-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, QMhviLQEeAOy/sFUR6brdB80qbpLBun3eFV0BODOCdM6rplGW4dS4c/dRfhOUBzM +wf0leO5XVAURhCOHOXufg== 0001066107-09-000090.txt : 20091109 0001066107-09-000090.hdr.sgml : 20091109 20091106211423 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001066107-09-000090 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20090930 FILED AS OF DATE: 20091109 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20091106 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE CO CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000097142 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION [4922] IRS NUMBER: 741056569 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-04101 FILM NUMBER: 091166331 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1001 LOUISIANA STREET 2: EL PASO BLDG CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77002 BUSINESS PHONE: 7134202600 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1001 LOUISIANA STREET 2: EL PASO BLDG CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77002 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: TENNECO INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19871227 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION CO DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19680411 10-Q 1 tgp10q09302009.htm TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY (TGP) FORM 10-Q (09.30.2009) tgp10q09302009.htm


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
 
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)

R
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
   
 
OR
 
£
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the transition period from                                                       to

Commission File Number 1-4101
________________
 
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
74-1056569
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
El Paso Building
 
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas
77002
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)

Telephone Number: (713) 420-2600

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes ¨ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
   Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer þ
    Smaller reporting company o
 
   
   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No þ

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

     Common stock, par value $5 per share. Shares outstanding on November 6, 2009: 208

     TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY MEETS THE CONDITIONS OF GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) TO FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS REPORT WITH A REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT AS PERMITTED BY SUCH INSTRUCTION.
 
 

 

 
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY


 
____________

* We have not included a response to this item in this document since no response is required pursuant to the  reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.

Below is a list of terms that are common to our industry and used throughout this document:

   /d = per day
 
Tonne = metric ton
   BBtu = billion British thermal units
   
 
 
When we refer to cubic feet measurements, all measurements are at a pressure of 14.73 pounds per square inch.


When we refer to “us”, “we”, “our”, or “ours”, we are describing Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and/or our subsidiaries.
 
 





TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions)
(Unaudited)

 
 
 
Quarter Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
2009
   
2008
   
2009
   
2008
 
Operating revenues
  $ 221     $ 209     $ 704     $ 671  
Operating expenses
                               
   Operation and maintenance
    95       106       272       278  
   Depreciation and amortization
    46       46       139       136  
   Loss on long-lived assets
    2             2       24  
   Taxes, other than income taxes
    14       8       43       40  
      157       160       456       478  
Operating income
    64       49       248       193  
Earnings from unconsolidated affiliate
    3       2       8       10  
Other income, net
    1       2       8       8  
Interest and debt expense
    (40 )     (33 )     (117 )     (101 )
Affiliated interest income, net
    4       7       12       24  
Income before income taxes
    32       27       159       134  
Income taxes
    12       11       61       53  
Net income
  $ 20     $ 16     $ 98     $ 81  

See accompanying notes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except for share amounts)
(Unaudited)
 
   
September 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
ASSETS
 
Current assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 55     $  
Accounts and notes receivable
               
Customer 
    6       24  
Affiliates
    139       81  
Other
    9       13  
Deferred income taxes
    44       8  
Other
    52       51  
Total current assets
    305       177  
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
    4,571       4,365  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    914       884  
      3,657       3,481  
Additional acquisition cost assigned to utility plant, net
    1,973       2,002  
Total property, plant and equipment, net
    5,630       5,483  
Other assets
               
Notes receivable from affiliates
    998       800  
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate
    79       81  
Other 
    60       53  
      1,137       934  
Total assets
  $ 7,072     $ 6,594  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
Current liabilities
               
Accounts payable
               
Trade
  $ 33     $ 54  
Affiliates
    56       36  
Other
    43       52  
Taxes payable
    131       82  
Contractual deposits
    44       60  
Asset retirement obligations 
    56       5  
Accrued interest
    47       24  
Regulatory liabilities
    47       3  
Other
    18       23  
       Total current liabilities
    475       339  
Long-term debt
    1,845       1,605  
Other liabilities
               
Deferred income taxes
    1,361       1,314  
Other 
    222       265  
      1,583       1,579  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
               
Stockholder’s equity
               
Common stock, par value $5 per share; 300 shares authorized; 208 shares issued and outstanding
           
Additional paid-in capital 
    2,209       2,209  
Retained earnings
    1,294       1,196  
Note receivable from affiliate
    (334 )     (334 ) 
       Total stockholder’s equity 
    3,169       3,071  
       Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity
  $ 7,072     $ 6,594  

See accompanying notes.


TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)

 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
2009
   
2008
 
Cash flows from operating activities
           
Net income
  $ 98     $ 81  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities
               
 Depreciation and amortization
    139       136  
 Deferred income taxes
    11       10  
 Earnings from unconsolidated affiliate, adjusted for cash distributions
    2       3  
 Loss on long-lived assets
    2       24  
 Other non-cash income items
    (1 )     (3 )
       Asset and liability changes
    99       103  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    350       354  
                 
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Additions to property, plant and equipment
    (251 )     (203 )
Net change in notes receivable from affiliates
    (277 )     (158 )
Other
          7  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (528 )               (354 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
    234        
Other
    (1 )      
Net cash provided by financing activities
    233        
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    55        
Cash and cash equivalents
               
Beginning of period 
           
End of period 
  $ 55     $  

See accompanying notes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

  Basis of Presentation

We are an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation (El Paso).  We prepared this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Because this is an interim period filing presented using a condensed format, it does not include all of the disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q along with our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains a summary of our significant accounting policies and other disclosures. The financial statements as of September 30, 2009, and for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, are unaudited. We derived the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, from the audited balance sheet filed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, we have made all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, to fairly present our interim period results. We have evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing on November 6, 2009, the date of issuance of our financial statements. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, information for interim periods may not be indicative of our operating results for the entire year.

Significant Accounting Policies

The information below provides an update of our significant accounting policies and accounting pronouncements as discussed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
 
Fair Value Measurements. On January 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting and reporting standards related to our non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which primarily relates to any impairment of long-lived assets or investments. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

 Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests. On January 1, 2009, we adopted accounting standard updates that clarify how to account for and report acquisitions of businesses and transactions involving noncontrolling interests. These  updates require that all acquired assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and certain contingencies be measured at fair value, and certain other acquisition-related costs be expensed rather than capitalized. Additionally,  all transactions with noncontrolling interest holders after adoption, including the issuance and repurchase of noncontrolling interests, should be accounted for as equity transactions unless a change in control of the subsidiary occurs. The adoption of these accounting standard updates did not have an impact on our financial statements. Application of these updates impacts transactions that are entered into after December 31, 2008.

Transfers of Financial Assets. In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued updates to the existing accounting standards on financial asset transfers. Among other items, these accounting standard updates eliminate the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) for purposes of evaluating whether an entity should be consolidated as a variable interest entity and are effective for existing QSPEs as of January 1, 2010 and for transactions entered into on or after January 1, 2010. We are currently assessing the impact that these accounting standard updates may have on our financial statements, including any impacts it may have on accounting for our accounts receivable sales program and related senior beneficial interests (see Note 6).

Variable Interest Entities. In June 2009, the FASB issued updates to existing accounting standards for variable interest entities which revise how companies determine their primary beneficiaries, among other changes. These updates require companies to use a qualitative approach based on their responsibilities and controlling power over the variable interest entities’ operations rather than a quantitative approach in determining the primary beneficiary as previously required. We are currently assessing the impact that these accounting standard updates, effective January 1, 2010, may have on our financial statements, including any impact it may have on accounting for our accounts receivable sales program (see Note 6).

 
 
2. Loss on Long-Lived Assets

During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded an impairment of $2 million associated with an asset anticipated to be sold in the fourth quarter of 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded impairments of $24 million, including an impairment related to our Essex-Middlesex Lateral project due to its prolonged permitting process.

3.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables and payables are representative of their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had a note receivable from El Paso of approximately $1.1 billion and $0.8 billion due upon demand, with a variable interest rate of 1.5% and 3.2%. While we are exposed to changes in interest income based on changes to the variable interest rate, the fair value of this note receivable approximates its carrying value due to the note being due on demand and the market-based nature of its interest rate.

In addition, the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term debt are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues and are as follows:

 
 
September 30, 2009
   
December 31, 2008
 
 
 
 
Carrying
Amount
   
Fair
Value
   
Carrying
Amount
   
Fair
Value
 
   
(In millions)
 
Long-term debt
  $ 1,845     $ 2,081     $ 1,605     $ 1,311  

4. Debt

In 2009, we issued $250 million of 8.00% senior notes due in February 2016 and received proceeds of $234 million, net of issuance costs.

5. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

Gas Measurement Cases. We and a number of our affiliates were named defendants in actions that generally allege mismeasurement of natural gas volumes and/or heating content resulting in the underpayment of royalties. The first set of cases was filed in 1997 by an individual under the False Claims Act and have been consolidated for pretrial purposes (In re: Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation, U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming). These complaints allege an industry-wide conspiracy to underreport the heating value as well as the volumes of the natural gas produced from federal and Native American lands. In October 2006, the U.S. District Judge issued an order dismissing all claims against all defendants. In March 2009, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissals and in October 2009, the plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied.

Similar allegations were filed in a second set of actions initiated in 1999 in Will Price, et al. v. Gas Pipelines and Their Predecessors, et al., in the District Court of Stevens County, Kansas. The plaintiffs currently seek certification of a class of royalty owners in wells on non-federal and non-Native American lands in Kansas, Wyoming and Colorado. Motions for class certification were argued in March 2005 and in September 2009, the Kansas State Court Judge denied the motions.  Plaintiffs have filed a motion for reconsideration.  The plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of monetary damages in the form of additional royalty payments (along with interest, expenses and punitive damages) and injunctive relief with regard to future gas measurement practices. Our costs and legal exposure related to these lawsuits and claims are not currently determinable.





In addition to the above proceedings, we and our subsidiaries and affiliates are named as defendants in numerous lawsuits and governmental proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. For each of these matters, we evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter, possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. If we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and can be estimated, we establish the necessary accruals. While the outcome of these matters, including those discussed above, cannot be predicted with certainty, and there are still uncertainties related to the costs we may incur, based upon our evaluation and experience to date, we believe we have established appropriate reserves for these matters. It is possible, however,  that new information or future developments could require us to reassess our potential exposure related to these matters and establish our accruals accordingly, and these adjustments could be material.  At September 30, 2009, we had accrued approximately $2 million for our outstanding legal matters.
 
Environmental Matters

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. These laws and regulations require us to remove or remedy the effect on the environment of the disposal or release of specified substances at current and former operating sites. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had accrued approximately $6 million for expected remediation costs and associated onsite, offsite and groundwater technical studies and for related environmental legal costs. We estimate that our exposure could be as high as $7 million at September 30, 2009.

Our accrual represents a combination of two estimation methodologies. First, where the most likely outcome can be reasonably estimated, that cost has been accrued. Second, where the most likely outcome cannot be estimated, a range of costs is established and if no one amount in that range is more likely than any other, the lower end of the expected range has been accrued. Our environmental remediation projects are in various stages of completion. Our recorded liabilities reflect our current estimates of amounts we will expend to remediate these sites. However, depending on the stage of completion or assessment, the ultimate extent of contamination or remediation required may not be known. As additional assessments occur or remediation efforts continue, we may incur additional liabilities.

For the remainder of 2009, we estimate that our total remediation expenditures will be less than $1 million, which will be expended under government directed clean-up programs.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Cost Recoveries and Refund. Since 1994, we have been conducting remediation activities at certain of our compressor stations associated with PCB’s and other hazardous materials. We have collected amounts, substantially in excess of remediation costs actually incurred to date, through a surcharge to our customers under a settlement approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in November 1995. In November 2009, the FERC approved an amendment to the 1995 settlement that provides for interim refunds over a three year period of approximately $157 million of our collected amounts plus interest of 8%. The refunds will be paid beginning in December 2009, assuming no requests for rehearing are filed. Our refund obligations are recorded as regulatory liabilities on our balance sheet and as of September 30, 2009, we have classified approximately $47 million as current liabilities based on the timing of when these amounts are expected to be refunded to our customers.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Matters. We have received notice that we could be designated, or have been asked for information to determine whether we could be designated, as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) with respect to four active sites under the CERCLA or state equivalents. We have sought to resolve our liability as a PRP at these sites through indemnification by third parties and settlements which provide for payment of our allocable share of remediation costs. As of September 30, 2009, we have estimated our share of the remediation costs at these sites to be between $1 million and $2 million. Because the clean-up costs are estimates and are subject to revision as more information becomes available about the extent of remediation required, and in some cases we have asserted a defense to any liability, our estimates could change. Moreover, liability under the federal CERCLA statute is joint and several, meaning that we could be required to pay in excess of our pro rata share of remediation costs. Our understanding of the financial strength of other PRPs has been considered, where appropriate, in estimating our liabilities. Accruals for these matters are included in the environmental reserve discussed above.
 
