PREC14A 1 e619389_prec14a-siii.htm

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

 

Information Required in Proxy Statement

 

Schedule 14a Information

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

(Amendment No. )

 

Filed by the Registrant ¨

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ý

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

ýPreliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

¨Definitive Proxy Statement

 

¨Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

 

SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 

D.C. Capital Partners, l.p.

D.C. Capital advisors, limited

D.C.R. Partners, l.p.

douglas l. dethy

raynard d. benvenuti

(Name of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

ýNo fee required.

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

(5)Total fee paid:

 

 

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

 

 

 

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

 

(1)Amount previously paid:

 

 

 

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

(3)Filing Party:

 

 

 

(4)Date Filed:

 

 

 

  

PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2020

D.C. CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

___________________, 2020

 

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

 

D.C. Capital Partners, L.P. and the other participants in this solicitation (collectively, “D.C. Capital”, “we” or “our”) are the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 1,232,500 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), of Superior Industries International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SUP” or the “Company”), representing approximately 4.9% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. We believe strongly that there is significant value for stockholders to be recovered at SUP. However, given the Company’s prolonged operating and stock price underperformance, and based on D.C. Capital’s extended period of interaction with SUP, we also believe strongly that recovery requires the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), under the Chairmanship of Mr. Timothy McQuay, to be refreshed, as soon as possible, with new, independent and objective perspectives.

 

We are seeking your support for the election of our nominee to the Board at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders scheduled to be held at [_______________], on [_____, _______, 2020] at [_:__ _.m., EDT] (including any adjournments or postponements thereof and any meeting which may be called in lieu thereof, the “Annual Meeting”). We are seeking representation on the Board because we believe that the Board will benefit from the addition of a new independent director with relevant skill sets and a shared objective of accelerating the recovery of value for the benefit of all SUP stockholders. The individual that we have nominated is highly-qualified, capable and ready to serve the stockholders of SUP.

 

The Board is currently composed of nine (9) directors, all of whom are up for election at the Annual Meeting. Through the attached Proxy Statement, we are soliciting proxies to elect not only our one (1) nominee, but also the candidates who have been nominated by the Company other than [_____]. This gives stockholders who wish to vote for our nominee the ability to vote for a full slate of nine (9) nominees in total. The names, backgrounds and qualifications of the Company’s nominees, and other information about them, can be found in the Company’s proxy statement. Your vote to elect our nominee will have the legal effect of replacing one incumbent director with our nominee. If elected, our nominee will constitute a minority on the Board and there can be no guarantee that our nominee will be able to implement the actions that he believes are necessary to unlock stockholder value. However, we believe the election of our nominee will be a catalyst to change the boardroom dynamics that have hampered SUP’s progress.

 

[We are aware that GAMCO Assets Management Inc. (“GAMCO”) has notified the Company of its intention to nominate one nominee for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting (the “GAMCO Nominee”). Neither this proxy statement nor the enclosed WHITE proxy card is soliciting votes to elect the GAMCO Nominee. We make no recommendation with respect to the GAMCO Nominee.]

  

We urge you to carefully consider the information contained in the attached Proxy Statement and then support our efforts by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card today. The attached Proxy Statement and the enclosed WHITE proxy card are first being furnished to the stockholders on or about ____________, 2020.

 

You can only vote for our Nominee on our WHITE proxy card. Since only your latest dated proxy card will count, we urge you not to return any proxy card you receive from the Company [or GAMCO]. Even if you return the management proxy card [or GAMCO’s proxy card] marked “withhold” as a protest against the incumbent directors, it will revoke any proxy card you may have previously sent to us. Please make certain that the latest dated proxy card you return is the WHITE proxy card. If you have already voted for the incumbent management slate [or on GAMCO’s proxy card], you have every right to change your vote by signing, dating and returning a later dated WHITE proxy card or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

 

 

If you have any questions or require any assistance with your vote, please contact Saratoga Proxy Consulting LLC, which is assisting us, at its address and toll-free numbers listed below.

 

 

Thank you for your support,

/s/ Douglas L. Dethy

 

Douglas L. Dethy
D.C. Capital Partners, L.P.

 

 

If you have any questions, require assistance in voting your WHITE proxy card,

or need additional copies of D.C. Capital’s proxy materials,

please contact:

 

 

Stockholders call toll free at (888) 368-0379

Email: info@saratogaproxy.com

 

 

 

PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2020

2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF
SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

_________________________

PROXY STATEMENT
OF
D.C. CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

_________________________

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD TODAY

 

D.C. Capital Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“D.C. Capital Partners”), and the other participants in this solicitation (collectively, “D.C. Capital”, “we” or “our”) are significant stockholders of Superior Industries International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SUP”, “Superior” or the “Company”), who collectively beneficially own an aggregate of 1,232,500 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), of the Company, representing approximately 4.9% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. We believe that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) needs to be reconstituted with new independent directors who have strong, relevant backgrounds and who are committed to fully exploring all opportunities to unlock stockholder value. We are seeking your support at the annual meeting of stockholders scheduled to be held at [_______________], on [_____, _______, 2020] at [_:__ _.m., EDT] (including any adjournments or postponements thereof and any meeting which may be called in lieu thereof, the “Annual Meeting”), for the following:

  

1.To elect D.C. Capital’s director nominee, Raynard D. Benvenuti (the “Nominee”), to hold office until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2021 Annual Meeting”) and until his successor has been duly elected and qualified;

 

2. To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the executive compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

 

3. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and

 

4.To act upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof.

 

The Board is currently composed of nine (9) directors, all of whom are up for election at the Annual Meeting. Through this Proxy Statement, we are soliciting proxies to elect not only our Nominee, but also the candidates who have been nominated by the Company other than [_____]. This gives stockholders who wish to vote for our Nominee the ability to vote for a full slate of nine (9) nominees in total. The names, backgrounds and qualifications of the Company’s nominees, and other information about them, can be found in the Company’s proxy statement. Your vote to elect our Nominee will have the legal effect of replacing one incumbent director with our Nominee. If elected, our Nominee will constitute a minority on the Board and there can be no guarantee that our Nominee will be able to implement the actions that he believes are necessary to unlock stockholder value. However, we believe the election of our Nominee will be a catalyst to change the boardroom dynamics that have hampered SUP’s progress.

  

 

[We are aware that GAMCO Assets Management Inc. (“GAMCO”) has notified the Company of its intention to nominate one nominee for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting (the “GAMCO Nominee”). Neither this proxy statement nor the enclosed WHITE proxy card is soliciting votes to elect the GAMCO Nominee. We make no recommendation with respect to the GAMCO Nominee.]

 

As of the date hereof, D.C. Capital Partners, together with D.C.R. Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“D.C. GP”), D.C. Capital Advisors, Limited, a Delaware limited company (“D.C. Capital Advisors”), Douglas L. Dethy (together with D.C. Capital Partners, D.C. GP and D.C. Capital Advisors, the “D.C. Capital Group”) and the Nominee (each, a “Participant”, and together, the “Participants”) collectively beneficially own 1,232,500 shares of Common Stock. The participants intend to vote their shares FOR the election of the Nominee, [______] the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation, and FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, as described herein.

 

The Company has set the close of business on [______], 2020 as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”). The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is 26600 Telegraph Rd., Southfield, MI 48033. Stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. According to the Company, as of the Record Date, there were [_______] shares of Common Stock outstanding and [___] shares of Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock” and, together with the Common Stock, the “Shares”) who are entitled to one vote on each matter for each share of Common Stock held, or into which such holder’s Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, on the Record Date.

 

We urge you to carefully consider the information contained in the Proxy Statement and then support our efforts by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card today. The Proxy Statement and the enclosed WHITE proxy card are first being furnished to the stockholders on or about ____________, 2020.

