Subject: S7-04-23
From: Hym Self
Affiliation:

Oct. 28, 2023

Subject: Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets Proposal - Public Comment 

Dear SEC, 

I am writing as A Concerned U.S. Citizen regarding the "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets" proposal by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While I appreciate the SEC's efforts to enhance investor protections and address gaps in the custody rule, I have concerns about potential negative impacts on tokenized securities and digital assets. 

As we witness the rise of digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, built on blockchain technology, it is crucial to provide regulatory clarity and enable innovation in the financial industry. However, the proposed rules have the potential to hinder the issuance and trading of tokenized securities, thereby limiting the benefits of digitization for traditional financial assets. 

It is important to acknowledge that digital assets offer numerous advantages, including increased accessibility, security, and efficiency in transactions. These assets hold great potential for democratizing access to financial services and improving market liquidity. Unfortunately, regulatory uncertainties surrounding digital assets have hindered their widespread adoption and integration into traditional financial systems. 

The proposed rules, particularly in terms of qualifying custodian protections and the scope of the rule, need to consider the unique characteristics of digital assets. The definition of assets and discretionary authority in custody should encompass tokenized securities and digital assets, ensuring investor protections while facilitating the growth of this emerging asset class. By proactively addressing the specific challenges faced by digital assets, the SEC would support innovation and improve the overall integrity of the market. 

Additionally, I urge the SEC to consider the possible unintended consequences of the proposed rules. Excessive regulatory burdens on custodians of tokenized securities and digital assets could discourage innovation and drive these activities away from regulated entities, potentially leading to a less secure and transparent market environment. It is essential to strike a balance between protecting investors and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. 

Moreover, I encourage the SEC to work closely with industry participants, including digital asset custodians, exchanges, and issuers, to gain valuable insights and formulate effective regulations. Collaboration will help ensure that the proposed rules can adapt to the evolving nature of digital assets without impeding progress. 

In conclusion, while I support the aim of the proposed rule to enhance investor protection and safeguard client assets, I strongly urge the SEC to consider the impact of these rules on tokenized securities and digital assets. By creating a regulatory environment that fosters innovation and encourages participation in the emerging digital asset ecosystem, the SEC can play a crucial role in aligning traditional financial systems with the transformative capabilities of blockchain technology. 

Thank you for considering my concerns and engaging in a dialogue that addresses the complexities and potential of digital assets within the regulatory framework. 

Sincerely, 

A Concerned U.S. Citizen