10-Q

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

  X  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

____TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _____________ to ____________

Commission file number 0-9347

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Arizona

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

86-0220694

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7950 E. Acoma Drive, Suite 111, Scottsdale, Arizona  85260

(Address of principal executive offices)        (Zip Code)

(480) 607-1010

(Registrant’s telephone number)

______________________________________________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements in the past 90 days.      X   Yes   ___ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  X   Yes   ___ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer	Smaller reporting  company	X

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes X No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of November 10, 2015 there were 4,982,400 shares of common stock outstanding.

1

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

INDEX
					Page Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 (Unaudited)			4
			and June 30, 2015
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)			5
			For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)			6
			For the three months ended September 30, 2015
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
			For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014		7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)				8
		Note A –		Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
		Note B –		Stock-Based Compensation
		Note C –		Note Receivable
		Note D –		Land, Property and Equipment
		Note E –		Earnings Per Share
		Note F –		Equity
		Note G –		Contingent Payments
		Note H -		Asset Retirement Obligation
		Note I -		Commitments and Contingencies
		Note J -		Related Party Transactions
		Note K -		Subsequent Events
		Note L –		Liquidity and Going Concern
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
			and Results of Operations		16
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			20
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures			21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings			21
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			21
	Item 6.	Exhibits			22

2

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Except for historical information, the statements contained herein are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts.  The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” ”should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “will,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.   From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature.  All such forward-looking statements are based on the expectations of management when made and are subject to, and are qualified by, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors, among others, that could affect the outcome of the Company's forward-looking statements: general economic and market conditions; the inability to profitably run current operations sufficient to cover overhead;  the inability to attract, hire and retain key personnel; the difficulty of integrating an acquired business; unforeseen litigation; unfavorable result of potential litigation; the ability to maintain sufficient liquidity in order to support operations; the ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with current and future suppliers; federal and/or state regulatory and legislative action; the ability to implement or adjust to new technologies and the ability to secure and maintain key contracts and relationships.  New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible to accurately predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any risk factor, or combination of risk factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risk factors described in this Quarterly Report or in the documents we incorporate by reference, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

3

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND JUNE 30, 2015
				September 30, 2015		June 30, 2015
ASSETS				(unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	525,200	$	788,900
	Accounts receivable - trade, net			54,700		45,900
	Other receivables - related party			6,600		4,200
	Note receivable, current - related party			60,000		60,000
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			33,200		164,500
		Total current assets		679,700		1,063,500
LAND, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET				3,893,100		3,938,600
OTHER ASSETS
	Note receivable, long-term - related party			245,600		262,800
	Trust account - asset retirement obligation			72,100		67,400
TOTAL ASSETS			$	4,890,500	$	5,332,300
LIABILITIES AND  SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts payable		$	118,100	$	151,100
	Accrued expenses			167,700		191,800
	Contingent payments, current			25,000		50,000
		Total current liabilities		310,800		392,900
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
	Contingent payments, long-term			633,600		603,900
	Asset retirement obligation			429,700		429,700
TOTAL LIABILITIES				1,374,100		1,426,500
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Preferred Stock - no shares issued or outstanding			-		-
	Common Stock
		Class A - 75,000,000 no par shares authorized, 4,982,400
		shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015
		and June 30, 2015		109,173,200		109,159,300
	Accumulated Deficit			(105,656,800)		(105,253,500)
		Total shareholders' equity		3,516,400		3,905,800
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY			$	4,890,500	$	5,332,300
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

4

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (unaudited)
			2015		2014
NET REVENUES		$	114,300	$	225,300
	Cost of revenues		260,400		186,300
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)			(146,100)		39,000
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
	Corporate expenses		93,700		61,100
	Alanco Energy Services		157,000		199,500
	Stock-based compensation		13,900		15,000
			264,600		275,600
OPERATING LOSS			(410,700)		(236,600)
OTHER INCOME
	Interest income		7,400		11,500
	Gain on sale of marketable securities		-		46,700
	Other income		-		200
NET LOSS		$	(403,300)	$	(178,200)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED		$	(0.08)	$	(0.04)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING			4,982,400		4,962,500
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

5

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (unaudited)
		COMMON STOCK				ACCUMULATED
		SHARES		AMOUNT		DEFICIT		TOTAL
Balances, June 30, 2015		4,982,400	$	109,159,300	$	(105,253,500)	$	3,905,800
	Value of stock-based compensation	-		13,900		-		13,900
	Net loss	-		-		(403,300)		(403,300)
Balances, September 30, 2015		4,982,400	$	109,173,200	$	(105,656,800)	$	3,516,400
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

6

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (unaudited)
				2015		2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
	Net loss		$	(403,300)	$	(178,200)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization		46,100		45,100
		Accretion of fair value - contingent payments		4,700		8,400
		Gain on sale of marketable securities		-		(46,700)
		Stock-based compensation for options		13,900		-
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Accounts receivable		(8,800)		9,500
		Other receivables - related party		(2,400)		5,000
		Prepaid expenses and other current assets		131,300		22,600
		Trust account - asset retirement obligation		(4,700)		(4,700)
		Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(57,100)		128,800
		Contingent land payment		-		(16,400)
	Net cash used in operating activities			(280,300)		(26,600)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
	Proceeds from repayment of American Citizenship Center, LLC note receivable			17,200		50,000
	Purchase of land, property, and equipment			(600)		(163,300)
	Proceeds from sale of marketable securities			-		279,100
	Net cash provided by investing activities			16,600		165,800
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
	Net cash used in financing activities			-		-
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS				(263,700)		139,200
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period				788,900		1,215,600
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period			$	525,200	$	1,354,800
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
	Non-cash investing & financing activities:
		Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities	$	-	$	(97,700)
		Note receivable issued for ACC amendment fee	$	-	$	(10,000)
		Value of stock-based compensation for options	$	13,900	$	-
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

7

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note A – Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Nature of Operations

Alanco Technologies, Inc. (Stock Symbol:  ALAN) was incorporated in 1969 under the laws of the State of Arizona.  Unless otherwise noted, the “Company” or “Alanco” refers to Alanco Technologies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company formed Alanco Energy Services, Inc. (“AES”), for the purpose of obtaining property to establish a water disposal facility near Grand Junction, CO to receive produced water generated as a byproduct from oil and natural gas production in Western Colorado.  The new facility started to receive produced water in August 2012.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.  In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such condensed consolidated financial statements.  Such necessary adjustments consist of normal recurring items and the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s June 30, 2015 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year numbers have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.  Sales tax on certain revenues for the fiscal year 2015 that were classified as cost of revenues has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to offset revenues to conform to the current year’s presentation.  In addition, the value of stock-based compensation for the fiscal year 2015 which was included in corporate expenses has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to a separate line item.  These reclassifications had no effect on net loss or net loss per share.

     Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities – The estimated fair values for assets and liabilities are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant information. The Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels: Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets, Level 2 – observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 categories as of the date of the event or change in circumstances occurs. The carrying amounts of receivables, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value given their short-term nature or their effective interest rates, which represent Level 3 input levels.