 

THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING MADE BY D.C. CAPITAL AND NOT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OR MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY. WE ARE NOT AWARE OF ANY OTHER MATTERS TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. SHOULD OTHER MATTERS, WHICH D.C. CAPITAL IS NOT AWARE OF A REASONABLE TIME BEFORE THIS SOLICITATION, BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING, THE PERSONS NAMED AS PROXIES IN THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD WILL VOTE ON SUCH MATTERS IN THEIR DISCRETION.

 

D.C. CAPITAL URGES YOU TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE WHITE PROXY CARD IN FAVOR OF THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEE.

 

IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SENT A PROXY CARD FURNISHED BY COMPANY MANAGEMENT [OR GAMCO], YOU MAY REVOKE THAT PROXY AND VOTE ON EACH OF THE PROPOSALS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD. THE LATEST DATED PROXY IS THE ONLY ONE THAT COUNTS. ANY PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL MEETING BY DELIVERING A WRITTEN NOTICE OF REVOCATION OR A LATER DATED PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OR BY VOTING IN PERSON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.

 

2

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting

 

This Proxy Statement and our WHITE proxy card are available at

 

[______________________________]

 

3

 

IMPORTANT

 

Your vote is important, no matter how few Shares you own. D.C. Capital urges you to sign, date, and return the enclosed WHITE proxy card today to vote FOR the election of the Nominee and in accordance with D.C. Capital’s recommendations on the other proposals on the agenda for the Annual Meeting.

 

·If your Shares are registered in your own name, please sign and date the enclosed WHITE proxy card and return it to D.C. Capital, c/o Saratoga Proxy Consulting LLC (“Saratoga”), in the enclosed postage-paid envelope today.

 

·If your Shares are held in a brokerage account or bank, you are considered the beneficial owner of the Shares, and these proxy materials, together with a WHITE voting instruction form, are being forwarded to you by your broker or bank. As a beneficial owner, you must instruct your broker, trustee or other representative how to vote. Your broker cannot vote your Shares on your behalf without your instructions.

 

·Depending upon your broker or custodian, you may be able to vote either by toll-free telephone or by the Internet. Please refer to the enclosed voting form for instructions on how to vote electronically. You may also vote by signing, dating and returning the enclosed voting form.

 

Since only your latest dated proxy card will count, we urge you not to return any proxy card you receive from the Company [or GAMCO]. Even if you return the management proxy card [or GAMCO’s proxy card] marked “withhold” as a protest against the incumbent directors, it will revoke any proxy card you may have previously sent to us. Remember, you can vote for our Nominee only on our WHITE proxy card. So please make certain that the latest dated proxy card you return is the WHITE proxy card.

 

If you have any questions, require assistance in voting your WHITE proxy card,

or need additional copies of D.C. Capital’s proxy materials,

please contact:

 

 

Stockholders call toll free at (888) 368-0379

Email: info@saratogaproxy.com

 

 

4

 

Background to the Solicitation

 

Below is a description of the material events leading up to this solicitation:

 

·On October 23, 2017, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti met with Donald Stebbins, then the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, as well as other members of the Company’s management team, at the Company’s headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, to discuss the Company’s operational results in Mexico, the Company’s debt following its acquisition of Uniwheels AG (“Uniwheels”) in May 2017 (the “Uniwheels Acquisition”) and future synergies anticipated from the acquisition.

 

·On November 1, 2017, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Vice President of Corporate Finance, Troy Ford. During the call, the parties further discussed the topics covered during their October 23, 2017 meeting.

 

·On November 29, 2017, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. Ford following the Company’s third quarter 2017 earnings call. During the call, D.C. Capital proposed a possible investment into Superior to help deleverage the Company following the Uniwheels Acquisition.

 

·Also on November 29, 2017, Mr. Dethy sent Mr. Ford an email to confirm Mr. Dethy’s upcoming visit to certain of the Company’s facilities in Mexico in order to conduct due diligence. The email also included a draft term sheet for D.C. Capital’s potential investment in the Company to fund identified initiatives to accelerate revenue growth or operating improvements.

 

·On February 1, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. Ford in order to finalize the preparations for Mr. Dethy’s due diligence trip to certain of the Company’s facilities in Mexico.

 

·On February 12, 2018, Mr. Dethy and a consultant hired by D.C. Capital visited three of the Company’s facilities in Mexico in order for the consultant to review the Company’s Mexico manufacturing operations. The consultant’s report was subsequently shared with the Company.

 

·On April 9, 2018, Messrs. Dethy, Benvenuti and the consultant had a telephone conversation with Mr. Ford and Robert Tykal, the Company’s Senior Vice President of Operations, North America, to discuss the consultant’s review of the Mexican operations.

 

·On May 9, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Messrs. Stebbins, Ford and Nadeem Moiz, the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, following the Company’s first quarter 2018 earnings release. The parties discussed the Company generally.

 

·On June 4, 2018, Messrs. Dethy, Benvenuti and the consultant had a telephone conversation with Messrs. Ford, Moiz and the Company’s Treasurer, Clemens Denks. During the call, the parties discussed and reviewed the concerns of D.C. Capital’s consultant regarding the Company’s operations in Mexico.

 

·On August 8, 2018, Mr. Dethy and Messrs. Stebbins and Ford met in New York City for dinner. The parties discussed the Company generally.

 

5

 

·On September 9, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti met with Mr. Stebbins in New York City at a conference hosted by Buckingham Research Group. Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti set forth their concerns and misgivings regarding the Company’s earnings shortfall. In addition, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti expressed their desire to learn more about the Company’s new Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Matti Masanovich.

 

·On October 25, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Messrs. Denks, Ford, Masanovich, Stebbins and the Company’s Director of Corporate Financial Planning and Analysis, Justin Swalberg. During the call, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti again sought to discuss the Company’s earnings and cash shortfalls.

 

·On November 15, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Messrs. Ford and Masanovich. On the call, D.C. Capital proposed an investment into the Company to fund the next 12 quarterly payments of dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock. Following this call, Mr. Dethy sent an email to Messrs. Ford and Masanovich with a hypothetical press release detailing D.C. Capital’s proposed investment.

 

·On November 28, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. Ford. During the call, Mr. Ford disclosed that the Company was not interested in an investment by D.C. Capital in order to help deleverage the Company, despite the Company’s mounting operational and financial shortfalls.

 

·On December 14, 2018, the Company disclosed that Donald Stebbins, President and Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board, would retire effective December 31, 2018, and that Timothy McQuay, Chairman of the Board, would assume the duties of interim President and Chief Executive Officer immediately. In addition, the Company announced that the Board was initiating an external search for a permanent President and Chief Executive Officer.

 

·Also on December 14, 2018, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Messrs. McQuay, Masanovich and Ford. During the call, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti once again sought to discuss their concerns regarding the Company’s underperforming operations, limited cash flow and earnings shortfalls.

 

·On January 2, 2019, D.C. Capital commissioned a market research study from Ducker Worldwide on the Company, (the “Ducker Study”). The Ducker Study was a competitive market assessment of Superior compared against other aluminum wheel manufacturers.

 

·On January 16, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti met with Messrs. Masanovich and Ford at the Company headquarters in Detroit, Michigan. Mr. McQuay was also present at the meeting. At the meeting, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti once again sought to express their growing concerns with the Company’s underperforming operations, reduced earnings, limited cash flow and idled PVD plant.

 

·On February 26, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Messrs. Ford, Masanovich and McQuay. During the call the parties discussed the results of the Ducker Study, which indicated, as D.C. Capital had been concerned about all along, that the Company was losing market share and certain customers had perceptions of poor operational performance.

