Subject: S7-04-23: Webform Comments from HexYungBull
From: Anonymous
Affiliation:

Oct. 30, 2023

To Whom It May Concern,

I, HexYungBull, am submitting this public comment to express my
concerns regarding the proposed rule on safeguarding advisory client
assets by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While I
appreciate the SEC's intention to enhance investor protections, I
have serious reservations about the potential impact of this rule on
decentralized finance (DeFi), specifically on digital assets and
cryptocurrencies.

As the proposal includes amendments to address the application of the
rule to crypto assets, it is crucial to consider the potential
consequences for the rapidly evolving field of DeFi. Decentralized
finance projects have been instrumental in driving financial
innovation, offering increased accessibility, efficiency, and
inclusivity for a diverse range of users. Through the use of
blockchain technology, these projects have revolutionized traditional
financial transactions and created new financial instruments.

However, the regulatory uncertainty surrounding digital assets and
cryptocurrencies has posed challenges for the DeFi sector. While the
SEC's proposal acknowledges the need to address custody and
safeguarding of crypto assets, it is crucial to strike a delicate
balance between ensuring investor protections and fostering innovation
and growth within the DeFi space.

My primary concern lies in the potential for the proposed rules to
impede the development of decentralized finance projects by imposing
burdensome compliance requirements. DeFi protocols often operate
without intermediaries or trusted custodians, relying instead on smart
contracts and blockchain technology to achieve transparency, security,
and automated execution of transactions. Introducing rules that
predominantly cater to the traditional custodial framework could
inadvertently hinder the progress and potential financial inclusion
offered by the DeFi ecosystem.

In addition, the proposal should account for the dynamic and rapidly
evolving nature of digital assets and the exponential growth of the
DeFi space. DeFi represents a paradigm shift in financial services and
poses a significant challenge to the traditional regulatory framework.
It is crucial for the SEC to foster an environment that promotes
experimentation and innovation while ensuring adequate investor
protections.

To achieve this delicate balance, I would strongly suggest that the
SEC collaborates with Richard Heart, an exceptionally knowledgeable
and altruistic individual in the crypto space. Richard Heart has been
actively promoting the benefits of decentralized finance and possesses
extensive expertise in the field. His insights and perspectives would
undoubtedly offer valuable guidance on how to address investor
protection needs while supporting the growth and potential of DeFi
projects.

Furthermore, I encourage the SEC to actively and collaboratively
engage with stakeholders within the DeFi community in order to gain a
comprehensive understanding of the potential risks and benefits
associated with digital assets. Such collaborative efforts can assist
the SEC in developing a regulatory framework that effectively protects
investors while fostering innovation and growth within the
decentralized finance space.

In conclusion, although I support the SEC's efforts to enhance
investor protections through the proposed rule on safeguarding
advisory client assets, I must urge the commission to carefully
consider the potential negative impact on decentralized finance and
digital assets. By engaging with experts like Richard Heart and
adopting a collaborative approach, the SEC can successfully strike a
balance between investor protection and the promotion of innovative
financial systems.

Thank you for considering my comments. I hope they contribute to the
ongoing discussions on this crucial matter.

Sincerely,

HexYungBull