XML 29 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES {1} 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Note 15:  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

 

We have financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk generated in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

 

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments.  We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments.  As of September 30, 2011, outstanding commitments for which no liability has been recorded consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

Contract or Notional Amount

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

 

 

Commitments to extend credit

 

 

Real estate secured for commercial, construction or land development

$

90,140

Revolving open-end lines secured by one-to four- family residential properties

 

115,884

Credit card lines

 

70,201

Other, primarily business and agricultural loans

 

503,964

Real estate secured by one- to four-family residential properties

 

73,868

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees

 

7,639

Total commitments

$

861,696

Commitments to sell loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

$

67,401

 

 

 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.  Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income producing commercial properties.

 

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee a customer’s performance or payment to a third party.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

 

Interest rates on residential one- to four-family mortgage loan applications are typically rate locked (committed) to customers during the application stage for periods ranging from 15 to 45 days, the most typical period being 30 days.  Typically, pricing for the sale of these loans is locked with various qualified investors under a best-efforts delivery program at or near the time the interest rate is locked with the customer.  The Banks attempt to deliver these loans before their rate locks expire.  This arrangement generally requires delivery of the loans prior to the expiration of the rate lock.  Delays in funding the loans can require a lock extension.  The cost of a lock extension at times is borne by the customer and at times by the Banks.  These lock extension costs are not expected to have a material impact to Banner’s operations.  This activity is managed daily.

 

The Company has stand-alone derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swap agreements, which derive their value from underlying interest rates.  These transactions involve both credit and market risk.  The notional amount is the amount on which calculations, payments, and the value of the derivative are based.  The notional amount does not represent direct credit exposure.  Direct credit exposure is limited to the net difference between the calculated amount to be received and paid.  This difference represents the fair value of the derivative instrument.

 

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to these agreements.  Credit risk of the financial contract is controlled through the credit approval, limits, and monitoring procedures and management does not expect the counterparty to fail its obligations.

 

Information pertaining to outstanding interest rate swaps at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

September 30

2011

 

December 31

2010

 

Notional amount

$

38,854

 

$

19,213

 

Weighted average pay rate

 

5.10

%

 

5.36

%

Weighted average receive rate

 

2.61

%

 

0.26

%

Weighted average maturity in years

 

7.3

 

 

6.9

 

Unrealized gain included in total loans

 

3,681

 

 

2,796

 

Unrealized gain included in other assets

 

788

 

 

--

 

Unrealized loss included in other liabilities

$

4,467

 

$

2,796

 

 

At September 30, 2011, the Company’s interest rate swap agreements are with the Pacific Coast Bankers Bank, Wells Fargo N/A and various loan customers.