  

·On March 18, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti as well as representatives of Ducker Worldwide and authors of the Ducker Study, met with Messrs. Masanovich and Ford at the Company’s headquarters in Detroit. Mr. McQuay was also present at the meeting via telephone. At the meeting, representatives of Ducker Worldwide reviewed and explained the Ducker Study indicating market share loss and customer perceptions of poor operational performance.

 

6

 

·On March 22, 2019, Mr. Dethy sent a private letter to Messrs. McQuay, Masanovich, Ford and Kakar summarizing the meeting on March 18, 2019 and reiterating D.C. Capital’s concerns regarding the Company’s market share loss, low yields and resultant cash flow, and the need for a Chief Commercial Officer. D.C. Capital urged the Company to develop, articulate and execute on a turnaround plan and provided some suggestions on how to maximize profitability of the Company’s Mexico facilities.

 

·On April 1, 2019, the Company announced the appointment of Majdi Abulaban as the Company’s new President and Chief Executive Officer, effective May 15, 2019.

 

·Beginning on May 6, 2019, and continuing over the course of the next few months until August 2019, Mr. Dethy repeatedly had telephone conversations with Mr. Ford requesting a meeting with the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer to discuss D.C. Capital’s serious and growing concerns with the Company’s operational underperformance and poor stock price performance. The Company would not accommodate D.C. Capital’s request during this time period.

 

·On May 9, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti has a telephone conversation with Messrs. Ford and Masanovich. During the call, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti once again expressed their serious concerns regarding the Company’s poor operational performance, and asked for details regarding the Company’s yield underperformance, but were given no insight.

 

·On August 9, 2019, D.C. Capital sent an email to Messrs. Abulaban, Masanovich and Ford with a sensitivity analysis between unit production volume, value added content and resultant margins outlining the objective of getting the Company’s net debt below $400 million by the end of 2022.

 

·On August 27, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had their first in person meeting with the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Abulaban. Messrs. Masanovich and Ford were also present at the meeting. During the meeting, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti once again expressed their now grave concerns regarding the Company’s sustained operational underperformance and high debt and cash flow shortages. In addition, they encouraged the Company to cut its dividends in order to help reduce debt and deleverage the Company. Further, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti requested both a meeting with the Board and that the Board undertake measures to refresh itself.

 

·On September 1, 2019, Mr. Dethy delivered a private letter to Mr. Abulaban summarizing their August 27, 2019, meeting and reiterating his request for a meeting with the Board.

 

·On September 12, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti met with Ransom Langford (the “Preferred Stock Director”), who was appointed to the Board by TPG Group Holdings (SBS) Advisors, Inc. (“TPG”) in connection with TPG’s investment to purchase Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock to finance the acquisition of Uniwheels. Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti expressed their concerns relative to the Company’s market share losses, operational, earnings and cash shortfalls, and disappointment regarding Board and management inaction to address these issues.

 

·On September 23, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. Ford, during which, they once again requested a meeting with the Board and to coordinate schedules.

  

·On September 30, 2019, Mr. Dethy delivered a private letter to the Board c/o Mr. Abulaban. In the letter, Mr. Dethy noted D.C. Capital was encouraged by the suspension of the dividend and ceasing wheel production in Fayetteville but emphasized it took the Company much longer to enact than expected. D.C. Capital then outlined the challenges facing the Company, including poor operational performance in Mexico, competitive market share loss, underperforming contracts in the United States, and insufficient cash flow to meaningfully pay down debt. Mr. Dethy also stated in the letter that he was discouraged by both management’s and the Board’s apparent lack of urgency regarding the matters set forth above. In addition, Mr. Dethy expressed D.C. Capital’s belief that it was time for the Board to be refreshed, particularly with directors who have both operational and turnaround experience, and welcomed an initiative to shrink the Board so that it can work quickly, nimbly and extensively with the management team to execute a turnaround plan.

 

7

 

·On October 7, 2019, Mr. Abulaban delivered a letter to Mr. Dethy suggesting he meet with a subset of the Board on October 29, 2019, almost three months after Mr. Dethy’s initial request.

 

·On October 8, 2019, Mr. Dethy delivered a private letter to Mr. Abulaban thanking him for the invitation to meet with a subset of the Board, but expressing his disappointment at the timing and apparent lack of urgency in scheduling it for the end of the month. In the letter, Mr. Dethy once again noted Superior’s continued underperformance and also attached an article outlining steps that General Electric was making to aggressively reduce its debt and replace seven of ten incumbent directors over a three year period.

 

·On October 10, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. Langford to follow up on their discussions on September 12, 2019. During the call, Mr. Langford refused to engage in a meaningful discussion.

 

·On October 29, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti met with Messrs. Abulaban, McQuay, Masanovich, Ford and Richard Giromini, who is also a member of the Board, at the Company’s headquarters in Detroit, Michigan. At the meeting, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti delivered a presentation clearly setting forth and reiterating their concerns as disclosed in the private letter delivered to the Company on September 30, 2019. In addition, at the meeting, D.C. Capital requested a Board seat because it believed that the Board was in need of a stockholder representative who would bring new and refreshed perspective.

 

·On November 11, 2019, Mr. McQuay delivered a private letter to Mr. Dethy. In the letter, Mr. McQuay rejected D.C. Capital’s request for a Board seat and stated “the Board is appropriately sized and incorporates the right skillset to address the challenges and pursue the opportunities ahead of Superior.”

 

·On December 20, 2019, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Messrs. Abulaban, McQuay, Masanovich and Ford. During the call, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti reiterated their concerns as outlined in their presentation from October 29, 2019, and once again requested a seat on the Board in order to add stockholder perspective.

 

·On January 23, 2020, GAMCO filed an amended Schedule 13D disclosing that on that same day it had submitted a stockholder notice of nomination of a director candidate for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting.

 

·On January 24, 2020, D.C. Capital delivered a letter (the “Nomination Letter”) to the Company, in accordance with its Bylaws, nominating Mr. Benvenuti for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting.

 

·Also on January 24, 2020, in connection with the submission of the Nomination Letter, Mr. Dethy sent Mr. McQuay and the Board a letter expressing D.C. Capital’s continued frustrations with the Company’s performance and Board’s apparent unwillingness to refresh itself. Nevertheless, Mr. Dethy noted that that D.C. Capital was submitting the Nomination Letter on a private basis in the hopes that the Board would meaningfully engage regarding a Board refreshment.

 

8

 

·On January 27, 2020, Mr. McQuay sent an email to Mr. Dethy acknowledging receipt of the Nomination Letter.

 

·Also on January 27, 2020, D.C. Capital delivered a letter to the Company, within its rights as a stockholder of the Company under Delaware law, demanding production of certain of the Company’s books and records, pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

 

·On January 28, 2020, Mr. Dethy sent an email to Mr. McQuay to see if the Board wished to respond to his letter dated January 24, 2020 and engage to avoid a contested election at the Annual Meeting. In response, McQuay sent Mr. Dethy an email informing Mr. Dethy not to expect a response by Thursday of that week.

 

·On February 3, 2020, after not hearing from the Company since delivering the Nomination Letter ten days earlier, D.C. Capital issued a press release and delivered a public letter to the Board. In the letter, D.C. Capital set forth its intentions and efforts to engage constructively with the Company to address the many issues facing the Company including the Company’s poor operating results, high debt balance, and depressed stock prices, however, the incumbent Board’s lack of responsiveness and sense of urgency forced D.C. Capital’s hand to nominate Mr. Benvenuti for election to the Board, who D.C. Capital believes will bring the necessary expertise and drive to the Board.

 

·Also on February 3, 2020, D.C. Capital delivered a supplement to the Nomination Letter in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws, disclosing that Mr. Benvenuti had been appointed to the NN, Inc. board of directors.