8

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

    The following are the classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and 2014, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

Fair Value at September 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		September 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		658,600		658,600
	$	-	$	-	$	1,088,300	$	1,088,300

Fair Value at June 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		June 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		653,900		653,900
	$	-	$	-	$	1,083,600	$	1,083,600

The following is a reconciliation of the opening and closing balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

			Asset		Contingent
			Retirement		Land
			Obligation		Payment		Total
Opening balance		$	429,700	$	653,900	$	1,083,600
	Accretion expense		-		4,700		4,700
Closing balance		$	429,700	$	658,600	$	1,088,300

Fair Value of Asset Retirement Obligation – The Deer Creek asset retirement obligation is the estimated cost to close the Deer Creek facility under terms of the lease, meeting environmental and State of Colorado regulatory requirements.  The estimate is determined at discrete points in time based upon significant unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.  Management’s estimate of the asset retirement obligation is based upon a cost estimate developed by a consultant knowledgeable of government closure requirements and costs incurred at similar water disposal facility operations.  The process used was to identify each activity in the closure process, obtaining vendor estimated costs, in current dollars, to perform the closure activity and accumulating the various vendor estimates to determine the asset retirement obligation.  A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated asset retirement obligation results in the fair value of the asset retirement obligation to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 410-20: Asset Retirement Obligations requires the Company to review the asset retirement obligation on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred.

9

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

Fair Value of Contingent Payments – The contingent land payment and contingent purchase price liabilities are also determined at discrete points in time based upon unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.  In calculating the estimate of fair value for both of the contingent payments, management completed an estimate of the present value of each identified contingent liability based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek facility developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors.  Different assumptions relative to the expansion or alternative uses of the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities could result in significantly different valuations.  The projected payments have been discounted at a rate of 3% per annum to determine net present value.  The lack of an active market to validate the estimated contingent land liability results in the fair value of the contingent land liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement.  ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement requires the Company to review the contingent land liability on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred.  Pursuant to ASC Topic 820, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 the Company reversed the contingent purchase price liability it had previously recorded based on the parameters of the contingency and the estimated present value based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers.  The guidance outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes the most current revenue recognition guidance.  In August 2015, this accounting pronouncement was deferred for one year, and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.  Earlier application is permitted only as of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance regarding the simplification of accounting for measurement period adjustments for business combinations.  The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period and early adoption is permitted.  The Company has early adopted the guidance, which had no material impact on its financial position and results of operations.

There have been no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended September 30, 2015, that are of significance, or potential significance, to us.

Note B – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based compensation plans and reports stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards based on the estimated grant date fair value.  The value of the compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the award (generally the option vesting term).

The Company estimates fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  Assumptions used to estimate compensation expense are determined as follows:

10

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

·   Expected term is determined under the simplified method using an average of the contractual term and vesting period of the award as appropriate statistical data required to properly estimate the expected term was not available;

·   Expected volatility of award grants made under the Company’s plans is measured using the historical daily changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock over the expected term of the award and contemplation of future activity;

·   Risk-free interest rate is the implied yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity equal to the expected term of the awards; and,

·   Forfeitures are based on the history of cancellations of awards granted by the Company and management’s analysis of potential future forfeitures.

The Company has several employee stock option and officer and director stock option plans that have been approved by the shareholders of the Company.  The plans require that options be granted at a price not less than market on the date of grant and are more fully discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity during the first three months of fiscal 2016:

				Weighted
			Weighted	Average
			Average	Remaining		Aggregate		Aggregate
			Exercise Price	Contractual		Fair		Instrinsic
		Shares	Per Share	Term (1)		Value (3)		Value (2)
Outstanding July 1, 2015		1,203,200	$0.58	3.03	$	275,800	$	-
	Granted	-	-	-		-		-
	Exercised	-	-	-		-		-
	Forfeited or expired	(3,200)	$1.50	-		(2,300)		-
Outstanding September 30, 2015		1,200,000	$0.58	2.78	$	273,500	$	-
Exercisable September 30, 2015		1,122,000	$0.59	2.69	$	259,800	$	-
(1)	Remaining contractual term presented in years.
(2)	The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
	awards and the closing price of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2015, for those awards that
	have an exercise price currently below the closing price as of September 30, 2015 of $0.19.
(3)	Aggregate Fair Value is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based
	compensation.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had approximately $13,800 of unamortized Black Scholes value related to outstanding stock options.  The unamortized amount is scheduled to be expensed in the next quarter.  There were no new grants during the current quarter.

11

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

Note C – Note Receivable

Note receivable of $305,600 and $322,800 at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively, represents a note due from American Citizenship Center, LLC (“ACC”), a related party.  In August 2015, ACC and the Company modified the loan agreement by revising the maturity data to August 31, 2017.  All other terms of the note, including the interest rate of 9.5% and minimum monthly required payments of the greater of $5,000 or 10% of ACC’s gross monthly revenues remained the same.  Based on the minimum monthly payments of $5,000, the Company has classified $60,000 of the note as current and $245,600 of the note as long-term as of September 30, 2015.  ACC is currently in compliance with all terms of the August 2015 amendment.  No provision for collectability has been recorded as of September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015.

Note D – Land, Property and Equipment

Land, Property and Equipment at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 consist of the following:

		June 30, 2015		Additions		September 30, 2015
Office furniture and equipment	$	51,300	$	-	$	51,300
Water disposal facility		2,219,200		-		2,219,200
Production equipment		514,400		-		514,400
		2,784,900		-		2,784,900
Less accumulation depreciation		(491,900)		(46,100)		(538,000)
Land and permit costs		1,645,600		600		1,646,200
Net book value	$	3,938,600	$	(45,500)	$	3,893,100

Note E – Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted loss per share of common stock was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.  Dilutive securities are options, warrants, convertible debt, and preferred stock that are freely exercisable into common stock at less than the prevailing market price.  Dilutive securities are not included in the weighted average number of shares when inclusion would increase the earnings per share or decrease the loss per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no dilutive securities included in the loss per share calculation as the effect would be antidilutive.  Considering all holders’ rights, total common stock equivalents issuable under these potentially dilutive securities are approximately 1,200,000 and 814,000 at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Note F – Equity

The Company did not issue any shares of Common Stock during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

During the three months ended September 30, 1015, the Company recognized the value of stock-based compensation in the amount of $13,900.

12

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

In December 2011, the Company announced that its board of directors had authorized a stock repurchase program whereby the Company could repurchase up to 2 million shares of its outstanding common stock over the next 12 months.  The stock repurchase program was extended, under the same limitation, through December 31, 2013.  During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the board of directors renewed the stock repurchase program, extending it through December 31, 2015.  There were no shares repurchased under the program in the current quarter.

The Company has authorized 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of which 5,000,000 shares have been allocated to Series A, 500,000 have been allocated to Series B, 400,000 have been allocated to Series C Junior Participating, 500,000 have been allocated to Series D, and 750,000 have been allocated to Series E.  At September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, no Preferred Stock of any series was issued or outstanding.

Note G - Contingent Payments

Contingent payments at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 relate to AES asset purchase transactions completed in conjunction with the construction of water disposal facilities for the treatment and disposal of produced water generated by oil and natural gas producers in Western Colorado.  Details of the contingent payments are as follows:

		September 30,		June 30,
		2015		2015
Contingent land payment	$	658,600	$	653,900
Less current portion		(25,000)		(50,000)
Contingent payments, long-term	$	633,600	$	603,900

Contingent land payment of $658,600 at September 30, 2015 represents the net present value of $800,000 of estimated contingent land payments due under an agreement whereby Alanco Energy Services, Inc. (“AES”) acquired 160 acres of land known as Indian Mesa.  The maximum total of $800,000 of contingent land payments is based upon 10% of quarterly revenues in excess of operating expenses up to $200,000 per quarter for activity at both the Deer Creek and the Indian Mesa locations.  The payments were projected considering current operating plans as approved by the Alanco Board of Directors, with the payments discounted at a rate of 3% per annum.  Accretion expense is being imputed at 3% per annum, increasing the fair value of the contingent land payment during the three months ended September 30, 2015 by $4,700.  During the three months ended September 30, 2015, no contingent land payment was earned or payable under the contingency formula.  At September 30, 2015, the Company reduced the current portion of the contingent land payment to $25,000 to reflect its short-term estimate of the obligation.

