-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, GmkpFRFrUbxLA3ueOUXUi7q7EtvchMiOnWkAaziW/KAaqs+0QivJsB+ypprCkWtN DNfTxrmHyva0RS6KbWzSSQ== 0001193125-03-063536.txt : 20031017 0001193125-03-063536.hdr.sgml : 20031017 20031017161419 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-03-063536 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20031010 ITEM INFORMATION: Financial statements and exhibits ITEM INFORMATION: Regulation FD Disclosure FILED AS OF DATE: 20031017 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: LEVI STRAUSS & CO CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000094845 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: APPAREL & OTHER FINISHED PRODS OF FABRICS & SIMILAR MATERIAL [2300] IRS NUMBER: 940905160 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1124 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 002-90139 FILM NUMBER: 03946352 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1155 BATTERY ST CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94111 BUSINESS PHONE: 4155446000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1155 BATTERY STREET CITY: SAN FRAINCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94111 8-K 1 d8k.htm FORM 8-K DATED OCTOBER 10, 2003 Form 8-K dated October 10, 2003

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 


 

FORM 8-K

 

CURRENT REPORT

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event Reported): October 10, 2003

 


 

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)

 

333-36234

(Commission File Number)

 

94-0905160

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

1155 BATTERY STREET

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

(415) 501-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 



ITEM 7.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

 

(c) Exhibits

 

99.1 Press release of Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services dated October 10, 2003.

 

ITEM 9.   REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

 

On October 10, 2003, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) issued a press release regarding its decision to revise its outlook on Levi Strauss & Co. to negative from stable. At the same time, S&P affirmed all its outstanding ratings on Levi Strauss & Co., including the company’s corporate credit rating of “B.” Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 is a copy of S&P’s press release dated October 10, 2003 titled “Levi Strauss’ Outlook Revised to Negative; Ratings Affirmed.”


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

        LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
DATE:   October 17, 2003       By:   /s/    William B. Chiasson        
             
           

Name:

Title:

 

William B. Chiasson

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description


99.1    Press release of Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services dated October 10, 2003.
EX-99.1 3 dex991.htm PRESS RELEASE OF STANDARD & POOR'S RATINGS SERVICES DATED OCTOBER 10, 2003 Press release of Standard & Poor's Ratings Services dated October 10, 2003

Exhibit 99.1

 

Levi Strauss’ Outlook Revised to Negative; Ratings Affirmed

 

NEW YORK (Standard & Poor’s) Oct. 10, 2003—Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services said today that it revised its outlook on apparel maker Levi Strauss & Co. to negative from stable.

 

At the same time, Standard & Poor’s affirmed all its outstanding ratings on Levi Strauss, including the company’s corporate credit rating of ‘B’.

 

About $2.7 billion of rated debt of San Francisco, Calif. –based Levi Strauss is affected.

 

The outlook revision follows the company’s recent announcement that it will delay the filings of its third-quarter Form 10-Q with the SEC and will amend its financial statements for fiscal year 2001 and the third quarter of this year (fiscal 2003). The delay relates to an improper tax deduction for losses on plant closures that were mistakenly claimed twice on Levi Strauss’ 1998 and 1999 tax returns. This resulted in the company overstating profits in 2001 and the most recent quarter. To correct the error, Levi Strauss will restate its results for fiscal 2001 and the third quarter ended Aug. 24, 2003. The company’s auditors, KPMG, will conduct another audit of fiscal 2001 financial statements. There is the possibility that the new audit may lead to changes to post-2001 financial statements as well. In addition, the audit committee must complete its review of the third-quarter results before senior management can certify the financial statements and file the statements with the SEC.

 

“Although the amount of the error, about $30 million, is not material, Standard & Poor’s finds the timing of the disclosure troublesome because the company just completed a new $1.15 billion bank refinancing at the end of September. In the absence of any material adverse change to Levi Strauss’ previously reported financial statements, Standard & Poor’s does not expect the filing delay to have an immediate impact on Levi Strauss’ ratings. However, this development represents another in a series of challenges for the company. Standard & Poor’s is very concerned about the impediment these events pose to the company as it seeks to execute a turnaround. Standard & Poor’s will closely monitor the company’s progress, and any further meaningful deviations from plan will prompt an immediate review or downgrade. Furthermore, any additional surprises or a lack of a prompt resolution of the audit review and audit will also result in rating review and/or downgrade,” said credit analyst Jayne M. Ross.

 

The ratings reflect Levi Strauss’ leveraged financial profile and its participation in the highly competitive denim and casual pants industry. The ratings also reflect the inherent fashion risk in the apparel industry. This is somewhat offset by the company’s well-recognized brand names in jeans and other apparel.

 

1

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----