 

·On February 4, 2020, Messrs. Dethy and Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. McQuay. During the call, Mr. McQuay asked to interview Mr. Benvenuti, noted that the Board was looking for a female director candidate, and also disclosed that the Company intends to interview the nominee for election to the Board submitted by GAMCO. Mr. McQuay did not meaningfully react to the public letter or the issues raised by D.C. Capital.

 

·Later on February 4, 2020, Mr. Dethy, on behalf of D.C. Capital, sent an email to Mr. McQuay following up on the Company’s request to interview the Nominee. D.C. Capital expressed frustration that after many months of engaging with the Company about Board refreshment, the Company only requested an interview with Mr. Benvenuti after D.C. Capital was forced to go public with its concerns. D.C. Capital expressed concern that the Board was not acting in good faith in seeking to interview Mr. Benvenuti. D.C. Capital indicated that if the Board desired to have discussions to avoid a contested election at the Annual Meeting, it was prepared to engage on that basis.

 

·On February 5, 2020, Mr. Dethy had a telephone conversation with Mr. McQuay. During the call Mr. Dethy explained D.C. Capital’s view that the Board undertake efforts to refresh itself, including Mr. McQuay stepping down as Chairman. Mr. McQuay responded that he thought the Board would be naturally refreshed as directors began to hit the mandatory retirement age of 75. He also noted that he had tried to pass the baton as Chairman to other directors, but none were willing to take the baton.

 

9

 

·Also on February 5, 2020, Mr. Benvenuti had a telephone conversation with Mr. Giromini. During the call Mr. Benvenuti expressed D.C. Capital’s desire to engage to avoid a contested election at the Annual Meeting, but would like to understand if the Board was prepared to meaningfully refresh itself. Mr. Giromini indicated he would discuss this with the Board further.

 

·On February 7, 2020, counsel to Superior contacted counsel to D.C. Capital to understand the viewpoints of D.C. Capital to avoid a contested election at the Annual Meeting. Counsel to D.C. Capital explained the need to agree on a meaningful refreshment of the Board and leadership change at the Chairman level. To date, no representative from the Company has reached out to D.C. Capital.

 

10

 

REASONS FOR THE SOLICITATION

 

We Believe That Superior’s Board Needs New Leadership and the Addition of a New Independent Director with a Stockholder Results-Oriented Mindset

 

For many months leading up to this solicitation, we sought to engage with the Company to address our concerns with the Company’s underperformance and persistently low stock price. In our view, the Board’s poor decisions and oversight have materially and adversely affected the Company’s operating results, led the Company to be highly leveraged, and depressed its stock price. While we had hoped to keep our discussions with the Company private and avoid engaging in any public campaign, the Board, led by Chairman Timothy C. McQuay, seems too complacent with the status quo. Even in the face of two separate stockholder nominations of director candidates, the Board has continued to argue that significant Board change is unnecessary. We disagree. To date, the Board has yet to engage with us in any meaningful discussion to refresh the Board.

 

In our view, the Board lacks the requisite leadership to drive the changes necessary to restore value for all stockholders. Accordingly, we felt compelled to take the step of nominating our own candidate, Raynard D. Benvenuti, for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. We strongly believe that Mr. Benvenuti, who possesses over 30 years of experience as a senior executive and advisor to various aerospace, automotive and manufacturing companies, including in turnaround situations, will bring a stockholder results-oriented mindset to the Board to change the moribund Boardroom dynamics that we believe have hampered Superior’s progress. We believe our Nominee will inject the Board with a sense of urgency to adopt the much needed changes to realize the synergies promised from the Uniwheels Acquisition, aggressively reduce costs in order to improve cash flow and reduce debt, and proactively refresh the Board further.

 

We are Deeply Concerned by Superior’s Disastrous Stock Price Performance

 

As indicated in the chart below, over a five-year period ending January 31, 2020, Superior’s stock has delivered a negative 79% total return to investors. The Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000, by comparison, have delivered positive returns of 110% and 48% over the same period. 

 

     
   Source: Bloomberg  

 

11

 

This decline in Superior’s stock price suggests that stockholders are increasingly disillusioned with the Company’s prospects.

 

Superior’s stock performance over one- and three-year periods paints a similar picture, as summarized below.

 

 

One hundred dollars invested in Superior since January 31, 2015, is now worth $21, while $100 invested in the Nasdaq Composite or Russell 2000 would be worth $210 or $148, respectively. Superior has also significantly underperformed its own proxy peer group over one-, three- and five-year periods.

 

We are Deeply Concerned with the Poor Execution at Superior Following the Uniwheels Acquisition and the Severe Consequences that Have Resulted

 

While Superior has underperformed over the past five years, the focal point for the Company’s precipitous stock price decline can be traced to May 2017, when, led by the Company’s former CEO, Don Stebbins, and Chairman of the Board, Timothy C. McQuay, the Company completed the acquisition of Uniwheels, a European aluminum wheel manufacturer, essentially doubling the size of the Company to $1.4 billion in revenue. The acquisition price was approximately $715 million. At the end of the transaction, Superior went from being a company with no net debt to one having approximately $800 million of debt and preferred equity to repay. Management promised that significant operational and revenue synergies would be harvested from the combination and that U.S. operations were poised for a significant increase in revenues and profitability given recently received contract awards, a strategic focus on larger, higher value-added wheels, and output from a new PVD coating facility then under construction. This increase in North America profitability and deal synergies were a key part of making the deal financeable, and were expected and necessary to pay down the acquisition debt.

 

Regrettably, this expected increase in profitability has not materialized. In 2016, before the Uniwheels Acquisition, the Company reported gross margins of 11.8% on $733 million of revenue. For the last nine months of 2019, the Company reported $1.1 billion of revenue, at a disappointing 8.4% gross margin. Shortly after the Uniwheels deal was announced in 2017, Superior had released a 2020 EBITDA goal in excess of $230 million. In comparison, as part of the Company’s last quarterly release, the Company provided 2019 EBITDA guidance of $165-175 million, over $50 million short of the 2020 original target.

  

12

 

This profitability shortfall amounts to approximately $1 million per week or $2 per common share (pre-tax) per year since the acquisition. Most significantly, unless reversed, the Company has essentially no ability to make any meaningful repayment from operating cash flow before its term loan facility matures in May 2024 or in advance of its revolver facility maturity (“currently undrawn”) in May 2022. Accordingly, if urgent measures are not taken to reduce operating costs and realize the aforementioned synergies following the Uniwheels Acquisition, we believe Superior will not be able to significantly reduce its debt before these debt facilities mature.

 

While the CEO who promoted and executed the Uniwheels Acquisition is no longer with the Company, the Board that approved the acquisition and presided over the subsequent period of underperformance is for the most part unchanged. Accordingly, we believe the Board and, in particular, Chairman McQuay, need to be held accountable.

 

We Are Concerned that the Board is Not Adequately Aligned with Common Stockholders and Lacks a Sense of Urgency to Undertake the Aggressive Steps Needed to Turnaround the Company

 

We firmly believe that the Board needs to be refreshed with new, independent and objective perspectives, including the addition of a stockholder representative on the Board that is aligned with all stockholders of Superior. In our view, the Company’s independent directors, excluding the Preferred Stock Director, lack a meaningful vested financial interest in the Company. Based on Superior’s proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2019 Annual Meeting”), the independent members of the Board, excluding the Preferred Stock Director, beneficially own a mere 0.66% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, a substantial portion of which are represented by equity awards. While TPG, which owns $150 million (initial value) of Series A Preferred Stock, and approximately 17.6% of the outstanding voting power of the Company, has a representative on the Board, its economic interest is senior to those of the common stockholders and we are concerned that its interests are diverging as the common share price sits far below the conversion price of its preferred. Accordingly, we believe that Board representation for common stockholders is not adequate.

