Mar. 24, 2023
March 24, 2023 Dear Sir/Madam, I appreciate the SEC's initiative in addressing conflicts of interest through proposed rule S7-01-23 for securitizations. However, I recommend removing exceptions for risk-mitigating hedging, bona fide market making, and specific liquidity commitments, as they could be exploited to engage in conflicted practices, undermining the rule's effectiveness. Examples of potential loopholes include: Risk-mitigating hedging: Securitizers might hedge to benefit their interests at investors' expense. Bona fide market making: Securitizers could manipulate the market for personal gain. Certain liquidity commitments: Securitizers may use this exception to dodge losses at investors' expense. Additionally, I suggest expanding the rule's scope to encompass collateralized debt obligations and other securitization transactions to promote transparency, protect investors, and maintain market integrity. In conclusion, I do not support this rule given its potential for abuse by those with more money. Thank you for considering my recommendations. Sincerely, Travis Lyons