Subject: Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the 2x Long VIX Futures ETF; Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the -1x Short Futures ETF
From: Robert Rutkowski
Affiliation:

May. 10, 2021

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Jay Clayton, Chair
SEC Headquarters
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
(202) 551-2100
chairmanoffice@sec.gov

Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, DC 20549-1090
rule-comments@sec.gov

Re: Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the 2x Long VIX
Futures ETF; Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the -1x
Short Futures ETF

Dear Chairman and Secretary:

AFR submitted a comment letter,
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9e7f6ddc-c1e4552a-9e7f896a-8681010e5614-ff972451594dada3&q=1&e=8082edb3-bd59-4fc8-80af-bf589000c36a&u=https%3A%2F%2Fourfinancialsecurity.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F05%2FLeveraged-VIX-ETF-Comment-Letter-FINAL.pdf,
urging that the Commission against approving yet another unnecessary
leveraged ETF based on the Chicago Board of Exchange (CBOE) Volatility
Index of the S&P 500 (“VIX”).

The letter raises important concerns about not only the inherent dangers
of leveraged ETFs that make them unsuitable investments for retail
investors but also the systemic risks around managing another volatility
ETF reminiscent of the “Volmageddon” episode back on February 5, 2018.

Given that these products clearly pose risk to investors and do not
provide clear benefits for capital formation, approving them would
conflict with the SEC’s mission. While other such risky and synthetic
products already exist, this is not a reason to add to the problem.
Instead, the Commission should reconsider its overall approach to
complex exchange-traded products.

Yours sincerely.
Robert E. Rutkowski