Regulatory Matters (All Registrants)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2020

Regulated Operations [Abstract]

Regulatory Matters (All Registrants)

Regulatory Matters (All Registrants)

The following matters below discuss the status of material regulatory and legislative proceedings of the Registrants.

Utility Regulatory Matters (Exelon, PHI, and the Utility Registrants)

Distribution Base Rate Case Proceedings

The following tables show the completed and pending distribution base rate case proceedings in 2020.

Completed Distribution Base Rate Case Proceedings

Registrant/Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Service	Requested Revenue Requirement (Decrease) Increase		Approved Revenue Requirement (Decrease) Increase		Approved ROE		Approval Date	Rate Effective Date
ComEd - Illinois(a)	April 8, 2019	Electric	$	(6)	$	(17)	8.91	%	December 4, 2019	January 1, 2020
ComEd - Illinois(a)	April 16, 2020	Electric	(11)		(14)		8.38	%	December 9, 2020	January 1, 2021
BGE - Maryland(b)	May 15, 2020 (amended September 11, 2020)	Electric	137		81		9.50	%	December 16, 2020	January 1, 2021
		Natural Gas	91		21		9.65	%
DPL - Maryland	December 5, 2019 (amended April 23, 2020)	Electric	17		12		9.60	%	July 14, 2020	July 16, 2020
DPL - Delaware	February 21, 2020 (amended October 9, 2020)	Natural Gas	7		2		9.60	%	January 6, 2021	September 21, 2020

__________

(a)Pursuant to EIMA and FEJA, ComEd’s electric distribution rates are established through a performance-based formula, which sunsets at the end of 2022. The electric distribution formula rate includes decoupling provisions and, as a result, ComEd's electric distribution formula rate revenues are not impacted by abnormal weather, usage per customer, or number of customers. ComEd is required to file an annual update to its electric distribution formula rate on or before May 1st, with resulting rates effective in January of the following year. ComEd’s annual electric distribution formula rate update is based on prior year actual costs and current year projected capital additions (initial year revenue requirement). The update also reconciles any differences between the revenue requirement in effect for the prior year and actual costs incurred from the year (annual reconciliation).

ComEd’s 2020 approved revenue requirement above reflects an increase of $51 million for the initial year revenue requirement for 2020 and a decrease of $68 million related to the annual reconciliation for 2018. The revenue requirement for 2020 and the revenue requirement for 2018 provides for a weighted average debt and equity return on distribution rate

base of 6.51% inclusive of an allowed ROE of 8.91%, reflecting the monthly average yields for 30-year treasury bonds plus 580 basis points.

ComEd’s 2021 approved revenue requirement above reflects an increase of $50 million for the initial year revenue requirement for 2021 and a decrease of $64 million related to the annual reconciliation for 2019. The revenue requirement for 2021 and the revenue requirement for 2019 provide for a weighted average debt and equity return on distribution rate base of 6.28% inclusive of an allowed ROE of 8.38%, reflecting the monthly average yields for 30-year treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. See table below for ComEd's regulatory assets associated with its electric distribution formula rate.

(b) Reflects a three-year cumulative multi-year plan for 2021 through 2023. The MDPSC awarded BGE electric revenue requirement increases of $59 million, $39 million, and $42 million in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively, and natural gas revenue requirement increases of $53 million, $11 million, and $10 million in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. However, the MDPSC utilized certain tax benefits to fully offset the increases in 2021 so that customer rates will remain unchanged from 2020 to 2021. The MDPSC has deferred a decision on whether to use certain tax benefits to offset the revenue requirement increases in 2022 and 2023 and BGE cannot predict the outcome.

Pending Distribution Base Rate Case Proceedings

Registrant/Jurisdiction	Filing Date	Service	Requested Revenue Requirement Increase		Requested ROE		Expected Approval Timing
PECO - Pennsylvania	September 30, 2020	Natural Gas	$	69	10.95	%	Second quarter of 2021
Pepco - District of Columbia(a)	May 30, 2019 (amended June 1, 2020)	Electric	136		9.7	%	Second quarter of 2021
Pepco - Maryland(b)	October 26, 2020	Electric	110		10.2	%	Second quarter of 2021
DPL - Delaware(c)	March 6, 2020 (amended February 2, 2021)	Electric	23		10.3	%	Third quarter of 2021
ACE - New Jersey(d)	December 9, 2020	Electric	67		10.3	%	Fourth quarter of 2021

_________

(a)Pepco filed the multi-year plan enhanced proposal as an alternative to address the impacts of COVID-19. Reflects a three-year cumulative multi-year plan for 2020 through 2022 and requested revenue requirement increases of $73 million in 2022 and $63 million in 2023, to recover capital investments made during 2018 through 2020 and planned capital investments through the end of 2022.

(b)Reflects a three-year cumulative multi-year plan for April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024 and total requested revenue requirement increases of $56 million effective April 1, 2023 and $54 million effective April 1, 2024 to recover capital investments made in 2019 and 2020 and planned capital investments through March 31, 2024.

(c)The rates went into effect on October 6, 2020, subject to refund.

(d)Requested increases are before New Jersey sales and use tax. ACE intends to put rates into effect on September 8, 2021, subject to refund.

Transmission Formula Rates (Exelon, PHI, and the Utility Registrants)

The Utility Registrants' transmission rates are each established based on a FERC-approved formula. ComEd, BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE are required to file an annual update to the FERC-approved formula on or before May 15, and PECO is required to file on or before May 31, with the resulting rates effective on June 1 of the same year. The annual update for ComEd, BGE, DPL, and ACE is based on prior year actual costs and current year projected capital additions (initial year revenue requirement). The annual update for PECO is based on prior year actual costs and current year projected capital additions, accumulated depreciation, and accumulated deferred income taxes. The annual update for Pepco is based on prior year actual costs and current year projected capital additions, accumulated depreciation, depreciation and amortization expense, and accumulated deferred income taxes. The update for ComEd, BGE, DPL, and ACE also reconciles any differences between the revenue requirement in effect beginning June 1 of the prior year and actual costs incurred for that year (annual reconciliation). The update for PECO and Pepco also reconciles any differences between the actual costs and actual revenues for the calendar year (annual reconciliation).

