Subject: Proposed rule
From: A H
Affiliation:

Oct. 16, 2023

As an individual who is deeply involved in the cryptocurrency and digital assets space, I am deeply concerned about the proposed legislation by the SEC regarding the safeguarding of advisory client assets. While I understand the need for regulatory oversight in this rapidly evolving industry, I believe that the SEC's approach is an overreach that could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of this promising technology. 

First and foremost, it is important to recognize that cryptocurrencies and digital assets are fundamentally different from traditional financial instruments. They operate on decentralized networks and are governed by cryptographic algorithms, which provide a level of security and transparency that is unparalleled in traditional financial systems. By imposing stringent regulations on these assets, the SEC risks stifling innovation and driving businesses away from the United States to more crypto-friendly jurisdictions. 

Furthermore, it is worth noting that existing laws already provide a framework for regulating cryptocurrencies and digital assets. The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were designed to regulate securities offerings and trading activities. However, cryptocurrencies do not fit neatly into the definition of securities, as they do not represent ownership in a company or entity. Therefore, applying these laws to cryptocurrencies would be a misinterpretation of their intended scope. 

Additionally, the proposed legislation fails to consider the 

unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies and digital assets. Unlike traditional financial assets, cryptocurrencies are not held by a central authority or custodian. Instead, they are stored in digital wallets that are controlled by individual users. This decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies provides a high level of security and control for users, as they are not reliant on third-party intermediaries. 

By imposing stringent regulations on the custody of digital assets, the SEC is essentially forcing cryptocurrency businesses to adopt the same custodial practices as traditional financial institutions. This not only goes against the core principles of cryptocurrencies but also creates unnecessary burdens and costs for businesses operating in this space. It is important to recognize that the existing regulatory framework for traditional financial assets may not be suitable for cryptocurrencies and digital assets, and a more nuanced approach is needed. 

Moreover, the proposed legislation fails to acknowledge the potential benefits of cryptocurrencies and digital assets. These technologies have the potential to revolutionize various industries, including finance, supply chain management, and healthcare. By imposing overly burdensome regulations, the SEC risks stifling innovation and hindering the development of new and transformative applications. 

Instead of taking a heavy-handed approach, the SEC should focus on fostering innovation and providing clear guidance to businesses operating in the cryptocurrency space. This can be achieved through collaboration with industry 

experts and stakeholders to develop a regulatory framework that strikes a balance between investor protection and innovation. By working together, we can ensure that the United States remains at the forefront of this rapidly evolving industry, attracting businesses and investment while safeguarding the interests of investors. 

In conclusion, while I recognize the importance of regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency and digital assets space, I believe that the proposed legislation by the SEC regarding the safeguarding of advisory client assets is an overreach that could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of this promising technology. Existing laws already provide a framework for regulating cryptocurrencies, and a more nuanced approach is needed to account for their unique characteristics. By fostering innovation and providing clear guidance, the SEC can strike a balance between investor protection and innovation, ensuring that the United States remains a leader in this rapidly evolving industry. Thank you for considering my comments.