Note H – Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company has recognized estimated asset retirement obligations (closure cost) of $429,700 to remove leasehold improvements, remediate any pollution issues and return the Deer Creek water disposal property to its natural state at the conclusion of the Company’s lease.  The closure process is a requirement of both the Deer Creek lease and the State of Colorado, a permitting authority for such facilities.  The closure cost estimate, in current dollars, was completed by an approved independent consultant experienced in estimating closure costs for water disposal operations and the estimated amount was approved by the State of Colorado.  A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility.

13

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

The Company reviews the asset retirement obligation quarterly and performs a formal annual assessment of its estimates to determine if an adjustment to the value of the asset retirement obligation is required.

The laws of the State of Colorado require companies to meet environmental and asset retirement obligations by selecting an approved payment method.  The Company has elected to meet its obligation by making quarterly payments of approximately $4,700 into a trust that, over the expected lease period, will build liquid assets to meet the asset retirement obligation.  During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company made the required quarterly payments.  The balances in the trust account for the asset retirement obligation as of September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 were $72,100 and $67,400, respectively.

Note I – Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Company is a defendant and counterclaimant in litigation involving its subsidiary, TSI Dissolution Corp. (formerly known as Alanco/TSI Prism Inc. (“TSI”)) and the purchaser of TSI’s assets, Black Creek Integrated Systems Corp.  Black Creek filed a complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court against TSI and the Company, being Civil Case NO. CV2011-014175, claiming various offsets from the purchase price, primarily concerning inventory adjustments, and TSI counterclaimed for monies due from Black Creek under the purchase agreement.  Following a trial during fiscal 2014, the court awarded a net judgment in favor of Black Creek in the amount of $16,800, plus attorney’s fees and accrued interest, resulting in a total judgment in the amount of $128,300 for which the Company recorded an accrued liability at June 30, 2014.  In addition, the Company posted a bond with the court in conjunction with the Company’s appeal of the judgment.  In May 2015, the State of Arizona Division One Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s damages award and remanded to the trial court to direct the parties to follow dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement.  In addition, the appellate court’s decision vacated the trial court’s attorney’s fee award and stated that TSI is entitled to an award of fees on appeal.  As a result, at June 30, 2015, the Company reversed the accrual of $128,300 for the prior judgment.  The Company is currently following the court’s direction and working under the dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement.  The Company believes that the lower court’s judgment failed to address, among other matters, inventory reserves established for the specific items of inventory which were the subject of Black Creek’s concerns, which if properly addressed would result in a net judgment in favor of the Company, with an attendant award of attorney’s fees in favor of the Company.  Therefore, no accrual for the loss contingency was deemed necessary at September 30, 2015.

The Company may from time to time be involved in litigation arising from the normal course of business.  As of September 30, 2015, there was no such litigation pending deemed material by the Company.

Note J – Related Party Transactions

At September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 the Company had a note due from American Citizenship Center, LLC (“ACC”), a related party, with balances of $305,600 and $322,800, respectively.  Refer to Note C – Note Receivable for further discussion.  During the three months ended September 30, 2015 the Company billed ACC a total of approximately $7,500 for interest on the note.  At September 30, 2015, the Company had unpaid receivables from ACC in the amount of $6,600, consisting of $4,900 representing two months of interest and $1,700 of legal fees.  All required payments have been subsequently paid.

Note K – Subsequent Events

There have been no significant subsequent events.

14

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

Note L – Liquidity and Going Concern

             During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company reported a net loss of ($403,300) and for fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company reported a net loss of ($900,600).  Historically, the Company had relied on the liquidation of its investment in Marketable Securities to fund working capital needs.  The Company sold all remaining marketable securities during fiscal 2015.  These factors raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next year.  The Company’s fiscal 2016 operating plan contemplates development of the AES Indian Mesa site.  In order to develop the Indian Mesa site, the Company will need additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both.  Management cannot assure that it will secure additional financing in order to achieve projections.  If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected.  Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital needs or the Company may seek to sell assets.  Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.  As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 discussing the substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

15

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Item 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements:Except for historical information, the statements contained herein are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts.  The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” ”should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “will,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.   From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature.  All such forward-looking statements are based on the expectations of management when made and are subject to, and are qualified by, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors, among others, that could affect the outcome of the Company's forward-looking statements: general economic and market conditions; the inability to profitably run current operations sufficient to cover overhead;  the inability to attract, hire and retain key personnel; the difficulty of integrating an acquired business; unforeseen litigation; unfavorable result of potential litigation; the ability to maintain sufficient liquidity in order to support operations; the ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with current and future suppliers; federal and/or state regulatory and legislative action; the ability to implement or adjust to new technologies and the ability to secure and maintain key contracts and relationships.  New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible to accurately predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any risk factor, or combination of risk factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risk factors described in this Quarterly Report or in the documents we incorporate by reference, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Current Status of Deer Creek facility

The Deer Creek produced water disposal facility, located near Grand Junction, CO, became operational in August 2012 with annual evaporative capacity of approximately 300,000 barrels without using enhanced evaporation methods, providing some Piceance Basin producers with significant transportation cost savings compared to alternative water disposal sites.  In November 2014, the facility received approval from the Mesa County Board of Commissioners allowing 24 hours a day, seven days per week operations for two years with an administrative review conducted by the Planning Division after one year.  During fiscal year 2015, the facility experienced anaerobic bacterial conditions in its evaporation ponds and as a result, restricted water intake during the fourth quarter 2015 and first quarter 2016 while it was treating the ponds.  The pond conditions have significantly improved and the Company is currently following a bioremediation maintenance program to maintain pond health.  The Company anticipates increased water revenues during the second quarter of fiscal 2016 which will be achieved by allowing increased water deliveries as well as an increase to the average sales price per barrel for water deliveries.

Current Status of Indian Mesa facility

The permitting process for the Indian Mesa facility, located approximately 4 miles North West of the Deer Creek site, has been in process for a number of years with an initial County Use Permit issued in 2010 covering, among other things, evaporation ponds and land farming.  In December 2013, in response to an AES request to amend its County User Permit (“CUP”), the Mesa County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a new CUP for AES to construct and operate on its 160 acre Indian Mesa site evaporation ponds and/or landfill for disposal of solid oil and gas (O&G) waste, such as drill cuttings, tank bottoms, sock filters, etc.  The approval also allows for solid and produced water disposal of Naturally-Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) and Technically Enhanced Naturally-Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM).  In June 2014 AES received final construction approval from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) for twelve produced water disposal ponds, which if developed as planned, would be located on the north 80 acres of the Indian Mesa site.

16

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

The capacity of Indian Mesa is dependent on its type of development, which the Company is still planning.  If 80 acres is developed as 12 ponds as discussed above, the annual capacity at Indian Mesa for produced water, not considering enhanced evaporation, would be approximately 1 million barrels.  If the remaining 80 acres were developed into landfills, the capacity would be approximately 3 million cubic yards.  If the entire 160 acres were developed into landfill, the solid waste capacity would increase to approximately 8 million cubic yards.  Complete build-out of its Indian Mesa facility, including both landfill and evaporative ponds, would result in a unique Western Colorado “one stop shop” for all O&G waste products, including NORM and TENORM contaminated waste streams.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions concerning the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation, expense recognition, realization of deferred tax assets, accounts and notes receivables, estimated useful lives and carrying value of fixed assets, the recorded values of accruals and contingencies including the estimated fair values of the Company’s asset retirement obligation and the contingent land and purchase price liabilities, and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  The result of these estimates and judgments form the basis for making conclusions about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The SEC suggests that all registrants discuss their most “critical accounting policies” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis.  A critical accounting policy is one which is both important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.  Management has identified the critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that affect its more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.  The Company’s Audit Committee has reviewed and approved the critical accounting policies identified.  These policies include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, realization of note receivable, stock-based compensation, the recorded values of accruals and fair values of assets and liabilities including the Company’s contingent liabilities.

