Subject: Comments on SR-OCC-2024-001 34-100009
From: Elke Caspert
Affiliation:

May 16, 2024

Dear Chair of SEC, Mr. Gensler, 

I appreciate that you are willing to teach private investors how to participate in regulating the US market, the most important market in the world. Trust is the most worthy thing in the world and the SEC garants trust and transparency in US markets. I am writing to express my concerns about SR-OCC-2024-001, titled “Proposed Rule Change by The Options Clearing Corporation Concerning ts Process for Adjusting Certain Parameters in Its Proprietary System for Calculating Margin Requirements During Periods When the Products It Clears and the Markets It Serves Experience High Volatility.” 

I cannot support the approval of this proposal because of the following reasons: 

Lack of transparency: The proposal contains significant redactions, preventing meaningful public review and comment. 

Systemic risk: The OCC's proposal to reduce margin requirements for Clearing members poses increased risk to the stability of our financial system. If clearing members cannot meet their financial obligations - they must close their bets. 

Conflict of interest: The role of the Financial Risk Management Officer has an inherent conflict of interest to oversee both the well-being of Clearing Members as well as the agency itself. 

Moral hazard: The proposal shifts the costs of Clearing member defaults to the non-bank liquidity facility, creating a moral hazard and perpetuating an unfair marketplace. 

Inadequate Risk Management: The proposal fails to properly manage liquidity risk and increases systemic risk, as evidenced by the OCC's reliance on reducing margin requirements. 

With note to the rejection reasons as put forward by the SEC in the dismissal of this rule: 

Failure to promote prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and safeguard securities and funds. 

Lack of clear and direct lines of responsibility in governance arrangements. 

Inadequate policies and procedures to cover credit exposures to participants and insufficient margin calculation to cover potential future exposure. 

In conclusion, I support the SEC in their rejection of this proposed rule change - to ensure the protection of all investors and the integrity of our financial markets. 

Thank you for considering my concerns and for your continued help to protect our markets, 

Sincerely 

Elke Kaspert


Virenfrei.www.avast.com