SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 15645 / February 18, 1998 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Zurich National USA, LLC, Compunomics 139, Inc. and Paul Douglas Catchings, Civil Action No. 98-CV- 29D (USDC WY) On February 13, 1998, the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming issued an order for civil contempt and arrest against Paul Douglas Catchings ("Catchings") individually, and as president and Chief Executive Officer of Compunomics 139, Inc. ("Compunomics"), for violating the Court's temporary restraining orders of February 10, 1998 [See Litigation Release No. 15639, February 10, 1998], and February 3, 1998. [See Litigation Release No. 15634, February 3, 1998] The Court also issued a preliminary injunction against First Zurich National USA, LLC ("First Zurich"), Compunomics and Catchings in an action involving an affinity fraud largely targeting African Americans. The Court enjoined each from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Court also continued the asset freeze of, and ordered an accounting of assets from, each defendant. Finally, the Court appointed a special officer to take control of the assets, accounts and property of First Zurich, Compunomics and Catchings. This civil action was originally filed by the Commission on February 2, 1998, in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming against First Zurich and Compunomics. The Commission filed an amended complaint adding Catchings as an individual defendant on February 10, 1998. The preliminary injunction was based on the Commission's February 10, 1998, amended complaint, which alleges that in soliciting persons to purchase Compunomics' stock, Catchings and Compunomics are falsely representing to investors (some of whom have purchased Compunomics' stock for as low as $0.32 per share) that they will reap enormous profits when the stock begins publicly trading in the near future at $10.00 per share. The complaint also alleges that they are falsely representing to investors that Compunomics will soon be profitably operating a bank. The amended complaint alleges that in soliciting persons to acquire stock in First Zurich, a Wyoming limited liability company and Compunomics subsidiary (which Compunomics claims to be a "global internet bank"), Catchings and the two companies are failing to disclose to investors that First Zurich cannot legally operate as a bank. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has not granted a national bank charter to First Zurich nor has the Wyoming State Banking Board authorized First Zurich to conduct banking operations. Moreover, First Zurich, as a Wyoming limited liability company, is not permitted under Wyoming corporate law to conduct banking operations. The amended complaint further alleges that Catchings, Compunomics and First Zurich have, since approximately April 1995 to the present, sold ======END OF PAGE 1====== between $4 million and $5 million of Compunomics and First Zurich stock. Between 1,000 and 2,000 persons have purchased Compunomics' stock and at least 400 persons have purchased First Zurich stock. Sales and promotional activities have been largely directed towards African Americans. Public sales meetings were held on a regular basis at Los Angeles area restaurants from approximately April 1995 to April 1997 where the false claims were made. In July 1997, Compunomics' former vice chairman and chief operating officer addressed approximately 30,000 persons attending the Full Gospel Baptist Fellowship conference in New Orleans. Written materials approved and authorized by Catchings repeating the false claims were disseminated during the convention. Also, sales materials containing false and misleading information concerning Compunomics have been, and continue to be, posted on the internet. The amended complaint charges that the defendants have violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws -- Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission has received substantial assistance in this case from the California Department of Corporations, the Wyoming State Securities Division and the Cheyenne, Wyoming office of the United States Postal Inspection Service. ======END OF PAGE 2======