UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  SCHEDULE 14A

           Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
                      Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ___)

Filed by the Registrant [ ]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement

[ ]  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
     14a-6(e)(2))

[ ]  Definitive Proxy Statement

[X]  Definitive Additional Materials

[ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

                            TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

                               HERRICK FOUNDATION
                      TERENCE C. SEIKEL, ZACHARY E. SAVAS,
             TODD W. HERRICK, KENT B. HERRICK AND MICHAEL INDENBAUM
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.

[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
          pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
          filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     (5)  Total fee paid:

[ ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
     previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
     or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1)  Amount Previously Paid: __________

     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: ___________

     (3)  Filing Party: ___________

     (4)  Date Filed: ___________

The following materials are posted on the website www.TecumsehProxyFight.com on
or after November 7, 2008.


Change Tecumseh's Direction, Get Value Directly to Shareholders

HERRICK FOUNDATION PROXY

Navigation
HOME Q&A TIMELINE ANNOUNCEMENTS KEY GOALS CONTACT

Herrick Foundation is a Michigan nonprofit corporation and shareholder of
Tecumseh Products Company. The Foundation believes that Tecumseh's board of
directors should reassess what we believe is a risky business restructuring
plan. We are fighting to maximize shareholder value.

Downloads

- -    SEC Filings: official Herrick Foundation proxy statement

- -    Letters to Shareholders

- -    Proxy Instructions

Vote Now button (linked to proxyvote.com)

If your shares are held through a bank or a broker please click here to cast
your electronically. If your shares are held in registered name, please contact
the Altman Group toll free at (866) 340-7104



A Message to Tecumseh Shareholders

Vote for Shareholder Value
[Check box]

In an uncertain market and a rapidly changing industry, we believe that the best
use of Tecumseh's cash and other assets is to get value directly to shareholders
by:

- -    Offering to exchange 1.1 Class A shares for each Class B share, ultimately
     resulting in equal voting rights for Class A and increased liquidity for
     Class B;

- -    Distributing excess cash to investors through dividends or open market
     purchases; and

- -    Exploring the sale of all or select assets of the Company.

Vote for [check box]

The Herrick Foundation proposal using the WHITE proxy card before November 21st.

Value in uncertain times.



Q&A-THE SITUATION

WHY IS HERRICK FOUNDATION SOLICITING YOUR PROXY?

We are urgently soliciting your proxy because we desire to change Tecumseh's
direction under its current board and believe it is imperative for Tecumseh's
Board of Directors to take steps to reassess what we believe is a risky business
restructuring plan and, instead, move to maximize shareholder value. We are not
soliciting your proxy in an effort to have the Herricks manage Tecumseh. Todd W.
Herrick has informed Herrick Foundation that he will not reassume director or
officer positions with Tecumseh, Kent B. Herrick has informed Herrick Foundation
that he will not reassume an officer position with Tecumseh, and the proposed
new directors have informed Herrick Foundation that they do not have any current
plans or intentions to replace Mr. Buker, Tecumseh's Chief Executive Officer, or
his new management team. In addition, we support a recapitalization that will
substantially dilute our voting power in Tecumseh.

HOW WILL SHAREHOLDERS BENEFIT FROM THE HERRICK FOUNDATION PLAN?

We believe that the best use of Tecumseh's cash and other assets is to get value
directly to shareholders. We will propose that the reconstituted Board obtain
value for shareholders by simultaneously: (1) implementing an exchange offer to
Class B shareholders in which Tecumseh would offer to exchange 1.1 Class A
common shares for each outstanding Class B common share, ultimately resulting in
only one class of common shares outstanding with equal voting rights and
increased liquidity for Class B shareholders, (2) pursuing using excess cash to
pay dividends to all shareholders, and (3) exploring whether a sale of Tecumseh
as a whole or in parts is desirable to enhance shareholder value. We believe
that Class B shareholders should receive a premium in the exchange offer because
of the surrender of exclusive voting rights. Herrick Foundation desires to elect
directors who are willing to take Tecumseh in this new direction.

WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO SEEK A BUYER FOR THE COMPANY?

Tecumseh Products is a quality company with largely sound management. However,
its remaining business is compressors, and we believe Tecumseh's untested
business restructuring plan and the board's effort to transition a steady,
predictable, mature-market compressor company into a global leader in compressor
manufacturing are risky and will consume available cash that we believe should
be distributed to shareholders. Tecumseh needs new board leadership now.



