10-Q 1 j5173_10q.htm 10-Q

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

 

ý

Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarter period ended August 31, 2002

 

OR

 

o

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                  to                    

 

 

Commission file number: 1-7736

 

TAB PRODUCTS CO.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE

 

94-1190862

(State of Incorporation)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

935 Lakeview Parkway, Suite 195

Vernon Hills, IL  60061

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(847) 968-5400

(Registrant’s telephone number - including area code)

 

 

NOT APPLICABLE

Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ý    No  o

 

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  Common shares outstanding as of August 31, 2002 — 5,123,915

 

 



 

 

TAB PRODUCTS CO.

 

INDEX

 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

ITEM 1

 

Financial Statements (Unaudited):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations Three months ended August 31, 2002 and August 31, 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flow Three months ended August 31, 2002 and August 31, 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 2

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 3

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 4

 

Controls and Procedures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 6

 

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signatures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certifications

 

 

 

2



TAB PRODUCTS CO.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(000’s omitted except share and per share data)

 

 

 

August 31,
2002

 

May 31,
2002

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

8,719

 

$

8,836

 

Short-term investments

 

1,799

 

2,313

 

Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $837 and $867

 

15,701

 

15,657

 

Inventories

 

5,130

 

4,667

 

Income tax receivable

 

141

 

2,809

 

Deferred income taxes

 

1,835

 

1,927

 

Prepaid expenses

 

1,841

 

1,144

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

35,166

 

37,353

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $27,004 and $27,927

 

5,833

 

5,975

 

Goodwill, net

 

2,460

 

2,510

 

Deferred income taxes

 

3,818

 

3,798

 

Other assets

 

499

 

513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

47,776

 

$

50,149

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

7,127

 

7,217

 

Compensation payable

 

1,543

 

1,738

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

4,767

 

5,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

13,437

 

14,043

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-current liabilities

 

1,961

 

2,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000 shares, issued — none

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 25,000,000 shares, issued — August 2002 and May 2002 — 7,802,384 shares

 

78

 

78

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

15,662

 

15,662

 

Stock subscription — notes receivable

 

(198

)

(198

)

Retained earnings

 

53,227

 

54,584

 

Treasury stock, August 2002 and May 2002 — 2,678,469 shares

 

(32,452

)

(32,452

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum pension liability

 

(2,920

)

(2,920

)

Translation adjustment

 

(1,019

)

(651

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

32,378

 

34,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

47,776

 

$

50,149

 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

 

3



 

TAB PRODUCTS CO.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(000’s omitted except share and per share data)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
August 31

 

 

 

2002

 

2001

 

Revenues

 

$

22,744

 

$

28,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

14,338

 

17,350

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

10,748

 

12,506

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

25,086

 

29,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of property and equipment

 

(434

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating loss

 

(1,908

)

(1,351

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other, net

 

22

 

121

 

Loss before income taxes

 

(1,886

)

(1,230

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit

 

(529

)

(431

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,357

)

$

(799

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net loss per share

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares used in computing basic net loss per share

 

5,123,915

 

5,196,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted net loss per share

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares used in computing diluted net loss per share

 

5,123,915

 

5,196,470

 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

 

4



 

TAB PRODUCTS CO.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED)

(000’s omitted)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
August 31,

 

 

 

2002

 

2001

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,357

)

$

(799

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from

 

 

 

 

 

     operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

426

 

753

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(116

)

(363

)

Gain on sale of property and equipment

 

(434

)

 

Issuance of common stock to Tax Deferred Savings Plan

 

 

81

 

Other

 

44

 

47

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

(44

)

2,370

 

Inventories

 

(463

)

(85

)

Income tax receivable

 

2,668

 

4,264

 

Deferred income taxes

 

188

 

118

 

Prepaid expenses

 

(697

)

(376

)

Deferred pension asset

 

 

(210

)

Other assets

 

14

 

88

 

Accounts payable

 

(90

)

(1,471

)

Compensation payable

 

(195

)

121

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

(321

)

(1,229

)

Other non-current liabilities

 

(42

)

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

 

(419

)

3,309

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

 

(618

)

(218

)

Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment

 

774

 

 

Purchases of short-term investments

 

(264

)

 

Sales of short-term investments

 

778

 

816

 

Net cash flows from investing activities

 

670

 

598

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(368

)

56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(117

)

3,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

8,836

 

5,872

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

8,719

 