  

In addition, we are concerned that the Board is stale. Five members on the current Board have an average tenure of eight years and all five presided over the Uniwheels Acquisition and the Company’s subsequent decline as the synergies promised from the acquisition have failed to materialize. When we discussed with Chairman McQuay the need to refresh the Board, he suggested that the Board would naturally refresh itself as members reached the Board’s mandatory retirement age (which only one director is currently approaching that age and not for another three years). Board refreshment should not be tied to a mandatory retirement age, but rather the evolving needs of the Company. In our view, the Board is not taking the necessary steps to aggressively improve operating performance to substantially reduce excess debt and should be proactively refreshed.

 

The Company’s Executive Compensation Practices Have Been Questioned by a Leading Proxy Advisory Firm

 

In December 2018, the Board granted former CEO Donald Stebbins an approximately $1.75 million cash severance payment despite his significant missteps and voluntary retirement from the Company. In light of his role in the Uniwheels Acquisition and failure to realize the synergies promised from the acquisition, we are puzzled by the Board’s decision to grant Mr. Stebbins’ this payment. Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), a leading proxy advisory firm, also found this decision troubling and recommended that stockholders vote against the Company’s advisory vote to ratify the Company’s named executive officers’ compensation at the 2019 Annual Meeting. In making its recommendation, ISS noted that “[t]he company granting this severance pay for a voluntary retirement, especially amid poor stock performance, should concern shareholders, as severance upon a voluntary termination is not a common market practice.”

 

13

 

D.C. Capital’s Nominee Possesses the Expertise, Qualifications and Commitment to Bring Much-Needed Change to the Board

 

We have nominated Raynard Benvenuti for election to the Board because we believe the Board needs a renewed sense of urgency to address the operational and stock price performance issues facing the Company. We believe Mr. Benvenuti will bring outstanding qualities of intellect, judgment, experience and drive to the Board.

 

·Mr. Benvenuti is the founder of Concord Investment Partners, an investment and advisory firm focused on making private and public investments in aerospace, automotive and industrial companies, including in undermanaged and distressed situations.

 

·Previously, Mr. Benvenuti served as a Managing Partner and an operational practice leader for the aerospace and automotive/truck sectors at Greenbriar Equity Group. For Greenbriar, Mr. Benvenuti served on five boards, three as Chairman, and as interim CEO of an aerospace portfolio company. Earlier, as President and CEO, Ray led the award winning turnaround of Stellex Aerostructures Inc., a manufacturer of large structural components for commercial and military aircraft, culminating in a successful sale to GKN, plc.

 

·Mr. Benvenuti previously worked at Forstmann Little & Co., a private equity firm, and McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm.

 

·Mr. Benvenuti was recently appointed to the board of NN, Inc., a NASDAQ-traded industrial manufacturer of high-precision metal and plastic components and assemblies.

 

·Mr. Benvenuti’s senior executive and advisor experience make him highly qualified to provide valuable strategic, financial, operational, turnaround and corporate governance expertise to the Board.

 

14

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board currently is currently composed of nine (9) directors, each with a term expiring at the Annual Meeting. D.C. Capital has nominated one (1) independent, highly-qualified Nominee for election to the Board to replace one (1) incumbent director. If elected, our Nominee will constitute a minority of the Board and there can be no guarantee that the Nominee will be able to implement the actions that he believes are necessary to unlock stockholder value. However, we believe the election of our Nominee is an important step in the right direction for enhancing long-term value at the Company.

 

According to the Company’s proxy statement for the Annual Meeting, the current Board intends to nominate nine (9) candidates for election as directors at the Annual Meeting with terms expiring at the 2021 Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement is soliciting proxies to elect our Nominee as a director in opposition to one of the incumbent directors. Stockholders who vote on the enclosed WHITE proxy card will also have the opportunity to vote for the candidates who has been nominated by the Company other than [_____]. Stockholders will therefore be able to vote for the total number of directors up for election at the Annual Meeting. The names, backgrounds and qualifications of the Company’s nominees, and other information about them, can be found in the Company’s proxy statement.

 

[We are aware that GAMCO has notified the Company of its intention to nominate the GAMCO Nominee for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. Neither this proxy statement nor the enclosed WHITE proxy card is soliciting votes to elect the GAMCO Nominee. We make no recommendation with respect to the GAMCO Nominee.]

 

THE NOMINEE

 

The following information sets forth the name, age, business address, present principal occupation, and employment and material occupations, positions, offices, or employments for the past five (5) years of the Nominee. The nomination was made in a timely manner and in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Company’s governing instruments. The specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led us to conclude that the Nominee should serve as directors of the Company are set forth above in the section entitled “Reasons for the Solicitation” and below. This information has been furnished to us by the Nominee. The Nominee is a citizen of the United States of America.

  

Raynard D. Benvenuti, age 63, is the founder of Concord Investment Partners, an investment and advisory firm he founded in 1996 focused on making private and public investments in aerospace, automotive and industrial companies. Through Concord Investment Partners, Mr. Benvenuti advises various private equity investment firms, D.C. Capital and certain other firms and companies. From 2007 to January 2016, Mr. Benvenuti served in various capacities at Greenbriar Equity Group, including as a Managing Director and operational practice leader for the aerospace and automotive/truck sectors from 2007 to December 2012 and Managing Partner from December 2012 to January 2016. Mr. Benvenuti subsequently became a senior advisor to Greenbriar from March 2016 to June 2019. Mr. Benvenuti also served as Chairman and Interim CEO of Align Aerospace LLC, an aerospace hardware distribution company servicing commercial and military aerospace manufacturers, from Greenbriar’s acquisition of the company, in 2011 to 2012. From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Benvenuti served as the President of Stellex Aerostructures Inc., a manufacturer of large structural components for commercial and military aircraft, became its CEO and a director in 2003, and led the company from bankruptcy to profitability and its ultimate sale to GKN plc. Mr. Benvenuti previously worked at Forstmann Little & Co., a private equity firm, and McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm. Mr. Benvenuti currently serves on the board of directors of NN, Inc. (NASDAQ: NNBR), an industrial manufacturer of high-precision metal and plastic components and assemblies, as well as at The Whitcraft Group, an aircraft engine components manufacturer. Previously, Mr. Benvenuti served on the boards of directors of EDAC Technologies Inc., an aircraft engine components manufacturer, Muth Mirror Systems, an automotive blind spot detection lighting manufacturer, and AmSafe Partners, an aviation passenger and cargo restraint manufacturer, where he also served as Chairman. Mr. Benvenuti holds a B.E. in Mechanical Engineering from Manhattan College, an M.S. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton University, and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, where he graduated as a Baker Scholar.

 

15

 

D.C. Capital believes that Mr. Benvenuti’s extensive experience as a senior executive and advisor to various aerospace, automotive and manufacturing companies, including in turnaround situations, and experience serving on boards make him highly qualified to provide valuable strategic, financial, operational and corporate governance expertise to the Board.

 

D.C. Capital believes that the Nominee presently is, and if elected as a director of the Company, the Nominee would be, an “independent director” within the meaning of (i) applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards applicable to board composition and (ii) Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Nominee is not a member of the Company’s compensation, nominating or audit committee that is not independent under any such committee’s applicable independence standards.

 

The principal business address of Mr. Benvenuti is 100 Main Street, Suite 320 Concord, MA 01742.

 

As of the date hereof, the Nominee beneficially owns 32,500 shares of Common Stock, which are beneficially owned through the Raynard D. Benvenuti Trust-2009 (the “Benvenuti Trust”), which the Nominee controls. The shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Benvenuti were purchased with personal funds in open market purchases.

 

The Nominee may be deemed to be a member of a “group” with the D.C. Capital Group (the “Group”) for the purposes of Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and accordingly, the Group may be deemed to beneficially own, in the aggregate, the 1,232,500 shares of Common Stock. Each member of the Group disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the securities of the Company reported owned herein. For information regarding purchases and sales during the past two (2) years by the members of the Group of securities of the Company, see Schedule I.