 
It is possible that new information or future developments could require us to reassess our potential exposure related to environmental matters. We may incur significant costs and liabilities in order to comply with existing environmental laws and regulations. It is also possible that other developments, such as increasingly strict environmental laws, regulations and orders of regulatory agencies, as well as claims for damages to property and the environment or injuries to employees and other persons resulting from our current or past operations, could result in substantial costs and liabilities in the future. As this information becomes available, or other relevant developments occur, we will adjust our accrual amounts accordingly. While there are still uncertainties related to the ultimate costs we may incur, based upon our evaluation and experience to date, we believe our reserves are adequate.

Regulatory Matter

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. In October 2007, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) — Pipelines and Pipeline Rights-of-Way. If adopted, the proposed rules would substantially revise MMS OCS pipeline and rights-of-way regulations. The proposed rules would have the effect of: (i) increasing the financial obligations of entities, like us, which have pipelines and pipeline rights-of-way in the OCS; (ii) increasing the regulatory requirements imposed on the operation and maintenance of existing pipelines and rights of way in the OCS; and (iii) increasing the requirements and preconditions for obtaining new rights-of-way in the OCS.

Other Commitments

Asset Retirement Obligations. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had total asset retirement liabilities of $84 million and $42 million. During 2009, we increased our asset retirement liabilities by $42 million primarily resulting from our continuing assessment of the impacts of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike on our offshore pipeline assets. As of September 30, 2009, we have classified $56 million as current liabilities on our balance sheet.

Purchase Obligations. We have entered into contracts to purchase and install pipe associated with our 300 Line Expansion Project which is anticipated to be placed in service in 2011.  Our current estimated obligations under these agreements are approximately $32 million in the fourth quarter of 2009, $27 million in 2010, and $189 million in 2011.
 
6. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate and Transactions with Affiliates

  Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

We have a 50 percent ownership interest in Bear Creek Storage Company, a joint venture with Southern Natural Gas Company, our affiliate and we received $10 million and $13 million in dividends for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Summarized income statement information of our proportionate share of the income of this investment for the periods ended September 30 is as follows:

 
 
 
Quarter Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
2009
   
2008
   
2009
   
2008
 
   
(In millions)
 
Operating results data:
                       
   Operating revenues
  $ 5     $ 4     $ 14     $ 15  
   Operating expenses
    2       2       6       6  
   Income from continuing operations and net income
    3       2       8       10  
 
 
 


Transactions with Affiliates

     Cash Management Program and Other Notes Receivable. We participate in El Paso’s cash management program which matches short-term cash surpluses and needs of participating affiliates, thus minimizing total borrowings from outside sources. El Paso uses the cash management program to settle intercompany transactions between participating affiliates. We have historically advanced cash to El Paso in exchange for an affiliated note receivable that is due upon demand. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had interest bearing notes receivable from El Paso of $1.1 billion and $0.8 billion. We classified approximately $79 million of this receivable as current on our balance sheet at September 30, 2009, based on the net amount we anticipate using in the next twelve months considering available cash sources and needs. The interest rate on these variable rate notes was 1.5% at September 30, 2009 and 3.2% at December 31, 2008.

      At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had non-interest bearing notes receivable of $334 million from an El Paso affiliate. These notes are reflected as a reduction of our stockholders’ equity based on uncertainties regarding the timing and method through which El Paso will settle these balances.

Income Taxes. El Paso files consolidated U.S. federal and certain state tax returns which include our taxable income. In certain states, we file and pay taxes directly to the state taxing authorities. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had federal and state income taxes payable of $107 million and $58 million. The majority of these balances, as well as deferred income taxes and amounts associated with the resolution of unrecognized tax benefits, will become payable to El Paso.

