July 16, 2020
When Congress first adopted Section 13(f) it did so to stimulate a higher degree of confidence among all investors in the integrity of the US securities markets. Taking this data away will have the opposite effect. Transparency is what gives investors confidence in US markets.
The justification for the rule change is highly questionable.
When is less transparency and less data ever a good thing for the small investor
Some investors may want to avoid over-owned stocks, believing they have a high level of risk. This rule change greatly reduces individual investors ability to reduce their risk.
In the event of a significant correction the number of reporting managers would be diminished even further. The SP suffered a 56.4% decline during the 2007-2009 financial crisis. A similar event using the most recent quarter as an example, would have reduced the number of funds by another 31% at a time when such data is needed even more.