Subject: S7-16-22
From: Taj Reilly
Affiliation:

Oct. 26, 2022

 
I approve of the proposed rule change in ensuring discrete honesty when naming a fund for the purpose of increased clarity.  


There should be no confusion whatsoever, or misdirection, when an individual is choosing to invest their capital. I believe an 80% policy is a good starting point, but for larger discretionary funds can still leave room for shenanigans that either go against the intention of the fund or misappropriated funds to the detriment of the investors. 


Thank you for allowing for extended commenting periods on the rules that had lost comments.