WHY IS A SPECIAL MEETING NECESSARY?

Shortly before expiration of a Settlement Agreement that required Herrick
Foundation to vote for specified directors, Tecumseh amended its bylaws to
require holders of 75% of the outstanding voting shares (rather than 50%) to
call a special meeting of shareholders, to make it extremely difficult for large
shareholders to call a special meeting. As a result, on June 13, 2008, Herrick
Foundation filed a legal action asking the court, among other things, for an
order of a special meeting to remove and replace two of Tecumseh's directors.
Despite Tecumseh's vigorous efforts to keep us from calling this special
meeting, the court agreed with Herrick Foundation and ordered a special meeting.

This meeting is being held to remove two members of the Board of Directors and
critically review a risky plan to invest free cash in risky business
restructuring. We propose that the Board promptly provide liquidity to Class B
shareholders and voting rights to Class A shareholders, and the potential to
realize value for shareholders through exploration of a sale of Tecumseh and/or
distribution of excess cash.

WHY HAS HERRICK FOUNDATION'S OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE DECREASED RECENTLY?

On September 25, 2008, Tricap Partners II, L.P. (successor to Tricap Partners,
LLC) exercised an option granted by Herrick Foundation that would have expired
in November 2008. Herrick Foundation's sale of stock was not a voluntary sale by
Herrick Foundation. Tricap exercised its option to purchase 500,000 shares of
Class B Stock from Herrick Foundation at $16.00 a share.

Herrick Foundation had granted this option (along with an option to purchase
Class A Stock) to Tricap in November 2006 in part to induce Tricap to make a
$100,000,000 Second Lien Credit Agreement available to Tecumseh at that time.
This Second Lien Credit Agreement provided Tecumseh with significant additional
liquidity, relief from then existing financial covenants and more favorable
terms and replaced a credit agreement that was in default.

Tricap demanded options on Class B Stock and Class A Stock as a condition to
making this loan, and Herrick Foundation and the Herrick family Trusts provided
them. The options to purchase Class A Stock from Herrick Foundation and the
Herrick family Trusts have all been exercised in full. Because the option to
purchase Class B Stock was about to expire and the market price of the Class B
Stock was higher than the exercise price of the option, Tricap has exercised its
option to purchase Class B Stock from Herrick Foundation in full.



Q&A-PROXY INSTRUCTIONS

WHY AM I RECEIVING THIS PROXY STATEMENT?

You are receiving this proxy statement and the accompanying WHITE proxy card
because you own Tecumseh Class B common shares. This proxy statement contains
information related to the solicitation of proxies by Herrick Foundation for use
at the special meeting of Tecumseh shareholders to be held on November 21, 2008
at 10:00 a.m. eastern time, at 3885 Research Park Dr., Ann Arbor, Michigan.

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?

The record date is October 17, 2008. Only holders of Tecumseh's common shares as
of the close of business on October 17, 2008 are entitled to vote. Only holders
of Tecumseh's Class B common shares are entitled to vote on Herrick Foundation's
Proposals 1 and 2. Each Class B common shares is entitled to one vote on each
matter on which it is entitled to vote.

HOW DO I VOTE?

Vote Now button (linked to proxyvote.com)

Brokers and Bankers: To vote your shares electronically NOW, click here.

All others: Sign and date the WHITE proxy card that was mailed to you, and
return it in the prepaid envelope. If you do not mark any selections, your proxy
card will be voted in favor of our proposals and nominees (Proposals 1 and 2).
You have the right to revoke your proxy any time before the meeting by

     -    notifying The Altman Group, our proxy solicitor, or Tecumseh's
          secretary,

     -    voting in person, or

     -    returning a later-dated proxy.

If you return your signed WHITE proxy card, but do not indicate your voting
preferences, Todd W. Herrick or Michael A. Indenbaum will vote FOR our proposals
(Proposals 1 and 2) and FOR our nominees on your behalf.



WHAT SHARES ARE INCLUDED ON THE PROXY CARD AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF I GET MORE
THAN ONE WHITE PROXY CARD?