For 2020, the following total increases/(decreases) were included in the Utility Registrants' electric transmission formula rate updates:

Registrant(a)	Initial Revenue Requirement Increase/(Decrease)		Annual Reconciliation Decrease		Total Revenue Requirement Increase/(Decrease)(b)		Allowed Return on Rate Base(c)		Allowed ROE(d)
ComEd	$	18	$	(4)	$	14	8.17	%	11.50	%
PECO	5		(28)		(23)		7.47	%	10.35	%
BGE	16		(3)		4		7.26	%	10.50	%
Pepco	2		(46)		(44)		7.81	%	10.50	%
DPL	(4)		(40)		(44)		7.20	%	10.50	%
ACE	5		(25)		(20)		7.40	%	10.50	%

__________

(a)All rates are effective June 30, 2020 - May 31, 2021, subject to review by interested parties pursuant to review protocols of each Utility Registrant's tariff.

(b)The decrease in PECO's transmission revenue requirement relates to refunds from December 1, 2017, in accordance with the settlement agreement dated July 22, 2019. The increase in BGE's transmission revenue requirement includes a $9 million reduction related to a FERC approved dedicated facilities charge to recover the costs of providing transmission service to specifically designated load by BGE. ComEd, BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE’s transmission revenue requirement include a decrease related to the April 24, 2020 settlement agreement related to excess deferred income taxes. Refer to Transmission-Related Income Tax Regulatory assets below for additional information.

(c)Represents the weighted average debt and equity return on transmission rate bases.

(d)As part of the FERC-approved settlement of ComEd’s 2007 and PECO's 2017 transmission rate cases, the rate of return on common equity is 11.50% and 10.35%, respectively inclusive of a 50-basis-point incentive adder for being a member of a RTO, and the common equity component of the ratio used to calculate the weighted average debt and equity return for the transmission formula rate is currently capped at 55% and 55.75%, respectively. As part of the FERC-approved settlement of the ROE complaint against BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE, the rate of return on common equity is 10.50%, inclusive of a 50-basis-point incentive adder for being a member of a RTO.

Other State Regulatory Matters

Illinois Regulatory Matters

Energy Efficiency Formula Rate (Exelon and ComEd). FEJA allows ComEd to defer energy efficiency costs (except for any voltage optimization costs which are recovered through the electric distribution formula rate) as a separate regulatory asset that is recovered through the energy efficiency formula rate over the weighted average useful life, as approved by the ICC, of the related energy efficiency measures. ComEd earns a return on the energy efficiency regulatory asset at a rate equal to its weighted average cost of capital, which is based on a year-end capital structure and calculated using the same methodology applicable to ComEd’s electric distribution formula rate. Beginning January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2030, the ROE that ComEd earns on its energy efficiency regulatory asset is subject to a maximum downward or upward adjustment of 200 basis points if ComEd’s cumulative persisting annual MWh savings falls short of or exceeds specified percentage benchmarks of its annual incremental savings goal. ComEd is required to file an update to its energy efficiency formula rate on or before June 1st each year, with resulting rates effective in January of the following year. The annual update is based on projected current year energy efficiency costs, PJM capacity revenues, and the projected year-end regulatory asset balance less any related deferred income taxes (initial year revenue requirement). The update also reconciles any differences between the revenue requirement in effect for the prior year and actual costs incurred from the year (annual reconciliation). The approved energy efficiency formula rate also provides for revenue decoupling provisions similar to those in ComEd’s electric distribution formula rate.

During 2020, the ICC approved the following total increases in ComEd's requested energy efficiency revenue requirement:

Filing Date	Requested Revenue Requirement Increase		Approved Revenue Requirement Increase			Approved ROE		Approval Date	Rate Effective Date
May 21, 2020	$	48	$	48	(a)	8.38	%	December 2, 2020	January 1, 2021

_________

(a)ComEd’s 2021 approved revenue requirement above reflects an increase of $45 million for the initial year revenue requirement for 2021 and an increase of $3 million related to the annual reconciliation for 2019. The revenue requirement for 2021 provides for a weighted average debt and equity return on the energy efficiency regulatory asset and rate base of 6.28% inclusive of an allowed ROE of 8.38%, reflecting the monthly average yields for 30-year treasury bonds plus 580 basis points. The revenue requirement for 2019 provides for a weighted average debt and equity return on the energy efficiency regulatory asset and rate base of 6.56% inclusive of an allowed ROE of 8.96%, which includes an upward performance adjustment that can either increase or decrease the ROE. See table below for ComEd's regulatory assets associated with its energy efficiency formula rate.

Maryland Regulatory Matters

The Maryland Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement Program (Exelon and BGE). On December 1, 2017 (as amended on January 22, 2018), BGE filed an application with the MDPSC seeking approval for a new gas infrastructure replacement plan and associated surcharge, effective for the five-year period from 2019 through 2023. On May 30, 2018, the MDPSC approved with modifications a new infrastructure plan and associated surcharge, subject to BGE's acceptance of the Order. On June 1, 2018, BGE accepted the MDPSC Order and the associated surcharge became effective January 2019. The five-year plan calls for capital expenditures over the 2019-2023 timeframe of $732 million with an associated revenue requirement of $200 million.

Cash Working Capital Order (Exelon and BGE). On November 17, 2016, the MDPSC rendered a decision in the proceeding to review BGE’s request to recover its cash working capital (CWC) requirement for its POLR service, also known as SOS, as well as other components that make up the Administrative Charge, the mechanism that enables BGE to recover its SOS-related costs. The Administrative Charge is comprised of five components: CWC, uncollectibles, incremental costs, return, and an administrative adjustment, which acts as a proxy for retail suppliers’ costs. The MDPSC accepted BGE's positions on recovery of CWC and pass-through recovery of BGE’s actual uncollectibles and incremental costs. The order also grants BGE a return on the SOS. Subsequently, the MDPSC Staff and residential consumer advocate sought clarification and appealed the amount of return awarded to BGE on the SOS. On July 27, 2020, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals affirmed the circuit court’s judgment affirming the MDPSC’s decision. No party appealed the decision to the Maryland Court of Appeals. Also, in BGE’s 2019 electric and gas distribution base rate proceeding, the MDPSC established a normalized administrative adjustment. However, a group of electric suppliers appealed the MDPSC’s decision to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. BGE cannot predict the outcome of this appeal.

