*V/_@0G^-']NZ/ M_P!!6Q_\"$_QH`T**S_[=T?_`*"MC_X$)_C1_;NC_P#05L?_``(3_&@#0HK/ M_MW1_P#H*V/_`($)_C1_;NC_`/05L?\`P(3_`!H`T**S_P"W='_Z"MC_`.!" M?XT?V[H__05L?_`A/\:`-"BL_P#MW1_^@K8_^!"?XT?V[H__`$%;'_P(3_&@ M#0HK/_MW1_\`H*V/_@0G^-']NZ/_`-!6Q_\``A/\:`-"BL_^W='_`.@K8_\` M@0G^-']NZ/\`]!6Q_P#`A/\`&@#0JO+8VDP(EMH7S_>0&J_]NZ/_`-!6Q_\` M`A/\:/[=T?\`Z"MC_P"!"?XT`(^AZMV\0,NG07#[CN\B7:`,#!&>3SGC MZ58_MW1_^@K8_P#@0G^-']NZ/_T%;'_P(3_&CF[H"%M=CADF6YL[N$19.]H\ MJP!`X(Z]>WH34T.MZ;,!MO(AG/#G8>.HP<8(]/QH_MW1_P#H*V/_`($)_C4$ MVH^'K@$37NF29&#NFC/'YT70&I'(DJAHW5U/=3D4^N;E3PN[RR)J%G#)*"&> M.[4'J#QS@=!TIHGL87A^S^*X@D?!66XC?<-V<9)]\9YHLNX'345S"ZW-`"#K M.BW7(P?.5#C)R,9QTQSGMCOD*OC&VC(6Y%N#MRS0W<;C@$GO[#CU.*.4#IJ* MQ+7Q7I%S&K_:?*W9XD&",#)SC/X>O05<&MZ5M#'4K0`\_-,H_F:3BT!?HK/_ M`+=T?_H*V/\`X$)_C1_;NC_]!6Q_\"$_QI`:%%9_]NZ/_P!!6Q_\"$_QH_MW M1_\`H*V/_@0G^-`&A16?_;NC_P#05L?_``(3_&C^W='_`.@K8_\`@0G^-`&A M16?_`&[H_P#T%;'_`,"$_P`:/[=T?_H*V/\`X$)_C0!H45G_`-NZ/_T%;'_P M(3_&C^W='_Z"MC_X$)_C0!H45G_V[H__`$%;'_P(3_&C^W='_P"@K8_^!"?X MT`:%%9_]NZ/_`-!6Q_\``A/\:/[=T?\`Z"MC_P"!"?XT`6$_Y",W_7*/^;U8 MJC97=M>7D\EI<13H(T4M$X8`Y?C(^M7J`,_P_P#\B]IG_7I%_P"@"M"L_P`/ M_P#(O:9_UZ1?^@"M"@`K-U![,SL+FVCE\F-99'<#$:9.&Y],,?;!K2K/OIK1 M+@"[@5U5`0^S>>6"A<`$]2*`*PO=$M&$:HD7F`IA;9@,9;(.%P/N-D'^[3X] M4TBZ,FU@QRADMH4DB9/DD9.64C&3D9Z?I0!7M]3T9&C>)50GY8V2!N M0Q/`X[[,_1<]!6S55=.LD4*MI`%!R`(QUSG^=6J`,_P__P`B]IG_`%Z1?^@" MM"L_P_\`\B]IG_7I%_Z`*T*`"BBB@`HHHH`*CGA2XA>&3.QQ@X8@X^HJ2B@" MM%8V\-P;A(_WI7:6+$D\*#U[D*O/^R*@TW_C^U;_`*^U_P#1,57\C=MR,]<5 M0TW_`(_M6_Z^U_\`1,5`&A1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`-95<$,`P/8BJDVD:?,^][2+?MV[E&TXQC&1V MQQCTXJ[133:`Q_\`A'X(DVV=U=6GH(Y>!QCH:4V6K0M*;?4DD4C]VDT7W3D= M2.3P#Z=:UZ*?,P,D7&M0M"LUE;S@\2/%)M"_-UP>>F#CFD77=BG[7I]Y;D$# ME,@Y)&XNH9(GVHH*N"W53UP,=<=#GU MXH`3^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QNC^SKK_H,WW_?$'_QNH397RK$T4B@IM1-IE]]N5XIO*@1U^7S68L`RG)R.I4,OT?VY`+?]G77_09OO^^( M/_C=']G77_09OO\`OB#_`.-U3TW3=4MKU)+F\6:(8RIR>=FUF^I8!O;+#G-; ME`&?_9UU_P!!F^_[X@_^-T?V==?]!F^_[X@_^-UH44`9_P#9UU_T&;[_`+X@ M_P#C=']G77_09OO^^(/_`(W6A10!G_V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=-CTZ]$:B36[QG M`&XK'"`3WP/+./S-:5%`&?\`V==?]!F^_P"^(/\`XW1_9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"- MUH44`9_]G77_`$&;[_OB#_XW1_9UU_T&;[_OB#_XW6A10!G_`-G77_09OO\` MOB#_`.-T?V==?]!F^_[X@_\`C=:%9WV.X%Q/KS0 M`O\`9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"-T?V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=5X-/O8W822B2(QHNWS6!R MK2'KVSN0$CT/'2H)M+U-S;%+E8UC*EXQ(2&`+EDSCHP91STV]Z`+_P#9UU_T M&;[_`+X@_P#C=']G77_09OO^^(/_`(W186$EN\+SRF25+98G?>3O;C<2#_NC M'U-:%`&?_9UU_P!!F^_[X@_^-T?V==?]!F^_[X@_^-UH44`9_P#9UU_T&;[_ M`+X@_P#C=']G77_09OO^^(/_`(W6A10!FR:=>F-A'K=XKD':6CA(![9'EC/Y MBG?V==?]!F^_[X@_^-UH44`9_P#9UU_T&;[_`+X@_P#C=']G77_09OO^^(/_ M`(W6A10!G_V==?\`09OO^^(/_C=']G77_09OO^^(/_C=:%%`&?\`V==?]!F^ M_P"^(/\`XW1_9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"-UH5C?V;>>7,OF\L^Z,F0Y4DY.[@9Y`QT MX_.@"S_9UU_T&;[_`+X@_P#C=']G77_09OO^^(/_`(W47V*[^R-$S)(PDF=0 M96&=SDH">N`K'CV%4H=(U5+N.1[[,:[^8I&MWFS!R/+AR3QCGR_KV[CICE MW]G77_09OO\`OB#_`.-UH44`9_\`9UU_T&;[_OB#_P"-T?V==?\`09OO^^(/ M_C=:%%`&?_9UU_T&;[_OB#_XW1_9UU_T&;[_`+X@_P#C=:%%`&?_`&==?]!F M^_[X@_\`C=']G77_`$&;[_OB#_XW5F\B:>TEB0L"Z[G&"3^=`&C1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` G!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`'__9 ` end GRAPHIC 108 equity2.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 equity2.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`#(!;0,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`&NZQHSNP55&22<`#UH`R=.\5:+JM[]CL;Y9I\$A0K#( M'4@D8-%@-B@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@ M`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`Y_QLTR^# M]2,&[=Y8SMZ[=PW?IF@#R/0H(IKP%=3&G7T9#VTDJ_NV;T+?P_D1U_%L5SW> MW8F%5>1'E4!9"G3=WX[4ADF<4`9LVNV4$[PMYF]#@X0FO*J9MAZZWT. MJ.%J2BI+J26FKVM[,88=^\#=\RX_SUK7#9C1Q,^2%[^:(J8>=-7D3W5];V4> M^XD"`]!W/T%;XC%4L-'FJNQ$*4ZCM%&>/$=GG)BG5/[Y3BO-_MO#[M2MWL=' MU*IT:OZFG!(MB'[V1C_`#TJ*.-I5U-P^SN.=&4+)]2H M/$FGXX:3_OBN+^V\(M[_`'&_U*J21:]93OLC\QFP3C;Z#-:T\VPU27+&][7V M)GA:D%>1:L[^"_B,ENV5!P0>"*Z\-BJ6*ASTGE6OVF]N$ABSM!;J3Z` M#DGV%`'#^)OB*+>26PTF'=(!M>>52`I[@(1U'OW[&@#SO3]/NM5O8[*SB,D\ MAX'8#N3Z`>M-B1ZKX?T6-I/L\]C%87VE/&OVJR8#S\J"0Q*@G((R#Z\&D,[$ M\4`WD<-2C.DO>,BPC&JZQ/Y'\Z\3!P M6/QDZU751T2.VM+V%&,(==SH6C4H5(!4C&,<5],XQ:Y6M#S5H[HP(T_LKQ$L M,/$%R,[<\`\_U'ZU\W&*P&8JG#X)]/,]%OV^'IMM]QOH:]Z?PLX5N8WA?_D'2?\`74_R%>'D/^[R]6=V.^->@SPX M/^/T?]-!_6HR35UK_P`P\;IR>@[Q*BIID>U0/WHZ#V-5GD8QPRLNJ%@FW4=^ MQKQ(OEH=H!VCG%>U2A%1B[=#CDW=F'<*=#U07,8/V.*K/&U?2*\C M.O)4HJC'YFX!BO>.(*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`#-`!D9Q0`4`%`!0`4`%` M!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!YVRW?B+XDPET=K'3&WXQ\L9P2I^K$`_3'I0! MR.O:8]QKNL76F1OF^"-/CM/#%G,;**"ZG3=( MRIAG&3M)_#!_&@#8TS3+?2K7R+<.=S%W>1MSR,>K,>YH`N&@#`TZ6*+6]2,L MB("W&X@9Y-?-8*<(8ZOSM+7J>A6C)T80D>XP!7G9'"4<,VU:[9T8UIU++HB+PYUO?^N@_K6.1[UO\`$5C=H>@_Q/\` M\@R/_KJ/Y&M,]_W9?XE^3)P7\1^AL1?ZI/\`=%>U2^"/H<;W,_Q"!_8TWU7^ M8KR\Z_W*7R_,ZL'_`!D6M.&-.ML?\\E_E7=@U;#P]$85?XDO4M5U&84`(WW3 M0!QNC:_J*:##?W@N;J>Z,,<*2I'%&SN:!CYNX*8U!)Z#(.:`,N?Q7>/ITVH6<`5S9VTXBFD!1/,=@<87)/`[X]N.0# M73Q$_P#:?]FR6@6]^T+$467(V&/>9`<#(&".G4>]`$-Y?7__``F$5C#)<"U6 M&*1EABC89+L#O+<@8';F@"A;^,)XM,21;)[D167VR626=5;9O92.%P3\OH*` M-.?Q,(=6^QK;I)$69!*DA)#K&7(8;<#H1C<3[4`54\82?9?-FTTH\MO#<6Z+ M,&WB1PBAC@;3DCUX_*@">;6;BSO[E;A%26.WA;R3-F+<\C*`I";B3CT.>`!W M(`S3M;FU/6[#"M!&\%T)80#W/8=>10`LDNHQ>*I;8ZG*UJEM]K\ MKRH_[Y&S.W.,#KUH`=:^*)9X;>673O)6XLY+R,>=N^10A`/'&=_Z>]`$:>*9 MYF*1V,<3-:"XA\^5E\TF,.0N%PP&<'G/'2@!\VN7T'@>/6'BA6[DAC8]`$TEU>Z1);6C7#ZG>7KE8A*%A5-JDL);B2^\A= M.'EM=2VD/48Y^H MH`V:`"@`H`*`"@"..&*`,(HUC#,6;:,9)ZD^]`&!8:.EQHNH:'?6C1V8GE6/ M!P'C9MZE2.F,X_X#0!H:-_:$5N]IJ$>6MVV1W`(Q.F.&QV/8CUZ<4`:=`"&@ M"C+I%C-*TDENK.QR3D\FN">6X6I)SG!-LWCB*L5:+%ATFQ@E66.W577D')XH MIY=A:4E.$$F@EB*LERMEJ6"*>,QRQJZ'LPR*ZZE*%6/+-71E&3@[QT,Z3P_I MSJ=L)C8]U8\5Y=3)L)-64;>C.B.,K)WN5[>+4M)/E"/[7:_P[3AE_.L*%/&9 M?[B7/#\47.5*O[S?*S2:&&_@`N+8@?W9!R/RKU94J>+IVJP^3.93E2E[K*Z: M%IT;AA;`D=`6)'Y5R1RC!PE?D-7BJSTN:*J%4!0`!P`.U>HDDK(YMR&VLX+3 M?Y,83>PMS:P7<8CGC#H#D`^M.M0IUX\M5700 MG*F[Q=B8*%``'`K9))61!'<017,)BF0.AZ@UG6HPK0Y*BNBHS<'S1'1HL4:H M@VJHP!Z"KA%0BHQV0F[N['U0@H`0C(Q0!E1^&=(AM9+5+-1!(%!3>Q'!R,<\ M8/I0!!:^%=/@BEBFB69#!;-!$\'V=ER>8\D[?IDG\Z`#^P=,-V;HVB><6+9R M<9*[2<9P"0<'UH`5M"TUX1"UG&T8@6VVG)_=@Y"_@:`&GP_IAC*-:[LJJ[FD M8MA6++\VO(P!P?2@!\6B:?#<).M ML-\:>6FYF8*NT+@`G`X`%`$D&E65MI_]GQVZ_9,%?*W.>/:@"JOAK25 MM_(%I^[W!U!D?*$`@;3G*\$],=:`)#H&E^28?L40C,(M]HR!Y><[?SYH`@U# MPY:7]U!,RA`LYGE`SF1O+*#D'((&#D>E`#W\,Z/)%'$UA'Y<<8B502!M!R`0 M#SR2>>YS0!8_LJT4AXX$619FN$8Y.)6!!;K[F@"/1=(72+65-ZO+/,\\KJFP M%V/89.!T'7M0!I4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`8H`*`"@`H`* M`"@`H`*`"@`H`8VX*2O7M4R;2=AKS,G[1KN/^/*#_OO_`.O7C>VS3_GU'[_^ M"=G)AOYF36LVJM<*MU;11Q"4?)F52-%1]QNYIUZ9SA M0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4` M%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0 ?`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`?_V3\_ ` end GRAPHIC 109 equity3.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 equity3.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`#$`K0,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`#-`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`9H`*`"@`H`*`#/:@`H`*`#- M`!0`4`%`!0`4`'AO88I#YF&'G.8B%0=B!PQ/3(&.21F%E)8#_: M(S^=`%5;C4Q!*]K)+&CK=W*%HMQ;#KY8P1P"">.I'3%`$DU]J-O)=2V]O_K9 M_*51$?OM#&4%90D10EOE^XP&T9SU/S=^,8H` MDO;F]BNKFSD8W:JD;)^Z!`^9,[QM^]R2,'&`>`1D@$9OM1T^&=A-)`A&"*!R"2`"6*\9Z9H`KV M^I:K(]E"\+))<*JO^[XC>-CYN3TPP`"G\>:`)-#U*]F0OJ+I\P0;%5MT&_T2&XBN@D+E)49D9DE!&0K`8.#_A]*`*L.K7BI#";: M2WDD:U\N`Q%MD;;0X)QV^89/3B@"K';#YBN;'=%;>5A-X8YP`.H&#C MJ:`-6VN]2?1;F6/R[NY!(@VG[PXQN)"#()/3`P/6@#G62X2Q>.YBU!(T^U"+ M>Q9VFROEG*D\_?QVST[4`:5@MT->B,OF_;//D^TGYMGD[/DQVQG;C'?=[T`= M50`4`%`!0`4`9K:I*FJFR:R8*$\PS&1=H3.,XZT`+_;FF>29OM2[.F.<]\T`6(=1L[BY:WBF5I5W94=\'#8/0X/!QT/6@!M[?FVGAMH;=I M[B96944A0%7&22>@^8#\:`((]?T\PH\TOV=SNW1R?>3:VULXR``>_3WH`1K_ M`$^ZFF9TD9K";9S$QPY4'(`'/!]/7ZT`/FUJR53Y4\SAEB9ENI/+W#&$Z#)] MLD#\:`*,_B6UM7O(E@*I:/'%O9E1&W$KP2>`"I!^E`$\OB"VMDF^T*L;16JW M.WS%.\'=PISR?D_44`3:GJ\.EZ8;V2)W^7*QICS<`SE@I!`S_M_H:`+-O?K<:A=6GD21M;A#N;&'#9Y'M\IZT`7*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`H7.FPW=Q-)*6*RV[6[*.,J3S^-`$":+_I,=S/=O-,C1X.T*-J M!L#'K\Y)/\J`(KCP['<0RV[W3_9V\YHT"C*-*&#'/?&]L#W[\4`6)]($MR]P MD[)*98Y0=N0"H(QCOD$T`0#19;G2@!UQHIGFF<73*LLZSF,H"I(3801W&`#CU`//2@!L/AZ&"P:T$\A5H(8=Q M`SB/H?QH`E@T=8+N.4W#M##+)+%$5'RL^=V3W^\V/KWXH`EU'2XM2*>:[*%1 MTPO^TN/S'6@""WT=K)6:VNR)VC1&=T#;BK.Q8CCEC(Q-`$2>&K..VE@W,RR6 MHM@6525`+G<..#\YXZ<"@"QJ.BVNIV?DS-(&6)XED21E*AA@\`X/0=:`&/H- MLZ7"EF+321R;V^9EV!`!D\G[G?U-`%V.T6/4+B\#G=,B(5[#:6_^*_2@"S0` M4`%`!0`4`%`&:8`=:S^\V^5O^^VW=G'KCIVKSO9?[9UM:^[WN;\[]E;S,ZZD MO_\`A*;-GMKE;993'&5=?+9?*8EF&[/WL=1QMXZUZ)@4K@7$&G)"T[BW%_*L MLMP[D;0&*[B"#@MCN!T'M0!IRWD$_A^,7&RUD\F-FCG=E$989`9N#V/]:`,: MUN;M+C3#.)9?W4`CCE,@9R78.PYYP,'YLG;C.,DD`W[!OLMYJHFEE*&[4(9" M6^]&G`]!D]N*`,731//9W*>==!S8`W1WL&6XRV0/0]<@=MOM0!/(SQW6E3M- MYTSQ0)]E+.'ZGH]*XL?S?5Y]6]M]*$5I`\D MS,%/E.,HI/+`N1R!TYZX[5O0@Z<%%[F8:0H7GD!F2W7:P&[;MYQGVH`GB+2:7`T)=4@U"-4>!WV3*74%N221R1 MU(R">:`&ZS<.^J2"*67S$2);14+`-+YI\P8Z'Y=F<]B>V:`(5DO#+J GRAPHIC 110 equity4.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 equity4.gif M1TE&.#EAB0`:`/<``%]?7V!@8&1D9&5E96=G9VEI:6IJ:FMK:VUM;6YN;F]O M;W!P<')R'EY>7IZ>GM[>WQ\?'U]?7Y^?H"` M@(&!@8*"@H.#@X2$A(6%A8:&AH>'AXB(B(F)B8J*BHN+BXV-C8Z.CI"0D)&1 MD9*2DI.3DY24E)65E9:6EI>7EYB8F)F9F9J:FIN;FYRGI^?GZ"@ MH*&AH:*BHJ.CHZ2DI*6EI::FIJ>GIZBHJ*FIJ:JJJJNKJZRLK*VMK:ZNKJ^O MK["PL+&QL;*RLK.SL[2TM+6UM;:VMK>WM[BXN+FYN;JZNKN[N[R\O+V]O;Z^ MOK^_O\#`P,'!P<+"PL/#P\3$Q,7%Q<;&QL?'Q\C(R,G)RWM_?W^#@X.'AX>+BXN/CX^3DY.7EY>;FYN?GY^CHZ.GIZ>KJZNOK MZ^SL[.WM[>[N[N_O[_#P\/'Q\?+R\O/S\_3T]/7U]?;V]O?W]_CX^/GY^?KZ M^OO[^_S\_/W]_?[^_O___P`````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M`````````````````````"'Y!```````+`````")`!H```C^`"T)'$BPH,&# M"!,J7,BPH<.'$"-*G$BQHL6+&#-JW,BQH\>/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRI1(@BLU[22C M5BTQE504$B5)D8:^K43U<*6]8"4A%BNQR0(C,>A0'OA(,%.!68`:<4.0D:4Z M!(S@.,-HBT%%!1L1I`2)!C%X4A4IXX&:H MCP42)DST^4,?2@C.P9$$#1U(431I2LT<8002A"5A8O;+$(&)8P`L4,3XC5`1H"R:"%0'"@H<,< M;CP%R1.6T`%$$73`@,`3B5A"F"!#Q-"')6'<@(0A(:IA1`^(3+&#?M8]],0& M4Q01"2$->!$'`%,XL@!93RA'`1QW<'#$(#(D80D1/_@!`11&U-%'`99<(8`9 M7F3`""%8$')#$)94L,(<,>1@"0\EM,&'(`E8TH@7@)00A24S0:QR6E#`SQ@"0XF`.*$RQN09@D-4P@DA!,"K>"%)8)`(DE-5`0);(RA""((R(''`5;<#`;^(0O(20%I*O@@ MVQ,)7&$)'`@,U,A@"2R0``>$L(0:Q&")04!!*4M8 M1(\:TISEF(8I&$O(9RCA""78P!*WCA"+6*Q"%L&T#2TJ&@A9=JA$SQ2E;0.) M1-MJB!2#A"4H3*G$<3[SEN4(1B"'<4X2)V*5O3SF+Y;@@OSX(A6U2+$24&A! M()!"EDO]I3%0@<11").4HS!E$H^`BUBBLIPE2N4H@DD+520CB;!`QC&48(14 M5N67JHP%+HFLBA`7^1A62>2*H'R.;8HB1.M<42"F7,ZE5`E*5([2E GRAPHIC 111 exhibit99-60x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-60x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`/;`M0#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHK.UC5X])BB)MKBYEF8I'%;IN9B`3T].*`-&BN;_X2>\\ ML2?\(YJ>""<;.>N.G7O47_"RWQ8H;-8CYBD=<_D??CD"@#J:*Y_ M^W]2WX_X1R]V8Z[USGZ?_7K1TG4QJEN\AM+JT=&VM'&U5%QJD*^?]I'+M*!G&[TS_G/-4]3AUY=5T1M:FM'M_MR!3`6P M'SP".,YP<'!QSTSSW5`&-X3UO&W`QMQ_2MG0M4UD^)KG2=7-LWE6_FAH5(!Y7H3_ M`+Q[=J`.HHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ M`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHJCJ5^ M]F$CMK5[NZE#&.%&"Y`ZDL>`!D#ZD4`7JY>X('Q)MK^'++5[F.ZE>XANHU"K-!(58#GCN.Y[4`'BG3)-5 MT.:"W&;E2)(#G!#@]CV)&1GWK)_X3:T.@I*I=]2<>2+=5!?S<=]2MX#TEERTUZT^0?M!F_>#GN/F7_/X4Q?"%TL MZ_\`%1ZI]F!/[L2D-C'`#9QP?;\NM:>D^';#2;AKFW$KW+IL::60LS#CKV[# MM0!K453TZ:>=)VN-ORSR)&`A7Y`V!GDYZ=1^AS5R@`HJ.`2K;QB=E>4*`[*, M`MCD@?6B">&YA6:WECFB;[KQL&4]N"*`)***:\B1J&D=4!(7+'').`/Q)`H` M=116)#RO'=6"JX423E6! MS\P\ISC\P#^%+=:I864RPW5W#%(XW!'<`XYYQZ<'GIP:`+=%4-+NFN6OD;=_ MH]TT0).XJ9-,O9GC.HZEYZ1 M2+*J10"(%EZ;LELC.#CCD`]JNBRC&I/?!G\UX5A(R-N`2?S^8T`4+U[:^NWM MQI::@T+JLK2!-D?&^'=,61W5S>E'*R88(LCC:#D9X M&WKG&>IX.N=+ECU%[FTO9+>*8[IX0BL';``921\IX&>N?8\T6VC6]K8PVD3R M&*";SD#[6(.XMCD=,D\]??/-`$$VGV5AJ6F265I!;/).T;F&,)N7RI&P<=>5 M!_"H-)T^"^GU*ZU"%+B=KJ2(&5`=D:-\B@=AT/'7.>:VIK=)I8)'SN@D,B8/ M?:R\_@QJM+I:->R74-S<6[S+ME$17$F!@$@@X('<8Z"@#GK)%L-,U2:-WF33 MM4:5/F+%4`7>HR>2%9QR>O7O6^C&[U>1T"^5;0^6LJN"=[X8C'LH0Y/]ZGZ; MI-IIEO-!:HWES2-(X=B^20`>3]*?IVGPZ;:BWMRY0'/SL6/YF@#FH9[E](\- MP06L=W$\6YDD;8K,B#:I)!']YL8YV9&`#6C;V-Y<7\C7&G06=M+;/#*L<_F! MR2,';M`R!N'OGV%:!TBU.FPV`\U8H,>6RR%73'0AAS4MK9FW>O7WH`PTW:GI>GZ1>2%YFWI='[QQ%\I.3D9W[#SUS5B*:+5?[.MY M"YD@F=Y5/&6A^4DG/3>RGW_.M2WL(+:]NKN(,);HJ9.>,J,#`[<4D.FVT&I7 M-_&A%QVL^IVT-W M:10KRS2M(S`9P,L3CKVJ&70;"2=Y2DJ!SN>..9TC<^Z@XZ\] M.<;=N!TP?>M9H(F,1,:_N3NCX^Z<$:19WLHEE1U?&UFBE: M,N/1BI&1]>GYT`4/"Z01C54M=@A%^X4(WMVK=J"UM+:RC,=K!'"A. MXK&H`S_D`?@*GH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BFM(B,B MNZJ7.U03C<<$X'KP"?PI68*I9B``,DGM0`M%5AJ%DUW]D6\MSE6-PW!Z>U2X MB:X0;FB#@NHXY(ZCJ/SH`FHJHVJ:>MS]F:_M1<;@OE&9=^3T&,YS23ZMIULX M2XU"UB<@,%>95)!Z'DT`7**@M;VUO59K2YAN%4X)BD#`'\*;=7]K9-&MS.D; M2DA%)Y;'7`ZG%`%FBJC:G8KIXOS=1_9#_P`M@.&"^A M>27[B@_>Z]/R-`&C114:31R0+-&P>-EWJR\[AC((QUH`DHJG;:K97EM)<6UP M)H8SAG0$@&FR:O817$5N]RHFF4/''@[F!Z$#'L:`+U%4QJEDUE->)<*\$&[S M60%MF.H('.14,>NZ?-;03PR2RQSAC'Y=O(Y8*<,2X6X+V\;;6F2-F0'C^(#&.>O M2@#0HK.NM;TZT>T2:XP;S'V?:C,),XQ@@$=Q^=36NI6EY<3V\$I,T!`DC=&1 MEST."`<>_2@"W1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`J4.@:=!+?LD`V7X`FB_@.,\@=L[C0!@ZENM/A M_#J$,DBWJPPS?:-QWEF*YR>_WCP:?XAY\%3ZH`\=W<102LVXY0DH"!Z?ACJ: MV1H-M_9T6GR2S26<9!\EBN&`.0I(&2`<=^PSGFIM6TJ'5=->PF>2*!\`B+`. M`00.0?04`9'C&WCLO#6HW-KNAD<1#Y&(`Q(.0.Q^8YQUK/NKYY9/"VGKYT%O MF.H]*B?0 M;*6SLK>4.YL0OV>8G#H1C!R!CL.V.!0!-_8]@I3R[6*-%5E,:*`C*W4%>A_+ M^=);C3HBQ\UOM31H6!4KC!ZC&3V[5V-O:21!O,O;B=CT:38-OX M*H!_$&JMKH5M9Z<9_6@"MXSN[FR\,W.X4`/N+*"VX=SDY](_#UVUE')= MSV3N\6`H9_+)`.>@!]>E=780+:Z>#!"JLZB0QJ`@W%1G@<#)_4TVXTJ"XU.# M4':3[1;@B(@C"@C!XQSGWJ_0!Q_@)AJFG7E[?A+BZ>Y*L[J"=H52!CL,D]/6 MH_$]A%IS:%%9Q*Y&H`HKG&=SEMN<<#)QWX]:Z6/2;:"YGGMC)`]R=TPC;ASZ MX/`/N,&B\TBUOI;1[CS6^R,'B'F'AAT)/4GZF@#GXVN&^(T)NK>*"3[">(I" MX8;CSDJOTZ=JK>(-86/7+;4+>XN#%87'DSQB%]@3.'?.,'GY>O4"NL;2[1M2 M&HM&QNU0QB3S&X7GC&<=_2EDTZUETYK"1'>V9=A5I&)(]-V<_K0!C>)-(@UV M^M(&?:WV6>2&53]UPT6T^XY/Y_C6)9ZEJ5Q_;)G3;J-GIWD.0,996<[A[X.? MKTKL[?3+2V:V:%'4VT9BBS*YVH<9')YZ#KZ#TJ5;2!;U[Q8P)W01L^3RH)(X MZ=Z`.?T:XL-.\"6UQ=1@VOE@RA5W9);&2._)JMXC9_[:\,-9(A;,AC25B!C" M<$C)Z?6MY]"TU[1[0VY^RNVXPB1PF<#BI+K2+&[GMIIHF,EK_J2L MK+LZ=,$>@H`;HJ;=.MY)D"7DL$;W&5VNS[0,L/7@C\*Q=&^T'QWK)O-AD$2" M+;G`CXQC/X9QQG-=#;64%K+++$)#)+C>TDK.2!G`&XG`&3P..:6:QMYYO.>/ M$VW9YJ,4?;G.W<,'&>U`'&Q_:!<^,A'L%EY,A(Y_UA0].WKGO]VMKPY!<2V= MFUVDHQ\H.#ZX]:P_ M!%V\45UHET)4N;"0[1)U,9/'^>F",5TCVT+W,=RR9EC!5&R?E!Z_G_05%'IM MG'?/?)`!=.,-+D[F'H?;@<>PH`YSPD"-#UL$8(O)^/\`@*U-XD4?\)7X;;`R M9)03^"UMKI-@EP\ZVD2R2.)'(&`SCD,1T)!).?7FBYTFPN[I+JXMDDN(\;)# MGHQTYR:([*UAMFMHK:%+=@0T2Q@(0 M>O'3F@#`\'1F3P/:J@R^R79['>X_K5+1G2+X9W4;D1O'!<1R!OE*OEN#GOR* MZRULK6R5EM+:&W5CDB*,*"?PICZ;8270NI+*V>X!#>:T2E\CH?3P M3VUKX*CG8"3SBP+VF,,T4+2 M(X`."HST((YQBK]5-5MI+S2KRUB*B2>%XU+'`!*D<_G0!D?VK+IFJK:W5\+R MU-L]Q),8QOCVX_N#&WOTSSU-:MQJMG;`F5W`$!NPU-I8'V6>R.RDMROFMD,VWG.WD?( M!T&.3STH`F@\0V-S"LD`G/:J1TJZ;3-,L9$@=+:(+*ZS/&ZNJ@*T;`?[V<^M-DTS4Q-YRO M;3326"VLKR,5PXW'>`%.02W3B@"Z-:LS$DVYA$T4]F`B9 M1AB!CYL]CP1Z&K0T>\-]K-RQ@`OQ#Y:AR=NP8.?E[T`:-EJ#76HWUJ;=HQ:N MJ;RP.[*AL^W7_P#5TJ$:QMU#4()K=XX;*))#+D'((8YP#G^'CO4MI93V^K7] MP6C,-TR..3N!"!<8Z=@HK'O;Z\TW79I%/FZ:D,3W", MQ+1%W<;U]AMR1Z5H6ME<-J"W]Z8A,D!@"PD[3ELEN>><+@=N>34BVDG]JW%R M_EF&:!(MIY/REC],'>?RH`I:H7AL]5N8;F8E;0S1$2<(=K?=QVRH/.>I[<5K M*&C@`7<[*O&\\DX[FLG^PVAT_4;.WFS%=(8X5?I`I!&!Z@$D@>^*TUCE2Q$2 M,BS+'M5BN5#8ZXXXS]*`,?0)IY+V9+^6\BOA&&DM9F0QYAU!+B5IFMKZ6!7?&64$8S@`=^PJW9VEU]H6ZU":&2=$:-!!&415)! M/4DDG:OY4RQTTQ+J*7*0-%>S-(4C4@890I!'J<9)[DGI0`W793)H%]-:7;1M M%"[B2%AG*KG&>?\`&F:K>.FKZ3IZ.Z+=O(9"O!*HA.,]1R1T]*DFT:W31[K3 MM/2*S2Y5E)";@-PP3C(YQ[U)>6,ERMK*)D2\MFWI)Y9*$E2K97=G!!/?(XY] M0"AIK_VI;3)<7=R$L+B:WD(?RS(5/RL64@\+C.,`DGCI5S1GN8="ADU"5Y)5 M1F+L,,5R2N1@<[<9[YJ!]'NH[=(K*]AM]SM+<$VV[SY&.23\PX]N>,#H*T;: M&9;7RKR=;F1LAF$>P$'MC)[>]`'.Z[>W,G@274TDEM[B58Y5,Q$2B..ZW)F7OC?\RKC&3C'7T--N-'EU#PZ^A^8]LL3+ M$)9$\S?&IRA!!`S@+GTP1CH:UKRTDN].-N\P28A3YB)QO!!SM)/&1T)Z<9H` MR&\4H+"2=+999(KE('6*8,AW=&5\WB6W$K*LY M=ADD#G;@\KTXQG.3TILOALR&Z'VPE+JZBN'WQ`L-F,@$8P21UQP.,'K6D;#_ M`(G']H+,P)@\EX\##`,2#GMU;Z\=,<@&9XGO";"]M8;CR6CM7ED=7"MT.U1D M,QB4QJ70'/W20<8 MSD>]3QVPBE0QR,D*1^6MNH41CT(XSG''7&.U`&?H&?-U92[L%OV"[F+8&Q#C MGMS3/#I\ZUOXY=SJE].G[P[L@/QUS^M7[*P2R>Y=))'-S*9F#XX;`'&`.P%1 MVEBFE0WCQ-<7'FR/<&,E2=QY(7IU]#0`:1=-<17$3[C):W#P,S<[@.5.?]UE MS[YJ_5/3;06L,C,I66XE:>7+;OF;MGV``_"KE`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%8=OK%P/%,^DW7DF/RQ)`Z(5))R=IR2"< M`GM]TT`;E%9;ZC+)XACTZ`((TA:29V0MD@I\@.1@X<$]>"*FDU>Q2.X9;F-S M!$TS*K9.Q<@D>H!!''?B@"]161;7.I7-M;W\;6WV:8))Y'E-O$;8/WMV"P!S MC;[>]7FO[5+CR&G19,D8)QR%W$9]=O./3F@"S167_P`)'HN[;_:EIG_KJ,=< M=?\`/KTJ>+5M/GMC<0W<1^=`%VBJ4>JV$LR0I3]F!D5F`&_;MSD#]!R:`-6BJ MAU*T$\<)E.Z1VC0[#M+#.5W8QG@\9['TJ+^V;$C(E?!C,JGR7^=!U*\?-V/& M>"#T-`&A166GB'2W4L+A@H@-P"T+@-&.21D9;?SED@4.$4AMKG/!4E< M<9XYZU6;FXGBU'2WU"WM=[238=02T2>66P#Z\8/8XZ>@!O45D6M_=S6JZ MFQMVL)+6B-YJ<`@9R0QQG(P,'UJJ-0U[[->2M91(J6_G0.P7!8X=]4-K%C8" MJ[`P`W%1DCCD]2.#T+KF^UQ$T]'$5K)I&>W7M5J:^N(M82VF\VWCDE`BUEME7:.A4J/Z4`7Z*Y^74[J2UUFYCE,3:=*P6(A2 M'1$5N>_S?-@YXXXX(HN=2NOL.L7L".^:GBO\`4+\79@F2SGMI M]I@E(?:.,;EVAB&Y(P1UX-`'0T5S%A<:G=Q:K(-3"207SVT"R",1XW+M!(7. MXYP.O)'!K9TJZ:ZBF\Q9HY(I/+>.8+N0[5.,KP1@@Y]Z`+U%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%W6I:AH?`/M[5TE%`'-ZC%*NDNJPV6GZF\HEM(X9%)9Q@9Y`!)R5 M/&,$5O6UNEO;+"H7`'.%QN)Y)Q[G)/UJO>211ZEIXDM%D>1W2.*5E/!8A!QW/*GMW%:.F:A#JFGPWMMN\J494-U'."#^( MJW0!B6NGW5OJ+H]I92VWGO/'BDXSR*Z&B@#`LM(O(+W1Y'$&RRLS;RE9"23@#(&WI\HZG MO[V/47PDP\D8VB.$D[XQCU#'Z[$Z8&.FJO>7MM8QK)=3+$KNL:E MN[$X`'^?4T`49["[CU6:ZL1;LEW$L,X'(R344>BRV1 MVV,BO'+;1VL@F;!4("`XP.3@GCC/J*US/"LZP-*@E8%EC+#<0.I`H$\)D,8E M0N#M*[AD'`.,?0@_0B@#GY?#UU;6DUIIDD`AN;/R)C/NSO5-JL,<7O"X'3&<9_K44.K64S7H%Q&HLI-DS,X`4X!SUX'4<] MU/I5J">&YA6:WECFB;[KQL&4]N"*`*=C975I9VMH+F(Q6\<:;A$0S!1C^]QG M`]>IJ#3M)N-.6^$-Y&3=W,EQDP'Y"V./OM&BB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"H+VTBOK.6UN%+12J58`XXJ>J&N3R6NB7MQ#+Y,L4+NCX!PP&1U!'7B@" MW/"EQ!)#*"8Y%*,`2,@C!Y'-1R65O)+;2NA+VI)B.\_+D8/?GCUK,M-0DNM: M5+&[%[8B(^E3C7;4R(/+E$,LAAAG(79+("1L'.9W"CT`8 MG`^GH*KV.L1WT'F16TZG[0;=HV*;E8?>R`QQCGWXX!R,NM]32[N5MQ;W,7FQ MR/'(X"A@K!21SG^($9'(-`$RZ=9)##"MK"(H)/-B0(-J-R<@=CR:B;1K!I7D M,+`O*)BJRN%W@@AMH.`<@'..>]1>'IIKSP[9RSRLTLL(+2=\^M0!';Q!/9?: M;@0BS21<2G*L68$_H.O%`%Y])L9!#P.1CI4GV"UVQ M`Q9\J3S%)8DA_P"]GJ3R>M9ZZZ\ES>11:;=.EHSJ\I*!2RKN`'/?],C.,\33 MZPEL2TMO((OL;W8=2#D+C!R:S;G6KC[-#+;VZ;9;B&)9#+N5P[+DJ0.>I' ML?6M>:'SM@,DB!6W$(VW=P1@GKCG/'H*`(+C2[&Y:4SVL4GG8\P,O#XX!([D M=CU%/-C;-,LQB!=7#C).`P7;G'3..,U4TPYLWN)II3Y5Q<`DN2-JR.H!'?`` M_*GIJ9\VTCEA\MKQ&:$%L\A=VUL#@XSZC@^V0"Q#86EO.TT-O&DC9RP'/)R< M>F3R?6B*PM859(H$2-N3&!A,^NWIG\*HQ^(+5I=-23$?]H!PA+?==<`H??)Q M]1CTHFUPJ)5@M))Y8HDF>-`22&S@#`.3A3QQVY-`%]K*U>5Y6@C+N5+G'WRN M-I/J1@8)Z8H>QM9)FE>WC,CXWG;]_'3=ZX[9Z54MM4FNM2EM8[)A'`R++(T@ M!7=&7'R^WR@_[WL:T)HQ-"\19U#J5W(VUAGN".AH`S[?2D74=1N;A8I5NG0H MI7)`"*ISGW!X^GX6I-/LYKM+N6UA>XC&%E9`67Z&L73D:X\1Z]:RW%T88A`( MU%PXV;D)..>*MMKR_8YKY80;."",KZ_>%`&O1 M7.7VLZA##=A8[:.3[$UY`G-TW]U)>?8+7R3P!K45EV^O6+K:+/*MMTL49?M312N9[A2WRI)L7(! M&200=;81W3-$ZH&R&"NVX$]CL^[CC/4U76^N[>TLQ`EFDMS?S6 M\K")@I8-)\X7=U.S)!/.>M`'0,Z)C>RKN.!DXR?2G5RS:K/=6]NTL=I,]KJH MM)O,@."P7QS]_/('3 M!`Z\T`;M(S!5+,0`!DD]JY6'6M4DEDE:6V$,.J_8&C$!RZE@-V[=P>?2K_B1 MSYVE6[D?9;B[$T@D=&[XVDD?3BLV\N]5LM&N[XW5K-&MLLD3QC.7[GIC:1C'7Z]Z`.AHKE] M>NM6@TW5XHKD--#;0S(\*;"H9F$F.3QA"0>H]21FK$MSJ2ZS>K%]U'2$5G13>E2Z$QER$ZJPP2.@R/I M4%E<6\=I]EDNU\N._N(AYTI8*!N"@C.6/3`R/7J!76//#'-'"\L:RRY\M&8! MGQR<#OBDN+F"TB,MS/'#&#@O(X4?F:`.,LHH]3;0;:XO)R[6DJS(ERRD,I7& M0#P8T^A_(UUMK>VMZK-:7,-PJG! M,4@8`_A4]`'+MIMLYTZ`37TL`NI(PTL[*3'Y;DX*D$KO``)Y]R",EN\G]H/; MS2W:ZA%Q7457N[VULE5KNYAMU8X4RN%!/XT M`Q%/H`Y>%+S3]4U*RMWB:6^ M@:YBD1-JQW&,$%26'/#<^_6H$"7VF-)I]M>1:DEO&EPA#ID*ZEE);`9CAQGO MDY/-=?10!SJRV;VT][8VMRD+RQ/GI0!SL MP\V;59397)B>]M)DW6KY91LW$#&>`K9X_G5;4;-OMFI-;V5Q);I<6LJQ&W?8 M2K;9-@V\\!HKM:@MKN"[\W[/*LGDR&*3'\+CJ/UH`Y>\\Q+Z\9=,O8V M2ZMIOW4&]71"@)#>H7(VKSUZC.&W*1[KF:'3;E"NK0S`+9N&*`)N887D91SQ M_49[&F2R)#$\LKA(T4LS,<``=2:`.;V21R:I%+%>PDWPG2>&`O@%%VD#!W<@ M@@#COBM;0DF330)X1$QDD=0%*E@SE@Q4D[2],[\TB[M;;RQ+/$T8,C$*,C!)(![$]JNU%;(!\J;MNX_7M0!1BTZ9 M;Z/4%>.WN'CV7,2`M'+Z'M\P_O$=.*K6&B36=E#IOFQFRMYQ,C`'>P#[PI'0 M8;'S9Y`Q@5,NI7^^ZB-A!)-`(\+#<[@68XP24&W`PQ]B*EL+^XGU"YL[FWAB M>!$PXQ8.H;-0GMYD1(XHXW\S?RV M]F4#&.N5]>K2ED5=PS\V!SMSCC&<4`&D6)TW2[>R,O MF^2FW?MVY_#)IBV$JZX^H>>GEO`L/E>6<@`DYW9]2>U6'O;6.38]S"K[UCVM M(`=Y&0N/4CD"F76I6%G(([N]MH'(W!9954D>N"?:@"&TTUH#J`>8.EY*9,*F MTIE0I&2!62$#`;;AL$GD;!UR#Z"I=:U(:3ILEV MR;@I5?8$D`$^V33/M\EC!--JDD`MHD5Q=1@JK9)XVY)!'R]SG=Q0!%)H,)BD M$3)!(]PEQF*/";T((.W/?'.",_7KKUG1ZYICA!]NMP[JK;/-!(W8QG_OH?G5 MB*_M)KI[6*YB>=`6:-6R0`<'\CQ]:`&6UB(;.6VD<2)*\C-\N/OL6(_-C3(M M.`DM'GE\TV:D1';M.2NW<<'!.,]@.3QTPLVK6,,)IMG=%[0L+W M[+>IY;?)\^T[<,<$#G!SG(/'0ZAO3'>WKS2)'8VL:!F8CB3EFSSD84IV[T`. MM=.^RW%[,D[EKHJ>1G854*#[\`=:L6BS):Q+^I[^PJ(:1;JDL*LPMYI#+)"0K*Q)!(Y!X)S MD>_:M"N>T?5+C5$C:*Z5;F*4B\M'C`,8W$8'?CUR3?PR%Y8 MKYV>5'(P"0`<8`(X`I)M(AN(9DGGGD:6W-MYC,-RH>N.,9/&3CG`]*>^KV,< M32O/M19_L[$HWRR>A&..HYZ095*9=1TW`KMR#R M"`/RXJ9M6L48J\^W#B,DJ0JN>0I.,`\C@^M/OQ+]GS'=+:HIW2S$`E4`))&> M`>G)!&,T`300I;P1PQYV1J%&3DX'J>]56TQ&AN(C<7`2X-IU@D=S%+-=7)B%PH&&C&]MPXQN*)Z8R?2F3ZM-#<)8;BTKWPMQ,0.%V+( M3CIG#;?U[<@%^32+5I+62$-;R6B[(FB(&%/52#D$<=Q],&@Z1:F\M;KYA):E MVCP0!N?[Y(QR3FLU-6O)KB6QB=1*NH"V$I49$>S>3Z;L*P'&.GO6II\\LDEY M#*V\VT_EA^,L"BN,X_W\?A0`JZ=$JVJAY,6KF1.1U((YX]&8?C4:Z1;@1`O* MPBN&N5RP^^YK0HH`RAH%FN=K3`-=_;"`_!ER#D^W'3I5DZ;;F0L M0VTRB8Q[L+Y@QAL?@#CIGG&>:N44`98T&S$4D8,H$MU]K;#X/F9SG/;D#\JO MW-O%=V[P7"!XW'(/Z$'L0>01R#4M%`%.UTVWM0P7SI=PQ^_F>7`]!N)P/IUP M,YJ"/0-,BTZ2P2W(MI?O+YKY(XXW9R!QTSC\ZTZ*`*)TBS9IRZRN9X!;R;YY M&W)C&.3[GGKR3GDTMKI5G9W37,$;K*T:Q$F5V!5>G!./QZ\GU-7:*`*-EI-C MI\TDUK;B-Y,Y.XD#)R0H)PH)[#`X'H*O444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%8^I@+K^C.%7>TDJ%MHSM\MCC/U`K8JO/9P7$]O/*A,ENQ:,AB-I M(P>AYX]:`.>U27?'XF:60AK:.,1,O!3"!UQ_P,DYZ^_`QIZR3+X4O6E4%FLG M8@COL)_G5RXTZUNI6DGBWEU"."QVNH)(!&<$9)Z^IJ2ZMHKRVDMYU+12*5=0 MQ7(/!&10!S]U'ZO;6&WC3S($:VE\S?2I[34;ZZF M54EA=9A.BR(G[L.API4DY/OQC(.#CKJG3[=IXYG61WB.4WRLP4^N"<9Y//7F MJJZ):6L>ZPA$-98$=;V-<967= MA1[#AC^78TS58KC^UC3WJ:>SAGE660/YBJ55ED92`>HX(]!^0]!0!S MD%ZUQ?>&TM4>RMY3<-+;$!=C(""N",X!+#'IS@8X/[:U1-+MKMFMW:YNS:JI M4H%^=@&)YP?EQT(Y!['/1-8VSO!(T0,ENQ:)R3N4GKSUY[^M1MI-@]H]HUK& MUN[[VC(R"V1Z4S5 M)KAUDCEN6*Q:O;QJ0%&$(B;!XYP6)K8ET32YYY)YM.MI99""S/$&)(^M/_LK M3]EPALH"MRVZ8&,'S#G.6]>>:`,>#5+J?4[Q'OH8;:UE4*`N^2484XVXYW`M M@JMOQ!"]S-I=L7V6\EV#*P`/W5+J.>Q*BKQTVQ,\$_V2#S8%V1,$&47 ML!Z`?I4\\$-S"T-Q%'-$WWDD4,I[\@T`8"75U<7Z)=+F&TU+8LI7&]3$X&>Q M.YE''M4%P'DU&*XB_P"/4:SR<8`(B$>?;YPR^Y(ZY%=&ME:K:?9%MH1;8(\D M1C9@\GY>E/\`(A^S_9_*C\C9L\O:-NW&,8Z8QQB@#*T-6_M'67`(A:[&WT)" M*&QSZ_R_`;-,BBC@B6*&-(XU&%1```/8"GT`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%,ED6)"[D@9`X!/4X'`H`IZ1$1;R7+QR1R MWY&)[ES,PV[2H/W01@XIXU2S+ M;1(W^M$)/EMA7.,*3C`/(Z^H]15R@#G+RV:\\2RR6YNK>YAMT$%P87\K<#)N M4Y&U@0X_7!S4GHH`Y'4-+: M]_X218K25)G:)X)5BVEV5%/RL<9^93G'K[U+J,_E7UW%)!>M:37,1FJ=AHDWE0PW$%Q'<6Z/&M MX;QF4`H5W1KN.UN1Q@`B0 MQMIUROFA6&62X*[-R^F%YSP-X>\CS%EOR5F=I#E7D#!RIZ?+D;0 M/[N!6Q10!A+927E@XO=(CM6:17*6LX#DJ.'W#;R#C'/:I+>UU&*\L9Y1%-L6 M>.1LA&"NZLK$`8+83G&!D\58.LVZZZ-(D22.X>+S8V;;MD'M@YSP>H'0TZZU M:VM=2M-/8L]S=9V(F#M`!.YN>!P?R/I0!/8S37%JLEQ$L4I+`HC[P,,0,'`S MP,]*R)M,GO9-/N+BSBBU&"5'ENH7P-H^\`?O$$<8/`W'DXYOKJ3R:G]DCL+D MQ*Q5KD@",$+GCG)YXZ=:BM=9^U6]_+';L39SO;[-W,CKV'UR`/Z4`9=[I.JR M/=Q0P6[12WZ7:R-<%3@!>,!3_=ZY[]#5U[.]EAU%C`JR27L=Q"AD&'">7@$] MB?+].,]ZV(7>2%'EC,3LH+(2"5/ID<57M[]9]2O+(1.K6HC)1['!YSC]:CBOGN3/]EMRZ0.8RSML#L.NW@YPXXJQ0!B1Z- M-&)+I6C6^>Y^U8R3&#M*;,XSC:2-V.ISCC%:%A;R0B:2?8)KB3S9`A)4':%` M!(&>%'.!5NB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ M`HHHH`****`"BBB@`K#\1).((=E[<1K/>0QE8V";59@I`(&?4]>];E9^KV,U M_';)#)''Y5S',Q=2.SWW-V\FYXPQ!9$4*#EB1GDCKD_-Z M#B%->BFAMGM[2YG:X9U"($RC)]X-E@!W[XX]QF:^L)IKN"\LYT@N8@T9,D>] M71L94C(/4`@@]O>H8-(EMFM6ANDW)+)+.7B)\UG.6QAAM[XZ]NN.0!SZTB3, M6MY!:)-]G:X)&/,R!P/[N206[$8Q4$7B..6=U%I.L,=Y]B:5BN!)T'`.<9(' MXCWP]M$=VF@EN8Y-.EG\]K9X(G(7<,@AAP0>W0^H%4FT&4RW4BWNTR7(NH/W(/E28"D MGGY@0,=NI_"26QOH8C-!.&OIIH_.E2%0IC!^[ACPH!/..TMX MV9/MEPL#.IPRJ58D@]CA<9[9S5&_QH%SI\MH9WCNKI;:6*2=W!WYPP+$X((_ M')SV(U[VSCO8E1RR,CB2.1,;D8=",@C_`!!(J*"RF:6*:_N%GDA8F,1Q^6BD MC&<9))P6YSCGI0!GP:]=R&'SM-6$32R6ZL;@$&9=_'"YVG81NQG/;');I^KZ MG/IB7$EK9[I)GC#&X*(H#./F^0X^Z`.N<]NE7(=&5;:VCGN9))(+EKK>JA0S ML6)&.?E^<\=?>DMM$2V*!+NXV12M+$F$(0MNW?P\_?//T'KD`HKXBO+J#3&L M-.222_BDD"R3%!'MQG/R\CD?7]:D_M5K*.[/V*..ZDU!+=8S.=KNZIAB<7EG<0^7-:E2&7.V1&!VL,CV((YP1U-0>)X# M@M4AGEGWO)+*%5F?'1,Y5@PZ@]P*`,:SOY=3TC^S[N1HM0,C6EP8Q@@@99QQQE>0<8R1 M3#9W5]X5TG[,J38ACDEB>9XC+^[_`+R\YR<\\'O6P=+MA?7%]$IBNYXQ&TR8 MW`#TR",].W84VUTTVMK:V\=[<^7;IL&=GSKC`!^7M@8(P?>@#.N%MKWPO8$V MH6)IK;]S*-^W,J!@2>O4@D]([-((_L0L[0/,.`;H.,* M,+P54Y.2>IZ=ZV9=)BGM)[:>>XECF7:P>3/'M2S:5;S?9&=I/-LR3#*"`RY& M".F",=O:@#GK:7R_$;PSH);5[YFAO5CY67',3'';.`>>!M_W>PJG'IL$^:`.:@O=1_X1_3K][^:5KV:&.=B(U6%"^"5PHP>V??VJU/-?6\ M\]J+V800W-HD,A`+,'WAM((X),[XTC`5LC!R M!P>.*;_9MCY,4/V*V\J%MT:>4NU#UR!C@T`4O[P@YRW'///-2-:6SW273V\37"#:LI0%U'/`/4=3^= M`"QW$,LDD<4T;O$<2*K`E#Z$=JR-"1[34=5M[MLW$UTT\;$_?B(&T`GKMP01 MV^F*UH[6&*XFN$C42S[?,8``M@8&?7'O3IH(9]GG11R>6X=-Z@[6'0C/0^]` M'(S)-`+B[2X>VANM7B,3QOMWKD*Q]"#SUX.,\C%375O$]K=P2WEQ+'9ZI!L+ MW+;D5C%D%LYP"S8)Y&.O%=910!Q]QJ$2WINH+UT,.H1P$2S$GRSL5OE.!LQR M"=W][(/2%H@GAC6KI+VZ9XY9XD8W3L`HD&,<]>!SWRW* MVLJ+?6<4-Q!CEMP:3@CT(XZ]^GJR[1WU71KQX-DLUPS,`NXJFQ@H;Z9Y[`L< M9[]+10!S\B6LFL0SZ0X2\\XI=!`0I13\^\8QN]#U.1R163IT5W;-K&HV[&1K M>^N)19R#Y94.TEE.,AL#@\CC&.37;44`5[*[BO;9)X2<,`=K##+[$=C6?9'; MXIU,$'YX("#C@XW9_P#0A^=;%%`&)IDL=K9W.GW@>!H7D&[!C$B,S,&0@\G! MYQR#61-92R:9X?MKYKM1(QDGNI)&\^"382N&_A&21SZ#O7944`4=%DFDTFW: MXC$;[2-H39\H)"G;VR,'%7J**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HI&8*I9B``,DGM2T`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!5 M274(HM1BL663SI8S(A"_*0.O/3/3CW%6ZQ?$XE@LX-2@4L^GS"=@H&6CP0X& M?]DG\J`)XM=M9=-N;\).L-LS+)OB*L"OWN#SQ_C6BC;D#8(R,X(P17+:-%>I MJ,D,D7EQWY746!7;Y!S\T?&,MD1]0/XNI')+?/-JUU!_CN+^ZLU219;8(7++@$-G&#WZ?YYJW7&^())+:Z MUR\AN&@EMHK1T(=@K'N5DEMY+-I7UH7%JUY&?,5R@A&,E=Y)]?7(SVX MI&@O1;WTMCJ$T]O97:SPYG9FD"@&2(MD[E[#/.00?6@#JZ*J:<&:V$[B56G) ME*2DY0'HN"?E(&`0.,YJCXMD,7AZX<3/#AXP9$;!"F10?T)H`V:*X+7%M4LM M4_LZ^+Z?):AI2MQY@-QO&WYB222H((ST`SVK5EBT^'48K6X8?V7-;F6VDDDW MJ9V07,:"'=$RL6DW#Y2",#'?.3SVQ[US"VMW;V M.CZS):/K:;I]FR"8V5PH4$*2QV$ M-M'&25;\CZ<`&U/?>3JMI9>5G[0DC[]WW=NWC'?[U7*X>SC>272Y=-MGBOS: MSPW<[0$%+C8I!E..N[GG/7WJ]X5M;=;D3I]NCNTB,=S'-;K&H;@\E4&YCD$' M).#SUH`ZJDR,XSS0Q"J6.<`9X&:XBSTR2TM]&:TL)(KE;J8-*86W1H2X7<2. M%PPZ_P"-`':^;&"XWKE!E^?N_7TJG%J*WD,$U@TA MS61IEG,;;16,$L=[`Y^T2.I!VE7+Y)'S9;'XG-5;6V,5EI$?V*99;34I`V+9 MOW:,9#P MV,QNTO)9Q.J%8VSO`DW`D?=.T*23T[#(JZ%8N+BS%Y!?-=61=/WB(D499?FD M5E4;PQXZD\DD=Z`.JJ(7,!<()HRQZ`,,FI:XNPTJTD@>*TL%6ZCU1MDZPC]T MB2Y^\1TVC`'/)''H`=BLT;*K+(A5CA2&&"?:H_M=M@G[1%@*6/SC@#J?I6*/ MM,1AM18W#E=0DE:10-@1I"P;)//WQ^1]LUK'28DTR\+6$D5Q)=EED2/;*J&8 M,K`X.=N`V.?NT`=&+RU,D<8N82\I(10XR^!DX'?`I%OK-H?.6Z@,62-XD&W( MZC-821WMM%#E)]OMOM<-L)5, MDT;2)A@00-O\]PQ^-;FEB] MA70B^GSCRK5[6894&(YCPQR>AV$\?SXH`Z2J-KJ]C=BX:&Y0K;RF*1F.T!AC MU[9.,]ZO5RRZ9JD0N4\HNL>J?;HP'7;-&2#LZ@A@23R,94?6@#HK2\M[V+S+ M:99%&,X/*G&<$=0>>AYHO7ECLII(&19$0LI=2PXYY`(_G5'2H)_[2U&]EMGM M5N3&%B=PS$JN"YVL0,Y`P/[H]:NWXD-A<"&(RR&-@J`@%B1ZGB@"E::J]YIL M[A5@O;8%9X'!;RW`SCMD'L1P:MRW]M!/'!+,!([!.`<].#0!;N-=TVVEFB MFN@'@95D`5CL)&03@<#'?H/6I)=5LX;L6TDCB0NL>?*8H&."%+8V@G(X)[CU MK.DTZ\G_`.$A01J@O@$@9WX/[H(2<9P,TVXL-1FO;K]Q%Y9N8)XY!.4#!3&6 M4J!R1L/S'U&.F``7])NYKJ345F8'R+MHDP,?+M4C_P!"-2ZO/):Z1>7,+;9( M8'D4XSRH)_I4>EV#C'+#KZU2O=+O7& MM+;BW8:B@52\C+L/E[#G"GTS^G'6KMU;W+7MK=P"+?'&\3J['`#;3D8')!0< M<9R>E`%9O$EB%MF2.ZE^TQ^;$(K=G+*#@]!U'^'J*DL=?L+]K;R#+MNBPA=H MF57*C+#)'89]N#@\5!IVBS69TG=*C"QADB;&?FW8Y'_?/ZU#I>@3Z?:Z1"9H MY/L$DK,>1O#AAQ]-WZ>]`%Q?$%@\FQ'=B87F78-V]%ZD8_3/6G6VMQ74FR&U MN]S0F>+?'L\Y0<';N(YR1UQPP/0TVSL+R#3%L9)H6CBA\F,JA!8!2HW9)QQC M.._Y5+#9S)=V7B"W>%@&)SN*'(X_V!^?MR`2Z7=/?:7:7/:DU-[E+0BTBF>5F`S#LW*,\D;R!T^O)'%+I=L]EIEM:2.KM!&L>Y1@$*, M`_D*EN/M/[LVQBX;YQ(#RN.Q'0YQV-`&?;W7VO0'GM;R,8[5H6KM):0NYRS(I)]3BJZV+16%S%$4,]P7=W;@%F[\=@,`>P'UHGTJ MTO+2"WOH([A85`&X<9QC-`%74+R:W\2Z1;+(WDW2S!TXQE5!!Z9[D8SCIZ5! M?SW6W6;M+ED&GK^XC4?+N$0:.]Q_:"1W9BBOT59$V;B#C:2#GC*A1T[4`5=5CNOL*ZE;WUP MEV0I@A7F,EL#84_BSGDG)')&,8K?K-FLM0\W-K>6T42J%B1[9G*<8SGS`"?? M']]2V]M!:1"*V@CAC!R$C0*/R%`%+6;V:W^RVMF4^UWDPC M3=@[5`R[X)&=JC\\>M.EL(X8K9_MEQ%'9DR,[W#$.N#D.2>1WYZ8XP*EU"R- MY'%LF:":&02QR*,X.".1W!!(_&BXLVO+6>WN9LQS1-$?*7;@,,$\D\^E`%:# M65FN8$,!6&[B,UM(&R74`$EAQM^\,^9DF3.P* M,Y'&6'09XP3WJW_8ROF26;,ZVQMHY%3'E@CD@$G)/'7T'OF&Y\.QR`I;W,EO M"+)[-(0`R*&!YYYSTS@@G:,F@"NM]J%Y::4TL2(;RX#JUMGI3;;0HK5=,2"9D33U8!0J_O"PP2GJ:`&QZW(\ M<3&T`::\>VC7SADHA(:0\<8"L<<]!SS1'KTSF*)RV&("DA]I'0 MD$?3![XIEMX=C@GMI9+R>=H$DC^?:-R/_"<`=.N>N3UQQ4]AHL=FUKF5I4LX M_+MU8`;,\%CCJQ'&?KQR:`"+5V>.U!A43W%Q)"(O,Z*C,&?..1A<_4@9YJ73 MK^2^EG_=H(XI9(B0^65E;&",=QA@??';)HQ>&UBF@F&HW9FACDC5R5SAACH! MC@\],D]IS[^F``"[6%;6ME?6^HWM MR$"332+YV0I1$^3ANPRA;KW)[UM2H9(G0.T992`ZXRON,\9K*M_#\4-I'9O> MW<]G&-OV>3R]K#T)50Q'XT`5--N+FZFTMIXWDGBT[SV(X/ MX/M->N+BQAF\F+S+HK';IDK^]^;>K#J`NWKW]*O2:.C374T=W=0O<",`QN!Y M00Y`48X!YR#D72313-,+A&59"Q!!S\N,8..!VH`KZF);V6 MUTZ[6-&ENA(NWG=%&`Q;V);"XSG#9YYH77I)4LKB&%6MKR[\B('(BPI8W-M)<7$WVF'R&ED*[P@4@`8`' M&2>G4G.:0>']/\ZZD>)I%NMAEC=B58HVX$^O/KGICI0!5.KW\*V\=W;Q17-T M28HU5W*HJ[G9@!U]%!ZD#/4UJ:=+//9I+-E M93T*G(-1FUMV+$P1$MU)0""SXYXXZ= M*EAU]V:T:6.!([BU:\<"0EH(AMPS<PY!&3UH`VA#&&1A&F4&%.T?*/;T MI$ABCW;(D7=]["@9^M8[:Y-'-9)/;K`MU#)._F'#6R(N3RMHWJ,#J5X&#UQZ]0#=$,8B\H1H(_P"YM&/RJ&ZM/M$2 MPK,\,0X=(U7#KC&TY!P/I@U0MM8>3$3^\"!&<,?R&0.FXN7E])9>9:)%%=-)M8L0S(H)#A3SM/R?]]>@!(!OU4U.UAOK-K>XE,:,5?< MI`(VL&[_`$JOHNIOJD3O)&()(F,XQCD=<]NE1I;B_OM5\X[@H M%HBL,A5,:NQQ[EQGUVB@#2-Q"%+&:,*,9.X8YZ4YIHU17:1`K8VDL,'/I6-< M:!:)97-N,FWN9+=6C/0*A1=H/7HO7K6/I,5SHFM6OAV\C%Q9/(T]I,5Z8#'! M[9!YXY!P>XP`=QI+J\M;)`]W/I%6CXFTB]U-[>2V%G*EN&/D72DK(Q]<=,8X_PH`V3 M>6JVHNC ML)%9;+3I5;%RNOE)#T)9F.=W?.`/PH`[=-1L9+QK2.[@:Y7K$)`6'X?A1%J% MK-+Y<6P5_R)'Y\5S=S#I)\6:9!;O:VHT]6!"LBEW8C9&!G).2 MQ/'?U-=#:Z9;VLWG1AC)NE;)/_/1P[?J!CV%`%Q6#*&4@@C(([TM8WA]V$FI M6H3;;VUV4A`Z*I4-M'L"3^>.@JFM]?S6;:FEU(&2\\EK+8@3;YH3;DC=NQSG M/4X`[4`;LM[!#*L;N=S.J<*3@MG&<=,X[^H]15>*&TT.QN9-\OE;GN)2Y+G) MY8X_6J6C0NGB'6V-Q*Z^:DKAH;R^TK28FAOI9`VC M>>B2*I6-AL"[<#L&/7.>^:Z33&E^VREKZ.>&:))8H0^]E'3<#@?*W\\XH`U: M*YN1M336=8D^T7#Q6L4=Q;6R;2)S(6 M,Y(\S(RY;.0?F`(``!/2@#H)IEA"%E^NQ(R%Y[> M6+4K>)XO-$B[6P"`V,E2#GG!_E3FU)[S5KG3H[S%PE]'L6*9`#"%&]2,YR/G MS@9R1V!P`=117)F]G6XU2>:]E2*TU"!%!?"(C.H8'VPQZ],<8I9M7*ZA;D7F MU#J3V[&28`D*&RNSH%!V8;J(5W$$G&3Z`=SVJ> MN.FN5M=">.RNV$T.IE9%$Y9U!N&`#9.>1Z]>O-77N)IX]2D^T.E_;782.(3% M55=P$8*\@AP>I!R2?0``'245Q]V\OE:IW2RVVI1I&JW#!50F,$%_MUKG-5+C2]7$DTK6<5[#Y+R M2$@?.F\;CU`;\2;_4_9W#[B?N[3GGKTH`?87T.H6$-[`3Y4 MJ!QNX(]C]*CTG4H=6L5O+9)%A=F"%P`6`.,X!Z9!Z\UD".8:C+I]M<%K/4LW M:2K\PC3(\Q5[?-D8(Z;R>O7-M;Z`:'8&9Q)IOVV=+S;\R@%G*;L=!ED/IR*` M.LO;Z*R\E75WDG?RXXXURS'!/X#`.2>!1%>&2\:V>VGB8()`[@;6&<8!!/([ MCW'K6*RI;W>FZJD\\VGQI,C/+N=D5CN#D\DI\N-Q[;22>35[4M2MI-(N)K=S M<0JF6D@8%0,@'YNF!R3UX!H`UJ*X*Y>S33M8BB9([8W=J\?DJT4>#Y9)'8<< M]?>K=UH-C'JM[:6MMLV:;YD`&YMDA>3#`>H)X_2@#LJ*X66,WMS&GB"2\CGG MMX3:B*V1G8B,&3;\A*,'SG[O4=A6VVFM:ZTZV]NCP:CM>X?Y5*&/DL1_%NR! M@=\GN:`-B]NXK&SENIVVQQ+N/J?0#W)X`]359+O4%D3[1I\:Q.P&Z.XWLF2/ MO`J/T)Y]N1'XBL9;_2G2`;I8G69$Z;RISMSVSC%1:L[7MO:B`W\4AN(B5C62 M/*%@'#$#@;2QZCD#F@#6$L9?8'4MDC&>>.O\Q2+-$\9D25&1>K!@0/QKF(M+ M(M]=^RV9CNO.D$#%"FY&10=C=,G#8/.#@FH+G3I);*:]M!JC^=Y)NHI8(TDD M1<_(J;`"5&,\8(&T$Y.`#KO/AV*_FIL8X#;A@FD^T0D(?.CPYPGS#YOIZURE MQH]M+:12+9W5PTFI12NUU`-Q#%?,.T*,+@JD,%W]G MT:V;3)TEL[S,T@"[2,,#)G/1BV['L?;(!N:M>RV4=N\00^;<1PD,"<;V`SU[ M9J74[E[+3+JZC"LT$32!6Z':,X_2J?B%))+>T$,4DK)=PRE47/RJX)_2C599 M;W3-1M8+6<[K5U5V7:'9E("@'G]*`+NG7#W>FVMS(@1YHED*C^$D`X_6L,^) M+F/2/[2>WC>-+KR'B3.\C=MRO/)Z?+^M7M*EGM]-TNR%K-YBP(DK,F%BVJ,@ MD]2>0,9YJ#1-.219YKVS=9%OI9H1,,XRV58#.`>?KD4`:NH78L[4RX#2,RQQ MJ3C<['"C/U(JE<7FH17LL2Q1M&AML$1L2P>0J_?C`&?;O3?$L#R6MI,K%4M; MR*XE(.`$5OF)]@.?PK8H`YB+7[MM.T4&-VC.6SC&07!/4=!SGJ, MC.K_`&HEE!;IJTL45W(#N$08J,=6[X7W.`.]8`\/SWWC._O;^P(LY(P(9"ZD MJZ[,,`#D?=/YX/>K&MZ/?-JM_>VL'VE;O3GM`B,JLCGN=Q`V\=N?:@#8O=<,@X*>H.,$^W6JK>+=$7=F]/RJKD"&0D*PR#]WI@CGW%4[?1 MKF#6-&$L'GV]G9&%Y]RX#D8Q@G.,#'3N/>J=_H=_]NU_[+8Y@NK:.*VV,BK\ MJJN,$C&.?R^F0#IK/5["^GGAM;E)7@`+XS@`C((/0CW%0#Q#I9AN)5NMT=N` MTC"-R-I)&XQ[^E`'0:;K%AJK2BQN/.,04O\K#`8 M9'4>U4_$^N-H=M;S)"TJM*OFX&=D8(W'Z\@#/&2*NZ+;R6FBV-O+&(Y(H$5U M!!PP49Z>]5;K11?S:B]X#BXB$,?ES$80`GGC@[F)[CI^(!:O-6L[*VM[B>4B M*XD6.-@I.2W(_2HFUVQ2"^GD:2..QHK(E\/ZG<>&["P MFDM?M-C.DB$2,5D5<@`DKE3@^AZ>_$.I>%M0U.PU"*::"*2>Z6ZA59"R`[=I M!^0'IWYZ#@(TFU.ST]$FG M:6U69YE@*@[MNTXSP,$Y[`X&?O$]. MWOP_3-"O;#5;&\#6Q5+!+2==S9RN/F7CG.!Z?C0!I6^N65S/##&SYN/,\DE< M"78<-C\N]45\2P:I:21Z0MRUS+%((',)">8%)`W'Y?3KZBH]+\-RV,NE!YD: M/3//V$9S)YA.,C'&![FKWAK29-%TK['(ZOMD=E*G/RD\9X'-``C:K;V5[)<. MCRQ2;X<@;70(I*\8(R=PSU!YY'!MC4(#IBZ@I=H&B$HVJ2Q!&1P.])JLXAL) M5P7DE4QQ1J,EW(.`/R//0`$G@5!_9UPGAQ--@N?*G2V6%9ER,$*!D=^U`#YM M7@@$GFI(CQR)%LX)+/C:.#COW(JY#)YL>_8RP: M"Y92\'EG:<=23Z]#G'6M'3K4V5H(,_*I.Q020BYX4$\X'3_`<4`6J***`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`JM/9K-E:,.I6D\\<,4($B^JDC!ZCIZB@"C?:9-;M_:.G-)/?P6O MV>&*:7Y'&"W)YR:N'2[9-S2W#!I&8]2%"CVZ"HHK-K?4Y[F)F9+K:949CA648#* M/<8!^@JO/KUK:VDT]W'/;F`IYT;IED#MM#<$@CJ<@GH1UXJ]:7'VJ#S?)EA^ M9EV2KM;@D9QZ'&1[&@`O;5;VV:!WEC5B#NB".1XG=0SQ-N1 MB.0<$9_(FI:S[S5H[:=X4MY[AH4$D_E`?NE.<$Y(SG!X&3Q],@#8-$LX-7EU M1/-^UR@AV+G!''&/08%/OM(M;ZZBN9/-CGC4J)(96C8KG.TE2"169>:A)>ZY M9V$)NH[6>W:59X'0;_ND,"3G`&>,E7HT$<:QJ6(4``LQ8\>I/)^IIMQ/';6\MQ,VV*)" M[MC.`!DGBLBT>:ZT$ZA>SR0R7$7FK]G+$0J1\N%'4@8)R#SGMB@"V-&LAJ7] MH;)C=;B0\$YVXW8VY/3&*E&F6:WIO!`/.))SDX#$8+;>@;`QNQG'&:S8= M=$%0.,@%L,5QUS^(_![>(%2YAMWM)1-.)3'#N'F?)NQ ME3@@-M.#R*`%M?"NC6EZEY!9E;A&W!S,['/KRW-;!SCCK6'9>)8[@6[SVDMK M!<1/-'([*1M0`L3@\#GOZ5%=W5W)KFA2*LD45P)2T8G.UOW990Z@8S[C/0]> M*`-RVMTMT<*!ND_7IZ5 M%9ZD+NW@=8MDLI<&%VPR;"0V?HP`)]Q^-'3]41=/M([:UD)D:951I6DVK&Y4 MDL06QG:.AQN'84`:\=M;Q3/-'!$DLG+NJ`,WU/>F7&GV5U*);FSMYI`NP/)$ MK';SQDCIR?SJE%K$TLM@IL)(EO$?!F+(T;J,["-O<`D<]`31INLMJ$5JRP(L MDLDJRH)<^6J$@L.!NYVCM]\4`7A86:M&PM(`T:>6A$8RJ_W1Z#VI;6RM;)66 MTMH;=6.2(HPH)_"IZI:S=26.CWEU"NZ2&%G7C/('7Z4`3I:V\<\D\<$2328W MR*@#-CU/4TR*PLX6E:*T@C:;F0K&`7^OK6->V5E9>'YKYY))I_)#/J%OM$SY M`&Y6STZ<9QBK43.9"TMNK2*<`#:W08`P"03TY]<=[V"W\1MK@A M*V\NB^?T`9SO4X..^"H__55^*WG3QPMS-&BK+IK*"AX++(N1ZG`9><<_H`#; M-M`=V88SO.6^4*`)&M MX7!#PQMDY.5!R?6G&*,R"0HID`P&QR/QK"TVYN;71]`AMHH"ES`J$NQ!5O*+ M@X`Y'RG-6+'5Y[^&V$<4<<\RS,=Q+*/+<(?0\D@^PSUH`TS;0'=F&,[SEOE' M)]ZD90RE6`((P0>]1VKRR6T;W$(AE907C#[MA],]ZEH`:J(J;%50N,;0.*7< M,$Y''7VJCKM[)IVBWEW%&[R11$J%7=@]B1Z#J?8&J5XDME?Z'9V4BPP--()% MVYWXC8G.".3R?J0>W(!LQR)*@>)U=3T93D4^N8\.K=:78Z?8^9#);FZGMO\` M5D.=IE.[.<#E.F._6KFF:GJ5]+:RG3V6RN(MYD8H"F1D$8!C:/7VH`VZ M:[K&C.[!549+$X`'K3JAN[=+NTFMI?N31M&WT(P:`'I+'(SJDB,T9VN%.2IQ MG!]."*A2_LY#B.[@<[MGRR`_-G&.O7-<]XOBDTO0=3N[)WCDNID,C*,;1A4( M]LXZ^IKH(;6W^P6]N%#P1K&8_3Y<%3^8!H`M55MK*.VFFF$D\CRL6_>REP@/ M90>%'L/Z"N77Q3>,JZ@8RD!U'[`;21`&5<9WD]0_;&<>V>:L:9JNKZSJVH6L M<]M;1:?=;&*PDM(F7&.20#\H/^<4`=517$V.NZNFCZ-J=QN#GH.M`'645RVE M7&LWM_?I+J*0P65\0=\"EGB'.W/``(QSC/T[U-&\17LOB.RLI+D7=O=P,QDV M!5#C?DQX`.WY=OS<\'VR`=7>WUK86QN+N98H0P4N>F2!WNU MO7DD:[8D2Q1LN1,^3@KW.&YZ$#&*M7NO:A%)K=[O>)=,ECCCM2%VR*S`%FR- MW(Y!&,>_-`'9U2FU:Q@NQ:RSA)BZ1A2I^\^[:,XQSM/Y5R&LZKK,;Z[*FH/` MNGM`T<*QH1^\(X)QDXKM#90&>2<)MEEV;V!^]L)*_P`S0!*DBR;MASM)4^Q% M/K,021>)9%CC'D3VH>5@G216PN3ZE2>O9!Z5IT`%%9NOW+6FDRRH\B-N108U M#,1Q:E(DD.IQQ1NCK(55C$&7DO.0`2>X! MU%5[6\CNVN%C#@P2F)PZE?F`!XSU&""#[USTNH3V4U[:SW[I`M_'&;F3!:)' MC#D>@!/RY[;L]JT]#"+<:L(YFF47I&YFW$'RH\KGV/'KQSS0!JD`C!&0::`D M4:J`J(N%4#@#L`*?6'XJMXY+2SN)I/+2UO8)68OM`&\*2?\`OK.>U`&G:7L= MX]RL:N#;S&%]P')`!X]OF%6:XV\9;=-9O;:_E3RM0@/ ME%77N1<:N83K'V6YM[U?]'P=TJ$#";_6ET&5KV/2C;ZA/"Q87,+2M)E]A*D\X M5@_`!Y()QT-7-/DA%S:R6=QMA6V3*R`O'NW;#CD9'7'K2F6,3+"6`D92RKW(&`3_X\/SKCK9[*^NO#JW% MR)=^FN)4,W!^50U2W-D_D:?:7*SPZ7YLT M2XMA(4)E(CW!P<`K@*V,@GWH`[6HA/$;@VXD4S!=Y0'D#ID^EO3O5*"W8:M%<6]L\%FEAY.1(@K(ZE2#]#0!JT444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!6=?6UTVIV5Y:B)Q$LDCZD!?N?L,;3RP3QI&6VAHRA(/'`^3J`>N?:GOI>K%Y+ MI)K,7'VI+E(\-MSY0C<%NN,9QQV![X'054FU*SAM+BY:YB,5N2LK!P=K#^$^ MAY`Q[B@#(&E:FMK<9%F\T]_'=[=[*JA=A(SM)SE,=.AS[59N=(GN);P^;&JO M<174)&21(BJ,,/3Y!T]3ZQPK,D>."\D$&2B&1$,3EQC."]0P!'4>V:<-4T\QS.+^U*0$"5O.7$9)P-QSQSQS M0!;K-FTR0WMU8ZS*53/`R<\9H`IV^A"VO[&>&<"&RMS;I&8^ M6'')8$<\>E;%9MSJ\(^QI9/#],_M73Q&\AO(%2-0S,S@`*>C<]CV/0]J`( M;/2$M)[.5)6;[+:?90"/O+\O/U^457MM!:W:T(O"WV1V>,F)07+`@ER/O'GK MQGOSS5NVUK3+LR"WO[>3RD\Q\2#Y5[D^P[^E.DU?3X49YKR&)5(!\QMO7)'7 MUP<>N#Z4`9__``C,)M[&![B0Q6D,L&`,>8LB[3G\,?C5B'1W26P:2]DE%CD1 M@J,M\I7YCW.#4[:SIPA$OVR)HV5G#*=PVJ=I;([`\9Z5/>7*VEN96!;E551W M9B%`_,B@""TTJWM-1NKV/<9+D@L&.0AP`=OIG`S]!Z#%1-`6**T\J[ECGM9) M'CE4#D2-EE*G((.?KP*LOJ&-1&F+D736[2B4Q'RQ@@#OSU]?QYJ'2M>M+VUL M_,N(EN9X!(5&0I8*"X4G@E>XR2.]`%B_TNWU&Q^R79D>/<&)W88\\C([$9'' M8]J?;:=!:WMS=1;@UQM+)GY5(&,J.Q(`SZ[12V^H6MS*L<,NYGC\U!M(W)Q\ MPR.1R.GK4-Q/?KJ!BA@0VX2(B1@>29,..#V3D>]`&A3)(TEB>.1=R."K`]P: MYE_$TYU/4M-4V\%["VVTAG0CS^.!NW`9)Z=.H]\;-QK6GVUS/;S3,);>'SY% M$;G:G'S<#GJ.E`$8T.'^S#IIN;AK0KL$9*\+_=SMSC\<^]2S:3!+1BFSZYIUO;17$MR!'-%YR81B2F,[L`9`Y%.FUK3H1N> MY4J(UE)0%@$;HQ(!P#ZF@".XT.TN)F>0OY1M3:B!0H14..@`R#P._&*6STA; M6YAN&O;N=X83`OG.I!4D'G`'/RCGJ>^:>^KV:7HM3(2V\1LX&51SC:A/8GM] M/4C+5UO3VBFE\XB*$.6D*-MPA`;G'8G&.I[9H`T:BN(O/MY(2[()%*[EQD9] M,@BL^/Q!92637*^9E2B^5MRY9P"BCL2_9)VBBF\B<*@ MW0OT(89[$@<9Z\9H`M6VF16]O8P^9+(MC_JBY&?NE!G`&<*2*JR^'+%X(HT: MXA:&1Y(Y8I2KH7^]@^A]*MZ;J<&I?:/(29?(E\IO-C*$G`/0\]^^#69K>N2Z M=K&G0K%)]E:81W$N!MRX(54L&RI M]ZLU0NM4BM=3M+!XI6ENPYC*@;?E&2"2>O\`C52V\3V5UIT%Y#%<,;B7R88= MJ[W;OWP/7)(H`U;JWCN[6:VE!,0BUZ\CT34WN;R]C%O>B%)/*C:6-<]&&0">,'D]?2NAC\1$Z[ M?V,MH\5O91[Y)BRG`QNW$9Z8Z8R>><4`6TT6"."VB6:XVV\QG0F3YMYSDD]3 MG!7'+,L9D)CC+=2JGA21$P<@A6)`/N!56]UZ2TGO8_[+ MN9$M(UE>17C`V$'YN6S_``MT].U7]3N9K2Q>:"-'=2.'8@8)QV!H`8NDV*7C M7:PGS6?S"-[;-^,;MF=H;'?&:2RTBSTZ>YN+*$I-0/ M-)W#5#I7A;3IC$KJ+`/EI-F66-2$'!R2,G_@)H`U_[+T_RI(C96YCE?S)% M:,$.V<(X4E=6?8V74, M$`PN>2?H+%%%`#)8HYXFBFC22-AAD<`@CW!J,VELG?I7844`ZD%Q8WTEE?0)'%'#;A3'M)R MCY^[DD$'CKS]VFV=F!K/B"X>QESY4?DR/`Q+,(V5]A*Y)SQQU_&NLHH`XEM/ MN'ATN&SMY[>Z;2GADD\EE57*K@,V,`Y5NOM[5K1VLEY+#)%:O;B*SEM9EDCV M[F^7:ONHPQ!&1SP>37044`<?6NLHH`YI=$-O-;:C9 MV4D?<\@D0*Y9F)&_(R/FQQZGC5U*.YOM-N[:&-H'E@=%=V7[Q&` M.,_G6A10!SFJ:7>ZXBR&%;&3['+$RNX8EWVX7*_PC:>??I5C4+6>YC>Z\HV\ MD=C-$5;:02P4@9&>`5/;O6W3)8UFC:-P2K#!`)&?RH`Y-=(N-7T+3!"!!MTM MH@[XPS.J8Z'..#G^56[?39WM+IGTPP7$R*KF6\,[/ACP"Q.%QSU'7&.,UT$, M,=O"D,*A(XU"JHZ`#H*DH`Q]9T^6:07-FDBW<<3+$R.NQMW575N"O3/?\0*L M:W#YMBKY/^CS13G#E1M1PS9]>`>#QG%:%%`&7/!/_;EOJ$$:S0_9GB.'`/+* MP(]>!6?)H]U<6.D61@,`G..<=:KZGX?U&34[F>R:V=+G3S9DSNRE22,G@'/`_SWZNB@#E6 MT'4[>XTJZM3:RRVMF+2:*5VV,`,9!V_GQV%7&T>]M_$$FH6DEO)'=1K'<1S` M@)MP`4`SGC/!QSW]-ZB@#G;30;BSUJYG'V2XM;F<7!:="9(FR3A>,'M@Y&/0 MXYBM_#UU;W-_/%';1BYB=6M_/=H9&9@=Q4K\O`(.">O&,<]/10!REKX7N(;( M1^8JF"]CNK:#SV=%V`?*6*@X/S=%XXZU'<>%;I]'U6*,VXO=4N/-E+2-LC4. M6`!VY)_`=?;GKZ*`"N9N_#G1Q7H::QN#*KM M&0K*WWE*Y_7/\ZZ>B@#EKCP@UQ8:C;&_`-]=?:2P@^[R3MQN_6KK^'O,U/4[ MIKK]WJ,'DRQB/E?EVY5L_P`Q6Y10!A6_A]XS;M+=J[6UE]DBVQ;0.,;C\QSP M!QQ5S0=,.C:1!8&;SO*W8?9MSEB>F3ZUHT4`4-9CDN=.FLX0IDN4,7)QA3PS M?@"?QP.]37]JUU8R6\;K$S`88KN`P0>F1Z>M6:*`*%UIJW1O]\F!=VXMSM'* MJ-_/7G[YJ>\MS=V;P%]I8#YL9P>O2K%%`%)K%GN+F9I1FX@6$@)TV[L'KZN? MT_&MKEIK>]F3S502I@%6*J%#`'[IP!GUP/2M.B@#)NM#6Y%\#<,GVR6* M4D+]TIMQC_OD?K6E+((86D<,0HR=B%B?H!DFI**`,31=/E.FZ7-/(Z36UJ(T MC:,KL8J`=P/4C&.W?UI?^$>0P)";R<(++[$P4+AH\$9&0<-ZGOCI6U10!D0: M$MJD:VM[/`1#'#*8U3,H08!.5.&QQD=OH")TTLQ:E+=P7MS$DQ#20#:8V(`& M<$$C/?!&:T**`(H8WCW[YWEW.6&X*-@/11@#@>^3[U+110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4455O-0MK%[=;F0H;B011_(Q!<]!D#C\:`+5% M5;;4;:ZDN8X'9GM7V2CRV&T^G(Y_#-2VMQ%=VT=Q`Q:*50Z,5(R#T.#S0!+1 M110`445!=745I$))FP"RHH`R69C@`>Y)H`GHJG8:@+UG46MU`4`+>?$4Y)/` M/0XQSC(Y'-7*`"BBFLRKC)QGH/6@!U%4])U*'5]-BOK=9%BESM$@`;@D:"SCOI);*>XVM.TN?+5HV(C$A.22RY MSG(#*.XK?DC26-HY$5T<%65AD,#U!%0_8+/[']C^R0?9?^>/EC9US]WIUYH` MQ(VOEE:W:\F\FWODBBE!!:1"@)#$CYL$XSWQSFL^4"XTB.*:YFE%MK(@#-.V MX*)L`%@IY'&*ZHZ?9$0`V=N1;G,.8E_=?[O''0=/2HFT;2VW;M-LSO;< MV8%Y/J>.O)_.@#$UN6:TM];6&^N`(;*!H_WG,9S(,`],C!`SQD].V>VIV\3:_IEQ+*Z!1(N/.903P1P"!ZY]>,]*UXXTBC6.- M%1$`5548"@=`!3J`.,\,Q?8K#0]]PRS?:)[:2/SLIC]Z<8!QG7##/;#=>G08X%=#110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%(K!E#*001D$=Z`%HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`***B MN+F&U0//*L8)P-QZG&<#U.`?RH`EHJ.">*Y@2:"19(G&Y64Y!%-FNH()(HY9 M%1YFVQ@_Q'T%`$U%%%`!14BBB@`HHHH`***CEF2'9OW?.P0$*3R>F<=/J>*`)****`"BBF MM(B,BNZJ7.U03C<<$X'KP"?PH`=14-K#[@U-0`44 MA.!FJL6I6TT4,L9D,<^WRW\EP#N&0M`%NBBB@`HHHH`****`"BJU MG?07OG_9WW>1*T,G'1UZC]15F@`HJCJ6H_V>]J#;R2K<3K"74C$98@`G)SW[ M"I4NAY;O<1M;@3>4N\_>^;:I'U)&/K0!9HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBFK(CLZHZL4.U@#G:<`X/IP0?QIU`!14<<\,KR)%*CM&=KA6!*GT/I5*#4Q/ MK4]C'Y;QQ0B3>C[CNW,I4^A!6@#1HI&8*I9B``,DGM4'V^S^Q_;/M<'V7_GM MY@V=Z=>*`+%%,BECGB66&1)(V&5="""/8BHIK^S@N$MYKN".>3&R-Y`&; M)P,`\GGB@"Q15=[ZTC25Y+J!$A(65FD`$9/0-Z=1UJEKVLPZ183R^;`;A$#I M#(^"W/Y\X./H?2@#5HK-NM5AL8+ZZN;B%X+8CY8N77@?*W.,D].G45/+J=C" M@>2[A5"BR;BXQM8X#$]@3T/0T`6Z*I/J^G)>"T:^MQ<%@OE&0;LGH,>O_P!; MU%2VU[;73NMO,LA158[?1L[3[@X.#0!8HJ.:>*!`TTBH"0HR>I/0#U)]*I7N MJ1QV!GMF#L95@!V%@CEPAW`8/!/3@\8H`T:*BMO.,69W1F))!1"G';())SBL MO4]:>'3=4FM$Q-8-M_?1MM8X5CZ=FQU]^E`&S15--3LI(9)EG7RX]N7((!W8 MVX)ZYR,8ZU-;W,-TKF%]VQRCC!!5AV(/(ZC\Z`)J***`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`K-\1+N\/Z@P:1&2WD=2CE2"%)'(/Z5I55U.S.H:=/:"9H1,A1G4`D` M]1SZC(_&@"U157[-.?LNZ\DS#_K"%`\[C'([>O%6J`"BBB@`JAK-ZMC8,Y#E MI&$2[`206XS@<\#)XYXJ_5:2T,E]#1\HQ@]Q70Z8UR^G0/>-&\[("S1J54YZ<'V MQ5:XT6*YU":ZFN;EEFA\B2W#`1LF#P0!G^(G.<\^G%6K"T%C9QVPFFF$8P'F M;P&X3[)_95Q)Y7EGL%')W8)SR#C@9&.%4?AZY)`':?-JAN&BO[>/R_+#":, M!!NSRFW>Q]\T:]?7.G:>+BU2)V$L:,),XVLP7MWY%.TW1[?33F)YY-H*1^=( M7\I"0=B^@X'OP,G@59O+2"^MS!\C M@$KDQG8^YF"@`N"`-O)YZ]*;J>I:DD&HSV+6B?V>H,D,R,Q<[`Y^8,,##<<< MD'I6E=:5:7=[#>2(ZW$(VK)'(R$K_=)!&1GG'_UZIZOX?M;VUO?)@1;FXA\O M)D94)`PA91P=O;@]*`*^I:S?6AUS9'"!8Q12P%XV^8,#NSR,\J0"/UP14\]] MJ,NHSQV*0F*UE1)5DQ\P*AF.:3::@2UW$Y9XQ'($F=59>>" M`1G&3C([T/HVGR3)*]OET55Y=L,%^Z&&<-C&1G/-`%(7UZVIO922?9GE,GD% MH=R,`#MVL#R>"2IP?IC+7-`9WT'3WDD>1WMHV+.@R>GMVH`H7=[<2:VFEVT@A)M M'N#*4W<[@JCZ9))[].E9WVF>_NO#T\Q:&1I95=%'R[EC<$C(S@X.,]C6]/96 M\\\<\D?[Z,$+(K%6`/49':C[%;9M\0J/LPQ"!P$XQQ^'%`$H0+'L3Y!C`V@< M?2N0A^TOI6C-]I:25M5<;Y0&Q@S`GC':NRJBFD:?&^]+5%;S/-RN00W//_CS M?]]'U-`&7%K-U]K-C)AG:^DMTGQL`58PX!."-QS@<<@'I6MIC71MF%[+!),K ML"83D`9X!X'..M$NEV,\,T,MLCQSOYDBMR&;U^O`J>VMH;2W2"VB2*)!A408 M`H`R;\N/%>E>8<0>5-LSC'F8'Z[<_AGWJSJLT-C%)>*(UN,)&TF,L$9PN3Z@ M9)_.KMQ;Q7,829`ZA@PSV(.00>Q!IHM+<12Q&(,DV?-#?-OR,".<5?E,>`O''WCUSQUSUJ^NE6*6LELML@AE`#K_>```!]@`!CTJ&ZTQ;C4;.9 MHH6@MXGCVN,D;MO*^F-N/H30!G6%_?W-U:6-Q:&X,FR)<2%'55*YZ9!SZ$=AU&Y-86D]O';RVT3P MQXV1E1M7`Q@#TP2,>AQ3WM+:1X7>WB9X/]4Q0$Q_[OIT[4`8R7\\EY9E+PF& M>ZGA(P@R%$F"!@G@H!G///'(JCI-U)9Z5I4<5R3YNHR12AR&)4M+P2>>2H.> MO6ND33[))6E2SMUD9_,9Q$H)?GYB<=>3S[GUI&TVQ?[UE;-^\,O,2GYSU;IU M]^M`&*U[>S:>-1B=TO(KHP/:`AU"^;MVLH_B"X;(Y].#38Y[R6)KQ[ZZ]JA_LC3`Q8:=:; MBPUAMO-\F-4,LAD?:`-S'J3COP*=-!#/L\Z*.3RW#IO4' M:PZ$9Z'WH`YH2/:P07<-U(#_`&I)`\>[]WM>X8'(]<'.>H^E&BW%Q>7,-T]_ MLN%FECNK9I"V<'`41]%V_+\PY(Y/4BMY=+T](1"EA:K$K^8$$*A0_3=C'7WJ M<00K.TZQ()6`5I`HW$#H":`'D@#).`*P]"$I\/V%S;W1E1;$+Y8`(WA5QC'H M588.36[10!S.FR;QI-P+VX>XNE87D33L1_JRS'83\FUPHRN`-V.XK,$3IHVA M7L.KWLLEQK0:ZO=:EAN-12TGMKK<($B822P$X4;M^"I')P/E//!K MJZA6[MG5V2XB8))Y3$.#M?(&T^AR0,=>:`,OP_#&T;W"W4TS++/"`TYY`[U1\QH6M;7,_F1ZTAZ<#G(J":V:XLX`P+);:WYC[SNV MQ;V`//.WD?AST%=4M_:.TJK<1LT./,4')7(W#CW'(]:GCD26-9(W5TH0N9X[_P"TA[7&1QQY6WC[F/O>AWGBKNGVT#ZQJ,YW>9'< M@Q@2,`!Y2`G;G'4MDXZCU'&Q43W,,=Q%!)*BRS!C&A."