Subject: S7-04-23
From: Hym Self
Affiliation:

Oct. 28, 2023

Dear Securities and Exchange Commission, 

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed rule "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets" from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While the rule aims to enhance investor protections and address gaps in the custody rule, there are several areas where I believe the proposed rule falls short, particularly in providing regulatory clarity for Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies. 

The proposed rule does not provide clear regulatory guidelines for ICOs, creating uncertainty and potential investor protection issues. ICOs have become a prominent avenue for raising capital, particularly in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space. However, the lack of regulatory clarity surrounding ICOs leaves investors vulnerable to scams and frauds, as there are limited safeguards in place to protect their interests. Without clear guidance on how ICOs should be regulated, investors may face significant financial risks and losses. 

Furthermore, the proposed rule fails to adequately address the unique challenges posed by digital assets or crypto-assets. Digital assets, like cryptocurrencies, have transformed the financial landscape, but their regulatory environment remains uncertain. The proposed rule should have provided comprehensive guidance on how investment advisers should handle digital assets, including specific safeguarding measures and custody requirements. 

Digital assets, by their nature, are held on decentralized networks and are not subject to traditional custodial arrangements. However, the proposed rule does not explicitly address these unique characteristics and fails to provide clear guidelines on how investment advisers can demonstrate exclusive control over digital assets. This lack of specificity may impede the development of innovative investment strategies involving digital assets, stifling growth and investment in this emerging market. 

In order to effectively regulate digital assets, it is crucial for the SEC to provide regulatory clarity and guidance that suits the unique characteristics of these assets. This will promote investor confidence and protect against potential abuses in the market. The SEC should collaborate with industry experts and stakeholders to develop comprehensive guidelines for the custody and safeguarding of digital assets, ensuring that investor protection remains a top priority. 

In conclusion, I urge the SEC to reconsider the proposed rule and take into account the regulatory uncertainties surrounding ICOs and digital assets. The lack of clarity in these areas may hinder market growth and innovation, and leave investors exposed to significant risks. By providing clear guidelines and safeguards for ICOs and digital assets, the SEC can foster a thriving and secure investment environment. I appreciate the opportunity to comment on this important proposal and hope that my concerns are taken into consideration. 

Thank you for considering my comments. 

Sincerely, 

A Concerned U.S. Citizen