Subject: SR-CboeBZX-2021-019
From: Technology Ethecist Mark Pile
Affiliation:

Jun. 17, 2021


Dear SEC,

I would like to express grave concern over the
implementation and integration of any market
related securities that are tied to the
crypto-currency market, including but not limited
to any of the CBOBZX exchange funds or any
related plan to integrate securities tied to the
crypto market in traditional financial exchanges.

CRYPTO MARKET IS NOT A TRADITIONAL MARKET

As you all know, crypto currency exchanges are
not regulated and overseen anywhere near to the
degree of traditional banks, financial
institutions and other market exchanges.  In many
cases, we do not even know who the principals are
running these crypto operations, where they're
located, or who else they're doing business
with?  Mingling a well-regulated traditional
marketplace with such a volatile, crime-ridden
speculative, high-risk marketplace with very
little accountability is a recipe for disaster,
and can undermine the credibility of traditional
markets and regulators.   Ironically, one talking
point for crypto is its ability to bypass
traditional regulation.  It's a point of pride
that they're not subject to centralized
oversight.  This is analogous to Amazon allowing
burglars to set up their own online store in their marketplace.

THERE IS NO SOLID EVIDENCE THE MARKET IS ACTUALLY SOLVENT

Furthermore, in light of this oversight, there
are SERIOUS CONCERNS regarding ACCOUNTING and
LIQUIDITY in the crypto marketplace.

As of this writing, just as one example (of many)
there is more than US$56 Billion in one
stablecoin, USDT (Tether) in active circulation
within all the top crypto exchanges, involved in
market manipulation of all the other crypto
securities.   There is NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE that
this so-called "stable coin" has adequate
backing.  Its owners have refused to conduct a
formal audit, even after being sued by the New
York Attorney General's office, and have admitted
less than 3% is actually cash-backed, and none of
these claims are verifiable by any independent entities.

The amount of trading with these so-called
"stable coins" is one of the primary forces
maintaining the market's stability, continuing to
"pump" the price of Bitcoin, Ethereum and other
cryptocurrencies.   Nobody really knows how much
actual liquidity is in the marketplace.  Many
experts believe at some point this will cause a
catastrophic implosion, not unlike the bank runs
in the early days of America prior to
Glass-Steagall restricting financial
institutions' ability to engage in risky business.

CRYPTO CURRENCY AS AN "INVESTMENT" IS A PONZI SCHEME

The de-facto definition of a Ponzi is a scheme
that relies on continued recruitment of new
clients to pay the gains of previous
clients.  This is the exact model of all major
crypto currencies.  Unlike stocks, they do not
represent any fractional ownership in anything
tangible, that can create value or has assets or
income.  Therefore the only way to profit is by
selling your crypto to a "greater fool" who comes
in later at a higher price.

This business model is 100% mathematically
un-sustainable.  Since these securities do not
have the potential to create any other value, in
order to sustain the market, prices must
continually go up, but this is not possible
indefinitely.  At some point, the market will
plateau and then collapse as more people try to
extract value and find the liquidity isn't there.

CRYPTO'S UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY IS INFERIOR TO
EXISTING TECHNOLOGY BY EVERY MEASUREABLE METRIC

Crypto enthusiasts suggest Bitcoin, Ethereum,
"smart contracts", "NFSs", etc., are "the
future."  But if you ask them to explain what
their new technology does that's better, they
often enshroud their arguments in a bunch of
meaningless techno-babble that also assumes
falsehoods like "government/regulation is evil"
and "fiat inflation will destroy everybody's lives."

Respected economist Paul Krugman recently stated
in a New York Times article, "First, crypto
boosters are very good at technobabble ­ using
arcane terminology to convince themselves and
others that they're offering a revolutionary new
technology, even though blockchain is actually
pretty elderly by infotech standards and has yet
to find any compelling uses... But I've been in
numerous meetings with enthusiasts for
cryptocurrency and/or blockchain, the concept
that underlies it. In such meetings I and others
always ask, as politely as we can: "What problem
does this technology solve? What does it do that
other, much cheaper and easier-to-use
technologies can't do just as well or better?" I
still haven't heard a clear answer."

SUMMARY

The existing crypto currency market is little
more than an outlet for criminals, money
launderers and scammers to exchange value, and
entice uninformed citizens that there's a chance
they can "get rich quick" by buying into the
Ponzi.   For every dollar one supposedly earns in
crypto, another customer has to lose that
dollar.  Value is created no other way than by
keeping this constant recruitment going.   These
financial instruments don't contribute to any
problem solving or technological
advancements.  They are merely schemes to milk
unsuspecting people out of money.  It's not a
question of "if" the market will collapse, but "when."


References:
   https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/20/opinion/cryptocurrency-bitcoin.html
   https://reddit.com/r/CryptoReality/comments/lq6xpq/the_defacto_list_of_cryptocurrencyblockchain/

   https://reddit.com/r/CryptoReality/