Subject: Please: Stop Regulations S7-25-97 Date: 11/18/97 12:31 AM Dear SEC: I am writing because I am concerned about the effect of your proposed regulations (S7-25-97) on the small investor. These new rules seem effectively to take away the small shareholder's rights to have our voices heard and our votes counted through corporate shareholder ballots and at annual shareholder meetings. The regulations do nothing for the small investor and everything for big business. Take the "over-ride" clause, for example. 3% of a company's shares are needed to allow a ballot resolution despite management's objections. For most Fortune 500 companies, 3% means more than $1 billion worth of stock! Please consider keeping the over-ride idea but only with a $10 million dollar cap. This is a reasonable manner to ensure access to the shareholder ballot for average shareholders-it will give small shareholders a reasonable goal to reach in combining their voices, not an impossible one as with the 3% proposal. Increasing the percentage needed to reintroduce an issue is another example of how the new regulations favor corporate management at the expense of regular Americans. Please let the existing resubmission thresholds stand. Don't take away small investor's tools for protecting their financial interests in a company. Reconsider your regulations. Secondly, your proposed regulations (S7-25-97) will pose a major setback in the efforts to protect women and children's rights both in the workplace and in the media. The shareholder resolution process is an absolutely indispensable tool for concerned investors to engage in a dialogue with company management about social issues, workplace practices and corporate accountability. The new regulations would eliminate shareholders' ability to make their voices heard. The shareholder advocacy campaign against tobacco sales to children is an example of the power of the shareholder resolution process to bring important issues to the attention of management and make sure action is taken. American consumers are becoming increasingly enraged about sweat shops. Shareholder resolutions have played a crucial role in helping stop sweat shops, which most frequently rely on exploiting children and women both at home and abroad. The shareholder resolution process is already helping protect companies from reputational backlash. Had Nike heeded the advice of concerned shareholders in past years they would not be the regular target of America's most popular cartoonist. Had they worked with shareholders they would not be struggling to rebuild their extremely damaged public image. Shareholder resolutions protect the financial interests of shareholders. Please protect the rights of American shareholders to address corporate behavior. Stop these regulations from going through. Sincerely, Joanie Misrack ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "It is man's vision of a world fit for rational, civilized humanity which leads him to dare to suffer to build societies free from want and fear. Concepts such as truth, justice and compassion cannot be dismissed as trite when these are often the only bulwarks which stand against ruthless power." (Aung San Suu Kyi) MAY PEACE PREVAIL ON EARTH, AND IN YOUR HEART....! Joanie Misrack, Pathways To Peace