Subject: Comments on SR-OCC-2024-001 34-100009
From: B Burmeister
Affiliation:

May 15, 2024

To whom it may concern.

As an international retail investor who has invested in the US market
, I appreciate the additional consideration and opportunity extended
by SR-OCC-2024-001 Release No 34-100009 [1] to comment on
SR-OCC-2024-001 34-99393 entitled “Proposed Rule Change by The Options
Clearing Corporation Concerning Its Process for Adjusting Certain
Parameters in Its Proprietary System for Calculating Margin
Requirements During Periods When the Products It Clears and the
Markets It Serves Experience High Volatility” aka a complet shit-show
because financial institutions has made bad bets.

I SUPPORT the SEC's grounds for disapproval under consideration as I
have several concerns about the OCC rule proposal, and appreciate the
opportunity to contribute to the rulemaking process to ensure all
investors are protected in a fair, orderly, and efficient market
especially the retail investors who has been shit on for centuries.

Anyway this OCC rule proposal appears designed actually lat me
rephrase its its clearly designed to protect Clearing Members from
realizing the risk of potentially costly trades by rubber stamping
reductions in margin requirements as required by Clearing Members.

The OCC’s rule proposal attempts to avoid triggering a systemic
financial crisis by reducing margin requirements using “idiosyncratic”
and “global” terminology on a systemic risk they themself caused in
their pursuit of greed and fraud.

Therefore, the SEC is correct to have identified reasonable grounds
for disapproval as this Proposed Rule Change is NOT consistent with at
least Section 17A(b)(3)(F), Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2), and Rule 17Ad-22(e)(6)
of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)).

Furthermore the SEC is 100% correct to reject this proposal on the
grounds of sheer stupidity because giving financial institutions
reduced margin requirement would be like giving Epstein a new island
and the keys to a kindergarten.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment for the protection of all
investors as all investors benefit from a fair, transparent, and
resilient market.

Regards Benny Burmeister Jørgensen, Denmark