The number of shares printed on your WHITE proxy card(s) represents all your
Class B shares under a particular registration. Receipt of more than one WHITE
proxy card means that your shares are registered differently and are in more
than one account. Sign and return all WHITE proxy cards to ensure that all your
shares are voted.

WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I RECEIVE A GOLD PROXY CARD FROM TECUMSEH'S BOARD?

You may receive a gold proxy card(s), which is being solicited by the board. We
urge you to discard any gold proxy card or voting instruction forms sent to you
by Tecumseh. If you submit a proxy to us by signing and returning the enclosed
WHITE proxy card, do not sign or return the gold proxy card or follow any voting
instructions provided to you by Tecumseh unless you intend to change your vote,
because only your latest-dated proxy will be counted.

If you have already sent a gold proxy card to Tecumseh, we urge you to revoke it
simply by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card. Only the
latest-dated card returned will be counted. It is therefore very important that
you date your proxy. It is not necessary to contact Tecumseh for your revocation
to be effective.

If you need assistance, please contact The Altman Group, our proxy solicitor, by
telephone at (866) 340-7104.

WHAT CONSTITUTES A QUORUM?

For Proposals 1 and 2, the shareholders present in person or by proxy at the
special meeting and having voting power constitute a quorum for the transaction
of the business at the special meeting described in Proposals 1 and 2.
Abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose
of determining the number of shares present at the special meeting. So long as
one Class B shareholder is present in person or by proxy at the court-ordered
special meeting, a quorum is present for the transaction of business described
in Proposals 1 and 2 at the special meeting. If you submit a properly executed
WHITE proxy card, you will be considered part of the quorum. If you are present
or represented by a proxy at the special meeting and you abstain with respect to
the proposal to remove two directors (Proposal 1), your abstention will have the
same effect as a vote against the proposal.

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF BROKER NON-VOTES?

A broker non-vote occurs when a brokerage firm holding shares for a beneficial
owner does not vote on a particular proposal because it does not have
discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal and has not received
instructions with respect to that



proposal from the beneficial owner (despite voting on at least one other
proposal for which it does have discretionary authority or for which it has
received instructions). Institutions that hold shares in "street name" for
customers have the authority to vote on "routine" proposals when they have not
received instructions from beneficial owners. However, they are precluded from
exercising their voting discretion with respect to the approval of "non-routine"
matters, such as the proposals in this proxy statement, because they are being
opposed by Tecumseh's management. Therefore, brokers will not have discretion to
vote your shares if you hold your shares in "street name" (e.g., through a
brokerage firm) and, unless instructed by their customer, do not send in a proxy
card or voting instructions to vote the shares they hold in "street name."

Broker non-votes will count as votes present for the purpose of determining
whether a quorum is present. Because the removal of directors (Proposal 1)
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Class B shares,
broker non-votes will have the same effect as a negative vote on that proposal.
Broker non-votes are not counted for the purposes of electing directors
(Proposal 2).

WHO CAN ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING?

All Class B shareholders of Tecumseh as of the record date, October 17, 2008,
can attend.

WHO IS TECUMSEH'S LARGEST PRINCIPAL CLASS B SHAREHOLDER?

Herrick Foundation owns 769,426 Class B common shares of Tecumseh, or 15% of the
Class B common shares entitled to vote at the special meeting. In addition, Todd
W. Herrick is one of the trustees of the Trusts and shares voting power with his
sister, Toni L. Herrick, over the 888,113 Class B shares beneficially owned by
the Trusts, or 17.5% of Tecumseh's Class B common shares. Todd W. Herrick also
owns 21,906 Class B shares directly, or 0.4% of Tecumseh's Class B common
shares.

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF CLASS B COMMON SHARES ARE TECUMSEH'S DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING?

Together, they are entitled to vote 8,600 Class B common shares, or
approximately 0.17% of the Class B common shares entitled to vote at the special
meeting.

WHO PAYS FOR HERRICK FOUNDATION'S SOLICITATION EXPENSES?

Herrick Foundation will bear the entire expense of preparing this proxy
statement and the soliciting of proxies (including, without limitation, costs,
if any, related to advertising, printing, fees of attorneys, financial advisors,
solicitors, accountants, public relations, Internet websites, transportation and
litigation). We will ask banks, brokerage houses, and other custodians,
nominees, and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial
owners of Tecumseh Class B shares that these institutions hold. We will
reimburse these institutions for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
Proxies may be



solicited by Herrick Foundation, its trustees, directors, officers, agents or
representatives by phone, fax, e mail, via the Internet, such as postings on
websites, including www.TecumsehProxyFight.com, mail, or personal solicitation.

