From: Kenneth Christenson [kennethchr@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:45 PM
To: rule-comments@sec.gov
Subject: (s7-02-03) Standards Relating to Listed Company Audit

Here is how your agency made notification of it.

Proposed Rule:
Standards Relating To Listed Company Audit Committees
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

17 CFR PARTS 228, 229, 240, 249 and 274 

[RELEASE NOS. 33-8173; 34-47137; IC-25885; File No. S7-02-03] 

RIN 3235-AI75 

STANDARDS RELATING TO LISTED COMPANY AUDIT COMMITTEES 

Anyway here goes. Personally I'm sure that the problem stem from how 
the SEC responds to itself or designed to pay it own way. This enables 
a bartering system that in the past our society had already said was not 
good enough.  The reason for this is because nobody could tell if it was 
being worked through a concept or a source of cooperation. 

Nonetheless there is also other tangibles that worked through our 
educational system who by title was and remains a principal that if a 
student does wrong could be expelled. This is how the SEC is currently 
functioning rather than responding to itself as source of cooperation 
can help business enable correct principles to keep management remain 
clean of larceny petty or otherwise. Doing so is not only good for the 
investor but also for other people that work for the company since it 
removes the potential for fraud and other types of habitual abuses that 
allows the person go home without any guilt complexes and at the same 
time hold the Fifth Amendment silent and guilty feelings at bay.