Subject: Re: File No. S7-32-22; Release No. 34-96496· Regulation Best Execution File No. S7-31 -22; Release No. 34-96495· Order Competition Rule File No. S7-30-22; Release No. 34-96494; Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees, and Transparency o...
From: vice1337 N/A
Affiliation:

Mar. 27, 2023


Dear Ms. Countryman 



While I have read quite a bit about the proposals I personally do not believe that I am adequately capable of adding comments about the specifics of the proposals. Still, I would like to voice my opinion that these proposals while going in the right direction, and I'm grateful for that do not go far enough in terms of providing greater transparency, reducing unfair and non-competitive advantages to institutions, organizations and investors, particularly market makers, hedge funds, brokers and short sellers and reducing disadvantages and increasing fair and competitive advantages for retail/household investors and other investors.  
I would like the SEC to seriously consider the comments from "we the investors" and other retail/household investors and be cautious of the comments from big institutions and organizations due to the inherent monetarily self-serving nature of those institutions and organizations. 


Thanks, 


Victor Forss, Retail/Household Investor