Accounts Receivable Sales Program. We sell certain accounts receivable to a QSPE  whose purpose is solely to invest in our receivables, which are short-term assets that generally settle within 60 days. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we received net proceeds of approximately $0.2 billion and $0.7 billion related to sales of receivables to the QSPE and changes in our subordinated beneficial interests and recognized losses of less than $1 million on these transactions.  As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had approximately $75 million and $97 million of receivables outstanding with the QSPE, for which we received cash of $37 million and $38 million, and received subordinated beneficial interests of approximately $37 million and $58 million. The QSPE also issued senior beneficial interests on the receivables sold to a third party financial institution, which totaled $38 million and $39 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. We reflect the subordinated beneficial interest in receivables sold at their fair value on the date they are issued.  These amounts (adjusted for subsequent collections) are recorded as accounts receivable from affiliate in our balance sheets. Our ability to recover our carrying value of our subordinated beneficial interests is based on the collectibility of the underlying receivables sold to the QSPE. We reflect accounts receivable sold under this program and changes in the subordinated beneficial interests as operating cash flows in our statement of cash flows. Under the agreements, we earn a fee for servicing the receivables and performing all administrative duties for the QSPE which is reflected as a reduction of operation and maintenance expense in our income statement. The fair value of these servicing and administrative agreements as well as the fees earned were not material to our financial statements for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

Other Affiliate Balances. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had contractual deposits from our affiliates of $9 million. 
 
Affiliate Revenues and Expenses. We enter into transactions with our affiliates within the ordinary course of business. For a further discussion of our affiliated transactions, see our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table shows revenues and charges from our affiliates for the periods ended September 30:  
 
 
 
 
 
Quarter Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
2009
   
2008
   
2009
   
2008
 
   
(In millions)
 
Revenues from affiliates
  $ 4     $ 5     $ 12     $ 15  
Operation and maintenance expenses from affiliates
    18       16       52       47  
Reimbursement of operating expenses charged to affiliates
    11       12       34       35  

 
 
 

 


The information required by this Item is presented in a reduced disclosure format pursuant to General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.  In addition, this Item updates, and should be read in conjunction with, information disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying footnotes presented in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Results of Operations

Our management uses earnings before interest expense and income taxes (EBIT) as a measure to assess the operating results and effectiveness of our business, which consists of consolidated operations as well as an investment in an unconsolidated affiliate. We believe EBIT is useful to investors to provide them with the same measure used by El Paso to evaluate our performance. We define EBIT as net income adjusted for items such as (i) interest and debt expense, (ii) affiliated interest income, and (iii) income taxes. We exclude interest and debt expense from this measure so that investors may evaluate our operating results without regard to our financing methods. EBIT may not be comparable to measures used by other companies. Additionally, EBIT should be considered in conjunction with net income, income before income taxes and other performance measures such as operating income or operating cash flows.  Below is a reconciliation of our EBIT to net income, our throughput volumes and an analysis and discussion of our results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.

Operating Results:
   
2009
   
2008
 
   
(In millions,
except for volumes)
 
Operating revenues
  $ 704     $ 671  
Operating expenses
    (456 )      (478 )
   Operating income
    248       193  
Earnings from unconsolidated affiliate
    8       10  
Other income, net
    8       8  
   EBIT
    264       211  
Interest and debt expense
    (117 )     (101 )
Affiliated interest income, net
    12       24  
Income taxes
    (61 )             (53 )
   Net income
  $ 98     $ 81  
 
Throughput volumes (BBtu/d)
    4,650       4,875  

EBIT Analysis:
 
 
 
Revenue
   
Expense
   
Other
   
EBIT
Impact
 
   
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
 
   
(In millions)
 
Gas not used in operations and other natural gas sales
  $ 23     $ 9     $     $ 32  
Reservation and other services revenues
    4                   4  
Hurricanes
    7       (1 )           6  
Loss on long-lived assets
          22             22  
Other(1) 
    (1 )     (8 )     (2 )     (11 )
Total impact on EBIT
  $ 33     $ 22     $ (2 )   $ 53  
______________
 
(1) Consists of individually insignificant items.

Gas Not Used in Operations and Other Natural Gas Sales.  Gas not used for operations results in revenues to us, which we recognize when the volumes are retained. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our EBIT increased primarily due to a $19 million favorable impact resulting from higher retained fuel volumes in excess of fuel used to operate our system and higher average realized prices on operational sales, partially offset by a lower index price used to value the volumes that we retained as compared to the same period in 2008. Our EBIT was also favorably impacted by $9 million due to lower electric compression utilization. For a further discussion of gas not used in operations and other natural gas sales, see our 2008 Annual Report on  Form 10-K.
 
Reservation and Other Services Revenues.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our EBIT was favorably impacted as compared to the same period in 2008 by additional capacity sales primarily from the Marcellus Basin in the northeast market area due to transportation contracts with shippers which were executed during 2009.  In addition, the Carthage project was placed in-service in May 2009, generating additional sales in the southern region of our system. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in usage revenues due to reduced throughput in 2009.