Revenue Recognition

The Company uses four factors to determine the appropriate timing of revenue recognition.  Three of these factors are generally factual considerations that are not subject to material estimates (evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been performed and the fee is determinable).  The fourth factor includes judgment regarding the collectability of the sales price.  The Company’s written arrangement with customers establishes payment terms and the Company only enters into arrangements when it has reasonable assurance that it will receive payment from the customer.  The assessment of a customer’s credit-worthiness is reliant on management’s judgment on factors such as credit references and market reputation.  If any sales are made that become uncollectible, the Company establishes a reserve for the uncollectible amount.

17

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Realization of Note Receivable

The Company has reviewed ACC’s projected revenues, related assumptions and cash flows when evaluating the collectability of the note receivable and determining the need for any reserve.  These assumptions are further influenced by current political activities.  Based on this evaluation, the note is deemed fully collectible.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based compensation plans and the associated compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based compensation using the Black-Scholes valuation model using the following inputs:  the plain-vanilla method for expected term based on the contractual term and vesting period of the award, the expected volatility of daily changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock, the assumed risk-free interest rate and an assumption of future forfeitures based on historical cancellations and management’s analysis of potential forfeitures.

Recorded Values of Accruals

The Company makes accruals for contingent liabilities based on reasonable estimates for known or anticipated obligations.  Estimates may be based on known inputs, experience with similar situations, or anticipated outcomes.  Estimates for the Company’s asset retirement obligation and contingent payments are determined at discrete points in time based upon unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.  Estimates for the asset retirement obligation were developed by a consultant knowledgeable about the State of Colorado regulatory requirements and use vendor estimates for the various activities required for the closure of the Deer Creek facility.  Estimates for the contingent payments were calculated based on projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities under current plans.

Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

The Company estimates fair values for assets and liabilities at certain points in time based on information known at that time using the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and recognizes transfers as they occur.  The ASC uses a three level hierarchy:  Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets, Level 2 – observable inputs, other than quoted prices included with Level 1, and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that are significant to the fair value.  The asset retirement obligation and contingent payments discussed above use Level 3 inputs.

Results of Operations

Presented below is management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated:

(A)   Three months ended September 30, 2015 versus three months ended September 30, 2014

Net Revenues

Net revenues reported for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 were $114,300 versus $225,300 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of $111,000, or 49.3%.  Revenues are comprised of produced water

delivery fees and sales of reclaimed oil (net of associated taxes).  The decrease in net revenues reflects the Company’s restricted water intake while it was treating the ponds.  The pond conditions have significantly improved and the Company anticipates increased revenues during the second quarter of fiscal 2016.  Water deliveries are impacted by the prices of oil and gas which drives drilling activities in the region, the restriction on drilling during winter months which negatively impact water deliveries, and alternative uses of produced water, such as for fracking fluid that some current and potential customers are utilizing.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were $260,400 and $186,300, respectively, an increase of $74,100 or 39.8% when comparing the periods.  Cost of revenues consists of direct labor costs, equipment costs (including depreciation), land lease costs, pond maintenance and other operating costs.  The increase is primarily due to higher pond maintenance costs including pond treatments to manage anaerobic bacterial conditions offset by decreases in variable costs resulting from decreased revenues such as fees tied to water volumes, plus a reduction to equipment rental costs for a system rented in the prior year which was subsequently purchased.  Fixed costs such as depreciation, amortization, accretion and lease costs represent approximately 22.7% and 30.4% of the cost of revenues for three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were (127.8%) and 17.3% respectively.  The negative swing in gross profit between the two periods is the result of reduced revenues combined with increased costs in the current quarter.  The gross loss in the current quarter is primarily due to the increased pond maintenance costs mentioned above.  Without these extra costs of approximately $117,000, the Company would have had a gross loss of approximately ($29,100), or (25.5%), which would significantly decrease the negative swing in gross profit (loss) between the two periods.

18

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 (consisting of corporate expenses, AES selling, general and administrative expense and stock-based compensation) was $264,600, a decrease of $11,000, or 4%, compared to $275,600 reported for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.  Corporate expenses for the current quarter was $93,700 and represented an increase of $32,600, or 53.4%, compared to corporate expenses of $61,100 reported for the comparable quarter ended September 30, 2014.  The net increase is primarily comprised of costs related to professional services offset by a decrease to payroll and associated employee benefit costs.  AES expense of $157,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 compared to $199,500 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 reflects a decrease of $42,500 or 21.3% when comparing the two periods and primarily reflects a decrease in the operations management fees for the Deer Creek facility.  Stock-based compensation was $13,900 for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $1,100, or 7.3%, compared to $15,000 reported for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

Operating Loss

Operating loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was ($410,700), a decrease of $174,100, or 73.6%, compared to an operating loss of ($236,600) reported for the same quarter of the prior year.  The increased operating loss resulted primarily from the gross loss of ($146,100) for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 compared to a gross profit of $39,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, offset by a decrease of $11,000 in selling, general and administrative expenses during the current quarter as compared to the same quarter of the previous year as discussed above.

Other Income

Interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was $7,400, a decrease of $4,100, or 35.7%, when compared to interest income of $11,500 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.  The decrease in interest income related primarily to a decrease in the average outstanding balance of the ACC note receivable.

The Company did not have any sales of marketable securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded net gains on the sale of marketable securities of $46,700, resulting from the sale of 45,000 shares of its ORBCOMM Common Stock at an average selling price of $6.20 per share and average cost of $5.16 per share.

Net Loss

Net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 amounted to ($403,300), or ($.08) per share, compared to net loss of ($178,200), or ($.04) per share, in the comparable quarter of the prior year for reasons previously discussed.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s current assets at September 30, 2015 exceeded current liabilities by $368,900, resulting in a current ratio of 2.2 to 1.  At June 30, 2015, current assets exceeded current liabilities by $670,600 reflecting a current ratio of 2.7 to 1.  The reduction in net current assets at September 30, 2015 versus June 30, 2015 was due primarily to a reduction in cash balances and prepaid expenses and other current assets.

19

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Accounts receivable – trade, net of $54,700 represents the outstanding billings at September 30, 2015 of the AES water disposal operation.  Other receivables – related party totaling $6,600 at September 30, 2015 represents billings to ACC for interest of $4,900 and legal fees of $1,700.

Cash used in operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2015 was ($280,300), an increase of $253,700, or 953.8% compared to ($26,600) reported for the same period of the prior year.  The increase in net cash used in operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was due primarily to an increase in operating loss, a decrease to accounts payable and accrued expenses offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets as compared to the same period of the prior year.

 Cash provided by investing activities for the three month period ended September 30, 2015 was $16,600, a decrease of $149,200, or 90% compared to the $165,800 provided for the same period of the prior year.  The decrease was primarily due to lower proceeds from the sale of marketable securities and repayment of note receivable during the period offset by a decrease in the purchase of land, property and equipment as compared to the prior year.  Purchases of land, property and equipment include permitting costs for the Indian Mesa site and the purchase of equipment for the Deer Creek facility.

There was no cash used or provided by financing activities for the three month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

During fiscal 2016, the Company’s operating plan contemplates development of the AES Indian Mesa site.  In order to develop the Indian Mesa site, the Company will need additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both.  Management cannot assure that it will secure additional financing in order to achieve projections.  If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected.  Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital needs or the Company may seek to sell assets.  Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.  As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 which is further discussed in the Company’s Form 10-K for that period.

Item 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to smaller reporting company.

20

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Item 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).  Based on their evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2015, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.  Management has concluded that the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods and dates presented.

