From: Tommy L. Feezel [tlfeezel@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 10:39 PM To: Jonathan G. Katz Cc: senfronia.thompson@house.state.tx.us; robert.talton@house.state.tx.us; wayne.smith@house.state.tx.us; rick.noriega@house.state.tx.us; joe.moreno@house.state.tx.us; al.edwards@house.state.tx.us; glenda.dawson@house.state.tx.us; john.davis@house.state.tx.us; joe.crabb@house.state.tx.us; dennis.bonnen@house.state.tx.us; tommy.williams@senate.state.tx.us; john.whitmire@senate.state.tx.us; john.lindsay@senate.state.tx.us; kyle.janek@senate.state.tx.us; mike.jackson@senate.state.tx.us; mario.gallegos@senate.state.tx.us; rodney.ellis@senate.state.tx.us; nick.lampson@mail.house.gov; askgene@mail.house.gov; tom.delay@mail.house.gov; john.carter@mail.house.gov Subject: File No. S7-11-04 Mandatory 2% Redemption Fee Jonathan G. Katz Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549-0609 Dear Mr. Katz, I would like to inform you of my opposing the idea of a mandatory 2% redemption fee on the sale of mutual funds held less than 5 days. I do not think this is in any way warranted. If an investor should enter the market when he feels it is right, only to see it turn bearish, he should not be penalized for desiring to exit the market regardless of the time. The mutual funds already have in place policies and practices to ensure they receive adequate compensation for trades within the funds. Perhaps quick short term trading is due to stale pricing of the funds. Fair pricing of the funds would be a much more effective method of stopping short term trading of funds than a mandatory redemption fee. I have not heard of any industry wide problem of excessive or abusive trading of mutual funds or of any such actions that results in higher costs to "long term" investors of mutual funds. I have not seen or heard of any academic study or industry study which concludes that a redemption fee would eliminate excessive or abusive mutual fund trading. Mutual fund companies already have built in methods of "getting their commission" even in no load funds. This mandatory redemption fee would just add another cost to the investor for no practical or logical reason. I urge you to not to support or recommend this mandatory redemption fee! Sincerely, Tommy L. Feezel