$

9,835

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

1

 

$

1

 

Income taxes, net of refunds received

 

$

(2,909

)

$

(4,107

)

 

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

 

5



TAB PRODUCTS CO.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

1.        Basis of Presentation

 

On July 29, 2002, the Company announced that it had entered into a Merger Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2002, which sets forth the terms and conditions of the proposed acquisition of the Company by T Acquisition Co. and T Acquisition L.P., affiliates of HS Morgan Limited Partnership.  Under the Merger Agreement, T Acquisition Co. will be merged with and into the Company (the “Merger”).  The Merger Agreement provides that the stockholders of the Company will receive $5.85 in cash for each share of common stock of the Company.  The Merger is subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company and the satisfaction of certain other closing conditions.  The stockholders’ meeting to vote on the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement and the Merger is scheduled to be held on October 22, 2002.  If the Company’s stockholders approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the Merger, it is expected that the Merger will be completed as soon as practicable after the stockholders’ meeting.

            The Company’s unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with  accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.  These unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002.  The results of operations for the three-month period ended August 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the entire fiscal year ending May 31, 2003.  The May 31, 2002 balance sheet was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Certain reclassifications have been made to the first quarter of fiscal 2002 financial statements to conform to the first quarter of fiscal 2003 presentation.

 

2.             Inventory

 

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

August 31,
2002

 

May 31,
2002

 

Raw materials

 

$

3,200

 

$

2,867

 

Work in process

 

113

 

348

 

Finished goods

 

2,062

 

1,697

 

LIFO Reserve

 

(245

)

(245

)

 

 

$

5,130

 

$

4,667

 

 

3.             Segment Reporting

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or chief decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.  The Chief Executive Officer is the Company’s chief decision maker. The Company operates and is managed internally by four geographic operating segments. The operating segments are the United States, Canada, the Netherlands and Australia. Outside the United States, each operating segment has a general manager that reports to the Vice President, International, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer.  Within the United States, the individuals responsible for operations, marketing and sales report directly to the Chief Executive Officer.

 

6



 

Information about segments (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
August 31,

 

 

 

2002

 

2001

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

    United States

 

$

17,503

 

$

22,944

 

    Canada

 

4,021

 

4,598

 

    Netherlands

 

931

 

691

 

    Australia

 

793

 

1,072

 

    Elimination of intersegment revenue

 

(504

)

(800

)

    Consolidated Total

 

$

22,744

 

$

28,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

    United States

 

$

(1,985

)

$

(1,558

)

    Canada

 

(31

)

145

 

    Netherlands

 

108

 

156

 

    Australia

 

22

 

27

 

    Consolidated Total

 

$

(1,886

)

$

(1,230

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

    United States

 

$

359

 

$

645

 

    Canada

 

45

 

84

 

    Netherlands

 

13

 

13

 

    Australia

 

9

 

11

 

    Consolidated Total

 

$

426

 

$

753

 

 

                         

 

 

August 31, 2002

 

May 31, 2002

 

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

    United States

 

$

5,226

 

$

5,357

 

    Canada

 

278

 

304

 

    Netherlands

 

134

 

110

 

    Australia

 

195

 

204

 

    Consolidated Total

 

$

5,833

 

$

5,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets:

 

 

 

 

 

    United States

 

$

42,678

 

$

44,402

 

    Canada

 

7,580

 

7,799

 

    Netherlands

 

6,460

 

6,282

 

    Australia

 

1,373

 

1,449

 

    Elimination of intersegment loans

 

(4,818

)

(3,976

)

    Elimination of intersegment investments

 

(4,172

)

(4,179

)

    Elimination of intersegment receivables and other

 

(1,325

)

(1,628

)

    Consolidated Total

 

$

47,776

 

$

50,149

 

 

 

Geographic revenues are based on the country from which customers are invoiced.

 

 

7



 

4.             Comprehensive Loss

 

The components of comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

August 31,

 

 

 

2002

 

2001

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,357

)

$

(799

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(368

)

56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(1,725

)

$

(743

)

 

 

5.             Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” which addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition.  SFAS No. 142 provides that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized and that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will rather be tested at least annually for impairment.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on June 1, 2002 and stopped the amortization of goodwill that resulted from business combinations initiated prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 141.  The Company would have incurred $38,000 of goodwill amortization in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 if SFAS No. 142 had not been adopted.  The Company evaluated goodwill under the SFAS No. 142 transitional impairment test and determined that there was no impairment loss.