(b) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings - The Company is a defendant and counterclaimant in litigation involving its subsidiary, TSI Dissolution Corp. (formerly known as Alanco/TSI Prism Inc. (“TSI”)) and the purchaser of TSI’s assets, Black Creek Integrated Systems Corp.  Black Creek filed a complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court against TSI and the Company, being Civil Case NO. CV2011-014175, claiming various offsets from the purchase price, primarily concerning inventory adjustments, and TSI counterclaimed for monies due from Black Creek under the purchase agreement.  Following a trial during fiscal 2014, the court awarded a net judgment in favor of Black Creek in the amount of $16,800, plus attorney’s fees and accrued interest, resulting in a total judgment in the amount of $128,300 for which the Company recorded an accrued liability at June 30, 2014.  In addition, the Company posted a bond with the court in conjunction with the Company’s appeal of the judgment.  In May 2015, the State of Arizona Division One Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s damages award and remanded to the trial court to direct the parties to follow dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement.  In addition, the appellate court’s decision vacated the trial court’s attorney’s fee award and stated that TSI is entitled to an award of fees on appeal.  As a result, at June 30, 2015, the Company reversed the accrual of $128,300 for the prior judgment.  The Company is currently following the court’s direction and working under the dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement.  The Company believes that the lower court’s judgment to address, among other matters, inventory reserves established for the specific items of inventory which were the subject of Black Creek’s concerns, which if properly addressed would result in a net judgment in favor of the Company, with an attendant award of attorney’s fees in favor of the Company.  Therefore, no accrual for the loss contingency was deemed necessary at September 30, 2015.

The Company may from time to time be involved in litigation arising from the normal course of business.  As of September 30, 2015, there was no such litigation pending deemed material by the Company.

Item 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, no shares of Company stock were sold.

21

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Item 6.  EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunder duly authorized.

                                                                                                                                 ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Registrant)

/s/ Danielle L. Haney

Danielle L. Haney

Chief Financial Officer

Alanco Technologies, Inc.

November 16, 2015

22

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of

President and Chief Executive Officer

of Alanco Technologies, Inc.

I, John A. Carlson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alanco Technologies, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)      Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    November 16, 2015

/s/ John A. Carlson

________________________

John A. Carlson

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Alanco Technologies, Inc.

I, Danielle L. Haney, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alanco Technologies, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)      Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    November 16, 2015

/s/ Danielle L. Haney

________________________

Danielle L. Haney

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alanco Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John A. Carlson, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Danielle L. Haney, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, to the best of his/her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

/s/ John A. Carlson

John A. Carlson

President and Chief Executive Officer

Alanco Technologies, Inc.

Dated:    November 16, 2015

/s/ Danielle L. Haney

Danielle L. Haney

Chief Financial Officer

Alanco Technologies, Inc.

Dated:    November 16, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Alanco Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

H. Asset Retirement Obligation (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Payment made for asset retirement obligation	$ 4,700
Balance at trust account for asset retirement obligation	$ 72,100	$ 67,400

XML

A. Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent AccountingPronouncements (Details 1)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Opening balance	$ 1,083,600
Accretion expense	4,700
Closing balance	1,088,300
Asset Retirement Obligation [Member]
Opening balance	$ 429,700
Accretion expense
Closing balance	$ 429,700
Contingent Land Payment [Member]
Opening balance	653,900
Accretion expense	4,700
Closing balance	$ 658,600

XML

C. Note Receivable

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Receivables [Abstract]

Note Receivable

Note receivable of $305,600 and $322,800 at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively, represents a note due from American Citizenship Center, LLC (“ACC”), a related party. In August 2015, ACC and the Company modified the loan agreement by revising the maturity data to August 31, 2017. All other terms of the note, including the interest rate of 9.5% and minimum monthly required payments of the greater of $5,000 or 10% of ACC’s gross monthly revenues remained the same. Based on the minimum monthly payments of $5,000, the Company has classified $60,000 of the note as current and $245,600 of the note as long-term as of September 30, 2015. ACC is currently in compliance with all terms of the August 2015 amendment. No provision for collectability has been recorded as of September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015.

XML

D. Land, Property and Equipment (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Land, property and equipment	$ 2,784,900	$ 2,784,900
Additions
Less accumulation depreciation	$ (538,000)	(491,900)
Land and permit costs	1,646,200	1,645,600
Net book value	3,893,100	3,938,600
Office furniture and equipment [Member]
Land, property and equipment	$ 51,300	51,300
Additions
Water disposal facility [Member
Land, property and equipment	$ 2,219,200	2,219,200
Additions
Production equipment [Member
Land, property and equipment	$ 514,400	$ 514,400
Less accumulation depreciation [Member]
Additions	(46,100)
Land and permit costs [Member]
Additions	600
Net book value [Member]
Additions	$ (45,500)

XML

C. Note Receivable (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Receivables [Abstract]
Note receivable	$ 305,600	$ 322,800
Minimum monthly payments	5,000
Note Receivable, current	60,000
Note Receivable, noncurrent	$ 245,600

XML

E. Earnings Per Share (Details Narrative) - shares	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Total common stock equivalents issuable under these potentially dilutive securities	1,200,000	814,000

XML

E. Equity (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Stock-based compensation	$ 13,900
Preferred Stock, authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Preferred Stock, issued	0	0
Preferred Stock, outstanding	0	0
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred Stock, authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred Stock, authorized	500,000	500,000
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred Stock, authorized	400,000	400,000
Series D Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred Stock, authorized	500,000	500,000
Series E Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred Stock, authorized	750,000	750,000

XML

B. Stock-Based Compensation

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Equity [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based compensation plans and reports stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards based on the estimated grant date fair value. The value of the compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the award (generally the option vesting term).

The Company estimates fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Assumptions used to estimate compensation expense are determined as follows:

• Expected term is determined under the simplified method using an average of the contractual term and vesting period of the award as appropriate statistical data required to properly estimate the expected term was not available;

• Expected volatility of award grants made under the Company’s plans is measured using the historical daily changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock over the expected term of the award and contemplation of future activity;

• Risk-free interest rate is the implied yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity equal to the expected term of the awards; and,

• Forfeitures are based on the history of cancellations of awards granted by the Company and management’s analysis of potential future forfeitures.

The Company has several employee stock option and officer and director stock option plans that have been approved by the shareholders of the Company. The plans require that options be granted at a price not less than market on the date of grant and are more fully discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity during the first three months of fiscal 2016:

				Weighted
			Weighted	Average
			Average	Remaining		Aggregate		Aggregate
			Exercise Price	Contractual		Fair		Instrinsic
		Shares	Per Share	Term (1)		Value (3)		Value (2)
Outstanding July 1, 2015		1,203,200	$0.58	3.03	$	275,800	$	-
	Granted	-	-	-		-		-
	Exercised	-	-	-		-		-
	Forfeited or expired	(3,200)	$1.50	-		(2,300)		-
Outstanding September 30, 2015		1,200,000	$0.58	2.78	$	273,500	$	-
Exercisable September 30, 2015		1,122,000	$0.59	2.69	$	259,800	$	-

(1) Remaining contractual term presented in years.

(2) The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the closing price of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2015, for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the closing price as of September 30, 2015 of $0.19.

(3) Aggregate Fair Value is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based compensation.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had approximately $13,800 of unamortized Black Scholes value related to outstanding stock options. The unamortized amount is scheduled to be expensed in the next quarter. There were no new grants during the current quarter.