New Jersey Regulatory Matters

ACE Infrastructure Investment Program Filing (Exelon, PHI, and ACE). On February 28, 2018, ACE filed with the NJBPU the company’s IIP proposing to seek recovery of a series of investments through a new rider mechanism, totaling $338 million, between 2019-2022 to provide safe and reliable service for its customers. The IIP will allow for more timely recovery of investments made to modernize and enhance ACE’s electric system. On April 15, 2019, ACE entered into a settlement agreement with other parties, which allows for a recovery totaling $96 million of reliability related capital investments from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2023. On April 18, 2019, the NJBPU approved the settlement agreement.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure Filing (Exelon, PHI, and ACE). On August 26, 2020, ACE filed an application with the NJBPU as was required seeking approval to deploy a smart energy network in alignment with New Jersey’s Energy Master Plan and Clean Energy Act. The proposal consists of estimated costs totaling $220 million, with deployment taking place over a 3-year implementation period from approximately 2021 to 2024 that involves the installation of an integrated system of smart meters for all customers accompanied by the requisite communications facilities and data management systems. ACE is seeking authority to recover these estimated investments through a combination of the ACE IIP rider mechanism and future distribution base rates. ACE currently expects a decision in this matter in the third quarter of 2021 but cannot predict if the NJBPU will approve the application as filed.

New Jersey Clean Energy Legislation (Exelon, PHI, and ACE). On May 23, 2018, New Jersey enacted legislation that established and modified New Jersey’s clean energy and energy efficiency programs and solar and RPS. On the same day, New Jersey enacted legislation that established a ZEC program that provides compensation for nuclear plants that demonstrate to the NJBPU that they meet certain requirements, including that they make a significant contribution to air quality in the state and that their revenues are insufficient to cover their costs and risks. Electric distribution utilities in New Jersey, including ACE, began collecting from retail distribution customers, through a non-bypassable charge, all costs associated with the utility’s procurement of the ZECs effective April 18, 2019. See Generation Regulatory Matters below for additional information.

Other Federal Regulatory Matters

Transmission-Related Income Tax Regulatory Assets (Exelon, ComEd, BGE, PHI, Pepco, DPL, and ACE). On December 13, 2016 (and as amended on March 13, 2017), BGE filed with FERC to begin recovering certain existing and future transmission-related income tax regulatory assets through its transmission formula rate. BGE’s existing regulatory assets included (1) amounts that, if BGE’s transmission formula rate provided for recovery, would have been previously amortized and (2) amounts that would be amortized and recovered prospectively. On November 16, 2017, FERC issued an order rejecting BGE’s proposed revisions to its transmission formula rate to recover these transmission-related income tax regulatory assets. In the fourth quarter of 2017, ComEd, BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE fully impaired their associated transmission-related income tax regulatory assets for the portion of the income tax regulatory assets that would have been previously amortized.

On February 23, 2018 (as amended on July 9, 2018), ComEd, Pepco, DPL, and ACE each filed with FERC to revise their transmission formula rate mechanisms to permit recovery of transmission-related income tax regulatory assets, including those amounts that would have been previously amortized and recovered through rates had the transmission formula rate provided for such recovery.

On September 7, 2018, FERC issued orders rejecting 1) BGE’s rehearing request of FERC's November 16, 2017 order and 2) the February 23, 2018 (as amended on July 9, 2018) filing by ComEd, Pepco, DPL, and ACE for similar recovery.

On November 2, 2018, BGE filed an appeal of FERC's September 7, 2018 order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. On March 27, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Court denied BGE’s November 2, 2018 appeal.

On October 1, 2018, ComEd, BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE submitted filings to recover ongoing non-TCJA amortization amounts and credit TCJA transmission-related income tax regulatory liabilities to customers for the prospective period starting on October 1, 2018. On April 26, 2019, FERC issued an order accepting ComEd's, BGE's, Pepco's, DPL's, and ACE's October 1, 2018 filings, effective October 1, 2018, subject to refund and established hearing and settlement judge procedures. On April 24, 2020, ComEd, BGE, Pepco, DPL, ACE, and other parties filed a settlement agreement with FERC, which FERC approved on September 24, 2020. The settlement agreement provides for the recovery of ongoing transmission-related income tax regulatory assets and establishes the amount and amortization period for excess deferred income taxes resulting from TCJA. The settlement resulted in a reduction to Operating revenues and an offsetting reduction to Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2020.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that have been deferred because of their probable future recovery from customers through regulated rates. Regulatory liabilities represent the excess recovery of costs or accrued credits that have been deferred because it is probable such amounts will be returned to customers through future regulated rates or represent billings in advance of expenditures for approved regulatory programs.

The following tables provide information about the regulatory assets and liabilities of Exelon, ComEd, PECO, BGE, PHI, Pepco, DPL, and ACE as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:

December 31, 2020	Exelon		ComEd		PECO		BGE		PHI		Pepco		DPL		ACE
Regulatory assets
Pension and OPEB	$	3,010	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Pension and OPEB - merger related	1,014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Deferred income taxes	715		—		705		—		10		10		—		—
AMI programs - deployment costs	174		—		—		109		65		35		30		—
AMI programs - legacy meters	219		90		—		37		92		68		24		—
Electric distribution formula rate annual reconciliations	(14)		(14)		—		—		—		—		—		—
Electric distribution formula rate significant one-time events	117		117		—		—		—		—		—		—
Energy efficiency costs	982		982		—		—		—		—		—		—
Fair value of long-term debt	598		—		—		—		478		—		—		—
Fair value of PHI's unamortized energy contracts	328		—		—		—		328		—		—		—
Asset retirement obligations	135		92		21		18		4		3		—		1
MGP remediation costs	285		271		10		4		—		—		—		—
Renewable energy	301		301		—		—		—		—		—		—
Electric energy and natural gas costs	95		—		—		23		72		37		5		30
Transmission formula rate annual reconciliations	5		—		—		2		3		—		2		1
Energy efficiency and demand response programs	572		—		—		289		283		203		80		—
Under-recovered revenue decoupling	113		—		—		20		93		93		—		—
Stranded costs	25		—		—		—		25		—		—		25
Removal costs	701		—		—		107		594		151		105		339
DC PLUG charge	100		—		—		—		100		100		—		—
Deferred storm costs	50		—		—		—		50		5		4		41
COVID-19	81		22		38		10		11		7		4		—
Under-recovered credit loss expense	107		89		—		—		18		—		—		18
Other	274		78		27		30		147		72		26		15
Total regulatory assets	9,987		2,028		801		649		2,373		784		280		470
Less: current portion	1,228		279		25		168		440		214		58		75
Total noncurrent regulatory assets	$	8,759	$	1,749	$	776	$	481	$	1,933	$	570	$	222	$	395

