XML 40 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Fair value measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair value measurement Fair value measurement Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Under GAAP, there is a three-level
hierarchy of the inputs (i.e., assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability) used to measure fair value. The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the entire fair value measurement.
The levels of inputs within the hierarchy used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 — inputs to the fair value measurement that are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — inputs to the fair value measurement that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 — inputs to the fair value measurement that are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The following tables provide information regarding our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:
Basis of fair value measurement
December 31, 2020(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Investments in marketable securities$12,617 $12,617 $— $— 
Derivative assets21,858 — 21,858 — 
Derivative liabilities35,995 — 35,995 — 
Contingent consideration liabilities36,633 — — 36,633 

Basis of fair value measurement
December 31, 2019(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
Investments in marketable securities$10,926 $10,926 $— $— 
Derivative assets36,492 — 36,492 — 
Derivative liabilities1,387 — 1,387 — 
Contingent consideration liabilities219,908 — — 219,908 
There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities into or out of Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.
Valuation Techniques
Our financial assets valued based upon Level 1 inputs are comprised of investments in marketable securities held in trust, which are available to satisfy benefit obligations under Company benefit plans and other arrangements. The investment assets of the trust are valued using quoted market prices.
Our financial assets and liabilities valued based upon Level 2 inputs are comprised of foreign currency forward contracts and cross-currency interest rate swap agreements. We use foreign currency forward contracts and cross-currency interest rate swap agreements to manage foreign currency transaction exposure as well as exposure to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. We measure the fair value of the foreign currency forward and cross-currency swap agreements by calculating the amount required to enter into offsetting contracts with similar remaining maturities, based on quoted market prices, and taking into account the creditworthiness of the counterparties.
Our financial liabilities valued based upon Level 3 inputs are comprised of contingent consideration arrangements pertaining to our acquisitions.
Contingent consideration
Contingent consideration liabilities, which primarily consist of payment obligations that are contingent upon the achievement of revenue-based goals, but also can be based on other milestones such as regulatory approvals, are remeasured to fair value each reporting period using assumptions including estimated revenues (based on internal operational budgets and long-range strategic plans), discount rates, probability of payment and projected payment dates.
We determine the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities using a Monte Carlo simulation (which involves a simulation of future revenues during the earn-out period using management's best estimates) or discounted cash flow analysis. Increases in projected revenues, estimated cash flows and probabilities of payment may result in significantly higher fair value measurements; decreases in these items may have the opposite effect. Increases in the discount rates in periods prior to payment may result in significantly lower fair value measurements and decreases in the discount rates may have the opposite effect. As of December 31, 2020, the maximum amount we could be required to pay under the contingent consideration arrangements related to the Essential Medical and Z-Medica acquisitions was $91.9 million. See Note 17 for additional information regarding the revenue-based milestone goals related to our acquisition of Essential Medical.
The table below provides additional information regarding the valuation technique and inputs used in determining the fair value of contingent consideration.
Contingent Consideration LiabilityValuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRange (Weighted average)
Milestone-based payment
Discounted cash flowDiscount rate
1.3% - 2.3% (1.5%)
Projected year of payment2021 - 2023
Revenue-based
Monte Carlo simulationRevenue volatility
22.4%
 
 Risk free rateCost of debt structure
Projected year of payment2021 - 2022
Discounted cash flowDiscount rate
6.5% - 10.0% (9.1%)
Projected year of payment2021 - 2029
The following table provides information regarding changes in our contingent consideration liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
20202019
Beginning balance – January 1$219,908 $304,248 
Payments (1)
(146,971)(138,171)
Initial estimate upon acquisition and revaluations(36,714)53,915 
Translation adjustment410 (84)
Ending balance – December 31$36,633 $219,908 
(1) Consists mainly of a $140.6 million payment associated with our acquisition of NeoTract, Inc. ("Neotract") and resulting from the achievement of a revenue-based goal for the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019.