XML

G. Contingent Payments (Details) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
G. Contingent Payments Details
Contingent land payment	$ 658,600	$ 653,900
Less current portion	(25,000)	(50,000)
Contingent payments, long-term	$ 633,600	$ 603,900

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 525,200	$ 788,900
Accounts receivable - trade, net	54,700	45,900
Other receivables - related party	6,600	4,200
Note receivable, current - related party	60,000	60,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	33,200	164,500
Total current assets	679,700	1,063,500
LAND, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET	3,893,100	3,938,600
OTHER ASSETS
Note receivable, long-term - related party	245,600	262,800
Trust account - asset retirement obligation	72,100	67,400
TOTAL ASSETS	4,890,500	5,332,300
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	118,100	151,100
Accrued expenses	167,700	191,800
Contingent payments, current	25,000	50,000
Total current liabilities	310,800	392,900
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Contingent payments, long-term	633,600	603,900
Asset retirement obligation	429,700	429,700
TOTAL LIABILITIES	$ 1,374,100	$ 1,426,500
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock - no shares issued or outstanding
Common Stock Class A - 75,000,000 no par shares authorized, 4,982,400 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015	$ 109,173,200	$ 109,159,300
Accumulated Deficit	(105,656,800)	(105,253,500)
Total shareholders' equity	3,516,400	3,905,800
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 4,890,500	$ 5,332,300

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$ (403,300)	$ (178,200)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	46,100	45,100
Accretion of fair value - contingent payments	$ 4,700	8,400
Gain on sale of marketable securities		$ (46,700)
Stock-based compensation for options	$ 13,900
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(8,800)	$ 9,500
Other receivables - related party	(2,400)	5,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	131,300	22,600
Trust account - asset retirement obligation	(4,700)	(4,700)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$ (57,100)	128,800
Contingent land payment		(16,400)
Net cash used in operating activities	$ (280,300)	(26,600)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from repayment of American Citizenship Center, LLC note receivable	17,200	50,000
Purchase of land, property, and equipment	$ (600)	(163,300)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		279,100
Net cash provided by investing activities	$ 16,600	$ 165,800
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash used in financing activities
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	$ (263,700)	$ 139,200
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period	788,900	1,215,600
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$ 525,200	1,354,800
Non-cash investing & financing activities:
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		(97,700)
Note receivable issued for ACC amendment fee		$ (10,000)
Value of stock-based compensation for options	$ 13,900

XML

J. Related Party Transactions (Details Narrative) - American Citizenship Center, LLC - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Due from related party	$ 305,600	$ 322,800
Interest on note	7,500
Unpaid receivables	6,600
Interest expense	4,900
legal fees	$ 1,700

XML

D. Land, Property and Equipment (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

D. Land Property And Equipment Tables

Land, Property and Equipment

		June 30, 2015		Additions		September 30, 2015
Office furniture and equipment	$	51,300	$	-	$	51,300
Water disposal facility		2,219,200		-		2,219,200
Production equipment		514,400		-		514,400
		2,784,900		-		2,784,900
Less accumulation depreciation		(491,900)		(46,100)		(538,000)
Land and permit costs		1,645,600		600		1,646,200
Net book value	$	3,938,600	$	(45,500)	$	3,893,100

XML

L. Liquidity and Going Concern (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2015
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (403,300)	$ (178,200)	$ (900,600)

XML

A. Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent AccountingPronouncements (Details) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Asset retirement obligation	$ 429,700	$ 429,700
Contingent land payment	658,600	653,900
Total	$ 1,088,300	$ 1,083,600
Level 1: Quoted Prices Quoted Prices in active Markets for Identical Assets [Member]
Asset retirement obligation
Contingent land payment
Total
Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs [Member]
Asset retirement obligation
Contingent land payment
Total
Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs [Member]
Asset retirement obligation	$ 429,700	$ 429,700
Contingent land payment	658,600	653,900
Total	$ 1,088,300	$ 1,083,600

XML

A. Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Nature of Operations

Alanco Technologies, Inc. (Stock Symbol: ALAN) was incorporated in 1969 under the laws of the State of Arizona. Unless otherwise noted, the “Company” or “Alanco” refers to Alanco Technologies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company formed Alanco Energy Services, Inc. (“AES”), for the purpose of obtaining property to establish a water disposal facility near Grand Junction, CO to receive produced water generated as a byproduct from oil and natural gas production in Western Colorado. The new facility started to receive produced water in August 2012.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such condensed consolidated financial statements. Such necessary adjustments consist of normal recurring items and the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s June 30, 2015 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year numbers have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Sales tax on certain revenues for the fiscal year 2015 that were classified as cost of revenues has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to offset revenues to conform to the current year’s presentation. In addition, the value of stock-based compensation for the fiscal year 2015 which was included in corporate expenses has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to a separate line item. These reclassifications had no effect on net loss or net loss per share.

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities – The estimated fair values for assets and liabilities are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant information. The Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels: Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets, Level 2 – observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 categories as of the date of the event or change in circumstances occurs. The carrying amounts of receivables, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value given their short-term nature or their effective interest rates, which represent Level 3 input levels.

The following are the classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and 2014, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

Fair Value at September 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		September 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		658,600		658,600
	$	-	$	-	$	1,088,300	$	1,088,300

Fair Value at June 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		June 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		653,900		653,900
	$	-	$	-	$	1,083,600	$	1,083,600

The following is a reconciliation of the opening and closing balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

			Asset		Contingent
			Retirement		Land
			Obligation		Payment		Total
Opening balance		$	429,700	$	653,900	$	1,083,600
	Accretion expense		-		4,700		4,700
Closing balance		$	429,700	$	658,600	$	1,088,300

Fair Value of Asset Retirement Obligation – The Deer Creek asset retirement obligation is the estimated cost to close the Deer Creek facility under terms of the lease, meeting environmental and State of Colorado regulatory requirements. The estimate is determined at discrete points in time based upon significant unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. Management’s estimate of the asset retirement obligation is based upon a cost estimate developed by a consultant knowledgeable of government closure requirements and costs incurred at similar water disposal facility operations. The process used was to identify each activity in the closure process, obtaining vendor estimated costs, in current dollars, to perform the closure activity and accumulating the various vendor estimates to determine the asset retirement obligation. A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated asset retirement obligation results in the fair value of the asset retirement obligation to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 410-20: Asset Retirement Obligations requires the Company to review the asset retirement obligation on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred.

Fair Value of Contingent Payments – The contingent land payment and contingent purchase price liabilities are also determined at discrete points in time based upon unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. In calculating the estimate of fair value for both of the contingent payments, management completed an estimate of the present value of each identified contingent liability based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek facility developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors. Different assumptions relative to the expansion or alternative uses of the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities could result in significantly different valuations. The projected payments have been discounted at a rate of 3% per annum to determine net present value. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated contingent land liability results in the fair value of the contingent land liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement requires the Company to review the contingent land liability on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred. Pursuant to ASC Topic 820, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 the Company reversed the contingent purchase price liability it had previously recorded based on the parameters of the contingency and the estimated present value based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes the most current revenue recognition guidance. In August 2015, this accounting pronouncement was deferred for one year, and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance regarding the simplification of accounting for measurement period adjustments for business combinations. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period and early adoption is permitted. The Company has early adopted the guidance, which had no material impact on its financial position and results of operations.

There have been no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended September 30, 2015, that are of significance, or potential significance, to us.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - shares	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Class A Common Stock, Shares Authorized	75,000,000	75,000,000
Class A Common Stock, Shares Issued	4,982,400	4,982,400
Class A Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	4,982,400	4,982,400

XML

K. Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

There have been no significant subsequent events.

