Author: zxcvbob at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:39 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am in favor of Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99. I am tired
of companies in which I own common stock sharing information with Wall
Street analysts that I am not privy to, giving them time to warn their
best customers of earnings surprises, etc. before that information is
available to the public in general.
Regards,
Robert Baron
Rochester, MN
Author: "Marty&Debbie Brady" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 8:58 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Author: at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:28 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
As an individual investor who does much of my own research into companies, I
support the proposed rule change opening conference calls.
Beth Brennan
Missoula, Montana
Author: Gail Buckles at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 8:36 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
As a retiree earning my living through my personally selected stock
investments, I am strongly in favor of the proposed changes to the subject
regulation.
Respectfully yours,
Gail K. Buckles
18700 Walker's Choice Rd., Apt. 114
Montgomery Village, MD 20886-0553
Author: "Bill Craven" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:54 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
William L Craven
4320 Pinewalk Drive
Alpharetta, GA 30022
(770)667-9838
Author: "Coleen Philipson" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 12:05 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Jack & Mary Darragh
marynjack@msn.com
Lets have a level playing field please.
Author: Elizabeth Doutre at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:22 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99. I am an individual
investor who prefers to do my own stock research, and would like any company
information to be publicly available to all interested investors at the same
time.
Elizabeth Doutre
doutre@mindspring.com
Author: "Duff" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 6:56 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
As an individual investor I believe that I am
entitled to the same information - AT THE SAME
TIME - as the analysts and brokerage houses.
Anything less is un-American.
Howard F. Downer
Author: "Tim Evans" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:01 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Tim Evans
Individual investor
Author: Bob Feltner at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:37 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am in favor of this regulation. There is no reason why large
investors
should receive favored treatment or advance information.
Author: "Kimberly V. Giese" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 6:39 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor the proposed regulation.
Kimberly Giese
Individual Investor
Author: "A&A Goroch" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:44 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I strongly support Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Andreas Goroch
Salinas, CA
Author: "Pretzels" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 9:28 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Gina L. Gwozdz
Pretzels@arn.net
"I not only use all the brains I have, but all I can borrow." --
Woodrow Wilson
Author: Adrian Hawkins at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 6:54 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
It's the right thing to do,
Adrian Hawkins
=====
----
Adrian Hawkins
eahawkins@yahoo.com
Author: Edwin Horneij at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 7:06 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
-----
Edwin H. Horneij, Jr.
402 S. Robertson Blvd., Apt. 7
Los Angeles, CA 90048-3931
Author: Carol Howell at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:27 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Stop Selective Disclosure
Carol L. Howell
5505 E Baywood
Mesa, AZ 85206
Author: at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 9:25 PM
Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
To whom it may concern:
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Thank you Jan F. Jaekel
Author: Jen Jordan at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:17 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
-Jennifer Jordan
eCommerce Consultant
703.521.2140
Author: "Rebecca Kerlin" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 6:55 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Equal Access to information
Rebecca Kerlin
Author: John Kiljan at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:57 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Gentlemen:
I favor the adoption of Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Thank you,
-- John P Kiljan
jpkiljan@4dv.net
(no company affiliation)
Author: at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:31 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Deane Lappin
216 Pheasant Run
Paoli PA 19301
Author: Bob Liggett at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 7:43 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No.S7-31-99
Robert M Liggett
Author: at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:59 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
CC: Bill522@aol.com at Internet
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Fair disclosure is absolutely necessary for the markets to thrive. To allow
anything less creates a conflict of interest for the regulatory
responsibility of the SEC. It's time investors were given a fair shake in
the market. The more disclosure, the better!
William Lubera
Private Investor
4681 Kautz Drive
Dayton OH 45424
Author: "Steve McGhee" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 9:13 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
4/28/2000
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Steven A McGhee
HCR 4810
Oracle, AZ 85623
Author: at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 9:59 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD:S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I have read the ideas expressed by the Securities Industry Association
lobbying on behalf of its full-service broker members. I completely disagree
with their contention that alalysts provide a better service for the owners
of America's public companies by operating in an environment with access to
information denied to the very people who own or are considering owning those
companies. Their contentions betray all common sence.