In July 2009, we filed an application with the FERC for certificate authorization of our 300 Line Expansion Project to add firm transportation capacity to our existing pipeline system in the northeast U.S. market area.  All of the firm transportation capacity resulting from this project is fully subscribed with one shipper based on a precedent agreement which was executed in the third quarter of 2009. In October 2009, we entered into a pipeline installation contract of approximately $194 million.

Our system is located over a significant portion of the Marcellus Basin that is under various phases of development by producers.  We have executed firm transportation contracts with shippers from the basin utilizing existing capacity. We have been in discussions with producers to expand our system to provide additional transportation capacity from the Marcellus Basin.  Higher contracting of capacity by our customers may or may not be sustained.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our throughput volumes decreased compared with the same period in 2008.  This was due, in part, to general weakness in natural gas demand in the United States, including general reductions in industrial and power generation loads in the northeast. The demand for gas from the power generation sector was negatively impacted by economic factors but positively impacted by the displacement of coal-fired generation by gas-fired generation due to lower gas sales. If the economy recovers, electricity demand will positively affect throughput but may be offset by loss of market share in the event of higher gas prices. Although fluctuations in throughput on our system has a limited impact on our short-term results due to the fact that a material portion of our revenues are derived from firm reservation charges, it can be an indication of the risks we may face when seeking to recontract or renew any of our existing firm transportation contracts in the future. Continuing negative economic impacts on demand, as well as adverse shifting of sources of supply, could negatively impact basis differentials and our ability to renew firm transportation contracts that are expiring on our system or our ability to renew such contracts at current rates.  If we determine there is a significant change in our costs or billing determinants, we will have the option to file a rate case with the FERC to recover our prudently incurred costs.
 
Hurricanes. During the third quarter of 2008, we incurred damage to sections of our Gulf Coast and offshore pipeline facilities due to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded losses of $1 million and $7 million related to gas loss from various damaged facilities, lower volume of gas not used in operations, lower usage revenue and repair costs that were not recoverable from insurance due to losses not exceeding self-retention levels.  We continue to evaluate those damaged facilities for further repair or retirement.
 
   Loss on Long-lived Assets. During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded an impairment of $2 million associated with an asset anticipated to be sold in the fourth quarter of 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded impairments of $24 million, including an impairment related to our Essex-Middlesex Lateral project due to its prolonged permitting process.
 
Interest and Debt Expense
 
   Interest and debt expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, was approximately $16 million higher than the same period in 2008 primarily due to the issuance of $250 million of 8.00% senior notes in January 2009.

 

 
 
Affiliated Interest Income, Net

Affiliated interest income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, was $12 million lower than the same period in 2008 due to lower average short-term interest rates on advances to El Paso under its cash management program, partially offset by higher average advances. The following table shows the average advances due from El Paso and the average short-term interest rates for the nine months ended September 30:

   
2009
   
2008
 
   
(In millions, except for rates)
 
Average advance due from El Paso
  $ 899     $ 751  
Average short-term interest rate
    1.8 %     4.5 %

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rates of 38 percent and 40 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were higher than the statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to the effect of state income taxes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


Liquidity and Capital Expenditures

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and El Paso’s cash management program. At September 30, 2009, we had a notes receivable from El Paso of approximately $1.1 billion of which approximately $79 million was classified as current based on the net amount we anticipate using in the next twelve months considering available cash sources and needs. In addition, we had non-interest bearing notes receivable of $334 million from an El Paso affiliate. See Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 6, for a further discussion of El Paso’s cash management program and our other affiliate notes receivable. Our primary uses of cash are for working capital and capital expenditures. Our cash capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and our estimated capital expenditures for the remainder of this year to expand and maintain our system are listed below.

 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
   
2009
Remaining
   
 
Total
 
   
(In millions)
 
Maintenance                                                                                           
  $ 93     $ 65     $ 158  
Expansion
    88       51       139  
Hurricanes
    29       6       35  
Other(1)
    41       24       65  
    $ 251     $ 146     $ 397  
 

(1) Relates to building renovations at our corporate facilities.

