Fair Value

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value [Abstract]

Fair Value

Note 11: Fair Value

The Company is required under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") to disclose information about the fair value of all the Company's financial instruments, whether or not these instruments are measured at fair value on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Company estimates that the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their carrying values due to the short-term maturities of these items.

The Company also has certain warrants with a cash settlement feature in the unlikely occurrence of a Fundamental Transaction.The fair value recalculation of the Liability resulting from the issuance of the Warrants ("Call") and existence of the Fundamental Transaction ("Put") related to the May 2009 issuance, are calculated using aMonte Carlo Simulation.While the Monte Carlo Simulation is one of a number of possible pricing models, the Company has determined it to be industry accepted and fairly presented the Fair Value of the Warrants.As an additional factor to determine the Fair Value of the Put's Liability, the occurrence probability of a Fundamental Transaction event was factored into the valuation.The Company recomputes the fair value of the Warrants at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Such value computation includes subjective input assumptions that are consistently applied each period.If the Company were to alter its assumptions or the numbers input based on such assumptions, the resulting fair value could be materially different.

Fair value at June 30, 2012, was estimated using the following assumptions:

Underlying price per share$0.28-$0.39

Exercise price per share$1.31-$1.65

Risk-free interest rate0.32%-0.44%

Expected holding period1.88-2.63 yrs.

Expected volatility69.2%-79.7%

Expected dividend yieldNone

.

While the assumptions remain consistent from period to period (e.g., utilizing historical stock prices), the numbers input change from period to period (e.g., the actual historical prices input for the relevant period). The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the above warrants was approximately $144,000 at June 30, 2012.There were no other financial instruments at June 30, 2012.

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted new accounting guidance (codified at FASB ASC 820 and formerly Statement No. 157 Fair Value Measurements) that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.The guidance does not impose any new requirements around which assets and liabilities are to be measured at fair value, and instead applies to asset and liability balances required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements.The Company measures its warrant liability for those warrants with a cash settlement feature at fair value.As of June 30, 2012, the Company had no derivative assets or liabilities.

FASB ASC 820-10-35-37 (formerly SFAS No. 157) establishes a valuation hierarchy based on the transparency of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability.Classification is based on the lowest level of inputs that is significant to the fair value measurement.The valuation hierarchy contains three levels:

·Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the reporting date.Generally, this includes debt and equity securities that are traded in an active market.

·Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.Generally, this includes debt and equity securities that are not traded in an active market.

·Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or other valuation techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company has classified the Warrants with cash settlement features as Level 3.Management evaluates a variety of inputs and then estimates fair value based on those inputs.As discussed above, the Company utilized the Monte Carlo Simulation Model in valuing these Warrants.

The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the hierarchy as of June 30, 2012:

	Total	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Assets:
Marketable Securities-unrestricted	$19,442	$17,384	$ 2,058	$0
Marketable Securities-restricted	7,343	1,010	6,333	0
Liabilities:
Warrants	(144)	0	0	(144)
Total	$26,641	$18,394	$ 8,391	$   (144)

The changes in Level 3 Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

	Fair Value of Redeemable Warrants (in thousands)
	2012	2011
Balance at January 1	$380		$2,805
Fair value adjustment at March 31	151	(302)
Balance at March 31	531	2,503
Fair value adjustment at June 30	(387)	(643)
Balance at June 30	$144	$1,860