Aug. 16, 2022
August 16, 2022 In the interest of fairness for all parties in an open and equitable market, I can think of no reason that parties should be able to obscure and advantageously omit positions based on their ability to move capital, ie funds and makers who have command of capital orders of magnitude larger than individual and smaller investors. It is an inequity that previously has been covered in the shadows, because John Q Public generally cant be bothered, or it doesnt apply to them, or the lobbyists managed to grease the right wheels to keep it that way. Well, lets change that. Be equitable for the sake of being equitable. It will help literally everyone who isnt a drain on the welfare of the economy, and would (by my guess) even help legitimate (ie non-predatory or non-naked) short selling on the basis of the communitization of the appropriate data. Personally, I would have the ability to sell short removed entirely, but. . . baby steps. I trust youll take all the comments youre receiving to hea rt, as this issue is becoming increasingly important to all investors and publicly traded companies.