Volatility in the financial markets, the energy industry and the global economy will likely continue through the remainder of 2009 and beyond.  In January 2009, we issued $250 million of 8.00% senior notes due February 2016 for net proceeds of $234 million. Although recent financial market conditions have shown signs of improvement, continued volatility in the financial markets could impact our longer-term access to capital for future growth projects as well as the cost of such capital. Additionally, although the impacts are difficult to quantify at this point, a prolonged recovery of the global economy could have adverse impacts on natural gas consumption and demand. However, we believe our exposure to changes in natural gas consumption and demand is largely mitigated by a revenue base that is mostly comprised of long-term contracts that are based on firm demand charges and are less affected by a potential reduction in the actual usage or consumption of natural gas. 

We believe we have adequate liquidity available to us to meet our capital requirements and our existing operating needs through cash on hand and cash flows from operating activities combined with amounts available to us under El Paso’s cash management program. As of September 30, 2009, El Paso had approximately $2.4 billion of available liquidity, including approximately $1.4 billion of capacity available to it under various committed credit facilities. In addition to the cash management program above, we are eligible to borrow amounts available under El Paso’s $1.5 billion credit agreement and are only liable for amounts we directly borrow. As of September 30, 2009, El Paso had approximately $0.9 billion of capacity remaining and available to us and our affiliates under this credit agreement, and none of the amount outstanding under the facility was issued or borrowed by us. For a further discussion of this credit agreement, see our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. While we do not anticipate a need to further access the financial markets for the remainder of 2009 for any of our operating activities or expansion capital needs based on liquidity available to us, volatility in the financial markets could impact our or El Paso’s ability to access these markets at reasonable rates in the future.








 

Commitments and Contingencies
 
   For a further discussion of our commitments and contingencies, see Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 5, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Climate Change and Energy Legislation. There are various legislative and regulatory measures relating to climate change and energy policies that have been proposed and, if enacted, will likely impact our business.

Climate Change Regulation.  Measures to address climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are in various phases of discussions or implementation at international, federal, regional and state levels. It is likely that federal legislation requiring GHG controls will be enacted within the next few years in the United States. Although it is uncertain what legislation will ultimately be enacted, it is our belief that cap-and-trade or other legislation that sets a price on carbon emissions will increase demand for natural gas, particularly in the power sector. We believe this increased demand will occur due to substantially less carbon emissions associated with the use of natural gas compared with alternate fuel sources for power generation, including coal and oil-fired power generation.  However, the actual impact on demand will depend on the legislative provisions that are ultimately adopted, including the level of emission caps, allowances granted and the cost of emission credits.

It is also likely that any federal legislation enacted would increase our cost of environmental compliance by requiring us to install additional equipment to reduce carbon emissions from our larger facilities as well as to potentially purchase emission credits.  Based on 2007 data we reported to the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR), our operations in the United States emitted approximately 4.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions during 2007. We believe that approximately 4.2 million tonnes of the GHG emissions that we reported to CCAR would be subject to regulations under the climate change legislation that passed in the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2009, with approximately one-third of this amount being subject to the cap-and-trade rules contained in the proposed legislation and the remainder being subject to performance standards.  As proposed, the portion of our GHG emissions that would be subject to performance standards could require us to install additional equipment or initiate new work practice standards to reduce emission levels at many of our facilities, the costs of which would likely be material.  Although we believe that many of these costs should be recoverable in the rates charged to customers, recovery is still uncertain at this time.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized regulations to monitor and report GHG emissions on an annual basis and recently proposed new regulations to regulate GHGs under the Clean Air Act, which EPA has indicated could be finalized as early as March 2010.  In addition, various lawsuits have been filed seeking to force further regulation of GHG emissions, as well as to require specific companies to reduce GHG emissions from their operations. Enactment of additional regulations, as well as lawsuits, could result in delays and have negative impacts on our ability to obtain permits and other regulatory approvals with regard to existing and new facilities, could impact our costs of operations, as well as require us to install new equipment to control emissions from our facilities, the costs of which would likely be material.

Energy Legislation.  In conjunction with these climate change proposals, there have been various federal and state legislative and regulatory proposals that would create additional incentives to move to a less carbon intensive “footprint”.  These proposals would establish renewable portfolio standards at both the federal and state level, some of which would require a material increase of renewable sources, such as wind and solar power generation, over the next several decades. Additionally, the proposals would establish incentives for energy efficiency and conservation.  Although the ultimate targets that would be established in these areas are uncertain at this time, such proposals if enacted could negatively impact natural gas usage over the longer term.



