MessageFrom: Carter, Gary [gcarter@ci.hartford.ct.us] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:50 PM To: rule-comments@sec.gov Cc: Palm, Kathleen Subject: S7-19-03: Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to voice my support for the general thrust of the proposal to provide shareholder (the true owners of the enterprise) access to company proxy cards for the nomination of directors. It represents an opportunity to provide the owners of the enterprise a true voice on the governing boards and committees of the enterprise. As has become painfully evident over the last several years (MCI, ENRON, etc.) executive management and their boards have focused more on their welfare than that of the shareholders. They have lost sight of the need to provide the enterprise owners with a say as to how the capital (contributed by those of us who have purchased an ownership interest with real cash) is used and even what margins (profits) the we are willing to forgo for the greater good of society. Again the overall direction of the proposal is good, however more attention needs to be given to providing shareholders with a true voice and true protections, including the ability to replace poorly performing or unresponsive personnel. For example, two years is much too long a time to wait to replace an underperforming or unresponsive board member. If they fail to perform, their seat needs to be at risk as of the next election. Further, there should not be a phase in, all companies subject to SEC proxy rules should immediately be covered by the rule, exceptions of any kind should be kept to a minimum. All shareholders deserve to have their interests represented and protected. On another front, it is my understanding that there is no mechanism in the current proposal that would trigger access in those instances where there have been majority shareholder support for a resolution sponsored by a shareholder that a management and its Board has chosen to ignore. That is a clear breach of duty, a failure to abide by the wishes of the owners of the enterprise. I respectfully request that you add such a trigger. There are other issues that others who are much more familiar and conversant with this issue can raise and address and I trust that you will hear from them. Gary L. Carter, Director of Investments City of Hartford Pension Commission Telephone: (860) 757-9112 Telecopier: (860) 722-6127 Mailing Address: City of Hartford Pension Commission C/O Office of the City Treasurer 550 Main Street Hartford, CT 06103 Location/Overnight Delivery: City of Hartford Pension Commission C/O Office of the City Treasurer 250 Constitution Plaza, 2nd Floor Hartford, CT 06103 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This email with all information contained herein or attached hereto may contain confidential and/or privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and immediately delete this email in its entirety and any attachments thereto. The City of Hartford reserves the right to intercept and monitor the content of e-mail messages to and from its systems.