 

The Nominee, through Concord Investment Partners LLC, a single member limited liability company that he controls, has entered into an agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with D.C. Capital Advisors, pursuant to which the Nominee provides advisory services to D.C. Capital Advisors, including with respect to the Company. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, the Nominee is paid $30,000 per calendar quarter and is entitled to a discretionary bonus based on the overall performance of the underlying investments. The Consulting Agreement will terminate March 31, 2020.

 

On January 24, 2020, the Participants entered into a Group Agreement in which, among other things, (a) the Participants agreed, to the extent required by applicable law, to the joint filing on behalf of each of them of statements on Schedule 13D with respect to the securities of the Company, (b) they agreed to solicit proxies or written consents for the election of the Nominee, or any other person(s) nominated by D.C. Capital (the “Solicitation”), (c) they agreed to provide notice to the Participants’ legal counsel of all trading in the securities of the Company, and (d) the D.C. Capital Group agreed to bear all expenses incurred in connection with the activities of the Participants, including approved expenses incurred by any of the parties in connection with the Solicitation, subject to certain limitations.

 

16

 

On January 24, 2020, D.C. Capital Partners entered into a letter agreement with the Nominee pursuant to which D.C. Capital Partners agreed to indemnify the Nominee against claims arising from the Solicitation and any related transactions. For the avoidance of doubt, such indemnification does not apply to any claims made against the Nominee in his capacity as a director of the Company, if so elected.

 

Other than as stated herein, there are no arrangements or understandings between the members of the Group or any other person or persons pursuant to which the nomination of the Nominee described herein is to be made, other than the consent by the Nominee to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a director of the Company if elected as such at the Annual Meeting. The Nominee is not a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries in any material pending legal proceeding.

 

We have no reason to believe that the Nominee will be unable to stand for election, but, in the event the Nominee is unable to serve or will not serve for good cause, the shares of Common Stock represented by the enclosed WHITE proxy card will be voted for substitute nominee(s), to the extent this is not prohibited under the Company’s Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) and applicable law. In addition, we reserve the right to nominate substitute person(s) if the Company makes or announces any changes to the Bylaws or takes or announces any other action that has, or if consummated would have, the effect of disqualifying the Nominee, to the extent this is not prohibited under the Bylaws and applicable law. In any such case, we would identify and properly nominate such substitute nominee(s) in accordance with the Bylaws and shares of Common Stock represented by the enclosed WHITE proxy card will be voted for such substitute nominee(s). We reserve the right to nominate additional person(s), to the extent this is not prohibited under the Bylaws and applicable law, if the Company increases the size of the Board above its existing size or increases the number of directors whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting.

 

WE URGE YOU TO VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEE ON THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD.

 

17

 

PROPOSAL NO. 2

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 

As discussed in further detail in the Company’s proxy statement, the Company is asking stockholders to cast an annual advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in the Company’s proxy statement. Accordingly, the Company is asking stockholders to vote for the following resolution:

 

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve the compensation of Superior’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation tables and narrative discussion.”

 

As disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement, the say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation and Benefits Committee or the Board. The stockholders’ advisory vote will not overrule any decision made by the Board or the Compensation and Benefits Committee or create or imply any additional fiduciary duty by the Company’s directors. However, the Company has disclosed that The Compensation and Benefits Committee will continue to consider the results of future Say-on-Pay votes when making future compensation decisions for Superior’s named executive officers.

 

FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, WE RECOMMEND VOTING, AND INTEND TO VOTE OUR SHARES, “[______]” THIS RESOLUTION.

 

18

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

As discussed in further detail in the Company’s proxy statement, the Audit Committee of the Board has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit and report upon the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 and is proposing that stockholders ratify such appointment. The Company is submitting the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP for ratification of the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

 

As disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement, stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required, but the Company is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting with a view toward soliciting the stockholders’ opinions, which the Audit Committee will take into consideration in future deliberations. If the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not ratified at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the Company’s and its stockholders’ best interests.

 

WE MAKE NO RECOMMENDATION WITH RESPECT TO THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND INTEND TO VOTE OUR SHARES “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

 

19

 

VOTING AND PROXY PROCEDURES

 

Only stockholders of record on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who sell their Shares before the Record Date (or acquire them without voting rights after the Record Date) may not vote such shares. Stockholders of record on the Record Date will retain their voting rights in connection with the Annual Meeting even if they sell such shares after the Record Date. Based on publicly available information, D.C. Capital believes that the outstanding classes of securities of the Company entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are the Common Stock and the Series A Preferred Stock. Each holder of Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock as of the Record Date will be entitled to one vote on each matter for each share of Common Stock held, or into which such holder’s Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, on the Record Date.

 

Shares represented by properly executed WHITE proxy cards will be voted at the Annual Meeting as marked and, in the absence of specific instructions, will be voted FOR the election of our Nominee, [______] the approval of the non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, as described herein

 

According to the Company’s proxy statement for the Annual Meeting, the current Board intends to nominate nine (9) candidates for election as directors at the Annual Meeting with terms expiring at the 2021 Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement is soliciting proxies to elect our Nominee as a director in opposition to one of the incumbent directors. Stockholders who vote on the enclosed WHITE proxy card will also have the opportunity to vote for the candidates who has been nominated by the Company other than [_____]. Stockholders will therefore be able to vote for the total number of directors up for election at the Annual Meeting. Under applicable proxy rules we are required either to solicit proxies only for our Nominee, which could result in limiting the ability of stockholders to fully exercise their voting rights with respect to the Company’s nominees, or to solicit for our Nominee while also allowing stockholders to vote for fewer than all of the Company’s nominees, which enables a stockholder who desires to vote for our Nominee to also vote for certain of the Company’s nominees. The names, backgrounds and qualifications of the Company’s nominees, and other information about them, can be found in the Company’s proxy statement.

  

[We are aware that GAMCO has notified the Company of its intention to nominate the GAMCO Nominee for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. Neither this proxy statement nor the enclosed WHITE proxy card is soliciting votes to elect the GAMCO Nominee. We make no recommendation with respect to the GAMCO Nominee.]

 

QUORUM; BROKER NON-VOTES; DISCRETIONARY VOTING

 

A quorum is the minimum number of shares of Common Stock that must be represented at a duly called meeting in person or by proxy in order to legally conduct business at the meeting. According to the Company’s proxy statement, a majority of the Shares entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, shall constitute a quorum. 

 

Votes withheld from director nominees, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as Shares present for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be counted in determining the number of shares voted “FOR” director nominees or treated as votes cast on any other proposal. According to the Company’s proxy statement, abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not affect the outcome of the election of director nominees, approval of the non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, or the ratification of the appointment Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

 

20

 

A broker non-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other nominee who holds shares for another person returns a proxy but does not vote on a particular item, usually because the nominee does not have discretionary voting authority for that item and has not received instructions from the owner of the shares.

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you must deliver your vote by mail, attend the Annual Meeting in person and vote, vote by Internet or vote by telephone in order to be counted in the determination of a quorum.

