Trinity Industries, Inc.

July 2012

Exhibit 99.1

2

Forward Looking Statements

This

presentation

contains

“forward

looking

statements”

as

defined

by

the

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and includes statements as

to expectations, beliefs and future financial performance, or assumptions

underlying or concerning matters herein. These statements that are not

historical facts are forward looking. Readers are directed to Trinity’s Form

10-K and other SEC filings for a description of certain of the business issues

and risks, a change in any of which could cause actual results or outcomes

to

differ

materially

from

those

expressed

in

the

forward

looking

statements.

Any forward looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such

statement is made. Trinity undertakes no obligation to update any forward

looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the

date on which such statement is made.

3

Agenda

I.

Overview

II.

Key Investment Considerations

III.

Strategy and Vision

IV.

Financial Highlights

V.

Appendix

I. Trinity Industries, Inc. Overview

4

Trinity Industries, Inc. is a multi-industry

company that owns a variety of market-leading

businesses that provide products and services to

the industrial, energy, transportation, and

construction sectors

Trinity operates through five business segments:

Rail Group

Railcar Leasing and Management Services

Group (“Leasing”)

Inland Barge Group

Construction Products Group (“CPG”)

Energy Equipment Group (“EEG”)

The Company serves its customers through

manufacturing facilities located in the United

States and Mexico and had approximately 13,400

employees at the end of 2011

Total Revenue and EBITDA for the LTM 6/12 was

$3,686 million and $717 million, respectively

1

Intersegment  Revenues are eliminated and Leasing Revenues include revenues

related to TRIP beginning in FY 2010

2

FY 2009 EPS excludes a $325 million pretax Goodwill impairment

External Revenue by Business Group

(1)

II.  Key Investment Considerations

5

Seasoned

Performers

Enrichment Value

Focused

Flexible and      

Cost-Effective

Manufacturing

Diversified

Portfolio

of Businesses

Leading Market

Positions

Leading Market Positions

6

Rail Group

Leading

manufacturer of railcars  in North America

Leading

manufacturer of railcar axles in North America

Leading

manufacturer of railcar coupling devices in

North America

Railcar Leasing and

Management Services

Group

Leading

provider of railcar leasing and management

services

Inland Barge Group

Leading

manufacturer of inland barges in the United

States

Largest

manufacturer of fiberglass covers for barges in the

United States

Construction Products

Group

Leading

full-line manufacturer of highway guardrail and

crash cushions in the United States

Leading

supplier of concrete and aggregates in certain

regions of

Texas

Energy Equipment Group

Leading

manufacturer of structural wind towers in North

America

Leading

producer of propane tanks, tank containers, and

tank

heads

for

pressure

and

non-

pressure

vessels

in

North

America

Diversified Portfolio of Businesses

7

PAST (FY 2000)

PRESENT (FY 2011)

Total Revenues = $2.7 B

Total Revenues = $3.1 B

Revenues

Revenues

Operating

Profit

(1)

Operating

Profit

(1)

Our diversified portfolio of businesses

produced a higher level of EPS on fewer

railcar deliveries during the latest recovery

(1) Operating Profit Excludes All Other, Corporate and is reduced by Leasing Interest Expense of $7 million in FY 2000 and $161 million in FY2011

(2) Rail percentage represents Operating Profit less all Intersegment Company Eliminations; Leasing percentage represents Operating Profit less Leasing Interest Expense

(3) FY 2009 EPS excludes a $325 million pretax Goodwill impairment

(1) Operating Profit Excludes All Other, Corporate and is reduced by Leasing Interest Expense of $7 million in FY 2000 and $161 million in FY2011

(2) Rail percentage represents Operating Profit less all Intersegment Company Eliminations; Leasing percentage represents Operating Profit less Leasing Interest Expense

(3) FY 2009 EPS excludes a $325 million pretax Goodwill impairment

(2)

(2)

(2)

(2)

