Subject: S7-04-23
From: Ricardo Flamenco
Affiliation:

Oct. 15, 2023

As an individual deeply involved in the cryptocurrency and digital asset space, I am deeply concerned about the proposed legislation "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets" and the potential overreach by the SEC. While I understand the need for investor protection and safeguarding client assets, it is crucial to consider the unique nature of cryptocurrencies and digital assets before imposing burdensome regulations.
Firstly, it is important to recognize that cryptocurrencies operate on decentralized networks, which inherently differ from traditional financial systems. The proposed legislation fails to acknowledge the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies and treats them as if they were traditional securities. This approach not only undermines the fundamental principles of cryptocurrencies but also stifles innovation in this rapidly evolving industry.
Furthermore, the SEC's jurisdiction should be limited to securities and commodities, as defined by existing laws. The Howey Test, established by the Supreme Court, provides a clear framework for determining whether an investment qualifies as a security. Applying this test to cryptocurrencies would ensure that only those assets meeting the criteria are subject to SEC regulations. By extending its reach beyond securities and commodities, the SEC risks encroaching on areas that fall outside its purview.
Additionally, the proposed legislation fails to consider the existing regulatory frameworks that already govern cryptocurrencies and digital assets. For instance,the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has already established regulations for virtual currency exchanges and administrators under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). These regulations require virtual currency businesses to implement anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) measures, ensuring that illicit activities are detected and prevented. By duplicating these efforts, the SEC would create unnecessary regulatory overlap and confusion within the industry.


Moreover, the proposed legislation could have a chilling effect on innovation and entrepreneurship in the cryptocurrency space. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to revolutionize various industries, including finance, supply chain management, and decentralized applications. Imposing burdensome regulations without a clear understanding of the technology and its potential benefits could stifle innovation and drive businesses away from the United States to more crypto-friendly jurisdictions.
It is also worth noting that the SEC's approach to cryptocurrencies and digital assets has been inconsistent and lacks clarity. The agency has struggled to provide clear guidance on whether certain cryptocurrencies are securities or not, leading to confusion among market participants. This lack of clarity hampers the growth of the industry and creates unnecessary legal risks for businesses operating in good faith.
Furthermore, the proposed legislation fails to consider the potential unintended consequences of overregulation. Excessive can hinder market liquidity and restrict access to investment opportunities for retail investors. By imposing stringent requirements on advisory firms, the proposed legislation may inadvertently limit the availability of cryptocurrency investment options for retail clients, depriving them of potential returns and diversification.
In conclusion, while investor protection is paramount, it is crucial for the SEC to approach the regulation of cryptocurrencies and digital assets with nuance and a deep understanding of the technology and its potential benefits. The proposed legislation "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets" risks overreach by treating cryptocurrencies as traditional securities without considering their unique decentralized nature. Instead, the SEC should focus on applying existing laws, such as the Howey Test, to determine whether an investment qualifies as a security. Additionally, the agency should collaborate with existing regulatory bodies, such as FinCEN, to avoid duplicating efforts and creating unnecessary regulatory overlap. By fostering innovation and providing clear guidance, the SEC can strike a balance between investor protection and promoting the growth of the