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Nov. 10, 2015
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000098618
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2015
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--06-30
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		4,982,400
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016

XML

L. Liquidity and Going Concern

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Liquidity and Going Concern

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company reported a net loss of ($403,300) and for fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company reported a net loss of ($900,600). Historically, the Company had relied on the liquidation of its investment in Marketable Securities to fund working capital needs. The Company sold all remaining marketable securities during fiscal 2015. These factors raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next year. The Company’s fiscal 2016 operating plan contemplates development of the AES Indian Mesa site. In order to develop the Indian Mesa site, the Company will need additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both. Management cannot assure that it will secure additional financing in order to achieve projections. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected. Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital needs or the Company may seek to sell assets. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 discussing the substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Operations
NET REVENUES	$ 114,300	$ 225,300
Cost of revenues	260,400	186,300
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)	(146,100)	39,000
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Corporate expenses	93,700	61,100
Alanco Energy Services	157,000	199,500
Stock-based compensation	13,900	15,000
Selling general and administrative expenses	264,600	275,600
OPERATING LOSS	(410,700)	(236,600)
OTHER INCOME
Interest income	$ 7,400	11,500
Gain on sale of marketable securities		46,700
Other income		200
NET LOSS	$ (403,300)	$ (178,200)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$ (0.08)	$ (0.04)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING	4,982,400	4,962,500

XML

F. Equity

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Equity [Abstract]

Equity

The Company did not issue any shares of Common Stock during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized the value of stock-based compensation in the amount of $13,900.

In December 2011, the Company announced that its board of directors had authorized a stock repurchase program whereby the Company could repurchase up to 2 million shares of its outstanding common stock over the next 12 months. The stock repurchase program was extended, under the same limitation, through December 31, 2013. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the board of directors renewed the stock repurchase program, extending it through December 31, 2015. There were no shares repurchased under the program in the current quarter.

The Company has authorized 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of which 5,000,000 shares have been allocated to Series A, 500,000 have been allocated to Series B, 400,000 have been allocated to Series C Junior Participating, 500,000 have been allocated to Series D, and 750,000 have been allocated to Series E. At September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, no Preferred Stock of any series was issued or outstanding.

XML

E. Earnings Per Share

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted loss per share of common stock was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive securities are options, warrants, convertible debt, and preferred stock that are freely exercisable into common stock at less than the prevailing market price. Dilutive securities are not included in the weighted average number of shares when inclusion would increase the earnings per share or decrease the loss per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no dilutive securities included in the loss per share calculation as the effect would be antidilutive. Considering all holders’ rights, total common stock equivalents issuable under these potentially dilutive securities are approximately 1,200,000 and 814,000 at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

XML

G. Contingent Payments (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Contingent payments

		September 30,		June 30,
		2015		2015
Contingent land payment	$	658,600	$	653,900
Less current portion		(25,000)		(50,000)
Contingent payments, long-term	$	633,600	$	603,900

XML

A. Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Nature of Operations

Nature of Operations

Alanco Technologies, Inc. (Stock Symbol: ALAN) was incorporated in 1969 under the laws of the State of Arizona. Unless otherwise noted, the “Company” or “Alanco” refers to Alanco Technologies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company formed Alanco Energy Services, Inc. (“AES”), for the purpose of obtaining property to establish a water disposal facility near Grand Junction, CO to receive produced water generated as a byproduct from oil and natural gas production in Western Colorado. The new facility started to receive produced water in August 2012.

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such condensed consolidated financial statements. Such necessary adjustments consist of normal recurring items and the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s June 30, 2015 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year numbers have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Sales tax on certain revenues for the fiscal year 2015 that were classified as cost of revenues has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to offset revenues to conform to the current year’s presentation. In addition, the value of stock-based compensation for the fiscal year 2015 which was included in corporate expenses has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to a separate line item. These reclassifications had no effect on net loss or net loss per share.

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities – The estimated fair values for assets and liabilities are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant information. The Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels: Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets, Level 2 – observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 categories as of the date of the event or change in circumstances occurs. The carrying amounts of receivables, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value given their short-term nature or their effective interest rates, which represent Level 3 input levels.

The following are the classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 and 2014, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

Fair Value at September 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		September 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		658,600		658,600
	$	-	$	-	$	1,088,300	$	1,088,300

Fair Value at June 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		June 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		653,900		653,900
	$	-	$	-	$	1,083,600	$	1,083,600

The following is a reconciliation of the opening and closing balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

			Asset		Contingent
			Retirement		Land
			Obligation		Payment		Total
Opening balance		$	429,700	$	653,900	$	1,083,600
	Accretion expense		-		4,700		4,700
Closing balance		$	429,700	$	658,600	$	1,088,300

Fair Value of Asset Retirement Obligation

Fair Value of Asset Retirement Obligation – The Deer Creek asset retirement obligation is the estimated cost to close the Deer Creek facility under terms of the lease, meeting environmental and State of Colorado regulatory requirements. The estimate is determined at discrete points in time based upon significant unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. Management’s estimate of the asset retirement obligation is based upon a cost estimate developed by a consultant knowledgeable of government closure requirements and costs incurred at similar water disposal facility operations. The process used was to identify each activity in the closure process, obtaining vendor estimated costs, in current dollars, to perform the closure activity and accumulating the various vendor estimates to determine the asset retirement obligation. A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated asset retirement obligation results in the fair value of the asset retirement obligation to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 410-20: Asset Retirement Obligations requires the Company to review the asset retirement obligation on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred.

Fair Value of Contingent Payments

Fair Value of Contingent Payments – The contingent land payment and contingent purchase price liabilities are also determined at discrete points in time based upon unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. In calculating the estimate of fair value for both of the contingent payments, management completed an estimate of the present value of each identified contingent liability based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek facility developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors. Different assumptions relative to the expansion or alternative uses of the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities could result in significantly different valuations. The projected payments have been discounted at a rate of 3% per annum to determine net present value. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated contingent land liability results in the fair value of the contingent land liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement requires the Company to review the contingent land liability on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred. Pursuant to ASC Topic 820, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 the Company reversed the contingent purchase price liability it had previously recorded based on the parameters of the contingency and the estimated present value based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes the most current revenue recognition guidance. In August 2015, this accounting pronouncement was deferred for one year, and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance regarding the simplification of accounting for measurement period adjustments for business combinations. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period and early adoption is permitted. The Company has early adopted the guidance, which had no material impact on its financial position and results of operations.

There have been no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended September 30, 2015, that are of significance, or potential significance, to us.

XML

I. Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Company is a defendant and counterclaimant in litigation involving its subsidiary, TSI Dissolution Corp. (formerly known as Alanco/TSI Prism Inc. (“TSI”)) and the purchaser of TSI’s assets, Black Creek Integrated Systems Corp. Black Creek filed a complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court against TSI and the Company, being Civil Case NO. CV2011-014175, claiming various offsets from the purchase price, primarily concerning inventory adjustments, and TSI counterclaimed for monies due from Black Creek under the purchase agreement. Following a trial during fiscal 2014, the court awarded a net judgment in favor of Black Creek in the amount of $16,800, plus attorney’s fees and accrued interest, resulting in a total judgment in the amount of $128,300 for which the Company recorded an accrued liability at June 30, 2014. In addition, the Company posted a bond with the court in conjunction with the Company’s appeal of the judgment. In May 2015, the State of Arizona Division One Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s damages award and remanded to the trial court to direct the parties to follow dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement. In addition, the appellate court’s decision vacated the trial court’s attorney’s fee award and stated that TSI is entitled to an award of fees on appeal. As a result, at June 30, 2015, the Company reversed the accrual of $128,300 for the prior judgment. The Company is currently following the court’s direction and working under the dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement. The Company believes that the lower court’s judgment failed to address, among other matters, inventory reserves established for the specific items of inventory which were the subject of Black Creek’s concerns, which if properly addressed would result in a net judgment in favor of the Company, with an attendant award of attorney’s fees in favor of the Company. Therefore, no accrual for the loss contingency was deemed necessary at September 30, 2015.