^.N/7&:`(]1LX]0T M^>TF5629"IW#.#V/X'G\*P-E]+/%?I9R0S7T9LYP8P3"0#B4@CD`ANN,@IT[ M]110!Q5_B+4B(;>:-+.]A)`MWD;8"@W!\<+C("#D\GOBM"PB,.KP%89)HY)I M6#RHR36Y*L3O/1U)&%SZCDX%=#+-'"%\QL%CM48R6."<`#D\`GZ`TVVNH+M' M:WE60(Y1\'E6'4$=C[&@"+5(DGTN[BDC,B-"P*`$D\'H!SGZ>.HHH`YE+&"/7K$26<[P)I[QAI(FDQ M\P*JS8(S@-P?YD55LK9XET`6L-U;W0A=;B5K>0A2T9'SY`S\ZC@GL,8&*ZI+ MF*2YDMU8^;$JLRE2,!L@'/?[IZ>E34`F:FT[2YX!)9^6D4-I+))9S8R`SY*G;QG:'8>AR,>V_5"]UBPL) M#'=7`1E`9OE)"`G`+$#"@GUH`PX;":ZTUO(MKN"_M[8VO[X[5*\;E5@!NSCA MO?-7--D>X\0-=I87-O!)8H@\V+9M(=^"/7IQ].V#6S+`3QZ5*I#*&&<$9Y&*`,[7T>32I!';FXPZ,R#).U7!)`!!)`&0,\D=^E9 MLMC.ZWC/%=1N+P3PSJJ,R$0!=^P??P01M`R?\`8(_M2(DW M.[8NT'DX;';(P<=LUA^(;*\F36#!:2%9K5%5XBI,I7=D$$YXSQM`SD]>*Z![ MJ%)((V?F5\Z#!,00@\]01]/>FZM:W]QIVJV::?)*UV=\<@D3'W0 M`""PP1M`XSZ^M=&K!E#*001D$=Z6@#EM4TF]O[?7X5MF7[68I(2[+ARBIE>& MR#E2/3WJQ=V=],NKH+/B@"EJ44[-:36Z>8;>?S&CW;2RE&4X[9&[.#Z=15.:QN&AN66+YI[Z M&X"9&55#'G/.,GRS^8K9HH`0HH`P=4TNZO;NXEB1%&VW9!(1MD:-V8JV.@.X#//0UJV48CB8_98[9G;6=E`XCDN"S%R,[43!;`]3D#GIDGG&*OU0U"SFEN;6[MC'YUL7^63 M@.K#!7(!(Y"G.#TH`CEDGTV4W%W>;].CMR9&=!O#@C!^4#((SP!VI+C7;2U6 M;STG22&,3/'Y1+!#_%QGCKGTQS1J=C=ZII4ML\B6DKA65XG+%'5@P(;`[CTS M4%[H\U]-#6K6Z@BEM%EG\V-Y%14PV%.TY!QSGCW[53U-Y%\2:-M$7F-% M<#:SD`\)D`X_IVI+'0I=+O$N[1UDD=&2>.1]JG,A?.-89@)-^QV``;8<'@G/YCM],T=/T M$ZDW4%W'/)-#(ZR.6E*DO(I+$`G/ M&T$`#D=?I0`MKJPO+/3KMHKB);B7Y-FT@Y#8#R2J6!XX(YZ@\B@"O#KUO/_9_E6]PQOXVDB`5>`N,[N>.HIT&K MQ7D$'D0RL]PLA\O(4J$.ULG/9B!QGKZ9(JZ9H5Q9/IWFW<4J6,M+::!)9M:S6]W&MQ#YJNY@R)4=R^TC.>&P1SZ^M`$_AJ:6;PW8S M2L\TK0@DLV68_4U%;^(8Y;:.>6UEMTFD\F)I'7#.&8$<$XQM)R?PSQFWH^GR M:7I$%B;@3/"I42%-N>3CC/;@=>U5$T)DTF*T%T!/!<&XAG$9^1BQ;E=W/#,. MO0T`21ZUYBQ!+.4R23M!C$H9I7B4%AN!4,>" M/6FC5\6J7C6LGV-X6G\Y6!V(!N!8'!Y'0#-1QZ/+'=1S"[7;'=/:2T:;_A+;M9RW,5T\)F@$#JJ@\`L0P/9AN;U'M52:U%QJ5E:Q MVO-`$4WB/;!$]O8W%P\EM%K3K M/G'`'.:L.A(!&+F\N;D)%)`5DVA7C8`%2`/\` M9'(P<]3VH`FN]1FL8R]S;H`TL<46R7.XN<ZC=6RQ0_9HA=W$K10 M`2;E("EMQ)`].GZ]Z;'H%N;9X;R>XO21M62X<%XQ_LD`8.0#GJ2!Z4XZ'`]M MY3B0?+QC&T@$]<\C+WT8&-%C MO[R)@&$CJ4)F+8&7W*02`H`..!Q3GTB-GC"W$Z6T9C*VRE?+&P@KVR.0.A'2 M@"I%K,[Q6>H%8S87DBQI'L(EC+'"DG)!YZC`QGJ<V,#\QGO@/M]%MK9P(V?[,K^;':D+Y4;YSN48SUR0,X!/`&!B72] M.32[0V\<\TR;V<&7;D;CDC@#C))_&@#,\3R-.BV"?:48H9_-@B:3:ZD>6"%4 M\%N?^`58_M62XTFRU"U*!99HHY4DC;/S2"-@.1@@D^O2KUK8QVMS=3J[L]TX M=]V."%"@#CI@"J]OHEK!:W%LK3-'/,9L%\>6V[<-N,8P1D=Z`*J:M>_;[JR9 M;YN([B0Z@EK#F,JD98(,XW'Y1N!Q['GG(GN]4U&%K M^V@:W:XM3'(KR1-M:-^,'#?>&"<]#Z#MIMI5D_VC="2+E@\J[VPS#&#C.`?E M'(]*632[21)5>-CYI4NWF,&;;T!;.<#TZ=?6@!);B>PTF>YO"DTD$;R-Y2E` MP&2``2<<8[FL_49M032]49W,<:V;20R@A9`X4YZ$\=,'J.?:MQE#*58`@C!! M[U0BT73XK>:!86\N:/R6#2,Q\O\`N`DY"\G@8%`&7):S_;?#^[(&<\=<=C6B=-MB;7( ME_T7_5?OG^7C&3SR<$C)SU--ATFP@OI;V*V1+B4[G89P6Y&['3/+-"UTFPM)IYK>UC1YR3(<9SG&>.V<#..N!4BV%JI@(B^:`DQL6 M)*DC'7OQQ]*`,VSU9YII;%Q(;RT=S,`H^9!RI''\09??[WIFI=-GOIOLDSSV MTL$\9+D2<[L`C8`O(ZY!)Z]>.=,1H)6E"`2,H4MCD@9P/U/YU6M=*L+.YDN; M:TBBFDSO=5P3DY/ZT`9TGF?\)S!YF/)_L]_*SC[_`)@W8]\8JEJEU-I^NZO= MV85A'IBO(.N)=S;"?^`Y/TKII88Y@OF+DJ=RG."IP1D$-2#2["WM9;:"TACAE!$B( M@`8'KGUI'TNP!SD#D^H[JNKW%R;R)[F+3KB&.)U$S#;AD#,2".@.1PQZ=NIV;C3K.Z MG6:>WC>50%W$]$^G65Q=174]K#)/%C9(R`LN.1@^QYH`H:// M=7E[?O-=N8X+EHTAV*!MV*>?EW<$G'3WS4FN20S6TNF"6))KJ,JQ9E_=H>"Y M!()]O4CT!(T8X(8GD>*)$:0[G*J`6/J?6H+G2]/NY?-NK"UGDQC?)"K''U(H M`PC%,=6OIUN?)%I91_8G4JP>,@EF(.0PA=`BAD>)0X(`'!'(&/<5K3Z3IMS,TUQI]I-*WWGDA5F/;DD5* MUE:NL*M;0LL!!A!C&(R.FWTQ[4`9,:-;V?AN.>#R>A_O"MNXLK6Z:-KFVAF:(Y0R1ABA]L].@_*G MR00RO&\L2.T9W(64$J?4>E`%72-T6F6EM.X-S%;1^:I;+`[<9/?D@_D:O4FT M;BV!DC!-+0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`PQH75RBEUZ,1R*?110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`45%<7,%I$9;F>.&,'!>1PH_,U+0`44 MR*6.>/?#(DB$D;D((R#@\_48I]`!1110`4444`%%%107,-P91!*DGE.8WVG. MUAU!]^:`):***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`JO=W#6Z*4MY;AV.!'$5!Z9S\ MQ`Q^-6*HZOJMKH]G]IO)-B%@B\$Y8]N!['\J`':=J$>H1S,D6444PCE>:1KHI/(L#@>Q*H[6UU=B>^61FN;89R MP^8[0HV@X&20!QS3+C2=VL3V\T-ZEHS0-;_9E0H5C4`*Q*Y7!S_$,[J`.K9T M3&]E7<<#)QD^E,^T0@.?.CPAP_S#Y?KZ53UVTEO=*F2V)%U'B6`C'^L0[EZ\ M=1CGUK-M]+NI]5-Y=P*(;X*]Q`9_Q%11W]G+(L<5W`\C9VJL@)..N![=ZKZ1;16\=P8;1[99IVE M(=RS.2!ECDG&3V]L]\5BV]C+"MN5M)E4:Q).PC4J1&0X5C@CC#+QZ<8/2@#H MUN[9K@VZW$1G&.OU"FXGBA#'"F1PN3Z#-85C878TS3 M[*X1OM5K="624?,&PQ)<,>NX'GO\QJ]KML]S)I92$RK%?)(^/X0%;YOP)%`% MX7MJ1$1R23?8X'@%P\RNDC*R(65@)XR# ME6/&1_MGW-`&Z-0LFC:07EN8U7>6$JX"^N<]/>DCU*QE*B*]MG+N8U"RJ=S# MDJ.>O(XK$GM;N^TZX\S1Y(KQK.2(/)<*_P`S#&U#N/'W\ MJ,?;+79-"K-@;U'0XXY&5_'\:`+=UJ%K:1[Y9FV]Y;)H[264H-O9M;2J'3*-^[P?O8(^0],GIQ0!>MM01-+BN; MFXBG+DC?:QLRN>W(FL_/CEA#*25D;(8'..,+Q[GTYFM=*N[>ZTZ3R!M6]N)Y% M1EQ$KA@HZ\]1TH`U6UBQ6SCNO-=HI20NR)V;C.*<#<%`/UQU` M]AFKS7<0L3>*QDA\OS04&=RXSP._%9.FZ==6ESITDD8(MM-^S/M8)`Y&.AST/'7`K+L--OX9M#,D$<:6,+ MPR[)`5QGIUJJ^M6<<=P\A=?L\:S.I7GRST8>HX/OQ4J MPW$.D&*W2WBN5A(C2,8B5\<`>V?_`-582:/J4[:@T\$4)NM/-NI^TM(Q<;L% MB0.N:`-^2_@ADN$E++]GC65SC.5;WDB=%@B65Y21M" MG=[Y_@-1R:S;0^>)TFA:&'SV5H^2GYL+R\GGWI%'%?6(MY_G) M:%AO^[Q\W^L/IT_"FW5A?:E;3FYC@@G-G-;($E+JQDQR?E!`^1?4\GTY`)H] M0EN[N*>W$J6$<:2+RI$:-58[QP0V<8(R# MT-.Q-):D21Q"5E(*;BR9],X&1^%9^AZ;+IWV@,L<$#D&*VBE:1(NI8@L!C)/ M0#`Q[T`))XCLH[FXA=+@"VW>=((243"EN6Z"[:-8KR?SH6C[)A950 MF1%,3LPY(!.=Q[#'OCEMQI=Y-YER%@6ZN)K=I$,I*(D3[A@[' M59Y=;ALFLI((WMGF)D*[@P8+C@GCD^NM[]&3REMWA=3G=RRD$?E3[JUF>^@N[=XP\4;Q%' M!P0[(2_H:W M:`.2T14N[>W!N]36[6Y8F1I)S&RI*3MR3L.57;QD_D:V5UN'9:2O%(D%Y-Y, M,C8&3S@D9Z-CY2,YR.E3Z18MIMB+9I1+AW<,$V_>8MC&3ZU430@(+&WEN#)! M8S"6$%/F^4$*"<\@9].PH`5]=$=F]T]C7C[WKWZ8S^*3:ZT+ M7RO83YLE$LN'3_5D$Y'/)^4\?K2SZ-+-H\MC]J0.]P9Q)Y1P,R^9C&[UXZTM MSH[SOJC?:57[?;K!_J\[,!AGKS]X^E`#)_$-O'YIBC>98617"W%C+&D$AC>5W3&=H88`)/(8?G]0*L&AW%I=-):ZE)%%,%\^+R M@06`4;D)^Z2%P>O7Z$7K*TFMKF]EEFCD6YE$BJL94IA0N"=QSPJ^G.?7``&: MM<&*U\F.989[G,<4C'`0X)+?@!GW.!D9S52SUP2>&FU-T,CP1GSU48RR<-CK MQP2/;TK2%OF^^TLRG$?EH-O*@D$\Y[X';L/2J3:(A&J1K,R0ZB#OC50`C%=I M8>YZG/4T`.DUF&%9FE0JL<,4HQSN\PE57V.Y<>G(K*EFEAU?5Y+Z'$:Z<)&B MBG)#*"P)!P""0,?4=:N#P\9$E2ZOYIA+;I"1L5-I1MR,,#.023@Y'//&`''0 M9)7NY+K4))I+JT^RM^[50!C[P`[\D^G)]L`"'5)(=3MXBL:6/]GM;BP90>1CCK_`/JK.M-61+6_EM;+F+4OLSJTQR[LRJ6R M0<017;(;J[^V%P@)1] MP;C/&,J.H]:`+FGW[74UW!+"(IK60(X5]RG*A@0<#L1VJI=:U-:_;Y7LU-M8 ML5DD$WS']V'&%V_[0!YX]ZNVEB+6\O;CS2YNG5R",;<*%`_("F?V7"_V]9W> M:*^.9(GP`/E"\8`/0#OVH`BGU.\MK>XFGTQPD04H8Y!)NR<'(`R,=3P>/RJ` MZ[)*+`V4%O/9E"R-V8$8Z#H>/?F@!L7B"XNI?L-O:J M-0C9UF5C\B[&4';G!.0P(Z=<]L5/'JE_=2/;PVB6]W!$DLT4SALY+80%3CG; M][G&1QZ33:+#-'#_`*1<)<1%BMTC*)/F)+`\8P<],8]*#HD`EAF2>XCFC`62 M1'`:<9R0_'.3GI@\G&*`&6LNH-XAN8II(?LRV\3B-5.Y2Q<=<]?E.3CG`Z(#G:<@^O48/O0!B17-WJ>O:?*CQ"TN M;`RF"6)CM0E-P^\`2<`5;3288K^VNH9)8Q;0?9TA4C9L]#D9[#OV'OF:ZL8KJ>UF=G5[60R(4. M,Y!!!]L&@#'TF6XLS:V\:P"REO+F`+@[U(>5@ M0%4\\GGT!YQ!J&J:ND^I_9S:116-JEP5DB9V)()*Y#`?PGG'ZTNVN[D MS3>8=\)AD19"JR*?[P'7&6Q_O&HX]#T^**6-(7"30"W=?.<@Q@8`Z]@3[\T` M9M[J.J*FH2PRVT:6]I'=Q@Q%C@B0E#SU)3K^G-2WNHWD4FNK'*@%G;)/!\G0 M[6)!]<[?UJ__`&-9;)U*2E;B(0R`SN3DT`9]]K%U:PI<(5D4/`CH%X&_&0>G7_& M@"]I^JV>I/.EI([/`0LJO$Z%2<\?,!Z5=KD[W4-3MX/$")>/FP$303&-,G*` ML"-N#^7>FWE]J-KJ5]8#49"6-N8G,:[E+OM95XQR.F?S[T`==17,PW6H3I=0 M)=R0E-2$*.RJS*A4':>,'&<@Y)Z9R."IOKBSF6SN;US#_:'V=KERH?:81(%/ M&.6.,@#CT/-`&_+M22.(XVD8,0H)(52QX]`. M3]!6,CS17&FQKJ,URHNI()2R*!)B.1AD@.[:XM MY_/_`'C-M\W#=H^!G(SW'2@# MU9/A/_D6-._ZXBN>_;PU=Q7#SFZ>U5U>"4O%/&'7?(I`R.&Y'3!'O0!W5 M,$D;2M&'4R(`64'D`YP2/?!_*N5\1ZFT,6H?V?>LLU@D6=TA58V)8]\^8S#` MVD8&.N:BU&Z_L_5=8N8;ET$GV,M(6W>7&S$,0/3'Y;N,4`=E17*3NWV3R['6 M_/BEO($5H9"S0ACAAO9FW9ZX/3\JF,$T*:FRZA>L+2[7R5:7.T%8W(/&6'SD M8;(QCOS0!TM%Y&*V='N3-HQDA68R*THVS2> M8=X8Y4-_$H/`/H!0!J5GV^K1W-P(X;>X=#,\)F"@HK)G.3G(&1@'')K)T^9[ ME-':&\E>ZP8[Z!ICD?(=Y9>JD.%`QC&['>I?!?DMIEPT$OF+]KE&0Y88W9'Z M$'\:`->XOH8$W9\P"9(&$9!*,Q`&>>/O#WP:M5QN+.T&KH\@A<:K`S[I"N$+ MQ-N)S_O'/7@^].ENEM+[5(;*5&LX9(9+E0[2&,$OYK8!SG(7V>3,8"%8TX&5 MCS_#].`<^]5-&N(](^U6.I3+#*UU))$\IP)U8@@J3P3\V"`2?SH`VK.Y%Y:1 MW"QR1!QG9*NUE]B.QJ>N=UB>#^UK?^U@BZ1);2*//&$,NX'Y@>AV@[<\]<5G M0Q;M1T*TU2\E$YBN0T MH9M&9RS)Q'EL'/R_WC@\=>U68XC,9_M";=<2[WQL$_>"+S``0?\`GGMR#VY( M/-`'65%+/%"BM+(JJ[*BDGJ2<`#ZDUS']G016WB"YFT^9W:>4)@,I9&5V M=J436!:V%U:S0QBRVQA04$A0<\D`@C'0=\T`=>K.9'#1[4 M&-K;L[O7CM2AT9=RLI7U!XKE)H[XW?B$6MO<*LK6\D9$942+A1+M)`R<`\9S MZV8+:B;:UE2QD@B8QI"R[IMY)95QG=@+R!V'<4`=,K*V=K`[3@X/0U0N M-4":D;""-9)UC61@T@3@L1@=&K&"ST:T,=HMO.\$?G_NMC,P7!W<9SG/7UH`==ZS##%#+;^5.CW*V[D2XV M$OMST/?/ITJ^;B`0F8S1^4.K[AM'XUSMU:R7.G"RDM)7VZIOD5HR5:-IF?.> MA&T\_EUIEQ9S0WI>&SF>T@U$S&*,%3M:$+O7IG#EC@4`=0K*ZAD8,IZ$'(-9 M4&LF\D#6:V[6ZW!@=I)]K9!QE0`0VBRS")SRN2 M2>,G'KCWK'A@G73;A#!*';5!.!Y9Y3[0'ST_N@F@#?\`M$'G^1YT?F_\\]PW M=,]/H*:+RV+.HN82T:[G&\95?4^@X-8LEA&\M9+>X3?#*I5U.1D']10`OVF#&?/CQ ML\S.\?<_O?3WIHN[8HSBXB*H0&(<84GIFL!])O;GPW/$[1S7;&-8R#LW1Q.- MHW#UPS9]7]!3I;=IH6N(-&EA9IHF>68H\_RY&]02PRO&"3GD\<<@&T^I6,:( M\E[;(K[MI:50&V_>QSSCOZ5/YL?E"7S%\LC<'SQCUS7+V>DW,,W[W3Y'B_MA M[P`RHQ"&,A6.6'1B#CKQW[[>N03W&F.MK&)9DDCE6/?LW['5L;NQ.W&:`'_V MMI_D>=]KB\OS%BSGHY.`I'4'G\N>E":K8O9O=K<*849D)P<[@<%<=<\=,9/: MLJ:QN)X(WBTPV[F^@FD4S*SL%(+,QSCM@8)/\@7-C?&_:\BM2XBOQ.(F=1YB M>2L9(YQN!!(SCZT`6='U?[5!?37$J,D-RT492-E)`13C;RV[D\=<\8[5<.JV M0M([D3;HY#M0(I9F/H%`W9'.1C(P<]#6,MAJ!$]R+-U<:A]J2%I55I$,6P@, MK8!Y/?''O5E;>[MI[:]M]-P!YRR6ZRJ9,.RG=DG!;*9(SW/)[@%OP]?2ZEH\ M5W.5+N\@RJE1@.P'!Y'`%5/#FN3:D]Q;7L2Q743,5**0LB!BNX`DD?,I!%7] M'BFALF2XB\N0SS2;=P/#2,PY'LU8PT:^F2UNH1]AO%N9A,V\;C!)(S$`C()& MX$`\`B@"UIVO&XU#6$NA'!:6/ELCMD$JRDY.?7`(X'6K;Z[IZ6\D[R3*D4@B M<&WD#(Q`(RNW(SD8.,M--A M%#-K$NKM%9VFI)'$K/<@MD*PY+-B9+".GK6=?W-[;ZQ:(EY:F&>4)]F:/#E=I);=GV/8#MUZVM'MI+;3XQ<,7 MN9`'FD(P7;`&3[X`'X5%>0W%]Y,4MC&/*NED61W#!51LAAWW$#&.VX\GH0`N M+NZB\16=H#']EGAD8C;\VY<=\]/F':M.LVZM9Y=?L;E4'D012JS;NV>OM0!0U&36+25;F.XMY(FG2,6O MDG)5F"\/GK@YZ8'/84MWJ4]M!J%^W-O:,%6(`9<#&\D_B<#CISUX+@ZH^I!U MTV&2*)B(9&NL;62JOV6]E#/)YGS1J0-X`QU) M7CK]XYZ8(`^6]O(_$UM:%XVLYX7=<1D$%1!%*K-NYRVW''_`?UJ"^TRYN8[RR M`C%I>2!FD\SYD4@;P!MY)P2#GN?0`@&S14$#7)EG$Z1K&&Q$58DLN.I].:GH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"HI[>&Y4+/#'*JL&`=0P!'0\]ZEHH`JOIUE(TK26=N[38$A:)2 M7QTSQS^-+)I]E*[/)9V[NX`9FB4E@.@/';`JS10!473-/5-BV-L%RK8$2XRO M"GIV[>E.?3K*1)$>SMV64@R!HE(<^IXYZ#\JLT4`0?8[7;"OV:';`08AL&(\ M?W?3\*8NG6*.72SMUB@!J(L:*B*%51@*!@`>E.HHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"HY88IE"S1I(H.<.H(SZU)10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M45!=P?:(#&998ER"QB;:Q`[9ZC/M@^AH`GHK(\.S*]O=1BYGF\JY==EP#YD( MZA23RWJ">QQVK7H`****`"BBL3Q5!%<6EE'/&LB&_@!5AD'+X/Z$C\:`-NBL M*Z\036TFI;M/W0Z>Z>9()AEE(R2!CJ`1QT//(K5OY9X+&:6V2-YD0LHD8JOX MD`_Y].M`%BBN2BEO9IO#MRL<,E]+8R$F20A6XC.6(&>A)P!U./>KD'B5K_3X MI=.M_-NGMQ.86#8/S%2H('7*M@GC@>N0`=#14#74<5B;N1[9K.BU.\$MJD]O"OVV-F@`D.0X!8(W!_A[CH01@\$@&Q35977\7:I\X[EG:?:1^<\Z^ M692J1E6;IA3D$@]A_@`=$6`(!(!)P/>EK%AOY[A],:XMH,O=30N5&UO#;C[+<79M@`?G3YBBL<^K#D=@>^*`-RBL6TU._DBAEN M(+95:Z:W98W8GY692P)`[KT].W']F:Q8N4$B6@E614;:T;9!![!N&&,^_/(&UI MT*):Q2[$$KQ(&=5P6`'`)[XS_.@"RSHF-[*NXX&3C)]*=7/B6[FL(&>1'E&I M.BEE(`"RNOKV`X_R:7^V+Z!OLUS'!)P&?SJ"PEO)4F%[;K"R3,D95@1(@^Z^,G&?0^E9NCCSO$6L3W M*%+J-DAC1N=L&,JP;'1CN)';�!MHZ2('C964]"IR#3JR&,6F:G':6H5)=3 MFDG8N/E!5%W8`QDD@'_OHY[51.N:A)]ECCC@CD>]ELY'9&9G3-`'2 MT5SD^IZM$=6;?:,NF*K8$3`R_NP[?Q';P3CKV].7/J]W/97VH6^(8[`DF"2/ M_6@1AVR3R`=WRD#L#R#B@#H:*P)K_4#?ZH5NK2WMM/QM$B'#DQ9&YL\`,P/' M)QV[T=1O-0^PZM:23S9%B+I)-BK(F<@KQCY?E/4!AD]\4`=.;J$7BVA?]^T9 MD"X/W00"<].I%35@:AJ5WIEY(AD-Q%#ITMQAE`9V4KC<1QW/0#K237U[9O;$ MW!G6_BJCR'$9<;0!RO!&&)/`YZT`=!17-Z3>:B;S26NKWSX[^R,IC\I5" M,%0Y!')SN/M^@%[7)[J"73EM;CR1/<^2_P`@;(*,>_\`NT`:U%82W5_BQL9I MG22>6=&NU1<_NV.T`8*AF49Z=`W'<6]#O)[NUF%S\TEO<26_F8`\P(V-V!T) M[].<\8H`L+J-FUS]F%Q'YWF&,)GDL%#$#UP""<>M6JJ1:=!%.\R@[GG^T3P-=HPW M.JQ[E4G&`V3@X[IB@#JJ3(.<'IUKF1)JMQ]FADU"2$_;I+;S8E0B9%1SN(*\ M-E=IQQD'CI5F,FV75,W$V1=Q1!LEF.Y(1@`G`)+$9[9SVH`T[W4(+%X%G\S, M\@C0K&S#<2`,D#`Y/>G7E]!9>3YY<>=*L2;4)&YC@9(Z=>],5J:U=2V=FD MD8"H946:4GB)">6(R#[<'C.>U`&C17.2/<3:?-<`U0MG:6\\-W=[<,[)-= M6_F/)M).65,]B2%QV))'6@#KKJXCM+6:YE)$<*-(Y`SP!DTVUNX[OSO+#CRI M6B;>A7D=<9ZCWK$L2TVJ-97K23)+;RE2LV^*>,NH)*GE6&<8Z'7&#Z4`=+17.0ZA:RZ@]K<7=Q#J,=XQ\A M'<[UR=@V\C:4VD]AR>.M4;>_EMS9VEQ>R?:4U9HI$:5MQC(?:#GDJ?EQGK0! MV-%<9?2Q_P!@7UXNJW(G6]:/*Z>RRVG6Y4 MX)B7!(Z<>E`#K:X%R)&1'5%*'1S M$DH165NADT*QCN)X`UM-<1BWOE*PR88@*6;[K*I&WT MP1ZX`.ZJNUT%U"*T*-F2)Y0_&/E*@C_Q\4V)G;2T:&)H9#""D;]4.W@'/<5R M^GY;[+-8P2KJ3Z?+;SS-`V5N`(ROFDCKD'D^HH`[!W6.-GX/( M.6//7FI;"T,$'A=DL9(FBW";%N04)C*L6],MCD_6@#J]PW!1]:Y?3[&*Q&F2):3+)'>SQLX@?(B)EV@X'"Y*'TYSZU#IVGWAC6=GO MTUJ.&1"7BC6,,5;!9POSKNP0-S5>JS&.,N578P).!P,D4`:OG1[PGF)N)(V[AG(ZU6 MU>^.FZ7<7HB\WR4W;-VW/XX->C(^],#J"2`< M].V*O?:K?R_,\^+9G&[>,9],UE-I<"Z3/<):--=RV)B*R.^YAM_U?)RH)[#% M8.L:7=7T&N&.VFN9+E+:6!Y(!&20S`@`@$$*<<\XZT`=DUY;+Y>ZXA'F'"9< M?,?;UZ&EEN[:%PDUQ%&[.6R(0VT*@2']YF M,YX4?.#T!.XX/%,O+<:C/J=K)!+]GN_)$CB+=)&0%)7@\`+@CN"Q.#W`.B^U M6^\)Y\6\]%WC/3/\J;]NM/+ED^U0;(?]8WF#"=^3VK"AMDG?6KN&R2X6Z19; M7='A9AY..O;)9AV^\?6LRZLKJWT_7&>"8PRV*!'9`BKLW#:$!.``>,Y.!R3G M-`'3:EJ8ATN^N+"2WN)K6(NR&3A<#/.,GISCC/J.M7(+FWN2X@GBEV'#;'#; M3Z''2N>N[-[F&ZFL+=XX)-*:W$80KO<_<`7_`&1D9Z#=P>N+NGV[P^(;QH[< MQVCVT*QD+M4;<_*!VP&%`&U1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%07<=Q)#MM) MT@ER#O>/>,>F,C^=3T4`4(=/EA1W6Y`N9IEEFE6,8<#`*@'.!M&.N1UR:OT4 M4`%%%%`!534;!-0BCC>62/RY4E5H\9W*)B<.I4GOR*J:-= M7%YIZS7:1QSB21'6,Y4%79>/7I34O)CK\UBP3REMDF4@'=DLP()S_L^E`$=M MHD=LUD1=W+FRB:&+=LX4@#G"C.-H_+O4-IX:MK*WMXK2YNH6@5D$JE-[(S;B MK';@C))'&1VJ1=1N/^$J.EL(C!]C^T!@I#`[]N,YQC\*T9KB*#9YC$&1MJ`` MDL<$X`'L"?PH`6.&..W6!5S&JA`&);@#')/7\:I6>DPV"0A))YDM@P@21@VP M'L#@'@<#)Z4R^U6);&&6&1U6XE$(D$1+(2VT\$<,#Q@CKU!QBH=3N=0TC0'G M29+VY210IECV;PS@`$`@`@-UXZ=*`$\/:7-;Z58QWWG"6VY$3%"J-M(XV]1R M>I/)^E7K73+>T2%8B^(6=ER<\N26_4FJBWTFJ:EO%A$@4Y`53D'&M7+R6>"[TR-91LEF:.7*C+_NG8<]N M5S_GD`='IL4<:QB20JLQG&2/O%BQ[="234]W;17EK);S`E'&#M."/<'L:FK) MMKR<:SJL5Q*&M[>**2-53&T$/GZGY10!/-I,$\-W',\KF[4)*Y;DJ.BC'`') MX'J?6K<$0AA2(,S!!@%L9Q6!:ZE>M;:;J#3>9_:#%!;-M$:$HS+A@N[JH!SG MJ>*LQ?VI::K9Q37PNX[@.94:)5\H*N=YCB[97<%^%91@,O]T@`M-/>64K; MI[*149LC+J5#*Q`Q@G)Z<9!Z=`V?6[2!YQ()PMNX29_);:F0#DG&,8(_GTH` MM65G#8P>5`&P3N9G8LSMW+,>2?\`ZU0WFE6MY,)G$LPX`R2/QSCH:`+!T^V,4*%6/DR"5&+L6W#N6)R>.#GJ#BHFT>Q;[+^Y8?97 M\R+;(PPW=C@_,3W)SG)]344>O64T=J\'FS"[1GB\M"H-8262 M+;M-]IN!#D,!MR"<\]>G^>A`*B:#'+JNH75ZN^.Y>-D19G"L%4##H,*>1T.> MM7)M)LYKPW;QN)B%#%)74.%.0&4$!OQ!J)]/N[MQQD9P M#C/L<`%M=)LEN(9Q$WF01>2A,K$;.X(SAOJ<]O2DBT>PA29(X2$F0QLOF-A5 M.F2,@G;G\:`+EOI=E;/;O%!AK:,Q0DL6V*<9`R?8<]:L2P0S%#+$DAC;> MA90=K>H]#52WU6*YO+BV@BD=[>3RY2"N%.W<#C.<'IG'6JVFZI:BSL$B2[/V MF22)!,^]]R;MVYBQ_NGN>U`%Z73[.:*2-[:+;(_F-A<'?_>R.0W^UUJPB)&@ M2-551T"C`%9=OKT%S]A\JVN3]NC:2+A>`N,Y^;CJ*5]2Y$I"MA=AC. /4-QQGO5BTU.&YTK^T"#%$%8N'Q\FTD,#]"# M0!.UK;OY>^")O*.8\H#L/MZ4V6QM)VD::U@D:10CEXP2R]<'U%4K;5WG:U9K M4I%>INM7WYS\A?#C'RG`[;NA_&EX7MS0;V!5A@9`P M``3'M!R%VC`/K7(ZE>:A=: M?=M=QH/LNJ0J@@D)V@;.,X'J.3W/08%;:ZU*('$UGLNQ1%YX&/-V#=CTSUJ5E#*58`@C!![U7L;B2YM]\UNT$@ M8J4;D<=P<#(/N`?85S>CZ?8B.<#259QJ,L:3QQH#"!(<$'[PQCT]*`.IBABA MA6&*-(XE&`BJ`H'IBE:-'38Z*R?W2,BLJ;6)80;HVRFP69WA-VW&, M;\CKG'/M51M>U0VVH74>F6_V>R,REFN3EC'U(`7V/!Q_B`;Y@A)0F)"4^[\H M^7Z>E"P0J%"Q(`IRH"C@^U89UG4A(\/V*W$K6_VJ$F8[2@.&#<9#E`&O'#'$6,<:(6ZE5`S3ZQK;4] M0NM6N;6.RA$%M)&KR/,0V&0-PH4\C([^WN+6KW/D6RPI(4GN6$4952S#/WF` M`/(4$^G`H`N/%'(RLZ*Q4Y4D9Q]*4JI96*@E>A(Z5C:)=^7H\]L%<2Z;N@_> MK@LJC*-CT*[?3O3;W7IK*1FEM0T`T]KM6#8W."`4_P#'AS[T`;):(2\E!(%S MSC(7_"GC&,C'/.1WKG9O.C\3F6=(&;^RY3PI[.IVGU`_J>!5Z.>Y;5;%$>-+ M:6S>0Q"/H08^^?\`:XX]>O8`U:*R;?4[B4Z=*TP).3^9)--FNK>W!,\\46!N.]PN!Z\U4TN]GN)[ZVNE3S;28) MN1<*RE0RG&3@X/K5;P^IDN=4N9PQNC>/$2ZX*QKC8H]MI!]\YH`V58,H92"" M,@CO2US6EW=Q;7DMBBL89KZ98)I`6155=Q08Q_%N`&>S?W<5/HXR,<^U5[6>_M+=9XVMVM3J4L3QE2&VO<%0 MP;/4,>F.1[T`='16%9W6J7,T5Q$R&UN4;Y)T">2P7Y0H!W-R#NSZ<8Z5/X:N M+V\T>WN[V>.5IHU8;8MA![YYP<\=AW]@`"['?VM4-, MN=0CA34);=&>[O6AN8PH+PJ)"BC>#A@I&.!_$3ZY`.EJG%J=E-?RV,=PAN8A MEH^A_#UQCG&<'K5RLS[!$U[8?9T$=O8;]NW@;BNT*!Z8+9/J![X`+,6H6LUW M):QS`S1]5P1GUP>C8R,XSC/.*=#>VUQ=3VT,RO-;[?-4?P9SC)_`USH2^CTK MPXB9^U+?*)6P(F\S\-VW)Z9V^U=$&##*D$9QQ0```#`&`*AO;."_M)+6Y0O#(,,H M8KD?4$&IZ*`&0Q)!"D48(2-0JY))P..IY-/HHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`JK>6C71B9+J>V:,DAHMISD8Y#*15JB@#+TBUNK M"T:.9I9V>YE;YR@VJTC$-P!U!!(]3VZ4+!<#Q1)2Y$ MD2D!BK*1D$D#(..O;-:%%`'.O975LGF1V4L[7%\+QXT,8,0`4;268`GC/'&< M\]";WB""XN]&:*V@>25I(F\L,H.%=6/)('0'O6I10!D76E&XU"UU.$RV\XV+ M/$2,2)G.&P<94\Y![$<\46,5TOB'4)Y+5X[>>.-4D+J*U MZ*`,W58KF]BFT]+=?(N8&0W!V" M5\MTXP.OS"K]%`%)M*M&U#[<5D^T9!SYS[>!C[N=OZ5%;6,R:Q?W4RQ&"YCC M15#$GY=W48QSN]:TJ*`,>UTAH8M/M653;V,A>-_,)9L!E7(V@=&R>>HJ2R&K M(^Z]@L,8Y'(-=%10!G65G<6^H:GQ!SU!ZD>];E%`& M/:Z1-#=6$[S([6ZSF4@$;WE8,2!V&<_G5G5;&6]^R-!*DK2W5E>K%#=;?/C="Q!48W)S@$J`.0>@ZUK44`9$VE2W.H M1W$S0H89Q(DT2E92@!^1CW!XS[#&,\C)O]+GM=/TZT:YVM#--.TZQ2;,DL0" M4(9<[SW[?0'K:*`,.QL+F>YL;J=8;?[!YL2I%"565&5<%5)RF",=\XST(J./ M0+N&&UCCOXOW7GK(3;GYEE;<<#=P0>`??\^@HH`Q;+19[5M.D%X/,M+4VS_N MLAU^4C'/&"H]VEQ:7*1BW,I*RQ%]YD8,QR&&.?YU-I>G&QTS[%-*LX+.2RH4SN8 ML1C)]3WK0HH`R['2I;:&WAEN5FCL_P#CU_=;63Y2HWD'YB%..`O?\)=%L)=, ML?LTMPL^)'<,L>S`9BQ&,GN35^B@#&FT(RI>1_:B(KJZCN678"5V[20#GOL' M/;WJ6\T5+D7#+<21S23KX M:WFG^T-"7!4-N#<<9`W#.`>N?6E71HEL;ZS^T3F*]:1GSMRN_.[;\ON>N:TJ M*`,W^QXC<"8W$Y*VIM0/EP%.,G[O7@>WM3#H4?F++'>7<4ODB!WC95,B#IGY M>#SU&".QK5HH`I6FG1V=YF<\#OCBK%%`%(Z;";^:\+2;YHA"Z!L*RC/8=^3SUYJ`Z%:O+OF> M:;-N;5E=_E:,XR,`#!X'(Q6I10!FQ:+!'*)#-.[K;FV4N^<1GMTZ\#GKQSFI M%TN%6LV\R??:*4C;S""5.,AL?>'RCKZ5>HH`HPZ7!"\)5Y2L&XPHSY6,MU(^ M@)`SG`)`J'^QHXM-ALK:>>)8I1*K"0[L[B3D_P`7))PP> M3.NY=P8$'!5@<@@^H(JM)I$$D80R3Y^T"Y9@_+N"""WJ!@8'3@<<"M"B@"K: MV,5K<7,Z%R]RX>3<<\@8&/PP/PIDVF02W,MRC2PSRQ^5(\3E2R]OQ'9NH]:N MT4`4+K1[&[L$LIHB88R&3#D,K#^+=G.>3SWSS0^C6+QVL9B;9:.7B'F-U.35F MRLX+"TCM;9"D,8PJEBV!]22:GHH`S(=`TV"Y%PD#[PYD`:9V7<3G.TG&<\]. MO-6?[/M?MGVLQ9FZC+$J#C&X+G`;'&<9QQFK5%`%6QL8K%9EAR!-,TS#)(!8 M\XST_P#UU!::%I=E)YMO8PB7=N\QEW.#C&=QR?\`)/ MO-+!!#;0K#;Q1PQ+]U(U"J._`%244`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`454L]1MKZ:YBMW+M;2>5)Q@!NXJW0`4444`%%%1RR&,+B-Y M"3C"8X_,T`245DG74%K/=&PO!;PB0F3:F"4SN&-V1]UNH`X]QG3BD$L22+D! MU##/O0`^BBJMU>QVTT,&QY9IR=D:8R0,;CR0,#([T`6J*KP7)EGDB:"6)D56 MR^W!!)'&"?[OZBK%`!1110`444C,%4LQ``&23VH`6BJL%ZMW%:SV:^=;S\F7 M.W:N#@X/)YP,>]6J`"BBJ=I?":UAFN46V>9RJ([CYN3C'KD#.*`+E%%49-4A MCU:'3F63S)E8J^P[-P&=N>F<9/T'N*`+U%5GU"RCEEBDO+=9(5WR(TJ@HO') M&>!R/S%1:AJ=O9Z>;K[1;8=-T)DF"+)QD8/?\*`+U%9$&LAH;.XN6MH(9[,7 M$FZ7#*<`\#N.>M7[*]M]0M4N;2598G&0RG]#Z'VH`L45GQW\MW?3V]HBB.V; M9+-(#]_&=JKWP",G(ZCKV=%J'EVHDU-([&0R&/:\H*L>VUN,Y'/3/4=J`+U% M5)-3L(XXI)+VW5)@6C8RJ`X`R2#GD`4R/6--EDMXX[Z!WN!NB57!+CGI^((^ MH-`%ZBJ(UG3"R*-0MB9$9UQ*.57.3]!@\^Q]*1M4MIK.&XL[NV999DC1G?Y6 M.X!E'^UC.!ZX[4`7Z*RY]?L(%OFD=PMCQ*VPXSCH#Z\@?C5J;4+2!E6:=49@ MIPW!`8X!/ID\<]Z`+5%5I+^TBF6*2=%=G$8R>-Y&0N>FXCG'7D5-+*D,;22, M%11DDT`/HJE+JUA!#YLUW%$GF>42YV[7QG:<]#CGGM4L=Y;RPM+')N16*-@' M(8'!&.N<\8H`L45FZ-J+Z@;_`'E"MO=O"A12OR@*>03U&2#TZ=*CEO[G^WY; M!9K:.)+07`+QDMRQ4_Q#@8_6@#6HK,TO5?MFF)=3Q["79!Y89P^"<,G&2"!D M<5/_`&G9^2DOG95Y/*4!26+\Y7&,YX/'M0!65PD M:*69F.``.I-59=1A6.XV%FF@B\PQ%"K$4T841,1DA3@$KR`,YZ=35+3I;^?Q'JUJVHS&&S,1C1HX\'>I)#84$@ M=L$4`=#16'#K!E@*74AMKF"]2UE\M-RR,6&,9SA6!'7D M,C@'@G@U7/B&Q\JYEQ.8[5WCF?RCA&3J,_C0!K45%!-YV_,4D91MI$BXSP#D M=B.>H]ZR#J;6FLZM]H>:2V@@BE"JN1&,-N/Z`^OITX`-RBJ%QJT%NGF.DWD[ MD4R^60HWXV]>3U'3.,_6G#4X3)]7]0O8].L)KR97:.%=S!`"2/;-`%FBL MJZ\06-G@7+&&0JSB*5D1MH)`.&8=<<=Z>NM6QNY+6SO%% MJF]U\L'([X8':2.<\]J`-.BLQ- M&!4]N`1GGZ'&=Z:0Q1[A&\AR!M3&>3CO0!)16%%XEBFLQ/%;F4B[6T;RI%9- MQ*C*MQD8;C@9QVZU/%K+%!%-:^7?F8P"`2;EW[-X^?'W=I!)QQZ&@#6HK"\+ MF5O[5,\0BD^WON02;P/D3^+O5Z2_F-U)%:VAG2"18YF\P*02`?E'?`8$Y(]L MG(`!?HK&FUJ6'-PUF#8"X^SF42_O`=VS.S;C&_C[V<8UO+(2J1G("D[3NR01[#).>`0#H**YO2;^:WT2 MPMK:)IY4L$F.X,>H^1>`>NUAD],=#5C^VKMM2EB^QQQ6EO%'-/+++AXU96)R MH&,C![GI[\`&Y3=R[]FX;L9QGG%8+>(Y(;3[=5T)W,.3W(QC/'`'`H`WJ***`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`JAK7VLZ]7Z*`.4\,7(M[O M6FN+=;"".9<[W0+%\H`7@XZ8]JZNBB@`HHHH`*0D`9)P!2T4`>6:XTTR2HLYDPGN)HYE&_<`L:,O``7`PQYR`/ MX><'&8[N+['XKAU.8D6TEFUJ6QQ&P<,"Q[`C//M[UN44`8^K7)N;.(V3>=#Y ML3RRQD,OEB12PXZY7)X[`YZC.-K%MM_M(6O-C-]GP(VPJR>9\^W!X)3DD>O/ M>NQJ&VNH+N,R6\BR(&*DKZCJ*`.9O].TIO$=I;31Q"TEM9WVE\*S,P)/ZDCI MC`QT%+I$%Q$+>UU2.1K-K5Q$TN&P?-;`)Z@E"F`?0^AK=ETR.75X-2,THDAC M,:QC;L(/7/&?3OV^M7J`.-T^SDDU'0TU&!G<6!\P3`DA@P98[[&#']Z=Q M+8SM,>0">#P*ZRB@#G+*RBAM+9HK$Q.FH28Q`5*H9'QVX7:1[8-3:XDAE=K6 M.9IH[?F,PL\4Z$G,8(^ZV5'/H1UXQNU6N+^VM7V32X?`)4`L0"<`D#H,]SQU M]*`)I9!%$TC!BJC)"J6/X`+&D6,L/^6>W&[[O MR^_4UTE06EW!>1L]NY94=HVRI7#*<$8/O0!BZ@J3:PD\EGN*I6*7%M#&+NTN6CETJ*"(K"S>6X!#HR@9&20M`'/:9;S+J>@,UK,HBTWRY':)AM;`^4DC@\ M&MK0`RZ%81NCQO%`D;JZ%2&50#P?<=:GAOK>:Y>V5G$RKN*/&R$CU&0,CUQT MR,U9H`PM.BDT?4=0CEAE:VNYS>3U'O5N>TOUU"6\AL7*0W_GB(L@\Y M3"(R5PW4$$_-C@^O%=+10!E:'!J]W M!.OB-[LZ7)=V[6J1!E,7#!F)X9AV-;M53>H-36P,WMMR7 M-WYLT"NJNBF(+][I]Y^.:UY;V.+4+>S97\RX1W1@!MPN,YY_VA5F@#D] M+TS5+&30DFLU<68GBE>-E("L0%89(/09/!..V3@618ZE!`]BENLT0ODN%G:4 M`E#,)#QC)8E='10!2U>R.HZ9-;*^QVPR-V#*0RY]L@9]JSTT^ZO-2F MU.:#[-(]A]E6%W!(8L6))7(QTP?KQ6[10!4TJVDL]*L[64J9((4C8J<@D*!Q M^54+73[ZTUK5K]$MY%O/*\M3*RD;%(Y^4]?QK:HH`P6T.=;-1&\;W,E^M[.S M,0O#`[1P3@``#Z9XJ6ZTF>[LM8MY'CC^W/NC926V_NT7D8'=/UK9HH`Y^XTO M4KK3@I%A;74;Q2IY08HSH+%[9ZC=Q6TK+:B>WNA.L0D;9 MM"E<;]N<\DYV^WO6Q574KIK'3;F[6/S3!&TFS=MR`,GF@#+N=%NKBPNM/::- MK:XN?/#$D-&I<2,H`'/S9P*@NM)FGFUG)X[U+0!S-[X?O;B*95FMF=C$8GF M4L8P@7*+Z`LH.1[\9YK4FTA9]6@OVF=2B`21IPLK*.1&>-P#D$`$'();'U_.74]*%_)9.SC_`$>0^9N`/F1D892. MF#QGMQ3X]5M4M(I;R\LXFD3?Q."F,XR"<9&2!FDEUK3H;RUM6NH_-NP&APP( M8'.#GI@XP/4T`1W>E?;KR\^T^4UG=6RP,F,OE68A@>@^^?7D`U+IUM?QQNFI M7D5V"-J[8-F1SDMR`,D]>PY^@J:/4;.6V MBN([B-XICMC93G>>>!ZG@\>QH`S$\+621Z>H)S9R^9NYS(.RGGD`K'USP@%6 MXM/NH-2DFAOL6DLAE>!H\MNP!PV>!QG&/7UX?+K6F0JK27]NJM'YJDR#E,XS M],\?6E&K633VL2S;FNT+P%02'`QG!_'-`&?-H-W)-:*-25;6UNAE33SQ6\1EFD6-%QEF. M.IP/UXJAJVL1:?H]Q?(/,\H$!2"/FSC!XXY]:`*9\/W1BD']H1F22\CO"S6_ MRAE`XP&'!*COT_.I9=#FEGGN&O%6Z*T05+/41)GS4(D!4#:!@XY)`[T M`:>E:<^G_:S)J' M'!(ZCT/-6QJ%H88YEG5TE0NA3YMRC&3@=AD9/;(J:">*Y@2:"19(G&Y64Y!% M`&:=$4O-&UP[64TOVAK<\D2;MQPV>%)&=N.O?!Q5B33(Y(7B\Z8![A;@D;JFE:I/J?E/');DHQ6[M]I$D!P>.3V88Z<\D8Q5T:G:$0'S&Q/ M*T,>8V&74D%>G'W3U]*`&_V<#>+>,5;?P_# M:+!]DN[N"2&'R/,4H2Z9R`0RE>"3R`#S5Q=3LVN%A$I#LKLI*,%8*<,0Q&#C M/K3(]9T^19&%P%6.(3,SJRC8'P_;VPM&M[FYBFM8O)692I9 MX\YVME2"/PJQ:Z5#:W4TZRS2>=$D3I(0P(7."3C)/)SD\YIZ:G:N90KR%HI! M&Z>4^X,0"/EQGH7=Q+Y*PDS,K;E!)&<* M.>>O?OWJ2[U:SLF;[1(RI&P62382D9.,!CT&2[7$2%@#G!8>A'MGVR.];=5[RSM[Z#R+J/S(]P;&2,$ M'(((Y'(H`YN2\O=,GUZ[B6WD-O)"\N0R^9^Z3<%'\/J"2WICO5PZOJ,^I2_8 M+1+FR@G\B4Y52,`;CN+@@J3TV<@=>>-!M%L'BN(WBD9;E0LVZ9R7```R<]<` M?:S$WG'86(D8!RGW2PSAB.Q(-`$'B?49])T*XOK41F2(IQ(I((+` M=B/6LZ?4=>2YDL((XY[N"(2L\:*$1^9 M`^-R[BN<'(Y!SU%1W>DV5Y,DT\1,R+L$B2,C;?[I*D$CV/%`&WO9;9S%'AI@@)&T'(!)*\DX'KWJ]9Z6&AB:[$JNKB58OMD MLH1A_M$Y;Z8Q[=S(-%T]00+?&9VN"0[9,C<,!Z@^]`& M2VKWK3I;JP1DU+[&\FT$.A0N"!V8#`].^.PT=#NI[JUG^TN)'AN98=P7&X*Q M`./PJR;"U(B!B&(9#(G)X8Y5G8#&\K]TMZX[9Z4HL[=;QKM8\3L`K.">0.@-` M%74PWV_22LC*#=$%1C!_H(+9! M!QQC'>NEGMH;GR_/B23RG$B;AG:PZ$>]5O[&T[RO*^QQ>7YWG[<<>9_>^M`& M9INH7^HR6]PL\$40F=)X&<;T&2%0KMR'&!GYO7CTL^*]QT"780&\V'!(R`?- M3M5]-/LX[QKM+6%;EQAI0@#'\:?=6EM>1B.[MXIT!W!94#`'UP?K0!F7CWMC M8SSW=U`7,T:K.D03RHV9%;ALXQRV22/7@8JI=37EI-J-C!>2,B6\@_*@#"FMKB/Q#::KJ6R:73Y7E M@$Y9A(JYRJG_`%>TY!`]NXS71:/$\>GQ/+=2W,DJ([.Y&,[%'R@=!QG'J34Q ML;0^?FU@/VC'G?NQ^\Q_>]?QJ2""&VA6&WBCAB7[J1J%4=^`*`,;6;2?63/; M6\D)CAC*@,<%9R,JV0"1M&#Q_>]JS[K5IKW2M&NHY9(IDOX8KT(^T+R5?=@X MVE@,9]1740VT%NTC001Q&5M[E$`WMZG'4U$FFV*),B65LJS_`.M`B4"3_>XY MZGK0!ST=\K/=Q2WLGV9M5*2.)V!CC,6Y0&!RJEP!U`Y(JII#)%8W_E7+IY>O M#:1,O7&:[22-)8VCD171P596&0P/4$4D4L<\>^&1)$)(W(0 M1D'!Y^HQ0!R+N+5M8D2XFCD.HJDQ$S9C@;R]SA MM.1;X)# M_'-=%10!SNO00W7B31H9YVC1DN`RK(4+Y"`+D$'W]\5G6TZ2:1!;/,S3&*[C MC,KEAQ)@#U9P`-N#D#-=G10!S,+3V]IHNJ*DUQ(T"6]RB\LS,HP[$]PPP>_S M'TP4N+91J274-O\`98TMY84(7=EMY!PB@"IJ64TFZXED*P/Q M&<.WRGH1T/\`6N9P5_MM'?$#PPF-H8VC7`9@2"2(K`0:=JQT@.+/[-&950EE:3>N6!YY"!MYSSD$YY- M2ZOI\21:RUA`3:RV:,-H)0S;F&0/[V`,XYYYZUU-Y8_;=->RDN9E61/+DD7; MO8$8/\..?8#VQ5I00H!)8@=3WH`YT6<-MKELGDJ=)-I)Y:E2Z"5I`QSG(!() MQ^(%1"ROK;3=*U$Q2W-]:$ATSB22)\@*W`RP&S.>ZDY/?J**`.7U"W2UU."* M\BN'L7M#'NAB,J^86RVY=K$OX6>#6()[.XED>S'V4F)I!CRR-H(& M`^_)/KD>E=310!6L@&TZ!70X,2@JZX/3H0?Y&N?M;8M%X:A:SEQ"G[]6@8!3 MY)'S9&/O5U-%`''V4-Q"+&6Y@O#:*MQ$ZB`N8RTA*DQD$[2OR@@=#V%=391K M%8V\:(\:I&JA)#EE`'0GGFIZ*`.0MH)[K5;)OLT\:-92Q2I)"ZI&[8.S)'(Y MZY.<<5-HUC%/;Z"UO;J@@M@]P3"5#AH\8SC#$M@GGMGTKIW4.C*UBMK1+6%66&-`BC<20!P!G.:`.9T^Q%WI>BM90-;W$=HVZ?9M4!HMO/ M3=EBK=_NGI5R&U-Y>:1,EM)%]DB=)_-C*?*4V[,'AOFP>,CY3STSM6MM%9VL M=M`I6*)=J*6+8'89/-34`U.RWCGW$Q_<)*[?IT/\`DU4L--N; M>709/LC*EK/=!P%(,:N6V\=,]==10!S%C8%;/2TN+,EHKZ:60-%G`/F M;6Z>K1_Y'#-0LKAY+>[CM;F6*&]E=XH7,4A5UQN!R#P?0C.3GVZJB@#GK:R\ MK4-(>&RE@@ABN"RN2YC+D$9//)PV>3CIZ4W38KBVDT^5=/F2/==1&(!08%DE M#(2,XP%7L?IFNCHH`R]=AGDAM9[>$7#6MRDS0D`EU`(.,D#<-VX>ZBL[4=,N M9M/UYX(Y7>_91#!N`&`JKNP<8).DR3,SI@%EVC`W9/(_(BNPHH`Y5+*_26UNWT@W`CBDMY+:22, M,-S!@XY*D<8P2#[5T=G$8;6.,Q10[1CRX?N+[#@?R'T%3T4`<]]BN+N_L+E] M.>SO8&'G7>Z,JZ8^9<]QQG/"&PU/4 M-#>TOK>SCN$155\AEE9&!!("X"':./<\"NAHH`QAI\M]IYAO]/M(-[*6CAE. M>.0P8`8.<8'UYYJKI/+=6\=O#VVPP742V<=U]HCC,'*`DED&"!C).#CC..U+< MZ-+.)R+I%DDNX[I#Y)(4H$&"-W(.P=QUH`+CQ##;K)(]I=&&`JMS*JJ1`3C( M/S9)&03M!'/6GVVN)H0F MY"P7[!I5$?*M@!BISQD`=0<>]6;+36M=3O+OS59+A8T6,(1L"`@OH*`& M:OK`TI'EDMI)(8D#R."`.3C"Y^\V,G'H/<92?6/+U(V4=K)*RO&KD$`@/_$% MZE1QD^_L<,U?17U)[@K<)&L]M]G.Z+>R\DY4[AC.1D=]H]*6YT>6\EA:[NEE M6">.>/$.&5E`R`<]"1G&.YYZ8`+5_>FS5-L+2L^[`SM48&>6/`SP!GJ3Z`D1 MP:H+@6IBA8_:K0W,8+`'C9\I]/OC]:-0T^6[N[2>*[:`VY?*A`P;@/Z4`0Z5K4UU8Z.`,@8Y/(]R&S^) M%6*$VUG)<327#VIB#JI25/NCWR\:&BBUVW#_N;IKM\J/WDC9S]!\QX'M0!;FO&@M(99(&$LK(@BR"59 MB!@D>F>2.P-9NI:M.++5[;R?(O+6U:53ORC(0<,IQU&#P1U&/>M/4;)-0M&@ M=F0Y#I(OWD93E6'T(JO/I*W$%T)9,W%U!]G>8+T3!X`SCN3]3^%``MF]E9WE MQ8VD27TR;S$LA,;2!<#&<`=LG`SWK'>:XN9/#%^8HY+R1&/W]H;="3R<<>O0 MXYQ730H\<*)+(9750&<@`L?7`XK.M=%6W33@UW-*=/W"+<%`(*[0#@=EZ?KF M@"&/7_-BA"6K"YDADD>([CY91@C*=JDGYLC@=OI5G4;Z>W\/3WRPF.=+8R>6 MW)1MN<'UP>OTJFGA>WAM[>.WO+N&2V=C%,A0,JL'0K:70E@256N9(P_V]#N=I,9$@?.3SR.>G'2IY=9"V MUY=0PK);V,?-D$]``<$9`%`%2YUFZBDU(I:0M%IP+2 M%IR&<>7O&!M]P.OYU"^O7=D(9M1M(U@N+=Y4\E]S(R(7(;.!RHXQT(QSUJ6^ MT=Q:ZQ);SSSS7\+KY+%`NXIM7!P",``X80F,1W&S]T M"N&`V`%]_E')RRB"&.W@%R+Q[2?>Q"$K&S[EQDX(`.#]/ M]JKNB7L][9.UV(Q/%-)#)Y0(4E6(R,\]JF&FVBO&ZQ$-'*9@0[9+D$%CS\QP M<X?8KR+&IP3EF.`./>EN[J&RM9+FY?9#$NYVP3@?04`344 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4R9I%A=HD$D@4E4+;0Q[#/;ZT^B@#" M@\022P:5,;142_D,3;I3^Y89X^[R?E([<_G6B+QUO+A)8XX[6%5/GM)C+'M@ MCC''.>X_#G;W0+F2ZUB.%/D8?:[1EX(G;'1N,,#'V/`?GK5S4;:_;P];RE)9 MKI9X[NXBB^4OA@Q0=^.`._RB@#>BFBF4M#(DB@XRC`C/I23W,%L%-Q-'$&.U M2[!:WM;BW6>3>WV@L&=L8+;6)(Z`=LXZ8P3!XD1I+6T589)@ M+V%F5(R_RA@22!VP#UH`T1>VI$1%S"1+CRSY@^?/3'KF@W=LKE&N(@R@D@N, M@#K^5<]>:=MO+RRFTV:ZL[M4-M'#(R11[%'R/@@(-PR.N"*.Y MCB9IGE@E3,2Y5B)8Y,=6R,KDXW-Q\M`&]!J-C5;WEO-)MW;(Y58X]<`]. M1^=/CO+:5G6.YA=HQN<*X)4>I].EIJ>33KC4=/)@TJ6UNXE56:ZFR7*2*QC0DL=F0<$X'W<<$X`.AN-5 MLK>(2&>-U\Y(3L<'#,0!GGCKGZ50O-:D_M9[2TGLDCMXUEG>X8@$%L$`@_*0 M!G//4=,4M]#-=VK31Z6\4RW,$Q1C&))=CJ2X-Y@QP<`C()P,^]4K35KJ: M?2/,\D17UF9I`%(*L`I.#GI\W3';K5+3K34+>\TN633I@MGIYMY/GB)+X7[O MS=\$9X_*KNGV]S!!HT,=>1CCV]:>E];21F2.4.`YCPH);<.JXZY&#Q61 M::1<67AV"SMX]TEM.SQQR2;2R>8Q`++T.T]1WI;>WO84MKJ/2HH)/M!::W2< M,Q5P`SEB`"P/;OCK0!K1WUM*8PDG^L=HURI&67.1R.HP?R/I0M_:LNY9E;]X MT8`R27&9_*5@0%9#D`\9YE)R?T[1OHFH26T MV5&9F0@'=GI^7^<5EWFESR64:VMC'9W,<+F&2TD">3 M(3G9T`93W_ESD7+*TNX-;N;B98WBGMXE,@;D.F?$\>[&=NX$9Q^-9MK%J`N].FFLT00V\D,H68-MR4((X&?N=.,9ZF@"T^M MZ>EJER;C,4D1F4JC,=@ZL0!D`>]/34X9-4^PHKE_)$V_:=N"2!S^!_STYX:+ MJTFBVVFR10>4MI)`ZO+\JR?P2<#YL>G8\]@:T[&RU"'5H;F:&W$9LU@DVS$E M"K,1CY1G.1Z8Y]L@&Q+((HFD8,549(52Q_`#D_A5:'4[2XAAFAE+QS;BC!&Q MQUSQ\N.G..>*M22)%&TDCJB("S,QP%`ZDFLK3[&!UO3;S[[28L(50@J@<`N5 M(ZY8Y]L<8H`M1ZI9R-"$D8^>I:(F-@)`!GY3CGCGCJ.12QZG9RBS,N*I6.G7T0TZWN/LX@T_[DD;L6EPAC7*D87AB3R>:KVVE:G'<: M8LAM/LVG,51E9M[IL9`2,8#8([XSGI0!T-9<&O6D\3RA9TB4X5WC*JYWLF%/ MKE<_0C/?&I7/VVC7BZ&EO(;=+RVN&N+9E=F3<6+`-P#@[F4^QSUH`N1:Y:SP M%X5DDF$ODFW!4/OQNVY)V]`3G..."31<:[:V[B+RKJ6(H+>*XMYI6T MX(5E<[@4D]AG&'.,Y)V')ZF@#7&KV\L*2VB2W8=%EQ"HRJ'.&(8CT/'7CI4, MWB"UC0R,<#!)'IGG'Y\5':Z1/I3VYT^5942W6WDCG.T$* M20X(!.1N;CH<]1BECT1[>7,$ZF,:>MFJNO.5SM8D?4Y&*`'WVK*;%FLH;FY\ MRV\X/"%&Q2/E8[B.O.`,GCI5^S8M90,Q))C4DGOQ6/9:'=65NJ03P*TUK'!< M[E9@&1"H=>1_L@CC(`/&,':MHFAM8HG8.R(%+`8!('7'.*`*$NJ21Z\E@;9U MA^SO,TQ*XX*X(^;..2#QG..V33[?5DFN(H9;:>W\\$P-+MQ*`,G&"<''.#@X M^APZYTXS:I'>"50H@>!XV0GF.?3I0!IUE6^O6UQ#9R^5.@NWD10RC*E-V[=@G^Z>F:U:PH=`GA^RA; MY-MK--+'^X.[]X&X)W=1O/./3B@"[I.J)JL`FA3$3(KJV\-USP<=&&.1VR*3 MQ",^'M1(9U*VTC`HQ4@A21R/<4MII@@U![YG3SI(PD@AC\M)#G.YADY(Z`YX M!-6;ZV6]L;BU=BJSQ-&6'4`C&?UH`S#KLH\Y&TNY2X2+SXX&9-TD><$C!(!& M1D$YYXS6A!>">Y,<<9:,1+)YP.4);/RCWP`?H1ZU#.!9@:C=!YYH8O+_`'$; M'@L-V$R>N%]?NT_2K-;*R$2%MK,S@,""JD_*N,G&U<+^%`$FH*&TZY4YP8G' M!P>A[BL[^V#!$(8;6:ZE@MHY9`@).&S@#`.6^4G!QVYK6GC\Z"2+.-ZE<^F1 M6=+HS&2.:TOIK2;REBE>-5/FJ.F0P(!'.".>30!!>ZM>V\FJ&.")H[2U2=`S MLI(.\D_=Z_+T]NO)Q/=ZP]O++!%9R7$\$*RRI%D_>SA5P.3\IZ@=JFNM-6YF MN6>0B.YMQ;R)CJHW]^WWS^0J&31Y3<+>,$$>Q]LZ]4X+)HM1N+MIRXF1(P MA7[@7.,'ORS$Y]:N4`8ZZ\BRLMQ#Y:I:/=,5?>552,JPQ][D<`G_`!J7EV;# MQ&UY=P,D4>FR.S1R;@^UTX`('S#U[[AZ5/;>&TA>'S;ZXN(HK=K7RG5`K1$` M;>%![#G.>*>OA\2.K7VH75XHA>!HY=@5D;&0<*#G@'.!S[4^^T2.\M[-5N9X9[/\`U-PF-X^7:<\8 MY'7&*`&SZQ-;I"9K-83)"SEI9=D:R`@!"VW@G)P3CITJ4ZFWVX6QC2-O-*;) MGVLZX!#IQAN_&>@[$$4Z;3#-`L+7UUY?E^7(IV-YP[[MRGKD],?RITFFB6]C MGDNIW2-Q(D#;"BL%VY!V[O4]>YH`HV^MSM%]KEMB;%[8W/FA"IB`7.TY^\<= MQ^7>F0I>+XP1[N.VVM8R;)(DPQ^=,HQ)RVWC!P/O'BK5IH-K:I)%YEQ-;L&5 M()9,QQJVS:=IT1EA-W=6OGB5HR54#9D%=V6/SC MG(]?:MNLR+188+6&&&YND>#*PS!P7C4X^49&"N%`P0>@/7F@"SIMTUY9K+)' MY<@=XW7.0&5BIQ[94U1U^:^BFTU;*XCA6:Z$?7CGKG4@A2 M"(1QC`R2?N02:EM]1U6YU1?)LU.GB>2)W(4$!"RY!\S)^ M9>FP<>O6KS:39-OS$WSW`N6_>-S(,8;K[#CIQ2PZ7;0WLMS'YH,AW&+S&\O= MG);9G&XG&3[9ZYR`7:YLZOJ<%KYLP@F>:Y:T@6*/'SJ[@L0SCC"GC=U`YYKI M*I/I5E)82V,D.^VF9F='=FR6.XG).1SS]:`,>^FOI;"T&H6S0R+J4`4L5RZ^ M8,$A20#VZ]L]\"W!J-_=7RFWLY#:K<20RLQCVA5++N'S;L[AT(Z'\:NOI-G) M;K`\;E5D67/FOO+C&&+9W$C`ZGL/2E&EV8O#=^3^]+^9]]MN_&-VW.W=CC., MT`9]AJ,]Q,]B\X6]@NF$H9!S$""&`!Z%609[%C3+6_U"ZOA"D\(CGMI9(Y5C MWQJRNH&TY!8`,.2`"1D<'`W!%&)FF"@2,H5F[D#)`_\`'C^=4K;1=/M9!)!" MT;JAC5A(V0A.=HYX&>W04`8EOJ>IR+!%=72$7VGMOIZ=* MV]`+-X?TYG=G9K:,EFZG*BIET^T5HF%O'F&/RH^/NITV_2I+2U@LH%@MHQ'& MO110!F:W=WMI/$T2S?9-A\R2WC#O&V1@LIR2F-V<#-,6_N[WSY["XM_+AE7: MLC[5:,JI^;Y2>02001VX/.=2>RMYY1+)'F0(4W!B#M/4<=N!4+:-IKW,-PUC M!YL`41L$`V!?NX^G:@"*QFN+Q4N!=`+YLLXZ8SK#4 M;V6/0?.N&\R\61)U**.51CG&."",>GM6PNEV"7YOUM(1='K+M^;IC^5,.C:: M9FF^Q0"5I/-+A,-O_O9]>3SV/-`&))J&IV_AVTOY+MS/--"KHT:87+891@=# M^?O4U_<7-E8>(KF"X=98I@8R0I"_NHCT(]\5LMIEFUG':&!?L\9!2/)PI'2B M73+*9KAI+:-FN5"S-CEP.@-`%"[N[J2\NX8;R&U-LT94.1EUX))!!.#DJ"". M11]LN8]GI7.W6H7%M<7\7GND+?92K>TOM9-I>2QR8LMK!]S`%RIY.PX[T`=!91VUO;BUM"OEV^(]@?=LP`<'//0CKZU8KD5C MVV^JQP74\$AU>)=R2G>`QB!ZY[$_EZ"F:K<-8R3V\.H7;/:FW)::8@C=*.!T MWY4G).'1G9`REEQN`/(^M.KD))$MKW6FAF\M'N[;S6$Q&(G$>] M@<\=3SV!X(IVNSSPOJ,=O>3I`JVI$@E;,;M)@@$GNF"1R.E`'6TC*&4JP!!& M"#WKFM;>33F"P74C0)$OF0BY;[0F7.'0MG>3R,-_=`&*Z:@"AIEU:2/%I(T=^L\+VP27:=_EKT!..=Q!]B:T[F MUGDUI[.9II;"[*7"YY$31D$KGL&(3C_>QB@#>HHKAM1N!'JVO3&Y8&TGLVA8 MRG$18@28YXR,@^W%`':Q0Q0ES%$D?F,7?:H&YCW/J>.M25R-VMQ*-6SD:M#= M@V+#!=5(3:%)Z*>=PZ"HYSZ@$9'6JIAL7M M[^T^S))'!J$,JH+9@BQDQ;RH((P?GSCJ"3T-`'8T5QMM;6TVOL+D7L,D<\;V M2+;!5\H*I"ABF548;*Y`Z\9S5_PYI]D;F\NC;K]JBO9PCD'*J6.-O^R03TXY M/O0!OSSQ6T#S3R+'$@W,S'``JD-6A_M?[`1C_11?[+E#^;"5S@IM!W`9Y5R!^/H:`.G>6.-E5W5 M2QPH)QGZ4AEB0A"Z*<@!<@=>@KAKZ3?X>B@6"99_[)CC5EMW=F(/S)D<(`4& M M-/,DRVT(#T!.#R>>/;Z9N*P90RD$$9!'>L2.)M,\1W]Y*KFVOHXSYBJ6",@( MP<#@$'.>G'7H*`+UEJ<5U+=PLIAFLWVS(Y'`(R&!_ND=,XZ=*EFU"S@C226Z MB1)'$:,7&&8G``KG9+6Z2XU/6$M9I(I[FVD6WV8D=(L98+USGD`X/RU9NO)N M--:ZM],DC07D%QCR")6<2+O<)C/W>_4_-]2`;[31K((VD0.W12PR?PJK#J,; MW-Q!,8X7CG\E`9!F0[%?@''.&Z<]*P)[2Z:'5K.2*;[;>70FM9_*;:@PH0EU MR%*;3WSQQG-3W=I%+=:U;O:S"YO600SK`S+@1H%.\<#:ZD\D=*`.@:Y@241- M-&LA.`A<`D^F*([F"5]D:==SR27GVF"6(LL3 M#@J68-A2NW';(`X)/-OPQ`BV]U-]D:!VNYV7S(3&VUF!'4`X("_D/2@#6N9) M8X2T$/G2Y`5"VTS;#()-R,IZ,'P..O;( MQR!5Z_NOL=H\XBEF91\J11EV)^@K'BFDN-,OHK2VO?/;#R27,!B,NXX8+QU" MK@?\!Y[T`:6GZC]MN;R$QA3;.J[T?QX+[G4)(FN94$?V>R8"?.=Q^4,<=AA6!SSGD<=:;?R32S^2^E7-Q;(58%& MBP[#D<,XX!P>1U'MS!-I\VW5[.&W40Z@=ZRJ5`4N@1\CKD;=V><[O:@"[<7S MPZO:67E*4N$D?S-W(VXR,8_VASGUXJ"?5)4DNIHQ%]DL6V3Y!+L=JL2,<*%# M9YSG!'&,TM[!<-K^FW$<#/#$DR2.&4;-VW'!.3]T],U5GTV<)J]E!;E8+]PX ME1E`!=0L@(//\).<'[WM0!O4R65(4+R'"Y`_$G`'YU#!<227=S!);M&(MI1R MP(D4CKQR,$$8/L>_#=3@^TV+Q>7(^XKCRF"NIW`A@3QE?O?A0`W^U;1I[:&. M0R-<[BFQ21A>&Y`P,'`([9I3J=IMU16=C?_Z.9K5DV64L#9D7`=BAPJ@X"#;@ M8YQC(XR0"_;ZC]LDTR6*>.&.ZA:4P2+^\<;01@]L9Y]:L0:I87#HL-U$YD+* MF&^\1U`]2/3K698Z=>(WA^22'9]CM7AG5G&5)50,8R#ROKWIMOI5W'8Z9$T8 M#V]\\\GS#A29"/Q^@"I_:-IY<4AF`2:3RD8@X+YV[?8 MYXQ6?J.JRVVL::D3%K29IDG`C+$,BY```SG.>F1V/7VZUCRZ-E`&U97L%_$9;9F9`VW+1LG.`>,@9'(YZ4 MZ:YB@=$*JWT%S]OM M+RU$;F(/'+&YP3&Q4DJ?[P*#@\'GI0`2:S81FW!F9FN=_E*D3N6V?>&`"C307%A/%#:F1+J6YN7+$-F0$$*=O(&[OC.Q>G;>H`SY M]:L;=YEDD<>0ZQRGRFPA;&W)QWR/SI;K5K>T),BRF%&VRS*N4B./XN_?J`<= M\5EZCHM]=1ZNBBU(O)H9(P[MC";X$FJZ@NEV+ MW2.*ATZPFL]1OY/W(MIVC,04L7^5%7!SP!\O'7K5G4;BU MMK&62^Q]GP$<%"^=QVXV@'.2<=*`(YM4MX(Y))=RI&B,6X();.%&#RW`_P"^ MA56YU^&TM9Y9K2Y62W`:6#,>]$/1_O8(XQP342:##+H"V2.T9+K*DC#)!4C9 MD<9PJJN/0=>].N-&EU&WO&O7CAN;JV6W/DY=8P"QSSC.2V>@]/<@&A!>K-?7 M-IY,L;VZHQ9P-KALX*X/^R>N*EN9O(A:01O*1@!(P-S$G``R0._W@9%D<<;\[6P<[6QS MM.,'V)H`KKKMJUKYQ256%RMJ8CM+"0D`#(.WH0<@]/?BHYM?6WXEL+O)G^SK MY81M[X)POS9QQU('4=.<4-2TQK.VD5KM4BNKZ.8,EJS>40!_=;(!**,C&,GF MK*V5U?&(^=;*MM="X6:.%MLS88,-I;CK][)SZ<4`32^(;>/>1#*WE%!,@QO1 MFQ\NW/)7(W8Z9[X.)QJ\1O5@5"RM,80Z,&PP&22!R!D%<^H].:1-,F@O[F>U MNQ'#=$/+$T>[#;=NY"",9P,Y!Z46^G7%O>N.*`-$YQQUK*76P$LVEM7B:XG:W=&<9B8$@9QU!(ZCU'J*UJS9]%@E^W$ M/(C7>&RIQY;@##KZ-E5/U4>^0"(WJRZK9JT$BR,L_DGS?D8*0,G'KP1Z`_45 MFKJ=Q?/X>O\`R'1KB67$*RY!4HV"W0$#`/K@>O%;;Z:#>V%PDI'V1'CVD9WJ MP`Z]C\H_6JMEH0M$T]/M3R+8.YBW(,E64J%./0$\T`7[&Z%Y;>=Y9C(=XV4G M."K%3^H-5M1O;FWU32[>%8S'>H`]J3[+96\./(MXH@`,;%50.U8MCJEV]IIL M6EZ;;)'U'V6W. MVDM;>#^RFN#;(8F)91NV*WH07SWZ$'G.!5?Q!JZ6EQ=?V=:&*&G/MTS[4`=%]DMO\`GWBY&/N"E-O"65C#&2@`4[1\N.F*YVZ\0:K:-?B7 M3;?_`$$++(?.8*T;#C8=O)X89P`"M7=0UJ6RU&*#RHF1YXH0N\ER'XW\`[0# M@#.,X;IQD`U988&!,L<9#$9W*.3T'X]J<8T+[RBEB-N<712^-V8 MKE8]4BA52NT(I,>".O(+`_4&II];F,6H75G%'+;:?+Y4H)(9MN#(1_N@^^<' MVR`;>T;BV!DC!-(B)&@2-551T"C`%<]J'B"ZL9-1ED@A-II\D:N58F1P^SH. M`,!B>O48]ZZ"1UBC>1ONH"Q^@H`<5!()`)!R/:EK$BUBY_LV/59XHOL+6QG< M1DM(G&0OHWZ8(J3[=>PJC3&!UG@>2,I&5V,!D`Y8[A@]L=/?@`UZIVNG);74 MUP;BXG>0MCSI-PC!.2JCL,_CP/05A-K&L-9P,!;L][ITEQ"(8FWI(J*0.20V M=W3'Y]YEU6]M_#UG.K1SSG3S.0R%F9@@(R`>A^;+>N!U(%`&_P"=%Y_D>:GG M%=_E[ANVYQG'IGO4E<^VM74@22UMHR\^E->)'M+L7&W:F01D?-CIFA-:O([& M*[G6"19=->]"(A0AE"';DL<@[_3C'>@#H*C6>%YGA65&EC`+H&!90>F1VK(N M+[5;9L2QV_ENL:(Y7#"1I%0G:&.5`8'J.F,\YJ*P#CQIJ/F,K-]EBY5<#J?< MT`;KR)'MWL%W$*,GJ3VI]5;V=X/L^P+^\F5&W#L<]/>LN>[U)5OG6XAQ9W:+ MM$6-\95"5))/9SR.X'0<4`;U137,,#Q)+*J-,VR,$\L<9P*?(I>-E5VC+`@. MN,K[C((_,5QUHDYT?1\W+O*^JR'S'4'!S,"<#'?)Y[GTXH`Z^26.+9YCA=[! M%SW/I4E8-I?WI4Q23J[6]_\`9GD\L`RKM#`XZ`_-CCT[4VWO+]=?CM[^>>`N M[F.)85:"9-K8"OCY,@C>V$,W#0`GS%4. M1M.,'/?H>EE3QN)(U=<[6`(R"#CZ&N>M(EDTSPON+CA!\KD?\NS^AKH)% M+QN@8J6!&X=1[T`/HK`L+F\:W8R2N]SIT+QSQ*.)I<`@Y..PR/\`?[8Q399; MJW:Q>*XGF2YM'$H)R%(3<)01TYX]/F'3N`;[*KKM=0P]",TZN>T^_GEG\/JU MP6-Q8M),,_>8*F"?Q+5I:SW(63((P2,@>_&#^-3UR,UR;"ZU@P3,B&^M4EDW%F1&5`QR M\T>L7]G\[VT8CD1Y'+$,P.5!/4<9]L^F``#5HK+UB-I+G3$6>>$27)5_*D*[ ME$4C8/L2H]_3%9.DWLMPNGVEW<7"HTMS&6#L&=T;Y%9^H^4L>O.T<]10!U#. MJE0S`%CA03U.,X'X`TZN3M8R[Z3->R-(UO?SV\%P\IW/%LD`+$8&24'/?`]: MZ+4Y%BTRZ=Y7A41-^\3[R<=1[B@"U17,2W$R#50E\D3+:PS`"X,BJ=S[@&8\ M9"@9`&,@XSU6X+/!J=W'?NEO,D/D[+LL8R#RPP2`#E>G7'(]0#IJ*YO4FM+; M48[&\NA;VY@#V\ES*[?.')8[B_WA\A!/([>E17<\+74R7]\;25%1[65E8.R[ M!DQC=C=N+@@`D\#GB@#HX[6WBD:2*")'8Y9E0`D^Y_"IJ1<[1GKCFN/%L]A: MO#Y`":).[F:$2H1M5AG@_]\MT]#6:1#;ZWI+<2R1<*'=MI&1W;! M(SUK+MX;(Z1I-H4A`DU6598A@%O]:,$#V*CZ$"@#MZBDF5-RJ#)*$+B-2-S# MVR0/;FLWPU+`UA-;V[`BUNIX2HS\@$C%0/;:5J`VML/&C32VT8=[-&CD:,H!&VB\NYETZ1 M)&Z,S!$VAB?0@X!Z8]JL>%K?3_MDMS:SW3W7DK'<));B)5;@\X1FBA3[3%/YENR#YD8QQ99,="6!R1R2*`-RZU1TNI+:SM MA=31*CO&)E0D,Q'RYX)&TD@D=JT%='SL96VG!P:`<]R!L_#%0_9+>XO=/N+98([06S1WD+J,&/:-B,#T(/8@<`_0@& M\)HCTE0_1AZ9_ES0LT3;-LJ'?G;AA\V.N/6N1@TG28M.\/O-80;I7C$Y\K<2 M?)8?-QTW[@#K?/AWE M/-3>.J[AD55CU**Y6WDL6BN(996C:02A0N,Y(_O2#2="MWMG6:SU`Q2A8V..),L#C ME3D'/3GVH`ZWSHO-\KS4\S^YN&?RI/M,'FB+SH_,.<+O&3CVKG9X)KC3A8LL MDFH0ZAYL;NA&!YQ?S`>FW82,^O'7`HGMX(8)[A+&59O[41]T=J^]@'!9N!DC M:7YZ')'>@#IF8*I9B``,DGM4"WMHTC1K=0ET7%X6>>Y$4BELLJ[6 M.0`?4#\ZS-;BFDM-$#03-,+^*YD6&%G"1SLY965D'4'&#OZ8[=:S=/BEWR636%VD\#.11_.B?4[&WEDCGNX8WC`9U9P"H/0FFZU#+<:+?00(9)98'C100, MDJ0.O'>LR\L;R:77BELV+RR2*'++\S!7!'7C[P]J`-\$$9!R#6#JFO/#%!-: MKM@6^2WN7EC("(3@MG@#GCGU[5LVBLEG`CKM98U!!['%9%Q#>&.:%;&9LW\4 MPP%`%"ST:*R2T6&XG'V6%X4)VG*L5 M)S\O7Y14=OH,-N+/9=7)^R.\B;MG+/NW9^7_`&C4UEK>G7[%;:XW$1^9ED90 M5XY!(&<9&?3/-,;7K`)*5:=FCC\P(+=]SKG&5!'S#D.,@;OFQG&:B?087L;FT-S<^7<3_:"04RC;]_'R],COFH;36X M=0GTIEN9K62Y1G^RM`V)?D!.'*CA>N1P:MKK5@960RLH$;RB1T(1U4X8JQ&# MCV['/2@!EWHL=X+P3W5PPNXDA?&P;54DC'R^K-USU^E1W?AV"[GEEDN[Q?-D MCE95D`7>@`#`8ZX`SVX'H,7+34H+R>6!!*DL:ABDL3(2IZ,`1TX/TQSBH3K= MH'O4_>[K(J)08RI.XD#;G&[)'&.O&,Y%`"#1+837,OFSYN)5F*^9\JNI4@@= M.J+US^IITVCP33SR-).$N"K31!_D>,'/>JVH7\&G0I+<"0J\BQCRXVO08SG&,#BFW.LVMK%>R2B3;9,HFVI MDC(!!]Q@BIC?IY[PI%+(R/Y;;%&`^S?CD^A'/3)`S0!';Z3;V[690R'['&T4 M6YLX4XR#Z]!^55_^$-(V*6\30H'=F&QL94Y/(^4<'IBHK74($M]^ M9V#W;PDRLI*N7(QUX`/RC\.N229Y"P'3[Q M-2V5[%?6GVB`$@%E*9&0RG!7KC.1ZX]\5S::[=7]OH-^D,D8N+F1'A1^'`#` M#J`>F>>XH`Z2^L+?4(DCN5=E1Q(NR1D(8=#E2#Q5=M$LG296%QB=Q))_I4OS M,!@?Q>F./8>@PJ:O;M!'(P:-Y'=!$[*&!1BK=\8!&,@]QZU+!?Q7&G?;8TD\ MO:S;2,-QG/MV]<4`6ZS5T+3DD21(&4I.;A0LK@!SWQG'KQTY/')J*W\003VT M-P;:XBCG*B%I-@$F0QX.[`P%.9NR%&T(<$D[L8.1C M!.<_7``Z'1+"%=J1RX\\7!W3R,3(.C$EN?H>#4MOIEG;2>9##M(9G4%B55F) M)*@G`)W'IV..E4QXAMG@AE@BFE,L`G6(;0[+SPH)^9@1R![>HS*VLQXGECAD M>VMY3#++PN'!`.`<9`R/9-&DB$@[7`(R#D=A[')SQQCF@"Q%IUG%;-;+;H8G&'5QOW\8^8G);@` M<^E2):VZ2>8D$2OL$>X(`=HZ+GT]JSM<>Z,UC;PV]O/#<3%)$FD*A_W;MM(V MMQ\N?P`QS34U%;2/_1;=I=/@F\B24RLTB-NP<*0" M.^"3@@XYX`-:F2QQS1-'*BR1N,,K#((]"*S[C4KF(LL-FEPT$8>Y6.;+(<9V MH-N6;&2`=N>/6HUULS22+;0*ZBR2\B9I"N]6S@$8..GO0!>.GV3)$AM+L6UUZ[N[N""'3HCYUI%=@FZ` M(5^",%WM M@)W62X<[Y9%7;O;U_`8`]@*DAMH+?/D01Q9R3L0+G)SV]ZYO065-/\-E[..7 M*,@DC:@&">I_&I64,I5@"",$'O6(=?9$O`84D:WN(H`ZL0C;R MN&.1P!N]\XZ\TZ;5=0ACNECC2)=L:*B^BC`K%O=7U"V<0+9++=+`)&5%D='8L0%#!2%X4 MG+8[>Y%EM1N)FD:R@69(+E8)4+?-R%W%2#C*[L$'^ZW-`&B\4,W/VU;1!$V5.4#[CG'\)/'J,9[T`;+*K8W*#@Y&1T-*0",$9!K M*DO]01;9#:)'--&?YU2CU?4G+S^3:"UC MOQ:,,MO8>9Y>X=@02IQSD9Z=P#H**SM:N[FQM$N;<1LD&0L1&2`S#!&, M#G)XXJ*;59%DMDC$?^F7)BA=P0`BJ26Z_-DJ<8QD,#]0#6HK`FUJ[CF:'9"' MAOXK:0E20Z2;<%>?E.&[YZ?@'7&IZA'/Y,202,-16V9MC`"-HP^[[W49QZ'V MS0!MR2)%&TDCJB("S,QP%`ZDFG5EZT)1X7U`3E&E^QR;R@(4G82W2VM612BH2SEHPWWL\8+#G!SCMWV:`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M1@&4JIQ4U%` M'.0^'[DZ7:V4TD2A+":UD=&8X+E,$#`R/EY''6K:6-W.D"7"11FWA:+>K9$A M*`9`[#.>O/'XUL44`<[;:-?"XT"640*-,B>*0"0DOE`@(^7VSS2Q:/J,VA/H MU]);>0L)A2:)FW,`,)E<#&,`GDYQBNAHH`S-,M[Z-P]Y#80D(5(M03O.1SD@ M8''3GKUXJL\6GW_B2*:"X22>W1EN(T8,#M(*AAV*L20>#D'TXW*:J(F=BJNX MY.!C)]:`,-M"F:/5+0R1_9-0F\TMD[TW8WC!&.@X.>,].,%-2TK4;A[Z*W:U M-O=30S@NS*ZLFP$<`@@B,8/UX[C?HH`IZI;S75JD<&SW3:K%!/`D.HA" M6<'=&54*1CH00!SD8]#5Y],6358[\HD_'/:/<217D20SV-SBYD/V8!TGB# MO\Q*DX4J#S\O&&`/)SV-%`&-;:'NT[4;*]8/'>SR2_NRY)/&/RK7HH`BMEF6!!E8 MEMH$UO!80"6`QV=X\Z;8RIV'=\O7_:/Y#ZUT%%`&(=&ND"S0742W4,\\D):, ME=DC[BC#//U&/\=-8)#9&&>;S9&4AI"N`2?0#H.>.058CK[^U23Z5=7(M6N+Y'EBWJY\@;6#<949^5@.` MW/4\8.*UJ*`,`>'[DZ1!IS&!C=SPJ\\=_P(M%G:\CGO+U9Q#.T\)6':ZYS\A8LWIS`FD&.>=8YP+*XE,TL#*6;>>3 MM;=\H)`)&#WQC/&I10!6M+*.SDN7C9R;F4S,&(P&P!QQTX%4K^(WVJ6D`M7` MM)5N#<.OR8PPVJ<\MG';`'/7%:U%`&?=:9YUU)/#=2V[3Q>5-Y8&64!MI!QE M6!;K^G0ALFBV[,3')-`#:BU(B(`\L9QVX(R>1CK6E10!F66BPV5S;SI/.Y@M MA:HK[<;`0><*#G@5/=V"W5S;7(GF@FM]VUHF'S*V,JP(((.!^0Q5RB@#,M-% MBM+>Q@2YN&2R??%NV<_*RX.%Z88T-HL4B*);FXD=(#`LKE2^"5.2<K-/!.$$;-$^`Z9)VD$$=2>1 M@^]1G1;<:B;R*6XA+[?-BCDQ')MQC*^P4#C&1P<@G.E10!0;2+5A(#O^>Y%T M3N_Y:#&/P^4<4D^D6UPLXE,A,THFW!MK(X``92.0<`#_`/6I&LN[$WCCEC62;9+<"Y8%L_/N#9''`W`''M] M:T**`*FHR720HMI:K:SAB'\S((?<.01@8]``.G%,31;%&RL@P#UY.`,YZ]\UH44`1W$$=S;RV\R[HI4*.N<9!&".*JSZ18W$\, M\L&980`K!V!('0-@_,/8Y[^IJ]10!3?3+-YII6@&Z>/RI1DA77&.5Z$XXSC. M..E0RZ!I*`)Z*I'4HFTR._@CEN(Y0A1(@-S;B`.I M`'7G)XYK.@\56US=7=M#97KR6DFR4*BG'S;<_>Y`/ZZTN M*TNGN;92S#"`,.!P2PZ[AUQ3[K7X+6/3WDMKG_3V18@%7*LW0,"W!YH`UJ*S MK'6+:]OKJQ"R0W5L?GBEP&(/1A@G(Y'YCU%6+R[%M#*8U$LR1-(L6[&0/?L/ M\\T`6:*J6MW)=Z1#>Q0CS)H%E6(O@9*Y"[L?AG%3P-(\$;31B*1E!=`V[:<< MC/?'K0!)14-U+)%"6AA,TIX5`<`GW/8>_P#/I5"TUM'BO1?0FTN+'F>+.\!2 M"5*L!\V0.G7/&*`-6BLJ2^N7M[:=HOLB2SQ@+(?GVMV88^4YP,9/]*@T.[NO MM1LII%FC6V69'V!2N7=0G!P?2GLRHI9V"J.I)P!0`Z MBJ6H7Z6M@;B-XF+,L<99\*69@HR1GC)Y^AIOVV2UL+F[U`1+'#N=7A;(>,#( M//0GTY^M`%^BLNXU&XL;".^OH5CB&TSQIEVA!XSD?>P2,X'3)&<8-][F".1( MWGC5Y.$4N`6^@[]#0!+152VU*VN9+M(Y`#:2>7*6(&#@'/TYQ]0:BO[_`&:= M)=64MO*(W`8EMRXW`,,@]10!H45!%>6LZ2/#G1!Y0X M.9&QN*@YXPN.<'EO8YU8)DN+>.>,Y210ZGU!&10!)1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%(S!5+,0`!DD]J6B@#S33);6#0O$&GPS122RSM';Q0Y8R MCH"BY)(X]3]:W[*S1=+TOP]=213SK'Y]Q;RN5RNN#G/IFF^'YK4^.M<%O+$5D5"NT@;C@;L8Z M\YS7844`>>2S6K?$/4I9;^*VCC6)M[2`!BC1%D]S\K#'J*N>(M9LKU]!N4GC M6,7X?YF`/EK(5WX[*=IYKMZ*`.2TJPFN_'%[K48(L3&BQNRD>;E%Y7(Y''7Z M8S5N^6./Q'=N\1S)IOR,(RAP#_`(4Z:"X?0=/A6SD=X=/"R0S6[%91\R/\O!Z<]^W M6T4`07=P+6W:4QR28P-L:,YY..B@G'X5SVI?Z?8.D=K>3^7<0W,YDMFC\P;Q ME5!`)PJ^G3')-=110!EZ9:I#J=]+;J\=M*L>(RC(HD&[<54@#D%-HY`SD()XH(\VEQB[D);A9>5(QCO\` M*WU4^U2Z[%<.^G2PK))%!=*\R(,G;@C=CJ<''`R?RJ_;6<%KO,*$&1MS,S%F M8YSR3SW-3T`ZMKAXGBERK(H"*N'STVE-W&>O2M^B@#F7AOK>?4!'8RR@7Z7:LNW; M(F$!5BHH`Y MS4]-FN;R?4H$N"JQQ)Y"2&$S;6+%N.W3J*ZFB@"E%=M_:;V'V.6-$C#I,,&-AP,<'(/H#UP: MJ:C<:C]M\J/2)+FS0!MPEC'F-D$?>8$`8_$^PYU\#.<)GCU2#RW?2!T7@_,>/>@"U151]4L([=[AKR#R8 MV*/('!56]"1T/M[CUIMIJUE>R>7#./-QD12*8W(QG(5@"1SUQB@"[136D1&1 M7=5+G:H)QN."<#UX!/X55O\`5+/36@6\F\KSWV1L48J6]"0,#\<=_2@"Y156 M74+>&^CLW:3SY$,BJ(F(*CKR!C]>X]15*#Q-I%P-R71$88H99(G2-6`S@NP` M!^I[B@#7HJA=ZS86=[!9SRL)YQF)5B=MWT(!%+/JMI!>FSKGVV+=:KA\W()3Y@]:`+M%9PUJU=[M8!+/]CR)S&G"$9R.> MIXZ#-1WGB+3;/3(-1>8O:3L%22-=V3@G&.HZ'Z8H`U:*9'()84E4'#J&`[\B ML=/%.G/IW]HXN!9"3RS,8C@'W`YQVSC&>*`-NBF!U:(21_O%(W+M(.X>W:LM M?$E@VBMJRF4V:-M+;.1R!G'U(%`&O165/XBTRWTR#4);C;;SXV''//MUXQVJ M&U\36M_=26UA:WEU)$"7VQA`OIG>5Z]A0!MT5CV6K:A=*SMH[QJDLB.OVA"_ MR],#@9)R.2!C!!(-:=O+Y\*R;&0G(*-C*D'!!P2.OH:`):***`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*Y+PB7&HZ^US%*VI+/\ MYD.,I@[`#VZ'VQMKK:@DL[:2<3M"GG`8\P##8]">I')XZ4`<7J>IVNK^!=8O M+2V:W#W">8&;)9]T>3[<8_*IXGDN/%NF1:JI@B@@W6!0?+,Y5=P+>HP>,#M[ M9ZH:=8BT-H+.W^S$Y,/E+LSU^[C%.EL;2=8EFM8)!#_JP\8.SZ>G2@#D_%\% M[>R&\M+.Y=M.=6MY4V[=P.7)!;<>BC@=5/K6IJJ67B*RTD,1+:74Y.5/3]S* M?S!'YBMI;2V6%H5MXA$Q)9`@VDGDDBF1Z?91+$L=G;H(26B"Q*-A/4KQQ^%` M',>&TU&R\0)I.H#?'9VLHMY\8\R,O'C\MO3MTK.L]B^!O$7FD$?;)!EAW^3' MXYQ7?-'&SAV12X4J&(Y`.,CZ'`_(5!!IMA;8^SV5M%@Y'EQ*N#Z\#V'Y4`D73>"M/E$1.I:=''+&/XEQC(_`#IZK71:2[75O_:$UN;>6Y4'8Q!94&=H) M_$MCMN(J\0",$9!I"JE"A4%2,8QQB@#@?^:0_P"?^?BNHTAGM8HDO[E9)+A\ M6OR8.SRU.WCTVMD]_P`0*T4L[:.'R8[:%(L[MBH`N?7%$5I;0L&BMXHV'0J@ M!Z8H`Y5-/GAU_4]#7*6.I(;H/&<>6.CC!'F>+O@S[9)IRB^P#9;K2/ M'?:W)(X]%49Y^4GO71;5W[]HW8QG'.*%55SM4#)R<#J:`.7\3?Z/XFT2_NHB MUA"S([G!6-VX5CGI@X.?:M!M5\WQ4NE&QC=H8O/6X9^4!&#@;>#SCJ./RK99 M0RE6`((P0>],C@AA),42(3UVJ!F@#E_!6=-L-5M[^0)/;73R3ENRE%(8^QP3 M7.7>G36OPVC^VR&%_M8FBB=>6!&-O7C@LWX5Z6\,4C!I(DYA5E\^>1 MXEC7[TDA(P`.I."/PKODMK>,Y2")3C&0@%+';PQ-NBAC0XQE5`H`IZ/&VG>' MK1+UPC06Z^:6(`3"\@GV_I7!Z%>77_"-6T7F0VEA'>QB2Y=UWL_FHV%!X&T? M,20>!Z9KJEA?Q)J,S7.X:1:2F..'&!@Z$CVQ70JJHNU%"CT`Q0! MQMEX;;0O%]I):1^;97!;+L@+0L(VXSVS]!Z58T.YM=$U;6+34Y(;:>:Y-RDT MK*OG1L>.>.ASQZDX[UU3,J+N=@H]2<4Z@#)DUZU%]8VRQS.E]O$4J(<$KC\= MN#G<..^<;K5^S&W2'3H`V%:=#) M*X_O;00%'L3GZ4>&KRYO+:\-U*9A%>2Q12E0"\:D8)P`,]>PI-6O)KN?^R-+ MFV73`-/.O2WCR,_\#(/`Z\YXX-:=G:PV-I';6T:QQ1C"J!C_`">]`$]%%%`! M7.>-]:.CZ*RPOMNKG,<9!P5'\3#Z#]2*LZEKRQ7@TW38UO=289\H-A8A_>=N MV/3KT]167X?TN6;Q'?7M_=&_-GMACE8@KYI4%]JC[NW@?B>_0`Z#1H_)TBUB M%NUNJ(%6)VRRKVW>^,$^A)J]110`A4$@D`D'(]J6BB@`HHHH`****`"BBD)` MZG%`"T444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%% M%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%%%%`!115/5-3M-)LVNKV41Q`@#N6)[`=S_@:`+;,%4LQ``&23VK*A M-YJ=RTC%[730I5%'RRSD_P`1(Y5<=,8;N<=*BMH7UMQ=7D96P^];VSY_>H70L=!(X8BXOBFZ.''51S\S]./AS MU4<<` MYJW3(Y8Y2XCD1S&VUPI!VGK@^AY'YU4U75K32(%DNF8ER5CCC4L\AQG`'^10 M!;ED2&)Y97"1HI9F8X``ZDUSB:A?