60%

5%

21%

6%

8%

55%

14%

19%

4%

8%

Rail

Leasing

CPG

EEG

Barge

16%

30%

17%

3%

34%

Rail

Leasing

CPG

EEG

Barge

30%

18%

19%

15%

18%

MEASUREABLE PROGRESS

Flexible and Cost-Effective Manufacturing

8

Trinity's manufacturing

flexibility across product and

business segments enhances

our ability to opportunistically

respond to changes in market

demand

Trinity’s manufacturing scale,

vertical integration, and

presence in the Southern U.S.

and Mexico provides cost

effective benefits across

multiple business segments

Flexibility

Cost-Effective

Enrichment Value Focused

9

Rail

Leasing

Construction

Energy

Inland Barge

Customer

Sharing

Internal

Component

Sourcing

Shared Best

Manufacturing

Practices

Facility

Optimization

Centralized

Cost

Savings

Trinity focuses on

collaboration across

business segments…

…generating synergies

that enrich value and

ultimately provide

competitive benefits

10

Seasoned Performer Across Economic Cycles

Trinity is uniquely positioned to emerge from a severe down cycle with more

opportunity

for

growth

to

generate

significant

profits

during

an

up

cycle

Seasoned

management

team

knows

how

to

assess

the

market,

proactively

plan for cycles and address changes in economic conditions

Manufacturing

flexibility

is

a

core

competency,

and

when

combined

with

our

broad

product

offering

allows

us

to

pursue

a

wide

range

of

orders

Cost-effective manufacturing footprint in the Southern United States and

Mexico

is a competitive advantage for many of our product lines

Shared

synergies

across

business

lines

provide

unique

opportunities

Trinity’s

lease

fleet

of

approximately

70,700

railcars

(including

TRIP)

provides

a strong strategic connection to our customers, as well as a consistent long-term

stream of profit and cash flow

Strong

liquidity

position

of

approximately

$832

million

and

solid

balance

sheet

III. Strategy and Vision: Operational

11

Strategically Grow the Lease Fleet

Maximize Manufacturing Efficiency

Selectively Build our Backlogs

Diversify Through Organic Growth

Acquire Complementary Product

Portfolios

Be a premier, multi-industry growth

company that generates superior

earnings and returns for shareholders

Liquidity (at 6/30/12): ~ $832 mm

Strategy and Vision: Financial

12

Working Capital

Working Capital

Capital

Expenditures

Capital

Expenditures

Acquisitions

Acquisitions

Shareholder

Distributions

Shareholder

Distributions

Corporate

Debt

(1)

-

Convertible

Subordinated

Notes

-

$450

mm

Leasing

Debt

(2)

–

Recourse Debt:

Capital

lease

obligations/Term

loan

-

$100

mm

Non-recourse Debt:

TILC

Warehouse

borrowings

-

$291

mm

TILC

Long-term

financings

-

$1,277

mm

TRIP

Long-term

financings

-

$880

mm

(1) Excludes $93.8 mm of unamortized discount

(2) Total leasing financings of $2.5 billion, including TRIP; Leasing assets have a

net book value of $4.3 billion, including TRIP, which  leaves a significant

amount of unencumbered assets available for financing

Cash

and

Cash

Equivalents

-

$294

mm

Corporate

Revolver

Availability

-

$354

mm

TILC

Warehouse

Availability

-

$184

mm

Balance Sheet Debt (at 6/30/12): ~ $2,911 mm

Equity (at 6/30/12): ~ $2,028 mm

13

IV. Financial Highlights

LTM

as

of

June

30,

2012

(1):

Revenues increased 47% from $2.5 billion to

$3.7 billion

Operating profit increased 64% from $212

million

to

$348

million

(2)

EBITDA increased 33% from $540 million to

$717 million

Earnings per common diluted share increased

106% from $1.26  to $2.60 per diluted share

(1)

Relative to LTM 6/30/11

(2)

Operating Profit includes Leasing Interest Expense

(3)

EPS from Continuing Operations

(4)

Excludes $325mm pre-tax impact of impairment of Goodwill

(5)

Beginning in FY 2010, TRIP Revenues and OP were consolidated with the Leasing Group

(6)

See Note in Appendix pg. 21 for Reconciliation of EBITDA

(1)