 

The Company adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” effective June 1, 2002.  SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.  SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion).  The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have an effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

 

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”.  SFAS No. 146 requires the Company to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan.  SFAS No. 146 will affect only the timing of the recognition of future restructuring costs and is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.  The Company will adopt SFAS No. 146 for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

 

6.             Commitments and Contingencies

 

The Company has been involved from time to time in various litigation and product liability matters arising in the ordinary course of business.  Although the final outcome of any unresolved matters cannot be determined, it is management’s opinion that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

This report, including without limitation the following section regarding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding the Company and its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.   Words such as “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “forecasts,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “projections,” “believes,” “seeks,”

 

8



“foreseeable,” “break-even,” “estimates,” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  Additionally, statements concerning future matters such as the development of new products, enhancements or technologies, possible changes in legislation and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements.

 

Although forward-looking statements in this report reflect the good faith judgment of the Company’s management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by the Company.  Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation those discussed in “Business Environment and Risk Factors” as well as those discussed elsewhere in this report.  Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.  Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company in this report, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.  The Company is not under any obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) to update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of the Company.

 

Financial Condition

 

                At August 31, 2002, the Company had cash and short-term investments of $10.5 million, a decrease of $0.6 million from the $11.1 million at May 31, 2002.  The Company’s working capital position at August 31, 2002 was $21.7 million as compared with $23.3 million at May 31, 2002.  The current ratio of 2.6 at August 31, 2002 was lower than the current ratio of 2.7 reported for May 31, 2002.  A $2.8 million income tax refund received during the first quarter and $0.8 million received from the sale of the Lomira facility were more than offset by the $1.9 million operating loss, a $0.7 million increase in prepaid expenses, a $0.6 million reduction in current liabilities, a $0.5 million increase in inventories and capital expenditures of $0.6 million.  The decrease in working capital is primarily due to the net loss of $1.4 million and capital expenditures of $0.6 million.

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, net cash required by operating activities was $0.4 million, versus net cash provided by operations of  $3.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, a decrease in cash from operations of $3.7 million quarter over quarter.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company invested approximately $0.6 million in property, plant and equipment, which primarily represented investments in manufacturing production equipment and a new paint line installed at the Mayville, Wisconsin facility due to the sale of the Lomira, Wisconsin facility.  Capital expenditures for fiscal 2003 of approximately $1.5 million will consist primarily of those investments mentioned above and manufacturing equipment and management information systems.

 

At August 31, 2002 and May 31, 2002, the Company had no outstanding debt.  The Company currently has a $5 million secured line of credit with a bank.  The line of credit contains covenants related to cash flow and tangible effective net worth that the Company must maintain.  The Company was not in compliance with the tangible effective net worth covenant at August 31, 2002The Company received a waiver of the covenant violation from the bank on October 2, 2002.  The Company does not anticipate the need to utilize the line of credit prior to its expiration on October 31, 2002, and will evaluate whether to renew it in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

 

The Company believes that its current cash, future cash flows and potential borrowing capacity will provide sufficient working capital for at least the next twelve months.

 

Results of Operations

 

Revenues — Total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 of $22.7 million were $5.8 million or 20.2% lower than the $28.5 million of revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.  Of the $5.8 million decrease in revenues, $5.3 million was due to a decline in all product lines within the U.S except for imaging services which had a 9% increase in revenues.  The Company believes that this decline was due to reduced volume and longer customer decision lead times largely as a result of the economic downturn that impacted the Company in the latter part of fiscal 2002 and the uncertainty regarding the future ownership of the Company.  In addition, the Company experienced revenue declines in Canada of $0.4 million

 

9



as a result of cutbacks by customers in technology spending and world economic events.  Australia revenues declined $0.3 million while revenues from Europe increased $0.2 million.

