Litigation	9 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]
Legal Matters and Contingencies [Text Block]	Note 14 – Litigation Currently, we are not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of executive officers of our Company, threatened against or affecting our Company, or our common stock in which an adverse decision could have a material effect. The Aeroflex litigation did not result in a favorable outcome for the Company, despite our belief that we committed no wrongdoing. We have paid the $6.6 million judgment in full and there are no outstanding obligations related to the Aeroflex litigation. The jury found no misappropriation of Aeroflex trade secrets but found that the Company tortiously interfered with a prospective business opportunity and awarded damages. The jury also found that TIC tortiously interfered with Aeroflex’s non-disclosure agreements with two former Aeroflex employees, and that the former Aeroflex employees breached their non-disclosure agreements with Aeroflex. Upon appeal, a decision on the case was rendered and released on July 21, 2023, the Kansas Appeals Court rejected each of TIC’s appeal arguments. TIC paid the full judgement amount of $6,559,233 on September 15, 2023, including interest of $1,659,233.

Litigation

9 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2023

Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]

Legal Matters and Contingencies [Text Block]

Note 14 – Litigation

Currently, we are not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of executive officers of our Company, threatened against or affecting our Company, or our common stock in which an adverse decision could have a material effect.

The Aeroflex litigation did not result in a favorable outcome for the Company, despite our belief that we committed no wrongdoing. We have paid the $6.6 million judgment in full and there are no outstanding obligations related to the Aeroflex litigation. The jury found no misappropriation of Aeroflex trade secrets but found that the Company tortiously interfered with a prospective business opportunity and awarded damages. The jury also found that TIC tortiously interfered with Aeroflex’s non-disclosure agreements with two former Aeroflex employees, and that the former Aeroflex employees breached their non-disclosure agreements with Aeroflex. Upon appeal, a decision on the case was rendered and released on July 21, 2023, the Kansas Appeals Court rejected each of TIC’s appeal arguments. TIC paid the full judgement amount of $6,559,233 on September 15, 2023, including interest of $1,659,233.