 

If your Shares are held in the name of your broker, a bank or other nominee, that party will give you instructions for voting your Shares. If you do not give instructions to your bank or brokerage firm, it will not be allowed to vote your Shares with respect to any of the proposals to be presented at the Annual Meeting. In the absence of voting instructions, Shares subject to such so-called broker non-votes will not be counted as voted on those proposals and so will have no effect on the vote, but will be counted as present for the purpose of determining the existence of a quorum. Accordingly, we encourage you to vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

 

VOTES REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL

 

Election of Directors ─ The election of directors requires a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. As a result of our nomination of the Nominee, the nine (9) nominees receiving the greatest number of “for” votes will be elected as directors. Proxy cards specifying that votes should be withheld with respect to one or more nominees will result in those nominees receiving fewer votes but will not count as a vote against the nominees. Neither a withhold vote nor a broker non-vote will count as a vote cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director nominee. Therefore, withhold votes and broker non-votes will have no direct effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

 

Other Proposals ─ According to the Company’s proxy statement, approval of the non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm each require the Shares voted “for” the proposal to exceed the number of Shares voted “against” the proposal at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as Shares present for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be treated as votes cast on any other proposal and, therefore, will not affect the outcome of these other proposals.

 

REVOCATION OF PROXIES

 

Stockholders of the Company may revoke their proxies at any time prior to exercise by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person (although, attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of a proxy) or by delivering a written notice of revocation. The delivery of a subsequently dated proxy which is properly completed will constitute a revocation of any earlier proxy. The revocation may be delivered either to D.C. Capital in care of Saratoga at the address set forth on the back cover of this Proxy Statement or to the Company at 26600 Telegraph Rd., Southfield, MI 48033 or any other address provided by the Company. Although a revocation is effective if delivered to the Company, we request that either the original or photostatic copies of all revocations be mailed to D.C. Capital in care of Saratoga at the address set forth on the back cover of this Proxy Statement so that we will be aware of all revocations and can more accurately determine if and when proxies have been received from the holders of record on the Record Date. Additionally, Saratoga may use this information to contact stockholders who have revoked their proxies in order to solicit later dated proxies for the election of the Nominee.

 

IF YOU WISH TO VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEE TO THE BOARD, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY THE ENCLOSED WHITE PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.

 

21

 

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

 

The solicitation of proxies pursuant to this Proxy Statement is being made by D.C. Capital Partners. Proxies may be solicited by mail, facsimile, telephone, telegraph, Internet, in person and by advertisements.

 

D.C. Capital Advisors has entered into an agreement with Saratoga for solicitation and advisory services in connection with this solicitation, for which Saratoga will receive a fee up to $75,000, applicable toward the final fee to be mutually agreed upon by the D.C. Capital Group and Saratoga, together with reimbursement for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, and will be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws. Saratoga will solicit proxies from individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other institutional holders. D.C. Capital has requested banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward all solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the Shares they hold of record. D.C. Capital will reimburse these record holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in so doing. It is anticipated that Saratoga will employ approximately [__] persons to solicit stockholders for the Annual Meeting.

 

The entire expense of soliciting proxies is being borne by the D.C. Capital Group. Costs of this solicitation of proxies are currently estimated to be approximately $[___________] (including, but not limited to, fees for attorneys, solicitors and other advisors, and other costs incidental to the solicitation). The D.C. Capital Group estimates that through the date hereof its expenses in connection with this solicitation are approximately $[___________]. To the extent legally permissible, if the D.C. Capital Group is successful in its proxy solicitation, the D.C. Capital Group intends to seek reimbursement from the Company for the expenses it incurs in connection with this solicitation. The D.C. Capital Group does not intend to submit the question of such reimbursement to a vote of security holders of the Company.

 

ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANT INFORMATION

 

The members of the Group are participants in this solicitation. The principal business of D.C. Capital Partners is investing in securities. The principal business of D.C. Capital Advisors is serving as the investment advisor for D.C. Capital Partners. The principal business of D.C. GP is serving as the general partner of D.C. Capital Partners. Mr. Dethy serves as the general partner of D.C. GP and as the managing director of D.C. Capital Advisors.

 

The address of the principal office of each of the members of the D.C. Capital Group is 800 Third Avenue, 39th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

 

As of the date hereof, D.C. Capital Partners directly owns 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock. D.C. GP, as the general partner of D.C. Capital Partners, may be deemed to beneficially own the 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned directly by D.C. Capital Partners. D.C. Capital Advisors, as the investment advisor of D.C. Capital Partners, may be deemed to beneficially own the 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned directly by D.C. Capital Partners. Mr. Dethy, as the general partner of D.C. GP and as the managing director of D.C. Capital Advisors, may be deemed to beneficially own the 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned directly by D.C. Capital Partners.

 

Each participant in this solicitation is a member of the Group with the other participants for the purposes of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act. The Group may be deemed to beneficially own the 1,232,500 shares of Common Stock owned in the aggregate by all of the participants in this solicitation. Each participant in this solicitation disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock that he or it does not directly own. For information regarding purchases and sales of securities of the Company during the past two (2) years by the participants in this solicitation, see Schedule I. The securities of the Company owned by D.C. Capital Partners were purchased with working capital in open market purchases.

 

22

 

Except as set forth in this Proxy Statement (including the Schedules hereto), (i) during the past ten (10) years, no participant in this solicitation has been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors); (ii) no participant in this solicitation directly or indirectly beneficially owns any securities of the Company; (iii) no participant in this solicitation owns any securities of the Company which are owned of record but not beneficially; (iv) no participant in this solicitation has purchased or sold any securities of the Company during the past two (2) years; (v) no part of the purchase price or market value of the securities of the Company owned by any participant in this solicitation is represented by funds borrowed or otherwise obtained for the purpose of acquiring or holding such securities; (vi) no participant in this solicitation is, or within the past year was, a party to any contract, arrangements or understandings with any person with respect to any securities of the Company, including, but not limited to, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls, guarantees against loss or guarantees of profit, division of losses or profits, or the giving or withholding of proxies; (vii) no associate of any participant in this solicitation owns beneficially, directly or indirectly, any securities of the Company; (viii) no participant in this solicitation owns beneficially, directly or indirectly, any securities of any parent or subsidiary of the Company; (ix) no participant in this solicitation or any of his or its associates was a party to any transaction, or series of similar transactions, since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year, or is a party to any currently proposed transaction, or series of similar transactions, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was or is to be a party, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000; (x) no participant in this solicitation or any of his or its associates has any arrangement or understanding with any person with respect to any future employment by the Company or its affiliates, or with respect to any future transactions to which the Company or any of its affiliates will or may be a party; and (xi) no participant in this solicitation has a substantial interest, direct or indirect, by securities holdings or otherwise, in any matter to be acted on at the Annual Meeting.

 

There are no material proceedings to which any participant in this solicitation or any of his or its associates is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries. With respect to the Nominee, none of the events enumerated in Item 401(f)(1)-(8) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act occurred during the past ten (10) years.

 

OTHER MATTERS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

D.C. Capital is unaware of any other matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting. However, should other matters, which D.C. Capital is not aware of at a reasonable time before this solicitation, be brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed WHITE proxy card will vote on such matters in their discretion.

 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 2021 Annual Meeting must, in order to be included in the Company’s proxy statement and the form of proxy for the 2021 Annual Meeting, be delivered to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 26600 Telegraph Road, Suite 400 Southfield, Michigan 48033 by [________].

 

Under the Bylaws, any stockholder intending to present any proposal (including director nominations) at the 2021 Annual Meeting, must give written notice of that proposal to the Company’s Secretary no earlier than [_______], and no later than [_______].

 

The information set forth above regarding the procedures for submitting stockholder proposals for consideration at the 2021 Annual Meeting is based on information contained in the Company’s proxy statement and the Bylaws. The incorporation of this information in this proxy statement should not be construed as an admission by D.C. Capital that such procedures are legal, valid or binding.

 

23

 

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

 

WE HAVE OMITTED FROM THIS PROXY STATEMENT CERTAIN DISCLOSURE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW THAT IS EXPECTED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY’S PROXY STATEMENT RELATING TO THE ANNUAL MEETING based on reliance on Rule 14a-5(c). THIS DISCLOSURE IS EXPECTED TO INCLUDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CURRENT BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY’S DIRECTORS, INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, AND OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION. SEE SCHEDULE II FOR INFORMATION REGARDING PERSONS WHO BENEFICIALLY OWN MORE THAN 5% OF THE SHARES AND THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SHARES BY THE DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY.