Relative to LTM 6/30/11

(2)

Operating Profit includes Leasing Interest Expense

(3)

EPS from Continuing Operations

(4)

Excludes $325mm pre-tax impact of impairment of Goodwill

(5)

Beginning in FY 2010, TRIP Revenues and OP were consolidated with the Leasing Group

(6)

See Note in Appendix pg. 21 for Reconciliation of EBITDA

Trinity’s

Earnings

Summary

FY

2005

–

LTM

6/30/12

(3)

Trinity’s

EBITDA

Summary

FY

2005

–

LTM

6/30/12

(6)

Guidance and Outlook (As of July 26, 2012)

14

Any

forward-looking

statements

made

by

the

Company

speak

only

as

of

the

date

on

which

they

are

made.

The

Company is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking

statements, whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise.

Rail Group

Revenues ~ $1 –

1.1B in 2H-2012

OP Margin ~ 9-11% in 2H-2012

Shipments ~ 8,745 –

9,745 in 2H-2012

Leasing Group

Revenue Eliminations ~ $290-310mm in 2H-2012

EPS Elimination Impact ~ $0.20-0.26 in 2H-2012

Net Lease Fleet Additions ~ $140-170mm in 2H-2012

Railcar Sales from Lease Fleet EPS Impact ~ $0.17-0.22 in 2H-2012

Barge Group

Revenues ~ $320-340mm in 2H-2012

OP Margin ~ 16-18% in 2H-2012

Total Company

EPS ~ $2.95-3.10 in FY 2012

Manufacturing Capital Expenditures ~ $130-150mm in FY 2012

EPS Impact of Manufacturing Repositioning ~ ($0.08-0.10) in 2H-2012

Appendix:

Operating Business Summaries

16

Trinity delivered approximately 18,965 railcars

representing 30% of industry shipments during LTM

6/30/12

Trinity received orders for approximately 22,335 

railcars representing 34% of the industry total during

LTM 6/30/12

Trinity’s order backlog was approximately 30,610

railcars representing 52% of industry backlog as of

6/30/12

Rail Group

Leading manufacturer of railcars, railcar axles, and

coupling devices  in North America

Broadest product offering for railcar manufacturing in

North America

Networking of customers between railcar sales and

railcar leasing

Focus on new and advanced engineering designs

Centralized sourcing provides cost savings

Streamlined manufacturing efficiencies

Rail Group Highlights

(1)

Before eliminations for Intersegment Sales to Leasing and Intercompany Profit

(2)

Excludes $325mm pretax charge for impairment of Goodwill

(1) Sources: Historical data as reported per the Railway Supply Institute.  2012-2016 projections are an

average of estimates provided by Global Insight (05/12) and Economic Planning Associates, Inc. (04/12)

and  are provided as a point of reference.

Rail

30%

Total  FY11 Revenue $3.1B

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

Rail Group Historical Revenues and OP Margin

Railcar Deliveries (1958 - 2016P)

(1)

Projections based on Third Party estimates(1)

17

Railcar Leasing & Management Services Group

Leading provider of comprehensive railcar leasing

and management services

Marketed with railcar sales activities as TrinityRail®

Single point of contact for equipment and services

Strengthens relationship with end-user of railcar

Scale of operations facilitates active participation in

secondary market activities for portfolio railcar

sales as market conditions warrant

Strategic Position

Operating Benefits

Financial Results

Complements product offering (one-stop shopping)

Provides Trinity’s rail customers option to purchase or

lease

Facilitates ideal method for introduction of new

products

Assists in balancing and extending production lines

Minimizes administrative costs

Provides an important dashboard of metrics for

assessing railcar demand

Provides attractive cash return on investment

Minimizes the cyclicality of the company

Diversifies Trinity’s revenue and cash flow

($mm)

(1) Operations Margin calculated using  only revenues and profitfrom Leasing Operations and excludes Car

Sales; PBT  Margin calculated using Operating Profit from Leasing Operations less Leasing Interest Expense

(2) Beginning in FY 2010, TRIP Revenues and OP were consolidated

with the Leasing Group

(1) Operations Margin calculated using  only revenues and profitfrom Leasing Operations and excludes Car