>)79-+,MEI@)5[PKB289P?+_`+O0_-^@ M(I;?1KO69_MOB%OW)PT6G*Q\N/&,%^FX]>/_`-0Z-$6-%1%"JHP%`P`/2@"G M96%GHUE(+:(JH!>1NKR$#DD]S5+PC;20Z%%-.4,UXQNG*9ZOR,YZG&*G\37" M6OAS49)'*#[.Z`C/WF&U>GN15A)X+"RCCGE1##$-R@Y/`[`) MM3U:^?[(D5M9PSA&'E&2=\'IM[`CKZ<\UI:_XH&AS6J363;;C=\[R`!TNSN/L\UY'Y^0OE)EWR3@#:N3GVJD->M-1D6WMH)YI6 M5MBNWD+)QGHQ!8''8-@=11IHN91-!9MI-@J`;H[0> MUI#$Q;4=?N9,<,IN%@7/0?(]N2*UC)J]=[Z8' M.^XP0#_LK]U?P&:`.67_`(2K4+Z)K+44GM",F;RO*B&1T'1FZ=1D<]>M6H/# M6JV^J/J7F:7/=NV[S)8G^3UP`V.F>O/O77``#`&`*6@##5?%)5]TFCAA]P". M4@_4YX_6I=GB+_GXTO\`[\2?_%UKT4`5;3[<$1;P6[/SN>(LH]L*<^W>K5%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%/J_B2WMGO)9HU@^RQQ MRMA'9,YY.T#."<]A77UGV>F"UU6^OQ+N:]V;TVX"[!@8_#K_`$H`JMK$\8FB M@M)+Z6T9(IF0%-[$`L5X(X!S@D>GU=I^KW6H->^38QXM9Y8,F?[SIC'\/`.? MPQWI\NB*VJ/>0WEQ;K-M,\,9&V4C@$YZ<8!QC@?C2V6C_8EU%8;N4"]D:7HO M[IV'++Q].#Z#WH`U**S;O6([6X>%K._D*X^:*U=U.1G@@8-$&L+H`G9@JEF(``R2>U/;[;"6**4L,O*I8*.^!W-4&T.#R!-?HVK7<:$CS\89L*TO/D_P"?2;\T_P#BJ:]S*J%A8W#D?PJT>3^;4`<]$S:FL5TME-=ZC&#L M>Y39#:2=U&0-Q#+C(!.0,LO&)M%2]N/#R16GVC3;PONN);NWW,SD99E4G'+> MO;/'2M9[ZX4X72KQ_=6A_K)_G%4M1UZXLXHP-'O//G<10*[Q89R#@':Y(''7 M%`&-+1]V?I5?2AL1;FYTF25M42>:`,\GVN(ED1. M2`R`Y&!QP".ASUQIKF/KCJ+2SMK*+RK2WB@C)R5C0*"?7CO MP*//D_Y])OS3_P"*H\^3_GTF_-/_`(J@">H+IKI$!M(897SR)93&`/J%:CSY M/^?2;\T_^*J"ZNKY%7[)IWFMGD2SK&`/J-U`&;:>'Y;F];4->ECNKG!2..(L M(HE(P0!WSDYS5R;P[HT[AI-,MB0`O$8'`Z=*9]MUS_H#6_\`X'?_`&%'VW7/ M^@-;_P#@=_\`84`/B\.:+%G;I=H<_P!Z(-_.K]O;06D0BMH(X8PWVU_\` MXU2^=K'_`#XV/_@8_P#\:H`T**S_`#M8_P"?&Q_\#'_^-4>=K'_/C8_^!C__ M`!J@#0HK/\[6/^?&Q_\``Q__`(U37EUHH1'9:>K=BUVY'Y>6*`-*BL@R>(/^N\G_Q%&_Q%_P`^^E_]_P"3_P"(H`UZ*JQ"_,>9I+9'R>$1F&,\AR"00?8FJGBT,?#T_EDA_,B((4L1B13G`ZXQG\*;J= ME#907NH/+.\LRQQO(2!L0,!V'W1DD\9QF@#;KF/$4E[>7B:?):3QZ29(X[B> M-U!E+LH51GD+D\XR3TXZU41KA!>`/,8(-4@D4[64+&67<5!).SKTXQR.*N/< MQR+J"()$5=2M74/&R#;F+)&0.,JYX],]\T`;,\UIHNFJ=OEP1!8XXT'))X51 M[D^OU/K3++4S=77Y>_P`_(VYSC;ZY[UQMS<>99ZPD1NU0SP2PF.&6,!3L#%01Q_%Q MWY(&*VY;0V6H0QZ66$AT^X$0DE9U+!XRN&+49+F*U$%S;,2BYZ,WEM$6U:,Y)`3CW]:ZY""@*C M`QP,8_2@!U%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!16!XX=XO"E[)&S(Z^ M7AE."/G4=:9,+S3KG4]4BM_*MHK0;8&<8=ERQ;"Y`XX]:`.BHK&.I:BEV+*2 MTA^TO&\R^3)O7:"H`.[;R2QY]AZ\1R:U/!?VUO>QQV/FI&P,H+*['.]`X(4% M<#KG/XB@#=HK"BU-HWNTC@@65]2%LFU=H;Y%8LW/)"[OK@"F0WC:?/?(R"2: MXU%8E\M,+N,$;$X+>@/?K0!T%5X[2..?SB7>0!@K.V=JD@D#VX'Y"LU[[5E- MM&UO;PR37C0@N2P:/8SAQ@\'Y<;3GD=1G-4WU:_G_L]0R0NVH/:SE$)1]F[U M.0"5Z?KZ@'345GZU?)9604Y,MTXMX0.,R-D#)[#N3[=^E8GAV6Z:[,0:);I" M$OXMAV1*FY4V?[3`9R2>!GT!`.KJ&&[MKB26."XBE>$[9%1PQ0\\$#IT/Y5E M^*W9=)1-TB1S7$44K(2"$+@-R/41HE5[9@8F7Y2O;`]L$C'O M0!&NMZ2[!4U2R9F.`!<(23^=6;J[MK.,27=Q%`A.T-*X4$^F3]*YG1%O)5U6 MWB@M9[5M4E63S96!1=XW`+MQTR1\W4U?TV1YO%NL>:21#%`L&20#T[42:;#+$8':1 MK=E"-"S94@=N>?UYJY10!GMHUJZ7"/YA$\PN#A\%9!C#*1R,8'Y?6D?1+.2* M5)1(YD=92[2'01(<$\U:HH`SXM&L88[B.))46X=GE"SR#BB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ M`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ M`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBLN;7(H9GB-CJ3%&*[D MLW93CN"!R*`-2BJ,&I>?(42RO`0H;YXM@P1DBH//D_Y])OS3_P"*J*:\GCQLTVZESUV-$,?FXH`N45G_`-HW M7_0&OO\`ON#_`..4?VC=?]`:^_[[@_\`CE`&A15!+^Y9L'2;U!ZL\/\`22IA MPM_9-J"#]W[:=K'_/C8_\`@8__`,:H`T**S_.UC_GQL?\`P,?_`.-4>=K'_/C8_P#@ M8_\`\:H`T**SFFUG:=MC8`XX)O'/_M*HC)XAS\MMI8&.]Q(?_9*`-:BLC?XB M_P"??2_^_P#)_P#$4;_$7_/OI?\`W_D_^(H`UZ*R-_B+_GWTO_O_`"?_`!%& M_P`1?\^^E_\`?^3_`.(H`UZ*I?\`$SR.;3'S9X;CGY?S'7T]Z>HO_-<-);", M`;6",23WR,\=NY_"@"U152,:@7D$KVRJ#\A568L/<9&/UJ39=?\`/:'_`+]' M_P"*H`GHJ#9=?\]H?^_1_P#BJ;LO<\7$&/\`K@?_`(OZT`6:*S_)UC_G^L?_ M``#?_P".T>3K'_/]8_\`@&__`,=H`T**S_)UC_G^L?\`P#?_`..T>3K'_/\` M6/\`X!O_`/':`-"BL_R=8_Y_K'_P#?\`^.TY(M4"MOO+,DCY2+1A@^_[SG]* M`+U%0;+K_GM#_P!^C_\`%4;+K_GM#_WZ/_Q5`$]%0;+K_GM#_P!^C_\`%5$\ M%ZSY%ZJ#'W1",?J:`+E%4?LM_P#]!'_R`M'V6_\`^@C_`.0%H`O451^RW_\` MT$?_`"`M'V6__P"@C_Y`6@"]15(6U[M.=0.>Q\E?\^M2+;S_`,5Y*>3T1!]. MU`%FBJ_D2Y_X^YL?[J?_`!-+Y$G_`#]S?DG_`,30!/14'D2?\_OO5;_`(1^'_H(:I_X&R?XT`:]%9'_``C\/_00U3_P-D_Q MH_X1^'_H(:I_X&R?XT`:]%9'_"/P_P#00U3_`,#9/\:W#4[^QK7_GK??\`@?/_`/%T`:%%9_\` M8UK_`,];[_P/G_\`BZB?P[ITAS(+ISZM>3'_`-FH`U:*R/\`A&=+_P">=Q_X M%S?_`!5'_",Z7_SSN/\`P+F_^*H`UZ*R/^$9TO\`YYW'_@7-_P#%5IPQ)!"D M,0(1%"J"23@>YY-`$E%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`4[^[EM'@V6XDCDD5'6\+*NR?<%;<<[@,XQC'0'OGCIUP7UG'?V[6\Y8PN,.@.-X]">OY8J1X=\ MT,9P1GIGO0!']K4/&K``2RM$G/)(#$_^@FB_NQ96PF*%P98X\#_; M=5S^&[..].%J@E5]S$*Q=4.,!CG)Z9[GOWI;FW2ZB$XYJ'2=535M/>YMQ&661X]@DR,J2!\ MP'<8/3OWJS!9PV_G&(,IFE\Z0[CDMQ^F`!BG1VZ17$TZEMTVW<"WRY`QD#UQ M_(>E`%;3=0:_C#>1Y108G1FYBDX^3ISUSGCMZ\/U*\-C`DNS]V6Q)(02(EVD M[B!SC(`/IG/05):V<5H]PT6[-Q*97R?XB`./P`I\\`F:)B[H8GWJ5/?!'/J, M$T`5WN)VMH)HFM]L@3)4F126('RGC(YZ]Z==3S6UGYLCQAE[O7MM*O+O:':WC=@"C)N*KSU[$@\^F M.M._LV`68M5W+"LBR(H/W"&#`#V!'`Z8XZ<5+):QS6TUO.6ECF4HX8XR"N". M,8S[>M`""9GDGBC(\R-1@,C`9.2.>XZ=/0T122O-(N4VQR[3\I!QM!&/?)%2 M[%\SS/XL;?H/\_R%,@MHK:Q4%NIVYQ^G<^IIR6D$=Y+=HA$TJJKMN/(&<<=.YH`9;7 M+W%Q=QX51;S"/UW`QJWXI.#_WUZ53QP`./2J\&DVEO-YD7G@[R^UKF1DW$DD[2VWJ2> MG7F@!^IW3V5DT\:!V#HN/]YPO`[GG@=SQ4/VR:72A=0&(2#.X,K-R,@J!P=V MX8QZ^M79X([F%HIEW(WO@@CD$$<@@X((Y!&:K7.E6=U:+:RQ$0H^\+&[)\W/ M.5()Y)/UYH`AN-4>VNA!+'&I%E)' MD52>OHWZ4/<2Q7-M;N\6Z8N=Y&T$#D*!G);!_P#'2?:K,D<: M:FHS_8-0N9+9P;9I/+B*X=@JYY&3U.<$=1@]ZOB"((Z")-DA)==HPV>N?7-* M(HPS,(T!88)"CD4`5FDFMY+1)94D,SF-^-O.UFRHY_N]">G?CFE/?75H]VES M(/)W$07"KRK$`A'XQ_$`#WQ@\XSJ16\$*HL4,<:QC:@50`H]!Z4HAB"NHB3$ MAW.-H^8^I]:`,K7VNX/LTMM?S0"2XA@9$2,C#/@GYE)S@_3CI5F::2*[L;(W M!!D5F:5E&Z0IM^4=@6R2<#H&QCJ+DT$,X431)(%8.H=0<,.A&>]+)%'*NV5% M<9SAAF@"GI5Q)-]KAED\UK6!H9(U:-N2I'?.<_7/.?6I:`,T7.:M^3%YJR>6GF(I56VC(!Z@'TX'Y4\@'J,T`1EDMX\R284MU<]V/` M_,@`?054L6GNK"6WNI&2YB9H9)(RH;/\+C'`)4JV,<9Z5=,:%=I12I.<8XSG M/\Z/*C)<[%RXP_'WOKZT`9UM>N;FWMKDGSSDI(APDZ;0` MQQ[5<"(KLX50S8W$#D_6E*@D$@$@Y'M0!7T^8SV4;,=SKE'/^VI*M^H-9UY> MW-MKK%$FGMT@B5X4*\,[.%8`XYR@7KCYLGU10!D7!\[1RKWRQ,;C893,8 M]VV7E=PP02`5X]:2]N'9-$='>$37*[AO/(\ISM)ZGD#K6Q10!E:))))-JHDD M=PE\RIN8G:-B'`ST&2>*;J,\"ZM;Q/J?D3'84A,H4$;\'Y?XRWW<'(&,C!K7 MHH`RUE<:NR^8)T,NTA92IMSY0(4KT8'!.>Q8<=P174C:PR;7:/>Z8#?ZLA4. M6&>!Z'K\XXYS6I10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`! M1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%% M%%`%34KU=.M/M,@7RQ)&CEGVA0SA2Q/MG/X4:?>F]M_.,1C#2,J$'<'4$X<' M'0@9!]ZEN;=+F-4DSM61).#W5@P_4"I&7<5.YAM.<`]>".?SH`9<3""!Y2K/ MM&0B_>8]@/<]*B%U(=,6[\D!S$)#&S].,D9`/3FK#HDB%)%5E/4,,@U"EG#' M9?9(E$46S8`@`P,8H`CO]0BL6B60C+[F.6P%11EF/L./Q(Z#D7*K7EC;WR;; MB,,-K)GH=K###/4`C^0]*F\F/>K^6F]1@-M&0*`*MK?FXU.[M?)*I`B,LA;[ M^XN#QVP4(_\`K8JM9:W'HZXSD>M+>7)MC"Y/8=OJ1VR1( MMK`JR*(4VRL7<;<[F]3Z]!^0I7MXY)"[AFR`-I<[>#D?+G&<]Z`*T5OKUK<:]+IB21;HTR&\P99\D,H7U&#FM-HD M=T=E!9"2I],C%'E)YHEVCS`NW=[>E`%'3]8M=0NI8K>YMI0JAT\J8,Q7H21V MP?KU'K1J=_)9W5C%&%9;B1U8;"S8",PV@>X'7UJ\L2+(\BJ`[@!CZXZ4R6UA MFG@FD3=)`Q:,Y/RD@@_7@F@!$>5&ABE0R.RDO*B[4!&.Q)(SG@<]#4]1M$C3 M),0=Z*54Y.`#C/'3L/\`)-24`92ZY;OX@&EI)$6\M]WS_,'7:=NW_=8G/L?0 MU9BOP'89P:L-!&UPEP5_>HC(K9Z!B"1_XZ/R MIP1%=G"J&;&X@V"4U74_L5M M')#$9C)R"`2%7^\4_=C#,5^;'(SC`X(SUP.:F6_SJ+P-M5!)Y"\9+2>6 M).N>!MSU';Z9MO!#(S:9+/!:@SK(RQHW`D0/@,,D=5&1D M_I6BRAE*L`01@@]Z:T:.FQT5D_ND9%`&7?74EUHL%[9WDEF)E1T/E*[,7P$4 M@Y`R6'^.*EU%;A;VT>+4)(4DD6,6XB4B0C+-R1D?*#W'3UJ^8HRJJ44A""HQ M]W'3%*41G5RJEESM)'(^E`#JR-;O)K`B5)R!(FR&+:#OF!W!,X_C`*_AQR:U MZ0J&&&`(SGF@#.M&FO-+::TU`R^=`!!,T8'S8/SD8'^T@)P,@L,\]-U55%"HH51T`&`*%1$`"JJ@9Q@8ZT`8 M6KWMW8O.HNF`)$R'8N1%C;(!GKLXDR?4#I6S"S^4'G(4L?NG^'/0?7I^-2%5 M8Y*@G!&2.QI2`>HS0!E/>7+1:H9(ID\APL*P@!RFT'S`6(!Y+>WRXP>6-<2J,!R1G:0KQR^3.S+&S(,^6X<*V,CG#`C MD66\GCN(Y(Y844'KY;@D_,OUQ MWY&,>YS-,NY7TZRFDNW^T27,D01OF$JB5@01[*"'4Y&,;2"O(^8=\@'?HH`S+FXG3212SC%I*?[3252]OOY`WKO!4 M_P`.UN#Z%3W%2/?)!XAO!/<;+>&RCD8,WR(=[Y)]#C'^<5L44`9[M$VJ2QR3 M39:W218E9APK-D@#O\P!_P"`U+IS3_8+?[7DS%<$X.3Z%N!@XZ\=>*MT4`9\ M+L82;T2I(;EE4(6Y`<[.G;:%)[=<]Z?%O-S?+/Y^T,ICZ@;-@^[CON#>_P"! M%7:*`,AXK^32=-+R31WD822781\[!#N5L<$$\?7%6-+FDN//GE2XC\QE9(YE M*E%*+@8Z9SG/N<5?HH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB 4@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`__]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 112 exhibit99-61x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-61x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`/5`LH#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BD'(!QCVI:`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBDH`6B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**3 MZTM`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`'*^(-?U.S\1VNE:9%:R/<1!OWX/!RW<$=A45Q>^,["%KB6TL M+F-1EDCR6`]0,C^M11H;GXJ2$<_9;?)SVR@''_?==D[K&C.[!549)/0"@#)\ M-:]#K^GFX1/*E0[98\YVGV]C6Q7DOA75;^TUB6UTM+']W+;AAM/X^_\^M`'5T5S6B>()[E]9N=0>**QLIB MD;;<'`)Z^IQM_.H[74O$.MQ/=Z9%:6=GDB'[2&+R^_'0?YYH`ZFBN.O=>UQ9 M-(LTAM[:_O&=9D=2RKAL`]>G!/?ZUD>-DUZ*TM+G5&L3''(44VQ<%B1G#9[? M+VH`](HJOJ%Y%I]A/=S']W"A<^^.U4C7I^?\`,"HM)UM= M8\23:8UM"=-CA+6ZO'G=M(7<,]OO8H`V/^$FT3_H*6W_`'V*N6.H6>HHSV5Q M'.J'#%#D`UR:P6LGQ$N"\<,=MI]GEL@*BY`Z]OXS710ZMH-N"(-0TV($Y(2: M,9_(T`:E%WZ,OR\8)]&!H`ZVBJNFWJZCI\-Y'&\:3+N57QG';./;FLJP\6V%[I]Y M?A)HK:TQN>0#YB>R\\]O3J*`-^BN5L[GQ+K4/VZUDM=/MI!F".1-[..Q8]LT M_2_$D]Q8:I%?1I!J.G1NT@7E6P#\P'X?R]:`.GHK#\'W][J>A)>7[J\DDC;2 M%`^4'';W!I)]3N?^$Q@TZ*0"V6U,\XVCU('/;M0!NU1O=7T[3Y1%>7D,$C+N M"NV"1Z_H:IMXKT-9_*.H)G=M+!6*9_WL;?UK$NFM;OXD*+IH6AM[3_EIMVDD M9'7_`'\T`=1;ZOIUU,L-M?VTTC`D+'*&.!UZ5S]YXGN]3U!M,\,Q)+(O^LNY M/]6@]O7Z_D#UJMXVO+&ST:.+2X[<3WI,:O;HN2@^\`1ZG`_.M_PSHT>BZ/%` M%`F8!YF[EC_ATH`RI]'\51P>=!X@$UP/F,1A55)]`?\`ZPJ]X3U/4M3M+@ZI M;I%)!+Y65!!8CKD?ER*CUG6[LZI'HVBI')>L-TLD@RD"^I]__K>M4M0N]<\, MB*]O;V+4;-W"3((!&8R>X(Z].]`'7T5RT>I:MXANIAHTT=CI\+;!=O$)&E8= M=H/&/\_1=)UC4;7Q`=#UMXY9'3?;SHFWS!SU`X['MU!H`ZBBN,L;K7-;UG5X M;36/LD%G-L0&U1\\L.O_``'WZU7_`.$DU:TLM;M;V>-KRP53'<)&.)[S3+>Y_MR)3<1+)AK1,ID9[=>*BEN-;NO$W]D6NK?9Q!: M*\TGV='R_&3@@=0..A__ M`%TZR?Q#KMH=2M=2BT^&3)@M_(63(!P-S'IG':@#JZJZAJ-IIEN9[Z=(8^F6 M[GT`ZG\*--:[;3K=K]46Z*`R!!P#7$_$F-[C4])MU)_>;E`]RRB@#H/^$V\. M_P#00_\`(,G_`,35W3/$.E:M*8K&\260#.PJ5)'L"!FO/'\+V8>Y"W5UB"1X MP1$A,I09?:-PZ#N?IUXJ'0DL(_$6E3:=./GGN3D^N`#_`#8UV-`' MG=Q;'0_$T$>F6HN1I=@TK*S[2Q.0S9QR?F'%:.A02ZW=)XIU.>$QPHPA@B!Q M'@G);/?J?Q%6]%BGE\::U=RPRI%M2)"Z$!@,#@]_N_K60\%]H;Z_IEO:74EI M=(6M?*A9E#,,$`@=<'_QV@#%G>63PIIMJ&VMJ5])*Q'<@A?YG]*]5MX([:WC M@B7;'&H11Z`#`KA+_0;YO!NCR6]NWVNP)D,.TA\,'BN&XA5;" MRN[B\;`\DQ,H0_[3$8`'K0!E:K)=W'Q$@%C#'/+96V=DC;5&QFPRGI0!)K3G6+C1])5MT=R!=77;,:X M(R/0G]13-$9(?&7B)V(5$6-B3T`QDU)X'BDN+-M5N1^\G1(8QZ)&NWCZL":P M=46>Y\=:IIMN"/MRQ1R./X(PJ,Q_($?C0!.]])!IUSJ)9DO];EVP$(2T4`XW M8'/"^GM4T4UG#XUT5++S%B%JUN=\+QG@,1PP&>:U?#EK-6SP?\N]I M#(A4Q1#V/3/^-5_%UO=?V[H5Y:VT\PAE/FF)"VU5H4)WA22QZCGKR<5C>+-,M]#\,O9V)E9K MZZ3<';)8]?Y@5TL?AW1[;9*FG0B2$AU9$^;*\@C'?(H`XR;4[K2M7US4]/MX M&BBE2T.[($0`VC"CM\H'Y5;U/3/[,\*ZCJ,UV+V^U$(IF4?*5+`X7VQ_(5>\ M*:3-<>&]2AU""2"6^FD)65"I&5&#@^^36"[WT>E:5H.H6\D,HU!0A=>)$SC@ M]\%OY4`=/%KT=EHZ0#2]57R+<)N:T8`;5QDGL.*Y2*V!\.:%IN7"ZE?-(^.` M0"J?R/Z5W/B^X^S>%M0?.-T7E_\`?1"_UK#OM'NG\,:%>649EN].6.81`87\Y_MCQ5=Q'-/CQ@^0K$>Y&3_.N3UMI;C_`(2N\AR?+6&V7&>%!&^M.R\42KID-K'I M%^VHI$L?E&`A=P&,D]A6EXTV[8T&`,`R'CZFO1*\[%BNA_$BQ5YII8YERLDS[V) M967D_6O1*`.)^'?^ES:MJ;\R3S8YZ@GQQA?]%AS*WIPQY_ M,?G5JR\0WEEIT5G<:'?M?PH(PL<68WQP#N]*ALM$U"RT_5M4NE,VK7T3*L<7 M.S=T'YX]L"@#/\)G7'L+RYTJ&T*W5PS>9.Y!4_[H^M)XCTDZ)X8F66X-S?:E M=)YTA&-QY;`'IG^==1X0L9=/\-VEO<1F.8;F=3U!+$_RQ6?XSL[V]N]*^S6< MMS#!,99E0CD`KQSWQF@"[:V_B.*:VCDFTP6L>%=8D<-M'IG(_E7*SZAJ=OJW MB+5]-6!Q#*L,F]2S!1QE<V>N#V/?:??'K6E9)J'@^\GMUL[F_T MB5C)$8%WO$?0C_/KZBG:I]L\7&WLX;"YM-/2423S72;&;'91G)ZGG^5`'8*P M90RG((R#7&^)E\_QQH438VQ@RY_W26/_`*#79*H50JC``P!7$>/GN]/OK74K M:$.I@DMV=E)";N_'0X)Q0!1GNFVK)Y:1#[!]I9C)O9XGDRZ]`%8DX/!/I5.+ M[/%XRTZWMX84_P!*\YC&H_C.0H/]T+MP.Q)K%MM::.Q2SNK2"\ACSY8EW`ID MYP"I!QGG%:'AE9]6\76D\=ND:1N'80IA$51_GJ&Z@>"XC62)QAD89!J6B@".""*VA2&"-8XD&%51@`5 M&EC:QWLEXD$:W,B[7E`^9AQQG\!^56**`"BBB@#)US0+;7#;&XGN(C;L60PL M%.3CGD'IBHK7PX+>[BG;5]5N/+;=Y<]SN0GW&*VZ*`"H9;2VGE26:WBDD0@H MSH"5P1A]:U***`.>\8:`^MV,;6K!+VW;=$Q.,^HSVZ`_A56R\3:E:PI#J^A:@ M9U`4R6\6]7/\OR-=710!S27&N:S?0`6;Z9IT;AY3*V)9@#G;@=!TS_/M72T4 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!2$!@00"#P0>]+10!#]EM_P#GA%_WP*D1$C7: MBJH]`,4ZB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**KS6OFR;_/G3C&U'P*9]A_Z>KG_`+^4`6Z* MJ?8?^GJY_P"_E(;#/_+U=?\`?R@"Y15$Z:K$DW=YSZ3$4W^R4_Y_+[_P):@# M0HK/_LE/^?R^_P#`EJ/[)3_G\OO_``):@#0HK/\`[)3_`)_+[_P):C^R4_Y_ M+[_P):@#0HK/_LE/^?R^_P#`EJ!I,8/-W?'V-R_^-`&A15#^RH]I'VF]SZ_: M7X_6GC3H0.9;H_6ZD_\`BJ`+E%5/[.@_OW/_`(%2_P#Q5-?2[=Q@R78^EY*/ MY-0!=HJBFE6Z`@27ASZWDQ_FU(^D6SMDRWN?:]F'\GH`OT5G_P!C6O\`SUOO M_`^?_P"+H_L:U_YZWW_@?/\`_%T`:%%9_P#8UK_SUOO_``/G_P#BZ/[&M?\` MGK??^!\__P`70!H45G_V-:_\];[_`,#Y_P#XNG#2;88_>7G'_3[-_P#%>U`% MZBJ8TV`?\M+K_P`"I?\`XJE_LZ#^_<_^!4O_`,50!;HJI_9T']^Y_P#`J7_X MJC^SH/[]S_X%2_\`Q5`%NBJG]G0?W[G_`,"I?_BJ/[.@_OW/_@5+_P#%4`6Z M*J?V=!_?N?\`P*D_^*J(Z+8GJDI_[;R?_%4`:%%9_P#8MA_SSE_[_P`G_P`5 M1_8MA_SSE_[_`,G_`,50!H45G_V+8?\`/.7_`+_R?_%4?V+8?\\Y?^_\G_Q5 M`&A16?\`V+8?\\Y?^_\`)_\`%4?V+8?\\Y?^_P#)_P#%4`:%%9_]BV'_`#SE M_P"_\G_Q5']BV'_/.7_O_)_\50!H45G_`-BV/_/.7_O_`"?XTY=)LE/$3=,< MR,?ZT`7J*IC3+,``1'CU=C_6E_LVT_YY?^/'_&@"W153^S;3_GE_X\?\:/[- MM/\`GE_X\?\`&@"W153^S;3_`)Y?^/'_`!H_LVT_YY?^/'_&@"W15`Z+IQ.3 M:1D^IS2?V)IF,?8X\"@#0HK/_L/3/^?*+\J/[#TS_GRB_*@#0HK/_L/3/^?* M+\J/[#TS_GRB_*@#0HK/_L/3/^?*+\J5=%TQ1CEE`%^BJ"Z-IJ]+*'KGEG_\^-M_WY7_``H`MT54_LO3_P#GQMO^_*_X4?V7I_\` MSXVW_?E?\*`+=%5/[+T__GQMO^_*_P"%-&D:8%*C3K0*>WD+C^5`%VBL_P#L M/2<$?V798/7_`$=.?TH_L+1_^@58_P#@.G^%`&A16?\`V%H__0*L?_`=/\*/ M["T?_H%6/_@.G^%`&A16?_86C_\`0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_`*!5C_X#I_A0!H45 MG_V%H_\`T"K'_P`!T_PI5T325^[I=D/I;I_A0!?HJB-&TM5*C3;,`]A`O^%/ M_LO3_P#GQMO^_*_X4`6Z*J?V7I__`#XVW_?E?\*/[+T__GQMO^_*_P"%`%NB MJG]EZ?\`\^-M_P!^5_PH_LO3_P#GQMO^_*_X4`6Z0D`$DX`[U5_LO3_^?&V_ M[\K_`(4?V7I__/C;?]^5_P`*`+`EC+A`Z[CSC/-/JO%8V<$@DAM8(W'1DC`( M_&K%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`503_D/R_] M>J?^A-5^J"?\A^7_`*]4_P#0FH`OT5S_`(D>:C?P6U[;R21/]BCA5Y5+*[LP7)X/'?\Z`.GHKF;OQ%=0M,(TM MP5N&AP^08L%L%\D##87!R/O=ZD76=4:^CMS9Q`2N%1AD@!E#C//8>9G_`'1Z MT`=%17+?V]?3D;##$GVJ-=XC8C86<'J?5.O'7I3[?7M1N988XX;9'FE9`),C MR\*QPV">05`[9ST'&0#IJ*Y2TUB[MOMT9*R!9I&225F;RU\_9D\_="G/;@5, M/$-V)[6-H(L3>5S@_,&D9&(YZ8`8>QH`Z6BN8M?$-].;8&&`>8[!VP=I(9!M M4@GG#,?PQ@8V20&PI3H%Z8./3&2>0#JZ*YW^W M+T/$H2"4&3;O1&Q,-Z+\G)Z!F/?[OUQ$OB"_V2MY4,BJ5!=$;$7[TH=W//`W M=OZT`=/17,'7=3$-S(5L\P+#\NUOG+@9P2P&/O8SZCGN9-2NB\>AW,TC0^8Z MO.`S1X4H2=P!Z;MO7O@4`='17--J5M_PDZ7!N66S^R,>6;89`^`<=,[J?^A-0!8N+N&V>-)6.^0D(JJ6+8Z\`9IEMJ-K=3 M&*&1C(%WE2C+@;BO<>JD8]J@OK*=]1M;^U\MI(%>,QR.55E;'.0#@C'IS5&Z MT:ZNM4M;YQ:J\1C+;2W`5F)`X]&'/&<=J`-X,&S@@X.#BF+-$S.HD4E&"-ST M;`./K@C\ZYF/PQ=I M!'ED^4QA,9`X(P2/J>E`'2LRH,LP`'G2.4D6[/)=M,X.0)$*D8)QD$%B1UY]:LZ;HL]EJYNF>)X]CKD%MYW%", MY]-F.O3%`&O]HB-R;;>/.""0IWVYQG\Q3O,CP#O7!.T<]3Z5B/I%\^KQZB)T M63F#U[USB>&YT!(FB9EF210P.'VN[$M[D28_#\FVG MAJ>"ZLIBUMFW6!6(!RP1'5NW?>/RH`Z&&ZM[A`\,R.I)`(;K@X-11M9V%NJ+ M(D<1?:N7SEF.<<]SG-8=GX:NK:XLG\VVV6S`X52"PS)_20?KUIECX6N+6&-" M]M^[E@D&%."44ALC'4YH`ZA65P2K!@#C@YIU9FA:=)IMI)%*T9+REP$Z`8`Q MD\GIWZ#`R<5IT`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%)0`M%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%4$_Y#\O_7JG_H35?J@G_(?E_P"O M5/\`T)J`(M6O+RVE1+,([-"[A#"SEF4J`.",9W=3P*@.I7926\_=+;Q7`MS` M5.X_.$)W9ZY/`QTQZYK2ECMOM<4\K`3(I5,R$<'KQG!Z#\AZ4AT^U-S]H,(\ MPL'/)P6'`;'3/OC-`&;J>JW5C?7"H8S##%%*08F.`S,&RP.%`"9SCO[58?7( M$$Q\B=EB+98!<$*^QV'/12.>_H#5B;3+.XN#/-#O=@`=S'!`SC*YP<9/;O49 MMM-5A<9B'FN'#>9@,P.>.<=>?<\T`0:GJ<\>E075HA5IF&%90SE<$\`'DX&> MO3/I4MGH)XX`X';@`?2@"W14,]W;6Q`N+B*(MT#N%S^= M2*RNH92&5AD$'((H`=1110`45'Y\/G^1YL?FXSY>X;L?2G&1!(L9=0[`L%SR M0,9./;(_,4`.HI.G6H?MMKLC?[3#LE;:C>8,.WH/4T`3T5`UY:H)BUS"H@_U MI+@>7_O>GXU*K*ZAE(96&00<@B@!U%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 MF!G..?6EHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*HI_R'9N/^79/ M_0GJ]5%%SKEM&/_'G_P`*`*6OVDUW*B01!S]GE5MR9!!*?*">`2`V">AJ M*9[][@E9)[6W/RAY,!4C\H_,<_QB3'X?C6CJ%]/:21B.U$B.RIO:7:-S'`'0 MT'5+40D79$3JFZ5""P4\9&0,'&X9Q0!EQ3:M,+&X'FE92KR+'@KMRJXY]1EL M^_3TEN;'S/"DL1MF>X6VECB5DRX+`@?3/%:)U6R569IMH1=S%D88''M_M#CW MH_M6TW8WMC&0W*2S/8B>.-8XI$CC4*K,7._C'7;CB MJ5U'JUQ!<1J+K+03JBDA<',FS)Z'C8.H/3KS6W;_2WN6DG<1HKX(&$#$@#H,[N:FAU2W<[9'56\QD`7*`,S4+>[-]153>-D;'<..G&#]X?G0!!IJ MWH>]:]CF>-@=L3[2#RW"_,>HQUP.G?)JC/87DEM(J6LF9HYXHRQ16C\S9M9@ M#C@J>1S@#N:UIM:T^`@33F/=O'''3\*MT4`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M5(_^0M$/$?LP*?OV.\;=@#.?1MW7'IUH`O7&B0W#W!:>95FR=J M[?D)QN(R.^T=<]_P)=$BD=F^T3@EBXQM^4^9Y@(^7LWZ'G-4[C6[JV-PC_9C M)"#E3E<$;,$Y/1MQQ^'7G#'UNY1V)FM<*"C#:2JD3%"YYS@+@D?J.M`&@=#M M?+&PLD^[%;;D5B+J3VUK#<6URT]PL!:[CFD9@C\=5S\ MAW$@`8[\<4`:CZ#`ZR(+FX5'4IM&S`4A!@?+V$:_K3FT2%I)'%S<*9-V<%>- MSASCY?48^GYU0DUJ[2>16EMDVMY0#(<$^;M+?>]".,]2.>:=%JES>1V\C^0B M--`K1`L&!958_,&YP21C'.*`+J:';I*9!-/\S^8ZDKAR)6E7/'9F)&,>^:EM M-)@MK-K0O)-`T*P%) M@K5H`S3I&Y%#W]XSQD&)RRYCQD.2,\>O!K`/AZZ%VCPFW@CCE=HS&2&16+=/EXX;.,@9'? MJ(CX1HE\N-FR5(#'@?=!/7I4&I:;H'%5X-%E18H_*M8UBN?.CD4EG10V0HX&,@;3[$]:`-&UU.WNW1(1 M*2P8\QD8`)'/IR#CUP:DDOK>-IQ))M^SJ&D)4X`/3'KT[51TVPO;*=G9HF2= MW>==['#%B05X]#@CIP".^7W>FRW,EX0Z()5B,3,Q.\UJ`#N12H M)3_:&[.,\TZ/48!+-?K2 M:UN5-N5\U/DW*K=&^]C'7OV-2W.KP6Q;S4=0)%B!+(`S%=V`2W8>N/;-`&A1 M61'K\,K0+#:W,C3F14"A.J=1G=CW!S@^M/MM9BNY+>(6]S%]I#A&<*.5^\.# MG(^F/>@#4HKG]&U1Q0!NT5#;3-/&7:"2'YB`LF,D>O![_`)U2T:29I=22:=YO M*NRB%\9"^6AQP`.I-`&G165H4DSI?">>2=H[MT#/C.`!CH`/R%7[I)9+=T@D M$4CZ5%JQANI;J&&)!$T^&*3'((SW`RI/UJ[:-+!K M-SIAN)71K9)T=FW,A)*MR<^@(_&@#9HKG8KRY/AK3")F::\DBB>;=SAC\Q!] M<9QZ5>TB9Q=:A8L[R+:3*(V=BS;60,`2>3@D\GG&*`-2BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"J$+?\3^[7TM8#T_VI:OUGP_\ MC#>_]>D'_HXY.23U]A59]6FV+$L$<^:J/CT^\?\]=&Z^R,\8N6C#(P=`S8(/8C]:1M-LFEDE-M'YDA!=@,$D$$ M'\P#^`H`I1:ZD[*L-EG8U+9:H+RT>X6TN%48*JRC_/.?QJQ:V=M9JRVL$<(8Y8(N,F@#. MBU6>XMK"81>5Y\P1PPSD%2?E.?:I+S4S#J]I:+E4=\2,4)W95L`?B`2?I[XN MM#;S%`51C`V5`_@;'Z=:=)Y#,C2%"T3_`"DD?*Q&/SPV/QH`R+[4[FVA*C+N M9)27C092-!DX!.">G4^I]J=J^HSV\EG]FD'EN-\A*YPNY!EO1<%LXYSCL#5V M2TTYV^RRQ6[,[&;RGP23W;!I\T=C=D23+!*;9C\S8/ED2+IMKOO2V]O8&4S6T-MYD?[LO&JY7`QMR.G M&.*`+=%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110!3FMYVU2"Y0Q^ M7'$\9!SD[BI/M_`*HS>'HV%Z()FA\]TECVC/DR*Q;(]BQSCW-;5%`&='IOFF M\>^V.UW&(I%3(78`1CG_`'F_/VJH-"E32+.".\*WMJXE6X*[@SX(.1W!!(_* MMRB@#'_LR^;4+*[ENXY6@WEP4(!+`#"C/```]>_K4=GH]Y`]BSW%N?LTDKL% MC;Y]Y)..>.I]:W**`,2UT)D@MK:[G26WM(VCB"(58@KMRQSUVDCCUJ-]!O9= M+EL9M4\Q#"8(_P!UC:IQRP!^9@!@'COZUOT4`,B$@C42E6DQ\Q48!/L,FJ6F M6,UG->/++$XN9O.PB%=IP%QU.>%'XYK0HH`RK6QN[&VO\7"/).SRH8X>4=AZ M%L-CCTJTJ7CZ6B&=8[TQ*&E,88!\WJ36KQ-' MY<4'EG).=Y)8DM[^I)JY:6,T4T]U/.DMW*BQAQ&5557./ESZDD\]ZOT4`9$& MB&/1+?3Y+A7DM2C0S"/&UE.5)7)S[\\CTJY861M!,\D@EGN)/,E<+M!.```, MG```'4U;HH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`*SX?^1AO?^O2#_P!#FK0K/A_Y&&]_Z](/_0YJ`(=2LWO-3MEVXB6)Q(S1 MAU8%D.SGU"L*I8U@W$OF?;%MV?\`@,>\#,@X]N8_R[\YV[B^MK:0)-)L8@$9 M!Z$A?YD#\:C35+)Y3$LXWB3R\;2/FYXSC_9;GV-`&9&-4:Z'F_:"@FC.2%QC MG<,>GN#W'`J.U76%:W>66[8'9YJD)W#[NW;"?G6K'K%A+$94N,H%+YVMT&W/ M;_:7\ZDFU&T@NEMI9@LK8PI![YQSTYP:`,%H-8V1^4)HBT,2RLBJ7+A.P)`Q MGK[XXQFMF[MKN:6U>*X$8C;+C8#_``L,_F1Q2C5[`QB3[0NQ@"#@\@KO&..X M'].M2-J-HMJMR9?W3,5!"DDD9R,8SD8.1CC!]*`(;2&2.\U)DBV>8ZLC,.&. MP#/'N*SH]/OH[&:.:%9)?MT$P*-G<%,19N7ITR*8VLVKVTTELXFDC``CY71[@+;R16LDD1,:B,-A=V0!RI&=IYY/(]*T_[9T_= MM%QEMP7`1C^/3I[]/>K]`&-96MX+^"XG5_,\G;<.Y0JQ`XV@'(.2RM)H)+$_9WVQVLJ2'Y0 M0Q9"`,$XSAL8/'%3Z-;26EM)$Z.D0D_(SDYW=SQBM&B@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHHH`*IQ6\BZQX%07.@VES&B,9`4C6/<#R<'(.?7[W/^T?6M2B@#,FT2VFO!2*(&^G\V*3S4E(4D-\P/&,8PQ&,<8K1H MH`QY/#\3L3]IF/(8;L$AODRVF255."5.<'WH`GHHJ%[J".YCMGD432@E$[D#K0!-112=.M`" MT53M]4L;F810W,;NV=H!^_CJ5_O?A5R@`HI*6@`HJ"WNX+F29(9`[0/Y<@`/ MRMC./UJ>@`HJE-JUA!,\4MRJLAP^0<*>H!/0'VZU=H`****`"BH'NX8[N*U9 MB)I59D7:>0N,\]!U%$MW##-;Q.QWW#%8\*2"0,]>W`H`GHHHH`**IW&IVEO. M87=VE4`LL43R%`>A;:#M_&I[:XBNH$G@954L=@&`,@C//H>`:MWUC;:A!Y%W'YD1.2NX@'Z MXZT2V%M/;I!+%OCCP4RQRI'<'.<_C0!!ILT]W93)-*5ECEDA\Y%`)VG`8`Y& M?TSFN?TU)Y8/#Q6Z82S)*YD90Q4E03@<>_7/6NL@ACMXEBA0(B]`/SJI%HVG M0,C0VJ1F-F9"F5VD]<8Z?_6%`&%#JNJ7Z6MO!.D=RUL92V57S&#LN<%6X&W) M`P>>M7-?FN+CP:\R,I:2*-I6BS@H2-Y7/.,9_"M!]#TN2"*"2Q@>*(ED5ER% M)ZX^M7PH"A0`%`QCM0!B>(P#IUD+0J)OM4/V;9TSGMCMMW?A59KS4D*W!O08 MAJ7V;RO*7YD,FSD]6?47CVLL9=@"V=OR@9(`Y/``XQ3TN-4N_L4 M4.H>0\AN8Y',2.3LIX[F@#).HWD:7B-)8U)R0HQD^IH`YF\$]BE_=P,MYI4LK_:;9QMDC;.UBA[\C.#[8ZU,=0O MY=4E,=W;Q1078A:%Y,$KP,;-A))SD'=_6MK^R[$S>=]DA\S?OW;!RV"[:UA-R!@2E!N'XT`<_#J,T^E?;5U4F6>TDD\E54F*11NXXX"X*G. M<\=ZDU&^N5%V;>^972Q28*`I"L3UQCN!_A6Y%86<,DSQ6L*//_K66,`O]?6F M#2=-"%!I]H$*[2HA7&,YQTZ9YH`S+HWEM>V]K)J$KI-!MXV5J9(Y#;0F2)=B-Y8RB^@/8 M5''IEA%Y7EV-LGE$M'MB4;">I''%`'-VNI7]Q91W4>IVXDN('!1GW[)=N0M7!IUD#,19VX,X(E_=+ M^\_WN.?QI]O;6]JA2V@BA0G)6-`HS^%`&/X9<(=4BG;%VMY(\P8\X/W3]-N, M4OGQW%[':VET]M:O!).CQ\;VW\D$CD#.?0[AVQ6IH7QM3+>S6YDTV29A$%`+*R@,,KT M.7XM[2X-_*S7>FR7##:F$=50@J,?[1'.:Z.2PLYI&DEM('=EV%FC!)7T MSZ>U-.FV!`!LK;"@@#REX!R2.GN?S-`&#&UVS6B'5;G,^GM^"-:-+>$>5_J_D'R?3TH`P]/N+B6/2IQ>2NU^C?:1D$1G82 M2H_AVL`/QYS3=!GNF_LF:>]FF-Y;.TB.1MR-N"./WAO-06V<-(T`6V+*KM'&VX\YP"2]0ZY;Q792WO-/:[LRC,S M1KEXW!&".<\@GIZ512SN4L].CFBN;@0WN]&D`,B1#.-QS]/?%`&X;^S`8F[@ M&U2[?O!PH."3ST!XJ6">*YA6:WE26)ONNC!E/T(KG4T]3879.G2Q3/=LRR1( MJRA/,#JP]0"JG'M6II[75OHS/-"7G3S'"JNUI?F)!V]BW7'J:`+%M<2W`N65 M5"I(R1$_Q8&"3_P+;JQ_$YK"CTN[E>&2%7@$Z/;78;Y2$W%@P]^2N?\`:]J`-+3-9^W+ M=SR1QV]K;R&,2/)RPP&#'@``AAWJX=0LA`)S>6XA+;1)YJ[2?3.<9KGVM+N2 MVU*.*RE&;U+F-"WEB5%$?RA@>#\IQ^%*;&41B>VL;RS=YFF#K*)9%;;MRZLQ M!!Z8![#\`#7U75H+#3I+A)K=I/*,D2/*!YF!GCUS_45,NH6H>*&:YA2XD4$1 MEP"2?0?RK!GL]12TO83IYE>]L%A4Q,NV)A&04.YNF3D8SUIMW9ZC)=[EL)55 M9[:;"-'M<+LSN.V#^5.&HV1M! M=B[A-N>!('!4GTSZU@_V9Y;)3B,LQ!//HPXZTCZ=?X>064S! M;^6;RDN!$SHRD;E96X.3G!(ZF@#>?4[%%A9KN$+,,QG>,./:IHKB&=Y4BE1V MB;;(%.2IZX-/O7RYF/&(Y/E)/L"5/YUG:2!,5TLQA% M-S]M\O'W83B11]0Y"_@:`.J!!`(.0>],,\0G$!E02L-PC+#<1ZX]*R8-4O)[ MXE((Q9K<-;LSD*00=N0=W)+#IM[]?5-468^(M-^S&)93!<#?(I8`9C[`C/YC MK0!MT5R]SKNHC3TN84A#I:&XDC"%LD$YSR`JX4X.23Z<5;NM2O8+Z:R)C$LL M:-:83N6PP;GG;P3CM0!NT5@IJ.I2WQ,2P_9(KCR)2^%Z8!.=V*K=KB>*;=82$&--N M/GCSW.1Z4V[-Q_;UXK7&8([`/Y>S/!+@C_QT1\P].AK8TV:]:>:*],)`57C*GYB#U MR!QC(X.?Y4`:-%?[/E)3"1&"K!1P5;^\.<@_ATIDUY?V5I!' M;S!S!9B=D"`G'^T3@;<`CCDF@#IJ*YB2ZN[2^U>5;C>1<0P)O4!4#A,$G';< M?SYJ9[K5H4AAEN;83M=+'E4W$(RDC<.!G(/3K[4`=#17-V]]J@*O+=Q.D-]] MD=1#@R@MC<3G@C(X'I4MG>ZA=R+K-NK[5+0ZCF M]20631,,P`%P^,J>>G7WYZT`=/44MQ#`\22R!6E;:@/\1QG%8LNH7HUHK'*7 MMDN4MV157:,IDY)&XL"0>.,5`EQ-J']FWSW)*27Q46X"[8\!P.<9SQSD_@*` M.FJ$74)NS:B0>>$W[/\`9SC/ZUBZ)?7]XUM=S7,#6]VI_(W*- MP1AAU'/UI+F\@M7@2>38T\GEQC!.YL9QQTZ5SOF7EC:WEVEY*R6^H$W'R)F2 M+"AC]W@CVQT-77N[P?V;,)W"7=Z5V%%_U15BHZ9'W0?7DT`;M%=Q(/Y56@UF_B\F6Y>61$5K6=0J#-R,XQ\N>=O MT^=?>@#K:H?VSI^X#[0,,VQ7VG:S9Q@-C!.3V-4]?COD\(W4<[AN7F2%BQ@D\ MN3*D8;`..>O!'2L9[V[6%[U;IF>.]%NUMM`0KY@3'3.2"&SGOZ5%]J:WN+V- M9?)%SJHA:7C*`PH>,\9)`'/K0!OV]U#=>;Y+%O*D,;Y4C##J.?K4=KJ%M>2R MQP.S/$<2`QLNT^AR.M4]`!5;]#(92MVZ[FQDX"]<=ZR))KFV77)K68PR#485 M!P&!W>6I!![8/;'UH`ZVBN9FU*ZL5O8);MF2.]BA^TR*N8T=58G@`<$D#(XS MWQ6MIURBHT,M^EPPF:-'8!2W&X+Z,0#R1Z'T-`%F>[AMY8(I6(>=]D8"DY." M>W3@=ZGK+U>6>&[TSR9WC66Y\J1`%PP*.>XSU45EZ7=7[2://-?2RB[>6.2, MJH4A5<@\#.@#KJK75];V919G.^3[B(A=V]<*H)/Y5CZ'?27%Q;-_:,=PD\&YXPX=MW!W< M*-O7&/I4D+B+QE^2#B@"\NL63&,+(Y,DWD`&)AA\`[ M3D<'![U?K#U,03S0BUE*2->H))$YPPC/3.1D`#],U2_M"X6);62_8,MY-$)& M*J615)^9L8&,CLA8'^'].&]J`.IHKE+V]O([N6%M4C@DMHHW!2>9ML<8 MW,<9XIEG>17@D\M9%,3['61"I!P#W]B*YW5FF6PU2VDGDE@MGA,;LWS98C*, M>^.#SS\PKH9I8]/L7EE=V2%2Q+'+'_$T`/CN89+F6W1P980I=?[N[./Y5-7, M0+<:7J]M>7L*1F]8P3R*^=SDED/3H,%1]13=2U&2W;5(_MK1/#>6_D@R8(5] MF[&>H^9_\B@#H+R]ALDC:?=B218EVJ6RS'`Z=*6.\AD:=O45S>I7B33%IKS;)%J<,0@+@!4#J0<'KD#=G^E.U0O*;@27DQ2+5;=%Q)M" MJ1$<<=@6.*`.JHKF'O)_*NKJ"[O/M5S2%N)] M3U"62^G=+>Y:)83MVX*(?3L2<4`:4-]!-=R6JLPGC&YD="I(R1D9'(XZBBUO M([MI51)5,1VMYD93GVSU[?F*S-1L)+O6))[6017MK#$\+'HX$+$2VL5Q>^5<'.&C(CQMR.F74#/^-`'0LRKC<0,G`R>IJ."X6=I@ MJNOE/Y9W*1DX!R/4<]:YN[V">W%W>2?9X-1:-)FG*_+Y!;D@]0Q(R>>,>M27 M.HO;I-YMTXMSJ8AEE+8\J,H#C(^Z-V!GWH`Z:BN6NKX(]O`NJ`63F7;=R2E5 M+`J54.",X!89)Y([XK>TMW?3;=I)_/?8,R[=OF?[6/?K0!;HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@"&\M8;VTEMKA=T4JE6&<9%"VL* M73W*H!*Z+&S?[*DD#_QXU0UJ]D2"YM[>-WD2W,KNLFPQCG!'J<\T`:*Z19)J+7ZQ$3L/R%9XUFXA\[[5;HI-SY$*K)G)VY.3CL` M3WZXI\&L->+'##:/]HD\SF?I5T6-N)+>39E[92L3,Q)4$`'D]>G6L[0[ET\+1W,I>1TCD M<[V+,<%NI/7I59%N)O#@U?[5*+YK?[2N)6\H<;@NS.W&..F>^<\T`:AT:P.H M&^-O_I!(8GQ,H"0M/M?!0R*&PHQ\V`P)Y'%)#K5P%N&GAA)^V?98$24\MP,'*].I)^O% M`%[^Q[`:@;[[./M!.XG<<%L8W;OI5L^(61)(I;,QWDW@*RQIY:L9&8A?3DGCVJ6ZTNSO)S-/$6D M,9B+!V7*G/'!]S],FLXZ]-3ND$3E&/'3<.0/I0!$FBV"/&XB=O+A,"AYG9?+/52"<$=.OH*ET_3;/3 M8C'9PB)6.3R23^)Y_"L-;R^@TNTM8I)9IKV>18)&8&00C7R2?EYX///7CT[4S6K2.6"2>XN9TBBC^1(9&0[^QX.6/ M0`>OKFJ1^TSW4-A>S/YD&G":0HY7=*3MW<=<;3^=`&HVCZPCCBCCM]BQ/YBA78?/_>.#R?L\B27$J"10 MQ56S$Y/R]#R`:BU&XEEGU^7S71M-A0V^UB`&V>9DCN2<#GL/K0!L#1[$`@1/ M@R^Z]:7^Q].%Y)>"TC6XD!#2+PW(P3QT/N.:MPN9(8W(P64''U%8 ME]KL]D^H));Q`VBI(HWG]Y&Q(W#CMC]*`-"+2+&$VQCA*_9L^3^\;"9ZXYIB MZ#I:1K&EG&JC=PN1G.,@^H.!QTXK/U2ZDN9[YM(+N$0SQAXP00N2!D=.G MI4,FDV,K2M)`&,Q!DRQ._'3//.*AMKZ:_7$-GIUL\""WG,BI)YF6R"QY&.G![T`:S:+ICS&9[*%Y202[+DDCH>? MH/K3AI&G"Y-P+*#SB^_?L&=WK]?>H]0OY;.\AC*Q"&9'(E=B`K*N[!]B`3GV M-44\1,VG17)@'F>6[30\YC<,%"GC(.XXZ>IH`U;?3;*UN9;FWM8HII?ONJ@% MJ=]B#20BQBVN(@AWEUZQMW1V60Y4+MY&3C!R!VZ'BH_[>O$L+2[N8+:WBNE5DE9V9$!4'#$# MC)Z=J`-/^Q=,P`+"!<%3\J`/2G-I5@\_]:`- M>+3K*""6"&T@CBE!$B(@`<$8Y]>*=-96MPT32PHY@.8^/N'VK.75KD2?99(H M1>&Z^SKM8E,>6)"W3/"GIZT_04=!J*NL:O\`;&SY8^7[J\T`7H[&UBNI+J.V MB6XD&'E"`,WU-.:"`_*T:'+^9@CJP[_7I6,=:UPL,G.50=\=/F`!_*@#G+.)A9P M"3=D'8/O=G7UQQ2'3[)DE1K2`K,=TJF,8< M^K<<_C62FN74D@M1;+]K3S1($RZ_(5`QT.#N'TK12XN)M'\]HQ;7)B)9&^;8 MPZC@\T`2VMM9V@9+2&"$$X(B4+DCZ5'_`&5IC*X^P6C!SEOW2G<1Z\ZM]/T^_ELM.M;2T@WO+-=$!4W;565NBY'] MX=Z`-]=/LE\W;9VX\X8E_=CY_P#>XY_&ECL[14A$=M`$AYB"H,)GNOI^%9:: MAQ\(QW4*JS06*R!6Z':F< M?I0!H3V=K_ECLS(ENGVVR:XCVACL954\\\@[OP]Z`-@V-H5 MB4VL&V$YB'EC"?3T_"FIIUC&`$L[=0&#@+$HPWKTZ^]4K"XNAX6ANGF62?[( MLH=D)S\@/(SR?RJ'3;Z\E@T^T$D9N);,7#22H>!A0`1NY.2/>LZ[T5+FX)MSIYA"B/R9[02B/&3\H#``\\U:@O# MJ&@-H..<' MWH`Z"VTVU@@MH_*20VR[8W=!E?IQQ^%671)$*2*KHPP589!KGVUW4(;-;N>R M18)849'+*`KLR@#AB2/FSG`Z=.>'ZU>:A:VCJ9H$;SX55XP=S(S`'*YXYR.I MR/2@#4%G8>6+06UMLCPXA$:X7.1G;V[\_6I&L[5H$@:VA,*?=C*#:OT':L:] MU%].U*Z+0P/+]G@Q(J%2Q>0H`>3P#S3M2U:^T\7:%+>22*))8WVD*P9MI!&< M@C@YS0!KR6EM+&DO?T%8VNZE%)J-LLC.L=I>QC;Y;'<>I;(&.,X`^O MM0!TC6MN\GF/!$SX`W%`3@=.:06MJRR8MX2LQR_R##GU/K3W2.>+;(BO&PY5 MAD'\*Q=%BCF\%6LTS_KTB_]`%4X]8N'CM+O;$UKG:+=;MADX"B0C^=/G^S*FRX\H)*P7#XPY/`'/4]* MR-"@,MQ?3W(AEECO9-CB+#*=H4D')XQ@8_6J-TUU-:M)<212R)JT21_(5VD2 M*/4X'3I[])1)]\!`-WU]:R6U6\ MCE-H5BEN?M1@#(FT$>4),[6?KSC[WO[5HZ;-<36N;R...=6*NJ,".O'..M/ M;2)OM45XE\PO%#*\AC!5T./EV]L8&.?7.U/AU&)()I9[E)5$[1IY439]EP,EF'M0!+IE@-/TZ.S,AF5,CGXU4&BD6!TU;IEL#E?+V_/L/\&_/3MTSCO5AM:TY$A9KE0)BRI\IR2N< MC&.",'@TCZUIZ6\E)>7=S#K%I;+)$()DDD8F,E@$V<`YQSN/:@".?1!<*7EG/ MVDW,=R9%3"[DP%&W/W>/7N>:6;1?-_?"[DCO/.$PG11@';MP%.1MV\8_&IK7 M6M/O+A(+>XWR.I91L8!@.N"1@D>G6H+GQ#9QVIM4LI;^W$,=T;==V7P@;> M/[ISV]?6H6U_34F\EYW64;-NW:.,$$Y^M-73[BVEMEM)W"F=YKECC$ MF[J".OL,=,?FH\0Z80<3N3L#@"%R64]U&/F'N,XJ:?5[.W5'>1BC()-R1LP5 M#T9B!P/K_0T`-U#3I+V>*1;R2$19*JJ*PW?WOF!Y';TICZ06$;"\G$ZQM$\Q MP6=6.3GC`.>F.GTXISZW8)<-`TKATE$+?NFPK'&,G&`#N&">#3M.U-;^6Z18 M94$$IC!=",X`SU&,Y)X],&@`N-,6462QRF&.SF?3@X/M5;^T9W\0?9&G^S1@XCCDMC_I``R2LF<>O&#P,U M9BNK@Z_/9R,AA6W25-JX()9AR<\_=]J`)+6&Z34;N625OLS[1%$2#M(')''` M/ID_A2W&FV]Q?PWD@)>)&CQV8-CKZXY_.IKII$MI7B*AU4D%AD<>V16:FHSM MH6F3Y'VB]$*E@.%+@%CCZ9H`D31(HK*SM89I$2UD$BGABQ&>N?K3?[$YE/VN M7]Y=+='Y5^\,<=.GRC\J9;W-_A M]C5=M$LW_M`,K$7Y'FC/3`QQZ<\_6M*B@"EIVG"Q#%KFXNI6`4R3L"VT=!P! MZFJT^@PS7$LHNKF,23I<>6A7:)%VX89!_NC@\5K44`91T./:RB\N0&N1='[G MWP<_W>F0*;_PC\`D4QW5TD23_:$A5EV*^23C*YQDGC-:]%`&3#H%O`S^7E:]%`&7+H<4S3.UUGY"G2Z7')=VDZ32Q"T4 MK'&FW;@C'.03T]ZO44`9,>A11PVL2W=UBVG:X0G9DLQ.<_+T^9OS^F+=]8)> M-"_FRPRP,7CDCQE200>""#P3U%6Z*`,NXT*WGCA`FN8IHF9A<12;9"6.6R<8 MP?3'TQ5LV:"Q-K$\D:[=N\$%OO)I-1LGC\-SZ?9Q23L;9H(P6&>5(&22*U**`, MN#2(I+5A=F>22:`0MYK+NC7^Z"O'7OR>!R<4UM`MF$^Z>Z+SJBR.9,EMIR.H M]36M10!0N-*BN9':2:;$B*DB`J!(%)(SQ[]L5$^A6CSO(7GPTPGV"4A0X(.0 M/J!6I10!CCPY9J(PDMTOE%S'B8X0-U`'3'-2Q:)!$;3$T[+:0M!&K$8V'`(/ M'H`/P'O6G10!4L=/AL;$6D;2O$!M'F.6(&,8'H,#M5:+0[:&&%(YKE7@!5)? M-)<*0`5R>W`X]L]:U**`*WV&`:>;$)BW,9BV@_PD8//]:CBTV-)EDDFGG**5 M03/N"@]?J<<9.35VB@#)A\.Z?%#-"5EE@D4H(I9698U/4(#]WH/RIW]@V9LI M+9VN)!(5)DDF9G!4Y7#$\8/05J44`9K:)9R/*TOFRB6$0L)'+94'(YZY!).< MYR:)-%MIH)8YI)Y3+M#N\GS$*20,]@"<\5I44`5H;*.&\ENPSF69%1R3P0N< M<"?*D65,'&&'2IZ*`*PLHQ+<2J\JO2\I\YS(^]]V6/4U!+H=G*SL3,I> M83D+*P`<'((';GFM*B@#.GT6SN%G$OFMY\HF)\P@JX&`5(Z<`#Z"K=M;16D" MPP@A%S]YBQ)/)))Y)J:B@`HHHH`****`"FLQ4#"ELD#CM[TZB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`SKBW>;5E\RV,ELUN\3L2NWD@X(SG'![= MZS#H][9V<\%KMN$$\;0^8PWB-<<`D'##H#Z`=ZZ2B@#F[;3-2MKB"988F\NY ME?8;@M\KKU+$9./S-/CL+Y)A=K!\\-Y+,(F=?WB.,<'LPS_.NAHH`P$TZ[6_ MM+GR!@74EQ(H/ MZ5172]5*1^9#;?N]/DL\+,3DG;AON]]O3MZGI7344`8266H+ MQ)';CS[N*9"92,*GE]<+U/E_^/>U7M,M+FSN;T2>48)IFF1E8[OFQP1C`QCU M.?:M&B@#-EMKR[NHQ=1VR6\$_FHT;LSMC.T$$`+UYY/I21VMV/$$MXR0"W>! M81B0E_E9CG&W'\7K6G10!EP:0EA;7*V32R23)MQ<7#,._.IJU:Q7\$$<82SC1'51''NPL0'.#_>_2M"B@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ M`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**K2W]M#5 M'4YZ4`3T444`%%%%`!113)9%BB:1\[5&3@$\?04`/HJ."9+BWCGB),1@JCN30`^BJ]O=I<7%Q"JNK6[! M6+#`)(SQ^!JQ0`444T.AD:,,"Z@$CN`8GF^5N'F;=VWOCUH`?114-O.9C+F&2+RY"@WC&_'\0]J M`)J**HW.IPP&#"O*LL_V?F:`+U%%(2`"2<`=2:`%HK+_MI&M3 M=QV=U):]1,H0*1_>`+`X]\>_3FK-I?+=7%W`(GC:UD"-OQSE0P(P3Q@B@"W1 M110`4444`%%%9]WJ3079MX;26Y9%1Y=A&55B0,`]3\IX]!0!H457O[R+3[&: M[F_U<*%B!U/L/<]*EAE2>%)HF#)(H92.X/(H`?116=)J<@N+Z"&SDEEM4C<* M&4>9NSTYX^Z>M`&C14:S1M.\`;,B*K,OH#D#_P!!/Y5)0`45%<2210EXH6G< M=$5@"?Q/%48=:ANM%.IV<;31A2S(2%9<=0?>@#3HIJ%BBEUVL1R,YQ4%Q.A!H`LT4@)(!(P?3TI:`"BBB@`HHI*`%HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`,7Q"PLS9ZKG"V/YT`8=I?7L^H&0W,*6Z74ENT!.6."0N`%R#P&R21@G\ M)=4CDE\0::D4S0L8+C]XH!9>8^FH!ZB@#EYM6)!SG;@*H'?)'%:- MU=WD.KR6"W4A^V!&M6VK^[PW[P=.<#GG/I6@-$TL!1_9]N=J&-%`V`XX'IT%`&`E[>R:D7%_"D4-UY#PN02PR%'RAW6@##LKNZO9+2RFNY8MT4K><@4/*4DVXZ8X M')P.]:-G--/HCM<,KRJ)4+J.'VLRAN/4`'\:G;3+!H5A-E;^4K%E3RA@$]2! M5E(TCC6-$5448"@8`'IB@#EH)[K3;;3I/M[R0363/(CQJ1"J1;@ZX`.`<#!) MSFBVU"^<:A;B]191';M#YLBDAG)!&0."<#U`)KHH=/LH`XAM((Q(-KA(P-P] M#[4W^R]/\LQ_8;;84"%?)7&T'(&,=,\X]:`,6WO;A_[.QO-3Z-<71U(Q7N5XX/TIUO9VMJ6-O;0PENIC0+G\J`.4PQF1UV M,^T99?0GN/:BWMH+2+RK:".&/.=D:!1^0H`YV/4G_MZ(_;LPO=RP,CR!>%1N M`G8!E'S9!.>E1:9=3ZA<6H%](LFZ0W1692K@$[=BG.!G'8<9SS72M:6Y9F$, M8=FW;P@SN['Z\UEVWA](TBCG:VECBQ\PM@LCX_O-DYSWX&?QH`RK:YN5TO2K MFZU281WVT322'"1D*Q`R,$9.,G/:I9+UPME:S:SMMW28+?$;!(ZD!1N##H"> M"&2-8Y(HW1<85E!`QTXH`R[F[GA\,-8WW@`ACV8$\9_AKJ. MO6H19VJQ&(6T(C)W%0@P3ZXH`JRK-I^D7DL,TMW*J22QF4AB3C(`P!QGM6%' M<6DNH6,EMJ3SR/8SLS&?<0V$.0/X2<'@8''2NL1$C0)&JHBC`51@"H_LMO@C MR(L'.1L'.>OYX'Y4`S?V1IMQ]LD?;9QR2HDQ60EL`N/[YR"-I_GBIH]1 M7_A((V^W81KV2!DDN".`C<>7]T#<%PW4Y]ZZ3[+;Y4^1%\AW+\@^4^HIWDQ@ MLP159CDL%&<^M`',:7<_;;V-6U%MZM+YY6[&)/F^7:F[*X`]!QGK56WGD31M M,N[G5;@1WFU)Y9)6V1D*Q`^4J5R<9.>PS6];:&(_(6>X\^.`@H#$H8X&!N;O M^F>]:8AB"%!&@0]5"C!H`Y:2Z58[2&?6&6S=9=EXS,@=@1@;@P)P"V"3SCO6 MVD+W^@I%]JG$DD6%N%)CQ?8^9G(2=?O..>.C\_P#3/WJ?5?*(U.![B5HH?LS8,[?)\Y!)Y_$_G73[ M5X^4<'(X[_Y-)Y4>6/EIEN&.T<_6@#DM4EB2/5;FSOI%-M;0R0LEP?F(W8W' M.6S[DYS6OXE$3Z7%*\A6);B!FD64J%7S%R<@^GY=:U3!"Q),49)ZY4*YCN M5\NW0,QEB('0;MI4CDG'&#SQ72F&(DDQ(2>3E1S3@B@@A0"!@'';TH`PO$TY MB:$"=%VQR/Y+SF'S,;>5<'[P[`\<_C6;-2W@8?OBKX8`$GGC MDC)QQVKKV57`#*&`.>1FE*@YR`]B^QV:2WN+`3W,33,[.JE9/W89E8' M[F<$GTKL:*`.-#03W$\%SJ5RT4>GHX+W#1LS!G`8C.>FTX[Y!(I8I;47+WDM MR8YI=)CD$J,6;=B3>P'0X'7T.*[&B@##\,OD7B[E?9(HWQ3&2)OE'*D\CW'8 MUD37<)0JVH,G_$YVDBX(.STZ]*[.B@#&\.R120WUO'.94ANI$4&0N57TSDGU MK"B^R+IUI;F3RIAJA65=Q4@>9)CZ<$=/4>U=M10!Q;7@2WV-=/\`V=%?31R2 M`M*$7'R;L')7)/7CIZ5NVUO+-X8>VCFFDD>&2..6888YR%)S[8Z]NM:]%`&% MIVJ6?]CP6KKFY2%8FLB/WA8#:5VGMGOTQWQ6?=M;FYU6[6<"2*^@\LK+@`A8 MPW'0]&!SGH?>NMHH`Y`S(VM)*'F1C?O%*3OW!-C@988`4D`@=>^:;I)CC_L. M99Y/-DDF24M*S97:Y`()]=OXX]:[&F2QK-$\;YVNI4X..#0!Q6GW'VJ&-K:X M"7R6DF%$C!KJ8C*L0<`D8)YSUQT%:WAPP/=/+:2W3*\7[Y'C**CYXSGJ_)R1 MZ<]JT;72A`T1DO+FX2#_`%4N:T:`.8U4,\VIB1I%OEVMIY4G M/W1@+_P/.[VZ\5/81VO_``E=\S>5YXBBVD'^+]YOQ^8S7044`95]*MYJ<.GI M)%F,>?('&X$C[JXR/7=^`]:PF(70M1TC_7RZ=(#"RJ23'D'CW4$J<>GO7944 M`TC=(9+:'RL1 MN@9OGX7@>HZ>_O7;44`ZHUG;M]HEAB='BC.9(\_O"K`=2,CKG.*CU0 M6[V-^^GY6UD2((L098D]ND5W".,D#;O'N.A'H]+MS_;(>9;P:@DTGFD1A8V0 MDX)?;\RXVX7.0?I74TE`$-G=)>6J7$:2(KYPLB%&&#CD'Z5/110`4444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!2!@20""1U'I2TPQ1F42[!Y@&W M=WQZ?2@!]%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`8^M7%U83VMV+AUL!($N4"K\H/1LD9QG@^QXQ3X;QDCEOYYYFMY7V MV\(1?F!("D8&22HZ5#<:3<3[KG?"EV9XYLYYQ3&TB^\V.0RV M[,MY]K/#*/N;-O?U)S[=^P!=@U:.>XCB6VN%#D+O90`K%-^TC.0=N.V.U22Z MBD6HQ6312[Y49U?C:0.O.?<<>]5&TJ9M;2_WQQ[6)+QY#2IC`1AT..#GKQ4V MLZ7_`&G'`%E,4D4@8..NT@JX_%2?QQ0!6G\36,$,@>YEMX+:[G>(@,8XLKRFX'.<^1Z_H:@N-9DM]3N;=[&9H;>W$S2(4.0=W.-V\3?LN9"T2NNW;'DD#';+,Q^A'I1J&E3W-Y<3PS1*MQ:?9G21">[< M@Y_VOT]Z`'6^MQ7$\$0M+N,SEA&9$"@A5#9Y/0@X^N:KMJ+W5WHT\!FBAGEE M1X6V_-M1^N,]U]:GDTRY8:=)'/$D]F"IW1EE8%=IXR#[]:BM]&N8#IH-S$XL MY9)#^[*EMP88ZGIN//TH`L6VLQ7$:,MM.C/Q!!_&@#0HJM< M7]K;75M:S2[)KHL(EP3NP,GGMU[U9H`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHI*`%HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`KC+[5;;6M7DMI(KRXT^#"_9XH"?/F#'J?[HP.I'.>U;/ MB.:X>.WTRRD,5Q?L4\T+GRT`RY^N.GUK1M+6'3;!+>VC(AA3"J.2?\30!SNK MZY?V<"2M"-+L]P1=ZJ\SGT5<[5'N34^DZK9P6[1:7::AJ"D^9+.JAMSGKEF8 M`GCMQ4=AHK:Y*-6\00/YA.8+-R=L"YXR.Y..<_EZ6M8FN[W4$T2RS!&\/F7- MQM^[&3MVKVW']*`%3Q+I$MBNHSAH2DCQ(LJ#S-PQD*!GVZ5:BUVU.GR7MS'< M6<4;["+F(HQ/&,#OG-<]IM[HVGWMQ/>.J36L[V=I`H+E$7C(49.6)))/K5"] MU&ZU'7WGGMM22"#BUCCM")1E><$\+GKN.3TQB@#L='UJWU@W`@BN(FMW".LZ M;2"?;-7XY8Y0QBD1PK%3M(.".H^M<1JLNH:9I$,.^WT*WED$,<$9\UP#]YF? MZ>G/O4RRW%GHA>S1M,TB%F1VJ#^TK(?:-US&HMFV2LQVA#C.,GCI7+:-9S:?&VFZ/(DE_)S?WCG<+= MNP'9C][CUZUEZ>]C;Z7]MM+"74KY%,@7:S0VV>1DGAF&1GJ<^F*`/08KNVG\ MOR;B*3S%W)M<'HKG/$.N:Q9:JNGZ=;V\S7"@18R70D?>;L!GU]*I:#:7 M32[]*MV0L@2;4KN/;D?W88^..X)`ZWTF\EOY78W-S*H4J>@ MVCJV.OL2>U`%_3M1URUNAI$^HZ9)?%BR^;YDC$=<97`&,=#S6K+!XKD/RWNF M1?[D3?US7))=S^'X8WT[2Y?MEX2JW%Z/W[G/.(P<@9_/WK=MK#Q#!I,USJNO M_9.LC#RUEV\[N&+,BGG8O?&,?-ZYQ0!W`UG33?BQ%[";DDCRPV3GT^ MOM5YF"J68@`=2:X2RNKN[EL[;0]%<:7:N9(I9V9%D;G#DD>I)P/_`*U5[R75 MM5UNXTZ\B?4$MRNV&.,Q0^9ZLW7:,GOSQTH`[V>\MK>V^TS3QI#C(D9A@C&> M#WXJ#5=6M-)L#>73GRAC`7DL3T`KBK1;ZXDF^WZ?<7TMI(8[:T$31VT00<-G MH?0#K^?#=-?6_$NKF[D2U9+(C;;S;A'$QZ94H"]>G&30!:?4[K5 M[F6TTAC!#"<2W[*&7W5`>"??H/RK.N-3T32[]!%/?ZGJ"-@I',\I)Z'(SM_` M#CVJEK%_J]OX9\BPTB73[>,)&6+?O`#UP!VSU/7FJWA2QUE;?;8Z;!8>8OS7 MTX)=@<=!^`]J`.TL];LKNQ:[:3[,B.8Y%N<1M&PZJV>AY%4#XRT?S2%EF>)3 MAITA8QJ<$X)Q[5Q]G:6OV@V>M_VA=7-K=.!:PQ$K*IS\_0$DMW)Z8'3IT\!-X`QG)]O> MH+3Q'8W&C/JLA:"U5F4&3&6QZ`>OIUKD[QS]FTV"399Z:KG[(UR2254`F1UZ M$G/RCIR<]JBCT2^>^%_+I]UJ5E,6D6&60(S/Q\[+P`#Z>E`'*--34 MEL(VEN)2P4M`GF*I/8D5M5SG@YEGCO;R&U%K;SR)Y<03:%*QJ&QQTW`C\*V- M4U"'2]/FO+@@)$I.,XW'L![DT`4-:U"Z^TQZ5I@7[;.A8RMRL*=V/OU`]ZT) M)DTW33+=3%Q"@W2-U<_XD]O>N5T/Q3I<-NT]W=&XU2[8-)%!"['/\,:\8X'' M7KGDTEQKVD:IJ*W&I7#065FVV*V<$F67NS(,G"\`?C[T`=-HMW=WVGKJOB'5I+*)+33QYNIW!`AB`SM&>6;T7W/^-17'B5%TJXO(;. MY4J52W\^/8)V;[NWN1^5,@\,V]Y%]IUN,7%_(V]W21E">B+@C"@'\:`*EY<: MSH-K]LO=;M;IE4,UI+"L18=PK`Y)].*ZF-_,B1\8W`''I6=9>'=)L9O.@LH_ M-R"))"9&!'3!8DC\*U*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HII)#`;20>_I3J M`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M@6SMDNFNEMX5N'&&E"`.1[GK4]%%`$%S9VUX$%U!',$8.H=0<'UI+VRM]0M7 MM;N(2PO]Y3_]:K%%`%:PL+73;5;:RA6&)>=J]SZD]2?K4L4,4$8CAC2-!T5% M`'Y"I**`"BBB@"L]A:R7R7KP(US&FQ)".5'M^9_.EOK*WU"W-O=)OB+!BN<` MX.>?;VJQ10`T*JJ%4`*!@`#@"AXTD&)$5AUPPS3J*`$50JA5``'0"EHHH`*0 M`#.`!GDTM%`!1110`4444`17-Q%:V\D\[K'%&-S,QP`*P[2"X\0NMWJ,8333 MA[>T=<,Q[-)_0=*U]2L(-3LI+2Z#&&3&X*Q4G!S4\<:Q1)&@PJ`*.<\"@!DM MK;S-$TL$3M$=T99`2A]1Z5-110`4444`%,EBCGC,JNH(/X4^B@!BQ1 MI'Y:(JIC&U1@8Z5GZ=X?TG2W+V5E'&^<[SEF'T+$D5IT4`13V\-RJK/$D@1@ MZAU!PPZ$>]2T44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%8NJ:I.FLV6DV91)KA6D MDE<;MB#/0=R<&H-:NM5TO3K^X%PKK#$CPR&(#)W$,K#/IC&,4`=#169#KEB; M&6YEN-BVX7SBR,NTL!C@CG.>,=>U*=-+9@LP>-@T9.,97&>XH` MTJ*P+OQ981B`6K/<&6Y2`%(V*\D$G..?E/`'4U?.LV0N4@+N'9ECR8V`#L,A M2<<-CL:`-"BLB+Q)IO(!)/X`$_AB@#3HJ@NKVG]CQ:G)($MW17SUY/;ZYXJ%/$%C) M&3&9&E$QM_("?O/,`R5Q[#OT]Z`-6BLG_A(M/>"&:%I)A+$9PL:9*Q@X+$=@ M#Q_*G3Z_80/M9I&_T?[4"J$AH^[`T`:E%9%QXCL;=H5=;@M-!]HC5(BQ9<9[ M=",=ZBNO$,:W&EQVL4LRWX,BLJ9R@4DX]^E`&Y167!K]E<74,$1V0#@C)[4FKV>I:KHMY:E+:)Y MPJQH9"0O.22V/T`[=>>-NB@#FI]%U.2WU-8_L2R7:0B/S"9%!0`'(*X]<'GM M4,WAW4I+/6(0]MF_$6TM*[;2H`.202>G_P"JNKHH`P=7T>ZO;32O(,"36,T< MI1F.P[>P(&?TJ)=`NEU6>0_8Y;6>=;C=(&,D;\9P.AZ<'/'O71T4`85KHMP= M)U6RNFBC-]--(K1,6VA^F<@=*H?\(M=SZ.]O.UG%=+&B)-$&._:006)^G0>I M/M7644`8>E:7>V^O7^I79MP+M$&R)F;:5`'<#WJQ-8W%UJIEN53[*D>R+R[A MU<$_>)``Z\#KQCWXU**`.1B\+ZA_8DNF-<0Q1K-Y]J4=F,)SD*<@9')Y]>U7 M;S2-4N?L=X)[2+4+64R!45A$VX88'G)SCK70T4`8$NC7BWWV^%[9KF6T:VE4 MY1%RV0R\'ITQQGU%5[OPQ.5@2TGBV1Z>]D?-!SR/O<5T]%`'.3:)?O<64B26 MX%O9-;,NYOF++C/3ID"B+0+R%-#=)X!-IBNC!@2KJPVY'0YP*Z.B@#F+?P]J M*:M9ZA/>6TLEO+*Q_=L"RN,8ZX&.P``&2>UGM;R[:Y,,8VX.?7/;^M.H`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`I*6B@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`ICEP!Y M:JW/.YL8'Y>4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!13=JDYP,XQG':AE5OO*#]10`ZBF ME5)!*C@Y''0TAC0MN**3ZXH`?16?J<L M)=8O(-+Q,R3>;:/O$VGJHBWMOR<``$L<[>,@QG_`('[&@#=HKE_ M^$EG,;RF&W9$4842#KO92^>FW`'XL/6FWNKS[XKH0V^8A)B%9=QRGY>O M04`=516"VO!;B5!'!Y2R!'??_JQOV9?TR,$>HJI_PDTDB.WV6!W5$R`^=@8# MEO09)'.#TZT`=32=.M<[%?D* M+(+>WRS$A@Q(D(5/E4X^_P#,1C_8/O@`Z*BN;?Q#BG\`#7T"!&C2Y-K( M(@(E96E81;LC'&"WRXQC(]J`.BZ=:6N?&K7[SQ10Q02"7.)?*D57/(&,CC&! MGD_7BB+5[^17D>S$055(9XFSABH7C/7/F9Y[#IF@#H**YF'6=4D`D,"#S&C/ MEO"_R`QHQ&1DY+%AG'&TT@O[XWEM<[%.Y9`T2(X7'FQJ"><;L;B#Z4`=/17. MC5]033Y9OL\;.B94+`X^;RV8)C.<@C!/OT%(VJ:E]JD$5I"1Y^T.T+C*`G`R M,G<0.I`P1R.F0#HZ0$$`@Y![USPD=+3SG-R]^I8R1.)&CY.#E.FT9!&,9QP> M:2;6-2BC=_L\1V(Q#>4V)L%AN'/R@!5)!SD-P>]`'1T5ST.K:HTT*&"'RFDP M9?)D`9,(>`,X(W,.>#M[5)I5]>7-S;+#P>1F@#?Z]**RM5U&:+3Q=:9$)I&=H^8F;[H;((&"/F7'X MTVVO[^XGN(F@VJ5E,):!T^ZV%R6ZY!'ITH`U^G6BN;MVN;=;V@8(6?"M;28SY@`<]_N\X`]3B@#I**P;>6^N-8M&NXF51$ZL$A<)DJAR2>, M$YP",C&.M599M0@:3[-;.S?/Y;O;NQ'[V0@'VP%[9P?>@#J**YJ.:_PT;0.8 M9)?,;=!(2F9$X'/((+'CIMYIL4FH0RH(XWC&8P97MW;Y2\N0>1T^0]N&H`Z> MBL3[??IH5U>.L*31CY0$++N&`YP#D@MNQSTQ5:74M7A\M8[Q"`7$0BMHHU\]!;N#$/)WDDDGD-@8Z\^U`'2T5EZG=WT M-ULMXBT85"/W+.)"6(8$CI@8//7-+:WGW=QSS^E`'1TG7I6+:W>H2Z7--=P8F#J`!`Q*J=N[Y2,M MCYCP.<#&:AFOM6C4B&W+,%X'V9@"/++;^O!WC;MSGO0!T-%F-S<^W?H0#H**:JJN=H`R7&B;CEMJ@9/J:?@$8(&*`%HI@C0'(1>N>G>G;0>PH`6BFE5(P M5!P<\CO2D!A@@$'L:`%HIGEINW;%W#OCFE"(&+!5!/4XZT`.HINQ=V[:,YSG M'?&*"B$Y*J3ZXH`=130B!RX50QZD#DTN!G.!Q0`M%)@>@I-JYSM&<8SB@!U% M,$:!BP103U('6E**PP5!&/E'R]..E+@9SCD4`+12$`]1FD\M M-Y?8NXC&['..M`#J*;Y:;]^Q=WKCFFF&(DDQH2>^T4`24444`%%%%`%*[U** MSN$BECE(8`EU`*KE@O/.>I';O1_:UCND_P!*@$<84M+YR;023@=>O%+-8+/J M$=U)Y3B)"$5X@Q5LYW`]JH#07'ED7F'CBCB!\D$$*)!R"<!D\?3FL\>';<>:#(Q$DH MDX10>K%@2!DY#L/8'BF'PW'_`*.HNY0D*X*D9W'YLDGU^8C\..^0#1_M73]F M\WUN!A2=TH&`>F<],TR#6+&:W:9KB*$(Y1Q+(H*D$CG!(YVG%5(O#ZI.LQN2 M7#(YQ$HW%<'KC./E'&>.:<="(G:>.[99MVX'RU(',IZ=_P#7-^GX@%]M0LE# M%KNW&T$G,B\8(![^K#\QZU'-JEI&A*3).^5`CB8,S%ON\9[^IXK//AM%B,4= MW(L87:JE0<<1]^N?W8.00:>GAV&-F=)W$@(9)-B;E8'.2V,MSG@]B10!>AU* M%RJ3@VLS-M$,[*&)XZ8)!ZCH:&U;3E7>59)[Q MW9MHE&Q0&"L&`'IR/?K55O#S1M!%#-(8=AB=R0"L80JJ@8YX/7\:`-&*[TRQ MA,*W4$21-M(:7H22<'1I;.WE:1VD5P6(7&&4_+P0.G''!H`G76K$O-NG MC2*/;B8N-KY!/!SVVG\C1#K5C()O,GCA>)RK([KGAMH/!Z$X_,54@T%@BR2W M#1SA0HV`$*`&7'(YX;DX'(S[4K^&X'4J+F=4YV`;?E#,K,.1SG:.M`&@-1@" M3R3,(8X9!&7D8`'(!!!ST.X4U]6T]$WM=Q8V[^#G(J/^RO\`1);,^E)%?V"X4(RL1P!&(\#`'\*B@!)];LH@NR02NV<*#C@%0>U2'5]/&W-Y$ M-READXR!G_`\>QJLV@Q._FO=W)F))>3Y,OGR^HVX_P"62=,=_6D?P[`^_-W= M#S`V[!3DDL<_=_VB/3IW&:`+LNIV4*Q-+M+/JFER0M%/E1G1(S(9/MET&+F3(V=U`$M[JD6GP0K##N0Q&0`Y15C7&3G'&,CK4SZO81EEDN%4J2&X/!!P>< M=C2W^FQWY/FS2HK0O"RIMP5?&[J">PJ)]&A>&2)IY\2%RQRN3O()[>HH`L0Z MA:SR+'%,&=@2``?4CGTY5NOH?2H;K5K>"*1HR9I$;;L4'D[MO7'8\'&<41:3 M%%?K=B:9G0.`IVX^9BQZ#/4],XZ>@J-]#@;>/M%P$))1`5Q'E@Y`XZ%@#SGI MCI0`2:M':^3');M$S%1(H'$>X,>"!S]T]/6K4.H6EQ(\<,ZNZ*'('IZ^]176 ME0W4_FO+*I^4D*1@D!@#T]&/Z4EAI%OI[,;=Y1E-N"V0.F3CU.,__KH`5=9T MYMF+I/G("Y!&Y?S%)'K-B\:N96C#*7`D0J=H!;/3T!/X5#'X?M8Y(Y! M+<;HPH!WCD`*`#@?[(]_SJ3^Q+,B+S`\AB"*A<]`IR!Q]2/I0!,VJV2LRF<; ME;:0`2NT@D=?PS^-1#1X%N?/$LVX2>8HR M,+EBQ`XZ$G)S^&*;:Z0+%U-I=2HAE,DJ,`1)D'/;CJ/R%`$LFKV$4DJ/<*'A M^^H!)'7T'L<^F#45SK5M`\80^:#($<@'Y003DN`?7.?Y8IO]A6V%`FN,*VY1OR`<$'`QCG.3[T`6I=1M(A$7F`$J[D M(!(V\*231K>2&"-GEQ%% MY/WA\Z<<-Q[#WJ1M,@>R-K*SR1F3S26(!SNW=@.]`$0UJU:\CA1MT6LGF9!`);.?3'Z?K0!/)J%K$8P\H'F+O7@GY>.3Z# MD.:)M'MIUMEE:1TMUV*I(P1C'/'7Z8S M4$>AHEXKF:5X%11M>0LS,K;ADGMTX]J`+(UBQ;&V5F^\?EB<_=QGM_M#\Q5? M^U](@:>0LD2L$>24Q$!R0<9..3A?RI8M`M(HFC5Y\-&8^7[$*#_Z`OY4#0+1 M1P]P",8(D(*D;N01TX9A]#0!-=:I#:7.V^*`+<.JP2FXD)5;:&))A-GAD8$YQCCI0FM:?(F^.?>N M,Y5&/@"$:_:K\\NY(F`(^1BRC9O)88XP/0FM.&>.<.8FW!&*$X/45GC1;>(!H M,^8N-OFL67A=G(SR-O:K-A8)8V\,4;N5BC$>,\,>I;'J30!;HHHH`*88HS*) M3&ID`P'QR!Z9I]%`!1110`G3I2T44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`E+110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 =10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110!__]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 113 mglogo.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 mglogo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`&\`R0,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@!"RJ,D M@#U-`%9]3T^,X>^MU/H95']:T5*;VBR'4@NJ$75=.8X6_MB?02K_`(T>RJ+[ M+^X/:0[HLHZ2#*.K#U!S4--;E)I[#J0PH`*`"@`H`*`/F#Q5XBUV#Q?K<4.N M:C'%'?3*B)=R*J@2'``!X%?=87#470@W!7LNB['F3E)2>IZ[\)_%C^(?#C65 MY,TFH:>0C,[9:2,_=8D\D]03[>]?.YMA%AZO/!>[+\&=="IS*SW1Z!7CG0%` M!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'+_$#Q0/"GA6XNXV'VR;]S;*?[Y[_@,G\*[\OPOUFNHO9: MLRK3Y(GSB_B?Q"(FQX@U3@?\_LG_`,57VBPM"_\`#C]R//YY=SZTC_U2?[HK M\]>YZBV'4AD%W>6]C;F>YE6.,=SW]AZU4(2F[11,I1@KR..O_&-W3IL)B M4\!BNZ1OH.@_6O2IX.,5>H_\C@GBI2=H$$?AS7=4/F77_`#_LQ?\`UZQ>.[1-%@^[%?P*F#LU!O;=&/\` M&A8Y]8C>#71E*7PEJUB?,LKA7(Z>4Y1O\_C6JQ=*>DD9O#5(:Q86OB?5=+G% MOJ,32@=5D&UP/8]Z)8:E45X.P1Q%2F[3.PT[5+35(/-M9,X^\AX9?J*\VI2E M2=I'=3J1J*\2Y69H.[4`%`!0!\VV]A;ZI\:+S3[M-]O0P7&!_K(&(^8?AAA[BM*T( M9AA/=ZZKR?\`6A,6Z4SZ7BD2:))8G#QNH96!X(/0U\.TT[,]-.XZD`4`%`!0 M`4`%`!0!\Y?$C7YO%_C9;#3LSP6K_9;5%_Y:2$@,?Q;C/HHK[3+<.L)AN>>C M>K]#S:L^>>A1^)&@0>&=0T[28,'R=/4R.!_K'+.6;\_TQ6N6XAXB$JCZR_#0 M52'))(^F8_\`5)_NBOAWN>DMB"^OH=.LY+F=L(G8=2>P%53@ZDN6),YJ$>9G M`DZCXKU7`X4=OX(E_P`?YUZ_[O"P_K4\SW\1/^M#MM*T2STF("%-TN/FE8?, M?\![5Y=6M.J]=CT:=&--:&C6)J%`!0`4`5KVPM=1@,-U$LB]CW7W![5<*DJ; MO%D3A&:M)'"7UC>^%=3CN+>0M$Q^1^S#^ZU>K"<,3#EEN>;.$L/*Z.XTO48M M4L$NHN,\.O\`=;N*\NK3=*7*ST:=15(\R+W:LS0*`"@#YVT;_DO3?]A:Y_G) M7V5;_D6?]NK]#SX_QOF=?\:O"_VK3H?$=LF9K0"*XQWB)X/X$_DWM7G9+BN6 M;H2V>J]37$0TYD6_@UXH_M/07T.Y?-UIP'E9_BA/3_OD\?3%99SA?9U?;1VE M^?\`P1X>=URL]-KPSJ"@`H`*`"@`H`XSXF>*3X8\*2_9Y-M_>9AM\=5_O-^` M_4BO3RS"_6*ZO\*U?^1A6GR1\VMA::I4^>77\CS<1 M-U)\JZ'8:1I<6DV"6\>"_61_[S5YM:JZLN9G=2IJG&R+]9&H4`%`!0`4`%`% M74;&/4;"6UE'#C@_W3V-:4YNG)21%2"G%Q9QGA2[DT_6Y+";Y5E)C9?1U_\` MU$5Z6*@IT^==/R//PTG"IR,[_M7DGIA0`4`?.VC?\EZ;_L+7/\Y*^RK?\BS_ M`+=7Z'GQ_C?,^@KJVAO;2:UN(Q)!,C1R(>C*1@C\J^/C)PDI1W1WM)JS/FL_ M;/AE\1OXF2TE_P"_UNW]2OY$>U?;^YF.$]5]S_K\#S=:4_0^E+6YAO;2&ZMW M$D$Z+)&XZ,I&0?R-?$2BX2<9;H]).ZNB6I&%`!0`4`%`'S7XSUBY\?\`CU+; M3CYD/F"ULAG@C/+_`(G)^@'I7V^"HQP.%YJF^[_R/-J2=2>A]":%H]MX?T2T MTJT'[FV3:">K'J6/N22?QKXZO6E7J.I+=GH0BH1LCPSXX?\`(YQ?]>*_^A-7 MU>1_[N_7_(X<1_$/=KZ[^PZ/+==XXLCZXX_6ODX0YZBB=DY?,^AWE>2>D%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`& M1+XYDV*]E5]C+:7Y_\$Y<1"ZYET*?P5\4?:M.F\.7+_O;0&6V MSWC)Y7\"?R;VK7.L+RS5>.ST?J+#3TY6>L5\\=84`%`!0!P/Q9\4?V!X6-E; MR;;[46T=?GT.?$3Y8V74Y?X)^%N9_$MS M'P,P6F?R=O\`V7_OJN_.\5MAX^K_`$_S^XRP\/M,]FKYD[3Y\^.'_(YQ?]>* M_P#H35]CD?\`N[]?\CS\1_$/8O%LA3PV$'_+1T4_S_I7S6$5ZWWFN)=J0SP5 M$$T:23O),?T`%/&N]1+R#"*T+G25Q'6%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`[M0`4`%`'S MMHW_`"7IO^PM<_SDK[*M_P`BS_MU?H>?'^-\SZ'KXT]`;)&DL3Q2*'C<%64C M@@]133:=T#5]#YIUBSN_AK\1%DM0?+MY!/;9Z20L3\I_#*GZ5]O1G#,<):77 M1^O]:GF23I3T/H[3=0M]5TVVU"T??;W$8D0^Q'\Z^+J4Y4IN$MT>E&2DKHM5 MF,*`&NZQHSNP5%&68G``]::3;L@V/FK7+Z[^)/Q#6.R)\N>006N0<1Q+U8CZ M98_6OMZ%.&782\^FK]?ZT/,DW5GH?1FF:=;:1IEMIUFFRWMHQ&@]AZ^]?%U: MDJLW.6[/1C%15D6ZS*/GSXX?\CG%_P!>*_\`H35]CD?^[OU_R//Q'\0]=\8+ MG0(#Z2+_`"-?.8/^*S3%?PT3^#F!T!0/X96'ZY_K48Q6JE87^&;]BU%5TQ93;^4"=D88;LG/4>F*[L/&BX?O-SCKRJJ7N;&5]K\7_W+ MG_ORO^%;\F%\OO,>;$^?W!]K\7_W+G_ORO\`A1R87R^\.;$^?W!]K\7_`-RY M_P"_*_X4?PJY$JM:/Q, M[O397GTNTFD;=(\*,Q]20,UY51*,VEW/2IMN";+506%`'SMHW_)>F_["US_. M2OLJW_(L_P"W5^AY\?XWS/H>OC3T`H`\_P#BUX6_MWPN;^WCS?:;F5<#EX_X MU_K^'O7L91BO85N26TOSZ'/B(H@A\'E(A][\^GY MU[>3X7VM7VLMH_G_`,`YL1.RY5U,_P""OA?[-83^([F/]Y<@Q6P(^[&#\S?B M1C\/>MLZQ7-)4(]-7ZDX:'VF>M5\\=84`?/GQP_Y'.+_`*\5_P#0FK['(_\` M=WZ_Y'GXC^(>T>)8#/X9FVC+1JKC\",_IFOF,-+EK(WKQO2,WP/<@V]W:D\J MPD`]B,'^7ZUMCHV:D98.6CB=;7GG<%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'`^-)A)K4<0/$4( M!^I)/\L5ZV"C:G?NSS,6[SL=II'_`"!;'_KWC_\`017FU?XDO5G?2^"/H7*S M-`H`^=M&_P"2]-_V%KG^6>^S_S_`%]3 MS:D72GH?0FB:O;:[HMIJEHA"2E&Z+= MQ<0VEM+<7$BQPQ(7=V.`J@9)-9QBY-1CNQMV5V?-*_P#H35]CD?\`N[]?\CS\1_$/?O+2 M:U\IQE'3:P]B*^0NU*Z.ZUXV9YYIL[^'?$>RQ4BJ]*\3R MZ;=&K9GI`((R#D5XIZP4`%`!0`4`%`!0`V21(8GDD8*B`LQ/8"FDV[(3:2NS MRK4+MK^_N+M@0)')'L.P_+%>_3@H143Q9RYY.1Z;I'_(%L?^O>/_`-!%>'5_ MB2]6>O2^"/H7*S-`H`^=M&_Y+TW_`&%KG^:*KQW6C]## M#SL^5FU\:/%/V+2HO#UK)B>\'F7&#RL0/`_X$1^0/K7+DN%YYNO+9;>O_`+Q M$[+E1/\`!KPM_9FA/KES'BZU`?NLCE(1T_[Z//T"U.%ES,].KPCJ"@`H`^?/CA_R.<7_7BO\`Z$U?8Y'_`+N_7_(\_$?Q#Z!C_P!4 MG^Z*^/>YWK8YKQ;HC7<0O[9,S1+B10.67U^HKMPE;D?)+8Y,31YESK6FG7DF".(9&/!']TG^57BL.[\\/F3AJ^G)(Z^O..X*`"@`H`*`"@#CO%.M M_:&&E6),A9@)"G.X_P!P?CUKTL+0Y?WD_P"O,X,16YOW<3/US2AI.BZ?"V/. M=V>4C^]@95_B2]6>A2^"/ MH7*S-`H`^=M&_P"2]-_V%KG^.(]1T[,,%Q)]JMG7@1N#EE_`\X]#7VF75XXO#>SGJUH_0\ZK# MV<[HIZ5:WWQ+^(6^[R!YK6K*&786T>FB\W_6I,4ZL] M3Z5BBC@B2*)%2.-0JJHP%`Z`5\.VV[L]-*V@^D`4`%`'SY\6AZ M!O<>AKT*&+Y?=G]YQ5L-?WH&=IWB>_TE_LE_$\J)QM?B1?Q/7\:VJ8:%7WH. MWY&,,1.G[LCI[3Q+I5V!BZ6)O[LWR$?T_6N&>&JPZ'9'$4Y=332:*1=T_O7-B,2ZGNQV.BAAU3]Z6Y3\=?ZBQ_P!Y_P"0 MK3`[R,\9LCH](_Y`MC_U[Q_^@BN.K_$EZLZJ7P1]"Y69H%`'#:9X%\,R>++C MQ%8W=Q-?07LK2J)0428Y+*1CMOZ?2O5JX[$J@J$TE%I6TZ=/R,(TH\W,F==? MZA9Z5:-=WUPEO;J0"[G`R3@#\S7FTZ9[+N`R?85K+ M#U(IRMHNS3_(E5(MV(/$WA;3?%FFI8ZFLFR.02(\3;74].#CN#5X7%5,+/GI MA.FIJS*WA7P1H_@_[2=,$S/:]3"8[$8:GRTTK; MZ_\`#G-4A"4KMZG9V\T,\"O!(LD?0,#Z5YLDT[,WBTUH2U)04`5KS3[2_CV7 M5NDH'0L.1]#U%7"I*#O%V(E",])(P+GP192'-O<2P^S`./Z']:ZXXV:^)7.: M6$B]G8H-X%N0?W=Y"?JA%;+'1ZHR^IRZ,1?`MT3\]Y"![*31]>CT0?4Y=S0M M?!%G&0;FXEF_V5`0?XUC+&S?PJQK'"17Q,Z"TL;6PC\NU@2)>^TI*"@#B-/\`^)/J;ZLO%K>7\UG=@=`Q MF;RI#^)V'V9>RUZE3][#V75137W*Z_7Y/NY9?_9$/YN>ZU6#_;_\E_X+_+S"I[U^R_,V+,7NNR7ER=3N+.WB MN9;>&&V"#'EL4+,64DDL"<=,8XKFGR4%&/*FVDW>_77N:*\[NY!#%<2>*=/M M-5GBNS:P330.`!N<,@#LO0.%;'''S$C&>*;BJ$I4E:[2?XZ>C:_`E7YTI=#: MUN*QFT6[&I-LLTC,DD@)!C"\[@1R",9!'<5S4'-5%[/>6)[=?IC*I*G M"$)*"NU=[]WMJ4DVVK[&>VN:B)H])DN;IG2>X22[MK823-'&8\#:%*J3YH!; M&/E.`">-E0IV=5);+1NRN[^=^FUR.>7P^HLEYKBS-2N%>,NIOK39L=,, M$WE0"K@,I[@D$&DH4+7JI+T?1Z7M?=;^8VYKX;_,U+K6Y-032TT:1@UVANF; M:"R0H`2"#T+,53U&6QR*PC05/G=7II\W_DKO[BI3;2Y#3TX+#HMNULGFEHP_ MWL;R>22?4Y)KGJ:U'S%0T@K&?VNXK,75TX=3+)(L89^"``,#`'/I4Q2DN:R*DW% M\MV13:A=62R&(7,T;*`IGA(,;EE4=AN!W=.O'O5*G&6]EZ,ESE'8=)/Q2RRW\J?OI%18PHP`Y` MSD')XJ9N,&DET7Y%14I*[?<;9W\TY''_?5.5--I0]/^"$:C2;EZC[-; MV[\R.XO'C^SXC?RPH+.5#$YQT&X`8]*F?)'5+<<>:6C>PCW-Y%>#3?/W.[*5 MG*CW?VIJ,7'GM\ON_S$Y23Y+DERTVEB.?[3+/"7"/'(`3ST(( M`YSVJ8I5-+68Y7IZWN+!!>7%I'^I9TG/\`8UCGKY"=/]T5-7XY>I5/X%Z%RLRPH`SO[&M6TV\T^16DM[MI M6D#'_GH23CTZ\5M[:2G&:W5OP(Y%9KN0+X=M%\-OH>^8P2(RR2LV9'9CEG)[ ML222?4U3Q$_;>VZ_AY+T%[-*/*#Z$T=W<7&GZA<6/VEM\T<01D9\8W@.IP<` M9QP?3-"KWBHSBG;;?[M&#AK>+L-_X1FP%E'`IF6:.4SK=+)B82G[S[NY.>1C M&.,8XI_6I\S>EK6MTMV_K7S#V<;6%.@OU'MU&_LXI/OK^K_P""'L[_`!.XG]@R127'V/5;NT@GD:5XHQ&0&8Y8 MJ64D9.3UZDXQ1]832YXIM:7U^6S#D?1V$TKPU;:1/')!/.ZPB98DD8$(LKJ[ M#.,GYESDDGDTZN)E5332UM?Y*P1IJ)H6MA':7%[-&6+7X2>-ANC9@`P`((*D`<$'\P*V6) MDE9I-6M;T_4CV:Z$D6E-:W+:E/-11LD(;8NQ3@D(!M7)P.3Z=0*3J\R] MG%**Z[_CNP4;/F>K*WAS2'LI=1U":V:VGOIRX@9PWDQ@DA<@D1GD*%W9LLQ1MP)_E].E'M9?UYB]DBQ=68N'CD61X9H\[ M)$QD`]1@\$'`Z^E3&7+IT+E&^I%_94Y9T\O+X&U>N!MQCD#GKP/2J M]HU\.A/LT_BU$_LQI`J7%Y-/"I!\MPH#8Z9(`)_SFCVEOA5F'L[[NY9M[=;: M(QH2079^?5F)/\ZB4N9W+BN56*T^DV]S9BUDW[!(9`0<')))'T.XCZ&KC5E& M7,B'337*R6[T^&\EMY)0