The Company may from time to time be involved in litigation arising from the normal course of business.  As of September 30, 2015, there was no such litigation pending deemed material by the Company.

XML

G. Contingent Payments

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Contingent Payments

Contingent payments at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 relate to AES asset purchase transactions completed in conjunction with the construction of water disposal facilities for the treatment and disposal of produced water generated by oil and natural gas producers in Western Colorado. Details of the contingent payments are as follows:

		September 30,		June 30,
		2015		2015
Contingent land payment	$	658,600	$	653,900
Less current portion		(25,000)		(50,000)
Contingent payments, long-term	$	633,600	$	603,900

Contingent land payment of $658,600 at September 30, 2015 represents the net present value of $800,000 of estimated contingent land payments due under an agreement whereby Alanco Energy Services, Inc. (“AES”) acquired 160 acres of land known as Indian Mesa. The maximum total of $800,000 of contingent land payments is based upon 10% of quarterly revenues in excess of operating expenses up to $200,000 per quarter for activity at both the Deer Creek and the Indian Mesa locations. The payments were projected considering current operating plans as approved by the Alanco Board of Directors, with the payments discounted at a rate of 3% per annum. Accretion expense is being imputed at 3% per annum, increasing the fair value of the contingent land payment during the three months ended September 30, 2015 by $4,700. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, no contingent land payment was earned or payable under the contingency formula. At September 30, 2015, the Company reduced the current portion of the contingent land payment to $25,000 to reflect its short-term estimate of the obligation.

XML

H. Asset Retirement Obligation

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company has recognized estimated asset retirement obligations (closure cost) of $429,700 to remove leasehold improvements, remediate any pollution issues and return the Deer Creek water disposal property to its natural state at the conclusion of the Company’s lease. The closure process is a requirement of both the Deer Creek lease and the State of Colorado, a permitting authority for such facilities. The closure cost estimate, in current dollars, was completed by an approved independent consultant experienced in estimating closure costs for water disposal operations and the estimated amount was approved by the State of Colorado. A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility.

The Company reviews the asset retirement obligation quarterly and performs a formal annual assessment of its estimates to determine if an adjustment to the value of the asset retirement obligation is required.

The laws of the State of Colorado require companies to meet environmental and asset retirement obligations by selecting an approved payment method. The Company has elected to meet its obligation by making quarterly payments of approximately $4,700 into a trust that, over the expected lease period, will build liquid assets to meet the asset retirement obligation. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company made the required quarterly payments. The balances in the trust account for the asset retirement obligation as of September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 were $72,100 and $67,400, respectively.

XML

J. Related Party Transactions

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

At September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 the Company had a note due from American Citizenship Center, LLC (“ACC”), a related party, with balances of $305,600 and $322,800, respectively. Refer to Note C – Note Receivable for further discussion. During the three months ended September 30, 2015 the Company billed ACC a total of approximately $7,500 for interest on the note. At September 30, 2015, the Company had unpaid receivables from ACC in the amount of $6,600, consisting of $4,900 representing two months of interest and $1,700 of legal fees. All required payments have been subsequently paid.

XML

I. Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Attorney fees and accrued interest	$ 16,800
Accrued liability	$ 128,300
Reversed accrual		$ 128,300

XML

B. Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Equity [Abstract]

Stock option activity

				Weighted
			Weighted	Average
			Average	Remaining		Aggregate		Aggregate
			Exercise Price	Contractual		Fair		Instrinsic
		Shares	Per Share	Term (1)		Value (3)		Value (2)
Outstanding July 1, 2015		1,203,200	$0.58	3.03	$	275,800	$	-
	Granted	-	-	-		-		-
	Exercised	-	-	-		-		-
	Forfeited or expired	(3,200)	$1.50	-		(2,300)		-
Outstanding September 30, 2015		1,200,000	$0.58	2.78	$	273,500	$	-
Exercisable September 30, 2015		1,122,000	$0.59	2.69	$	259,800	$	-

(1) Remaining contractual term presented in years.

(2) The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the closing price of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2015, for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the closing price as of September 30, 2015 of $0.19.

(3) Aggregate Fair Value is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based compensation.

XML

B. Stock-Based Compensation (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) $ / shares shares
B. Stock-based Compensation Details
Shares Outstanding July 1, 2015 | shares	1,203,200
Shares Granted | shares
Shares Exercised | shares
Shares Forfeited or expired | shares	(3,200)
Shares Outstanding September 30, 2015 | shares	1,200,000
Shares Exercisable September 30, 2015 | shares	1,122,000
Weighted average exercise price per share outstanding July 1, 2015 | $ / shares	$ 0.58
Weighted average exercise price per share Granted | $ / shares
Weighted average exercise price per share Exercised | $ / shares
Weighted average exercise price per share Forfeited or expired | $ / shares	$ 1.50
Weighted average exercise price per share Outstanding September 30, 2015 | $ / shares	0.58
Weighted average exercise price per share Exercisable September 30, 2015 | $ / shares	$ 0.59
Weighted average remaining contractual term Outstanding July 1, 2015	3 years 11 days	[1]
Weighted average remaining contractual term Outstanding September 30, 2015	2 years 9 months 11 days	[1]
Weighted average remaining contractual term Exercisable September 30, 2015	2 years 8 months 9 days	[1]
Aggregate fair value outstanding July 1, 2015	$ 275,800	[2]
Aggregate fair value Granted
Aggregate fair value Exercised
Aggregate fair value Forfeited or expired	$ (2,300)	[2]
Aggregate fair value Outstanding September 30, 2015	273,500	[2]
Aggregate fair value Exercisable September 30, 2015	$ 259,800	[2]
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Outstanding July 1, 2015
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Granted
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Exercised
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Forfeited or expired
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Outstanding September 30, 2015
Aggregate Intrinsic Value Exercisable September 30, 2015

[1] Remaining contractual term presented in years.

[2] Aggregate Fair Value is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based compensation

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited) - 3 months ended Sep. 30, 2015 - USD ($)	COMMON STOCK	ACCUMULATED DEFICIT	Total
Beginning balance, Amount at Jun. 30, 2015	$ 109,159,300	$ (105,253,500)	$ 3,905,800
Beginning balance, Shares at Jun. 30, 2015	4,982,400
Value of stock-based compensation	$ 13,900		13,900
Net loss		$ (403,300)	(403,300)
Ending balance, Amount at Sep. 30, 2015	$ 109,173,200	$ (105,656,800)	$ 3,516,400
Ending balance, Shares at Sep. 30, 2015	4,982,400

XML

D. Land, Property and Equipment

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Land, Property and Equipment

Land, Property and Equipment at September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 consist of the following:

		June 30, 2015		Additions		September 30, 2015
Office furniture and equipment	$	51,300	$	-	$	51,300
Water disposal facility		2,219,200		-		2,219,200
Production equipment		514,400		-		514,400
		2,784,900		-		2,784,900
Less accumulation depreciation		(491,900)		(46,100)		(538,000)
Land and permit costs		1,645,600		600		1,646,200
Net book value	$	3,938,600	$	(45,500)	$	3,893,100

XML

B. Stock-Based Compensation (Details Narrative)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Equity [Abstract]
Unamortized Black Scholes value	$ 13,800

XML

A. Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Fair Value at September 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		September 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		658,600		658,600
	$	-	$	-	$	1,088,300	$	1,088,300

Fair Value at June 30, 2015
		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		June 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		653,900		653,900
	$	-	$	-	$	1,083,600	$	1,083,600

Reconciliation of Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

			Asset		Contingent
			Retirement		Land
			Obligation		Payment		Total
Opening balance		$	429,700	$	653,900	$	1,083,600
	Accretion expense		-		4,700		4,700
Closing balance		$	429,700	$	658,600	$	1,088,300