Cost of Revenues — Cost of revenues, as a percentage of revenues, for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and 2002 were 63.0% and 60.9%, respectively.   The percentage increase in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 from the first quarter of fiscal 2002 was due primarily to a decrease in manufacturing efficiencies due to lower than planned volume. The cost reduction programs implemented throughout fiscal 2002 partially offset the first quarter of fiscal 2003 increase in cost of revenue percentage.    In addition, there were significant improvements in the cost structure of the imaging services operation, which improved from a negative 2.6% gross margin to a positive 20.7% gross margin.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense — Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and 2002 were 47.3% and 43.9%, respectively.  Total operating expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 were $10.7 million, a decrease of $1.8 million as compared to total operating expenses of $12.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.  The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to lower salaries, wages, benefits and travel due to lower headcount, lower commissions associated with the reduced revenues from the first quarter of fiscal 2002, a reduction in sales meeting costs, decreased bad debt expense as a result of improved collection efforts, and lower depreciation and amortization costs due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated in fiscal 2002 and to the cessation of goodwill amortization effective June 1, 2002.

First quarter of fiscal 2003 selling, general and administrative expenses included $0.7 million associated with the exploration of strategic alternatives process, primarily financial advisor and attorneys’ fees.   First quarter of fiscal 2002 selling, general and administrative expenses included $0.4 million of costs related to the fiscal 2002 proxy contest.

        Gain on Sale  — Gain on sale of property in first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $0.4 million.  On August 16, 2002 the Company completed the sale of its Lomira, Wisconsin manufacturing facility for a gross sales price of $0.8 million, resulting in a gain of $0.4 million.  Operations previously conducted at the Lomira facility have been transferred to the Company’s main plant in Mayville, Wisconsin.

Interest and other, net — Interest and other, net was $22,000 income for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and $121,000 income for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.  Gross interest income was $44,000 and $89,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively.  The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower interest rates on the Company’s cash balances.  The remaining expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and the remaining income for the first quarter of fiscal 2002 included foreign currency transaction and exchange gains and losses and other miscellaneous expenses.

Income Taxes — Income tax benefit, as a percentage of pre-tax loss, for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was 28.0%, an improvement of 7.0 percentage points as compared to the effective tax rate of 35.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.  The change in the effective tax rate was primarily due to a limitation on loss carry-forwards for federal and certain state income taxes.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” which addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition.  SFAS No. 142 provides that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized and that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will rather be tested at least annually for impairment.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on June 1, 2002 and stopped the amortization of goodwill that resulted from business combinations initiated prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 141.  The Company would have incurred $38,000 of goodwill amortization in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 if SFAS No. 142 had not been adopted.  The Company evaluated goodwill under the SFAS No. 142 transitional impairment test and determined that there was no impairment loss.

 

The Company adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” effective June 1, 2002.  SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.  SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion).  The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have an effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

 

10



 

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”.  SFAS No. 146 requires the Company to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan.  SFAS No. 146 will affect only the timing of the recognition of future restructuring costs and is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.  The Company will adopt SFAS No. 146 for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

 

Business Environment And Risk Factors

The Company’s future operating results may be affected by various trends and factors, which we must successfully manage in order to achieve favorable operating results. In addition, there are trends and factors beyond our control, which affect our operations.  Such trends and factors include, but are not limited to, possible adverse changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the specific markets for our products, governmental regulation, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, force majeure, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

Failure to manage expenses in alignment with revenues could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.  We have implemented cost reduction programs in fiscal 2002 and these efforts continue in fiscal 2003.  If these programs do not prove to be sufficient or if we fail to take additional actions that may become necessary to align future expenses with future revenue levels, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted.

The continued effects of the general state of the world economy could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.  The downturn in world economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.  Our experience indicates that our industry lags general business trends.  Therefore, the timing of a recovery for the Company is also uncertain.

An accelerated move to digital technology by our customers could weaken demand for our products and services.  Although the use of paper by business has continued to increase, the use of digital records by large document-intensive industries may accelerate.  This could weaken the demand for our paper-based supplies and storage products.  If we fail to respond with new digital products and services to such a potential market change, our revenues, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be adversely affected.

The impact of the recent terrorist attacks in the United States may have both short-term and long-term adverse effects on our revenues, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.   While it is likely that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 have had an immediate impact on our business as a result of business disruption generally, including transportation disruption, deferral of customer purchasing decisions and supply chain disruption, the long-term effects are not known at this time.

 

We may not be able to achieve higher market penetration for sales of large document management solution projects.  Although from fiscal 2001 onward we have focused our selling efforts on obtaining a balanced mix of orders of varying sizes and types, large projects may be important to achieving revenue growth.  While the Company does not know of a single large competitor with the capability to handle these large projects, if we fail to achieve significant market penetration for such projects, revenue growth may be limited and our results of operations may be adversely impacted.

