Jan. 12, 2024
Dear sirs and madams: I have been learning about the plan proposed by the NYSE to create a class of Natural Asset Companies to be made public. From my study of the people and companies leading the way in this proposal, I have come to the conclusion that it is even worse than the class of "investments" that are considered "ESG" friendly. Investments, so-called, that are doomed to not actually produce a genuine profit but supposedly save the planet. This new proposal is even worse. Under the guise of doing good "for the planet" it could actually instead strip landowners from accessing any profitably of their land via mineral, water, food production, etc. All in the name of "protecting" the land. This could, over time, ruin the lives of rural Americans and impoverish the nation and its citizens. Funny that, since it fits in well with globalists desire to get humans off of open land and into cities instead, and have corporations and governments own the land and use it for their purposes instead. You can read more opinion about it here: Invest in nature? Might be possible with 'natural asset companies.' - E&E News by POLITICO (eenews.net) Invest in nature? Might be possible with 'natural asset companies.' Jennifer Yachnin A proposal before the Securities and Exchange Commission would allow the New York Stock Exchange to list compani... You can read economist and author Carol Roth's assessment of this here: (2) Carol Roth on X: "I am posting the comments I have sent to the SEC against NACs (Natural Asset Companies). I hope that many of you will take the time to send off your comments, as they are due soon. I have included the email to send the comments. The subject line of the email MUST include…" / X (twitter.com) and here: (2) Carol Roth on X: "My letter sent to the SEC against NACs: To: rule-comments@sec.gov Subject: File No. SR-NYSE-2023-09 Asking the SEC to NOT ALLOW NACs To all involved at the SEC: I am urging the SEC to NOT allow the NYSE to list “Natural Asset Companies” or NACs, pursuant to File No.…" / X (twitter.com) And finally, other organizations evaluation of it here: American Stewards Some think anything for dealing with climate change is a good thing. Others see it as a typical means of removing citizens' rights and options and fulfilling a globalist dream that ends individual nations' sovereignty. Individual ownership and property rights has proven from history to make people more productive and happier (and their nations as well), while instead, trying to create regimentation, order and "efficiency" creates authoritarian governments and ends up suppressing people in the name of what "experts" claim is "for their own good". Please stand against this latest power grab! Sincerely, Rick D. Shepherd [REDACTED] “In essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, in all things charity.” Rupertus Meldenius, Lutheran theologian (1582-1651) "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher (1788-1860)