    ?.CEN+F6X,?**X4*IQC.`!DX]:3GI:*L"AK=NXQ=**1^ M0EY.EKT$0V\+_=#8R!^-/VFMVE GRAPHIC 114 mgfooter.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 mgfooter.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`$X`N`,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`&HZ2('C8,IZ%3D5%.I"I'F@TUW0VG%V8ZK$%`!0`4`% M`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`4-&_P"03!_P+_T(UXV1 M_P#(OI_/_P!*9TXK^,_ZZ$>OM?+I$G]FSK#>%T6-V4,,E@,$'L>E>QJFK?\` M#Z;'.K=3"?Q5+)=6MZA,>G+:S/-$5`8RJ%)4D]-N<<=\^E-;NVJ=K?-I7_$G M6RONGK]S?Z?D75O]2O==@TV=AIV(7F;[/(LOFX90`&9>!ALG@'IVZB5[^5OQ MO_E^.HV[)>?^2_S_``'2ZU/IE[;Z>W^G;AAKEFVMD[\`A4VC[N.H[X!P:F4K M)NVR_)7_`*_R':W]=VE^I%!XEOG$#S:7#''(D$C%;HL565BHXV#)!ZC./>M' M&TG%^A-]+H2+Q5=M!+>S:2L.FK(H6Y-T&S'N*LY4`D;>"0>Q//%0FK)RTO\` MJKK[]AR5FTNE_P`-RUJ>IW*Z?IY1OL;7URD)E&&,2MD@_,,9.`.1P6[T[/F4 M7_5E>W]=`NN5R6O_``]K_J0RZO=6>HS65O%+>2F=(A]ID2-%S&S_`"LJDD?+ MW&/Q9J,MBMPFA`MA MSR<4]=%U_2UPT5^R_.]BRGB&_><1?V5&K%O*VFZR?,\GS`O"D8ZKG/O@T/1- MK7>WG;^OZW!=+_UT(8/&<,\-S*+=`+>(3,/-.?+V9)^[V?Y#Z'//&*;7;O;[ M[6^^_P"#W#5.S_KO]WZHF?Q%>)-)9_V=`;^/5XWR_SL1'NP5V\8/^U^%6HVDT M^S_"27^8KZ*WE^*O_D7=/NYI-7UF.>?,-O+&L:D*`@,:D\XR>3WJ8_#?S?Z# M>DK>2?XO_(H)J=XO@_4[U[HFZB-T(G*J,;&<*`,8.`H[5#;5.+ZV1<4G4:Z7 M+?AQM5>"=]1>5XV*F`SB,2$;1G/E_+C/3OZUM)):>;^[_,Q@VTGY+[_ZL;50 M6%`!0`4`%`!0!0T;_D$P?\"_]"->-D?_`"+Z?S_]*9TXK^,_ZZ$NHS6=O9F: M^"F%&4X9-_S9&W"@$DYQC'.>E>Q>S1S="@MSHUW>1V[V8^T'-FTVR>:W550F!"T:C[H''`]*-[OO_7Y!MH3C3-/4*!8VX"*JJ!$O`4Y M4#CH#R/2B^MQ6*%[INEP?NTC6S-_,$F-O`@-P2"2KG:>#SSP??FB.C45]WH- M[.7]=B[?/I[>3I]\(7%V2B0RJ&$F!N(P>.`,T;NWS!>ZKKT%CTO3XB#'8VZ$ M.)`1$H(8#`;IUQQGTHO_`%Z[BLB(Z%HYAFA.E6?E3,'E3R%P[>I&.32LK)=$ M.^K?/IQ57=[BLA1:V:LT0@@#.A#+L'* MDY.1Z9)_.ILFK?UY#O9ID)T;2S`L!TVT\E3N">0NT'&,XQZFZ8U MY_:$5E:FZ/\`R\+$N_IC[V,].*%IMU`231-)EO?MLFF6;W88-YS0*7R.AW8S MD8H6FP/7-D?_`"+Z?S_]*9TX MK^,_ZZ$>N:?/J%I#]E:,7%O.D\8D)"L5.<$@$C(SS@U[&JDI+I^J:_4Y_LM= M_P#._P"A2O\`2[[6DMAJ%E8[(I&9H?.:52#&R@Y*#/)'&.,9R>E*4;IVWLU\ M]+?D"=OO1BS>$M7FEE+I8-YEH;=G\Y@S'RU'/[O/WE_O>^`>NC:OK8E*T4NW^37ZEC4O!WG23I:Z=IYM)7B=X"[0B0*I!0E%X&2&!YY'3O4>O M?]+?A^3'Z=OUO^)'=>"C-!*/[/L9-TL1\IYY!OB6(*8S)MW##*&'7.!FF]7= MZZO_`(?^OO!:+3LOS_R+D?AZ\CU*SD%M9&"W>)DD,K&6%%CVF-?X;?DV-ZKE\OQ_X=(JWN@:A=7=]/Y%AYTHS%<-(V]054&)@%Y0D M'G/?[N:$K??]ZO?7Y:=0W^[[G9K3\^A&WABXJMZ_DK/\`K\QK>&;^23RY(+$P(2%/FMF13<++ MR-G'`(QD\FE%)))_W5]R:_&XY=;>?XC9?"=U&D@M[73FW1O$H=BHC0S%PH^0 MC&TXQC`('#"DK]?+\/Z7W#>^GG^*7_!^\+3PI>1K"T\-EYT/E>6P*4--^R7W+^O^''/6]N[?WM?H=E0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`%#1O M^03!_P`"_P#0C7C9'_R+Z?S_`/2F=.*_C/\`KH2:K))#I%[+#(8Y4A=D<`$J M0"0>7!8+<*(5AVHVYLLV\9(PHX7 M)ZXYJ(NUV^C7W=?,TM=I+K?]/EU+LOB:X%W-;VM@EUMA,D;+*R^80JL5^X0. M&Z9)Z9`SFF]+WZ?DG9_TO3H.\1?14\CR$N)W2 M\4F%'!*_*5&X_*<@?AFJE[G-?I?[TK_Y?T@BG*R6[)['7]4NVT_SM)AM1=3% M>;L29C\LL&!4=>#P?3WX?+:7*^B?X-+]2>9-77E^-R[X@EU&&RA;30SR"4;X MXW19'3!R$W@C/?'<`\BH>C\BULRA9>(V-G%B.6?"P;I)\12$R2F,AE"X#*5Y M`X/M5VU2_K:]_F3LOO\`P9`_B>]ME`2Q2X!!"A[@*S2&13+$;58$>%PK&1VF:-\D+S]W M@KCUQVHNG[RV;_"U_P!?P$]$UV3_``_K\2_H.IWEWC:7?S":\TVTN90-N^:!7./3)%):.Z&,GT6QDFDNH+>&VOV'%Y'`AE7C&02 M#VXYI;:+0"REC;+8"Q:%)+;9L*.H(8>XZ'--V8*Z*LFG:+869,MG8V]K&XE) M:-%16Z!O0'MFAZZ/^K_Y@O+^K$03PZ9;:4)IOF0M]F@;$>4;'^K7T//W11:[ M]?Q74-E;L2P:5HJQO:VUC9*L,F]HXXD_=R8X;`'#8/7TI/5?A_F&S!+'29K9 M-*:*VN5L@G[F0*YCX^4E>QQG'`]JI^][P;:%>2/PQML9)$TK:&\JT9A'P0?N MQGU![#O27Q76[_(&K)I[(G:PT.\\V!K2PG\C*R(8T;R]WS$$=L\'WZTM$K]- MON_R_`?6W7_/_,B6^\-R:1M6ZTQM,1A%CS(_)5AR%],]#BF^C8DK72)%?05@ MM+E6T\1*I-O(-FT`==A]![4[-/S_`*2_/\1:->7]/]+_`"+T-I;6SR/!;Q1- M(-D M?_(OI_/_`-*9TXK^,_ZZ%JZ4M:RA4WOL.U1C)..V:]6HG*#2[&$':2N9;^827C>:D=Z4)BVG:4^=[PR`QJQ^U83:8R'RH;!.<\B,"0!6-V&10#^]#KO.[/.#@]5Z8XTDUS M.7F_NMI\[_\`#M$VTM_5[_E:WXZ&IJ(GU6PTR_M;9W\FX2X-NS*&=0",`YVY M&0PYQQUJ5I-/^M5_5_F-ZQFPSJ^JW,]G)&+B;>D+E" MS*(U7L2.2I[_`%J=H+YC^T8EU8:GJ4`D73[JQNY+Z&5V+PGRT48ROS,#@#N, MDGIZ-)IJS[_>XM?Y+_(+KWM.B2^3O_F_PU*MSX?U2;1[2T6TFBN+;SM\LM.7)%R[&$4F[&7H&K75UX;BUG59K5( MI(!,?*C9!&,$G)+'/Z5K.T#.%Y[?UJ5K/Q.]_I=[=6TMF[P7:1JL;^8/+8KC M)!ZX)]LCOBDEI%OJ[/[VO\G_`,.-OXK=%?\`"Y83Q`S^)I-/,+1VB-Y`F*9# MS;0^W.>/E]CD]QW4/>5_6WRW_KROKT27: M+9]P*+G'F9VDD!CC`.!4WLI>2O\`BE_7R*Y;\MNKM^94AUW4[S1;BX3R;.^M M_GD@GMV?"L,HHVO\Q.<;L]?X0>!PMXEBCN+E79C(-RIM3)&`1GG'ZU,WRN5MDF_Q2_4(7<4Y=6E^;_0I6.O7E MYJ&G;[?[/8WMN)(V,6\2.5W%0X?Y<#L5YVGFKM:4EVV_#^K"Z)_?_7ZCKG5] M430'N[>V$TZ3R(YBAWA$1V&[874MPHX#9YZ=JS;LHMZ*RO\`U_6A5M6E\C:C MF\RQ6>.17W1AE<#Y3QG.,]/QIU;P4O(4/>L5(@0A"?-)M#[2BD/M7C>"N?7Y@#UI1U:OU_/7_+3U6HY:*7E^5D_U_!A=Z[?6%WJ M4,SPLEOY3J_V611'&SD,QRV'"C!)!'?TI1U2OWM^&GWO0;TV[/\`#^MC3T#4 MVU;2_M+,CD2R1B2-<)(%#CUJNB?=$WU:[&I2&%`!0!0T;_`)!,'_`O M_0C7C9'_`,B^G\__`$IG3BOXS_KH79(UEB:-\[6!!P<<'W%>PTI*S.=.SNB" MPL+;2[&*RM(S';PC:BERV!Z9))JFV]R4DMADNEV<6#G]XVTL%V[MN=N<<9Q0M-OZ M_K^MV#U!])M)+N2YD$LCNI4J\[M&`1@X0G:..X'<^M*RLUW'=II]BL_AO37B M2,K<@(P8,MY,K9`P/F#9X';/<^IIO5W_`*U$M%8MW&FVUU!%#,LC+%]QA*P< M<$?>!ST)[T/5W8+31#8=*M(+H7$:RAE4*J&9S&@`Q\J$[5XXR!Z^M.[U\Q6V M0QM%LVM1;#[0D0D:3$=S(A+,23DA@2,D\'BIM:WE_7S'W+QC4Q&/&$QMP.," MB2YDT^H+38KZ=IUKI-A%8V49BMXLA$+%L9.>I)/>J;;W$E8)=.M9OM6^(YNH MQ%*0Q!91GC@\=3TJ;:6^?Y?Y%)M.Z(YM'L;AXFDBZNHKB4S%X\;5$[JAPJL59/# MFF2QS1M%*%ESN"W$BX!;<0N&^4$]0,9I6M9=K?AM]P?U_7]?F6AIMM]@%DPE MDA!S^\F=WSG(.\DMD'H<\4WJ&Q$NBV2/"RK,!"2547$FTDG.67=ACDYRP-"T M!ZZ"Q:1:PBXVM,1PQJ% M55Z`53=R4K$M(84`%`$-M;I:6ZP1DE5S@MUZYKFPF&AA**HP;LN_F[EU)NI) JR9-720%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!__9 ` end GRAPHIC 115 largerlogo.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 largerlogo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`)H!H0,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H` M*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@ M`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`* M`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`S0!#-=6]N"9YXX@/[[A?Y MTG)+=CLRDWB+1$ZZQ8C_`+>$_P`:CVD%U'R2[$D.MZ3<,%@U.TD8]`DZD_H: M:J0>S#E:Z%X$$9!XJT2&10`V26.)=TCJBCNQP*3:6X[%!_$.BQG#ZO9*1V-P MG^-3[2"ZCY)=A8]?T:1@L>K63'T6X0_UH]I#N'++L7DECD7,;JP]5.:I-/8F MUAV13`6@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H` M*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`0]*`/'_&6OZRGB"]L/ MM\L5O$^$2([."`1G')ZUY->K/G<;G?2A#EYF8MMX=UO4/GATNZD#'GLU@1X8)`/FFC3YF_/@5L\74:L0J$$S"6'5=;G+*EW?R]R=TF/Q[5 M@E4F6^2!I1^!/$DBY72RH_VI8Q^FZM%A:O8GV\%U"3P)XEC&3I1;_=EC/_LU M-X6K;8/;0[F;-8:MHSB22WN[(@X$@#)S_O"L^6I3Z6*3A(]`^'&LZGJ M7;7$$"+L+X+`DG^+J>!WKNPM24KJ1S5XJ.QZ!7<E1R1OS#YG:Q>J MQ"4`4]4U*VTG3IKVZ?;%$,GU)[`>YZ5$YJ"NRHQ^(=2-Q<;CD[ M885Y"`]`/4_SKQIU)57<]"$535B[J?@S5M*T>+4KB-"A&943EH1VS_7TK2>' MG"/,*-:,I6+G@OQ;)HEVMG>2$Z=*V.3_`*EC_$/;U_.JP]?V;Y7L36IH4( MQ>@W*^Y=%6(*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H` M*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@!,4!86@!#UH"QY M3\2-9-UJL>E1L1#:@-(`?O.1_0'_`,>KS,74O+E.S#QLN8M?#?PZDSMK=T@( M1MENI'&>[_T'XU6$I)^^PQ%3[*/2I$5T*LH92""#T(KT+:6.,\2\7Z!_8&MO M#$/]$F'F09[#NOX'],5XU>E[.>FQZ-*ISQU.^^'6M-J.AM93-NGLB$R>I0_= M_D1^%=^$J[NYDU"_GN6!,MQ*SX]R>!7 MA3?-.YZB2C$]ZTFP32](M+%`,01A#CN<;.5Y7+M:$G&_$G3 MQ=>&OM0'[RSE#Y[[3\I'Z@_A7)BH7IMF]"5IG%_#Z]-IXM@ASA+I&B/UQN'_ M`*#^M<>$ERU#HQ"O$]E%>N<'06@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*` M"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H M`*`"@#/UG5H=$TN6_N$=XHB`5C`W" MUO%EEA9$+*N`2"!GYJF>+@XM%1H231P.@PB;7],A(!5KF,$'_>%<--7FCIGI M%GO]>X>8+3`R?$T0F\,:JA_Y]9"/J%)%9U5>#14':2/$](O5T[6+*]8,4@E5 MV"]2,\X_"O%IRY9)GHR3DFCTK_A:&C_\^=]_WPG_`,57HO&0.3ZO(/\`A:&C M?\^=]_WPG_Q5'UR'8/J\P_X6AH__`#YWO_?"_P#Q5-8RFW8'AY)';(VY`PZ$ M9KK3NKG..I@%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4` M%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`AH`YCX@?\B9??[T?_H8K MFQ/\-FU'XT>5:!I(UO6H=/\`.\GS=WS[=V,`GID>E>92INI*QVU)^U[O4\T6@#*\22"+PQJ MSGC%K)_Z":SJNT&7#62/#]-LCJ&IVEDK[#/(L>[&=N>^*\2$>>21Z$GRIL[W M_A5/_4:_\EO_`+*N_P"I+NC_P#0Q7-BOX;-:/QH\]\`_P#(Z6/TD_\`0#7GX;^*CLK_ M``,]JKV3SB.:)9HGB-9!^(S7N1DI1NCS&K.Q9JA')?$2_%GX5EAS MA[J18@/;[Q_0'\ZYL5+EIFM%7F<%X"LS=^,+1L96W#2M^`P/U(K@PL;U58ZZ M^D6>TU[!YX4K:`?.7^?UKP'\1ZOV4?1X^F(*`"@`H`* M`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@` MH`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@!#0!S/Q`_P"1,O?]Z/\`]#%=XV-[X;:\LELVBSMB6+,D&3]Y#U7\#D_0^U;X2K=>6FR.^C#E MCKN=7\--&:VTR;4Y5P]V0L>1_P`LQW_$Y_(5U82GRQYNYA7G=V.ZQBNTYPH` M^X->.XRI2\ST.95$='JOQ!U#4=%2RCC%O.X M*W$RG[P_V?3/?]*WGBI2CRF4:"4KF;X5\,S>(=152K)8Q$&:3IQ_='N?TK.A M1]I+R+JSY$>V0Q1V\*0Q($CC4*J@<`#H*]A))61Y['Y%,0E`'SGT_.O`:U/5 M^R?1X^J$%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0` M4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`&DP, M/Q7IEQK'ANZLK39Y\FTJ&;`.&!Z_A65>G[2#2+I2Y9)GCMYI.K:+*'NK2XM7 M4_+(,X!]F7C]:\ATZE/=6/04H21H6OCGQ#:KM343*/25%?\`7K6D<3474ET8 M,OI\2=?48(M&^L1_QJ_K=0CZO$BF^(GB&4$+/!"/5(1G]P%8-RJRNRTHTR]<>#]?M;5;F339?+/4)AF7ZJ#FK]A- M*[0O;0;LBMIWB'5M&'E65])"H.3$P!7/^Z:4*LZ>B'*$)FW%\1_$$8PQM9/= MHL']#6WUJHC/V$`D^(_B!QA6M8_I#G^9H^MU`]A$R;[Q7KFHJ8Y]3E*-P4CQ M&#_WR!63^`-$*$Y/84JL M(Z'N48*QJIZ@8KV4K*QYW4H-K^EIK(TAKV(:@>D&?FZ9_D,TP-(4`%`!0`AH M`8D\65UCC0%F9C@*!U)H`\O MU'XAZQKVIMI?@VR+]C#OB!I@\W3_`!/]H*\^7),_/X.&'\J&X@DT>@>'GU*3 M0K1]74+J!3,RA0,')[#BH+-.@`P,8QQ0!F7'A_1[O/GZ7:N3U)B7/YUDZ47N MBE.2V91/@?PV>?[*C'T=A_6I]A3_`)2O:S[DD/@WP[`X9-)MR1_?!?\`GFCV M%-=`=2;W9KV]K!:1^7;P1PI_=C4*/TK6,5'8BY-5"*=WI=A?'_2[*"<^LD88 M_K4N$7NAIM;,RF\$>&W8DZ3$#_LLP_D:R>'I=B_:S[BIX)\.1G(TF$X_O%F_ MF:/J])=`]K/N:=II6GV)S:V-O`1WCB53^E:*$8[(ER;W+M62%`'E-S_R7VW_ M`-T?^B&J_LD?:/5>]9EBTP"@!#0!QOA7P9<^'_$VKZI+<021WQ8JL:D%(?$-AX;TQKV^<@9Q'&OW MY&]%%-*XF['G46N>._'+NVC(FEZ=G`ESM!'^_@DG_=&*JRCN3=O8LCX=>+6& M]_&$OF>TLI_7=_2CFB'*^Y/8Z-\1-#U.T!U9=0L'F19MS^850L-Q(<9X'H:& MX@E)'I8J"Q:`"@`H`.]`'E?CW_DJ/A;_`'X?_1U7'8SENCU/M4&@M`!0!Y5\ M9^N@_P"_+_[)51,Y]#U3O4F@M`!0!YC\6M:G6&R\/6A)DO"'E4=67("+^+?R MJXKJ1)]#LO"WANV\,Z)#90J#,0&GE`YD?')^G8>U2W74"3BW#A M?+5AD;FYY]ADU2B)RL:G@SQ2WBO2IKM[(6CPS&(H'W`_*#GH/6DU8%J9_B'X MCV.AZJ^DPV%U?7Z$`QQ+@(]-6^T^0M'G:RL, M,C>A'K46L5^O(]/L+F\F.(K>-I7/L!D_P`J`,?PGXI7Q9I\UY%8RVL4Q)#.[`AL,5XQ]*IJPKG2LP4$D@`#))[5 M)1Y]J/Q7M%OS9:'ID^K2CHT9*J?]T`$D>^*I0?4GF70;9_%:&*]2UU_1[G2F M8??;+`>Y!`./<9IN/82EW.[NKSR-.FO(4^T!(C*BH1^\P,@`].:@LQO"/B^V M\765Q<6]O);F"0(T&M;;3);*:=D16 MD=&4!<]N?;!_&J46U!(88UCBC4*B*,!0.@` MJ"R7%`"8H`*`,[6=ZC.(H0<+QEF/H!W-%F]@;2.%'Q6N[YW_`+'\ M+W5W$AP7W$_F%4X_.KY>Y'-V+ND_%73;J^%EJMG-I4^X+F4[E!/9N`5_$8I. M/8:DCO5.0"*DH\M\>_\`)4?"W^_#_P"CJN.QG+='J?:H-#D/%/Q$TOPQ/]D* M/=WP`+0QG:$!Z;F/3ZO*@'\Q3 MY1;`[S#.,%2-F01V(HBK"D[V/8^]0:"T`%`'D.N?Z M5\A1)I`UZY7S+RX_=0NW)CB3Y0!Z=#^&*);BCL>@SP17 M,#P3QK)#(I5T89#`]0:G5%GE7P\C.B_$;7="C9OLRHY`)S]QQM/UVN:N6US. M*L['4_$S5I-*\&SB!BDMVXMU8=0#DM_XZ"/QI16I4M$0?#+P[!I7AFWOS$OV MV^7S'&K?PQHL5K&B_:74-<2CJ[_7T'05+=RDK"^+M"@\0>';JUDC! MF5"\#XY1P."/Y?2B+LPDKHYKX1ZN]_X8FL9&+&QD`3/]QAD#\#N'TJI:,F.U MC(\'C_A&/BEJFAM\EO=!O*'T^=/_`!TL*;U5Q1TE8]7DD2*-G=@J*"23V`K, MT/#X=)?Q9H'B[Q,\9:4S;[?(Y"I\S`?\`('X5I=QLC*R=V>E?#O5/[5\%6#L MV9;=3;O]4X'_`([@_C4RT9<7H97Q9U0V/A0649S+?RB/:.I0?,W\@/QI)!+: MQTWA?2O[$\,:?IY`#Q1#S,?WSRWZDTF-+0V*!C)6\N-W`^ZI-'4#RCX*QAWU MFY?F7;"N?KO)JYD0/6CTJ"SDO%GC<>%;RV@.ESWGGQE]T;8"X.,=*:5Q-V.= M?XQ1(N7\/W*#IEI0!_*GRLGG1Z'I5\-3TFTOUC,:W,*RA"_%5M-E=O[.T\LI4'^!"`_3^\Q`SZ5ILB-V>NVMM#9VT=O;Q)##&-J(@ MP%'H!6;+6ASGCGPM;^(M"G(A7[?;QE[>0#YL@9VY]#T_'--.PFDS(^$^NRZG MXD:M?K MI>D7NH,,BVA:7'K@$XJ$6W8\Q^%.BKJEY?>)-1'GW"R[8F<9_>'YG?Z\@#TY MJY-K0F*3U/62N5((!!&"#WJ"SP7XB:!'X?\`$:+:#R[&\_?QQC[J/D!P/T_/ MVK1.YE)69[WWK,U%H`*`/(/B`?[`^)&D:ZP/D/L9C_N-A_\`QTC\ZTCL9O<] M=1U=`Z,&4C((/!%9F@N*-A%+5_\`D"W_`/U[R?\`H)IK<.AYW\%?^05JO_76 M/_T&KFK$0V-3XN_\B6G_`%]Q_P`FJ8;CGL=+X24)X-T0*,#[##_Z`*E[C6QI M7EU%8V4]W.VR&%#([>@`R:$-GDUMJ_C#XB7\ZZ5='2M+B;!=&*E?0%A\S-CL M,#^NEE$C5FJ/A+YQWWOB6^G?N;_">[FL;C6?#EV=LUI+YBJ?J5?\`DI_&KEMTTM0\H[97#-^9*+0M(W$]96/4QUJ#0\K^''_(_^)_]]_\`T::N M6Q$=RK\8PPU?13NV#8^&[`[EY_#BB&P2-3_A#/'?_0Y'\WHYH]@M+N'_``AG MCS_HHE*["*LCG_B?" MVB^)-#\3PKCRW$*L,1''?,I'5GY(/YX_"E)ZCBM#D/AH[Z)X MGU[PQ,QQ&_F0@^BG!/XJ4/X51ZD.E9LT0M`"$`\'I0!Y#\,9/["\::OH%P=KOE$![M&3C\U)/X M5OI)_K=LOZ3#/\Q5RV(CN>O5F:#6("DGIWHZB/)?@[EM M5UUX_P#4E8\?]]/C]*TEL3$L>/?^2H^%O]^'_P!'4EL*6Z.R\=*S>!M9"=?L MS?EWJ5N5+8Q?A(5/@M@N,BZDW?7BG+<4-CN^U26>3_&9E\[05_CS,?PS'5Q, MY]#UCO4&@M`!0!SGC/PO'XHT)K4%4NHCYEO(>@;T/L1P?S[4T["DKHX?PEXZ MF\,L/#OBF&:#[-\D4Q4DHO8,!U7T89JG%/8A-K1GI-KXAT:\B$EMJMI(I_NS M+_+/%19EW10U_P`1:+;:/>I-JMHK-"ZJOG*6)*G'`YII.X-JQQ_P6&-+U4'J M)D_]!JID0V-/XN_\B6G_`%]Q_P`FI0W'/8Z;PI_R)VB?]>,'_HL5+W&MAGBZ MTGOO"&JVULI::2W;:HZL<9P/KTIK)-*T&RDN+^\C3:,K&&!=SZ`=34I,J]CR_P"'DEU/\3[R MZO8C%<7-M+.R'@KO9&`_(BK;]VQG%>]<[GXF\?#W4_K%_P"C4J8[ERV)_AW_ M`,B#I/\`US;_`-#:B6X1V.F-24>5^&O^2W:[_P!.M#D\0 M>%+JT@7=K*>GXC(_&I3LRY*Z.<^&GB^RDT6+1+^X6WO;3*1B8[?,3/ M`&>XZ8Z\"J<>Q*?0['6O$>EZ#9/=7UW&@496,,"[GT4=S4I,IM'D'A.YN[[X MK65_>QF.:\=Y]I[*T3%?PQC'M6CLHF:OS'NO>L>IJ>4>))5\'_%6TUQ@RV5] M$?-VCJ<;6_78:U6JL9OW7]24>5_#C_DH'BC_>?_T::N6Q"W-CXK>'Y=7\.QW=M&TD]BQ7<4.IQ(%D5V"^;CHRYZYH:8TT=3=Z MMIVGQ^9>7UO;IC.9)57^9J;,=T.TW4K35K".^L91+;2YV.`0&P2#U]P:!F%\ M0-).K^#+^)%W30+Y\?\`O)S^HR/QJHNS)DKH\PLM0?QC)X.\/L69+7=]H'JJ MGC_R&O\`X]5_#=D;V1[KVK%FQY;XQ9?#'Q,T?Q"9_ M$/PI?"_B\4:$'^VP8:9(QECM'#J.Y`&".XJT^A$HZW1H^&?B=H^J6T<.IRII M]\/E82'$;GU5N@^AZ>]2XV&F=:NL:8R;UU&U*?WA,N/YTK,JYYS\6=;TN^T" MTL[/4+>XN%NUD9(9`Y"A'&3CIR1^=7%&Y:V/.?$ MT-SX&^(D?B2"!GT^[TO6+1;BPO89D M89(#C"Q(Z'T'7--1$Y M6)_AIX-HW^A&#_.H-#R7P'K'_"%Z]J'AS77%NCR`I(_"J^,` MD^C+C!]JN2OJC.+MHSU:?5+"VM#=3WMO';@9\QI`%_.I29=TCPCQQKK>)-<3 M488W&FQM]FMG88W[<,Q_\>'X8K1*QE)W9]!]ZR-@H`*`"@#,U?P_I6NPB+4K M&*X5?NLPPR_1AR*:=MA-)G'S?!WPY+(S)<7\0)X59$('YJ3^M/G8N1$EK\(? M#5O(&D:]N`/X9)0`?^^5!_6GSL7(CL=+T?3M%MOLVFV45K$3DB-<%CZD]2?< MU+9221#KV@V/B/3Q8Z@CM`'$F$((TE%_,NQSYAV MD8`Z?\!%2.Q/\`@(IW%9&W@4AG M*:]\/-`\0W375Q!);W+G+RV[!2_^\"""??&::;1+BF4=.^$_ANPNEGD%S>%> MB7#J4_$*!GZ'BJY=TK2[71M,@T^R0I;P#"@G)Z MY.3]32&7#[4`8FD>%=,T35+S4;-)5N+PDREG+`Y;=P.W-.XK(W,"D,XS5_AC MX;U:X:?[/+9R,]`'-:'X& MT3P[J)OM/AE$Y0H-\A8`$C.`>G2FY7$DEL=*!Q2&9'B#PUIOB6UBM]1C=DB? M>A1RI!QCK33:$UF@/EL?/P9\/%LB[U`#TWQ__$4^ M=D\B-+3OA=X7L&#/:27C`Y'VF3=I(IKZV!_@CE!` M]AN4G]:I29/*NAIZ#\.O#V@W"W,-L]Q<((/">C^)8E74;;,B#"3 M1G;(H],^GL GRAPHIC 116 graph64.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 graph64.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`-(">P,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/:-<\3Z1X<^S#5+EHFN2RPJD+RLY`RZCC\TQRVTL)V9QD;U&1DCI0!NT`N,@G/.^WYK3U2_K^KE#3M9:YGTV6;5;F'5F^R"VL);@HTT+*OFL8L_/U MD)8@D;."*ZI)*M)+N[^2M=>EM_-Z>1BG^[5^R^;O;YWVMVU\S1\5ZI"E\7_M MHVK+:"33$BNO+%U<;CE<`XEZ(-IR/FZ5E#X]-7>.GD]_O[]+75C25E'71:W] M5;\M=.O6]AWAK4!/X@5$U9[J]=)SJ5J;C>+9E7;A2WU^8@8_&@9SU MCX^LM1LHKNWTO43%*,KE8P?_`$.@"Q_PF,'_`$"M0_[YC_\`BZ`#_A,8/^@5 MJ'_?,?\`\70`?\)C!_T"M0_[YC_^+H`/^$Q@_P"@5J'_`'S'_P#%T`'_``F, M'_0*U#_OF/\`^+H`/^$Q@_Z!6H?]\Q__`!=`!_PF,'_0*U#_`+YC_P#BZ`#_ M`(3&#_H%:A_WS'_\70`?\)C!_P!`K4/^^8__`(N@`_X3&#_H%:A_WS'_`/%T M`'_"8P?]`K4/^^8__BZ`#_A,8/\`H%:A_P!\Q_\`Q=`!_P`)C!_T"M0_[YC_ M`/BZ`#_A,8/^@5J'_?,?_P`70`?\)C!_T"M0_P"^8_\`XN@`_P"$Q@_Z!6H? M]\Q__%T`'_"8P?\`0*U#_OF/_P"+H`/^$Q@_Z!6H?]\Q_P#Q=`!_PF,'_0*U M#_OF/_XN@`_X3&#_`*!6H?\`?,?_`,70`?\`"8P?]`K4/^^8_P#XN@`_X3&# M_H%:A_WS'_\`%T`'_"8P?]`K4/\`OF/_`.+H`/\`A,8/^@5J'_?,?_Q=`!_P MF,'_`$"M0_[YC_\`BZ`#_A,8/^@5J'_?,?\`\70`?\)C!_T"M0_[YC_^+H`/ M^$Q@_P"@5J'_`'S'_P#%T`'_``F,'_0*U#_OF/\`^+H`/^$Q@_Z!6H?]\Q__ M`!=`!_PF,'_0*U#_`+YC_P#BZ`#_`(3&#_H%:A_WS'_\70`?\)C!_P!`K4/^ M^8__`(N@`_X3&#_H%:A_WS'_`/%T`'_"8P?]`K4/^^8__BZ`#_A,8/\`H%:A M_P!\Q_\`Q=`!_P`)C!_T"M0_[YC_`/BZ`#_A,8/^@5J'_?,?_P`70`?\)C!_ MT"M0_P"^8_\`XN@`_P"$Q@_Z!6H?]\Q__%T`'_"8P?\`0*U#_OF/_P"+H`/^ M$Q@_Z!6H?]\Q_P#Q=`!_PF,'_0*U#_OF/_XN@`_X3&#_`*!6H?\`?,?_`,70 M`?\`"8P?]`K4/^^8_P#XN@#1TC6X=7:=8[:>!H=NX3!1G.<8P3Z&@#3H`*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@#D'_Y+%#_`-@)_P#T M>E`'7T`%/^/[4O]V+_P!GH`ZB@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`.0?_`)+%#_V`G_\`1Z4`=?0!Q_B+_DH_@O\`[??_ M`$4*`.PH`*`"@#$_X26$^(GT=+"[?RN);I50Q1G:&PWS;AP1SMQSUI)IIMZ) M?U_GO_E^2#C.?N@G@G&!2CK*WI][V7S^Y=;#>BOZ_AO_77I<-.\1VV MI:@UI';W,:D.8)Y%41W`1MKE,$G@D?>`SG(R.:(ZJ_H_D]G_`%KWL#T=OZOV M-B@#R3PC_P`BK8?[A_\`0C0!MT`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0``$G`ZTF MU%7>P"D%201@CM2C*,XJ47=,-A`">@IN2CJV`\12'I&WY5A+%X>/Q32^:'RO ML+]GF_YY,/J,5C_:.#Z58OT:?Y#Y)=@\B3N`/JP%']H8?HV_2,G^2#E8>2>[ MH/\`@8H^O0?PPD_^W9+\T@Y0\I>\R#\_\*/K1@,QQLJD_K5&2B]5ILNW=_*[WT[:2A&WNLJLC(<,"*^AI5J=9RO\[MO]=NO730I.S;6[M\M$OT(;?PM>PO#%]OLDL2\,L]O!9-'EX]NWRSY MA"+\B?*0W0\\\:7]Z[\_Q7^>I%M++T^5_P`^A8U70+_4)7:+4;>%;FW%M>`V MK-YB`D_)^\&PX9AD[NHXXJ8Z/7;1_-?H_P"F4WIIOK^/^0[2_#]U87\4D]_% M-9VJR):0I;E'C#L#\[ER'P!@8"_C1'1:[V2^2_X9$M=MKW^>O^;-74-.MM4M M?LUT)#%N#?NYGC.1[J0:!GC_`(5T>UE\,6+F2\!*'A+V91U/8-B@#8_L.T_Y M[7W_`('S_P#Q=`!_8=I_SVOO_`^?_P"+H`/[#M/^>U]_X'S_`/Q=`!_8=I_S MVOO_``/G_P#BZ`#^P[3_`)[7W_@?/_\`%T`']AVG_/:^_P#`^?\`^+H`/[#M M/^>U]_X'S_\`Q=`!_8=I_P`]K[_P/G_^+H`/[#M/^>U]_P"!\_\`\70`Y=`M MG.%DOR?:_G_^+K*I6IT5S5))+S=AI-[#O^$=M1]^>\3ZZA/G\@]EM'KYMG MKX'+:E>KRU%R*U]5^CL6(=8M=9C6>222TEDX\M;IUZ>F"/TK&/#$U]_P"!\_\`\70`?V':?\]K[_P/G_\`BZ`#^P[3_GM??^!\_P#\70`?V':? M\]K[_P`#Y_\`XN@`_L.T_P">U]_X'S__`!=`!_8=I_SVOO\`P/G_`/BZ`+%M MI\-KNV2W3!A@K)=RN/P#,<'W'-U]_P"!\_\`\70` M?V':?\]K[_P/G_\`BZ`#^P[3_GM??^!\_P#\70`?V':?\]K[_P`#Y_\`XN@` M_L.T_P">U]_X'S__`!=`!_8=I_SVOO\`P/G_`/BZ`#^P[3_GM??^!\__`,70 M`?V':?\`/:^_\#Y__BZ`#^P[3_GM??\`@?/_`/%T`']AVG_/:^_\#Y__`(N@ M`_L.T_Y[7W_@?/\`_%T`']AVG_/:^_\``^?_`.+H`/[#M/\`GM??^!\__P`7 M0`?V':?\]K[_`,#Y_P#XN@`_L.T_Y[7W_@?/_P#%T`']AVG_`#VOO_`^?_XN M@`_L.T_Y[7W_`('S_P#Q=`!_8=I_SVOO_`^?_P"+H`Z3P7:QVEUJ4<;2LNV( M_O9FD/\`'W8DT`==0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0` M4`%`'(/_`,EBA_[`3_\`H]*`.OH`X_Q%_P`E'\%_]OO_`**%`'84`%`!0`=\ M4`%`!0`4`%`!0!Y)X1_Y%6P_W#_Z$:`-N@`H`*`"@`H`559CA5)/H!6=2K3I M+FJ227F[#2;V&2R06QQ<7,,)]'D`/Y=:RAB'6_W>G*?^&+M][M'\3>GA:U36 M$6_D1_;[3_EFMQ.?^F<1`_[Z/%:>PQTMU"FO[TKO_P`!C_F:_4W'XY)?-?DK MO\`^V71_U.G)'[SR#/Y#(H^H0?\`'Q$GY15E^C_$.3#PWG?T3?YV_(:QU*88 MDNXXU_NQQD_J3C]*UIX;`4'S4Z5WW;U_*_X@ZN'6T6_5V7W)?J,^P[O];CW7R&FUL.W1O\`>78?5>GY5S^SQ%'^'+F7:6_R ME_FGZCNGN(8F`W+AE]5JX8NFYGW/9_)L.5]!E=9(4`%`!0`4`%`!0 M`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`;'A3_C^U+_=B_P#9Z`.HH`*`"@`H`*`"@`H` M*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@#D'_`.2Q0_\`8"?_`-'I0!U]`''^ M(O\`DH_@O_M]_P#10H`["@#EM>\0^);&]\C0_!DVK1)P\\E]%;)G`/R[LENO M7`Z=Z2;[#:21MZ1?7.H6"S7FF3Z;<`[9+>9D8J<#HR$AASU_0=*MI+9DIOJ< M-=VWE_%F*XBL))IY"`7DL'#1KL`+QW`.S8.Z-WW>HJ*2^);?T]^][:?+^5CJ M[1_KK^'G_P`$MW6E1VMD8-2MKZ_TI=3=[B.2*2Z:93%\I9`&+KOQP!@$#@`< M"M:-UTE]_,[?A?5]T/6\FO+\E?\`'IVN9^FV$B7EH;BPOCJHG@:QN'MI3Y-J M"-R-+MPAV[]RL022.#Q5PNFK[_:\_=_%7V\]?,F5K.VW3R]Y].FEOEIY&GXK M@CO;XS26-Y<2O:`:8Z6DK>1<;CEB0O[H_<^9L<`\XS4PTG=;WC]W7_@KKHBI M6Y;/;6_X6_6SZ;CO#5H(?$"NEE=0WP2<:G/);R1K.Y<;#O90),<[2"=J\<=* M(:0TVLOOZ_K=]="9;Z[W?_@.NGY:>IUFH_VA]F_XEGV;[1N'_'QNVX[_`'>< MT#/)?"<>H'PO8%;FV4;#P8&..3WWB@#9\O4O^?NU_P#`9O\`XN@`\O4O^?NU M_P#`9O\`XN@`\O4O^?NU_P#`9O\`XN@!UOI\T\T[WNH;5,6R(0AD`8D_,1D] M./:O/S''8K#QIPPE'F?-S2=EK%?9U[ZWZK0]+#5Z-.DE**;YKZKI9:?F5(=0 MN+N1K6*Y@M;N,9DBDMR7'N,M@K[@'ZUU/"R:4ZDFT^E[+_R6TD_^WCDC5IQV MA?U;_P"`2/9ZA+D37T4@/56B?;_WR),?I5TJ=*B^:G!)][*__@3O+\2_K=5: M1LO1+\]_Q%BLKN`8AELHQ_L6A'_L];SJU*GQR;]695*U2I\7J7_`#]VO_@,W_Q=`!Y>I?\`/W:_ M^`S?_%T`'EZE_P`_=K_X#-_\70`>7J7_`#]VO_@,W_Q=`!Y>I?\`/W:_^`S? M_%T`'EZE_P`_=K_X#-_\70`>7J7_`#]VO_@,W_Q=`!Y>I?\`/W:_^`S?_%T` M,EM+V==LLUG(OHUJ2/\`T.KA4G3=X.WH:4ZDZ3O!M/R*_P#9=\G^HU".'V2% MB/R+D?I6WUF3^-*7JOU5F;_6Y2_B14O5:_>K/\2:2/6(XP(KBTE8=3)$R_R: MB^'ENG'\?\OS"^&GNG'\5^C_`!9#]IU./_7E(O<6C./_`!US^M'U=2_AR3_# M\[?@'U92_AS3^=G^-OP;)8IKJ<$Q:C9-CKB`\?7YZSG1J4_BBT95*%6G\<6@ MAFN;@D0:G8RE>H2$MC\I**E&K2UG%KU5@J8>M1UJ1:]4T3>7J7_/W:_^`S?_ M`!=9&(>7J7_/W:_^`S?_`!=`!Y>I?\_=K_X#-_\`%T`'EZE_S]VO_@,W_P`7 M0`JIJ:G*WEL".XMV_P#BZB=.%2/+-77F"=MB>,W9S]IE@?CAHX2A!]_F.?\` M/-Y']EU)N8[RU?V^S,#^6^CZXJ>F(CR>>\?O M_P`[!R]B/RM2_P"?NV_\!F_^+KM335T2'EZE_P`_=K_X#-_\73`/+U+_`)^[ M7_P&;_XN@`\O4O\`G[M?_`9O_BZ`#R]2_P"?NU_\!F_^+H`/+U+_`)^[7_P& M;_XN@!1!JC?=N;8_2V;_`.+K.=6G3^.27JQI-C_L>K]Y[I">1';;%RB%1_ M'V)-`'64`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!R#_\ MEBA_[`3_`/H]*`.OH`X_Q%_R4?P7_P!OO_HH4`=A0!\[_%>Q\2V_C*\46TM[ MIFI,AL[=98&>281[01$59V5VMSW?0;:XLO#^GVUW+++DF MH),T:R-`H`*`"@`H`*`/)/"/_(JV'^X?_0C0!MT`%`!0`4`5KRPMK^-4N(]Q M0Y1P2K(?56'(/N*N$Y0?NA8I>;J&E\3A[^T'_+6-?WR#_:4??^J\^QZUI:%3 M;1_A_P`#Y_>+8T+:Z@O(%GMI4EB;HRG(^GUK*47!VDADU2`4`%`!0`4`%`!0 M`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`07-G!=(5EB1B1@,5!(^E;4J]2B[P=C>CB*M!IPDT9FG MZ(VCR/-;2&;<,,C#&1['UKT<3F"QL5"HN6W5?J>IB\S6/BH55RVV:U^]=OZU M-6&>.=24)!7AE(P5/N*\RI3E3>O_``YY-2E*D_>^3Z/T):S,@H`*`"@`H`*- MP)/-)XD`<>IZ_G7"\&H.]!\C[+X?_`=ONL_,KF[E@V2_91,&8#K@CM7BK/*B MQSP;BF]M';7Y[=K:Z]6:>S7+S%?$(_B<_@!7MWU&4R2-@G`RX`P`222``.M+K9#MI=D%M9Z2UMYN MH:EKFD2>=Y'DW^JO&QFEGN3M>_0='#X5EM9KJ+QC36P5G,T>MNR!5^\=P?&!D9],U5FOZ[[?>" M=]B6[T32;&RN;N;6]8\JV&9=FIS,5X!Q@-G)R,#JF^G_!!:[!9V6B:CIMYJ%CKFKW M-I:E@98=6D=7VJ&.TA\'KCZTI/EASOS_``;7Z#@N>7*B2"P\/7$YMH_$]^;E M8_->#^VI/,1>Y9=^0!52]V_EN3%\R5NNQ-IVBZ+J]L;G3/$>HWL`8J9+?6)) M%SZ95B,T6:"ZV+?_``B-K_T%-9_\&?[3HEA<8(\VWC?!8L1E0>IY/U-=5:/+4DNS9STG>$7Y%B MY>6.UF>"/S9E0E$SCOD)W2?=? MYM;=-K_AYFCKVM:E8W5P+%+;R+"V%WH:G8Z3:_:=0NHK:#<%WR-@9 M/:@9X_X5US2(?#%C'+JEG&X0Y5IU!')[$T`;'_"0Z)_T&+'_`,"4_P`:`#_A M(=$_Z#%C_P"!*?XT`'_"0Z)_T&+'_P`"4_QH`/\`A(=$_P"@Q8_^!*?XT`'_ M``D.B?\`08L?_`E/\:`#_A(=$_Z#%C_X$I_C0!GW-YH3SM=6>NV5G>'K(EPA M63_?7.&^O7T(K6-5I,--686U_?644I^[+%<*T3_CGY3[-^!-- MTE)7IZ^74+]S0_X2'1/^@Q8_^!*?XUB,/^$AT3_H,6/_`($I_C0`?\)#HG_0 M8L?_``)3_&@`_P"$AT3_`*#%C_X$I_C0`?\`"0Z)_P!!BQ_\"4_QH`/^$AT3 M_H,6/_@2G^-`!_PD.B?]!BQ_\"4_QH`/^$AT3_H,6/\`X$I_C0`?\)#HG_08 ML?\`P)3_`!H`/^$AT3_H,6/_`($I_C0`?\)#HG_08L?_``)3_&@`_P"$AT3_ M`*#%C_X$I_C0`?\`"0Z)_P!!BQ_\"4_QH`/^$AT3_H,6/_@2G^-`!_PD.B?] M!BQ_\"4_QH`AFUC0I6#KK-E'*OW76Y3(]NO(]JUIU7!/H?UJY4E),+$-T3AAGY^XH`ZZ@`H`Y'POI\E_P##[PXL>I7=ELL8B3;%`6^0 M==RFKA)1Z)^H&9XS^'>I^)-$%E:^*]05A(K%+EE,;@'OL4'(ZCJ,CIW'9A\7 M"E/F<%\B7&YNV?A6\MK."!_%>LRO&@4N7BRQ`Z\H3^9/U-8RKQ;;4%^/^8[% MF[T.[>TL_LNJO]OLY#)%!SZ\\G>7,E;2WRT_5)CTM M9F3HG@7^QQ*XO(%EEN9+EOL]LR)N:(IPKR.<\YZX[8%0XKDY%V:^]K_+_@CO M>?.^Z_"_^8W0?`]UI5R)KK6!=;6A*@)-P(P_'[R:3&=_1<`8Z5IS:W\V_O5O M7[R6M+>GYI^G3L3R^$;P,RVNIVZ0S,IN%EM"[,%F:0!"'&W[Q'(;UJ8>[RI[ M*WWI)?=HOQ'+5.V[NOOO_F0W?@!+H7RG4Y%$Z210X3!@C;D(""#@,6/8X.,C M&:E*R26ZM^#37W**7WOJ-N[_`*ZII_-WO\D16WP\46WEWVH_:6DN#)6^DFF MD)8W90;M^KWFHV)U&>%4$MO8NBEE=&4NK3,&`,8&!MX)Y]!>ZGR]T_N_KN#ULGV:^_ M^NQ.T*1;\Q%?D+DX'DKD;LG)Y%"]U+EZ?YM_K^H; MWO\`UI;]32LM%NHM*U*VO;R&:XOW=WE@MS$B[E"\*78]O[W-*44Z?(O/\6W^ MI4).,^=]U^%O\BG/X06?2_L)O2HWS,7$7_/1&3IGMNS[XJFW?F7G_P"E*7Z6 M\R(+ET?E^$>7_@FEI=CJ=KO>^OK2XED?+F"S,(*A<``;V..`!1I_7?3 M^OUZ!;^OO_S_`.`:E(84`%`!0!YAX+_Y'/2O^P%/_P"E8H`]/H`X_P`1?\E' M\%_]OO\`Z*%`'84`>;^)-<73=5UZQU.YU>"XOHXTTD6=LT@?"9Q$54CS-^[= MNQQM[5"YG'EA\5[_`)6_[=[_`#+T4DY?#:WWW_'L=_IQN3IEH;U0MT84\X#' M#X&[I[YK:IR\[Y=KF-._(N;$]'M MKFWGA@F1K<+M474NQB.C.F[:[XWJK/S_' M<=9:!IVG7\M[;1S":3=G?<2.B;CN;8C,53)Y.T"A>ZN5?U8'J[FG0!Y)X1_Y M%6P_W#_Z$:`-N@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@!LD:2QM'(BNC##*PR"/I33:=T!E_V?=: M;\VE.'@'6SF8[1_N-U7Z'(],=:VYXS_B;]_\^_Y^HK6V+-EJ<%X[0@-#]1.FX:].X7+M9C"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@!KH MDB%'4,IX((R#51DXN\79E1E*#YHNS*VV:T^YNF@_N]73Z?WA^OUK>\*V_NR_ M!_Y?EZ;G3>G7W]V7X/\`R_+TW+$4J31AXV#*>XK"<)0?+)69SSA*G+EDK,?4 MD!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`;'A3_C^U+_=B_\`9Z`. MHH`*`.?\"_\`(@^'_P#KPA_]`%`&K>ZI8:;L^VW<-OOSM\QP,XZX_.MJ5"K5 MO[.+=C>EAZM:_LXMV[%F.1)HDEBYC*+BW&6Z,OQ%J M6HZ3ICWMA8VUV(@6E6>Z:'"C^Z0CY/UQ4Z\R7=I?>T@TLV8-WXWO-.UB'2[W M3]-@NBL9:-]4V-+O8@"#?&HE(`Y!*\G'O50M*5EZ>>V]NWGY/0F7NQO\_+TO MW_S6IJ/XF:/7_P"PSITOV]G#1C)\MH.\N_&!CIMZ[L#H]\M_+MZW_P`^ MPY>[\]OU^[\K=78GN=?^RQZD'M3Y]K(D<40?F?>!L(XXRQ*^VTT1UMYNW]?+ M4'HW?M?^OGI]W<27Q7H]O=3V\UQ*CP!M[_9I?+)4995DV[68#.54D\'C@T)W MV_K6WYZ`]-_ZTO\`D1?\)AI7GV\8%V/-,@):SE3RMBACO!4%>"",CG-*_P"5 M_P`;?U_PP[-VMW2^_P#K^K,MW7B'3+-E66:0NY0*L<$DC'>&*\*I/16/MCG% M5:SMYV^ZW^:UV)33CS+:UQ=+\0:=K$LD=E+*S(H;]Y;R1!U/1D+J`Z_[2Y'O M0EI?^ON&]'8P])\;#4];EL80L,^0(^^W.-W0U,6G#G?:^F MO]?YA)6ERKO;70U$\7:'+927<%X;B%&5";>&24EV&0H55)9L>P?U^GW^6Y&OB_33?1P$7`BEBCDCF%M*5&]F7#_+^[P5Q\^.3CM32N[? MUM??S$W97]?PW)%\6Z.WG_O;D>3C):SF4/E@H,>4_>#<0,IGJ/6I3NN9?U?; M3?H4U9\OK^&Y'+XST2&*.1YKG#@D@6,Y:(!MN9%"9CY!^_CH:I*\E%=;?CMK ML2W9-O\`KK^1+=*\,P:I%<7>J:II%_?,"S:7<31F<)@?.J9&.0-Q`/(`-2FHNW17= MNG]:?/4IIM7^1T^A:=INF:5'%I*;;64F8,9&=I"W)8LQ+,3GJ36DDT^5]-#. M+37,NI?EEC@A>65PD:*69CT`'4U#:BKLM)MV1B0^,M$GL9+M)[C8D@B\MK.9 M968YP%C*[VS@]`>A]#3>EA+4FB\4:--=VMM'>%I+E5:,B)]OS#*AFQM5C@X5 MB"?2FE=M+^NNG?373IKL)NRN_P"NFO;737KIN3:CKVFZ3<0P7EP8Y)N0!&S! M1D##M)P>#@T+5^J\_P"SWK2T*GPZ/MT^_I\_O%L:-M7*>O'RO]1_7K6\*NG)-77XKT_RV.B%;W>2HKQ_%>C_`$V%AN0S^5*OE3== MI/7W![BE.ERKFB[Q[_Y]OZL%2CRKG@[Q[_YKI_5FR>L3G"@`H`*`"@`H`*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@#8\*?\?VI?[L7_`+/0!U%`!0!R_A"RBO?A_P"' M5E>=0MC"1Y4[Q?P#KM(S6E.I*GM;YI/\TS6G5E2UC;YI/\TQNN>!++6?()O+ MN(Q9^_.\VIA,XJX6_NIW\DOR2-*V\-V=M M:0P">^(B0("+Z9R2\MEH9N ML^%EUIYUFU>_BL[A0L]HGE-%(!_OHS+G_9(Z9Z\U,='??6_]?<0WIIII85O" M>GMJ']I&2?\`M(3"5;O*^8JCCR@<8\O&1MQW)^]S1'W=O._G?O\`A;M9":NK M?=Y>G]:^A"Q'/3@8*?[NUOZLT_P`U M]P3]_?\`K2QKW/ANUN;Q[DSSHTCLSJI7#!HQ&5Y'3"@\%(K69)KC4[V^D1E*M/Y0P%1T"_(BC&)&]^G-5*TDT^M[ M_.R_0B*Y=O+\-2#PQX&TGPG<3S:?DM*@C&884VJ#G&8T4M]7+'CKUIJ34;?U M_E^`-)RYO7\?Q+%GX;GL)W,'B'4UMFDDD%L4MRBER2<'RMW!;(^;\ZE*T>7R MM^A76Y!!X+M+.Q^S66HZA;$3"X259%=XY<$.XWJPR^X[@01DD@`T^R6EMO3M MZ?CYB[M]=_\`/^M+="XOAR#R9$FO+N>22..-Y974NVQV<'@8R2QZ#&,``4/I M;R?W6_R#HUZK[_ZT,K3?AYI>EWTUW%=7+R2E2Q,<"DE9%D!9DC5G.5'+%CUY MR9%XS3JI(+EL;3$^X#< MV`&0\\L>,%/W9*^R:?W._P#6OR[D_>3MN_\`)+]"]I?@/2-(\1S:W;`_:)&D M;:881M+G+'>$$A[\,Y'/TP0]R/*O3Y?U\PE[SN_ZTL=/0`4`>8>"_P#D<]*_ M[`4__I6*`/3Z`./\1?\`)1_!?_;[_P"BA0!V%`'EOQCLKF[BTI[37M(T>6$N MY>]OY+:2505.Q-A^89`SW!Q@BLF^6;ENDMN^_3[U\V:)7C;\>QZ#H#K)X=TQ MTC6-6M8R$7.%^4<#/./K7575JLEYLYZ7P+T+5Y$\UE/%&(C(\;*HE7M835XM&T7:29YS;>!]<;CBWT>[U_3[]5^/DB5UZ;?UY&QI_AK7+5(K2=K6:WEGAN;BX:YD:6-H]N$ M4,AWCY%&YF!Y)(IIZJ_3\=+?+77KIH)K1VZZ>FK?Y/[R]K6CZM?33FVALBM_ M:"TN3+<,#"`6^9,1G><.>#MZ#FICH]=KI_=_6C_`IOJMU?\`'^M1=&T74K/4 M+9;J.T2SL$E2WDBF9I)@[`Y=2@"X`YP6R?2B.BUWLE]UO\B6NBVO?\]/Q_!& MWJ%C_:%KY'VJXMOF!WV[[&^F<=*!GC?A?1/.\-6,G]J:@F4/RI/@#D]L4`:_ M]@?]1?4__`C_`.M0`?V!_P!1?4__``(_^M0`?V!_U%]3_P#`C_ZU`!_8'_47 MU/\`\"/_`*U`!_8'_47U/_P(_P#K4`']@?\`47U/_P`"/_K4`']@?]1?4_\` MP(_^M0`?V!_U%]3_`/`C_P"M0`?V!_U%]3_\"/\`ZU`!_8'_`%%]3_\``C_Z MU`!_8'_47U/_`,"/_K4`4Y?"*J\L]GJ^H6UU)RT@ER'/^T,#=^>?>M8U;+ED MKK^MOZL*Q4:-=/4C6M4U&RVC_7_:+(9-'DMY"TNJ:D8#T=)S\GU&/UK;DA6^#27;OZ?Y/Y=C?DA7_`(>D MNW1^G^3^3Z$ZZ"&4,NL:D0>01<]?TKG::=F'M M*KLAI-Z(6MA&%XHU/4M+LK>33H-QDF"2R_9)+KR4P3N\J,AWY`'!XSGM4W]Y M+I_6G_!_S';1LYK5/'UW9>'M+N[9K2YN;B5EG>.%_+15;:6<.R&$9P"7)V$X MPU6K.<5T:3^^W7[[:7=K6N+7ED^J_K;[K^M[EKQ!XOO;764M=,N[;RGLDN8M MNF7%\9RS,``T+84?*.2#UJ=4Y*U[=-OQ'I:+[W_3I\S3N]6UBXL+R6P^RVC=OQ?\`P_X& M+J/B;Q)HYB:]FL5M_(6OG?; MRM^.ND1;E34EU5_33MN_4U+OQ3=6_BNW\/+':O/>A9K6;S!M$('S[ESDMP=N M.#G_`&6I05VXO[._IT^?1]M_(=O\`AGN$8MM1ZZ7\ MKVM^:V[B0^,$DE59M$U*V3UNH[F[P`LC1(4;>R%<%P7(93G MRPP'7.#1%:7X)_K_`)7*:]YQ72_X-K]/^&+EMXKMM5\(7NN: M9M;[/'*=CNC@.@)P3&Q4CI]UCUZU35K/O_G84+2ERA_PE]NC2^;I]XD2"0)* M1&5F9&VLJ@/NSGIN`'O2]-^WJ[>F[0NEW_PVE_R3,B[^)5II#SKK-C-92B*++4-8_ MLNWAN6G$8F+&/""(@%7W9QAN@'7(/`P:OE>J?31^O;]?3ST(YE9-==OZ\MO^ M`<7X+_Y'/2O^P%/_`.E8J2CT^@#C_$7_`"4?P7_V^_\`HH4`=A0!Y/\`%;2] M1ANXM3T^[NX81&TES(UQ=&*(*44;4A8;>I)]<<W&3_`*U=_P!;+Y]KFEN9 M)?U_7^5NQZ7H[2/HM@TP<2FWC+!\[L[1G.QK2E5E1DIPW$UJ.BSQF)C]77(_\` M':B]&6Z:]-?P?^8]0_MBYM^+[2+N(=Y(`)T_`+\__CM'LHOX)+YZ?GI^(7)[ M76],O)?)@OH3-_SR9ML@_P"`G!'Y5,J-2"NUH%T7ZR&%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`! M0`4`%`!0!5:W>!B]K@9Y:(_=;Z>AKI56,URU?OZ_\%'4JT:BY:WW]5Z]U^/G MT)8;A)L@961?O(W#+_GUK.I2E3UW3V?0SJ494[/=/9K9_P!=MR6LC$*`"@`H M`9)-%",R2(@]68"KC3G/2*N7"G.;M!-^A7_M*T/^KE,O_7)2_P#(&MOJE9?$ MK>K2_.QT?4JZ^)[;5'ZG/Z4>PBOBFOQ?Y*WXA]7A' MXZB7I=_DK?B&Z_?I%!$/]IRQ_(`?SHMAX]6_DE^K_(.7"QWE)_)+]7^0?9[M MOOWNW_KE$!_Z%FCVE&/PT_O;_2P>UH1^&G?U;?Y%/^/[4O\`=B_]GH`ZB@`H`X3PIXHT.R\':-97MSY=Q;VD4_-=].E3HI1II12Z+1?@3=O<>G%2TG'EZ?YZ_J4FXRYEO_D9U_>>!]1F\V>]N5;RA"P@GNH5D09P M'"$!^I^]GK3ZM]]?Z6Q*7*DET_K?F-I#8R,8`` M!``R.YIIVL^SO\WO]^WIIL%E:WE;Y?UKZZ[C=4U+P5J]P+BZOKE)O+\MGMIK MFW+IUVMY97<.3P:DTB#&!"K7`A7Y=F1%]P' M;QD#/O3>M[];_COZ?(2]VUNEOPVOW^?9=B[-KWA"6%X_M>-Q0Y\N7@I]T].V M*FHG-/N[_BK/\`A:%K=+?VTR.SDU&[F=5C!G,]UYH*`@%'SNC M'+<*0.2*TF^:5UW_`*UZ_,25E_7Y$RS>`UEMY%N;A3;E2H$UT%M2E9 M67E^"M^6C[]2KZW]?QU?X_=T+$&N>#[?2I=,6]E>UE#"02F>1WW=[L;M]22)2&RZEQN5OE M'RG(&5;N076?[O33?\$M+_/???R)AI/OM_5NG](TM.UEKF?399M5N8=6;[(+ M:PEN"C30LJ^:QBS\_60EB"1LX(K>22K22[N_DK77I;?S>GD9I_NU?LOF[V^= M]K=M?,T?%>J0I?%_[:-JRV@DTQ(KKRQ=7&XY7`.)>B#:ZO72[^[77\M?,ZS4+N>RMO-M].N;]] MP'E6[1AL>O[QE&/QH&>-^%]5O(O#=BB>']0F4(<.CVX!Y/K*#^E`&O\`VS?_ M`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X]0`?VS?_`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0 M`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X]0`?VS?_`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_ M+;_X]0`?VS?_`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X]0`?VS?_`/0L MZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X]0`?VS?_`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS M?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X]0`?VS?_`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X M]0`?VS?_`/0LZG_W\MO_`(]0`?VS?_\`0LZG_P!_+;_X]0!!=7DE]%Y5WX0O MKB/^[*;5A^1EJHSE!WB[`4/(FAYL="UZQ/8075N4'T1I2H_*M?;R?Q)/U7ZK M45@_M/Q9;?ZO0[B]4?PS&WA;\668C_QVB]&6Z:_'^OO#4N2>);^TM1+>>%=5 M#=UMS#/C_OE\_I1[*+^"2_+\]/Q"Y':>,X[V3RK?1[UIN\1FM5_MF_\`^A9U/_OY;?\`QZLAA_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_;-__ M`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU`!_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU` M!_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU`!_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV M_P#CU`!_;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU`$4VHWDV"?#6J+(OW762V#+_Y%_2M:=65 M/3=/IT-J=:5/1:I[I[/^N^Y4MM=UAK_R7TUW`)!BVA7X'KNVY_$CTS7M5<#A M%AE64K.R>]]SWZN7X)815XSLVD][[VTMN3MK.O%B%\+W2#^]YT#_`*>:*\FV M'CU;^27ZL\6V%CUD_DE^K_(;_:.LM]_1]47_`*Y?9%_G*:/:TH_#3^]M_E8/ M;4(_#3^]M_E8/M-T?]9X=UF3_>N;?'Y";%'UF:^%)?)?GN'UN:^!)>B7YN[_ M`!)([N2$YC\(7RGU!M<_GYM3+$5IZ2D_O(GBJ\U:4V_F3_VS?_\`0LZG_P!_ M+;_X]6!SA_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU`!_;-_P#] M"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU`!_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_ M;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO_CU`!_;-_P#]"SJ?_?RV_P#CU`!_;-__`-"SJ?\`W\MO M_CU`'3^![F6ZN-2>:QGLVQ$/+F*%OX^?D9A^M`'8T`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0 M`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!R#_`/)8H?\`L!/_`.CTH`Z^@#C_`!%_ MR4?P7_V^_P#HH4`=A0`4`%`!0`U(TB4K&BH"2Q"C').2?SH`=0`4`%`!0!Y) MX1_Y%6P_W#_Z$:`-N@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@ M`H`KW5C:7T?EW=K#<)_=E0,/UJHSE!WB[`4#X?@B!^P7=W8MV$4Q9!_P!\K^ M0K7V[?QI/^NZU%8P=!T_QII>I:A-?W4.I6SO\B/+L9NGS+P0OIMX'\SU5IX6 MI&*@N5_UO_F2E)'0+X@M(V"7Z2Z]3.7+%R[%17-)(Y31?&%_KNBRWMCIN MGSRI-Y8\K4PT*C!),C[-R$8Z;#U7U.+DN5)]/P^7?\"(N[MZ>OW$MCXRDO\` M[-<1:7C3V:**>];OM]U]>W;KKIY@W9>G M^=M.^U^FGW%W6O$$^EW3QV^G_:8K:$7-VYEV&.(DC*C!WM\K'!*\#KVJ8ZNS MVT7S?Z+K^I36FF^OX?UI^@:5XBFU#4$BDT_R+2Y61[2;S=QD",`=RX&S.01@ MMD=<'BB.JUWLG\G^NU_7=B>CTVO;Y_TG]QMR2QPIND=47U8X%`'D_A'GPIIY M']P_^A&@#;H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H M`*`$90RE6`((P0>]`&6WA^S1C)8M+I\A._XB ML)G6[+JMOJ,0_N_N9?R.58_BM'[J7>/XK_/\PU')K]B'6*[,EA,3@)=+Y>3Z M!ONM^!-)T)[QU7E_5PN:@((R.E8C"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H M`*`"@`H`V/"G_']J7^[%_P"ST`=10`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4` M%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'(/_`,EBA_[`3_\`H]*`.OH`X_Q%_P`E'\%_]OO_`**% M`'84`%`!0!'<0BXMI8"[H)%*EHV*LN1U!'0^])JZL-.SN<@_P\BGLKB"ZU_4 MY9+B99)9ML`,BJ6*HR^6596OSLE?Y6T^_>PN_I;^OZ_4U$\+ M*+N*:35KZ9`R230LL(2>1,;7;;&"",+]TJ/E''7+3L[_`-;6_KS%;2W]6O>W M]="34?#::C(KOJ5Y%NB\FX$8BQ7R_+MP[`L$VJ&[#[Q.!THCHK>B^2Z?UV!ZO\` M'Y]_S^\T;RPL]1@\B^M(;J'.[9-&'7/K@T`>.^%M#TB;PS8R2Z79R.4.6:!2 M3R>^*`-C_A'M$_Z`]C_X#)_A0`?\(]HG_0'L?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_`.`R M?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_`,!D_P`*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_P"`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_P`! MD_PH`/\`A'M$_P"@/8_^`R?X4`'_``CVB?\`0'L?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_X M#)_A0`?\(]HG_0'L?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_`.`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_`,!D M_P`*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_P"`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_P`!D_PH`/\`A'M$_P"@/8_^ M`R?X4`'_``CVB?\`0'L?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_X#)_A0`?\(]HG_0'L?_`9 M/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_`.`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_`,!D_P`*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_P"` MR?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_P`!D_PH`/\`A'M$_P"@/8_^`R?X4`'_``CVB?\`0'L? M_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_X#)_A0`?\(]HG_0'L?_`9/\*``^'=$(P=&L,?]>R? MX4TVM4!G7'@C0Y)3-;6<=I+ZQQJ4_P"^&!7\@#6WMY/XU?U_SW%;L1?V']C_ M`-9H&E:A&/XH+=(9/^^6RI_[Z'THM2EL^7UU7]?(-1\*>%9)5AFTNSM)VX$5 MU:+$Q/MD8;_@)-)T)I76J\M0N:?_``CVB?\`0'L?_`9/\*Q&'_"/:)_T!['_ M`,!D_P`*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_P"`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_P`!D_PH`/\`A'M$_P"@ M/8_^`R?X4`'_``CVB?\`0'L?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_X#)_A0`?\(]HG_0'L M?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_`.`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_`,!D_P`*`#_A'M$_Z`]C M_P"`R?X4`'_"/:)_T!['_P`!D_PH`/\`A'M$_P"@/8_^`R?X4`'_``CVB?\` M0'L?_`9/\*`#_A'M$_Z`]C_X#)_A0!TG@NSM;*ZU**TMHK>,K$=L2!1GY^PH M`ZZ@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`.0?\`Y+%# M_P!@)_\`T>E`'7T`6Y?9"DLJJ96]%!/)]A26KLMQO17Z! M!J-C=7=Q:6][!+P(Z)&VZ+Z M>6V0!_NXK;VS?QJ_Y_?_`)BMV,".^\<1^+WLWL;.XT]8LB3F&-AV;=\Q#=MO M/]:ZG#".CS)M2^]_IIYD^]WVJ1OU\L5RVH]W]R_S*U#S/$/ M_/MIH]_/D./_`!RBU'N_N7^8:A_Q4/\`U#?_`")1^Y\_P#4-OB%O^6NFQ_\` M;.1L_J*/W/G^`:AY?B'_`)^M-_\``>3_`.+HO1[/[U_D&H?9_$/7^TM-7V^P M2''X^=1S4?Y7]Z_^1#4/LWB`\-JM@!_LV#@_K*:.:C_*_O\`^`&H?8]<_P"@ MQ;?^`1_^+HYZ7\K^_P#X`:F'XCT+Q9?QVGV#7T0QS*SJD7DC'][.23CTZ&NG M#UL/"_/#]1-,Z^%9$@C263S)%4!GV[=QQR<=JX&TWH4/I`%`!0!L>%/^/[4O M]V+_`-GH`ZB@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`. M0?\`Y+%#_P!@)_\`T>E`'7T`*7>ILGC$L?RL-P63Y6'."#V.1R*G7G37]:K^O6W2X_LM&- MIVD:R@AM[O1B)Y[BVN6NT,*I`(]N590^0V%;[BE<5I&RDNEK_`(QMI^6O M1$.]GUOI_P"3-W?Y^IH^(;"^O+BY:'1YKC[?9"U5M\0^R,&8[GRXX^93\FX_ M)]*F'Q=M8N_I^JZ=-2Y/3O;F7K>WYV%T'3+VWU2U2;3)+9+&.X1KIGC*W)DD M#94*Q;G&X[@.?6B&D?DE;T_RUMZDRWMYM_GI^*^XZ/4%U!K;&F2VT5QN'-Q& MSKCOPK`Y_&@9YOX;\(^+H?#UE']LTVWPG^KGM)=Z\GK\XH`U?^$5\6_]!/1_ M_`67_P"+H`/^$5\6_P#03T?_`,!9?_BZ`#_A%?%O_03T?_P%E_\`BZ`#_A%? M%O\`T$]'_P#`67_XN@`_X17Q;_T$]'_\!9?_`(N@`_X17Q;_`-!/1_\`P%E_ M^+H`/^$5\6_]!/1__`67_P"+H`/^$5\6_P#03T?_`,!9?_BZ`*D&@>,I;^[M MVNM*CC@V;)6M)=LF1DX^?MTH`M_\(KXM_P"@GH__`("R_P#Q=`!_PBOBW_H) MZ/\`^`LO_P`70`?\(KXM_P"@GH__`("R_P#Q=`!_PBOBW_H)Z/\`^`LO_P`7 M0`?\(KXM_P"@GH__`("R_P#Q=`!_PBOBW_H)Z/\`^`LO_P`70`?\(KXM_P"@ MGH__`("R_P#Q=`!_PBOBW_H)Z/\`^`LO_P`70!4N=`\907EE`EUI4J7#LKR+ M:2XB`0L"?GZ$@#ZF@"W_`,(KXM_Z">C_`/@++_\`%T`'_"*^+?\`H)Z/_P"` MLO\`\70`?\(KXM_Z">C_`/@++_\`%T`'_"*^+?\`H)Z/_P"`LO\`\70`?\(K MXM_Z">C_`/@++_\`%T`'_"*^+?\`H)Z/_P"`LO\`\70`?\(KXM_Z">C_`/@+ M+_\`%T`'_"*^+?\`H)Z/_P"`LO\`\70!4U'0/&5E9F:&ZTJY?>B^7':2YPSA M2?O]`"2?84`6_P#A%?%O_03T?_P%E_\`BZ`#_A%?%O\`T$]'_P#`67_XN@`_ MX17Q;_T$]'_\!9?_`(N@`_X17Q;_`-!/1_\`P%E_^+H`/^$5\6_]!/1__`67 M_P"+H`/^$5\6_P#03T?_`,!9?_BZ`#_A%?%O_03T?_P%E_\`BZ`#_A%?%O\` MT$]'_P#`67_XN@`_X17Q;_T$]'_\!9?_`(N@"IIN@>,KVPBN)KK2K61\YBDM M)0RX)'/S^V?QH`M_\(KXM_Z">C_^`LO_`,70`?\`"*^+?^@GH_\`X"R__%T` M'_"*^+?^@GH__@++_P#%T`'_``BOBW_H)Z/_`.`LO_Q=`!_PBOBW_H)Z/_X" MR_\`Q=`!_P`(KXM_Z">C_P#@++_\70`?\(KXM_Z">C_^`LO_`,70`?\`"*^+ M?^@GH_\`X"R__%T`:7A*PUG3M7U:'5C!(IC@,4UO$R(W^LW#YB3PA=\TT*+L@3.-S%F&?HNX\=*%K+E]/O>W]=.H/17_`*T_ MKY]"G+XRL(99UDMKM84+K#-Y:E+EU8*R)@YW;CCY@`>Q(&:2U6F_1=[Z7]-M M^]]@>F^WY:7_`"OMZ;Z#)?&=M%`G_$LOVO-[))9JL?FQ;<9+?/M/WEQM8D[A M@&J6K5MO^#;UW3Z=&]@_K]?3^K/4Z16#*&`(!&>1@_E0U;02=U<6D,*`"@`H M`*`*NH7IT^S:=;6>Z<$*L-NH+N2<`#)`'U)`'G-4E=JVSM][Z>I+T3;Z?DNOW:DL7BJ*XF MFBMM,OIF57:WVB,"Z",%?RRSCH2/O[<]1D5*=XW7E]SV?]:]T4U9V_J_;U+6 M@:XNO64MREA=68CF>$I3:.D8EG#[MI7Y\#[K? M?*D8.0*>OS_+2_I^/XAMZ=_P]=VOO#_A,K`^04M;QT95:X<1KBTRY0>9EL_> M5A\H;&"3QS32N[+;2S[WU7WZ?>KB>BN_/\-_ZZ]+EG2/$UIK-[+;0V]Q$0ID MB>4+MG0,5++AB0`PQA@I]J4?>CS>GW/5??\`\/8S0WEG>6]M&'VW*;:6KV6 M_E:V_P!ZVN):[>5O.]_\GO;;T)X?%MC<7\,$,%R]M*R(MZ$`A\QE#*G)W9(( MYVXY`SGBGRN[B_/YVWMZ:_I#"@`H`*`"@`H`RM9UQ=%57>PO M+F,(TDKP(I6%%QEF+,/7HN6/.`:2>MOZU_KY=1VTTW[$%OXJL9[V2$Q3PVZB M3R[N15$,OE\2!3G/R\_>`S@XSBGTO\_EW_K75"ZJW7\][?=_5R&3QE8_88+J MWL[ZY$WFMY<<.V1(XVVN[*Y4@`XX^\<\`T/3?:R?I?O_`%W&E?;T]?Z^XWXI M4FA26)@T;J&5AW!Z&FTXNS)BU)70^D,*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`* M`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@#D'_`.2Q0_\`8"?_`-'I0!U]`''^(O\`DH_@ MO_M]_P#10H`["@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`.=\0:!J>L:C9RP:I;165 MO\[6=Q:-*DD@.0Q*R)G&.`XLD%JVZ*5GW@NWF8=0<\`+P>O>E&\;-;I)?+3]$E<'9Z=' M^=FOUN4]3\`2:LPN[RYTRYU%S)YKW.F&6'#JB_)&9/E8"->2Q[\0`&4@D<9!!&>.:EJ]NPT M[&'#X0OH;9+5-1L8K:2)(;N.&Q=1(BLQ&PF4E"0Q!)W9Z\&M+ZI]$T_FK?AH MM/(FVC775??^NKU+=KX5LZI"8((I8[)4MBK0[SG+L7(?&`!@+6?+>'+U MM:_E_GHB[KFOTO?YZ_YLW+"RBT[3[>R@4+%!&L:@#'`&*TE+F;9G%-*S+%24 M%`!0`4`%`#9`YC81L%<@[6(R`>QQWI23:T&K7U./T_PCK%G`\DVMV=QJ?GK< M+>-8/EGPRGS!YQW+M8@*I0+VJMDE'I_7W[:^5MA/5N_7_.Z^7_#[ZDW_``B- MZJ-$FJPB*[4"_!M6)E/F,Y,9\S]WG>PYW<8_%*RLNBL_.ZMK^"Z`]4^[NOD_ M\AWAOP&YM7W1M&3!:>3)-E@=\[[V\UQC[V%ZMZT1]V'+Z>FGEYA+6 M7-Z_C^AU5`!0`4`%`!0`4`VGM[F)X8D-FPDMHV'"HWF[ M1R`2=F6Q@G`&%&\5Y[W\T[KY+MIW&[-KMV_/Y^?0?_PC6M?:SJ8UFR&K,IB, MOV!_)\K`^41^;G.1G=N_"AK1Q6SO?\-NVB\Q?I;]=_O\NA7A\`I#KMG>"]4V MEKY3+!Y;AB\:!58D2;">.IC+8XW8XJU*TG+UM\U;\NUNE_-25XI/Y_??^M_( M[*I&%`!0`4`%`!0!SOB70-2UN>S%MJEM!9PDM+:W%HTR3MD;2VV1"0/[IR#W M!P*(Z3YOZ7GZ]NV^XWK'E_KT_P`^^VU[OT_P_=VNI1RSW\,ME;O++;PI;E'1 MY"2=S[R&`W,`-HZ]\41]U?*WRT_'1:DO7\_G_EKU3*2BKL<8N3LC+T+Q;H?B M1I$TJ^\Z2-0[1O$\3[3T;:X!*^X&*TY6ESUY M7&_GT_#3?J-65[K[2=O1:KYFI\.O!FH^$EO/M\T3&:.)=L,BLKLN=TA`BCPQ MR.3N)QRQK3F7+9=_NT7];(FSYK_T]?ZZG=5!04`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4` M%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0 M`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!R#_\`)8H?^P$__H]*`.OH`X_Q%_R4?P7_`-OO_HH4`=A0 M`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`% M`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0` M4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`<@ M_P#R6*'_`+`3_P#H]*`.OH`Q=;\-QZS?:=?+J-W87>GF0PRVWED_.NU@1(C` M\#TH`A_X1[5/^ARUG_OU9_\`QB@`_P"$>U3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z M'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+ M6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[ M5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z M'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+ M6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[ M5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z M'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+ M6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[ M5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z M'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+ M6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[ M5/\`HU3_HU3_`*'+6?