According to the SEC website, your mission is to make a positive impact on the U.S. economy, our capital markets, and people’s lives as well as to protect investors. It appears the agency is failing at their mission. When I saw the proposal for the creation of Natural Asset Corporations (NACs), I immediately thought this is another backdoor political move to push the 30 by 30 plan of the current executive administration and the radicals push for their Green New Deal and climate change agenda. I opened the link to “Force for Good” and it is clear to me that my thoughts are correct. The creation of these NACs are a radical step to take over land and peoples rights. The NACs will strip the rights and properties of American small businesses (farmers, ranchers, etc); individuals and families that help create capital markets since the founding of our country. The NACs are a similar tactic as the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) funds that were created years ago that investors are rejecting. Many individual investors and administrators of state retirement plans are rejecting these funds because they have a negative effect on the U.S. economy and state budgets. In addition, the returns are also dismal. The following are a list of concerns: 1) Who are going to own these NACs since there are no restrictions on ownership? The global elitists, foreign advisories, and others that are looking to take over the U.S. People who are willing to destroy our energy and mineral supplies—reducing our ability to power our homes and offices, our food supply, and other crucial activities. Our livelihood! People who want to take away our personal property, our state land, our federal land including our national parks. 2) Can the NACs and ESGs be free of bias? They have an objective regardless of factual data from scientists and other professionals who are on the other side of the spectrum on the impact of climate change, sustainable energy, etc. 3) Who made the decisions on what is sustainable and unsubstantial? The United Nations that is influenced by China and doesn't have the U.S. best interest. The global elitist that are hell bent on destroying the U.S. so they can advance their “New World Order.” Politicians that don't have a clear understanding of the negative economic, social, and environmental impact their Green New Deal/climate change agenda will have on the U.S. 4) Who created the rules for the SEEA EA? That would be the United Nations who are pushing the EU Green New Deal. I wouldn't be surprised if the global elitist assisted in drafting the rules. 5) How is the audit committee going to set clear hiring policies that are free of bias? Special interest groups, the global elitist, foreign advisories that push climate change propaganda are more than likely to sit on the committee. 6) Are the NACs going to work with the local communities and respect their opinions? Since most Americans don't want windmills, solar panels and the like in their communities, it appears the NACs are a way to grab land and to strip the property rights of Americans. If this proposal is allowed to go through, it will fundamentally change our great nation. If this proposal is allowed to go through, the SEC will be aiding and abetting in destroying our nation in order to push a a political agenda.