 Barclays CEO Energy-Power
Conference
Jack Thayer, EVP & Chief Financial Officer
September 5, 2012
Exhibit 99.1 |
 Cautionary Statements Regarding
Forward-Looking Information
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that
are subject to risks and uncertainties. The factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made by
Exelon Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, PECO Energy Company,
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company and Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(Registrants) include those factors discussed herein, as well as the items discussed in (1)
Exelon’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K in (a) ITEM 1A. Risk Factors,
(b) ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and (c) ITEM 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data: Note 18; (2) Constellation Energy Group’s 2011 Annual Report on Form
10-K in (a) ITEM 1A. Risk Factors, (b) ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and (c)
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data: Note 12; (3) the
Registrant’s Second Quarter 2012 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in (a)
Part II, Other Information, ITEM 1A. Risk Factors; (b) Part 1, Financial
Information, ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and (c) Part I, Financial Information, ITEM
1. Financial Statements: Note 16; and (4) other factors discussed in
filings with the SEC by the Registrants. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only
as of the date of this presentation. None of the Registrants undertakes
any obligation to publicly release any revision to its forward-
looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this
presentation. 1
Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference |
 Market Fundamentals –
Exelon’s Macro View on the Economy
2
GDP growth at 2% or less in 2012 and 2013
Housing starts at ~500 thousand units / year
Unemployment expected to stay over 8%
Oil prices in the $100/bbl range
Load growth is flat
GDP growth in excess of 2.5% in 2014
Housing starts exceed 1 million units / year
Unemployment moves under 8%
Oil prices remain in the $100/bbl range
Load growth is positive but at a rate lower
than GDP
Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference
Current & Near Term
2012 & 2013
Medium to Long Term
2014 & Beyond
Slow but positive growth in the near term will give way to higher growth
levels in 2014 and beyond. This will result in higher gas and power demand,
stabilizing prices in the short term and a positive trajectory going
forward. |
 Market Fundamentals –
Natural Gas Price Expectations
3
Market Dynamics
Steady production
Record
warm
winter
in
2012
resulting
in
excess gas storage, partially offset by hot
summer
Coal to gas switching reduces supply glut
and provides market elasticity
Anticipated Price Range
$2.00 -
$4.00 / mmbtu
Limited downside to gas prices from coal to
gas switching
Market Dynamics
Declining production from oil drilling competition
Growing industrial demand
Increased transportation demand
Increased power generation demand
Potential for LNG exports
Anticipated Price Range
$4.00 -
$6.00 / mmbtu
Limited downside to gas prices from increasing
demand and market elasticity
Current & Near Term
2012 & 2013
Medium to Long Term
2014 & Beyond
Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference
We anticipate 2013 to be a transition year, with demand side pressures from a
variety of factors coming into play in 2014 and beyond
|
 Market Fundamentals –
Expectations for Power Prices in PJM
4
Current & Near Term
2012 & 2013
Medium to Long Term
2014 & Beyond
Market Dynamics
No major impact on power prices from CSAPR
being vacated on power prices
~ 15 GW of retirements expected in latter half
of 2012 and 2013
High heat rates in 2012 due to low gas prices and
summer heat. Current forwards are fairly valued
Exelon Portfolio Impact
4
Fully hedged in 2012, and >80% hedged
in 2013
Market Dynamics
Low
gas
prices
&
MATS
rule
are
major
drivers
of
coal retirements
~40 GW of coal retirements, with almost 70%
already announced
. Includes ~25 GW of
retirements in 2014 and 2015
Internal view of $3-5/MWh upside in power prices
not currently reflected in forward prices
Exelon Portfolio Impact
4
53% open in 2014, and mostly
open
beyond 2014
3. Retirement estimate is for the Eastern Interconnect as per Exelon’s
internal projections. 4. Portfolio hedge percentages are shown as
of 6/30/2012. Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference
1. Cross State Air Pollution Rule
2. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
1
2
3
Our baseload and intermediate generation fleet is well positioned and
mostly open in 2015 to capture the upside in power prices |
 Market Fundamentals –
Expected Upside in Power Prices
5
We believe PJM Power forwards do not fully reflect the upcoming changes in the
generation supply stack
Supply stack changes driven by the following:
~18 GW of retirements in PJM by 2016
Increased compliance cost that will impact cost of operations for coal units
that survive and increase their marginal cost
Contango
1
in gas market of ~$0.80 cents from 2013 to 2017 results in a $5/MWh
increase in power prices at NIHUB
We
believe
the
higher
power
prices
only
reflect
gas
contango
and
not
a
restructuring
of
the
generation stack
PJM Market View indicates the following:
NIHUB has the most upside with ~1 heat rate point increase over current
forward market Some upside is already reflected in PJM-WHUB and we
anticipate ~1/2 point heat rate increase
Significant amount of upside is already reflected in PJM-EHUB due to large
number of gas units in that area
1. Contango
refers
to
upward
trajectory
in
forward
prices.
Data
as
of
7/30/2012.
Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference
Expect power prices to move higher than gas prices resulting in higher heat
rates |
 6
Exelon’s
Texas
and
New
England
Portfolio
21
17
20
18
New England
30
ERCOT
44
ERCOT
New England
Intermediate
3,750
2,740
Peaking
1,260
710
Total
5,010
3,450
Generation Capacity, Expected Generation & Load
(2012 in TWh )
Generation Capacity
(MW)
1.
Data as of 06/30/2012. Owned and contracted capacity converted from MW to MWh
assuming 100% capacity factor for all technology types, except renewables which are
shown at estimated capacity factor.
2.
Represents installed capacity owned or net contracted as of 6/30/2012. Capacity
is rounded to the nearest 10 MW. Well balanced portfolio in Texas and
New England Retail provides a lucrative channel to market our
generation Intermediate and peaking generation assets are effectively
call options at various heat rates that benefit from price
volatility Leverage strong asset base and utilize market-based
hedging instruments to effectively manage load-following
obligations Premium asset location
Sizeable generation position in TX close to large load pockets in Dallas and
Houston Sizeable generation position in MA close to large load pockets
in Boston Generation Capacity -
Intermediate
Generation Capacity -
Peaking
Expected Generation
Expected Load
Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference
1
2 |
 7
Asset Divestiture Update –
Maryland Coal Assets
Transaction Background and Overview
Competitive sales process despite buyer restrictions due to market power
considerations Cumulative cash proceeds of ~$605 million
~$400
million
sales
price
represents
strong
value
for
the
assets
in
a
challenging
market
environment
$205 million tax benefit resulting from differences in sale proceeds versus tax
basis Sale
requires
approval
by
FERC
and
DOJ
-
anticipate
closing
in
the
fourth
quarter
of
this
year
Earnings and ExGen Disclosures
No impact on operating earnings or gross margins shown in ExGen disclosures
Units
Installed Capacity
Technology Type
Brandon Shores
1, 273 MW
2 coal units
C.P. Crane
399 MW
2 coal & 1 oil unit
H.A. Wagner
976 MW
2 coal, 2 oil & 1 dual fuel
Barclays CEO Energy-Power Conference |