If we cannot attract or retain key qualified personnel, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely impactedOur future performance depends in significant part upon attracting and retaining key management, sales, manufacturing, marketing and technical support personnel.  The inability to attract, assimilate or retain highly qualified personnel in the future on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The ongoing strategic alternatives evaluation process could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  In October 2001, the Company announced that it would explore strategic alternatives for maximizing stockholder value.  As of July 29, 2002, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with T Acquisition Co. and T Acquisition L.P., affiliates of HS Morgan Limited Partnership pursuant to which T Acquisition Co. will merge with and into the Company.  This activity and announcement could cause uncertainty with our employees including management, sales and other personnel.  It may also have a negative impact on our customers and suppliers.  The impact of these uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

11



 

Failure to consummate the proposed merger with T Acquisition Co. could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  If the Company fails to consummate the Merger and subsequently accepts an offer for a competing alternative strategic transaction, the Company may be required to pay a break fee to T Acquisition Co. and T Acquisition L.P. under the terms of the Merger Agreement.  In addition, the failure to consummate the Merger could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our operating results may fluctuate from period to period.  Factors affecting our operating results and gross margins include the volume of product sales, competitive pricing pressures, the ability to match supply with demand, changes in product and customer mix, changes in the channels through which our products and services are distributed, timing of new product announcements and introductions by us and our competitors, fluctuations in product costs, variations in manufacturing cycle times, fluctuations in manufacturing utilization, our ability to achieve manufacturing volumes with our new and existing products, exchange rate fluctuations, a change in our effective tax rate and changes in general economic conditions.  All of these factors are difficult to forecast and these or other factors can materially affect our quarterly or annual operating results.

Our liquidity could be adversely impacted by unexpected events.  Although we believe that we have sufficient cash on hand and expected cash from operations to satisfy our working capital needs for at least the next twelve months, any significant unexpected cash requirements could adversely impact our liquidity.  In those circumstances, we may be required to seek third party financing and we cannot be certain that financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all.  Factors affecting our cash flows include net losses, the timely collection of accounts receivable from customers, the willingness of suppliers to extend normal credit terms, the purchase and sale of assets and the willingness of financial institutions to lend to us.  Although our projections of these factors indicate that our operational cash flows, together with our existing cash and cash equivalent balances and our borrowing capacity will adequately finance anticipated operations and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months, investors are cautioned that such projections inherently involve risks and uncertainties.

 

Failure to obtain sufficient quantities of critical components could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.  We purchase several critical components from single or sole source vendors for which alternative sources are not currently in place.  We do not maintain long-term supply agreements with any of these vendors.  Development of alternative supply sources would require a significant amount of time to qualify in the case of certain of our components.    The inability to develop alternative sources for these single or sole source components or to obtain sufficient quantities of these components could result in delays or reductions in product shipments, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to achieve planned manufacturing volumes could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.  There can be no assurance that our manufacturing facilities will achieve or maintain acceptable manufacturing volumes in the future.  The inability to achieve planned volumes from our manufacturing facilities could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  Any problems experienced by us in our current or future transitions to new processes and products or the consolidation of manufacturing operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Sales to the U.S. Government may result in fluctuations due to their budget constraints and new initiatives.

Government revenues primarily expose us to risks from reductions in budget allocations to support regulation and administrative offices.  The government may periodically undertake initiatives that create opportunities to help agencies streamline workflow processes, reduce paperwork and increase customer service, which may provide short-term opportunities for us.  However, the long-term effect of a government initiative to streamline processes could eventually have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Unfavorable intellectual property developments could adversely impact our business and results of operations.  We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights.  We have been notified in the past and may be notified in the future of claims that they may be infringing upon patents or other intellectual property rights owned by third parties.  There can be no assurance that in the future any patents held by us will not be invalidated, that patents will be issued for any of our pending applications or that any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will be of sufficient scope or strength or be issued in the primary countries where our products can be sold to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to us.  Additionally, our competitors may be able to design around our patents.