December 31, 2020	Exelon		ComEd		PECO		BGE		PHI		Pepco		DPL		ACE
Regulatory liabilities
Deferred income taxes	$	4,502	$	2,205	$	—	$	1,001	$	1,296	$	621	$	404	$	271
Nuclear decommissioning	3,016		2,541		475		—		—		—		—		—
Removal costs	1,649		1,482		—		47		120		20		100		—
Electric energy and natural gas costs	175		34		97		6		38		24		10		4
Transmission formula rate annual reconciliations	52		2		12		—		38		23		9		6
Renewable portfolio standards costs	427		427		—		—		—		—		—		—
Stranded costs	24		—		—		—		24		—		—		24
Other	221		1		40		85		59		2		17		13
Total regulatory liabilities	10,066		6,692		624		1,139		1,575		690		540		318
Less: current portion	581		289		121		30		137		46		47		44
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities	$	9,485	$	6,403	$	503	$	1,109	$	1,438	$	644	$	493	$	274

December 31, 2019	Exelon		ComEd		PECO		BGE		PHI		Pepco		DPL		ACE
Regulatory assets
Pension and OPEB	$	2,784	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Pension and OPEB - merger related	1,138		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Deferred income taxes	528		—		518		—		10		10		—		—
AMI programs - deployment costs	207		—		—		129		78		43		35		—
AMI programs - legacy meters	276		113		12		45		106		79		27		—
Electric distribution formula rate annual reconciliations	34		34		—		—		—		—		—		—
Electric distribution formula rate significant one-time events	66		66		—		—		—		—		—		—
Energy efficiency costs	746		746		—		—		—		—		—		—
Fair value of long-term debt	650		—		—		—		523		—		—		—
Fair value of PHI's unamortized energy contracts	443		—		—		—		443		—		—		—
Asset retirement obligations	127		85		23		16		3		2		—		1
MGP remediation costs	302		287		11		4		—		—		—		—
Renewable energy	301		301		—		—		—		—		—		—
Electric energy and natural gas costs	110		—		6		36		68		43		5		20
Transmission formula rate annual reconciliations	11		—		—		1		10		1		2		7
Energy efficiency and demand response programs	572		—		—		303		269		196		73		—
Merger integration costs	32		—		—		2		30		15		8		7
Under-recovered revenue decoupling	37		—		—		8		29		29		—		—
Stranded costs	37		—		—		—		37		—		—		37
Removal costs	641		—		—		67		574		152		100		324
DC PLUG charge	126		—		—		—		126		126		—		—
Other	337		129		25		26		167		76		24		29
Total regulatory assets	9,505		1,761		595		637		2,473		772		274		425
Less: current portion	1,170		281		41		183		412		188		52		57
Total noncurrent regulatory assets	$	8,335	$	1,480	$	554	$	454	$	2,061	$	584	$	222	$	368

December 31, 2019	Exelon		ComEd		PECO		BGE		PHI		Pepco		DPL		ACE
Regulatory liabilities
Deferred income taxes	$	4,944	$	2,297	$	—	$	1,089	$	1,558	$	725	$	477	$	356
Nuclear decommissioning	3,102		2,622		480		—		—		—		—		—
Removal costs	1,621		1,435		—		58		128		20		108		—
Electric energy and natural gas costs	109		45		56		—		8		—		8		—
Transmission formula rate annual reconciliations	34		6		28		—		—		—		—		—
Other	582		337		37		81		83		9		18		26
Total regulatory liabilities	10,392		6,742		601		1,228		1,777		754		611		382
Less: current portion	406		200		91		33		70		8		37		25
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities	$	9,986	$	6,542	$	510	$	1,195	$	1,707	$	746	$	574	$	357

Descriptions of the regulatory assets and liabilities included in the tables above are summarized below, including their recovery and amortization periods.

Line Item	Description	End Date of Remaining Recovery/Refund Period	Return
Pension and OPEB	Primarily reflects the Utility Registrants' portion of deferred costs, including unamortized actuarial losses (gains) and prior service costs (credits), associated with Exelon's pension and OPEB plans, which are recovered through customer rates once amortized through net periodic benefit cost. Also, includes the Utility Registrants' non–service cost components capitalized in Property, plant and equipment, net on their Consolidated Balance Sheets.	The deferred costs are amortized over the plan participants' average remaining service periods subject to applicable pension and OPEB cost recognition policies. See Note 15 — Retirement Benefits for additional information. The capitalized non–service cost components are amortized over the lives of the underlying assets.	No
Pension and OPEB - merger related	The deferred costs are amortized over the plan participants' average remaining service periods subject to applicable pension and OPEB cost recognition policies. See Note 15 — Retirement Benefits for additional information. The capitalized non–service cost components are amortized over the lives of the underlying assets.	Legacy Constellation - 2038 Legacy PHI - 2032	No
Deferred income taxes	Deferred income taxes that are recoverable or refundable through customer rates, primarily associated with accelerated depreciation, the equity component of AFUDC, and the effects of income tax rate changes, including those resulting from the TCJA. These amounts include transmission-related regulatory liabilities that require FERC approval separate from the transmission formula rate. See Transmission-Related Income Tax Regulatory Assets section above for additional information.	Over the period in which the related deferred income taxes reverse, which is generally based on the expected life of the underlying assets. For TCJA, generally refunded over the remaining depreciable life of the underlying assets, except in certain jurisdictions where the commissions have approved a shorter refund period for certain assets not subject to IRS normalization rules.	No

