Subject: S7-04-23: Webform Comments from Arrogant
From: Anonymous
Affiliation: Sr. Blockchain Developer

Oct. 30, 2023

Dear Securities and Exchange Commission,

I wish to express my concerns and pose questions regarding the
proposed rule "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets." While I
appreciate the SEC's efforts to enhance investor protections and
address gaps in the custody rule, I would like to address specific
issues related to the treatment of different types of digital assets,
such as cryptocurrencies.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that we cannot live in the
past if we want to live in a brighter future. Digital assets,
particularly cryptocurrencies, have gained significant popularity and
have transformed financial markets. These assets present unique
opportunities and risks that need to be carefully considered in
regulation. Unfortunately, the proposed rules seem to treat digital
assets inconsistently, leading to confusion and potential regulatory
arbitrage. In order to foster innovation and responsible growth, it is
crucial to establish clear and consistent guidelines that account for
the unique characteristics of digital assets.

Moreover, the velocity of change in the digital asset space requires a
comprehensive and adaptable regulatory approach. The proposed rules
should consider the rapid advancements in blockchain technology, which
underlies digital assets, and take into account the ever-evolving
nature of the market. A dynamic and flexible regulatory framework will
strike the right balance and ensure that investor protection keeps
pace with technological progress.

It is also worth noting that digital assets come in various forms,
each with its own intricacies and risks. Applying a one-size-fits-all
regulatory approach may hinder innovation and restrict market growth.
Flexibility and nuance are needed to differentiate between
cryptocurrencies, utility tokens, and security tokens. Tailoring
regulation to the specific characteristics of each digital asset will
enable adequate investor protection without stifling innovation.

Furthermore, in order to establish an effective global regulatory
ecosystem, the SEC should consider international developments in the
digital asset space. Cooperation and harmonization with global
regulatory bodies will help avoid regulatory arbitrage and ensure a
level playing field for market participants. By collaborating with
international counterparts, the SEC can proactively address potential
challenges and work towards a consistent and globally accepted
regulatory framework.

In conclusion, I urge the SEC to address the unequal treatment of
different types of digital assets in the proposed rule. It is
essential to embrace a forward-thinking, technology-neutral, and
proportionate regulatory approach that accounts for the unique risks
and opportunities presented by digital assets. By finding the right
balance, we can foster a healthy market development, enhance investor
protection, and harness the full potential of innovative technologies.

Thank you for considering these comments. If there are any additional
questions or areas of concern you would like me to address, please let
me know.

Yours sincerely,

Arrogant