Finance Area Fogelman College of Business and Economics University of Memphis Memphis TN 38152 August 18, 1998 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission Mail Stop 6-9 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 VIA Internet Re: File No. 4-208 Dear Mr. Katz: The intention of the 1975 Securities Act Amendment was to enhance the competition for order flow for listed securities. The ITS system that was developed to respond to the requirements this act provides only very limited competition for order flow. Technologically speaking, it is an obsolete system. In contrast, the Optimark system that is proposed for the Pacific Exchange promises to greatly enhance the competition for order flow, to the benefit of all investors and our entire economy. It would be quite ironic if an obscure requirement of the ITS system were to cripple the functioning of Optimark. For example, the argument that Optimark orders be manually entered into the ITS system rather than entered by computer is absurd. Computers constantly communicate with other computers today-manual intervention in this process in the case of Optimark introduces the opportunity for human error, seriously delays execution which thereby reduces the value of the system to traders, and potentially disadvantages traders who have entered orders into the Optimark system. I urge that the SEC not impose, nor permit to be imposed, any such unreasonable restriction on the functioning of the Optimark system. Sincerely, Robert A. Wood Distinguished Professor of Finance