If it betrays common sense, what is the motivation? SIA desires unequal access
to information by its members' analysts because they resell the information to
the American public. There's nothing wrong with reselling the information. But
making that information more valuable by giving them unequal access to it,
denying equal access to individual investors is wrong.
I applaud Proposed Regulation FD.
Bob McTiernan
Author: "Murph_at_Night" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:41 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Brian Murphy,
Methuen, MA
Author: Hans Overton at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 8:49 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
Since you have probably been getting hundreds or even thousands
of these, I'll keep it short and sweet. As a member of the
Motley Fool investing community, I favor Proposed Regulation
FD: File No. S7-31-99.
Thank you,
Hans Overton
=====
************************************************************
Hans Overton hoverton@yahoo.com
One always writes comedy at the moment of deepest hysteria.
-- V. S. Naipaul
************************************************************
Author: "Judy" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:12 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD:File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No.S7-31-99.
Judith Patrick,
Jr. Partner
Women's Investment Society of Eastern Kentucky
Author: George Powell at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 9:38 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Reg. FD file #S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed
Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
George Powell
Skate One Corp.
Goleta, CA. 93117
Author: "E. Pulaski" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:05 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
[NOTE: I am a private investor and have no relationship -- save as a client --
to any Wall Street or other financial firm.]
I would respectfully suggest that any system that restricts news to Wall Street
analysts while failing to allow equal and immediate access to the public is
inappropriate. This methodology eliminates the chance for investors to hear
anything but a filtered view of the facts ... and such filtering is frequently
done by analysts who are vigorously courted by the companies they follow. (Note
the fact that ANY 'sell' reccommendation from Wall Street analysts is usually a
source of news in and of itself because of its rarity.)
Transparency in financial transactions cannot fail but to enhance the free and
productive flow of capital that is the basis of capitalism. Please DO modify
the current system in the direction of providing more direct access to
information for the individual investor.
Thank you.
E. Thomas Pulaski
96 Ballyhoo Drive
Lewisville, NC 27023
Author: "Pere Marc Rigo" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:12 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99. Concentrating information
in the hands of a select few is clearly not in the best interest of all
investors.
Pere Rigo
Author: Stuart Saslow at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:41 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: "Proposed Regulation FD: File No.S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No.S7-31-99"
Stuart B. Saslow
Author: William Sengel at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 9:57 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed regulation FD:File No. S7-31-99"
------------------------------- Message Contents
LETS DEMAND FULL DISCLOSURE FOR EVEN THE SMALLEST INVESTOR> WALL STREET
GREED SHOULD NOT PREVAIL! wsengel@erols.com
Author: "Diane Sock" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 8:14 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: proposed regulation FD: File No. s7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am opposed to the proposed change in rules of disclosure.
Diane Sock
Author: "Edgar StPierre" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:34 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
signed,
Edgar StPierre
1510 Highland Ave
Fall River, MA
Author: "J. F. Swisher" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 8:32 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor proposed regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Author: "Alun Thomas" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:22 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I am in favour of Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Alun M. Thomas
Author: "Sam & Lanelle" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:58 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Samuel D Wagner
4320 Kindley Place
Trenton, NJ 08641
Author: "Sam C. Wang" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:06 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Author: Shu Wang at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:59 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Author: mward3 at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 6:31 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
Malcolm Ward
Manager, PowerPC Customer Technical Support
Motorola
Author: Nathaniel West at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 7:27 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99.
I thinks its absolutely outrageous that analysts
are giving insider information before the general public.
This is simply unacceptable in a free democratic country like the U.S.
Sincerely,
Nathaniel West
Author: "Timothy F. Wheeler" at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 11:01 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: Proposed Regulation FD: File No. S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
I favor an end to selective disclosure.
Timothy F. Wheeler
tfw1@psu.edu
Penn State University
814.863.5403
Timothy F. Wheeler
814/863-5403
tfw1@psu.edu
Author: at Internet
Date: 04/28/2000 10:12 PM
Normal
TO: RULE-COMMENTS at 03SEC
Subject: file # S7-31-99
------------------------------- Message Contents
To make an uneven playing field obviously isn't the responsible thing to do.
I favor Proposed Regulation FD: File # S7-31-99.
Regards,
Gerald Wolf