XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Fair Value Measurement [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

NOTE 8 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

 

ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data and requires disclosures for assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. Also, ASC Topic 820 provides clarification that in circumstances, in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liabilities is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the techniques provided for in this update.

 

The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of input, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

 

Level 2 - Input other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets of liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liabilities.

 

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

The following table sets forth the liabilities at March 31, 2018 which were recorded on the balance sheet at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required, these are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

 

     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  March 31, 2018  

Quoted

Prices in

Active

Markets for

Identical

Assets

  

Significant Other

Observable

Inputs

  

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

 
     (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Contingent liability – Verifi Acquisition $1,929,934      -         -  $1,929,934 
Derivative liability – ALB shortfall provision  2,690,589           2,690,589 
Derivative liability – stock warrants  8,489,758   -   -   8,489,758 
  $13,110,281   -   -  $13,110,281 

 

     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  December 31, 2017  

Quoted

Prices in

Active

Markets for

Identical

Assets

  

Significant Other

Observable

Inputs

  

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

 
     (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Contingent Liability – Verifi Acquisition  1,957,225                      1,957,225 
Derivative liability – ALB shortfall provision  2,307,363           2,307,363 
  $4,264,588   -   -  $4,264,588 

 

The roll forward of the Contingent liability – Verifi acquisition is as follows:

 

Balance December 31, 2017 $1,957,224 
Fair value adjustment  (27,290)
Balance March 31, 2018  1,929,934 

  

The roll forward of the derivative liability – ALB shortfall provision is as follows:

 

Balance December 31, 2017 $2,307,363 
Fair value adjustment  383,226 
Balance March 31, 2018  2,690,589 

 

From time to time, certain assets may be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These non-recurring fair value adjustments typically are the result of impairment determinations or the initial determination of fair value of assets received and liabilities assumed upon the consummation of a business combination (see note 3 and 14). Outside of such business combination assets and liabilities, there were no assets or liabilities held for use where the carrying value of such assets or liabilities were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.