\`OU9__&*`#_A'M4_Z M'+6?^_5G_P#&*`#_`(1[5/\`HU3_H GRAPHIC 117 exhibit99-66x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-66x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`!-`M,#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`I* M6D[4`LW45\;>TIW$^Z,K`T@Q\[MM9AV'0Y-`'245#;3--&6>)HF!*E6]O0]Q4&I M2/'"I1BIW=16=2HJ<')]"HQYG8NT52^RSD9^UO\`E_\`7J6:86T`9CN8#`]S M4JJ[-S5DO0?+K9.Y8HK/2"XN%$DDS(#R%7M2.;BR(9G,L7?/45'UAI6RN2T52NI'6 M\@56(5NH]>:+V1TGMPK$!FYQWZ5G*NDI.VSL4H-V\R[156XAFDD#1S%!C&!5 M2W6XG,@%PPV''UI3KN,N7E>OH"@FKW-6BL^?S[;RY?,9U7`<5/-=)';B1>=W MW?>J5>.O-I87(]+=2S15>U218@96+,W)SV]JL5K%\R3:L2U9V"BBBJ$%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M57O'*0EA+Y9'?`)/L!0!8HK--S_)21I"KXVN`O&U"<<^X M[T]-1$DH187(..0">"2`>![9H`O44E4(+J1'\NX#>87"[<```YP0>XXH`T** MSC?,Y9HES@#Y6/'WRN?TJ>*\\RX,7E-@$KNP<9'X8H`M45ESZBRW3JA3:D;\ M'J67'Z<_H:)+FX1S`)5W*6/F%>H"@XQ^/Y"@#4HJ."0RV\WUQHXN6?;',Y4HH&%7Z]>HKJM_9@I9Z>I\NTF*33=/BL=:E&THI0"'<<[O[WX_XUN4`% M4=5_U"_[W]*O55U"%YHE6,9(.>M<^)BY4I)%TVE--B"WGP/]*;_OFHM3!'DD M_=!YIX>_`_UN.U8N*J0<(IW\[_J6GRR4G8F4@C(Y!J* M\*BUDW?W<575;RW&Q%65!TR<&J\SR23*MX#&G7`'%.KB+0LXM-Z>7WA"G[VY M)@C2.?P_.KMM_P`>T7^X*22-)KV\S:A'-'&[H(]IV2[#G.?Q M%`&CD>M-DD$:%R"0.RC)K$EM)$OXR\(R]RQ\[/+`@X&/:D.GWCVGE-$JE8%B M'S@[B&!S^0H`VTFCD9E1P2APP'8T33)!$TLC81>2>N*Q;JT^RBZE$:(_G++` MP_B('W<=?7\ZN264@T5K9?FE9K$Y/ZT`78YTD(VAQD$Y9"O\ZDW#&I^E,ET^5#(D,$;0/(K;./[N"1GCK0!L;AZTR25 M8U+')QV49/Y5AKI-PUNPEC5I5MPD9W=&#$_RQS4UQ83NEZH@5I)CE9MPR1D? M+^E`&M)*L<;NQX0%C]*CENX88%FD+",C.0I.![XZ5EO8W;WDDGE(NX2J64@; M@1\OOZ=:OW5O))I#6Z`&0Q!<9[XH`M1RK(@<9`/]X%3^1IV1ZUG7-@9[N21E M!'V?8A)Z-S_C59[.XFA?SK2N>N>,^*C-Y M#YYA#%G!`8*I;;GIDCI5*TLY(;])I+>(DPJI=,`(PSGCZ8%211W-M>E)N'J*Q%TVY\J11$L;>28V(;_7,3U/Z]?6I_P"S M!'<^9%"JA;A64CLFT`_KF@#5W#U%)N&,Y&*Y^PM+AK(/#;HC&`J2Q!\TDCJ/ M8`]?6I8-+E,T8FA7R!*SE"1P"H`X''6@#_/YU$;)EAC!A M67AMREL98XP<_I0!=6V@4N5B0%QAL#K2JL,F)%"MSN##GG&,_E5);&3?O2VGN#N=%C*Q&,!6^\21^0XH M`M21P@ID('+$H2/XL41VZ);F$@,ISN!'!RBE,.QR*`-(I%*260'`*6.&Q MT`JE)92[FS&LB$OM7=C;G&#_`)Z5=DC=K-HBVYS&5SZG%`$<;6D169'4"?") MZ'K@#\S352Q,3@(FPL,Y7@G.!^M5UL9\QJ=NR)T9.>>H+?J/UI[6DKQR(JM& MA9"%,F[HV21Z<4`6E@MBKQK&F!\K`#\"F5./+V^OK0!<>6U+(7=-Q)C7 M/4G."/TIWV.W\H1^2A0'(&.]5ELY%MU3@L+CS,DY.W?G^57Z`#I2T44`%%%% M`!1110`5%-`DVS>,[&#JX$,=LD1^3(]MQQ4N*6BE&*BK)#;;W$HI:*H0E M%+10`4E+10`E+110`E,>6-#AW53[G%/J.2"*0Y=`Q]ZF7-;W=QJW4/M$/_/5 M/^^A3U(8`J00>XJ+[';_`//):E50BA5&`.@J8>TO[UAOEZ"T4M%:$B44M%`" M44M%`"44M%`"44M%`"44M%`"44M%`"44M%`"44M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`5#=,Z1%D; M:1[9S4U-90PPPR*F2;BTAIV95O+G[+;#?*HD<[59N!GU_*F6US++]E:.5C&X"Q*K%2,[LL1C]*M"&-0@"`!#E>.A_R333;0 ML5)C4E>1QTYS_.@"!I+@FX12"RLNS:.@.,]>_6F-/-LA,4I:1FVE&0]:YNIDAEB8!,QC.<444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`?__9 ` end GRAPHIC 118 exhibit99-66x1x2.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-66x1x2.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"``?`(X#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBJFH.R M+"%;;NDP?FVY&#WH`MT5FR7(*C1H5;)9MV.0<^_IVI)K]@NT;2QCE8 M@$@C;P*`-.BLW[5/#),\LD30QRA6^7!52HYZ^I'ZTD,L\DTSMG"(IQO(VY7. M,=Z`-.BL];FX)W#R_*5T0C!+'<%[Y_VJA_M*8^8%"$[DV$C'#-CID_TH`UJ* MSHKN>5UB+1(X9PS$'!VG'`S_`%J.;4)85BV`')&\$9X+8ZD_XT`:M%8Z/(T= MH3-+^\N'1OG/(!?'\A5I+B4,ID:,1M,T8ZY`&[J<]>!0!>HK)^WW#A"#&BR1 M$HVW=N;!)'7C@9J;N99]I:+:LBQE<' :X-L7(&`<=!2[%QC:.F.G:G44`)2T44`?_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 119 exhibit99-74x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-74x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`(K`J4#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@#"U^9CJ>D6#%EMK MJ9_.*L5SM7*J2.Q/\J25=.;6)K:UE$5X+617A$;A<$J0Y/W1C'7OGVK7NK2W MO(Q'V:`.2TB:6>XT" MWADFM;CRS--,Q^6Z4=4Z_,>O7IUK1\2:W)IVK6LJ8^S6CJ+D!N6#@@\?[(VG M_@0]ZV_[&T_R8H?LP\N%MT0W']V?]GGC\*D?3;22&:&2,O',J6L7D/YD8C*K ML:/_`%8=0>N,[@>QKL+?3K6V>-X8RAB3RT`=L!?3&<8ILVE64\4L4L`,4K;Y M$W$*QXY(!QV%`&2]LH\4RZN"*ZF"SM[>5Y8X_WL@`:1B68@=!D\XIR6T,= MS+<)&%FF"B1A_$%SC^9H`X^Y$AL0T0'_`"S/EY^7TY.>.]3>&'2[ MBM5NMRE;5&+.V6N"[..3GG&P8[CGT%=$VCV#2W$K09DN1MF;>V9!Z'GIVQZ< M4MOI-E;-$8(F00DF-1(VU201PN<=">U`''7!NA87NBIYDE_82--#*003"!NY M.?FXPN/<>E=/X>E^VPSZGY?EK=LI1?\`950N?SW?ACZG26WA6X>X6-1,ZA6? M')`S@?J:=%&D,211*%1%"JHZ`#H*`.8TZYAN]0UVZU0B2.TF\E#M)$2+DY`' M0]RW7Z5`MT'N_#^F)=23Z?,KN9<9XQGG(^E=+-IEI.\KO%AIEV M2[&*^8/1L=:5],LGMH;=K=/+@QY78QXZ;3U'X4`G7!&>E`&%KHN;#4)-0 ML/-:.UBC>:T0G9*C,X8[>F1C.?:J%Q?O)9Z+#:3.MK?ZA)NE5B&V"4A4![?* M<G!/UY]S49TNQ-H+4VL9@5S(J$9"L26) M'IR3TZ4`+!81V]R)86=4$?E^5N)46&>)Y4E"JY>5 MV8@'(&XG(&?2M``*````.`!VH`6BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BH+6[AN[=9X7#1L2`V>X./YBIZ`"BBF32"&%Y M6!*H"QQZ4`/HK-N].U.N]9LK2XA@>0O-,NZ-(QN+# MM^>#CUP?2@#0HHJI?:C;V,4KS,Q,:AV1%+-@G`.![T`6Z*0'(!QCV-+0`45# M=W,5G:R7-P^R*-=S-Z"JD^M6=O9QW."%(!Y_P"!#\Z`)J*K6M]; MW9Y%+9+#Y0H!'J"3^'O1+K<=C*+:^!:9$1Y9(E^1 M0S[%ZG/7'0'K0!KU5U+[0;*1;0'SGPH(QE03@L,D<@9/6L^?Q);0K.PM[F00 M>=NVJ#D1,HWD9^]N.?3I MUK4D\16JPQNL4KLYFS&-NY!%]\GG'''?G(I8?$5G-J*6:)*=[*J2@`HVY-X[ MYY7VH`PGT#5FTV")(D$WV`VKEY<;6\Q"#D9SP#^7TJR=(U'^T)[L6Z_.]P-O MG99A(B[#SZ8P1GCL,=='6]6GTR>/Y5CMV4$SO$SJ&W`88@C:,9.>?Z&"Q\2- M)J;V=W"`#<""*2+E<[-PRQ`Q0!-!IL@T33;"XM_-$06.==XQ@*5)]QSG MZ5G0Z!>62Z4507#V;LTK`C+*!M0*21_#V/&3VYJ^WBNQ$$\PBN6$(C;:J`LR MN<*0,\<]C@^W-//B.".XB@GMY89&($BMC,.YB%+<]#C.1G`QG%`&6NA:FEEP M!YZRHTH\T;;E5ON`5$TO4$UA+Y;<@"^>5B64GRFC"XP#Z[CBF^#=D=S*?S;E8(#:\YW*"-PR<$D,/P%`&,VAZF=+O;+S"ZYN&, MFY7//9?7FM7Q%83W^C0V]G:LK+.C>6&5"JJ>Q!P/;!J4>([47,=O+#<13/&9 M-DB8((0.5^N,^V014<'BFPG@GE42@11K(`R@%U;A<<]SQ@\T`4/[&OECU4+" MY6XN8YD7S1F1%(W(3GJ0#UX]31/I.HRVQ@CA=-\%TJ?.@$(DD5DCX/94QQD# M(QD5IVFN*21>KY.Z[EMT;&%&S.-QSP2`:K)XGC$DQFC(VB$)`J_."Z%_F.<= M%/Y=\B@"C+HE_(MTT5J((I;N.7[.)5!9/+VL,X(X/(!XX^E64T:9IKWS[1W0 M6D2V^9^?,$;*<'/7YL;C]:N#Q/IQ1I"S+&$B<,<#*R9P>O08Y]*?JFN)8Z5# M>)"[MXN=TD<498%W\K[1<@YF^?QW,;RQF.1'2-2`HVIL`Z9QCWK7HH`H76EI1)% M]INSYB(A8NI/RN7!Y'7HP:T** M`,^RT>VLXKF/+R_:?]<9,9?C'.T`=._4U67PW:@HQGN'=&B*NS+D",Y1?NXQ M^ISUK9HH`J7NGQ7KP2,SQS6[%HI8R`R$C!Z@C!'&"*H_\(W:>4B>=<;EOA?E M]RY:7WXQCV`%;-%`&5-H-O-J+WS33B5FW<,,+^[*8'&<8)/UJO#X4L(()8ED MN")(5AR67*A3E2..H-;M%`&2OAZS\AXI'EE5KO[62Y&?,SD]`.#T^AHN=`M[ MB]FNQ/<13RO%('C9?D:,$`C(/4,00<@YK6HH`RKKP_979)F\TDV[6[$/RRL0 MQ)]\C/XGBK=YI]K>V8M9X@8A@J!P4(Z$'L15JB@#(?P]:S7$UQ<33S331+$S MMM'`(8'`4#.0#G%/&A6PN8K@R2LZ2R3,#MQ(SKM.X8_N\<8K4HH`S-,T2VTR MX::&29W,2PCS&!VHO0#`'3WIG]@6OVF6<2S[I;I+HC*X#KT`XZ&M:B@#'@\. MVULMMY%S=1RVZNHE#*68.Q9@O2M"N9@T":.YM=1A5X+@R` M74)8?O$#D@G!(R/E/!Z`_2@#IJ0D#&3UZ5RPV\BQDO(I&X;C@XSU_3DT`=;4(N83= MM:A_WRQB0K@\*20#GIU!KF)-,U/,K+:R%S?2."9U`:(Q;><'H6P<8_`4R72= M3EAA40O'`,'&Q'H?44`)%KVGS6KSPRL^V40^7L*N7/1=IP< MG_/0U9BU"TF^S>5,K_:E+PX!^8#!/TZCK6#'87\Q%W/8O#,EW'=.&D5FE(#* M0,'`"J5QW.#]:GTS3[V`:,9XVS$LS3G<#Y9?D*<\G&<<>E`&K:ZG:W=PT,$F MY@"1Z.`VTD>H##'_`.L5[LM2A,ZL(K6"6,2%\^:7E+#ZC'KWQ73T` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110!Q5[J$MIX@ MO(!>2PQ+>P*KL[,D0=-S`C/1B/H.>G-69%DG\1:K:F:?[.&B9Y([AU-N#$YS M@'!&0.#Q\PX].E:SM7$H>VA;SL>9E`=^.F?6F-IM@^[=96S;@`ZU?&TO)$6"_7<)97*B+;DJ$SCDX],55&JWJ>'FU/=*NI"^\O[.9"0? MFQY97Z#'KQG/-=I';012/)%#&CN])]DMO/\_P"SQ>=G/F;!NSC' M7Z4`<1?7US:W6LI%?S(L=Y`D<@,5O"QM`)0+6`";B0",?/]?6G"UMQ)'(((M\0Q&VP90> M@/:@#+U.::'5=%L5>3[-.T@E?<0S%8SM!8>IY]\5A:Q=W<.E^(88[JX6.QFA M-M<"1MP+;=R;@><9QSG&[GM79S017"!)XDE4'(#J",^O-,:SM6B$36T)C#%M MA08SZX]>30!1TVTF>QNA` M!^%`',1W,L.EZ%?1W<\EQ(`1V\2!6+#:@&">I^M.,$+*Z MF*,B0[G!4?,>.3Z]!^5`&9I-Q%+J=_'!)=,(MJ.DS%EC89/!)/7/Z?05S]G? MW']LL7O;A-VKS09DD+1^6J@^6%Z9)P!Q].:[*&W@M]WD0QQ;CEMB@9^N*C-A M9L6)M("6;>V8QRW/)XZ\GGW-`'.:?-(T]ZUU823VD[V]Q#.2DH`!#8)RC#.1VP?;CIAI]D,XL[<9.X_NE MY.M/AM+:W(,%O%$0NT;$`P/3CM0!SVG3RR^'=/FDNI3.]M*QS*VY_E// MO@X^F:M:%-]I\-::+B>42W*@;_-;<[`%C\Q.>0IZ&M:.SMH@PCMH4#`@A4`R M#U_.B.RM8G5X[:%&3.TK&`5SUQ0!@>3>.> M`1R,U>T*XGEGNX[JWFMIX]FZ&28RKR#\RMGH?3VK2^R6WE-%]GB\MVW,FP8) M]2/7@?E3HH8H01%&D8/)VJ!F@"2BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**JB]']H/9M&1(( M_-3D?.O`./Q./R]:6QNS>6RSM$T(<_(&8'<.Q&/7K0!9HJO<7:013MMDE:%- MYCB0LYZX`'2(Q.PR48@E?8D<4`244R6188GE7)52!@$`DD@`XU)[;36NYK&X5E8+Y.4+G)`'1L=QWH`OT451& MJ0`WWF))$MD<2,X&#\F_Y<'GY2#0!>HK-357+2(^GW(F&PK"NUF*L#@GG"\J MPY...O-6;"\COKXH`LT454>^4W3VENOG7"*&==V!& M#TW'MGG`Y/%`%NBJVGWBW]J+A$9%+LFUNH*L5.<>X-6:`"BH6N8P65=SLCK& MRHI)4G'7VP0@"Q155+Y3=K;2 M0RPR.A=-X!#`8SR">1D?G4UO+Y\"2^7)'O&=D@PP]B*`)**@O;C[)9S7)`(B M0N03@8`R>?I3X)#+!'(5VEU#%3VR.E`$E%%%`!114%W=1VD/F2Y.3M5%&6=C MT4#N:`)Z*S&U;RQ`)(K0E3 MCK3;:87-M%.JN@D4,%==K#/8CL:`):***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`I&.U2<$X&<#J:6B@#F[RQO+Q9;RW@:&Z-T57S#C]T5\L MG`[`$MCU%-U"RNI(M2@CLY'4B.WM@&`5(MJ@E2?XLEO;Y1S7344`>2WD-W;^=+,=V?.8A@J*2>5 MYR,],#/-=+10!R3:-?6L<36D#/=1VK.9=ZKF5L`J#GH!N('3)SG/62?3KB:Y MGCCTWR87F@A#!@#Y(^=CP>[`*3[]\5U-%`&9K<-QXOU)12!LB3H>W+;!W_C[9-=-10!R;Z;>26ETK MV;,;F=-OS#F>U;U%`'(OIM_)#-:FTD6-+>&RMF+KE4)&]R1GG"J3CH0`,]:D@T:XCO8)! M;L";N:;)(VQA5*1[N<_,`I)&23UKJJ*`.5&EWT^DQ0202B:=(XYWD9"4!;,A M&,Y/&P+RRMNBC&[>Q/JQ.>_;Z]510!5O794$8L7 MNHW4[@NS`Z8!#$=?Z5FQ6%S!;Z-9&(R10,'G<$84JIVCDYQN(]>E;E%`%58; MI;II6NM\/)6$1@=NF:R+BRNIO#4Z1V\B74TXF>-G&3^]#$`YQ]T8`KH:*`.= MD.H6QN;A+2Y>:^E`S%M+0QJN!U(&3R0.V[N1SK6-NT6F10A3;,%Z*0S+WY)R M"?4\\YY/6G:C>+86C7#H652`>0`,G&23T'J>W7I3(=0#7%S%,@A6!48REQL; M=GH?P_6@"=(9$;<;B20?W7"@?HM9EOY^FZC?![2>X2[G$L&XVJNULD8QC MZ8-:DES!'L\R:-/,^YN8#=]/6JTNJVRM+'&PEEBD2)D5@#N8C@$D`D`@XH`R MM3MKV[:Z@>UWSW$"10O]Z*$G.\[N",'G.,GY:B;1))KM[B2%BUQJ"EPQX2*/ MHP'JQC7GKANV371_:(-[IYT>Y!EAN&5'J?2ECFCE`,XD=<;?.<'$8! MZ+\[\`WGCAA2WMFC4\F$QH`Y1 M+*[G@LXYK*<3&7S)MX!1UE.9`3QM90>#UX`'4BM;7#._V6&*VDFA\]9)RJ!A ML7Y@.3UW!:UJ*`,#5(+Z_66=+5HEB@>.&.3:S.SX!8@'&`O3G/)S4,VG7$U] M$T-EL"6^Q5D(*1,A)B*GU!`SC@@\UTM%`',&SN)+"%4TZ:.2;R(+EVD&]D#% MI,C.,'D9ZG<>P&9DM[PW=R\L+M,MV9A)V,2K\BJ??H1ZEJZ&B@#D9-,GFCU' M_0[@"5EBA+,`Z"1QYG0X(4X()S]<58339KNY036DD"->&23Y^D<:;4`(/2D`<%B1C.YN1@=`1Z5); M6=S]L\]H&2*>[\TPEAB)%C*@G!ZD@-@?0UNT4`0+MWE1G'IGTY-2QHL:*B*%51@`=J`.7DTRX$=W%';3'RK2*SMV.T MYW???.>HW<]OE/6K,]G=32W$/V9M[W*".88588%VGY3]0>!SGKQBNAHH`YN6 MSNDD2ZCMYI)FGEN2C8&`H.R/T4M\O/7C!XJ_HUMY4]VY@=1YA6.60G>ZD[CD M'T9F`/<`=>IU:*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`H:FTO[N,0/ M/;N'6=%4-E2,<@]>O0<]:P1IVHPV]BK1WCQ1--Y21R(SPDG]T6W'!"KNZDXR M/2NMHH`Y^.RE34YH9-.$L)2%(7W#9%$N-R[C\V<[C@#GC..T5G9:FT$/F1LD MAN9IVWE<9(.TGKC!;@#^[72T4`_L;L73?8'EV7,3*I55.`&!QNX)SU-`'145R\FKWLOBRQLHI3#92>:F! MM9I"@.220M68/$FGW#E(FD8F)I4X`WJIP2.>/7G&1R*` M->BL7_A)K';&?+N1YK$1[XMF\;=V5W8SU`XY)(P#3O$$U]_8+WFF3O!-&HEP M44DKW!!!QQSQZ4`;%%85MJ#7LEM/#>N+6&U$]QPGS9'R@\<'AB<$8P/6GWWB M&*WTRZN8X7:6&$3+&V`65LA6X/3(^HH`VJ*QUU^VB2W2YW++(L9D^[A"YPI/ M/<_I52]UJ635--6Q>1;:6Z>"0E5V2[>I4]>N1VZ'ZT`='16'KMQ>6^HZ;';W M\EF>V58B%"I\AQ]*/[=M=L!$Q`/2K]%`&*WA]%U*PO+>+="\GDE M\AH')"_."V[)XZY)YK;HH`Q;3P]':K8+]JED6S61%#*N&1L94\>P_,^V&VGA MN.TMI+9+RX,11TC!P"BL,8R.3CMDX'IP,;E%`&/?:"M[8P6LD_RPPM%\T88< M@`,`>C+C@]LGUK5CC$<*QY+!5"Y;DGZT^B@#/L=(MK'39+"-8%Z'I\I[9';WYIJ^&E26WVWDHBMKAIX4V+E2QRP)[C)/;H?QK=HH`H: MMI:ZDD!$SP36\HEBE0`E2/8]0:R?%6F3SZ'>"(2W5U?2EKD]6?4H M]375[6VFEBMI_(\E$)=X^`Y"X_O+U]`*`.LHKD?-U;^V5*->+;F_:,JT3!!$ M4&#R.F[-5+:[UUM%F>;[>;I[(R+F,C:XE8<8'7:%X]#0!W-)D9QGGTKD9+^^ M$%U&&O\`<]\8XF\H_<*#;S_"N[)R`<]!Q5O1IGN-1SJ4,D:"+!D7YCD-V`P23[8JPNIZI$^R::ZW)]J5V M$)<+C!0XXR0,G'7&*`.VW#=MR-V,XSSBEKB!/GMZ9 MYQB@#1HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`B>Y@CG2!YXUFD&4C+@,P]AWI8IHIMWE2*^QBK;3G!'!!K M%\5V$LUI#J%G'OOK"02Q#'WA_$OY<_A[U%?PWMG9!8?.$\T4\A:#)_T@[60' MKQ]X<\8':@#HLC.,\^E+7&2'4;:YU2X$5U]H>6U$@0,W[O"[]F.#SN''(![5 M=LIM0DUFT5Y;MXMJB4R0M%C$9.<8VE22/]H,,=*`-R74;*&7RI;N!)/[K.`? M2K53F@#J:*S]"6<:1;/=2SO/)&KR"889&VC(Q@=\]?6M"@`HHHH`* M***`"H1=6Y=T$\1>,$NH<94#N?2IJY[5M)D?7+>YM2R+>(;:[VDC*`;@>.AP MI7/N*`-Z*6.:,21.LB-T93D'\:<"#TKG+BXOX]7\E%G+&[C1%13Y7V;;\Q]B M"3SUSM[<5GQ3ZA##9Q(]Y%$GFYD\B24M,)1\K+QD%Q77FM$FXHY4JO+\*0>A`'!7@J0>M;U`!1110`4444`%(S!%+,0J@9))X` MI:P?%4,SI87"(TMM;W2/I`ZXZT`;D2W\HQY.]L@2,%'!&"03@YQG/%+:3WLUS9O*]TYCO;B-2\3`8V_)N M&W@8[XX!-`'645R=I>7[:?:RR2W8622,7?F1E3%PV[!P?E+`ZH(`J2W`A2[N$\\1-(1M8 M>4"`,LIY'OQS6QKTUS"EMY;2K$Y=96A7)W;#L'J,MCUYP.]`&H9HQ*(C(@D8 M9"%ADCZ4@FB,1E$J>6.K;AC\ZY_P]#,^JW=QJ$()[58R=-N76^8]`LJGE1ZY(1J`.DHKD[BXU*6WU")_M'G-;W>] M4'$;*5\K:?=3VY.?:GZ;=7HUB&U+3QQ+%$8T:%BLD>SY^2>"&(Y//0`>H!U- M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`5A:CXC_L^Z MNX);)V-O$DV5D7]XA.W(!]#Q6[6??Z5%?7UMGRGWJ"/ MPZT.AVE@DH9X+A)F=R3OVMG&?H`![`4^31KKS[62.>'%OM:=<[%X?N(9 MHO+FB$*7@NR#DL&\O9M'J.^:Z*@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBDW`L5R-P&2,\@?Y M!H`6BBB@`HHHH`**BEN8(6VRSQQL1G#.`<5(K!U#*0RD9!!X(H`6BDW#=MR- MV,XSSBFQ31S`F*1)`"5)5@<$=10`^BBD9@BEF(50,DD\`4`+144-Q!/CR9HY M,J'&Q@?E.<'CL<'GV-2T`%%%%`!1139)$BC:21U1%&2S'``^M`#J*C@GAN8Q M);RQRQDD;HV##(Z\BEBECFB66)UDC<95E.01Z@T`/HI"0.IQ4-O>VMTS+;7, M,S*2&$<@8@CKG%`$]%%("#T.:`%HHHH`**9%(DT22Q.'C=0RLIR"#T(I]`!1 M4$EY;174=M),BSR#*(3R>O\`@?R-3T`%%1S3PP;/.E2/S'")N.-S'H!ZFI*` M"BBB@`HHJ.&>*X5FAD5PCLC8/1@<$?G0!)1110`44V21(D+R.J*.K,<`4R:Y M@MR@GFCB,C;4WL%W'T&>IH`EHJ.2>&*2..25%>4D(I."V.N*ZA6(OY8=G`!;T! M[]#^1H`M4444`%%%%`!1110`445#]I@^T_9O.C\_&[R]PW$>N.N*`)J*BBN( M9E9HI4=5^\5;(%*LT3P^]`$E%%%`!1110`4444`%%,CECE3?$ZNOJI MR*?0`44V21(EW2.J+D#+'`R3@?K3J`"BFEU#A"PWD$A<\D#&3^H_.G4`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%8]M+%'XDU4EU&+> M`MSZ>9G\@1^8K8HH`:CK(BNARK`$'U%.HHH`****`,?7(+4RVLTRQ[VG1=S@ M'@;CW[<\U3:[:UO9+.TG\N2&XBCALS@K)$<;FZ%N,R<@\;!D8SG=FO+:#?YU MQ%'Y:[GW.!M'3)]![T->6J^;NN81Y(S+EQ\@]3Z?C0!CZQJ%S;ZHEO'*8PRQ MM"AAWK,=S;QTR6`"\`C&VI>-!A_(U,``,#@4`1& MJR`*P)`."O?G.?3IKZC?>7)IT7V@PP71(:;"G)V_*O((&2?TQWK7I"`>M`'$ MVE_+#;:8MK-Y8DM;&-G"*6P7=7Y8'@?D/QYMW&J:E"UX%O-TUN)0T'DY)`7Y M&'R\=`23Z7=M)?LT*V9\WY1\DQ^7RR`HR#GH>1QC&:Z MVB@#&U1X[.33&$[1H]T3(Z(/GS&_)P.I.!^-8D>HW5E8QP64RB(VWF'Y01"H MEVLRX&3\K9QS["NTHH`QKH3WGA:3RI7N'DCSN"%6=,\@#W7(!'7J.M07=]:B MSANM.`5T\M&>&//E0F1=P((X.`?EQGKQQ7044`<_;RWL]_%`MW*ML!)Y4H4- MYH4Q%23CG[SC(Z@9]356*_O42,_;9)[>1+NJIL< M:Q1K'&H5$`50.P%`'-F\NEMG9KVY06\-Q(NQ%9Y$4X1B"O<$XZ9V@^M5X;N: MXUBP\R>9DBO2H(^92I@RI^Z,Y+,,^A[<5UU%`'*)>W;10%+J59XX+^42W4LB2FZ*(X&,+*`I!`&>#[\5N44`V:FTN:]O=2V37DRQ(I=-FW$JB0A6/'1E MQ_,8S71T4`HVGJ:CN;F[^SW/DWMPOEQWS@(H`W(X\O!QZ9^N#7 M844`H..16]35159F50&8Y8@<<8QG%&E3-IM]J#:@)(Q(\(+G+`N4`XP.G?/0<^E=)37 MC20`2(K`$,`PS@@Y!_.@#C;NWNOLH@1V-I:EEN+N)3F2-I5W`'N0N\MC(XJV M)V2Y2?4/WE@L-Q;Q83F0$ICY0!R0"!CCC_:Q74``#`X%+0!5TR.:+2[2.Z.9 MTA19,G/S!1GGZU:HHH`****`"BBB@`K#N39W&K+9H`CY=Y)`A+,Y0IC..RDG M.>,*.G3"0W?VMY6D(R"OED;L]EQM7ZCVXWJ*`"BB MB@`HHHH`*R=?Q(+"WE)6WGNE28]B,$A#SSN;:/3FM:F2PQSQF.:-)$/574$' M\#0!FW\$&GQRW=C';07;($!*X##??VK6:QM'B:)[6%HVQN5HP0<'(R/8T1V-I$X>.VA1PVX,J` M'.,9_+B@#GM5U"];P]J5U,MG)%"[(L;PEOF67`R-V#T'XC\*MRZS=QFXNA"C M6EN95>/(#Y4'&#SS\IX..&'XZOV"T^S26QMXC#(270J"&).23ZG-.%G:K.9Q M;0B8C!D"#<>,=?I0!C:89FUV"66:%S<6!D*HFT\N".>X&['_`.NN@J""RM;9 MLV]M#"<8S'&%XZXXJ>@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@#'U&W-YK5K$D;A40M<.5^5XRUO9+K,#LMN8H M5;)PP=V!)//1A[]:VDW;%\S&_`W;>F?:G44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`5 MF?VG,FHV]K-9F-+AG6.0/NY09.1@8!`.#SVXYK3JC]CN/[0-T9X20"B@PG*H M*"YDX\DR`D-DC'XXX]:=J5B;Y(%$@C\ MF=)LE=V=ISC\?6J]QI!FFNC]HQ%=/'(ZF,$J4Q]UNWW1US@Y(H`NW5Y;V:!K MF58P3R;2.TV2!2!*8]^,<\<;."3WYK0N[4W$EK(KA6MY?,&1D'Y64C\F-`$-IJD$ MUJDDLB)+Y<;21J22I<9`'M6DN(7M_M"RH8=N[S-WRX]'VD>!Q<1 MDP1Q*H>(D$Q[P,C/((D;(^E:$-AY&EM91.D>5<*T4014W$GA1QQG_$D\T`+' MJMC*!Y=RC9?8`,Y+;=V`._R\^]0WFJQ1M;K!(C-+)'G.R$'VE0P,K9\O@EI1(.,]`0`1W%2QZ1(+Y+R2X1I1/YK`18!_=^6 M,<\'!R3S^@H`OVUW!=AC!('VXR.A&1D?@12?;;?S6C$FYUSD("W(ZCCOR..O M-0:9IW]G"=1,721]ZI@A8^.0,D]^?Y8J&'1O*OA,)R8TG>Y12O(=U96!/]WY MN!^M`$NCWMQJ%L+F6%(HI422+:Q)PPS@Y`Z9[5#;:W%-=[)-L,)@BE4OD$EV M8`'WFMY(6O``T,,2D1=!$ MY92>>>N#TH`U8KNWFE,4]BZ7LE MY:R)%+*@2163X4;`2W!XP<55ET-I3.'NRRW+1M/NC!8E",;>RCY?0^N:1]/N$\F MVBD3F*97E,9VC>RD\9Z]<<]J`+TFI6D=RL#2$,QP#M.W=@$+NQC<0<@=33?[ M6L/E_P!)3##.[/`R0!GTR3@>]4X?#\<%NEO'<.8DFCG'F#GR@_GS MS4=[X=^UP0I]J"M%"D0)BR/E8$'&>O&.*;,I(BMT$V]I@4*^ M6^TGD8Q_+^4IU6R#*IF^=I/+"!&+;L9P1C(..:IMH;.)(WO"(G,Q`6,!E\R0 M2=23R"/3ICCUE&ES->1W,#JO.>2<=JT;.W^RV<5N&#>6@4-MQ MG'?%8\?AA([`6HNFP;=;9VVVO;>Z>1()-[1'#X!^4Y( MQ]<@U4DU>(31J@;;]H:!R8V[1LQQQZK_`)R*M6-J;2%XS('#322@[<8WN6QU M[%C55=,E2Y\U;I=HN&G5#%W*,N"<]/FS^%`%A=2LG:%5N8R9U5H^?O!AD?F` M,RQQVZR`A6CW>8-O(;##Y.)V<_.CNH8`J.F-RCKU;VYGT_4#>W-W&$Q'"P"-_?!SS]../7K M4,NC>?(_FS[HY)DGD4)@LZ@#@@\#Y5_+KSFB/2C8-++I[,9'"(JS.SJH&,Y) M.>@H`?'JHGU2:SMHQ)Y4>XN6P"V[:5_#!S_]:D74+J72K6^@A@*RQ+-)YLIC M$:D`GD`YX/MT_"EMM&AM=0%U#)(H$6P1F1BH.2>TAFDB,+R(&:-NJ$C.#[BIJ**`"BBB@`HHHH`* MIS7IBU6VLO*!6>.1P^[D%=O&,?[0[U\WD-`DB!<<'=M_\`B:`, M^/7))8+J5+>("&14"F;#+DXW2`J-JX.<@GC-6GU/9I0O?*!W.L:J'X8LX13D MCH<@YQTJ.?23=>8]Q,AED$08I%M5@C%L$$DD'.",]*0:;((A8D02Z>R/O652 M3DME0!Z`80"/EQP,G'7/?I2IH<264=NLA!6Y2Y9@OWF4@X^GR@=ZE?28' MU*.](`*'=M"\NVW:&8]\#IZ4`:%%%%`!1110`55U"^CL+?S9%9RS!$1>KL3A M0/J>*M5FZW8RWMO`UN5,UK.MPB/]V0KGY2>W7KV.*`);>\G:80W=K]G19Y>]=^-VW/./7%<]>:-)+HNJ0Q6<2W,SR+#P MOW"01SV'&<>U.;3;N2_+_9V7]ZTT<_VC&PD8Y4?Q`$KZ8QS0!J#4%;54LH]K M@Q2.SAONLI0;J\$YZY)R M*WJ`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`,R^U;[+?QVB0^8Q57=F8JJ*S;0<=/>J2>(Y6C(^P?O6A:6) M5D+9`D"'/R@CD@\`\>_%;%Q8VMU+%+<6\6%,B7`Q(,[AQS@=N_M55=:N+2"X<6IEV?:Y MB)9STB<`@';TR2`,<8%;)TNQ+Q/]DA#1;?+8*`5V\C%!TNQ(8&TB(8."-O!W MXW<>^!0!0.N3-J;6<-EYA2,*6'\(P.,9X'-6VM M))-16XDGW01#,4.P?*^""V>O0X_$T`9RZY<,92;-4C$C1([2CEUD$9&.IZDC M'7&.M-L]>N;VZ@@ALHSYB-(S&?H$DV/@;>>>G/(]*NBRTN2ZN(Q;PM-*%EE& MW[P)X;\T_,"K$-A:P3"6&!$D&[YE&#\QW'\SS0!1O=7DMM4CM$A1E;:"Q8]6 MSC)`(7IWZ]NAJM;^(9GAC:6U16G""$+(2-S.4^;(&!QGUQVS6Q+8VLTWG201 MM+\OSD<\'(Y]LG\Z:--LA&8Q:Q!"GE[0HQMSG&/3-`%32)94LKMIV>1XKB;[ M[<8#'`!)X&,"J>G^(9KNXCMVMT61IO+))..8C(#T'3&/?J*VX+6"VB,4$*1Q MDDE5&`2>I-5QHVFA0HLH,!UG\ZTSI=@0@-G#\BJB?(, MJ%.5`],'FE&EV/EK']DB**2P4KD`GK^??UH`RSJ5S=R(3`L=M]I6($2D,3GD M$8Y&.WZ^K4UN^+A&@A9F98@5R%$IR67).#@#'!^\<5L?8+7"CR$PLIF''\9. M2WUSWJ%=$TM0P%A;X90I_=@\#H/PP/RH`AN-0N1X=N;X1QQ7$4+N5#B10RCD M9'N"*K2:EW7C'7O63?ZG=2HUR"$@?3KF9!'.RG`*8)]'&?PR1VKHK2QM;%&2SMXH$9 MMQ6-0H)_"HSI5@?,_P!#@'FA@^$`W!L$@_7`S0!ESZ]<0R2H((2B78M%;S#] M[:K9.<#H3W'(]Z<=RM7BEB>W MB:.4EI%*##G&,GU..](MA9K)'(MI`KQ)Y<9$8!1?0>@]J`,.'7[D:9#2`(_D'R8QC'Y#\J273;&:-8Y+2!D4L54QC`W?>X]^_K0!6U>\GM M)[$0[2LDCAU())`C=N.?]FF:7JTMY/`DL*(MQ:"ZC*L3@$CY3QUP1^M:,UO# M<;/.C5_+;>FX9VMTR/0\GFFPV=O;RR200I&\GWR@QN^M`&%?2W1U6=FE8QPS MVRB-)7CX=]HZ'!^\2?H.U:5GJ$MQJEU:.L8%N3D@_>!QM(]>,@^A'O5M[.UD M:1GMH6,NWS"4!W[?NY]<=O2G+;PK()%AC#C.&"C(RIAKEVY1(K-6=4#RDR!5`\PH<$GL%8_D.]:[V M5J\OFO;0M)D'>8P3D'(Y]CS3?[/LMT+?9(,P$M%^['R$G)(]"3SF@#*TO4;J M:[:!(T*FYN`[22LQ`1P#C_OH8'`K>J&.UMXI#)'!$DAW994`/S'+<^Y`)]<5 M-0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110!D:O;WL\_^@S2QN+=RN&(3>&7;GL2?FK-D MBU64Q"/[6+:1I2V]BK@>40%(YP-X&#GG<>@QGJ:*`.:4ZK$(90ER5$\+S(!R M5\HAP!Z;MO%)%+JQ@1I$O/,5@<%1DC[0>#C`/[L?EWKIJ*`.6DBU98KLC[:) M\N&*L-I!?Y6C'/.T*,8``SGGK/<0WKW-TD2WK;P858O@%3"<-G.!\PZXR"?? M`Z*B@#G(/MH$7[BZ6UCCMQ)&V=^09-Q7G)_Y9DXZ@8Z\5#(NK+:R1P"]`2TE M,(8_-N\S]V">YVX[].O-=310!%;S-,C,T,D6UV0!\?,`2-P]CC(J6BB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**3'.:6@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHJ!KVU4X:YA!'8R"@">BBB@`HI"0`23@#J338Y$E0/&P=3T8<@_0 M]Z`'T45%+<00D"::.,GH'8#-`$M%1PSQ3J6@E210Q4E&!`(ZCCO4E`!1110` M4444`%%,\Z,3"'S$\TKO";AN*YQG'IR*?0`445E7[27NIIIB2&.$1":X*Y#. MI)"H#V!(.>^![T`3OJUFK`"0LF_RVE528T;T+=!SQ]:R]?NY(]3BBB/ELD!" MRXSL>1PBD^@`$A_X#[R5$C\^-I%3C8BD,%Q[A2?^`U#_PCTDVM M-*\9@M3,9"$<8957"`#MDO(2/\D4Q)X9)'CCEC>2,X=58$J?<=NM`$ ME%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%8EK%#+XCUA)HD=?*MR=Z@@\./Y5MU5?3;&22222RMV>3&]FB4EL M=,G'-`',QZQ?V>F,(54I"D\L>5+$QJWR%LD83&>^XX&`<',\NJ7<$]U<+*A, MHMXXUDQMCW#.21CN3UXR>PXKHIK*UN'1Y[:&5D!52\88J",$#/3--_L^R&[_ M`$.W^=/+;]TOS)_=/'3VH`S(KZ]GFBLI3%%*[RYDR&RBA2%QTW'>.,]%)XS@ M265P;?PK%/$T.Z.WX,F50$#'.!GKZ=:OOIUD]JMJ]G;M;HF.F*`.;EU*^GNH[=I_)*W\<8!CPVUHMX##..#[]O MP.IKUE;3Z9>W+P++,+21%;OC:3@9X'/>K1TK3BI4V%J58@D>2N"1T/3M5F:& M.>)HIHTDC889'4$$>X-`&/O%I/IUK9Q10->(6DE"#HBCCZG=^0/U$-IJ>I7D MUO`C6Z2J9Q,VTE9/+D13MYXR&/KS6T]G:R0I"]O$8HR"B%!M4CI@=J$L[5&B M9+:%6A4K$0@!C'HOH/I0!DVNIW",<]N?PZ$6-HK2,+6`-+GS"(QE\]<^N:8^ MFV+G+63GRQ]S^[]/:@#-GU2[MTGDS%+]CDBBDB1<-,6"DLO/'W^!SDJ M?7C9WB6-O)D4G.-P^;!J/[#:!XW%K#OB`"'RQE0.F/2FV-C%8K,(O^6TS3-P M`,GT`XZ`?S/)-`&!9BX$FFW$,L;3-I+D,R`DG]T><8SR<_B:F36[J>X1HC;I M&(X)"LC`;P_+$U`%FJ=UIL%U.)V,L3DG%:U9EC;W+:S?WESD1G;#;H>R*,D_BQ/Y5 MIT`%4-6O&M([8+\OGW"0F3CY`<\\_3`]R*OTR6-)HFCE0.C##*1D$4`W))Z<#FIFU:_1;>0;9%O;1?L^U,XN#C(/MS MGZ*WI6[]F@``\B/`?>/D'#>OU]ZK1Z<$O_/,N8HU`@@6-56(X()R!DYR?IDT M`)?SR1/9VZR^6;B3RVEV\C",W&01DD#KQU]JRY)[B[CA6:5E:#4?LXD"C$F` M&8*)88W"]-R@XIPAC6,QK&@0C!4*,$?2@#"BO[P/%:SWMLN\N/M"NI8,% M4A#QMW?,3D#D+T&>&G5;MVGVW5M&T!AP&RJNK*I+`;23DL0,=P,UNFW@,0B, M,?ECHFT8_*G-#&\BR-&C.OW6*@D?0T`8=O)`I)`5`,$ M]?S[TGV*U\M8_LT.Q?NKY8P/H*`,*WU2]NKP()[:`Q&',4C[1*K*I)&03U8@ M<]0,]:N:+HH`IZZ;1;KD].X%=3+;03-NE@CD8#&60$XH-O`6B8P MQEHO]62HRGT]*`*3(B^(XG489K63<1_%\R=?I6/I[/YFA2?Q^9<_:6&3CAMV M2><;@O7OBNG,,9E$IC0R*,!RHR!]::+>!99)1#&))``[A1E@.@)[T`/1E=%= M&#*PR"#D$4ZFHBQHJ1J$10`JJ,``=A3J`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**BGN(+:,R7$T<2#JTC! M0/Q-9L_B.PA)VBXF55W%XH&*@<_Q8QV-`&O14-M@^&(#I:V M`N9?+$_GDX`RW7'`&!FK8TD)>SW4,[127$>V4(,*Q[,!G@C_`!H`HV>LR2^) MFMY&7[)'[5UL?*Q`]FZNKQKMWX'0X[&K(TR&2VN;>Y59HKER[H00,G'O[4`8 M,-Q="\\-Q->2N+^&1[@AS\Y$888],$GICCKFHH;[5=2LM8M8[AUO=-G/ESQD M#S5!(VL.1G"G\QQUSMQZ(LE85CJE]-X0 M@OI+N=KEKL1%PW5%HH]'CTQ;I MQ"DWG!M@W;LY^GZ4`*D-U?V%[-8W=Q$)%9+=78[DD1W4GGL<+P>G/2LQ-7D: MXT:Z2YE:"55@ND9SA93PI..^5;(Z<#/6NFBL2E\+IY>G'/0C@&LB?6+QK)K>2[E2>UU,6AN%^7S4.<%@!QTY(]..M=0=* MC34)KZVE>&>X4+-@Y63`P#CL1VQC\:J3>&;-].CLXV:)$F\\L%4L\G]XY'OV M]ATH`E\2R26WAZZE@ED2:&+>C*Q#<=_>LQ=1N++6=&1IY)+?4(`&B8[BKXSN M!)SW''_ZJT;W0C?R3-_"_E4MKHD$%Y#=22232P1B. M'>>(UQC@#OCO[T`5]5=TU_28%FE6.Y:42(LA`8+&2.G3FL_^TKK3M2:2]GD; M2;N66#S&X^S.KE1SU`..I^O&.=RZT[[3?VMWYQ5K4LT8`SDL"#GU&#VQ3$T> M(V%S97#FX@N'=V5AC&YBQ`Q[GB@#(L+VXU#6+;3O.F2""S2XF(8AI7;!'S9S MCGMQQBMZSMIK>>XWSO)`Q7RE=RQ3CD9//7U)JN^C1>9:S03207%M%Y*RK@ET MQ]U@1@C//UJ0ZW):.7S&&[Y7X.%QTP,_H._-`%^J.JZD-.BCV0M<7 M$[^7#"I`+M@GJ>@XY/:KDDB11M)(P5$!9F/0`=ZR=&MFN)FUFZ7$UR@$*$Y\ MF+J!]3U/Y=J`#3]&)D6]U9EN;XCTS'#[(#_,\GKW-:5U<0V5I)<3L(X8ERQ] M!4CNL:,[L%11EF8X`'J:PT2;Q$ZR29BTI'W(F"&NL'(8YZ)TQW/TZ@%GP[9/ M9Z:6F&)KF1KB1<_=+@ZECZ`#DGV%0ZCJ"V:*D:>==2<0P+]YSZ^RCN>@K#O1=/=K!8O'+J\X(F MN?O):1X/"]".>!QD\YH`LZ9K5YJ6O26Z0""U@0F19!EP3]W)!X/^SC@9SVKH M*HZ1I=OI%BEK;+P.7CMM046UYJ$H@0*AW*C$9)`;J`2<9Z#D=:Z4A+>WPNV..-> M..%`%9-[Y3^([20S;?LD4DCC;@`$`=9KA-FGJ`8X6QF8_W MF']WH0OL"?0`#&3^WYEWI_Q*XFR`W_+RPZ''=!S_`+WTZ[(````P!T`H```` M&`.@%+0`4444`%%%%`!152;4["W0M->V\:KP2T@&#Z?6H'U[34C\PW.Z/^\D M;,/O!>H'J0/QH`TJ*Q#XJTTN%B9YL@,I0#D'N,D'_P#4:7D\O<8..W&W^O]<3![]@#Y-O'ST,I8XP M/]D<]?\`&@"W13%$@8[F4KS@!<'V[T^@`HHHH`****`"BBDYW#IMQSZY_P`Y MH`6BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`K,UW5ETFS#*HDNICLMXO[[_X5)JN ML66D0&6\F"G!*HO+.1V`]>GYUS?V!+HS>(_$#;;4(3';[<83D+D=,\Y& M?0`%O1Y;^Z1C;3>?*6VSZA,@VX&2%B`P&`Z9X'4^U;UA86^G6XAMTQGEW/+. MW]YCW-<7JGBJ\\ETL$CLH`@5`W$F`#T'11UP<'.!BIY?%=UIUBMJTL%WJ!OJ`=O7-:GXE5[>;^S)$6.'(GO'&4B]E'1V]`#Z=CFH M9+NY\21MG?I^C(,R7###S'IA=PX7WQS^8#]&TX:C+!>26HMM,MQ_H5H2&)R3M]&;/5L`8/;@=A6]>7<-C:O<7+[( MT&2>OX`=S3KFYAM(&GN)%CC49+'_`#U]JP+2\@U6^BO+V2,1J0UG:#YG4_\` M/1P.<]AV'UH`9962:QK]Y>7L!$2QHJ0..H.Y!4'\1Z5TQ(`))P!U)K(T M"5I--N;KRCNEN)G`!^_AB!CTZ8_"N+OM1U'6`YN8[NXB1F\VT@CVJF"<`MM) MR>1R/?(Z``]*1U==R,&7U!R*'8(C.WW5&3@9K@KK5[[1M.AM;2T>TMTD;RI9 MR3*_/:/CCGGC&#QSBK\/C-[4(-2LI_+6`%IHT)+R`#)`X&T\\YZB@"Y:76O: MQ"D]O);6%NZDQED+NPR.=I]!^OMS4DNA:I,X9_$5T"#G$<80'\`>G7\ZS].\ M01V(6&WMY9;>1F\NVC4M+%QG`QP4((P.",GKBJMU?^)-7N@EEY]HI##REA9- MG'&YW7[QYZ>@[F@#8FT%TB\V]UV]$<>6+B380*-_.`*VX7;L'7YL= M_;GORO=[8S!MD8HC,#ZG:!P3R,?ICJ:IPZ>L.H7% MXL\Q:XVAD.W:`H(`'&>_K0!4@UJ2:YV+8S/%YS0%T4G:RY!)XQMRI'7T]:LZ M1J)U2RCNQ;M%'(BLF6!SD<_D:B3188[B61)YUBED,S094H).N\9&< M5:TZR33K&&TB>1XX5"J9""SQ@8(G;KW_`(/\^U/W:AS^[MON\?O&Z_ETH`MT54+WXQBWMCUS M^_8?3^"G;[W`_P!'M\]_W[1_7?NK:&\MI+>YC62&0;61NA%5X_ML2+'':6BQK\JJ)V&U1T_ M@ISO?[6V06Q;MF9L?^@T`5XO#^DQ6TENEA#Y23SZU99M0P-L-MGCK*WX_PT![_`)S!;'CC]^PY_P"^ M*`,R[`UW5A9!F6SL)%DGXXF?G"?[HZGKGI[UL7=S#9VLES<.(XHUW,Q/2L%& MG\,Z<5=8KAIIRRCS6\R5F;[H&WDX_E4PL=2O)H+N_AM&DB(>*!G.V)L=3PY8M,JDON.2"23@\GIG'''%:-4B=3V\)9[O7/PKDM1O[CQ?,VEZ;$R:>=IEN74X89'3Z M=0,\X]*Z?.J\?+9>_+_X41KJ,2!4BLU`8D@,P&#SZ4`2V&GVVG6ZPVL2H``" M<#+>Y/>K542=5P<+9CGC+-T_*C.J8/RV?M\S?X4`7J0D`$DX`ZDU1)U7G:MD M..,ESS^7TI&&J.I5DL64Y!!+'(].E`&A15$'5=IRMGGG!W-^':D)U7LMD.G4 MO_A0!?HJ&V^T;#]J\H/GCR\XQ^-34`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`! M6%K4S1ZUIL327"V\Z3"5("^6(`V\)SW/(Q6[56XL([B^M;MGD$EMNV`$8^88 M.10!D1R:H=`2UGD"7UTSQQ2,2&5.3N;`&U@F?QVYY-,UC47D\&_V@LKP2KY? MF&)RI1@X5QGOCYA6\;93>K=%F++&8U7C:`2"3]3@?E58:1:[+R)PSP7;%Y8F M/R[CU([C.!WH`9/$#KEHI:38;6;*[SM.&C`)YZX9OS-1^&;B2?P[8S7$K/)) M'EG70;>W ML+M6N;B(*EQD$8`Y8Y]>GK\U:#^(^E-AL(;>X2 M6$L@6(0A,@KM!)'7G//KSWS@4`8&K7C:EH&G7$)`&6P,K)$C'#Y'#D\!ADC/)SS]*L_P!A6VPKYL_-P+ECN',H MP=W3`Y'0<>U/ET6VDN)9U>:*2;9YIB?;O*]#QT/N,<<4`8$0;/A[(NIQ<6KR M31K,P\Q]J?,02!W/YUIBX:WT8)`\BRSS-'&MQ(2\>2@'/I3X=,AMKK[4)I6<`[B[`@YQDGCV'TQQ@$Y` M,=[N2?P;=M)+(;RR62.1PS*RR)D;NW8AA]146H:DTWE6TWG+JD1:,P0$AF8J M=LB\X*Y`.3TZ43I'J]S?V^C-YPNAY=[=LW[M0,@*H`P6`Z8[8R36OI?AZPTR M3SHT:2Y+,[3N;)&L9R>-H)(X^I/YU8H`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`K'U=V35=,`,^V3S5 M=(6(W@)N&<$="./K[UL55N;);BX@G,DB/`24VG`Y&#GUXH`R[*[U2U6""\C# MO()929'&Z.)708.T$,VUL]>2.M"Z_=/;K-'IDLB2V_GQE2?0$+C')P>V?3WK M7:V1KR.Z)821HR#GC!P3^H'Y5471+1$*J9P-P*9F8^5@@X3)^4<=J`,Z358O MM,&H-&'$=M=.6CE/*QL/X>F2".#R,D=J235&M;N.ZN<%WLTV0HY(W.X`'/4] M.<?E(I++5;F^U*RC!CBBDM7G=0-Q+!U7 M&?3DD'_)M1Z)9Q^3D32/&ZR^;+*7=F48&6)SW;@<0.AJ*#7) M'E4RP110_:Y;5F\PD@HKG=C'^Q^M7+W2+6]G,TOFAV14)25ER%;K\]^3[(KRTO;K98613_1X2RF0,I^\?0C(/TP,ULK@30&8%4\M5 M,K%57).`,XQS^@J>:QAFN!<9D24+L+1N5W+G.#CKU/N,G&,T`8DFF6]I>6$, M/GR?ZY28I=IQU`Z@9&>OM211LU_I^EN\D5J899FB$A!<[N$+#!(`;D9YQR.M M;3:=:L8CL<&'.PK*P(SU)P>2>Y/-))I=K(J#:ZO&Y=9%=@X)Z_-G//3\O04` M5+(O:Z]/I\;2-:BV290[[O+8LRD#/./EZ9XK7JO:6<=H'*M)(\AR\DC;F;VS MZ#/`'`JQ0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`%>_,PLIC;.$F"Y0D9&?R-+9-*]G" M\_\`K60%OE*\X]#T^E3T4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`! M1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%% M%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`! M1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%% M%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`! M1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%% M%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110!__9 ` end GRAPHIC 120 exhibit99-75x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-75x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"``Z`*`#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#OR0HR:;YB M^M.HH`;YB^M'F+ZTK9"G`R>U9O\`Q.)!D?98AZ')-)NPTKFCYB^M'F+ZUB3: MK>V8OK5:S:] M+LMW'$`!PT9ZU;JT[DL;YB^M'F+ZTZBF`WS%]:/,7UIU%`#?,7UH\Q?6G44` M-\Q?6CS%]:=10`WS%]:/,7UIU%``"&&12TE+0`4444`-9E12S$*!U)-027MN MD3OYT9V@G`<&'4=6NY9(P\2809]?\BH6T;%=7)L)`%1>!RW4G\B!23WFZ^D@-P\"1`9 MV)N+$\]2#QC%,#3HK+@O9S]G:0Y0RM"[;<;O[K>WI^-20WXAMD#S2*@)P,GJ?2HK"62>`S/T=V*#T7/'Z<_C442B75 M[EI!DPJJQ^P.23^/3\*`)X;R">3RXW._&<%2IQ^(J>J@O&%ZEO);NF_=LS!5+'H! MFLN*X-U-I\K`!LR*P'3(&#^HI8VNKJRDNA/M+;BD6T;<`D`'C/./6@#2AD6: M%)4SM=0PSZ&GU6T[_D'6O_7)/Y"K-`Q*HK9W-M\EG/&L68-)-*)68)@`Y!P!G_9J6\M'GF@GBD5)8"=NY=RD$8.:N44`9 MQT^63[6TLZL]S#Y9PF`O7IS[U9FMO,MXXMV-C(V<==K`_P!*L44`4GM;A+B2 M6UF1!+@NKH6&0,9&".P%)%I^VRGMY)2YE9F+D8.3W_.KU%`%+["3IS6S29=\ MEI-O4DY)Q2RVLRW+3VLJ(S@!U="P;'0\$8-7**`*LMO+/9&*65?-/(=4P`0< M@XSVX[U%/IWF:?';QR[)(\%9,9.>YQ[Y/YU?HH`9&BQQK&HPJ@`?2J]S:,\P MG@E\J<#;DCYFB/E!@JQQD9SZDDT@M+J#=':W$:0L2 M0'CW%,G)QR/UJ_10!3CL%B:U\MB%@W=>2V1R?ZU%]@G2.2WBN%6V GRAPHIC 121 exhibit99-76x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-76x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`!P`6\#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBDH`6B MDHH`6BDHH`6DHS4$EW;Q'][<1)_O.!0!/154ZE9?\_9#LRW14,=S!-GRIHY,?W7!ISRQQ+ND=4'JQQ3N(DHJK_`&E8YQ]K@/TD M!I/[3L?^?N'_`+[%+F0[,MT562_M'.$NH6/H'!JP&!Z:;+BWD_U'YH8'E-PI"#.`#S M3/#F3JHR3CRV[_2M%4?,DT1R)IM,ZVBD%+6QF%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%+24M`!1110`4E+24`% M%%%`!1110!A>*?\`CVA_WS_*E\,?\>LW^_\`TIOBD_Z-!_O_`-*/"Y_T6;_? MK#_EZ:_\NS=KE/$-LT-_YP&%E&<^XKJ\\U3U"R6^MC$YP:-B8/E M8W2KQ;RS1@0748<>AJY)(L:%W("J,DUR,,EUHEXP(!SPRYR"/7KUJ74M6DU` M"WA39&<=3R3_`"J?:66NY7(V]-BM,SZGJIV`_O6POL/_`-5=E$@2-47@*,"L MG1=+-GF68#S7&-O!VBMC&*=.+2O+=DS:;LNA7U#_`(\)_P#<-;P[*'S;R(%_VV.?T%:]Y?Q6WEMS^HJ2Y\-IL_T61MV?\`EJW'Z"M6ROH+Z+="V2.&4\%3 M[BFW6H0VEU%#+\ID!(8]`!ZT>RAV#GEW,--#U.$_NYXP/17;_"I/[*U=QAK@ M`>\A_P`*OR:PY)-OI]S/'V<*0#]/6K%AJD-X[1`/%,OWHI!AA2]DA^T9BKX= MO&<>=-$5SS\Q)Q^5:MAH\%E-YR/(TF"OS$8_E6A++'#&9)7"(.I)P*RO[<\Q MB;2QN;B,<;U7`-4J<4[DN;>A:U:[DL-/DN8PK,F,!NG)Q5FVD,MM%(PP70,< M>XK"UO48KG1KB-E>&"RA238S[G"X49ZU;7E152]O MH[&".:56PS!<#KDU:+`+D\#&:`'49K+EUJ/S#'9P37;#[QB7('XTMMJ\;2"* MZADM)&^Z)A@-]#TH`TZ*I7M_'920K,&"2MMWXX!]ZN9R*`%HK-U#5[?3YDCE M#%F&3M'W1[UH*P90P.01D$4`.HJI=7\=M<00$,TDQPJBK0-`"TR61(HR[L%4 M#))/`%./(KFV!U[56B)_T.V/(Q]X_4=*`+K^([%7VQ":<^L:9'\Q37\2VJ$> M9;W<8/=HQ@?K6M%&L,8C0811@#T%/Y[4`,@F2>%)8SE'&0:DIJC:,57O;^VL MP/.D&X_=0HVUX"(G^C;AA^%`$6LW MTFGVR21*K,T@3YADW4^IW5M<3"58AP0NW)S5PZU8*,M<'Y4 MEUF_E1LJV2..HW4`2^*$,DUA&K%2TA&1U'2MN"".WB$<2*B@=`,5C^(/^/W3 M/^NW^%;M`%.]OK2S"M=.J9/R9!)S^%5'UIVYMK&6=3_%AE'ZK5&^:.V\3)-? M\P,@$61N`./3ZUK2:O91)N>;@]/D;G]*`,WP^Q;5=0_=>2"0WE_W3DT[7(1/ MK.FQ-G:Y8'Z=:;H+2/K%_)*FQG"MMSG`/2IM4_Y_JW\J`-A8U1`J`*HZ* M!@"L6[18/$]FT8VF52'QQN^M;O:L34?^1DT[_=:@"+Q9)(+:WA1B!*^&P>H_ MR:VK:WCMH%BB4*J@#`&/QK.\1V4EW9HT/,D3;P,XR.].L-=M+J!29-LFWYEV MG@]Z`(/%5K&VF/<;1YL9'S8Y()Q@U=-JEYHL<#CAX5`/H<<&L?Q%JD=W926] MKEPN&E;IM&>!SUYK?LO^/&W_`.N2_P`J`,[PU<.UF]K-Q+;-L()YQV_PJ.9A MJ7B)(3\T%HN]NX+5#J,G]CZS]L`/E7"$,!_>`]/R_,U=\/VC16)GE_UMPV]B M/0]*`(_%'_(.A_Z[K_6I?$%P]OI#M&Q5VP@([9J+Q3_R#X?^NZ_UJWJ]FU]I MLD*8WD`KGU%`&=I5_I]G8Q*"PD*@NPB;)/UQ4.NWMK>V7[DN9T8,A\M@1CW( MJ?2-:@BMDM+I_+GA&P@@G...HJ_)J]E&ZHT^&8A0-KZ_2@"W!: M#61J%T^?WG[N'/(`'<9J_P"'KHW&FJLA_>PDQL">>.E7;&V%I910#^!<$^IK M`OY3HVI790'9=Q90`]'Z=NG>@"S99U+7YKHG,-M^[C],^M;H&*H:)9_8M.C0 MC$C#<_3J:T*`&N"4('7'%8'A0@)>*?OB7GUKH#TK`O;2XTR_?4;-`\+#,T>0 M,#U[4`;S9(P.#CK69+;ZG'&\@U)?E!./LX_QH@U_3YE!$Q5C_"4;(_2ENM8L M/L\J^?@E2/N-Z?2@!OA^\GOK*22XD#L)"H(7'&!5&P5=2\0W4L_SK!Q&IY`Y MQ4OA$YTZ7_KL?Y"HYBVB:S)=,N;2YX9NZGKTH`Z(+\N*Y[5(1I^L6-S;_NQ, MX215X#<__7K3_MBR$>\S_+Z[&_PK*WMKFKQ20_\`'I;,&W'@D]>E`%KQ1_QX MPC_INM6]7D:'1KB120PCP".V>*J>*/\`CQA_Z[+5^^MS=Z=+`#R\>!]>U`%; M0+2.WTN%E`#R+N9@.3FI]5M4N-/F#`%E0E"1RI'<5FZ1JL=O;BRO#Y4\)VXP M3D?49J75-7A:WDM;9O,N)5*A<$8R.3D^U`#O"W&D#_?-;-8OA?\`Y!"_[YK: MH`****`"DI:*`$J*:".<;98U=?\`:&:FHH`IKIEDAREI"#ZA15I5"J`%"^U. MHH`8\:.060,1T)[4ZEHH`CDB29=LB!E]&&:ABL;>W?=!;QHW.1O5E M!JS10!"L$:Q^6(E$?]T#BI`,``#`':G44`,>-)!AU##T(S3@`!@=*6B@!CQH M^-ZAL'/-.`XI:*`()K:&X&)XDD'HPS38K&VMSF"WCC/JJ@59HH`2F-$C,&9` M6'0D=*DHH`2F/$CX+H&(Z9%244`-'TQ2TM%`"44M%`$$UG;W'^NAC?\`WES3 M(M/LXFW1VL2$=PHJU10`@%(R[A@C(/7-.HH`IG3;+?O^R1;O7:*M*,*!@#'8 M4ZB@"-XUDX=0PZC-/Q2T4`0SVL%RNV>))!_M#-)%:P0(4AA1%/4*,9J>B@!B 1(L:X10H]!3Z**`"BBB@#_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 122 exhibit99-76x3x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-76x3x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"``]`*(#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBDH`6B MDHH`6BDS1F@!:*3-%`"T4E%`"T444`%%%%`!1124`+1110`4444`%%%%`!24 MM)0`5%"-^/6M#69;IK`K+!&D;,H)64L>OI@5J M2JOV9EQ\NPC'MBLFKO0M.RU,]=(8J'BU*ZR1D$OD5IPHT<*([[V`P6(QD^M8 M^B2W?]F1>7!&Z#(#-*5/7TVFM'3[O[;:+-Y>S)(V[L]#50:Z$R3ZEJBBBM"0 MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`6BDI:`"BBB@`I*6J]^\D5A<&J;/J)TI;=K> M;RL[3(!\Q7TVUJW+*C);BXNFD5,E80"Q]V./\*CCFN9[.R`F*22R,CMM&<`- MV]>*AP;ZE*2709#J\4<*1065TQ50JKLQ4VEYL=,C%T/+)?&#SR3Q36N9;![U M&=IUB@$R;SR.O&?PJ*]@G2UM9'NGD+31&16Q@DL.GI347>[8F]+&U30ZLS*# MDKU'I6?+6W?#*GG2KZJ"`R_S M_*@#6H)P,FJD?T&/SIETJOJEHLGW55W4'NPQC\@30! M92Y@D?;'-&[>BL":EJI/=2031JT(,.B@"!K6)Y7D9` MS.GEL#R"O/&/Q-0_V9`2-S3.JL&56E8A2#D8%7:*`(&M(6N5N"G[Q1@'^N/7 MD_G0]K#)YF]`WF$%L^HZ'VJ>B@"O;VJP,6$LSY&,22%@/SHBLH(6E*1@>;][ M/(^GTY/'O5BB@""VMHK6/RX5P,Y))R3]33IH(Y@!(N2/NL."OT/45+10!333 MHED1WDGDV'O\`*H'TNW=60F01,"/*$A"#Z"KU%`"*-J@#H*6BB@`HHHH`_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 123 exhibit99-80x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-80x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"``W`*T#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#OBRJ<%@/J M:3S$_OK^=*55CDJ#]12>6G]Q?RH`/,3^^OYT>8G]]?SJ&Z98+=Y5A\PJ,[5' M)K/^T:HPRNE1*/1I1FI8G]]?SJK8RM8G]]?SH\M/[B_E1Y:?W%_*F`>8G]]?SH\Q/[ MZ_G1Y:?W%_*CRT_N+^5`!YB?WU_.CS$_OK^='EI_<7\J/+3^XOY4`'F)_?7\ MZ/,3^^OYT>6G]Q?RH\M/[B_E0`>8G]]?SH\Q/[Z_G1Y:?W%_*CRT_N+^5`#@ M01D'(I:0``8`P*6@`HHHH`***2@`-5-3N#:Z=-,OWE7Y?J>!5+Q/G^S4YQF5 M1^AJMJ>AV]OI\TT32ET&>6R,9Y_2LY2>J2*BEHV6=-TN(Z1MF4-)<+N=R.>> MGY4OAZ:1K62VFY>V6,\],#FL/3=/@U6:\N9"X5ICLVG M&>_]:G:UBM[W.E&*=6!HT"VVM7L"%BB*`,G-;]:1=U3RD#`KCANW;!%3S27$,*-)-:QGGS'<$+[8 M&?ZU+B[W3'S:6.=5=1CAGAM+>X6TD/W7C^90>N*T[348K.V2".POOD&,>5R3 M4J:G*^G33JL4DL7<.AQ4>EW3I'80,@$,1QHOF1-_>CR1G]/U%`&I4.5HHP1G8J\<# MU)H`T8+F"Y!,$TN>N/:@#1$J><8MP\P+NV]\>M++*D,32RL%11EB>PK-6X0Z MDUR/]6;)9,^VXFJFHW%]/X?EN'CB$3&`=RJ>ASGD].U`C?!R,BEIJ?ZM? MI3J!A1110!#=0)=6\D$@RCK@U2C?4[=!$]NET1P)5D"9'N#W^E%%`AMK8306 MMA$VTM#*7?!XP0W3_OJG7EO.NI1W<5NMP%C*;"P4H)'C9V:.5FQ MLW'.".IP3VI6L;H:-;Q1,HN[?:RDG@D=?S!(_&BBF`\Z>\=E8P(=Q@E1W8GK MC.3^9J,VLUK5)D_\`+,XR/_'1113`U,5G/;W5IJGW[YHHI#&PV]Q>6X<#I@= 6CTZ^]%%`&X@P@'H*=110,****`/_V3\_ ` end GRAPHIC 124 pricewater.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 pricewater.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_X0!217AI9@``24DJ``@````!`&F'!``! M````&@`````````!`(:2`@`>````+`````````!,14%$(%1E8VAN;VQO9VEE M7J# MA(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3 MU-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$!`0$!`0`` M``````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$"`Q$$!2$Q M!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF)R@I*C4V M-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$A8:'B(F* MDI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7V-G: MXN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#W^O&;CXH>,-0^(.J^ M&/#6BZ;>-92.`9793M0@$D[@.IQ7LU>#_`^`:E\0?&>O]=TK(K>OFRLY_P#0 M!0!M:MX_^(OA.W-]KW@^PFTY,>9+971^3/KRQ'U(Q[UWOA#Q;IWC308]5TUF M";RDL3_?B<=5/Y@_0U<\1M;KX8U9KL*;86-M:\.ZE)H MFBZ;;WT^JS($6>0H%90>X]CS]*`/K.BO+[;XE:QI'C'3_#OB_0(["3465;:Y MM;CS(R6.`#Q_>XZ\9Z8YJ_X4^(%UXA\:>)M)ELH+?3=%9T:[WG)(7)J-W/Y,3MZ(,9/;G].16=KGQ9U? M0?"+ZC?^&Q9ZI#J8T^6UFFW(W[K>75@.F-OKUZF@#URBO'/'OB+XBQ^#K^0^ M'X=*2)5E:^M-3#/&`P)PN`3Z'ZUWGP_OYM4^'^AWMS*TT\MHADD;#$5@4_Q2MP@QWY(_#-`'1UC-XJ\.HQ5M?TM6!P0;R,$'\Z\ONO'F MH_#3P]XWO"'16("D@@]TMS"Q9E8DSB*AY-C-@L0!PH)/)["L7Q!\0-#T'PQ::W-++/'?HK6$$2$2718`KM4\C@ M@Y/3([X%`'7T5Y??>.O'.DZ:VN:AX(CCTI%\R:*.^#7$4?\`>(QVZD8X[XYK M0\3_`!*MM,^'$'B[2$2\BN'184E)7DDA@<=Q@\>HH`]`HK-T.]GU'0-.OKF% M89[BVBFDC4\(S*"1^&:P?#'BVY\0^+?$VEFUBCM-'F2%)E8EI&.<@]N-M`'8 M5&)8S(8PZEU&2H/(_"J<&M:5=W)M;;4[.:Y&,:5X=TOQS\= M/&,FL6:7=E:(L0C9F`$@V(#P1V1OSH`]UW+N"Y&XC(&><5YGK_Q8_P")X?#W M@[2VU[5QE697Q!$1URW?'?D#WKE?B=%X?^&>EFU\*6"V&M:Q&8'DBE=F6#/S M8!)P2<`$<]?2N_\`AEX(M_!/A6&%HE&J7*B6]D[[O[F?1#QQD$<9')J7Q;X\MO#M[:Z/96#_1M/@.TD?WG;HJ\'GV],D< MW+XTUOP0R77B;PE::?I-[G?@4`>JT5Y]>_$.\U M#7;C1?!FD+K5Q;#_`$J\:X$=M"?[N[G_H<1Z!\1KIO%X\*>*-'&DZPZ; M[9DF\R&X'/0]NAQUZ$<'B@#T6BO,-4^(7B.3XCZAX1\.Z+97DEG"LK27$Y3@ MJA/ZN!4F@_$N_?QJ/"7BC1!I>I-&9(I(IO,BD`4MZ<#:#SD\C'%`'I=%>1>% MOB5XS\7Z9-J.D^$;*YMXIS`2=0\HY`!Z,.>&'YU9\3?$;Q/X3T/3IM1T"R35 M;^^:WBM%N"ZB,`8.X=3DXH`]4HKRC4?B?K_A#4+*/QEX9@MK*\?8MY9W7F!" M.N01SC.>HXZ9K>U[QS>1>(V\,^&=(_M76(HQ+<&2810VRG&-S=RM`'::0%^7_`F^O+KP#-: MWDOF'3]0DM(COW80*C8![@%CCVQ7J%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%% M%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`4=9O1INAZA?D@"VMI)B3VVJ3_2 MOGGX.?$/PSX,\.:A;ZO/.E[<7?F!8X2^Y`J@U#^S?A;KD@^]+$ ML`]][!3^A-1?!JQ^P?"K15*X>97F;WW.Q'Z8H`XSQ%X@\4_%5/[!\+Z-=Z?H MDYQ=:E?(8PZ9Z#V]ADGV&:Y.6&R^'/Q5M%M+"YU&W\.:9ONO(`#,SJ=TC9Z# M,R_08]*^G*\5^'\<'BGXL_$+4)XUFM2OV`YY#QDE,?0K%0`:'I^K?%+Q?I/C M;5;:WL?#NG@O8P+,)'E96ZL1T^89.=PZS-8_"?Q1JL(*3>(=9%HS M]#Y84R-_Z$5_X$:Z/1-?D^&R>-?!%_(Q6"">XTR1C]XE/E'X@JW'0AJS;OPK M2WDJCKY99D)Q[84_3-`'OG@G0HO#7@W2M+B0*8K=3*1_ M%(1ES^+$UYQ\U^)?A.7P[! MJ\^NV,*O$'>(S#S%;'*[/O9![8KS7Q+XGTJX^._AF_U&X%GIUGIRS-]H^4QN MZ.ZAAS@_,G%`'7>)-=U;7?"?B#3+_P`(ZAIL3:7<2"XGD1T#*A8#Y2>XK*\* M^)I-"_9TM-1A;-XD4MO;+W:4S,B`#OU!_"NR3QCX:\86FIZ1HVK1WEP;*4NL M:-PI&W.2,=6%>/?"'S?%,N@:&ZEM.T&>74Y\C@R$XA7Z@EF_.@#3U#P\OA#Q MG\+=.^3STW)._=I&8%SGO\SG%=7XSNH==^(-GIEU*%T+PW#_`&OJC'[OF8/E M(??'..X)K(^-NI1Z'XP\!:M*"8K6[EED`'.U6A)Q^&:R+&PO-?NK'PS<2$ZC MXBF&M>(F4D&&U&#%![9&..HR.QH`Q/%U]I7B+X?ZOXEN]4TY]F#S.-^6P.3^\_G4_P`3=/2UUCP'X0CN[V]$NH^=-)>S&:5@TBJ" MS'KP7^@%`%636=:^(VAK\/-`TG^SHK".*WU*>^F4.BQD#`0<_>09QGICC-$7 M]A^&OCCI-C?:A#;6/A_1TMTFN'"!G*$\Y[GSB-H$(TO4 MO]&U`+T!Q@G'^Z`P]2AJ?X=QVGBGXJ>.]9N(;>ZACECMX2Z!U*@LH(S[1#\Z M`*_QJ\8Z)KG@JWTK1-6L[^ZN;^,&*"4,0H#'/'^UM'XU7\/VJ^(?CT;.5O-T M[PK:"&VC/W0T85,X]=Y+?\!'I5_XFV-E-\2/`>B6=K!!OO/M$XBC"DJ'7'3V M5ZKZ5-%X!^/&MKK$PM;#74::VNIB%C+%@^"QX&#N7\O44`>N^(S`OA?5C<@& M`6L:MB.3[-('2"'^(LPX&1Q]"3Z9X_QGH$7P_P!1^&[7!,FE:7,/ MM$ZH<"7S%D=OQY('HM`'T(B)%&J(`J*,`#H`*^:[G6&M_!D=P\\MI8^*_$L\ MU[=1Y#?9`X#+GT^\?P(]:]3\8_$;1(_#4]KH&J6VJ:OJ"&VLK:QF$K[W&`2% M/RXSGG'3%6+?X:Z5>?#33?"FL1>9]FB#&2)L-'._P!9QGIDU6\.:?XA\!?$EO`,&K-D:UH9@,K39FM9&8L0!U!]AVH`X.\LDUW M]H?2=#:::>TTDPVZ/,^]W6"/S#N/(+J&PO+>\\Z)KB01K,I4+E2>O"J?H?K47Q0U2[^(\@\+^#A_:%M M8JUW?W,)W1;E4[(PPX)/.`.I(]#@`[KX1:#%H7PUTD*JB:]B%[*P'WC)\RY^ MB[1^%<1\7"?^%N>!!;?\?8GC/'7'G+C\/O5U'@CXB>&(_`&E+?ZU96-U96D= MO/;W$RI*K1J%.$/)SC(P.]AE\9_$'4/B5?02P:#I<+#3EF&&E"*?F`]! MEF^I`YP:`*/AGQ0NG_%;QMK0T'6M69IS:1G3+0S!0K8^8YXSL7'T-7KC2-:O M]4U[XE>(K%M+%EIDR:;8.P,G^K907]/O'C'4^W.E^SW!(WA'5M3FYFO=28EC M_$`J\_FS5M_&[4%L/A7J:;MKW3Q0)^+@D?\`?*M0!R7PKUK6O#WP[M8[3P7J M5]%+(\WVF":,"3+8R%)ST`'3M1\7;^6?QYX%C73[BYDMB;][.(9D8!E8KCUQ M$?UKH?"/Q&\$:%X-T339M?MDG@LHDD15=L/M&X<`_P`6:RUD.L?M0D#E='T[ M:#Z93G]9Z`,P-J7QUU:QF%I%IWAC3)R92TP>:9^"5P.1QQZ77(K=_P#A$=:8+=B- M21;2$YS@=,$DCV)`Z"NZUSQ]X*'AJYN+O5M-O;22`_Z,DRNTV1]P)UR>G3CO MB@#;\->)=-\6:+%JFERF2W&^"([32_A]I5]6T9O]7C_<-+LD0+;QR$`8VJS9)99)SU^9FSAY4@G'W>U4-0U_3&L-02WUC6+M[JTAM%BEM(H%6.+:$ M#,'8G&T=`,]2>2*`/:_V=BI\`ZB44JAU:3`)S@>5%WKUZO(?V=49/AY>,P(# MZI(5)[CRXQ_,&O7J`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`\8_:-U/[/X0TW3E;#7=YO(]513G]66O4/#%A_9GA M32+`C!MK*&(@^H0`U)J>@:/K31'5=*L;\Q`^7]JMTEV9ZXW`XS@?E6G0`56M M[.UM6D:WMH83(&"& MWA$,,21Q+P$10%'X"IJ*`,*+P;X9M[_[=#X?TN.[SN$RVB!@?4<<'WJ_-I.G M74IEN-/M9I3U>2%6)_$BKU%`%.WTRQLG+VME;P.1@M%$JDCTX%8'@KP'I'@2 MUN[?2FN'%U*)'>X96;@8"@@#@<_F:ZNB@#E?%O@32/&=QIDFK-.1I\IEC2-E M"R9VY5\@D@[1TQ71):6T5Q)<1V\232##R*@#-]3WJQ10!%)&DT;1R(KHP(96 M&01Z$50U'3BV@7MAIB06TLL$B0X7:BNRD`D`=,FM2B@#R/PGX*^(G@[11I6E MZGX;-N)&D)EBE9BQZY(QZ"O1-+T^Y.GV09SY=Q$'4'UP>]7J*`,W3-!TG1(VCTK2[.Q1\;A;P+'N^N!S^-6+VPM M-2M'M;ZUANK=_O13('5OJ#Q5JB@#$TOPGX>T6;[1IFB6%G-C'FPVZJ^/3.,U MS>H:+X_L/$&H7WA[5])N;*^97-IJJ2`6Y"A?D,?LH]/IGFN_HH`X;PGX&N=, MUZZ\3>(-0_M+Q!=)Y?F(FR*"/CY$'X=?_KD]S110!XA\7/#NJ:%XNT[XB:)" M96M63[9&HR0%XW'_`&2ORD]N*[S0/B=X2U[35O(];L[1BNZ2WO)UBDC/?(8\ M@>HXKLB`1@C(KEKKX<>#;RY-Q-X:TXRDY)6$*"?<#`H`Y77?%7A7Q;XCL=#T MO1[+Q+?-*J37+VPE@M(=WSL7QSQG&#C/?L?2-.TNQTFU%MI]E;6D`.1';Q"- M<_04W3])T_2+?R-,L;6SASGR[>)8US]`*O4`8ESX1\.7M\;^YT#3)KLG<9GM M$9R?4DCD_6M4PQF$PF-3$5V[,?+CIC'I4U%`$%O;06D?E6\$<*`YVQJ%'Y"D MN;2VO(Q'\M/,))C MMY\("?0$''TZ577]GWP6K`E]48`_=-P,'\EKU>B@#,T71;#0-+@TS3;=8+.! M=J1KV[DDGDDGG-:=%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110 M`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%85S<^)TN9!:Z1I$L`8^6\NJ2(S#L2HMR`?; M)^M`&[17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/ M&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,', MO_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\` M0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\` M\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/ M&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,', MO_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\` M0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\` M\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/ M&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,', MO_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\` M0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\` M\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/ M&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,', MO_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\` M0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\` M\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/ M&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,', MO_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\` M0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\` M\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/ M&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,', MO_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\` M0#T/_P`',O\`\BT`=!17/_;/&'_0#T/_`,',O_R+1]L\8?\`0#T/_P`',O\` M\BT`=!17(ZCKGBG3(8'FT'1V$UQ';KLU>4X9V"@G-MTR>:O?;/&'_0#T/_P< MR_\`R+0!T%%<_P#;/&'_`$`]#_\`!S+_`/(M'VSQA_T`]#_\',O_`,BT`=!1 M7/\`VSQA_P!`/0__``.F_\`86L__1RU M;UO5X-!T6ZU*YBEDAMD\QDB`+$>@R0/UH;L!JT5RUOXVTKS+R+5!)HLEF8Q( MFI2Q(/G!*X9793D`\9SQTJT_BO1+>UAGOM3M+))I7BB-Q=1C>58J<$,0>GKD M9YP>*`-^BL<^)-#6]N+)M7L12/3FE<#3HKFD\<>')+[3[6#5K2=K[S/*>&963Y!ELG/ M%6%\7>'#I[7ZZ]IILTD\IIQ=IL#XSMW9QG':F!NT5SNG>,-#U*[N;2'4;5;N MWDD1[=YD$@"'!;;G.WC.?2KECXBT34T#:?J]C=*TOE`PW"OE\$[>#UP"<>@H M`UJ*Q9/$^@PW=M:R:Q8+/='$$9N%S(19)4P<8V@YSGCZTK@=!17.6OB9#%=R:MI]YHD5LB2-+J)C6,JQ(&)% M9ESQR"'8+*WO9==TU+6X)$,S7:!)".N#GG'?TI@;E%9/\`PD>B M?VF-,_M>P_M`G_CU^TIYO3/W@ M)S@$]O6@#=HK(M/$FB7^I/I]GJUG<7J)O:"*=6<+ZX!]Q^8I;36[>]NM5@BC ME$FFRB*7[$7E0H$$I, MC!5'+!1RP_BJWHFNQ:U]M1;.YLY[*;R)X+G9N1MH80+J/RS(4W;>?3(S^=0> M+O\`CQTW_L+6?_HY:E\3ZL^B>'+[488TDFA3]VKYV[B0!NQSC)&?:DP3L]"K M_P`(AI4!TY--LK.PBM+Q;MD@ME42L$91G&.?FSGGI63+X%O(W$NGZS#!/MNX MW::Q$RM'/+YN`I<`,IXR<@]Q2W^M>)-`1#>G3-4>2XMHTCL86BFQ(S!AL>0C ML-K%@.#D<4:E\2M,TO2K6_N;.ZC2>26-HGFMUDC,;[&&TR?.<_W-U&[T[_C9 M?H+^OS_X)%;_``YCB\075]-J4D]G.]P_V5A(,-,NUL_O/+QUZ1@\C).*K6'P MR?38YF@UZX%S+9O#YXCP1.QYN.&SNVX7@C@=15Z_\> M4QA6P6WE!OSQMZD"H;/XJZ)?17S6]M=2FV"LL<;PO),#*(QA0^5.XCA]IP0: M%=K3T_#_`(/]6'U_KO\`\`@M?AE+#&1-K?F/)-5FW#:"& M9F^E6-#^'KZ6]O)<:H;J6*ZAGRR2$%8XV15_>2N0?GSD''&`!4DWQ-T>TUIM M+OK:XM+B)?WHDDA)C?R_,V[0Y8\<;E!7/&:N^'_%-UK>OW=M)ILUE;1V5O

    N::OT\OPV$]%K_5]""\\!Q7L#PR7Q6.2XO97V18)^ MT*RXSG^'=U[X[5"O@C4_/2_?7+.=.M+,W3V]TT82[?"HN<6S;7_`(NYZ?KBC;\?^"&OY?\``*MQX5UG4+28 M:CXC2>Y$MO+;,EELAA:)MV3'O)8L>OS#MC&!5-_`%\&GN8=:MTO[M+I+N1[' M=$ZSE2=D?F#81M')+9YSFI;OQQ,);2&VT6\CN'U.&RGAN6BW(KIO##;(1]WW M]VJV-W+/:M&HC@EMY3(7D$0`VRD*=QZ,0<46U_KR_X`KV5_3\ M]"G:^!+V2\O+:>]6#1A>12QQ^0&GE"6R1AO,W?*,@Y!7/'8&I-%^&S:4D0GU M8W1BEM63='(1LMRQ5/)&U+3HHM'O!#,;P72N$:2)K<< MJ`KD$Y],YXQ[:O@[QA9^,],>]LHGB1'P4DEB=AD9!(1FV_1L&FK[^C^[9_@# MVL_0HZ7X)FTSQE=ZXFI[8;F2222VBC=/,+``;_WA0[<<$(">Y/>W!X>U:SUO M5+NUU6R6TU*=99;>6Q9I%Q&J$*XE`'"YY4UU5%*VEO*WR'Y_,X&/P+J$OA2V M\,ZEJ]C=:;!Y*HJZ6=O?V4]I=Q)+;3 M(4DC<<,I&"#63XN_X\=-_P"PM9_^CEIWBZTDOO#-[:Q1K(\BJH1XC(I^8=5' MWAZCTI/8%N0V7@S0-/S)!:.6\R*7S9;F65LQ_<^9V)PO89Q[5%=>"/#FI0H) M;.4QGS/]5=RQAQ*^]P=KC<"W.#D>E8$W@^/1HA-=6EE=:=+O"CCBMGP[;V\<>JMIFF26&ER;?(@:U:WW/M.]EB8`J#\HZ# M)!/?)'*R;[`M[&E+X;TF>T2V>V;8EV;M=DSJ5F))+!@QP!DX`Q7)_$?3I]1O++9"Q$4$O ME$:8U[OD++A05!\AOEXD/J?2K>A16DOC6\G@T>?3GC\U#,^GRJ]V2P+.TS)M M*Y'RKN.>O``%3';[_P`!LZ%/"VB1V]E`M@BK8R>;;G&X8/*CLYU`*%'%Y/OCV9VA'W[D`W-PI`Y-=5118#F/^$'\.G[.HL&5 M+>-(T1;B14=4;9)/'<%TG=&$B+M5@001@<<=>]5;;P-X>LIA+ M#9S`C9MWW1U6-)T#3=#$YL(YM\Q4R/-O#),(P#Y<6-S$D``;B! MU/#@^U:T.K:?<0K/#?6TD3!&#I* MI4ASA3GW/`]:YW_A"X["\>;0)K/2U,J7"6PLPT*RA2A;:K+P4;&`1R`?4%D/ MANXBUK3LL^R)9)KN=$5(IY"[.BA-Q8;7=F';IR31H(U[?Q3HMV'-C?V]X8YT M@D%M(KE&=L#//3/?V--U/Q!<:;J4-FF@ZC>><<1RP20!&."2/GD4\`'M6-H_ M@:\TZZDN+O6FNV/D;V5SYF/LTC.5VYW9 M0K^'7-.V@=1EOKFE7C3I;:E:2O;EEF5)E)C*XW`X/&,C/IFJ%YXPT"Q:]CEU M6U,]E#Y\\*2`NL?KC/N/S'J*K7WAB]DLTBT_5(;:7R[F)Y)K0R@I,VXX`=<$ M8&"21[51/@>X2]U":+5EAAO(F1HTAD&YB@4,X\WRVQC.0BL>`6ZY28V;NL:X MVE6,5W#IEUJ,$F"7M7B^7)`4G>ZYSGMFB'Q)IWVF&SO+F&PU&5-XL+F>/SE' MN%8CH">">_H:LW]@]_IHM9)E61BA:14X)5@QP,\9QZ_G69<^'[J?599%OX5T M^:XBN9K=[8M(9$"XVR;P`/D7(*D]>>>#J+H:!A.O[R3^X/5N>EP1M(DDD;M,FPHBJS'.>.&!Y[`GI5JUUW3]0TJ34=-N$O[=`QS: MD2%B!DJ`/XO:N;N/`\EQIQM!J6U7@>)V,)S@I&`1AP00T2GZ$C@\UHZ'X;N= M'TJ_MSJCO>7;F3[3B1_+;8%!`FDD)QM!Y8_A3=D)#(O%XFA<1:-J+WB7+6S6 M*/`9%(0.23YFS`!'\6J=KX4O[(275IJ&FP:E)<-*SQ:59G4(S MI2E7>!K<^:[B+R\^9OP%.`<;G4U])UL:JTL;:==V4B(DH2Y M\O+HV=K#8S8^Z>#@\=*VJP-%TB\L+B6;4+Z&\E:&*!#%;F$+&F[&06;+$L.F_P#86L__`$UB'3K26\@&JW5VK2Q MP:=`L&R-HQ@CKT[BQ_PF`F.+'2+Z[5V1865HD$KM&)=HW.",(