Sales; PBT  Margin calculated using Operating Profit from Leasing Operations less Leasing Interest Expense

(2) Beginning in FY 2010, TRIP Revenues and OP were consolidated

with the Leasing Group

Trinity’s Lease fleet has grown

at a 19% CAGR  since 2000

Trinity’s Lease fleet has grown

at a 19% CAGR  since 2000

(2)

Leasing

18%

Total  FY11 Revenue $3.1B

Trinity Leasing’s capabilities provide the following advantages:

Leasing

Historical

Revenues

and

Profit

from

Operations

(1)

18

Revenues up 32.2% in LTM 6/30/12 vs. LTM 6/30/11

Profitability continues to be strong compared to historical

averages

for

this

business

-

Operating

Profit

margins

increased

from

6.5%

in

FY

2005

to

17.1%

during

LTM

6/30/12

(3)

Backlog remained strong at $542mm at 6/30/12

Quickly recovered from 2 significant floods in Tennessee (in

2010) and Missouri (in 2011) that halted production levels for

a period of time and impacted financial results in certain

periods

Inland Barge Group

Inland Barge Group Highlights

Inland Barge Group Historical Revenues and OP Margin

Tank Barges

Hopper Barges

Transports grain & coal

Transports liquids

($mm)

Leading manufacturer of barges that transport goods

along U.S. inland waterways

Largest U.S. manufacturer of fiberglass barge covers

Multiple barge manufacturing facilities on inland

waterways enable rapid delivery

Barge transportation has a cost advantage in high-cost

fuel environments

4,250 out of 17,996 hopper barges, or approximately 24%,

are 20+ years old

1,152 out of 3,084 tank barges, or approximately 37%, are

20+ years old

Over the past 10 years, 22% more barges were scrapped

vs.

built

(9,306

scrapped

vs.

7,630

built

from

2001

–

2011)

Leading manufacturer of barges that transport goods

along U.S. inland waterways

Largest U.S. manufacturer of fiberglass barge covers

Multiple barge manufacturing facilities on inland

waterways enable rapid delivery

Barge transportation has a cost advantage in high-cost

fuel environments

4,250 out of 17,996 hopper barges, or approximately 24%,

are 20+ years old

1,152 out of 3,084 tank barges, or approximately 37%, are

20+ years old

Over the past 10 years, 22% more barges were scrapped

vs.

built

(9,306

scrapped

vs.

7,630

built

from

2001

–

2011)

(1)

(1) OP Margin excludes a $5.1mm net gain as a result of flood damage to the Tennessee barge plant

(2) OP Margin excludes a $15.5 mm net gain as a result of flood damage to the Tennessee and Missouri barge plants

(3) OP Margin excludes a $23.3 mm net gain as a result of flood damage to the Tennessee and Missouri barge

plants, and the sale of leased barges

(1) OP Margin excludes a $5.1mm net gain as a result of flood damage to the Tennessee barge plant

(2) OP Margin excludes a $15.5 mm net gain as a result of flood damage to the Tennessee and Missouri barge plants

(3) OP Margin excludes a $23.3 mm net gain as a result of flood damage to the Tennessee and Missouri barge

plants, and the sale of leased barges

(2)

(3)

Barge

18%

Total  FY11 Revenue $3.1B

Replacement demand driver (as of 12/31/11):

19

Revenues increased 8.1% LTM 06/30/12 vs. LTM 6/30/11

Operating Profit increased 7.0% LTM 6/30/12 vs. LTM

6/30/11

Acquired Quixote Corporation in February 2010 which

increased Highway Products Revenue by 31% during the

year it was acquired

Continued portfolio restructuring in 2011 through the

completion of several acquisitions, including the addition

of a custom galvanizing business and increased exposure

to Aggregates

Construction Products Group

Leading U.S. manufacturer of highway guardrail and

crash cushions; plus a line of proprietary products

including guardrail end treatments and cable barrier

guardrail systems

Leading Texas producer of concrete and aggregates

Diversified exposure to commercial, residential,

industrial, and highway markets

Business has grown organically and through

acquisitions

Consistent contributor to Company cash flow

Demand tied to construction projects and federal

funding

Construction Products Group Highlights

($mm)

