XML 26 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurement
6 Months Ended
Feb. 29, 2012
Fair Value Measurement [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement

7. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous

 

market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The fair value hierarchy requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2: Includes the following inputs:

  • Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities
  • Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active
  • Or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities.

  • Long-Term Debt, Inclusive of Current Maturities - Based upon discounted cash flows and current borrowing rates with similar maturities, the book value of the Bank debt of approximately $14.1 million and $15.8 million compares to fair values of $14.1 million and $15.8 million respectively as of February 29, 2012 and August 31, 2011. Also included in the Company's long-term debt was $28.1 million and $28.1 million in tax exempt bonds, in comparison to the fair value of $28.1 million and $28.1 million respectively as of February 29, 2012 and August 31, 2011.
  • Proceeds for Bond Issuance Transferred to Restricted Investment – included in the Company's current bond trust and restricted long-term other assets was $0.0 million and $3.6 million in comparison to the fair value of $0.0 million and $3.6 million respectively as of February 29, 2012 and August 31, 2011.
  • Investments in Other Cooperatives and Other Corporations - The Company believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of these investments without incurring excessive costs because there is no established market for these securities and equity interests, and it is inappropriate to estimate future cash flows which are largely dependent on future earnings of these organizations.
  • Investments in Unconsolidated Marketing Subsidiaries - The Company believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of these investments without incurring excessive costs because there is no established market for these securities and equity interests, and it is inappropriate to estimate future cash flows which are largely dependent on future earnings of these organizations.
  • Interest Rate Contracts — Based on the zero coupon method in which the term, notional amount, and re- pricing date of the interest rate swap match the term, re-pricing date, and principal amount of the interest- bearing liability on which the hedging interest payments are due, the fair value of the interest rate contracts as of February 29, 2012 was a liability of $1.0 million and August 31, 2011 was a liability of $0.9 million.
    The current portion of the liability ($0.3 million as of February 29, 2012 and $0.2 million as of August 31, 2011) is included in accrued liabilities and the long-term portion of the liability ($0.7 million as of February 29, 2012 and $0.7 million as of August 31, 2011) is included in other long-term liabilities. Inputs used to measure the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts are quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and therefore are contained within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Because the critical terms of the swap contracts and the notes payable are the same, the swap contracts effectively hedge the risk of changes in interest payments. Due to this, the changes in the fair value of the swap contracts have been excluded from the statement of operations. Financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
 

        Fair Value of Liabilities as of February 29, 2012
Interest Rate Swaps                    
(In Millions)     Level 1 Level 2 Level 3   Total
 
Fiscal Year - Notional Amt. - Ave Interest Rate              
 
2012 $45.0 Million 0.663 % $ - $ 0.1 $ - $ 0.1
2013 $40.0 Million 1.607 %   -   0.4   -   0.4
2014 $30.0 Million 2.305 %   -   0.3   -   0.3
2015 $ 5.0 Million 3.685 %   -   0.2   -   0.2
 
Total       $ - $ 1.0 $ - $ 1.0

 

        Fair Value of Liabilities as of August 31, 2011
Interest Rate Swaps                    
(In Millions)       Level 1   Level 2 Level 3   Total
 
Fiscal Year - Notional Amt. - Ave Interest Rate              
 
2012 $30.0 Million 0.853 % $ - $ 0.2 $ - $ 0.2
2013 $25.0 Million 1.870 %   -   0.3   -   0.3
2014 $15.0 Million 2.879 %   -   0.3   -   0.3
2015 $ 5.0 Million 3.685 %   -   0.1   -   0.1
 
Total       $ - $ 0.9 $ - $ 0.9