Subject: RE: File No. S7-30-22; Release No. 34-96494; Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees, and Transparency of Better Priced Orders
From: William Suh
Affiliation:

Mar. 26, 2023

  


To whom it may concern, 


As a household investor, I strongly support the Commission's proposed tick size regime, and recommend clear and unambiguous language in the rule structure to avoid any confusion or litigation. 


Furthermore, the Commission should establish a zero or very low fee structure to eliminate the potential for trading for the sake of volume or liquidity. To that end, implementing a variable minimum pricing increment model that applies to both quoting and trading of NMS stocks to promote fair and transparent pricing across trading venues would be a good idea. 


There is no reason why Citadel should be able to trade at sub-penny intervals while others trade at penny intervals. The proposed rule would level the playing field by allowing everyone to trade at sub-penny intervals, eliminating this unfair advantage. I fully support this rule. 


Sincerely, 
Will S.