Subject: S7-29-22, S7-30-22, S7-31-22, S7-32-22 Comments on SEC's Proposals for Equity Market Structure Reform ETC
From: Trevor Panhorst
Affiliation:

Apr. 01, 2023



Dear Gary Gensler, the SEC, and the general public,

I am writing to provide my comments on the four proposals presented by
Chairman Gary Gensler for equity market structure reform. While these
proposals are a step in the right direction, there are several
concerns I would like to address that are crucial for safeguarding the
interests of individual investors in today's complex and fast-paced
trading environment.

Failures to Deliver: The SEC should take measures to reduce the
prevalence of failures to deliver, which can contribute to market
manipulation and disrupt the efficient functioning of the market.
Strengthening the rules surrounding short selling and providing better
oversight on naked short selling would mitigate this issue and protect
individual investors.

Multiple Markets: Currently, stocks are available on multiple trading
venues, including off-exchange venues like dark pools and other
alternative trading systems. This fragmentation leads to reduced
transparency and may hinder individual investors' ability to achieve
best execution. The SEC should consider reviewing the practices of
such venues and enforce stricter rules to promote transparency and
fairness across all trading platforms.

Consequences for Rule Violations: It is important to ensure that
market participants who bend or break the rules face significant
consequences. This would deter potential wrongdoers and create a fair
and equitable market environment. Increasing the penalties for
non-compliance and establishing more proactive enforcement mechanisms
would help accomplish this.

Best Execution: While the proposal for a best execution standard and
framework is commendable, the SEC should ensure that the definition of
best execution encompasses more than just the lowest price. It should
also take into account factors like speed, likelihood of execution,
and overall costs associated with a trade. This would better align
broker-dealers' interests with those of individual investors.

Order Competition: The proposed rule on order competition is
beneficial, but it should be extended to cover all types of orders,
not just marketable orders from individual investors. A more
comprehensive approach would foster a competitive and fair market
environment that benefits all participants.

In conclusion, the proposed equity market structure reforms are a
welcome effort to modernize our market system. However, addressing the
aforementioned concerns will be essential to truly level the playing
field and protect the interests of individual investors.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Trevor Panhorst