We have retained The Altman Group to assist us in the solicitation of proxies at
a fee estimated at $45,000, including a base fee, a fee when definitive proxy
materials are mailed and a success fee. We will also reimburse The Altman Group
for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, a set up fee and telephone call fees.
The Altman Group will utilize approximately 25 persons in its solicitation
efforts.

We estimate that our total expenditures relating to the solicitation of proxies
for approval of the proposals at this special meeting will be approximately
$800,000 (including, without limitation, costs, if any, related to advertising,
printing, fees of attorneys, financial advisors, solicitors, accountants, public
relations, transportation, and litigation). Total expenditures to date relating
to these solicitations have been approximately $376,000. We have also incurred
additional costs, not included in these amounts, in connection with the Special
Meeting Lawsuit. If we succeed in removing and replacing Tecumseh directors, we
will seek reimbursement of our expenses from Tecumseh without submitting the
question of reimbursement to a vote of shareholders.



TIMELINE OF EVENTS

FEBRUARY 2007

Herrick Foundation notified Tecumseh that it intended to nominate Todd W.
Herrick and two new directors for election as directors at Tecumseh's 2007
annual meeting of shareholders.

MARCH 1, 2007

Tecumseh Products announced in a press release that the Board of Directors had
voted to expand the Company's Board from five to seven members, effectively
preventing the Foundation from taking control of the board. (Herrick
Foundation's nominees, if elected, would represent a minority of the directors.)

MARCH 6, 2007

Todd W. Herrick and the Herrick Foundation filed a lawsuit against Albert A.
Koch, Peter M. Banks, David M. Risley and Tecumseh in the Lenawee County Circuit
Court.

MARCH 20, 2007

Tecumseh filed a lawsuit against Todd W. Herrick, Kent B. Herrick, Toni Herrick,
Michael Indenbaum and Herrick Foundation in the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

APRIL 2, 2007

Herrick Foundation entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement with Todd W.
Herrick, Kent B. Herrick, Toni L. Herrick, and Michael A. Indenbaum, Tecumseh
and the director defendants settling corporate governance disputes that had been
the subject of the Herrick lawsuit and the Tecumseh lawsuit.

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things:

1    Todd W. Herrick resigned from Tecumseh's board and the board appointed Kent
     B. Herrick to fill the vacancy. Todd W. Herrick became "Chairman Emeritus"
     with the right to attend board meetings and receive materials distributed
     to the board, but with no vote. [He later resigned as "Chairman Emeritus"
     and a consultant effective March 10, 2008.]

2    Effective July 31, 2007, Mr. Koch resigned from the board.



3    Effective August 13, 2007, (a) Edwin L. Buker, William E. Aziz, Steven J.
     Lebowski and, independent of the settlement agreement, Jeffry N. Quinn were
     appointed as new directors of Tecumseh, (b) Edwin L. Buker was appointed
     President and Chief Executive Officer of Tecumseh, and (c) James J.
     Bonsall, also a managing director of AlixPartners, ceased to be Tecumseh's
     interim President and Chief Operating Officer. Todd W. Herrick and the
     other Herrick Entities agreed to exercise their voting rights in a manner
     consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement through the 2008
     annual meeting of shareholders, which was held April 30, 2008.

MARCH 10, 2008

Herrick Foundation sent a letter to Tecumseh's Board of Directors stating that
the Foundation, in the exercise of its fiduciary responsibilities, engaged
Beringea LLC to review and evaluate the Foundation's shareholdings in Tecumseh.
Beringea recommended that the Foundation liquidate its position in Tecumseh
stock in the short term and the Foundation's Board of Directors determined that
it should pursue a sale. The Foundation also stated that it believes it is
possible that Herrick family members and related trusts would also be interested
in liquidating their positions.

Herrick Foundation asked Tecumseh's board to explore the possible sale of
Tecumseh and to take all necessary actions to redeem or terminate the poison
pills, eliminate the Class A Protective Provision and take all other necessary
steps to avoid the application of anti-takeover provisions under applicable law.