Line Item	Description	End Date of Remaining Recovery/Refund Period	Return
AMI programs - deployment costs	Installation costs of new smart meters, including implementation costs at Pepco and DPL of dynamic pricing for energy usage resulting from smart meters.	BGE - 2026 Pepco - 2027 DPL - 2030	Yes
AMI programs - legacy meters	Early retirement costs of legacy meters.	ComEd - 2028 BGE - 2026 Pepco - 2027 DPL - 2030	ComEd, Pepco (District of Columbia), DPL (Delaware) - Yes BGE, Pepco (Maryland), DPL (Maryland) - No
Electric distribution formula rate annual reconciliations	Under/(Over)-recoveries related to electric distribution service costs recoverable through ComEd's performance-based formula rate, which is updated annually with rates effective on January 1st.	2022	Yes
Electric distribution formula rate significant one-time events	Deferred distribution service costs related to ComEd's significant one-time events (e.g., storm costs), which are recovered over 5 years from date of the event.	2024	Yes
Energy efficiency costs	ComEd's costs recovered through the energy efficiency formula rate tariff and the reconciliation of the difference of the revenue requirement in effect for the prior year and the revenue requirement based on actual prior year costs. Deferred energy efficiency costs are recovered over the weighted average useful life of the related energy measure.	2031	Yes
Fair value of long-term debt	Represents the difference between the carrying value and fair value of long-term debt of PHI and BGE of $478 million and $120 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020 and $523 million and $127 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019, as of the PHI and Constellation merger dates.	BGE - 2036 PHI - 2045	No
Fair value of PHI’s unamortized energy contracts	Represents the regulatory assets recorded at Exelon and PHI offsetting the fair value adjustment related to Pepco's, DPL's, and ACE's electricity and natural gas energy supply contracts recorded at PHI as of the PHI merger date.	2036	No
Asset retirement obligations	Future legally required removal costs associated with existing AROs.	Over the life of the related assets.	Yes, once the removal activities have been performed.
MGP remediation costs	Environmental remediation costs for MGP sites recorded at ComEd, PECO, and BGE.	Over the expected remediation period. See Note 19 — Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.	No

Line Item	Description	End Date of Remaining Recovery/Refund Period	Return
Renewable energy	Represents the change in fair value of ComEd‘s 20-year floating-to-fixed long-term renewable energy swap contracts.	2032	No
Electric energy and natural gas costs	Under (over)-recoveries related to energy and gas supply related costs recoverable (refundable) under approved rate riders.	2025	DPL (Delaware), ACE - Yes ComEd, PECO, BGE, Pepco, DPL (Maryland) - No
Transmission formula rate annual reconciliations	Under (over)-recoveries related to transmission service costs recoverable through the Utility Registrants’ FERC formula rates, which are updated annually with rates effective each June 1st.	2022	Yes
Energy efficiency and demand response programs	Includes under (over)-recoveries of costs incurred related to energy efficiency programs and demand response programs and recoverable costs associated with customer direct load control and energy efficiency and conservation programs that are being recovered from customers.	PECO - 2021 BGE - 2025 Pepco, DPL - 2035	BGE, Pepco, DPL - Yes PECO - Yes on capital investment recovered through this mechanism
Merger integration costs	Integration costs to achieve distribution synergies related to the Constellation merger and PHI acquisition. Costs for Pepco (Maryland) and Pepco (District of Columbia) were $3 million and $9 million, respectively as of December 31, 2020, which are included in Other in the table above, and $6 million and $9 million, respectively as of December 31, 2019.	BGE - 2021 Pepco - 2021 DPL- 2026 ACE - 2022	BGE, Pepco (Maryland), DPL - Yes Pepco (District of Columbia), ACE - No
Under (over)-recovered revenue decoupling	Electric and / or gas distribution costs recoverable from or (refundable) to customers under decoupling mechanisms.	BGE and DPL - 2021 Pepco (Maryland) - $16 million - 2021 Pepco (District of Columbia) - $31 million - 2021; $46 million to be determined by the DCPSC	BGE, Pepco, DPL - No
Stranded costs	The regulatory asset represents certain stranded costs associated with ACE's former electricity generation business. The regulatory liability represents overcollection of a customer surcharge collected by ACE to fund principal and interest payments on Transition Bonds of ACE Transition Funding that securitized such costs.	Stranded costs - 2022 Overcollection - To be determined by NJBPU	Stranded costs - Yes Overcollection - No

Line Item	Description	End Date of Remaining Recovery/Refund Period	Return
Removal costs	For BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE, the regulatory asset represents costs incurred to remove property, plant and equipment in excess of amounts received from customers through depreciation rates. For ComEd, BGE, Pepco, and DPL, the regulatory liability represents amounts received from customers through depreciation rates to cover the future non–legally required cost to remove property, plant and equipment, which reduces rate base for ratemaking purposes.	BGE, Pepco, DPL, and ACE - Asset is generally recovered over the life of the underlying assets. ComEd, BGE, Pepco, and DPL - Liability is reduced as costs are incurred.	Yes
DC PLUG charge	Costs associated with DC PLUG, which is a projected six year, $500 million project to place underground some of the District of Columbia’s most outage-prone power lines with $250 million of the project costs funded by Pepco and $250 million funded by the District of Columbia. Rates for the DC PLUG initiative went into effect on February 7, 2018.	2021 - $30 million $70 million to be determined based on future biennial plans filed with the DCPSC.	Portion of asset funded by Pepco-Yes
Deferred storm costs	For Pepco, DPL, and ACE amounts represent total incremental storm restoration costs incurred due to major storm events recoverable from customers in the Maryland and New Jersey jurisdictions.	Pepco - 2024 DPL - $2 million - 2025; $2 million not currently being recovered ACE - $5 million - 2021; $36 million not currently being recovered	Pepco, DPL - Yes ACE - No
Nuclear decommissioning	Estimated future decommissioning costs for the Regulatory Agreement Units that are less than the associated NDT fund assets. See Note 10 — Asset Retirement Obligations for additional information.	Not currently being refunded.	No
COVID-19	See COVID-19 section below for detail on the COVID-19 regulatory asset.	ComEd - 2024 BGE - 2025 PECO, Pepco, DPL, and ACE - Not currently being recovered.	ComEd and BGE - Yes PECO, Pepco, DPL, and ACE - No