    HWHP8@\9!.#@>E/F\.:7/:FW-O)' M&760&&9XG1E4("K*0R_*`.".,^II>H&ZDM@YO9[/8L<2J[IO"N^X@F-CM&X@#OQG%-#N%MPENX6W3R@(;J1`R@YVR!6'F#.3A M\\D^IH&RG+XUV2R!?#VIO`@D?SP\&THC[';'F;L9[8R?2II_%2VD\L7V&[N% MA9S--"(U6%`^W)#/EO\`@(/3H.E:AT333&T9M_D9)(R-[?==MS#KW/-!T33G M^TYM\_:5*R_O&^8$DGOQR3TH36E_Z[!T,AO%PBN9$_L^\N88)&6YN(414@7S M'0$@ON;[A)V@\(1J.HFU.GW=NI$IBFE,9641OL;`5B1R1U`I)/"N MD2W8NFMY1('WD1W,J+(=Y?YU#!7&YB0&!`S5Z#3;."6*2&+:\0D"'<3@.P9N M_<@&A`8<=YKUY>W%Y;7>FV^GV]TT!MKBVR13F5I5E> M-;J587=<89H@VQC\HY*GH/2BU\+:193&6&&;=N#(KW4KK'AMP"*S$(,@<*`. M!QQ1'I<'U,QO&4ZW'RZ+>/$(02@>+S!-YWE>7R^.O?./>C3/'>G:CXE.B+"T M5T"T>&N(6;S%!+J45RX`P?F*X..O3.PVA:6]TDIMW#*Q88E<`DR"3)`.#\XR M,].<<$T0>'].MM5?488IQ.S,^TW$AB#-]YA&6V*Q[D`'D^IH5NOG_P``3\C9 MHHHIC"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHHH`****`.?\7?\`'CIO_86L_P#TVT-S;OP\4T M8=&[\@\&LGQ=_P`>.F_]A:S_`/1RUI:E?PZ9I\UY,K,D0SM099CT"@>I)`'U MI,$<)%IW]@:+IL5E;7^CPRH[73Z1I@DF:48\L.HC8XQNYQV`)&<&S*^OFW:[ MO;W5H%:2&&>*QM5D,2&%69XU$;,29#M)&[`SC&,C>B\4);V\\^N6%QH<4(!$ ME])$4D!)`PR.PW^UC.L6&^\56ME^TKF4$X!49Y!/'UXH# M8YN%_$4\27)OM3588XFC0VJ(;@&=P3(ICR&\L*2!MQGH*S8Y=9L+"VM4O=>6 M6*)OLX6P\Q9Y_,<,DI\H[4QLPV5!!)#'&1VB>*=">6]B&KV.^Q!:Z'VA?W0! MP2W/&#P?0\553QKX;9!(VKV4<;SF")WG4"5@`3M.>0-P!]#Q0M7H#VU':X[Z MGX9O19))(3E'C52'<*^)$`..2`P'KFN=BM[:.YGF\)Z1U)?U^7ZA;I_7]:&9>+K5C?7$W MVG6+IH+6YAMG6W5O,SY;`MMB(R,M@[3G;C#'(-;1)?$NHV$L=Y/JB10_:&03 M6^3.`D6Q&,D",RDM)_`I.,<@5U[^([9+H68@N7O3*L?V5`I?E59F^]@*H<98 MG&>!DD9M7VL0Z?=65K)%<227RVVBP>7D,)`F-V<<;\YR,8Z=U7-OXCG:_:&WT'4 M;BS2;R7OHO*\L,"`<*7WD`Y!(7L<9I=,\4VNJZSU>P74],FM"_ELX!20*&V.""K8/7!`/X51\7?\>.F_P#86L__`$^GZ6;.34#,YABC:3RB,E)GDSRQ/._'))XSDUG M2>-I]`T:RO->FM+J:^RT*6ZI9JBK][+3S88\C`!!/IU(74/B7INE'?.GF13, M'M\3Q0YB\J-R29'4%OWG"CD_K3OV#46/P+?_`-IW%]+KWF.4;[.K12N$;S4D M4D/,RX!0`A`@(/;C$>J^!-7U2"99O$<:27#2&;R+::)#N"CA$N!G`7^/>/;K MG5N/%P#3^3IUUY"AEBO7">4TGE>8%P&WX([X'/%$?BV9H(D.A7_]H.4"V@>$ M%@R%MV[S-H&%;J<\=*2NOE^O]?TA-W^9H:KHS:B\,8&DB"Z9J M'DD1^=,?*`@+N4"L-^XD,"#M!'N:;X5\;Z=XKFGALD*M&BR+^_ADW(>`2(W8 MH?\`9;!_7!O=#O8B@\$6=G)]KLYDBU.)H?)O6BW2*B1JGEL-:UIX+?RXB]PT;?(&!QA2WOP,T-]?G_7W"MT^1E:IX M+FU(O:M>V!TUKHW*13:=YD\#,VY_+EW@*22V"4)&>]6M"\(?V/KDVH>;9,&6 M10T-EY4TN]PV9I-Q\PC'!P.IJGIWBS4-3\/PZC;#29W_`+2%M.8;EG2.,RA1 MM*@[VVL.X'.>G!?;^(]2F\9FS,:QZ8+A[57>U8;I%3=@2[^3P>-FW'\6[BA* MVG]=/^`#V;?];_\`!.VHK@]1\87UCXO>R$.[3HGV.XLW*Y\DO_K]VT-D`;-N M>1SSQ#8^(_$>H:9=R,MO!<0Q1W2J^F2ES"P8_)$LI,A)4`?,AZY4<9$]+C>C ML>A45S4>LZA<^"(M7M;>V:_>T6;RIF:.-7VY8'`8C!SQ[8SWJ2;4M02YT0Q0 MVWV:];;,K26_P#"6H6L$8EEE0*J&/S`?F'5>X]12;L")+CP[I=[ M;VUNR3+%;@B)K>ZEA=0>HWHP;![@G!P/2F7/A'1;H#?;S1D#&;>ZEA)7:J[2 M48$KA%^7IQTKD]<]^^:32]`TW16=[*.=2RA,27,DH11G"H'8A%&> MBX%<+=W'BJRU>SM[**\CM3*614B?8[-<2;_,Q`XQM*GYGC&#D$]NVUFVUV>[ ML7TJ^M+>%)"9EGMFD)&UN>)$XZ<8/.#VI+N/R-A(T1G9452YRQ`P6.,9/X`5 M##9V]O:+;)&!"`0$/(ZY[UE0Z>L/B^XO$68F>T57=I'9,AC@*"<+QS@8]:PS M::^_Q&AN[O3HS8>5/!'=0WK$11$*1E-H`8L.N?\`T'D[?,&=3'HVFV]H]O%; M1QPO/]H95)4&3<&W?]]`&HQH.GKJYU3RY?M.[=S7NV[=WE[MF['&[&:XG M5]``T&SL)HKH:=%J%T9`;!M0DY9S&VQE M2B%!I[WB6\GED!F@!+,`>,IO/X=TR75CJ+Q3>>6WE?M$@B9 MMNW<8MVPMCC)7/2JJ^#=%$/EK%><,K))]OG\R/:"`$??N0`,PVJ0.3Q7#:7H M]Y#J^D375K/)>P+:I;AM+;'DA`KDS[*WFM8XB9@6`A8*=B@G!9?\`:XH6MOE^8WI_7D;1\'Z,S3Y@GQ*2@K5T_3K?2[46MJL@C#%B9)6D9B3DDLQ+$^Y-<5H&GI;^.[N M[AMKEYYWN3=276EK#Y8WC9Y21,1S!=QC<-5O;W!!Y[&JUOX M@T>ZM&NX-4LY+90S-*LZ[0%QN).>,9&?J/6L=O#MYI_A.[TNSN4N)9(90&DB MP7<_<_B`PJ@+CO@BV-W#:W>JV4$\S^7'&\ZAF;CC&?873#7-/VVI"W#?:4Q&2<#)SQSQ]>.M+;^*=#O8+B33]5L[XV\1E=+699&"C MV!_"LJT\)W<4MG]KU*&:&Q"):B.T,;A`Z-AVWD,?D49`4=3BKO\`PCC8B`O> M$\P.!']Y7F$A'7C@;?QS0K:7&2GQ7H,2`):,DB% MI!(0TBRJQ'4?)L//).*U?#6ARZ#I/V.>\%W(9I)6E"N,EF+8^=W8XSU+$TT) M^1NT444#"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`J-'+,P_NG'Z444 M,"2BBB@`IA?Y"V.@S110`I;`!Q2"3+`8ZKFBB@!OG_,1M[*>OJ:>SXSQVS11 M0"!GVC..V:1GV]NQ-%%`A=WS8QVS3J**2&%%%%,`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"B MBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`__9 ` end GRAPHIC 125 pricefooter.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 pricefooter.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`)0`7``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``@&!@<&!0@'!P<*"0@*#18.#0P,#1L3%!`6(!PB(1\< M'QXC*#,K(R8P)AX?+#TM,#4V.3HY(BL_0SXX0S,X.3H.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`"X"/P,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/?Z`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`" M@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H` M*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@ M`H`*`&ONV-LQNQQGIFIE>SY=QJU]3S^_N_%\.I+91SWEQ>Q6JRA;"*W^S,Y> M3'FF7#!<*H^0@\'OBKC9RTVNM_ZN)Z17S]>GR-FZ\2WUM,Q;3X]ID>"!1.U2M;6W?^=OZ_JS:LM>EO_26RM-XVN[75K73I]&S*Q1; MEH))9DB9W*+AUBVGD9.\H0#T)XIQ]Z_+_3M?T_-^0G[JU_I?UY6\Q5\>Q,SH M+'#K$9`#,.=J,9!TS\C`(?=A2O=7C\O1V2?7=NUM]'N.UG9^GSZ_AK.;SHLSB0NOE;`JO$KD'S1G*9],]V]%?TMZMV^[\?(2_KTLW^G MIYEI/%^I7NDRR6VDB&ZCBG:42R21^68U4C:)(E9L[U^\J]^O&7;9KR_-JWX? M\"^@+>S_`*ZEA_%&JH7M?['M#J$)D:>/[>1$J(J,2KF/);$B\%0.O/',MI+F M>RW^_IW_``'%-V75VM\^_P#3)-0\7_9=,CN[>P:=Y=_EQ%R"=K*HR%5FYW=` M">P!-.5XRY?ZWL*-G'F]/QBY?\`SS\07#Z>JZ1(YF4-<[%G;R,R&/`Q#URK9 M$GE_GD!V]ZW33\5]WX_(3=H\WK^']=K>9-9ZM>0V$?B&\UH26T\]6O.VUG;\U]_]>9(_BK5XY6L MVT:S_M"-&FD0:@?*6(!3D/Y62WS#Y2H'?=TRVTDY/9;_`/`[Z>@HIR:2ZVM\ M[[_=TN-O/&D]DD]T^EHU@"4@9)V::238'`:()E1SC@L?]GFAIK1[_P#VW+^? MD_O%%J2NMMW]U_ZU&P^-+Z?33>.266+;Y84@*'B5VSO7JJ]^O&1 MZ)-?T[M=+]O7ROH-:NW];7_KIY]2_H.HZAKP@U%G%G%&7BGLPK'+#..9(T<= M5."H^F.35K:[IK]?Z_X<5[Z=O\D4];\87NDS2)'HXN!YQBAV/,Y<*NYV*Q1. M5`R`.#GG)7OFI:)OS?R3M]_W+S*M^B^;5_R_X8RY/'>H6;3W3:=)=1SR;K>! M/,;RX5C1F)$<+,&/F#AOE_VE[VUR:2\[_)VTV71[V]>B4??U7E][5_7[ON-' M5O&E[IT;3Q:*LUMYFU6\Z0OM"!F9D2)RN,@9/'7)7C*6DDI>?X.W_!ULO,47 MS1O'R_%7_JUWY%_7/$%[IE_9):6D%S!<0LWS3%#O+QH@R%(VYDY/IR`<8)9\ MSCZ?\'\!IIQ4OZVN5]5UK4&\)W-Q'')::A%E)Z\K77_@K\U]PUHY)]/\`*Z(].U/7[:P1+NSGE>6X81O?R113+"$W%F$( M9"V=P``&>,XY-*OI^0HK7YI?UY:#+GQG=VEE)>?V6DUI'LA5_ MM!\V29E4@>6L9)7YARN6X.$-:35F_5V^3L_3KW]10U2]+O[K_P!;#8_'P%C# M/=:8UN[D@H[L@`5\2M^\1&PBX?E02.PJ=+^7_#K\U;YJ_8-=>_\`P$U]Z?X, MAO/']S'.D=MI2LDL)>.5WEPKF-G0,1$4&0%R"X;G[IX)F7,E*^C7Z*[^[5:7 MVZ=-(I-KLW^#=D_GOJ21>.[@:E]BFTAODB^>:/S2GFB'S2H8Q;-N.,[]V?X: MN6G,UTO;SL[?U:YG3]Y1\[7^?]=;?YV1XEU:SNI'U'3+=+($!FBNR[QL8]^U M5,8##CJ2.3T.*F34;WZ7_!7_`,[?H5%.?+;K;\967Z7_`%+FF^(;N>XCMK_3 MX;:>3:RB&Y,J[&1V4DE%^;Y"",>AR:J2Y4_*]_E;_/\`X!$99I-(9;<6PEB96D8RN45M@Q%M/WL85F;C.VEW[_`/!M^;Z7^_0MJS^_\$W^ M2ZV^[4?9Z]J/BFXAL8;B;09421Y2D.7VENOZ)_C?SV9;?Q9<6D:RM!;7MC`D0N;R&?:7=QP8X\$,O(Z MN,9[XI2DM7:RUM\ES?E_5M1J+NH7U_X+7WZ#E\3:PPCMQH]D-0E9"D9U`^5L M9'8$OY60W[LC:%/;FJ::OY7O\K;??Y$Q:DKK9VM\^_;\2G!\03<:AY":1-]G M\K/FXEQYGE>;MW>7Y>,<9WYS_#CFE]ER7G;SL[?U:Y27O*+[V?E_7G8NV/BJ M]E\1Q:1>Z5';;U_UJ322+OV;]H;R@AX[;@W^SCFJ2NY+M_P/\^E_.ST(OI%] M_P#@_P!?YERXU2YCTK7[A67S+)I!"=O3$:L,^O)J5\,7WO\`^E-?D6E[[7I^ M2,_Q7?:K%?Z9;:=)J:^=%*[KIT=NSDJ4QN\\8"_,>A!Y%)WYFE_P/F"MR)O^ MM&=!93W4>BP3ZFJ1W2P![A00%5MN6[D=<]_QIU6HW:V0H)NR.7T_QMJ6I12) M;Z'$MVC#]W-/-"FPJ6W9>`-GY2.%(Z?-UPI/EBY/I>_RY?\`Y+K8$[RLNMK? M._\`ETN:NI:A<7L.CP6-XVG_`-IG=YX16=5";]JA@5W'W!&`W%7*#51P?2_X M-+]1*7N*5M[?C?\`RMZM>AG0^(M5L5GMWABU)+&1UGO'E\EFC7;R%52&?YB" M/E!*GITI1?/R]+V7SH2]VZ^?X)_KV(+KQQ?:=$C7.EQ39N)E?R7 MF;9$DI0,=L3`$X/WRJ\?>ZX4/><8][?>W;^NO9,<_=3:Z;?))_UOYE^3Q+?I M\W]G1^9*Q2VB^T_*_P"]$:L[;,IR2>-V!ZGHHWE9+=I/[U)_DOO^\'9/RU_! MI?FR_%JUQ<:;;SM$MO/]J\B9$?S%!5BK!6(&1QUP#["B3M9K9I_DW^:#573W M5OQ:_1F3'XJU=TMQ;:1;3I*JJLD]Z8V9_)$IR%B(`P2,COV`Y#G[K=]E=_). MWZ_\$=MDOZW_`,B*^\:75BXFCLEN+5DD;:6;S-V8@@4(A)&9>>"?0'H1IQT_ MKXFOR7];DQ]Y7_KX;C7\9ZG>:.TUCI217$:,]P)Y7B\H!]N45X@S]"<,J4TD MY1[7C^+M^C_R!NR??7\$G^J_X;?9U;67TS4/F;]PJ*Q&0O:0G)(Z?(*ANU_Z MZ,M*Z7]=8K]3%M/&.L:DD?V32(([I+AHY8+B>6!2OE;P0TD"OGVV8]\53:C[ MSV2=_DX_Y];?D1UMZ?C?_+I M>:=E=I=/\E^;T^38/3?^M?\`+474/%%SIU]=B33X#8P,8A,+K]XT@B\S!CV< M+CC.XGVQ47T_+[[?UO\`B7;5?C_7_#?@9]OXTU.]TR>2WT:*.\A,HD2>6:-4 M"(K@X>%7.=XX*K]>]$WRQYEV;^YV_K8(+FDD^Z7W_P##>9:;Q9>V\J2R2P@(J!LKYL2,2WW._P#E MY^N]DA\7ZM=V4=U;Z5`LD7G?:;>6>6+8$56R"\(?.&X!09SUQ@T2M'5[6;^Y MV_K8<4Y:+>Z7WI_UI MY7Z?-MK]"7)*KJ[N`ME8QRQ<2S/<7(B\J([< M;?E(8\G@D=.O-7RV?*^CM_Y-)+\O^'9/-I?^M$F_S_X8MZ)K&H75X]KJ%I#$ M&622"2.]FCCT>V>VC$KB1KUE9DB8!SM$9`/S#`SSW(HA[UKZ?\/8&Y..PI M[I6[K[F+:]^B?Y71%/X[N+74(+&;1B9E<+=F!I9DBRY0%76(@]"?G,?\Z<+2 M:ML_SU7IOYW\N@I7BFWT_P`D_P`GVMYVU+^HZMK$GAR:YM;>&UN)+I8(3]HR M=AE";\F,@-R<###IUZ4HZ\E^MF_NO_6Q6W-Y7_`;_P`)%J(0K;:='<[54;YK MKRR7>9HU&`AX^4DG]#1&\DGW2_),6V_G^!:T/7+W4I62]T^"U!1FC,5R9=Q1 MRCYRBXYZ=&M"BD MM)(]$T]'LQBV9;5`8.<_(ILK6*N[W*EIX?\.):F&STC35MPTBE(K:,+D_*XP!C)Q@_3!I MO5:_TM_SU$M'H36VFZ1IZ1Z=:6%K;1F-RD$4"HNTD;^`,8)(SZT[M_*W_`%9 M(6^T+2-37;J&E6=VN_S,3VZO\^,;N1UP`,^E):--;H?2Q'+X:T&>XN+B71-/ MDGN5V3R-:H6E7CACC)'`X/H*5E:W]=PZW*VH:9X8TJSMKN\TJPCAT\@6Q%HK M&$EA@1*%)!+8P%&2<4^:TK]7IY_U^@6TMTW#1[/PU?R3ZQIFF6:W,Q>.>;[& M(IB<_,L@90X/J&HY;1MT?W?U^H7O*_5?U^7X$O\`PB7AO[&MG_PCVF?95D\U M8?L<>P/C&X+C&<=Z=W=/ML'==QZ>&M%6]O+QM+M)+J\!6:5X$+NA`!0G&2N` M.#4I)1Y>G_!N'6_;\.FA-;Z)I-I8_8;;2[.&TVLGD1P*J;6^\-H&,'N.]-^\ MK,%[KNAUA;:;I2KIFG6UO9HJF18((A&H!/)P!CK3NW\O^"*R7S_X'_`([[2] M&U8-8W]C97@4B9H9XDD`)R`Y4@\\$9]C4VZ]BKM?,6\T'1]0A6&]TFRN8E?S M`DUNC@-C&[!'7'&:?52ZK_A_SU$E96Z"WVB:3J<*PZAIEG=Q*_F!)X%"TC(9((XE5%(.X$*!@<\_6J;;U8DDMB64V M[7$44JJTK*Q0,N>!@'^8_.ILGH5MJ9CZ1X`7&`# MDY]:'KN"TV]?F5TTCP]>Z@-072["2^C4#SFMD\U`5P`21N'RGIZ4;W\]_P#@ MAM:/;_/I\P.B^'[.^MYAI5A%=2+]FBD6V0/M"GY`0.!M!XZ8%/6[\]_/^M`[ M/M^!HM:V['+6\9.X-R@Z@8!^N.*35]P\OZ[FR?0.K?<%T#P\EZX71M/6YDM_*8BU0,T.`NPG'*XP,=,4;W_ M`!_KY!M;RV_KYA)X5\.RZ?%82:#IKV4+%X[=K2,QHQZD+C`)H>KNP6ETB=M" MTA[V"];2K-KNW3RX9C;J7C7D;5;&0.3P/6AZMOOOYA;1+HBG)X.\-O:):_V' MIZ6:S>>UNMK&(W?:5RRXP3@]?84FTM7T_`?5^98M]'T*>:+5(-+LC,\(1+@6 MZAS&5P%SC.,<8]*IW3=^N_GZB72W3;R)QH^F#4QJ8TVU&H!=@NO)7S0O3&_& M<>V:2TO;KN#UMY%"UT_PYJMWV_\`7W%*[DK;_P!?YE+1=*T*VLEGT?2; M6SAG&_$=F("V1C)7:#T]15R3MRO^K_UJ2FG[R)[JPTK4(#I5Y96US;JBL;:: M$/&%S\ORD8[?I2?O.[&O=6@D-GI-II92&RMX+&*-E\M8`J*@.2-N.G?&*'+[ M3\OPV^[\`4;NR_KN5[SP]X>N/],N]$L)VC)F#O:([!C@EAP3DX'OP*:7*U;1 M_P#!_P`V*_,O)_U^1=N-+T^\MWM[FPMIX'4HT1I[7X?,1J_8;/(/V6'.@QCG(M$UWM^&R]%_70;U=_7\>I7C\/Z#=WESJC:=:7-Q=@I)-+`K,5VA M"F2,[<+T^M)6Y;+9_CU"^M^WX%JST72-*MVBL=,L[.#YBR0P+&O(&XD`8Y`& M?I1)KE][;]`6CT&6\>CB*""WAM5BR/)18U"G]WQLXP?DXX[<54DVVI>=_P!? MS!::H=9Z%H^G6S6UCI5E:P-NW1PVZ(IW`!L@#'(`SZXI/WE9[`M'=#K/1=*T MZU^RV.F6EK;_`#?NH8%1?F^]P!CG`SZT/568+1W1!)X;T:;4H;^;3+62X@`\ MEG@0^4H]!0M&VM_^'_S!ZI1Z+_@?Y%Q=/LTLY+/[-&;:0L7B905 M;<26R#ZDFCMY6_#8!R65K&6*6T2EF+L0@&6(P2?W0F)N.5XX/`Z>@JKN_-U"VENA<2V@C=72&-74%0P4` M@$Y(_$\TMM/ZTV`JQZ'I,.H+J$>EV:7J)Y:W"P*)`OH&QG'M0O=O;J#UW"/0 M](BU1M4CTJS347SNNE@42G(PXL+:6&0,'C>)65@QRV01SD\GU-)I-68[M%8>&M!46871-/'V(YML6J?N#G/ MRN>?K2V&(MG:IPMM$O(/ M"#L.QTR>%'_O7_`#_X`.W1 M:=NFR7Z?\%&7HW@#5]/L;J-[JW2>22,JRNI#C#+*[;(8_F9'/7><@98XJFHR MBHM::W7D[:+;MV6P7:DY+?H_.]U_5WNR+4?A_K=PEF(Y+"5[=R4D=P#$H*K' MMWPR'(1%R5*'=GYNF*A)^T4Y;Z-^;O=_Y+7;=$RBN1QCMJEZ6T_&_3T)=3^' M^I7-W`]I]BABCNII1L=%*%Y=XD&Z!SOQQ\I0_*/FYXFE[DHM[*WX-Z>CZ_BF M.I[T6EU_'1+\+=GOT-B]\#6EW%.[6-B]TPN9$EDCR5FD<%),XZ@`#/48XHC[ MMK=+?\'[Q[OWMBO;^%=4M;V[N8;/3$F)=Q<+.XDO&,JNHF_=_*%`(!R^,\8' M!(^[%)>6G33=^K_5W8M]_/7Y6MZ?Y(K-X/URY\1:?J\\6G1RQ3F23;/YGE*9 M"Q"%H=QRIQE6CYZ[AQ1!)-: M2W*3),BO*JIY[D/=BE^'RMI_PRO;ST)VE)OO\`YIK\ MK;Z7T-'6/#VMZV(I[W3=%FG`D5(GG7D&T\X0C.`>Y(JTK^FO5 M:O;UNNNZ^XOIJM.W1^O]/O7X6K?-^:^\@O_`.K78TXP+86:6[NRVT M$J^79Y<$&(O`Q)P/X?*.>A]*@^6HI-WM;\&W;TL[;[+5$R5X-+3?\DOS3>W7 M[[>L^!+BYO;&ZL+>P6>.[EN)99"H.6D#!N8G+$*`."A&,!L4J?N33Z*W_!^_ MU]4QS]Z#75_Y:?=Z>ENO1ZOH7]K71\Y(9+5TC22.3D,%E#D$8P00,8I12N[^ M7X*7^:!MZ6Z7_&W^1RVH_#^ZDM[J&RAT^-)%5$4;4_=K,[K$0T3KLVNO!5@" M@&.X-7:_E\]&OPTM^A6BV\_EJG^.M_7KL:&G>!UCTM(-1AM;F?RX8F9@'Q&L MF]H\A%&W&!@*H.!P!Q5W77_A_=2_/4S5U_7F_P!&9USX$U,ZYID]K'IT=G8S M`QX*JT4?G,Y1086(&PA<(Z#L7:WX6_K6WEO>II.-H_P!?UZ7\^TX\ M$W4.F0VHTS2+N"&0'[#-(5@E`\P;F_=D9^<-C:><\]ZA)V5][?=I%77_`("U MTT?R&_BDUU_S;M^*^XM1^#;B"".YB6S.K*NQKEL[BGV?R]F[&[;OP<>@SUJJ MFJ:75._GKU"#2:;Z;>6O3\A/!/A/4/#LDANQ:1Q%W*16[(0,J@_@AB7JI_AS MTY-5?2W]=/ZZ$6U^[]?\UW-`:;K6Z\LS!9+9RW/VB.<73^9_K`V#'Y>!T/\` M$:B.B5^C_6Y4MY-=5;_R6WYE-?`UK'?F]2RL!]O\`WOQMR_=^'0R=4\`:A=6DD4*6#-(\+R[F4>?L MC9-K[X9%(!((RI_X#C-2DTDOZVCKZZ/MOOT*;O)OO_\`)-_JON^99TV$E<=7AE!*GI\F?0BLY1]^Z??]-? MZ:]2HR]RS\O^&_J^VQB#P)KAUJ>[:>S_`'EJT!N!(/-ES$$&[$(?J,G,K#N% M'`%W5Y.VCZ='[R=G\E;9[]B4FN77:WRTMI\]>GWFDO@A)[/,FBZ/8W$*/]CB MMB9([9R5(="47:7;]+6]+^?7;O,TG& MR_KS]?E\^VA;>!;6UNUNXK*P2Y40,)5C^<2*[&1\XSEE(&>IZ'BI2Y8\J_K2 MWYE2]YMON_SNON_#H8S^`-3?07L8;'2;'F'?;VTH,5T4#9>3S(&7<2RGE'^Z M.>A!+6WY=%IT_I#OJ_/KUWOK_75G4^&?#?\`8T&^[6&6],,<+3##-M50-N[: MO&0>@`]ATJI6::[[^>EM=_UW(2U3[?AJW^J^XI:=X*BM8K2WEMK(VL$B2>2J M?)N"RFUW]SC9+[]?QW%)M>$;G4]; MNKC[#ILD=P,"\F-/+VF$+L(V$Y)^;'S'Y<\UER^ZUZ_/32_IOUV1HI)2B M^UOE9W=O5:=/N-+5/#;7>AV.G6AAMQ`%A=5RJF$KLD48Z?*3CW`K2I:0QK=7ZV5SJR%#%M]R4?GI?UV$?PA>MJ#RO9:;N MOW6*>@>&+[2O&&J:I*MJMM=AOF1@9')8$9_=JPP,CYG?VVCBIA[L''S_`,_\ M^U_-A+62?E^B_P`O^`1>%O"VJ:/XFU+4KL6:17:MG[.RDNQ?(9L0H>F?O/(> M>OJH+EI.#WT_!._Y]K]V.>M3F7G^EOZV[(Y__A7&L_V7$]5CO M)66RT\7,,8C_`+2DE?SY3]F5-AP@S'NYR&[?=SS5S]Y2MUO\]>N_Z]!1]UQO MTM\M>GY=!_AWP+>:=9O%?0:>0ER;B")2C(C^7M5L)#$N=W/"Y[Y)I3NXZ;V: M7SM_D]N^VY*^)-[:7^5[_FM[[%'2OAYJUG$WF+IT$N]FB:)E)A+0NAD79!&- MV67MD@EV_7J;?ACPG?Z/X:U/3I MS;QO=%O+CB=#&F4`S\D,0&3R?DS[FKYOA\G?\5I_5MR4K2;\O\]?ZN8VH>#M M4M-5UC5Y/*NK>7]&22W_^12_-/IZ/OU?B/PS?:MX7ATV!X3)'/YCQ MR,HCE7+?*=\4/([=1DX_#Y)?E;^MBXNW-YW_.Y7A\$?Z#:&ZCM)M0@B MAB$\@#LJ+D2*#M'!!(X`!'4#I55%S72ZW^=XV5_GKN^^Y,;K^MO>O^6A'#X. M:&ST\7EG9-%:`!XXMS;$^SF)O+PF2<\X`&?K55)7E*>UT_57Y=O2UOZL.*:L METM\[-[_`'W]?O-SPO#J$6DP2ZB`US<+YDSME&SP$&PCCY0,\\'MZ.7G_3>K M^[9>1*5MMNGHMOOW^9N5)04`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`% M`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0` M4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%` M!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4 M`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`! M0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4` ?%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'__V3\_ ` end GRAPHIC 126 pricewater2.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 pricewater2.gif M1TE&.#EA9`%``/<```````@("!`0$!@8&"`@("@H*#`P,#@X.$!`0$A(2%!0 M4%A86&!@8&AH:'!P<'AX>']_?X>'AX^/CY>7EY^?GZ>GIZ^OK[>WM[^_O\?' MQ\_/S]?7U]_?W^?GY^_O[_?W]____P`````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M`````````````````````"'Y!```````+`````!D`4````C^`$$('$BPH,&# M"!,J7,BPH<.'$"-*G$BQHL6+&#-JW,BQH\>/($.*'$FRI,F3*%.J7,FRIV)1_,W3NWP`2\ M@`=^@#"`+]\''0*#9""7`%D'$!0(V*L`K.*P&@K(%="@@MH,#R;+17#9(P*Y M%0QF4##706FM%`+(?7"WH`>X<2F\YDA`+@>$K.6J71K!K'&S$:9FP#"!5`L:E'4$>]!;77Y==%Z-A.%[$7US))73!9AI:J")! M%E1XI$$<2&!F;2"H&8%7<&X)`(`&:197BP>=EAT(@T&`YT`-Q`5!0QB$"4$% M0UJ4@845/"E0!Q:R29`&%=)XT)?8(61@7*0QY$$%%4:0`4(<4%#A!'\29*JA M-*X*IU?^%U3X`7=A3I"H8&56RI"=5^XU0$;TQ47G047&2$"7()P&P`$%82`B M98E)V9][!64P%W0&;1#7F4D","A!"0C;$&.&*<`@11&(!N:3Q4HZ4)'8*E1D MIP5U`*.EMH6[UP'VK<:7N04IRU<`R$K+EWS%[D5`:H)!H&Y<"J1JD,&]RI61 M7G&Y6Q#& MA`1)>:Y"RB)0X7H$@"6>Q'S^]L&Y'N@[0`,0."!:`MIU^^M!)0.@L4%!NF;0 MI@`HL-`%YX$'`;DI"A0;B@Q4**4`]IV',@0-2)L>"#Z5#;- M:87DRGR0M`J\.@$##HB'00.B983A0C3/-I`'YQ$@T(D,@T"N`7\*SH&V0A84 MJ+<&>2#;LS8+](%LW(Y64%R:-V1GY\'."<*S(PO4)`##<6`G`]IY\.RW(&Q* M;T&,U4YY;@9I<"^2M(\ZD+4`:&Y!7`6$KF_1KLL5+WXF>^!CZ0>=SC,(')Q' MX*:=@R#=U@-)>^0"9*E8@9X0?!!L1L]:TGU@Q#F"Y,X#OZO-I@3P,SXAR$8` M$`#7T&,0^N0G+F,B2)*NIK,`R.9J`B&=`!?B&X*(9E"BB9]`,`6`@>#&:Y,R M&8/T=3>#B$AL`ZD`_B0T`VW+=Q8C MDV^,F!!E(4M^%G,B#`=RQ2Y``[$013)/)`C!+0)`D&$G5RL9X! MN3U;&`R!:!`!SA`K@W81$Z M8A`A'0AE`T@'0A!@[HE=`X$3=9>0TZD2!+5D'@!<4R3D"41$."J9:\B508RE M9GLHNF@'MC3"307``]C+HU)11RY;%J1;FL->>0Y".K"(Z)@&U!RF!-"V'4*J M,=`\$2`-`A]\>?-'67.JYR"6Q+BL5*A1#.&)DO-/B4B)60]`D($LX*-G"4!* M&)'30#<@+0-\@*L#R6E%P5(XDL7%D56,BR0'TB1;.K%%11K^&5;58J]S!@F0 MP5%+L,1Z5G*J32[)*1))"V(GZHC&E42R6)%X=)#MR;5F!J%.M[H92HV^2X8) MD9)9526^P0(@?L$2P&^"T[J!0)"Y(-#`LPB0F*R%C7X(D1*)%*`;`2`(`J`3 M5'`PDK6U0@D",%H`6+)F`%#13`!XP@UUGH5#7F84`JN"@(I..\E.875DX<+1 M=;X5+.39"2P80RZ@T#,!"*SG6T'JHD!$XP%<^O6O$2PL`+HI$.E,:%.WJO$S MH72MA.B+MQ.C($**!1W<6"\#5HHE"-(8@1)7"%M%6EAD=H2GWV7OL%XT$@@* MX`'_?EHZ&0E3IZO//V%[Z:8I2\5"X0UR='7:@EB M)6'B4J`).=%P#W*B%^P6-X8`*$`%O)(KZ$A)//:R*`37)QT< ML@:0-NT4II;$NI+&)P-QPN@RD M,&IA(5\<&2R2GJ?@K?U`&@N"W*R"X-,#D(!VL.=U@0AQ>6 M10#PT4(6@38/<7@#836U(270\3O^'KAU_]B405F)'8F@RI$5/88==IU.%($`Z$M,!E8,@Q<8>HV80H@&*`S%3 M`[5VU)%J,W@?B)*WA'*-)/!8$;2R)1\,53"1$<3L5"Y%B& MI%B,&Q!0`J!0Z254$M"'%H%1"J@0)P)$7K55Q-@F$4D0#N)2;W<0$)0`A8%$ M-])')`G^/@+9D79B23!3F.B(C&!E)&DMD(0Q`%@<`%D84-G28R-:!7$)LR M`$URAEPD9*]G,O'2`4+I''8R```B4DNYEZ"6?+*C$/I"-1Q8&&FC3[7!`5:R MA0*A/`HQEQ"P0V0A>NHX5@'@5!R@+'])7!7C*Q:!?5A6$/UE$,$Q`/JB31@@ M&@*``*&D&Z^(5ZDX%\(D$'-Q).$B`/2#2T."/9NWCCX';,1!#*\H_)TA^:LW8#E8Q# M])[`Y1!N5C'XR1"UEG$$42@00(X;8"B@Z`%2TQ@+,!Q.1GIG@E'I*279`2D0 M<)0-LR%(*8RYPDD14"'!>!#M*'/SV3)N.'*^$@':X:&!Q1"A1(;.\0!].`#4 MQYOP,0`+<)1J`@$>2#*D9R;I92$)@0$*0#$+8*,'$96W:3+,YQ`"`U\?H0', M,1$:F';YARX951&1N4H_PI088*6A!2<-Y"$M1YX#8*8@P#'6U2!>8:8L,A,M MEJ42(2>]$@"[V1"B<9TY(2)S:)_J*)*"#Q$<#\!N%/"0!Q$A"Z<:#Q(2.D(P MI20!DR$`S7F!V+4;OB,!"N`=99$`$C"E#A%0PL@6%#,7!4H3%M"'C4&JY[A4 M;:$`'LJI$H%]<H0ZN*&X8H5RK GRAPHIC 127 logolrg.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 logolrg.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`2`!(``#_VP!#``8$!`0%!`8%!08)!@4&"0L(!@8( M"PP*"@L*"@P0#`P,#`P,$`P.#Q`/#@P3$Q04$Q,<&QL;'"`@("`@("`@("#_ MVP!#`0<'!PT,#1@0$!@:%1$5&B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@ M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("#_P``1"`"``:(#`1$``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'``!``("`P$```````````````8'!`4!`P@"_\0`6A```0,"!`($"`8+"@L) M`````0`"`P0%!@<1$B$Q$Q1!40@B(S)A<8&1-F)SH;&S%18S-#="4G)UDJ(D M-6-TD[*TPM'2%R4F0U2"@Y2CP>,8.%-55F6$P]3_Q``:`0$``P$!`0`````` M`````````0(#!00&_\0`*1$!``(!!`$#!`,!`0$```````$"$0,$$C$A!4%1 M%"(R81,S0A5Q(__:``P#`0`"$0,1`#\`]4H"`@("`@(-)B[%%)AFT.N=5%+- M'O;$V.'34N=RYD`#AS6.MJ\(S*^G3E.%4W'/C$$KB+=;Z>EC['2E\[_FZ-JY MM_4;>SWQL?EHY\W?,37&.R6XRCD*BK.P M'U1LX^]P6>IZC$3]J]-E/NB=7G%CR=QV5L5,/R88&:?\02%>.V^U&]=K1AMS M4QZ#N%Z>?1T;9XO;-1NU_XNGJ/S#"VS^%OQNW-:[O`/'FNGV\3[4@@("` M@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@C^.<-/Q)AZ> MU1RM@?*^)S9G`N#=CPX\!IKPU6&XT^=<--*_&$*9ND-EHFZ=O5XR?>02O370I'LRG4M\N MU^%\-/&U]IHG#N-/%_=5OXJ_$(YV^5>YGV/+BRVS>ZVMBNM1KU*&C<8"2.;W M-;XNQO;JWT+P;NNE6.O+T[>U[3^E-PP33/$<+'2RD$AC&ESCH-20!QX!*%_1O+?0[Y_[%;3QGSTK:)QX>A\.X0R\FMT%= M:[725%-.W=%/)'TSB/29=QU!X'N7>T]'3F,Q#D:FI?/ENCAC#9&AM5&1W=7B M_NK;^*OQ"G.WRP*W+S!-8TB6S4K=?QHHQ"[WQ[2L[;;3M[+1K6CW1&[Y&6=T MT<]HJY*;:]KGTT_E8RT.!(#N#V\/6O+;85]F\;NWNL\=BZ$/(Y4@@("`@("` M@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@X*`$'*#%N5=36^A MGKJI^RGIHW2RN^*T:JM[\8R4B9G#S!B*^W#$E]FN$X<^:I>&4].WB6LUTCB: M/1K[25\[JWG4MEV=.D5JO?+G`5/AFV"29K9+S4M!K)^>WNB9Z&_.5V=MMXI& M?=S-;6FT_I!>$H[@X\'>E>/?;;'W5>K:Z_M M+$R9Q>^W7?[!53_W#<3K3Z\HZG_J#@?3HJ;#<8GC[2G=:68Y+VU7:#2X:I[:QVC[E-X_IB@\=W[98N?O]3C3'R]6UIFR#9-6%MRQ=UN5FZG MM<9GX\NE<=L7_,^Q>+8Z7*^?AZMU?C7'R]`@+NN6Q[C;Z:OH)Z&J;TE/4L=% M,P]K7C0JMZYC"8G#RK6TM9:+K-2N)95V^=S-X_+B?XKA[@5\U:.-ICX=FOW5 MR]16&Z,NEEHKDSS:N".;AV%S>(]A7TFE;-8EQ[1B<-BKJB`@("`@("`@("`@ M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(!*#X,L8.A<-?6%'*##C MIHORA[PHYQ\F'!FCT\\>\)RCY,*/SUK>EQ+04P.K*>DW>V5YU^9@7(]1MFT. MCLZXJDN0U&UF'[C6?CU%9T>OQ8HFZ?.\KT>G5^V98[RWW+/"Z+R!Y(/.N;M$ M*;'M:0>_13!A]J00$!` M0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!!P4'FS,\G[?;O MQ/W1G;_!-7S^\M/\DNIMH^R&JI<,XDK*=E126VKGIY!K'-'&]S'<=.!'I65: M7F/&6EK4B79]IN+_`/R>N_D9%,Z6I^T?R4:^OM]PH)A!7T\M-/MW=',US';3 MR.CNQ4M68GRUBT3TO+(_;]I3M.8K)M?,M[ M6KGRR/M.Q?K^\]=_(R?V*W\.I^U>=&%<+3=[:6-N%+/2.D!,8F:]F[3GIN[E M34K:O>6E>,]+7R`UZM>]?_$@^AZZ?IT^)>#>1YA;:Z;QB`@("`@("`@("`@( M"`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(/E!YLS/^'MX^49]4U?/;S^R7 M7VWX0NC*KX`6CY-_USUV-G_5#G;C\Y2S0KTL5(9\T3F7ZV5FGBU-,Z/7TPOU M^B4+C^I1YB70V74MYD)7-=9[I;R?'AJ1.!\6:,-^F):^G6^V89;N/N6HNF\C MAW)!YPS7KQ68\N6TZLI^CIV_ZC!N_;)7S^^MG4_\=3;1BBV\H:(TV`Z$D:&I M=+4>Q[SM/M:`NKLHQI0\6YG[Y31>M@IK/W[]LGR<_P!+%R/4_9T-C[LO(#[V MO?RD'T/5_3>I4WO<+;74>(0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$ M!`0$!`0$!`0$!!\H/-F9_P`/;Q\HSZIJ^>W?]DNMMOPA=&5/P`L_RC; M7Q;_`-53EEBJ'#F)63U3B*"K9U>J<.30X@MD[.#"./H)7+VFMPOGVE[MQI\H M>D6G4:\P>17T#DM5BC$=%A^RSW2KU+(N#(QIN?([@UHU(YE9ZVI%*Y7TZBLZE_W+KSBM7J.UVZ* MW6ZEH(?N-)"R&/U1M#?^2^CI7C&'&M.6459"FL_?OVR?)S_2QI4WOLMM=1XA`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!` M0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$'R@\V9G_#V\?*,^J:OGMW_`&2ZVV_!=&57P`L_REB^'M#AM(U:>!!Y%0/.&8^#),,WMW1-_Q36.+Z%_8W7S MH#Z6=G>/:N!N]OPLZNWU>4)=EKFK2TE"VSXAF,<=.W]QUSM7>(W_`#4FFIU` M\T]O)>O:;R,<;//K[6>X1',/'D^*;B.CW0VFEUZG`>!//65_QB.0[![5YMUN M.<_IZ=OH\(_:=9,8)?2QG$E?'MFJ&;;=&[FV)WG2>C?R'H]:]FPV^/NGMYMW MJY\?"V%TGB<%!36?OW[9/DY_I8N3ZG[/?LO=E>#_`/>U[^4@_FO5_3>I5WGL MMQ=-XA`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$'R4 M'F_-2&:+'5T?)&YC)7L=$]S2&O'1-'BGM]BX&\K_`/275V_X,["6;=ZP_;X; M8ZCAK:&GU$32XQ2M!)=IN&X'B>T*^AOII&,*VVL62^GS\M!^^+54QN[1&^-_ MT[%ZH]1K\,9V5OEWNSYPWIXMOK"[N/1#^N5/_1I\(^CM\HQBW.&*^6V:V,LD M?5IN,]JX:Q[W;&-+W::Z`:G0S+NMU7'2UD%4ZGCK&1.#NKS;C&_3L=M+=?4K5GC.43]T?"VJ#/NDVM%=9 MY(R.;J>5KV^YX9HNI3U*/>'AMLI^6><^,-]EOK2?5%_?5O\`HT^$?1V^6!69 M^TH!ZG99'N_%,TS6#]EKU6?48]H3]%^U=XOQI=L4544]P;%$RG:X011#0-#N M>KG:D\@O!K[B=5Z]/2K2%D9!03LH;O*^)[(II(>BD,QA:^JZ+QFJ#E`0$'!.B#E`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$!`0$'&J!J M@Y0$!!QJ@Y0$!!K;]B"T6&W27&[53*2DCX;WGSG'DQ@YN<>P!,(F<*EJ_"`O M-TJWTN#,-3W`M_SLS7R.]9AI]VT>MZTX*;EVON(FX=O-AEM5Q,3Y=YWM`$?/=',UCQSX<4S`]ON=JJVI$]IBTPAMRR:P16'6&GEH"?]%DT'ZKQ(T> MY>:VRTY]L-HW-X_;0SY!6XG]SWF=@[.DC8_^;L6%O3:_+6-Y/PZ1D!'N\:^. MV^BG&O\`/5?^;^UOK)^&TM^16&87!U95U=81^+N;$S]AN[]I:5]/I[^5+;RR M:V3"^'[)'LM=!%2Z^<]K=9'?G/.KC[2O931K7J'GMJ6MVUE\RVP=>7.FJ;-]/O#%&0#->-\=IZ*?_J*O_-_:?K?TS:3(2Q,.M53\)-9LLL%6MS9(K:R:9O*6J\L[7O`=JT>P+TTV>G7V8VU[2E(8UH`: M-`.0')>F&,H/G;45%/EM=):>5\,K3!MDC<6.&L[.3FZ%356S)RBFFFRYLZMNFF MO4*;:7-UY&5Q(;&#Z>/H4Q"LVP@\>;V;MW'3V+"`ZF[C'+)#42@CT2;J=A]B MOPA7E+E^;.<=M'2W?!NZG;]T?%!5,`'I>'5`'N3A".#[Z^-Q8]MOJBU[3H01"[0@CD4A$H+X.U75U6!:F2JGDJ)!<)1OE>Y[M M.BBX:N)/:K6A6D^%I*JX@X8L@DF?%A2U>,P-X:0[M! MIW2U&A.[L;RY<=>H9?DONSV2UV:ACH+731TE)$-&11-T'K)YN<>TGB5DUAGH M.LP1E[9"T&1NH:\CQAKST*#[U4#6T.);#<+A4VZAKX*FOHB15TL;PZ2,M=L= MO:.(T=P4HRTXS4P`^\1V:.\PRW"65L$<<39)&F5SMH;TC&F/7<=/.4X,I--/ M##$Z65[8XV<7O>0UH'I)X*"42KLW\MJ*8PS7V!SV\#T+9)Q[XFO'SJ>$HY0V MF'\<83Q$YS++&OTX\]%&$YAO`42U]-B.Q55UGM%/7P M2W.F!=44;'@RL`T!+FH6U,9TDCB;).6GN=T+7@' MT*>,HFT-EA[&6%\1M>ZRW&&M,?&2-A(D;Z71NVO`]BB8E,2W292Z:NLI:*GD MJJN9E/31#=+-*X,8T#M+CP"0(>_.G+%LO1&^QZZZ;A'.6?KB/;\ZMQE7E#7Y MR7*AN.4URK*">.KI933F.:%P>UPZ=G(A*1Y1?IF955U)0946>LK)F4]+!3O? M--(=K&M$K]22>047CRFG26VF]VF\4G6[75Q5M+N+.F@>'LW-YC4=HU4869R# M5W#$^'[=<*>W5UPIZ:OJ]O5:621K9)-[MC=C3Q.KN"&7-YQ)8;(R)]WKX:!D MQ(B=4/#`XMXD#7N2J);+7AJ./9P8P>LE!$VY MTY9&;H?L[%NY;C'.&?RACV?.K<95YPE]+6TM931U5)*RHII0'131.#V.:>T. M&H*JLP9L4X>ANS;/+<:>.ZOTV4+I&B4[AJW1O/B$,MH#J@Q[C<:&VT9UVE!LT!!#,U\;'".%):RGT^ MR=4>K6]KN0D=Q,A]$;07*:QE%IPAF3>5U,^CCQ=B6/KUSN/[IHXZGRFQK_&$ MSP[SI7\P3R"M-E8JN3:J+N=$'Q'#'$W;&UK&ZDZ-&@U<=2>'>4'V2@TF(,;8 M4P]M%ZN<%'(_BV%SMTI'>(V[GD>G1(A&8:J@S@RWKZAM/!?(6RO.C>G;+`"? MSIF,;\ZMQE$7A+FR,>T.8=S7<6N'(CO"JM"(9P_@SO\`_%_Z[5->U;],+(K\ M&-J_.JOZ3(IOVBG2>/E9&USWD-8P%SG$Z``=I*JNA]9G'EK1U#J>:^1&1AVN MZ)DTS=1S\>)CV_.IXRKR9-\Q!9;Y@&_5=HK(JVF^Q]6#)"[=H>@=P<.8/H*$ M](EX-OP!J?TC+]3"IMVKI]+756@@BV9UQ?;LO[]5,X2"DDC81WR^3'SO4PK? MI$O!SMD5+@>:L`\I7UDA+OBP@1-'[)4ZB--:P5%VEN&-L(6ZLDHJ^]45+5Q: M=+!-/&Q[=P#AJTD'B""K<91RATQYA8$ED9''B"WODD(:QHJ8B2XG0`<4P9;\ MJJ7EYWV9J,RL6X=LYZ.MQ'73T1J-2.B@%2Z:=QTT/%C2/5JML>&,]K;L&16" MK/)0U+145%PH98ZAE4Z4MUEB<'M\FW1@;J.2IS7X)/C;"=/BO#\UEJ9WTT$\ MD3Y)8P'/VQ2!^@W<`3IS419::M5:\G\N;?3-A;98:D@:&:J\O(?67Q[.T-=L+7-Y*];99VKA>]HN$=Q MM5'<(QM960QSM;W"1@=I\ZRQY;/.>(I[VW.'$MJL?B7&_P"VVQSZD=$R8022 MR<./F1.6OC#'W6UAS)7`5HMS*:>W1W.HT\M5U;0]SCV[6^:P>@*G)IQA6>:. M#FY=7VUXNPSNIZ5U1HZEW':R5HZ3HP>?1RL:06GN5ZSF%)C#T#;ZR*MH*>MA M^XU43)HM?R9&AP^8K+#50N8=7=,P\S8<%4$QBMEMD+9G#U6SVJZXBP=6<*FED,[6_&A=U>8^W1A4V M5TUX%4:*+L31C'/ZNN?GV_#X(C=S&M/Y&/3URN>\>I:3&(8QYL[O"?\`WKL/ MRU3]4U11:Z[?Q.[@J-'GNJAN&<&8=13">2GPK9"1N9^3N+0YNO#I9W-.A_%: M%KTQ[E:#\G)XOUF[PHHG4A=E#5P5E'!5P.W05,;9HG=[7MW`^XK.6L*N\("XS26>SX8I M?&K+[71M#!VLB1MW]`_;NT[# M)%(QRM973\>%X$]RS;*0P3_E7GI?,0^?168/AIG\QJW]RQZ>AP$CUI/3..UX M+-H%!0GA`F2Z8TPO8-=&/`'MK*AD7S"-:59W[7Q%%'%&R.-NUD8#6-'(`<`% MFT?%764M'32U57*R"FA:7S32$-:UHYN<3R`0:/\`PC8!_P#4-O\`]YB_M4\9 M5Y0S[3B;#UY=*RTW*FKW0`&9M/*V0M#M=N[:3IKHHF,)RTF:&-1A#"DMQC`= M7SN%-;V'ETSP3N=Z&-:7'U:*U8RBTX5QE?D_3WJF9BS%YDKYKEY>&DD)\9KN M4LYUW.+^;6\@%:95K5-\1Y*8#O%"Z""WLM=3IY*KI!L(.G#':K6\JUG"PLX?P9 MX@_B_P#7:J5[6OTPLBOP8VK\ZJ_I,BF_:*=(;GOB.YW2^6[`-H<=]6Z(UH!T MWOG=MBB?\0>>[V=RM6/=%I]DPPODG@BSVUD%;01W:M('6*NJ;OU.G$1L\UC> MX*LWE:*(1F1@/[1148FPKNBM=;')07FUZGHQ'5,,8 MPS.9.]C?$8V,:-'`>*P*T74XJ>S+P58<)XWP[1V9DC(:@PS2])(9#N%2&C0G MEP5ZSX5MV],=JR:J*RUI8Y<^,5S.&IIG5SH_075+&:^XE:6Z91VO59-4=QKC MNP80MPK+L]Q=*2VFI8='32D<]C26C0=I)T"M%43;"MX,W\SK_P"5PKA`/HW? M7 MAQ/8IC&5+9PO'`'P'P_^CZ;ZIJSEM7I5F'X&/\).[%PU,3)7L]!ZO$WZ'%7_ M`,L_]+S6;55/A(`?:#!KV7&'3^3E5]/MGJ=)W@?X&6#]'4OU+565X4]D*P56 M86*;A)QG#9>/RU47.^K5[=,Z=K[[%FU5UG[213Y;5DCQXU-/3RQ'N<91'_-D M*O3M34Z;')W\&5A^1=]:]1;M->E?XS'VH9YV>_M&RAO>QE4_\75VE--KZ@8Y M%:.E)\2MC&^(&X>PG<[Q^/2PGH1WS/\`$B'Z[@J1&6DSA!_!YP\:#!LEVF&M M3>9C()#S,,/DV>]V]WM5KSY5I'AI?"?_`'KL/RU3]4U30NM;%U5+281O-5$= M):>WU,L9^,R!SA\X5/=;V>?,I,=W;"]HK8;?AFIO/69PZ2KI^ET&U@:(SLBD MY<3S[5I:&593O_#ABW3X!7#W5'_YU7A"W*4)Q1>\58KQM8;T,+7"VR4$E/&[ M6&>0%K:CI-Q=T3---Q4^(A6V9E<>;^'_`+-Y?W6%C=U12,Z[3]^^G\<@>ES- MS?:J5GRTMTP$"X^?; M\*4^@/9TP'T]+*?U%/4([EB9F#[5LW\.8M;XE)7[8*UW9JWR,I/9]QE;^JD= M$^)RL['M_%@P==KJ':2P4[A3_+2>)%^VX*E8\K3*(^#[A\VW`K:^4>7O$SJG M<>?1-\G%[]I=[5>ZM(6>J+B"A,]W&VYBX6O4@\@P1.)_BE4)'_LR!:4Z97[7 MTUP=Q'$'D5FU8=XM5)=[756RLU-+61.AG#26NV/&AT(Y(('_`-G[+?\`T>I_ MWF16YJ<$+\&AH%WQ,T$O(^6IPW0:Z1/ZP\^LF-FOL!*G M33J+RI8(J>FAIXFAL4+&QQM'(-:-`/_3"R,_!A:OSZG^DR*;]HT^D#M8%; MX3%8Z;CU=\AC_P!E1-8WZ5;_`"I'Y+\6;9'&2"5@DAE:62,/(M< M-"#ZP@\\84N&1LL$H#XY6'"SAJ\_P"8\$5[SYM%GNGC6T"EA$+O-OD9?J8%?_*G^ MEWK-HJKPC_@!!^D(/JY5?3[9ZG2.MW&=L MLD?=3P>,7'UR;?G5Z0SO*59.?@RL/R+OK7JE^UZ=-)X0>'OLG@4U\8_=%GE; M4[ASZ)WDY?9XP=_JJ^G*NI'A#,Q<856*L#X,LU&[?<+^YAJV_P`)`X4_'T&< MEW^JIB,*6\KVM-MIK9:Z2VTPTIZ*%D$0^+&W:/H6;:%.>$_^]=A^6J?JFK2B MEUQ76@;<;164#CHVLIY(''T2L+/^:HLI;P=;RVW5UYPE7GH:\2]-#&[F9(1T M50SUMV`^]7NSHO0$=ZSRU<\$'R]C7,+'##V(*&RVN<>!,8XTL-8=* M&DBFKJ9I[6TNKV:>E\$@]RTMYAE7PD?@]6RH-@N6)*WQJV_5;WN>>UD3G`GV MRN>HNG3AL,_H1J;=.Z*=P_%94#Q7^H21M'M33E-X6+@C$U+B M7"]ON\#P72QAM2T?B3LX2L/J+=*1QFG=ZNDTC]>BTB,0QSFRT,X/P9W_\`B_\`7:J5[:VZ861?X,;5^?4_ MTF1396G2`8JE&$?"`I+S4^3M]SZ-[I3YH9-%U65Q_,>-Q]"M[*S/W+]U!6;5 M!!4W-AH*9G:XSC:\C\V/<5:L*VGPTG@X?`.J_24WU,*7[5T M^EK*K00$&@QE@FPXLMG4KM%NZ,[Z:I9XLL+_`,ICOI!X%3$X1-X%3%L(_CF5X%9M5:X) MR^O]FS+Q%B2L=3FW73K'51&]SI/*U#9&[VEH`\5O>IFRO%9:A97&:N5;\6RT MUUM54**_40#8Y'%P9(QKM[`7-XM+U M^4TVOK.UPU[_`+FK>%<6?%WR6Q)V)K7DS>-'&T:LVZ,685CME MJ,(J65<(#N/C#L5JSA6T92?#5OGMV'+7;JC;T]'204\I9Q;N MBC#3H>'#4*LK0B&:.5-+C"."MI)Q0WVD&V"J()8]C3N$YWK6DV\,JU\KM`X+-JK;.C+^ M_P",Z*UPVAT#7T#9&O9QCD].AU5ZV9VHUD$_A+4\/5C3454>0JWFFU]? M!\8/M8I^T^YOL"X:S19B'[-8RO$<\(@?#%;HG>*USRWQBV-D47`-])43,)B) M61V*BZGLV\H<08DQ&R\6!]-&Z2E$%8V>1T>YS"=I\5K]06$-/J5XLI:N5EX4 ML<5BP[;K/'II14[(G$=KP/'=[7$E53#/KZ&GKJ&IHZ@;J>JB?#,WO9(TMT$PR2?EEH+2QY/XS/<5>+*6HC\= MH\)*T#J]+717.!G!CW/I9#^M4-BD]Y3PC[G+K7X2MSUAGKH;;$_SG!U+&?UH M&32>XIX1]R5Y4975&">OU%7<&UM7<6Q-D9&PM8SHB\\'.)<\GI.>@46G*:4P MG=QH**X44U#6Q">DJ6.BGA=YKF.&A!56BF9,JLR_N;9J*H.LE!4EH M<0/-#^D!CDVZ\'ZM42RX3#LK[;X1.(8OL?6.I+-1R^+42Q/B:2P\#XT1G MDX_%T41@G*;Y;9:6K!5"YD3^M7.J`ZY7.&FH;RCC;J=K![SVJDV7K7#9Y@6. MNOV#KI9Z$L%760]'"926LUW`\2`=.7L<5\55=6TD\-HMS3Y"*62-S6/?L`8`'$'1H/'0D\-%3DOQREF3^#;QA+ B"\ULNQA=4R5CZ@&!Q>S:Z.-HXD-XZL/8HGRF(PG2A9__V3\_ ` end GRAPHIC 128 exhibit99-92x16x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-92x16x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`%"`GX#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#M-1NYK8VR M6\,VE\M8U0-$,'["MYKKM.6) M`'L.@S4-OH]G;3^=$)PVYF(-S(RDDDGY2V.I)Z=30`R*^N!93O,L331@,NS( M4[@"`>O3.,]^O'2HSJ%VI52(2T1/G$*0'&X+\HSQUSSGICOFK<>FVL4#0)&? M+8DLI=CG(Q@\\C'`'08&.@I!IEH!"/+)\DEE)=B221#_`,\H_P#OD4`;GV^S_P"?N#_OX*/M]G_S M]P?]_!6'Y$/_`#RC_P"^11Y$/_/*/_OD4`;GV^S_`.?N#_OX*/M]G_S]P?\` M?P5A^1#_`,\H_P#OD4>1#_SRC_[Y%`&Y]OL_^?N#_OX*/M]G_P`_<'_?P5A^ M1#_SRC_[Y%'D0_\`/*/_`+Y%`&Y]OL_^?N#_`+^"C[?9_P#/W!_W\%8?D0_\ M\H_^^11Y$/\`SRC_`.^10!N?;[/_`)^X/^_@H^WV?_/W!_W\%8?D0_\`/*/_ M`+Y%'D0_\\H_^^10!N?;[/\`Y^X/^_@H^WV?_/W!_P!_!6'Y$/\`SRC_`.^1 M1Y$/_/*/_OD4`;GV^S_Y^X/^_@H^WV?_`#]P?]_!6'Y$/_/*/_OD4>1#_P`\ MH_\`OD4`;GV^S_Y^X/\`OX*/M]G_`,_<'_?P5A^1#_SRC_[Y%'D0_P#/*/\` M[Y%`&Y]OL_\`G[@_[^"C[?9_\_<'_?P5A^1#_P`\H_\`OD4>1#_SRC_[Y%`& MY]OL_P#G[@_[^"C[?9_\_<'_`'\%8?D0_P#/*/\`[Y%'D0_\\H_^^10!N?;[ M/_G[@_[^"C[?9_\`/W!_W\%8?D0_\\H_^^11Y$/_`#RC_P"^10!N?;[/_G[@ M_P"_@H^WV?\`S]P?]_!6'Y$/_/*/_OD4>1#_`,\H_P#OD4`;GV^S_P"?N#_O MX*/M]G_S]P?]_!6'Y$/_`#RC_P"^11Y$/_/*/_OD4`;GV^S_`.?N#_OX*/M] MG_S]P?\`?P5A^1#_`,\H_P#OD4>1#_SRC_[Y%`&Y]OL_^?N#_OX*/M]G_P`_ M<'_?P5A^1#_SRC_[Y%'D0_\`/*/_`+Y%`&Y]OL_^?N#_`+^"C[?9_P#/W!_W M\%8?D0_\\H_^^11Y$/\`SRC_`.^10!N?;[/_`)^X/^_@H^WV?_/W!_W\%8?D M0_\`/*/_`+Y%'D0_\\H_^^10!N?;[/\`Y^X/^_@H^WV?_/W!_P!_!6'Y$/\` MSRC_`.^11Y$/_/*/_OD4`;GV^S_Y^X/^_@H^WV?_`#]P?]_!6'Y$/_/*/_OD M4>1#_P`\H_\`OD4`;GV^S_Y^X/\`OX*/M]G_`,_<'_?P5A^1#_SRC_[Y%'D0 M_P#/*/\`[Y%`&Y]OL_\`G[@_[^"C[?9_\_<'_?P5A^1#_P`\H_\`OD4>1#_S MRC_[Y%`&Y]OL_P#G[@_[^"G1W=M*X2.XB=CT57!)K!\B'_GE'_WR*=:1HFKV M>Q%7._.!C^&@#HJ***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`,_3?^/[5O^OM?_1$5:%9^F_\`']JW_7VO_HB*M"@#/U+_`(_M)_Z^ MV_\`1$M:%9^I?\?VD_\`7VW_`*(EK0H`****`"BJ$-U.VK3VTOEK&J!HA@[F M'_7CI49U"[4JI$):(GSB%(#C<%^49XZYYSTQWS0! MK5R\O_(T:G_UR@_D]=17+R_\C1J?_7*#^3T`6****`"BBJ]_=?8K&>Y*;_*0 MMMSC/XT`6**YS2O%L%]OZ5K'5K+;N24RC_IDC/G M\@:`+M%4O[2#+F*SO)/;RMG_`*%B@7=XZDIISJ>PEE49_(F@"[15)7U-\YAM M(AV_>,__`+**18=28_O+R!1Z1P'^98T`7J*I"QG+9DU*Z8?W5"*/T7/ZT'2X M&;=)+=2'_:N'Q^0.*`+C,%&6(`]S6#KWB0:5+$D$<=QO!+?/]W'TK2_LC3B= MS64#GU=`Q_6F7NAZ=?%#/;`[,A=I*]?I0`_1[XZEID-VT8C,F?E!SC#$?TJ[ M6=%HT%I&JV#RVI7^ZQ8'Z@Y!_G3OM-Y:\7=OYJ#_`):VX)_$IU'X9H`OT5%; MW4%TF^"59`.#@\@^A':I:`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBH+B]MK7`GGCC)X`+4O\` MX]S^0-'E:C-_K+B*W4C[L*;F'_`FX_\`':`+I(4$D@`=S50ZI:%BL,AN'!QM M@4O@^Y'`_&D&E6I.ZS_X' M_P"@T46W_(7L_P#@?_H-`'04444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`9^F_\?VK?]?:_P#HB*M"L_3?^/[5O^OM?_1$5:%`&?J7 M_']I/_7VW_HB6M"L_4O^/[2?^OMO_1$M:%`%&36M*BD:.34[-'0E65IU!4CJ M",U):ZE87DACM+VVG<#<5BE5B!ZX!]Z\9\0?\C#J?_7W+_Z&:Z#X8_\`(PW' M_7HW_H:4`>CI8P)>O=A6\UUVG+$@#V'09J*#2;*WE$L<3;P6;+2,W+$DG!/7 M+-],GU-7J*`*D>FVL4#0)&?+8DLI=CG(Q@\\C'`'08&.@I!IEH!"/+)\DEE) M=B22GW%K+#':6T+NI59%A7*GUK1HH`Y2W\$0HY,]ZTB%2 M,+'M(/KG)_E3VT-[#[MO!/"!PWV99"/JO#'\&/TKJ**`,"WBMI$9UTBPND4X M)ME3<#WRK`8/MFI@-"#!9K*VMV)QB>V"9/L2,'\*T+BP@G?S<&.;&!+&=K_G MW^AJ`M>VR[9HQ?0]V0!7`]UZ'\,?2@!ZZ7IC*&6PLR#T(A7_``I?[)TW_H'V MG_?E?\*@@MM-NBS6G[F0'+"%C$P/^THQ^HJ7[/?PD>3>+*O]V>/G_OIQ#UA1)!^FUOTK;HH`R;>#19Y/*%C:QS=XI(%5OR(Y^HXJU_9 M.F_]`^T_[\K_`(5/<6T-TFR>)9%Z@,.A]O2JOV6[M>;.Y\Q.T-P<@?1^H_'- M`#_[)TW_`*!]I_WY7_"C^R=-_P"@?:?]^5_PI%U*-&"7D;VKG@&3[A^C#C\\ M'VJZ"",CD4`4_P"R=-_Z!]I_WY7_``H_LG3?^@?:?]^5_P`*N44`4_[)TW_H M'VG_`'Y7_"C^R=-_Z!]I_P!^5_PJY10!3_LG3?\`H'VG_?E?\*/[)TW_`*!] MI_WY7_"KE%`%/^R=-_Z!]I_WY7_"C^R=-_Z!]I_WY7_"KA.!DU5DU.QBD\M[ MJ+S#_`&RWY#F@!O]DZ;_`-`^T_[\K_A1_9.F_P#0/M/^_*_X4W^TMZYMK.[F MYQ_J_+'_`(_BEWZE(2%@MH5QPSR%S^0`_G0!#>VNC6%LUQ6MPN,YQU'L:75-(O-2L3!-J"@D@D+"%4\_4G]:AT3 MPS%IS2M=&*Z+%2FZ/[A&>>?K0!+C0V(%O86]R3_SPM@X_P"^L8'YT?V:)O\` M5Z/I]LI'WIHU=A_P%1C_`,>K9``&`,`=A2T`8P\-6+MNN423OM2)8E'_`'R, M_F35Q='TQ5`&GVN!ZQ*?Z5=HH`I_V3IO_0/M/^_*_P"%']DZ;_T#[3_ORO\` MA5RB@"G_`&3IO_0/M/\`ORO^%']DZ;_T#[3_`+\K_A5RB@"G_9.F_P#0/M/^ M_*_X4?V3IO\`T#[3_ORO^%7**`*?]DZ;_P!`^T_[\K_A1_9.F_\`0/M/^_*_ MX5N*FHMO^0O9 M_P#`_P#T&@#H****`(HPQC4F1LD#L/\`"G;3_P`]&_3_``HB_P!4G^Z*QKC_ M`(2K[1+]F_L;R-Y\OS/-W;<\9QQG%`&SM/\`ST;]/\*-I_YZ-^G^%,T`=*5(!)D8 M`=2Z69>FZ-E8?I61Y'B&ZMKF'41I;1O$0BP&0%FR/E;=QM( MR#]:62"^N96=X+V*)I8U$*2QQE%`(8[D8$KST))ST'2@#;VG_GHWZ?X4QW1' M1'N-KR$A%)4%B!DX]>!FL-;?45MY/,@OI";E7"QW(#;<$-R9.GMQU'`(X:EE MJ5P^F&]CN-T:KYSK.!LS"Z,VZ4^:2(\,OSDC?I_A1M/\`ST;]/\*IZ:L\4+">*?S2 M_P`[/*&#?[2C<=J^W'TJ_0!&P90#O8\CKCUJ2F2?='^\/YT^@#/TW_C^U;_K M[7_T1%6A6?IO_']JW_7VO_HB*M"@#/U+_C^TG_K[;_T1+6A6?J7_`!_:3_U] MM_Z(EK0H`\/\0?\`(PZG_P!?C?^AI7/\`B#_D8=3_ M`.ON7_T,UT'PQ_Y&&X_Z]&_]#2@#O]9FFM[:.2&8Q!9`9"H!8KGG`/7^=0W- MY<)JT:QRY@\L$H`,$D,<'N"<#&..#GMG1N;:"[C$=S"DJ!@P5UR`1T-*UO`T MZSM#&9D&U9"HW`>@/6@#-@O)UTZY=KA9715992H`7=W_X"2_\`Q-7**`*?]IP?\\[O_P`!)?\`XFC^TX/^ M>=W_`.`DO_Q-7**`*?\`:<'_`#SN_P#P$E_^)H_M.#_GG=_^`DO_`,35RB@# M+N9;"Y8/)!=B1?NR):S*Z_0A MMV4DAC7[1YJC+1_9I"R_4!:=->VXD4]0]E*1_Z#5BZLX+L#SHP2OW6 M!PR_0CD57*7]HUJZM+,PQW+L\O"LUL\+J.YR<`_@.]=);7\%PYB5BDR]8I!MH]QQ M4[QH^-Z*V/49H`R-+\0VM[:QD^:9P@\Q$@=\'_@(/%7?[3@_YYW?_@)+_P#$ MTZXL89PI4>5*GW)8^&7_`.M[=*BCO)+:00Z@%7)PDZ_=W_X"2__`!-']IP?\\[O_P`!)?\`XFKE%`%/^TX/^>=W_P"`DO\`\31_ M:<'_`#SN_P#P$E_^)JY10!2;4;9U*M%=,IX(-G+@_P#CM4B;>'YK!KVV/]P6 M88FAR",YVGG\.E`&F/$6F&4Q">0R M#JGD29_+;1-K:QX\JPU";/=;9@/U%:21I&NV-%0>BC%.H`QO[5NY,[;9H!V+ M6\\A_((/YT>>\F/.O+\>HAL70'\T)_6MFB@#&V:8<^=;WL^>OGV\\GZ$8JU' M?6<*[8K>X1?1;*4#_P!!J_10!3_M.#_GG=_^`DO_`,31_:<'_/.[_P#`27_X MFKE%`%/^TX/^>=W_`.`DO_Q-']IP?\\[O_P$E_\`B:N44`4_[3@_YYW?_@)+ M_P#$T?VG!_SSN_\`P$E_^)JY10!3_M.#_GG=_P#@)+_\31_:<'_/.[_\!)?_ M`(FKE%`%/^TX/^>=W_X"2_\`Q-']IP?\\[O_`,!)?_B:N44`4_[3@_YYW?\` MX"2__$T?VG!_SSN__`27_P")JY10!3_M.#_GG=_^`DO_`,31_:<'_/.[_P#` M27_XFKE%`%/^TX/^>=W_`.`DO_Q-']IP?\\[O_P$E_\`B:N44`4_[3@_YYW? M_@)+_P#$U-I]S'S_X'_Z#0!T%%%%` M#(O]4G^Z*?3(O]4G^Z*?0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`, MD^Z/]X?SI],D^Z/]X?SI]`&?IO\`Q_:M_P!?:_\`HB*M"L_3?^/[5O\`K[7_ M`-$15H4`9^I?\?VD_P#7VW_HB6M"L_4O^/[2?^OMO_1$M:%`'A_B#_D8=3_Z M^Y?_`$,UT'PQ_P"1AN/^O1O_`$-*Y_Q!_P`C#J?_`%]R_P#H9KH/AC_R,-Q_ MUZ-_Z&E`'J%%9VLS36]M')#,8@L@,A4`L5SS@'K_`#J&[OKI=3C2(+]F106V ML-[LP;`P0?EX[$'/T-`&O161!>3KIUR[7"RNBJRRE0`NY0>W&!G/TQGUJ,WE MRA5/M6?)9@6*KF?#A<'CWQQCG'TH`VZY>7_D:-3_`.N4'\GKJ*XR748#XCU" M39=;6BA`'V67/&[J-N1^-`&G15/^TX/^>=W_`.`DO_Q-']IP?\\[O_P$E_\` MB:`+E%4_[3@_YYW?_@)+_P#$T?VG!_SSN_\`P$E_^)H`N453_M.#_GG=_P#@ M)+_\31_:<'_/.[_\!)?_`(F@"Y15/^TX/^>=W_X"2_\`Q-']IP?\\[O_`,!) M?_B:`+E%4_[3@_YYW?\`X"2__$T?VG!_SSN__`27_P")H`N453_M.#_GG=_^ M`DO_`,31_:<'_/.[_P#`27_XF@">XMH;I-D\:N!TSU'N#VKG/$LNI:58J+2X ME>W?>MS^TX/\`GG=_^`DO_P`32-J-LP(:*Z(/4&SE_P#B M:`(M!OY+_3D>X`6=?E=>_L2.V>M:#HLB%)%#*PP01D&LNZFMYF$T(NX;E1A9 M!9RG\"-O(]J6WUN,XCNX;B&Q_#TJY;W$5U$)(7#J>..Q]#Z&H/[3@_YYW?_@)+_P#$U3N)8#-]IM?M M<%QW/V.4K)[,-O/UZT`;%%9<&N0MMCN8;B"X;.(_L\AW8ZE?ER1^%6/[3@_Y MYW?_`("2_P#Q-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_`,!)?_B:/[3@_P">=W_X"2__`!-`%RBJ M?]IP?\\[O_P$E_\`B:/[3@_YYW?_`("2_P#Q-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_`,!)?_B: M/[3@_P">=W_X"2__`!-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_P$E_\`B:/[3@_YYW?_`("2_P#Q M-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_`,!)?_B:/[3@_P">=W_X"2__`!-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_P$ ME_\`B:/[3@_YYW?_`("2_P#Q-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_`,!)?_B:/[3@_P">=W_X M"2__`!-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_P$E_\`B:/[3@_YYW?_`("2_P#Q-`%RBJ?]IP?\ M\[O_`,!)?_B:/[3@_P">=W_X"2__`!-`%RBJ?]IP?\\[O_P$E_\`B:BGUVPM MAFX>:(>KV\B_S6@#1HK+FUN)5!@L[ZX![I;.!^H%0_VE=S=4:U7/:TFE;'_? M(`_6@#3N[R"S$9G?;YKB-?,IS_X'_P"@U3_M.#_GG=_^`DO_`,34VGW,=SJ]KY:RC;OSYD+I M_">FX#-`'34444`,B_U2?[HI],B_U2?[HK&N/#?GW$LW]MZS'YCEMD=UA5R< MX`QP*`-"^U2PTYD6]NXH"XRH=L9J>VN8+RW6>VE26)_NNAR#SBN*U_P+>WLD M)M-3EN`H(8W\[.1_NX6KVD^#IK;38H;C6=2AE7.Y+2Z*Q#DGY05_/WS0!U,T MJ0Q-)(<(HR3C-0M?VZ6GVIF<1.OO23Z;>SZ=':NT9&3N#2L_E_W2&*Y?F'/X4`7O[4M1=BV M+2"0[<$PN$^;I\^-O/UZ\4MYJ5M9$"X>SD6!8GF:4/B1RJX#`CD`]@.U`$D M6H6TTB(C/N=0PS$PQ[$D<'V/-1V^K6ER\:Q&1<%0,YRO'7O22VL[ M:E%<1A$4<.XD8%EQT*XPW.>3R.W4U%;6U]'J'VIX;5?.!$ZK*3MQ]TK\HR<= ME`%R.]@EG:%&8LIVYV,%)YR`V,'&#G!XJQ6?!!>I%):MY*0A6$02.$VLS_`"?*"._/'6M&VTJ:&\MI&,3B%`#+D[\!=NP< M?=)YY/4=.X`-9G"C)SU`X&:4$,`5((/(([UCRZ7*UDUNL-M@W`D`)Z+W)(7E MCSU]>33;#1YK;4H+E_+1(X!'LC887@`J/DR5R,_>'/:@#8D^Z/\`>'\Z?3)/ MNC_>'\Z?0!GZ;_Q_:M_U]K_Z(BK0K/TW_C^U;_K[7_T1%6A0!GZE_P`?VD_] M?;?^B):T*S]2_P"/[2?^OMO_`$1+6A0!X?X@_P"1AU/_`*^Y?_0S70?#'_D8 M;C_KT;_T-*Y_Q!_R,.I_]?C?^AI0!Z57_`)&C M4_\`KE!_)Z`+%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!45S;1741CF M7QJ6B@#.%Q-IY"7K&2WZ+<_P!WV?T^O3Z5H@@C(Y%(0&!!`(/! M!K/,$VG'=:*9;;^*W[I[I_\`$_E0!W8X5O4K_`'3^A_6K-K=Q708)E9$X>-QAD/N/ZT`3T444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%13W-O;J6GGCB`[NX'\Z`):*S;G7;&WMWF#O*JC.8 MXV9?^^L8_6J&A:W>ZK:L(X86FC;#L[[0`EV<;!S")77H\Q,C#\6S0`W^U;=_^/82 M71[>0A8?]]?=_6CS=1F_U=O#;J1UE?>P/^ZO'_CU7NE%`%'^SY9<_:KZ>0'J ML9\I?_'>?UJ:"QM;9B\-O&KGJ^,L?J>IJQ10`4444`%%%%`!1110`46W_(7L M_P#@?_H-%%M_R%[/_@?_`*#0!T%%%%`#(O\`5)_NBGTR+_5)_NBGT`%%%%`$ M5S$DUNZ2.\:'EF1RA`'/WAR*P;>]%GH]O/:W0E$X+%[B9IE9A_`I+<,3P.O( MZ&NCHH`P]4U2YLFN]DUN&18S''(G()SU^89R1@N#U-%`'+SZV]S;6K+2#GAOQJQ!K5Y-:SS%8( MS'.$"-@EA@Y3`@;S(QA6XZ@9.!^-3444 M`,D^Z/\`>'\Z?3)/NC_>'\Z?0!GZ;_Q_:M_U]K_Z(BK0K/TW_C^U;_K[7_T1 M%6A0!GZE_P`?VD_]?;?^B):T*S]2_P"/[2?^OMO_`$1+6A0!X?X@_P"1AU/_ M`*^Y?_0S70?#'_D8;C_KT;_T-*Y_Q!_R,.I_]?C?^ MAI0!W?B&406<4IN&B"RJ2%..U:I`888`C.>:6@#"MKK&EW)BNI)!@;79MS;MN7`SW')QV.1VP(OM/%OY= MW*8]Y^RMYA/G?.!@G^/C/7/&3VR.BHH`*XR6\G_X2/4'_LZZ#-%#E-T65^]U M^?'/L:[.N7E_Y&C4_P#KE!_)Z`(_ML__`$#+O_OJ+_XNC[;/_P!`R[_[ZB_^ M+JY10!3^VS_]`R[_`.^HO_BZ/ML__0,N_P#OJ+_XNKE%`%/[;/\`]`R[_P"^ MHO\`XNC[;/\`]`R[_P"^HO\`XNKE%`%/[;/_`-`R[_[ZB_\`BZ/ML_\`T#+O M_OJ+_P"+JY10!3^VS_\`0,N_^^HO_BZ/ML__`$#+O_OJ+_XNKE%`%/[;/_T# M+O\`[ZB_^+H^VS_]`R[_`.^HO_BZN44`4_ML_P#T#+O_`+ZB_P#BZ/ML_P#T M#+O_`+ZB_P#BZN44`4_ML_\`T#+O_OJ+_P"+H^VS_P#0,N_^^HO_`(NKE%`% M/[;/_P!`R[_[ZB_^+H^VS_\`0,N_^^HO_BZN44`8]S]J\TW%GI]S%M.H+NTCNT`E7Z`,A-6N8/+BO]/G65SA70Q[6_$O@'VS5O[;/_P!` MR[_[ZB_^+JS+%'-&T3VR,^_2 M@#J_ML__`$#+O_OJ+_XND-].!DZ;=`?[T7_Q='V&9V)FU"X8'^%-J#]!G]:0 M:18X_>0>?SG,[&3G_@1-`%>37X8WV-;3%_[BR0LWY!\TZ#67N!F+2M0_X'&J M?S:M*.*.(8C14'HHQ3J`,F2_U;>!%HS!/[S3H3^6?ZU'YFKR`^;%U\RUE@QOQYA0Y^4]-K&IJ+;_`)"] MG_P/_P!!H`Z"BBB@!D7^J3_=%5)-:TJ*1HY-3LT="596G4%2.H(S5N+_`%2? M[HJI)HNE2R-))IEF[N2S,T"DL3U).*`*&K>*]+T^P>XAN[:[D!`6**969LGV MJW'X@T>2-7&J60#`'#3J"/J,\5FZQX+TS4VB,:+9",'BVB1=V<=>.>E6=-\+ M:58626[VEO=%2?WL\",YR<\G%`%O^U;6YBE73;NVNKA4+"..57/UP#[U!;N3$RA0#\S,A((P,D@G\:M1:5IMMN>"QMH"1AFBC5#C.>HQQP/R MJ."TTV[MX_(<3QQL2&2=GR3P=S9RV>A!STH`I)K4[:BD326Z+)LV6S)^]<%B MI92'((&"W3IUQ5S4)[U$9[.2W14=4)EC9\DD#C##U_2I[/3K:Q=WMQ("X`.Z M9W&!T`#$@=>U/N+*"YMS!('\LMN.R1D.M`%9;F[COH8+EH0K+CQXJ*SN-2>^:VN)+4F%B9"D+#Q-Y[.%[A M9V5BZG(^=L9QC)7."?J*ACTVSAF@*F7S8MQ3=<.Q(.-V/G-2KIVG72(Z9E1'+*4G8C<'W=CV9>G;!% M2P:9:VYB,0E!BSM)GN<4`7****`&2?='^\/YT^F2?='^\/YT M^@#/TW_C^U;_`*^U_P#1$5:%9^F_\?VK?]?:_P#HB*M"@#/U+_C^TG_K[;_T M1+6A6?J7_']I/_7VW_HB6M"@#SG5/`.JWFJWEU'<682>=Y%#.V0"Q(S\OO6I MX.\)W^@ZK+=7>YYSSDQ?9^+?R[681[S]E7RR/)^<0S>=8Z=<(6.9(7:((_OP M_P`I]_S%1KXJM6O!:?9;D3[BNUM@^;TR6Q0!NT5GG5&7.;&<8ZYDA_\`BZB? M788QF2!T'3+3P#_VI0!JT5C'Q+:`_(_R>@# M8HK&;Q#&N/\`B77[9Z;8U;^34#Q"#TTK5#]+?_Z]`&S166FLLZ[AI.I8]XE! M_5JE&I2DX_LN^_*/_P"+H`OT5DWVIWL5G-)!I=QO52079,#WP&)/X5G>&]9U M*ZM7\ZTENPK8$J,BGZ')'Z4`=/15'[;=?]`JY_[^1?\`Q=)_:%SGG2KO_OJ/ M_P"*H`OT51^WS?\`0+O/SC_^+I#J4H./[+OOP$?_`,70!?HK/_M.7_H%WWY) M_P#%4C:K(O72K_\`!$/_`+-0!HT5F_VN_P#T"M0_[]K_`/%4Q]::,`MI.I'/ M]V$-_)J`-6BN6U7Q9);&)8;">)BV7%U'LROH.?UK:@U*6>%)4TR[*NH89,8X M_%\T`7Z*I_;9_P#H&7?_`'U%_P#%T?;9_P#H&7?_`'U%_P#%T`7*+;_D+V?_ M``/_`-!JG]MG_P"@9=_]]1?_`!=3:?-)-J]KYEK+!C?CS"AS\IZ;6-`'3444 M4`,B_P!4G^Z*?44;@1J"&R`/X33O,'HW_?)H`?13/,'HW_?)H\P>C?\`?)H` MBOHFGLY8T`9F'"LC?]\FCS!Z-_P!\F@#"O;?4]UKY:7DCK'$)7BG55)#C?P6&3MW6=OFZCNEB5FC>Z!**KXW.H<[LC(SSDD9Z9'0^8/1O^^31Y@]&_P"^30!E M06][Y-XLOV@%U`'[W)9\G+)\PVJ1CC*]^G4LNK>[EFLO]'N-B(AD$<^`&##C M[W)`R3USZGBMCS!Z-_WR:/,'HW_?)H`S-(CO[:*[>]\R9RQ9$&/FX_A)<\'C MKM'L*R-(L]8M;6*W:VO(U2V*.'N58%AY>`GSG'23'3&1Z<=5Y@]&_P"^31Y@ M]&_[Y-`'/6-CJ<4]H,30P)-,[*6#G#2.PW$2#.58=F.?3K6CI,-Q!),LT=R% M('EM-/YF!D_+]X\CU[C'7%:'F#T;_ODT>8/1O^^30`^BF>8/1O\`ODT>8/1O M^^30`2?='^\/YT^HV8,``&SD?PGUJ2@#/TW_`(_M6_Z^U_\`1$5:%9^F_P#' M]JW_`%]K_P"B(JT*`,_4O^/[2?\`K[;_`-$2UH5GZE_Q_:3_`-?;?^B):T*` M"BBB@`HHJ)9X6G>!98S,@!:,,-R@]"1VH`EHJ*.XAEC:2*6-T4D%E8$`CKS[ M4T7=LRPLMQ$5GXB(<8D[_+Z_A0!/7+R_\C1J?_7*#^3UU%Y?;/RYYQ]:VZ*`"N3?3M8D\0WICNK$NT$+,S0N`1EP,#<!@8RV3D M#&_Y^=-_[]2?_%4?V5KW_/SIO_?J3_XJMH:A:F2.,3`F1-ZD M`X(QD<]!P#QWP?2G6EY#>*S0B4;#@B2%XSTST8`T`8?]E:]_S\Z;_P!^I/\` MXJC^RM>_Y^=-_P"_4G_Q5=)10!S?]E:]_P`_.F_]^I/_`(JH+&TUR]L+>Z6? M3E6>)9`IB?(#`''WO>NKHH`YO^RM>_Y^=-_[]2?_`!5']E:]_P`_.F_]^I/_ M`(JNDHH`YO\`LK7O^?G3?^_4G_Q5']E:]_S\Z;_WZD_^*K?N)X[:(RR[MH[* MA8GZ``D_A42ZA:/)$B3!C,@="`2I!&1STY`)'K@^E`&+_96O?\_.F_\`?J3_ M`.*H_LK7O^?G3?\`OU)_\56L=7LA;^>9CY>[;Q&V_V?UJ?^RM>_Y^=-_P"_4G_Q5=)10!S?]E:]_P`_.F_]^I/_ M`(JC^RM>_P"?G3?^_4G_`,57244`01W26SN5E?.W*G!XSC=TS@$XSG`S47]JV7D>?YQ\O=MSL;.<9SC M&<8YSTQSTYH`R/[*U[_GYTW_`+]2?_%4?V5KW_/SIO\`WZD_^*K<2\@DNFME MHZ=,BK%`'-_V5KW_/SIO_?J3_XJC^RM>_Y^=-_[]2?_`!5= M)10!RB6FN/?RVOGZ=NBB20MY3X(8N,?>_P!@_G4_]E:]_P`_.F_]^I/_`(JN MDHH`YO\`LK7O^?G3?^_4G_Q5']E:]_S\Z;_WZD_^*KI**`.;_LK7O^?G3?\` MOU)_\51_96O?\_.F_P#?J3_XJMC^T[3$Q\QLPD;E\MLG/`P,9;)R!C.<<42: MI9Q%`TI/F1^:FU&;>N0.,#DY9>!SR.*`,?\`LK7O^?G3?^_4G_Q5']E:]_S\ MZ;_WZD_^*KH8I$EC62-@R.`5([BGT`2!SCDXZTHU"V,R1;W#O*T*@QL,NH+$WOI9)I7AMED5U:+$S$.%)P&^4;>I_O0VX`\`8Z'/KQCOGC0@C,88Y4>_(!_E5`:=.SQH5AC@*+O56)*%5(` M7CD-:B@##GTN]FM0K?9_-W#@.P``3:#G&<\Y*XP1\I)&<[:Y"@$Y M..<4M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`%&ZAN9[R-?*A-J%/SF0AU8@C(7;@\''4=353^ MS[[RM^;?S_N8W';MV[Y76P-V[*G:,D\]0.N>V"ALKUKZ*5DMPD=ZT_$K$E#$4'&WKSG'ZUKT4`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M9^F_\?VK?]?:_P#HB*M"L_3?^/[5O^OM?_1$5:%`&?J7_']I/_7VW_HB6M"L M_4O^/[2?^OMO_1$M:%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`444 M4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`')Z?:%=7B>RLI;=A=S-/( M8&B#1$'`R0-W.,=<>U3K=:O/!K2;;D%86-H6@V'=EQA>.>B]R><]\#I:*`,* MVFU-=8M(/G-@+92S21D%VPIX/;=HHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`S]-_X_M6_Z^U_]$15H5GZ;_P`? MVK?]?:_^B(JT*`,_4O\`C^TG_K[;_P!$2UH5#=6EM>1B.[MXIT!W!94#`'UP M?K57^PM'_P"@58_^`Z?X4`:%%9_]A:/_`-`JQ_\``=/\*/["T?\`Z!5C_P"` MZ?X4`:%%9_\`86C_`/0*L?\`P'3_``H_L+1_^@58_P#@.G^%`&A16?\`V%H_ M_0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_H%6/_@.G^%`&A16?_86C_\`0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_`*!5 MC_X#I_A0!H45G_V%H_\`T"K'_P`!T_PH_L+1_P#H%6/_`(#I_A0!H45G_P!A M:/\`]`JQ_P#`=/\`"C^PM'_Z!5C_`.`Z?X4`:%%9_P#86C_]`JQ_\!T_PH_L M+1_^@58_^`Z?X4`:%%9_]A:/_P!`JQ_\!T_PH_L+1_\`H%6/_@.G^%`&A16? M_86C_P#0*L?_``'3_"C^PM'_`.@58_\`@.G^%`&A16?_`&%H_P#T"K'_`,!T M_P`*/["T?_H%6/\`X#I_A0!H45G_`-A:/_T"K'_P'3_"C^PM'_Z!5C_X#I_A M0!H45G_V%H__`$"K'_P'3_"C^PM'_P"@58_^`Z?X4`:%%9_]A:/_`-`JQ_\` M`=/\*/["T?\`Z!5C_P"`Z?X4`:%%9_\`86C_`/0*L?\`P'3_``H_L+1_^@58 M_P#@.G^%`&A16?\`V%H__0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_H%6/_@.G^%`&A16?_86C_\` M0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_`*!5C_X#I_A0!H45G_V%H_\`T"K'_P`!T_PH_L+1_P#H M%6/_`(#I_A0!H45G_P!A:/\`]`JQ_P#`=/\`"C^PM'_Z!5C_`.`Z?X4`:%%9 M_P#86C_]`JQ_\!T_PH_L+1_^@58_^`Z?X4`:%%9_]A:/_P!`JQ_\!T_PH_L+ M1_\`H%6/_@.G^%`&A16?_86C_P#0*L?_``'3_"C^PM'_`.@58_\`@.G^%`&A M16?_`&%H_P#T"K'_`,!T_P`*/["T?