(1) OP Margin excludes a $3.8mm net gain as a result of the divestiture of the Asphalt business from within the

Concrete and Aggregates business

(1) OP Margin excludes a $3.8mm net gain as a result of the divestiture of the Asphalt business from within the

Concrete and Aggregates business

(1)

CPG

19%

Total FY11 Revenue $3.1B

Construction

Products

Group

Historical

Revenues

and

OP

Margin

20

Structural Wind Towers:

Revenues of $228 million in LTM 6/30/12

Trinity’s

backlog

as

of

6/30/12

was

$817

million

(1)

Plants are strategically located along the central corridor where

the majority of wind farms are installed

Tank Containers:

Consistent and mature business

Recently launched the frac tank product to support oil & gas

exploration industry

Trinity has taken cost out of the business

–

Improved processes

–

Elimination of non-profitable products

–

Consolidated North American operations

Energy Equipment Group

Leading North American manufacturer of

structural wind tower business

Leading producer of propane tanks, tank

containers, and tank heads for pressure and non-

pressure vessels in North America

Low-cost manufacturer with primary tank

container production in Mexico facilities

Synergies among products across multiple Trinity

business groups

Energy Equipment Group Highlights

($mm)

(1) Approximately $413 million of this backlog is involved in litigation filed by the Company against one of our

structural wind tower customers for breach of a long-term supply contract for the manufacture of towers

EEG

15%

Total FY11 Revenue $3.1B

Energy Equipment Group Historical Revenues & OP Margin

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011(1)

LTM 6/12

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$110.5

$212.6

$289.8

$282.4

($137.7)

$75.4

$145.7

$208.3

Add:

     Interest expense

42.2

68.7

84.5

109.4

123.2

182.1

185.3

192.8

     Provision/(Benefit) for income taxes

65.6

131.3

165.1

171.4

(9.4)

40.9

91.8

120.0

     Depreciation & amortization expense

76.2

87.6

118.9

140.3

160.8

189.6

192.9

196.2

     Goodwill impairment

-

-

-

-

325.0

-

-

-

Earnings from continuing

     before interest expense, income

     taxes, and depreciation and

     amortization expense

$294.5

$500.2

$658.3

$703.5

$461.9

$488.0

$615.7

$717.3

Reconciliation of EBITDA

“EBITDA”

is defined as income (loss) from continuing operations plus interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization

including goodwill impairment charges. EBITDA is not a calculation based on generally accepted accounting principles. The amounts included

in the EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the historical statements of operations data. In addition, EBITDA

should

not

be

considered

as

an

alternative

to

net

income

or

operating

income

as

an

indicator

of

our

operating

performance,

or

as

an

alternative

to operating cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We believe EBITDA assists investors in comparing a company’s performance on a consistent

basis

without

regard

to

depreciation

and

amortization,

which

can

vary

significantly

depending

upon

many

factors.

However,

the

EBITDA

measure presented in this presentation may not always be comparable to similarly titled measures by other companies due to differences in the

components of the calculation.

(1) Includes results of operations related to TRIP starting January 1, 2010

“EBITDA”

is defined as income (loss) from continuing operations plus interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization

including goodwill impairment charges. EBITDA is not a calculation based on generally accepted accounting principles. The amounts included

in the EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the historical statements of operations data. In addition, EBITDA

should

not

be

considered

as

an

alternative

to

net

income

or

operating

income

as

an

indicator

of

our

operating

performance,

or

as

an

alternative

to operating cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We believe EBITDA assists investors in comparing a company’s performance on a consistent

basis

without

regard

to

depreciation

and

amortization,

which

can

vary

significantly

depending

upon

many

factors.

However,

the

EBITDA

measure presented in this presentation may not always be comparable to similarly titled measures by other companies due to differences in the

components of the calculation.

(1) Includes results of operations related to TRIP starting January 1, 2010

21

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)