Subject: RE: File No. S7-30-22; Release No. 34-96494; Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees, and Transparency of Better Priced Orders
From: Dalton Zerlan
Affiliation:

Mar. 31, 2023

 



Dear Ma'am/Sir, 

This letter is in support of the Commission's proposed tick size rules and regime. 

Furthermore, clear and unambiguous language in the overall rule structure is paramount to avoid any litigation andor confusion.

It's odd how the larger (and smaller) established industry players oppose this rule to such a degree. No? Reasonably speaking, it does make one wonder why that would be. 

There's claim they represent retail interests - which is bullshit, by and large. Unadulterated bullshit, *backstabbing,* and deception. But what's new from such people, ya? 

What is wanted by the "big players" is protection of the current obscure, complex, and unfair market structure - because they benefit enormously from it - at the expense of millions upon millions upon millions upon million and millions and millions of individual investors and families and children and grandparents and grandchildren and wives and husbands and brothers and sisters and uncles and aunts and more. 

We're talking about families and honest, hardworking people who are being deceived, backstabbed, and worked to death due to this Wall Street (Don't Tax Me!) Bro Cult and the associated concentration of power and wealth. End it already. For everything good and virtuous in this world, end... it... already. 

Thank you for your time. 


Dalton Zerlan