MARCH 30, 2008

Tecumseh responded that its Governance and Nominating Committee, on behalf of
the Board, had determined that the proposal to eliminate the Class A Protective
Provision was not in the best interests of Tecumseh and all of its shareholders.

APRIL 4, 2008

A majority of Tecumseh's board amended Tecumseh's bylaws to make it extremely
difficult for large shareholders to call a special meeting. Specifically, the
board raised the percentage of voting shares needed to call a special meeting
from 50% to 75%.

APRIL 16, 2008

Herrick Foundation sent a letter to Tecumseh's board urging the Board to reverse
the bylaw amendment or submit it to a vote of shareholders.



APRIL 24, 2008

Tecumseh responded that its Governance and Nominating Committee had determined
not to recommend that the board redeem or terminate Tecumseh's Class A and Class
B Rights Agreements or take action to avoid application of certain anti-takeover
provisions under applicable law at this time. The letter also indicated that the
board had authorized the Governance Committee to consider potential alternatives
that would facilitate the Herrick Foundation's desire to sell its Class A and
Class B shares in a manner that is in the best interests of Tecumseh and all of
its shareholders. The letter did not agree to reverse the bylaw amendment.

JUNE 13, 2008

Herrick Foundation filed a Verified Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive and
Other Relief against Tecumseh in the Lenawee County Circuit Court, asking the
court, among other things, to order a special meeting to remove and replace two
of Tecumseh's directors.

AUGUST 11, 2008

The Court entered an order requiring Tecumseh to timely call and hold a special
meeting of shareholders on November 21, 2008. The purpose of the meeting shall
be to consider the removal of Peter Banks and David Risley as directors and, to
the extent that removal is approved, the election of directors to fill the
vacancies created by the removal. While the Court did not grant a requested
injunction against the enforcement of an amendment to Tecumseh's bylaws
requiring holders of 75% of the voting shares (rather than 50%) to call a
special meeting of shareholders, the Court has not yet ruled on the validity of
the bylaw amendment.

OCTOBER 17, 2008

Record date for special meeting. Tecumseh has two classes of common shares:
Class B, which has full voting rights, and Class A, which generally has no
voting rights. Nothing on the agenda for this special meeting will require a
vote by Class A shareholders, so only proxies for Class B shareholders are being
solicited.

NOVEMBER 21, 2008

Special meeting of Class B shareholders at 10:00 AM eastern time, at 3885
Research Park Dr., Ann Arbor, Michigan.



ANNOUNCEMENTS
& PRESS RELEASES

Press Release, August 12, 2008

COURT ORDERS SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY

DETROIT, MI, Aug. 12, 2008 -- The Herrick Foundation today announced that Judge
Timothy P. Pickard of the Lenawee County Circuit Court entered an order
requiring Tecumseh Products Company (NASDAQ: TECUA, TECUB) to timely call and
hold a special meeting of shareholders on November 21, 2008. The purpose of the
meeting shall be to consider the removal of Peter Banks and David Risley as
directors and, to the extent that removal is approved, the election of directors
to fill the vacancies created by the removal.

"We are very pleased with Judge Pickard's order that calls for a special meeting
of shareholders of Tecumseh Products Company in November," said Jeff Caponigro,
spokesman for the Herrick Foundation. "We believe the order is consistent with
best governance practices and preserves important shareholder democracy rights
for the good of all shareholders."

The order was in response to a complaint by the Herrick Foundation against
Tecumseh that asked the Court, among other things, to require Tecumseh to hold a
special meeting of shareholders for the purpose of removing Peter Banks and
David Risley from Tecumseh's board of directors and replacing them. Under
applicable Michigan statutes, upon application of holders of at least 10% of the
shares entitled to vote at a meeting, the Circuit Court, for good cause shown,
may order a special meeting of shareholders. Notwithstanding a vigorous
opposition by Tecumseh, the Court advised the parties that it intended to issue
an order requiring a special meeting. The parties, with the direction of the
Court, then agreed upon certain terms and procedures relating to the conduct of
the meeting.

While the Court did not grant a requested injunction against the enforcement of
an amendment to Tecumseh's bylaws requiring holders of 75% of the voting shares
(rather than 50%) to call a special meeting of shareholders, the Court has not
yet ruled on the validity of the bylaw amendment. Importantly, the special
meeting required by the Court's order was Herrick Foundation's primary reason
for filing the lawsuit.