_H%6/\`X#I_A0!H45G_`-A:/_T"K'_P M'3_"C^PM'_Z!5C_X#I_A0!H45G_V%H__`$"K'_P'3_"C^PM'_P"@58_^`Z?X M4`:%%9_]A:/_`-`JQ_\``=/\*/["T?\`Z!5C_P"`Z?X4`:%%9_\`86C_`/0* ML?\`P'3_``H_L+1_^@58_P#@.G^%`&A16?\`V%H__0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_H%6 M/_@.G^%`&A16?_86C_\`0*L?_`=/\*/["T?_`*!5C_X#I_A0!H45G_V%H_\` MT"K'_P`!T_PH_L+1_P#H%6/_`(#I_A0!H45G_P!A:/\`]`JQ_P#`=/\`"C^P MM'_Z!5C_`.`Z?X4`:%%9_P#86C_]`JQ_\!T_PH_L+1_^@58_^`Z?X4`:%%9_ M]A:/_P!`JQ_\!T_PH_L+1_\`H%6/_@.G^%`&A16?_86C_P#0*L?_``'3_"C^ MPM'_`.@58_\`@.G^%`&A16?_`&%H_P#T"K'_`,!T_P`*/["T?_H%6/\`X#I_ MA0!H45G_`-A:/_T"K'_P'3_"C^PM'_Z!5C_X#I_A0!H45G_V%H__`$"K'_P' M3_"C^PM'_P"@58_^`Z?X4`:%%9_]A:/_`-`JQ_\``=/\*/["T?\`Z!5C_P"` MZ?X4`:%%9_\`86C_`/0*L?\`P'3_``H_L+1_^@58_P#@.G^%`!IO_']JW_7V MO_HB*M"H;6TMK.,QVEO%`A.XK$@4$^N!]*FH`QK;5-2N81(MC9KR596NWRK* M2&!Q%C@@CC(XXS4OVW5/^?.Q_P#`Q_\`XU5?2_\`CWF_Z^[C_P!'/5R@"/[; MJG_/G8_^!C__`!JC[;JG_/G8_P#@8_\`\:J2B@"/[;JG_/G8_P#@8_\`\:H^ MVZI_SYV/_@8__P`:J2B@"/[;JG_/G8_^!C__`!JC[;JG_/G8_P#@8_\`\:J2 MF2RI#$TDK!449)-`"?;=4_Y\['_P,?\`^-4?;=4_Y\['_P`#'_\`C5$;E\YC M=`,8W8YX]C_.FW5U#9PF6=MJY`'&22>@`[F@!WVW5/\`GSL?_`Q__C5'VW5/ M^?.Q_P#`Q_\`XU5.34_*6,-9W`ED.$C.W)]\YQ^N?:K<,Z3&14SNC;:P/4'` M/\B*`%^VZI_SYV/_`(&/_P#&J/MNJ?\`/G8_^!C_`/QJI**`(_MNJ?\`/G8_ M^!C_`/QJC[;JG_/G8_\`@8__`,:J2B@"/[;JG_/G8_\`@8__`,:H^VZI_P`^ M=C_X&/\`_&JDHH`C^VZI_P`^=C_X&/\`_&JAM-4U6YM8YFTRV@+C/ERW;!U^ MH$9Q5JB@"/[;JG_/G8_^!C__`!JC[;JG_/G8_P#@8_\`\:J2JAU")=46P=)% MD>,R(QQM<#J!SG/X4`3_`&W5/^?.Q_\``Q__`(U1]MU3_GSL?_`Q_P#XU4%G M?QWLUS'$DF+=_+9VQM9L9..<]QVJW0!']MU3_GSL?_`Q_P#XU1]MU3_GSL?_ M``,?_P"-5#+>K%>Q6S12EI0VU@!M)`R1UST[]/>C3[U+^W,R1R1X=D*R8R"I MP>A(ZB@";[;JG_/G8_\`@8__`,:H^VZI_P`^=C_X&/\`_&JJ3ZM;V^HI92I, MK.I82&,^7P,D;O7'-1_VW;^6K>5-O9@JQ8&XC;NSUQC:">OZ\4`7_MNJ?\^= MC_X&/_\`&J/MNJ?\^=C_`.!C_P#QJJ']M1&_AM4MKJ19L;9UC_=]&GWJ7]N9DCDCP[(5DQD%3@]"1U%`$WVW5/ M^?.Q_P#`Q_\`XU1]MU3_`)\['_P,?_XU52?5K>WU%+*5)E9U+"0QGR^!DC=Z MXYJ/^V[?RU;RIM[,%6+`W$;=V>N,;03U_7B@"_\`;=4_Y\['_P`#'_\`C5'V MW5/^?.Q_\#'_`/C55$U:WDNU@C#MNV_O`!M!9=RCKGD<],5?H`C^VZI_SYV/ M_@8__P`:J&TU35;FUCF;3+:`N,^7+=L'7Z@1G%6J*`(_MNJ?\^=C_P"!C_\` MQJC[;JG_`#YV/_@8_P#\:J2JAU")=46P=)%D>,R(QQM<#J!SG/X4`3_;=4_Y M\['_`,#'_P#C5'VW5/\`GSL?_`Q__C506=_'>S7,<228MW\MG;&UFQDXYSW' M:K=`$?VW5/\`GSL?_`Q__C5'VW5/^?.Q_P#`Q_\`XU4,MZL5[%;-%*6E#;6` M&TD#)'7/3OT]Z-/O4O[0HD`&W<5W!>N>F*T*`(_MNJ?\^=C_P"!C_\`QJH; M35-5N;6.9M,MH"XSYK%>Q6S12EI0VU@!M)`R1UST[]/ M>C3[U+^W,R1R1X=D*R8R"IP>A(ZB@";[;JG_`#YV/_@8_P#\:H^VZI_SYV/_ M`(&/_P#&JJ3ZM;V^HI92I,K.I82&,^7P,D;O7'-1/K<"6IN#!/M5T1AA_M0!H?;=4_P"?.Q_\#'_^-4?;=4_Y\['_`,#'_P#C55WU&!+Y;0A] MS-LWX&T,5+!>NK%>Q6S12EI0VU@!M)`R1UST[]/>C3[U+^W,R1R1X=D M*R8R"IP>A(ZB@";[;JG_`#YV/_@8_P#\:H^VZI_SYV/_`(&/_P#&JJ3ZM;V^ MHI92I,K.I82&,^7P,D;O7'-1/K<"6IN#!/M5T1AA_M0!H?;=4 M_P"?.Q_\#'_^-4?;=4_Y\['_`,#'_P#C50F^0:D+$Q2!VC,JOQM(!`/?.>1V MJU0!5N]5U&TM)KF2QLV2&-I&"W;Y(`SQ^ZJ]I-Y)?V"W$UO]GEWNCQ;]^TJY M4C(Z]*S=<_Y`6H?]>TG_`*":O:)_QXR?]?=S_P"CWH`IZ6/]'F_Z^[C_`-'/ M5RDT3BQES_S]7/\`Z.>BTU":ZC%RMLBV;P-`$-%);:Q M:268FN+BV@8*&D4S#"`G`.3C@GH<"IEU*T"1&2[M5,H+1XF!#J.X/?B@"*J6 MIVYN(X%P2JSQNP`SD`_XX/X5IIJ5A(<1WMLY^4?+*I^]]WOW[>M1-?327LMO M:6Z2K!@3.TNW!(SM`PP*Y'S2$`'IV7KZFK] M]8/-%9F'9YEI()$1V(5L*1@G'OUQ6K-?Q1AXEDA-XL1D%NTH#=/Q./?%12:H MB2V40\LR7)&8_,PR`J3G&.1QCM0!E:E:7E[!$I$49!WET8DQ,.A4XRQ_`9_2 MI]-MI(?M,TPQ)TN5@@BC1&25I^7+;L+M(' M/R-W/0>^+0OK0M"HNH"9QF("0?O!_L^OX4`5Z*;+=7`OXHU!"&X\MP%SA/*9 M@V>WS8&>G:K=I(TMLCN/F.>?49X/X]:`*U%:%%`&?16A10!GX-&#Z5H44`9] M<]JMQ;37R,NH:?!+;2*59[D;A@D."O;@GOU':NQHH`\\N$M[B&\@.HZ0L5Q, M77-WN*CR]HXP!D$`]^_0C-6[.YTC^U6E:\LE*1H)BTB8DD4#:ZG//5AGKD"N MV=@B%FX"C)K/M]76?3S>"UG$8;`'RDE=V-W7';IU]J`,&:]L)M4CNFU#3%$) M_=R)<@.RE2"C=L9.?Z5#IFI16*)#)?Z61)<2/(4N@V%;+<'`Y!./>NIFU*&& MZ\AU?`P'E`&Q">0#SG)^GIZTMGJ,5TLA"21%%#E9``2ASM;@G@X/7GCD4`ZA%=7VP:GI`L&C*,3<`RC(.2.WH/IFJ>+3,<_\`:NF^?&0`OVH;2HC,><^O M.>GMGO75C6X67"V]P9FQL@PN]P02&'.`"%8\D=/6K\$R7$$+4K.18(Q%&HF4LS8"COZ9'XULUH44`9^#1@^E:%%`&?7/:K<6 MTU\C+J&GP2VTBE6>Y&X8)#@KVX)[]1VKL:*`//+A+>XAO(#J.D+%<3%US=[B MH\O:.,`9!`/?OT(S5NSN=(_M5I6O+)2D:"8M(F))%`VNISSU89ZY`KN*I'45 M_M3["L,C$)N>08PG3`(SGOUQ_7`!SDU[83:I'=-J&F*(3^[D2Y`=E*D%&[8R M<_TJ'3-2BL42&2_TLB2XD>0I=!L*V6X.!R"<>]=$^MPB,21VUQ*LDGEPE0H\ MXX8G;DC@!2 MD"P:,HQ-P#*,@Y([>@^F:IXM,QS_`-JZ;Y\9`"_:AM*B,QYSZ\YZ>V>]=?'J MUO++&L0=XI-N)AC8"P!4'G.2".V.15^@#A;6&S75+,PZI8.(=B1LLX\UE";? M+P.H)YSG/M755H44`9^#1@^E:%%`&?7/:K<6TU\C+J&GP2VTBE6>Y&X8)#@K MVX)[]1VKL:*`//+A+>XAO(#J.D+%<3%US=[BH\O:.,`9!`/?OT(S5NSN=(_M M5I6O+)2D:"8M(F))%`VNISSU89ZY`KN*I'45_M06*PR,0FYY!C"],#&<]^N/ MZX`.#RK6XDAFV[9QM"C(ST+!OR%7Z`.)LH-* M&H6A34++$`18TCN=S3,%V*2,XSR1P"3QSVKIJT**`,_!HP?2M"B@#/KGM5N+ M::^1EU#3X);:12K/7M'&`,@@'OWZ$9JW9W.D?VJTK7EDI2-!,6D3$DB@;74YYZL,]<@5W%4CJ* M_P!J"Q6&1B$W/(,87I@8SGOUQ_7`!SDU[83:I'=-J&F*(3^[D2Y`=E*D%&[8 MR<_TJ'3-2BL42&2_TLB2XD>0I=!L*V6X.!R"<>]=,VJ*(`ZVMP\AD:)85V[R M5SG^+&,#/7]>*?/J=O#8QW8)=)=HC4%5+EN@&X@9^IH`YJ]U"*ZOM@U/2!8- M&48FX!E&0W/6K5`'&`V,^L12QZE8D/.LQ5;@,QD"%`H'<' M/7VZ_ M4=J[&B@#SRX2WN(;R`ZCI"Q7$Q=XJ/+VCC`&00#W[]",U;L[G2/[5:5KR MR4I&@F+2)B210-KJ<\]6&>N0*[BJ1U%?[4%BL,C$)N>08PO3`QG/?KC^N`#G M)KVPFU2.Z;4-,40G]W(ER`[*5(*-VQDY_I4.F:E%8HD,E_I9$EQ(\A2Z#85L MMP<#D$X]ZZ635XX[=9#;SF1YF@6$;=S,,D\[MO12>OZ\5,]^HL8[N&">=)%# MA44!MI&T3_`(\9/^ONY_\`1[T>(/\`D7M3_P"O27_T`T:)_P`>,G_7W<_^CWH` M310#82@]#=7/_HYZK+H1"P0--!+:VS;X$EMMSQ^@W;L8'TSQUJUHG_'C)_U] MW/\`Z/>JUE?31-)'J$TB7(4MY4D8VGD`>65'S+D@8Y;YAGJ*`&0Z'X%U#`\QFVQ8B=1S&1]5/;[I'.:O6LUY/;R0I<7(+OB*>>`1R M`;/N]Z`)K32Y+?[/FY#>4K*P6/:'&[YG^SPWL5[.T4$A6XA,*J[CI@@C.X'!XQD=.HH`EL]%^RW<4MYXHX%;S(X_(&4?9LSD$?+CG&,^^.*6+1+B*>.07L9"RI,P,!Y94V M'!W<`@=.<'UZ4X>(;!7IU]N:6/7X9)2GV2Z4* M$+L0N$W,R\X;/#*0<9_+F@!MWH]U<:C)WI19 M:-<6LZR/=02YQYBM;=<.S+M^;Y2"Q]>W2I$UV%T#BVN`KA7C)"XD0_Q@[L`? M7!Z<=U$_E2$E`(P(P^1SR,$'N>OL*`-2-7$:B4H\F`&95V@G MZ9.!^)IU9UEJ4.LVDQL9FC96V%P4OXBJ>G7=S#"\US=3WA:YEMX MX=L:EBKL!C`49VJ2ZC*8Y&-L]K#-&K`?*6,@/(_W1W-`&I1110`4444`%%%%`"'.T[<9[ M9K"@TV_BLKU$CMT,\F8X/-(C7YB2V0O&01P!V]2:WJ*`,FZTR:XN)5S&+>X= M)93N.X,H`P!CD'"\Y'3IS2VVGW(,SW)B+RPI;G8QQL7=\W3J=QX[>M:M%`&& MNF7Z7"7NZW:ZC5(@FXA'10XR3C()WDXP>F,]ZU;&W-K90P%]YC0*6QC)[FIZ M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"LF_T^XNM5@E0)'&B,K2JY#X./E([CKU/'UK6HH`YG M_A'K@6S1B&S"-Y:O;J[(D@0,-^X+E6Y4\`_<`SWK4DBU)-/CMT\B>4(J22/* M8RW'S'A3@_YXK2HH`R5TMI;Z&>6..%8PC,L4K,'91P"N`,#L<9.!TZ5K444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%9=U97$VM6MRBQI'$K9E#D,1Q\I'<=>IX],UJ44`9T%M M=_8[J*411O+(Y4QR%L*QZ\J,'DT^\M[EG@DM5AW6[917<@,"I!!P#C&01UZ= MJO44`4K:R:".SC9PZVZ')Q@E\8SCZ%OSJ[110`4444`%%%%`!1110`5EW5E< M3:U:W*+&D<2MF4.0Q''RD=QUZGCTS6I10!C/I]W-;-')%;K(;EI4D6=_W8.> M>`"3SC;D`^O:K8M7M[%+*""&6%$$8$TAY&.XVG/;ZU>HH`S$L;F+4K!U\M[> MVMGA9WD/F$G;SC&#]P=^Y].=.BB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`K+NK*XFUJUN46-( MXE;,H%.#_GBM*B@#)72VEOH9Y8XX5C",RQ2L MP=E'`*X`P.QQDX'3I6M110`4444`9_B#_D7M3_Z])?\`T`T:)_QXR?\`7W<_ M^CWH\0?\B]J?_7I+_P"@&C1/^/&3_K[N?_1[T`)HI`L)23@"ZNW9?*2YNHY!YHC\N#/.T$!]T0 M'7<,@`8XSGDV$O;Z:^$9EU"*%SD,+/HIC!ZE."&!X/KTZ4`:XTZTBBG!#[)7 M\V0O,Q^;KD$GCIVQTJ*RM=.F\FYLY?/6(MM=+EI%+$8)/S$,<'J@7E_* M2M^+AO\`18I"9+8IB3D.H^49Z*<>YQ[4XKZZBA'D_P!H(J*6,?V%\$^9TR4S MRIY_3'-`&U#9:?!"^FC#+*IR,"Q,LS!6#*S3R%U( MZ8#;D)$#)']TA#G*`GG=R.G\-6;>ZU/_ M`$=IYKHJ=OG>7:DX^8XQF,$Y`&[@8[8S0!I/H.G/)O,4H;Y/NW$BCY/N\!L< M'GZ\]:@M_#UO!J+W&]GAVJ%A9Y&PRLS9)+'=RQ."/2MFB@"A'H]E%"\422HC MC&%G<8']U3GY1ST&!0-'L5OC(79TSC&WC'3%7Z*`(+6UBM$*0F M3:3G#RL^/IN)P/8<57CT>RCM6ME27RVD,O,[E@YY+!B<@YYX/<^M7Z*`*+Z1 M8R$$Q,"%5F:P;*[NCI5R);J5;R"0EU94)7YSTXP M5."!]",\<;Y`92",@\$5071K-;>:#;*5F;<[>W]Q!< MSRHY\JWD2+R=HQ)N`.:QMGN4N&C)D48!+'!]"1G!/)Y//-);Z?;6R[8491G.-['Z#KT&>!T'I0! MD)>7SWD>GF\^>9(Y3.$7*[ED)51C'5!C.3@GZUL:=.UUI]O.^W>Z`G;T)]O: MHO[(L1`81$P7<&!$C!E(Z8;.0,$C`.,''2KD<:11K'&H5%`"J!@`#M0`ZBBB M@`HHHH`****`&ONV'9C=CC/3-8-E=W1TJY$MU*MY!(2ZLJ$K\YZ<8*G!`^A& M>.-\@,I!&0>"*H+HUFMO-!ME*S-N=O.<,>20-P.<#)XS0!!<7=R+Z0QS;(XI MHX/+V@AMX'S>O&X=#C@U-9^;;O=M<7TT\,6!NF5!M(&6/RJ.,$?D:L-8V[72 M7+(3*@P#N./8D9P3R>3SS4BP(H`4,!O+\,>222<^O7ITH`P+76)=3NYK6VOH ME#7`5'A*.43R@W'4$[LC)ST/I6WIT[76GV\[[=[H"=O0GV]J;+IMI-YI>,YE MD$C,KLIW!0H((.1P`./ZFK,<:11K'&H5%`"J!@`#M0`ZBBB@`HHHH`****`" ML>YGN8M?A1YWCMY8V6(!0R%N/O<9!]#G'0?78JK)I]O)>QW;JQD0$`;SMSQS MMZ9X'-`&/?27]G')Y=_=3H)50XCB,O"LS>6`@!_AR"#P&QS5N\U46FAQ3R7E MLL\L.4E)`C9MN@JU0`4444`%%%%`!1110`5C7EQ=P M:Y&IE=89(F$*!04=^.&XR#Z'..0/KLU4ETZWFO$NG#F1`0`'(7G'..F>!S_] M:@#*@OKR2VNAYUP&A6-_,DA",&).Y-I7H,#GKANO>M#6M133K%W,\,$KJPB: M4@#I&TRU:S:TV.(F.6VRN&8^I8'<3]34[01LCHVYED7:P+$\8QZ\ M4`9ZO-.".HK5J-88U9&"\HI13GH./\!4E M`!1110`4444`%%%%`#7W;#LQNQQGIFL&RN[HZ57,UOJ\0 M61C"UI-(8L#&Y"F#G&?XB.N.E)I=S<-=2VUQ-YY$$4X?`&-Y8%1@=!MX[\U: M>PMWO(KMA(9HD,:GS6QM/4%.H[#T%+;V%M:KM@1D&[/WV/3H.O0=AT'I M0!F7&J&QTNX::\C6;S)4BDG*J.,XZ8!^G>M:TF6XM(9DD6170'O))Q^%3JH10JC``P!0`ZBBB@#/\0?\B]J?_7I+_P"@ M&C1/^/&3_K[N?_1[T>(/^1>U/_KTE_\`0#1HG_'C)_U]W/\`Z/>@`T3_`(\9 M/^ONY_\`1[U%I^I2SK,;EX4DC!9X2I1XO0')Y'!^88![5)HI`L)23@"ZN6+M(&N M$!MWV;1U5N>&!#+USQG':K5IJ5Q=VTJV\]I<2[]D4\:'RF^7/(W'ITX:F2Z+ M;-]HM#J-PC7D9\V,-&#)V9\;>,@X...:Q%!=2EK6<0R>7B.W<$. M-B1V!'S<<\$8.*MQ:?Y23K]KN&,TGF;LJ"A]L`<<#KFF1:4L53DNCA M-KL>-Q`43RUE7"*IC(1$B5?D)(X"<.!GC)QS23W5Q)J M?V&T,2&.-999)5+<$D```C^Z><\<<&J[^';65+<32R2O`6*O)'$Y()R004P. M>X`/O5NZTY9[I+J.>:VG5=A>+;\Z]=I#`@C/MD9/K0`DFIV]LPBNG(E`^;RX MW9S%M-*DQVQQ>89!"[*HQG)P.<=2, MY^E4M/\`#[16%HMS=3+=VZ(J2Q,I$>U2N%RN""&;[P/7V%69]#AF@:$W$Z1M M"T)"[.0PP3G;DGKUXYZ=*`'?VU:*UPLOFIY#[&/DO@\`DCCH.Y[=3U%:((8` M@Y!Y!%9-UX>MKL-Y\LCEG$@+I&^UMH4D!D(Y`';Z8K510B*HZ*,#C%`#J*** M`"BBB@`HIK[MAV8W8XSTS6#97=T=*N1+=2K>02$NK*A*_.>G&"IP0/H1GC@` MZ"BL6]O[B"YGE1SY5O(D7D[1B3<`\CT\WGSS)'*9PBY7A/M[4`6:***`"BBB@`HHHH`***Q[JXN8->B62=H[>2-A$-H M,;-QG?QD'T.<=!]0#8HKGK.\O)-.NFDNY!-$4;YHT!&<$X^7!0]CUZ\YZ:.K MRSQ11>5)-$C/B26&(2,@P<'!!XSC)P?Z@`T**Y^VU>ZN9[0RK)#!B,2,B+\T MCC(5MW*KR.@)R>HQST%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11611$P7C4!B0 MZBLY([B1KA4B$!1RB>4')Z@$Y##DXS]*U3(;C2( MKB.]N(D$?F-*$3S&`'<%2`?7B@#1HK*A>[BU.P@GN&?S+.1I5*K@NIC^;@`_ MQGVZ<5JT`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%8UY=3VNN1F::1+5HF\M54%6(QD-QD'T. M<<@?4`V:*YD:])#9W#7EP+6\>,211SA%C0,&*E3G+="#D\E>@S6A>:C+_9]H MUB//ENL!7CVMQM+$C)`)XXYZF@#6HK(M;N234-/\NYEDM[BSD&. M`"#\Y!'3VK7H`****`,_Q!_R+VI_]>DO_H!HT3_CQD_Z^[G_`-'O1X@_Y%[4 M_P#KTE_]`-&B?\>,G_7W<_\`H]Z`$T4XL)3Z75S_`.CGK!M[R^@MW%N+^,+Y M\GE?87.YC.63DIGE6.?;T.:NIX=O5+G^TUR\CR':+A!EF+'`6<`2@)YSSQC/%317>J+% M#)/-=%>/-$5HQ(7><$9C!)QPW`XY`&14O]@7W_03_P#'KK_Y(H_L"^_Z"?\` MX]=?_)%`'045S_\`8%]_T$__`!ZZ_P#DBC^P+[_H)_\`CUU_\D4`=!17/_V! M??\`03_\>NO_`)(H_L"^_P"@G_X]=?\`R10!T%%<_P#V!??]!/\`\>NO_DBC M^P+[_H)_^/77_P`D4`=!17/_`-@7W_03_P#'KK_Y(H_L"^_Z"?\`X]=?_)%` M'045S_\`8%]_T$__`!ZZ_P#DBC^P+[_H)_\`CUU_\D4`=!17/_V!??\`03_\ M>NO_`)(H_L"^_P"@G_X]=?\`R10!T%%<_P#V!??]!/\`\>NO_DBC^P+[_H)_ M^/77_P`D4`=!17.R>'K]XV5=6:,L"`ZMY2X:,F11@$L<'T)&<$\GD\\TEOI]M;+MA1E&E9/\`8%]_T$__`!ZZ_P#DBC^P+[_H)_\`CUU_\D4`:7]D6(@, M(B8+N#`B1@RD=,-G(&"1@'&#CI5R.-(HUCC4*B@!5`P`!VK!_L"^_P"@G_X] M=?\`R11_8%]_T$__`!ZZ_P#DB@#H**Y_^P+[_H)_^/77_P`D4?V!??\`03_\ M>NO_`)(H`Z"BN=D\/7[QLJZLT98$!U:YRON,SD?F*(_#U^D:JVK-(5`!=FN< MM[G$X'Y"@#HJ*Y_^P+[_`*"?_CUU_P#)%']@7W_03_\`'KK_`.2*`.@JI+IU MM->)=2*S.@(`+':NO\` MY(H`T%T6Q6"6%8Y`DNT,1.^[`Z`-G(`]`<Z6Y9#YB@`88@'' M3*YP2.Q(XJS7/_V!??\`03_\>NO_`)(H_L"^_P"@G_X]=?\`R10!T%%<_P#V M!??]!/\`\>NO_DBC^P+[_H)_^/77_P`D4`=!17.R>'K]XV5=6:,L"`ZM!S_P#6K*_L"^_Z M"?\`X]=?_)%']@7W_03_`/'KK_Y(H`UXK&"&W>!5=DD!#EY&=FSQRQ)/ZTD^ MGV]Q&(Y%?:,%=LK*5QP,$'(X)Z=:R?[`OO\`H)_^/77_`,D4?V!??]!/_P`> MNO\`Y(H`U!IEFLTNO\`Y(H`Z"BN?_L"^_Z"?_CUU_\`)%']@7W_`$$__'KK_P"2 M*`.@HKG9/#U^\;*NK-&6!`=6NYQ.!^ M0H`Z*BN?_L"^_P"@G_X]=?\`R11_8%]_T$__`!ZZ_P#DB@#H*JR:?;R7L=VZ ML9$!`&\[<\<[>F>!S63_`&!??]!/_P`>NO\`Y(H_L"^_Z"?_`(]=?_)%`&I- MIEI/YI>-@TL@D9DD96W!0H((((X`'']:E6TA6+RE3$>%`0,<`#I@=JQO[`OO M^@G_`./77_R11_8%]_T$_P#QZZ_^2*`-=[*"2^BO6#^?$A1")&"@'J-N<'MV M[#T%6:Y_^P+[_H)_^/77_P`D4?V!??\`03_\>NO_`)(H`Z"BN?\`[`OO^@G_ M`./77_R11_8%]_T$_P#QZZ_^2*`.@HKG9/#U^\;*NK-&6!`=6NYQ.!^0H`Z*BN?_L"^_Z"?_CUU_\`)%']@7W_`$$_ M_'KK_P"2*`.@JK)I]O+>I=.K&1`0!N.WG')7IG@NO_DBC M^P+[_H)_^/77_P`D4`:L&FVEO#)%%$0DHVL"[-\OH"3P!DX`X':EGT^WN(Q' M(K[1@KME92N.!@@Y'!/3K63_`&!??]!/_P`>NO\`Y(H_L"^_Z"?_`(]=?_)% M`&J--M5NH+A499+>,Q1A9&"JIZC;G![=NP]!5NN?_L"^_P"@G_X]=?\`R11_ M8%]_T$__`!ZZ_P#DB@#H**Y_^P+[_H)_^/77_P`D4?V!??\`03_\>NO_`)(H M`T/$'_(O:G_UZ2_^@&C1/^/&3_K[N?\`T>]9=QX:O+BWEA?5,+(A0\W!X(QT M,Y!_$$5M:;:O9VGE22K*YDDD9E3:"7 GRAPHIC 129 chart1a.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 chart1a.gif M1TE&.#EA@@$Q`N8``````-__U=W4IP")IP``@\2)`&8``+"4'9G,_W\`:N"X M@.;FYH3#\7=/%@!J@P``26.)I;;>R]C__\R99I1P?P!%FZ.CH]KBYCB*RGH# M.O___^W6.R:KU_9D``.?_[@`RBK9Q`$^>S:7;^9D`F>+BQ%,`2453C?+__P!NNO'$ MB^FY;9:=UIF(9LWX_YIYE)Z]J@"9S/_OP?33FYD`,RX`DH@``*1<`'*\[`!R MJ[C>\)^"4_OS[O_=J/__[H(`FH["YD9UHT*D8V8` M9E5550!6H*4[`/;AL.#>WNV^@```F9A^59F9S+R/L7FGR```9K:*3?_VSJ$J MG&ZEU,S,S-+>\*YI=0"*RJ.]W'D\1,R9`/__S)2ZQP!FF7BGI\S$G-[T^MRG M0.3'JTT``+KJ_YQIM_CISC%/7>3(B8J+C(V.CY"1DI.4E9:7F)F:FYR=GI^@ MH:*CI*6FIZBIJJNLK:ZOL+&RL[2UMK>&`+J[O+V^O\#!PL/$Q<;'R,G*R\S- MSL_0T=+3NX4`"]C9VMOKCYNON[_#A[?'T]>L`UO;Z M^^+S_/\`_0$3T^;,@-Z$XB>K+ M:08*OY[J&,JPH$:+TF]Z=')CFA1_[OI M(1+F"%R:W.;6!5CV;)<';>.]%<`V:CL&Q9K`WK)$ M#KEQFPP^%(4G1C)=\MY*T#`;NIZ!EF[YO`=80YD=89=,P0!7FS96/0AP"\(1YYYKF`'F,) MAE><`!0LEPUK$7B!S00`8("$&^`=498#(\I`@?\.@(4X8HDG?A"!A&!](Q99 MH)VQ0`$/=-#$:'&HH0`!<5@W9@0)&+G9F$<4<`68:I3P`!@Z8A1?:W+2F:<: MQ2GP@)AD6@?GG@%V(]N>>_;YYYAE?CF$$6$VR$<8#0#PPDZ,"CI$&GVVYB:< MQ2WPH*,8**`?CYMVPY`+NCS@QIJ>7G%FFL5%J@V7'N"$`E+'`K&J6JM\- M!$0065G"PH`JAX%BUL]SV40W5Y>.HB9G%!8<44)KV(2ZK;;%-G=#!Y;"M]J` MY+XPKJ6*QOD`MFJBMJYQ,PEXQ+SSMGMMMJ%Z4UL<=51@U[[Q?I;&M]L:BUJH MH^H;+KTJ=J.3`)4.L!G_P@2(P>T"94G101''M?:6%K^6^VVWD?FYW`160.BP MP@0_!&VW61+F0!W58D.%=7I<\&%@H;)90`L*\T18:!G=><041X]PM,(J[\S8 M!?TR;0#2/]EK=05.7PWUGU+WW*^DH940Y`)A4WWL$*5Z2G1S#./+4#8`TZH"0`'1O+A0.MP$#&Z`:47X,0?NMIY&!&NVHZ[ M[]L1\4$7`!1Q>NJD[P1\H=L(P+L;P`,_U_#%'W]$\MYTSN?SUA^Y1V*?Q3Y[ M_^F?O?[A^$`60<4#5E@!AJJ&/@#']Q&X#KOL9:U^/>T?.N&3`"(```1T4(96.#VM!"5F(2#A&: M80$FS`9O.`B6%#+/&RETX0)6N``0ND,KQ8$"46R8#0]^@T4`T`\W#$(R&3C& MAS7<8972P4,5+@")V0"B?KYBD9F]AA\RN>(]BH(L>XC!#1RC0(I4HT5O?#&, M8R3'E,VXD"5)3YKI+"STE,^7H5/=A($F3M-2M*%RA.E@S3(")T( M#AE"`8HLQ`94DU@1I`*RI$3_78!5^[A5KF9UB$;59E?S.%:R?M4C8<5F6>&X M5K:>]:1IK69;V3A7NKY51=:@AE[WRM>^^O6O@`VL8`>;#&O@HA1B.2PH$JO8 M3S"VL9RX$F1#\=C)9J*REL4$9C-;"RC-T`%,8[7CUD:P%+V`!.Y+`$H5Q7 M`^*%`G#%^UY;U'808S#+E*Y07PWDEVAB>``,-/`#`R"@$/D%`22V(&!28)8- M!S;$_P:(:X@;U($!@@`"!KI;"\;.P0AR`$(5!FR(!2QBPN`]!!7<,(%BB8$& M9Z""#S20A:M)0`-;,`*%E6``#-.8"%`$5;X1JPA_O\\B"HC8`L#$(.7 M2N``-0"!UK;>`I(8`&LE^QK8V$V$FB50XPKL(`F#P$$8:-#H02A!"*M&@7/' MP`,D)!G:TFX"M<4T8P7X0-L-8`"][,``(%`\V^E\V>XEO@4`1%CQC-=X!#YN94%L@0!V MR+*I+7_V+^3VR`CP6UM0`0%`?`C0!L=G9&-&8P8P8\PV!B0@:^:7`A^P=ZJ0 M6.\69$$7?-LG=1"&@!PX?*XW8Q!8<+/@=6N6!:NV!&*P:AJ&8XPV?BO`=0G' M9&-P!MJG_WMUMWMR]WTV*%VB)7Z%H!EA@!88P`9K-@B:T1I+P#L(<`/%DU^H MLP,UE@8[PP`X``!P8`!I4(7`E5\?X`&?YV`J!F)2Y@(M<`"WDP8_D``PP`8` MD`<02PU\$YH9ZR(?21PN/E03YT01`X"I_,&Q4H!\,V`+[QW9%H(0&```5 M4'.,:`2.^`(>UQYOH`"46&.L:(*7)82*D`3]Q0@+0'LFE@041G8+0(RUQPA) ML`%`.`C!.&6,H`44AFY2Y@J5I0>_.`A3]HRTIP'2>%BLQ8R0@/^,QIAL4^:+ M2U",&K`$P1A^?0=GDR!;\/B.\UA:]6B/]'B/C2"/]\B/_:B/D&!H`'D(_CB/ M!6F0`^D(`IF0^%]"-&2F2!'D(ZI43S7@(>*`&JF5HBE8L1(!_*GD(^04& M`).*`PF2K<5806D&<1`"NC@(>)B3O$@(2`AI'_.3XQ<$`W8#ME:4,!F3,AAA MT'@(VG=:`CF5./``/6``H"9J!P`!'@`#S&<=7`(#6\``-08!1$"#'>9W6+D$ M!4""]99D%.AJ8_!M=-EO_[9MHJ<#0K#_`P,GF*T69838E;G@=TM'8$XN'G/;%E\&VE>#7>9]7?#$P MG717G=^W=P_J>9EH"D8)E5\I9;W5>0<&?CGX!+]7=>NW?B&P`P6``.!GGR0I M"%/9>?MY9=2W_P-LT(H:`(794P,`9$H&!L\(,"6`%_Z5\D(``\ M"'7?EX='<*0U<(-)VI1;!IXI89D1]@-'@`)QT)C,YJ4E^H&M5Z($Q@,\<`0U M6*4U.9DQB@>\\SEGP85?B`5@0`1$:7R0]@+`56`1M:&QP%A`8`!EH`(U]@*$ MD8MLL(:7V(=CL`*T:(N]%6FYB(NMV*BXXY*+I:5;6F$4<@(>(`1_4`2*]@:$ MEXLY)@*Q$YJEQ)@E)T*PE5@-AZ91W")?MJ`$IB0H#!>*M!>\B6P#-N5CS4'`I,%(B"H+^FIC&5A/J9A-?!A(39B M.[IK1!!E)4"S"UJP[WH(7^=?.&F5-FN9898#9H9FX^9L.VIG&D"<_HJO'7D( MMR<(A?EK=+EMT,8'8S>O$)MSB"=FMT>US,9X8["T+#NM$@K_!*?(L7+;L'1K>P=F?$Z:?5(' M@G^KI8R%:Z>7>H9[8&U`!&X`M5=@`5B:G"T+DXS%>--U!@_8I,(W=VT0@9D[ MMX$K"#4&=8TI"!MHMP(F>9DEL4Q;"',``%+@`>SVJ`RP!92H!'Z`B6.9M6>; M878H"$]IB(BHB'EV?B70N(X[%H![".U5D\GJ;N^16TOPIHVUL>`8"=AH",25 MK0IKM/EJ"?))EM(*ON'[N"Y["730`]D8M[:KN5HKKM/;O_NKOP.\P`R,P*DK MDNR+N@2[8V?*\NG,,GG,(O/,,@K,%!3,-`[,,/C,1' MK,1&O,.RX,1/G+]0W*XL;,`]?+0_;,0JK,5#',-;W,5<7,13_`J)!5U`2%W6 MM0@WB0KQM:L3*6$G6;Z$8'2"0,<:L,:/4+$7*ZQC,`)NC,=U/(A>60CQ15[F M91?IM5[M908!+`EM#%]IS'])C,6%@+,9QJZ(8&)/>0J=1[0*:0A!&0<-8':$ M@&)#AF).6;>+`+-'(+,;^@.TRPB;+`BH_,:&L&(M%@$O%F,S5FXWEF,9.PD\ MYF-9`&2+\*WX.,GU2V4K\+2#]F;16PIM@)6K):25R'"%0&AB*7R,D+1O._]^ ML;P(8.%;0@II8"/VS.Z#0W;9OW3:84!>:!JT( M7=MK8'MH$;@%B(EOS]L`C*8$%5(\%XUM&8N"Y'8UYY9NZR;(E_!N\39OL'F: M_>!TW-=W>W[UD#]UN;5>8$ M.M`!&W9W6">[-->=3LW1JBS5LPMIU&EU-^"!3&<"-9`%(5"`->>>05T(7Q=V M9;N.+D#*FX!V:L=V;@=W\,E]%6J=?VV!+3O&UNC_=V,6J9X[N1,:N]V7HB2: MHKSWU`,VEA+*@=&(IIL]"1&-V22XVJ9MU=2L:$4`VC3GU1*0I)4[W72MH.G[NJK-@3V89J\M MNW<`UV9:V\E';BO8@F"'`3!(TY90930(W3B8HCN89E`JHS\XUX@-HX50AW?X M:GO8A\P;HH\8JZQJ!(O:B@^^JJMZ"85ZJ`].8`V.81ANAK59J$ZP!VE11.JD@1@5IP`(%4`994`5N\`5^5R=^(E%+HJD6&.FV`ES0)0,J*JO&(NSZ`&U>(NX*M]53,*/(,)((ZF0([.:H[&RE[J>.8& M?L7'+<1B3.A6C.AB;MR)OL247,,NK,<8.[&1``1PZ[7;UG$%Y,H;Z$ M`,B98,8?:UV%;.J?/L\C3.G$&[,SR^J/@`-]0`@\*V+>B\P2-N7I\J88,GW70.=Y^MBL&>]_NNG6]Q"_>B#X,V77H_^F`*SSKMGQKM)2`CR M;/_!A$"U4M:-Y+W?S3Q@O$:UZ0CN\OO)80[K,JK*^ARV`3>V=QV\AD":V>;0 M@7@"(G#M"2>9SJ;3^W9MI4G1L1;O',JEF*F9.\"9GKD#_XR:^&Z:#JV:K.F: ML*FK:(O/N%=IWDFU7JKJ[3Z\MCG60(>W>LNWP&[OA6!SW<:>-K>C_OZY[#EW M+E]U[(IU4IV,W[X"XUF>HX:>V+F>\'GS4_UT\KD%]%G8@5O48U9EZCIC4$^> MAHU:JT[R[X[:E`O9L=WL$NRUHX>BO+=ZUE[RS99[`"YUM.W=KN?87J\)FWN9 MODA@0S"BP)VB:P_@*]JB+XKVH-@FR/WCQ_]EWZI6&*HU):II&?^3^@IFSJW[?+ M@%)_F4K7I=@;O!_>X8ZEJ!5MIMX>8B*L6 MXK$8B;":XI;XX0D/JAP@JJ1JJBZ`JF)GX:_HJI(X_!1>J[>:BQI/O0L.=H9* M7#<0JJ/Z]H-NZ.OHL8-`YE'WJ^G+K[J%K5Y6K>O^OHBPC8!0DU2C46AHJ*5R MN,C8Z/@(\"B9=$'(N"!H:7@#4\BYA%FX($E:2AIYB&JZRMKJVJKZ6ICB(VM[ M"XFKN\NK$=OKR/;`X8&A"6S[__N+S-SLJTO7(^=,O;AOKJMWOZWU_M'T!J`@07,&$O18R MY.7PH39K$O=5M'@Q6\2,Z.9Q;+;QXSJ1!$F"I&@26,B4N5BJ=-D0)R-2P1]4/5J4W/ M1>SZ-?_LG*P-UK8]N]#MA+%V]_/]._<[X;T;+=""7-&M),BUC,+]:!"R#8D. M45B,Z.0^(/X5'C:,P>+Q>P%]+._=%Y\N.3&MH`)7]^/=X6 M+-E@AAER+`&%@/?E1PA^TU14'"-C#$%`#R)<(<$A2YRQRA(N$!`!$038,9`] M;""@RW.%_#"$"88\6,0EC/Q`0H7(7/,@&'$TD`9W&RCRW(Z'W%`+(W-4<$06 M(C"P"(PRE@*D=>X=M0@5;DS`H1@TG$%%+5D84$&%6QB!G1(&(*E!%DS4]XB) M[C2X2!M8='D#`"0:,@<(K+#!A01*=-`B0.P\F.,M/Y1Q2!O_:(10GP(-S&G( MH(RT$>-!C;011"<_)`#BBX0VHL03C*20YWOH%1JI*4JH:)-Q&H`J00HV$&+& MB08@,,8=W+$19`ID/N*H/&P6^J8$P`$'L#P;+1;0D`$A1@UHD`$F!:R12T*^#!&$%'4X<2Z&JR;P@<-^%"" M`VI8TH87!=C9[XAC\(#$%2SDJP80''1A@PJ0+AG3HY5J<`,!.VSA0`,,_,"$ M!`ASW*J]/BCAA!@=[(KK(F.@<<(,,#R<[KRU;#&`&'ZXT8#%2G#0``!%@)S" MP@UO]0BK6U:P0Q*&X!`@:HH00_R"B,-[`!4M`L\E-("SONAAK;+6XSOQJ MB)MA[$'#'ES$(6<;*]@)*ML(N&V##-\8PD88)\`K1PH6LV%#`"O4?83;?:00 M1J;8;--O#6S8J<&ID9M`BP9;@"#YJ7-@P,((DI>=0]0[W(#`B'-`L,>LDF^! M`,@/2_KH"D[HT($Q2ABC01MDZ*FB[L)R[KDQE4\K;2$X()G"%0'$F+F*M]=P M@XHCGNIL"`'LSCK(1#O"J@9`U.&S(1H&NHB&(/P`1B&GIX[`\[0T/_GS&JP_ M:TEM31KL_&'`8<$.;MLYA_WU[W^,H-:6TD"%/,V!"X*#W/\0I[B`..(&$+"` M#D+5/"4@JO\`[7.>"5`$``9\KA!MR,$2"E"&+ZA@1"."FHK&0($>=.QU,YK4 MQ,:P`A%Z*G>[DYSO0*C#R.U0`RD[1`O'$(/E\6YR0EP5`#N8NR3N#H8RA%A+ M&L&J02RA!!9#%QR&L*L?<>$/\.`;C_2!'FJP MA0H(`%4DS,&J0MA&-N1H#&>0W(C:$`,)T/`E$NN$AHK`1M_Y<'>7S*0`/,7& M526N$!=*V1A(H,1*-C$%3_3A':XG@5.F MH0!.^$,:?I"!%U@""#0XPA)X(($L#`$#`C```+H$TA>P`0!YJ,,+LA"""':' M$4`P@!/VT(`N;>$*T[@4#&(J@P3`@`T=/6A#O[2@^0%`"AYP&DC=(`8&X+2? M&:6H'*!*A32P`(59J((;_G!4IS#+".GPMGRL'5MLQK(281`#=V;)#7#\]-RPW*0;=W/) M=>_Q77V0;2_$*:]PSAG>>/QI/>WAQM/4$1(@C&JWFH#/?%9S7O1:UQ%#*M*1 MF-&CWN)#%CCH0P$9I:0FE4)-`S[O>$_33!F-8;Z\Z!5X99$"`Q\"4/QB'B=Y MM:ETI+<>V=7*-8JX(I:Y[&L,H!D??+:REL&`Q4%CV,'T!;(8K[AF)TND(6IL M`P7PF`%+8)D(-/]LB'*=*W?,XQF,"4:AKVU-7PICF(!AMP@`!<@,N&7$?9L! MVT(D`046.,,H\`.%"]!$LK`Y3-&7?9Z]@LJZ5G M.M=@>(MK1)\%30O640S)N?."XQSHX>J5`'6JP]WJ6M>Q<=!H"&`P0QQ"`-E- MO!D89C1>"XZ`AP/4HD83\(-?@5)BK+B9CR1"XBW/V+L8<%`#MMXA%?W,$*/XFAN*DC)BSG]JE!GJY:A+-93."9AMS&&J595G!K#:XL8JX699 MO6I6ASJ-M=H4J4HU>HL+&U5SXHVF=>!`804`/F,IAZ$.A:@=MEK6LW)KL%AK M;$R5WE:%QHX#41!!'ET``4?/(8]HL(/[?-!G/0G/!Y6['/W<6#9'/XYX[R&" M7MT&@2ZTX+U6N=]LV'';0^C6A9I%Q&:#V]I%3+[!E\C$(BCA;4DLX;>\;*XA MI(/YBN=N!23R+$&'0*)2>_,)V9Z]!G?`P5(W_X*"%@S5-F=1"TJ]NAR.;[,N M"/T6\W+[1$=`01Q`GC*,SS[?LX_D)(GX<$8L`>&-C)RK@7_NX>\DUE492C2B M'A?E_\@`'#B!!X3PAR)HZ`U8?RQ4OU0`JK]``5=?#!=D0'9M\'*%P'6IY75P M!@`0<".UT%-E<&7,A'/DM5\3Z`J4(%RIMPE^]0FLQ6"2@!\/"&O%AQCKQFZ/ M1P[250S"I5[D]Q0D"%_JEPW*(5L M%H97^(5=V(1CB(96F/^%JL>%9#B&:ZAV9UB&3@B'A0:&;8B%=[B$;CB'=0AP M?+B'>2B'!!(@-4"(Z%<>'KAE7,80U_`=FV<(B5@(DJ@!7Z8R[/4D\+$*EDB) M-W<@^@$%_'$$_J%E`U(@485F"0(%Z#>#5(B'A0`$+@.+U'4?//((->)IH-:* M*L-I-T(^M:@!`?8C-M=?1A)&!%4J3%(\/F(?!#@E57(E62)8),KQZ@I).:-@S$IX9@#)[3,R'G9#^SDD(#@F*X"$;#)4FS-$W#>%$S-573`H8:&S=[*D(LG3*HSB-FSG=I&S=W\G/WT'`ER9`H"W4]@T.[53 M`_*CE3ST.YUS=P*Y"'&6/,'D06()/=+30=6#3'D'@4$9*M\3/KSD`K\H/BYP M/NDS/Y36/GNG1B8@/W\WE6"(2EW&I(0B``DMBD:DU#=-G;1&W06_GF?:8 MC^K(:SD42ST4;!(`1+-GET94:TGD84ST2,64:\B4_VV#>0A99(A<5!];\$4$ M23%C5$:EF49[N4;CI)8C297.U4JST#[^%I>K\@%A%)H$97?^1DX0=R*2=#?U M@IR[<`W"]VXN`$L[%)>^4TN:Y&\_YF[PQFO`Q#SA5`N[.3]0)(#(E&_`^6/. M!$W2Y#W5M`775"C9)"/A:7O.HY]L%)Z7*8?&$P9G!7+W9UA-%U*&B`9/

    !59B159FA59&A7;HZ(UP)5=T95=XI5>"U5="$EA;8G^%=5@OD%@> ML%B-A:5R1)U`686?!P5=EO]1"=LH""3O"HD>JB>MB& MT[EMN$`'W<4+,MBI?YB&;XBIC%JJ"+FHVK6%WTBJ%?H>F%A^LB!?:;HBVV&) MT&&&?%B,_]6"!,9HTX)@,:)@I,"-;%B%FCJ2`RIA]/@3(6%P*S($Y+-PI5". M1U@(6A8@:&H>S(H+A&@&AE@@9@"*JXAF*K`$>K"*Q$>FKTA$;Z9C,\:1+G:8 MZ?+GV:/P]H+L>A7U#0!SQ@! M8H#_`-_3)S?`H^.7JB;6"#.'EWM&"';VEKI(KXMP:'NG:#?`:(TS>/5(/3@U M:>PC/Y>F/:K7G:$'-?"X"YGY'CFPCWE21W`62"RZFADK:QO[9L,V;]2FFHW8 M"+\V<"3RK!0#;:$RK:BT:V<4<2^4;$L;,'K#74;IEBG[^4M+V3C!]Q8A,W<`6'9-NG M"`G'L@SG<-PDGDP4H#2[`F#Y=G%7`W-79'9GLIBF=X/&=S,#`I;9)@H9CQ"C M!'6@F"&XKJPJ553UHT"'HD,'=.!V&`5$=5:WH_6G=03(_Z,/Q4]@AZ1C9W]F M%U)+*KFM5U2PUT8W*T2UYV^WEWN6^K;B6+JTIJBKBZJ-8*>%`(FG4GD7,K+; MZ'F[=0$VZPBC9PEM6JC!.+YQN*!S@G'.!WVU('W@.7%ZXF_6]PT3VB83LRIS M(K=X8ZEX>ZJD@'PFD;=ZNP@AVG[O%W_S5W^$M:/YQU8Z^B4"X'\`^%AM>PA, M@Z'CX:1-H`D]=;'J^H2LRPKGYUVK.@F58!SM*UJBA5P=F`1GJH5$&ZL%7+3C M@(*T*%Y$:!0)'%F`V`PRB*LGG+U$;*JY.JKLZL3'JL,Y[*I0/,5)W,14K,2J M&L4[C+U+G,4:.X5=K,55[,6"^/_%7'S&8"S&:IS&O1K&2%S&RC$:]G&=OS&>7RI9#S&=%C'17C'2>S'U[O'A-S'@QS$A>S%A[QFUM$!NC1*XIE`C<5`' M@96.#M*+.*(CMJ@!S.@)Q$@DQI@DK_P("LO+C2["*3-0F58$,!'[<#&AG/I\":)LEB*8EC*RDR95N;*29C,*,N,U,S.*DS M.PDT/GG_RF/0'Z5XB)^HBJQ8NVN,QNSL5V[3!9#Y,!TK:'"F9S+B-N]2!H3P M=YO3.2+M095)=W:PTL##S['3EK:#.^^Y.RP=/)Y;T,:C9WJIF\80/6W4LM:# M/9PKH#"")3YP-%X")E!SC65R)L1ZQ)`\M-3\'D%`!%X9(T@+G;Q&<<)7`D-3 M:D"$M"\=UL#:*$.04%=$DIV`0T$DEW\VF_,)DP(LUD(-3D[4G]3FFULKH""K M`;%24`!Y*P-)"M5Z83CLQEH]/S80G@_#;_@6;R9=*6-`!'82GO%I;_=Y:^)$ M>!C7V9@DIHZ0GA/S2J^I;[1DVLM&GWQ[!OP63/HY3+R9.\Y71#^J6C"3Y=0MWAG;IZX3W1+:/87:,WJMX67,([Y[H^!W1"VE5$ M5:1C509AEZ1JI7^)>L*&V2?C$Q_F@S[J`YEW-YF5"9G-[=A\;`KJR[V]!8G: M&PIT>N%BEJ?DF[X;#JA^*J>S->+G:\-WNEL??KY[:@A]"M>%ND5=9)Q@M'O* MR=98VYRZ29EK#818'<[(7*;86*!V0$W6Q'ANHTT/]Z##-#+CE'TWK-%2G,B- M_"EU]0=&$%=[90!5^E=7>J):BEA=5?_>CG7:[@OD&`O(;)QEVNH(@BH^A"IF MALKBI4?@0YSFJEOES[W(%5JNCC"K1"&KS`I;]L6MP='G;O@@8:0F!:83(>'H MUGLBPFISV[@F2>C<0L&:UQR$=Z,J[[+<2`]AOOH&TNXX.GO!Y>XW5>U#@RJP,(HN^83:.R/@."]#M!!;0!2L74EF0=38P;UVQ ML;=[=2._=;WK=<`K=M2-=&N?X"+2K"^2\S*KDO\G\QW`C!LAUZ;<1O7K&7[K2W MM;9WFKH'V>WR,CT_]ED-]&PNY.S:G?'[?()$OT=`FIE9?>2)?8Y;G9%=`^2\ M`?[COY]O]V6O]Q7*P"/ZP"Y`?^==HA.L?_2-P1>EP5WR]>T=HXT%_Z,>[P02 MD/L?S[6HG>G_3OK"7X&8++[>%EH4LRP<.,V+O]&-C\+,T,-+C^K.3^5S',?5 M8,0A$ORPON;/WZIY3_SB7_K6_]CDWQ28/N&*_/W7KX;#[_WH'_]W[XG0;\7O MW_[GC_V&#/_IW__S#P@:@H.$A8:'B(F*BXR-@@".D9*3E(Z0E9B9FHN7FYZ? MFIT:HJ"EIHBDIZJJJ:NNGZVOLJ&$L;.WEKBZE;:[OH:]O\*#HL'#N\;'NLG* MM\S-SK4`T]35UM?8V=K;W-W>W^#AXN/DY>;GZ.GJZ^S4M=#-S_"K\O.G]?;W M[_F_^/R>_O[1$MAO'\%H!W$%3#AI(<.&!O\?TI,HRR%%3AKF`$U.Q0TMRB#A1AX$@(!AJ MF#Y#Q8>&+`8JH-YBA/35(6#BU`G-V7>*-U:1*]?`W/GMW")\9[I[B`T7"4N^ M]&S4AL_V.0\P)SG_*JC-"L>#YN!?=JA-$,QL&'?(#V54T@8:(:RG0`.+8=+& M::D=DD(+J&F0PGF$$)B1(JU<6.$8;JP0WU4Y6)B&2F8(DA@"8]Q!7WW_:7"# M#2K8AQ@81ZW8XHL>"C*&&@,]@HAY,MR!6EY6V%`#0@;7A1@&.!LH$8$Q)L,8`8'3`P1I]/NMD``RG42>.#$J3P00,",M)* M@("N<,*B'<`I)YUVJB`I`S\@.H::;!+T::8B@&: M@Q)"['`#N@BT088$2@27@@\&(WPEOP"W*@&FL MDL02X)`OE/G,2D@;.>1E0P`E:@!$'0"$)I4+)_:W@I;+1KD"`$4_1O2+&D`+ MRT:#F">``7O-$08<%NP`K[O?3@F#N0C,P86Z('R]%[R^M.(?;(9>%8,`3PBR M\A@4]("H$@D6`/&\.1=0QABF')F;.:4I;V(ZG#L&P M]:1`7YA;6?DX5Y^)@0I\HIM'A[RE@268H6?(,4X6^+($,?`%.-QIW>S^,P8B M$&H%B,E=4$"X!1$.PGF0"=(H#H$'[+(P!`(< M`0\N`$`9MA`T'$C!"AS_:`)RTD`%:[4!"V]8C[P*`00#E,$E/\B`&\3`@"U< MP2IA?('O\E"'%P"!&ER0@0&.!R4@T.`(2^"!!(B(`1DDH$VL8<[5Z&A&JZRQ MC5D(@1W8X(0_Z(Y#B,!!"]0P`2'8@3ER8(X,,J!&`+#Q!0HXHP9^\,```M M@($N>6F`9!9B#JMLI19Y,3Q$+&$!4(O$,:=!04(DP3FS8,9-##$?#6!S/C>( M)0RNF3/,8%ID6!SS`+X9$=$/`P.A$$JJ+)=#!`D"1H"H^JK[::+04%SUI M1%)Z4I:V5*71@BE*JRG32+2B+.VL*4UUV@B7JE1:/!5*(:H35$@6-4)'I29' MDTJYF\6(J87P*4:EJE&@0M6H(VP3J1Q%`1TT+*A4S4A8-V35JZ*B>RZ[V$*7 M@`:^\'2L%('K1_85(TO]JUVSFM?[&><')=6I7!^R M6),*2;"':$47RZ"`0!I!`$!3SOYDVMB$=-:B.^VK/))P`97$L*:?_2=D$T%7 MR*96(*_]1VQA&]JZSK9FJXUL;L\:V-W>=G2[C6IP!_\[P^$6U[B_%:EQ`YM< M:#37NYWA3%>\D:WO,.@[E_1RSWL M9E>]HCVO?-];6[.R5S+NG>]V?:O?X=ZWO?O-[7^WZ-_PPM>V_>6N@>M[U0$C M!+D+[JV`$\Q?^DIXM0X.)X45?&'7;AC#$0XPB`U1%IHH(BD:H(-#46P(K&@% M$2I^J(]"JH_\VCC#KV@%92Q3)A*[!&!;\`%M##&I:51UD@3+'BPQ/N<'6[%S4'6$H%>/.J#!!U@P9`X`@> M2_-7CY,<7EGHS&U^\Z/\Q(+_.*GA00$@`HVR``%P(A41Y;P*4/``I%D`H=$: M?K)T*SR[%=2K!7L(V%K1$(&)::`$F('9IMWJ,Z"%IF.(^C1F,J:8E6'J@)G: MZW@4L3C32$"6(]D$#OI`8"=#>MPM3EC+ZY?GL%4 M7A"`@@@J=3(JC-)I5J8(#6DB!;Q^\(UM7"RX]4\"H/I!IU'#AE`[\+`EW6`% M/;C`J`$H?ZZ&D*90*<-"*"`"">`+II3`@6H58<^1^I('3G7F%YY948SR#5M/ M(()P1YHL,LFX'K*RE:Y\)2QC$01.15,5QC(8JI(59M0\BII'=A?;F!QC1B""FZ8``$B(`8:$$>#R5E.RN(^?C\$FW^D3J)D>X@80L(`.SC/P:,?`;VQ/G&?PICXT-HQD,I4)(&LJPC8%9-0"G@-Y$+=-U?KS* M5*92@P*,L_U56=\5![;OANB0V*E]G34:2((+6M`#16:A"O^VA/D?%(0P,"/P`&@L!J&U,#%[,R$F@"+J,! M#@A^=I=4.-9YD[`$6A`4[^1-^P02]`%X*V$2>V=X$G(>RB9"KQ,[A\<%?[`8 MSU98$PAM^_-L&"AFKT=NE":`YR%O'?1!&!!",F8??[(^-=`^-N@9]1.!C8,_ M2TA0,<6#\45B,F%BC/!H+^6#?#!U"*O1&J\!3XLP9*`E:1OXB#=C:?82!_PB,Q82*5O7!Q,X M:BL3,B,#7`)((3>'(8-PB9SUB;WX9<%F/\3S%Z"#;G\!;A-8@YXA.:HWBY5S M,J*"?:_X<*089Z:H6F3A%5Y!A1P!::!08F3;D>P,@`D0-!E,J'2`RE3=2W#+S!#C+!&6RT& M'6;P2G@H([*H"90A'=0!@])G")/U8Z)D2F34+T"3 M)''H`?J2_UD_Q$F,Y$@IR!\861\KT`,)-'F;LS^>PXW#AXGS@D*#EPB;!0H( M.2/,%3XX$_IAX+IQXAM&13S,4_TF%X$-&<')#Z(HT#% MUSGO=A5,-HA9^1>(-0OT(I*X`015RFI`G&-@B=ZPB=^\C&F]S;'HC3* M0A_0=Y?3)W?BY84C9@B21$F6A$F:A)0L!TH]64IB]),B66D<$`4B@`!Y`0%> M4`/*F#)8ES(7PQT%(W6T9Q](\S)+\T@'F$UYH8`,B)96&(F^=@CXA&@CF&B' MP)9866E_L8BC-`1_48.8?$&F-6&^V<8GZ1_@@1'2JG9>JG/]BF>6BG7!JH MB`JG@)JCAHI0@KJ'XQ:IT+FH$OJHFQ#_"RZV`(PV%#0V"5S(&$6139V*HXU: MJ%Y89#Z`:P,"(43ZAUU7BZZQ9:P:IGJJIIA:>R:"(EUY,Z=!C8U0B18"C18B MC6SG&:8J&AZ!G8/0B9U8JBW6%'01%Y^J"-":8J!YI'W:J,VWF!%G?0_29W)B M?9+B!I""'FI2<:<7*@C@F#3B+QT$!@!X:(P!'7'0``A(&[*ABRA)B[BA&_QF M:XU0JZ(QK]JJJ(1*@$60=0[8>!8HG"[C@``C(Q9G.2B$=2:@`#,Z:\%&2J26 M(:QG"+U:K!]BC]IVDH3`;9EJC5[8@G&`.<_FL."I>=NX>>N:G^*I!'F0(+8J MBC=P*ZOB,7[F_S&:PBG>VB@W^QFFB"FJV'V+X@=NT`"W0G`&1[0-UU,PD7$R ML7%:P18?]Q8Y(1,#67*[**4H=PA"*`90:3]2V#XR^WL%>@8-:;-V@Y=/$J`F M0`6BYZ:_Z`0ZT`%4YY'T$VT3PXPCD'5)^WSY$@"[YR\N

    )9`=I]'/T M=T:T2S%!:3O/-TF5Q!?Y9P0+X`).4)`<*XICL`(,0)6#>VP_-`368GP*63E6 MR;@4XX04")&.L5"N%@.5*P'BB;F"\'GG$7HHHB**L2/G>'/E"+(7:?^V=Y<( M](07@B>"%32_!CB_I&6=@S"=@V""R8J0>;&P?EF]S%N1>MDX%D)!D/%`)$"] M3Z@RV&N!DLM[W5MO6$N)05AGSJN.^B^ M&KAA7>0$>]``M8M&KOD"+Y>40619^01-K!0L/LD`L7N\,3B#-9N0>\G%CAN%+FD;PAD-)AZ)TNYL6,PB] M"8%:1['*]QQ@4)(A<)+]_`FR>HO$-XTNB1U4[84K:@`\=XC,"@,"%B+8V!T30VLH!+::.WBHCI%[^"X$_)[$VE91*WQ0$J"L[9!Y;2.C=`2&N0.(J9B,V?\H M[JHJ6R69=;`GYYJB24O>JPAP;I4L29/++*R6,/6;NDH%Z*=^[.=^\/<'\D=( M9V1_JXE_J^FZV7;8*GZV!ZF5YRHC%HJA&LJA+N"A1@G+(MI&KBL`)GJ'].TKO&M)2R#@5D'@1["3Q[3* M-I66147F97ZJB\"C;RS;0"HCZS2__\R_WFSH@_[_VX3\"DWZI"C.E/U=Z&#V MU)QHNLIEI5F!I90.O@1M@:PQJ[@X&P8;I2.-Z&=NV]%(,\#Z4RS;Y._;E$HS M*HR2?:A"(T'K*N^(I0.=J`1ML1IIUW*]-X(;,S-C[`@KZX,:O4ZYMGWL.)6G MO-XH-VAM7KQHZ9V$.&NZRU\"*79N[#\AOG7FC#PP_`8 MZZG.J(0@Z2M1G3G%K+C5[F.LNM0^IJ=^P>[NWP1OYM6^[Y.>\)_M M\`;OJ!2_ZPO_[IW.5QOO\?J.["3/[ZC:\2"/\I[^G...\9>N\2JO6&):IA8/ MQ07_\B=_\RU_\#0?\@P?__-O1>@IK_,3WU\U?[`0__`Y[_([G_0([_,K#_0R MS_)%3_1.;O3MD/5:O_5__5@'_9B/PY"'_10'_5G>O0:;?57G_9G;_9O M/_54W_9,W_1B,BE4A,??@H?,`DV50A!-FMXTP M>`,`8"2G,8:&K6T`Q^?S,U2\Y&*%J\Z^#4%T)7%3YP,B9HZ@#2M&2-V)&3!2 M25B"YH2(/F-X(/&W98"8#L<*'4JT*`6'+C94;''0@$%&/@"*$%QFT".B&P1V MG$SY@XF$$@[4Y+3UH8$/)4XV=G1$C)%"A@ZW%%/@(Z/_&#]N&M14PJ%!RY\B M2:J(%)-0K6T5=B09Y(W&CD9*A&1"L;;B10E2.S3AJ0:J!J@W&0;<@X8KB8J#@`$&AN_'A%'\EV M((,(W(APTG1$PN@XEN)*`%5;Q-WH,P?"'E]*,-1(@;#P"BFZ!IKKH'8 M#%(-TN*#?NG$L)L$2J;0AY*">-+*)S*!E`X%/>A$92N+M!&#=D2*2,E'8ZS` M0)=ME'?>FA+(`T":GW2)5'*)B#,&D_1I:`*5*;PVQWY?,EG>&%H.&.(CM211 MPQ(EU"3(%G`,<10A-W#QAS@:2%EEE1EZV26G8\9&)B72D")9!)Q%-MF'@DR0 MR:8^I+KJ:X7AJ,$6I2VA`JTJ"NG8J(0IX<=`R"4U!@E-LN$2E&Q8-\895-)9 M"9;Z@6F>E6VJ,BJIJ'Q43Q%JLOEE>7K4L$4%`LQII2.L";+$&<@J2]\G&-H+ MJ*"%W?\!H),(8$N@HJ-DD MPP8`>=3Q@@)7H$,LU)5NK$%80!C@Q!X-:+VVS@G`X/0+,NS-AA-_I*$`U^=` M,@<`4GB@EM-N3WUF'AZ\4;@<5*3!0@%E9%&%&W_P#;C9:./`A=$=,Y+$!&$T M`<0#GMO``A5A(+)-"P,1,D?+&F"MM>$R9/!"8Y)3GC?O8G;_.Q@LLR3Q%:^0 MG(7'&<(L_Q4A"[B`T!(ONJ@!\XYX/R;2@FP`1?4::&&^($E_P1D$+0$%_PT"?:B3@_,>L00MP,]%-6#4&":@J=-%HG_, M`!^\MM>(]B7!@/=['_X$D;P/P@(Y!="="$$AOA,RPSTJS%\+7[B,&W#(6S"L M86!":$-&T.$("\PA"'U($#KTP&LG3"$0C_A#)"J1ADE@C#+H)1A.*;WQA&`*-3:)$@0%"C!,=GACB:08"/P(,; MX98$%%C@#+/HHMB@``4Y=/&+-WSC_QJKZ(@Q#`%F=3`A#.7Q-BR^1U,_4,4- M[`2)61Q29'TH2"(7:88X9`<2E_P@#EIP!#P8"AV M[H`H1DFH233"D3$$(0IU<((,+.*/-@1C$/"!Z#05(4T8?).6AMPF&1T!&9*6 M(1<>0L``1WO@V)]:F\T\!MC-HP#41`!`NH!`:M&E6H7B@H"I%-7]VP! M!#UMQ&S&4)N&+*(PIK:%'_=A$$)=,DI.#%`27DB*J@^P:G(#B%. M3>V4)T2%/$?<``(6T,$HM#JH`D2P2^PK02C[T?++2YV`\V%K"OP5BTSI6N`H"3!.M" M$I62,E'KG@&[)8JI9Y\`WI"%EA%+^,)7#/.O8*KTE1F3V)3R\Z__,+WP6F'R M+;-H85N.'9.21T!!'-J97O_F-[B>^`$/>!`R\;*E6*$HAG*K"0/JTE3`T95D M(^86MFV\0``&R)J3!)<&QT4M$ M\(T,-A8Q$9^K MV`Y351D>3`(%!4'`W!Y0?81TW_8,34=0K"\7\1KT,A(H#`^B+A?R@_+&.IU! M]HW1BJAK-"-`;:F!W$"F&-0D(\CG7+A!_U?0ZZ7U36U=1!NRX0$<\,`,J3AK M7/=8V-(E=K%M2`<+J%>+P3;VAIUM:6B'3]K1=B&UMT/J:\TFXEL9]U9W6%+0@E48 MB!##U':_T=WL?3]4X8EE!'PB6I>!JJ&@7NG+3\AITX.7.^$,3W?'!>-7>2+S MJ6&]*YC()[8(X([+7TN"+;!GWG"/`WWA M0Q?ZE.ZY<@8_X3S\#2YZYN7S*+K\VAS_^-2I39A3JF$";LF5[X`GY;0M>6\J MCB2SBTYSF:,]W_]K5_L@]/#G36L`U8Y(]#:O+NVJ=QSOT.9[W]LN0;\36_"# M!SS,9ZYWAA->V(MGO.&-WGA:1U[RCS=ZVQ.O\,D+6O.;KSS;.;]8T(?>\VR_ M_.&M[GG1C[[RF-^WZN].^M?;^_1[3WWL;<]AP,N^Y;=G/>T5CWO?"]_R:-_] M(8U__."[O>C(/[OR=?_[S#\?^L-?_M";?T7L9__YVG_B]$U?_=(7__MK[[[W M0!2(02944=21("".X;OA'?/SG?]5R"5-%<)S@"#P6"J-0"G=4"-S" M"N=1;?\G?C3X:H`$2"I`@43R@,Y'"-5"$S:!$@SP$WC!%?'$41S!4IB$<4WQ M%%&A$51A%1OU3T7`%095;VKU@DH(2'J@;`NP!!L01P8$!69`1&*D`>03=\F7 M?_''"/(`!F8@!@@`@ZS@:H_`@E!H<]\1'M>!=8V!TB;\4AY-UXT"(P%D M819H$09JP19=!Q?I@%)T`5(2IQ=\487A=&PS>'W`V&L^X";CH51`=1Y*Y57Q M98HY)#=T8S=XHUMD!SQ_`P,S1CB&0T2)LSB-\S11LSM%QF*4=R%,Q69+6!W0C$HP+L)(7$T'/ MB%\L%4'X^'.PL3^0!O\*`!1I=C<(&[1H#J)`I]9`$&B2B](HCV(TDD(IHH4I MFM);..EB5>XB674G=_C3`6!7,P!Z(P6\`P4>@P MJR!>OD4Q"ID($5.61WB2'P8V7W$)Y50\A#_59HA]8^FJ9I?NA_CW!HRF!! MCC9&&L1![(5!C,6.OQB>^B=_[XF$,FB![8EP^S>;]"F;E-D(@R28<*.'MQ2> M="A'D=8($M@M7;2$"KJ@@&1J``A(N<"'B3*9B/=)C.1(+]1*O?1]'!A*H_3_ M"*6T,8)(B`B`BJK(BK\02[-$"+:(B[I(H69IH;B$5@<%0[PDH/I9",'8/5#& M@T2"6[PR"[7`*U)HH[)B#`%3H3'76#,UC^,4$0QA3B+9`.JD44\J3Q]!3QF% M=$5HA#LJ411E41AE3QM5%!SA45LZ4B5U4G-!9V`*30/I@S$U4XS0%F^QBX$7 MGCE5!SO5(3%)B9EX!9:U(34P5RW)5%?R5'.%3Y]IJF#8XEL.!F$0 M4U\-@@:=DPLEW;[.:.,T&<&,&*ZZ9-EEY0N!F/3(&,H5F.UV355IF,S M&9'AN65=]F5A-F9E1A>&DV93AF-N!F>Z^:9Y9CZILSJY\*\OT(>Y`W)_.)]W M^6CCF6A\F3Z3=D&Y8)>P0+/FJJ,X^Z"#0'>"L&I`RVK3\T'EN:_829/XR9\P MM&N]]FN>R;+Y69]*NS')MFSYN*34NK/PJ9](:T->^[6.:H1@FZ/"N;4M2[8O ME+9J*[9<.ZVU)Y\M.[9QN_^T9RNU_(JJ=%NW9HNW6CNU>INW60NW=GNWXBLNW:RN9?YNX?MNW@RNYEVNXF.NVF@N(BRM]C4NYFU>]L]`00O>A!(H("@S!"@6]2?`JB7 M$RAN3=B[K#`&"]B`C?"$K-"[3;BOX^.&4`"'1R"'!&J'>`BA4""ANYMQ]KEQ MHE4''9$P4#8+(DH0&ZJ!S!M+'MA#(RB"Z8.^K#`')YB"*RB$H#"_AQBC@W"B MJ]B*KQB+!E`BM$@_MR@(N9BGI[:.M8NX-I<-Z9`#D)`,/PH+.`J\^J@W.-BJ M.KC_3,HP<*9`"?D;"4283=XX"N"H"[Q`CBM5<[20CAWJ`1L94!^)%R&)3BE!DDM,P[)K MP_5@`P&0`X(J`&"E(7754]/Q5)TU'GQLB;)V3(XH'I%H'N62'NLQR)%@Q8** MD(TLEI^H'ULUBG11BF(L%E:9(+I3#Q^X(*3JE14"EH]9J']:(=>YIQ-\)DZ0 M`Z_:7:J,J_0CD-0RKFRY)-UEP<.FP9HV]S"KZ9A^8C&O.:]T[+GC3`A`$`*J%@]%J1)+!CQK1F(FIF1G!I2"8&,E MK3,>W;"',\]?4S=W0Q=CQS<["3@HMF9]R`A"R3@[4'9':0<%NY28HSF_W)JR#"-;P,Q10*`3?-@>C!O'?9FFO%/%R%*X&5CC?& M:KA0$3$1T:@<"!!Q>$%Q"E6%%X?%'/IJ_ MHP(0Y&L<)%J('IK?,7C1?>UPR#R-Z3PH$`N>@S"L55);Q!U1K)ESA^)T;I+, M]FUSR>3_H\PT*I`1P3IQ87G<`OF7\UB6VUA M-)I(X:#HKO;\D`>IX6"J,V*Z`Q?%I6;:4!F9BY@)D]K`MO;%IT['E\+$FYN0:S=$B"[1<)NT,KJ>!_=>C MR[-C]+-HI6I#RSWV]]VU MCLB'G>6HK?"(WO!4=^@0__`2W[43GW=M:[H(_](%S_&$C>X&_O'+/O`@;^__ MOKH6_W=42[D:7VN#+;:O(=?_`H3^L8[_$S_\`EG_,Q'[XJ M_[HU/VTZO_.W#?2V:_`T[V9/#_51+_533_55;_57C_59K_5;S_5=[_5?#_9A B+_9C3_9E;_90WPQGK_9KS_9M[_9O#PGW<2_W GRAPHIC 130 chart1b.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 chart1b.gif M1TE&.#EA@P%W`.8``````-[_U=VT8PQM@P``9L%\`%.MX68``(UZ)(P`;M_@ MXX:TR'T`9K:&7T5QB]C___KFM*.]W```47=/%G.3&O?__ M_V8`,[Z.1Z3'[IQ-JT*?_[J6EB87'].Z^?'E@1_+__Y1P?P``F.[?I0<2YY:J/_0``(@``@2'Y!`04`/\` M+`````"#`7<```?_@`""@X2%AH>(B8J+C(V.CY"1DI.4E9:7F)F:FXD9&0"> MH:*CI*6FIZBIJJNAH*ROL+&RJZZSMK>XJ;6YO+VSNY[`OL/$I<+%R,7'R5CBH9XNSIFK!4F!`M/&6Y0S/550I)_]B, M005G1`8775Q&5WLL*OV0&0(>.2D,@QNGZD:`,B6VF(B:RD(!]H, M-J7$-XWA\7:;D#!WRYQ76X)TG:%8U1?=W(1%[QJ'P8E2<2B84N.!50T9.5.2 MVD)YE1HKLHXU//^@AN`,(CR)[>(CQ^`9;7A20V2GA$>.;:7@%H$0;S"WU1H? M/,";`3[$\)TH0R!`P(6F:7'&AEE2CAA1S. M^0`"%SQL4,(*2>P`0Q84(+1=!M35X``73`0@1/\313P0!Q`/N#&!`S@\^8`/ M2S;9SGK291#&C"X,,$$+5FY000100%D#%G9F5PQ@4N/-$`&V2\\(<<:HA)E95&(CE05*?0!]P'O-U@[(4OKC?'5B4$,(<22+!P`!E06HF!;)[PA@07 ME+J@!P1`;*"'%'WLVD-&UQ$[KQ+OQKOE*+PYT$0(4<"@1@H%;3'O>_8^H$0* M*Q`Q,`PU5'<*G:((D%;_#:WNJ<8-S=[P0+< M_P4`PN!#%34,H,6:'(B"-Y'0B@%@6#@$_K>>\\X?AZ_0%-[55EJ87.`8-Z^# MN(`'?)#"1D$W_4XXYPL>RTBAA#ML@`=#`(#L2G`5/RQ! M#J8I@1L`D`*`2"$)=P"#%,X`@#^<8"L5:(`?6C"#)9!F"T:H@!Q0I(4D"F"+ MR2%%%O`P%R]=`#@`0,V=Y*`#(9!++7N@P$!F```5A&`),4--=\:0A3R.8)!J M.$`<5Z9#/#J@#A-`C0LJ8)=!QD$#=X`"`\;0Q0:TX?\,JU&-BX@#`"R\P`9. MHL,"-I"6->[*!%=H0@6&L(,I"&!'!2@C`R+0`#T,DH]^],!PEJ&#)!"``UF0 MP`*2L"-CSL4T6&ACQ:HB/D5*,I0[*`,F:Q7+65(R`W!T8=H@58I^>((&&:"! M$Q6`'%5(X5'IA`G3OE$/';#3$P/1@2K8>1Q[MG-I]]S7+-09"AW\P"FO6(A3 M1C(*'4QAGEH):"CXB1QYP`&AJ8"H`R4J"H(Z5*,;_2@N2LK21+X5I3,Q12;?+28RBE(F#_LK$0PSPD(G`00158%]8IA+4H4CA*+%P: M5%L(L(+("" MO'K"L+XX2V36\B,VD`6%,#"-"T6Y5J"VU:V[$4)L/'&&"2!-9^YK#RGH@Y*M M(E86-0BL7.]#K,W%%16H;>IZ3$"6XYQB^"/?^+CV<\R M=SUYF$%6MN`$D;%J!:7*PI&88"?*K*E-<)-8!NR$)SV$:4R!,H+,FB&,1G$W M4'%J@0[Z\(8#R#8#;J""KLJU.45I@55\4E5VMPM/D]Z-M^#$01)F)``*8(E) MBX,3_UK<"P;XHF4+:%C#'P-PHXPMEU@QFE'X/)B3\,$.4W>$!5N=JV*U;6J, M>A`9SXZ&L)1!:4\+:UAX1V&Q#&",#P1KEF#4@`?'.H,4-E[ M#"C.:3FP"A#L`*6;E4'5[E2P\5N<`F=0%4]G0`IFL`L8)6U;8J7!V:@.6;A5 MJARRQ.$$9A@"I_2'`TZ'6X9Q`$$=?.5L.E=3,=%IXX#4DD(7K+#%Y$3V1 M!11<,0T/@,(1,FE-)V$2F"'P@"L[:3.]EO*4J5QE"R9I%S40`#212Z-@^QAR M4(Y`-7P(@1]44`(I"F`U&=!!`1KC2@CLLI?AY-,W+WD'D`OSRZ5PPP'$S*0D M:`&+?.BX*%7C=)OC?!`R*$/'M_#A-;;1L`(@`!F2T*0G$N"9>XAF9R,N<8@G M-*`$I6A!#TH*A=:UP._Y@5VDP-3_(Y-"[PU]:(%/(86`^I,4>8>!;Z$NB\^H19Y%=WKGNRG1*PLI)]X-&;@!P>\(,CL^'/J09@/#)!A ME#*??>FMP8>!VT/VNA=>\'<_?,T4'Q7`+_Y*4[]\YA_?^#M\/NVE?VSJ0\7Z MH[\^]M&Q?>%WW_O?US[WO]_\NI??_.$??_2[?WYDM]_]Z1>__*W_?A;7W_[Q M3_[P[_]9_O<__]7W?/X75`-(@`"8??1W@.E7@#RE?\''@#H%@1&H@.NW?1)8 M4Q>(@12H?A:X@>SG@1E851[8@0L8@,<7@B(X@@F(@-2'@BSE@B\(@B4X@S1( M?B:H?"JX_X+AYX"Z!X,GY8,_*(,[6`I*(440@11(E0$GX19`\7DQ83?]0PHA M\0\DX2I+J!ZOH%0O`7E06!.NM82F,%0]X1--.!1HI5:>H!1,$7HEQ8.S=PPP MXQMA`'3BTQZ941.B01J>8%>_X6VY)U<4`!BT%0I\81AWZ$:+T1B/46S@Y(>G M`%F'`7VAP!F>`1IY6!JGD1IT^#*N(3ZCA0I\V!P8!\% MD1^YM1N."%-#TAW>HQ_B40K`E0JL!6NN167N<5O&=G@^AAZLB!_(I5S_$2`^ MQHBC\(JB"'X?6`HZ8`16X`(7LUT!0!F,0F`61B"34BFMY/4&>5);?*(8?P)?A&(HB.)?V^@HTS<* MDG(`E&(I**8IG)(!G@)K'28J\54JI]*/J@)@,`6$^?`,SG(?-I:-$H(R7:9D M$"->,",S"#-C>J"2YN^4O`",P039`&70O#.,P2S8GXI4!/88QC,8Y'D,P M(`,_))-9>$`Z25:0HL!:)TE7-%-RHH`S.J.2;L8[0Q-D*IF1-4@*?*-I(!DX MM:9`!<4ZKH,H\@8WNM&2?T@LAF,",9'2G&@ M2JST,M7)&]U$2[:$2[K$2[[DGM@Y3*903,>43,O43&\'3G$G3:$@`'25=%N7 M3=L$2[(T!-^4=,YI@ZR`>'6%>72!A`!A>9:'>@/U*`;EA*?@=Q.U>!^U>#/# M41G@H=`8HK``_U(EVE$CJG@-):-)`JA2&]^<004L%B-]8@[R0MQ^%BK<17T MN*:4>8()XC*\2`S..`[-9VZS)23M5A.W6!OU=D[_])J]8(H/@(IL*9E"Q:8] M6`J0=H]YLH[I115W@H_FI2KNA5UG\HZQVJJCLJBBMY3*"N['H7(QF7\)J3Y=EF2X877O)D439EQFIE6-8S M1,-E*N.G+"1F9%8`9@8#:!8O;H:O)7EZ<9:5N!@"M$6NAI>D3[IC@B5I8K!M MHG.7'SLLM;::(NN:"^22OV(ZXM8L'M!IL@5J+"!J&4%JF#-KE99H+&NPK=85 MKQ9K\!,*,A26+GMKFL/:L?^*9O#,N&0NE&QL*2C"?*<=*+-%8@>"UZ>;Y%4'^G6Z-`HP[$ MHZO0>`B1H^<$$-)KCK&`O7L(HHBQ>9T74"JJLDY+BKEP>FVUI$QJ#:SG>K#G M5^8:I+A@>Y8;4^S[>]G0>_P##V[H?$>*I$4JN$]KI`8QA+_-V(L;D6*L-KQ!5P#K=15_ M4`9C\2M8H0HPHQM7,2-2P$=DLL9?\:>^D<-L3`%#<`!T90J'F(A\Q:N'$8IX MI0VB\!>!,1B%F(:CM*=N.LB2$8MF(5Z!C'RE0(F?$1JC@8F;M8GZ`:@BT$NL M`(EXT2>FT*=%3,9^DHE*B`#H,7D'EL>G`!QI:00N]`7#=1Q24!R[1HY= M$08M@@R[2*:XM:EW0\FJX#]AX1W@HMYS+S($B>E`B./`@$<(;_#S%F,PE]QP@`/9=%V`EW?A@39*KNK&J MV/H$ZJ4%97(FVN4HI$E\Y8*.8*(J(8TF:A*/;Q)?$V./&KTG?=*/@O*/AW*L MBZ(F!/;0C_H`WZB0F;);>J`#1'`7M/JK\?4>K=,94X(#-9TJ8U(JN=O.3DH% MN-$&XT+/9?`LMY(KK^0!TU(#M&(K,F`!LG(T=V,$:D<&1L`#7U$S-1)0!W5@`6I=+KA,+W#]+,SR MVUYC`-:FS::I!U]0S(/C.)`S0..VT1Y;V#M9LG^IFK#&LB5]#<+L-6])V8WC M:'39MSLILB!)VWP9.J4&F#M+VB&D.F1YF,36J0TQ.42[.RHPJ/?3,4-3M;9M MU1M^U,("`$@L"O^ M$0=L_0;)>@1&A$1[4`)3L7)"U.9%M`1!1%?8\PPJ4CG*3VP*NI)\76DNWM`*Y1+J]=)W!)`#0PX(&BDS= MJ:!P%TVZ3BZ]JT>P\TVS>W,[P)\*RP>&!.O>5$G;]&%S=[ZI8+W\D$[K!,5] M-_\0V'ZY&75/*8H*)8K$#L2&%!5XN!=YLESBL!##XWZCQFON+\IX,DI1/G`[ MOOFE3ICOILJ\W#Z](*7M&5"^86C!`&QZA=I3J1<&;+'OL>#P`3\/_TMZ&YP* M]EN>(KSQ%W\.'>_Q3?KQYE#QZ`?"(3RX(D^I.X&&R9"F([^B`S%53%Q33R68 M/'%//$$##.$01_A_\]NF?PH7\6^?R`4,PKP03-(&=943CUSKN9H(M^.[3K].U M.0!+^D'&V`Z-"Z[-9/L:^6&VUY5?9W?F7"0O<>##M`.>G-TMM,.BW00R)/[& MLY\6:NAALQZ$L]Q6WHL6#0/^LEUAJ1J['=<]`KOO-;_F\];NJ'/OMIFC.\0O MMJ$Y.=168EW":2W>O^8[,^E&+&@+_>^V_@IN_K-_"UK+:8"@E5%SDV%XF`&` M>+@5I+=E9-"HE[$U9PAQ<+'(V>GY"1HJ:JBX6#J*FJJZJGJ*F+5'`98Q`Z`2 MXG%6,1*G<7>V,^*R4W8`P//@_[)+N]30!F.8=2`[++S#9XRLYL':RBD0G*%3 M\&&!=P+!$-&@EWFBQ"Q3G6#)RN1@&I@L>,88 M"K,)G\2)G%R1HH@QHT2+GA3`H''/$(V!B'1X7*3CQQ14)J%)6:FQ$\=04DZ* MLXEH9`:/(&-^XAGRD(XI.D@BFNDSJ5*.2)4ZQ=CTJ51\4:=:]78U*]6*6KMB M]0HV5-6P8<>2[>6M4L6*0TS$8RJPO``[R>Y@F/6 M+9R5,&*HG93LF)*%CD-."D+!&;&88.:KAS?3]6R58PUDAFK("(PH#@70J!2S M7M7YM?]AV4XYSHA8R80>%T\:A&BQH4*$+`ZX,`'C8L"$%G&`/-@BY(T&2HA= MTQX5^SI%Z]I!V<:]1;>:%#!J7%!C)8.+=L['0]O2XX&`%H.8H!;,O;NG[/J[ MY>^O&2*W,2(>-]N@EX$/,9#1'C>5Q#=#%Y6(<1]>_P%X"'\8IG+AAARI480< MI3$QPC89')C>#(]0:.*##PSH0P<5VM4AAAINB!V.&W4BP`<1)%'$">H%,TP9 MONB32SP,C!$''0ML0%]U.FX5X)0<6LE*4RI]HA-0/_EE(9:P<25F:V5>>::9 M:8IRXYH7N>D=G&+).1B9=%9Y9X9YRK0GGF_U^2:@?PHZ**`\3`&`:***+LIH MHXX^"FFDDDY*::667HIIIIINRFFGGGX*:JB('B5JJ::>BFJJJJ[*:JNN=DIH (K++.^DD@`#L_ ` end GRAPHIC 131 exhibit99-94x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-94x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`!'`NX#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@#*U?65TUDC6/S)&&<9P`*FTK4TU*`L%V2*<,F:70[VW6;/V5_M`3;^Y&0X[DCM0!U5%06UU%M3*2C%R?0:5W9$]%4DEO'175(L,,CDU85V$6Z;"D#G'2HA54N MC&XV):*H+=7%P3]GC4(/XFI6NKBW(^T1J4_O+4?686OK;O;0KV;VZEZBHGEQ M;M*A!PN13;65IH%D8`$YZ5K[2/-R_,CE=KD]%5;RX>W"%0#N..:6]N'MXE90 M"2V.:F5:,>:_3<:@W;S+-%5YY)UV>2BMGKGM5=;NZ:5HQ$FY>H_R:F=>,'9I M_<-0;5S0HJC+#0`^BL\:@[1[ MUA&%4M)\W09(R..>A/:I+>],TP0Q[5<,4;.F,\_I2?;8GCW1MW7[RD9#'`(XYH`M456^W6^T,')R`0`I).>.*GBN(IL"-LDKNZ=NG]# M0!+151;U1+,)%*QQ@D/UW`?>X]C3WO;>-BK/R#SA2<<`]NW(H`L44E54O1YD MHDV(L9V_>RW7`R,=#0!;HJK->QQ%L'=L#;@`[$5S#"%W%SACG[O!(_D:A&H.57]R-\FTQC?P0V>O''0^M`&A1 M4-K-]HMUEQMSG(]"#@U-0`4444`%%%%`!1110`A.!D]*P[G7)#!<2VD2F*(A M!(QZL?0>E:.J)-+9/'`NYGXQG&168]B;#1/L>P22W+A2>BJQZ?EB@#G7>ZU" MXRQ>>4]@,G\JU[;2WL;0SRR2QW<@*PI&> MO:NH(!()'(Z4`-C7:HS@L0-QQUJOJ/\`QZ-^'\ZMU5U!2UJP`)/'3ZUC7_A2 M]&7#XD00/>"!`D2%=HP2>WYT[4&<6:YX)(W8HAN_+A1#!*2H`^[4N1>0,I1D M!X&X5RI*=-PC)MM&CTES-:$MNBK`@7I@4Z55>-E;H1S5.&:6T41S1L5'1E&: MCN+WSOW40*;N"S<5I]8IQIV>_8GVH.3[FJ\$YM(_*FC?CH0,@UG!.BX.>UK%2?.GR]QVJ?=B_WJ75/^ M/=/]X?RJ.0O?2($C98U.2S5+J:LT"A5).[L*FI[\:LEL[#CHXIEM>@JE;_\` M(2G^E75Z"J<"L-0G8J0".N*Z:R]Z'K^AG#:1;=0ZE6&01@UF"*3SOL9;]WG= MGVK5JGM;^U"VT[=O7'%3B::DX^MOD.G*URVBA$"J,`#`I:*6NM*QD%-9U7[S M`?4TZLK64WRVI*@H&;<3"9`./04`:@.1D4,0JDL0`.236+0103CK6&BW:M M(4>5)6M49`4&W<.HZ8'_`->KMM)-]"W%[%`&D\Z0M;HY^4`JQ//;T]C0! MM4C,%!+$`#J36)!-?S,BLTJ+^]^8(,G&-O4>Y[4];BY=&$_FAVMP401Y5FVG M.>.N>U`&NK!E#*00>01WI!*AC#AU*GH<\5C1W5X)K6,1RJ!Y8<%."".3C;QS M[_A5NV@#Z,L,]*`-FFLZI]Y@,^IK'B>9[JQFE\]%*N MIR,@G(QGCH?<"I+E(EU*22]@:6(HHB/EEU'7(P,X/2@#5I:R!/=FYVKYF[>^ M]#'A53G:0<=>G>F[[X0[_-F+"*)\;!RQ/S#IZ=J`-FBL:&[N&NG"M+(4FD4H M$&W8,XP<=HK#DNKVW3%HR[(&ZE3@U+45S$DT+* MZ!QC(!&>:`(FLE8`&1\;=C`8&Y<]#Q_*EALXX9=ZEC@,%!/"Y.3C\:J@26T" M)$KI^Z!4)'G<_<-QQV]*E9[A06=I`OFD':F2%P<8&.><4`3"T3S%?>Y"N7"9 M&`3GGU[FD^QQ[%7+84(!S_=.158R7A5F&_Y44J-GWCN/7CK@#BD5[B-F5FGV M>:VY@FX@?PXXZ4`6#I\.&'/S2>9V.#SZ]N3^=.%G&%<`GYU"G@8P,]L8[T6D MKR0`2#$R@;QCH<51@C=6@*1R+_0\XQ0!=%C&JJ%9P5*D'/H,# M]*6TMS%YK$!6D6SUS_.FC38`J`9R@(!(#9R<\Y% M1N9XKA_O^7N4-(L8+$;?8<\^U6[8R-;H91ASUR,4`*$<2[O-.S!^7`Z\?Y_& MHY;-9F8R.YR,#H-O(/''L.M91AN/[/>V\J7D&7.#U_N_7.#5B>)@]YY49=GB M?+>400<<`'O^%`%L6$>YF9G9FW9)(_B`!_D*I`QS2"PC``WOE=NPY&5"YQCCW/6JDUO.]O?"3<[E@R;%*AOE'09.:U10` MR")8(5C3.U?7J:DHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*KWMN;FW,:OL;(96QG!!R/Y58 MHH`KW=K]HC&US'*ARD@'*FIU!"@$Y/]345,HJ2LT--K5%6*WFB.%FW)Z,N:LXI:*48**L@;;W$Q12T58A**6B@`I. M]+10`E+110`E%%0W%N9MN)&3']T]:F3:5TKC5F]1\D4N*?367< MI7U&*3O;0$1^=MMS-(-H`W8!S4,5XTB0L82/,=D/(.TC/Y]*G:!'A$4@W*,? MITJ.*S2&-$5FPCEQD]SG_&B-[:@PM[I9Y9$4I\A(P'RW!QR.U,EO1#,Z,H(5 M&VUGQG'`Q^O(IHLP8F5Y&9FD60M@#)! M&/\`T$43VAFR?.=3R,@#A3C(Z>U`"&\QYA$;;5B\P'(^84C7A%HUPHB=4!)V MR9''OCK[5-Y`#[E)4[-@]J@:P+8/VA]V_>3@8)P`.,=L4`6U.Y0<$9&<&HO. M_P!(,6!QZGGIZ5,H(`!.3ZTP1@2,_=L5$E)VL-6ZD1NA]K\@(3\I);/?KC]1 M^=1-J`2)&=5C9V88D<*!M.#S4OV.(7*SJ"'&3P>"3226>Y1LE9&!8[@`?O') M'-6(DFF,4'F?N\#J6?`_/%0PWPEF2/:J$J&*NV&&1G&*D-LWE"-)F10`!P#@ M8QW%1IIZ1M'M=]B;?EXY(&`<]:`'"[`@GED0H(2VX9R<`9J-]0\M'WQ?O5/W M`V&;R MC$&)QC#>K`#/''?\C5B"7S4)(VD,5(SG!!Q4 GRAPHIC 132 exhibit99-94x1x2.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-94x1x2.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"``@`)8#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HJ M&2Y1)UB(8LV#P.GUJ7(H`6BF-(%*C!.XXR.W&>:575E#*05(R"*`'457BO$F M^XCD9QG''UJ?(H`6BDR*:[A%)P3CL.M`#Z*BN)TMX))G!*QKN(7K42WT;7'D MA7WCKP/S_2@"U129%(SJN-S`9..3WH`=129HR*`%HI,BEH`****`"BBB@"G) M%)]O$H1F0HJY#XQ@GJ._6J2VDB.$$*K(T4@+AO\`6-E>36S10!G+;2RSN\T: MA'E#;"V?E\LKS^-0Q6YA>VA2-48H%F"GLIR#QZG(_&M>B@"A;VCQ6T*DG>'# M,-Y(')Z?G40L&B@411H':'9)WW'*^O7^+K6I10!C?V9*\0215(6.4*"1P205 MZ0,#C]#6E10!BW.GW,TT[JJCS$=.P!SC'N?QJW/ M;2//=.N,2VXC7GO\W^(J_10!G3VLBEDMHE",J#KC;AB3_.H1I[;VS`C*)A(N M_&X\G=SZ>F>:UZ*`*,D+R7< GRAPHIC 133 logosml.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 logosml.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`2`!(``#_VP!#``8$!`0%!`8%!08)!@4&"0L(!@8( M"PP*"@L*"@P0#`P,#`P,$`P.#Q`/#@P3$Q04$Q,<&QL;'"`@("`@("`@("#_ MVP!#`0<'!PT,#1@0$!@:%1$5&B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@ M("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@("#_P``1"``M`(H#`1$``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'``!``(#`0$!``````````````$%`P0&`@<(_\0`-!```0,#`P$%!@0'```` M`````0(#!``%$082$R$'%#%!414B(S)"<6%B@J$D,T-S@9*3_\0`&0$!`0$! M`0$```````````````,"!`$%_\0`*!$!``(!`P(%!`,```````````$"`P01 M(3%!$A1187$B,E*Q@9'Q_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#]4T$9H-6Y7:V6QCGN$IJ( MR3M#CRP@$^.!GQ/3PK-K17J]BLST4J>TC1*G.,7B.#ZG$VAR3=8J$N#>*1Q-G1IZQS:>8JI=4:;8T3%A:ETX%,FW%MBXL;B1)CK4$D MN>6[<1Y>>?(5')CC!M>O$1U]XE3'DG+]-N=^GL^D(<8EQD.`B:!0*!0*!0*!0*!0300:"*#YWKJ`S&PGJI:@ZE9P/TX^Y%5UT[X_#WMQ'REI/O\7:JFU?V?6.SZ-E3V2_[0BM-_ M%[P\4[]Z4J.PJVX.3Y5+4Z:L8YGO$>LJ8-1:Z6).FK22&)CK$JF M[6RYNN&RW?7T`J?V)5`?APDO+*NJ!L6O.3TQT^U8G3WGB;\?$-QEI',5Y^6* M7H:!97HTMK5HM\J"VAM#MS$:0&T*)V!M+Q1Q`E"@G'H?QJ4:&:SO6W/OS_G\ M-^:WZQ&WMPWI>F+O>+0IR[:S3*L+J`ZZN-&C,-*;3[V[GW+&T8SGPJE]->T; M6OQ\,USUK.]:\_*T@ZDM,:3:+;;9T659DPY7/-2ZASC$!+`3N<0=@]QW*\_M M77$;.:9W=*[+C-(0MUU"$.J2AM2E`!2EG"$ISXE1/0>=>C38N[#5J,^Y2HC+ M2%.!R0AX=W2$NE"FY##CCC;;B5N,D)>0 MD@E"BD*`4!X$I4#U\J"HN.H92;H;3:8??K@VA+THN.