UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 40256 / July 23, 1998 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-9654 ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15(b)(6) and 19(h) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 The Commission announced today that it instituted administrative proceedings against Eugene Laff ("Laff"), Stanley Aslanian, Jr. ("Aslanian"), and Lawrence Caito ("Caito") to determine whether they should be sanctioned in the public interest based on Caito's injunction for secutities fraud and Laff's and Aslanian's criminal convictions for securities fraud. More specifically, the Order alleges that over a two-year period, from October 1985 through October 1987, the respondents, together with other brokers and dealers, engaged in a scheme to defraud the investing public by manipulating the over-the-counter NASDAQ market for the securities of seven companies: Big O Tires, Inc. (and its predecessor company, Tires, Inc.), Cliff Engle Ltd., Digital Metcom, Inc., Flores de New Mexico, Inc., Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc., TS Industries, Inc., and Tunex International, Inc. The Order alleges that the respondents and the other brokers and dealers artificially increased the prices of those stocks by more than $644 million and then maintained and prevented the decline in the price of those stocks, despite the publication of news articles containing highly negative information about the companies, despite substantial short selling, and despite the Market Break of 1987. Respondents Laff and Aslanian were both criminally charged for their respective roles in the scheme. Aslanian pleaded guilty to one felony count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371. On December 8, 1989, Laff was convicted in the Southern District of New York of the following: one count of conspiracy to manipulate the securities of Big O Tires, Flores de New Mexico and TS Industries; two counts of securities fraud (manipulation); one count of mail fraud; and one count of obstruction of justice. Caito was a defendant in the Commission's civil injunctive case which went to trial in the Southern District of New York in December 1994. Following that trial, the court found Caito and his now-defunct company, Capital Shares, had violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 9(a)(2), 10(b), 15(c)(1), 15(c)(2) and 17(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rules 10b-5, 15c1- 2, 15c2-7, 17a-3 and 17a-4 promulgated thereunder. SEC v. Henry W. Lorin, 877 F. Supp. 192 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). On May 10, 1996, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment permanently enjoining Caito from violating those provisions of the federal securities laws. See SEC v. Henry W. Lorin, 90 Civ. 7461 (May 10, 1996). The district court's decision was affirmed on appeal. SEC v. Henry W. Lorin, 76 F.3d 458 (2d Cir. 1996). A hearing will be held to determine whether the staff's allegations are true and to provide respondents Laff, Aslanian and Caito with an opportunity to respond to the allegations.