Subject: F7-25-97 Date: 12/3/97 8:35 AM Scott J. Mulvaney Ellen M. Doskey Olivia Doskey-Mulvaney 1816 Glenwood Road Glendale, CA. 91201 E-Mail: elenscot@ix.netcom.com Dear Mr. Katz, My family and I are small shareholders and after careful review of proposal F7-25-97 and Commissioner Wallman's concurrence, we all urge the SEC NOT to accept these changes. As we enter a new century I have been witness to a rise in corporate power and influence, and an alarming lack of regulation and enforcement of anti trust law. In my own Motion Picture industry I have seen 4 mega companies personally buy up and squeeze out independent companies while gleefully breaking the 1944 Paramount Consent decree with impunity - owning the Means of Production - Distribution - and Exhibition in an iron grip on independent producers like myself. If the Government through our representatives will not balance the power of capital and democracy through law to protect shareholders and citizens from the steamrolling tactics of the invincible corporate lobby - the SEC must therefore be our "Advocate" as William O Douglas stated. To change rules making it easier for corporations to ignore the small shareholder is to throw us backward into the arms of Boss Tweed, J.P.Morgan and the Teapot Dome scandal days. We small shareholders have little enough recourse already to influence the actions of the companies we share ownership in, to reduce that shrinking ability to make a difference and influence just to save corporations the trouble and a few bucks (which I as a shareholder would gladly spend) is an insult to the very cornerstone of democracy - that we should all speak truth to power, as did our founders. If the corporation has been granted the rights of "Personhood" according to the bizarre 19th century ruling of the Supreme Court, then it must share a conscience with those of us who own and manage it. The public shareholder is the last line of defence in this realm. We have seen corporations do great harm and act irresponsabily with our money out of stupidity, avarice or in denial. Since most shareholders are locked in their own daily problems, a valiant few have often made stunning differences for the common good by raising a steady, small voice, to remind the corporate machinery of it's humanity and feduciary responsability. The SEC shares with us the power to watchdog. With limited funds and personell, you should welcome shareholders who are concerned enough to help you in this duty. There may be nusiance shareholders who abuse thier rights according to the current rules, but these are few compared to those of us who hold our responsability dear. We must not aid in the creation of apathy by taking away the rights of the least of us, for in so doing we allow the very freedoms our forefathers gave the last measure of their devotion for, slip away into a world of consumer slumber and vast corporate "Big Brother" -ism. Sincerely, Scott, Ellen, & Olivia Doskey-Mulvaney's