Line Item	Description	End Date of Remaining Recovery/Refund Period	Return
Under (over) -recovered credit loss expense	For ComEd and ACE, amounts represent the difference between annual credit loss expense and revenues collected in rates through ICC and NJBPU-approved riders. The difference between net credit loss expense and revenues collected through the rider each calendar year for ComEd is recovered or refunded over a twelve-month period beginning in June of the following calendar year. ACE intends to recover/refund from June through May of each respective year, subject to approval of the NJBPU.	ComEd - 2023 ACE - To be determined by NJBPU.	No
Renewable portfolio standards costs	Represents an overcollection of funds from both ComEd customers and alternative retail electricity suppliers to be spent on future renewable energy procurements. Costs were $320 million as of December 31, 2019, which are included in Other in the 2019 table above.	To be determined by the IPA and ICC.	No

COVID-19 (Exelon and the Utility Registrants). Starting in March of 2020, the Utility Registrants temporarily suspended customer disconnections for non-payment and temporarily ceased new late payment fees for all customers and restored service to customers upon request who were disconnected in the last twelve months. The duration and extent of these measures varies by jurisdiction. While these measures are no longer in place for some jurisdictions as of December 31, 2020, they are expected to continue through the first quarter of 2021 in other jurisdictions. Typically, the Utility Registrants recover credit loss expense through regulatory required programs or distribution base rate cases. ComEd and ACE have existing mechanisms for recovery of credit loss expense. For those jurisdictions without an existing regulatory required program to recover credit loss expense, the Utility Registrants are pursuing strategies to recover incremental costs being incurred as a result of COVID-19:

•In the period of April to July of 2020, the MDPSC, the DCPSC, the DPSC, and the NJBPU issued orders authorizing the creation of regulatory assets to track incremental COVID-19 related costs.

•In May of 2020, the PAPUC issued a Secretarial Letter authorizing the creation of regulatory assets to track incremental credit loss expense related to COVID-19.

The Utility Registrants have also incurred direct costs related to COVID-19 consisting primarily of costs to acquire personal protective equipment, costs for cleaning supplies and services, and costs to hire healthcare professionals to monitor the health of their employees.

The Utility Registrants have recorded regulatory assets for the impacts of COVID-19 reflecting primarily incremental credit losses and direct costs, partially offset by a decrease in travel costs at BGE and PHI. Refer to the Regulatory assets table above for amounts as of December 31, 2020. The Utility Registrants expect to seek recovery in upcoming distribution base rate cases.

Capitalized Ratemaking Amounts Not Recognized

The following table presents authorized amounts capitalized for ratemaking purposes related to earnings on shareholders’ investment that are not recognized for financial reporting purposes in Exelon's and the Utility Registrant's Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts will be recognized as revenues in the related Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in the periods they are billable to our customers.

	Exelon		ComEd(a)		PECO		BGE(b)		PHI		Pepco(c)		DPL(c)		ACE
December 31, 2020	$	51	$	(1)	$	—	$	45	$	7	$	4	$	3	$	—
December 31, 2019	$	63	$	3	$	—	$	53	$	7	$	4	$	3	$	—

__________

(a)Reflects ComEd's unrecognized equity returns/(losses) earned/(incurred) for ratemaking purposes on its electric distribution formula rate regulatory assets.

(b)BGE's authorized amounts capitalized for ratemaking purposes primarily relate to earnings on shareholders' investment on its AMI programs.

(c)Pepco's and DPL's authorized amounts capitalized for ratemaking purposes relate to earnings on shareholders' investment on their respective AMI Programs and Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs. The earnings on energy efficiency are on Pepco DC and DPL DE programs only.

Generation Regulatory Matters (Exelon and Generation)

Illinois Regulatory Matters

Zero Emission Standard. Pursuant to FEJA, on January 25, 2018, the ICC announced that Generation’s Clinton Unit 1, Quad Cities Unit 1, and Quad Cities Unit 2 nuclear plants were selected as the winning bidders through the IPA's ZEC procurement event.

Generation executed the ZEC procurement contracts with Illinois utilities, including ComEd, effective January 26, 2018 and began recognizing revenue with compensation for the sale of ZECs retroactive to the June 1, 2017 effective date of FEJA. The ZEC price was initially established at $16.50 per MWh of production, subject to annual future adjustments determined by the IPA for specified escalation and pricing adjustment mechanisms designed to lower the ZEC price based on increases in underlying energy and capacity prices. Illinois utilities are required to purchase all ZECs delivered by the zero-emissions nuclear-powered generating facilities, subject to annual cost caps. For the initial delivery year, June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018, and subsequent delivery year, June 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019, the ZEC annual cost cap was set at $235 million (ComEd’s share is approximately $170 million). For subsequent delivery years, the IPA-approved targeted ZEC procurement amounts will change based on forward energy and capacity prices. ZECs delivered to Illinois utilities in excess of the annual cost cap may be paid in subsequent years if the payments do not exceed the prescribed annual cost cap for that year. During the first quarter of 2018, Generation recognized $150 million of revenue related to ZECs generated from June 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.

New Jersey Regulatory Matters

New Jersey Clean Energy Legislation. On May 23, 2018, New Jersey enacted legislation that established a ZEC program that provides compensation for nuclear plants that demonstrate to the NJBPU that they meet certain requirements, including that they make a significant contribution to air quality in the state and that their revenues are insufficient to cover their costs and risks. Under the legislation, the NJBPU will issue ZECs to qualifying nuclear power plants and the electric distribution utilities in New Jersey, including ACE, will be required to purchase those ZECs. On April 18, 2019, the NJBPU approved the award of ZECs to Salem 1 and Salem 2. Upon approval, Generation began recognizing revenue for the sale of New Jersey ZECs in the month they are generated and has recognized $69 million and $53 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. On May 15, 2019, New Jersey Rate Counsel appealed the NJBPU's decision to the New Jersey Superior Court. Briefing has been completed, and on December 9, 2020, oral argument took place. On October 1, 2020, PSEG and Generation filed applications seeking ZECs for the second eligibility period (June 2022 through May 2025). The NJBPU will act on the applications by the end of April 2021. Exelon and Generation cannot predict the outcome of the appeal. See Note 7 - Early Plant Retirements for additional information related to Salem.