 

The information concerning the Company contained in this Proxy Statement and the Schedules attached hereto has been taken from, or is based upon, publicly available information.

 

  D.C. Capital Partners, L.P.

_________________, 2020

 

24

 

SCHEDULE I

 

TRANSACTIONS IN SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY BY THE PARTICIPANTS DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS

 

Nature of

Transaction

Shares of Common Stock

 Purchased / (Sold)

Date of 

Purchase / Sale

 

D.C. CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

 

Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 02/28/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 6,553 02/28/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 18,447 03/01/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 03/01/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 40,000 04/25/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 30,000 05/01/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 05/25/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 3,200 05/25/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 16,800 05/29/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 50,000 10/11/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 11,675 10/12/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 4,100 10/15/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 10/16/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 7,588 10/17/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 16,637 10/18/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 50,000 10/19/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 10/23/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 10/24/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 5,252 10/26/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 9,748 10/30/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 10/31/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 5,000 10/31/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 12,580 11/02/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 2,420 11/05/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 35,000 11/09/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 50,000 11/09/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 11/09/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 11/09/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 11/09/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 11/12/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 15,000 11/12/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/12/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 15,000 12/13/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 10,000 12/14/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/24/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/24/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/27/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/27/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/28/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 25,000 12/28/2018

 

I-1

 

BENVENUTI HOLDINGS LLC

 

Acquisition of Common Stock* 12.446 04/19/2018
Acquisition of Common Stock* 10.269 07/19/2018
Acquisition of Common Stock* 13.950 10/19/2018
Sale of Common Stock (2,041) 12/12/2018

 

RAYNARD D. BENVENUTI TRUST-2009

 

Purchase of Common Stock 750 10/11/2018
Sale of Common Stock (6,000) 12/12/2018
Purchase of Common Stock 5,000 02/20/2019
Purchase of Common Stock 1,600 02/21/2019
Purchase of Common Stock 1,500 03/07/2019
Purchase of Common Stock 20,000 01/30/2020
Purchase of Common Stock 4,400 01/31/2020

 

____________________

* Represents the reinvestment of a dividend

  

I-2

 

SCHEDULE II

 

The following table is reprinted from the definitive proxy statement filed by Superior Industries International, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on [______], 2020.

 

[to come]

 

II-1

 

IMPORTANT

 

Tell the Board what you think! Your vote is important. No matter how few Shares you own, please give D.C. Capital your proxy FOR the election of the Nominee and in accordance with D.C. Capital’s recommendations on the other proposals on the agenda for the Annual Meeting by taking three steps:

 

·SIGNING the enclosed WHITE proxy card;

 

·DATING the enclosed WHITE proxy card; and

 

·MAILING the enclosed WHITE proxy card TODAY in the envelope provided (no postage is required if mailed in the United States).

 

If any of your Shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, bank nominee or other institution, only it can vote such Shares and only upon receipt of your specific instructions. Depending upon your broker or custodian, you may be able to vote either by toll-free telephone or by the Internet. Please refer to the enclosed voting form for instructions on how to vote electronically. You may also vote by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE voting form.

 

If you have any questions or require any additional information concerning this Proxy Statement, please contact Saratoga at the address set forth below.

 

If you have any questions, require assistance in voting your WHITE proxy card,

or need additional copies of D.C. Capital’s proxy materials,

please contact:

 

 

Stockholders call toll free at (888) 368-0379

Email: info@saratogaproxy.com

 

 

WHITE PROXY CARD

 

 

PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2020

SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF D.C. CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. AND THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN ITS PROXY SOLICITATION

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
IS NOT SOLICITING THIS PROXY

 

P R O X Y

 

The undersigned appoints Douglas L. Dethy and John Ferguson, and each of them, attorneys and agents with full power of substitution to vote all Shares of Superior Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”) which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company scheduled to be held at [_______________], on [_____, _______,] 2020 at [_:__ _.m., EDT] (including any adjournments or postponements thereof and any meeting called in lieu thereof, the “Annual Meeting”).

 

The undersigned hereby revokes any other proxy or proxies heretofore given to vote or act with respect to the Shares of the Company held by the undersigned, and hereby ratifies and confirms all action the herein named attorneys and proxies, their substitutes, or any of them may lawfully take by virtue hereof. If properly executed, this Proxy will be voted as directed on the reverse and in the discretion of the herein named attorneys and proxies or their substitutes with respect to any other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting that are unknown to D.C. Capital Partners, L.P., D.C. Capital Advisors, Limited, D.C.R. Partners, and Douglas L. Dethy (collectively, “D.C. Capital”) a reasonable time before this solicitation, each of whom are deemed participants in this solicitation.

 

IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR THE NOMINEE” IN PROPOSAL 1, [“____”] PROPOSAL 2, AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 3.

 

This Proxy will be valid until the sooner of one year from the date indicated on the reverse and the completion of the Annual Meeting.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting

 

This Proxy Statement and our WHITE proxy card are available at

 

[______________________________]

 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY!

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE

 

WHITE PROXY CARD

 

 

[X] Please mark vote as in this example

 

D.C. CAPITAL STRONGLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR THE NOMINEE” LISTED BELOW IN PROPOSAL 1, [____] PROPOSAL 2, AND MAKES NO RECOMMENDATION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 3.

  

1.D.C. Capital’s proposal to elect Raynard D. Benvenuti to the Board with a term expiring at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.

 

  FOR THE
NOMINEE

WITHHOLD

AUTHORITY TO

VOTE FOR THE

NOMINEE

Nominees:

 

Raynard D. Benvenuti

 

¨ ¨
       

D.C. Capital does not expect that the Nominee will be unable to stand for election, but, in the event that the Nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the shares of voting stock represented by this proxy card will be voted for substitute nominee(s), to the extent this is not prohibited under the Bylaws and applicable law. In addition, D.C. Capital has reserved the right to nominate substitute person(s) if the Company makes or announces any changes to its Bylaws or takes or announces any other action that has, or if consummated would have, the effect of disqualifying the Nominee, to the extent this is not prohibited under the Bylaws and applicable law. In any such case, shares of voting stock represented by this proxy card will be voted for such substitute nominee(s).

 

D.C. Capital intends to use this proxy to vote (i) “FOR” Raynard D. Benvenuti and (ii) “FOR” the candidates who have been nominated by the Company to serve as directors, other than [_____], for whom D.C. Capital is not seeking authority to vote for and will not exercise any such authority. The names, backgrounds and qualifications of the candidates who have been nominated by the Company, and other information about them, can be found in the Company’s proxy statement. There is no assurance that any of the candidates who have been nominated by the Company will serve as directors if our Nominees are elected.

 

NOTE: You may withhold authority to vote for one or more of the candidates who have been nominated by the Company other than [_____] by writing the name of such nominee(s) below.

  

________________________________________________________________________

 

 

2.The Company’s proposal to vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

 

¨ FOR ¨ AGAINST ¨ ABSTAIN

 

3.The Company’s proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.

 

¨ FOR ¨ AGAINST ¨ ABSTAIN

 

WHITE PROXY CARD

 

 

DATED: ____________________________

____________________________________
(Signature)

____________________________________
(Signature, if held jointly)

____________________________________
(Title)

 

WHEN SHARES ARE HELD JOINTLY, JOINT OWNERS SHOULD EACH SIGN. EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, TRUSTEES, ETC., SHOULD INDICATE THE CAPACITY IN WHICH SIGNING. PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME APPEARS ON THIS PROXY.