Subject: SR-NYSE-2023-09: Webform Comments from Douglas Switzer
From: Douglas Switzer
Affiliation: Business Owner

Jan. 16, 2024

I vehemently oppose the creation of Natural Asset
Companies that will be used to sell off, and sell out, America. I do
not want our country’s public lands, waters and even air sold to
private interests obliged to preclude the productive use of such
resources to the betterment of our society and the strengthening of
our economy.

I also vehemently reject the imposition of unconstitutional
restrictions via such means on individual Americans’ property rights
and other freedoms.

My sentiments are further intensified by the prospect that those
private interests may include hostile foreign powers like the Chinese
Communist Party, Russia and Iran who may have their own reasons for
wanting to lock down our hydrocarbon-based fuels, our minerals,
forests, etc.

I urge the Commission to extend the time available for comment on
proposed Rule SR-NYSE-2023-09 or to reject it outright immediately.

Step 2. CLICK HERE TO EMAIL CONGRESS
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed a rule
that would enable radical environmentalists in the Biden
administration to sell off to the Chinese Communist Party and other
investors federal lands, water and even air to so-called “Natural
Asset Companies” (NACs) on the condition that they would preclude
virtually any productive use of such resources. Private land owners
may also be impacted.

We have until January 18th to oppose this stealthy effort to sell-off
– and sell-out – America. We must act NOW!

There are numerous problems with this scheme. In a powerful indictment
of the sneaky way in which Team Biden and its allies at the SEC and
the New York Stock Exchange are trying to engineer a new and ominous
means of imposing their “green” agenda on the rest of us, Margaret
Byfield warned in Real Clear Markets recently that:

These [NAC] companies would be given license to control lands, both
public and private, and would be required not to conduct any
“unsustainable activities, such as mining, that lead to the
degradation of the ecosystems…. Sovereign nations, such as the
United States Government, can provide their lands toprivate investors,
including those outside the United States. China, for example, may be
able to invest in a NAC and effectively be a stakeholder in our
national parks. Russia could assume control of lands currently leased
to produce oil and place them off limits for future natural resource
development.
NACs would prevent the productive use of the land, which would hurt
the landowners financially, but also reduce the supply of minerals,
food, and other goods that come from the land.
How might a company make control of land profitable while also not
using the land? The method is admittedly confusing, perhaps
intentionally. They profit from “ecological performance” such as
“conservation, restoration, or sustainable management.” These NACs
would quantify and monetize these natural outputs (such as air or
water). The best comparison would be using the air we breathe as a
cryptocurrency of sorts. And, these natural assets that collectively
belong to all of us would now belong to corporations run by what many
would call environmental special interests.
Traditional accounting standards would not be used to regulate NACs.
Likely, this is because NACs would not withstand scrutiny under
generally accepted accounting principles.
This effort would be a huge windfall for the federal government and
the NACs. The government would create an entirely new revenue stream
that would solely benefit the Davos-type [World Economic Forum] crowd
that gives the current administration support. Both Big Government and
radical environmentalists stand to benefit.
These efforts intentionally prioritize environmentalism over human
flourishing. [Prospective auditors] admit that “producing these
essential goods and services and managing resources wisely is as
valuable, or perhaps even more valuable, than the food production.”
If all this sounds crazy, it is. Crazy like a fox. And, if the Biden
administration and its allies have their way, this craziness will
translate shortly after January 18th into the further “fundamental
transformation” of the United States into a country in which
property rights and other personal freedoms are stripped from us in a
“global reset” that consolidates power and wealth in the
tyrannical hands of unelected, oppressive oligarchs and bureaucrats.
Say “No” to selling off and selling out America

Insert this draft comment in the SEC form here and click here to send
it to your elected representatives:

I oppose the creation of Natural Asset Companies that will be used to
sell off, and sell out, America. I do not want our country’s public
lands, waters and even air sold to private interests obliged to
preclude the productive use of such resources to the betterment of our
society and the strengthening of our economy.

I also reject the imposition of unconstitutional restrictions via such
means on individual Americans’ property rights and other freedoms.

My sentiments are further intensified by the prospect that those
private interests may include hostile foreign powers like the Chinese
Communist Party, Russia and Iran who may have their own reasons for
wanting to lock down our hydrocarbon-based fuels, our minerals,
forests, etc.

I urge the Commission to extend the time available for comment on
proposed Rule SR-NYSE-2023-09 or to reject it outright immediately.