Jun. 28, 2023
To whom it may concern, The prospect those borrowing stock that is not theirs and having the same ownership rights doesn’t make sense to me. Only the original owner/buyer should get voting rights for their shares. This is the only fair method in my opinion. Why should the ‘second’ (borrower) of a security get any voting rights or any rights at all? When the real owner’s voting power is being diluted by the borrower of stocks they don’t actually own. Please don’t allow S7-06-22 to pass because it would actually harm current shareholders by diluting their voting power, thus taking away their ability to guide their company. Thank you, Mike