 

A negative impact to our international operations could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.  International sales accounted for approximately 25% and 22%, respectively, of our consolidated

 

12



 

total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and 2002.  Fluctuations in currencies could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future.  Because sales of our products have been denominated to date primarily in United States dollars, increases in the value of the United States dollar could increase the price of our products so that they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency of a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in that country.  We are subject to the risks of conducting business internationally, including foreign government regulation and general geopolitical risks such as political and economic instability, potential hostilities and changes in diplomatic and trade relationships.  Manufacturing and sales of our products may also be materially adversely affected by factors such as unexpected changes in, or imposition of, regulatory requirements, tariffs, import and export restrictions and other barriers and restrictions, longer payment cycles, greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection, potentially adverse tax consequences, the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws and other factors beyond our control.  In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries in which our products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold, may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States and thus make piracy of our products a more likely possibility.  There can be no assurance that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in interest rates and in foreign currency exchange rates.

The Company’s exposure to market risk due to fluctuations in interest rates relates primarily to its short-term investment portfolio, which consists of corporate debt securities, which are classified as available-for-sale and were reported at an aggregate fair value of $1.8 million as of August 31, 2002.  These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate risk inasmuch as their fair value will fall, if market interest rates increase.  If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10% from the levels prevailing at August 31, 2002, the fair value of the portfolio would not decline by a material amount.  The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to mitigate the risks inherent in these securities.  However, the Company does attempt to reduce such risks by typically limiting the maturity date of such securities to no more than nine months, placing its investments with high credit quality issuers and limiting the amount of credit exposure with any one issuer.  In addition, the Company believes that it currently has the ability to hold these investments until maturity, and therefore, believes that reductions in the value of such securities attributable to short-term fluctuations in interest rates would not materially affect the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

The Company’s exposure to market risk due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relates primarily to the intercompany receivable balance with its Netherlands subsidiary.  Such intercompany receivable balance at August 31, 2002 was $28,000; therefore, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in Euro against U.S. dollars would not result in a material foreign exchange loss.  Although the Company transacts business with various foreign countries, settlement amounts are usually based on local currency.  Transaction gains or losses have not been significant in the past and there is no hedging activity on Euro or other currencies.  Consequently, the Company does not expect that reductions in the value of such intercompany receivable balances or of other accounts denominated in foreign currencies resulting from even a sudden or significant fluctuation in foreign exchange rates, would have a direct material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In January 1999, certain member countries of the European Union established permanent, fixed conversion rates between their existing currencies and the European Union’s common currency (the Euro). The transition period for conversion to the Euro was January 1, 1999 through January 1, 2002, at which time all legal tender within the participating member countries converted to the Euro.  The timing of phasing out all uses of existing currencies will comply with the legal requirements and also be scheduled to facilitate optimal coordination with the plans of our vendors, distributors and customers. Work related to the introduction of the Euro and the phasing out of the other currencies includes converting information technology systems; recalculating currency risk; and taking action, if needed, regarding continuity of contracts; and modifying our processes for preparing tax, accounting, payroll and customer records.  The introduction of the Euro and the phasing out of the other currencies did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Notwithstanding the foregoing analysis of the direct effects of interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the value of certain of the Company’s investments and accounts, the indirect effects of such fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.  For example, international demand for the Company’s products could be affected by foreign currency exchange rates.  In

 

13



 

addition, interest rate fluctuations may affect the buying patterns of the Company’s customers.  Furthermore, interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations have broad influence on the general condition of the U.S., foreign and global economies, which could materially and adversely affect the Company.

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

                The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer have concluded, based on an evaluation within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for gathering, analyzing and disclosing information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the foregoing evaluation.

 

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a)     Exhibits.

 

99.1       Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

(b)     Reports on Form 8-K.

 

The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 29, 2002 in which it reported in Item 5 that as of July 29, 2002, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with T Acquisition L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and T Acquisition Co., a Delaware corporation and that immediately prior to the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement dated as of July 29, 2002, between the Company and Mellon Investor Services LLC (f/k/a ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, LLC).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14



 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

TAB PRODUCTS CO.

 

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

Date:   October 11, 2002

/s/ Donald J. Hotz

 

 

Donald J. Hotz,

 

 

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:   October 11, 2002

/s/ Robert J. Crecca

 

 

Robert J. Crecca

 

 

Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Asst. Secretary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15



 

CERTIFICATION

I, Gary W. Ampulski, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tab Products Co.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 11, 2002

 

 

/s/ Gary W. Ampulski

 

Gary W. Ampulski

President & CEO

 

 

 

16



 

                CERTIFICATION

 

I, Donald J. Hotz, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tab Products Co.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 11, 2002

 

 

  /s/ Donald J. Hotz

 

Donald J. Hotz

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer &
Treasurer

 

 

17