Subject: S7-04-23
From: Hym Self
Affiliation:

Oct. 28, 2023

Dear Securities and Exchange Commission, 

I am writing as a concerned U.S. citizen to express my thoughts and concerns regarding the proposed rule "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets." While I understand the objective of enhancing investor protections and addressing gaps in the custody rule, I believe that certain aspects of the rule could have unintended negative consequences. 

One area of concern is the potential negative impact on tokenized art assets. The proposed rules may hinder the tokenization of art assets, limiting the democratization of art ownership and investment. Tokenization allows for fractional ownership of art, enabling access to a broader range of investors. By investing in tokenized art, individuals can have exposure to the art market without the need for large capital investments. This innovative approach has the potential to bring new participants into the art market and promote creativity. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that the proposed rule does not inadvertently curtail the development of tokenized art assets. 

Additionally, the proposed rule's treatment of digital assets and cryptocurrencies raises concerns. Digital assets, like cryptocurrencies, are built on blockchain technology and have transformed the financial landscape by providing decentralized and secure transactions. However, regulatory uncertainties in this space pose challenges for investment advisers and investors alike. It is essential that the SEC recognizes the unique characteristics of digital assets and ensures that the proposed rule does not stifle innovation or impede the growth of this emerging asset class. By striking the right balance, the SEC can foster an environment that encourages responsible investment in digital assets while safeguarding investors' interests. 

Furthermore, I appreciate the inclusion of exceptions for certain assets that may not be maintained with a qualified custodian. However, it is crucial to clarify the specific requirements and conditions for implementing these exceptions. Clear guidelines will help investment advisers navigate these exceptional circumstances without compromising the goals of investor protection and asset safeguarding. 

In conclusion, while I understand and support the intent behind the proposed rule "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets," it is vital to ensure that unintended negative consequences are mitigated. I urge the Securities and Exchange Commission to consider the potential negative impact on tokenized art assets, the unique characteristics of digital assets and cryptocurrencies, and the clarity surrounding exceptions for assets unable to be maintained with a qualified custodian. By taking these concerns into account, the SEC can strike the right balance between safeguarding investor assets and fostering innovation and growth in the advisory industry. 

Thank you for considering my comments. I appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on this important proposal. 

Sincerely, 

A Concerned U.S. Citizen