The Herrick Foundation, one of the largest charitable foundations in Michigan,
is a shareholder of Tecumseh Products Company. The Herrick Foundation is based
in Detroit, Mich.



KEY GOALS

The Purpose of the Herrick Foundation's Proxy

WE BELIEVE THAT THE BEST USE OF TECUMSEH'S CASH AND OTHER ASSETS IS TO GET VALUE
DIRECTLY TO SHAREHOLDERS. WE WILL PROPOSE THAT THE RECONSTITUTED BOARD OBTAIN
VALUE FOR SHAREHOLDERS BY SIMULTANEOUSLY:

- -    implementing an exchange offer to Class B shareholders in which Tecumseh
     would offer a premium to exchange Class A Common Shares for each
     outstanding Class B Common Share, ultimately resulting in only one class of
     common shares outstanding with equal voting rights and increased liquidity
     for Class B shareholders.

- -    pursuing using excess cash to pay dividends to all shareholders.

- -    exploring whether a sale of Tecumseh in whole or in parts is desirable to
     enhance shareholder value.

AT A NOVEMBER 21, SPECIAL SHAREHOLDERS MEETING, THE HERRICK FOUNDATION WILL ASK
FOR THE REMOVAL OF TECUMSEH'S DIRECTORS PETER BANKS AND DAVID RISLEY AND TO
ELECT TERENCE C. SEIKEL AND ZACHARY E. SAVAS.

- -    The only two current directors who have served from January 1, 2006 to the
     date of this proxy statement are Peter M. Banks and David M. Risley.

- -    We do not want to remove enough directors to trigger any change in control
     provisions, for example in Tecumseh's financing or compensation
     arrangements.

- -    We chose Peter M. Banks and David M. Risley for removal because they are
     Tecumseh's longest serving directors.

WE DESIRE TO CHANGE TECUMSEH'S DIRECTION UNDER ITS CURRENT BOARD AND BELIEVE IT
IS IMPERATIVE FOR TECUMSEH'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO TAKE STEPS TO REASSESS WHAT
WE BELIEVE IS A RISKY BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING PLAN.

- -    Tecumseh Products reported a decrease in sales for the first and second
     quarters of 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007. (Source: Tecumseh
     Products Form 10-Q filing for period ending March 31, 2008 and June 30,
     2008)

- -    Tecumseh's announced business restructuring plan involves trying to shape
     Tecumseh into a global leader focused on its core compressor business.
     (Source: Tecumseh Products Second Quarter 2008 Press Release)

- -    Worldwide productive capacities exceed global demand. (Source: Tecumseh
     Products Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)

- -    Customers and competitors are establishing new productive capacities in low
     cost countries. (Source: Tecumseh Products Form 10-K for the year ended
     December 31, 2007)



- -    Tecumseh says it has to remove excess capacities and shift productive
     capabilities to low cost countries. (Source: Tecumseh Products Form 10-K
     for the year ended December 31, 2007)

- -    The industry trend is toward the use of scroll compressors, which
     competitors have had for some time, but Tecumseh is in the early stages of
     offering. (Source: Tecumseh Products Form 10-K for the year ended December
     31, 2007)

- -    Competitors may have greater resources. (Source: Tecumseh Products Form
     10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)

- -    The compressor business is subject to currency exchange sale and commodity
     price risks. (Source: Tecumseh Products Form 10-K for the year ended
     December 31, 2007)

- -    Our proposals are intended to afford, you as a shareholder of Tecumseh, the
     opportunity to effect the necessary changes in the direction of Tecumseh to
     enhance shareholder value and preserve assets rather than dissipating
     assets in pursuit of a risky business restructuring plan.



CONTACT

SHAREHOLDER CONTACT: David Eberly, Beringea
Phone: (248) 489-5572
E-mail: deberly@beringea

MEDIA CONTACT: Jeff Caponigro, Caponigro PR, Inc.
Phone: (248) 355-3200
E-mail: jcap@caponigro.com

PROXY ASSISTANCE CONTACT: The Altman Group
Phone (toll free): (866) 340-7104

Online Form for questions and comments:

Name:

E-mail Address:

Phone number:

How many shares do you represent?

Have a Question or Comment?
Submit it Confidentially Here:

Submit button