\$=AM9(;Y70AU6YS:= MJ4H)P,G`Q0;=KD7UQQU-TAQHR0$EA<:2N0%YSN"@MB.4XZ>M`1J*PKN)MB;E M%5<02DP@^V7LCQ''NWY'VH,,&[OOW^[6YP(#$!$9;2QG<>=*U*W'..FSI0:< MK6-NUM`F2;4R_#;,B1 M;ID6>F(G`+PC.A:VTYP-Q3G9GZL4'/:OU18IEAFNVZ]O1;VQ%?,&WM.KCR52 M"CX:5Q2$NE6\#`*:"V;AMN]H$>0\UN6S9AQK4,[5K?(4>OU8Z>N"?6@YK5-\ ME7"SZI@R)C$-Y*9L=FPMQ^2;(0V@H;=65G)2\D!84A&$H^KH:#HK=&0[KPRW M6][K=CB!IX^16^_OP?4X&:"BEQ"B!.*V%JM,'5'>9\=""I/=L)<4KC'S(2^L M.JP/(F@LG)EAO.OK6]`V3FC;I[$R8T.1A:2IC:R71E"B,J.W/3/XT&/3<>9) MN=OL=0%M;4CWP'"<)*A06'L+HVE:5*PDY(SD4%;#EKF:AFL:/3ZL^=!LZC@SY1UFPRTM]QR+;>1IH'<\TG>9#;8\RMH*2`/'.*#-=[MIN MZ7C2GLA2)3D6X#XD<9$=DQG1QN$#X6XA.&U8/3P]V@[^@4$8H)Q01@4#`H&! :0,"@G%`Q0,4"@C`H)H&*","@8%!.*!0?_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 134 exhibit99-100x1x1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 exhibit99-100x1x1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#`!`+#`X,"A`.#0X2$1`3&"@:&!86 M&#$C)1TH.C,]/#DS.#=`2%Q.0$17137!D>%QE9V/_ MVP!#`1$2$A@5&"\:&B]C0CA"8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C M8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V-C8V/_P``1"`/@`L0#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'P```04!`0$!`0$```````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1```@$#`P($`P4% M!`0```%]`0(#``01!1(A,4$&$U%A!R)Q%#*!D:$((T*QP152T?`D,V)R@@D* M%A<8&1HE)B7J#A(6&AXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7& MQ\C)RM+3U-76U]C9VN'BX^3EYN?HZ>KQ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_\0`'P$``P$!`0$! M`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+_\0`M1$``@$"!`0#!`<%!`0``0)W``$" M`Q$$!2$Q!A)!40=A<1,B,H$(%$*1H;'!"2,S4O`58G+1"A8D-.$E\1<8&1HF M)R@I*C4V-S@Y.D-$149'2$E*4U155E=865IC9&5F9VAI:G-T=79W>'EZ@H.$ MA8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4 MU=;7V-G:XN/DY>;GZ.GJ\O/T]?;W^/GZ_]H`#`,!``(1`Q$`/P#T"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBN/\.W,-WI^IZKK2^:RW+JV^,R>2BJ#@``X`R>E`'845Q6 MH&T:+P\]D7N;18M(%2V9N82H^8D=% MSUP/Z4`=117)Z'JLC^)YTFN%DBU&%9X5#9\LKQL_WMO)^E0:HD^CZM=ZU:(T MMLLPBO+<=/+,:'E@11'/J8Y"XW(7/!]B,<5> MCC"^,;S2`I:PN;,2-#GY8VR!E1V_#OB@#JZ*XK0MS0S>&;E%::WN?G;')A^] MN_'A<_[0J\UO"/B`D8B3R_[-W;-HQG>1G'KCB@#IZ*X+P];Q7=SJ-M)"/+:] ME"SG!,>WD!3U'KTQ@&M/6&M](\207\R![._A:"4!.0<=R>E`'545P_A^& M5;B?P_=1+OBN4N6S\W[K`8#)ZX;:O/9CZ5I^-;NX@MK&W@D>)+NZ6*5T.#M/ M49[9_I0!TM%8LW]DVNKV%NN8+M6)C2.%OWHVD8)`P0,Y]L5E^%U&MQZMO;TH`ZZBO-A>W%_X5T>2[9I)!J*P>8W5TYX)[^GX5 MW&N",:'>IA1MMI&1?3"]1]./TH`T:*\_:ZFT[P]X?U*U=A6.(D+S$Q4;_USS[T`=[161!HMK]CM?+RD ML;1R&<$[Y"I#'<>K`X[^M:]`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!6;/HEG,UP0)(A=`B=8G*K+D8.1Z\]1S6E10!ERZ M#8R)9H%DC2R.8%20C8?7W_&B;0+&6XN9P)8GN@!-Y4A4/CU`K4HH`H7FDV][ M-;33-+YEL=T3*^"#ZU+;V,4#7!#22?:&W2"1MP)P!_(`8]JM44`94OA^PE@M M8"LBQ6C^9"JN1L;.0?PJS9Z;;6<\L\:LUQ-CS)I&+.V.@R>@]A5RB@"NEG`E M[)>*@$\J*C-Z@9Q_/^55VTBW;5#J.^87.SR]PD.`OICIBM"B@#'B\-V,,-Q% M&URJ7#%Y0)B-Y/7/UJ_/=A!YSH(R MW^R"2/YTE[96VH6S6]W$LL3F,\>N:)=&M7EGDC:6W-S_KQ"^T2>Y]#[C!K1HH`R[K0+"ZMK:V,;1P M6K;HDB;:%;L?K_C3I-&BF682W-R_G1F)BT@/R'J!QQGVYK2HH`RK3P_8VOV8 M8DE6USY"RMN$7N!Z^YR:FU?2K?6+7[-=M)Y. M1Q'Y>&*X(Z]`.N:;_95EY=W$8%,5VV^:,CY6;`!./7@?CS5VB@#/M=)BMEBC M6>Y>&$@QQ/*2JXZ>YQZ$FIK"QBT^%HH6E96:] M?0ZV((W@^S^=:H5*$G$N0><^V:=9ZY>2:HUO*\/EK=W,1)7'RQHI7)SQUY-` M'3T5P6J:Q=:AX?U6.X:,A(()4>,;1EGYP<]..,X-=)XCU*?3K97MGB5]DKX< M$EMB%N!Z</6H=5OY[S4[ M8,R)%;:S%;J@'S'Y/NX+7=9"-+:'3DNUCG4LY^8J5+9'IUQZ4`=C17,'Q%>&_O2D$?V M:T4[HR0')\HN,TEBN;JU9-@8%=WWL\]CT^G-` M'645Q]UK-Q>V^JVTC0O%]AN9%,:G"E#M&">O4?B./;2DMQ>^$;&&1F7S8[8% MU;##)09!_&@#>HKSN6XO9M)TNWNS(CV>HI9R,2<2G)Z^H"A?KFMV?Q%>17&H MNEM&UM9-)&5R`V53U`'845R;:_JTUC M:2V=LCRS6J2A5C9@[EPK#@_*`.>3_(UM:C=W$$^GVD3();IRC2LF0NU"QXSW MQZT`:5%X MJ[E1G>1NZ')Q@4`=/17&:+J5U:^&=-6`IYLD%Q^1SGH*5]:FB MOY;V%,/=6UIM1\LL9D)R2!CH/I0!V5%<7:ZI>6-Q?0PA9;B?4WB0L/E&$S@` ML.IXQD=:U(=4U:748[;RK.,K;1W$ZN22IW%64,#CMP>W>@#H**Q]`U2XU"*? M[8BQ3P[0\0C*LA(SZG(/8CKZ5C76O7UWH=Q(#'"9[&2XC*`[H@KA2I.>3@]> M,'/':@#L:*HZ/;+:Z="JG)=0[')P6(&<`DX'MFKU`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`%>=+2**:6X6%(V'[UY``"/]HG^M5[==)N_D@2SE M(7[BJI(7.>GIDYJCXIAF==.G2-Y;>VNTEG1%W':/XL#KCTI=:OA/8&73F9V5 MD$DT0.4C9QOPWK@=N1C/%`&JUC:,^]K6`MD')C&>!@4[[);><9OL\7FDY+[! MN)QCK]*Y0SW\DD,9GNQ:FYNA&ZLP+0A,H2W4C=T/TJO'=ZFNFW#-/>M*VEHX M+;LB;>1@>AZ<=^^:`.P_L^RV%/L=OM(`*^4N"`<@=/6I);:";;YL, M0*R_#-QZC/W7`5P>>Q^M5VT>!]7-]*(Y%\A85B: M,$*`<@CWR37)Z%>*`.V^SP>>9_)C\XC!DVC=CTS4:Z?9*H5;.W"AMX`B7 M&[UZ=?>N?N3?VVNV]FM[<+"BH\;R*7\[YVWJ2.#P0.>@&?>I_#%Q=2SW:W$K MSJ`K)-O8JP)8XVG[C8QD?3\0#9-C9X;-K!\V=W[L*Z^TIN;$8!'E8';(Z8^\,]:FFL;F?X=I M!8*_VE[>/F?2L:WU"*2]TRTMH(I(1$6+`D-;$+C!&.,Y(YQWK+L+B[&@ M1WL]_>N[W'DE.HV^9QSU&1QNR2`>.U`'5+86:QK&MI`$5MZJ(Q@-Z@8Z^]1S MV^FVT337$-I#&I+,\BJH!/!.3W-7>BE+EY<2:9#)&%!_>REAOR!U(XX[=:`.BO\`P[:WTJR)Y<2B(1A5 MC&%&2M9,*WO_"12P&68V,BI\46=T=`M8HS+<+#-$;G&6:6,?>R._.#B@#2MUT:ZC6 M"W6PF1,L(XPC`9ZG`^M2W4&G(&>[BM5\[$;-*JC?Z*<]?85ESZLT]_/#ID,- MP\5C)+%<1ONPW01X`QDD`XSVK#N;R>>S"O-)/`&LW+N<[92V7&>W`R1V]J`. MNDLM+0+;R6UFHE?X52MK%/(@C`PJLR]E]2/:N66XFN M=?L3=ROY\>HS*8B>(TVD)QZ'U[YK6UHC0+G\JC_L^RVR+]CM\2##CRE^;G//'//-6,^6GWF^GO5FJNHQRRV4D<"!Y&Q@% ML#J.]`%?3=8@U2*VEM%+1S(S,2<&,KC*D>N6%6A?694,+N`J6V@^8,9]/K63 M<>'5:^OKBUD,`OK62*10>!(<8<`?CG_Z]4G\-W=Q9W/F&*&?[/!';A'R!)%G M#YQQSQ]*`.E:[MD&6N(E&_R\EP/F_N_7VIIOK02&,W4`<$@J9!G(ZC%8NIZ# M-<-:;5CN8TCDCN(Y)FB#ER"6RH]1R*JR>'+U]4>XQ;F,ZA#1K::XD,8D(#"3@`''N?RJ.T\+W%K+8B3R[I(8$1LS/'Y;JY8,,?>'S M=#Z"@#IX[F"5ML4\;MSPK@GCK^61^=4/[:1=3^Q36MQ"&5VCE=1MDV?>QW_. MHM!TN2QFU"6YBB\R>\DFC=>2$;'&?PIGV?69=9DG=;2.WVM'$^XL\:XZ@8QD MMM)]AB@"QI.MQ:JP$43HKQ"9&)!RI8KS@\'(Z5)J^J?V5;&[LH(/-:&)'A+LPGE#?,_`X)!X^N3TK9U^"_NK9+>RA@ MEC=OWZRR%=RC^'@'@]_;([T`-E\0VD=S%$%D97$1:0#A/,.$S]O&/)GCC6/#`GY0>WOF@"WI>HQ:I:&Y@1U3>R8<8.5.#5RLGPY97&GZ M:T%TJK(9G?Y6R,,Q/]:UJ`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`2EHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@#$\3W]QI\>GM;S-$)[R."0J@8[6SD@$ M'GCBL>ZU[45\-7^HVUPKI!<[+>.E=+J6F0ZE]F,SR*;:43 M1["!\XZ'D&J5QX7L)XKN$M.D-W())8D'+W4;:\E;RR M%B\Z)0P(D*-D;1P>,<9J"76]4@D\AE.RXNX;>VN9HMC88?.<8`.#P.. M@PWUM/!=7=U(LX4-\RC@'.!A0!D\GUQ5FYTV"[LXK:C`CO0 M!E75_>V-]=V!NFFQ8M=0S,B[U93@@@``CIV]:K:)K-]J,MO#'6CAAETS]UN.10!4M+C49?$-[8_;BT=H(7&Z-/G#F<8JS?7T[Z_ M;:3;RF#?`T\LJJ"V`<`#((Z^QJU;:7%;ZI=:@LLK2W(4.K$;0!TQQ3KO3HKF MYAN0\D-Q""%ECQG:>JG(((_"@#FM1\07]MIFLHDRBZTR:,"38,2(YP,C'7&> MGI6_IDLMPT[BYEE@!\M?-C".&'4XVCCGN.WO4,_ARSN-.N+.1YRMS())Y`PW MRMG/)QTX'``K5C38N,[FXW,0,L<8R<=Z`.;T_4[^66]TRYN"+^*Z5$<(H_=' MYMV,8^Z&_'%.CU2^OUUB>WG\A-/=XXH]@(D*#)+YYY/IBMM;"W74FU`)BX:( M1%O]D'/^?I56;0[:1KHQRSVZ7G_'PD3`+(>YY!P2.#C&:`,:]UN^?2M-U.WG M\F.]FBB,016VYW;CDCU'%7[JXO[76M)LC>%X[IYMYV+DA5W+VZ]C_2K5]H5I M>V=I:[I((;219(EA(&"O3J#4UUID=UJ%G>O-,LMIN\L+MP=PP;MIJD^HW>I'[6EE;V4YMT.%.YAP M2Q;MGH!CZUH-I%O);6T,S/*;:99HY&QN#!MW8`8[=.E0W.@6L_VL))-`EY_Q M\)$5Q(?7D'!]QB@!-1O;BW\+RWD<\;7,4&\R189&8#G'MG-4-'U:[O;EH!=" M9!8K-)((P##*W1?0@C)Z=JV)]*@GT;^R]\D=OY0ARA&[:!CN#V'I5:/P_;Q3 M0S0W%S'+';_9BZE*`,[P[J]_J>GBY,HFG6$R/`8PJDDN$"G_ M`(!S]:9;:]-K(TB)WD>ZEDN6>%K?,@4?(V,CY0,YP*`*^F75U> M6&ESR3E6N(B\FU5Y)7([<8IGA>_O-3T,W5PZ-<,[JOR[5&#@?RJW8:4MC%%$ MMS-(D*&.$/M^0<>@Y/'>H+#P]#86T5M%>7;012B41N4PQ!SR0N<9YZT`5;>Z MU237KG3?MB$6\4#B@#2HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`1<[1N`#8Y`.12T44`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%9'B&VDOK6.UMSMN&)D1QC* M%02"#V^;:#[$UKU!]F'VT7)ED)"%`G&T`X)[9[#O0!BPZM!<>7JGDAV\J.&) M`!N,S\F//;''TR:-0UB_C%Q:Q10)E`$$^K?9]0F62%GDC M\JWC"3'$DDG.W&``1C.?0_A3;OQ!)9_:4EMXVF@EAC(61L-YG3'RY)'ICD?E M5UM&MFE>4/,)6G%P'WYVN!MX!XZ<=/Y"G1Z1:QO$^'9XY3.68Y+R%2NYO4X/ M'I0!5BUN9YYH&LL3+,L,2"7.XE=YW''&U2"<9]LU4O;R35$_L]X$&Z^6W+*V MX,%&^0CCC@8^IK1_L.V\T2+)<(XE>7*RD*(8E(W%\ M8'W?O613;/O15QMW8(R<@]B143:/:LJ@F7BY-T2'P6 M/6-0BBM(GLEN M;RXMWN/+27:5Y&%.1@#YL9)_A/4];4FA6\T$D4T]Q+OA\G>S+N"9!QD#GIWS M5R&QBANWN0SO*T:Q9=LX5<_U))H`HG6F6XEA:V&];I+9,2Y#D@,3TXPO/>H( MO$;R72PBQ8AKB6!763(8HI.1QTR"">@]:M1Z%;1W:W(EG,BS/,N6'!;.1TZ< M_P!#D<4JZ););+`KS`);O;JP8;@'^\V..M`%/_A)0;&"5+96N98?.%OYO M)!)"A<#+%L<<=CG%.OO$$MK/>0I8^:ULL;'$V,[\X!XX/3`YSFK2:+!%,\9/0CTITFC6\F\EY0SW(N68,,LPQ@=.@P/RH`-/O)[ MO4=04A!:V[K#&5.26`RQ/'^T!^!JM?K*-?LC<(7M93Y<1CF="D@#/DJ"`00O MOTJ_86$=@DJQO(_FRM*QD;/+')_G3;;3EAG\V2YN+@J6,8F8$1[NN,`'VYS@ M<4`0.ZOXB)+D):VFZ3+G:"[<$C.,@(WYU,^J6,EAZ8,_F;<#`P`,`<8HU'38[^S:U,DD$;D%O)V@L!V.0>*` M,N)+B'3-'T\RR"6Z;=.Y8[@N"[#/7KA?I2VAMY[34OM4TB64-XZJ%D91M"J" M`1SC=NX'>M:YL_M!B83212Q9VR)MSR,'J"/T[54FT.)XK:*"[N;6.V!V+$4Y M)ZL=RG+=>?<^M`#M(#V&CJ=0F*!68@W$F2B%CM5F)Y(!`JQ%J>GSR+'#?6TD MC?=5)E)/T`-3P1""!(E9F"*%W.YJ2@#+EE-YK9L2SK#;PK-(%8C>S$ MA02.P"DX[Y%$WE:9>AH59Y+O;%%;`X4%=Q9O11@C.!V'4FK$]@LMV+J*:2"? M9Y;/'M.Y.1C'IR?QI$UBZNI;6*WMDC,D\B2%Y,X2,_,1@K<=?!_P#KH`IIK/DS>:8I9!=73VZ()-P'E@@E!@<$J?Q_2Q;:VT\ENC6;)YTT ML6[S`0OEYRWN,C%366CP62VP26:0VR.B&0@GYB"3TZ\?J?6H/^$>M_LL-O\` M:;G9%"\/+#+!L$DG'J!TQGOGF@!8-;^U11FV@#.\;3;7DV@1AB%8G'\6,@?6 MECUZ&1(9C"Z6\EHUT9&(^51C((_&@:#`J&-+B=4>!()0"H,B)G`SCC@D'&*2 M^\/6MZ7#221QM"D(B3:%55)(P,>_3ITXX&`!R:P[W%M`MHWF2PQS,I?!16;! M[<[>_P"%)XB)>TM[6-W26ZN8XE9&(91G+$8_V0U3)I8%Y%<2W$LQA9GC#X^4 ML,$9`Z8[4Z\TXW5W!<"ZFB:#.P(%(R1@GD'G%`%21O<(DL@W8R#M!QR<-T[`'TJU+H\4UO=)+ M/.\MS$8FG9AO"GL,#`'T%!T=&FA=[B9TBE6548+@,J[1@XR!W('Z#B@!T>IF M>Y5;>V>2W\UH6F!X#*#DX_NY&,^OK5#1[S$6Z!#+-?RR7$:L^`D0.`2><#&W MH.I^IJW;Z*MM;7%M'>7/DR!Q&A*XBWY)QQSR3C.<4+HJ1QQ+#WM)(+=G>YC>18RP4DIC*CU;G@>@-/.MH)YXFMY`T5Q M';KR#O9_ITP#D]\4O]AP!H%6218('1XX1C"%!@8/4>_K3%T&-;Q;G[5.76X> M=0=N`6!!'3W_`"`H`9#XAC=)Y'M95A@=XWD!!&Y6"A1ZDDX`^GK5S3M0^W-< M+Y.SR7"%@P92<9(R.XZ'T/R_>8XZ\\`>Q/I6 M2+B>X>.VA$TZ1ZC)Y>'Y:.-1I'1`,AF^ M]AL9&>OKSP10VDQIY(M)&M5BB,*B,`X4D$XST/`YYH`J)>#5YM(DA$D2L9)Y M$)P<(-N#C@CX:254E=0(XT(4G('3.,=3S5I-(BBG,D, MLD2BV^S(B8P@R3D<=>?TK)NM.GB$%I'O\NSAV0,UOYRSY'*L!@`<`]B>2:>2UDNK5(9XH<;00#P#U`!8]#SQ4KZ&K+>*+J5?M-LMN<`? M*`",CCW/YT`1V>K9LXV1)YY9(C=E)&4&.,Y*@GI[`>QHF\1V\?*02RAK07:; M2H+(1G.">.AY-/DT)&,P6YD6.XB2*<`#+JN0`#VR"0?TQ3KG0H)HKQ$D:+[2 M(T)4#Y$3'R`>AP?^^C0`X:RC7<5M';3,[QQRD8`**YQDCOC'..G%:=9R:8WV MZ*YFN6E\EI&CRN&&_J">Z@=L=AZ5HT`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`5FZ[,[CGI].I[9K/3PZ\+Q&*6W9<2!XY8=R#>^\[%S@8/&#GH*NC3KF M/5IKJ&Z18KA8U<-'EQLS]TYP,Y]*`&7.M)%)?)LD1+2-2TNS=\S=,`'GCFI7 MU2"T01W,ID>%4%Q(B85"V,%AGC)[Z'CMR.?<>M7YW6."21W**JDEAV`'6LB30G=S)YT?F2WHN9F*9W(N=B=>V M%]N.E7=8M)[_`$Z6U@D2/S1M=F!/R]QQZCC\:`*MO=W$/A;[;>SL)A;F9GPH M(R"P&,8R!@=*OZ>+@:?;_:W+W'EJ9&(`^;'/`J#5;.:]M([>)HT3S$:0,#\R MJP.T8['&*LRBZ+/Y+0A?+.S>I)#]B>?N^W6@#/M[J:3Q!);I=-)&D;-+"\00 M)R`A7(R>ARI)/0?E6A0`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`44 M44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!111 M0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%-<,R,%;:Q'!QG%.ILA<(QC56?'RAC@$^YP* M]BU)(S=0HDL2QC`D5P-H'OD@?C4GA[79Y[&ZN=7GB4Q79M56*,X+<8P.222> ME36V@,DVFWE4+?P]J\&EW%JCV0DFOOM. M[>Q^4XRH.W*G@<[O"ZA<],Y'`QG)./3K6/_`,(SJ*V-U"K6NY]0%[$-[8QGE3\N M1T'K5Z^T.[O-3NYC)"L-Y8_9G(8[D;GD#'(_$4`7CX@TP6TMP;AA%$JNQ,3_ M`'6^ZP&,D'U'%(GB+2Y21#<&5@P7;'$[$G&[@`<\<\5D?\(]J$GAZ>PDCTU+ MEH5A6:,$%P"#EFVYZ#ISDU*!FACP6$K(T;@`!D;:?0]1Z4`: M-U//, M`9'U'K6WIT$UMI]O!<2^=-'&JO)_>(')JAI>AKIVKZA=J^8[E@\<>>$)^_QT MY('Y4`6O[5LA="U-P#+O$6=IV[\9V[L8W8[9S52V\1VUX:TRZ MTNTN8[LPEI;EYE\HD@!L<<@>E`%;1=2O[_5M7LII8PMDRI&RQX)SGD\_[/ZU M9M=8BAL;`ZA.3=7<(E58X6.[@$A0`AYXH`V!K-@UM#<)/YDH&21@<\5D:9H%[I;6MS'Y4LZI,LD> M\A5+MN&#CL1@\4EMX=O+*+2HHC%*ME!.KLSE2S2#/''0'C\:`.CM;F&\MH[B MVD$D,@W*PZ$5-67X'JXPWZ$_G0!7F\401 M6B7(MIF1[/[6`",[=RJ1]1NS5B37H8M0M[1X)E\]E59"/E)92PQZCC!/8FFR M^&M.FMH;=EE\N*$P`"0C*$@X/KR!3F\/637R7A:;SD:-@?,.,HI4 M`,\=>M=%:Z5#::?+9Q22^7*6)8D%LMUYQ]3^-06?AVQM##CS91;HR0B1\B-6 M^]CZ^O6@"LOBNU-L\[6\RHMO'<=C\KMM'?C!Z^U++KWER"=DE$"V:)D\D*CE07\T?)SG`[YR>,5):^([6[EM8X89B MUPA?'`*@,5/&><%3G&>Q[T'PU8LDJL\Y,@B&[>`5,8PA4@<$5-)HD$TT$LL] MQ(8>5WN#\W/S9QD'YNQ`X'I0`[1]7AUB!IH(W6,8P6*G.<\<$X(QR#ZUHU1T M[2X-/DFDC=WDGV[W?&3MSC.`,GD\GD^M7J`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`YRWU:_,^J6 M$[1B]@D1;3QM\W;MW>O3GZT`5[?Q3:/ MID=]<12Q+(TA5=N3L1B"WTQC/N>,UH6FJ6UY=RV]N6I!!K0JEH^G)I.F0V,4C2)% MG#,`"XP3@>_>@!;7Q':26-K<7 M(>`W"AMK*3M!(`)/898#-7;+4K:^DD2W+-Y9(+%2`2#@X/L16=#X;$0LB+QB MUM#Y!+1*=R9!'!Z$8ZU:T[2!8WMQ=&4.\X`8+'L#').2!P3SC/'2@#3HHHH` M****`"BBB@`K(.I7%UK-UIUCY*&T1&EDE0MDMR%`!&.._/TK7K-DTMDU*:_L MIU@FN$5)M\>\-MZ$G-6 M!KMFUVD2E_*:U^U^<48($[$G''&3SZ53?PM"MA;VMM#0!977M.9-RRN3NV[/*;?]W=]W&<;>*@&AW'DVH:_5I[4,D$HWM6MX[MDC-FEIRF3A7W;NO4\T`::ZYI[Q2.LS'RY!$RF)PV\]`%( MR<^PJ;^T[,Z>M^)U-LX!5P"=V>``.N<\8ZUDW/A@W#W$AO<2R7,=TA\K*JZ@ MCD9Y!!Z5>N-(2XTJ.R,@0QNLB.D84!@VX?*,<>WZYYH`K:CKVU+5=-599KF= MH!YJ.!&P!R&`&0!CZU=UG3(M8TN>RF.T2+\KXSL;L?SH`C_`+36 M&>8W+KY/F^5`(XV9W(7+<#.<<]!V-"ZW9O>6]O&S.)X3.LJJ2@4$**Y;RH[22U<%,EU M9DOKB1HE\W:NP(=N00?E.-W;&:V9=/M9C<&2 M%6-S&(IC_?49P/U-$UA;326TDD7S6IS#AB-AQCH#Z4`X)^F>*23P[IV8QB'R`HEOK0 M!`VN^?J,UC#;3-&HV-<)GY&*;N<#@=!G/7MWK`;7[L^$`J/(UXEH)Y)S)M9< MR;1CCD\'TXKK!I%BMPTZPD2N@1B)&&X`8!(S@D#C/7WJNWAO2FMEMS;,(EC\ MH*)G&4W;L$YY&>>>E`&E;L6MXF8Y8H"3^%24V-%CC5$&%4`#G/%.H`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBH+J[AM!&9V*B618EPI.68X`XZ4`3T444`%%%%`!116>=9L0Q!>7@$Y M\B3&`<$YVXQ[]*`-"BBB@`HJ"TNX;R(R0,6579#E2.5.".?<5,2`"2<`=Z`% MHI`0P!!!!Y!'>JL6HVLT@2-V+&5H?]6W#J,D'CCB@"W1110`44BL&4,I!4C( M(Z&EH`***@NKN&SC5YV(#':H52Q8X)P``2>`3^!H`GHJ'[5"+87&\>44\P'' M5<9SCKTIT$T=Q!'-$VZ.10ZMCJ",@T`244G3K56'4[*>98HKA69R0F,X?`). MT]#T/2@"W1110`4444`%%1?:(O/6$2`R,I<*.X!`)_,BI:`"BD)"@DD`#DD] MJ@M;VWO`QMY`X0@'@C&1D=?4$&@"Q1143W$*31PM(!)+D(OK@9-`$M%%%`!1 M110`45&9HQ.L!8>8REPO<@$`G]14E`!1110`457@OK2XGDA@N8998OOHC@E? MJ.U2QRQR-(L;JQC;:X!SM.`<'\"/SH`?14,=W;2W#V\=Q$\\?+QJX++]1U%1 MRZC901M)->6\:*_EEGD``?\`NY)Z^U`%JBJZWMHUI]K6ZA-MC/G"0;.N/O=. MM1#5],,)F&HVAB#;2_GKM!],YZT`7:*B^T0!HE\Z/=-_JQN&7XSQZ\,SJ-QC#CI.*`'44E+0`44UF5<;B!DX&3U-.H`**0L`P4D9 M/0>M+0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!69KBN\%J(X MWPK3HH`B28O<2Q>5(HC"G>P^5\YZ?3'-2T44`%%%%`!5` M@G6U_=/L^SE=^P[<[@<9^@J_4*7=M)M\NXB;<2%VN#DCD@4`8VEQW8O8/-29 M9T:473L&V."3L()X/;&.@XXI=0AN)->0M]M\O$30M!C8"&.X,2..,9]1QSTK M4_M&Q\@S_;;?RE;:9/-7:#Z9SUJ1;NV:58EN(C(P!50XR01D8'T!/X4`&<(&C,L:JPD\O(W`#KT[=<5G6$;Q3IB&\2!K MZ=C^[E'R&,X)[]<8]^E=510!R"V]RNF:=YAU1?.MR)F02/(LV%&2#]WH<'I^ M=69([J8WL%Q#?&YVR;'!/ELAC^49'&2X243,KH"VT8!RH((P0.H%=910!D7\ MDHTJSD*3I'OC-P@)+JF.0<6V-W<# M<<#/;VKIZ*`,?5H\:C!,8YW`M9U!C5V&[Y"`0OJ`W7K]<5BHE];6\*1I?^1] MEMC,-DC,"-P<`'O]S*CL.E=E10!B?9;BX\+7-K!)<-+)'(L37`VNG M/.*D2[2?3UBM;65;E(_DC>$CR6"\9)&.O'OVK7HH`Y-O.9K<0/J*V[O;B0%I M`P?!<)K$T-K<7;R07:*B/*[)Y?DJ6W9XZ\\\Y(]>>IJ&&V MA@EFEC3:\S!I#DG<0,9_("@#EWDN1ID;^=?)+Y*"[^:0LLOF(.!]/,Z<8QVQ M4\YGM]=M[>-[YH%E6-RS2.&1HWYR.,!LGHH`Y"S>[AT2V2S%T+A; M!P\;!\APR9P&_B^_C'X588R2:C"D=Q>C3WG'S&20''DON&X\XSL[\$G'/3IZ M*`,*)I+CP7FY:9I6M"&)+!RV, MV^0$+\VTANW!'(/I7744`H^8T]V?],V%3 MN*A#;Y)VCC_6?4`C`[Y987-Q"ULTTES)''?=/;?:D)'F/EE,) M)`8<@;@#QQVXKJJ@NK.&["B96RARK([(P^A!!H`K:&_F:3;L;G[2Q7YI-VY]ZDH`P%N/M=U*=-58YXH6AMP\3(H!(W,3M MP!D#`Y]>_":-+_9TU[%=PI;K+>*D>UF?>YB3OM'7'WCU)/U/04QXTD*ET5MI MW+D9P?6@#`MXG+7/]B3O(DR[G\]F41N6YVL02"06XP<$#UJ/35EL],U)I+*, M.EU(($!+Y=B``,J."<<^YKIJ*`,^V6TM(8],=@[0PB1@R9#`'ENF,[N:SEGA ML-+6ZFC5+F^=G&Z,G8&'`(`S@(%!'E/H`P(_LUN=` MAMV;RD9DC,@*L0(V&2#CJA^M/H`X:T`_LZ>,L70PVX1U;YK(>9PC'_8)SSS@<\5JVEU)%H5U%$RG M4)C<&!TZ7+@$[U[<\<=..*Z2F-&C2([*"R9VD]LT`<_I\UM%:W".R7>G6D"2 MK(R+E7PVY3CJW`/KEN:=-8+'HD-O)!']LO'V$[`2C2$M)CC^%=V/]T5T-%`# M418T5$`55```["G444`%%%%`!6'9@7?B;55NE$@MEA2%7&0JLI)(SZG(S[>U M;E5;G3[:ZF6:17651@/'(T;8]"5()'L:`,Z^WZ6ACTTHGFF24Q[-Y!"CA1D` M#/)).!GW%-M=2U"^N+18#;1QS6D5RV]&)^8_,!S^7^2+[Z38R>7O@SY>[!WM MD[L9W'/S9P.N>@I;72;.S96MXW0K"(%_>N<(#D`9/Z]:`,6&_P!0O+'3;N\B ML'2>YB"IY18QG+`L"6X/3![9-6H=7O)7>Z%NO]GQO*KL<`J$)&0=V2O=I`!,Y+-\QVECP6VY MQGWQF@#+MI+BYU?2;N6Z#MD9YI^EZ9>V*"5X+5YXK&*WC`D)RZ; M^2=HP#N'Y5OT4`(N=HW8W8YQTI:**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@` MHHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"J MM[J-I8!3=S"(-SD@G`]3CH.>IJU65K<@:+[)]GG=+A"DSQ0E\)W7([G)'MR? M3(!J=>E+5>VN!*S1B"6+8BGYTP.1T!Z$COCI5B@`HHHH`*H'6-/#[#! MPVP\_+C/'IC';-2>)S/]G"V_VD.8I2C0ASAPHVC"]_0DX&#[4`;E%8$"%!O!!X'T/0XQUYKV;WC:>DUK+?2OY!^T!GD8G$J_=N['7O5":.YET*2,-?R336$I=9&D.6#C;P>^-W'<=6Y#))*#$8F\LQY^0[B=O0 M#H,]<]S2^*9+A(0+9KA9/(F9#$'(W@+M&$[]<9..N0:`-ZJ]Q?6UJ7$\RH4C M,K`]D'4U@275U_:BI";Q@]\CJ"LFTQ-!G!/0#?V[52DEN'LI)U:^%X-.D$C$ M2`K/N4X7L.>P[8H`[,,#T/;-+7+2F2'5+YA]J$$EU$9'4R?ZDQC)!'0;_3H, M]JEM//DOH5DN+O[.@F>,AF^=5>,IN]?XQSR0*`.DHK$\-R2O'.LKRRE=O[YG M.5Z"H;V:Z&IS*KSK<+/#]F0$^7)$=N_(Z''SY)Y&!^(!M)>6[W M;6JS*9U&2G?M_B/S'K3IKB&`QB614,CA$!/WF/0"LW0$B47Q0N6^U29WNQXS MP1GL?4=:R;N+_B=7$9>=2U_"RGEY> MRP6R->SP_P"M$4BQM(7<2D!3@@$[=N-W!!)]ZW/$L,T^C2+`C28=&DC49+H& M!8`=^`>._2@"[;WUI=.5M[J&9@-V(Y`QQZ\=JL5C:E?1R6#RZ7_V= MY+2[FN;@"Z$D1(;8%> MH3Z%OPH`ZNHUGB:=X%D4RHH9D!Y`.<']#7)W]W-*=2MUEN3^XN4"EFW%D`*X M`&!T;'J,Y]*F-[(DLJV\TS6HBM=QR2R(6?>03STVY/8'-`'545R[3S/,L7V^ M9;4RS"*56R9$$:M][OAMP!]OQK;T>5[G1;*69BTLENAD/0[BHS^.N4L7@CB53=316TDMWNE$S9#^;E.<]U)/N0.M6M"FO;K4 M7-]/*KQVL#M!P%WLK;N,>P..Q-`&_(Z11M)(RHB@LS,<``=2321R)-$DD;!T M^,U>H`ACNK M>626..>)WB.)%5P2GU':EM[F"Z0O;3QS(#@M&X89_"N>EN-.N?MK6T2RK%9R MPI#""&D7@MT'`^4`?CCJ,OT"XBMGG2XNH[@R/'''=`\3?)PN.@(P<^N1WXH` MW8[FWE:18IXW,9PX5P=I]_2A[NVCM_M$EQ$L/_/1G`7\^E9.FSZ?<:E+);F) M5CA,*(JXR@/+-VQG&/;)[\9B''AG2_+G%LZW#%;IL;(&&_E@>,'[O/\`>H`Z MSS$\KS=Z^7C=NSQCUSZ4V.Y@E@\^*:-X<9\Q6!7'KGI6%`]O/X>@LQ)'9S)$ MDX20DJ`L@())_A8K^1JJR22W*W5[(MG9W%R9`>-I*QA5+;ACD@D9'.%]J`.C M>_LT5&>[@4.-RDR`;AZCGFK-<\8SJ=IIJW=K&+FY(>=C'SY:<]^0"=HQVW&N MAH`****`"BBB@`HHI&("DMT`YH`9'-%*6$W_X1*VF2*">14\N` M,`R[V;:H_/%`'0&:(0F8R)Y0&2^X;3]!3ZY>\M[AYHTCBC,MXUN^WX MY/?-=10`4444`%%%%`!116':A;_Q)JB7:K*EJL20QN,A0REBV#W).,^U`&Y1 M6+>,^D1LEAY8$K/+L9"^"%'RJH(P,\YZ#\13;?5+^]GM%MDMECFM8KEC)NR` MQY`QW]*`-LD#J:6N8BU&]OK/3;N\M;)HIKF(1KABR-E@6Y[\#'IDU;AUB\EE M:X6U#:6XN=8TFZG$(6>VE=%1 M3N0$(<$Y^;KU`%=!0`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%` M!1110`4444`%%%%`!41N8`SJ9HPT?+C<,K]?2I:YB71+QK>]A:WAE+^9Y><9KGVT2Y?3'MFM8M_V>ZC4E@0&D<,GY"HHY(_^$AS+&DN+I2%692Z2&-4) M*D9P.3QZ9%`'5ET5@K,H8]`3R:02QDJ!(I+#*C/7Z5DZ^GF262V\XBOS)B+` MRQ0_+)^`4Y^H%0OH\B:RDD=K');#RC&QG9/(V=MH^][>Y.:`-L31'=B1#M.U ML,.#Z&G;EV;]PVXSG/&*Y)-$OR(O-LHB,6^]5=<`QR%F`&``,$X[\\]ZW]5M M7?27M[*&(D%-L9`"X#`G`/&<`XSQG%`%WS8]F_>NW&=V>*KW]_'8B$NI8S3) M$`I&068+GZV*`.LR,X MR,^E0WMTEE93W4BLR0HTC!<9(`R<9]A6/!IT_P#;[W4UF2&E\U)S/]Q=F"I4 M'KG(].<_5WB&QN;L3+%:BZ66TDA094>5(>C?,1UXZ=,4`:\,YE=U\F1`H4AF M`PV1GCGMWJ:N8GTJYFU!WDL-\+W%N[!F0@JJ$-D$]B1]?>FOH][YUZ([8"3+ MF&?S0J.C8Q'M'(X`7GC`XH`W[:&UT]4MHB4$CLRJS%B2JUSI-W+9(B:>4D6.%)0&3]ZRR*Q;.>P5N M3@G=]:`.LIAD02K$6&]E+!>Y`QD_J*QX=/>WUY9;:S$=L%VD_)M`"\;,?,.> M"O3'/6DUK3KBZO&DMHANDLY81-D`HQP1GG.#R,CIF@# MYU1X].W^/QH`Z2H9[B.!27.6VLP4=6`&3BLF"QEBU]KQ;` M+!*S*1E/D8`?O>O\7(XYP!ZFI]5M99;VVFCM?/"Q2H2-N5)"D'DCT/3UH`OV M=REY907488)/&LBANH!&1G\Z#BK,VEW'V,QP6#KNLKF,(TRDJSE2JDY]CTX M'K0!TU%5K"W2ULXHTA$/R@LH`^\>O3OFK-`!3)(DD*[U#;&W#/KZT^B@`HHH MH`9Y:>;YN/GV[@SG_/T'I3\`D''2EHH`0``D@#)ZFEHHH`****`"BBB@`JIG3%:-8KZ"YMMB7:K,MU)UOK9+Q%BN0X3-N-T>XY.6!!;OCI^-`%]=9T]YD03$R-P/W3<9)`!XXR M5.,]<<5%::S%>&WDC8112>:2)HV5B%[@G``YYS_0TV]TB>[U".Y^UH!&T;*C M0EMK*23@[N`<\\=AS446@,+2.TFNED@1)HR%BVL5D]]QY'//?VH`N?VUIX3< MTS(,H,/$ZGYN%.",X.#STJS:7<-Y#YUNQ9,E3E2I!!P00>0:RWT2XF>&2>[B M:6)HL,("`5C;=TW=2<<]L=*N6-E<6COFY1XY)I)67RL'YCD`')Z<_7-`%^BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`JK?FSQCIU'I5S^RM3.KWTCM/YK(WV:X1U$8S&5PP/S<-@X'&>? MJ`=-<7*6WE>8'/FR"-=J%L$],XZ#W-%W)4+AR7+G&6S MEC@]2!Q0!TUWJUI9::NH3LZVS!6WA"3)+!(@D M8&9RI&[DG.,9X)^E`':U#%V:LW.GWKW&HX^U;)5^_L!=&W MIT[.A"DXZ@`COR`=;16=H$=Q%I$*742Q2@MD+D`C<2#@],]<=NG'2M&@`HHH MH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@ M`HHHH`****`*2:M8R0W$R3AH[;_7$*?W?KGCMW].]6T8.BLN<,,C(P?RK`.E M31^)YVB3%A>QK+/Z>8C#C_@61GUYJ&9=3.OL!]H(:[4`C<(_LWEG=ST!W?CG M'M0!TJLKC*,&&2,@YY!P?UIU<':6]]%HVFV__$PMOFG%PRQ2R,DFX%#@$<D_;5\07'G-/+"Z,6P*C!'W2#C*D?[7O0!J3:M8P3/#+H`****`"BBB@`I&8*I8\`#)I:*`*::K826C74=U$]NK;3(IRN M?3/XU;KF[#2[BU\07ELJXTR1UO%]`_(*_P#?0#?\!'K59GU66YN(V^U>:TER MKJK,%6/9^Z*]NNW!'/)]Z`.M5@PRI!'J*6N(M1>)8:3!#->6L?V;.[RY'/GA MERI&1P1D`'Y>36OH$ETVIWJSO-+%]Y)&9\+H'5"P#,"0 M,\G'7^=.KD=?EO/MUOK-JADBL;@1!%+;G0\/A,=_7/0`TUKXS^*&B;51'&)X M]L;3M'N0ID($XR2Q!SWZ>U`'63S1V\+S3.L<:#VMH5%S<10EN1O<#CU^E6*YV+_B7> M*M3NKYBL%Q#'Y$C9(PHPR#WSSCO0!T",KHKHP96&00<@BER,XSSZ5P5NNI:9 MHEHN;J'S8[MDB4$%25S&"!T.>1]:N>9?"5+B,W#W7]B*\6=QS+SNXZ$].#WQ M0!V5%<@MS*UM9N+Z[-M+N:8L64QR>5PA?K]X$XZ9P/:J5_?:N+5I7N+F&Z33 MHI=B9`,IDP>/7;CB@#O**XNXU"_@^V(EQ/);I?Q*TIR2L+*F!WKE'\R\N-/6Y>22`:I*L)8GYX=IQDG[PSQD]1]: MTO&%E,VGQ:A9#%WIS^='@=5_B'TQS^%`&ZD\,DDD<Y'O69;W6J&:TN;GSA=G2I7CC MP0'E##`(]2`"10!VE%8?A:>XN+1WGNOM"D(RY!W(2OS*20,G(SCMG'I6Y0`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110!&((A,9A$@E8;2X4;B/3-2444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!5-]+LWN#.\1+EPY!=MI8=#MSC/`YQVJY10 M`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`! M1110`4444`%%%%`!1167KEW/90I/'<11(&4$21DAB2!RW\(]_P#)`-2BBB@` MHHHH`***SIM1,6L06FS]RX*M)V$A&Y5_[Y5C^*T`:-%9QUFU6_-H5E#B40EM MAVABNX#/N*T:`"BH;JYCM83+)DC(4!1DL2<`#\35/^V[7>D?EW!E9F0QK$69 M64C(..GW@?3'-`&E16'*!VDCDE*J%>,J06)"@@],X_EZTL>LVLL22)YI67;Y7[LYDW`D;?7@$_A0! MH45E/JZ;XYT;-F()I)!Y9W@QLH(Q[9;(]J+C7K:%T1$EE=VB`"KVDSM/_CI_ M*@#5HK,AU2,";?(TS"=XT2.%MPV]1COCU]Q0=>T\.JB5VW+&X98F*[7.%.<8 MQGB@#3HHJ.::.WA>65@J(,DF@"2BL>]UN-(,6V\3&=(6#P.3&6P.(+,`ZNQ9H74)MQG.1Q]X!V/I0!?HJCHUY)?Z9%H`**SX-1^T:K):I'^Z2/<),_>8-@@>PZ?7/I39-1D&N1V"K&B%-Q:4,#)ZA M#C!QQGG^5`&E163%?WLEQ=VZQVLDT2HRJDO"%B1AS[`9X%3:7=7=R]RMU'`G MDR",&)BP8X!/4#IG'X&@#0HK-MM4:ZU.YM8HALBA62-V./,)9E/X97K^/I4- MOJEQ=6.GM%'$EQ>(7^8DHH`R>G7M^I[8H`V**JZ==_;K&*XV;"V0RYS@@D$9 M[\@U:H`****`"BBB@`HHI*`%HK(.L/:I>/J$<2);(KYADW\L2`AR!\V[UAK31I+W;#/(%9D2"31(@SSX9F;KA0IX')Y(Z&M2@`HHHH`****`"BBJ,E^3?-96L0FFC0/*6?:L M8.<9.#R<'C%`%ZBJEK>B:*1IXS;-'(8V61AUP#U]#FK)900"0">@S0`ZBJ]S M/+'Y7V>%9RTBJ_[P+L0G!;GKCT[U-N4L5W#^(S>8@E)_U9P=N%R. M&/KT]Z`-*^M%O;?RB[1L&5T=>JLIR#^8JO!I0BO4NVG9Y@79R5`#EE5?PP$6 MLNXUB\@E^V-9NOE6LKRV[S%00KK\R\2VC0JOR(^,\XR2`,<__`*WC1,3-+]I; M+/"Y&P?\LQ@#\:R)-1NAX3DCC:5YUM997F,[*Z`,0I!P23P>XZ>]:LNN.L]R ML5D\D4'F!I,L!N1 M^SFXUU;B2U>-;5&1)2PQ(6Q@@`]OF'/K5>'6YFDLUFM(X/M05DWS]0<<`[<% ML'.W(]LU8UK53I4'FB`2@([L-^#A<9P`"2<'/H,')%`&E535+(ZA826HD\O? MCYMN[&"#T_"J(UUS>M";0"$71M?-\W^/8&7C'0YQ[>]5QXEE%FER^GE5EA$T M0$P)8;E5NW&"Z_7VH`OR:46U3[;'=/&'"^;&%!#E>A!/(]#CJ!5>'0/)<3+< M*LZ.KH4BVIN`922F>K!B#C';TI[ZQ-&[B6S"I`Z).1+DH7/&!CY@`5)Z=>^* M(M7DN%EB-L$FC>5)4$O*A5R&!QWW+_WUGVH`1YMS@2G:.W)! M'/3/)]C=@U=I]1-JMN-N^1-WF?,-F,DKC@'/'/IZT`-CT>2&=IX;H"8SR2@M M'E<.!E2,\]`"(R1714&&*(9CR?DHPVK0@I(47? MYGS98D#"X/`QR3CJ,9J"/7_W)FN+-XH_*ED7#ABQC8*1CWR,4`;55[ZT2^LY M+9V*AQ]Y>H(.0?S%4=)GN9=4U-;GY"C1[8A)O505SQP.M`UAS"LXM28)B!`X M?[Y+!0",?+G.>_'OQ0`V31II9!/)=I]H,L];%8SZXZ MRFW6S9[E'='02#"D*&!SCD$$=JI7^H37<9N(VFBM5L!=KY$VV3GGH00>!C\? M7H`;NH6OVZPGMM_E^:A4-C./?%4&T:62X:66[1M\R2L!$1G:FP@?-WZ^U-;6 MWA68"RFE2W$8:3>N6+;]/M];,MVMM)9O&YF>`G>"-ZIOP/8KW]:`) M-'TN334V/F`1UZ4RRU@W5TL+6CQ*SRQARP/S1M@C_`#Z4`0-H,AN! M+]MWYCY1)Y.>I)ZT)H+!OGN@RM)<,X$6,K*W5RK,#G) M[KR3M_6I5UA_M@M393.ZD)*T:EE1RNX#.,8P1R3QD?6J\7B5'LS4PE1XUC(`1P`53+';]WWZG@<82#0KB% M87%]$9X'#1N+8*I&UE.X`_,2&/.1_/+WU=8WCN)%D`,#,$CD5D<[U48/RD^TF81;%<$+J%A#=(I02#.T]06#'$4&,YR#DLW7()))XSU_&M*B M@#,L]%@L=0DNK9B@:!85C)9@N"3GD].1QVQ[TR/29$T>WL&E@D,0QYK0`X]P MI)`/O^AK6HH`AM+6*RM(K:W7;%$H51[5-110`4444`%%%%`!2'.#@@'MD4M% M`&/+I$MT7FGD@2Y*QX:*(XW(X<$Y/(R!QZ9YYJ2.PNX6N)(I;<274F^8-&2H M^4*-HS[9.>N>U:E%`&/+IT^RWLH&5;:UBB:)W7)$B-P#SR"!SZ5'<^'4NK*[ M229UN;CS3OCD=$4N`,;0PR.!G/4_E6Y10!4%D!/:MN)CMD;:'8LVXX`.22>F MX<^M6Z**`"BBB@`HHHH`*Q$633->U"YEAEDM[T1LLD,32%&5=I4A03Z$'&.M M;=%`&#K!FNS`/L4^QTE565`SC(7`(/"[N>3TQVSQ6TFS6:XLGO;%\Q:=$"9H M3\LBGU(^\/SYKIZ*`.0LM.$.A:0W]GR+<+=1F7]P=ZA7;EN^!FIK:UF-]+') M:W?VZ.::2*Y/$6&+;3N[\$#;[#M74T4`@J_6#:7US<3Q[KEAY[S M1O$%4&WV$X8<9[#.[/WATH`N-I.F7/F+MW_-)Y@69NKXW@X/0X''3BG-I.GK M!)"\0*3E=P>1B6*@!2"3D$`#D<\5!X6A1=!LIN&DDMTW.54$\=,@/YBZNH0,%/EJ;?/`Q[G\O7.0#<.B:>T9C:%BK1F)LROEE)R03G M)S@<]:E73;1+CSQ$?,SNR78C=C&[&<;L<9ZUSXUF^>"W`N[>.0*[&24[1-MD M*$8"G)P!PN#EA70:JSKI5VT4C1NL+,KKC((!/>@"!M!TUK=8#`_EJK)@3."5 M8Y()SDC/8T]]&L'FEE:$[Y5*OB1@&R,$XSC..,]?>L>UU*Y-U:VT5Y`(U2'/ MG.-TH;(;`"\D'@8(P1SFEM+W4[B*P9[Z-?M?F9(A'R;0?IZ50O_`+-ITD1M%CMYIWCA8HH`52V,D=/8$]SWJK_:&H/( M]NMPB-&\T?F^6"9`BJ01VS\V#[@T`:']A:?Y7E^2^PK&F/.?[L9R@Z]CS5:T MTFZAU5KII0BF1G8I.Y$H.<`QGY5[<@GI5$ZQJ*V:S^="6E@M9E'E\)YC[6'7 MD>_UJ;^U=0M[HI(\=PJW$L.U8]K-MB,@[]>`*`-2YTBSNKK[1*LGF$H3ME90 M2ARIP#V)--_L6R\M(V1WC59$VM(2"'.6SSSS^6.*RY]6OX+1)%FAE,T4,JOY M?";Y%4CKR,-QWX-:ND74UP+N.X=)'M[AHMRKMR,*PX_X%0!)9:=;V+RO"96> M7;O:25G)P,#J:A30K%%E4))L:VV,[MV4&?E^8`\>E9NN*8KNYNRB75ND M*K<19Q)`!N(>,]._([X%,M;N6RU2[VO$MO-?RJX93D$6X?=G/^STQWH`V/[) MMMZO^\\P%R7WG+%EVDGUX``],"F#1+18#"#+Y9MA:XW_`/+,=OUZ]:QX=:U* M:58$DA5G:WQ(\7&)%>>:OZ?J5Y<:D8I'MS$DDD++G:^Y>A`SWP M3]"/Q`+3:-;-%/&6EVSE"_S]=@&/IT'Y4X:1;"Y^T`R"3SC/][HY7:3_`-\\ M4FJW%S#)916LD4;7$YB+2(6P/+=LXR.ZUDG6KX6;RLT*ND)/W?E9EF*$CGHP M'`]Z`-+^P++[-]G_`'OE^4L./,/W5;ZW+$'F+LZ3LV],\* M4*X'&!][MQZ4Q-4O3)+YDT"1&^-HA\LC9CD$G=SG&/J1]*J3WMU;7DUZLUL[ MQVT0F*(2LF)G4XYX./KS0!N7ND6M]/YTWFA]JKE)&7.UMR]#V-+#I5O!-'*A MDW1R22+EN[G+?F:S7U:]-U5(=LPAXPN]"H"Y)Y/S'/09X!J-M9O'1(K= MXA/B5C]H3R\%2ORL,]MW)'L10!KSZ9;3WJW;>8LH`4[)&4.`<@,`<-@D]:C. MBVA60,)#YL3PRG=S(K9SN/<\G![5<1FEMU8$*[ID'J`2/UKGH==O':*!P@F< M&W;;&<))MAV?NY%7`YR>O)QC/ M3(J>XO\`4;6ZNHYKFR"6UK]H9VB90-S-AB"6`)XX!^G MO0!O65I%8VJ6T.[RTSC<E7)N[".9GWL2RL3&4((8@@J>A&,&KE M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!3/*CW,WEIEQACM'S?6GUR2+.\5R\#7[2*] MXCD-(05#L$"^X(7&WGK0!U:(J#"*%'H!BFO'$"9&C4DO'6K:6UU%>7T+"?[-&&N(9%9LL77&P8Y."&X[ M97VH`U[;[+<6\,T$:&,@/&=FW&>^",BIR`1@\BN5B74&LK=7%XMQ]CMQ;D!_ MEE!/F!_0],[NH_&GJ;L23PL+]"AN_G2)VPI.8]O9CCH!].,T`;[FTAGMX61% MD?@R0...*D^S0;57R(]JYVC8,#/7'UKGK1)IWMHYH9@OGR*98UD4%3% MC<,\IR<=>H.":O:`MT4?[6S$VW^BJQ8GS-I.9#[D8_$&@#046T-RD21HDK1D MKM3'R@C/./4CBI98HYDV2QI(N8(T#XQNVC./ M3-.<*48.`5QR",Y%'!"$)@8Z'%5O#2/'X>L4D21'6(!ED4JP(]0:Q=,T^>:S2UBFO;60PS+-\\ MBB-M^4(&<`_3J,YH`ZRX6;YO;(X/Y M^IH`Z06=J%=1;0A7.YAL&&/J?6I(XHXRQCC1"YW,5`&X^IKE[B2>)7A^T7J6 MJW,L?FA9977Y5V\J=Q&2V#R,XK=:*XFT,Q)(RW+VVT.XPP+<6W9V#.?7ZUDVMPAT6"WMK=OM ML,&(X6C(\N14(YR,#GC/?/&:SYI9BL'V6XOA&S6XF+,^5GR[L@<#`X MH`Z-+"S0J4M(%*D%<1@8(Z8X]S4JP0K,TRQ()6&&<*-Q'IFN;*>[%R;<&Z!=LQSATX4=LYDX'!`%` M'1W]@E\]L9"-L$OF[64,&^4K@Y]F/Z4LD5B\T5M)#`SB-C&A0'"#`./0<@5A M7$DL&M6]O'/>M$)$1RS.P9'5^00,8SCYLYR!T[P64UU#H=LMHUQ]H%C)O0EB M0X9,X!S\V-^/H:`.I-I;&-XS;Q&.0[G78,,?4CO3396C*5-K"05"D&,=!T'T M%8'F.U_%%!=W/]GR3JJR>:Q/,3[EW'G&X1]^"3C';6T":2?1;9YG9Y-I#%^I MP2.?>@"RUC9L[.UK`6;.28QDY�&T:-(S:P&-#E5,8PI]0*Y@7EQ(UP1=3 MP+("#UH`V&T^R9F9K.W)?.XF)><]<\5(;> M!F8M#&2Z[&)4?,OH?;VJAJ\@6>&.:>6WMWCD/F1L5Q(-NWD>V[`Z'%9!OKZ. M5!=M<1SN+%RJAMH)?$O3@#'!_"@#HH["RC.Z.TMU([K&H[8]/3BHUM].F9[= M8+9S``C1[%.P'#`8[=C57PZJ);W<8,I=;N8-YC,W_+1MO+>V*HW%Q.VK2VXN MYEC-_&F$;&$,/(^F[]:`.BCC2%`D2*B#HJC`%/K.T&9I])B=Y6E8%UWL$E>"/?'6@#;-Q"KHAFC#R MM++/#`,S2I&,9R[`?S^HKG+70[V-[43102J(H`[-,X,3QC!(4<-ZC.,$FKVK MA6U>P3R8IW:*<".0@`\+['_]6:`-4SPARAE3M,%W;&(2BXB,9SAP MXQQUYK`A\/7$5K<0?NF?[-!%%,W.\IG<#QD*>GTIMY;.FLVD\]O$6N;H[;#20O:0*UO"\*"$9:-2!L M'7D=JP%T&[CM)+<>6PN(5CSN_P"/8B1WRO'(&\8]U'X27.D7LQO%A0)'(YD" M22Y5F$JOP0-RA@#D>IXH`V+K4+>VL'N_,1XPI9=KCY\#.`>F>*E@N$FM(K@_ M(LJ*PW'IG&!^M8,FE7HAH]J:+FW,9D$\113@L'& M`?3-8LFCRKJTTJ6D$D+,LD3&9E\K"!2H0<VYAD^SAX8)< MK!(R&3;LV_>'!P>F><9YH`VGO8TO5MV&`T1E$A(VX!`Q^HIM_)9/$+>\="DK MA-A;JW4#],UBS:'=OISV@5/FLYXP0W"L[[E7Z#&,TZ73=0FU+[:UI$/]*BEV M&7)VB-D/./5A^5`&W;SHL'[Q$MD1S$JEUQ@'`QC@9QT[5.9$#!2ZACT&>:P; M?3KF#YI+))D,ESF']1-"O(#"/)69XFM/WX89;RSESSSTX M'K0!U+R)&,R.JCIECBFO-%&&+R*NQ=S9/0>M9NO64UY%&+>-FD4-M8%2H)&, M,&X*GOCGTK/?1KJ2ZN_.MHY#)YCI<&X;'S(5V^7TXZ9Z8]Z`-V2^MX]/:^:3 M_1UC,NX#^$#/3^E)9WAN4R\+0$GY0[`[Q@'(P??'UJC<6EQ-X4EL_LJBX>V, M0B#`@,1C.>GO5>73+B2Y6."TD&GQ": M*_DED7*Y,;&3;SWQO''L:GT339K.>!Y+81'R9%E8,IRQD!7..O&>:`-E9F:Y MDA,3!456$AQALYX'?C'ZT_EKMD+LSP1P.F/EXH`W,C.,\TA90,E@,G')[US^M:5-=WUS- M%:"3=';!&RH.4E+-U/\`=('OTJO=Z/=M'=00V($,DTQC"&,8#1J`<'@`D'IS MTZ9-`'4T`@YP>G6N8&E7;7IN6L0)#-:N&W(2H48?G.?\:J3V-U;VLSSVH@\Y M%C(\Q%3?YH(`QU!Y^\(=FGO+B9S7`P M5(8CC'0G/S'UJ#TQV'([5,FD3_;C(;(#=>2,TFY3F-H=F>N M<%L''MGK0!T4,L=Q#'-$P>.10Z,.A!&0:DK/T&"2UT6SMYH/(EBB5'3(/(&" M>..<9K0H`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*** M*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH M`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`*REUB&%9#/*\I,LJH(K=\@)U!'J M/7O6K62NCNLC.+H',DSX,?3S!TZ]J`([S5V\^-;658X?(^T&>2)F1EX/4=!C M//KCZ58DURRB4F4S(P<)Y9A;?D@D<`9Y`./RZU`N@@VT=M)!3_`.R)I+B.YGNU>X62-F98=H94W8&,G'WSDT`/&NV)?8IG+[B@46\F M2P&XKTZX.:?_`&QI[M!ME+B959&6-B,-G;DXXS@]?2HDTATO/M`N1N^TO<`& M/C+1[,=>F.:I+X9D2*UC6_RML(MFZ'.#&Q.1SQD'!^@^E`%RUUF*[,#HWDQN M\JE98F!8(2,AN@Z9Y^G45+_;E@%W-*Z`E,!H7!.XX4@8Y!/&:KQZ"5C6%[G? M`K3_`"^7ABLI)(SGJ,GG'X4/HMQ*(C+>HSQ>4%80XRJ.'Y&[DDJ.>GM0!I6= MW#>P^;;LQ4,5.Y"A!!P000"*K76K6T:7"1S`31H[`M&Y3*CGD#G'<`YZT_3; M)K(7.^42&>=IN$V[<]NISTJK_9%P$O(4OR+>?S&2,Q9V,^23;&P'(R".._89SVZT]-7LG+!97W+ORIB<$;0"P(QG."#C MOGBJC:)))%Z_8VMX9HG"-N8R,R@8ZG.!@8SS4_\`;%B7@3S6 MW3DK&/*?)(;:1TXPQP<]*HG09Q&JI?A62WA@!\H_,(V)^;YN0/0KZ4`7[FZBM54RL07;:@5"Q8]>`.3P"?PK.T MS7(;BRM7NG59Y^@2-MO+E5SUVY(QR>M6[^SEN9;::WG6&:WUAMG61I9XXW^1BH5AG[PX!Q@X)Z=J@DT.RD;N2#T(Q2MH4PN5:.\40"XCN2CPY8NJA2`00`"`.W%`% M_4+UK4V\42!Y[F3RXPQP!P6)/L`#4*:DUO=2VVH!$9(Q*LD>2'!;;C'7=G`Q MSG(J;4+(W?D21R>5/;R>9$Y&1G!!!'<$$BJ=SH]Q=N]S+=(EV-@A9(_ECVMN MY!.6R>O([4`6%UBS:98U=MI21VD*,%38<,&)'!'OT_$9AN]:BC6!X&&TSK'* M)$964$$Y"D`\XX]?>FW.CSWL>VYND)DAEBF*1E?O[<;.>,%>^<\T2:3P:**5;@&.4X5@I('.WGCY>>.<<\5) M:ZA:WDDD=O,)'B.'`!^4Y(Q^8-9AT"19UF2>`L^XS^9`'&68ME.>",DW)YZ4`;%R\R0DV\0 MEDR`%9MHZ]2?05F0ZMW\Z!B8PD;!"I!!W98DDGG.>H^IH`=%J[2G3"L`" MWK,C9?F-E5B1TYY4C/%6#WO5=-)>$:8L4H86 M)JR+23^V&O"R^68!$%[_>SF@"2:>WL8T#XC4G"JB$]L\`# MT%4[G4V:ZMK>P,O;'3FK%Y:S2W%O<6\B+)#N&'!*L M&'/0]<@57L=,DLIK7;(C100/&W&"S,P8D>@R.GO0!/?:@EK(D`5FFDC=T^4E M?E'<@<=14.GZU:W5BDSS1B011O*B9.TN.`/7G(&*EO[.:XN(I89$39')&P=2 M.U`&[!/% MW!'US4E5K"W:UM5C?RM^23Y,>Q`3Z"K-`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!6' M8F[U:QGNUO)8)'DD2%5`VQA6*C(QSG&3]>,5N52_LNV$LCJ)$61MSQK(P1CW M)7..>_KWS0!6DUK9(";?]P\LD$@J+^P M[+[-%;XE$<2NB[96!VORP)!Y&5/S9'3 MG!'_`.NIY-<5(S+]G8PL95B8-R[1AB01VSM;'T[5*=$M,C!G^]&W^M8Y*8VG MD]>!^5..C69\P;7"2;_D#G:I?.XJ.Q.3T]3ZT`&FZF;Z:6)K=H62..498-N5 M\XZ=/NFM"L]-(MT;BKN`)/YC\Z`-"BBB@`HHHH`***HR:DD>KPV)7_6( M3OSP'ZA?J0&/X4`7J*I'5K(7GV0S$3>9Y94HV`VWH[C5U6\\J%U\M89G=VC8 M@,A4<'H0"3G&>E`&K16;%K-H/)AGN%-PZQ9V1MM)?[N..`3TS3VUFP43,T^% MA#,S%&VX4[6(.,'!X.,XH`OT5135[&3S=DQ/E8W_`+MN,DJ.W.2"./2K9*3*L&0K&S8V]0?EZ$=Z+C7 M+&"S^TK(TJM$)4"(274G`QQZD#\:`-*BL]-3B$UP)94"1E`J!&\S+#(!7&@.#QCL>OI0!?HINX;=W48SQS5"'6[*6T6Y+M'&S M,!N1@<*>6QC@=.>@SS0!HT4W<"NX$%<9R/2J*ZWIKQM(EVCJO4J"<=\\=N#S M0!H453&J6!NA;"[B\XMM";N2<`X_(YI#JMCAS]H4["!@`DDDX&!_%G!Z9Z&@ M"[15*&_$]]'%"4>"2`RK(#R?F`Q^M275[%;3V\+YWW#%4&.,@9Y_3\Z`+-%9 M6EZY:WNGI/+-%%)Y0DD3=]P&M"WN8;J+S()`Z9(R.Q'4'T-`$M%5Y+ZUBG\A MYT$N/N9YZ9Q]<`G'M5:XU:W%E+-;7%NS+$)%,CD)@D@$D`X&01^%`&C15"]U MBRLH[AI)=S6Z%W11D\8X^O(_,4G]JVZ7$PFN;:.%!'M8R8;+YP"#TZ6`"4%GVD#:V0`I^8=R*?I]]@#4HK.&JK_8<&I-$1YT<;+&&S\SX"C/U8#.*@FUMH6\A MX(UNA.(2&FQ&,J6#%\<`@8Z=>/>@#8HK&.OKY*3"W81K#'/1P*V:`"BBB@`HHHH`***2@!:*S;34;J:Z\BXTYX"8C*N958G!``P.A.?T- M,_MD?V$-4^S.5/6,,,CYL=:`-6BHKB22.$M#"9GX`0,!G\3VJA_:L[6(GBL' M>0&0.A<`+L8J?FZ')''K0!J45E+K4][F)9RKR!&2-NAP>2>O`]*U M:`"BBB@`HHHH`***J7%^D-P+>.*2XN-N\QQ;IJ`"BJ\E MVD=[#:LC[YE9E88V_+C(//N*L4`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`% M%%%`!1110`5GZII-OJ4;"10LIVCS.\>X^V(-]U'YTZ*SC`>X:X MN-A\UQE`03C('.,=ZJZ=K3067^G+/)L2:7SV"_O`DFTC`[\KV%`%F2W^UZW" M[0RK]E3]Y(5PDI."H'K@Y/L1[U?O(3RU-+J&XD,,L M?D'Y@R\-QG*GO5736O\`4-.M;_[:8WG*2F$(I01D@E>F<[>,YZT`-ET.5OLA M2>`F*`02&6#?D#^)>Q_"BXU_[*[K/I]T@B02RG*'RX MRS*&.&Y^[G`[4`/729?MT=XTT?F?:3/(`IP?W1C`'/ISFJ0\.7`LA;?;(MD= MOY$6(CGAPRD_-S]T9K0;68UD(\B8QEY(T<8P[H"64<_[+8S_`'34$GB%(;". M]FLYX8)%W@N4&5PI!&#U.[A>ORF@!7TBY>]>[^TQ"7S8YD`C.W*H48'GH0Q^ MGO4WO4TFOPQP23F"5H1'))&ZE?W@3[V.>.Y&>H%`&G`AC@C1B"RJ`<=.E8 M]OHUU:PHL5S"SQK+$I=#@HY#9//W@1]#^M:%CJ"WDUQ%Y,D,D!4,KXY!&0>" M:IGQ#`IF#VUP&B"L4^7>06V_=SD_<4R/4[B+PWI]Z8S<3SI`&Z#+.5!/8=6_6@"I::?+/J]]&2HMXKF&3<4 MP7*Q*!CMC(YQTQ3X=!NH+2*!)K0"$JJLD)1I$&?OD'.>G3&><]>-&+5H9+E( M?*E59)&B20@;6=0=R]1(68.#RI4@XQWYJC M_;2F\67$HLS;LZY5<2G>JJ5YSSGH<=14S:Y$LOD?9+DW&\H80$W`[=P_BQ@@ M<'/Y4`45\/W/]G6]J9X08;=8PVTL"ZR*X)'9%ET<(%P&[`[1GOU]>*QT.Z M6ROK:.6'%X@9L@X64_?(P/NGT_QJ>+Q)9S%-D]*O%"+F-E.UF(27#/;YD>V8@9&/*8L>W))(HS#N5 MF(;Y68=!E1W'4UHC6(Q(\,D$HF01':"IW^8<`J<\@'.3[4`9&I6MQ;,%9UQ, M\Y)5)""CE?D)4'!Z]NW&*Z&Q9FL82\(@;8/W8_A]JIZG>LAM!:7"_O+I(I-N M&P#G\CQ5G4+]+"(2/%+(.2=@'``SDDD`?G0!E'0[F5VWBUB)NO/$Z`F51NW; M0<#''&?0]*ETZUCN;V_N$$ZVLP*A'4QG>>)".A&=J<^N:E?Q!:(-S),%_)[E;=()F=F8<;>`&*[NN2,@],D=2!0!;M;:.T@$,._ M8.F^1G/YL2:FHHH`S+*WU%;^2>[-J5?CY"Q8#LHSP!W/J?PP1Q7=E#'L6.:: M>YW7!Y^ZQ.<'_9&`,]E]36G10!AV^E7UH\TT#P?:3&Z"1V8B8E\JSC'51D<9 MZ]A3X])FFMO+NW6-D8M&UO(X)8@@LQXR3FMFB@#&M+&>VL(-+DBCNH$M0',C M-@N"!C.#QU([C`]JC?0G%N`/*N'DF,EQ%,S".4;"H7/)P.",@\C/6MVB@#GS MH-P;4V[3K(+BWC@N9'8EL(3ROKD,1SZ`\UT%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`%2VMI M([J[N)2K/*P"8/1%'`_,L?QK-72KQ?"_]F_N/M'(SO.S&_/7;GI[5NT4`4;B M6]-P88K:"2,Q`GS'91NS@C.T@\?RYQD51;3;Z#3Q:VB6QCDE=Y8FE9%52,(X;U8FAE;[N54J5)Z`]QZY-;M%`'/:S<0W'D!8GV MR>8$=XBRN0HP0HY+'HI/H2,C&:VD+%?7%@US)*QCTZ*1LR,N)%/)/(_^O754 M4`<;:QQ1Z#IET))?/DO8E9FE8Y`E/!!/3;G\*L6Y+ZM,'ENUU"*XE*1B,;70 MYV$L1]S;CC/4>M=510!RNCS02WNDL%?[6+>1;HLC!O,PF=QQUR#75444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`5GQZ M1#'(S":XPTOG,GF?*7SG./J!QTK0KG1J^H.\RPI%,&5FB*+@?+(%.W)&XX/? M&2..#0!HVNC6MJ^Y#,PV,FUY"R[6.<8IT6D6D,82%&C(M_LP=&PP3Z^N><^M M/TNY-YI\>$@RK<,6F,F/G)4*6=@ZHA8N-V MQ3E5SCID_4]S6=;Z_=W-FMTJ0KY=O#-+&029-Y((4YXQMXZ\G%2/JVHKP?LY M\V[>UBVITV[R":0NQ]LU%;Z7%:[ M4AFG2!6W+`'^13G/'&<9[9Q[5F1ZOJ4LR6Z);I,UT\&Z2)@`!")`2H;@\XZ_ ME4=M?W+7%NUV8Y_]/N8P0A!0(LF,?-C^''/KZ\T`:+:!:-:R6I>;R&C:)$W# M$:,02J\=.!USCMBF7&E/=ZO*\[2?9'MHXF`9?WI5F)!&,X^8=,=ZA75KT)I\ MS/9O%>O%A4#;E#9SWYQ\O/UXJ+^T)'N(+J8Q*\(O%W4*S/((PPVH[`AF'&I/*MO&EOYKSI$K/&R@AHF<'&[/5?R/8TJ7TFFW-[.YC%I_:&VX8@DIN MACP1SP-W!Z]:`-$Z+`93)YT^3.MP1N!&]1C/3OCFD;0;5H98#)-Y+HZ+'D8C M#_>V\9Y]R<=L5=LFG>SB>Z55F90751@*3VZGI7/W.JR^8FIE4:&`76R)00WR M?+\QSCG;GIQ[T`;MM8I;W4]P))'><('W$8^48'051'AVW$7EBZN@H7:/F7@; M@W]WU%5Y]4U2"W9Y88E`8'S!&7VQE3\Q17)QN'4$\=JGCU2YG,TL)M3!$YC. M2_'6I/[*B_ MLF+3A+,(X0@20$;QL(*GIC@J.U8M]=W-UHS3721(\VEW$Z&(L"GRQD#KUR3^ M0]ZG.KWUM.EBT,3ROY?DNAW#:RN<$%E!/[L]QG/X4`:4.D00W`E$DK*LK3+& MQ!59&!!8<9YRW?')IMWH\5U>BZ,\\;@QG"%<$H21U!/5HM]+M#[('8J21G"DXR.1^%`%9?#ULL M?E&>Y:)8S'&A9<1J2&`4@9X*C&2>E-N-*E6]M9899VIIO]JW45^L#10B`3QP9!);YDW#\C5S69KB&S1K61(W:XAC)9-W#2*I[CU_ MSUH`+32H+.>.6!Y%V0"';D88`D@GCKDG\Z9_8T/VGSS/.3]H:XV$KMW%-A'3 MIM-9=MJ4^G/>M*HE@%S<'&X[\JF_C/;@\>]:NE7=Y-E93N!'/ M`8]/7O0`R+0X8[":R:YNI8)(_+42.#Y2]@O';C!.3P*L6VFVUK=R7,*%7DC2 M,C.1A>A^N,`_[HJEJVJW=C<2B*&%XHHXY#N8AFW.5('^-0R:S>1QW",D`G@F M>,@!F#`1JXP.WW@"2<#]*`+MQI`GGNI?MES']J14D5-F-HR,#*DCJ>_>D@L` MNH0G[*L4%C%Y4#;\E@0O;M@`CGUJDNNW33Q_N(1`7MU/S$M^]_3@T-KUP@N& M\F*0)"\J;,X&U]I^;^(8(.0.Q%`&C6]NF<-D,2G`VXQC;@=2>F5;M;AGQDJ M0!S@8R`,`^Y]:5]&A?[(IED\NUV%%PIY4Y!R1D$]\'D53.L7[*(8+1)KL-," MJL`K>60.-Q&,[ASSCT-*-9NS=B(PPK&]S]F1MQ8@F'S%)QQ['!^GN`:FGQ7$ M-J$NIC+)N8[B03C)P"0!G`QVJS6=H%Q/=Z):7-RZO)+&')48ZBM&@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`JC'::7<^:8[:TDP[)(1&I^;.2#QUSBKU%'4?U(_.G_9+;=N^SQ;MQ;.P M9R>"?J:YG[1++#%=1-))?_V4)-HA/4X]:DGFD>\2&UO[D64L\2K( MKECED?>NXY..$/L30!T(LK0>7BUA'E?ZO$8^3OQZ4-8VCPO"]K`T4C;G0Q@J MQ]2.YKGHI97U$Q-J5P(C>20G]X.$$0/7''S#K_C5:+5;MH],D>:;?Y=L9L[@ M"&U5-/TB"TM7AE2*G27DFR(VNHS MLC&W\UB=Q20R`,#D<94L2O;:.!W`.ACTZRBD$D=G;HX.X,L2@@XQG./3BDD@ ML+>5)9(;>.1Y?E.#ZGFL^PN;K^RM3$3-<3VTLR0;SN9L>6)W!`$>UGV#@9&1@^^% M[<%9=1G@NEC:[G+,UFR;TVEU9RKDKC@$=?0XZ&@#WOOL]R8I&N;E MEPVT%E`([')]%Z'GTK5T:XEO-4O)&O9)$C$>R$8V`-&ISTSUSWH`V'FBCDCC M>15>0D(I."Q`R<>O%1?8+/SFF^R0>:V=S^6-QR,')]Q7-W%XS:S`TTT@N(+N M<>0.=J"%]C!>^1SGN3CZ55U&2Y6,2W[F!9K64N)0.&U>=1Y6U7]`>.2]UDVUR+A3,A27<&S^Z7'(Z^ MGX4`:2Q:<9%M@EL7CC,8BPN50XRN.PZ4ITVQ-NT!M(3$Q!*E`02.A_#MZ5SJ MD-X;L[*)@-626/*9_>+('!=CWQC<2>X/O1>WS7.G:BLE[-'PVCKWW'\`#HI=-L)`OFV=N0BA1NC&%`.0/IGFI,6U]:D9CGMY!@X(96'I MZ&L./4)C?!8[LN1,ZK"QF0* MI^S$2J,X`S]TN><_=H`ZG^S;+?N^SIN#*^>^Y1A3^`J2Y2VF46]R(W$G(C?' MS8(/`]C@UAV-S/1@'"JV0%[Y)&,#U/X@&@EGIPN"B1P^TL]. MB?[/##;1]6*@*/QKG[62*'Q#-*[@0B:9BC-\T+!1N<_[)`./3(]>-G4;S3X] M/2[NWA>W.&C+,-KDCY<9XYSWX[]LT`/N;;3Y_P!Y<+"PF"Q[F/#C.0/?GFB3 M3M/>4M);0M)(Q<[ADL<8)_+%8$1LHH"S3VTEJT%SGRSF,2,RL44]#P<#'7!] MZOQ9CO\`1!=%1=?975\GYB<)G]9DFM>-UDC61&# M(P!4CN#0!F6^AP".1;Q8;@.P8(J%44C."`6;!YY.>:M-IEDS;C;)G*'@8^Y] MW\NWI5NB@"G)I5A*,26L3C>9/F&?F/4_C3O[/M/,\SR%W^8)<_[8&,_7''TJ MU10!#;6T%I"(K:)(HQT51@5-110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%% M%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`)1@?G2T4`%%%%`# M616#`\;A@D'!Q]121QI%&L<:A40`*HZ`4^B@!"`>HS2T44`)@>@HI:*`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HH MHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB M@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****` M"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`* M***`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBJ%[?RV]_:VD4"2-2V<\+6]S&@DVD@JRDXW*1U&>.<5-/J%I!$DLD\81W6-2&SEB<`?K0!9HI MHD0L%#KN(R!GDCUJK/?"+4+6T"!S.6#$-RF%SR/>@"Y136=4QN8#)P,GJ:B2 M[@DNY;5)%::)59U!^Z#G'\C0!/165>ZM/:2HOV$LDDXMXV,FW,FYB^SN'V;6;(/&>#WH`LT4A8#&2!GIFD5U8D*P)7@@'I0`ZBHYIHH( M7FE=4C1=S,3P!ZTJRHZ(X.`X!7/&<\T`/HHK/U358M/M+N55\Z2UC$KQ!L$* MV3Q4@.0,\$C.*`'454O;X6LUO`L M32S7!8(H('09))-8M]JYO+>&6";R(945U5_E;>)E4Y(/0EW4EW M9^9+L\Q99(F*#`)1V7('.,XS^-/-V!J2V?EG)A,N_(QP0,?K0!9HHHH`***H MQZB9KYX(;9Y(HI/*DE#`;'VANGI@CGU-`%ZBLS^V"UQ=0QZ?=2-:L%DV%.X# M#&6!/!S5NQO8-0M$N;9]\3]#C!!Z$$=C0!8HHHH`***K?:P-2%D8VR83*'XP M<$#'KGF@"S1110`45#=7*6L!E=7;!`"H,LQ)P`!5&/7+9H;IY8IX)+7;YD,B M#?\`-]W&"0<]!@T`:E%44U.-H[DM%,DEM@R0D`N,C(Q@D'/U]:4ZE#_9"ZF$ ME,+0B8*%RVTC/3Z4`7:*CMYEN+>*=`0LB!P#UP1FI*`"BBB@`HHHH`****`" MBBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`** M**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`K'U M3R1,P7*@#H/:MBB@#F]1AN[R:[ODL"T:6A@CAE'S3;F!8[ M0_+?W3GA>@/J>Q];.F(PUZ[F:UF3S[>%E MD>/`R-VX$]CR.*VZ*`,?Q"'9M-V0RR;+U)&\M"VU0#DG`]Q2WZ`:KYMU;O/: M/;&,!8FDVMG)!`!QD8Y_V:UZ*`.5L=+F,T4=U"6N8M/4)-)'N"2!B5^;&"RY M'ZU)#`6MK4K9S1/!:21W2F$_.=H&WI\^6Y&,]_6NFHH`XU-./]E+#'82++)H MK(X\@C=+A<`G'WLYQGFKBQ1EG:YL96M9;)4A3[,V48%MPVX^4G*G)ZX]JZ:B M@#,TB>6**VTZ\$INX[9&>1E^5S@`X;N0<9^M8^N6K^=KOEV"!YM\D0>.6W8;5&#YB/CC&>5/OZ\]'10!B^([9;O[ M+%.LHMMSEI8D):-MN%Z<@7MX!X.WMD`'%:5 M%`%34HYCI=VEEA;AHG$6./F(./UKFG\MHGDM=+N1C3FBDC\AXB6W+D9P"2.3 MQUYKL**`.2@TX7_]JV^QTWB.:WD>V,2JX'4`CCD8(ZD=:V]$WSVO]H3QK'/> M!9&4<[5QA1GOZ_B:LWMC;W\:QW2%T5MX&XCGWP>1ST/%6``!@<"@#F8H)FEM MT\J1=1COV>6781NB+,<[NZE"`!ZX':KGA^.%+O52D(C+79*'R]N4V(...F0: MVZ*`.>L[V*UUK69)%F(DEC\L)"[%\1@'&!Z@BLU;*2W1&U.*XCM[MYY3'#") M3$SL"%8;6P<=QT.:[.B@#EHT$=\8;RTO)6,<#63$,6&T7MW>I'SXSTQQ4L44,L&F-JD+R1'30K[D9CYGR9''\77WKJJ*`.+^S3@0 MP:M]O+M:1"$P)O)<9W+NVG:V<YXK1L/L]M>:O?W$F!7/S,E]9SSPI- M-_7/V=X( MXD8@C<5#$X'?[P'US2VI"^"8E.0RV`0KCD-LQC'KGC%;E%`&;874<&F::C[R MTR)&NU2<-M[^G0]:TJ**`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`**** M`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`K"UK4;A=:TS2+60PM=EFED`!8 M(HS@9XR<'FMVL[4]*6^N+2[CE\B[M&+12;=PP1@@CC(/U%`"10-'>B--1D>$ MQ,C1/("P?(P0<9Z!NIKDK?7-0_L=9(-0DGU4W31QVV%8R(#SE<9`QGGBNGMM M&EBUF?59)XC2%2$A5YSD_-DGCVK.C\'E=*-HU^/.2Z;IKV4-]" MZ>>LT8>$@1X8,5^]TR/U-`%;2-8NM1FMK*\FDM[^VF:*ZB7:/,&QB&Z=,KV_ MD152'4M5:TUZX2_!USFNDFTF*35[;4U"I=H+:7;2+$K1>5O92V!CD]>3^-`&%>ZC?6^ ME>'IQJ$J-?21+<.53D.`3C*X&*O2'4YM%N[O3]0F8LGF6ID1"W!;(QMP0PQC MOS[43>'KN6RTFW^V0@Z;(CJQB)W[.@/S<5IV%IZG>9GA: M8K"I"X55X.,#/+!NN>,5G'PK;?V;JEHC`?;I#(K8_P!6>J@>P.3^-;EO#';0 M1P1+MCC4*H]`*`,#1]0N=?O+^1+E[:UMI?)B6(+EB.K$D'\!T^M-U;4M3TNS MM;4RI)>WEWY$&V],X(XJPF@M9R7XL7A-O?-O>&=20C=R".WM[=:KP M^$8XM#M;$7.+BUF\^*X6/'SYSR,\CMU["@":\OKC1]9TVWDN9;FWOBT1\P+N M1QC#`@#KG!%)X=O+RYU75X;J[>:.UF\N-2B#CGDX`YXJR^ES7FIVM[?O$?L@ M;R8HP<;S_$2?8=/UJO8:1J-A=ZC<17%J7O9/,(:-OD//OSUH`;?W-Z/%EK81 M7TL5O<6[2%52,[6&>A*FI/#>KW%_/J%E>A#<6$WEF1!M$BY.#CL>#^E,&B7R M:G97PNH9'M;;R#O4_O#CECSZYJYHNC)I7VF5I3-=7<=OZUF6.NZH+:>SU&XV7CP+=6D\:+B M5"N2N",_2FW?AX7VBV=I0Q2>=[/2XTGN5_P!8[G$I#'-=+0`4444`%(2`"2<`=ZH:K?2VP2&U M5#7)J=HK],>J0VZ M@6T=R-@7A58HI<`>F>?J30!KT444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444 M`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110` M4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1 M110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4A(`))P! MWJ&\O+>QMVGNI5CC7N>Y]!ZGVK.6WN-9827\;06(Y2U)(>3WDQV_V/S]*`%, MKZV2EM(\>G@X>=#AI_9#_=[%N_;UJIJ0><#0=#VV^W'VF:,8$">GNQ]/3ZYI M;_4)]0N(]+T5_+5B5FNT'RQ*.H7U/;/8_ILV5G!86J6]NFU%_,GN2>Y/K0`S M3M/@TVU6"W4X``+'[S8]3_G'05;HJ&[NH+*W>>ZE6*)!DLQ_SD^U`$U8^JZ_ M!8LT$`6>Y7[R[L+'Z%SV]@,D]A6?>W]UJ5P+=(+A$(REJC&.60?WI6_Y9I[? M>/Z5HZ7H<=FRS3[))ARB(NV.+UVKW/JQR30!AV>E7&L:VL_B`LZF`20VX&U" M`Q^\O7N#@DGGGT'9*H10J@*H&``.`*S=8/V9K;41G;:N?-Q_SR888_0?*W_` M:9/>RZA,UGIG'=C MV'XGCKY)HM+6&RMU@@7:B^IR2>Y)[D^M3T`%%%% M`!1110`45&\\,9Q)+&A]&8"E\Q/+\S>NS&=V>/SH`?165)X@LMQ6U$U\XZBU MB,@_[Z^[^M1V6N2W6J_8I-/>'Y"Q)E5V3TWA<[<^YH`V:***`"BBB@`HHHH` M****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`H MHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`HHHH`****`"BB MB@`HHHH`****`"BBB@`JI=:C;VEQ%!+YGF3`E%2)GW8Z]`>E6ZQ-88G7-)CC MG2*4^=M+#/\`#Z4`:EG>6]]`)K:02)DC.""".H(/(/L:GKE[VV@TF2&WDO?( MANVFFFGE)`:8[<9*LN.-V.W'KBI+.,W.JV\+ZC=2B.TCF!$A3S"'.&*YZ$#G MUH`Z2BBB@`HHHH`****`"LZ_U3R9?LME%]KO2,^4K8"#^\Y_A'ZGM6=K=[J- MW>KI.E;H'89EG(P53U7T],_EGMJ:1I=OI-H((!ECS)(>6=O4F@"HL<.GA;[5 M[@37C\+\N0IQ]V)!D_EDFH[V=[BS>ZU-)+/3H\$P@YEF.0`&V]`21\H.3W]* MT;/3H;5VER\T[?>GF.YR/3/8>PP*GN;>*Z@>"XC$D3C#*>]`'+7%[<6`2613 MIYNCB&V@B$URX'10,;5`SG'/7KDU+<>+H[;68]/1&F2-0)Y&YD+$<*JJ.6SC M(QUSTQFM$^&-,,BR;)]X&&8W,A+CCACG)''3I3QIVV3996T.GHHV&944R%1T M"]0![G/TH`SY?$=]#?-"VDS'=!YD,*?/*3G'SX.$'^?:FVNE:KJ M2)(QL3@C^'CY@/?K0!J/XCT:,X.HP''4HVX#ZD<"M.-TD17C971AE64Y!'M7 M.R^$4.$AU&Z2WY)@YNP`` MY^F10!T-]J4%DR1N))9Y!E((EW.WOCL/??YKC/&X#IQT&>/2K%ROBKS<*]HT9'!MF$94^^] M6X_"@"^NB(YW7M[>73=PTQ1?^^4P*I21^'D%_$BJL M^@ZO>Q,9IX4<891+*\X8@YP00%4'V7-:446N;/+1=,LD'`\M7EQ]!\HH`KKH M\ER,)INFZ9$>N($ED/Z!1_X]4+:/X?L97C:V^W7CX)B`#N?^`C"K]2`*U!I# M38-_?7-U_L!O+C_[Y7&?Q)J[;6L%I'Y=M#'"G]U%"C]*`,*/PW!=E6NK&VLH M1@B"W`#G_><`?DOYFKZ>'M+CSY5L8\G)\N5UY]>#[5J44`98T&U4CR[B_C`[ M+>RX_5J!HTBX\O5]23'_`$T5L_\`?2FM2B@#+&G:BI^76YV&.DD$1_DHIPAU MA#Q>V2Q$6WS-6O$W'`W2(,G_OFK=JR) M:VREE4LBJH)QD[6,4-XR0A)K23@E"Q(92>`>"/?%`%H MZ5(>1JVH`>SI_P#$TUM-=%W-K-^J^I>/'_H%4_M5M<:!9PV<4ZV]UE2B(2\< M8SO&!R/[G_`A5:WG,O@G4[.?)FL8)8&WK@D*A*-@^J[30!JIIK2Y*:U?.!_= M>,_^RTQK$*Q#:[>AAU!EC'_LM4M("RZY#F%;0V]F-BJ/\`R'3?L,@SG7KT;>N3#Q_Y#J#5K2X_ MM1+S3<"\ABW>6>!.N>58_P`CV(HTJ2QUB[N;I(E8`QL5=<%'`8$,/49/!H`G M6PD<[4UZ]8XZ`PD_^BZD&EW`)(UF_P`GJ=L//_D.JOA^U@:.XE:%-\6H7!C8 M#!7YV'\B16Y0!G#3;D8_XG5_Q_LP_P#QNFOI,LA1GU:\?]^X?_C=:5%`&9_9U[_T&[S_`+]0_P#QNC^SK[_H.7?_`'ZA M_P#B*TZ*`,P:=?3R>IY-(-/MA9/9^63;R`AD+LIR)(SLYC\A78$$M\IX``QSTK2C\02O;I,=/95ED:& M/$A;PQIY:`,0`OICIV%12:392R7 M,CQ$M=+MFQ(PWC&,'GTXJC:ZOVY.,=6*"".X9_,`^1L]!Z\=/\` M)A\27\KV-[%:HV+9HQ)*LI0JQ*G``Z\$9Y'7O0!J1Z19Q[-HFP@P@-Q(0G!' MR@MP<$C(Z4YM+LWTW^SVB+6N-OEEVZ>FS6EM:Q6[^5)>74=L)!@E M`QY(SWP#^=3C35CFB>&>X`4D2*T[L'!4CN>N<'-`$T-C!#*LJ>9O5/+!:5V^ M7\3^M/CM88I9I(XPCS$&0KQN(&,_7WKF]`D6XL+$2RZBUP\S?O3)*4^5V."2 M=I!"X[]:MZ,S:Y;3WUQ-.H>9TB2.5HQ&BG`^Z1D\9)/\J`-:SL;>Q5UMD91( MQ=@79LL>IY)ZU9K*\.7TU_IFZY.Z:&5X7?&-Y4XW8]_YUJT`%%%%`!1110`4 M444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!11 M10`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%% M`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444` M%)]*6B@"EIMA]@AEC\]Y?,E:4LP`(+')Z>Y-5?[!B.EK9&YFS',9XIA@/&Y8 MMD<8ZL?P-:]%`&9)I!DMO)>]GD#!A*9`C>9NQU&,#&.,=.>M1R>'[>03J9I@ MLL448P1F/R^48'UR!G%;-%`%6_L(=0M/L]QN(R&5U. M&5AT8'L13(+2Y0JT]\\Q0';E`H)QC+8Z_H/;I5VB@#(L]&DL[%+**_D$"L2< M(`QRQ8C/ODU,NEM!),;&Z:V2=S(Z!`P#'J5ST)]\CVK1HH`KV5G#86J6]NNU M$]>23W)/S)+,)=Z$$%)63HY8A0HSM`4MD^W&/QIS64+KGN?4U#/I-I//%.XEWQXQMF90<`@9`.#]X_G0`R/6();62ZB5I(%=5# M(5.[)QD#/3D=>OI4QOX_[2%BB,\@3>Y#+A!SC()SSCL#4:Z1:I%Y:A@/*CBR M#SM0Y7\:LS6T