Subject: S7-04-23
From: Hym Self
Affiliation:

Oct. 28, 2023

Dear Securities and Exchange Commission, 

I, A Concerned U.S. Citizen, would like to provide my input on the proposed rule "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets." While I commend the SEC for its efforts to enhance investor protections and safeguard client assets, I have concerns regarding the burden placed on exchanges to verify ownership of digital assets, specifically cryptocurrencies. 

Digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, have emerged as innovative and transformative technologies within the financial industry. Blockchain, the underlying technology behind cryptocurrencies, has the potential to revolutionize the way we transact and store value. However, the regulatory landscape surrounding digital assets is still evolving, and there remains considerable uncertainty regarding their classification and treatment under existing laws and regulations. 

The proposed rules, while well-intentioned, seem to impose a significant burden on exchanges in verifying the ownership of digital assets. While it is crucial to ensure the protection of client assets, it is important to consider the unique characteristics of digital assets when formulating regulations. Unlike traditional assets, digital assets are stored on decentralized networks, making it challenging to establish exclusive control and the customary ownership documentation associated with traditional assets. 

The difficulty in verifying the ownership of digital assets lies in the nature of blockchain technology itself. Blockchain operates on a distributed ledger system, where ownership is recorded through cryptographic signatures. This decentralized and immutable nature of blockchain ensures transparency and reliability, but it also presents challenges in the context of regulatory oversight. 

Furthermore, the proposed rule does not provide clear guidance on how exchanges should determine the ownership of digital assets. Given the nascent state of the technology and the patchwork regulatory framework surrounding digital assets, it would be prudent for the SEC to collaborate with industry experts and stakeholders to develop holistic and practical solutions that strike a balance between investor protection and technological innovation. 

It is important for the SEC to consider the broader impact of these regulations on the digital asset ecosystem. Excessive regulatory burdens on exchanges could stifle innovation, drive investment and talent away from the United States, and impede the development of a vibrant and competitive marketplace for digital assets. 

To address these concerns, I propose that the SEC collaborate with stakeholders, including digital asset exchanges, to develop best practices and standards for verifying ownership of digital assets. This collaborative approach would help foster innovation and promote a diverse marketplace while ensuring adequate investor protections and regulatory oversight. 

In conclusion, while I appreciate the SEC's efforts to enhance investor protections through the proposed rule, certain aspects, particularly the burden placed on exchanges to verify ownership of digital assets, require careful consideration. By working together with industry experts and stakeholders, the SEC can strike a balanced and pragmatic approach that promotes investor protection while fostering innovation and competition in the rapidly evolving digital asset space. 

Thank you for considering my comments and for your commitment to protecting the interests of investors. 

Sincerely, 

A Concerned U.S. Citizen