New York Regulatory Matters

New York Clean Energy Standard. On August 1, 2016, the NYPSC issued an order establishing the New York CES, a component of which is a Tier 3 ZEC program targeted at preserving the environmental attributes of zero-emissions nuclear-powered generating facilities that meet the criteria demonstrating public necessity as determined by the NYPSC to be Generation's FitzPatrick, Ginna, and Nine Mile Point nuclear facilities.

On November 30, 2016 (as amended on January 13, 2017), a group of parties filed a Petition in New York State court seeking to invalidate the ZEC program, which argued that the NYPSC did not have authority to establish the program, that it violated state environmental law and that it violated certain technical provisions of the State Administrative Procedures Act when adopting the ZEC program. On January 22, 2018, the court dismissed the environmental claims and the majority of the plaintiffs from the case but denied the motions to dismiss with respect to the remaining five plaintiffs and claims, without commenting on the merits of the case. On October 8, 2019, the court dismissed all remaining claims. The petitioners filed a notice of appeal on November 4, 2019 and originally had until May 4, 2020 to file their brief. Due to COVID-19 related restrictions, the court extended the deadline to July 29, 2020. Petitioners did not file a brief by the deadline, so the case is deemed dismissed. Petitioners are permitted up to one year from July 29, 2020 to file a motion to vacate the dismissal if they can show good cause for the delay.

See Note 7 — Early Plant Retirements for additional information related to Ginna and Nine Mile Point.

New England Regulatory Matters

Mystic Units 8 & 9 and Everett Marine Terminal Cost of Service Agreement (Exelon and Generation). On March 29, 2018, Generation notified grid operator ISO-NE of its plans to early retire Mystic Units 8 and 9 absent regulatory reforms on June 1, 2022. On May 16, 2018, Generation made a filing with FERC to establish cost-of-service compensation and terms and conditions of service for Mystic Units 8 & 9 for the period between June 1, 2022 - May 31, 2024. On December 20, 2018, FERC issued an order accepting the cost of service compensation, reflecting a number of adjustments to the annual fixed revenue requirement, and allowing for recovery of a substantial portion of the costs associated with the adjacent Everett Marine Terminal acquired by Generation in October 2018. Those adjustments were reflected in a compliance filing made on March 1, 2019. In the December 20, 2018 order, FERC also directed a paper hearing on ROE using a new methodology. On January 22, 2019, Exelon and several other parties filed requests for rehearing of certain findings in the order.

On July 17, 2020, FERC issued three orders, which together affirmed the recovery of key elements of Mystic's cost of service compensation, including recovery of costs associated with the operation of the Everett Marine Terminal. FERC directed a downward adjustment to the rate base for Mystic Units 8 and 9, the effect of which will be partially offset by elimination of a crediting mechanism for third party gas sales during the term of the cost of service agreement. A compliance filing was submitted on September 15, 2020 and is pending. Several parties filed protests to the compliance filing on the issue of how gross plant in-service was calculated and Generation filed an answer to the protests on October 21, 2020. On July 28, 2020, FERC ordered additional briefings in the ROE proceeding. On December 21, 2020, FERC issued an order on rehearing of the three July 17, 2020 orders, clarifying several cost of service provisions.

On August 25, 2020, a group of New England generators filed a complaint against Generation seeking to extend the scope of the claw back provision in the cost-of-service agreement, whereby Generation would refund certain amounts recovered during the term of the cost of service if it returns to market afterwards. On September 14, 2020, Generation filed an answer to the complaint arguing that the complaint is procedurally improper and a collateral attack on existing FERC orders, and pointing out that the ISO-NE tariff contains protections against the New England generators' concerns that they failed to mention. On September 28, 2020, New England generators filed an answer to Generation’s answer. Generation cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.

On June 10, 2020, Generation filed a complaint with FERC against ISO-NE on the grounds that ISO-NE failed to follow its tariff with respect to its evaluation of Mystic for transmission security for the 2024 to 2025 Capacity Commitment Period (FCA 15) and that the modifications that ISO-NE made to its unfiled planning procedures to avoid retaining Mystic should have been filed with FERC for approval. On July 27, 2020, ISO-NE issued a memo to NEPOOL announcing its determination pursuant to its unfiled planning procedures that Mystic Units 8 and 9 are not needed for FCA 15 for transmission security. It had previously determined Mystic Units 8 and 9 are not needed for fuel security. On August 17, 2020, FERC issued an order denying the complaint. On September 16,

2020, Generation filed a request for rehearing with FERC. On October 19, 2020, FERC denied rehearing by operation of law and on December 18, 2020, Generation appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The timing and the outcome of this proceeding is uncertain.

See Note 7 — Early Plant Retirements and Note 12 — Asset Impairments for additional information on the impacts of Generation’s August 2020 decision to retire Mystic Units 8 & 9 upon expiration of the cost of service agreement.

Federal Regulatory Matters

PJM and NYISO MOPR Proceedings. PJM and NYISO capacity markets include a MOPR. If a resource is subjected to a MOPR, its offer is adjusted to effectively remove the revenues it receives through a state government-provided financial support program - resulting in a higher offer that may not clear the capacity market. Prior to December 19, 2019, the MOPR in PJM applied only to certain new gas-fired resources. Currently, the MOPR in NYISO applies only to certain resources in downstate New York.

For Generation’s facilities in PJM and NYISO that are currently receiving ZEC compensation, an expanded MOPR would require exclusion of ZEC compensation when bidding into future capacity auctions, resulting in an increased risk of these facilities not receiving capacity revenues in future auctions.

On December 19, 2019, FERC required PJM to broadly apply the MOPR to all new and existing resources including nuclear, renewables, demand response, energy efficiency, storage, and all resources owned by vertically-integrated utilities. This greatly expands the breadth and scope of PJM’s MOPR, which is effective as of PJM’s next capacity auction. While FERC included some limited exemptions, no exemptions were available to state-supported nuclear resources.

FERC provided no new mechanism for accommodating state-supported resources other than the existing FRR mechanism (under which an entire utility zone would be removed from PJM’s capacity auction along with sufficient resources to support the load in such zone). In response to FERC’s order, PJM submitted a compliance filing on March 18, 2020 wherein PJM proposed tariff language interpreting and implementing FERC's directives, and proposed a schedule for resuming capacity auctions that is contingent on the timing of FERC's action on the compliance filing.