 

 


Omitted from this report pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2009, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and our Chief Financial Officer, as to the effectiveness, design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation considered the various processes carried out under the direction of our disclosure committee in an effort to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the SEC reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accurate, complete and timely. Our management, including our President and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent and/or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and  procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our President and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective as of September 30, 2009.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the third quarter of 2009, we implemented a new financial accounting system and consolidated financial chart of accounts. The system implementation efforts were carefully planned and executed. Training sessions were administered to individuals who are impacted by the new system and chart of accounts, and system controls and functionality were reviewed and successfully tested prior and subsequent to implementation.  Following evaluation, management believes that  the new system has been successfully implemented. There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the third quarter of 2009 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 



See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 5, which is incorporated herein by reference.


CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF
THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions or beliefs that we believe to be reasonable; however, assumed facts almost always vary from actual results, and differences between assumed facts and actual results can be material, depending upon the circumstances. Where, based on assumptions, we or our management express an expectation or belief as to future results, that expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis. We cannot assure you, however, that the stated expectation or belief will occur, be achieved or accomplished. The words “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” and similar expressions will generally identify forward-looking statements. All of our forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any other cautionary statements that may accompany such forward-looking statements. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in forward-looking statements are described in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K under Part I, item 1A, Risk Factors. There have been no material changes in these risk factors since that report.


Omitted from this report pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.


Omitted from this report pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.


Omitted from this report pursuant to the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H to Form 10-Q.


None.








 

The Exhibit Index is hereby incorporated herein by reference and sets forth a list of those exhibits filed herewith.

The agreements included as exhibits to this report are intended to provide information regarding their terms and not to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties to the agreements, including us, solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

·  
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
·  
may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;
·  
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to certain investors; and
·  
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 

 
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
 
     
     
Date:  November 6, 2009
/s/ James C. Yardley
 
 
James C. Yardley
 
 
Chairman of the Board and President
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
     
     
     
Date:  November 6, 2009
/s/ John R. Sult
 
 
John R. Sult
 
 
Senior Vice President,
 
 
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
 
 
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY

EXHIBIT INDEX

Each exhibit identified below is filed as a part of this report.

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
  12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
  31.A
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.B
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.A
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.B
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

18


EX-12 2 exhibit12.htm EXHIBIT 12 exhibit12.htm


          Exhibit 12  
   
   
   
   
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
 
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT FOR RATIO)
 
   
   
For The Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2009
     
2008
 
Earnings
       
    Pre-tax income   $ 159       $ 134  
    Income from equity investee     (8)         (10)  
       Pre-tax income before income from equity investee     151         124  
 
                 
    Fixed charges     120         104  
    Distributed income of equity investee     10         13  
    Allowance for funds used during construction     (2)         (2)  
       Total earnings available for fixed charges   $ 279       $ 239  
                   
Fixed charges                  
    Interest and debt expense   $ 120       104  
                   
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    2.3         2.3  
   
 
 
 
For purposes of computing these ratios, earnings means pre-tax income before:
   
 
- income from equity investee, adjusted to reflect actual distribution from equity investment; and
 
- fixed charges;
                           
less
                                 
 
- allowance for funds used during construction.
                           
                                   
Fixed charges means the sum of the following:
                           
 
- interest costs, not including interests on tax liabilities which is included in income tax expense on our income statement;
                   
 
- amortization of debt costs; and
                           
 
- that portion of rental expense which we believe represents an interest factor, which was not material for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
                   
 
 
 
 
 

EX-31.A 3 exhibit31a.htm EXHIBIT 31.A exhibit31a.htm
 
 
CERTIFICATION
 
I, James C. Yardley, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 
Date:
November 6, 2009


 
     /s/ James C. Yardley
James C. Yardley
Chairman of the Board and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
EX-31.B 4 exhibit31b.htm EXHIBIT 31.B exhibit31b.htm
 
CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Sult, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

(b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.           The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 
Date:
November 6, 2009

 
        /s/ John R. Sult
John R. Sult
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
 
EX-32.A 5 exhibit32a.htm EXHIBIT 32.A exhibit32a.htm
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
       In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James C. Yardley, Chairman of the Board and President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
            /s/ James C. Yardley
James C. Yardley
Chairman of the Board and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
 
 
November 6, 2009
 

 
 
 

 
 
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.B 6 exhibit32b.htm EXHIBIT 32.B exhibit32b.htm
 
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 

 
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 

 
 
 
     /s/ John R. Sult
John R. Sult
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
 
 
 
November 6, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----