On April 16, 2020, FERC issued an order largely denying most requests for rehearing of FERC's December 2019 order but granting a few clarifications that required an additional PJM compliance filing which PJM submitted on June 1, 2020.

On October 15, 2020, FERC issued an order denying requests for rehearing of its April 16, 2020 order and accepting PJM’s two compliance filings, subject to a further compliance filing to revise minor aspects of the proposed MOPR methodology. As part of that order, FERC also accepted PJM’s proposal to condense the schedule of activities leading up to the next capacity auction. In November 2020, PJM announced that it will conduct its next capacity auction beginning on May 19, 2021 and ending on May 25, 2021 and will post the results on June 2, 2021.

Because neither Illinois nor New Jersey have implemented an FRR program in their PJM zones, the MOPR will apply in that next capacity auction to Generation's owned or jointly owned nuclear plants in those states receiving a benefit under the Illinois ZES, or the New Jersey ZEC program, as applicable, increasing the risk that those units may not clear the capacity market.

Exelon is currently working with PJM and other stakeholders to pursue the FRR option as an alternative to the PJM capacity auction. If Illinois implements the FRR option, Generation’s Illinois nuclear plants could be removed from PJM’s capacity auction and instead supply capacity, and be compensated under the FRR program, which has the potential to mitigate the current economic distress being experienced by Generation's nuclear plants in Illinois, as discussed in Note 7 — Early Plant Retirements. Implementing the FRR program in Illinois will require both legislative and regulatory changes. Whether legislation is needed in New Jersey would depend on how the state chooses to structure an FRR program. Exelon cannot predict whether or when such legislative and regulatory changes can be implemented.

On February 20, 2020, FERC issued an order rejecting requests to expand NYISO’s version of the MOPR (referred to as buyer-side mitigation rules) beyond its current limited applicability to certain resources in downstate. However, on October 14, 2020, two natural gas-fired generators in New York filed a complaint at FERC seeking to expand the MOPR in NYISO to apply to all resources, new and existing, across the entire NYISO market. Exelon is strenuously opposing expansion of FERC’s MOPR policies in the NYISO market. While it is too early in the proceeding to predict its outcome and there are significant differences between the NYISO and PJM markets that would justify a different result, if FERC follows its MOPR precedent in PJM and applies the MOPR in NYISO broadly as requested in the complaint, Generation’s facilities in NYISO that are receiving ZEC compensation may be at increased risk of not clearing the capacity auction.

If Generation’s state-supported nuclear plants in PJM or NYISO are subjected to the MOPR or equivalent without compensation under an FRR or similar program, it could have a material adverse impact on Exelon's and Generation's financial statements, which Exelon and Generation cannot reasonably estimate at this time.

Operating License Renewals

Conowingo Hydroelectric Project. On August 29, 2012, Generation submitted a hydroelectric license application to FERC for a new license for the Conowingo Hydroelectric Project (Conowingo). In connection with Generation’s efforts to obtain a water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (401 Certification) from MDE for Conowingo, Generation has been working with MDE and other stakeholders to resolve water quality licensing issues, including: (1) water quality, (2) fish habitat, and (3) sediment.

On April 21, 2016, Generation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior executed a settlement agreement (DOI Settlement) resolving all fish passage issues between the parties.

On April 27, 2018, MDE issued its 401 Certification for Conowingo. As issued, the 401 Certification contains numerous conditions, including those relating to reduction of nutrients from upstream sources, removal of all visible trash and debris from upstream sources, and implementation of measures relating to fish passage, which could have a material, unfavorable impact on Exelon’s and Generation’s financial statements through an increase in capital expenditures and operating costs if implemented. On May 25, 2018, Generation filed complaints in federal and state court, along with a petition for reconsideration with MDE, alleging that the conditions are unfair and onerous and in violation of MDE regulations and state, federal, and constitutional law. Generation also requested that FERC defer the issuance of the federal license while these significant state and federal law issues are pending. On February 28, 2019, Generation filed a Petition for Declaratory Order with FERC requesting that FERC issue an order declaring that MDE waived its right to issue a 401 Certification for Conowingo because it failed to timely act on Conowingo’s 401 Certification application and requesting that FERC decline to include the conditions required by MDE in April 2018.

On October 29, 2019, Generation and MDE filed with FERC a Joint Offer of Settlement (Offer of Settlement) that would resolve all outstanding issues relating to the 401 Certification. Pursuant to the Offer of Settlement, the parties submitted Proposed License Articles to FERC to be incorporated by FERC into the new license in accordance with FERC’s discretionary authority under the Federal Power Act. Among the Proposed License Articles are modifications to river flows to improve aquatic habitat, eel passage improvements, and initiatives to support rare, threatened and endangered wildlife. If FERC approves the Offer of Settlement and incorporates the Proposed License Articles into the new license without modification, then MDE would waive its rights to issue a 401 Certification and Generation would agree, pursuant to a separate agreement with MDE (MDE Settlement), to implement additional environmental protection, mitigation, and enhancement measures over the anticipated 50-year term of the new license. These measures address mussel restoration and other ecological and water quality matters, among other commitments. Exelon’s commitments under the various provisions of the Offer of Settlement and MDE Settlement are not effective unless and until FERC approves the Offer of Settlement, and issues the new license with the Proposed License Articles.

The financial impact of the DOI and MDE Settlements and other anticipated license commitments are estimated to be $11 million to $14 million per year, on average, recognized over the new license term, including capital and operating costs. The actual timing and amount of the majority of these costs are not currently fixed and will vary from year to year throughout the life of the new license. Generation cannot currently predict when FERC will issue the new license. As of December 31, 2020, $45 million of direct costs associated with Conowingo licensing efforts have been capitalized. Generation's current depreciation provision for Conowingo assumes renewal of the FERC license.

Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3. On July 10, 2018, Generation submitted a second 20-year license renewal application with the NRC for Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3, which was approved on March 6, 2020. Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 are now licensed to operate through 2053 and 2054, respectively. See Note 8 – Property, Plant, and Equipment for additional information regarding the estimated useful life and depreciation provisions for Peach Bottom.